Planning & Zoning Meeting 2-25-26
No description available.
the camera. I died There you go. Somebody was messing with my computer last night. It was like I'll blame Zagby for that. >> Okay, ready to go. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the city of Halier Planning and Zoning Board meeting for Wednesday, February 25th, 2026. Everyone, please rise for the invocation and the pledge of allegiance. Lord, we thank you for this opportunity that you have granted us here tonight. We ask that you please watch over us, enlighten us, give us the right uh put us in the right frame of mind so that we can make the right decisions for all those involved. Amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. May be seated. Meeting guidelines. The following guidelines apply to today's planning and zoning board meeting. Any person interested in making comments or posing questions on any item on the agenda may do so during the meeting. Individuals should be respectful of the planning and zoning board members and make every effort to speak with moderate tone using appropriate language and avoiding personal attacks. The public can view the planning and zoning board meeting on the city's YouTube page. All lobbyists must register with the planning and zoning board prior to item being heard. A maximum of four speakers in favor and four speakers in opposition will be allowed to address the planning and zoning board on any item. Each speaker's comments will be limited to three minutes. Item number one, roll call. Mr. Perez >> here. >> Mr. Mason >> here. >> Mr. >> here. >> Mr. Kabahal >> present. >> Mr. W >> is absent. Mr. Morales >> here. >> Mrs. Arriquez >> here. We have a quorum. >> We still have no Adonis. >> No, not yet. Item number two, approval of planning and zoning board summary agenda of February 11th, 2026 as submitted. Motion to approve. >> Second that motion. >> We had a motion by Mrs. Enrique. Second by Mr. Allesia. Mr. Mason. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Mr. Kbahanal. >> Yes. >> Mr. Mr. Morales. >> Yes. >> Mrs. Enriquez. >> Yes. >> Mr. Perez. >> Yes. >> Item has been approved. >> Administration of all tool applicants and anyone who will be speaking before the board on any item. >> All right. Anyone and everyone that's going to speak in front of the board, please stand. Raise your right hand so we can swear you in. >> Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth before this board? We >> we >> we >> Oh, I let the record show that Frank did a a wee on the on the swearing in. So, Re was it was on the affirmative. So, thank you Frank. >> A reading the session and resolution will be prepared and presented for review to the city council. The city council is authorized to affirm for conditions to override the decision by resolution. After the resolution is adopted, contact a member of the city cler's office to obtain a copy of the final decision and resolution. Upon your receipt of the final decision or resolution, contact the building department to obtain your required building permits. Summary minutes or a copy of the audio file of the proceedings before the planning and zoning board shall be prepared and submitted to the city council before its hearing. The planning and zoning board recommendations for the following public hearing request will be heard by the city council is scheduled meeting of Tuesday March 24th 2026. Item number three final decision to allow a rear seak of 1030 ft where 20 ft are required for the legalization of an in addition to the main residence properties located at 190 West 53rd Street High one one family district. Applicant Frank De Laass on behalf of Pedro Gonzalez and Somara Gonzalez. Frank Damon Andress >> microphone >> Frank Deaz 11,000 Southwest 104 Street Miami Floyd on behalf of Mr. Gonzalez and we do agree with the planner's recommendation and we wave the right to listen to it unless she's forced to read it. >> It has to go on the record >> to go into the record. >> All right. I I will speed it up. The property in this application is located at the intersection of West 53rd Street and West 2nd Avenue. The lot is approximately 13,500 square feet or 31 acres. The property is designated as low density residential on the city's future land use map. The stunning classification is R1 one family district which is consistent there. A review of the city microfilms records indicate that the property was origin originally improved with a 2,183 square foot one-story single family home constructed in 1948, but no records were found to demonstrate the original layout of the residence. Records further indicate that a bedroom addition was constructed under building permit number 1955-29264 and that a chain link fence was installed under building permit number 1997-493. A building permit was issued under building permit number 2012-3201 which legalized a previously unpermitted addition that included the relocation of a kitchen and a laundry area and the expansion of the existing office room. The permit also this permit also approved a 17t x 12t shed. The approved plans associated with permit number 20 2012-3201 depicted a second kitchen subject to approval to an extended family living quarters EFLQ application. Such application has not been approved and or renewed since then. An additional building permit was issued under permit number 2017-6818, but its current status shows as expired. Most recently, windows and doors were replaced under building permit number 2019-664 and solar panels were installed under building permit number EL-015848-2024. In September 2025, the property owner was issued a building without a permit violation under case number BWOP-004225-2025 for an addition constructed along the southern side of the residence. The addition consists of a bedroom, bathroom, and open terrace. Upon review, it was determined that the addition encroaches into the required rear setback by providing 1030 ft where 20 ft are required. As a result, the owner representative submitted a final decision application and the and the request is now before the board for consideration. During review of the submitted floor plan in comparison with the plans approved under permit number 2012-3201, staff identified several discrepancies. Modifications include an addition of a master bedroom, a master bathroom, conversion of the existing office into bedroom number one with the addition of a bathroom and walk-in closet. Alterations to the former sitting area previously approved as a bedroom. for configuration of the master bedroom to include an uncovered terrace and the construction of bedroom number three in bathroom number three a walk-in closet then bar area in the north side terrace and a porc alteration were previously approved under building permit number 2017-6818 however the building permit was never finalized and has since expired according to the building department records as such a new building permit application would be required to finalize and legalize improvements additional and extended family living waters EFLQ you region unless it is removed. A staff has also advised the property owner and the owner's representative that the existing dura fence located along the northern property lines does not comply with the required visibility standards. The applicant has agreed to remove the existing fence and replace it with an aluminum fence providing a minimum of 75% visibility and has submitted details demonstrating compliance. Review of the submitted survey and side plan demonstrate that the resident complies with the front the required front street side and interior east side setbacks. The site also complies with the minimum 30% pvious area 19% of per areas which exceed the minimum requirements. Staff finds that the request may be approved as it's necessary to legalize existing additions and alterations. The reduced rear setback um is a minor and does not is is minor and does not create negative impacts on the adjacent property as the structure does not obstruct light air flow or visibility and remains fully within the property boundaries. Approval of this request will allow the property owner to bring the resident into compliance through the building permitting process and the zoning approvals while maintaining compatibility with the surrounding single family residential neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the request subject to the following conditions. One, the applicant shall apply for and obtain all required building permits to legalize the existing bedroom, bathroom, open terrace addition, as well as any additional interior or exterior modification identified during start review in order to resolve the outstanding code violation. And number two, building permit number 2017-6818 has expired. Therefore, a new building permit application shall be submitted as determined by the building department and all required approvals and inspections including final inspection shall be obtained and completed. And number three, the approved rear setback reduction of to 10.3 ft shall apply solidly to the existing addition as depicted on the plans review and approved by staff. No further encroachment into the required rear setback shall be permitted and for the terrace to be legalized shall remain open and all sides and shall not be enclosed, screened or converted into a habitable space unless approved through an appropriate zoning review and building permitting process. And five, the all utility sheds, aluminum roofs, a structure depicted on the submitted plan shall be demolished and removed from the property. And number six, no additional expansion, enclosure, modification or extension of the existing addition or terra shall occur without private prior approvals through the sewing and building permit process and the existing dura fence located along the north property line shall be removed and replaced with a fence providing a minimum 75% visibility consistent with the city of Hayelia ordinance and the fence details submitted to staff and aid. The second kitchen located within the pantry area shall be removed prior to the final inspection of the building permit issued to legalize the addition unless the applicant obtained retroactive approvals of an extended family living quarters EFLQ application and secured all required building permits including completion of the final inespections and um all development shall be consistent with the plans prepared and signed by Jose Martinez PE dated December 15, 2025 and review and approved by ESA as part of the final decision application recommendation approval. with conditions. >> Thank you. You can breathe now. >> Oh no, >> we agree with the sensation. Uh this is one of those original houses and they my voice is so low. I'm sorry. Apologize. This is one of the original lots in Ula. Uh it's 100 by 138. Uh since it was originally built uh some of the uh improvement have been done facing the avenue considering the frontage on the avenue otherwise considering the street the frontage and once and for all is going to be determined that the legal and from now on the frontage will be the north side. That's why the legally constructed fence have to be modified. So instead of asking for variances for the side, we're asking for the rear. But we agree with everything that she said and everything that she's asked will be in compliance uh before final inspection. Any questions? >> Very well. Comments or questions from the board? >> Anyone in the audience? Okay. Was the pleasure of the board? Motion to approve with conditions. >> Second the motion with conditions. >> We had a motion from Mrs. Enriquez. Second by Mr. Mr. Mason. >> Yes. >> Mr. Enriquez. >> Yes. >> Mr. Perez. >> Yes. >> Mr. Morales. >> Yes. >> Mr. Kabahans. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Item has been approved with conditions. >> Thank you very much. >> All right. The planning and zoning board recommendations for the following for the following public hearing request will be heard by the city council at a scheduled meeting of Tuesday March 10th, 2026. Item number four, reszoning property from C1 restricted retail commercial district to R2 one and two family residential district. Varian's permit to allow the construction of a duplex on a sub standard lot having a lot width of 50 feet where 75 ft are required to allow total lock area of 6,550 ft where 7,500 ft are required and to allow a lot coverage of 32.5% with 30% is the maximum lot coverage allowed. Properties located at 2334 West 4th Court Helio Zone 31 Restricted Retal Commercial District. Applicant Francisco Himenez on behalf of Layered Properties 2334 LLC. >> Thank you. >> Good afternoon. Francisco Himenez, address 11225 Northwest 62nd Avenue, Halia, Florida 33012. >> Thank you, sir. The property in this application is located on the west side of West 4th Court between West 23rd Street and West 25th Street within the Semola neighborhood in the city of Hyalia. The lot is the second parcel from West 23rd Street and contains approximately 6,550 square ft or 15 acres. According to Miami Day County property appraisal records, the property was originally platted in 1924 as a 50 foot wide by 131 foot deep lot under plat book number 9 page 154 and has remained vacant since that time. The site is designated as low density residential on the city's future land use map and is currently zone C1 restricted retail commercial district which is not consistent with the future land use designation. Therefore, this application seeks to address and resolve the that in inconsistency. The surrounding land use designation and zoning applications are as follows. to the north lowdensity residential, medium density residential and major institutions zone C1, R2, one two family residential districts and R33 multif family district to the east low density residential, highdensity residential and create and recreation open space C1, R3 and C2 liberal retail commercial districts to the south high density residential and commercial C2 R3 and R34 and to the west medium designate resident idential son R33. The applicant is before the city requesting a reszoning of the subject property from C1 to R2 in order to allow the construction of a duplex on a substandard lot. In addition, the applicant is requesting variances to permit a lot width of 50 ft where 75 ft are required, a lot area of 6,550 ft where 7,500 ft are required, and a lot coverage of 32.5% where a maximum L coverage of 30% is permitted. According to the submitted plans, the proposed project consists of a two-story duplex building. Each unit will contain an approximately living area of 2,124 square ft and will be uh designed with three bedrooms and two bathrooms. Each unit will include a covered terrace located at the rear of the building. The project proposes a minimum of four off streetet parking spaces thereby meeting the minimum parking requirements and complies with all the required setbacks. Additionally, the plans indicates a total pvious area of 2,284 square ft which is the 35% which exceeds the minimum require of 30% pvious area contributing to improved side drainage and enhancing the overall aesthetic and environmental quality of the property. Um, however, the site plan does not depict the required two ft of drainage separation on the north and south sides of the proposed driveway as required by the city of Helia code of ordinance. Therefore, staff advised that the site plan must be revised to show compliance with the two feet uh drainage separation requirement and to clearly depict an any rightway improvements or modifications to the existing sidewalk within the public right away to accommodate driveway access in accordance with city standards. The requested reszoning from C1 to R2 will bring the subject property into consistency with the city's future land use map and allowed um for residential use that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood which include a mix of one and two family and multif family residential development. Approval of the resial will facilitate the appropriate development of a long vacant infield lot in a matter that supports elderly growth and is consistent with established uh residential character of the area. With respect to the requested variances, the property has been platted has been platted prior to the adoption of the current minimum lot width and lot area requirements for the R2 sunning classification and is therefore considered substandard in size. The proposal also seeks approval of total low coverage of 32.5% where 30% is the maximum permitted. Staff does not consider this minor increase in lo coverage to result in any negative impacts on surrounded properties. The proposed duplex includes a slightly larger building footprint to accommodate additional bedrooms there, thereby providing additional housing opportunities while remaining compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The proposal was submitted to Miami Day County Public School concurrency management system to ensure the adequate school capacity is available to serve the student generated by the proposed residential development and it was determined that the project will have no impact on the school capacity. EST staff received an email from the department of public works advising that the sanitary sewer pump station serving the subject property is currently under temporary moratorum. Public works further indicates that no sanitary sewer allocation is permitted at this time unless the the previous and proposed uses generate the same level of sanitary sewer demand. As a result, final site plan and concurrency approval as well as issuance of a building permits and certificate of occupancy shall be contingent upon the lifting of the moratorum or written confirmation from the department of public works that adequate sanitary sewer capacity is available to serve the proposed development. Water and sewer and a utilities impacts will be further evaluated during the site plan and concurrency review process. Based on the applicant request, the staff recommends approval with the followable conditions that the site is developed according to plans digitally signed by Adil Valdez AR dated February 6, 2026. Submit two sets of architectural plans to the planning and zoning department to initiate site plan and concurrency review subject to the hearing approval and site plan must be revised to show the two feet of drainage separation to the north and south sides of the driveway as required by city of Helia code of ordinance and rightway improvements must be shown site during the site plan and concurrency review process and that the applicant obtain approval from the street department for the modification of the existing sidewalk within the public rideway to accommodate access in accordance to city standards and final site and approval building permits and certificate of occupancy shall be contingent upon written confirmation from the department of public works that adequate sanitary sewer capacities available and then no sewer location shall be permitted during the Palm station moratorium unless the proposed development results in no net increase in sanitary sewer demand recommendation staff recommends approval with the conditions >> did you understand that >> actually I was reading as I along I was doing good >> comments or questions >> no we're good with all the recommendations Okay. You're going to demolish that existing building and build new or >> There's nothing on there right now. There's It's a vacant lot. So, you're going to build new. Correct. >> Good deal. How much questions from the board? >> Through the chair? >> Yes. >> Are these for rent or for sale? >> We haven't gotten there yet. >> Okay. All right. Thanks. >> Seola is a historical area, so it is. It is. Are there any uh restrictions as to um I know it's an empty lot but any historical uh um the architectural designs that they had to follow or just >> No, we don't have standards. >> Okay. Any comments or questions from the board? Anyone in the audience? Right. Was the pleasure to motion to approve with conditions? >> Second. Okay. With conditions. >> We have a motion by Mrs. Enriquez and a second by Mr. Morales. >> Mr. Allesias. >> Yes. >> Mr. Mason. >> Yes. >> Mrs. Enrique. >> Yes. >> Mr. Perez. >> Yes. >> Mr. Morales. >> Yes. >> Mr. Gabah. >> Yes. >> The item has been approved with conditions. >> Thank you very much. Item number five, repeal and resend city of Halia ordinance number 2007-023 and release the existing declaration of restricted covenants recorded in official record book 25445 page 2153-2154. Conditional use permit to allow the operation of a vocational and technical school. Varian permit to allow 54 parking spaces where 121 parking spaces are required to allow 6.84% 84% perus area where 10% is the minimum required to allow partial wave of minimum landscape requirements through landscape mitigation as per section 98-2235 and to allow zero ft landscape buffer between off- streetet parking and the rightway on west 83rd uh street and west 84th street where a minimum of 7 ft landscape buffer is required. Properties located at 550 West 84th Street High M1 Industrial District. applicant Javier Raswis Esquire on behalf of Associated Builders and Contractors Florida East Coast Chapter Inc. >> Thank you. >> Good afternoon, Mr. Chair, board members, Jav Vasquez with law offices at 600 Bickl Avenue and um I'll wait to the planner. >> This property is located on the northern boundary of the city limits fronting West 84th Street between West 4th Avenue and West 6th Avenue. The property consists of approximately 49,658 square feet or 1.14 acres and is improved with a warehouse originally developed in 1963 and later modified with appropriate building and zoning permits according to city records. The current land use designation is industrial and the zoning classification is M1 industrial district which is consistent with the land use designation. In 2007, the property requested a parking variance of 56 spaces as 131 spaces were required to operate a clinical testing medical research facility with no more than 120 beds. The variance was approved pursuant to city ordinance number 07-023 and a declaration of restricted covenant recorded in official records book 25445 pages 2153-2154. The property operated in this capacity until 2025 when operation ceased and the city uh business tax received was uh therefore the current application includes a request to repeal and resin city ordinance number 07-023 and to release the existing declaration um declaration restricted covenant regarding official records book 25445 pages 2153-2154. The property was recently sold to Associated Buildings and Contractors Florida East Coast Chapter Inc. which is submitting this application to request a conditional use permit to allow a vocational and technical school operation at the existing facility. The co the city code requires all vocationals and technical school to obtain a CUP to mitigate any potential extraordinary impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. In addition to the CUP request, the application include a parking variance as the property was originally de developed to meet parking requirements for industrial uses only. Under current parking requirements, the proposed uses requires 121 parking spaces. However, the application proposes to provide 54 parking spaces. The applicant submitted the ABC in institute apprenticeship college facility use and parking capacity schedule to demonstrate that the facility will operate within the available parking capacity. As described, classes are held Monday through Sunday except Fridays with a staggered two hours and three and a half and three and one half hour sessions beginning at 8:00 a.m. and ending at 10 p.m. The maximum estimated parking demand at any given time is 32 spaces. Additionally, the applicant stated that each class will have one instructor and that a maximum of two administrative staff members will be present on campus. A staff requested a parking analysis considering the current public transportation system, the proposed school operations and the standards of the institute of transportations engineer ID based on the report prepared and signed by Hawim Vargas PE of track tech engineering dated January 22nd, 2026. The analysis recommended that a minimum of 30 on-site parking spaces be provided to meet the needs of the proposed vocational school. If the applicant intends to partially mitigate the parking variance through reliance on the existing public transportation system, a staff recommends that a proper pedestrian connection to the public sidewalk be installed as depicted on the submitted site plan. The application also requests a variance to allow a reduction and require pvious area and landscaping buffers. This request may be partially mitigated by the existing green swell area along West 84th Street. However, staff recommends that the swell be improved and protected with a curb and gutter system or other landscaping elements such as boulder to prevent vehicle vehicles from parking within the SW area as observed during city inspection conducted in February 2024, 2026. I'm sorry, February 24, 2026. A staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions to mitigate the parking and pvious area reduction. one that the applicant shall install a physical barrier to prevent vehicles from parking within the swell area along West 84th Street. Such barriers may be include a carbon gutter system or boulders installed along the edge of the private property. And two, that the student shall not park on any routway surrounding the school. And three, that the applicant shall require a declaration of restricted covenant limiting the use of the property to a vocational school and incorporating the ABC Institute apprenticeship college facility use and parking capacity schedule limiting to no more than two classes at any one time with the staggered class operations. And four, that the applicant shall obtain all required building permits for the site improvements reflected on the site plans within six months of the CUP and variance approval to ensure compliance with improvements and conditions outlined above. Staff recommends approval for the CUP on variances subject to the stipulated conditions. >> Thank you, Claudia. Abby. >> Thank you, Mr. Chair, and good evening once again, board members. I'm very happy to see my good friend Tony Resio here, a very, very capable uh municipal attorney helping this board. So, once again, Jav Vasquez with the Gunster Law Firm at 600 Brickl Avenue, and I'm here on behalf of Associated Builders and Contractors Florida East Coast uh chapter. Uh got a few people joining me tonight. My associate Janelli Perez, Mr. Hain Vargas, our traffic consultant. Uh John Carter who is here on behalf of the ownership and Mr. Herman Au who's our architect. This uh this this application and it's critical that this board understand this seems like a lot seems like there's a big stack of requests before the board and there are and a lot of it is just clean up because this is an existing building. A lot of this would be really ugly if this was vacant land with all these variances. This is an existing building located at 550 West 84th Street. And the several requests, and I don't want to be repetitive, just include the conditional use uh permit for of a vocational school. Um, as Claudia mentioned, the 2007 approval was for a clinical and testing medical research facility. I'll get into that in a minute. They had a a huge parking variance back then because of the size of the building and the type of use, but we're cleaning all of that up with a conditional use um for the proposed vocational school. Uh there are variances pertaining to pvious area, a landscape uh landscape buffer requirements. Um and as you heard, there's a parking variance uh to allow 54 parking spaces where 121 parking spaces are required. Now, it's important to highlight that in 2007, there was an ordinance which approved an even more significant parking variance to allow 56 parking spaces where 131 spaces were required. Like I said, existing building, we have what we have to deal with, but we've done a lot of things to mitigate the requests. Our conditional use permit also triggers the need to repeal and resin the 2007 ordinance and the uh declaration of restrictions that was recorded back then. And like I said, we do have mitigating factors that have been considered which is why staff and and this application comes before you with a recommendation of approval from your professional planning staff. One of them has to do with our proximity to two bus stops uh both being within 300 ft of the property and the proposed vocational school. school and this will hopefully encourage students to arrive via public transportation. Now, it's important to note that even though Hy Aliyah does not offer required parking reductions based on proximity to public transit, uh most jurisdictions do. Miami date county for example would be offering a 40% parking reduction on this application based on the proximity that we have to bus shelters like the two that I've pointed out. We also have a staggered programming of classes. Uh as mentioned by your planner, a uh facility use and parking capacity schedule was submitted to demonstrate that the facility will operate well within the available parking capacity. And then separate from our parking capacity schedule, staff requested a parking analysis which was prepared by traffic which is represented here tonight by Mr. of Vargas. Mr. Vargas, uh, his analysis recommends that a minimum of 30 on-site parking spaces be provided to meet the needs of the proposed vocational school. The existing 54 spaces will more than satisfy the parking requirements. Um, additional improvements. Staff is uh recommending approval of this application subject to certain conditions. I've been talking to Claudia about the conditions. We are in agreement with all of the conditions. Uh we have prepared a first draft of a declaration of restrictions for the use limiting the the vocational school use uh to the property or limiting the property to a vocational school and the conditional use that's being approved. Claudia has recommended other things like a physical barrier to prevent vehicles uh that students shall not park on any uh of the rideways. And I've mentioned that and again this goes to Mr. Preio and I'm going to be talking to to Claudia between now and when when this goes to council. When I read this staff report, I saw that the applicant shall record a covenant limiting the use of the property to a vocational school. And I prepared the covenant as it relates to that um with a thinking that the first two conditions were going to be conditions of the approval down the road. If Claudia prefers that those all be in the covenant, we will be happy to do so. I prefer that they they be conditions and then the covenant can limit the use, if you will. We can talk about that and if at the end you're more comfortable, I'm going to follow your your take your lead. I think it's going to be cleaner based on how I'm saying it, but we can talk about that and uh by the time we get to covenant to council, this will be more than cleaned up. Having said that, like I said, I did submit a a draft of the uh declaration of restrictions. by the time we go to covenant, not only will that be cleaned up, we will also have an opinion of title in place. So, with that, I will respectfully close. I will request that you forward a recommendation of approval like that of your planning staff so that the council can hopefully approve this and so that this vocational school can start serving Halia. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, Mr. Vasquez. Questions? >> I I have a couple, Mr. Chairman. >> Go ahead. Um, Mr. Vasquez, I just have a question regarding how many students will be attending the school and how many faculty because I do see um as exhibit A, you got an estimated occupied parking spaces um per class and per class time. And so the >> do you have a the traffic tech report, >> the the traffic analysis because attached to it >> Yeah. attached to it there's a planned staggered classes schedule and that answers your question hour by hour as to the number of students. If you look at that schedule the highest number of estimated occupied parking spaces is 32 and we have 54. >> Okay, that's pretty much all I add. >> Okay. >> Okay. Anyone else? This is one of those where the variance sounds terrible, but based on the use, based on the staggered schedule, and being that it's an existing building, I think everybody feels better about it. >> And this is for a vocational school. >> Exactly. >> Obviously, grown-ups that have to drive there or ride the bus, >> hopefully using transit facilities as well. Okay. Correct. Are we good? >> Yeah. >> Okay. Anyone else? Anyone in the audience have a comment or question? All right. Closes part of public hearing. Was a pleasure of the board. >> Motion to approve with conditions. >> Second. A motion with conditions. >> Okay. We had a motion by Mrs. Seras. Second by Mr. Gllesias. Mr. Carbaj. >> Yes. >> Mr. Allesius. Yes. >> Mrs. Enriquez. >> Yes. >> Mr. Mason. >> Yes. >> Mr. Perez. >> Yes. >> Mr. Morales. >> Yes. >> Item has been approved with conditions. >> Thank you so much. I think I heard you say the 24th. >> This one is actually uh March 10th. >> First reading. >> First reading. March 10th. Second reading. March 24th. >> One second. >> Scheduling conflict there. >> By the way, I just became a grandfather. Okay. >> Oh, congrats. Congratulations. I was wondering where the hair went. >> Give me one second. I'm that guy that's showing everybody the pictures. Hi, the city council ABC first reading on the Thank you so much. >> You're welcome. >> Have a good night. >> Good night. >> Thank you. You too. >> Take care. Congratulations, friend. >> Miscellane items now requiring advertising. Item number six, old business. Okay. No old business. Item number seven, new business. Any new business, >> Mr. Chair? So, I just want to introduce Mr. Tony Ron Reio. I'm sorry if you want to do an introduction for now. He's going to be our special counsel for the planning and sonic board. >> Thank you, Claudia. And it's very nice to meet all of you and and I look forward to working with you and and getting through these agendas. >> Absolutely. Any questions that you have, please feel free to anytime. >> You will be you will find that we're we're a fun group. >> Great. Excellent. >> I like I like a fun group. >> We're a fun group. We're not know-it-alls. We do rely on the expertise of staff and legal. And you have a very good staff. So, >> yeah. Absolutely. Thank you. Well, welcome aboard. >> Great. Thank you so much. >> Anything else? >> All righty. In is a journ.