Wichita City Council Meeting September 9, 2025
No description available.
[Music] Heat. Heat. N. [Music] [Music] [Music] Good morning, Witchita, and good morning to
all of you. Thank you for joining us at City Hall. I call this meeting to order. With
us this morning to provide the invocation is Pastor Philip Moore of Chapel Hill United
Methodist Church. Following the invocation, we will have the pledge of allegiance.
May I please ask everyone to stand? Good morning. And I want to thank uh the mayor
and the city council for this opportunity. Uh let's pray. Gracious and eternal God in heaven.
We come before you with thankful hearts for the gift of this day and the opportunity to
serve the people of Witchah. We ask your blessings upon this council. the mayor and all
who are gathered here. Grant wisdom, clarity, and unity as decisions are made that will shape
the future of our city. Lord, bless Witchah, its families, neighborhoods, schools,
and businesses. Protect those who serve in public safety. Strengthen those who
work for the good of our community. And encourage every citizen to seek peace and
justice. Guide this meeting with fairness and integrity. May every discussion be marked
by respect, every decision rooted in wisdom, and every action taken for the common good.
We ask these things in your holy name. Amen. I pledge algiance to the flag of the United
States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Thank you very much, Pastor Moore.
Madame clerk, happy birthday. Can you please call the first item? Approve the
minutes of the regular meeting September 2nd, 2025. Council members, any edits to
those minutes? I see none. I move to approve the minutes for the regular meeting
of September 2nd, 2025. A second. Motion and a second. Any further discussion? I see
none. Madame clerk, please open the role. Who's missing? Bless you. Maggie. Motion passes.
70. Madame clerk, please call the next item. Awards and proclamations. Today's proclamations
are recovery month, witchaw recovery coalition, national I'm sorry, opioid abuse and national
suicide prevention, mental health awareness month, and national literacy month. May please ask
council member Ballard to join me and ask Witchaw Recover Coalition to please
come forward at this time as well. Good morning. Good morning. Good morning.
Good morning. your money. Good morning to all. The proclamation reads, "The
city of Witchah, Kansas, founded in 1870, whereas behavioral health is essential to overall health
and well-being and recovery for mental health and substance use challenges as possible for every
individual. Whereas National Recovery Month, now in its 36th year, is a national observance
held every September to celebrate recovery, promote evidence-based practices, and honor the
dedication of service providers, peer leaders, and community partners. Whereas millions
of Americans and thousands of residents in Witchaw and Cedric County are living in recovery
today, demonstrating that treatment, peer support, and community connection are effective and
life-changing. Whereas the Witchaw Recovery Coalition is a grassroots network uniting
treatment providers, peer-led organizations, harm reduction advocates, public health partners,
faith communities, and local leaders to build a healthier, safer, and more resilient
Witchah. Now therefore, be it resolved that the Witchah City Council does hereby proclaim
September 2025 as recovery month. [Applause] Thank you, Mayor and Council, for recognizing
September as recovery month in Witchah. Recovery looks different for everyone. Many people are
navigating multiple challenges all at once. Healing from substance use, mental health
struggles, and other trauma. And it affects everyone, children, families, neighbors, and
even our local businesses. So, when someone finds support, the whole community benefits.
In Witchah, the need is urgent. Sedwick County um overdose deaths have doubled over the
last decade. And these aren't just statistic statistics. They represent lives, families,
and futures. That's why the Witchita Recovery Coalition is so important. This grassroots
network unites organizations, service providers, and advocates to make Witchah a recovery ready
city, a place where support is accessible, stigma is replaced with compassion, and no one
has to face these challenges alone. Thank you for shining a light on recovery and helping to
build a stronger, healthier Witchah. Thank you. Thank you again. And I also had the
opportunity to meet Salvation Army last week uh regarding their recovery program and
there are still beds available and so I just wanted to make sure that people in
our community knew that that resource is available to anyone who needs that
help. Congratulations to the coalition. You got to come see that. May I please ask council member Hohheisle to
come forward at this time and all those who are in support of the opioid abuse and national
suicide prevention mental health awareness month the proclamation reads, "The city
of Witchaw, Kansas, founded in 1870, whereas the associated general contractors AGC
of Kansas, the Chamber of Commerce for the Kansas construction industry, representing
300 Kansas commercial, industrial, and utility construction contractors and their
20,000 employees. Whereas AGC of Kansas is proud to partner with the public and private sectors
including the Kansas construction industry, US Department of Labor, OSHA, and the Kansas
Mental Health Association to recognize the month of September as opioid abuse and national
suicide prevention mental health awareness month. Whereas AGC of Kansas and its industry partners
created the Kansas Construction Safety Network to provide opioid abuse and mental health resources
and to bring attention to the critical challenges associated with drug abuse and mental health in
our community. Whereas AGC of Kansas has worked with its 300 Kansas construction firms to hold a
construction stand up on their construction job sites in Witchah and around Kansas to recognize
drug abuse and mental health month. Now therefore, be it resolved that the Witchaw City Council
does hereby proclaim September 2025 as Opioid Abuse and National Suicide Prevention
Mental Health Awareness Month. [Applause] Thank you. Um and what a great honor to be able
to share this platform with the coalition today. uh it speaks test a big testament of what
our city is going through and what we need to do collectively to not only recover but to
prevent. So on behalf of the associated general contractors of Kansas which is recognized as
the chamber of commerce for the construction industry representing 300 company construction
companies and their 20,000 employees. Our safety committee is honored to join the city of Witchah
and Mayor Liy Woo in recognizing se September as mental health awareness month. If I could,
I would like to introduce our great team of industry safety professionals that have joined us
on this. A couple of years ago, the Agency of Can uh the Agency of Kansas Safety Committee worked
in partnership with the US Department of Labor, OSHA, and the Mental Health Association to
creating the Kansas Construction Safety Network, that has a website that offers a a wide range of
resources of both the construction industry and the community as a whole to utilize in addressing
the many challenges associated with mental health, drug abuse and suicide prevention. We are proud
of this partnership and proud of the construction industry's investment of millions of dollars and
millions of men hours to asssure that employees return home safely at the end of each workday.
Because of this great safety partnership in Kansas, the construction industry leads the way on
job site safety practices. Thank you again, Mayor Mayor Woo, and the city council for this great
leadership to the citizens of Witchah. Thank you. Is anyone from storytime
village present at this moment? If not, we will delay doing this proclamation.
Is that proper or okay? We will read this proclamation at our next city council
meeting on Tuesday of next week. Thank you. We do have a representative from
Storytime Village, Dr. Prrisca Barnes. Can you please come forward at this time? Good morning. The proclamation reads, "The
city of Witchah, Kansas, founded in 1870, whereas literacy is essential for personal,
social, and economic well-being of individuals, families, and communities. Whereas Storytime
Village has demonstrated a commitment to promoting literacy in our community by providing access to
books, resources, hosting events, and building little free libraries to inspire a lifelong love
of reading and learning. Whereas Storytime Village recognizes the importance of early literacy in
laying the foundation for future academic success and is dedicated to empowering young leaders with
the tools needed to thrive in school and beyond. Whereas the city of Witchah acknowledges the
efforts of organizations like Storytime Village as well as educators, volunteers, and community
partners in working towards a future where every resident has the ability to read, write, and
fully participate in our society. Now therefore, be it resolved that the Witchaw City Council
does hereby proclaim September 2025 as National Literacy Month. [Applause] Good morning and thank
you, Mayor Liy Woo. Uh, Storytime Village, our mission is to inspire a lifelong love of reading
for underserved Kansas children from birth to age 8. And we've been doing this work since 2009.
And so we're in our 16th sweet 16th anniversary uh celebrating literacy, empowering young people
and families. Uh we are embarking upon a major endeavor building a literacy center um in the
northeast area providing wraparound services for uh children and families and we're so grateful
each year to celebrate National Literacy Month and grateful for this proclamation. So
thank you for this opportunity and we uh look forward to continuing to inspire
a lifelong love of reading. [Applause] Madame clerk, can you please call the next item?
Public agenda. The public agenda allows for five minutes for up to five speakers to each
have five minutes to address the council. No action will be taken relative to items on
the public agenda other than referral to the city manager for information as necessary.
Speakers will please state their name and address for the record. A time clock will display
the speaker's remaining time to speak. Order and rules of decorum will be observed. The first
speaker is Samantha Annayia Raider, Camp Sam. Buenos Diaz. Good morning. Grand Rising citizens,
civil servants, please look alive while Miss Sunshine herself, two-time Kansas State Fair,
Sunflower Ribbon winner, four-time grand champion of Sed County Market Wheat Show. Lady Samantha
Annayia of 2030 South Lulu District 3, presents Cam Sam. Can you picture abundance meeting private
interests? Soon accoladed, applauded, May we be. Camp Sam's sights are set on transforming more
than 650 acres of prime parks into the personal playground for Kansas obstacly charitable honchos.
My vision is an invite only quasi exclusive camp where pay to play is key. A place where one may
realize our little house on the prairie. Come on, come all come as you are. Build it and they
will come. I plan to purchase the parks at a sweetheart rate. Won't you pretty please sell
me the Northwest Sed County park for a dollar an acre? And I plan to, you know, count them out
for you. But this time I'm counting a dollar an acre. You've done it before. I promise to care
for it, not sell it for more. This camp will be grand. I'll start by breaking ground, planting
a stand of sunflowers for the great late Luke. Next, I'll fashion a grand guild defense to keep
my heritage herd bison and assorted creatures. Camp Sam of a center for health and wealth. I call
on your benefactors to invest in me too. City, I need a small loan of a million dollars in
exchange for your trust and one book donation. I owe you a favor. try your luck camp sand for
you and I originally intended to do a a whole campy thing. It's kind of an art thing and
um yeah, so it was just an inspired writing and thank you for allowing me to speak. Um
but I intend to have Pancakes in the Park at noon next Tuesday in Lynwood Park. Um, and I'll
personally invite all of you there. And I hope to see you next Tuesday at noon. And I also
will have a raffle for some signature prizes um to win a three-month print subscription to Sand
Press, my little newsletter I want to write. Um, and my award-winning spaghetti squash. Um, I
got a ribbon at the Cheni Fair. I'll I have two that I can give. Um and I'd like to invite Mr.
Hohiso, parks and wreck, um city manager Leighton, a few friends of mine, um art friends,
music friends as well. Um Mr. Arthur Stokes, I'd like to him to be there. Um I'd like to invite
a family friend named Roberto. He is a counselor. So, um, others may benefit from seeing him and,
you know, he's he's good good people. Um, I'd like to invite Mayor Whipple, Mayor Woo. I'd like to
invite um my my DJ friend, her name is Sadi. Um, I have another friend named Ka. Um, Kaia Papaya
is an amazing singer and I'd love her to perform there. I have a saxophone friend named Sage.
um my lab partner of ecology, Jacob Stewart, um and a few others. So, I hope to see you again
next Tuesday in for Pancakes in the Park um at Lynwood Park. And thank you for allowing to uh me
to camp it up and um yeah, this it's been fun. So, thank you and I hope to um be a community partner
with y'all. I was, excuse me, I was the wellness coordinator of the health department um before
I was laid off there. I wrote the wellness operational plan and I I believe that we can all
work together to it doesn't have to be called Camp Sam um but just a health and well health and
wealth a wellness center and I think we can all work together with it. Um, so I intended to sing
Home on the Range for y'all, but um my voice is uh failing me. I have I was exposed to black mold
at Johnson Controls and um my I need help with uh getting my lungs back. So um yeah, um home on the
range. So thank you. Thank you, Samantha. Council member Hohisel. Thank you, Mayor. Um, did you say
the pancakes was Tuesday or Saturday? Saturday. Uh, Dexter, we're not having one this
month. We have one next month. Okay. Um, okay. I just I just Tuesday's fine.
I just wanted some clarification. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Council
Member Hohheisle. And just a quick note, Cedric County owns Cedric County
Park. Council, sorry, Madame Clerk, can you please call the next individual?
Mayor, we don't have any more individuals signed up this morning. Thank you. Are there
any individuals who would like to address the council? I see none. We'll bring it back to
the bench. Madame Clerk, can you please call the next item? Consent agenda items 1 through
16. Council members, any items to be pulled? I see none. I will move to approve uh
consent agenda items 1- 16. Second. Motion and a second. Any further discussion? I
see none. Madame clerk, please open the role. Motion passes 70. Madame clerk, please call the next item. Board of bids
and contracts dated September 8th, 2025. Good morning, mayor, city council. Josh Lober, Department of Finance. The board of bids and
contracts convened yesterday, September 8th, 2025 for the following items. For engineering,
we have Sweeney Farm Edition phase 1 rebid for NOAK Construction Company Incorporated for
the aggregate bid total of 3,768,216.70. We have the storm water sewer number 800.
Oldtown slotted trench drains reject all bids. We have the water mainline
replacement for St. Paul and Newell Streets for Wildcat Construction
Company Incorporated for $533,249. We have the 2025 outsource paving
preservation program CIP Localized Street Repair for PS Contractors LLC for $734,490. We have the skylight replacement for West Link
Library for Icon Structures Incorporated for $74,200. We have the installation
of outdoor antennas for 21 fire stations for gateway wireless
and network services for 93,1329. We have the ortho phosphate bulk delivery
for Shannon Chemical Corporation for an estimated annual usage of $398,520 annually. We have the 58,000 gross vehicle
weight restriction dump trucks for Omaha Truck Center doing business as Truck Center
companies for an aggregate bid total of 377,138. We have the roof and gutter replacement
at 25 residential sites for AR Commercial Roofing LLC for an aggregate bid
of $249,000. And we had the license track software annual renewal change order
for Progressive Solutions Incorporated for $7,500 per year requesting authorization to
add. And we have the Witchaw Fire Department radios and equipment for Motorola
Solutions Incorporated for $99,226. This is how to become a vendor with the city. This
is our purchasing calendar of events that the city is hosting or participating in with small business
resource partners. This is our open public opportunities out on the street today and I'd
be happy to try to answer any of your questions and I recommend your approval. I have a couple
of questions. We go back to number six. Sure. Can you talk about this? Sure. um the
bid exceeded the engineer's estimate, requiring us to change the material
deviation of the scope. Um so we can hopefully resolit the project and then
get bids within the engineer's estimate. And then nine. Okay. Um I've attended
several grand reopenings of libraries and I'm very appreciative. This was in uh Council
Member GlassCox's district, Westlake Library, and all these improvements are great. uh had the
opportunity to see council member Tuttles um where she holds her district advisory board meetings
at Rockwell. Um can you address or can someone address since we've made all these investments?
Um can we make sure that the structures are structurally sound? This should have been item
number one prior to renovating inside. Uh I think this was a leak. Is that correct? Oh, sorry. I
apologize. I'm now thinking about yours, but it's still the same question. How can we make sure
that we first focus on the structural buildings before we I guess we've already done it though,
which is the insides of these, uh, libraries. Uh, thank you, uh, mayor and council members, Gary
Jansen, public works and utilities. there was a kind of a special set of circumstances related
to this issue that you point well received. I get it. You're right. And we certainly as we go
through these projects, we're trying to evaluate as many issues as we can. Uh the focus here uh
was on a lot of what happens with the interior use and the space. Um there again there were
some circumstances that led to this not being a part of the project but I think it gives us the
opportunity to re-evaluate how we approach these in the future. So I appreciate the comment and
uh we do want to be as thorough as we can upfront with these projects. Do you have any updates
regarding Alfred then? Um we I I can get you uh I don't have specific updates with me.
Uh we do have funding for roof replacement, additional window replacement, and then we're also
looking ahead at funding that's in the CIP for um some of the uh facade removal and replacement
to to hopefully address the issues we're having with the leaks. Um same thing there. When those
repairs were originally made, some of what has happened since that point in time we were not
aware of. Uh, and it had nothing to do with the repairs that were already made. Uh, but we do have
funding program to be able to move forward. So, I can get you specifics on that because we've got
multiple things getting ready to happen there, too. Thank you, Gary. And I know that we have
seven libraries and a majority of them had major improvements. So, I just want to make sure that
people understand that we are making those major investments not just inside, but also structurally
so that it is a sound building. Thank you, Gary. Council member Ballard. Thank you, Mayor
Josh. Can you go back to I think it's six, maybe? Certainly. This is probably a question for Gary.
Sorry, Gary. Is this the drains in Oldtown? Um, like in the center that I'm always harassing.
Yes. Yes. The the drains that are at the center of the street. The ones that we've been talking
about. We've had the temporary plates on them. Unique situation. When these were designed years
ago, they they lasted. They they served us well, but to try to get in and make repairs has
been more challenging than we thought. So, we've tried to take a different approach to
make sure these last longer next time being fairly unique and some of the materials being used
um resulted in a higher cost than we expected. So, we're going to take one more look and maybe
find a different way to approach this, but hopefully we can get back to bidding soon.
and get the per and get the permanent repairs done. I don't know what that timeline looks
like just yet, but I'll let you know as soon as we know. Okay. Thank you. And then lastly,
Josh, um it's slides 10 and 15, so maybe it's a chief's no question. Okay. 93,000 and then I think
what was um 15 909. So major um investments into the fire departments. Can Chief Snow maybe just
address uh the needs for this and how this will help with safety uh for our our firefighters
as well? Sure. I see Chief Snow coming now. Good morning, mayor, city council members, fire
chief Tammy Snow. Um, yes, both of these are part of a larger package for our station alerting.
Um, it will upgrade our station alerting. Um, and allow us to to uh receive and transmit
signals. Um, it's all part of a big package. These are two components of it. Um the current station
alerting it's currently out for um well we have RFPs and we are currently uh um interviewing um
the potential bid packages currently. Um some of the specifications on it or are to change the way
we currently alert our firefighters. Um currently there's a loud blast whenever an emergency call
comes in waking the entire station or notifying the entire station. Um in the current um vendors
that we're interviewing at this particular time, we've changed that to cardiac alerting
which means it's more heart friendly. Um if a firefighter is asleep at night, um it the
tones ramp up. goes from very soft to loud. Um, the packages also have the uh amenity
or the luxury or uh another feature of uh being able to um if we have multiple units in a
station, we can alert just those that are assigned to that particular uh station. So allowing the
rest of the members to continue to sleep. So yes, it's uh more health friendly and uh moving
forward and these is like I said, these are just two components of it. Thank you, Chief. So
nearly a million dollars and it is going to help uh with really the safety and uh health of
firefighters as well as communication. Yes. Thank you. Appreciate it. I have no further questions
and I see no further questions from the bench. I move to approve the board of bids and
contracts for September 8th, 2025. Second motion and a second. Any further discussion? I
see none. Madame clerk, please open the role. Motion passes 70. Madame clerk, please call the next item. Petitions
for public improvements. [Music] Good morning, mayor, city council members.
Paul Gunsman, public works and utilities. For the record, I have one location for your
consideration this morning. The signatures on the petitions represent 100% of the
improvement districts and the petitions are valid per Kansas statute. Northwest
High School addition located in district 5. The project will provide sewer improvements
required for an existing commercial development. And it is recommend recommended that the city
council approved the new petition and budget, adopt a new resolution, and authorize the
necessary signatures. I'll stand for questions. Questions for staff? I see none. I move to approve
the petitions for public improvements. Second. Motion and a second. Any further discussion? I
see none. Madame clerk, please open the role. Motion passes. 70. Madame clerk, please call
the next item. Ordinances relating to sections 568-218 and 505030 of the code of the city
of Witchaw relating to mapping restrictions good morning Sharon Dick Graph City Law
Department. I'm here today to talk about um some procedural cleanup ordinances um regarding
existing ordinances that we have for mapping restrictions for anti-prostitution areas and the
Oldtown um overlay as background. Um since 1995, we have had these mapping restrictions in
effect for prostitution or sale of sexual relations offenses. The areas were essentially
near the Broadway corridor. Those areas were based on statistics at the time that these were high
level prostitution areas. Um they are essentially uh areas from 21st Street on the north to second
street on the south, Maine on the west and Washington on the east. And then the second anti-
prostitution area was south of Kellogg um Waterman on the north to 47th Street South, Washington on
the east and witchah on the west. Second uh set of ordinances that these amendments would include
are back our Oldtown enhanced penalties and mapping restrictions in reference to Oldtown. 2014
ordinances were passed that allowed for additional penalties for person related crimes occurring
in the Oldtown area. These penalties included a mandatory fine as well as um opportunities for
the court to restrict individuals from returning to the Oldtown area as a condition of probation.
Um the area included in this is essentially the Oldtown overlay. The proposed ordinances um fix
a technical change in the ordinances that would allow these mapping restrictions to be part of
um my office's um diversions or deferred judgment agreements. It would allow the court and um my
office the opportunity to file additional charges um if these mapping restrictions were violated as
part of the defersion and deferred judgment. Um defersion and deferred judgment is an opportunity
for offenders to keep charges off of the record if they comply with all the terms and conditions of
the agreement. We are asking that the ordinances be placed on first reading and authorize any
necessary signatures. and I would stand for any questions. Thank you, Sharon. Questions for staff
beginning with Council Member Glasco. Thank you, Mayor. Um, I know we had to discuss and Sharon,
thank you for answering all my questions earlier this week, but I'll just reiterate them now.
So, they're in the public a little bit too, the whatifs uh regarding this. What if someone's
driving through transit in here? What about if someone's going to work? Uh, if they're going to
the farmers market, if they have a family event, what are the exceptions? Did the judge make the
makes those exceptions as they travel through? the judge may make exceptions. PD PD is only going
to have contact with people quite candidly if there's a problem. Um, one of the other questions
that a council member asked me yesterday was how how how do we know about these restrictions
and there is an order that's filed with the court copy is sent to spider. Um, so then when
an officer would make contact with a person, um, they would know then that they're on that
anti-prostitution or mapping restriction. So, if I'm passing through Oldtown, we're never going
to stop you. Um, if you're at a farmers market um and you are mapped out, that could be a violation.
Um, but if you ask the court for exceptions, the court would then determine whether or not an
exception was appropriate. And so, this is less about enforcement, more about uh helping in
prosecution, right, in the future. Thank you, Council Member Jonathan. Thanks, Mayor. Thank
you for the presentation. Um, just a couple questions. So, are there any time restrictions
on this or would that be something that someone would have to ask a judge for exception wise? You
mean as far as time of day or um, you can ask for exceptions? I mean, if if I work in the area, um,
frankly, the exceptions that we could ask for for work in the area, they were using work vehicles
when they were committing the crime. Um, so those were not granted. Um but the period of any kind
of restriction is for a period of the probation or the diversion agreement which is generally one
year. Okay. But it's 247 restriction and unless there's some exception authorized by the court
or the diversion agreement. Okay. If there is a situation where maybe this is wanted but the
person resides in Oldtown, how would that work? would be up to the court as to whether or not it
was appropriate for that person to continue to reside in Oldtown for that year period of time. I
have never seen it applied to someone who lived in Oldtown and required them to move. Okay, that was
all I have for now. Council member Ballard. Thank you, Mayor Sharon. Thank you for the presentation
and for answering my questions um yesterday, I guess. Um, can you talk a little bit about the
successes of this and is that why we are expanding it into Oldtown or did did legal bring this up
or legal? Yeah, legal legal brought this up. Um, we don't file a lot of violations of the mapping
restrictions and that could be that they're either successful or they're just not going to
back to those areas for that period of time. Um it became an issue when we were wanting to
have these restrictions on people who were on the diversion agreement for the period of agreement
and the court did not feel comfortable ordering those because the ordinance talked about condition
of probation or conviction. Um so we just wanted to include language to allow that as a sentencing
tool and a tool for our office to use as regarding diversion con conditions. Great. Thank you so much
Sharon. So these types of offenses again are I'm looking at page two of the ordinance. So urinating
in public, defecating in public, public nudity, these are all items that if a individual has
been charged with these items then would not be allowed to be in the area. You have to be
convicted or you have to be placed on diversion. Um and we are asking for a slight expansion into
those um to include the the offenses that you just listed. Um right now they are related to the
person crimes, the battery crimes, the assault crimes. Um but we are asking for a slight um
expansion of those in the Oldtown area to include some of the public nudity type offenses that we
are seeing. How often are we seeing those types of offenses? I do not have that data with me, but I
could get that for you. Has that been increasing, decreasing, or staying the same? I'm going to
look to see if Captain Moses has any data or idea. I don't have specific data on those specific
incidents. Um, but obviously crime in Oldtown or or downtown is of high priority to everyone in
our community. It's something we hear a lot about. Uh certainly the perception of crime in in
the Oldtown and downtown area is something we hear a lot about. So it is something that
we track uh just not these specific crimes, but I can certainly have those pulled uh and
get those to you at a later date if you'd like. You don't need to. I don't want to add one
more layer of um information. This is more of the question that I wanted to know which is
how often has this been an issue in particular that this obviously law believed that this was
an issue to bring it to an ordinance change but how often has this really been an issue in the
Oldtown area? Well, I'll let Sharon talk about the issue with the diversion versus probation,
but what I can touch on is we all saw incidents in the last six months that draw extreme
public attention to the Oldtown area. Uh, and and we certainly feel that any additional
restriction we can place to help people feel safe in that area is important. I'm speaking
specifically about the case where a female was battered in the Oldtown area that draw a lot of
that drew a lot of public attention. Uh so from the police department's perspective, having
another tool in the tool belt to try to keep uh problem people out of the area while they
work on changing their behavior is beneficial. I don't have anything to add other than what
Captain Mosa said. It's just really to give our office another tool um and the police department
another tool should these people come back um into an area that that they shouldn't be for
that limited period of time. Thank you Sharon and Captain Moses. I see no further questions.
We'll open it up for public comment. I see none. We'll bring it back to the bench. I see no
council members. So, I will go ahead and move uh to approve the proposed ordinances and
authorize the necessary signatures. Second. Motion and a second. Any further discussion? I
see none. Madame clerk, please open the role. Motion passes 70. Madame clerk,
please call the next item. Amendments to chapter 544
related to illegal dumping. Sharon Degraph City Law Department. I'm here
today to talk about um ordinance changes regarding illegal dumping. Um, as background, an illegal
dumping work group was formed and has been working for about the last 18 months um to look at ideas
on how to improve enforcement of illegal dumping um and hopefully help the city with some cost
recovery as we clean up these dump sites. Um, since 2018, almost 11,000 dump sites have been
remediated by MABC and their contractors at a cost of a little over $1.5 million. Um these
codes or sorry these violations um present unique prosecution challenges. Um nearly 50%
of the criminal charges were dismissed due to evidentiary issues and less than $4,000 in fines
have been collected by municipal court. Um one of the requests was for illegal dumping data based
on districts. We were not able to locate concrete numbers, but the map on the slide does show the
concentration of dumping sites um within the city. They are primarily focused into the downtown
core area, some up um north. And that shows essentially the breakdown of districts and where
those illegal dumping activities occur. The task force came up with a number of recommendations.
Uh first was to enhance ordinance penalties for illegal dumping. Um allocate additional resources
for a dedicated MABCD inspector and continue to look at grant funding opportunities for
enforcement efforts. Um additionally, it was recommended that evidence collection be enhanced
by additional surveillance cameras. um working with the police department's technologies for
flock cameras and closed captioning TV cameras and uh assisting with community efforts and reporting
of these violations. Um, the final recommendation is a six-month pilot program um to use existing
MABC staffing resources um to help build better cases um and hopefully catch these offenders.
Additionally, we would continue to leverage WB WPD technologies um and install and monitor existing
camera systems in separate locations where illegal dumping frequently occurs. We would base
those on um ClickFix um reports as well as the data that you saw from 2023. Um the PO proposed
ordinances do a number of different things. Um they increase the fines to a minimum of
$500 for convicted offenders. Um it also has a structured tier penalty with um fines escalating
as it goes up. It allows the court to impose um restitution requirements um on offenders
to help pay for or offset cleanup costs. Um, this is a new charge and it was one that would
hold the offender's liable. Um, if my vehicle or trailer is used for illegal dumping, I could be
responsible for um, the illegal dumping charges and restitution um, in the same manner as if I
was the person that actually did the dumping. um a classification of major violations is created
which has enhanced penalties based on the number of large items that you dump. Um those tend to
be costly for the city to get rid of. So if I have dumped two sofas and three refrigerators, I
now have five separate violations. Um, municipal court may continue to order community service um
for offenders if they cannot pay otherwise. Um, and it would allow the court to assess the cleanup
costs as restitution. Um, spoke about this just briefly. Um, the owner of the vehicle or trailer
uh would be responsible for the illegal dumping. Um, they would be or could be assessed the same
fine, $500 for a first violation and $150 for major violation. Um, the goal of this is to have
better cases. Um, it's it's easier sometimes to get a description of a vehicle and perhaps a tag
number um than it was Sharon Dickraph out dumping her mattress. Um, you could see my vehicle with
my car tag um and then trace it back to me. Uh, we would ask that the ordinance be placed on first
reading and authorize all necessary signatures. Um I have representatives from the entire um internal
working group here. So if there are specific questions for MABCD um and WPD um as far as what
has been occurring and where we go from here um they can hopefully assist with answering
those questions. Thank you Sharon and the entire team that has been working for 18 months
towards this solution. Uh I really appreciate it. Council member Hoheisle. Thank you mayor. Thank
you Sharon. Thank you everybody else. Chris, everybody, Daniel, all of you who's been working
on this. Um, this is quite an issue in my district as we saw by the heat map. I know we've had a
couple of different pilots over the years. Um, it's been a touch and go. Um, we've learned
some things with some of these pilots. I think what you're talking about as far as the the
prosecution of the people who have the vehicles, own the vehicles, is a big one because that's
always been a barrier to successfully prosecuting. Yeah. Um, so I I do appreciate all your
work. Um, a couple of quick questions. Um, in here you talk about rummaging uh people who
rummage through it and kind of spread the mess even more. Can you uh just touch base on that
for a little bit for us? We are we are adding or it's proposed to add an offense that if
you rummage and leave through a mess. So, if I go to Goodwill and they have some boxes
sitting out or they have a dumpster for Goodwill and I go in and I take things out and I spew
them all about, the spewing about of those items um would also violate this particular ordinance.
Okay. Is there like how do we prosecute that? Like what would the fine spewing about? It would it
would be the same process to to prosecute any illegal dumping. um we would need to see the
person there. Um a lot of the Goodwill agencies I know of um do have cameras just because they're
tired of getting illegal things dumped. Um so we would use the same type of mechanisms to try
to enforce that violation as we would the other violations. Okay, thank you for that. Um we talk
about an additional MB MABCD inspector position. Um, is that a new one or is that moving about
from the the current employment? The the current six-month pilot is to utilize existing staff. Um,
the task force can't implement extra people. Um, we can recommend that. Um, the abbreviated final
recommendation was to utilize current staff. um have a six-month pilot program that they would
have more dedicated to illegal dumping um and then at the end of that six-month determine
whether financially a new position would be warranted. And I'm going to look for Chris or
Daniel if you want to add anything to that. Good morning, Mayor Council. Well, Chris Labram,
MABCD for the record and uh thank you for that, sir. Thanks, Sharon, for the presentation as well.
And so, yes, our uh my vision of this, if you will, is um again, the change in the ordinances
are a big game changer for us and the ability to try to prosecute, get the the information to
Sharon and her prosecutors that they would need. We often get video, maybe we get pictures. We've
had everything from individuals wearing a hat that said, "Ah, I don't think that was me." They
didn't even flat out deny it was. They just said, "I think it don't think it was or the video is a
little grainy." Uh, and therefore, uh, we are not allowed to prosecute. So, being able to pull the
vehicle in, uh, and that gives us a lot more, uh, ability to tie that evidence together. So, what
I would foresee with this is if we can get uh, some uh, payback through fines, some cost
recovery through fines, uh, through the um, reimbursement of dump site cleanups, that will
help. But mainly if we can start to deter illegal dumping, then we'll be back here next spring
with part of our budget process hopefully to say that we can take uh a good portion of the
$300,000 a year that we're spending right now to cleanup sites and divert that towards resources
such as an inspector vehicle equipment that we would need to continue to deter and prevent the
illegal dumping. If we can be successful with the uh implementation and uh with this that that will
be our long range plan. All right. I appreciate that. And thanks again, you WPD, everybody who's
been working on this. Um, if you guys need any suggestions for any of the pilot sites, I have
one or five or six that I could give you. So, um, but thank you again for all your guys' work
on this. Very welcome. Thank you, Chris. Follow-up question. What's the salary of a typical MABC
inspector position? Uh, they're about 60,000, 60 to 70 depending on range. um top out around
75. So with benefits uh and that's what I look at with benefits, salary, and a vehicle, I'm
about $150,000. So about half of the current illegal dumping budget. Thank you, Chris.
Council member Johnson. Thanks, Mayor. Thanks, Chris. Sharon team. Um I guess my thought process
even to your point Chris is um I kind of think the initial fine should be higher than 500 and happy
to have that conversation but just um the ugly act of illegal dumping is an intentional act and
I just believe that $500 is a little low. I think it should be double that at a th00and and maybe
a language change in the ordinance. Instead of saying not less than 500, just saying it's $1,000
on the first conviction. Um, looking at the ramp up on I think page eight. Um, not less than 1,000.
I would say not less than 1500, no more than 2,000. But I would ramp that up just because of
what we've seen. Just like council member Hohisel, I've had several neighborhood people send videos.
Chris, you know that. I've sent them to you, too. And people are just really frustrated. And
I think $1,000 minimum is a really good deterrent hopefully to stop people from doing that. But
I just wanted to add that in. I agree with um ramping this up, adding tools to the tool
belt. You all work really hard and adding more tools to make sure we can address these issues
I think is a good thing. Thank you. I am going to second what council member Johnson has
just said. I actually was looking at the violations for fireworks ordinances and firsttime
violations will result in a $1,000 fine or 100 uh community service hours. So again, there's
always that option for community service. However, the fine for fireworks is a thousand. illegal
dumping. If we just look at the numbers that were provided to us, $1.5 million was spent between
now and 2018 to remediate these sites for from illegal dumping. And the only fines we were able
to get back to recover the 1.5 million was $4,000. So, we need to send a stronger message that our
city doesn't tolerate actions that hurt others, especially in neighborhoods. Uh, these illegal
dumping sites uh then become a safety hazard for people in our community. And so, I am for
a stronger fine or a higher fine of $1,000 as well. Council member Glascock. Thank you, Mayor.
Um I would support uh the strictest enforcement we could have on legal dumping as well on particular
areas and try to give you as many tools uh to be successful in uh prosecuting them. Um regarding
this was my question last time to Sharon but it's question you could answer as well. Um in some ways
this is probably less about enforcement but more of prosecution for individuals. Correct. This
would give us more tools to prosecute. Correct. Uh for successful prosecution. Yes sir. So, one
thing I was looking um on the analysis um item 1B said that this will strengthen uh so this one
might be more of a sharing question. Um provide courts with the ability to impose restitution
fees on offenders to uh cover cleanup cost. So, I was trying to look through the actual language
of the ordinance and I probably just skipped past it. You know, when you read something like four
times and I couldn't find it, but where does it specifically say the restitution side? I soul
were said the fine on I'm sorry on page 8 J the court may require in addition to the fine and as
a condition of probation person convicted remove or pay the cost of removing any waste matter
which the person dumped or caused to be dumped on public or private property. I think I just want
to make sure that that language was in there. And then regarding the uh background um on the sheet
that we are provided, less than 4,000 fines been collected by the municipal court. So previously up
to this, we weren't uh doing restitution on top of fines. It was just the fine. It was just the fine.
Okay. Thank you. Thank you for your work on this. Thank you, Sharon. And thank you to the team. And
I might just add procedurally if it is the will of the council to change those amounts as far as the
minimum and maximum that could be done as part of the motion and then it would just be cleaned up
and you would be provided a cleaned up version on second reading. And if I was following Council
Person Johnson, that would be sections H on page seven. And then over on page eight would be the
same change for the minimum for a second offense to the maximum of $2,500 is generally what
we have jurisdiction over in municipal court. Council member Ballard. Oop. Sorry. Thank you,
Mayor. I have a quick question for Bob. Um, sorry if I'm out of order, but I was just
thinking, do you know offand how much our budget is for the neighborhood cleanups? I'm
just curious how much we spend on that. And then obviously there's just a situation with
a lot of trash and that's why it gets dumped. I'm just curious how much money you were
spending. I know it's just off the cuff, but yes. No, sorry. It's just I'm just curious. I
don't know that I remember. I know I remember the transfer. I'm gonna I think it's
around $100,000 if I remember correctly, but don't quote me on that. Okay. 300,000
300,000. Okay. Only off by 200. So that so it's that those organized cleanups in addition
to the million dollars that we're spending on the illegal dumping. That That's correct. Okay. Okay.
Thank you, Council Member Johnson. Thanks, Mayor. Um Sharon, one question I forgot to ask you that
came in my email and then a second one I thought of. I'll start. This is probably the harder one.
Um some of the illegal dumping that's happened in District 1 over the years Inspectors have told me
to stop doing this, but I would go look through the pile and see addresses that were not attached
to where it was dumped. Would the individual's name that's found and that be um prosecuted? Or
if we were able to identify who actually dumped it and it was a different person, would they be
prosecuted? That's in here. Um, page six, uh, D is in dog. Did I miss that? Um, if there's evidence
of three or more items in the waste manner, there can be presumption. And it's a presumption
because I think in a lot of the situations that you're talking about, right or wrong, I may have
paid my nephew Billy to go take my trash to the dump and instead he dumped it there and kept
my $25. I mean, so we we as prosecutors and the inspectors look at all the facts, but there's
a presumption and and then it would be up to the individual who paid her nephew or whoever or Bob's
trash service or whatever to come back and say, "No, I in fact paid him to do this." Okay. Um the
question in my email is um what would be done for illegal dumping at a business? So this person
works at a business and said that trash companies find them for cleaning up illegal dumping when
people go dump furniture, mattresses, tires, paint, and all that other stuff in front of their
trash recepticles. Is that something they would just share that video with us to prosecute who did
it? Yes. Okay. Would the would the judge be able to look at the fines that maybe this business
receives and add that as a condition of I guess the result of court or are they kind of on their
own for that and that's a civil matter that they would have to sue this individual. Okay. So, okay,
let me make sure I got the facts right. So, I own XY business and ABCD comes and tags me because I
have junk out there. I then come back with a video that shows that ABC, my neighbor, dumped the junk
there. They're saying that the hauler would. So if Waste Connections is your hauler and somebody
dumps there, Waste Connections cleans it up, but they find them. Yeah. I have to pay for an extra
mattress or oversized item or whatever. I mean, I I think you could ask the court as a matter
of restitution. I mean, that was something that the property owner had to pay or expend to get
those items removed. So, I think that would be an appropriate ask if we have enough information
to cross all the lines and dot all the tees to get over to who who did the dumping. And that's always
been the problem in this case is who dumped it. Yeah. Okay. Thank you, Sharon. Uh you mentioned
an example a little bit earlier ago where you said uh say for instance two sofas I'll make
it two mattresses and three fridges that's five violations. Yep. And just so that people kind of
have an understanding of what those costs are. If they would have gone to Brooks Landfield um the
mattresses per mattress is $20 each. So that's $40. And then the three fridges any items with
free on is $50 each. So, um, $150. So, nearly 200 bucks, um, in that they could have taken it
to Brooks Landfield. Instead, they would get five violations. If we went with the $1,000 fine,
how would that work? On the on the big stuff, it's a bigger fine. On page 10, if you dump big
items, it's $1,500 per violation. So, if you're talking the five big things, if my math is right,
the fine should be $7,500. So, it's $1,500 per big thing. So, they could save themselves that fine
$7,000 go to Brooks Landfill and simply go and dump it there instead of illegally dumping in our
community plus any restitution costs. So, there's always a choice. In other words, there's a choice
where you can do it appropriately. um and there's a choice of just dumping it in our neighborhoods
which is illegal. So I appreciate again I wanted to give context to those numbers uh so that
people understand there is an opportunity to do it correctly and then there's an opportunity to
do it incorrectly. Um in addition I had one more question. Um council member Ballard asked about
neighborhood cleanup costs. So per year $300,000 So neighborhoods have an opportunity. Um if
you cannot afford going to Brooks Landfield, you can go to these neighborhood cleanups. I know
council member Hohheisel Ballard and many others um have them in their neighborhood. So there is
an opportunity for free um neighborhood cleanups. Is that correct? There there is. I do not know the
frequency of those cleanups and and I think that's the I mean the issue is always I'm getting ready
to move. I have all this junk. What do I do? Do I leave it and then my landlord keeps my deposit?
Do I leave it at the curb? Do I call my c cousin Billy? Um if if I can't wait for that cleanup,
which would certainly be what we would want you to do. Um but just looking at what resources are
out there rather than just leaving at the curb and telling telling citizens it's somebody else's
problem is really what we're trying to address. So back to some personal responsibility. Yes. Thank
you very much, Council Member Hoisel. Oh, sorry, Council Member Ballard. Thank you, Mayor.
So question for I don't know if this for my colleagues but um so by increasing the fine which
I agree with. My concern is if we only collected $4,000 in the past and we've spent a million for
the cleanups. I just it sounds great, you know, in theory to up the consequence, but we're already
not collecting a lot. And so I'm just curious how you guys feel about that. I'm I mean I I believe
that there needs to come a consequence for for illegal dumping. Sometimes you the only way to
get their attention is you know to hit him in the pocket, but if we're already um having a
hard time collecting. I just am curious your thoughts on what that might look like. May Mayor,
if I could and I'd like Sharon to address this. If all we were doing was just increasing fines, I
wouldn't disagree with you. But we're asking for significant changes in the ordinance in order
to help us with prosecutions. And so I think we could see a substantial increase in revenue
because now we have greater tools to be able to find someone guilty or provide evidence
to the uh uh court to try to get guilty. If I may tag in manager uh Captain Moses
again for the record, that's the exact conversation we had as part of the work group.
Uh the the work group kind of started around, you know, the lowest barrier change we can make is
increase the fines. And we all said that's great, but what does that mean? And so that's when we
started looking at how can we also increase the fine and fill the gaps in the prosecution because
what we found is some of these barriers like not being able to hold the vehicle owner responsible.
that those were the types of things that really limited the ability of MABC, law enforcement, and
the prosecutor's office to successfully prosecute a case. So, that's why we did both of these
together. We had the conversation about increasing the fine amount candidly. Uh we anticipated
some of this conversation from the bench, but we wanted that to be a discussion that
you all were able to have and not something that staff imposed. Uh but we had some of
those very similar conversations, but that's why this all kind of comes together in in two
different ways like the manager said. Thank you. Council member Ho Heisel. Thank you, Mayor.
Um, yeah, I I agree and I support raising those fines 100%. Uh, just a little background on
the neighborhood cleanups. I believe we use CDBG funds for that. Um, or some sort of federal
funding, I believe, for it. No. Okay, Becca, could you come up here and just give a little
background about that? here. Um but also um another barrier that we see with the neighborhood
cleanups is that um you essentially have to have a neighborhood association to run those cleanups. It
might be worth a discussion moving forward about how to work our way around that a little better
cuz there's a number of areas in all around the city that don't have neighborhood cleanups because
they don't have an association going which I think is one of the requirements there. Yeah. Um,
we don't use CDBG funds. I don't have the full answer, so I don't run that program. Becca
Johnson from Office of Community Services for the record. Believe it is part of public works budget
for dumps. I think it it's a transfer from the um our landfill fund. Okay. Okay. Yes. Um, but we
do have requirements about the neighborhoods that are allowed to have them that do uh they have
to be low to moderate income neighborhoods. Okay. Thank you. Can you reiterate that? Um, city
manager, since I mentioned uh Brooks Landfill, uh, obviously people are asked to come and dump
there appropriately with a fee. And so because of these fees, then we're able to provide free
neighborhood cleanup locations so that people who cannot afford paying the $20 for a mattress
dump that they can have it at a neighborhood location. Can you address that? That has always
been um that this has been part of uh our method of trying to help individuals who are either low
to moderate income individuals. It it has, mayor, the money is transferred from the landfill fund
uh into the cleanup program. Um it's something that we're reviewing right now because uh we are
uh projecting some difficulties in that fund going forward and so our ability to be able to fund
the neighborhood cleanup to the level that we have in the past may come in jeopardy a little bit
because of that. Um, but that's under study right now and we're doing some long range projections
to make sure that the landfill fund stays healthy. Um, we the council also, if I remember correctly,
modified the program a few years ago so that some neighborhoods could take advantage of it that
aren't necessarily low or moderate income to make sure that um there were parts of the city
where a group of neighbors could come together or a homeowner association sponsor a cleanup. But if
I reme it's just a handful if I remember correctly every year. Council member Johnson. Thanks Mayor.
U just adding to the conversation what Captain Moses said is why I think the increase in fines
would be good. Adding those additional tools I think will result in better prosecutions. And
I think a few people and I continue to think about that red truck that was in that video. I
think a few good examples of people being fined for all the waste that they are dumping would
make an impact and hopefully in the future it's not happening as much but I think initially
having those additional tools will help out. Uh if I mayor thank you uh councilwoman Ballard
has asked me if I could go down go ahead and break down the case totals uh that we've had. So
if you look at that uh those prosecution numbers uh since 2018 we have cleaned up 10,944 total dump
sites. Uh of those we were able to charge 72. Um we were able to get 17 of those into court and
we were able to get six convictions of those. So uh oh actually sorry I take that back. So we
had 17 no contest and six uh guilties. So, of those uh we were we were able to uh to get
about half of those um with a conviction and that resulted in the $3,6896 cents in fines that
we were able to recover. So, that's the complete breakdown of those numbers and uh as the manager
and others have said, we would certainly hope that uh we would see a gross increase in that um be
able to recover uh a great uh a great deal more. Uh another thing uh I will add is so to the topic
of the dump sites and by council district. So we track every dump site uh the decision was made
several years ago that um we should not be making management decisions based on council district and
the location of those sites. It should be based on the urgency of the site and what was in it. So
that's why we had not uh ever retained or tracked that that data by council district. uh if that
is valuable, especially with this new ordinance, we can certainly begin doing that uh so that we
have it going forward. Does that answer all of your questions? Ma'am, I have a follow-up question
to that. Um so, of those neighborhood cleanups, can I just understand the breadth of which
districts, is it the same three districts that there have been issues on the map? Oh, you have
one. So, can you just raise your hand if your district receives funds for neighborhood cleanups?
So, no council district 5 or no council district 2. I I believe there have been limited ones in
one and five. That's why the council changed the policy of several years ago, but they're very
limited. And I don't have that information. It would be probably one or two a year at the most
if I remember correctly. And it's a first come, first serve basis. I know the council opened it
up, but I don't know that there have been many applications. For clarification, you said one
in five. Did you mean two and five? I'm sorry, I meant two and five. Okay, thank you. I'm not
a aware of any, but that doesn't mean that it hasn't happened, but my usually it's an HOA that
comes together to do a cleanup in my district. Thank you. So, there are opportunities. Again,
I just want to make it clear that that's why I really uh lean on the council members. They are
very good at sharing when there's a neighborhood cleanup because that is your quote free
opportunity to uh do it appropriately but also not get charged what you would get charged
at the landfill but it is being subsidized. So that is I think what I just um gleaned from that
information and knowing that the fund is unstable, can you address what are steps that we're taking
to make it stable? So again, that there are opportunities for those that cannot pay still have
these free opportunities. Um mayor, primarily what we're doing is looking at our fee structure. Um
we think we've been undercharging at the landfill. um when we look at competition on the private
side. And so we're trying to find the right spot not to discourage dumping um uh by our the vendors
that use us, but at the same time to get closer to cost recovery. Thank you, Council Member Jonathan.
Thanks, Mayor. Um two things, Chris. I do think it's important to track that by district just to
have that data. um to the neighborhood cleanup piece is a little more complicated um than we are
talking about. We don't publicly advertise um when those are happening citywide because of illegal
dumping. So if neighborhood A had a cleanup on Saturday, that neighborhood knows about it. The
rest of the city does not just because people will bring stuff over there and it's incumbent upon uh
most of us work with those neighborhoods. But, uh, council member CSR, neighborhood president, their
group to door knock and let people know when that is, get the flyers out. Hopefully they get their
belongings to the curb. And that happens once a year. We really need to do that more, but we
don't have the budget for that. Um, and that's kind of where some of this comes from. That one
time per year is great. People get stuff out, but in four or five months they may have something
else that they need and they don't have the funds to do that. And I think that's where some of this
comes from. Um, but again, those are not fully advertised citywide. And in cases, at least in
District One, where I've seen people put that on social media. One time we had a bus from West W,
not a bus, a boat from West Witchah show up at a neighborhood and they tried to leave it there and
speed off, but luckily the neighborhood president, myself, and the neighborhood officer were there
to make sure that did not happen. But so most of the time that's just advertised within the
neighborhood to try to stop that from happening. Thank you, council members. Thank you, staff. I see no further questions right now.
We will now open it up for public comment. I see none. I'll bring it back to the bench. Council member Heisel. Thank you, Mayor. I think
most of us up here are in agreement to raise the fine. Um, so Sharon, I don't know if you need to
help me through this, but you indicated earlier on page five, I believe it is. Page seven. Seven.
Thank you. Seven and eight. Yeah, seven and eight. And then the section H. H as in Harry. Yep. Um, go
ahead. Oh, no. If you wanted to increase the fine, the motion would just be moved to approve
the ordinance with the following changes. Um, increase the fine in section H to $1,000,
not more than $2500. Second violation, not less than $1,500, no more than $2,500, I
think was the gist of the conversation. Okay. So, I move that we approve the ordinance with
the changes of in section H changing changing the language from a mandatory fine not
less than $500 to $1,000. And then also changing um on page eight, not less than a,000
or more than 2,000 to uh $2,000. $2,000. Yeah. that. Yeah, I believe $2,000. Second.
And if I could interrupt for a moment, just to add the magic language, we'd like to
place have the motion to place the ordinance on first reading with those changes and authorize
necessary signatures. Just and place the ordinance on first reading and authorize the necessary
signatures. Thank you so much, Jennifer. Okay, second motion and a second. Any further
discussion? Council member Johnson. Thanks, Mayor. Council member Hohheisle, would
you take a friendly amendment on page eight to say not less than 1,500, no more than
2500? Accepted. [Music] Second. Motion and a second. I see no further discussion.
Madame clerk, please open the role. Motion passes 70. Madame clerk,
please call the next item. Ordinances relating to noise nuisances
and the operation of loud vehicles. This is kind of the Sharon show today. Um
noise trash. Yeah. Okay. Um before you today are amendments relating to the city's noise
uh ordinances. Uh currently noise violations are contained in Title 7. Um when these
were passed in 1991, enforcement of these ordinances was handled differently. Um the health
department, environmental services department, now that department is part of public works,
um were responsible for enforcement of these ordinances. Um when all of those restructuring
activities occurred, um those enforcement activities got shifted to the police department.
Um the provisions or amendments um do a couple of different things. um they move the ordinances
to title five with other criminal ordinances that are enforced by the police department. They
continue to allow um MABCD and other departments to enforce them. Um but recognize that most noise
violations occur after normal business hours and your officers are going to be the ones that are
going to get called to those kind of complaints. Um the methods to establish a noise violation are
unchanged and I know that was one of the questions that I received. Um there are two methods um
that prosecutors can use to to prove a noise violation. First one is an actual decibel reading.
The ordinance um continues to have decibel levels set by the use or zoning of the area. The second
method is testimony that the noise interferes with a person of reasonable sensibilities.
Um that's a standard that has been upheld by um the Kansas Court of Appeals and Supreme
Court as a objective basis to establish um a noise violation. Um the amendments also add some
changes to title 11 in reference to loud vehicles um which was requested primarily in the downtown
area to address some of the loud vehicles. Um the same standard is being applied if it is noise
that would interfere with the sensibilities of a reasonable person. Um a traffic infraction can be
issued to that driver. Um, minimum fine is $500. Maximum fine is $1,500. Um, I was asked, well,
how would we ever approve those? Officers are there when they do the speedouts on Douglas. Um,
they're they're going to know what was loud. Um, they're going to know who who was um interfered
with by that conduct. Um, I would ask that the ordinance be placed on first reading and
authorize all necessary signatures. Um, Captain Moses is here. Um if you have any enforcement
type questions um from the police department. Thank you Sharon. Council member Ballard. Thank
you mayor. Um Captain Moses I have a question for you. Okay. So I hear about this a lot in addition
to the motorcycles but that's for another day. Um how so how will this be enforced? I mean, I know
you guys are extremely busy. Um, but for example, will like the entertainment districts all
be treated the same as like downtown Oldtown Deleno? There's a lot of dragging Douglas going
on. And I'm just curious. I have gotten a couple messages basically about they're very excited,
but are really looking forward to enforcement. So, I'm just curious what that might look like.
Uh, it's a great question. So we have done special assignments in downtown in the downtown
area around Navar Park, Oldtown previously and I anticipate that that will continue. That is a
priority of the chief because he hears the same complaints you do. A lot of our enforcement
related to this type of activity is complaint generated. So we rely on the community to tell
us where these problems are occurring and then we establish a plan to address them. We have
to balance enforcement with the safety of the community. Uh, so it's important to make sure
that that that expectation is is metered. Um, you know, this is a $500 to $1,500 fine for
noise and it is a problem. Uh, but we also want to make sure that we're not recklessly chasing a
motorcycle or a vehicle that's making loud noise through the downtown area on a Saturday night uh
when it's packed uh putting people at risk. So, our our special assignments, while I'm not
going to get into the all the tactics behind it, they take those types of things into
consideration. Uh, that's why we've been leveraging technology at the department with
your all with your all support, which we're grateful for. And we'll continue to use that
technology to enforce things like this. This, like many of the other things we've talked about
today, simply gives us more tools to address those problems that people have. Um, so enforcement
will continue to look like what it has probably uh with increased special assignments focusing
on these specific ordinances now that they've been kind of tweaked and and that we can use
them a little bit differently. Hopefully that answers your question. Council member Glasco,
thank you. Um, these questions be for Sharon. Two quick ones. This is the same question
I asked on the last one that this is more for the prosecution less enforcement. Yes, people
who find violations and then in addition to that um often we may uh there are some people that
are unreasonable and so how are we defining reasonleness of a person? Uh it's a legal standard
what would a person of reasonable sensibilities and normally that's up to the court to
determine. Um, we do like to have in these cases, um, cooperating testimony. The officer was there.
The officer heard the music. He saw the pictures vibrating on the wall. Um, we do not intend to,
um, regulate the type of music. I don't like that music. So, I I want them charged. Um, generally,
we need at least one other person to testify or provide information that there was, in fact, a
problem. So it may not just be an individual going down the street and declaring things unreasonable.
That's not the standard that we're using. No. Okay. [Music] Council member Hohisel. Thank you,
Mayor. Captain Moses, just one quick question. Um, do we have any ability to measure decibel levels
with our our patrol units? We do have some decibel readers. They're mostly focused in Patrol South
for Oldtown. Uh we that's where we've used them most recently related to complaints that we've
received about uh specific locations in Oldtown, but we do have some um not they're not something
that patrol officers generally carry around, but we do have some. Okay. Thank you. Approximately
how much is that tool and is it beneficial to have more of those tools? one of her patrol. I don't
know the exact cost of the tool, but uh Captain Kulie was a part of purchasing those previously,
I believe, and I can go back and and talk with him about expanding uh having those in other areas
of the of the city. Thanks, Captain Moses. Council member Johnson. Thanks, Mayor. U I guess it's
good I got rid of my hemi. It's pretty loud. Um, I'm sure you drove very responsibly and would
not have violated this order, you know. Yeah, I did. Yeah. Um, just one quick clarification. I
know the answer to this. Well, I think I do. So, officers have discretion when they are called
out. So in an example like Sharon just mentioned, if the neighbors don't like Snoop Dogg or Ice
Cube and that's what's playing, officers can hear that and just ask them to turn it down because
of that, not just find them immediately. Yeah, absolutely. Chief Sullivan has taken a very
strong stance about education over enforcement when we can. So, if it is something where we can
reasonably communicate with the offender and say, "Hey, you may not have recognized this, but
your neighbor is hearing your noise and and it's too loud. Please turn it down." That's
what we're going to do first before we move to just citing somebody. Okay. And in a situation
where there's a responsible person with a Hemi in their truck who may work out early in the
morning and when they turn their truck on, it rattles everybody's windows, are they going to get
a potential fine for that just going to work out? I would say we would utilize the same education
model where we would maybe communicate with that person and say you may not recognize this but it
is causing issues for your neighbor. We all have a responsibility to be good neighbors and sometimes
we just need to uh hear from a third party, an independent third party about how your behavior
might be affecting your neighbors. Cool. Well, anybody with a hemi make sure you don't
add that extra tailpipe attachment. [Music] I see no further questions for staff. We'll
open it up for public comment. I see none. We'll bring it back to the bench. I know I've
had the opportunity to go to breakfastes at uh Council Member Ballard's District 6 and I've
also heard it in um College Hill and District 1 that this is an issue. Um, and so I will glean
on these two council members to move this item. Sure. Thank you, mayor. Uh, I take would
like to take the recommended action, adopt their proposed ordinance, and authorize the
necessary signatures. Second motion and a second. Any further discussion? I see none. Madame
clerk, please open the role. Motion passes. 70. Madame clerk, please call the next item.
Ordinance authorizing use of Hyatt proceeds. Good morning, mayor and city council. Becca
Johnson from the office of community services. For the record, on September 5th, 2017, the
city council adopted ordinance number 5585, which authorized use of Hyatt Regency, which
Hayatt Regency witchah sale of proceeds to fund projects in council districts 1, 2, 3, four,
five, and six. subsequent ordinance of authorized additional projects and allocations. As part of
those subsequent ordinances, on December 18th, 2018, the city council approved a $200,000 loan
to Starlight LLC, the operator Starlight Drive-In, for the acquisition of two digital projectors
and other related equipment and installation costs. The loan was amarized over 5 years
with interest only 1% for the first four years and then monthly repayment in year
five. The funds were appropriate out of the funds allocated to district 3 from the
sale of the city-owned Hyatt Regency Hotel in Witchah. And on December 27th, 2022,
Blake Smith, the operator of Starlite, requested and received an extension of the loan
agreement for two years due to the financial hardship of COVID and a slow industry recovery. On
February 4th, 2025, the city council approved an amendment to the promisary note to restructure
Starlight's loan at Mr. Smith's request. Mr. Smith has made a $50,000 payment following the
restructuring and agreed to repayment of the balance of $150,000 beginning July 1st, 2025
with equal monthly installments of $2,147.33, which includes the amortization at 1% through
June of 2031. One payment was made in August 2025, reducing the outstanding balance to
$147,977.67, 67, which means thus far $64,147.40 in proceeds, including $52,000 52,22.33 in principal and $12,125.7 in interest have been
recorded as program income to the district 3 Hyatt project and are available to be reallocated.
The proposed ordinance allocates $52,000 to three district 3 projects and the proposed
ordinance additionally allows for future requests to change the repayment timeline of the
Starlite loan with city council approval. A cont uh for the projects proposed to get funding. The
first is a contribution of $25,000 to the Witchah Animal Action League. These funds will be used for
spay and neuter clinics in the district 3 low to moderate income neighborhoods. The second project
is a contribution of $20,000 to Legacy Works ICT. Those funds will be used for its continued youth
employment and development programming within District 3. The third project is a contribution of
$7,000 that would be added to the beautifification grant program for District 3. $8,731.72 was
previously allocated to this project in 2023. Grants from this program will be available for
onetime beautifification projects located in district 3 to include murals, trees, signage, or
other beautifification efforts. It is recommended the city council place the ordinance on first
reading and authorize the necessary signatures. And I stand for any questions. Any questions for
Becca from the bench? I'm seeing none. Is there any uh one that would like to speak on this from
the audience? Seeing none, bring it back to the bench. Would uh Councilman Hai would like to Yes,
sir. Thank you, uh, Vice Mayor. Um, first I just want to give uh the flowers to everybody who's
currently doing work in our district. Uh, Wall is actually in Plane View right now and starting
to get into Hilltop with spay and neuter clinics. I know we all hear the heartbreaking stories of
um what's going on at the um the animal shelter and this is a countrywide issue right now. A
lot of it stems from uh the fallout from CO. This is a good step as far as getting ahead
of this problem so we don't have these issues further down the road. So they are doing great
work. Um while they not only deal with a lot of the strays that people have but also education
with people um hooking them up with resources uh letting them know you know here's where you can
get your heartworm medicine here's how to better take care of your pets. They also participate
in neighborhood cleanups as a matter of fact uh just uh this last weekend in Hilltop Wall was
out there and they were also out in Plane View helping with that as well. So, they're doing
so much more than just helping with this, but um it's great to be able to help them a little
bit, help us in return. Um also, Legacy Works, they've been doing great work working with
kids who are um in the foster care system, working with uh some atrisisk kids as well. Um I f
fully encourage people to go and try their coffee. I'm not sure if they're still at the downtown
library, but they they've been down at the downtown library, so stop by there and grab
some of their coffee. They also do pottery to help teach kids how to garden and um sell that
produce actually to help go back into the program. It's another great program that we have down in
District 3, and I'm just so thankful that they're there doing the work. Um, also we are looking at
um uh doing some murals um in Lynwood Park and uh Hilltop as well on the side of the community
building. So that's what the extra 7,000 or so of this ordinance will be going to. Um we have one of
South Witchah's um well-known artist uh Bill Stoer helping with that as well. So, uh this is all
a lot of um great momentum that we have that we want to further support in the district and also
the drive-in had a significant uh amount of damage that was done here recently. So, this is just
to help them kind of get the fence repairs done, get um some of the down limbs uh hauled out of
there as well. So, um, and just also of note, they will be having a scary movie, um, festivals
here in end of September and October, and those are always a a blast to deal with as well. So,
I just want to make sure that we give as much help to the drive-in as uh, we can because it's a
Southside institution. Thank you. And with that, I almost forgot at the end of that whole ramble.
Um, I recommend that the city council place the ordinance on first reading reading and
authorize the necessary signatures. Second. Motion in a second. Any further discussion? I
see none. Madame clerk, please open the role. Motion passes 70. Madame clerk, please call
the next item. Funding for 2025 park signage. Hello, Mayor, City Council. Tim
Kellum's public works and utilities uh here to present on 2025 park signage. So, a
little bit of background. on the adopted 2026 uh 2035 uh CIP includes funding for uh park
signage uh is located in the ongoing section uh for this year for 2025 that we're uh wanting
to initiate initiate. As you can see here, this is just a photo of the old uh wood signs.
I'm sure most of you all familiar with those uh as you drive around town. Um we have new brainy
materials. Um, as you can see, it's kind of all throughout the the community. And so now it's kind
of the steps to start implementing that into the uh into the parks. Uh, it helps with wayfinding
and also helps with a stronger sense of place. Uh, just kind of helps remind people on uh who's
responsible for the parks. Uh, making sure that they understand that we are uh have these
amenities throughout the the park system. uh and also provides a bit of um uh continuity
throughout the throughout the system. Uh so a little bit of analysis. Um the new park signage
uh will pro be provided. Um we're focusing mostly on the pools. Uh we focused heavily on the rec
centers and community facilities. Uh you should start to see some of those from the 2024 CIP
uh come up in the next probably about 30 days. uh probably early October is when you'll start to
see those uh go in. Uh so this is good timing for us to kind of go through the next round of funding
to start uh implementing new uh signage. Uh we're really focusing on the main uh heavy heavily
used amenities. So the pools, uh facilities, rec centers, those sorts of things. And eventually
we'll start to kind of filter down into the uh large uh regional parks, community parks, and
then eventually we'll get down to the neighborhood parks uh down the road. Um so our goal is to
do the pools and if we uh have good bids on it, we'll continue to do additional signage. So uh
Harrison Park would be one of them, Country Acres, uh K9 Rooster Dog Park, Clap uh Chapen, and then
uh the Kansas Fallen Fighters uh Memorial Park. Uh that's one that we're looking into. So those
are potential uh locations. Again, if we get good bids, uh we'll continue to work through uh
our long list. We have over I think 140 parks, so that means that there's likely over 140 signs.
Uh and many parks have multiple signs, so it'll take us a little while to get through all of them.
Um but kind of here for the for the long run to get through and and help uh continue to improve
our parks and make sure we aid with wayfinding. So, for the financial considerations, uh there's
$100,000 in the ongoing section in the approved or in the adopted 2026 2035 uh CIP uh for park
signage. And again, this is for 2025 um money. So, we'll be coming back again uh for 2026 uh park
signage um here in the near future. Uh so, staff recommends initiating the the whole
amount, the whole $100,000 at this time. Um, it is recommended that city council
initiate the project, adopt the resolution, and authorize the necessary signatures. And
I'm happy to stand for any questions. Thank you for the presentation. Questions for staff? I
have several. Uh, can you go to uh 73 again? So, I wanted to know this compared to the current
wood signs. How much is this obstructing um I guess traffic? Because I can see that the old
sign you could still see through and it would be helpful for people who are making left turns. Um
can you talk about that? Sure. Yeah. So um all the signs have to go through a a sign permit. Um
so that's done through MABC. So they look through that make sure that um it is appropriate for the
sign the right size and and is in a good location. Many of our signs most of the projects that we've
been doing now are the big facilities. So, they have like Evergreen Rec Center, they get these
big tall ones because they're they're they're pretty important and most people are trying to go
to those. As we get to these smaller um locations, we'll be going with a smaller 4x3 sign. So, it'll
it'll be smaller. It'll be basically pretty much the same size as this one. Um not as bulky uh as
this one. Still very legible. Uh but it will be roughly about the same size. We don't have any of
those currently installed, so I don't have a photo for you, but you should start to see those.
Uh we do have a couple of those in the 2024 uh park signage project. So, you'll start to see
those around, so we'll have a better idea. Thank you. That helps with uh comparison because again,
we're not comparing apples to apples right now. Yeah. Uh there is no such sign uh example
just yet. Correct. With these old signs, uh, the wooden signs, do you know how much those
used to cost versus these new signs, which cost $25,000 each? Um, so $25,000 is is not the number.
It depends on the bids. Um, and the size. We're seeing that those are coming in around um I think
the latest one was around probably around $4,000 to maybe $10,000. Depends on the size. The taller
ones are are more costly and the smaller ones are are a little less. you're just using less
material. Um the um uh in terms of cost, I'm not sure those these metal or these wood ones were
mostly done inhouse. So they were using staff time to repair these, create these. Um a lot of the
the issues that we're having with the wood signs are that um when they are vandalized, you can't
just take a uh graffiti remover to them and clean them off. You have to then go and replace them.
if they get cut, you have to replace them. So, it's using staff time to go through and maintain
these, whereas it's a lot easier to just remove a panel, get a new panel made uh for these wood or
for the metal signs, and you could just take the uh graffiti remover to them a lot quicker. So,
in terms of maintenance, we're we imagine that we'll be seeing uh less staff time going towards
the the maintenance of these signs um because it does take quite a bit of um you can see kind of
in the bottom of this one. They do get um with heavy wind, they are wood, they are susceptible to
to cracking and breaking. Uh there are um uh with weed eaters and mowers, they do damage the signs
as well. We're putting uh concrete footings around all of the new signs. So, that makes it easier
for mowers uh in the the maintenance team. So, our vision is that these new signs will be
getting uh have less uh wear and tear on them and they'll have a much longer lifespan compared
to these wood ones which do routinely have to get replaced over time. Um they they just aren't as
as structurally sound. I have several questions, but Council Member Johnson has some. Thanks,
mayor. I was just going to say I appreciate the presentation. I really like these. Um when it was
installed, I think the first one was at Lynette Woodard. People loved seeing that and really
kind of gave a refresh. Not to overstep into another district, but I just wonder on the Kansas
Firefighter Memorial when you all get there, would there be entertainment of adding red to it
just for firefighters instead of the consistent blue and water stuff? Yeah, I I think we're still
kind of exploring funding exactly how that one I know we do have a mockup for that and I'm planning
to move forward with that sign. Uh but I don't know the full details exactly on funding just
yet. I know there's a couple of moving pieces on on that one and what the final design will look
like, but I do believe there will be red on that one. Awesome. Council member Ho Heisel. Thank you,
Mayor. Uh just a little background. I do believe red and black is the um the color outline for
that particular one. I think maybe the wording, whether it's black or white wording is yeah,
kind of where we're at. Um, also it appears that um that sign will be donated. Um, so we would not
have to have that in our um the CIP going forward. We're still in discussions with that. So, um, a
lot of good momentum there. Thank you. Several more questions. Um, so back to the cost. So, we're
about to approve $100,000 for 2025 park signage, but you're telling me that each sign is
roughly $4,000. So, what's the remainder? Uh, so once we get into the to the pools, we are
looking at the different sign types and evaluating the the exact size that we that is appropriate
for these. Uh, if funding allows, we will continue to go and work on Harrison Park and those numbers
listed to potential additional signage. the v the numbers that we received um for park signage uh
has varied. Um so what we've done in the past when we've bid this out is we've put out multiple park
signs um and and we bid them in different groups. So if they are accepted, we can accept pretty much
all the groups that we can fit into our funding amount. Um so we will do our best to get all of
these in. Um, I didn't want to say that we're going to be doing all of these signs when we don't
know when the bids come in yet because we bid them uh on a individual basis um to each uh contractor.
So, um it allows us to get our bang for our buck because we're doing as many signs as we possibly
can, but knowing that uh the funding kind of changes around, especially given that they're all
metal, that changes a little bit. We know that we'll be able to do all of the the pool signs. Um,
and hopefully we'll be able to do those additional signs, but I don't know if we're going to be able
to get to all of them. Okay. So, technically, because the way that this screenshet reads, it
makes it sound like a $100,000 is for four pool signs. However, if there are remaining dollars
within the $100,000, you'll be able to also help out with possibly up to six, but I just heard that
the sixth one actually is going to be donated, so really five. So, my question uh really goes
back to it's $100,000 for up to is it nine parks, nine locations? Is that accurate? Um yes. Yes.
I mean, if we get great bids, we can always go back out and put out more and try to, you know, do
more. Right now, we've seen when we've done bids, we've seen uh pricing kind of all over the place.
Um, we luckily we had a vendor out of New Jersey of all places bid on a project and was a low bid
for the 2024 signs. Now, I don't know if they're going to bid on the next one. Um, and prices
may change and we don't know who exactly is going to bid on the projects. Uh, but I think
nine is is probably our our target. But again, with funding kind of bouncing around and
not knowing who's bidding on a project, um it does kind of open us up to not knowing
exactly how much we're able to get done. So again, just so that community understands, we're about
to approve $100,000 for up to nine signs. Sure. So that it doesn't because the way that the green
sheet again looks like it's it shows $100,000 for four specific pool signs. So that it does come
down to $25,000 each. So it's very um inaccurate. Um so I I think again I would encourage staff
to share this portion within the green sheet. So again when community understands $100,000 is
not being divided up by four signs but rather up to nine signs. It makes it more reasonable of
how much a sign actually costs. Sure. Just again for community and transparency sake. Um the other
question I had was about QR codes since these are uh panels versus these wood signs. Um and
that's I think one of the reasons that um you guys are having consistent signage look
is so that people understand that the city of Witchaw maintains these. Has a QR code ever been
considered? Um no I don't think so. We have kiosks that we have uh throughout our parks. Um those
are a little bit more appropriate for QR codes uh rather than I think these signs are more for um uh
vehicular wayfinding. Uh I mean they do help with pedestrian and bicyclists. Um but didn't really
want to encourage uh QR codes on more traffic signage. We do have QR codes throughout our parks
on smaller kiosk signs uh and we do use those. One great example of that is uh at LW Clap Park at the
playground. Uh we have um a uh panel that is used for the playground to help with uh uh individuals
that are um that have uh commun challenges in communication. Uh so there's a communication panel
board there uh that we do use QR codes for. So uh we do use them throughout the park, but probably
won't be on this project. you go back to slide 73 um and you brought up something that is of concern
to me and to this council which is vandalism. Can you address um since moving to these new signs um
have we had vandalism? if not uh which is great. Um what has deterred that vandalism? Because it is
a cost to community and I think oftentimes we just talk about the vandalism and then move on from it
and we clean it up but it is a cost to not only staff time but resources and it also goes back
to I think the three ordinances that we talked about earlier today about taking some personal
responsibility and your actions have consequences. Can you talk about vandalism and what we have done
to try to curb vandalism on especially on signs? Sure. Yeah. I think changing to uh materials
that are that are more appropriate and used with uh the uh graffiti removal um um material. That's
something that we've done on even signs and even other materials about not there are certain
uh coatings and materials that work well with uh graffiti removal. Uh so on our projects, we
we'll look through uh let's say it's a retaining wall. We'll make sure that the coating on the
retaining wall um doesn't allow for uh let's say spray paint to be absorbed into it and allows for
easy graffiti removal. That's the same thing that we're doing here on these signs is that it allows
it um the graffiti removal um uh chemicals to not eat into the into the material. Uh, I don't
know if I have I don't have exact numbers on um replacement or on uh maintenance. I do know
that when I've talked with maintenance staff that routinely there's been when I'd ask like hey
what are you guys doing this week or what's on your what's on your list? I've routinely hear that
replacing a sign at this park replacing a sign at this park and those are those wood signs. I have
yet to hear that I've never been told that we had to replace uh one of these metal signs. So, uh I
think that's great because that's allowing more staff time to do maintain other things. And again,
uh in terms of vandalism, in terms of graffiti, uh this is just a much easier thing to to
maintain. I think if you drive around, um businesses around town, a lot of them have these
metal signs, and I think you'll probably see that uh many of them don't have vandalism or they they
uh are easily or quickly removed simply because it's easier chemically to remove them. Thank you
again. Um maybe this is a question for law. How um have we prosecuted vandalism cases regarding
um sign vandalism or even just park vandalism? I haven't heard directly of any cases recently.
I can get that information for you. Of course, depending on the dollar cost damage,
they might be charged as felonies and go to district courts. So, we could
find out that as well. parks may know if we've gone to court on any. I don't
know if they have any memory, but yeah. So, part of the challenge that we've had
as well is uh being able to identify who those individuals are. So, with the changes
to the ordinance to be able to tie it back to vehicles or either to trailers if they're
there on site makes it more enforceable for us. But we do track all of the uh the
graffiti that we report. It's on the same uh uh dashboard that has the homeless
encampment along with any illegal dumping. It shows each location what the staff hours
and what the cost is that's associated with it that's forward facing for the community to
view. And you'll notice on the signage here, we try to put them in common places where it's
visible for the community as well as putting lighting there in the area so it's not a dark
area. People can go and do it and not be noticed. Yes. So, part of what we're doing as well, we're
starting to look at installing cameras at some of those locations as well so that we can have
them covered that's there. And we work with WPD and do the SEPTED to make sure that we can
capture all of those areas so that it's visible for them to be able to look at when they have the
uh real-time information system as well. And one of the locations that we've had some challenges
with is uh one of our community facilities that we have uh worked in getting cameras to cover
that area where we've seen a lot of that over at Kuanas. So that's another location that we're
moving with uh putting additional cameras as well. Thank you, Reggie, and thank you
to the park staff because again, I wanted to make mention that anytime vandalism
happens, uh, it is being tracked on the dashboard, but it does take away time for staff to do
other important work within the park system. And so I appreciate that you guys um are looking
at these types of signs that are easier to clean um but also and to maintain so that you the
staff can work on things that are even more important within the park system. Thank you. I
see no further questions. We'll open it up for public comment. I see none. I'll bring it back
to the bench. And again, this uh the four pools are in district 4, district 5, district 1, and
district 6. Council member Johnson. Thanks, Mayor. I just wanted to suggest city hall needs one,
too. That one on central is a little outdated. With that, I will move that the
city council initiate the project, adopt the resolution, and authorize the
necessary signatures. Second. Motion and a second. Any further discussion? I see
none. Madame clerk, please open the role. Motion passes 70. Madame clerk,
please call the next item. Council member appointments and
comments. [Music] We'll start with appointments. Council member Hoheisle. Thank you, Mayor. I would like to nominate Cole Schneers
to the affordable housing review board. Any other appointments? I see none. I move
to approve that appointment. Second. Motion and a second. Any further discussion? I see
none. Madame clerk, please open the role. Motion passes 70. Council members comments.
Council member Ho Heisel. Thank you, Mayor. Uh just a couple things real quick. The
meal art Grand View neighborhood associations have been moved to Hope Church. Uh same times
as usual. I'd like to thank Pastor Bon for his years of service and letting us use his church.
He really is a true servant to the community. And I'm going to miss seeing him twice a month. Um
also uh special thanks to Garrett Foster. He is um a friend of mine and he is now the chair
of the bicycle board. So he's a good dude as well. So congrats Garrett. [Music] Council member
Tuttle. Thank you. I just have a few things. One was an update. Um last week on my travel request,
we had delayed it until this week, but I requested through the city clerk and the manager that it be
next week. We're still trying to make my travel arrangements through them, so it's a little bit
more complicated than we thought. So, I don't have the exact cost quite yet, but it'll be next week.
I also wanted to mention again um that September 2025 is National Library Card Signup Month. We
had some great chat about Rockwell and how great um the um opening was for that branch yesterday.
Thank you again to Council Member Johnson for sharing Rockwell with me. Always appreciate it.
But if you haven't got your library card or you want to get an updated library card, please
make sure that you do that. And then finally, I just wanted to give a shout out. I mentioned
it at agenda review on Friday. The um protecting Witchah Firefighters Initiative received the
Kansas Hospital Association Visionary Ward on Friday and was honored to be a part of the team
with Chief Snow with our Witchaw Fire Department President Bush with the um IFFF135 and then also
with our friends at Ascension Via Christi. And this Thursday at the Witchah Business Journal
Awards ceremony, we will be receiving a healthc care hero award. So again, we'll be there with
Chief Snow, President Bush, and our friends from Ascension Via Christie who have been instrumental
in making this initiative happen. So lots of kudos and recognition, and our goal is just that the
firefighters in our community know that we care about them and we're trying to protect them like
they protect us. So thank you. Any other council members? I will just uh say thank you to uh
public works director Gary Jansen. He held uh two uh meetings. One for wholesale co
customers and yesterday he held a town hall uh with anyone interested uh regarding the water
schedule that will begin on September 15th. And so again, thank you to Gary for hosting those
two meetings uh at the request of this council uh during that vote. So again, I appreciate
uh his time and his team's time. With that, we cannot leave yet. Um I have to move an item. I
move that the city council recess into executive session for 15 minutes to receive information
on three actions pursuant to KSA 75-4319B2 for legal consultation with the city attorney
which would be deemed privileged in the attorney client relationship pending litigation and legal
advice. I think the executive session is required to protect attorney client privilege and the
public interest. The executive session will begin at 11:10 and end at 11:25. Second. Excuse
me, mayor. I am so sorry. Um, there is an error on the the document provided to you. You read it
correctly, but instead of three actions, it should be receive information on an action. So they're
just one if that could be um just reflected in your motion on an action. Okay. So the executive
session will begin at 11:10 a.m. and end at 11:25 uh regarding one action. The meeting will resume
in the council chambers. Thank you. Second motion and a second. Any further discussion? I see
none. Madame clerk, please open the role. Motion passes. 70. We'll uh
begin at 11:10. Thank you.