Wichita City Council Meeting July 15, 2025
No description available.
Good morning, Witchah, and thank you all for
joining us. I'd like to invite Pastor Pam Mason of St. Paul African Methodist Episcopal
Church to the podium to say the prayer. Let us pray. This morning, Lord, we gather
at the seat of the city council meeting for today's session. We pray for each person present
viewing virtually and their families. Lord, we pray for every employee of the city and their
family. We pray for the health and well-being of every person who says ICT is their home. Our
hearts acknowledge those who are experiencing loss and traumatic circumstances all around us
and globally. Our hearts are heavy in this time of uncertainty. We need you, your guidance, and
we need each other. As they lead us by example, we pray that each each council person's
countenance exemplifies integrity. May we witness the continued establishment
and reinforcement of viable policies and procedures and resources. May they be ongoing
dialogue that values and considers all sides. May leadership speak up and speak clearly for
justice. May they have the eyes and the ears to hear and to respond to the cries
of the people who reside in Witchah. May they implement change at all levels for the
betterment of our city and all communities. Lord, may the dialogue address the urgent needs of
ICT, senior care, mental health, homelessness, affordable housing, unsafe environments, education
disparity, unemployment, and environmental challenges. the fiscal impact on each household
and every business and the value of humankind. Let there be Lord productive intern inter interaction
with the city council which displays leadership working together for the common goal of our city
and every community therein. May wisdom prevail in decision making and deliberation. Lord, we love
our city. We are expecting great things and we cannot remain silent. We acknowledge the work that
has been done yet there is so much undone. Let us grasp the opportunity. May each person that serves
serves to be agents of change. Facing realities, answering the difficult questions, admitting
not knowing, being present in the now, creating a momentum and environment for
change. As movement occurs collaboratively, may we face each moment with hope and clear
understanding that all humankind matters. Bless this meeting on today, all those presents as
well as the lives of those who will that we will encounter afterwards. Prepare each of us to make
every moment count in the name of Jesus. Amen. Please stand for the pledge of allegiance. United States of America and
to the republic for it stands one nation under God indivisible
with liberty and justice for all. Thank you, Pastor Mason. We'll note that the mayor is in New York City
at a conference for uh government officials and we wish her luck there. She'll
be joining us later for a short time. Is there anyone who would like to uh any
corrections to the uh minutes? Do you need to read that first, Paul? Hey, go ahead.
Approve the minutes of regular meeting July 8, 2025. Okay. Now, does any council member
have any corrections? Uh, seeing none, I move we approve the minutes
of the regular meeting July 8th, 2025. Second. There's been a motion and a
second. Clerk, will you please pull up the vote? Motion carries. 6. Clerk. Mr. Clerk, please. The next item, proclamations. The proclamations this week
are Park and Recreation Month, ASeez WA, Witchah Month of Service, and the anniversary
of the Americans with Disabilities Act before we do this proclamation. Come
on. I come on parks and recite come up. But I believe someone has a birthday today
and it's the our leader of uh Parks and Rex, Reggie Davidson. So if you'll indulge me, we are going to sing happy birthday to him. Okay, I'm gonna lead. I'm not going to sing. Happy birthday to you. Happy
birthday to you. Happy birthday dear to you, Reggie. I hope you have a wonderful,
wonderful day. Do a great job with parks and recrecks. Which leads us to
the proclamation for of city of Witchah found in 1870. Whereas parks and recreation
promote time spent in nature which positively impacts mental health by increasing cognitive
performance and well-being and alleviating illness such as depression, attention
deficit disorders and Alzheimer's. And whereas parks and recreation encourages
physical activity by providing space for sports, hiking, swimming, and other activities designed
to promote active lifestyles. Their programming and educational activities such as out of
school time programming and youth sports are critical to childhood childhood development.
And whereas parks and recreation increases a community's economic prosperity through increased
property values, expansion of the local tax base, increased tourism, the attraction and retention
of business and crime reduction. And whereas our parks and recreation areas ensure the
ecological beauty of our community and provide a place for all to connect with nature
and recreation and outdoors. And now therefore, be it resolved that the city Witchaw city
council does hereby proclaim July 2025 as park and recreation month in the city of Witchaw
encourage all citizens to recognize the benefits derived from parks and recreation resources
as an integral part of the Witchaw community. No better way to uh celebrate my birthday today
besides with this team here. So, just wanted to say that uh how important uh recreation is to our
community and just that recreation is essential. uh all of the hard work that this team does behind
us to make sure that we create safe spaces for our young people to be able to have opportunity
to be in areas where they can enjoy the nature, enjoy sports, and not have to worry about there
being other barriers that contribute to them not being safe. uh the hard work that they do from
our forestry team to our park maintenance team with supporting all of our special events that
we have, our golf division that puts on quality programs for our community and quality services
that their hard work doesn't go unnoticed and this is an opportunity to kind of spotlight what
they do and our mantra for our department is that teamwork win and we always work together to make
sure that we deliver a good quality product to the community. So want to give these guys a a hand of
applause here for all the hard work that they do. There you go. I would like to now invite Councilman
Hohheisle from the next proclamation. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Um, if I could have all
the the members of um, Aza Wild Az I'm sorry. Uh, you're not going to get any
singing out of me today, but um, if I can go ahead and just speak real quick. You're fired, Bob. If I could just speak real
quick about uh the great work that this group is doing in our community. Um they've been out
at a number of park cleanups here recently, including Clat Park where we had catastrophic
floods. Uh they took time out of work days to come up and actually help clean the park up.
So, uh my appreciation just goes out to them and um I have the privilege of being able to
read the proclamation here. Whereas Azas WOW, an international young adult worker volunteer
group that practices love and volunteer service in workplaces and communities around the world,
whose members actively participate in pertinent global issues with a sense of ownership and
is affiliated with and sponsored by the World Mission Society Church of God. Whereas Azis
Wow, Witchah has been carrying out various park cleanups across underserved and at risk Witchah
communities as part of the ASUS WOW green earth campaign and to fulfill UN sustainable development
grow goals. Whereas today is the first day of the month of July in 2025, ASUS WOW sponsored by
the World Mission Society Church of God in partnership with the city of Witchah and with
the full support of parks and recreation will kick off the Asus Wow Witchah month of service to
raise community awareness about climate change, inspire volunteer participation and community
support and promote their advocacy in various activities in July. Whereas ASUS WOW has been
globally recognized and awarded over 300 times across 22 countries, including being awarded the
US President's Volunteer Service Award three times as Wild Witchah has demonstrated a commitment to
protecting and beautifying the local environment through various parks cleanup since 2021. Now
therefore, be it resolved that the Witchah City Council does hereby proclaim July 2025 as AS as
usual Witchah month of service in the city of Witchah and encourage all to get involved
with and support ASUS WOW Witchah during the month of July as they continue to serve
communities in clean parks all over the city. Firstly, we would like to give thanks and praise
to God Elohim for allowing us to do good work in Witchita to spread God's love through our deeds.
We also like to thank Mayor Woo, council members Co Ho Hazel and Glass [ __ ] and the other city
council members Witchah Parks and Recreation, our community partners, our volunteers and the
entire city for supporting assess stands for save the earth from A to Z. We are one family and it
is an international young adult worker volunteer group for the World Mission Society Church of God
members and we are we started doing park cleanups in Witchah in 2017 and we are grateful to be
recognized by the city council and we are eager to spread our mission to all of Witchah, our state
and the world. We actively carry out volunteer services in over 175 countries as well as in every
state and we have a goal to become active all over Kansas in the upcoming year. We are determined
to clean every park in the city and to and do so while uniting with each other and community
leaders in order to say to share the love of a mother to all people and to fulfill the UN
sustainable development goals for the environment. We're excited to continue working in Witchah
and we we want to invite all of you guys to um our cleanup on Sunday, July 27th at 9:30 for a
cleanup at uh Dr. Glende Park in District 1. And we look forward to our continued partnership
with all our volunteer community leaders, park and recreation, and with the citizens
of Witchah. And we also want to invite um you guys to our multicultural experience
event we are hosting on July 20th at noon. Thank you. And we have one final message for
you. Okay. Ready? One. We love you. We love you. Thank you. I invite anybody from the next proclamation anniversary of Americans disob
disabilities to come forward. Good. Good to see you. McM proclamation of the city of Witchaw,
Kansas, founded in 1870. Whereas on July 26, 1990, President George HW Bush signed into
law the Americans with Disabilities Act, ADA, to ensure the civil rights. Whereas this
legislation established a comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of
discrimination against individuals with disabilities and the legislation has expanded
opportunities for disabled communities. Whereas the full promise of the ADA
will only be reached if we continue our efforts to ensure comparable housing,
transportation, communication, education, and employment opportunities for all disabled
people. Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Witchaw City Council does hereby proclaim July
26th, 2025 as the anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the city of Witchaw and
encourage all citizens to celebrate this day. Thank you. Thank you, Vice Mayor and council
members. Um, my colleagues and I are here as members of the Witchah Cedric County Access
Advisory Board. As a board, we thoughtfully make accessibility recommendations based on
our diverse experiences and areas of expertise. It is our sincere hope that disabled people may
fully participate in the great opportunities that Witchah offers and that the city may
also benefit from the contributions of people with disabilities. Thank you again
for honoring the anniversary of what has truly been lifechanging legislation and we look
forward to collaborating in the coming year. Of course. Yeah. Yes. Most certainly. need it. Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Will you please
call the next item? Public agenda. The public agenda allows for up to five speakers to
have five minutes each to address the council. No action will be taken relative to items on the
public agenda other than referral to the city manager for information as necessary. Speakers
will please state their name and address for the record. A time clock will display the speaker's
remaining time to speak. Order and rules of the quorum will be observed. The first speaker is
Lisa Veta on behalf of the Witchaw Cedric County Access Advisory Board with regards to a letter
we sent to Witchaw and Cedric County leadership. Don't have to get out of my scooter. This is
great. Uh, first of all, I want to say thank you for your uh, community leadership. My name is
Lisa Vada. I am representing the Witchaw Sedwick County Access Advisory Board. I reside at 14400
Eastport of Kings, Witchaw, Kansas in District 2, uh, Council Member Tuttles District. I did send
you all email copies and I hope that you were able to read them. If not, I do have physical
copies here. Our letter is a response to the Witchaw Eagle uh April 15th article involving
the $4.9 million project that is intended to make the downtown area of Witchaw more walkable.
However, our response actually extends to all projects in the city and the county that involve
transportation, roads and walkways, buildings, events, and meetings such as this. I will say
thank you because last week I presented to the Seduite County Commission and I could not even
get to the podium because it is not an accessible uh building. So, thank you for allowing uh this
meeting site to be accessible. Um, this includes not only our our our issues include not just the
audible pedestrian signals and consistent curb cutouts that we address in our letter, but
also entrances and exits, signage, and most importantly, communication for everyone, including
the group of people uh including the group of people with disabilities. Remember that anyone
can become a member of this wonderful group at any time in their lives in just a matter of seconds.
Also, keep in mind that as we all age, we're going to have impairments to our mobility, our vision,
our hearing, and our cognitive function. So, yippee. Um, we hope that you understand we're
probably not intentional. limiting the safe access uh conveys a sense that certain groups of
people are not wanted, needed, or valued in our community. So, if we ensure that our city and
county are accessible, it's going to ensure that our city and county continue to grow and thrive.
Local author Sarah Smarsh, who actually grew up here in Witchah for part of her childhood and
and even recent years, wrote in her book Bone of the Bone, that the division in America today
is not political. It's not red or blue. It's but what is between what is discussed in the powerful
rooms such as this and what is understood by those of us in the field. And I will tell you that
just getting here today is a challenge between walkways, going through security, uh getting in
and out of seats. It is it is a challenge for each of us. But as Lyn Manuel Miranda says in Hamilton,
I want to be in the room where it happens. So I'm making two requests. One is that you each look
at the Witchah Seduite County Access Advisory Board list of appointees and you make sure not
I guess not even for our board but for all your boards that all the positions are filled and that
there are no vacancies. Right now we have seven vacancies on our board alone. I also ask on behalf
of our advisory group that you read our minutes, communicate with your appointees, and consider
our input when making decisions to make our wonderful community more accessible. And please
do this sooner rather than later. Thank you. Thank you, Lisa. Appreciate it. I appreciate the
reminder about getting old, too, needing services. Mr. Clerk, responding speaker. Oh,
excuse me. We have several speakers. Uh, Councilman Glascott. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Um,
to the manager real fast. I know that a lot of our minutes have been uh started being included
in our consent packet. I don't remember seeing the access advisory board ones. They could, but
I know some of our other boards and commissions are included our consent packet. Uh, council
member, I'll let me take a look at that. Um it may because of the confusion because it reports
both to the council and the uh commission, but we'll go ahead and make sure that if those
haven't been going out regularly that they will. Okay. Thank you. I appreciate that. Thank you.
Uh city manager Leighton. Um uh Vice Mayor, if it's okay, I would like to deviate from our
normal process a little bit. Um I was I thought it was um appropriate to have a response. I think
it was we really appreciated Lisa sending it to us her correspondence from the access advisory
board early and I do think this import this is an important enough issue that if we could just
do a quick staff response it'll let you know the direction we like to go um in order to address
some of the concerns expressed by the board. Well, that'd be fine. Okay. Uh Gary Jansen is
gonna make the presentation. Gary Andrew, you'll have to see the microphone for a
while. All right. I'll let Dary go first. Uh, thank you, Andrew, and thank you, Lisa,
for your words. Um, mayor and vice mayor and council members Gary Jansen, public works and
utilities. I just want to start by saying that how much we value our relationship with the access
advisory board and the disabled community and and how we move forward. Uh we've accomplished a
lot over the last 20 years when it comes to uh accessibility related to public infrastructure.
Uh we've done a lot as far as from an investment perspective working with the advisory board,
working with the disabled community, but I but we always know we know that we can always do
better. Um, I think we've seen recently with some of the communication from the board. Uh, some
of the discussions in the community and the media, uh, you know, there's some changes at times. Uh,
Lisa talked about some vacancies on the board. One of the things we're always trying to help
with is to make sure that there are are good appointments to that board, try to keep positions
filled. There's been some changes there. We've seen some transitions in our staff over the years
uh, across a variety of departments. And I think probably at some point in time we may have created
a little bit of a disconnect. So this is a great opportunity for a fresh start uh and talked and
and the opportunity to talk about what we might do going forward. So I thought I might hit on a
few specifics just so you know what our plan looks like uh and about some upcoming discussions we're
going to have with the access advisory board and and a few specifics that recently came out of some
of this information. Um, so what we'd like to do, uh, specific to the downtown street conversions
is where a lot of this conversation started, but as Lisa said to, it's all projects, and I'll
talk about that in just a moment. Um, we want to spend some time, we're going to go downtown with
the committee from the advisory board, our staff, have some further discussion of accessibility and
necessary improvements. I think we've got a pretty good idea of what we need to do. Uh, but it would
be good to hear from them what they're seeing. uh very specifically so that we can make sure
that we're headed in the right on the right path. I think future projects will accommodate
most of the requests. I've started spending some time with staff these last few month uh
this last month, last few weeks in particular, re-evaluating where where we're at with our
projects, some of the things we are doing and we know that we aren't doing and we need to
change. uh but this on-site evaluation with the uh with the board to look at their concerns
including discussion of technical and resource limitations will be helpful. We do need to look at
optimizing what our finite resources. Uh there are some technical challenge when you work downtown
in the core area that we need to make sure everybody is talking about and understanding
what some of those challenges are. you know, even when you've got uh federal regulations and
guidelines, something we're all cognizant of, we are all aware of, this still always be is and
will be uh an adaptive discussion and approach to trying to make this work for everybody.
So, uh Lisa mentioned this part. We want to make sure that all major projects, multimmoal
transportation and public facility projects as well as anything that impacts road or sidewalk
closures and community events, those projects uh those types of things that are happening,
we presented to the board and we'll summarize specific ADA improvements and impacts. We've done
that in the past. I think we kind of strayed from that a little bit. Didn't always have I think the
best approach. didn't have the best communication on both sides and it might have gone a little bit
by the wayside. So, we'll get back to focusing on that. That's the easy part. It makes sense. It
helps us understand uh what the concerns and what the values are moving forward. Couple more quick
things I wanted to talk about. It's been a lot of talk about accessible pedestrian signals and I
won't go too far into the weeds and talk about a lot of details here, but uh it's something that
going forward with all new projects, anytime we put in a new signal uh significant upgrades to a
traffic signal, we will be installing accessible pedestrian signals. Uh what we'd like to do
on existing intersections, existing signals is to do an evaluation of specific areas. uh talk
about the challenges, make sure this is strategic approach to what we do going forward. Uh we don't
want this to be a barrier for uh making sure that this happens. Uh these upgrades are costly.
They're they're hard to maintain. We've seen over time that the technology is not reliable. Some
communities have stepped away from APS because of that very reason. We want to find a way to
overcome that. In the past, we got uh Envision engaged. We're going to try to see if we can do
the same because uh they've got some expertise in this area. They work specifically with clients
in the uh that part of the blind and visually impaired community. They've been able to advise
us where it makes the most sense strategically for deployment of accessible pedestrian signals.
So, we're going to talk to them about that, too, and try to wrap this all together. All of this
stuff I've talked about with our recommended plan will be presented to the board at the next meeting
on July 23rd. We'll take off from there, see if we can figure out what to do next with some on-site
meetings. Um, this is not new territory to us. I'm confident that we can forge a path forward,
a collaborative path forward, and make sure we get back on track. But I just kind of want to let
you know what we're looking at, where we're going, uh, and we're excited to, uh, like I said, to kind
of have a fresh start here and be able to to move forward with the board on future projects. So, I'd
be happy to answer any questions. Anyone have any questions for Gary? Thank you, Gary. Councilman
Ho Hoisel. Uh, thank you, Vice Mayor. Um, not nothing for you, Gary. Um, I just want
to thank Miss Mrs. Vada for coming up. Um, holding us accountable is definitely um part of
the kind of the job description of the residents of the city who's paying the taxes that pay for us
to do things. Um I would also like to mention that um in the parks master plan we will be emphasizing
accessibility as well moving forward. Um that's something that uh we have the master plan coming
up here in the next year or so and we want to make sure that every child and every resident
who wants to come out and enjoy our parks and playgrounds has the ability to do so as well.
So, I just wanted to bring that to uh people's attention as well that we're listening and uh we
we can always do better, but we are going to keep moving forward and improving our services for
all of Witchah. Thank you. Um Mr. Clerk, will you please call the next speaker? Paige Regats,
proposed repeal of 5.70.10 restroom ordinance. Paige present? If not, we'll
go to the next speaker. Jim Underwood, West Maple Street replacement. Jim Linderwood, 142 South St. Paul. Vice Mayor,
members of council, thank you for letting me speak today. I attended a DAB meeting. Uh there was
a presentation. I have exceptions to what was presented. I wanted to express those opinions. The
project is two miles of city county road which is going to become all city. Uh it's bordered by
two drainage ditches on each side. um two to three feet deep near 151st up to 10 foot deep on
the north. It was stated there would be minimal dirt work. Having been in construction for many
years, I can tell you this means there's going to be tremendous dirt work. The ditches theirelves
will have to be moved a minimum of 18 feet each or tubed or boxed put in the ground. That's a lot
of expense. boxed means CBC concrete box cover. Um it was also stated or excuse me questioned by
a lady in the audience about the intersection at 151st. It was stated it's going to be a traffic
circle and that it was essentially the same size as a right angle intersection. I took exception to
this. Um you'll find that the diameters of traffic circles are set by the code of federal regulations
CFRs which all federal money is expended under and it determines their diameter and therefore
circumference by the incoming and outgoing speeds. It has nothing to do with the desire for how
big it is. It is required to be of minimum size. Um, excuse me. It was also stated by the lady
in the audience that 151st north of Maple is all dirt. If it ever got paved, traffic would increase
tremendously. The statistics given for traffic flows and counts, we were not given when they were
taken. On a dirt road, there are five factors that affect traffic. snow, ice, rain, drought, and
the human factor of how well it's maintained. When a road is paved, those basically go away
except for snow removal and periodic maintenance. The um further stated that there were going to be
two sidewalks, one six foot, one 10- foot adjacent to the roadway. Referring back to the CFRs, once
a trafficway reaches a certain speed, sidewalks cannot be adjacent to the traffic way. They have
to be separated. This is a arterial street. It's open to all traffic. It's open at speed greater
than 40 miles an hour and you have a semi going down the road, it's easy to catch a curb and pop
the truck up over the curb. The primary users of these sidewalks are Goddard school children
being dropped off by their school buses. Putting them next to a trafficway with
no separation is not a good point. the um I apologize standing is a little difficult today.
I'm fine. D I'm fine. Jim, do you need the remote mic as well? I'll finish up here quickly. Um
also, it was not stated that any of the other stakeholders in this area were consulted.
I hope they were. But you're looking at the county commission, county road and bridge,
county fire, county law enforcement, EMS, Goddard school district, and Goddard school
bus drivers. They should all be consulted. They will have opinions that count heavily for
the safety of their children and the safety of the children out there. Bear in mind, a
good portion of this road will remain in the county until the future and therefore
is subject to county enforcement. I would also like to point out that the traffic circle
does not have pedestrian cross walks on like a city intersection does. This is a detriment
for people wanting to cross that. Granted, there's not a whole lot of foot traffic out there
right now. But you still have your school children and they're going to use those sidewalks.
It would be better if 151st and Maple was a right angle intersection with full traffic
control. Thank you for your time this morning. Thank you, Mr. Underwick. Councilman GLCO. Thank
you, Vice Mayor Jim. Thank you for being involved and thank you for coming to most of my district
advisory boards. Also, thank you for being my appointee to the access advisory board as well,
for your service to the community there. Uh, to address a few of the things, I have been
in consultation with Commissioner Wise who represents that part of the community. Her
and I met last week about the project. Um, I've also reached out to the school district. I'm
in communication with them as well. And that will continue as this is a joint project to connect uh
both the parcels that's county owned and then also city- owned. This weekend, I attended the Meyers
uh Windows estate uh HOA as well as the Auburn Hills uh HOA that I hosted a town hall with that
about 80 people showed up to a month ago. And so I know that staff and staff was present at both
of those meetings to answer questions. A lot of the concerns that you addressed have been brought
up at previous meetings and staff is aware of them and is working at addressing those in the larger
plan. This is just the start. Uh, I know that one of the staffers um this weekend that was present
at the neighborhood or at the HOA meeting actually was taking a Saturday to go to a couple that homes
along the route to talk to individual owners about what this is for their property and to bring
them involved in the process early to try to mitigate maybe a lot of those challenges. And so I
just wanted to maybe ease some of those concerns. Thank you for speaking today and continue to
engage in the process in the future as well. Thank you. Also, this where's district five,
my district two. I've seen a lot of the plans and the sidewalks will be off of the street, not
on the street. Um, they will also there is also uh pedestrian crossings at the roundabout moved
out a bit to be safer. So, there is that too. And I think the county does begin at 167th. So, it is
in the city. So, thank you for coming and thank you for speaking. Mr. Clerk, please call the
next item. Emily Coelloo, city council duties. Good morning. I'm Emily Coo in Green Leaf Court
in District 2. The ethics board recently validated a claim from a small group of people in the
community who had said that their feelings were hurt by Mayor Woo. And isn't it amazing in today's
world that the people who complain that their feelings are getting hurt are the real bullies
of our society? Has anyone noticed that? And how unserious are we as a community that such a
claim wasn't laughed at and dismissed immediately, but was investigated for weeks. What a colossal
waste of time. Mayor Woo had been accused of discrimination. But the ethics board had concluded
that quote she didn't fulfill her duties by not working in cooperation with other officials end
quote because she declined to read a piece of paper out loud at a meeting. And I can assure you
that most voters do not view reading or signing proclamations and all of the staff work that
accompanies it as the city council's important duties. You've actually been hired for a very
serious job, which is to operate our city budget, to fill potholes, to fund the infrastructure, to
pay the first responders, to keep our crime low. The pressing needs that benefit all residents.
Today, I'm asking the city council to consider ending the practice of proclamation so you can
focus on the full-time job you were elected to do, which is to operate our city budget and sustain
our infrastructure. And lastly, on an incredibly serious note, I'm asking for prayers for those
people in our community who are confused and unsatisfied with their bodies. to their friends
and family. Validating their identity claims is not an act of love. In fact, it's cruel.
Confronting their mental health of your loved ones might be very difficult in the short
term. But I'm telling you, your loved one needs the truth and they need for you to tell them and
it's the only way. Thank you. Thank you, Emily. We have uh one more spot if
anybody would like to come forward and speak. Seeing none.
Oh, Andrew got up just in time. Good morning, city council and uh city manager.
Um I just want to say thank you. Um and I have a challenge for you. Um, take a time out of your
day to walk downtown Witchah and seeing the uh the the two-way conversions that that
you guys um did. And I I I challenge you guys to walk walk that because it's
it's a little bit of a problem and um for the disability community and for the blind
community and I am you know uh really excited that you know the city is moving in a good solid good
good way. But we need to work a lot more. We need you guys to work a lot more. And I challenge you
to walk this city on an afternoon because I do. I walk these cities. I walk the the sidewalk. Um,
and now that I have my third guide dog, I'll be walking the city a little bit more and I want it
accessible for all. And it's time we we do that. And so my challenge for you once again is to walk.
not not take your cars, but actually walk and take the bus. And you will see some of the problems
that we need to to to do in the city of Witchah and other cities are doing it. You know,
it's time. It's the 21st century. We're we're a big city. We need to start
acting like a big city. Thank you. Thank you, Andrew. You're welcome. Always good
to see you, Mr. Clerk. Please call Oh, excuse me, Johnson. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Um, this isn't to
the last speaker. Just something that was sitting on my heart. Um, I believe that every individual
as a man of faith needs prayer. But I just have to continue to challenge people's identity. Who
they are is not a mental health condition. It's not something that needs additional prayer.
People are who they are. You're born how you are who you are. And I think some of the
challenges we continue to face in society is when we other folks who are not others.
We're all humans. We are who we are and when we I believe engage in that type of dialogue
it begins to minimize other folks and I just always want to highlight we should respect people
for who they are. In regard to the first comment, um, our jobs are vast as council members.
We're also governed by codes and ordinances. As someone who's also been found in violation of
the ethics, um, policy that I helped create, um, there are things that you are supposed to do in
certain ways, and the ethics board had their own finding uh, for one of us, as they did with me. I
encourage people to read all the municipal codes, especially people who want to run for these seats
to understand what that is, our responsibilities. It's not about beliefs, but there are things that
it says that we shall do and shall not do, can do, may do. All of those words are important. So,
um I encourage people to read all the reports, also mine. Again, um they had a finding on me
and I own that. But um we helped craft the ethics policy for a specific reason to ensure things that
were happening or assumed to be happening before would not happen. And all of that was talked
about in the public setting at this bench, voted on, discussed in the public. So I just
want to encourage people to go to the site, read all those reports, be informed on that.
And also as we talk about praying for others and showing the love of Jesus, let's love
everyone. We are who we are as humans. Thank you. Mr. Clerk, will you please
call next item? Consent agenda items 1 through 17. Any council member like
to pull any of the items 1 to 17. Seeing none, I move that we uh approve
the council consent agenda items 1 through 17. Second. There's been a motion and a
second. Mr. Clerk, will you please roll consent a consent items 1 to 17
passes six to zero. Mr. Clerk, you please call the next item. Board of
bids and contracts dated July 7, 2025. Good morning, Vice Mayor and City Council.
Josh Lober, Department of Finance. Thank you. Uh the board of bids and
contracts convened yesterday, July 14th for the following items. For
engineering, we have the 17th Street sidewalk at Railroad Crossing for Prao
Construction LLC in the amount of 98,96.75 that was subject to your authorization of the
new engineers estimate budget authorization. Uh we for purchasing have the 16,000 gross vehicle
weight single cab dual wheel tire repair truck with service body redirecting of an award for
Don Hatton Ford Incorporated for $137,180. We have the smart sheet work and
project management system software renewal for smartshet.com
incorporated for $58,860. We have the Microsoft Enterprise
Agreement year one of three for SHI International Corporation for 1,297,679.94. We have the on call contractor services for
treatment plant contract change order recommending for utility contractors incorporated accepting
the 2025 rates listed in the board of bids agenda packet for one year effective September 1st 2025.
We have the polyphosphate contract change order for CAR US LLC doing business as Condi Holdings
LLC LLC for an amended amount of $455,430. We have Soda Ash contract change order for Dubois Chemicals Incorporated for
an amended amount of $112,50. This is how to become a vendor with the city. This is a purchasing calendar of small business
resource partner events the city's hosting or participating in. And these are open public
opportunities out on the street today for engagement. And I'd be happy to try to answer
any questions and I recommend your approval. Any questions for Josh Bench? Seeing none. Thank you, Josh. I move that we
approve board of bids and contracts dated July 7 July 15, 2025. Second. There's been a motion
and a second. Mr. Clerk, please pull up the role. Motion carries 6. Mr. Clerk, please call the
next item. Resolution authorizing the city manager authority to take administrative action to
ensure compliance with federal grant requirements. Sorry. Good morning, May uh Vice Mayor, Council.
Uh I am Deputy City Attorney Steve Smart. And with me from the law department is Mike
Fessinger, our city's labor and employment attorney. And before you today is a staff
proposal. This is Mayor Woo. Good morning, ma'am. Uh before you today is a staff
proposal seeking temporary authority for the city manager to ensure city compliance
with new federal grant recipient requirements. Federal grants fund significant portions
of city essential services such as housing, transportation, law enforcement, fire, and
airport infrastructure. According to the city auditor's office, federal funding is around
$100 million annually to the city. To advance its policy agenda, the executive branch of the federal
government has issued new rules, regulations, and requirements that apply to grant recipients such
as the city of Witchah. Most of those are routine and similar to previous administrations, such as
the general requirement to comply with all federal laws and executive orders. The new fiscal year
2025 changes require grant recipients to certify that their organization does not operate any
illegal DEI or diversity, equity, and inclusion program that violates federal law and that the
organization will cooperate generally with federal law enforcement in the enforcement of immigration
matters. City staff will soon be asked to certify compliance with these new requirements in order
to receive fiscal 25 federal funds for the city. And failure to certify risks loss of those federal
funds and a false certification would risk civil and criminal penalties for the city and its grant
signitories. At the direction of the city manager, city staff has been working diligently since
January to achieve compliance. And as part of that effort, the manager directed a comprehensive
citywide administrative review led by department directors and assisted by a managerappointed
compliance review team. Additionally, staff received advice from professional
organizations and solicited views of other cities regarding their approach to such compliance. Where
appropriate, staff has already made administrative changes such as removing references to rescended
executive orders in new contracts and adjusting department level policies and procedures. Compared
with years past, uh certifications and asurances are more detailed with clear penalties for
alleged non-compliance. Compliance is no longer viewed simply as a snapshot in time, but as
a continuum that requires continued vigilance and adjustment as new directives are passed. As the
federal government's fiscal year 2025 winds down, uh, new federal directives and agency contract
provisions are still being published. Each of these must be reviewed and analyzed for impact
on city of Witchah programs, policies, practices, and procedures and as well as fiscal 25 grant
recipient compliance. The law department primarily views compliance as a contractual issue in our
relationship with the federal government as it pertains to grants. To keep up with the volume of
changes and ensure continued compliance throughout this contractual relationship, staff recommends
temporary additional administrative measures be authorized by the council. The council will
still review and approve all grant applications. The proposed resolution gives the sense
and direction of the council, allows staff through city manager delegated authority, the
administrative flexibility and speed necessary to keep up with evolving compliance obligations.
While the city manager already holds authority to manage routine administrative matters,
the proposed resolution will authorize the city manager the temporary authority to make
additional administrative changes, including suspending enforcement of an ordinance to ensure
such compliance as the need arises. An example of that authority would be that the resolution would
allow the city manager to grant the diversity, inclusion, and civil rights advisory board's
request for a temporary suspension of its meetings as the city evaluates the board's strategic plan
in light of new federal compliance requirements. This proposed temporary authority will expire
no later than December 31st, 2025. And staff chose that date to ensure that you did not
give authority to a brand new city manager. And additionally, as time goes on, we will know
more regarding the administration administration's enforcement approach as its conflicts with
other cities, states, trade organizations, and universities are addressed more fully in the
courts. The December 31st, 2025 sunset also gives the council the ability to reassess in 2026. Of
course, the council could revoke this authority at any time. Uh the bottom line here is that
given what is at stake regarding federal dollars, staff has been working to put the city in a safe
harbor while issues and conflicts are fought and litigated elsewhere. This proposed resolution
allows the city to assess compliance and respond to federal regulator concerns on a case-byase
basis while the council exercises broad oversight. The staff recommends the council approve the
proposed resolution and authorize necessary signatures. I'll stand for any questions. Thank
you, Steve. Uh, Councilman Tuttle. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Smart. I don't have a question
for you, but I do for city manager Leighton. Um, hund00 million potentially is at risk for the
city. Correct. That is that's a total of uh our annual federal assistance. Thank you. Could
you maybe highlight a few of the departments that receive the most of this federal funding?
There are two departments that we have that are highly reliant on federal funds. The housing
and community services as well as our transit department. Okay. Majority of their operations are
funded uh federally. Thank you so much. Thank you. Also note that Mayor Woo is joining us virtually.
Councilman Glascott. Thank you, Vice Mayor. A few questions. I'll probably go back and forth
here. Uh, first, what happens January 1st, 2026, if we don't have more federal guidance, all the it
rescends back to, let's say, status quo currently, are we at risk of losing federal funds beginning
immediately January 1st or we reevaluate sometime December? I I think we will be re-evaluating
this from today all the way through. As as as I mentioned, this is a continuum. A new guidance is
continuing to to be published. I would think our risk would be lower as we would have taken any
administrative actions that regulators bring up after they have authorized the funding. That would
probably be the greatest time of risk as as fiscal 25 comes to an end in September. Okay. Thank you.
This would be a question for the manager. This is coming to this body because a lot of these funds
are greater than your statutory duty. Uh you have to bring this because some of these funds are so
large that that's why this body has to vote on correct that you can't unilaterally implement um
a lot of these changes. Um council member uh yes and no. Um you're right about the almost all of
our grants are uh received by the council. mayor signs on behalf of the council to receive those
grant funds. Um, so that's one aspect of it, but there are also a number of uh rules,
regulations, procedures, and ordinances that are in place that will require some adjustment.
It's doesn't pertain just to the programs that are receiving federal funds, but all of our activities
across the organization. And that's what we're certifying when we sign the grant asurances.
Ordinances have passed by this body that would have to get authorization. to amend. And that
so what what this resolution would allow us to do is temporarily suspend um the enforcement
or of ordinances when they're deemed to be in um um conflict with the federal with federal
requirements. Thank you. Thank you, Councilman Hohisel. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Um Bob, have we
been threatened with any suspension of grants so far? Uh council member, not specifically, but
we've received some very strongly worded guidance from um the um Department of Transportation that
maybe Steve could um address. Yes, sir. Um the Department of Transportation is the secretary
issued a memorandum to all grant recipients in April April 24th of 2025. And what was striking
about it was its tone and uh direction to grant recipients to ensure compliance with executive
orders. There is uh language in that memorandum that uh suggests that um any organization that
has a uh DEI program and and no further guidance on that um is presumptively illegal and that um
certifications made for the purpose of receiving Department of Transportation funds could result
in a false claims act uh case against uh the recipient. So, um, what was striking about that is
the tone and the length of the of the letter. Um, so, so no direct, uh, issues with the city
of Witchah. That was, uh, in general to all, uh, DOT grant recipients, but that that is
what has sparked a lot of the impetus for the resolution that's before you today.
Have they given any guidance or um, descriptions of DEI programs that fall under that?
No, sir. They they use the word what is an illegal DEI program. Mr. Fessinger um can certainly give
you a breakdown of illegal versus uh legal DEI, but the memorandum itself does not further
define that, nor does any other additional uh guidance. In fact, that is the subject of
litigation in in several areas of of the country. Mike can give you some more information. Okay.
Appreciate that. All right. Good morning, Council. Mike Fessinger. I'm your labor
relations attorney. Uh DEI, as we all know, stands for diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Uh it's often viewed as a workplace strategy that attempts to promote fair treatment amongst
employees uh generally with an emphasis on groups uh that have been the subject of historical under
representation, perhaps discrimination. Before I go on and talk about this, I'll just note that
the area this area of the law right now was is fluid. It's in flux. There's modern case law uh
that discusses the differences between DEI and what amounts to discrimination. But from our
perspective today and I think the perspective the of the federal administration is that the
the key distinction is whether the program uh grants a preferential treatment to people based
on their uh membership in a protected class uh versus whether the program seeks instead just to
remove systemic barriers that have caused under representation in the past. Uh so legal efforts
at DEI again um attempt to remove barriers. Uh illegal efforts at DEI grant a preferential
treatment to people based upon uh perhaps their gender or skin color. The line between the
two is unclear. Uh it is in flux and it's in all candidates probably for attorneys today to
argue about uh in court. Uh part of the reason we're advocating for this conservative course of
action today is because uh the answer is unclear as to where that line is and uh we uh we would
prefer the city to have time to see how this all shakes out over the coming months. Thank you.
Thank you. Uh Mayor Woo would like to comment. Woo, would you like to comment having technical difficulties or don't know? Good morning, council, and thank
you, Steve Smart. Um, I had a couple questions directed to city manager
Leighton. The questions are in regards to um were there residents who raised
concerns and if so um whom were they? Mayor, I'm only aware of one resident who
has uh raised a concern um consistently uh and that person Uh I don't I don't know
if it's appropriate to mention who that is, but the person has filed uh comments with
the mayor and council as well as staff. You have any other questions, mayor? Well, we'll move on then and open it up
for public comment. Man would like comment, please come forward. Please come forward. City manager, a follow-up question. I wanted
to know what's the risk for the city in terms of costly lawsuits. I'm sorry, mayor, I
didn't catch the last part of your question. I think the question had to do with risk.
I think the question had to do with risk. Not sure if there's something we can
Not sure if there's something we can do with that. Deal with that feedback
we're getting. feedback we're getting. I apologize. There's a one minute delay.
Therefore, I just want to know what is the risk of costly lawsuits for the city. It can be
significant. I an answer to a previous question, we indicated that there's about a hundred
million dollars that we receive from the federal government. So there is the possibility
that that could be suspended. A portion of that could be suspended or put in advance and then that
would force us to respond to any um uh complaints uh or claims filed by the federal government. Um,
I think Steve also mentioned the possibility of u being uh sued for false representation of
regarding our policies and that would require um litigation as well. Some that we could
probably handle with our own staff but some that we probably have to hire outside counsel
given the nature and severity of the issues. Thank you, city manager. Again, opportunity to
open up the public for any comment. Seeing none, I'll bring it back to the bench if
anybody'd like to comment on this further. Councilman Johnson. Thanks, Mayor or Vice Mayor.
Um, just wanted to share a few thoughts u before the vote. Um, fascism is a far-right authoritarian
and ultraationalist political ideology defined by a dict dictorial leader, a strong central
government, the suppression of opposition, and an emphasis on national unity and militarism.
It fundamentally opposes democracy, liberalism, and socialism, often demanding unity behind its
own ideas and leadership. Without elaborating, whether you agree with my inference
or not, you undoubtedly know exactly what and whom I'm referring to. That alone
speaks volumes. The executive branch of the United States government continues to push the
boundaries of settled law and the Constitution, infringing upon our God-given rights simply
because the current occupant disagrees. A nation founded on three co-equal branches and checks and
balances is seeing that very fabric stretch to a near breaking point. These are dark and trying
times. The congressional body, which should wield power from the people's house, often yields to
executive overreach, paralyzed by political fear, and often shared political affiliations.
Meanwhile, the judiciary with a handpicked majority has granted the executive branch blanket
immunity, consistently delivering victories to the executive and losses to the people. The
principles we learned in school are being eroded, promises rescended, powers increased, families
torn apart, and lives changed forever. Americans are being heavily influenced by a constant barrage
of misinformation from sources and institutions that should be trustworthy. While I could
continue to elaborate for a long time on that, this is unfortunately nothing new to those
who study history. Dr. King famously demanded that America simply be true to what it says on
paper. Yet, ironically, even in our founding, some were even considered only three-fifths of a
person due to their race. Some were some were not even recognized due to their gender. And if
you didn't have the fortune to own property, you too weren't recognized. Today, this governing
body faces consequences forced upon us by the current failure of our system of checks and
balances. Our efforts to be more equitable, more inclusive, and improve our local government
and community are in jeopardy due to the misguided sense of loss many felt and feel to this day.
Because more Americans were being seen, heard, and respected. And while the executive branch and many
others would prefer to whitewash America, doing so is a direct threat and slap in the face to what
truly makes us great, and that's our diversity. Though today's situation is the unfortunate result
of our democracy being infected with a vile virus, we know that the moral arc of the universe is long
and it still bends toward justice. I'm prayerful today that my no vote bends it ever so slightly
more toward justice. I will be voting no today. Councilman Bellor. Thank you, Vice Mayor. I would
just say that the die crab is not a DEI program. It's a citizen advisory board to inform council
and keep our policies inclusive for all residents of Witchaw and make sure we are aware of all
aspects of our community and focused on civil rights. I think it's important we don't lose that
perspective um on the council because we can't personally represent every demographic in Witchaw
and they help us to hear from more folks in our city. So for that I'll be voting no. Councilman
Hazel. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Um, I don't have anything prepared quite like uh my two esteemed
colleagues here, but I do want to say like most Americans, I have a political leaning, but like
most Americans, there's a lot of gray area. Um, we're all pretty much zebras. We have different
stripes with different thoughts on different issues. And one that's always made sense to me is
allowing local municipalities and local government to have a little more say because they're the
ones with their boots on the ground. We're the ones who see the impact in our communities.
We're the ones that see what we need to do in our communities in order to move forward to make
sure that everybody has a place at the table. So, um when I see something like this come down
that really meshes or it really conflicts with um I don't my my thoughts on local government.
So, for that reason, I will be voting no as well. Councilman Glascock, thank you. I do have one
quick question for the manager. A no vote today, if this were to fail, would jeopardize 100 million
dollars of investment in our community. Correct. That's a fair assessment of the amount of re of
revenue we receive. But we'll we probably will be challenged regarding our compliance with federal
guidelines, rules, regulations, and laws as um as they are interpreted. And so there is some
jeopardy to some or all of the funding if we're found to be non non-compliance. And a majority
of that is transportation, housing, serves some of the most vulnerable. Correct. A significant
amount of money also comes for capital projects. Thank you. Uh the mayor would like to
speak and we have about a one minute delay. So we can all just sit in silence
about one minute while she comes on. I know that this is a very difficult subject and
I appreciate council member Johnson Hoheisle and Ballard and speaking um on why you're voting
no. However, what I look at is that there's a risk and weighing risk is real and that risk is
the 100 million that the city receives from the federal government specifically and in large part
to housing and transit. So, I will be voting yes. Thank you, mayor. Seeing no comments, I'd like to
just make a comment that I agree. So we have to adjust to each administration what their agenda
is. And I think that's the case here. May not agree with it, but uh I don't want to put risk to
transportation and housing because that affects the the poorest in our society. So I will be
voting yes. Are there any more comments from council members? Seeing none, Mr. Clerk, will
you please open the role? M Mr. Vice Mayor, I don't think there is a motion to do Oh, yes.
Yes. So, we'll see seeing none then. Thank you. I I will while we make the motion to receive
and file the report, approve the contracts. Oh, wrong one. Thank you. We're struggling here. Um,
I would like to make the motion uh authorizing the city manager authority to take administrative
action to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements. If I may, Vice Mayor, may I just
clarify the motion is to approve the resolution. To approve the resolution and authorize the mayor
to sign and authorize the mayor to sign. Yes. Thank you. Second. Okay. There's been a motion and
a second. Now, Mr. Clerk, would you open the role? We will wait for the mayor to her vote. Yes. Mayor has voted. Motion passes 4 to
three. Mr. Clerk, will you please call the next item? Public request public
hearing and request by Witchaw Maple LLC for approval of a letter of intent
to issue industrial revenue bonds. Vice Mayor, members of council, Troy Anderson,
assistant city manager. Um, this request comes from uh Witchaw Maple LLC uh requesting approval
for uh the use of industrial revenue bonds. Uh more specifically, this is in regards to a project
associated with Town West Square. Um Town West Square has struggled over the last several years
with uh vacancies and finding tenants uh to occupy the building. Um the group that has acquired it
um has done this in other areas of the nation. Uh they've acquired some of these old uh unused
or underutilized um former shopping centers, former malls, and are repurposing them into
business parks. Uh so this is somewhat of a proven business model. Um, and we're really excited about
what uh this might bring to the former Town West Square Mall. Um, more specifically, they intend to
convert the buildings into industrial warehouses, manufacturing facilities, and distribution
centers. Uh, they're requesting the letter of intent to issue industrial revenue bonds in an
amount not exceeding $20 million for the purposes of sales tax exemption. Uh it's antip it's
anticipated that the improvements the some of the improvements will begin immediately.
This is going to be a phase project over over several years. Um more specifically to fully be
transparent in the complete incentive package that uh the owner developers are pursuing. Uh currently
they're pursuing the industrial revenue bond for the sales tax exemption as there are certain
construction uh commodities materials that need to be acquired. There are long lead
times associated with some of this stuff. Uh but for all intents and purposes, they will be
returning early next year uh to begin the process of applying for tax increment financing
for really the bulk of and for the rest of the project. Uh so we just wanted to be fully
transparent. Today's business at hand is simply the industrial revenue bond for that sales tax
exemption. But we again just wanted to paint the entire picture that they will also uh be returning
to early next year for tax increment financing. The approximate value of the sales tax exemption
is about $500,000 with the city share being approximately $39,000. This is our standard
disclaimer, right? Revenue bonds are a mechanism for achieving a sales tax exemption. Particularly
in this case, a sales tax exemption only. In a revenue bond transaction, the city's not lending
any money. Bears no risk. Owner developer is required to achieve all of its own financing.
There are no taxpayer dollars at risks and all costs are borne by the owner applicant requesting
the use of the bonds. WTO Maple agrees to pay all costs of issuing the bonds and agrees to pay the
annual origination fees. Bonds will be purchased by WTO Maple or related entity. Once the project's
complete, um bond documents that will be required for the issuance of the bond will be prepared
by outside legal counsel. But uh as always, law department will review and approve the final
form prior to issuance of any bonds. Therefore, it is recommended today uh to hold a public
hearing, but then ultimately close the public hearing, adopt the resolution, and authorize
the necessary signatures. With that being said, we do have representatives from uh the applicant
who uh have joined us virtually and are available for questions um at the behest of city council.
Otherwise, I'll stand for questions. Okay. Thank you, Troy. Any questions from the
bench? Councilman Hohheisle. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Um just one real quick question. I
drove by the other day. They're already at work um doing some painting, signage, facade
improvement. Uh this CI will just be from this point forward. So no C, but yes, the
industrial revenue bond IRB. I'm sorry. I apolog for the sales tax uh exemption. Yes, they
can't achieve the sales tax exemption until uh the letter of intent is approved and we obtain
a sales tax exemption certificate from the state. They can then use that sales tax exemption
certificate on any future um purchases, right, to obtain that sales tax exemption. regarding
the question. We've received the question around um improvements that are made now and the
implication of the tax increment financing. There are some allowances for what we kind of call
in that a look back period, right? So there may be expenses that are eligible that are necessary
today that once a tax increment financing district is established that you can sort of
look back and achieve uh the benefits from the tax increment financing district based on expenses
that were incurred prior to the approval. Again, those are all kind of laid out by state law and
bone counsel. So, but with regards to the IRB, no, they can't get in any sales tax exemption unless
they have that sales tax exemption certificate. Okay. Thank you, Councilman Glascock. Oh, I
meant to remove my name, but thank you for uh the transparency of letting us know that TIFF
is coming as well. I appreciate knowing what what requests will be made later. So, thank you for
including that in the agenda packet. Seeing no more questions from the bench, we'll open up for
public comment. Anyone would like to comment? Seeing no one, I'll bring it back to the bench.
Councilman Glascock. Thank you, Mr. Vice Mayor. I want to again thank the applicant for making a
significant investment in our community. I think it's incredibly exciting to see the project
come to fruition and uh to see the success they've had in other communities as well. So
with that, seeing nobody else on the board, I would move that the city council close the public
hearing, adopt the resolution, and authorize the necessary signatures. Second. Then a motion and a
second. Mr. Clerk, would you please open the role? Motion passes 6. Mr. Clerk, will
you please call the next item? request to set public hearings to create
a community improvement district CID and adopt a redevelopment project plan for a full
service hotel located at 229 East William. Vice Mayor, members of council, again,
Troy Anderson, assistant city manager. So, this request comes to us from a group uh more
specifically Mlen Hotel 1923 LLC. You'll probably hear me refer to them as Mlen throughout. Uh but
they are uh the recent the current owners. They've recently acquired a couple of properties near the
intersection of William and Broadway. Uh there are two existing buildings on these parcels. And
so Mlen uh wishes to renovate these two existing buildings and convert them into a full service
hotel. uh approximately 110 keys uh with an additional 4,000 ft of commercial retail space.
They do have some associated parking within the former petroleum building uh that they will use to
sort of park themselves, so to speak. Um and so as part of this request, they have uh requested
assistance from the city using pay as you go, C and tax income and financing to assist in the
acquisition and construction of the project. So being that it is a pay as you go request,
owner developer will pay all construction costs associated with the project and it's only the
increment that is realized both with the sales tax that is generated and the property tax that
is generated above and beyond the base value as it exists today. that will be used to reimburse the
owner developer um for certain eligible expenses. Again, owner developer assumes all risk, no risk
to the taxpayer. Uh the project is currently estimated at about $41 million project. Uh we've
identified some of the maximum eligible amounts that are uh eligible for reimbursement under the
community improvement district act and about 5.7 million redevelopment project costs eligible for
tiff about $4.5 million. So again owner developers request the use on a pay as you go basis. City
will not issue any debt for the project. More specifically kind of how this works right are
proceeds. So those CID sales tax proceeds as well as the property tax proceeds will come into
the city, be held by the city and then dispersed pursuant to a development agreement until the
maximum amounts in the development agreement have been realized specifically because those that
development agreement will come to you in the the purpose for this meeting here today is to set the
public hearings. Right? So those public hearings are currently slated for August 19th, 2025. That
being said, it's recommended the city council accept the C petition and adopt the resolution
setting the public hearings for August 19th, 2025. And I do believe we have representatives
from the applicant here in the audience today. But otherwise, I'll stand for questions. Thank
you, Troy. Any questions from the bench for Troy? Seeing no questions, like to open it up for public
comment if anyone would like to comment on this. No one. I'll bring it back to the bench. This
resides in district Councilman District One, Councilman Johnson's district. Thanks, Vice Mayor.
Looking forward to the public hearing on this. I'll probably say more at the public hearing.
Um, I would move that the city council accept the CO petition and adopt the resolution setting
the public hearing. Second. There's been a motion and a second. Mr. Clerk, we open the role. What
do you have? Motion carries. 6. Mr. Clerk, please call the next item. 2026 annual operating budget
and 2026 to 2035 capital improvement program. Mayor, oh, excuse me, vice mayor, members of the
council. Uh, good morning. I am proud to present my 41st operating budget and my last uh to this
council. It's for the 2026 uh operating year and fiscal year and we also to present the 2026 2035
tenure proposed capital improvement program. Oops. I want to thank the folks who have gotten us
to this point. First of all, the residents that have participated uh through the participation
in the community survey, giving us feedback at DAB meetings, and uh working through our online
simulator. Uh to date, we've received almost 750 uh uh survey, excuse me, um simulator responses
and uh and we are still encouraging people to submit. I want to thank the council for all of
your hard work starting in January to this point. I am extremely proud of the work that was done to
put the strategic plan together. If you see look in the operating budget and also in the CIP, we
have that document uh incorporated into both of those um plans. And I think it is um some of the
most exceptional work that I've seen the council do in the 16 years that I've been here. And it's
provided us great guidance as we put the budget together. And then I also want to thank all of
our employees starting with the finance department and the budget office for the work they've done,
but all of our departments for developing tactics that are in alignment with your strategic plan
and helping us get to where we are today. Just a reminder, the community survey was actually
distributed last year and we received the results in January of this year and those were discussed
with you. Uh the DAB meetings were conducted in May. The simulator as I said uh is still open.
It'll be open through August 19th. And of course, anybody that wants to follow the work that
the council's done to this point can get on YouTube and uh look at videos from the our budget
workshops. The reminder of the survey results, this is a graphic depiction of those results. Uh
what we've typically done in the past is focus on this magenta quadrant. It's those services
that are ranked as high highly important to our residents but where they believe we have
additional work to do and the quality of our service is lower than desired. Uh the mayor talks
about this frequently. Economic developments, street repair, affordable housing and homeless
services as well as crime prevention are the most significant issues that the community
wants us to focus on. And the budget that's being presented to you today does uh
focus on those uh uh important items. Uh just a real brief review on the strategic
plan. There were five budget workshops that you conducted starting in January running
through June. Uh the strategic plan was a specific focus in January, April and May. And
just a reminder that what we did in fact let me go to this. We started with pillars which were
reflective of our mission statement. We then had the council adopt goals which started to oper
operationalize excuse me the pillars strategies that helped us uh move towards achievement
of the goals and then the tactics which are the day-to-day activities or specific activities
to uh achieve your desired results and outcomes. graphic depiction of the budget process that I
just described. Your input from strategic plan as well as community input and engagement
has moved us to where we are today with the recommended budget which will hopefully then
move us in the direction of our highest priorities uh as reflected in u by all all of that activity
by the council as well as our citizens. So let's go to the mandatory pie charts. total budget is uh
almost uh well it's approximately $778 million. Uh if you look on the left our uh we have three major
funding sources for our total operating budget, our total budget. Charges for services, property
tax and sales tax. Charges for services are is a significant revenue source because this portion
of the budget includes our utilities uh primarily water and sewer. You'll also on the right see how
our money is spent or is anticipated to be spent in 2026 with salaries and benefits being the
largest piece of that pie but contractuals and debt service also rep representing significant
uh segments. The general fund which is really considered our operating budget um at least for
our basic services. Property tax is the number one revenue source which we've talked a lot about.
uh franchise fees and sales tax also contribute significantly to that budget. It's a $342.8
million uh recommended operating budget for 2026. A reminder uh that 76% of our total expenditures
would go to police, fire, and public works and utilities in the operating budget. And uh if you
look at the categories that are funded, salaries and benefits are the predominant take up the
predominant share of the operating budget at 76%. We're presenting to you today a balance
26 and a balanced 27 operating budget. because of significant increases in
our property t our property valuations, excuse me. Uh we believe that we can
get to the point of a balanced budget for both of those years and still come
in with a half mil reduction for 2026. This simply repeats what I said
regarding being balanced through 2027. I will point out that we are in good
financial position uh thanks to the actions of not just this council but
previous council as well. Uh we have uh over $50 million in our general fund
balance projected through 2027 and through the end of that year we believe we'll still
have 31.7 million in the stabilization reserve. Long term as we try to project uh where we're
going after 2027, there are a number of factors that uh can uh affect our uh projections. Interest
earnings, employee costs, any changes in service levels, and of course um any um changes in
our or any unspending in the operating budget. Uh I apologize for the titles here. Um but
this is uh this represents our projections uh for 2025 26 27 28 and 29. You'll
see that based on current assumptions on revenues and expenses we're projecting
deficits in 28 and 29. But this is very early um in the projection process and a
lot of things can happen between now and even next year when you'll be reviewing
the pro uh the long range plan. Again, I will remind you that at the end of last year's
budget process, you asked us to look at a number of efficiencies uh or efficiency and process
improvement projects. Those were the staff worked diligently on those uh through 2024 and into early
2025 and uh we presented those to you in May. I received some guidance. We adjusted some of our
thoughts and recommendations and now the adjusted uh strategies are included in the operating
budget that's being presented to you today. Just a reminder, uh what we did in terms
of process improvements included changes in street maintenance, park maintenance, court
operations, and equitable management. Uh and that's primarily our mid-level manager managers in
the organization. That will result in about $2.5 million in savings in 2026. And then we had some
budget reduction options that we shared with you uh in May and June that will result in
more favorable health insurance rates. I won't go through all of these,
but some other changes in um uh programs that we don't believe will have
a significant impact on service levels. Let's get into the details about what this budget
provides the public. Um and again, a reminder that the these are all reflected in your strategic plan
and what you wanted us to get accomplished over the next two years. Uh this uh budget anticipates
that during the next year we'll have a cost recovery study, an exhaustive one that will allow
us to adjust fees accordingly. Uh we're talking about centralizing some of our financial services.
We are changing um our approach on community engagement and we'll prepare a new plan for that
to be implemented in 2026. Uh we're uh doubling down on our uh development program for our
supervisors because we understand their important role in this organization. And then we're doing
a review of our employee benefit program to hopefully modernize our employee benefits in
a way that's consistent with the desires of our employees. So all of our employee groups
will be actively involved in that discussion. terms of the pillar on keeping Witchah safe. Uh
we're looking at working with Cedric County on a pilot project to come up with a more comprehensive
approach to EMS service inside city of Witchah. We are implementing the drone as first responder
pilot project in the Broadway corridor and hope to see some great results in our ability to have
a quicker response to emergencies in the corridor. Um primarily in terms of police response. Uh also
the next two items um are an effort by the police department to be much more oriented towards data,
the use of data in fighting uh crime and uh more importantly in crime prevention activities. And
the last is what an ongoing effort that makes sure that our police department has the resources
they need to deal with behavioral health issues that they encounter uh in the community,
especially among our homeless population. terms of growing our economy, that pillar,
um we are looking at revising our cultural funding program and the formula that's used to
disperse uh funds to cultural agencies. We're excited about implementation of the transit
uh study and the new network um that we think will be much more effective u probably purging
some of the less effective routes and putting in some new routes in place that will benefit
uh our riders. And then number of efforts on affordable housing recognizing again that
is one of the community's top concerns. Also excited about the water reuse study and
hopefully coming up with a permanent solution uh to the periodic droughts that
this community has experienced over the years. Um want to get a little
more um analytical about our park maintenance efforts and uh improving and
maintaining our park infrastructure. So, we'll be refining a decision support tool for
park all of our park infrastructure. That'll also be done in conjunction with or at the same
time as the update of the park master plan. One of the items under living well that's near
and dear to my heart is the desire to improve our early childhood ready reading readiness in
this community. recognizing that our future uh depends on how our kids read uh before they
get to kindergarten and definitely as they progress through elementary school and and up.
Um so that's an effort that uh we're spending more resources on in 2026. Uh another priority of
the council has been to play a meaningful role in addressing homelessness in this community. And
this budget includes uh funding uh to continue to assist with shelter and support services and
most importantly supportive housing uh to provide um a more permanent solution for those who are
unhoused today. And then we're embarking on the comprehensive plan update. That plan is a little
over 10 years old now and should be updated. So that is all I have on the operating budget. Um
I do want to talk a little bit about the SMID. um because it's going to be a little different
than it has been in the past. Um up until um recently uh the mill levy has been at about
6.8 uh mills u for this the smid. However, they have asked for that to go up to the maximum
amount which is 10 mills in order to implement a clean and safe program for the downtown so that
we can improve not just the appearance but the the feeling of safety for those who are regular
users in the downtown and as we see continued growth Troy talked about that with a project
that will be that's anticipated around the biomed center. We want folks to feel comfortable being
in the downtown all times of the day and night. Vice Mayor, I don't I I can stop there
on the operating budget or I can keep going and go through the CIP and then take
questions on any of the documents. Up to you. What's the will? Keep going.
All right. I'm on a roll. Thanks. um pie chart for the CIP. I always like to remind
people that we truly are a big business. This is a three billion dollar 10-year plan. Um our
revenue sources are very diverse for the CIP, more so than for the operating budget. Um,
I won't go through all of those sources, but you'll see a number of uh local funding as
well as um outside funding sources that support our CIP. Also very diverse in terms of how we
spend our funds, but a big chunk goes to our utilities, water and sewer, also to our street
system, and uh to our um public facilities. Our debt service uh fund mill levy rate is seven
mills uh for 2026 and it'll slightly drop in 2027 in order to be able to shift some funds to
the general fund. Um again uh the council's work in the strategic plan has guided the CI
CIP as well as the community investments plan um which is we must comply with every year.
Our go debt is consistent with the council's pre-established guidelines and all of our
fund balance meet u uh your uh benchmarks. Just a reminder that in preparing this um
CIP there are several factor se several um strategies and goals from the strategic plan
that were um incorporated into the document. Um I won't repeat these to you. You can read them
on the screen. But I just wanted you to know that your uh efforts in the strategic plan uh
really guided us in the infrastructure planning, not just the operating budget planning. Just a
few uh highlights from the CIP. This uh 10-year plan provides for the construction
of two new police stations, nine new fire stations, a significant fire apparatus
replacement, and a police training facility. It also um devotes significant dollars to the
upgrading of our city facilities, something that I think has been ignored for a little too
long. Um, it allows for significant projects, bridge repair and re rehabilitation projects,
an expansion project along K96, a number of street improvement projects. I just highlight
a few here just because of their uh scope and uh their cost. Some improvements on 13th
Street, 21st Street, Maple, and in downtown. You look at what we're doing out at the airport.
Sign significant amount of dollars put into the replacement of existing pavement um runways
and taxiways. Uh consistent uh excuse me um significant replacement of heavy equipment.
We're continuing to work with Cedric County to look for opportunities to purchase equipment
together or share uses. Um and um although it's been a little hard to identify um opportunities
that we know will work, we're still um continuing that uh study. Uh significant dollars put aside
for replacement of our bus fleet and as you know um always need to be diligent in terms of
improvements to our water and sewer system. terms of living well. Um we this CIP I think emphasizes
a little more than in the past the maintenance of cultural facilities that are owned by the city u
and operated by other uh groups. And then there is a concept for a new sports complex in Dr. Glende
Dy Park um uh that is um in a out in a few years. That is what I have on the CIP. Let me just
go through the budget process a little bit because this is important to note in terms
of what you're doing today and what you'll be doing in the future. Uh the city's required
to I'm going to probably read from the screen here to make sure I get this all accurate
because uh I want to make sure we all fully understand the process. Um we're required
to publish an official notice setting the maximum taxes to be levied by the by taxing
fund, the maximum expenditures by fund, and the date of the official budget adoption.
city must notify the county clerk by July 20th that there's an intent to exceed the
revenue neutral rate. Just a reminder, any increase in taxes levied triggers the RNR.
Reducing the mill levy rate as proposed still requires the city to exceed RNR. Approving the
intent to exceed RNR today is only a commitment to hold a hearing on whether to exceed it uh which
is scheduled would be scheduled for August 26th. Uh notification of the intent to exceed the RNR uh must be provided to the clerk. I've already
told you that without the notification of intent, the timeline for this process changes.
And so if you don't approve that today, then the final adoption will be moved to August
12th and available revenues will decrease by 11.5 million. This is just a quick table to
show you uh the taxes that were levied in 25 basically would be required to be the same
amount in 26 under RNR. And then what you're proposing with the half mill reduction is the
$175.6 million uh taxes, property taxes levied. You have uh three hearings scheduled after
today. The first is an evening hearing on August 7th. Also, there'll be another one,
a daytime hearing on August 19th. That's the same day that the budget simulator closes. And
then you have your final hearing on RNR. the adoption of the operating budget and adoption of
the capital improvement program on August 26th. So the recommended action today is to authorize
publication of notice setting the public hearing for August 26, 2025 and establishing the maximum
tax levies and expenditure authority included in the proposed budget. Approving the notification of
indication to exceed the revenue neutral rate and the RNR public hearing date of August 26, 2025.
Approving the first reading of budget ordinances and receiving and file the 2026 to 2020 2035,
excuse me, proposed capital improvement program. U mayor or vice mayor, there's a reason the mayor
left because you have a very long motion that you'll have to make that reflects all of this.
looking for volunteers. Well, I don't want to get in trouble. I believe that's your responsibility.
So, um, with that, I am glad to answer any questions regarding this document. Any questions
for the city manager? Councilman Hohheisle. Thank Thank you, Vice Mayor. Um, a couple of questions
here. One, I did have some people reaching out um asking about um the fire budget. uh the field
medical training officer. We have three positions listed on there. Has that position been filled
over the last couple of years? I'm sorry, I don't have that. Okay. Yeah, just a little bit of
clarification. We'll get information on that for you. I appreciate that. And then also questions
about the fourth battalion chief positions. Um if those have been added to the budget or not.
Um okay. The second thing is so this if we approve this today that caps that locks in the
mill levy reduction. It does. Yes. At a half a mill. It does. Okay. I'm not sure that that one's
been necessarily discussed fully on council here the implications of that one. Um so I'm curious if
we continue that discussion later. Um, it doesn't mean that we necessarily won't lower the mill
levy. I just don't want it locked in yet. So, I'm just bringing that up. Um, if I could clarify,
the only way that happens is if you approve the rate that is in existence today, I think then they
would have the ability to drop that in the future. Is that right? Or they are they locking in on the
rate period the total? But if they were to lock in at a higher total, they could have they still have
the ability to drop that which would include the rate. All right, that's the only way they could
get that done. So either a significant discussion today or you'd have to improve, you'd have to go
back to the existing rate. Okay. And the other part of that is I brought it up before. I would
like to see more discussion on the homestead tax rebate that's targeted towards senior citizens,
uh, disabled veterans and people who are in low income brackets, property tax relief for them. I
think that's a lot bigger bang for the buck than, um, lowering the mill a half a mill. So, um,
I guess we can chat about that a little more later. Um, depending on what action you take
today, miss probably a good time to talk about it today. Yes. All right. Thank you. One thing uh
you asked a number of questions and one of the I expected you to ask one question that you didn't
and I forgot to mention it. I have seen a lot of social media chatter regarding tree planting and
I just want you to know at the council direction at our last workshop we put that money back into
the operating budget. So there is full funding as there had been previously for tree planting. I
appreciate that. Yeah, Maggie is the tree lady up here. So, I usually rely on her to ask those
hard-hitting questions. All right. Thank you, Bob. Thank you. You, uh, Councilman Johnson.
Thanks, Vice Mayor. Bob, just one technical question. In the recommended action, um, one of
the pieces is to set a maximum amount of taxes levied for the city of Witchah at 175 million
or so. Is that based upon the 32.316 mills the half mill reduction? Excuse me. Sorry, I see Mark
shaking his head. Okay. Yes. So if um just going along with council member Hohisel's comment if
the council did say want to maintain at 32.816 would that number change? Would
that have to be mentioned today in the motion or could staff like adjust
to that since it's not in the motion? I I believe you have to make you'd have
to put that in the motion. Okay. So, the Well, what is that number then? Well, we'll get that for you, Mark. You have Okay. Thank you. Any other comments from the
bench? Questions? Seeing none, we'll open it up for public comment. One
who'd like to comment on the proposed budget? Seeing none, we bring it back to the bench.
Questions or comments from the bench? Councilman Tuttle. Thank you. Um I just want
to make a a few comments. Um I I want to thank Bob so much. Um I'm glad you're 41st budget is
going to be your best budget, right? I think that um this is my sixth or seventh. I've been doing
it since 2019 and this has been the most robust process we've had. So so glad to always have your
input and your expertise. Also want to thank our friends in finance. I know that this is your
labor of love every year. Um it's coming to to fruition. So thank you for all of your hard work.
I also want to thank all the departments and the department heads within the city. Um sometimes
we fail to forget how much time and energy they also put into this process. I like the new
process, how we developed it around our mission. I think it gave everybody an opportunity to just
take a pause back and think about our mission, think about it in different ways and all the ways
that probably every department contributes to the four pillars. So I I was really impressed
with that process. Um I also want to thank communications. They do so much to make sure
that the word gets out about the budget simulator when we're having town halls, you know, when it's
going to be at our district advisory board. So to our friends in communications, we probably don't
thank you enough, but always should. Um, and then I always want to thank the community folks who
came to our district advisory board meetings who contributed it to the community survey. Um, all
the folks who have given us feedback and input. It really does matter. It helps us shape our budget.
And so without community input, we wouldn't have the the product that we have today. Um, I have
said every year since 2019, where you allocate your treasure is a reflection of your values and
voting on the budget is the most important vote that I make every year. So, uh, I'm anticipating
coming to the finish line here with a budget that, um, we can all be proud of. So, thank you so
much, Councilman Johnson. Thanks, Mayor. I have a technical question for Mark. That question is
um you gave me the approximate number 2.7 million would be added to the 175 if we maintained if you
added one more to that how much would that be? One more mill to that. Yeah. Uh approximately
$5.4 million probably. Okay. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you. I I would like to ask the
city manager in the future budgets, CIP budgets. We just opened the second
phase of proc wetlands. Fabulous, absolutely fabulous. Um recommend everyone
go out there and see it. But when you go out there to see it, you want the two paths
to connect phase three. So, if we can find uh room in the budget in the future, maybe
28 29 uh to put that in the CIP, uh I would appreciate that and appreciate the discussion
on that. Any more comments from the bench? Councilman Johnson. Thanks, uh Vice Mayor. Um
before I say what I think about this, I do want to thank staff for all the work that you have done
to address what you've heard from um us on the council and come up with a budget that reflects um
what you were hearing specifically around reducing the meal half a mill. Um I am not supportive of
that. I've given a lot of reasons publicly but um I believe it is performative. I think one of
us said symbolic to give a $14 benefit to the average resident and it I don't believe the $14
annually is worth the impact to local government but with the services that we provide the demands
that we're hearing um and the quality of life initiatives that people really depend on. Um, we
have went, my joke is always, we haven't increased the mil levy since the greatest performer ever
performed in the Super Bowl, that'd be Michael Jackson back in the early 90s. And now we are
looking at reducing it, I understand some of the public conversation about property taxes, but
if the world has changed as much as it has in this time and we haven't increased it to provide better
services and more resources for our residents, to me, it just doesn't make sense to reduce
it. And again, for a symbolic $14 that you'll eat up with a few gallons of gas or one pizza
or if you are someone who goes to Starbucks, usually one of their drinks is like $28. So, I
think that um something performative like that is not worth doing today. I do believe strongly
that we need to either increase the mill levy or at least maintain to help this council, future
councils have an easier time serving our citizens in the future. Just like councils in the past have
taken revenues and put it into the rainy day fund, which is helping us now. Um, if we choose
to again symbolically do the $14 or $2.3 or $2.7 million impact to the budget, that likely
is not going to change in the future. Even as we've talked about a proposed sales tax, that
is up to you all, the voters, to say yes or no to. We just put it on the ballot. If that doesn't
happen, we again jeopardize a lot of the services uh with the city. And with so much of our budget
going to salaries, when those folks who are emailing us telling us to cut, that means that
we will be letting people go at some point. Um, I don't think that is what citizens really want.
There may be a few, but overall, I think the majority of Witchah wants the investments in this.
So, I asked for some specific numbers because I wanted to uh move that the city council raise
the mill levy, not cut the mill levy. Therefore, my motion is to set the public hearing on the
revenue neutral rate and proposed 2026 budget, including the tax increment finance districts
and self-supporting municipal improvement district and the reertification for the Ice
Rink Century 2 sewer and affordable housing funds. August 2 20 August 26, 2025. Authorized the
publication of the formal public hearing notices. approved the first reading of the ordinances on
the general tax levy for the city of Witchah, TIFF districts, and SMID. Authorize the staff to
make any technical adjustments required to comply with the state statute. Set a maximum amount of
taxes levy for the city of Witchah at 183,71,326 based on an anticipated mill levy of 33.816 816 and an estimated assessed
valuation of 5 bill433,881,828. set the maximum amount of estim taxes levy for the self-supporting municipal
improvement district at 1,396,024 based on an estimated levy of 10 mills and an
estimated assessed valuation of $139 million602 $418. authorized staff to notify the Cedric County
Clerk of the intent to exceed the revenue neutral rate for the city of Witchah taxing funds and the
SMID taxing fund and receive and file the 2026 2035 proposed capital improvement program. There's
a motion uh Councilman Tuttle. Thank you. Could you repeat that? No, I'm just kidding. Um, and
and I guess this is a question for council member Johnson or for council member or excuse me for
legal and I understand we're waiting on a second but can you just synthesize what your motion
was? I'm sorry I was trying to pay attention but I'm I'm a I'm a I'm not an audio learning
learner. So what exactly are you proposing? In short my motion was to raise the mill levy one.
So, not follow the proposed manager's budget, but to change the manager's budget to have it
be an increase in it was to um not follow the budget that came in with the half mill drop, but
to not only keep where we are, but add one. So, what I suggested, I guess, would be a mill and
a half over what is being proposed. And legal, correct me, we have a motion, and we're
anticipating a second. We have a motion. I have not heard a second. That's what I mean.
We haven't heard a second. Okay. Thank you, Councilman Hohisel. Thank you, Vice Mayor.
Um, I agree with much of what Council Member Johnson has said. I don't feel like this is the
time to necessarily raise taxes in the mil. So, I'm sorry you had to burn off all those calories
with that long long uh motion there. But, yeah, I just want to just make a note. I can't
support any tax increases at this time. Uh, Councilman Johnson again. Yep. Thanks,
Vice Mayor. Um, just for clarification before I continue, Jennifer, that motion did die for
lack of a second. Correct. That's correct. All right. Thank you. I have a second motion. I
would like to move that the that we maintain our mill levy rather than reduce it.
Therefore, I would move that the city council set the public hearing on the revenue
neutral rate and the proposed 2026 budget, including the tax increment finance districts and
the self-supporting municipal improvement district and the reertification for the ice rink century
2 sewer and affordable housing funds August 2026, August 26, 2025. Authorize public publication of
the formal public hearing notices. approved the first reading of the ordinances for the general
tax levy for the city of Witchah. TIFF districts and Smid authorize staff to make any technical
adjustments required to comply with state statute. Set a maximum amount of taxes levied for the
city of Witchah at $178,31 301,326 based on an anticipated mill levy of 32.816 816 mills and an
estimated assessed valuation of 5 bill433,881,828. set the maximum amount of taxes levied for
the self-supporting municipal improvement district at 1,396 396,24 based on
an estimated levy of 10 mills and an estimated assessed valuation of 139,139,62,418. authorized staff to notify the Cedric County Clerk
of the intent to exceed the revenue neutral rate for the city of Witchah taxing funds and the
SMID taxing fund and receive and file the 2026 2035 proposed capital improvement program.
Thank you. And that would be the a motion, correct? Since the first motion died, that would
be the motion. That is correct. Okay. I would like to make a substitute motion. Vice Mayor, just so
I can make sure we're clear, council member, what number did you use as the maximum amount of taxes
taxes levied? The maximum amount was 178,31,326 based on the meal levy that maintains where
we're at at 32.816. So, it may not make a difference. I mean, depending how you
all vote, but I want to make sure that number is accurate. It's actually, if you
would substitute this, it's a 178,318,266. I would like to make that change to
my motion. I'll second his motion. Okay, mayor. Point of clarification.
Legal. If this motion were to fail, then we would be allowed to offer a
different motion entirely. Correct. That's correct. Thank you. Am I allowed
to make a substitute motion right now? I've not heard a second on second. Oh, I did not
hear it and it's not showing on the screen. Okay. There's motion in a second. I would like to make
a substitute motion. That motion is to take the recommended action. set the public hearing on the
revenue neutral rate and the proposed 2026 budget, including the tax incremental financing districts
and the self-supporting municipal improvement district and the resertification for the
ice rink Century 2 sewer and affordable housing funds. August 26th, 2025. Authorize a
publication of the formal public hearing notice. Approve the first reading of the ordinance for
the general tax levy for the city of Witchaw, TIFF districts, and Smid. Authorize staff to make
any technical adjustments required to comply with the state statute. sent a maximum amount of taxes
levied for the city of Witchaw at 175,61,326 based on anticipated mill levy
of 32.316 mills an estimated assessed valuation of 5 billion433,881,828 set the maximum amount of taxes levied
by the self-supporting municipal improvement district at1,396,024 based on an estimated mill levy of 10 mills and
an estimated assessed valuation of 139 million $62,418. authorizes staff to notify the Seduk
County clerk of the intent to exceed the revenue neutral rate for the city of Witchaw taxing funds
and the Smid taxing fund and receive and file the 2026 to 2020 2035 proposed capital improvement
program. Second. There's been a motion and a second on the substitute motion. Any comments?
Councilman, I have Councilman Johnson. My name stayed there, but I will say um I am very
supportive again of all the work that staff did and the programs and services we provide and
all of the wonderful people here at the city of Witchah that work day in and day out to um make
local government more responsive to the community, provide the services that are necessary. Um today
I cannot support this. I would be reluctant in supporting something that maintains because I've
continually said that what I've seen over the years is we truly need to invest more in these
services, but I cannot vote for a symbolic $14 benefit to the average widget that I know will
put some strains on local government in the future. So, I will unfortunately not be supporting
this. It has nothing to do with our staff that are full of incredible people doing incredible
things, but um the symbolic nature of this is just something that I cannot support. Councilman
Hohis. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Um just a point of clarification from staff. If this is deadlocked
at three, uh what happens to that motion? And then if the other motion is deadlocked at three,
what happens? So on so forth. So, we have to have council authority by the 20th. Is that right?
We have to file with the county by the 20th. So, you'd have to have a special meeting if you can't
reach agreement today. I I think we do have the mayor online and and she said she will vote.
Oh, okay. So, we will have a Okay. a majority. Councilman Tuttle, I keep doing that today. Thank
you. Um, I just want to clarify with legal because I've had a few people asking me what's going on.
So, we had a substitute motion to decrease the mill levy that failed. Excuse me. We had a motion
to decrease the mill levy that failed. Then we had a motion to maintain and that then was offered a
substitute motion to have the proposed manager's budget come to us. That's correct. Okay. I
just want to make sure that everybody here, everybody who's watching online in their offices
and their homes because people are a little bit confused. This is an interesting situation that we
haven't probably experienced in the past. So, just wanted to make sure everybody's on the same page.
Thank you. That just to clarify, the first motion Councilman Johnson made was to increase it by a
mill. Second motion was to keep the full valuation of the assessed values. Substitute motion I made
was to take the half mill decrease. Thank you, Councilman Glascock. Mr. Manager, just a quick
question again. This would be the first time in nearly 40 years that the city council would be
reducing the mill levy. At least 30 years. 30 years if this were to pass right now. Right. Thank
you, Councilman Hohisel. Thank you, Vice Mayor. I was wondering if uh the vice mayor would accept
a friendly amendment to lower the mill levy by a quarter of a mill instead of a half of a mill. And
again, this could also um have further discussion. It doesn't mean we're locked in at reducing it
just a quarter of a mill, but it would allow for additional um discussion in the upcoming month. I
I appreciate that, but I'm going to stay with the motion substitute motion made. Thank you,
though. All right. Any any other comment? Seeing none, we'll open it up. Have we
already moved public comment yet? We have, haven't we? Yeah. Becky, just to confirm,
there was a second by council member Tuttle. I just don't see. Okay. Was a second a
motion. A second. Um have opened it up for com. Do we need to do it again
since a substitute motion? No. Okay, they brought it back to the bench. So, Mr.
Clerk, will you please open up the role? Mayor Woo. I Okay, motion passes 5 to two. Thank you. Uh we'll we'll just take a quick 10-minute break. Okay, we'll take a five
minute break. I tell you what, we're going to make it four
minutes. 11:20. Be back. Don't even have a vice mayor as fast as I de 2025 00008 proposed proposed amendment of the
city of Witchah 2035 urban growth areas map and 2035 future growth concept map as an element
of the community investments plan 2015 to 2035 good morning Scott Wadel from the planning
department so as you heard this item is to consider whether to adopt amendments to the
Witchaw Cedric County comprehensive plan here's the recommended action. It would update two
different maps that are contained in the plan. Uh one is the Witchaw 2035 urban growth areas map
and the other is the future growth concept map. The comprehensive plan's title is the
community investments plan. It is a guide and contains the two maps that are
being considered today. One of the maps is mentioned the urban growth areas map.
It is advisory only. It shows where cities in Cedric County expect to expand and
could provide services by the year 2035. The 2035 future growth concept
map is Witchaw focused and shows the preferred growth pattern for Witchah. This process was initiated by the city council
in May of this year with a focus on the area near 55th Street South and Ridge Road. The recommended
action would remove the following area from the Witchaw urban growth areas map and future growth
concept map. And the boundaries are 47th Street to the north, Hoover to the east, 119th Street to
the west, and halfway between 55th Street and 63rd Street south to the 63rd Street to the south. And
a note that this is in the unincorporated Cedric County as of this time, but has been identified as
part of the Witchaw Urban Growth area. So, here's another map with the list of the boundaries. Here
is a graphic that shows the location shown on the urban growth areas map. So, it's outlined
in blue with the hatch marks. Here's what the map would look like with that area removed.
Here's the location on the future growth concept map. And likewise, here's a graphic that shows
what it would look like with that area removed. As part of the analysis, staff did a review of
the area. The future land uses recommended in this location are agricultural or vacant, industrial,
and commercial. Staff also looked at the following features. Flood planes. There are some areas
located in the 100year area flood plane. We also looked at the CIP and the CIP does not
program any funding for any of the following in the area. Fire stations, police stations, or
roadway improvements. The location does have an electrical substation located approximately
half a mile to the east. This is one of three identified locations in Sedick County where
energy solar energy conversion systems can connect to the larger electrical grid. The
CIP also does not program any funding for water manes in this area. KDH records do show the
presence of contamination in the area and that the contamination is in the process of being
remediated. The KDH records indicate that it poses no unacceptable risk to human health or
the environment based on current conditions. Staff also reviewed the proximity to airports
and the site is approximately two miles to the south of Eisenhower airport. Here is a slide uh
that shows the review and consideration process. This is also described in the staff report.
So here's the recommended action and that is coming to you from the planning commission.
And with that, I'll stand for any questions. Any questions for Scott from the bench? I see no questions. I open up for public
comment. Anyone like to speak on this issue? See none. Bring it back to the bench. Oh, Councilman Glasco. Thank you, Vice Mayor.
With a motion, I move that the city council adopt the ordinance approving proposed amendment
of the city of Witchaw 2035 urban growth areas map and 2035 future growth concept map as an
element of the community investments plan 2015 to 2035. Sign the ordinance and authorize
the ordinance to be published. Second. There's been a motion a second. Open the poll. Don't see it on my screen, but
motion carries 6. Mr. Clerk, will you please call the next item? DE 20250011 College Hill Neighborhood Plan. Good morning,
Vice Mayor and Council. Justin Constantino with the planning department here to talk about the
College Hill Neighborhood Plan. Just a quick disclaimer before I get started. The College
Hill Neighborhood Plan does not allocate any funding for actions identified or recommended in
the plan. The recommended action this morning is to approve an ordinance adopting the College
Hill neighborhood plan as an element of the comprehensive plan. Authorize the necessary
signatures and authorize the ordinance to be published. The boundary of the College Hill
neighborhood consists of one square mile, Hillside Street to the west, Central
Avenue to the north, Oliver Street to the east, and US 54400 to the south. The
neighborhood is bisected by Douglas Avenue. Uh this item has been um definitely uh worked
through at the steering committee level. The steering committee was formed back in November of
2023. Um since December of 2023 until April of 25, the public steering committee has met 16 times.
The role of the steering committee member is to assist in the development of the plan goals,
actions, and strategies, and help develop criteria for setting priorities of the plan, review and
provide input on implementation strategies, assist with public events, public open houses,
and communicate the status of the planning process to stakeholders. The project kicked off
in earnest back in March of 2024 with a public open house held at Grace Presbyterian Church.
Every resident in College Hill, excuse me, every uh property address in College Hill received
a postcard. So over 3,000 postcards were mailed for the event. We had over 150 attendees that
were signins. Um we had uh the event was break uh broken up into two different sections, a round
table discussion and board engagement comments. The board engagement comments were kind of come
as you go. That was the first hour of the event. The round table discussion focused on smaller
groups where people were asked specific questions about the neighborhood involving land use and
zoning, mobility, housing, pools, recreation, community cohesion, schools, and education.
Following the public openhouse event, we released a online public survey uh that was released on
April 19th. Uh there was a survey and a social pinpoint map. The social pinpoint map was kind of
cool because folks taking the survey were able to identify certain uh areas in the neighborhood that
they would like to see improved or things that they liked. Uh a lot of uh responses on that 531
total responses were received prior to the survey close date on June 3rd. Uh one aspect uh one
question that came out of the survey was regarding the College Hill overlay. We asked if the
neighborhood would be in support of a potential overlay uh down the road and we received uh 90%
of the neighborhood stated that they would be in support of an overlay. The discussion this morning
is specifically focused on the neighborhood plan. Uh the discussion on the overlay would potentially
come later. Um, in addition to the public open house and the survey, we did hold community
engagement focus groups specifically for local business owners, churches, and nonprofits, and
schools. We wanted to get as much feedback from those groups as possible because we thought they
brought a unique perspective to the neighborhood. That was also held at Grace Presbyterian Church in
June of 24. Uh, we had a second public open house in the spring of this year on April 15th, again at
Grace. Uh, same process. Every property owner did receive a postcard about that event. Again, very
well attended, over 150 attendees. The intent of the project was to review the draft College
Hill neighborhood plan and then provide any input on a potential overlay for the neighborhood
at a later date. The um online public survey, we released a second online public survey for folks
that were unable to attend that public openhouse. We launched that uh just a few days after that
openhouse event and it closed a few weeks later on April 30th. The plan itself, the contents of
the plan, it is broken down into five chapters with an introduction, a little bit of demographics
about the neighborhood as well as uh the community engagement process that I just walked through. Uh
the plan recommendations, which I will go through uh in a little bit, as well as what happens if
the plan is approved. How do we implement that? The goals, strategies, and actions of the plan are
broken down into six different categories. Housing mobility, land use, neighborhood character, parks
and public space, and community cohesion. This is kind of the layout of what the plan looks like.
This is just an example. The image you see on your screen is from the housing section. Basically,
uh each uh strategy is broken up into an action uh followed by a brief description and then a city
department is assigned as a lead with a supporting department. Um so uh for example a lead would
be um uh either the public works department or the planning department and then support would
either come from another department or from the college hill neighborhood association itself.
Uh mobility is another example of uh one of the sections one of the strategies that was uh very
important to the neighborhood. What you see on the screen here is the uh reduction of lanes on
routant to Oliver from four lanes to three lanes with a turning lane in the center and two bicycle
lanes. This recommendation originally came from the 2011 Douglas Design District streetscape
plan. So, one of the things that came out of the steering committee was that they would like
to see this continued and to make Douglas Avenue more pedestrian friendly. Land use design and
development. This section provides guidance for staff and the development community as it
relates to future zoning cases. Uh the image on the left of the screen is the existing land uses
found in the unified zoning code and the image on the right depicts the desired future land uses
identified uh in the College Hill neighborhood. The future land use map uh creates new land use
categories within the College Hill neighborhood, specifically mixeduse office, neighborhood
commercial, and mixeduse commercial. Again, these land uses uh on the right are a guide
for future development and don't supersede the existing zoning code in the College
Hill neighborhood. If the plan is approved, uh implementation, we will uh create an annual
implementation work plan. We've already started that in the planning department. The work plan
will identify the tasks and activities that uh were identified in the plan and the organizations.
Uh the planning department will work with other city departments to make sure that the strategies
and actions uh identified in the plan are reviewed on an annual basis. Uh that will help uh ideally
implement the plan. Um this will include specific timelines, resources required and performance
metrics to track our progress on the development of the plan which is valuable to both the city and
the neighborhood and we will be following up with both the neighborhood association as well as the
steering committee on that. Uh this item has been reviewed by the district advisory board advanced
plans committee MAPC and here we are today on July 15th for uh your approval. Again the recommended
action is to approve the college neighborhood plan as an element of the comprehensive
plan and I'm available for any questions. Questions for my Councilman Hohisel. Thank you
Vice Mayor. Um just a question about process. So, if there's a property that's currently zoned
one way, but then the the College Hill plan or any neighborhood plan has it identified as it
being inappropriate and wants to zone it something else. How does that process work out? Is it
grandfathered in until the property changes or So, the future land use recommendations that are in
the plan would be used as a reference for staff uh for their staff report. So, if there's a a
an instance where development is about to occur in the College Hill neighborhood, obviously
staff would consult the unified zoning code, but they would also consult the future land
uses uh preferences within this plan as well. That information would go into the staff
report and be presented to the MAPC. Okay. So, if a business decides to leave the shutter, let's
let's take like South Broadway for example. Sure. Um where they want to eliminate uh car lots.
There's so many car lots along South Broadway. when that property comes up and um comes up
for sale or any other possibilities like that, does the reszoning automatically kick in or is
that something that would have to go through DAB and council? If I could, sir, Scott Wadel from
the planning department. Uh so the future land use map is a guide for when zoning cases uh come
forward and staff can use that as a tool to refer to about whether or not to recommend approval
of that zoning case. It's not so much in this case a tool that we anticipate uh seeing a
mass reszoning throughout the neighborhood, but rather something that's just a
guide when individual zoning cases come to the planning commission. Okay.
So it doesn't automatically kick in. It would still have to go through the process.
That's correct. Yes, sir. Okay. Thank you, Councilman Glascott. Quick question to that end
though because it's a guide and this that would influence the recommendation from staff or Nile
based on that. Correct. That is correct. Yes. Thank you. Seeing no one else on the bench, we'll open it up for public
comment. Like to comment on this? Seeing none, bring it back to the bench.
Councilman Glascock. Thank you, Vice Mayor. I know there will probably be a motion coming.
I think there's a lot of great things in this plan. I've read through every page, but there
are also some things that I don't agree with um that I think are overburdensome property
owners. So, I hope a lot of these things can take place, but I don't support all of these. And
because that influences staff's recommendation before district advisory boards, before the city
council, I will not be supportive of this today. Councilman Johnson. Thanks, Vice Mayor. Uh before
I make my motion, I just want to say you did a great job. Um all your work and the team's
work and I was trying to be a quiet a quiet uh watcher in the back and just saw how you
worked with this group and I tuned in from time to time. I'm really happy to see how this came
out. Um to council member Glascock's um point, that was actually a good point or reason that
this was formed was council had to continue to make these different decisions based upon what
was coming in College Hill and the neighborhood. uh working with the neighborhood and
it's good to have an idea of what the neighborhood as a whole is looking for and
the engagement, the postcards that went out, the high attendance of all of these, it
will help guide future councils and staff on what the neighborhood's actually looking
um to see happen in College Hill. So again, I'm I'm proud of it. It turned out even better
than I thought it would. And again, great job to you, planning department, and the teams that
we worked with. Um, I think this is going to be really good and also provide some guidance and
opportunities for other neighborhoods that might be looking to have plans. So, you might be busy
a lot in the next couple years hopefully. So, uh, with that, I am excited about this. I would
move that the city council approve an ordinance adopting the College Hill neighborhood plan as an
element of the Witchah Cedric County Comprehensive Plan. Second. There's a budget motion in a
second. Mr. Clerk, we'd open up the roll, please. Motion carries 5 to one. Clerk,
will you please call the next item, HPC 202545, nomination for the Crownuptown Theater
to the Witchah Register of Historic Places. Good morning. Scott Wadel from the planning
department. So, uh, this item, as you heard, is to consider whether or not to add
the Crown Uptown Theater to the Witchaw Register of Historic Places. And so, just
a quick note, this is not a zoning case. The recommended action is for the council
to take action as determined necessary. The history of this item goes back to a resoning
application to increase the permitted occupancy uh which was denied in February and a demolition
permit that the owner applied for also in February. Currently, there are interim controls
that prevent issuing a demolition permit for the site. Those controls are due to expire
at the end of August 4th. Here's a diagram with an overview of the nomination and review
process which is described in the staff report. Part of the review process included consideration
of the historic qualifications of the site. The Witchaw Historic Preservation Board found
that it meets the criteria to be listed on the Witchaw Register and the vote at their meeting for
this was 5 to zero. A report about the theater, its history, and qualifications is attached
to the staff report. The Crown Uptown Theater at 3207 East Douglas was constructed in 1928. It
is not listed on the National, State, or Witchaw Registers of Historic Places. It is identified
as an undesated historic resource by the city of Witchaw. Here's an image of a newspaper page from
when it opened and some images of the theater. The analysis uh for this also included review
of plans and policies. The planning commission determined that the listing is consistent with
adopted plans. The vote at their meeting was 8 to2. A question has come up during this process
about whether a structure on the Witchaw Register of Historic Places can be demolished. The answer
is yes, but it requires additional review. That review process requires consideration by the
Witchaw Historic Preservation Board. The board's decision can be appealed to the city council. Two
recent examples of similar processes where this occurred included the warehouses in Oldtown that
were demolished or are planned to be demolished and apartments north of downtown that were also
requesting per permission for a demolition permit. So in terms of considerations, any vote to
list the property on the Witchaw Register of Historic Places will require five out
of seven votes. On Friday, July 11th, the owner filed an objection to the
listing in writing with the city clerk, which per the municipal code requires a twothirds
majority vote for approval of including it on the register. So again, the recommended action is
to take action as determined necessary by the council. This is a public hearing for this item.
And I would also point out that Robin Gib Gibson with Faulk Architects is here today and available
for any questions. Robin conducted the research, compiled the photos, and prepared the report about
the history and qualifications of the theater. And so with that, I'll stand for any questions.
Thank you, Scott. Any questions from the bench? Seeing none, we will open it up for public
comment. Would anyone like to comment on this? Good morning. Is it still morning? It is barely.
My name is Anne Garvey and I'm a community I think I'm considered an arts activist uh referred to as
a passionate preservationist in a recent article, but and I am. Um, and before I begin my
remarks, I wanted to express my gratitude, my deep appreciation for the words that Mr.
Brandon Johnson spoke this morning in with who has the courage of his conviction to express so
eloquently his objection to our compliance with the new federal demands coming essentially from
the executive order. But thank you for that. And thank you for that too, Maggie. My own convictions
have brought me here this morning. It's my conviction that we must not see the destruction
of one more extremely valuable building, the Crown Uptown Theater. I'm here today as, as
I said, not as a passionate preservationist. Yes, it can be designated historic. That will not
keep it from being demolished. I have seen triple designated historic buildings torn down
and replaced with hideous structures here. Now, what I'm arguing is the bigger picture, the
long-term picture, how significant this place has been for nearly a hundred years until the last
two years. I've tried to estimate how many events and experiences I've had at the Crown since moving
to Witchah. And here are some of the things I've been to there. The Tallgrass Film Festival, dozens
of theatrical performances, plays, concerts, dance recital, your children's dance recital, book
readings, business Christmas parties, political rallies, a funeral, a wedding, a class reunion.
I've seen jazz, R&B, classic music concerts there. There have been art exhibits, anniversaries, and
celebratory gayas there. In other words, the crown is an extraordinarily valuable and extremely rare
venue. We do not have many stages in Witchah. And this serves a perfect medium model for it. It's
a third the size of a concert two uh Century 2 concert hall, half the size of or of the Oreium,
larger than Mary Jane Teal. There just aren't very many performing places for our enormous arts
community. It's been a great use to Witchah until the current owner closed its doors pretty much to
the Witchaw community. Now, for those of you who believe that a privatelyowned property must not be
tampered or interfered with by others, let me ask you this. If you knew of a child who was being
neglected, abused, or threatened, would you not feel compelled to act on that child's behalf?
This is how I feel about this building. I feel morally obligated to stand here in front of you
and beg that it not be demolished. It will never be returned. It can never be replicated. We cannot
do this again. We will lose a very valuable place. I know it's been gone for two years. We haven't
had it for two years. But look at the long-term plan. If we if you had something of value, you
must not see it go away forever in perpetuity. never have the opportunity to see and experience
beautiful events there, happy experiences. You know, art changes people's lives and it saved my
nephew when he restored it claims that art saved his life and he dedicated himself and spent a lot
of money doing a lot of work within that building. Now, do you any do you all get the the shout
which is our art newsletter? It's free to you. If you look at that, you can see how gigantic
our art community is and thereby how enormous our art community and uh audience is. Now,
I'm just imploring you to don't take this away forever. if you you know it's a stop gap
to put it on the historic register but we must think in long terms of what how valuable this
place is and I ask that you stop this continual demolition of beautiful buildings important
places we need this we college hill needs it the whole city of Witchah needs it thank you so
much for your attention this Morning. Thank you, Anne. Council member Tuttle, thank you.
Um, Miss Garvey, I would like to say that you are not an arts advocate or an activist.
You are the arts at activist. So, thank you for being here today. I really appreciate your
comments. It did spark a question for Scott. So, Scott, if you could possibly join us
again. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you, Scott. This is and I appreciate you
meeting with me last week. Um I think it was last week, right? Um this is a really hard one for me.
So I want to ask some clarifying questions based on comments from the speaker. Um and I know
we had an opportunity for questions before, but this just came up. So I I think it's
timely and I hope my colleagues will be okay. So today the vote is whether or not this
building goes on the historic list. Correct. That is correct. Voting for it to go on the
historic preservation doesn't mean that it can't be torn down. That is correct. We are
not voting on whether or not the building can be torn down or not. That that is correct
in nature. Uh I will explain though that uh there is a pending demolition permit uh that
is per currently being pursued that has a stay of 180 days which will expire at the end of August
4th. Uh if this property is not placed on the historic register uh then my understanding is
that there's no reason to deny issuing granting that demolition permit and so the property owner
will have the authority to demolish the site. It does not mean that it will be demolished, but
it simply means that that permit will be issued. Thank you, Council Member Glascock. Thank
you. Also, question for Scott. Even in this period where there's been a hold on the
demolition permit, if the applicant, let's say, demolished the building yesterday, they would
only faced $150 citation by the city. Correct. Uh, I'm not sure that I can
confirm or deny that one. So, uh, there would be penalties,
but I'm not sure to what degree. Vice Mayor, Council Members, Chris Labram, MABCD.
Good morning and thanks. Appreciate the chance to to clarify that. Uh, as that came up last time, we
didn't get very deeply into that. So to to ensure we cover all of that, uh we would go out if we
noticed that the building was under demolition, we would go out and stop that action. So if a
contractor was to undertake that, uh the potential of their licensing except insurance, some of those
things may be in jeopardy. So that would be the uh that would really be kind of the enforcement arm.
But as you pointed out in the last discussion, sir, the our code is not oriented to stop someone
from this action with their own building. So the penalty, for lack of a better term for that
would be an increased fee. Our normal fee for a demolition permit is $50. That fee would increase
to $150 once they had proper permissions in place to proceed with the demolition. So that was the
only penalty the property owner faced up until August 4th. Correct. Okay. Second question, I
don't know if this would be for you or Scott, probably Scott. What additional prohibitions would
be placed on the building if this was placed on the registry? Sure. So, um, just one moment. I
want to make sure I get to the right code here. There would have to um so what would happen
is that uh work that would modify the exterior or damage or destroy the building uh would be
required to and that is work that would require a permit or some action on the part of the city
uh would require a certificate of appropriateness uh first and that depending on the scope of the
work either can be approved administratively if it's something minor we just saw some
examples of those at the Witchah Historic Preservation Board yesterday where they were
doing some AC work or something like that um or something major where say they're replacing
they intend to replace windows or change the facade in some way uh the the minor ones can
be approved administratively the major ones require review by the historic preservation board.
The board then has the authority to deny a permit for one of those activities and if the property
owner uh disputes that or wants to continue or pursuing that, they can always appeal that then
to the city council. So, you've seen that in terms of demolition permits, but it would also
apply to possibly uh I don't know, permits that would somehow affect the exterior. So there would
be additional prohibitions placed on it that were not in place when the property owner purchased
the property in a manner of speaking. Yes. And processes that go with those. Yes, sir. Thank you,
Scott. Thank you, Council Member Rick Johnson. Thanks, Mayor Scott. real quick. Um, if something
was also listed on the historic register of pl or witchah register of historic places, does that
offer up them the ability to get any additional like incentives to maybe get some dollars to
help out with investment in the property? U, not so much on the Witchita register. However, uh, if
they can if it can get listed on the national and the state registers, uh, then there are uh, tax
incentives that come with those. So, uh, federal and and then state taxes. Uh, likewise, it, uh,
would make the property eligible potentially for, uh grants or something like that. However, I
do want to indicate that I've not seen one of those come through for in some time. So, I don't
want to get anyone's hopes up on those, but the the tax incentives is certainly available. Okay.
Well, it's always better to be eligible than not. Okay. I don't see anyone else wanting to speak
or do Okay. Afternoon yet? Not yet. Good morning, guys. Mike Brown with the Crown. Um I I think
we all know why we're here. We We bought this property and found out things that were not there,
even though it has been said publicly by folks on your council that we knew what we were buying.
Um the the piece of code that you guys are using here with this list that was created in 1991
is 42 pages long. It has over 700 properties on it. I wonder how many people in Witchah that own
those 700 properties know that their properties on this list and what the possibility of control
is that the council can put on them to do with their private property. I don't know how many of
you have read the constitution, but in the fifth amendment, it talks about regulatory takings. It
talks about imminent domain where someone takes private property for public use and that owner is
compensated. In my opinion, and I think that the Supreme Court has looked at it in some levels,
that this is a regulatory taking effort by the city council. You're putting restrictions on a
private property that were not there at the time it was purchased. They do not show up in title
work. They were not present at all. I've been, you know, in the middle of a of litigation with
a neighbor over use of our building, and that's here nor there. But I've had communication from
them in an email that the only reason that this was brought to light was because I underestimated
them and they made you guys aware of it. Now, whether that's true or not, it doesn't matter.
The problem is is that you've got private property being controlled or an effort to be controlled
with no compensation to me. Now, there was someone that spoke up here earlier that the venue's been
closed for two years. That's clearly not true. We've had Clint Black, Terry Clark, Paulie Shore,
multiple artists through that deal. We hosted the Panda Awards where we gifted back $1,200 of their
fee for a scholarship in perpetuity that we'll do as long as we're around. So for for you guys to
come in and restrict the use of this building for it's been owned by multiple people that have lost
quarter of a million dollars a year and great that they had all of these things that people enjoy
going to. But this is a business. This isn't a museum. It's not a publicly owned building. It's
not subsidized by the city. You guys just admitted that by placing this on your registry there's no
financial incentive for me to agree to this. Look, if can we go back and look at the photos that you
guys showed of the building that that were from the history? Is that an option? Can we see that?
Is who's in control of that? Can we do that? Mr. Clerk, you can put those up. I mean, there's and
the reason we're here is because of a capacity issue, right? So, the planning commission has
approved it twice for political reasons. I believe that it has been denied. There's not any Can we
go to the interior photo from 1928? Keep going. Thank you for this. There should there's There we go. So, that's what
that building looked like in 1928. There are 1500 people in seats there with no voice actuated
fire alarms, no strobe lights. The building is built out of non-combustible material. Now, I
don't see why other than just a few people that are complaining about us moving this property
forward with the capacity we need. You guys have the ability to save this building. It's
not economically feasible to operate it at the capacity that it's at. We've hired engineers,
architects that have expressed that the code says that it'll support what we've asked. We've had
drones in the air that have reflected what the parking was like when we had 860 people in there.
You could still park on Douglas at 8:30. We have a property owner across the street that controls
160 parking spaces. Private property. They can do with it what they want. But after 6:00, no one's
allowed to park there. None of their tenants are open after 6. Again, private property, their
rights. Just like my rights with our property, we should be allowed to do with it what we
see fit as an investment, not what a group of people that don't own it want to tell us what
to do. There's no public use involved here. There's no public compensation. If the city would
like to do something with it, buy it. It's all I have to say. I think it's a taking. I think it's
a forceful control of real estate. It impacts our ability to develop it. I've had multiple people
that have looked at it to buy it. However, with a historic designation and restriction on that in
that market, it's not viable. So, I ask you to do what's right and follow the Constitution and do
what you're elected to do and support the people of Witchah and property owners. Thank you for
your time. Thank you. I have a question for you, Mr. Yes, sir. Mr. Johnson, you asked for a permit
to allow 2,000 people, correct? And you said there was 1500 at that time. At that time, would you be
open to negotiations, a number less than 2,000, closer to 1500? So, is that something that you
guys can make that decision today? Can you enter into a motion? No. No. It it be it'd be something
between you and basically a neighborhood. Oh, the neighborhood doesn't vote on this. And and
I've I've you know, there's 8 10 people that have been out actively trying to unhook our parking
agreements from property owners. So, I I've I've, you know, I've met with enough property folks
in that area. I've made every effort. Uh, we've presented every piece of evidence to
support what we want to do and it's just not economically viable and I and from everyone we've
talked to, there's no real parking issue. Um, so I'm willing to listen, but so far nobody's
come to the table other than to try to tell us what to do. Councilman Glasco. Thank you, Mr.
Manager. Regardless if this passes or fails today, what could be the next steps for the
property owner to either bring another application before this body? I know that
we can't vote on an application today. What would be the next steps? What's the timeline
regardless of whether it's a yes or no vote? Yes, sir. Um, this property is a little bit unique
in that the zoning, the custom zoning that was created for this property is what restricts uh
the occupancy as well as fire codes and building codes. But it's unique that the zoning code has it
for this um because the application was considered and uh failed to increase it. Uh they have a 12
month basically cooling off period before they can submit another application. If it is substantially
different then they can submit it in six months. Uh ultimately if there's any questions about
whether or not it's a substantial difference, it will be referred to the planning commission
for them to determine whether or not it meets that criteria. How close are we to six months
or 12 months? Um I believe my notes indicated it was February of this year when that was decided.
So they would have 12 months from that date. So August or actually I beg to differ. It may be from
the council date or it may be from the MAPC date. Okay. U one of those two. So it would be within a
range of a couple months of that you're looking uh the applicant could come back around August or
September if it's a substantially different if subst if found to be substantially different. Yes
sir. In that six-month period of time if it's not substantially different they would have to wait
till February March. That's correct. Yes sir. Thank you. Anyone else would like
to publicly comment on this? I have a question for Scott. Is that an
option? No. No. Okay. Thank you though. Good afternoon. My name is Connie Staley. I've
been a educator in Kansas for close to 30 years. um recently moved to the Witchaw area by Garden
Plane and um I've brought so many students, administration, parents to the Crown Center
from rural areas to where those students didn't get that chance in those areas and I would
hate for anything to happen to the crown. I've never done this before so I don't
know if you doing great questions. Any questions for Connie? No. Thank you.
Would anyone else like to speak on this? Arthur Allen concerned citizen and neighbor. I've
all spoken I've spoken with all of you before. Um one thing I would ask is the vice mayor would
allow the um presentation that was prepared by the architecture firm that I witnessed at
the historical preservation board meeting as well as the MAPC which no one else spoke of
and the owner and none of his representatives respected either of those bodies enough to be
present. So I would like it you all because I don't know whether you actually looked
at those slides and that presentation that we as taxpayers and you asked to have put
together. she's here. You have the information, but it's really important that we look
at beyond the property rights situation and the greater whole. I'm sorry, Mike. Sorry I
didn't laugh at you. Thank you very much. You're welcome. They would have the same fiveminut
opportunity that anyone else would have. Is there anyone else that would
like to speak on this issue? Seeing none, I'll bring it back to the bench. Scott, sir, if I if I may, um, there were
questions about the scope of what level of review is required afterwards. I was able to find
the citation in the code and I just want to make sure that uh you understand that a certificate
of appropriateness is required as I described but that a certificate of appropriateness uh
does extend to projects that do not require a permit which proposed to alter features which
have been defined in a district's preservation guidelines as requiring protection. Um, and so I
I just want you to understand that not only is it um things that the city does issue a
permit for, which I'm very familiar with, but it would also extend to uh the features uh
that do not require a permit, but do make this a distinct and historic structure. So, I want you to
I just want to make sure that I convey to you the full breadth and scope of that requirement. Okay.
Thank you, Scott. Council member Title. Scott, don't go too far. Thank you. I'm sorry. I know I'm
working you today. I I just want to make sure that I completely understand, everybody completely
understands. This is the first time I've been through this process in my my time on council. So,
for this to pass today would mean if it passed, it would go on the Witchita Register of Historic
Places. Correct. Correct. Yes. And that would require five of six votes because there's only six
of us here today. Correct. It requires five votes. Yes. Correct. Okay. So, if it went on the Witchah
Register of Historic Places, the owner could still demolish the building if his permit were
approved. That is correct. Yes. I just want to go on record. This is a very hard vote for me. Um, as
someone who is incredibly supportive of the arts, um, culture of our community, historic, I see I
see that, but then I see the other side, too. Um, I also would like to just state for the record
that I know many of my colleagues were able to go and meet with Mr. Brown and take a tour. Um,
I have had no expart communication with with the owner applicant at this point. So, thank you for
answering all my questions. Thank you. Are there any other comments from the bench? Seeing none, I
do have one. Um Ted Morris owned that building for a long time. I went to a lot of plays. Life could
go to plays. Went to a lot of plays. Had Christmas parties from the clothing store there. Um it's
a great building. Um but there is the issue of property rights. I do value that. Be my hope
that Mr. Brown would engage in another process of bringing it back to the bench to MAPC and to
the bench uh to preserve that building and and use it for uh betterment. So, Councilman Glascock,
thank you, Mr. Vice Mayor, Mr. Brown. I've said this multiple times from this bench. I hope that
we save this building. I hope that we choose to be good neighbors in this community. This building
means a lot to people in this room. Means a lot to me. I have a lot of memories there as well.
Um I think value can be subjective but property rights are not. And I hope that somebody from this
bench stand up for my property rights if someone was trying to exert influence over my property
without my consent as well. So that's why I will not be supportive of adding this to the registry.
hope that as a community we can find a solution to save this building because I do believe it has
significance to our community and that is why I will not be adding to the registry. Okay, Council
Member Johnson. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Um, today's action is about the register of historic places.
I won't relitigate the original application, but I will highlight just for this body and others that
the concerns were not necessarily just parking. There was a huge public safety concern and if
you go back to the MAPC meeting and look at some of the questions and conversation capacity
also had to do with building code and fire code and so some of the numbers being requested
weren't realistic anyway. Um but those concerns of safety were a big part of the earlier piece.
Aside from that I am supportive of this. So, I would move that the city council uh enact by
ordinance putting the property on the Witchaw Register of Historic Places, sign the ordinance,
and authorize the ordinance to be published. Second. There's been a motion and a
second. Mr. Clerk, please open the role. Motion is defeated. 33. Mr. Mr. Clerk,
I'd like to take a a poll from the bench. You like to stop for lunch or just keep
going? Council member Johnson. Thanks, Vice Mayor. With that motion failing, I would
move to defer this item to the July the August 5th evening meeting. The item we just voted on.
Yes, it failed. It did not pass. It did not fail. So I would like to move it there where we will
have a full body. I would ask legal. I think it failed. Legal. What's the took five votes? It
would it would take the prevailing party to be able to revisit it and there's no prevailing
party. That's correct. May uh Vice Mayor, that's correct, Council Member Tuttle.
The motion's failed. I don't believe the motion the action can be deferred at this
time. So previously when that had happened, if there was a substantially different motion,
it was allowed. So is that not the case? And that is substantially different because it
would just have to be within this meeting. I wish we had another member on the phone.
With that said, lunch. Keep going. Couple more. Keep going. Okay. Mr. Clerk,
please follow the next item. Approval of insurance brokerage service contract. Good afternoon, Vice Mayor, City
Council. I'm Heather St. Pierre with the Finance Department Risk Management
Division. The item before you is the uh approval of our insurance
brokerage services contract. Let me see if I can get this to move. The risk manage the risk management division
in the finance department is responsible for protecting city assets. Often this involves
seeking insurance coverage and the city's place needs for placement are varied and complex.
To assist staff, the city uses an insurance broker to facilitate market access, manage
any claims processes, and to mitigate risks. The city ensures over 1 billion in property assets
every year. Excess coverages for general liability and workers compensation are also placed annually.
Specialized insurance lines include cyber art and coverages for the airport which are also placed
each year. On February 8th, 2025, the city issued a request for proposals for insurance brokerage
services. Five responses were received. A staff screening and selection committee with members
from finance, law, the city manager's office, and airport reviewed the proposals and
conduct conducted interviews. The staff screening and selection committee recommended
IMA due to their experienced professionals with market access and specific knowledge in
specialized fields. emphasis on risk mitigation, particularly through contract review, and a local
presence with a highly accessible local approach, including investing two times the industry average
in value added client services. The proposed contract is for one year with four additional
one-year renewal periods. The law department has approved the contract as to form and it is
recommended that the city council approve the selection of and contract with IMA Financial
Group. And with that, I'm happy to answer any questions. Any questions from the bench?
Seeing none, I'll open it up for public comment. None. I'll bring it back to the bench. With that, we'd like to I'd like to make
the motion to approve the selection of the contract with IMA Financial Group and
adopt the amending resolution and adopt the necessary signatures. Second. Been a motion
and a second. Clerk, please pull up the role. Motion carries 6. The clerk, next item, please.
Design concept supplemental agreement number four and funding for 29th Street North and Broadway
intersection. Uh good afternoon, Vice Mayor and Council. Steve Denhart with Public Works and
Utilities. Uh the item before you seeks approval for design concept supplemental design agreement
and funding for the 29th Street and Broadway intersection. A little history. Back in July 2021,
the council approved an agreement with Garver to evaluate the existing traffic conditions in an
area bound by uh Broadway on the west, hydraulic on the east, and 25th and 37th streets on the
north and south. Uh the evaluation considered multiple items uh including existing and future
traffic counts, crash history and existing lane configurations at the intersections along
those corridors. Uh that study uh of the that information spanned a 10-year period and evaluated
again traffic accidents uh for those corridors and from that this heat map was generated. So to
kind of orient the map here, Broadway north is to the top and Broadway being on the left and 29th
being on the bottom there. So uh want to draw your attention to the lower lefthand corner. That's the
29th Street and Broadway intersection. And you can tell by the heat map there. There were significant
number of crashes at that location compared to all the other uh intersections that were evaluated. uh
went into a little bit deeper evaluation of those crashes to figure out, you know, what was going on
at that intersection and identified uh primarily there that you know over a third of the crashes
were related to northbound and southbound left turn crashes. So uh from that then we we viewed
that this intersection would be a good candidate for the uh K DOT's highway safety and improvement
program funding and as a result uh applied for that funding and the project was then created as
a separate project standalone from the other 29th Street uh improvements that you've previously
taken action on between Broadway and hydraulic. Um the project again, we submitted it earlier
this year on the HSIP funding and hope to hear within a month here on Kot's um official word on
that application. But we we feel we're in a pretty good spot with that uh with that application. uh
traffic counts uh at that intersection just under 15,000 uh total currently and the split between
both Broadway and 29th it's about 5545 in favor of uh Broadway and so future traffic counts being
just under 19,000 vehicles per day for the future and I might also add to that uh not only did we
apply for the HSIP funding but you know earlier in fact just last month the whole Broadway corridor
for from Ponyie to the south and I235 to the north which is just north of 37th Street here was
applied for for the uh safe streets for all grant. Just a look at some of the existing conditions
out there. Each each uh leg of the intersection is four lanes. Uh no no left turn lanes at all in
either direction. And I think this picture here, this is uh north of the intersection looking
back south. I think this uh picture really illustrates why we really push for the that
center left turn lane. Uh as if you take the white vehicle there looking the same direction as the
camera uh assuming they were making a left-hand turn there and while the uh dark car looking back
towards the camera while also trying to make that lefthand turn. This white vehicle cannot see the
oncoming traffic in the other lane. and that's one of the big factors that contributes to such
a high number of uh left turn related crashes. So the proposed concept uh will reconstruct
the intersection, modify the lane configuration uh including left turn lanes on all four
directions and that does include the uh east leg of the intersection
there where the railroad tracks are. Just the white arrow doesn't show up very well
on this, but um at least my screen, but the um uh new intersection left turn lanes which will
be uh opposite each other which uh add uh create a better line of sight to see oncoming traffic as
well as new it will replace the existing traffic signals and those traffic signals will include the
accessible pedestrian signals. uh on June 29th uh 2025 district 6 advisory board approved the design
concept and supplemental design agreement number four has been prepared uh for final design. So
with that the design fee to date which includes the original design study uh or original study and
design of the 29th Street Broadway to hydraulic corridor improvements is just over $822,000. This
supplemental agreement number four is $54,530. 57 of that is for waterline design along
that 29th Street corridor and is funded through the arterial mains budget. The other
$447,000 is for the design of the 29th and Broadway intersection which brings the total
design fee to date to 1,300 thou $327,043. So the existing project budget for 29th and
Broadway is $500,000 was approved earlier this year and is funded by local sales tax. The
adopted 2025 2034 CIP includes $1 million in 2025 and staff recommends initiating the full amount
for RI revised budget of $ 1.5 million. Uh the adopted CIP also includes $1.5 million in 2027 for
a total program budget of $3 million. And again, pending uh the outcome of our uh HSIP funding
application, this amount would be split between KOT and city of Witchto. Uh so with that,
it's staff recommends that the city council approve the design concept, revise budget and
supplemental design agreement number four, adopt the amending resolution, and authorize
the necessary signatures. And I'd be glad to answer any questions. Thank you.
Are any questions from the bench? See none, open up to public speak on
this if they'd like to. Seeing none, I'll bring it back to the bench. This ride resides
in council member Ballard's district. Thank you, Vice Mayor. I would like to take the recommended
action approve the design concept rise budget supplemental design agreement number four.
Adopt the amending resolution and authorize the necessary signatures. Second. There's
been a motion and a second. Mr. Clerk, please open up the role. Motion carries.
6. Mr. Clerk, please call the next item. Public housing recovery agreement status report. Good afternoon, Vice Mayor, members of council.
Sally Stang with the Housing and Community Services Department. For the record, the item
that I have for you today is just an update, a monthly update required by HUD on our recovery
agreement. Little history. And January 7th, 2025, the housing authority board entered into a
recovery agreement with the Department of Housing and Urban Development due to the low uh public
housing assessment score. And HUD is requiring a status update report be presented to the Witchaw
Housing Authority Board monthly. The recovery agreement includes actions related to improving
the physical condition of occupied dwelling units, repositioning the remaining public housing
properties, and providing an update on the capital fund projects. So, under improving the physical
condition, all required maintenance plans, inspections, and work order monitoring reports
have been and continue to be submitted to HUD as required. And the HUD Real Estate Assessment
Center inspections were completed May 19th through May 23rd, 2025. And the preliminary scores from
those inspections are 100% and 93% respectively. Uh repositioning public housing, we currently
have a 21.5% occupancy rate. uh we stopped leasing units as they vacated and this occupancy
rate has driven much of the low score for foss because three of the four scoring areas are driven
by occupancy numbers. Approval of that final disposition application was received on June 20th.
To date 177 properties have sold, 24 are pending sale and we provide a detailed disposition report
which is attached to the agenda report. We provide that to you. We also provide it to HUD live in a
shared repository. Uh closings have slowed down as HUD's taking much longer than usual to release
the declarations of trust. I my discussion with them on the phone yesterday as they are hoping
to get us the declarations of trust releases we submitted at the beginning of May by the beginning
of August. It is a challenge um because we can't move forward until those are received with those
closings. Uh strategies for the remaining units um are to update the affordable housing fund plan to
provide subsidy for the south city units um that are to be sold as affordable rentals currently
occupied by some of our largest families in our community and units within the flood plane as
those are going to be challenging to reposition. Uh requests for proposals will be issued without
subsidy for the Arnold and Country Acres clusters. There is tremendous interest in both of those
clusters with all remaining units to be sold on the open market staggered not to flood the market
and after the occupants relocate. We had our first um 12 units from this last group hit the market
Friday late afternoon and by mid or late morning and by midafternoon we had had already received an
offer to purchase all 12. So they are definitely moving fast. capital fund projects. The roof
replacement uh project on 10 units is complete. The renovation of seven of those units down in
South City is 95% complete. We've got renovations underway on seven units in the country acres
cluster and that's about 10% complete at this moment. And we received another allocation of
capital funds for 2025. So, we're working through uh planning for additional roof replacements and
targeted investments in those units that are going to be most challenging to reposition. There is no
impact to the general fund. The monthly update is uh to the Witchaw Housing Authority Board
is required by the recovery plan and it is recommended that the Witchaw Housing Authority
Board receive and file the recovery plan status update report for July 2025. And I stand for any
questions. Any questions from the bench for Sally? Council member Hohisel. Thank you, Vice Mayor.
Glad to know your button still works. Yeah. I think I'm at a minimum for speaking so far today.
Um, uh, could you briefly touch on some of the, um, the updates to reflect the Inspire language?
So, um, HUD has changed from housing quality standards or the real estate assessment uh, system
standards, two different standards they had um, to the national standard for the physical in uh,
inspection of real estate. It is a new criteria. It covers very similar to the other standards,
but they're trying to to devise more consistency across programs. So, the Inspire voucher standard
comes into play on October 1st of this year and the Inspire standard for public housing came
into play two years ago. So, they're moving forward with that. Okay. Is this just um something
strictly related to section 8 and HUD homes? It is strictly related to um units that are subsidized
by HUD. Okay. I I did sit in on a presentation a couple of months ago, I believe, at the
housing conference, and it's pretty interesting um how it works out, and it's something maybe
we should take a look at as far as adopting um even in our own codes because it does give a
little flexibility. Um it tries to standardize it across the board. and that way something looks
one way to one inspector and it looks a different way to another inspector. So, it's really um
interesting how how they've pivoted to this. So, um yeah, I was just curious about that and
um maybe we have a presentation on it we can send to the other council members as well.
Sure, I can definitely forward information that shows what those criteria are when we're
inspecting a residential housing unit. Okay, I appreciate that. Thank you. You're welcome.
Thank you. Not seeing any more council members on the board. Open up for public comment if anyone
would like to comment on this. Seeing none, I'll move it back to the bench. This this is
very important to me and I so much appreciate Sally and her team's efforts on this because
affordable housing is so important especially to solving the homeless situation. So, thank
you Sally. With that, I move to receive and file the HUD recovery agreement status update
and public housing disposition update report for July 2025. Second. There's been a motion
and a second. Mr. Clerk, open the roll. Motion carries 6. With that,
we will move to council member appointments. Does anyone have any appointments? Seeing none, we'll move to council member
comments. Council member Tuttle. Thank you. I know that we're at the end of a long meeting,
even though it isn't as long as I thought it was going to go today, but I just wanted to highlight
an event that's happening on Saturday that I'm quite proud of. Um, our child care licensing team
along with child start and McConnell Air Force Base are offering a free CEU event for child
care providers. Uh, childcare providers who participate from 9 to noon on Saturday at child
start can get up to three free KDH CEUs in child care. And that's wonderful. But the true purpose
of this event is there's a need that most people aren't aware of. our servicemen and women across
the nation or you know our region when they come to McConnell for their trainings for the weekend
oftentimes they have to bring their kiddos and they don't have access to child care during
the weekend hours and so it takes a special training it takes special certification it's quite
a complicated process because you're working with the US military our child care licensing team
along with childstart can provide the content expertise to help child care providers who want
to do this navigate through the process. So, it's really asking our child care providers in
the community to step up to help our United States military so they can be trained. So, um this is
something that's very unique. Other military bases across the nation are already asking questions
about it. Um we have 27 child care providers who are registered for Saturday to be able to
learn more about this unique opportunity. So, just a big thanks to ChildStart, to again the city
of Witchaw childcare licensing team, McConnell Air Force Base, and then also our communications
team. Tomorrow at 10:30, we will have a media briefing just to let the community know about
this event. So, thanks to all and wish us luck, Council Member Tuttle, and thank you for the
work on child care. We appreciate that. I would also like to thank Council Member Johnson and
Tuttle for helping me get through this meeting. again. And uh, Council Member Johnson. Thanks,
Vice Mayor. I just wanted to let Bob know that I I let you off easy today because you said
this was your 41st budget and I was going to joke about having probably 41,000 pie charts
and I was going to have 41 questions for you, but I let you off easy today. I'm
going to thank you for that, too. Uh, with that, do I have a a motion to adjurnn
the I will make the motion to adjurnn the meeting. Second. There's been a motion and a second
to adjourn the meeting. Please open the role. Motion carries. 6. Thank you.