>>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. I WOULD LIKE TO CULL THIS TAMPA CITY COUNCIL EVENING MEETING TO ORDER. ROLL CALL VOTE. ROLL CALL PLEASE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SH SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, MR. CHAIRMAN, GOOD EVENING. MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY. WE ARE HERE AT OLD CITY HALL 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD. TONIGHT'S QUASI JUDICIAL AND LAND USE MEETING IS BEING HELD THROUGH THE COVID-19 EMERGENCY AND BEING CONDUCTED LIVE AS YOU HEARD WITH AN IN-PERSON QUORUM PRESENT IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AND IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE ENCOURAGED TO PARTICIPATE VIA VIDEO TELL CONFERENCE AND MEDIA TECHNOLOGY OR CMT. THESE MEETINGS ARE HELD WITH THE EMERGENCY RULES OF PROCEDURE 2020-225 AMENDED BY 2020-490 ARE, AND 2021-241. THE PUBLIC AND THE CITY OF TAMPA CITIZENS ARE ABLE TO WATCH THIS MEETING AND VIEW IT ON SPECTRUM 640, FRONTIER CHANNEL 15, AND LIVE ON THE INTERNET AT WWW.TAMP WWW.TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM. NOW BECAUSE THERE ARE MULTIPLE WAYS TO PARTICIPATE, I WILL GO THROUGH THEM BRIEFLY. COUNCIL AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY USING CMT, IT IS NECESSARY TO PREREGISTER FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND THIS INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT TAMPA.GOV/QUASI. Q-U-A,-S-I. NOW WITH REGARD TO THE DEVICE YOU NEED TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY, IT MUST HAVE EITHER A TABLET OR A COMPUTER EQUIPPED WITH A CAMERA OR MICROPHONE. CELL PHONES AND SMARTPHONES ARE NOT COMPATIBLE FOR QUASI JUDICIAL HEARINGS AS THEY WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO SHARE YOUR CAMERA WHEN CONNECTED. AND AGAIN FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC HEARINGS VIA CMT INCLUDING THE LINK TO REGISTRATION FORMS AND DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS TAMPA.GOV/QUASI. ALSO WAYS TO COMMUNICATE VIA E-MAIL AT COUNCILQUASI SUBMISSIONS -- EXCUSE ME, QU QUASICOUNCILSUBMISSIONS@TAMPA.G V OR BY U.S. MAIL. FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC, PARTICULARLY THE APPLICANTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS -- APPL APPLICANTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS WHO ELECT TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE DURING THE TIME OF THE HEARING MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETE ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL DOCUMENTS PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING TO COUNC COUNCILQUASISUBMISSIONS@TAMPA.G V WITHIN 24 HOURS AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING. NOW IF YOU DO NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY FOR USING A CMT DEVICE, YOU CAN USE FACILITIES THAT ARE MADE AVAILABLE HERE AT THE PUBLIC WHERE YOU CAN VIEW THE MEETING AND PARTICIPATE AT OLD CITY HALL 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD ON SECOND FLOOR. PLEASE NOTE THE USE OF MASK AND SOCIAL DISTANCING INSIDE THE BUILDING ARE REQUIRED. WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS MAY BE ACCESSED FOR THE PUBLIC TO VIEW AT TAMP TAMPA.GOV/AGENDAS. NOW WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED BY MAIL OR E-MAIL HAVE BEEN DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL AND ALSO WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE PERMANENT RECORD OF THE MEE MEETING. ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED BY MAIL, E-MAIL OR VIA CMT WILL BE AFFORD EQUAL CONSIDERATION AS IF THE PUBLIC COMMENTS WERE MADE IN PERSON. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. SHELBY. BEFORE WE BEGIN THE AGENDA, I WOULD LIKE TO DEFER TO COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER WHO WOULD LIKE TO SAY FEW WORDS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR, EVENING, COUNCIL. WITH A HEAVY HEART THAT I ASK COUNCIL TO PROVIDE A POSTHUMOUS COMMENDATION TO OUR GOOD FRIEND JIM REESE. JIMMY REESE, ALSO KNOWN AS COACH, SERVED THIS COUNCIL AND THIS CITY AND MY OFFICE AS WELL AS YOLY CAPIN AS A LEGISLATIVE AGE FOR A NUMBER YEARS, BUT EARLIER IN LIFE, JIMMY WAS A STAR QUARTERBACK FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA GOLDEN GOPHERS BACK IN THE 19 50s. AT SOME POINT HE TOOK ON THE NAME "COACH" AND IT STUCK WITH HIM OVER THE YEARS. JIM GREW UP IN NEW YORK AND EVENTUALLY ENDED UP ON LONG ISLAND, RAISED A WONDERFUL FAMILY, HIS WIFE PEGGY AND HIS THREE CHILDREN, ONE GRANDCHILD. ULTIMATELY HE WAS INVOLVED IN CITY GOVERNMENT. HE WAS THE MAYOR OF PATCHHOG, NEW YORK, IN LONG ISLAND. JIM IS THE KIND OF GUY WHO NEVER MET A STRANGER. I THINK PRETTY MUCH ALL OF YOU KNEW HIM IN SOME CAPACITY. IN HIS FINAL YEARS, HE LOVED TO HOLD COURT OVER AT OXFORD EXCHANGE. AND HE HAD HIS CHAIR THERE. AND NO MATTER WHO CAME BY, HE HAD A CONVERSATION, HE HAD A CHAT, MR. CHAIRMAN, I THINK THAT IS HOW YOU GOT TO KNOW HIM PRETTY WELL. AND BILL CARLSON, YOU AS WELL. BUT ANYWAY, THE FAMILY IS GOING TO DO THEIR OWN SERVICE COMING UP PRETTY SOON, BUT IN THE COMMUNITY, THE FOLKS OVER AT OXFORD EXCHANGE ARE -- JIMMY WAS TO IRISH OBVIOUSLY. JIMMY REESE, AND THEY WILL DO SOME FORM OF A WAKE AND PUT HIS PHOTOGRAPH UP ON THE WALL, AND THEY ARE GOING TO PUT A NAME PLAQUE ON HIS CHAIR. AND IT WILL FOREVER BE JIM -- COACH JIM REESE'S CHAIR. WITH THAT, COUNCIL, I WOULD LIKE TO DO A COMMENDATION AND TAKE IT OVER TO OXFORD EXCHANGE THAT EVENING. AND I THINK WE HAVE THE DATE. I'LL ANNOUNCE IT LATER IN THE MEETING. I THINK IT IS ABOUT A MONTH FROM NOW. SO WITH THAT, A MOTION FOR COMMENDATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND WHY COUNCILMAN GUDES. ALL IN FAVOR. AYE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU ARE RIGHT HE HAD HIS CHAIR AT THE OXFORD EXCHANGE. AND IF I WOULD AUTOMATICALLY GET UP AND PASS IT ON TO HIM. ALWAYS NICE MAN AND HOW I GOT TO KNOW HIM AND HAD MANY CONVERSATIONS WITH HIM. COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: JUST QUICKLY. I SAW HIM -- I WENT TO OXFORD ALMOST EVERY DAY BEFORE THE PANDEMIC, AND I WOULD SEE HIM THERE. AND WE ALWAYS WAVE AND SAY HI. HE ONE DAY SAID ARE YOU EVER GOING TO SIT DOWN AND TALK TO ME. I SAT DOWN AND TALK TO HIM. I DIDN'T KNOW HIS BACKGROUND WORK AND CONNECTED TO YOLY AND YOU AND HE SPENT HOURS AND HOURS WITH ME AS I BECAME CITY COUNCILMEMBER TALKING OF THE BACKGROUND WORK OF CITY COUNCIL AND HOW THINGS WORKED AND IF I HAVE A QUESTION OF SOMETHING -- I AM STILL A NOVICE OF ALL OF THIS, I COULD RUN OVER TO HIM AND ASK HIM A QUESTION AND WE GIVE ME ALL THE ANSWERS TO WHAT WAS GOING ON. SO I WAS THERE YESTERDAY AND I SAW HIS EMPTY CHAIR, AND IT IS GOING TO BE REALLY SAD NOT HAVING HIM THERE ANYMORE. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, HE WAS THE SUPERHUMAN BEING. FRIENDLIEST MAN THAT I EVER M MET. GIVE YOU THE ADVICE ALL THE TIME. WHETHER YOU NEEDED IT OR NOT, BUT HE WANTED TO YOU HAVE IT. I NEVER HAD A CONVERSATION WITH HIM AT OXFORD EXCHANGE BUT I SHARED TRIVIA NIGHT WITH HIM MANY, MANY NIGHTS AT BEEF O BRADY'S ON SOUTH MacDILL. AGAIN, BRILLIANT MAN. KNEW HIS TRIVIA. AND HE WILL BE MISSED. JOHN, YOU ARE CORRECT. ONE HECK OF A HUMAN BEING. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN -- THANK YOU, JOE. THANK ALL OF YOU. I JUST FOUND IN MY CALENDAR THE -- THIS EVENT OVER AT OXFORD AND REALLY EVERYBODY IS INVITED. ANYBODY WHO KNEW JIM. IT WILL BE APRIL 27 AT 7 P.M. AND WE WILL MISS HIM GREATLY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND WORDS AND I KNOW THE FAMILY APPRECIATES IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I CAN SAY THIS. I CAN ECHO EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN SAID. HE WAS AN INDIVIDUAL THAT NEVER RAISED HIS VOICE. AND HE JUST SAID HIS PEACE AND YOU KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE SAID. EVERY WORD HAD A MEANING AND THAT IS WHAT I REMEMBER HIM THE MOST. HE WAS A VERY CORDIAL INDIVIDUAL. VERY WELL MANNERED AND BESIDE BEING A VERY GOOD ATHLETE A GREAT HUMAN BEING. MY FEELING ABOUT HIM. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. A MOTION TO OPEN 1-11. MOTION BE COUNCILMAN GUDES AND SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, BEFORE WE BEGIN WITH TONIGHT'S MEET GOING YOU HAVE ANY EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION TO DISCLOSE THOSE HOPEFULLY AT THE START OF THE MEETING. AND THERE HAVE BEEN ITEMS UPLOADED FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AS I SAID EARLIER AND I WOULD LIKE FOR THEM TO BE RECEIVED AND FILED BY MOTION NOW. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES. SECOND? SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON. ALL IN FAVOR. ALL RIGHT. WE GO TO ITEM NUMBER 1. >> YES. GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL. THIS IS LA COMMON DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT -- LACHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. OUR NEW STAFF MEMBER, ZANE HUSSEIN IS ON THE LINE. ZANE STARTED WITH US SIX WEEKS AGO. HE IS AN URBAN PLANNER AND WILL PROCESS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PERMITS. ZANE COMES WITH SEVEN YEARS OF EXPERIENCE WITH URBAN PLANNING. WE ARE CERTAINLY HAPPY TO HAVE HIM ON OUR TEAM. AND ZANE WILL PRESENT A COUPLE OF CASES FOR YOU THIS EVENING. SO I WANTED TO MAKE THAT INTRODUCTION TO YOU FOR TONIGHT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WELCOME ON BOARD SIR. >> THANK YOU. GREAT TO BE HERE. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH. IF I CAN CHAIR MY SCREEN. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND GET TO ITEM NUMBER ONE >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU SO MUCH COUNCIL, FILE NO. RE REZ-20-92. A CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR 5430 AND 5440 W. TYSON AVENUE. JUST AS A REMINDER, COUNCIL THERE ARE REQUEST WAS TO RE REZONE. AND THIS IS FROM IH, INDUSTRIAL HEAVY TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. SO THE CASE WAS BEFORE YOU ON FEBRUARY 11 IN RESPONSE TO COUNCIL COMMENTS AT THE FEBRUARY 11 PUBLIC HEARING, AT THAT MEETING, ALONG WITH MEETINGS THAT WERE HELD WITH THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS, THE APPLICANT HAS MADE QUITE A FEW REVISIONS ON THEIR SITE PLAN. WHICH HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO OUR OFFICE. SO THERE ARE A COUPLE OF THINGS I WOULD LIKE TO REVIEW WITH Y YOU, AND THESE ARE THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE TO THE SITE P PLAN. ONE WAS IN RESPONSE TO THE CONCERNS REGARDING THE PRO PROJECT'S DENSITY. THE APPLICANT HAS REDUCED THE NUMBER OF MULTIFAMILY UNITS FROM 650 TO 495 UNITS. THIS HAS CHANGED THE PROJECT'S F.A.R. FROM .88 TO .80. AND THIS IS ALSO REDUCED THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS FROM FIVE TO THREE. I WILL SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN SHORTLY THAT WAS SUBMITTED. THE APPLICANT HAS INCREASED THE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT HAS BEEN INCREASED FROM 5,000 SQUARE FEET TO 14,000 SQUARE FEET. AND TWO COMMERCIAL LOCATIONS ON THE SITE. SO THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE 14,000 SQUARE FEET IS SPLIT BETWEEN TWO LOCATIONS ON-SITE AND I WILL INDICATE THAT ON THE SITE PLAN I WILL SHOW TO YOU MOMENTARILY AND THEY HAVE INCREASED THE SIZE OF THE CLUBHOUSE. THERE WERE ADDITIONAL CHANGES THAT WERE MADE TO THE SITE P PLAN, AND THESE WERE A A RESULT -- SOME OF THEM WAS A RESULT OF THE BUILDING PLACEMENT. AND THESE ARE RELOCATIONS OF THE SOLID WASTE AREA. THEY ALSO ADDED CONCEPTUAL PROPERTY LINES TO THE SITE PLAN TO INDICATE THE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL SPACES, ADDED A SECONDARY EGRESS FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS, RELOCATED THE PARKING, MODIFIED THE RESIDENTIAL PHASE LINE ON THE SITE PLAN, ADDED ACCESS POINT WHICH SERVES THE COMMERCIAL USE, AND UPDATED THE GREEN SPACE AND TREE COUNTS. SO WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW TO YOU NOW THE REVISED SITE PLAN. THIS CONTAINS THE SITE DATA, BUT THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS REVISED AND SUBMITTED. SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE IS IN THIS AREA IDENTIFIED IN THE ORANGE, THERE IS THE 8, 8,000-SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT OR RETAIL SPACE LOCATED HERE IN THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE. ALSO LOCATED HERE IN THE AREA IDENTIFIED IN PURPLE IS 6,000 SQUARE FEET OF REST RANTD RANT OR RETAIL. SO THOSE -- THAT WAS THE ADDITIONAL AREAS ADDED FOR COMMERCIAL. THESE ARE THE ACCESS POINTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE. AND THEN HERE ARE THE PLACEMENTS OF THE THREE BUILDINGS THAT YOU WILL SEE. ON-SITE. AND THE AMENITY AND THE CLUBHOUSE HAS BEEN LOCATED H HERE. JUST SOUTH OF THIS RESTAURANT -- >> THIS IS CATE. WE HAVE LOST YOUR SHARED SCREEN CAPABILITY. WE CAN'T SEE THE SITE PLAN ANYMORE. >>LaCHONE DOCK: I APOLOGIZE. IS IT UP NOW? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>LaCHONE DOCK: SORRY. THANK YOU. THE RESTAURANT -- I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH YOU WERE ABLE TO SEE, SO I WILL GO OVER, THE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL COMPONENT HAVE BEEN SPLIT ON THE SITE. THE FIRST AREA IN THE ORANGE ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE. AND THEN THIS IS THE OTHER AREA OF RESTAURANT, RETAIL AND THIS AREA IDENTIFIED IN THE PURPLE. AND THIS IS 6,000 SQUARE FEET. OF RESTAURANT OR RETAIL. THE ACCESS POINTS ARE AT THE THAT ARE LOCATED ON-SITE. THIS IS THE ACCESS POINT TO THE COMMERCIAL. AND THEN THE AREAS THAT ARE IN GRAY ARE THE BUILDING PLACEMENTS. AND THESE ARE THE THREE BUILDINGS PROPOSED. THE CLUBHOUSE AMENITY AREA IS LOCATED IN THIS PART OF THE SITE. SO THAT IS THE PREVIOUS PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED JUST TO SHOW TO YOU -- SO COUNCIL, AS A REMINDER, STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. MODIFICATIONS TO BE MADE TO THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READ. -- READINGS AND JUST A REMINDER IN RESPONSE TO CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY REQUESTED CHANGES. AND SOME WERE FOR ITEMS LIKE SOLID WASTE FOR FUNCTIONALITY OF THE SITE. WE DO AGREE WITH THESE AND WILL SUBMIT THE REVISION SHEET FROM THE RECORD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? I SEE -- COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. MISS DOCK? >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: GOOD EVENING. >>LaCHONE DOCK: GOOD EVENING. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE COMP PLAN CATEGORY FOR THIS PARCEL IS WHAT? >>LaCHONE DOCK: THE FUTURE LAND USE? DINGFELDER CREME. >>LaCHONE DOCK: CMU-35 ALREADY I BELIEVE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CMU-35. AND -- HOW MANY ACRES IS THE TOTAL PARCEL? APPROXIMATELY? >>LaCHONE DOCK: LET ME GO B BACK. HOLD ON JUST A SECOND. YES CMU-35, COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND THE TOTAL ACRES IS APPROXIMATELY WHAT? >>LaCHONE DOCK: HOLD ON JUST A SECOND. 18.54. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: 18 AND A HALF? >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, 18 AND A HALF ACRES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO TYPICALLY IF SOMETHING IS LIKE -- HAS 35 -- THAT MEANS 35 UNITS PER ACRE AND MULTIPLY THAT BY 18 AND A HALF, LET'S SEE. HOLD ON. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: 647, I BELIEVE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO 647 AND THEY ARE COMING DOWN TO THE 4 495, IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING? >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. THEY WILL HAVE A TOTAL OF 495 UNITS FROM 650. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND WHERE ARE THOSE THREE BUILDINGS AS RELATED -- I WAS HAVING TROUBLE ORIENTED MYSELF. WHERE ARE THOSE THREE BUILDINGS RELATED TO THE CHLORINE PLANT WORKSHOP TALKING ABOUT THE LAST TIME? >>LaCHONE DOCK: SO THIS IS -- LET ME -- LET ME BRING UP THE ACTUAL AERIAL OF THIS SITE. >> SO THIS IS THE SITE OUTLINED ON RED ON THE AERIAL AND THE BUILDINGS ARE LOCATED WITHIN THIS PORTION OF THE SITE AND ALONG THIS SOUTHERN BORDER OF THE SITE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY. SO LOOKED TO ME PERHAPS THE RESTAURANT WAS CLOSER TO THE CHLORINE PLANT? >>LaCHONE DOCK: TO THE NORTH IS ONE RESTAURANT RETAIL COMPONENT AND NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE. YES CLOSER. AND ONE RESTAURANT COMPONENT LOCATED TO THIS AREA HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MAYBE MISS BATSEL WILL GO INTO THAT A LULL MORE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE? MR. HEY, ARE YOU NEXT, SIR? >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCILS. DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WERE YOU SWORN IN, SIR? HEY WE REVIEWED THE MODIFICATIONS AND FIND IT CONSISTENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: RAISE YOUR HAND IF WE COULD AND ANYBODY ON THE SCREEN. MISS BATSEL AND MARTHA TOO. [SWEARING IN] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. NOTHING ELSE, MR. HEY? >>DAVID HEY: NO, THAT'S IT FOR US. I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MISS DOCK, ANYTHING ELSE? >>LaCHONE DOCK: NOTHING ADDITIONAL, MR. CHAIRMAN. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ELISE BATSEL ON LINE. >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, BEFORE WE START THE PRESENTATION. I HAVE ONE HOUSEKEEPING MATTER. I NEGLECTED TO NOTE ONE CHANGE I DIDN'T SHOW OVER TO LACHONE AND I WANT TO PUT THAT ON THE RECORD. IN A RUSH TO GET A NEW PLAN TO THE CITY, WE NEGLECTED TO UPDATE THE TRANSPORTATION NOTES ON THE PLAN. THE UPDATED INTERSECTION IS IN THE RECORD AND AND INCLUDES THE TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE. AND ALSO ACCOUNTS FOR OUR CROP SHARE PAYMENT. WE HAVE AGREED TO PAY THAT EARLIER FOR THIS. WE WILL PAY BOTH OF THOSE PAYMENTS. THE MITIGATION PAYMENT AND THE CROP SHARE PAYMENT. I WANTED TO NOTE THAT FOR THE RECORD AND MAKE SURE THAT IS NOTED ON THE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN THAT SAYS SUZANNE WALKER. I DON'T THINK YOU LET THAT PANELIST IN AND THAT'S ON OUR TEAM AS WELL AND THAT'S WHERE I HAVE THE POWERPOINT. OKAY GREAT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, WE SEE IT. GO AHEAD. >> ELISE BATSEL, STEARNS WEAVER MILLER ON BEHALF THE APPLICANT. IF YOU RECALL ON FEBRUARY 11, WE CAME BEFORE YOU FOR THE PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PENINSULA OF RATTLESNAKE POINT. IT IS A 18.85-ACRE PARCEL AND AS WE DISCUSSED AND HEARD MULTIPLE TIMES THAT RATTLESNAKE PARK IS AN AREA TRANSITION FROM INDUSTRY, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL MIXED USES. DURING THE FEBRUARY HEARING, WE PRESENTED A PROJECT THAT WAS MIXED USE EVEN THOUGH THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT IN THE COMP PLAN OR CODE THAT THIS IS APPLIED ON A PROJECT-WIDE BASIS, THIS DID HAVE -- THIS PROJECT HAD BOTH COMPONENTS. WE PROVIDED A PUBLIC BOARDWALK TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE WATER AND WE PROVIDED VISITOR BOAT SLIPS. THERE WAS A LOT OF THOUGHT THAT WENT INTO THIS ORIGINAL DESIGN. THE DEVELOPER INCORPORATED MANY DEVELOPMENTS THAT WENT ABOVE AND BEYOND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMP PLAN AND THE CODED, ROOTDZ THE LAST HEARING, WE HAD TIME GO BACK AND REALLY RETHINK A LOT OF THINGS ON THIS SITE PLAN. WE WENT BACK AND TOOK A HARD LOOK AT THE DENSITY ISSUES AND DESIGN ISSUES AND WE BELIEVE TODAY WE HAVE A MUCH BETTER PROJECT. WE ALSO HAD A MEETING WITH THE LEADERSHIP OF SOG INCLUDING SHAWN BROWN, STEPHANIE PONTER AND KALI RENAULT AND MADE SUBSTANTIAL PROGRESS AFTER THOSE MEETINGS. I WOULD LIKE TO GO OVER THE MAJOR CHANGES TO THE SITE PLAN. AS LACHONE NOTED THE FIRST SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IS THE SIGNIFICANT DECREASE IN DENSITY AND THE SECOND IS THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN THE COMMERCIAL COMPONENT. SO YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO SEE THIS A LITTLE BIT BETTER ON THE COLORED SITE PLANS. COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER ASKED THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDINGS. THE -- IF YOU ON THE RIGHT OF THE SCREEN, YOU WILL SEE THE MODEDFIED SITE PLAN AND TWO ENTIRE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND WE HAVE TAKEN A NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AND SHIFTED IT SOUTH -- YOU TOWARD THE SOUTHEAST PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. FROM A DENSITY PERSPECTIVE WE WENT FROM 649 OPPORTUNITIES 495 UNITS. THAT IS A 24% REDUCTION IN RESIDENTIAL DENSITY. WE WENT FROM 34.9 UNITS PER ACRE TO 26.68 UNITS PER ACRE. AGAIN, WE ELIMINATED TWO OF THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. AND ALSO SIGNIFICANTLY, WE INCREASED THE COMMERCIAL COMPONENT ON THE SITE PLAN FROM ONE 5,000-SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANTS TO TWO RESTAURANTS. ONE OF THE RESTAURANTS IS 8,000 SQUARE FEET AND ONE WILL BE 6,000 SQUARE FEET. 180% INCREASE IN THE COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. NOW YOU ARE PROBABLY ASKING US WHERE IN THE WORLD DID WE COME UP WITH THAT DENSITY NUMBER. WE ACTUALLY SLICED AND DICED THESE NUMBERS A NUMBER OF WAYS. WHEN WE TOOK -- WHEN WE WERE LAST AT THE HEARING, WE TOOK THE PROJECTS THAT THIS COUNCIL CALLED OUT SOUTH OF GANDY. IF YOU RECALL, THESE ARE THE PROJECTS THAT THIS COUNCIL HAS CONSIDERED SINCE TAKING OFFICE, THIS PARTICULAR COUNCIL. AND WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT AVERAGING THE NUMBER UNITS, YOU MAY RECALL MY CONCERN WAS IF WE JUST AVERAGE THE NUMBER OF UNITS, WE ARE NOT ACTUALLY COMPARING APPLES TO APPLES. SO WHAT WE DID IN THIS DENSITY STUDY TOOK THE PERCENTAGE OF THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED BY THE COMP PLAN AND AVERAGED THAT AMOUNT TO COME OUT WITH A AVERAGE. SO IF YOU SEE, THE INTERBAY PROJECT WHICH IS -- WHICH WAS APPROVED AT 22.99 ACRES. THE MAX THERE WAS 24 UNITS PER ACRE AND APPROVED AT 96% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY ALLOWED UNDER THE COMP PLAN. WE DID THE SAME FOR THE TYSON PROJECT. WE DID THE SAME FOR THE TRASK PROJECT. THE PERCENTAGE -- THE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF THE MAXIMUM WAS 9%. WE APPLIED THAT AVERAGE TO OUR PROJECT, AND THAT'S HOW WE CAME WITH OUR DENSITY OF 20 -- WE ARE AT 26.68, SLIGHTLY UNDER THAT, BUT THAT -- THERE WAS A REASON TO THE MADNESS, SO TO SPEAK. WE ALSO KNOW THAT THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION AMONG STAFF, AMONG THE COMMUNITY, AMONG COUNCIL ABOUT MIXED USE. AND WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF MIXED USE. AND I KNOW THAT STAFF IS POSSIBLY LOOKING AT REWRITING THE SECTIONS OF THE CODE. WHILE NONE OF US KNOW HOW THAT WILL COME OUT, WE REALLY SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED THE AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE SITE. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT UNDER THE COMP CODE AND PLAN TODAY, EACH PROJECT IS NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE THAT MIXED USE COMPONENT, BUT WE DID INTEGRATE THAT MIX OF USES INTO THE PROJECT AND FURTHER ENHANCED THAT AS FOLLOWS: FIRST, THE AREA YOU SEE IN ORANGE WAS THE ORIGINAL 5,000-SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT. YOU WILL SEE THAT THE RESTAURANT HAS BEEN EXPANDED BY 3,000 SQUARE FEET AND THE OUTDOOR PATIO AREA HAVE ALSO BEEN EXPANDED. THE AREA IN PURPLE A SECOND RETAIL RESTAURANT POD WHERE WE WILL HAVE A 6,000-SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING. THAT WILL BE A 6,000 6,000-SQUARE-FOOT REST RESTAURANT/RETAIL SPACE. WE ALSO INCREASED THE PARKING PROVIDED FOR EACH OF THESE AREAS. ONE OF THE THINGS WE RECOGNIZE REGARDLESS CODE IS THERE IS REALLY A PARKING ISSUE ON RATTLESNAKE POINT. SOME WHAT WE HAVE DONE IS OVERPARKED THE PUBLIC SPACES SLIGHTLY TO HAVE 19 EXTRA SP SPACES TO PARK IN IF THEY ARE VISITING THE BOARDWALK OR IF THEY ARE COMING TO OTHER AREAS ON RATTLESNAKE POINT. I WANTED TO USE THIS GRAPHIC JUST TO REMIND YOU OF THE PUBLIC SPACES AND THE OPEN SPACES ON THIS SITE. IF YOU -- IF YOU LOOK AT ALL OF THE AREAS THAT ARE NOT GRAYED OUT, THAT IS CONCEPTUALLY ALL OF THE SPACES OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. ALL OF THE PUBLIC AMENITY SPACES ON THE SITE. WE DID A CALCULATION JUST TO SHOW YOU HOW MUCH IS THIS MIXED USE. WE TALKED ABOUT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES ALREADY. BUT WE WANTED YOU TO SEE ON AN ACREAGE BASIS WHAT PERCENTAGES WERE COMMITTED TO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE. THE COMMERCIAL ACRE IT IS YOU LOOK AT RESTAURANT POD NUMBER ONE AND RESTAURANTED NUMBER T TWO, WE HAVE DEDICATED 3.139 ACRES 17% OF THE TOTAL SITE AREA TO COMMERCIAL USES. IF YOU LOOK AT THE PUBLIC USE AREAS, THAT IS THE BOARDWALK AND PUBLIC BOAT SLIPS, THAT'S AN ADDITIONAL .446 ACRES OR 2% OF THE OVERALL ACREAGE ON THE PROPERTY. SO OUR TOTAL PERCENTAGE FOR NONRESIDENTIAL ON AN ACREAGE BASIS 19% ON THIS REVISED PROJECT. WAIVERS, THEY STILL HAVE NONWHICH IS REMARKABLE OR A 18.5 ACRE SITE. WHEN YOU GO AND REDESIGN A PLAN LIKE WE DID SIGNIFICANTLY A LOT OF THE CHANGES THAT LACHONE MENTIONED ON THE REVISION LIST IS TO MOVE THINGS AROUND TO MAKE SURE EVERYTHING FITS EVEN THOUGH WE HAD SIGNIFICANT CHANGES. ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WAS BROUGHT UP BY MRS. POYNER AT THE LAST MEETING IS HOW FEMA REALLY WORKS IN THIS AREA. CONCERN OF HOW BUILDINGS WILL BE CONSTRUCT AND WE PROVIDED THIS GRAPHIC TO SHOW HOW VISUALLY THIS WORKS IN A SIMPLE MANNER. WE MET WITH MISS PONYE R CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AND GIVE MORE DETAIL BUT I WILL GIVE A LAYMAN'S OVERVIEW. WHAT HAPPENED -- YOU SEE THE ARROWS AT THE RESIDENTIAL CENTER AND AMENITY CENTER. THEY WILL BE HIGH ON A PODIUM AND PARKING UNDERNEATH. IF YOU LOOK AT THE SMALL, THE LITTLE CUTOUT WHERE YOU SEE THE HOUSE IN THE LOWER RIGHT-HAND CORNER THE IDEA THAT THEY ARE THEN ELEVATED FOR SAFETY ABOVE AREAS WITHIN A 100-YEAR STORM THE WAVES MIGHT BE HIGHER. THIS IS REALLY HOW ANY PROPERTY IN THIS AREA THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TAMPA WILL BE REQUIRED TO BUILD UNDER THE NEW FEMA REGULATIONS AND NEW FLORIDA BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT. AS YOU MAY REMEMBER, OBVIOUSLY ONE OF THE ISSUES WE DISCUSSED IN THE LAST HEARING IS THE CHLORINE PLANT ON RATTLESNAKE POINT. AFTER THE FIRST HEARING WE NEEDED OUR EXPERT MARTHA IRA TO DO FURTHER STUDY ON CHEMICAL FORMULATORS ITSELF TO GIVE COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY MORE INFORMATION ON THE SAFETY MEASURES IN PLACE AT THE PLANT WITH THAT I WILL TURN IT OVER TO MARTHA TO GIVE MORE COMMENTS ON THE RECORD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM, GO AHEAD. >> WE DID THE RESEARCH AS ELISE MENTIONED AND WE MAN FOUND A REPORT THAT CHEMICAL FORMULATOR SUBMITTED TO THE EPA INDICATED THAT THEY HAVE THE FOLLOWING SAFEGUARDS INSTALLED AT THE SITE. PRODUCTION BUILDING AND ENCLOSED PRODUCTION BUILDING TO CONTAIN THE CHLORINE CONTAINER WITH A CHLORINE SCRUBBER, A WATER DELUGE SYSTEM OVER THE CAME CARS, A CHLORINE DETECTOR IN THE PROCESS AREA AND AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE FACILITY, AND AN EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN SYSTEM THAT IS TRIGGERED BY THE CHLORINE DETECTORS. THESE DEVICES ARE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE THE LIKELIHOOD OF A CHLORINE RELEASE. THEY HAVE OPERATING AND EMERGENCY PROCEDURES WITH PERIODIC EMPLOYEE TRAINING. THE SAFEGUARDS. THE ENGINEERING SAFEGUARDS AND PRACTICES ARE RECOMMENDED BY THE CHLORINE INSTITUTE AND COMPONENTS OF THE OSHA AND EPA HAZARDOUS MATERIAL REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PROGRAM THAT CHEMICAL REGULATOR HAVE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE. WE FOUND AN ONLINE EPA COMPLIANCE DATABASE THAT SHOW NO VIOLATIONS NOR SITE. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MARTHA. BEFORE WE CONCLUDE, WE DID WANT TO PROVIDE COUNCIL WITH UPDATED RENDERING SINCE WE SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGED THE SITE LAYOUT. WE WANTED TO SHOW HOW THIS SITE WILL LAY OUT FROM AN AESTHETIC STANDPOINT. THIS FIRST SLIDE FROM THE VIEW OF TYSON ROAD WHERE YOU ENTER INTO THE PRIVATE EASEMENT AREA. YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE CREATED THIS WALKABLE BOULEVARD THAT INCLUDES BENCHES AND GREEN SPACE TO REALLY ENHANCE THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE. THIS BOULEVARD ALSO PROVIDES AN ATTRACTIVE WAY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ACTUALLY GET OUT TO THE WATERFRONT. AND ALTHOUGH WE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ANY TYPE OF BOULEVARD SINCE THIS IS A PRIVATE EASEMENT, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROJECT WAS REALLY INTEGRATED NOT ONLY WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS BUT WITH THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY OUT THERE. THIS VIEW IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU SAW DURING THE FIRST HEARING. THIS IS THE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH ALONG THE WATER ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL RESTAURANT SITE. IF YOU WERE FAMILIAR WITH THAT AREA THIS WILL BE LOOKING SOUTH FROM SALT SHACK. OUR VISION IS AN OPEN-AIR SEATING AREA WITH WATER VIEWS FOR EVERYONE TO ENJOY. YOU CAN SEE HOW THE PEDESTRIAN BOARDWALK IS GOING TO LOOK. AS YOU GO TO THE SOUTH IT WILL WRAP ENTIRELY AROUND THE WESTERN BORDER, THE SOUTHERN BORDER AND MOST OF THE EASTERN BORDER ON THE WATER IN FACT I BELIEVE WE HAVE OVER 2,000 FEET OF LINEAR PUBLIC WALKWAY HERE, BOARDWALK. AGAIN, AS WE MENTIONED, THERE WILL BE DESIGNATED VISITOR BOAT SLIPS TO ACCESS THE BOARDWALK AND THE RESTAURANTS. THE BOARDWALK AND PUBLIC BOAT SLIPS PROVIDE SOMETHING IN SOUTH TAMPA. NOT A LOT OF SPACES WHERE THE PUBLIC REALLY HAS TRUE ACCESS TO THE WATERFRONT AND HOPE THIS WILL BE AN AMENITY NOT ONLY TO OUR RESIDENTS BUT TO THE PUBLIC AT LARGE. WE REALLY BELIEVE THIS IS GOING TO BE A MAGNIFICENT PROJECT, AN WE WORKED VERY HARD SINCE FEBRUARY 11 TO LISTEN TO EVERYTHING THAT COUNCIL SAID, TO LISTEN TO THE INPUT THAT WE GOT FROM THE COMMUNITY AND THE MEMBERS OF SOG. BETWEEN THE FEBRUARY HEARING AND TONIGHT, WE HAVE ALREADY PROVIDED COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THE FORM OF EXPERT TESTIMONY AND WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION THAT WE MEET ALL OF THE APPLICABLE CONDITIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE LDC. YOUR STAFF HAS CONFIRMED THAT AGAIN THIS EVENING. DURING THE FEBRUARY HEARING, WE ALSO PROVIDED COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO ADDRESS HURRICANE SHELTER MITIGATION, QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHLORINE PLANTS, TRANSPORTATION ISSUES AND THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA. IF YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS ON THE ISSUE, WE WILL BE HAPPY TO REPRESENT INFORMATION AND ANSWER ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. IN THE INTEREST OF TIME WE THOUGHT WE WOULD WAIT FOR QUESTIONS SINCE THAT IS ALREADY PART OF THE RECORD. I ALSO WANTED TO REMIND YOU THAT THE DIRECT ADJACENT NEIGHBORS HAVE ALL SUPPORTED -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MA'AM. >> THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, JUST FOR THE SAKE OF DUE PROCESS. DID SHE NEED MUCH MORE TIME TO FINISH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU WANT ANOTHER 30 SECONDS. >> SURE. I ACTUALLY WAS JUST GOING TO SAY WE WERE JUST TRYING NOTE THAT WE DO HAVE THE SUPPORT OF ALL THE DIRECT IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORS TO THE NORTH, TO THE EAST, VIPER VENTURE SALT SHACK AND OLD DUTCH. IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORS ARE IN SUPPORT. WE HAD TWO MEETINGS AND MULTIPLE CORRESPONDENCE OF THE SO G LEADERSHIP AND TRIED TO INCORPORATE MOST IF NOT ALL OF THEIR CONCERNS AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL AND OUR WHOLE DEVELOPMENT TEAM IS HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS? HEARING NONE. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO IS HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 1? >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL, AILEEN ROSARIO AND WE HAVE ONE PERSON HERE IN THE PUBLIC WHO IS WILLING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I WONDER -- I BELIEVE MISS -- I BELIEVE THEY HAVE BEEN SWORN. SPEAKERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: EVERYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR HAVE BEEN SWORN IN SO WE ARE GOOD TO GO WITH THE IN-PERSON SPEAKERS. CAROL ANN BENNETT. >> HOW DID YOU KNOW. BEFORE YOU START TIMING ME, GIVE AN EXTRA 30, AND I DON'T WANT TO GET CUT OFF MIDSE MIDSENTENCE. >> MY NAME IS AROL ANN BENNETT AND PREVENTING COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FROM THE 2016 STAFF REPORTS THAT RECOMMENDED AGAINST CHANGING THE COMP PLAN AND PUTTING RESIDENTIAL UNIT NECK TO A HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL PLANT. BOTH THE CITY AND COUNTY STAFF SAID IT WAS DANGEROUS. AT THAT MEETING, COUNCILMAN SUAREZ SAID IN FIVE YEARS HE HAS NEVER BEFORE SEEN A TEXT AMENDMENT CALLED DANGEROUS. THESE ARE EXCERPTS FROM THE 2016 STAFF REPORTS. CREATES A PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERN. CLEARLY INCONSISTENT. ONLY ONE POINT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS COULD POSE POTENTIAL DANGER ESPECIALLY IF THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USE IS LOCATED BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE ONLY EXIT. DOES NOT PROMOTE THE OVERALL HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF TAMPA RESIDENTS. NOT APPROPRIATE UNTIL HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC USES ARE PERMANENTLY REMOVED. IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY, THE ROAD WILL BE CLOSED ISOLATING RESIDENTS AND POTENTIALLY PUTTING THEM AT RISK. NO INFORMATION ABOUT MEASURES THAT WOULD PROTECT RESIDENTS. THAT THIS LEAVES THAT ISSUE TO SUBSEQUENT REZONING PHASE. THERE SHOULD BE SOME DISCUSSION OF MITIGATION METHODS RATHER THAN SIMPLY DEFERRING TO THE REZONING PROCESS. THE DISCUSSION AT THAT MEETING IS A LITTLE DISTURBING. MUCH TALK OF THE DANGER OF RESIDENTS AND IF THE THINK WOULD BE LIABLE FOR WHAT THEY DID IN 2016 OR IF THAT LIABILITY WILL BE POSTPONED TO THE FUTURE TO THE REZONING WHICH IS TODAY. THEY GO SO FAR AS TO SAY THAT THE CITY CANNOT BE SUED FOR PLANNING LEVEL DECISIONS, ONLY FOR PD REZONING DECISIONS. THEY SAID THE DANGER OF THE CHEMICAL PLANT AND THE INGRESS AND EGRESS MUST BE CONSIDERED DURING THE REZONING PROCESS. YET AT THE FIRST RATTLESNAKE POINT, 5105 TYSON, CITY COUNCIL WAS NOT MADE AWARE THAT THE CHEMICAL PLANT EXISTED. NO EVALUATION OR TESTIMONY FROM CITY CHEMICAL EMERGENCY EXPERTS TO ADVISE COUNCIL. SO YOU REALLY HAVE NO IDEA HOW DANGEROUS THIS IS. THE CITY HAS NOT PRESENTED FACTS OR OPINIONS ABOUT THE DANGER LEVEL, ONLY THE APPLICANT HAS. EVEN THOUGH IT WAS CLEARLY INTENT OF CITY COUNCIL IN 2016 THAT THAT THIS WOULD BE DONE AT THE REZONING. HERE ARE EXCERPTS FROM THE 2016 DISCUSSION AND TESTIMONY. STAFF. THE CITY OF TAMPA HAS NUMEROUS OBJECTIONS TO POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS CONDITIONS. YOU HAVE ACCESS LIMITED TO ONE WAY ON AND OFF THE PENINSULA. YOU HAVE MANY PEOPLE LIVING ON A CORNER THAT WILL NOT BE ABLE TO LEAVE. THAT IS S AN ISSUE OF PUBLIC SAFETY. CITY COUNCIL. IF THERE IS AN EXPLOSION OR EVENT, WHO WILL BE HELD LIABLE. IF THE CITY WAS TO MAKE A MISTAKE, WOULDN'T THAT MISTAKE BE MADE AT THE PD PROCESS RATHER THAN POINT IN THE PROCESS? IF WE ARE GOING TO BE BLAMED FOR ANYTHING WOULDN'T IT BE THE WAY WE EVALUATE THE RISK FOR THE PD? ISN'T THAT THE PLACE THAT WE WOULD DECIDE THE DETAILS ABOUT THIS? WHEN IT COMES TO ANY TYPE OF NEGLIGENCE, THE COUNCIL, THE GOVERNMENT IS IMMUNE TO LIABILITY ON PLANNING LEVEL DECISIONS. IT IS DISTURBING TO ME IN LIGHT OF THE ENORMOUS LIABILITY THE CITY MAY HAVE IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY, AN EXPERT CITY SAFETY EVALUATION HAS NOT BEEN PRESENTED TO CITY COUNCIL. I ASK YOU TO DENY THIS REZ REZONING. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THAT IS THE ONLY PERSON IN PERSON TO SPEAK, BUT WE HAVE A FEW REGISTERED SPEAKERS. I SHOW FIVE ON MY LIST. I AM NOT SURE HOW MANY WE DO HAVE. IF THE CLERK WOULD BRING THEM ON, WE WILL SWEAR THEM IN AND GO FROM THERE. >>CLERK: CHAIR, EVERYONE IS ON. THEY JUST NEED TO TURN ON THE VIDEO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE TURN ON YOUR VIDEO AND SO WE CAN SEE YOU AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. ALL RIGHT, I SEE SHAWN BROWN AND STEPHANIE POYNER. WHO ELSE DO WE HAVE? I HAVE JEAN STROHMEYER AND PRACTICE SILL LA AND LAST NAME DENAULT. PRISCILLA IS ON AND IS JEAN STROHMEYER HERE? RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN START WITH STEPHANIE POYNOR. [SWEARING IN] FOR THE RECORD THE CLERK DID RECEIVE WRITTEN COMMENTS FOR THE ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. BEGIN STEPHANIE POYNOR. YES MA'AM. >> GOOD EVENING. I HAD SURGERY TODAY. I BROKE FOUR BONES IN MY LEG. SO I AM GOING TO KEEP THIS VERY SHORT. THIS ISN'T ABOUT OVERBUILDING S OG. IT IS ABOUT BUILDING WHERE IT IS DANGEROUS FOR FOLKS TO LIVE. I KNOW THAT EVERYONE IN THIS MEETING KNOWS ABOUT PINEY POINT IN MANATEE. TODAY IS YOUR CHANCE TO PREVENT SOMETHING SIMILAR FROM EMBARRASSING THE CITY. THIS PROJECT AND THE ONE THAT WAS PRESENTED AT 5101 WEST TYSON HAVE NEVER EVER BEEN CONSIDERED. THE GREED OF THE FOLKS THAT THINK IT IS A GOOD IDEA IS UNCONSCIONABLE. NONE OF THE DEVELOPERS WILL BE LIVING HERE. TONIGHT IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO SAY NO TO KICKING COMMON SENSE TO THE CURB. TONIGHT IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO ASK CITY STAFF TO INSTALL A BOX OR PUBLIC SAFETY BOX FOR STAFF REPORT FOR THINGS LIKE DANGEROUS CHEMICAL PLANT NEXT DOOR OR ACROSS THE STREET UNTIL THE CDC SAYS IT IS SAFE. TONIGHT IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO DO WHAT -- TO DO WHAT THE CITY COUNCIL SHOULD HAVE DONE IN 2016, JUST SAY NO. THE CITY SEEMS TO WORRY ABOUT GETTING SUED FOR NOT GIVING SOME RICH GUY WHAT HE WANTS TO DO WITH HIS LAND. WELL, NO ONE MADE THEM BUY THAT LAND NEXT TO CHEMICAL FORMULATORS IN 2004. NO ONE IS FORCING THE DEVELOPER TO BUY THIS LAND. NO ONE. THIS DEVELOPMENT IF IT WERE ON TRASK AND INTERBAY WOULD BE A DIFFERENT CONVERSATION, BUT OUR CITY IS ALREADY STRUGGLING WITH PUBLIC SAFETY DANGEROUSLY KEEPING UP WITH THE POPULATION HERE NOW OR THAT IS APPROVED OR COMING SOON. AN EXISTING PROBLEM A APARTMENT COMPLEX ON A DEAD END WHICH IS 499 FEET FROM A CHLORINE PLANT IS IRRESPONSIBLE AND DANGEROUS. TAMPA CAROL ANN BENNETT IS THERE IN PERSON AND READ THE 2016 REPORT FROM DAVID HEY AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT SAID NO TO CHANGING THESE REZONINGS IN RATTLESNAKE POINT. IT IS SUBMIT FOR THE RECORD AND MISS DOCK'S NAME WAS ON THAT AS WELL. IF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SAID NO IN 2016, WHY WOULD YOU SAY YES TODAY? TAMPA CITY COUNCIL NEEDS TO READ THE 2016 REPORT BEFORE MAKING A DECISION. AND SHOULD ALSO REVIEW THE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES. PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD SAVE FOLKS THAT WHO COULD FALL VICTIM FROM THESE DEVELOPER HAVE NO QUALMS PUTTING TENANTS NEXT TO A DANGEROUS FACILITY. FOR THE BUCK THE CITY, THE BUCK STOPS HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND WE WISH YOU A SPEEDY RECOVERY. NEXT UP JEAN STROHMEYE R. YES MA'AM. AND I THINK YOU ARE MUTED. FULL UNMUTE YOURSELF. >> OKAY. CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, GO AHEAD. >> HELLO. OKAY. I AM JEAN STROHMEYER. I'M HERE TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS PROPERTY BASED ON THE FACT THAT IT IS IN A DANGEROUS SITUATION. AGAIN, WE HAVE SEEN THESE CHEMICAL SPILLS, YOU KNOW, IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF -- IN THE PARTS OF THE COUNTRY. AND IT IS JUST SIMPLY DANG DANGEROUS. THE CHEMICALS DON'T STOP AT WALLS. I JUST THINK WITH ALL WE HAD ABOUT SMART PLANNING NEEDS TO BE UTILIZED. WE NEED OUR VOICES HEARD. WE NEED THESE -- WE JUST NOT NEED TO BE HEARD, BUT WE NEED ACTION AND -- I MEAN IT IS A BEAUTIFUL FACILITY THAT THEY WANT TO DO. I AM NOT GOING TO FAULT THEM FOR THAT. IT IS REALLY PRETTY; HOWEVER, THE PEOPLE LIVING THERE UNLESS THEY HAVE A VOTE -- OR THEY JUST WON'T BE ABLE TO GO OUT AS CAROL ANN SAID THEY DIDN'T WANT IT IN 2016 BECAUSE IT WAS INHERENTLY DANGEROUS. WE SHOULDN'T HAVE IT NOW. SAVE THE PEOPLE. BAD ENOUGH WITH HURRICANE BUT THE ADDED CHEMICAL THAT WOULD CREATE JUST -- JUST BAD PROBLEMS AND IF IT HAPPENED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT, HOW IS ANYBODY GOING TO GET PEOPLE SLEEPING AND WAKE THEM UP AND GET THEM OUT OF THERE BUT FOR GOING STRAIGHT THROUGH THE -- THE ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD CLOUD THEY WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH TO BREATHE THAT ON THEIR WAY OUT. SO JUST -- I SUGGEST Y'ALL MAKE SMART DECISIONS HERE. THANK YOU. HAVE A GOOD DAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT UP IS PRISCILLA. THEN WE HAVE SHAWN BROWN. AND MISS DENAULT. PRISCILLA. >> HI, I AM PRISCILLA PARTEL AND I LIVE IN THE SOG COMM COMMUNITY. THIS PROJECT WILL ADD 4097 T TRIPS TO THE LOCAL ROADS. THE THREE TYSON AVENUE APARTMENT COMPLEXES COMBINED WILL ADD 8445 TRIPS TO THE LOCAL ROADS. ONE OF THE DEVELOPERS OFFICIAL TRAFFIC STUDY SAYS THAT A NEW LIGHT AT TYSON IN WEST SHORE WILL COST $2 MILLION. BUT THIS PROJECT WILL PROBABLY PAY LESS THN $200,000 OF THAT COST. WE, THE TAXPAYERS, HAVE TO SUBSIDIZE THE REST. AND HOW LONG WILL THE RESIDENTS HAVE TO SUFFER THROUGH THE TRAFFIC OF ALL OF THAT CONSTRUCTION. AND 9,000 MORE CARS BEFORE THE LIGHT IS EVEN BUILT. WILL WE SUFFER FOR YEARS? RECENTLY, THE ZONING ADMINSTRATOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL DENIED A REQUEST FOR AN APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE BUILT ON A LOCAL ROAD BECAUSE IT IS PROHIBITED IN CITY CODE. THE CODE SAYS THE APARTMENT COMPLEXES MUST BE BUILT ON COLLECTOR OR ARTERIAL ROADS, BUT APPARENTLY THAT ONLY APPLIES FOR AN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE INSTEAD OF REZ REZONING. IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME CIRCUMSTANCES, BUT THE REQUIREMENTS ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. THERE IS NO COMMON SENSE IS THAT. NORFOLK, VIRGINIA PARK IS OFTEN COMMENDED FOR THEIR EFFORTS TO ADAPT TO RISING WATERS AND TO DEAL WITH SEA LEVEL RISE AND CLIMATE CHANGE. ACCORDING TO TAMPA SEA LEVEL RISE PRESENTATION, NORFOLK'S POLICY IS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT PLUS ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS VIA HOUSING BUYOUTS. AND THEIR POLICY IS TO MAINTAIN BUT NOT EXPAND KEY ROADS AND SEWER AND WATER UTILITIES. AT THE SAME TIME, THEY ARE ENHANCING THEIR COASTAL ECONOMIC ENGINES. THEY ARE MAKING MAJOR INVESTMENTS IN STRUCTURAL PROTECTION AND AREAS WITH KEY ECONOMIC ACCESS ESSENTIAL TO THE CITY'S FUTURE. ENCOURAGING DENSE MIX THE USE DEVELOPMENT IN THE COASTAL AREAS. THAT SEEMS TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT TAMPA IS DOING. TAMPA'S POLICY SEEMS TO BE TO CROSS OUR FINGERS AND HOPE FOR THE BEST. PLEASE DENY THIS IRRESPONSIBLE DENSITY INCREASE IN THE MOST VULNERABLE AREA AND PLAN RESPONSIBLY FOR OUR FUTURE. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT IS UP SHAWN BROWN. >> CAN YOU HEAR ME? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, GO AHEAD SIR. >> PERFECT. BEFORE I GET STARTED CAN I REQUEST AN ADDITIONAL 30 SECONDS, MR. CHAIRMAN? >> YES, GO AHEAD. >> GOOD EVENING, SHAWN BROWN, PRESIDENT OF THE GANDY CIVIC ASSOCIATION. TIME IN MY TRUCK BECAUSE IT IS THURSDAY AND OUR GROES GROCERIES ARE OPEN. AND ONE DAY YOU WILL COME AND SEE THE -- SERVE 170 FAMILIES SO FAR THIS EVENING. SO AT ANY RATE, HERE THIS EVENING ON THIS REZONING. I DO WANT TO THANK THE DEVELOPER, ELISE, AND OTHERS REACHING OUT TO US ON MARCH 16 TO DISCUSS THE UPDATES AND CONTINUE TO GET OUR FEEDBACK. OBVIOUSLY WHAT YOU DID -- AND HEARD FROM A LOT OF RESIDENTS FROM PINEY POINT, 300 HOMES THAT HAD TO BE EVACUATED AND BUSINESSES AND ALL THAT SUCH. A LOT OF RESIDENTS ARE CONCERNED IS RATTLESNAKE POINT THE SAME AS PINEY POINT WITH CHEMICAL FORMULATORS. AND I THINK THOSE CONCERNS ARE VALID COMING UP. WE DON'T KNOW THE -- [INAUDIBLE] -- THAT IT CAUSED. THAT THE -- THAT THE RESERVIST SPACE -- THE RESERVIST PROPERTY ON THERE DO ACTUAL DRILLS IN THE EVENT OF CHEMICAL FORMULATORS. THEY HAVE ACTIVE DRILLS WHERE THEY PREPARE FOR SO. THE QUESTION BEGS, IS THE DEVELOPER GOING TO HAVE TO REQUIRE DRILLS FOR RESIDENTS IN THE EVENT THAT SOMETHING HAPPENS? YOU KNOW, ALSO IT WAS BROUGHT UP THE FLOODING AND THE -- YOU KNOW, THE HURRICANE AND HOW FEMA HAS CLASSIFIED. ONE OF THE THINGS I SAW IN THE REDESIGN THAT -- FROM THE GROUND FIRST FLOOR IS 10 FEET, 8 INCHES. GRANTED IF WE HAVE A 14, 15-FOOT COMING IN THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE ACTUAL APARTMENTS WILL BE FLOODED. AND I TALKED TO SOME INSURANCE AGENTS AND SOME SAID THEY WOULDN'T INSURE ANYBODY -- GIVE RENTER'S INSURANCE OR ANYTHING OUT THERE ON THAT -- IN THIS PROJECT. SOME HAVE SAID THEY WOULD, BUT IT WOULD BE AT A VERY HIGH COST AND WE ARE TALKING OF CHEMICAL FORMULATORS OUT THERE. NOTHING IN POLICIES THAT SAYS IF SOMETHING WERE TO HAPPEN, ARE RESIDENTS COVERED. THERE ARE A LOT OF ISSUES FOR RESIDENTS AS FAR AS ARE THEY GOING TO INSURE THEIR LIVES, THEIR GOODS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE AS WELL. ONE OF THESE THINGS STEPHANIE MENTIONED IF THIS PROJECT WAS ELSEWHERE TRASK. I LIKE THE CHANGE. I LIKE THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE. I REALLY DO. IS IT FIT FOR RATTLESNAKE PO POINT, I DON'T THINK SO. I DON'T THINK IT FITS RIGHT N NOW. I THINK TO GET THE CHEMICAL TO MOVE TO GET A TRANSITION. WORKED HARD TO GET THE CONGARA FACILITY DOWNTOWN OFF OF WATER STREET AND FINICK AND HIS GROUP WANT TO CONTINUE. THE FLOUR MILL IS MOVING AND NEED TO WORK WITH CHEMICAL FORMULATORS TO MOVE ALL THE POINT SO A TRUE TRANSITION CAN OCCUR AND THE ISSUE -- THE SAFETY ISSUE. I LOOK AT THREE Ss: SAFE, SMART AND SUSTAINABLE. IN PROJECT CAN DO AND IN OTHER PARTS OF THE CITY. RIGHT NOW AT RATTLESNAKE POINT. WITH PINEY POINT AND $200 MILLION PRICE TAG THAT THE STATE WILL GET STUCK WITH AND WE AS TAXPAYERS, THE HSK IS NOT GOING TO HAVE ANY MONEY TO PAY BACK ON THAT. A LOT OF LIABILITY THAT THE CITY IS GOING TO ABSORB SHOULD SOMETHING HAPPEN WITH CHEMICAL FORMULATORS. IN HINDSIGHT, WE DON'T KNOW A LOT YET, BUT I THINK IT IS PROBABLY BEHOOVE THE CITY AND GIVEN THE DISCUSSIONS ON 2016 ON THIS, WILL BE FINE TO PUT RESOURCES TO HAVE THE CHEMICAL FORMULATORS TO BE RELOCATED. AT THIS POINT I ASK THAT YOU REJECT THE PROJECT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: POLICE DENAULT, YOU ARE THE LAST W WEEKER. >> HI, KALI DENAULT, I AM THE PORT TAMPA CIVIC PRESIDENT. GIVEN THE LACK OF INFRASTRUCTURE AROUND THIS AREA TO SUPPORT SUCH GROWTH, OUR ASSOCIATION DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PROJECT. THE TRAFFIC STUDY CONDUCTED IN 2007 BY TINDEL OLIVER AND ASSOCIATES IN THE NEAR -- [INAUDIBLE] -- MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS -- MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH OF AND GO TOW KEEP UP WITH THE INCREASE IN THE DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND WORK. NOT ONLY THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE MADE, BUT THE GROWTH CONDITIONED. I UNDERSTAND TRAFFIC STUDY IS CONDUCTED FOR EACH PROJECT TO CONSIDER IMPACT FEES BUT NOT PAINTING A CLEAR PICTURE. THE 440 APARTMENT ON WEST SHORE AND INTERBAY HAS NOT IMPACTED THE ROADS. TRAFFIC FROM 216 UP AT TRASK AND McCOY, 25 AT INTERBAY. 22 HOUSES -- 22 TOWNED. HOUSES AT WEST SHORE AND McCOY AND THE PROJECT APPROVED A MONTHS AGO ON WEST SHORE THAT THE TRAFFIC WILL FEED INTO. HOW IS THE CITY SURE THAT THEY WILL BE ABLE TO SAFELY EVACUATE OF A HURRICANE IN FIVE YEARS WHEN ALL OF THESE PROJECTS ARE COMPLETE. THE CITY COMPLETED BY A PROFESSIONAL SAID THAT WEST SHORE BOULEVARD NEEDED TO BE FOUR LANES BEGINNING AT TYSON. A SOUTHBOUND LANE SHOULD BE ON MANHATTAN AVENUE TO GANDY BOULEVARD. THESE ARE SOME OF THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT THE COMPANY SAID WOULD NEED AND WAS NOT DONE. THIS IS 14 YEARS AGO. DALE MABRY AT 90% CAPACITY AND BAYSHORE AT 95% CAPACITY. AS PRISCILLA ADDED, THAT THE APARTMENT COMPLEX BIND WILL ADD SICK CAN'T AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC TO THE ROAD AND TRAFFIC LIGHT AT TYSON AND WEST SHORE. HOW LONG THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 2007 STUDY NO IDEA WHEN THAT WILL BE INSTALLED. I APPRECIATE THE APPLICANT REDUCING THE NUMBER OF APARTMENTS AND ADD REGULAR TAIL WHICH IS HIGHLY DESIRED BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW OUR ROAD CAN WITHSTAND THIS TYPE OF GROWTH. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THAT CONCLUDES OUR REGISTERED SPEAKERS AND PUBLIC COMMENT IN PERSON. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS BEFORE WE GO TO -- COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WOULD LIKE TO DEFER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HEARING NONE. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING, SIR? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS TO POLICE IRA. I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS DR. IRA. BUT MISS IRA. SO TO START WITH, YOU INDICATED THAT IN YOUR RESEARCH YOU COULDN'T FIND ANY EPA CITATIONS. AND HOW FAR BACK DID YOU GO ON THAT? >> THE REPORT WENT BACK TO 1 1997, I BELIEVE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY OPINION. THE -- ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE 1998 SPILL THAT IT SHALL AT THAT PLANT THAT INVOLVED 68 PEOPLE BEING SICK? >> YEAH, I AM. AND THEY DIDN'T RECEIVE A CITATION FROM THAT ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION THAT I SAW. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU DON'T THAT I WAS IMPORTANT TELL US AS RELATED TO YOUR INFORMATION? >> WELL, I ONLY HAD A SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME. AND I WAS FOCUSING MY -- YOU KNOW MY OUTLINE ON THE SAFEGUARDS THEY INSTALLED. AND I -- BUT I WILL ADDRESS THAT RELEASE THAT OCCURRED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HOW ABOUT THE -- >> THEY HAD ANOTHER ONE -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SORRY. HOW ABOUT THE 20 05 INCIDENT THA RESULTED IN A E P C INVESTIGATION. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY EPC INVESTIGATION. AND ALSO -- SEVERAL PEOPLE GETTING SICK. >> THAT WAS -- THE INCIDENT ACTUALLY OCCURRED IN 2003. MAYBE THE INVESTIGATION HAPPENED IN 2005, BUT THE INCIDENT OCCURRED IN 2003. DINGFELDER DUNGY YOU DIDN'T FEEL THAT WAS IMPORTANT TO -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU DIDN'T FEEL THAT WAS IMPORTANT TO TELL US ABOUT? >> LIKE I SAID, I WAS FOCUSING MY TALK ON THE SAFEGUARDS THEY INSTALLED BECAUSE WANTED TO CONVEY THE INFORMATION WE FOUND ON THE PLANT ON THE SAFEGUARDS THEY INSTALLED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I ONLY HAVE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF TIME AND LET YOU EXPLAIN FURTHER WHEN MISS BATSEL COMES BACK ON HER REBUTTAL. HOW ABOUT HOMELAND SECURITY. IS THIS PLANT SUBJECT TO HOMELAND SECURITY AFTER NOT -- AFTER 9/11 AND WHY. >> THE PLANT IS SUBJECT TO THE CFAS RULE. THE CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TERRORISM STATUTE. I DIDN'T REALLY LOOK INTO THAT BECAUSE TO NONE OF THAT INFORMATION IS PUBLICLY AVAILABLE AND YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE FACILITY TO FIND OUT. BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE CHLORINE CONTAINERS AND 150-POUND CONTAINER THEY WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A CFAS RULE AND HAVE TO SUBMIT A SECURITY REPORT TO THE DHS BUT AGAIN THAT INFORMATION IS NOT PUBLICLY AVAILABLE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE GRANITEVILLE, GEORGIA DISASTER THAT INVOLVED THREE RAILROAD CARS THAT COME OFF THE TRACK. >> YEAH, IT DIDN'T COME OFF THE TRACK AND A SWITCHING ERROR BY THE RAILROAD AND CAUSED THE TWO TRAINS TO WRECK. AND ONE -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DO YOU REMEMBER HOW MANY PEOPLE DIED IN THAT INCIDENT? >> I THINK THERE WERE 12. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I ONLY HAVE GOT NINE FROM THE -- >> MAYBE YOU ARE RIGHT. MAYBE IT IS NINE. I DON'T HAVE THOSE NUMBERS. I REMEMBER THREE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AND THE OTHERS WERE AT THE MILL THAT WAS RIGHT NEXT TO THAT RAILROAD SITE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE HOSPITALIZED, CORRECT. >> RIGHT, RIGHT. THAT WOULD BE CARD TRANSPORTATION INCIDENT WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT. THAT TYPE OF ACCIDENT COULD HAPPEN ANYWHERE BECAUSE THOSE RAILCARS TRAVEL ACROSS STATE LINE, CITY LINE, ETC. AND IT IS THE WORST INCIDENT THAT I AM AWARE OF REGARDING A RAILCAR RELEASE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ARE THE RAILCARS FILLED WITH CHLORINE THAT GET MOVED AROUND THIS PLANT AND THIS FACILITY? >> THERE ARE RAILCARS SITED AT THERE AND THEY PARK THERE AND THEY UNLOAD CHLORINE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WITH YOU PREDICT -- IF THERE IS AN INCIDENT, CAN YOU PREDICT WHAT DIRECTION THE CHLORINE PLUME WOULD NECESSARILY FLOW? >> WOULD DEPEND ON THE WIND DIRECTION AT THE TIME OF THE RELEASE AND OTHER ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: POSSIBLE IT COULD GO TO THE WEST TO THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, CORRECT? >> IF THE WIND WERE BLOWING THAT WAY. BUT LIKE I STATED, THEY DO HAVE A DELUGE SYSTEM OVER THE R RAILCAR AND EMERGENCY SHUTOFF VA LVE. AND THE EMERGENCY SHUTOFF VA LVE WOULD NOT WORK IN A TRAIN WRECK, BUT DURING NORMAL OPERATION, THE EMERGENCY SHUTOFF VA LVE WOULD TYPICALLY ENGAGE AND STOP THE FLOW OF CHLORINE SO THE ONLY AMOUNT RELEASED IS THE AMOUNT IN THE TRANSFER HOSE AT THE TIME. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY. IN GRANITEVILLE, THE RELEASE WAS 46 TONS, DOES THAT RING A BELL? >> YEAH, IT WAS A 90-TON RAILCAR. SO IN A TRAIN WRECK, IT DID NOT RELEASE THE ENTIRE MAP, THE 46 TONS. ACTUALLY ABOUT -- ABOUT THAT AMOUNT. YOU SAW A DIFFERENT NUMBER. BUT THAT'S WHAT I SAW. SO I WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LET ME FINISH UP MY QUESTIONS AND THEN MISS BAT SEL CAN DECIDE HOW MUCH TIME SHE WANTS TO DEVOTE TO YOU AND I AM SURE MR. CHAIRMAN WILL GIVE YOU ALL THE TIME YOU NEED. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY FROM TRANSPORTATION -- OUR TRANSPORTATION STAFF ON? MISS DOCK? >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, JONATHAN SCOTT IS ON THE LINE. >> JONATHAN SCOTT, CITY OF TAMPA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JONATHAN, GOOD EVENING. REFRESH MY MEMORY. I AM SURE IT CAME UP LAST TIME AND IN TERM OF WAS THERE A TRAFFIC STUDY DONE EITHER BY THE CITY OR THE DEVELOPER ON THIS PROJECT? >> YES, SIR, THE DEVELOPER DID DO A TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THIS PROJECT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HOW MANY TRIPS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT FOR -- FOR THESE 495 NEW UNITS? >> FOR THE PROJECT -- LET'S SEE, LIKE A NET DAILY TRIPS OF UNDER -- LET'S SEE, AROUND 4,000 DAILY TRIPS. I KNOW THEY JUST UPDATED THAT SINCE THE -- SINCE THEY REDUCED THE UNITS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I AM TRYING TO -- I AM TRYING TO GO FAST BECAUSE PEOPLE -- PEOPLE WANT ME TO GO FAST. ARE THERE -- ARE THERE ANY FAILING ROADS THAT THESE 4,000 TRIPS DUMP ON TO, FAILING ROADS AND OR INTERSECTIONS. AND I SAY "FAILING" I MEAN IN TERMS OF THEIR CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE BEING, YOU KNOW, ARE THERE ANY LEVEL D OR LEVEL F? I THINK IF MY CHILDREN CAME HOME WITH Ds OR Fs I WOULD CALL IT FAILING. >> YES, FAILING MOVEMENT FROM THE PROJECT THAT THAT HAD PROJECT TRAFFIC IN WEST SHORE AND GANDY AND ALSO GANDY AND MANHATTAN AND CROP SHARE MITIGATION FOR THAT -- THE MOVEMENTS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: POURING 4,000 ADDITIONAL PROJECT ON TO FAILING ROADS AND FAILING INTERSECTIONS, IS THAT CORRECT? >> WELL, THOSE ARE DAILY TRIPS TOTAL, BUT ACTUAL TRIPS TO THOSE SPECIFIC FAILING MOVEMENTS IS NOT NOT NECESSARILY 4,000 BUT BROKEN UP IN THE DISTRIBUTION. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN. THANK YOU, JONATHAN. THANK YOU, IRA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: IS DAVID HEY THERE? >>DAVID HEY: YES, COU COUNCILMEMBER. I'M HERE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: KNOW I THINK THE -- THE APPLICANT HAS TRIED DO A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS TO GET THIS PROJECT MOVING, AND I AM APPRECIATIVE OF THAT, BUT AFTER GETTING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND THEN I AM LOOKING AT THE TRANSCRIPTS. IT SEEMS LIKE THIS ISSUE CAME UP BEFORE, DID IT NOT? >>DAVID HEY: WELL I THINK THE RESIDENTS IN SOG DID BRING UP THE 2016 TEXT AMENDMENT THAT THE RECOMMENDATION, I BELIEVE -- AND I DON'T HAVE THAT IN FRONT OF ME BUT I BELIEVE THAT IS CORRECT. THE RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF AT THE TIME WAS THE TEXT AMENDMENT WAS INCONSISTENT. AND I BELIEVE THE CITY STAFF WAS IN AGREEMENT WITH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. REMEMBER, WE MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE FINAL DETERMINATION WAS BY TAMPA CITY COUNCIL AT THAT TIME THAT IF T WAS CONSISTENT. SO THE LANGUAGE WAS CHANGED. AND WE ARE NOW -- WE ARE NOW REVIEWING THESE REZONING REQUESTS ON THAT LANGUAGE THAT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SO WE ARE SAYING THE LANGUAGE BEFORE WHEN THIS CAME UP WAS INCONSISTENT, CORRECT? >>DAVID HEY: WELL, THE -- THERE WAS ALREADY LANGUAGE WITHIN THE COMP PLAN PRIOR TO 2016 REGARDING RATTLESNAKE POINT. A PRIVATE TEXT AMENDMENT CAME IN, LIKE ANY OTHER APPLICANT CAN, AND SOUGHT A CHANGE TO THE TEXT REGARDING RATTLESNAKE PONT. THE STAFF REVIEWED THAT BASED ON THE POLICY DIRECTION AT THE TIME IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE BY THE APPLICANT WAS INCONSISTENT. BUT CITY COUNCIL IS THE FINAL DETERMINER, AND IT WAS FOUND CONSISTENT AND THE CHANGES WERE MADE TO THE LANGUAGE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHICH IS WELLS, I SEE YOUR HAND UP. >>CATE WELLS: THANK YOU, THERE CHAIR. I WANT T REMIND CITY COUNCIL THAT TODAY YOU APPLY THE LANGUAGE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IS EXISTS TODAY NOT AS IT EXISTED IN 2016. AND REGARDLESS OF STAFF'S POSITION ON THE 2016 AMEN AMENDMENTS, THAT WAS FIVE YEARS AGO. TODAY YOU HAVE GOT A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND YOU ARE OBLIGATED TO ABIDE BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SH SHELBY, DID -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: I AM GOOD, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MISS WELLS FOR THAT. IS -- MISS IRA? >> YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE THE EXPERT FOR THE APPLICANT, CORRECT? >> YES. GUDES AGAIN, MISS WELLS, YOU MAY CHIME IN WHEN I AM ASKING. IN YOUR EXPERT OPINION DO YOU FEEL THAT PUTTING THIS PROJECT AT THIS LOCATION IS SAFE FOR RESIDENTS? >> WELL, IT IS NOT REALLY MY ROLE TO TELL YOU WHETHER YOU SHOULD PUT THE PROJECT IN OR NOT. IF WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO ASK ME IF CHLORINE IS SAFE. CHLORINE HAS HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES AND IT DOES CARRY RISKS, BUT SO DO MANY OTHER THINGS THAT WE ARE USED TO USING AND DOING IN OUR DAILY LIVES IN OUR COMMUNITY. WE HAVE ELECTRICITY IN OUR HOUSES. WE DRIVE CAR. WE FLY AIRPLANE. REASON WE ARE COMFORTABLE WITH THOSE THINGS BECAUSE THEY HAVE INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND SAFETY DEVICES IMPLEMENTED AND PROCEDURES SUCH AS MAINTENANCE ON AIRPLANES A AND TRAINING FOR THE FLIGHT CREW AND RIGOROUS ADHERENCE TO REGULATORY COMPLIANCE AND THOSE KIND OF THINGS ARE THE SAME COMPONENT TO SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS THAT I DESCRIBED EARLIER FOR CHEMICAL FORMULATORS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO AND COUNCILMAN VIERA. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR. MR. HEY, ARE YOU STILL THERE? THANK YOU, MR. HEY. AND I AM JUST QUOTING SOME OF THE THINGS ARE IN THE LAND USE OBJECTIVES FOR RATTLESNAKE POINT AND LAND USE 8.11. AND I WILL JUST BRIEFLY RUN THROUGH IT REAL QUICK. THE TRANSITION OF RATTLESNAKES AREA FROM ITS CURRENT MIXED USE HEAVY AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES OF MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL RETAIL USES IN A WATERFRONT COMMUNITY IN A MANNER -- IN A MANNER THAT PROTECTS THE PUBLIC, HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE. BUT YET THIS IS STILL NEXT TO A CHLORINE GAS MANUFACTURING PLANT. I AM JUST -- I AM JUST USING THIS LAND USE POLICY THAT MIGHT IN THE FUTURE MAKE A POINT FOR ME. LET'S LOOK AT 8.11.5. AND I WILL GET DOWN TO WHERE I AM MORE CONCERNED ABOUT. REZONING ABUTTING AN EXISTING HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USES THAT ARE HAZARDOUS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY. THAT IS TWO LAND USE POLICIES THAT SHOULD -- THAT YOU ARE SAYING ARE SHOWING CONSISTENCY, BUT IT SAYS -- CRE, CATE, GIVE ME ONE SECOND. IT SAYS TO ME THAT THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE SAFE FROM ANY ACCIDENT THAT MAY OCCUR AT THIS CHLORINE GAS MANUFACTURING PLANT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR. PLEASE, MISS WELLS. >>CATE WELLS: JUST FOR THE RECORD, CHIEF ASSISTANT CITY KOREAN. WITH RESPECT TO.11.5 AND THE LANGUAGE THAT COUNCILMAN CITRO JUST MENTIONED PROPOSED PD REZONING ABUT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USES THAT ARE HAZARDOUS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY DEMONSTRATIONS OF ACCEPTED PRACTICES THAT SHOULD NOT BE UNDULY AT RISK OF SUCH HAZARDS. THAT LANGUAGE -- THAT SPECIFIC PROVISION DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS REZONING APPLICATION AS THIS PARCEL OF PROPERTY DOES NOT ABUT THE PARCEL OF PROPERTY OF WHICH CHEMICAL FORMULATORS ARE LOCATED. I WANTED TO CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MISS WELLS. MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I MAY -- ABUTTING MAY BE A PROPERTY NEXT TO ONE ANOTHER, BUT I AM LOOKING AT THIS AS A PROPERTY THAT IS ABUTTING ONLY SEPARATED BY A ROAD. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU, MISS WELLS. THANK YOU, MR. HEY. >>CATE WELLS: I AM ASKING COUNCIL TO APPLY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISIONS THAT ARE TODAY AND ABUT MEANS THE PROPERTY HAS TO TOUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA. >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. MOST OF MY QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED. IF YOU WILL FOR THE PUBLIC TO REVIEW OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THIS. IN 2016, THE PLAN WAS CHANGED TO ALLOW -- I AM SPEAKING TOO CLOSELY INTO THIS. TO POTENTIAL ALLEY ALLOW SUCH DEVELOPMENT AT RATTLESNAKE POINT. AND THAT IS THE -- THE STAFF REPORTS ON THE PROPOSED CHANGES BACK IN 2016 LOOKED AT THEM WITH THIS FAVOR, BUT ULTIMATELY COUNCIL VOTED ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. AND THAT VOTE OF COUNCIL REFLECTS THE PLAN WE RELY UPON TODAY CORRECT? JUST SAY YES. IS THAT IS A CORRECT STATEMENT, RIGHT? >>DAVID HEY: YES, THAT IS A CORRECT STATEMENT. >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MR. HEY. THAT WAS ANSWERED BEFORE, BUT THAT IS SOMETHING I WANTED TO MAKE CLEAR FOR MY OWN SELF, ETC. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CH CHAIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. SHELBY ASKED ME TO CLARIFY SOMETHING FOR THE RECORD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OBVIOUSLY AT THE PRIOR HEARING, THIS COUNCIL AND THIS COUNCILMAN HAD A LOT OF CONCERNS ABOUT THE CHLORINE ISSUE. AND THAT WAS SPOKEN TO AT LENGTH. THE -- AT TODAY'S HEARING, POLICE BATSEL AND HER TEAM INCLUDING MISS IRA BROUGHT UP THE CHLORINE ISSUE, AND I APPRECIATE THAT. IN THE INTERIM BETWEEN LAST HEARING AND THIS HEARING, I DID WHAT A LOT OF US DO, WHICH IS GOOGLED CHLORINE SAFETY. AND SPECIFICALLY AS RELATED TO THIS PLANT. SO I WILL ACKNOWLEDGE THAT AND ADMIT THAT ON THE RECORD. THAT IS WHERE I CAME UP WITH THE 199 SPILL AND 2005 SPILL AS WELL AS THAT MAJOR EVENT IN GRANITEVILLE, GEORGIA WHICH MISS IRA. I DON'T BELIEVE I TESTIFIED ABOUT THEM BUT I USED IT AS THE BASIS OF MY OWN INQUIRY. IF MISS WELLS WANTS TO TELL ME NOT TO GOOGLE THINGS LIKE THAT IN BETWEEN HEARINGS THAN I STAND AT FAULT. BUT I -- I BELIEVE IT IS IMPORTANT THAT WE ALL, YOU KNOW, USE THE SKILLS THAT WE HAVE AND THE COMMON SENSE THAT WE HAVE. AND I MADE VERY CLEAR NOT TO TRY TO TESTIFY AS TO THOSE ISSUES. BUT TO ELICIT TESTIMONY FROM MISS IRA, WHO IS THE EXPERT. AND I APPRECIATE HER CANDOR AFTER I ASKED THOSE QUESTIONS. I WANTED TO BE ABUNDANTLY CLEAR ON THOSE MATTERS, MR. CHAIR, PLANNED SHELBY, AND MISS WELLS. SO THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: YEAH, I WANT TO APOLOGIZE TO MY COLLEAGUES AND THE APPLICANT AND THE COMMUNITY ON THIS. DURING THE LAST FEW MINUTES I HAVE BEEN RESEARCHING AND MARTY HAS BEEN IF I HAVE A CONFLICT. BASED ON MARTY'S ADVICE, I AM RECUSING MYSELF. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW I HAVE BEEN RESEARCHING WHETHER OR NOT IT IS OR NOT AND IF SECOND READ GOING IT IS, I WILL RECUSE MYSELF AGAIN. APOLOGIZE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: CONGRESSMAN CARLSON, IF I CAN JUST BE CLEAR FROM WHAT YOU SAID, THEN BASED ON WHAT YOU BELIEVE TO BE THE ISSUE YOU WISH TO ABSTAIN BECAUSE OF THE APPEARANCE OF A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST? >>BILL CARLSON: YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE. REBUTTAL FOR MISS BATSEL. >> BEFORE WE CONTINUE THE NATURE OF THE CONFLICT -- AM I ENTITLED TO THE INFORMATION ON THE RECORD. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HE STEPPED OUT -- >> I WOULD LIKE TO GO BACK TO THAT IF YOU DON'T MIND. JUST QUICKLY IN REBUTTAL BEFORE WE GET TO MISS IRA AND SOME OF THE ISSUES WITH RESPECT TO THE CHEMICAL PLANT, JUST AS A REMINDER, THIS AREA IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY. OUR EXPERT STEVE HENRY IS ON LINE AND CAN REITERATE WHAT HE SAID AT THE LAST HEARING, BUT YOU HAVE CHOSEN TO HAVE THIS -- YOU HAVE CHOSEN TO BE A CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA AND I WILL LET STEVE TALK MORE ABOUT THAT. I WILL PUT -- TO ADDRESS THE TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON OF WHAT IS PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. STEVE, IF YOU COULD START AND START MY WEB CAM SHARING HERE. ARE YOU THERE? >> YES, I'M HERE. AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU HAVE BEEN SWORN, SIR? >> YES, AT THE BEGINNING -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LET'S SWEAR YOU IN JUST IN CASE. >> ABSOLUTELY. >>CLERK: ALSO NICOLE. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? >> I DO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR. >> THIS GRAPHIC IS A COMPARISON OF THE TRIP GENERATION WHAT COULD BE BUILT ON THE PROPERTY BASED ON THE EXISTING ZONING THAT IS THERE TODAY WHICH IS 800 AND SOME THOUSAND SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE THAT COULD BE DEVELOPED, WHICH IS IN THE GREEN, VERSUS THE BLUE, AND THE BLUE IS ACTUALLY THE NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE APARTMENTS AND WITH THE TWO RESTAURANTS. AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE A.M. PEAK HOUR, THE TRIP GENERATION WOULD BE 937 BASED ON EXISTING VERSUS 304 WITH THE PROPOSED. AND THEN IN THE P.M. PEAK HOUR 929 VERSUS 343. SO SIGNIFICANT DECREASE IN WHAT COULD BE DEVELOPED ON THE PROPERTY BASED ON EXISTING ZONING VERSUS WHAT WE ARE REQUESTING FOR YOU TONIGHT. AND IN ADDITION, AS INDICATED BY MISS BATSEL, THIS AREA IS A CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA. OUR ANALYSIS WAS DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH YOUR TRANSPORTATION AND MITIGATION PROCEDURES MANUAL THAT WE DID AN ANALYSIS. WE DID A METHODOLOGY THAT INCLUDED REVIEW BY YOUR STAFF AND APPROVAL BY THAT WHEN WE DID THE ANALYSIS AND DOING THE ANALYSIS TO LOOK AT WHAT MITIGATION IS REQUIRED BASED ON YOUR PROCEDURES. AND THIS WAS DONE AND APPROVED BY YOUR CITY STAFF. I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE ON TRANSPORTATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT, WHO IS NEXT. COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SORRY YOU COULDN'T SEE ME. MY HAND WAS UP. MR. HENRY. >> YES, SIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROFESSIONALISM AS ALWAYS. THE -- YOU KNOW THESE ROADS AS WELL AS ANYBODY THE ONES THAT JONATHAN SCOTT TESTIFIED TO EARLIER WERE FAILING OR THE INTERSECTIONS THAT WERE FAILING INCLUDE TWO THAT WERE VIRTUALLY IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THIS PROJECT, WEST SHORE AND TYSON AND WEST SHORE AND GANDY. AND THOSE ARE -- THOSE HAVE A LEVEL OF SERVICE THAT IS FAILING. DO YOU KNOW IN TERMS OF THE WEST SHORE AND TYSON -- YOU KNOW WHAT THE PLANS ARE FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THESE, YOU KNOW, WHEN -- WHEN ARE THEY BREAKING GROUND, WHEN IS THE CITY BREAKING GROUND AND BUDGETING FOR THIS? >> WELL, FOR THE -- FOR THE TYSON AND WEST SHORE INTERSECTION, BASED ON THE COUNTS THAT WE HAVE DONE, TODAY IT DOES NOT MEET SIGNAL. THERE ARE A NUMBER PROJECTS ALONG TIES T.H.A.N. HAVE THE CONDITION TO PAY THEIR PROPORTIONATE SHARE SUCH TIME AS THAT INTERSECTION NEEDS SIGNALS. AND AS THE DEVELOPMENT OCCURS ALONG THERE, ONCE THAT NEED WARRANTS, THEN THE MONIES WILL BE REQUIRED FROM THE DEVELOPMENT THAT HAVE THE CONDITION INCLUDING THIS ONE THAT WAS WILLING TO PAY IT UP FRONT TO GO AHEAD AND PUT THAT SIGNAL IN. BUT THAT IS BASICALLY -- YOU HAE TO MEET SIGNAL WARRANTS, AND TODAY BASED ON EXISTING VOLUME, IT DOES NOT MEET THE WARRANTS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO IS THAT SECTION ALREADY FAILING? I THOUGHT JONATHAN SAID IT WAS ALREADY FAILING. >> WELL, THE DIFFERENCE -- AGAIN, YOU HAVE ADOPTED A CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION. SO WE ARE -- WE DON'T LOOK AT -- WE LOOKED AT THE INTERSECTIONS THEMSELVES. WE LOOK AT WHAT MOVEMENT MAY BE FAILING AND MITIGATE FOR THAT MOVEMENT AND YOUR PROCEDURES HOW YOU ADOPTED THE CODE AND HOW WE IMPLEMENTED IT. WE ARE DOING EXACTLY WHAT THE CODE REQUIRES US TO LOOK AT AND HOW TO MITIGATE OUR IMPACTS INCLUDING PAYING OUR MOBILITY FEES IN ADDITION TO THE PROPORTIONATE SHARE THAT WE ARE PAYING FOR MITIGATION. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WHO IS THE NEXT. >> AND STEVE, I AM SORRY, I JUST HAVE A FEW MORE COMMENTS BEFORE WE GO TO MARTHA IRA IF YOU DON'T MIND, MR. CHAIRMAN. STEVE, I JUST PUT ON THE BOARD THE CITY'S MEMORANDUM OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS GOING IN AT GANDY. WILL YOU TELL US THE HIGH HIGHLIGHTED AREA THE IMPROVEMENTS AND TIMES AND WHEN THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO OPEN UP. THEY ARE NEARING COMPLETION. THERE ARE REALLY TWO PROJECTS GOING ON THERE. ONE IS THE ELEVATED LANES OVER CANDY THAT OVER GANDY THAT ARE CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. AND IN ADDITION TO THAT, THE CITY HAD A PROJECT TO ADD GEOMETRY TO GANDY AND WEST SHORE. BUT WHAT THEY DID WAS JOIN THE TWO PROJECTS TOGETHER SO ALL THE CONSTRUCTION WAS DONE AT ONE TIME. THIS IS A DOCUMENT THAT WAS ACTUALLY PUT OUT BY THE CITY THAT SAYS ONCE THOSE IMPROVEMENTS ARE COMPLETED WHICH THEY ARE NEARING COMPLETION NOW A 40% REDUCTION AND DELAY AT THAT INTERSECTION. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. AND STEVE, I UNDER STAND IT CORRECTLY YOUR PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT WE ARE MEETING EVERY REQUIREMENT OF THE CODE OF THIS PROJECT? >> YES, CORRECT. YES. >> SO TO ADDRESS WHAT MR. DINGFELDER IS SAYING THE CITY COUNCIL WOULD HAVE TO ADOPT AMENDMENTS TO THAT CODE? >> CORRECT, YES. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MISS BATSEL, JUST TO LET YOU KNOW COUNCILMAN CARLSON IS BACK IN THE ROOM. >> I MAY NEED A LITTLE EXTRA TIME, MR. CHAIRMAN, OBVIOUSLY A LOT OF QUESTIONS AND I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHERE THE TIME WENT BECAUSE I AM ANSWERING QUESTIONS. >> SHE STILL HAS THREE MINUTES REMAINING FOR REBUTTAL. >> MISS BATSEL, I STILL PLAN TO ABSTAIN. AND AS I UNDERSTAND THE RULES, IF I HAVE ANY IDEA THAT I MAY NOT BE ABLE TO BE FAIR AND IMPARTIAL, I HAVE TO ABSTAIN. SO REGRETFULLY THAT'S IT. I AM STILL RESEARCHING THIS. SO IF IT GETS A SECOND HEARING, I WILL HAVE MORE INFORMATION TO BE ABLE TO PASS ON. >> OKAY. THANK YOU. SO I WANT TO QUICKLY REVISIT SOMETHING WE TALKED ABOUT IN THE FIRST HEARING WITH RESPECT TO INDUSTRIAL USES BEING ADJACENT TO -- TO RESIDENTIAL. SO, AGAIN, WE TALKED ABOUT THIS A LITTLE BIT AT THE FIRST HEARING, BUT THIS IS CHANNELSIDE AND PALMETTO, AND IF YOU ZOOM IN, TAMPA, IN GENERAL, HAS REDEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL AREAS TO RESIDENTIAL THROUGH ITS HISTORY. SORRY. IT TAKES THIS A SECOND. IF YOU LOOK AT PORT TAMPA AREA THESE ARE RESIDENTIAL ELEMENTS NEXT TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL00 F FEET, 600 FEET. THE ONE I SHOWED YOU IS LESS THAN 200 FEET. SO WITH THE LAST -- THIS IS AN APPROVED PD. THIS IS ON RATTLESNAKE POINT. WHAT YOU APPROVED FOR NEWPORT, WE ARE TALKING 840 FEET. 319 FEET. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT MR. DINGFELDER ASKED IS HOW MANY FEET AWAY IS THE NEW PROJECT FROM -- THANK YOU, SUZANNE. FROM THE NEW BUILDING. FROM WHERE THE HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS ARE STORED. LET'S ZOOM ON THAT TO SHOW YOU. THESE BUILDINGS ARE 1600 -- OVER 1600 FEET, 1700 FEET. AND POINT IN BRINGING THAT UP IS THIS. THIS IS HOW IT HAS DEVELOPED THROUGHOUT TIME. INDUSTRIAL USE. WE ARE ADJACENT TO CHEMICAL FORMULATORS WHICH IS WHY CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DON'T APPLY TO US. WE HAVE TO APPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT IS IN EFFECT TODAY. DAVID H EY, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU, IF YOU DON'T MIND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THERE HE IS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. HE IS ON. >> YOUR PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT REGARDLESS OF ITS PROXIMITY OF CHEMICAL FORMULATORS IS CONSISTENT AND -- WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS APPLIED TO THIS PROPERTY? >>DAVID HEY: CORRECT. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY DIRECTION FOR RA RATTLESNAKE POINT AND THE UNDERLYING COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. >> THANK YOU. ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS I WANT TO NOTE TO COUNCIL IS THAT CHEMICAL FORMULATOR IS NOT HERE OBJECTING TONIGHT. THEY HAVEN'T FILED A LETTER OF OPPOSITION. YOU NOTICE AT THE WHITFIELD THEY DID COME TO ADDRESS. THEY WERE DIRECTLY ADJACENT. CHEMICAL FORMULATORS IS NO NOTICEABLY ABSENT AN THAT IS FOR A REASON. CHEMICAL FORMULATOR AS MISS IRA HAS SAID HAVE SPECIFIC SAFETY MEASURES IN PLACE. AND OBVIOUSLY IF THEY HAD CONCERNS, THEY WOULD BE HERE TONIGHT. MISS IRA, YOU MENTIONED BOTH AIRPLANES AND ELECTRICITY. SO ARE YOU CITING REGULATORY OVERSIGHT AND THE SAFETY -- YOU SAID SOMETHING TO ME AT ONE POINT. LET ME ASK THE QUESTION DIFFERENTLY. YOU SAID PEOPLE GET CONCERNED ABOUT THINGS LIKE THIS BECAUSE THEY ARE HIGH IMPACT BUT LOW FREQUENCY EVENTS. IN OTHER WORDS, THESE THINGS HARDLY EVER HAPPEN, IF THEY DO PEOPLE HEAR ABOUT THEM. LIKE A PLANE CRASH. IS THAT CORRECT? >> RIGHT. IT'S CONSIDERED A LOW FREQUENCY HIGH EFFECT EVENT. THAT IS THE WAY WE TALK ABOUT THAT IN RISK MITIGATION. BUT I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE -- THE COUNCILMAN'S COMMENTS ABOUT THE RELEASES THAT OCCURRED IN THE PAST. >> YES, PLEASE. >> JUST BRIEFLY THE RELEASE IN 1997 THAT OCCURRED WAS ACTUALLY BEFORE THE EPA'S RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN WAS FULLY IMPLEMENTED. IMPLEMENTATION WASN'T REQUIRED UNTIL 1999. THAT IS THE FIRST YEAR IT CAME INTO EFFECT. AND OSHA HAD A VERY SIMILAR REGULATION CALLED THE OSHA PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS THAT CAME INTO EFFECT EARLIER IN 1994. HAD A COUPLE YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD TO COME IN COMPLIANCE. AND BOTH OF THOSE RULES WERE ENACTED TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS. TOOK FACILITIES A WHILE TO COME INTO FULLY COMPLIANT AND ENACT ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS. BECAUSE THE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE THE SAFETY DEVICES, THE PERIODIC HAZARD ANALYSES, THE OPERATING PROCEDURES, EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS, TRAINING, ALL THE THINGS I MENTIONED -- AND MORE THAT I MENTIONED BEFORE ABOUT THE COMPONENTS OF THE SAFETY PROGRAMS OF -- OF THE CHEMICAL SAFETY PROGRAM THAT CHEMICAL FORMULATORS HAS. SO THE FACT THAT THEY HAD A RELEASE IN 1997, I AM NOT CONDONING A RELEASE OBVIOUSLY. 2003 AND THEY HAVEN'T HAD A RELEASE IN 18 YEARS. OSHA VISITED THE FACILITY IN 2007 AND THEY HAD TWO VIOLATIONS, BUT THEY WEREN'T RELATED TO THE CHLORINE SYSTEM. AND WHEN THEY VISITED THE FACILITY IN 2012, THEY SAW NO VIOLATIONS. AND A PICTURE OF THE FACILITY COME INTO COMPLIANCE AND MANAGING THEIR FACILITY MORE SAFELY SO WHEN I TALKED ABOUT THE SAFEGUARDS PARTICIPATE IN PLACE INITIALLY, I WAS FOCUSING ON THE CURRENT CONDITION OF CHEMICAL FORMULATORS. I THINK IT SHOWS THAT THEY HAVE IMPROVED OVER THE YEARS. AND I THINK THAT IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TESTIMONY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND THAT'S IT, MA'AM. >> YES. YES SIR. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. WE ARE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON, IS THAT YOU -- >>BILL CARLSON: I APOLOGIZE, EVERYBODY. THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED TO ME BEFORE. USUALLY -- I RESEARCH CAREFULLY WHETHER I HAVE A CONFLICT LIKE ALL OF DO YOU AND WORK IT OUT WITH MARTY IN ADVANCE, AND THIS ONE CAME UP AT THE LAST MINUTE. MARTY AND THE ATTORNEYS HAVE ASED ME JUST TO STATE ON THE RECORD THE NATURE OF THE CONFLICT IS THAT WE BELIEVE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT A COMPANY OR INDIVIDUAL THAT MY COMPANY DOES BUSINESS WITH MAY HAVE AN INDIRECT INTEREST IN THIS. A DIRECT OR INDIRECT FROM IN THIS. SO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE OBJECTTIVITY, I NEED TO ABS ABSTAIN. SO I APOLOGIZE AGAIN TO EVERYBODY, THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, I WILL NOT DO THIS, BUT MISS BATSEL PUT UP A MAP -- TWO DIFFERENT MAPS WE HAVEN'T SEEN DURING THE DIRECT TESTIMONY. MISS B A TSEL, I WILL LET YOU DECIDE WHO I ASK THE QUESTION. YOU TESTIFIED OF THE TWO MAPS. I AM COMFORTABLE ASKING YOU THE QUESTION. PUT THE TWO MAPS UP STARTING WITH THE ONE IN PALMETTO BEACH. AND IF YOU CAN ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT. YOU HAD IT ZOOMED IN BEFORE SLIGHTLY. OKAY, I'M PRETTY FAMILIAR WITH PALMETTO BEACH, BUT I AM NOT SUPPOSED TO TESTIFY, BUT THOSE ARE -- TO MY RECOLLECTION, REASONABILITY THOSE ALL SINGLE FAMILY HOMES BEEN THERE A LONG, LONG TIME. NOT LARGE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT THAT THIS COUNCIL MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT BE APPR APPROVING? WE CAN'T HEAR YOU, I AM SORRY. >> WHETHER IT IS PALMETTO OR WHETHER IT IS DAVIS ISLAND OR HARBOR ISLAND OR WHETHER IT IS PORT OF TAMPA, THE CITY OR -- AND THE CITY COUNCIL AT THOSE TIMES THROUGHOUT OUR CITY'S HISTORY APPROVED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT RIGHT NEXT TO INDUSTRIAL USES. THIS -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU ARE NOT TESTIFY THAWING KNOW IF THOSE HOUSES WERE THERE FIRST OR THE STORAGE TANKS WERE THERE FIRST. YOU DON'T HAVE THAT KNOWLEDGE, DO YOU? >> I DON'T HAVE THAT KNOWLEDGE FOR THIS PARTICULAR -- DINGFELDER DUNGY MY OTHER QUESTION. -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MY OTHER QUESTION. CAN YOU GO TO THE NICE AERIAL TO THE THREE LINES ON IT TO YOUR THREE BUILDINGS PROPOSED. OKAY. I AM HESITANT TO ASK THELA LAWER, BUT YOU PUT THIS UP, AND I THINK THE ANSWER IS PRETTY SIMPLE. THE -- THE TWO PROJECTS THAT YOU POINTED TO EARLIER, NEWPORT, WHICH IS ACROSS THE WATER GOING BACK TOWARD THE CITY AND SAGET, WHICH IS FURTHER CLOSER TO THE MAINLAND, THEY DON'T HAVE TO GO UP AND DOWN TYSON TO ESCAPE A CHLORINE PLUME, THAT'S CORRECT? THE BOTTOM LINE IS IF THE CHLORINE PLUME -- >> I AM SORRY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LET ME FINISH. IF THAT PLUME WAS COMING TOWARD THE SAGET PROPERTY WHICH I THINK YOU HAVE IN THAT SQUARE THERE OR THE NEWPORT PROPERTY WHICH YOU HAVE IN THE BLUE AT THE TOP CORNER, IF THEY WERE -- IF THOSE FOLKS WERE ABLE TO RUN, THEY COULD RUN INLAND AND HAVE SOMEWHERE TO GO. OKAY. MY ONLY QUESTION TO YOU IS, ISN'T THERE A DIFFERENT IN REGARD TO A PLUME THAT IS HEADED OUT TOWARD YOUR PROPOSED PROJECT WHERE THOSE PEOPLE WOULDN'T HAVE ANYWHERE TO GO BECAUSE THE CHLORINE PLANT WILL BE BETWEEN THEM. AND THE ONLY PLACE TO GO WOULD BE THE WATER, THAT'S CORRECT? >> I WOULD HAVE TO SAYS THERE ALREADY SUBSTANTIAL COMPETENT EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD THAT THE APPROPRIATE THING WOULD BE SHELTER IN PLACE. THAT IS ALREADY PART OF YOUR RECORD. YOU ARE ASSUMING FACTS THAT AREN'T INTO THE RECORD SAYING THAT A PLUME IS GOING TO GO ONE DIRECTION OR THE OTHER. MISS IRA IN HER PROFESSIONAL EXPERT TESTIMONY GAVE EXTENSIVE TESTIMONY AT THE LAST HEARING ABOUT THE APPROPRIATE SHE SHELTERING IN PLACE THAT WOULD NOT REQUIRE THOSE FOLKS TO EVACUATE. IN FACT IT WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO STAY RIGHT WHERE THEY ARE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I DON'T WANT TO BELABOR THIS. BUT THE NINE PEOPLE IN GRANITESVILLE WERE PROBABLY TRYING SHELTER IN PLACE CLOSE TO THAT FACILITY AS WELL. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYTHING ELSE? MISS BATSEL, WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE A FINAL WORD ANOTHER MINUTE AND THEN CLOSE THIS OUT. ANYTHING ELSE? >> YES, THANK YOU. I WOULD JUST REMIND COUNCIL THAT THE STANDARD BY WHICH YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO LOOK AT THIS PROJECT IS SUBSTANTIAL COMPETENT EVIDENCE. WE HAVE PROVIDED ALL EXPERT TESTIMONY ON ALL OF THESE TECHNICAL ISSUES INCLUDING SAFETY. AND THE ONLY COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT YOU HEARD WITH REGARD TO THE MATTER HAS COME WITH MISS IRA AND THE MAPS THAT I PROVIDED WHAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED FROM THE RECORD OF 2007 IS NOT RELEVANT OF WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT TODAY. WE BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE CHECKED ALL THE CATEGORIES FOR COMPETENT SUBSTANTIALAL EVIDENCE AND HONESTLY WE FEEL THIS IS A REALLY GOOD PROJECT AND REQUEST APPROVAL. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SO MOVED. >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND. -- COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, I APOLOGIZE SIR. PLEASE UNMUTE YOURSELF. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I REALLY APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY. AND I HAVE BEEN THINKING AS THE CONVERSATION HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR SOME TIME ABOUT DIFFERENT THINGS REGARDING THE AMMONIA, CITRIC NITRATE, WHATEVER IT IS AND I WAS LISTENING AND GOING BACK IN HISTORY IN MY MIND, THAT I REMEMBER THERE WAS A COMPANY IN THE MUDDLE OF -- OH, CLOSE TO THE INTERSTATE ON ARMENIA AND CHESTPUT IN CALLED SOUTHERN -- CHESTN YOU CAN T CALLED SOUTHERN MILL CREEK AND THIS CHLORINES -- I NEVER WENT INTO THE JOINT -- THAT OPERATION, I WILL SAY AND I LIVED IN CHESTNUT STREET. THE FIRST HOUSE THAT MY WIFE AND I EVER BOUGHT. AND GUESS WHAT A SPILL ONE NIGHT AT 2:00 IN THE MORNING. THE GAS LEAK OR WHATEVER -- HOWEVER THAT CAME OUT. WE -- THE POLICE OFFICERS AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, WHICH IS ONLY A BLOCK AWAY FROM EITHER SIDE WHERE I AM AT IN SOUTHERN MILL CREEK ON STATION 9 WENT OUT AND KNOCKED ON DOORS ALONG WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND TOLD US TO STAY INDOORS AND CLOSE THE WINDOWS AND TURN OFF THE AIR CONDITIONER. BUT AT THAT TIME I DIDN'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT AIR CONDITIONER BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE IT. BACK IN THE EARLY '60s, '62 AND '63. I GO BACK AND REMEMBER MY CHILDHOOD DAYS AND CHANNELSIDE AND RIGHT ABOUT WHERE THE AQUARIUM IS TODAY, MAYBE A LITTLE BIT TO THE NORTH, CITRIC NITRATE 40, 50 FEET IN THE AIR IN VOLUMES. HARBOUR ISLAND. WASN'T NAMED ALL THE TIME HARBOUR ISLAND. IT WAS STET ISLAND. WHAT HAPPENED? THEY WILL SILOS. BIG SILOS. OF WHAT? PHOSPHATE. PHOSPHATE IS VERY DANGEROUS. IT IS VERY BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH. BAD TO BREATHE IT. JUST LIKE GASS. AND IT ALSO HAD -- OF ALL THE THINGS THAT WAS THE EARLY -- THE MID-'70s. AND THE PEOPLE ON DAVIS ISLAND, GOD BLESS THEM, THE PROBLEM THAT THEY HAD WHEN THE WIND BLEW FROM EAST TO WEST AND THOSE ISLANDS WERE IN OPERATION LOADING AND UNLOADING THE PHOSPHATE, HALF DAVIS ISLAND TURNED A DIFFERENT COLOR. THE CARS, THE WINDOW SILLS, OUTSIDE EVERYTHING. THAT WAS BIG COMPLAINT WE HAD BACK THEN AND I SEE THAT WE STILL HAVE THE SAME COMPLAINT IN DIFFERENT AREA. THAT WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THOSE AREAS. WHAT HAPPENED TO STATEN ISLAND. IT WAS MANUFACTURER OR PRODUCT HOLDING SOMETHING THAT WAS MANUFACTURED FOR SHIPPING ALL OVER THE WORLD. THERE WAS A RAILROAD, LITTLE BRIDGE THAT TOOK CARS IN AND OUT. THEY LOADED THROUGH SHIPS, I IMAGINE. IT IS NOW PREMIERE LOCATION FOR RESIDENTIAL USE. LET'S LOOK AT THE CITRIC NITRATE. AND I AM NOT TRYING TO SAY ANYBODY ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. EYE JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND ALL -- I AM JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE CONVERSATION WE HAD HERE IN AN HOUR AND 45 MINUTES. WHICH IS VERY GOOD. CONVERSATION IS VERY HELPFUL. AND I ALWAYS HAD THE LAST WORD WITH MY WIFE. THAT IS WHY I SAID THAT, THEY WERE YES, MA'AM. BUT WHEN I AM LOOKING THAT THE AND AT THE CITRIC NITRATE. WHAT IS THERE NOW? NO MORE. COCA-COLA PLANT. NO MORE BANANA DOCKS. NO MORE CITRIC NITRATE. NO MORE OTHER -- HARD-WORKING PEOPLE HAD TO DO LABOR WORK IN MASS AMOUNTS. IT IS NOW ANOTHER AREA THAT IS A NOTIFICATION OF WHAT THE CITY OF TAMPA HAS BECOME. NOT WHAT IT WAS, BUT WHAT IT IS AND IT IS STILL GROWING. THE CITRIC NITRATE AREA HAS CHANGED FROM WHAT IT WAS. THE RESIDENTIAL -- HIGH APARTMENT -- HIGH-END RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL BUT ON THE CLEAN. NOT WHAT WAS THERE BEFORE. SO WHAT HAPPENED TO THE AREA -- DID THEY WANT TO STAY THERE? THEY SAID THEY DID. BUT THEY DIDN'T REALLY WANT TO BE THERE IN CASE SOMETHING HAPPENED AND THEY WERE SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL. JUST THINK OF THAT FOR SECOND. BOUGHT OUT BY A DEVELOPER AND HAVEN'T BEEN DEVELOPED. AT SOME POINT THERE ARE PLANS FOR. I AM SURE THEY ARE. WHAT I AM SAYING IS EVERYTHING CHANGES WHEN A CITY IS INC INCREASING IN POPULATION BECAUSE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY HARDLY EVER CHANGE. THE LAST BOUNDARY CHANGE WE HAVE WAS THE ACQUISITION OF NEW TAMPA OF THE COUNTY WHERE IT WAS VOTED INTO THE CITY. AND THAT WAS MY GOD, IT SEEMS LIKE YESTERDAY BUT THAT WAS 34 YEARS AGO IN PIECES. AND IT'S -- LIFE CHANGES. WHAT PRESENTED. THAT MAY BE WHAT I LIKE OR YOU LIKE AND WHAT YOU WANT OR DON'T WANT. BUT IT IS INCUMBENT TO UNDERSTAND THE WHOLE THING. IF THE WIND BLOWS ONE WAY -- AND I AM NOT AN EXPERT. I DON'T INTEND TO BE ONE AND I DON'T WANT TO BE ONE, YOU WILL GET THE EFFECTS OF WHATEVER IS IN THAT MANUFACTURING PLANT. THE WIND BLOWS THE OTHER WAY, YOU ARE NOT GOING TO GET IT. JUST LIKE WE HAVE A HURRICANE, IF IT COMES YOUR WAY, YOU ARE GOING TO GET IT. IF IT GOES THE OTHER WAY, SOMEBODY ELSE WILL GET IT. BUT WE HAVE NO CONTROL IN A LOT OF THINGS THAT WE WANT TO DO OR NOT DO, BUT WE HAVE NATURE. WE HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF NATURE. AND THAT'S WHY WE ARE IN THE POSITION WE ARE IN TODAY. TO CHANGE THINGS. DO YOU REALLY WANT TO LEAVE THAT PART OR ANY PART OF THE CITY FOR ANY TYPE OF THIS TYPE OF MANUFACTURING? DREW PARK USED TO BE AN AIR FORCE BASE. NO LONGER AN AIR FORCE BASE. IT IS CHANGING. AND MORE LIKELY WILL CONTINUE TO CHANGE AS YOU SEE MORE AND MORE DEMAND FOR RESIDENTIAL. SO WHAT I AM SAYING IS, YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT NOT ONLY WHAT IS THERE BUT WHAT DOES THE PUBLIC AND IN GENERAL WANT IN POPULATION MOVES IN. I DON'T KNOW. I CAN ONLY TELL YOU THAT IF IT WASN'T THAT THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND NEW ENGLAND, MOST OF THE RESIDENTS MOVE AWAY WANT TO COME TO FLORIDA. I AM NOT SAYING THIS BECAUSE I AM AN EXPERT. I AM SAYING THIS BECAUSE I READ IT SOMEWHERE. AND MOST OF THEM WANT TO COME TO HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. I THINK THAT TAXATION OF TACK NOTICE NORTH AND NORTHEAST ARE GETTING TO PEOPLE WEARY. WEARING THEM DOWN AND WANT A BRIEF SIGH OF RELIEF. I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHAT IT IS. SO IT IS INCUMBENT TO UNDERSTAND THAT IF THERE IS A COMPONENT THAT IS DANGEROUS TO PUBLIC HEALTH, THAT COMPONENT WILL REALIZE THAT AND THAT COMPONENT SHOULD AND WILL BE MOVING WHEN SOMEBODY -- AND MOVE TO ANOTHER AREA WHERE THE RAILCARS ARE VERY ACCESSIBLE. AND THE COUNTY AREAS WHERE THERE IS VACANT LAND AND LOTS OF IT. THE CITY OF TAMPA IS IN A POSITION NOW WHERE -- WHEN I WAS A KID A LOT WAS $00 OR $1,000. THAT IS $150,000 FOR THE SAME LOT. AND THAT'S HOW LIFE IS. I ISN'T TELL YOU WHAT SOMETHING TODAY WILL BE WORTH TOMORROW. THAT DEPENDS ON THE BUYER AND THE SELLER WILLING TO PAY WHAT THE BUYER WANTS AND THE BUYER WILLING TO ACCEPT WHAT THE PRICE IS. SO THAT'S HOW LIFE IS. I AM LOOKING AT IT VERY REALISTICALLY. AND THAT'S ALL I GOT TO SAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MOTION TO CLOSE? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED. >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND SECOND. HEARING IS CLOSED. WHAT THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL? I KNOW WE WILL TAKE A F FIVE-MINUTE RECESS. NO, AFTER -- AFTER -- WE ONLY HAVE TEN MORE CASES SO WE ARE GOOD. WILL ANYBODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? >>LUIS VIERA: MR. CHAIR, LET ME EXPLAIN. I WILL READ THIS AND SEE WHERE IT GOES. WE HAD A LOT DISCUSSION HERE TONIGHT AND COUNCILMAN MIRANDA SAID IT IS RIGHT THAT WE HAVE BEN ON THIS FOR TWO HOURS ALMOST AND IT IS RIGHT THAT WE HAVE BEEN ON THIS FOR ALMOST TWO HOURS BECAUSE THIS IS A REALLY COMPELLING ISSUE ON BOTH SIDES. AND THERE IS A LOT OF THINGS THAT HAVE COME FORWARD, SOME THINGS THAT WE CAN RELY UPON, SOME THINGS THAT WE CAN'T. YOU KNOW WHEN WE TAKE A LOOK AT THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE SOME YEARS AGO AND THE FACT THAT, YOU KNOW, AN OBJECTION TO THOSE CHANGES. I KNOW THAT CAN CAUSE A LOT OF FRUSTRATION AND WHAT NOT, AND THAT IS VERY REASONABLE. SOME OF THE -- A LOT OF DIFFERENT ISSUES BROUGHT UP I THINK JUSTIFY A GREAT DEAL OF ROBUST DISCUSSION ON THIS. THIS IS NOT OBVIOUSLY AN EASY VOTE. NOBODY LIKES TO VOTE ON -- ON SOMETHING WHERE PEOPLE ARE VERY, VERY CONTESTED AND ALL THAT OTHER GOOD STUFF. AND SO THIS TAKES A LOT OF CONSIDERATION IN IT. THE FACTS THAT I LOOK AT THIS -- I -- LIKE ALL OF US, CAME IN HERE WITH, YOU KNOW, AN OPEN MIND ON -- ON BOTH SIDES IN THIS REGARD AND CERTAIN THINGS JUST STICK OUT TO ME, SO TO SPEAK. THAT JUST STICK OUT TO ME. FIRST YOU HAVE THE SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED FOOT FOOTPRINT. BUILDINGS GOING DOWN FROM FIVE TO THREE NITS, DOWN FROM 25%, DOWN NOT ONLY FROM WHAT THEY WERE LOOKING AT A MONTH OR TWO AGO, WHENEVER THAT WAS, BUT ALSO FROM THEIR ENTITLEMENT OF WHAT THE PRESENT LAW SAYS THAT THEY ARE ENTITLED TO. THEY ARE GOING MUCH LESS THAN THAT. WE HAVE A POSITIVE CITY STAFF REPORT. POSITIVE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT. YOU KNOW, THINGS THAT ARE FOR ME VERY, VERY COMPELLING. AND THESE ARE FACTS THAT ARE PRIV TALL FOR ME IN THREE WAYS. NUMBER ONE, THEY ARE THE RULES THAT WE ARE GOVERNED BY HERE IN CITY COUNCIL. THOSE ARE THE RULES THAT WE ARE TO RELY UPON ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. NUMBER TWO, THOSE, OF THE RULES THAT PROPERTY OWNERS RELIED UPON PURCHASING THE PROPERT AND GOING FORWARD WITH IT. AND NUMBER THREE, THOSE ARE THE RULES IN COURT THAT IF WE DENY WILL LOOK AT IN APPLYING SOME LEVEL OF SCRUTINY IN A DECISION WE MAKE IT GOES DOWN THAT WAY. A LOT OF FOLKS ARE TALKING ABOUT THINGS THAT HAPPENED IN THE PAST, ETC. YOU KNOW, COMP PLAN CHANGES IS CERTAINLY SOMETHING THAT COULD BE POTENTIALLY TALKED ABOUT. MAYBE A LITTLE TOO LATE, RIGHT. BUT CERTAINLY AN ISSUE TO LOOK AT THERE, BUT IT IS RIGHT THAT WE TALK ABOUT THIS. IT IS RIGHT THAT WE TALK ABOUT THIS. MY FEAR IS THAT IF WE VOTE IT DOWN, WE ARE MAKING PROMISES TO A COMMUNITY -- PROMISES, I GUESS, FULL, WRITING CHECKS THAT WHEN IT COMES TIME, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE INSUFFICIENT FUNDS FOR, SO TO SPEAK AND MAKING PROMISES TO A COMMUNITY THAT WE CAN VOTE DOWN SOMETHING TODAY AND GIVE IT A YEAR OR SIX MONTHS DOWN THE ROAD, SEQUEL TO THIS. AND THAT SEQUEL WILL HAVE SOME LEVEL OF ACCOUNTABILITY. THIS -- THIS ISN'T A BLACK AND WHITE ISSUE THE WAY WE LOOK AT. A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE BEEN VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS. I ALWAYS SAY A LOT OF THINGS ARE NOT BLACK AND WHITE. THERE IS GRAY. A LOT OF GRAY HERE AND WHAT NEIGHBORS A DIFFICULT ISSUE AND WHATNOT. NOT JUST DEALING OF THE ISSUES THAT MANY HAVE TALKED ABOUT BUT AN AREA OF TAMPA THAT WE HAVE HEARD A LOT FROM IN CITY COUNCIL AND OBVIOUSLY THAT IS A VERY COMPELLING ISSUE. BUT, AGAIN, MY POSITION IS, IF WE MAKE A DENIAL, THERE IS GOING TO BE SOME ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THAT. I REALLY, REALLY DO FEEL. JUST MY POSITION. SO I WILL PUT THIS UP THE FLAG POLE AND LET'S SEE WHAT HAP HAPPENS. WE AR ON NUMBER 1. WE ARE ON NUMBER 1. SO LET'S GO AHEAD AND PROCEED THAT. MOVE AN ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION ORDINANCE OF THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED 5430 AND 5440 W. TYSON AVENUE FROM ZONING DISTRICT IH INDUSTRIAL HEAVY TO PD MULTIFAMILY, SING FAMILY, RESTAURANTS, RETAIL SALES PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. DO WE HAVE A SECOND. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WILL SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON ABSTAINING. GUDES AND DINGFELDER VOTING NO. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE MAY 6 AT 9:30 A.M. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ALL YOUR TIME TONIGHT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IN RECESS UNTIL 8:00. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL PLEASE. >>LUIS VIERA: HERE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT. MR. SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I WANT TO BRING TO COUNCIL'S ATTENTION AND PARTICULARLY I WANT TO REMIND THE PUBLIC OF THE FACT THAT IF YOU ARE REREGISTERED THERE IS A CHAT FUNCTION ON THE GO TO MEETING WEBBED. IN AR PLATFORM, THAT IS BE NEEDED ONLY FOR TECHNICAL ISSUE TO THE ORGANIZERS. THIS IS NOT TO BE USED TO COMMUNICATE TO ANYBODY ON SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES DURING A CITY COUNCIL MEETING. SO I AM GOING TO ASK MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC DO NOT USE THE CHAT FUNCTION TO COMMUNICATE TO CITY COUNCIL DURING A MEETING. IT IS IMPROPER TO DO SO. AND I AM GOING TO ASK EACH MEMBER OF CITY COUNCIL IF FOR SOME REASON DO YOU SEE A CHAT COME IN DURING MEETING THAT ATTRACTS YOUR ATTENTION AND RELATED TO ANY ITEM ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, THAT YOU DISCLOSE THAT ON THE RECORD SO THAT ISSUE CAN BE ADDRESSED. LIKEWISE, I WANT TO REMIND CITY COUNCIL TO BE MINDFUL OF THE FACT THAT PEOPLE MAY VERY WELL BE ATTEMPTING TO COMMUNICATE TO YOU VIA E-MAIL. AND, AGAIN, TO DO SO DURING A MEETING AND YOU NOT BEING ABLE TO, A, SEE IT -- OR LET ME STAY THIS, IF YOU DO SEE IT, IT IS INCUMBENT UPON YOU TO DISCLOSE IT. MY ADVICE TO YOU WOULD BE TO NOT ACCEPT AND NOT READ COMMUNICATIONS THAT ARE SENT TO YOU EX PARTE DURING A QUASI JUDICIAL EVENING MEETING. I WILL CAUTION THE PUBLIC DO NOT ATTEMPT TO COMMUNICATE WITH CITY COUNCILMEMBERS PRIVATELY. AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS IF YOU DO COME UPON THAT IT IS AN EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION AND IT IS INCUMBENT ON YOU TO DISCLOSE THAT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, SIR. ALL RIGHT. WE ARE ON ITEM NUMBER TWO. GO AHEAD. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, CHAIRMAN, THANK YOU. LaCHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. FILE NO. REZ-R 21-09. THE APPLICATION REPRESENTED BY JOHN LUM AND STEVE MICHELINI. THE PROPERTY 210 N. HUBERT AVENUE FROM RS-50 TO RM-24 TO PD RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED USES. I WILL HAND IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND IF I CAN HAVE THE CONTROL BACK FOR MY REPORT. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCI COUNCILMEMBERS, DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN. SHOW MY SCREEN. HOPEFULLY YOU CAN SEE IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN. GO AHEAD, SIR. HEY HAITI SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE WEST SHORE PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE WEST SHORE PALMS NEIGHBORHOOD. THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY CHARLES B. WILLIAMS PARK 300 FEET NORTH OF THE K KITE. THE CLOSEST TRANSIT IS 600 FEET SOUTH AT NORTH HUBERT AND WEST KENNEDY. THAT WEST KENNEDY IS SERVED BY WEST 30 WHICH CONNECT TO WEST SHORE PLAZA AND MARION TRANSIT CENTER DOWNTOWN. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL B EVACUATION ZONE. HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE. YOU CAN SEE IT RIGHT IN THE CENTER. TO THE SOUTH YOU CAN SEE WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD. THIS IS NORTH HUBERT RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH UP TO THE INTERSTATE AND NORTH B IS ON THE NORTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY. YOU CAN SEE THE SURROUNDING AREA HAS A MIXTURE OF RESIDENTIAL TYPES, MULTIFAMILY, TOWN HOMES, SOME SCATTERED SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED. THE WEST SHORE BAPTIST CHURCH IS LOCATED TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE OF MANHATTAN AND NORTH B. YOU CAN SEE THE COMMERCIAL SERVICES DOWN ON KENNEDY BOULEVARD. AND THEN ABOUT THREE BLOCKS TO THE NORTH IS THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. IF YOU CAN SEE THAT THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTIES BEEN THAT DARKER BROWN ARE THAT RESIDENTIAL 35. THEN TO THE NORTH AS WE MOVE CLOSER TO THE HIGHWAY, THE LIGHTER BROWN IS A RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. ALONG KENNEDY BOULEVARD, HE THAT URBAN MIXED USE-60. TO THE EAST NORTH LOIS, THE SENSE TEE GOES DOWN TO THE RESIDENTIAL-10. THAT IS REPRESENTED BY THE TAN. AND LARGER LOT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL IS LOCATED TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF KENNEDY IN THE YELLOW THAT REPRESENTS THE RESIDENTIAL-6 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DID FIND THAT THE REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR COMPATIBLE REDEVELOPMENT WITHIN A PLANNED AREA OF THE CITY WHERE WE ARE EXPECTING DEVELOPMENT MAXIMUM OF 35 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. AND ALLOW FOR REDEVELOPMENT FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING UNITS AT AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 20.62 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD DENSITY AND BELOW THE RESIDENTIAL 35 MAXIMUM DENSITY THAT IS PERMITTED. THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WOULD REDEVELOP WITHIN THE EXISTING THREE BLOCK AND LOT CONFIGURATION OF THAT PORTION OF THE WEST SHORE PALMS NEIGHBORHOOD. THE WEST SHORE PLANNING DISTRICT IS PROXIMATE IT TO EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSIT AND TWO THAT INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES NEAR. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES ENCOURAGE INFILL DEVELOPMENT. AND THIS SITE IS CURRENTLY UNDER UTILIZED AND WOULD MEET THE POLICY DIRECTION BOTH IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE PORTION OF THE PLAN. THE CITY OF TAMPA DOES ENCOURAGE SINGLE-FAMILY DE DETACHED -- ATTACHED, EXCUSE ME, AND MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS TO BE DESIGNED WITH ORIENTATION OF THE FRONT DOORS TO THE STREET. WE WOULD ENCOURAGE THE APPLICANT OF UNIT FOUR TO ENSURE THAT THE SIDEWALK DOES CONNECT WITH N. HUBERT AVENUE AND OVERALL THE PROPOSED PD SUPPORTS THE MIXED USE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WOULD NOT ALTER THIS PORTION OF THE WEST SHORE PALMS NEIGHBORHOOD. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT UP, WE HAVE THE APPLICANT I BELIEVE LIVE OR REGISTERED TO SPEAK. MR. MICHELINI. >>LaCHONE DOCK: MR. CHAIRMAN, I APOLOGIZE. IF I MAY PRESENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. IF I MAY SHARE MY SCREEN. CAN YOU SEE MY SLIDE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>LaCHONE DOCK: SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING UNITS. JUST ONE SECOND. I AM TRYING TO CHANGE THE MODE OF IT. THERE WE GO. TO CONSTRUCT FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING UNITS. THE ONE -- THE .19-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WEST NORTH B STREET AND N. HUBERT AVENUE. THE PROPERTY SURROUNDED AS DAVID SHOWED IN HIS MAP BY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE NORTH IN THE RS-50 ZONING DISTRICT. SINGLE-FAMILY USES TO THE SOUTH IN THE RS-50. AND RM-24 ZONING DISTRICTS AND MULTIFAMILY USES TO THE EAST IN THE RM-18 ZONING DISTRICT AND RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY USES TO THE WEST IN THE RM-20 ZONING DISTRICT. THE PROJECT IS PROPOSED FOR ONE THREE-STORY TOWNHOUSE-STYLE BUILDING WITH A TOTAL OF FOUR DWELLING UNITS. EACH UNIT WILL CONTAIN A TWO-CAR GARAGE. THE PROPOSED SETBACKS TO THE NORTH 18 FEET. SOUTH 10 FEET. EAST, 12 FEET. AND WEST IS 9 FEET PROPERTY POSED BUILDING HEIGHT IS 40 FEET. A TOTAL OF NINE PARKING SPACES INCLUDING THE GUEST SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 16 PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED THROUGH THE COMBINATION OF THE GARAGES AND THE SURFACE PARKING. AND HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE. THE SITE IS IDENTIFIED BY THIS DOTTED RED LINE. THIS IS THE SITE LOCATED WITH NORTH B. TO ORIENT YOU ON THE MAP, WEST NORTH B. TO THE WEST OF THE SITE. HUBERT AVENUE TO THE EAST OF THE SITE AND YOU CAN SEE THE SPLIT ZONING, THE WEST PORTION OF THE SITE IS THE RM-24 ZO ZONING. AND THEN THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE HAS THE SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED. SO THIS IS THE SITE LOCATED ON NORTH B. STREET AND THEN THIS IS HUBERT AVENUE TO THE EAST OF THE SITE. YOU CAN SEE VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE NORTH PROPOSED AND THESE ARE THE FOUR UNITS THAT ARE PROPOSED OR DEVELOPMENT IN THE STRUCTURE. THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED. THIS IS THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH ELEVATION. AND THEN THE EAST AND THE WEST ELEVATION ARE LOCATED ON THE BOTTOM. HERE ARE PICTURES OF THE SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS THE PICTURE OF THE SITE ON HUBERT AVENUE. ON THE RIGHT, THIS IS A PICTURE NORTH OF THE SITE. ON THE LEFT IS EAST OF THE SITE. AND THEN ON THE RIGHT IS WEST OF THE SITE, MULTIFAMILY. AND THEN THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PETITION AND FINDS THE PETITION CONSISTENT. SHOULD IT BE APPROVAL TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION, FURTHER MOD.IF I CASES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THIS CON CLOUDS MY PRESE PRESENTATION. ANY QUESTIONS? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A QUICK O ONE, MR. CHAIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU. LACHONE, IN REGARD TO -- ONE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME THAT IS ADJACENT TO THIS. EVERYTHING ELSE IS ALREADY MULTIFAMILY -- OR WAS MULTIFAMILY AND WHAT HAVE YOU. IS THAT CORRECT? >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. ARE YOU REFERRING TO SOUTH OF THAT SITE? IF I CAN SHARE MY SCREEN AGAIN. I APOLOGIZE, I CAN BRING UP THE AERIAL. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IF YOU WANT TO GO BACK TO THE AERIAL OR WHAT HAVE YOU. THE ONLY CONCERN I HAVE WHEN I WAS LOOKING AT THIS -- AT THE P -- -- THE PD AS PROPOSED IS THEY ARE ASKING FOR -- WHAT -- THEY ARE ASKING 40 OR 45 FEET TALL? >>LaCHONE DOCK: 45 FOR THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RIGHT. AND IT CONCERNED ME A LITTLE BIT -- LET'S SEE. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 40 FEET. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT CONCERNED ME A LITTLE BIT AS COMPARED TO, YOU KNOW, THE TRADITIONAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOME. I THINK YOU SHOWED US A PICTURE. JUST A LITTLE ONE-STORY HOME. I RECOGNIZE MAYBE THAT O ONE-STORY HOME IS NOT GOING TO EXIST THAT MUCH LONGER ESPECIALLY IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, BECAUSE THAT NEIGHBORHOOD HAS UNDERGONE A LOT OF TRANSITION, BUT IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU GUYS LOOK AT IN TERMS OF COMPATIBILITY WHEN YOU -- WHEN YOU ARE EVALUATING THIS? >> YES, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, WE CERTAINLY DO. WE LOOK AT PROPERTIES ADJACENT AS WELL -- WE TOOK THAT INTO CONSIDERATION AS WELL AS THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST AND SURROUNDING THE SITE DINGFELDER OKAY. I I REALIZE IT IS FIVE FEET TALLER THAN THE POSSIBLE SINGLE-FAMILY THAT WOULD BE NEXT TO IT. BECAUSE SINGLE-FAMILY, WE ALLOW 35 FEET, RIGHT? >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT, 35 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE? MR. MICHELINI. WERE YOU -- YES, WE SWORN IN EVERYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR. >> YES, SIR. I WAS SWORN IN EARLIER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. >> THANK YOU FOR LETTING US BRING THIS TO YOU. AS THE STAFF HAS POINTED OUT, BOTH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY STAFF FOUND THIS CONSISTENT. AS YOU KNOW, ACCORDING TO THE REPORT, THERE IS A MIX OF TOWN HOUSES AND MULTIFAMILY AND THE AREA ITSELF IS IN TRANSITION FOR BEING REDEVELOPED. WE ARE PROPOSING FOUR UNITS ON A .19-ACRE SITE. AND THIS HAS A LAND USE DESIGNATION OF A RES-35 WHICH IS A FAIRLY INTENSE LAND USE DESIGNATION. WE ARE PROPOSING TO BUILD AT 20 DEVELOPMENT UNITS TO THE ACRE WHICH IS COMPATIBLE WITH -- WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WHERE THE TOWN HOUSES, THE APARTMENT COMPLEXES ETC. THAT ARE AROUND THERE. YOU WILL ALSO NOTICE THAT WE ARE PROVIDING 16 PARKING SPACES WHERE NINE IS REQUIRED. TYPICALLY WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH ROOM TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR GUESTS AND THAT SORT OF THING, BUT IN THIS CASE, WE DECIDED TO PUT IN ADDITIONAL PARKING, INCLUDING THE TWO-CAR GARAGES PLUS THE VISITOR PARKING AND THE PARKING SPACES IN THE DRIVE AISLE BEHIND THE GARAGE. WE ARE COMMITTING TO THE MODIFICATIONS THAT ARE REQUESTED BY THE CITY STAFF. IF YOU RECALL ON THE CONDITIONS FOR THE -- FOR THE AUTO STO STORAGE, THE PROPOSED FOUR UNITS, THE DWELLING UNITS, ALL WERE FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT, AND WHEN THE STAFF REVIEWED THIS FOR DESIGN CONSISTENCY WHICH IS PART OF THE REVIEW, THE PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WAS COMPLEMENTARY TO THE AREA AND POINT NUMBER 8 IN THE STAFF REPORT, POTENTIAL REUSE OF THE BUILDING STOCK, THE DESIGN AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNIQUE AND THEREFORE IN NEED OF THE WAIVERS; HOWEVER, THE WAIVER GRANTED IN PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE AS STATED IN 27-136 HAS BEEN MET. THIS ALSO INVOLVES THE -- TO INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS OF OTHER WHO ARE ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY AND MIGHT BE ADVERSELY EFFECTED AND THE STAFF FOUND THEY WOULD NOT BE. THE SWAIVR IN HARMONY AND SE SERVES THE INTENTS AND PURPOSES AND THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF TAMPA. ALLOWING THE WLAIVRS ALLOW FOR SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE BEING DONE CONSIDERING BOTH THE PUBLIC BENEFITS AND INTENDED USE FOR THIS PROPERTY. THIS IS A PROPERTY -- A DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT HAS BEEN SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR THIS AREA. IT IS COMBATABLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT AND THE ONE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE THAT THE COUNCILMAN POINTED OUT MAST LIKELY IS GOING TO BE PHASED OUT AT SOME THIS POINT. THIS ENTIRE AREA IS DESIGNATED FOR REDEVELOPMENT. AND THIS REDEVELOPMENT IS OCCURRING. THE PLANNING COMMISSION WENT ON TO FIND WE WERE CONSISTENT IN TERMS OF VARIOUS LAND USE POLICIES. 1.2.8, PROMOTING A RANGE OF USES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF EACH OTHER, COMPACT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING CHARACTER, 2.2.1 AND USE OF RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND MORE ECONOMICALLY SOUND INFILL DEVELOPMENT THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE POLICY 2.1.2. AND ALL EXIST FOR FUTURE LAND DEVELOPMENTS. I CAN GO THROUGH THEM. BUT IT IS IN YOUR REPORT. 8.14.1. LAND USE 9.2. 9.2.1. 9.2 ENCOURAGED SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AND ORIENTATION THAT -- WHICH WE HAVE DONE THAT. THE DOORS ARE ORIENTED TO THE FRONT AND COMPATIBLE AND REDEVELOPMENT TO SUSTAIN NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS IS A STABILIZATION PROJECT WHICH WILL GO A LONG WAY TOWARD ASSISTING THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IN BEING REBUILT, REVITALIZE AND ALSO END UP PAYING FOR THE ADDITIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE NECESSARY WATER SEWER STREETS AND SIDEWALKS. I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. AGAIN, THIS IS A REZONING REQUEST GOING FROM RS-50 AND MULTIFAMILY RM-24 TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH A DENSITY OF 20 DEVELOPMENT UNITS TO THE ACRE WHEN THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS 35. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE. ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO IS HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 2? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK? >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 2. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO, SIR, MR. CHAIRMAN. I APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH. FILE NO. REZ-21-09 FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 210 N. HUBERT AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PATICULARLY DSCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND RM-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. AND LET ME SAY THAT IT IS CONSISTENT. AND THAT THE ADOPTION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT THE COMPLIANCE WITH BOTH THE CITY AND COUNTY COMMISSION -- THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY REPORT REGARDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECT SIEVE 9.2 WHICH IS INTENDED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF LAND FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROJECTED POPULATION, ALSO THE DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE DENSITY APPLICABLE UNDER THE FUTURE USE PURSUANT TO THE LAND USE POLICY 8.14.1. THE APPLICATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY 2.1.2. AND HOUSING POLICY 1.3.4. WHICH ENCOURAGES NEW DEVELOPMENT IN VACANT OR UNDERUTILIZED LAND. SECTION 27-136 PURPOSE OF SITE TO CONTROL DISTRICTS SUCH AS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAVE SHOWN THAT THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES AND ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION, CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. PROPOSES -- PROMOTES AN EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE AND MEETS ALL THE REQUIREMENTS TO MY KNOWLEDGE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A SECOND. >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING MAY 6 AT 9:30. >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL. ALSO FOR THE RECORD, WE ARE COMMITTED TO MAKING THE REVISIONS REQUESTED BY STAFF BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ITEM NUMBER 3. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCIL, LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. COUNCIL, ITEM NUMBER 3 FILE NO. REZ-21-10 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED 602 W. WARREN AVENUE AND 601 W. EUCLID AVENUE. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE FROM RM-18 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY -- RM-16, I AM SORRY FOR PD FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DEVELOPMENT. I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE REPORT AND THEN RETURN IT TO ME TO CONTINUE MY REPORT. THANK YOU. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. HOPEFULLY YOU CAN SEE MY SC SCREEN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN. GO AHEAD, SIR. >>DAVID HEY: ALL RIGHT. WE ARE MOVING OVER TO THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DIS DISTRICT, MOW SPECIFICALLY THE TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD. THE SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE. THAT IS THE COLD COLOR HERE ON THIS MAP. THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS PHILLIPS PARK WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 2/10 OF A MILE TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT S SITE. CLOSEST TRANSIT SPOT IS 400 FEET TO THE WEST IN THE CORNER OF NORTH BOULEVARD AND W. WARREN BY HART ROUTE 7 THAT CONNECTS DOWNTOWN, WEST TAMPA AND THE HILLSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE DALE MABRY CAMPUS. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL D EVACUATIONS. HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE. I HAVE GOT WOODROW AVENUE -- FORGOT THE NAME, WOODROW RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH. WARREN ON THE NORTH RUNNING EAST-WEST. YOU CAN SEE THERE IS A MIXTURE OF SOME DUPLEXES, MOSTLY SI SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED IN THIS AREA. THIS VACANT LOT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EUCLID AND NORTH BOULEVARD, MAY LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU. IT WAS RECENTLY APPROVED FOR TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENTS RIGHT HERE. TO THE EAST IS THE VILLA MADONNA SCHOOL. AND ALSO WE HAVE GRAHAM ELEMENTARY IN THE NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THERE ARE SOME COMMERCIAL USES NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH BOULEVARD AND COLUMBUS DRIVE. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTIES SURROUNDING IT IN THAT BROWN ARE THE RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. TO THE SOUTH AROUND THAT COMMERCIAL NODE THAT WE SAW IN THE AERIAL REPRESENTED BY THE PINK IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. THEN AS YOU CONTINUE MOVING SOUTH IN THIS PORTION OF TAMPA HEIGHTS, THE DENSITY INCREASES TO A RESIDENTIAL 35 IN THIS DARK -- DARKER BROWN. SO THE WEST OF NORTH BOULEVARD, IT MOST -- AND TO THE NORTH OF WEST PLAZA PLACE, IF REMAINS RESIDENTIAL-10, WHICH WILL REMAIN PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED IN THE FUTURE. WHOOPS. I -- THE -- THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREA IS DEVELOPED WITH THAT PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED WITH SOME DUPLEXES UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20. THIS AREA HAS BUILT ENVIRONMENT RIGHT NOW AS A 5.35 UNITS PER ACRE WHICH IS THE OVERALL DENSITY. THE APPLICANT IS UTILIZING THE DENSITY BONUS UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. THIS PROPOSED PD WILL BE DEVELOPED OUT AT 20 UNITS PER ACRE. THIS IS THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED ON THIS SUBJECT SITE. THE PROPOSED DENSITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT LONG-RANGE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20. THE PROPOSED P D FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES, ATTACHED DWELLINGS ORIENTED TOWARD NORTH WOODROW AVENUE. AND OFF OF WOODROW AVENUE AND FRONT DOORS ARE ORIENTED TOWARD WOODROW AVENUE. THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH POLICIES THAT BUILDINGS IN URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS MAINTAIN A CONSISTENT OVERALL SETBACK FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY. LASTLY, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT FORM STRATEGY WITH INFILL DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS WITH EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES. AND OVERALL, THE PD WOULD PROVIDE A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT WOULD BE COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THAT RESIDENTIAL 20. SO THEREFORE TONIGHT THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF IS RECOMMENDING TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE -- THAT THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS. LACHONE. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. LET ME KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE MY SCREEN AND POWERPOINT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, GO AHEAD. >>LaCHONE DOCK: OKAY, THANK YOU. FOR THIS COUNCIL, THREE WAIVERS REQUESTED. ONE IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FROM 14 TO 12. THE OTHER ALLOW THE REDUCTION IN DRIVE AISLE FROM 20 FEET TO 14.8. AND LAST WAIVER TO THE U VA BUFFER TO THE EAST AT THREE FEET AND ELIMINATE THE EVERGREEN TREE IN THE LOCATION GIVEN THE WIDTH THAT WILL BE PROVIDED. THE PETITIONER IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT SIX SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNITS. THE.3 ACRE IS LOCATED ON NORTH WOODROW AVENUE. THE PROJECT IS SURROUNDED WITH SINGLE RESIDENTIAL USES OF THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH AND ALSO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 16 ZONING DISTRICT AND MULTIFAMILY AND RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE WEST IN THE RM-16 DISTRICT. THE PROJECT IS PROPOSED FOR ONE THREE-STORY TOWNHOUSE-STYLE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH A TOTAL OF SIX DWELLING UNITS. EACH UNIT WILL CONTAIN A TWO-CAR GARAGE. THE PROPOSED SETBACK 13 FEET. SOUTH IS 13 FEET. TO THE EAST IS 9 FEET AND TO THE WEST IS 16 FEET. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 36 FEET. 14 PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED AND 12 SPACES ARE PROVIDED. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THIS SITE IS PROPOSED WITH ONE WAY ACCESS ON W. WARREN AVENUE, AND WOULD EXIT ON TO W. EUCLID AVENUE AND I WILL SHOW THAT YOU PRIMARY TARLY ON THE SITE PLAN PRO PROVIDED. THE PROPERTY HAD THE FUTURE ST. LOUIS DESIGNATION OF R-20 AS DAVID HAS PROVIDED FOR YOU. ALLOW FOR THE DENSITY OF 18 DWELLING UNION PER ACRE BY RIGHT OF THE 20 UNITS PER ACRE. WITH THE ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT AGROAN AGREEMENT. THE PROJECT PROPOSAL OF INCREASED DENSITY FROM FIVE DWELLING UNITS TO SIX DWELLING UNITS PURSUANT TO 27-140. THE AMOUNT TO ACHIEVE THE INCREMENTAL BONUS DENSITY IS 24,246.60. AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR CONSIDERATION. THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE. SO TO ORIENT YOU ON THIS AE AERIAL, THERE IS NORTH BOULEVARD. THIS IS TO THE WEST. AND THIS IS W. EUCLID TO THE SOUTH -- THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY. THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT IS IDENTIFIED HERE IN THE RED D DOTTED LINE. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THE -- THE PROPERTY USE HAS THE MIXTURE OF THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY SURROUNDING THE PROPERTY. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN SUBM SUBMITTED. I THINK THERE IS ALSO ANOTHER ONE WITH A CLOSE-UP. BUT THIS IS THE SITE. THESE ARE THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE -- THIS IS THE BUILDING PROPOSED WITH THE VEHICULAR ACCESS PROPOSED TO THE NORTH WITH THE ONE-WAY TRAFFIC. TRAVEL TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE AND THESE ARE THE SIX LOTS PROPOSED. THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED. PICTURES OF THE SITE IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS WEST OF THE SITE. THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS WEST OF THE SITE. THIS IS IF YOU START ON NORTH BOULEVARD AND HEAD TO THE SITE. THE SITE LOCATED TO THE RIGHT OF THE SCREEN. TO THE RIGHT OF THIS SITE HERE. THIS IS A PICTURE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE ON EUCLID. THIS IS THE EAST END OF THE SITE ON WOODROW. SO THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS THE EAST END OF THE SITE. ANOTHER VIEW. THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS THE NORTH END OF THE SITE ON WARREN AVENUE LOOKING AT THE SITE. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS EAST OF THE SITE ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EUCLID AND WOODROW. AND THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SITE. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS NORTH OF THE SITE ALSO. THAT IS THE VIEW THAT IS LOOKING WEST ON WARREN AVENUE TOWARD BOULEVARD. AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS WEST OF THE SITE ON WARREN AVENUE. THEN WE SWING BACK AROUND SOUTH OF THE SITE. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EUCLID AND WOODROW AND SOUTH OF THE SITE, THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PETITION AND FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE. PLEASE SEE THE FINDINGS OF THE INCONSISTENT FINDING PROVIDED ON THE STAFF REPORT. I IT IS THE POSITION OF THE CITY DOWN APPROVE THE APPLICATION FURTHER MODIFICATIONS OF THE SITE PLAN ARE REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. MISS DOCK, WHAT -- I THINK IT IS APPROXIMATELY $24,000 ACCUMULATED FOR THE DENSITY BONUS. AND I AM SORRY IF I MISSED IT IF YOU SAID IT, BUT USUALLY THAT IS TARGETED TO A SPECIFIC PROJECT NEARBY OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. IS THERE A PROJECT FOR THAT? MISS WELLS, I SEE YOUR HAND. >>CATE WELLS: THIS IS CATE WELLS. A BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT IN THE MATERIALS AND THE AMOUNT OF THE BONUS PAYMENT WOULD BE APPLIED BY THE APPLICANT TO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IMMEDIATELY WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. AND ATTACHED TO THE BONUS PROVISION AGREEMENT IS AN EXHIBIT C WHICH DEPICTS THE LOCATION OF THE UNDERGROUNDING OF THE UTILITIES. I DON'T KNOW IF PERHAPS IN HIS PRESENTATION MIGHT SHOW THAT. I DON'T KNOW IF HE IS PREPARED TO DO THAT TONIGHT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO THAT IS A NOVEL -- A NEWER ONE IN THIS TYPE OF SORT OF SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT. I KNOW WE UNDERGROUND IN CHANNELSIDE AS A CRA AND UNDERGROUNDING AS A GENERAL PRINCIPLE IS GOOD, BUT WHY DOES THAT BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY AS OPPOSED OF BENEFITING A PARTICULAR DEVELOPER. >>CATE WELLS: SECTION 27-140 OF YOUR CODE CONTEMPLATES THE UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES AS -- AS AN ACTIVITY THAT WOULD GO TOWARD THE ABILITY TO INCREASE THE DENSITY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY, SO -- SO THAT IS ONE OF THE LISTED OPPORTUNITIES EXPRESSLY LISTED IN OUR CODE ALREADY? >>CATE WELLS: THAT'S CORRECT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MISS DOCK, IF YOU HAVE ANY INPUT ON THIS. I DON'T REALLY UNDERSTAND, AGAIN, WHY THAT IS A BENEFIT TO -- I AM NOT TRYING TO BE CRITICAL. IF IT IS IN THE CODE, IT'S IN THE CODE. BUT I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW UNDERGROUNDING HIS OWN UTILITIES IS BENEFICIAL TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. I THOUGHT THESE BONUS FEES WERE SUPPOSED TO GO TO TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS OR BICYCLE PATHS AND THINGS LIKE THAT THAT MAY HELP MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF THE PROJECT ON THE COMMUNITY. >>LaCHONE DOCK: SO WE ACTUALLY HAVE IN THE CODE THE LIST OF CRITERIA. THE LIST OF ITEMS THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED AS A BONUS -- AS A BONUS PROVIDED. AND THIS IS ONE OF THE ITEM. THERE ARE SEVERAL THINGS THAT ARE LISTED. SO NOT ONLY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT THAT WILL BE APPLIED TO THAT PLANS AREA. THE FUNDS WOULD BE APPLIED TO A PROJECT WITHIN THAT PLANNING AREA THAT MIGHT BE TYPICALLY WHAT YOU MIGHT HEAR AND OTHER OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO AN APPLICANT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. THANK YOU, STAFF. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WHO IS THE APPLICANT PRES PRESENTING. IS IT MR. MILFORD? YOU ARE MUTED, SIR. >> YES, CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND IF YOU ARE GOING TO SPEAK. WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. >>CLERK: DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. >> I DO. >>CLERK: FOR THE RECORD, THE CLERK DID RECEIVE WRITTEN COMMENT ON THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GO AHEAD, SIR. >> OKAY. I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME TONIGHT. THE PROJECT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT WILL REPLACE SEVEN APARTMENT UNITS WITH SIX T TOWNHOME UNITS. AS WAS JUST MENTIONED, WE ARE REQUESTING A BONUS PROVISION. AND I WILL TALK MORE ABOUT THE UTILITIES IN JUST A MINUTE. BUT WITH THE -- WITH THE DENSITY CALCULATION ALLOWED WITHOUT THE BONUS PROVISION WOULD ACTUALLY -- THE MATH COMES OUT TO 5.4 UNITS, WHICH WE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO ROUND DOWN TO FIVE. THIS IS JUST ALLOWING TO ROUND UP TO SIX. AND SO -- AND AS STAFF HAS ALREADY INDICATED ONE OF THE ALLOWANCES WITHIN THE CODE IS TO PLACE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND AS ONE OF THE WAYS TO MITIGATE. AND, OF COURSE, THESE ARE TAMPA ELECTRIC AND FRONTIER AND CABLE UTILITIES THAT SURROUND THE PROPERTY ON THREE FRONTAGES ON POLES. AND THOSE WOULD GO UNDERGROUND. WE DON'T HAVE PRICES YET ON THESE AND THE WAY THE BONUS PROVISION IS WRITTEN, IF THE COST OF PUTTING THOSE UNDER GROUND DO TO THE COME UP TO THE FULL $24,000, THEN WE WILL WORK WITH CITY STAFF WHO EITHER PROVIDE OTHER IMPROVEMENTS AROUND THE PROPERTY OR TO WRITE A CHECK TO THE CITY FOR THE CITY TO USE THAT MONEY ON A NEARBY PROJECT. SO ANYWAY, I WANTED TO TALK -- WE CAN ANSWER MORE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BONUS PROVISION IF NEEDED. I WANTED TO TALK FOR A MINUTE ABOUT THE WAIVERS. I WON'T TAKE TOO MUCH LONGER BECAUSE STAFF HAS DONE A GOOD JOB WITH THIS PRESENTATION TONIGHT. BUT ONE OF THE WAIVERS, WE ARE REQUESTING A REDUCTION IN REQUIRED PARKING INSTEAD OF 14 SPACES, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE 12. WE HAVE ADDED AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH END OF THE BUILDING BICYCLE MOUNTS AND WHILE IN OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY, I UNDERSTAND THE BICYCLE MOUNTS WOULD AUTOMATICALLY COUNT TOWARD PARKING. THEY DO NOT IN OUR CASE, BUT WE ARE PROVIDING THOSE TO OFFSET THAT REDUCTION A LITTLE BIT. BUT RIGHT NOW WITH THE SEVEN APARTMENT UNITS OUT THERE OR WERE RECENTLY OUT THERE AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE PHOTOS THAT WERE SHOWN. THEY HAVE RECENTLY BEEN DEMOLISHED, BUT THERE WAS LESS ON-SITE PARKING FOR THOSE SEVEN UNITS THAN WE WILL HAVE FOR THE SIXTH. THE SECOND WAIVER HAS TO DO WITH SPECIFICALLY THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVE AISLE. AND THAT IS, YOU KNOW, A SUBSTANTIAL DECREASE WE ARE REQUESTING FROM 24 FEET TO JUST UNDER 15 FEET; HOWEVER, I WANT TO POINT THIS OUT, THAT NOT JUST THE DRIVE AISLE BUT FROM THE WEST END OF OUR DRIVE AI AISLE, THE -- THE END FARTHEST AWAY FROM THE GARAGES. THE FAR END OF THE GARAGES IS 42 FEET. WHICH NORMAL REQUIRED PARKING IS 24-FOOT DRIVE AISLE AND 18-FOOT-DEEP PARKING SPACE WHICH IS 42 FEET. WE HAVE THAT SAME OVERALL. ALSO WE PROVIDED TO CITY STAFF AS PART OF OUR SUBMITTAL AND IT IS IN THE FILE AND WE PROVIDED AUTO TURN MOVEMENTS TO SHOW THAT WE BELIEVE THIS WORKS. AND THEN LACHONE MENTIONED THE THIRD WAIVER WHICH IS INCREASING THE BUFFER FROM FIVE FEET TO THREE FEET. AND WE ARE PER THE PD PLAN INSTALLING A SIX-FOOT-HIGH OPAQUE FENCE ALONG THAT PROPERTY LINE. AND I WANT TO JUST MAKE SURE THIS IS IN THE RECORD. WE HAD A FOURTH WAIVER ON THE PLAN. AND THIS HAD TO DO WITH INSTALLING WALLED COURTYARDS ON THE FRONTAGE AND MR. BRIAN SEAL OF THE TAMPA HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION FILED AN OBJECTION TO THE CITY WITH REGARD TO THAT PARTICULAR WAIVER AND I LET HIM KNOW TODAY VIA E-MAIL THAT THAT WAIVER WAS BEING REMOVED FROM THE PLAN. SO THAT OBJECTION THAT MR. SEAL OF TAMPA HEIGHTS HAD IS NO LONGER A PART OF OUR -- OUR PROPOSAL. MR. S EAL NOW KNOWS THAT AND HE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT WE HAVE MADE THAT CHANGE. OTHER THAN MR. STEELE, OUT OF THE LETTERS THAT WENT OUT, WE RECEIVED ONE PHONE CALL FROM A LADY MISS DIXON THAT LIVES A BLOCK NORTH OF THE PROJECT THAT HAD QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT WE WERE DOING. AND I WAS NOT ONLY ABLE TO ANSWER HER QUESTIONS, WHICH SHE THANKED ME FOR, BUT I WAS ABLE TO TELL HER HOW SHE COULD EITHER PARTICIPATE IN THIS HEARING VIRTUALLY OR WATCH ON TELEVISION. SO I DON'T KNOW IF SHE'S ONLINE WITH US. SO PERHAPS JUST AT HOME WATCHING ON TV. I HAD A NICE CONVERSATION WITH HER. I KNOW IT'S BEEN KIND OF A LONG NIGHT ALREADY AND THIS IS ONLY ITEM, SO I WILL SET ASIDE ANY ADDITIONAL TIME WE HAVE FOR RESPONSE TO ANY QUESTIONS. AND I HOPE THAT OUR RESPONSES REGARDING THESE WAIVERS WILL SATISFY THE INCONSISTENCY REGARDING THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW. I BELIEVE ALL OTHER DEPARTMENTS FOUND THE PROJECT CONSISTENT, AND WE WILL RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL TONIGHT. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS? ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 3? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN PERSON FOR ITEM NUMBER 3? AILEEN ROSARIO. >>AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND BREATH, NO ONE HERE. >>CLERK: NO ONE REGISTERED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR. WHAT THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL. I BELIEVE -- WHO READ THE LAST ONE? CHARLIE DID? OKAY. GO DOWN THE ROW. COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ONE SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEN WE HAVE A RESOLUTION AFTER -- SORRY. THE RESOLUTION IS TO BE ADOPTED AFTER SECOND READING. NEVER MIND. JUST READ THE ORDINANCE THERE DING DINGFELDER OKAY, MR. CHAIRMAN. I WILL MOVE THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE, FILE NO. REZ-21-10. FOR APPROVAL AND ADOPTION ON FIRST READING. I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF FOR COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE EVER CONDITION AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CITY CODE AND I FIND THAT THE REQUESTED WAIVERS DO NOT ADVERSELY EFFECT OR IMPACT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE AND SPECIFICALLY I WILL MOVE AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 602 W. WARREN AVENUE AND 601 W. EUCLID AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS RM-16, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN. MR. DINGFELDER, INCLUDING THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ABSOLUTELY. INCLUDING THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING BY THE APPLICANT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. ROLL CALL VOTE PLEASE. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH MIRANDA VOTING NO. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION HELD ON MAY 6 AT 9:30 A.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, ITEM NUMBER 4. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, THANK YOU COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM NUMBER 4 IS REZ-21-12. THE PROPERTY LOCATED 404 EAST SEWARD STREET TO REZONE FROM RS-50 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND IF I CAN HAVE IT BACK TO PLEASE COMPLETE LIE REPORT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEM. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. WE MOVE TO THE UNIVERSITY PLAN DISTRICT FOR THE NEXT CASE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED 400 FEET TO THE SOUTH OF UCON TRANSFER CENTER AND SERVED BY SEVERAL PARTS OR ROUTES THAT CONNECT TO DOWNTOWN, THE UNIVERSITY AREA, AND ARMENIA AND HOWARD AVENUE. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN LEVEL E EVACUATION DEVELOPMENT AS WELL. THE -- HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE. YOU CAN SEE HERE IS THE PARCEL. ABOUT ONE BLOCK TO THE EAST YOU HAVE INTERSTATE 275. ONE BLOCK TO THE NORTH IS THAT EAST YUKON STREET COMING THROUGH. THIS IS HART TRANSFER CENTER. IN IS THE HOME DEPOT THAT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST OF FLORIDA AND YUKON. COMMERCIAL USES ALONG THE SECTION OF FLORIDA AVENUE. THIS AREA IS A POCKET OF SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL AND TO THE SOUTH, THIS IS A COMMERCIAL PLAZA FORMALLY YEARS AGO, THE K-MART. IT IS NOW AN AUTOZONE. AND THEN YOU HAVE THE GREYHOUND -- THE OLD GREYHOUND TRACK TO THE SOUTH. HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL. THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE SURROUNDING PARCELS IN THIS TAN COLOR ARE THAT RESIDENTIAL-10. SO THAT AREA IS EXPECTED TO REMAIN SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED IN CHARACTER. TO THE NORTH, THIS PINK COLOR HERE IS -- THAT IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. AS WE MOVE OUT TO FLORIDA, THE BRIGHT RED AND WHAT YOU SEE OVER ON NEBRASKA IS THE COMMUNICTY COMMERCIAL-35 WHICH HAS THE CI INTENSIVE USES. AND FURTHER TO THE SOUTH WHERE THE COMMERCIAL PLAZA IS AND THE GREYHOUND TRACK, THAT IS ACTUALLY URBAN MIXED USE-60 WITH A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ON THOSE PARCELS. THE DARK BROWN IS THE RESIDENTIAL 35. AND THEN YOU ACTUALLY HAVE SOME LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BUSCH BOULEVARD REPRESENTED BY THE GRAY. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILT PARCELS FACING THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG NORTH SEMINOLE AVENUE HAVE A CURRENT DENSITY OF 6.9 UNITS PER ACRE. THE PROPOSED DENSITY FOR THE SUBJECT SITE IF THE PD IS APPROVED IS 9.09 UNITS PER A ACRE. THESE DENSITIES ARE WITHIN THE RANGE PERMITTED AND PLANNED FOR UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. FURTHERMORE THE PROPOSED PD IS SIMILAR IN FORM, HEIGHT AND SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES FOUND ALONG THIS PORTION OF EAST SEWARD STREET. IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED PD IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE FINE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WITHIN THIS PORTION OF THE CITY AND THE PROPOSAL DOES -- IS CONSISTENT WITH INFILL POLICIES REGARDING RESIDENTIAL AND ITS PROXIMITY TO EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSIT AMENITIES. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES RECOMMEND TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, LACHONE. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCIL, THANK YOU. I WILL SHARE MY SCREEN. LaCHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. CAN YOU SEE MY POWERPOINT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN. >>LaCHONE DOCK: OKAY, THANK YOU. A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL LOTS. THE PROPERTY CONTAINED TWO PLATTED LOTS, LOT 11 AND LOT 12 OF BLOCK 2 OF. THE MINIMUM HEIGHTS AREA OF THE RS ZONING DISTRICT IS 5,000 SQUARE FEET. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THE LOTS AS CONFIGURED TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH ONE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE ON EACH LOT. GIVEN THE OVERALL LOT AREA OF 4750 SQUARE FEET FOR EACH LOT, THE ONLY WAY TO REQUEST TO ESTABLISH EACH LOT IS THROUGH THE PD PROCESS. SO THE SITE IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH SEMINOLE AVENUE. THE PROPOSED PD SETBACKS FOR LOTS 11 AND 12 ARE TO THE NORTH AT THE SEVEN FEET. TO THE SOUTH AT SEVEN FEET. TO THE EAST 20 FEET. AND TO THE WEST IS 20 FEET. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 35 FEET. AS DAVID HAS SHOWN, THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS WHICH ARE ALL IN THE RS-50 ZONING DISTRICT AND SURROUNDING THE SITE ON ALL SIDES. THE TOTAL OF FOUR PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR BOTH LOTS AND FOR PARKING -- AND FOUR PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED. LOT 11 HAVE VEHICULAR ACCESS. AND LOT 12 HAVE VEHICULAR ON THE EAST SEWARD AVENUE -- SEWARD STREET WHICH IS THE CORNER. THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE SITE LOCATED IN R RED. ON THE MAP, AND THIS IS SEMINOLE AVENUE THAT IS BORDERING THE SITE ON THE WEST. YOU CAN SEE THIS SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH THE RS-50 ZONING AS DAVID SHOWED EARLIER AND YOU HAVE 275 THAT IS TO THE EAST OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS PRO PROVIDED. THIS IS SEMINOLE AVENUE THAT IS TO THE WEST AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THESE ARE THE TWO STRUCTURES PROPOSED ON THE TWO LOTS. THE TOP ONE IS LOT 11. AND THE BOTTOM LOT IS LOT 12. SO YOU CAN SEE VEHICULAR ACCESS PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH FOR LOT 12 WHILE VEHICULAR ACCESS FOR LOT 11 IS PROPOSED ON THE WEST. AND THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED WITH THE SITE FOR LOT 11 AND FOR LOT 12. AND THEN THESE ARE PICTURES OF THE SITE. SO THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS THE VIEW OF THE SITE AS YOU ARE LOOKING EASTWARD. THIS IS ON THE RIGHT, ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE. AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE. THIS IS MORE ALONG THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE SITE. AND THEN THIS PROPERTY ON THE RIGHT -- THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS LOCATED EAST OF THE SITE. SO ON THE LEFT, OFF PICTURE OF THE WEST END OF THE SITE. THIS IS ON SEMINOLE AVENUE. AND THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SITE. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS WEST OF THE SITE. AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SITE. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS LOOKING EAST. AND YOU CAN SEE THE INTERSTATE IS IN THE BACKGROUND OF THE PICTURE. THE ROAD ACTUALLY DEAD-ENDS. AND THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PETITION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION FURTHER MODIFICATION OF THE SITE PLAN ARE REQUIRED DURING FIRST AND SECOND READING. AND I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT, WE GO TO THE APPLICANT. YES, SIR, YOU ARE SWORN IN, SO YOU ARE GOOD TO GO. >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN >> I'M JOHN LAROCA REPRESENTING THE OWNER AND APPLICANT, DANVA REAL ESTATE. AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THIS REZONING IS TO RECOGNIZE TWO EXISTING LOTS OF RECORD. LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK TWO OF URBANTON SUBDIVISION WERE PLATTED IN 1912. 109 YEARS AGO. THESE ARE LOTS OF RECORD THAT ARE 50 FEET WIDE BY 95 FEET DEEP WITH A 10-FOOT ALLEY IN THE REAR. AS MS. DOCK INDICATED, THE ONLY WAY THESE TWO LOTS IN THE RS 50 DISTRICT CAN BE DEVELOPED BECAUSE THEY ARE OWNED IN COMBINATION WOULD BE THROUGH THE PD ZONING. THE LOTS ARE PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES MEETING THE RS 50 REGULATIONS. YOU HAVE THE REPORT WITH YOU AND DAVID HEY GAVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT, AS DID MS. DOCK. THERE'S NO DISAGREEMENT. I CONCUR WHOLEHEARTEDLY. APPLICATION WAS FOUND CONSISTENT WITH SOME MODIFICATIONS NECESSARY BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. FOR THE RECORD, THOSE MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN DRAFTED. THOSE CHANGES WILL BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THIS ZONING. THE PROPERTY IS IN THE GREATER SULPHUR SPRINGS AREA. THIS IS A CLASSIC CASE OF UNDERUTILIZED PROPERTY IN WHAT IS A REDEVELOPING NATURE OF MANY OF OUR FORGOTTEN NEIGHBORHOODS OVER THE YEARS. AS YOU KNOW ON CITY COUNCIL, WITH MANY OTHER CHANGES YOU'VE BEEN SEEING OCCUR WITHIN THE CITY, UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES ARE BEING REDISCOVERED, AND THERE IS INTEREST FROM THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY TO REDEVELOP THESE PROPERTIES AS THEY WERE INTENDED. WITH THAT SAID, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 4? >> AILEEN ROSARIO, THERE'S NOBODY HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY REGISTERED FOR ITEM 4? COUNCILMAN VIERA, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 4? >> MR. CHAIR, MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 404 EAST SEARED STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD PLANNE DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL VOTE. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: [INAUDIBLE] >> I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE MOTION INCLUDES THE REVISIONS AS SHOWN ON THE REVISION SHEET WILL BE INCORPORATED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >>LUIS VIERA: YES, THE MOTION DOES INCLUDE THAT. YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6th AT 9:30 A.M. NEXT UP, ITEM NUMBER 5. >> HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I BELIEVE I NEED TO BE SWORN IN. [OATH ADMINISTERED] FOR THE RECORD, THE CLERK'S OFFICE DID RECEIVE WRITTEN COMMENTS FOR THIS ITEM. >> ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. FILE NUMBER 21-14, PROPERTY ADDRESS 9904 NORTH 14th STREET. THIS IS FOR A PROPOSED REZONING FROM RS 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50 TO RM 18 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 18. I'LL PASS IT ALONG TO PLANNING COMMISSION. DAVID. YOU. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS, DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO SEE MY SCREEN. THIS NEXT, WE REMAIN IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS NEXT REZONING. THE SUBJECT SITE IS THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITY, THE DAVID E. WEST PARK, WHICH IS ABOUT .8 MILES EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A LEVEL E EVACUATION ZONE, AND HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT, HART BUS 45 DOES SERVE THE SITE. THE CLOSEST STOP LOCATED JUST ONE-TENTH OF A MILE TO THE NORTHWEST AT THE CORNER OF NORTH LANTANA AVENUE AND EAST LINEBAUGH AVENUE. HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL. YOU CAN SEE HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE. IT'S HARD TO SEE BUT REALLY THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THIS AREA, IT'S A MIXTURE OF SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND DUPLEXES. THEN THIS IS LINEBAUGH ABOUT ONE BLOCK TO THE NORTH AND THEN YOU'VE GOT 14th STREET RUNNING DOWN THIS WAY. THIS IS THE CSX RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT HEADS NORTH AND DOWN TO NEAR THE FORT. AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE USES TO THE WEST CENTERED ALONG NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTIES IN THIS BROWN ARE THE RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. SO THAT ALLOWS CONSIDERATIONS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND ATTACHED DWELLINGS, PREDOMINANTLY TOWNHOMES. EAST OF NORTH 15th STREET, THE DENSITY DOES DECREASE DOWN TO A RESIDENTIAL 10, WHICH IS REPRESENTED BY THE TAN, AND THEN THAT COMMERCIAL THAT WE SAW OUT ON NEBRASKA AVENUE, THAT'S REPRESENTED BY THE RED, AND THE RED REPRESENTS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35. SO IT DOES ALLOW CONSIDERATION FOR UP TO COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES. THIS PORTION OF NORTH 14th STREET BETWEEN LINEBAUGH AVENUE AND EAST 98th AVENUE HAS AN AVERAGE EXISTING DENSITY OF 6.91 UNITS PER ACRE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED AT A DENSITY OF 3.46 UNITS PER ACRE, WELL BELOW THE AVERAGE FOR THIS PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S ALSO BELOW THE MAXIMUM 20 UNITS THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20. THE PROPOSED REZONING WOULD ALLOW CONSIDERATION OF UP TO AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 18 UNITS PER ACRE FOR THIS SITE. AND THIS IS COMPATIBLE WITH THAT UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OR DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, ESPECIALLY SINCE DUPLEXES AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED ALREADY COEXIST IN THE AREA. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES RECOMMEND TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU, DAVID. CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SHARED SCREEN? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE CAN SEE IT. >> ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. FILE REZ 21-14 FOR PROPERTY ADDRESS 9904 NORTH 14th STREET. PROPOSING FOR REZONING FROM RS 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50 TO RM 18, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 18. THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST, THEREFORE, NO WAIVERS ARE PERMITTED. THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 25,200 SQUARE FEET OR .58 ACRES. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH BROOK STREET AND EAST 99th AVENUE. THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST IN THE RS 50 ZONE DISTRICT. THE DEVELOPMENT MUST ADHERE TO ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING, INCLUDING REQUIRED USE TO USE BUFFERING. THIS APPLICATION WILL ALLOW THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO BE FULLY DEVELOPED TO THE RM 18 ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS. AS YOU SEE HERE IS THE OVERHEAD VIEW, OVERHEAD MAP. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS IN THE RED OUTLINE RIGHT THERE WHERE THE CURSOR IS. AS YOU SEE TO THE WEST, YOU HAVE NORTH BROOK STREET. TO THE NORTH EAST LINEBAUGH AVENUE. TO THE EAST YOU HAVE NORTH 14th STREET AND TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE EAST 99th AVENUE. PICTURE OF THE SITE HERE. THIS IS A VACANT LOT RIGHT NOW. TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE INTERSECTION WITH RESIDENTIAL FAMILY HOME. TO THE SOUTHEAST, YOU ALSO HAVE ANOTHER SINGLE-FAMILY HOME. TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE WE HAVE THREE PICTURES HERE OF HOMES, RESIDENTIAL. TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE, ANOTHER HOME. AND TO THE WEST OF THE SITE, ANOTHER HOME. TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE ALSO SURROUNDED BY HOMES. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO. ALL RIGHT, WE GO TO THE APPLICANT. IF YOU COULD RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. I SEE PETER. RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN. >>THE CLERK: DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? >> YES. >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR. >> AM I SUPPOSED TO DO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. >> YEAH, AS PRESENTED, WE BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY, AND WHEN WE LOOKED AT IT, WE WANTED TO DO A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON THE SITE, THE RM-18 ZONING IS WHAT WE CAN ADHERE TO, AND THAT IS WHAT OUR REQUEST IS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE, SIR? >> NO. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK FOR ITEM NUMBER 5? >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >> THIS IS AILEEN ROSARIO FROM DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH AND THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. COUNCILMAN CITRO, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 5. >>JOSEPH CITRO: FILE REZ-21-14, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 9904 NORTH 14th STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY) TO RM-18 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I CONCUR WITH THE FINDINGS AND REASONINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF. MORE ESPECIALLY, THAT THE DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY PURSUANT TO LAND USE POLICY 8.14.1 AND PROPOSED USE PROMOTES THE EFFECT AND SUSTAINABILITY USED IN LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>THE CLERK: GUDES? MIRANDA? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH GUDES ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD MAY 6 AT 9:30 A.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER 6. >> THANK YOU. ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. GOING OVER CASE REZ 21-15, PROPERTY ADDRESS 2710 AND 2724 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE. THIS IS PROPOSING REZONE FROM RS 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE. I'LL PASS THIS ALONG TO DAVID OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. HEY, YOU'RE MUTED. >>DAVID HEY: THANK YOU, ZAIN. DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. WE ARE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS NEXT CASE, MORE SPECIFICALLY THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE IN THE MacFARLANE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP TO THE SUBJECT SITE IS ABOUT 150 FEET TO THE WEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH HABANA AVENUE AND WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE. THAT'S SERVED BY HART ROUTE 15. THE SUBJECT SITE DOES FALL WITHIN A LEVEL E EVACUATION ZONE. HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AS YOU CAN SEE, COLUMBUS DRIVE IS ON THE NORTH AND THEN HAVANA IS TO THE WEST. AS YOU CAN SEE ABOUT FROM HERE DOWN, IT'S MORE COMMERCIAL PATTERN ALONG COLUMBUS, AND THEN ACTUALLY TO THE NORTH AND EAST AND TO THE SOUTH OF THIS SUBJECT SITE, THERE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOUSES FRONTING RIGHT ON TO COLUMBUS DRIVE. AND THEN THERE'S ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL FURTHER DOWN NEAR ARMENIA AND COLUMBUS DRIVE. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PARCELS IN THE RED ARE THAT COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35, SO THAT DOES ALLOW CONSIDERATION FOR CI USES. SOUTH OF WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET, IT DOES GO DOWN TO A RESIDENTIAL 20. THAT'S THAT LIGHTER BROWN. AND THEN YOU HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL 10 TO THE WEST OF NORTH HAVANA. THE NORTH SIDE OF COLUMBUS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THIS SUBJECT SITE IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35. THAT'S REPRESENTED BY THE PINK. THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR A MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES. SO A LITTLE LESS INTENSE TO THE NORTH. AND HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL 35 FURTHER TO THE EAST. THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. IT DOES ALLOW FOR THAT INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED CI ZONING DISTRICT IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35. CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED CI ZONING WOULD ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT THAT IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING USES, ESPECIALLY TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND THE CI IS WHAT'S ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35. SO BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. >> THANK YOU, DAVID. CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN? >> ZAIN HUSSEIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. CASE REZ 21-15, PROPERTY ADDRESS 2710 AND 2724 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE. PROPOSING A REZONE FROM RS 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE. THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST, THEREFORE IN WAIVERS ARE PERMITTED. THE SUBJECT SITE IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY A RETAIL SALES USE AND DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY COMMERCIAL AND DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES TO THE NORTH IN THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND RS 50 DISTRICT. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST IN THE RS 50 ZONING DISTRICT. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH IN THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND RS 50 ZONING DISTRICTS AND COMMERCIAL USE TO THE WEST IN THE CG ZONING DISTRICT. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY AND MUST COMPLY WITH WEST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARD AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING. THE DEVELOPMENT MUST ADHERE TO ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING, INCLUDING REQUIRED USE TO USE BUFFERING. THIS HAPPEN INDICATION WILL ALLOW THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO BE FULLY DEVELOPED UNDER CI ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE OVERHEAD SITE, THE SITE IS ACTUALLY BORDERED IN RED HERE. SO AS YOU SEE, THE RED HERE IS -- THAT THE WEST PORTION IN THE CI ZONING AND THE EAST IS IN THE RS 50 ZONING. TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE, COMMERCIAL ALL ALONG, AND THEN TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET. AND ALSO YOU HAVE RM 16 RIGHT BELOW IT. TO THE WEST YOU HAVE NORTH HABANA AVENUE AND TO THE EAST NORTH TAMPA PANA AVENUE. WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE. JENNY'S FLOWER SHOP AND ALSO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. VIEW LOOKING EAST ON COLUMBUS, STREET VIEW. TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE A DANCE COMPANY, DANCE STUDIO. SOUTH OF THE SITE, NORTH HAVANA AVENUE, SINGLE-FAMILY HOME. LOOKING EAST ON WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET, YOU CAN SEE HOMES DOWN THE STREET. TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE ON WEST ST. JOSEPH STREET, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOME. SOUTH OF THE SITE VACANT LOT AND ALSO A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I SEE GREG ON THE LINE. PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN, SIR. [OATH ADMINISTERED] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION TONIGHT ON THIS ITEM. AFTER REVIEWING STAFF'S REPORT AND HEARING THE PRESENTATION TONIGHT, WE HAVE NO FURTHER COMMENT. WE ARE IN FULL AGREEMENT WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 6? >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY DOWN ON THE SECOND FLOOR. >> AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT. THERE'S NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR? COUNCILMAN CITRO, I BELIEVE YOU WERE THE LAST ONE TO READ, CORRECT? >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN GUDES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: FILE REZ 21-15, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 2710 AND 2724 WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS 50, RENTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES. SECOND FROM VIERA. ROLL CALL. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6 AT 9:30 A.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER 7. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. >> ZAIN HUSAIN. CASE REZ 21-16, PROPERTY ADDRESS 6800 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE. IT IS PROPOSING A REZONE FROM SH-CI SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND SH-RS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DETACHED TO SEMINOLE HEIGHTS MULTIFAMILY. PASS IT ALONG TO DAVID. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. HEY. >>DAVID HEY: THANK YOU, ZAIN. DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. WE REMAIN IN THIS CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS NEXT CASE, MORE SPECIFICALLY THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE. AND ALSO IT'S LOCATED WITHIN THE OLD SEMINOLE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD. THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY A HUNDRED FEET TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE AND EAST SLIGH. IT IS SERVED BY THE ROUTE 400, WHICH IS THE METRO RAPID WHICH CONNECTS THE SUBJECT SITE TO DOWNTOWN TAMPA IN THE UNIVERSITY AREA TRANSIT CENTER. ALSO, THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE. HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE. IT'S ABOUT A BLOCK SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH NEBRASKA AND EAST SLIGH. THIS AREA, YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S COMMERCIAL USES ALONG THIS SEGMENT. THIS IS THE 7th SON BREWERY DIRECTLY TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE SOME AUTO SALES AND DETAILING COMMERCIAL USES TO THE NORTH AND THEN THIS IS THE OASIS MOTEL DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH. BEHIND THE SUBJECT SITE, THERE ARE SOME VACANT LOTS AND SOME SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, ESPECIALLY DOWN ELM STREET AND THE STREET RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTY IN RED IS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35. AND IT TRANSITIONS AS YOU MOVE WESTWARD, IT TRANSITIONS DOWN TO THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35, WHICH JUST ALLOWS AN INTENSITY OF CG AND THEN YOU GO DOWN TO THE RESIDENTIAL 10. SO THERE IS ANTICIPATION THAT THIS INTERSECTION AND THIS AREA WILL INTENSIFY LONG TERM UNDER THE SUBJECT SITE, AGAIN, IS WITHIN THAT CC 35, SO WE ARE LOOKING FOR SINGLE AND VERTICAL MIXED USE TO DEVELOP LONG TERM IN THESE AREAS, AND THE PROPOSED SEMINOLE HEIGHTS MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT PROVIDES AN EXCELLENT INFILL OPPORTUNITY ON A TRANSIT CORRIDOR WITHIN EMPLOYMENT AND RETAIL SERVICES. IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED SEMINOLE HEIGHTS MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING WOULD ALLOW FOR A DEVELOPMENT THAT IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING USES AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT COMMUNTY COMMERCIAL 35. SO BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. AND I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. BACK TO YOU, SIR. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: THANK YOU, DAVID. CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN? THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, WE CAN IT. GO AHEAD. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. CASE NUMBER REZ 21-16, PROPERTY ADDRESS 6800 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE. PROPOSING A REZONING FROM SH-CI SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND SH-RS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO SHRM SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. THIS IS THE EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST, THEREFORE NO WAIVERS ARE PERMITTED. THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 100 BY 215 FEET FOR A TOTAL LOT AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 21,500 SQUARE FEET AS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE AND EAST ELM STREET INTERSECTION. THE SUBJECT SITE IS SURROUNDED BY A MOTEL AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE SOUTH IN THE SH-RS AND SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICTS. COMMERCIAL USES TO THE EAST IN THE SH-CI ZONING DISTRICT, A COMMERCIAL USE TO THE NORTH IN THE SH-CI ZONING DISTRICT AND DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO THE WEST IN THE SH-RS ZONING DISTRICT. THE DEVELOPMENT MUST ADHERE TO ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AT TIME OF PERMITTING, INCLUDING REQUIRED USE TO USE BUFFERING. THIS APPLICATION WILL ALLOW THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO BE FULLY DEVELOPED UNDER SHRM ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS. IF YOU'LL GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, YOU'LL BE ABLE TO SEE OVERHEAD VIEW. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OUTLINED IN RED AS YOU SEE MY CURSOR IS RIGHT ALONG THE RED. TO THE EASTERN PORTION IS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND THE WESTERN PORTION IS THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. TO THE NORTH, YOU HAVE EAST SLIGH AVENUE. TO THE WEST YOU HAVE 275. TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE EAST ELM STREET AND TO THE WEST -- OR TO THE EAST, YOU HAVE NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE. LOOKING AT THE PICTURES HERE TO THE WEST END OF THE SITE ON ELM STREET, TO THE SITE ITSELF WITH A GARAGE, SOUTH OF THE SITE AND LOOKING DOWN ELM STREET, YOU CAN SEE THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. SOUTH OF THE SITE ALSO SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND ALSO THE WEST OF THE SITE THERE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE YOU HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT UP, WE HAVE JUAN QUINONES. RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN. [OATH] >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. >> MY NAME IS JUAN QUINONES REPRESENTING THE CLIENT, AUTHORIZED AGENT. WE ARE APPLYING TO GO FROM SH-CI AND SH-RS TO SHRM, SEMINOLE HEIGHT RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YEAH, JUST CURIOUS, MR. CHAIR. GENTLEMEN, YOU HAD TO NOTICE THE VARIOUS NEIGHBORS AS WELL AS THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. I'M NOT SURE, MR. CHAIRMAN CAN PROBABLY HELP ME -- PROBABLY OSHNA AS FAR AS THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, OLD SEMINOLE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. DID YOU GET ANY CALLS OR COMMENTS BACK FROM THE NEIGHBORS OR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION? >> NO. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOTHING? >> NO. NONE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CRICKETS, HUH? THANK YOU, SIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE SECOND FLOOR? >> AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT. THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES. ALL IN FAVOR? COUNCILMAN CARLSON, NUMBER 7. >>BILL CARLSON: YES, SIR. THANK YOU. I'D LIKE TO MOVE FILE NUMBER REZ 21-16, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 6800 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION SH-RS (SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED) AND SH-CI (SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE) TO SH-RM (SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>BILL CARLSON: I'D LIKE TO MAKE A NOTE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF HAVE FOUND THIS CONSISTENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD. MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ROLL CALL VOTE? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: [INAUDIBLE] >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6th AT 9:30 A.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER 8. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM NUMBER 8 IS REZ 21-17 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 902 EAST 25th AVENUE. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS 50 AND CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT. I WILL HAND IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR REPORT, AND IF YOU CAN PLEASE COME BACK TO ME TO COMPLETE MY REPORT. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS. DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. THIS NEXT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE VM YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD. IT IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT. THERE'S TRANSIT WITHIN 150 FEET OF THE SITE TO THE WEST ALONG NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE. THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS BORRELL PARK, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY ONE-FOURTH OF A MILE TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE. WE HAVE THE AERIAL. IT'S A SMALL PARCEL. HERE'S 25th -- EAST 25th AVENUE. THEN YOU'VE GOT NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE. THIS IS THE -- CHURCH HERE. IT IS EITHER SCATTERED VACANT LOTS, SOME COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ALL ALONG THIS SEGMENT. THEN WHEN YOU GO DOWN TO THE EAST INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, IT'S PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH -- NORTHWEST AND SOUTH IN THAT KIND OF PINK COLOR IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35. SO IT DOES ALLOW CONSIDERATION UP TO CG ZONING DISTRICT. DIRECTLY TO THE EAST IN THE BROWN IS THE RESIDENTIAL 20. SO WE TYPICALLY SEE TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT AND ATTACHED -- RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED IN THESE AREAS. AND THEN WITHIN THE TAN COLORS TO THE NORTH AND FURTHER TO THE EAST, EAST OF NORTH 10th STREET, IT'S THAT RESIDENTIAL 10. THAT'S THE AREAS THAT ARE LONG TERM TO REMAIN SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS PORTION OF EAST 25th AVENUE HAS AN EXISTING DENSITY OF 7.58 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSING ONE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT AN OVERALL DENSITY OF 9.09 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, WHICH IS WELL UNDER THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UP UNDER THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. AS DESCRIBED IN LAND USE POLICY 6.1.13, LAND RECOGNIZED UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35 DESIGNATION ARE CONSIDERED TO BE WITHIN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR, MIXED USE CORRIDORS ARE IDENTIFIED AS THOSE AREAS WITH THE GREATEST OPPORTUNITY TO SUPPORT THE GRADUAL TRANSFORMATION OF ROAD CORRIDORS WHERE INTENSIFICATION IS POSSIBLE AND ENCOURAGED TO CREATE NEW HOUSING AND JOB OPPORTUNITIES WHILE IMPROVING THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT, THE LOOK OF THE STREET, PROVIDING RETAIL AND TRANSIT AMENITIES FOR THE RESIDENTS. THE PROPOSAL SUPPORTS THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR POLICIES BY ORIENTING THE HOUSE TO THE STREET AND PROVIDING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION. IT DOES ALSO SUPPORT THE INFILL POLICIES, ESPECILLY LAND USE POLICY 9.2.1 AND HOUSING POLICY 1.3.4 THAT SEEKS TO DIRECT INFILL INTO APPROPRIATE AREAS WHERE TRANSIT IS AVAILABLE, WHERE COMMERCIAL IS AVAILABLE, AND THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. SO IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE DEVELOPED WITH A SIMILAR FORM, HEIGHT, LOT SIZE, AND SCALE OF THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES. THE PROPOSED REZONING SUPPORTS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT WOULD NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OR DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THIS PORTION OF THE VM YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD. FURTHERMORE, THE REQUEST WOULD CREATE ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THAT EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, WHICH IS ALSO ENCOURAGED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. BASED ON ALL THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES RECOMMEND TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. AND I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. LaCHONE. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU SO MUCH. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. AND I WILL SHARE MY SCREEN. CAN YOU SEE MY PowerPoint? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. WE SEE A SCREEN. GO AHEAD. >>LaCHONE DOCK: OKAY. THANK YOU. SO THE REQUEST IS REZONING FROM RS 50 IN CG TO PD FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT. THERE ARE NO WAIVERS REQUESTED WITH THIS PD REQUEST, AND THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY FOR DETACHED RESIDENTIAL. THE LOT MEASURES 49 FEET IN WIDTH AND 102 FEET IN LENGTH. IT HAS A TOTAL LOT AREA OF 4,998 SQUARE FEET. THE SITE IS LOCATED ON EAST 25th AVENUE AS SHOWN BY THE MAP PROVIDED BY DAVID HEY. IT IS ALSO EAST OF NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE. I'LL SHOW YOU FURTHER ON THE AERIAL THAT I'LL PROVIDE. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE BELVEDERE PLACE, GIBSON SUBDIVISION. LOT 12 OF BLOCK 6. RS 50 ZONING DISTRICT REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 50 FEET AND LOT AREA OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET. SO THE ONLY WAY TO DEVELOP THE SITE IS THROUGH THIS PD PROCESS. THE LOT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM RS 50 STANDARDS. THE BUILDING SETBACKS PROPOSED ARE TO THE SOUTH 26 FEET. TO THE WEST AND THE EAST 5 FEET. NORTH IS 15 FEET. AND THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY AND MUST COMPLY WITH THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DESIGN STANDARDS. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 35 FEET. SO WE DID AN ANALYSIS OF THE AREA, AND OF THAT SUBDIVISION, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED IN 1905, WIDTH LOTS THAT MEASURED IN WIDTHS THAT VARIED FROM 61 FEET TO 164 FEET, AND WITH THE DEPTHS OF THE LOTS AT 102 FEET TO 300 FEET. THE OVERALL SUBDIVISION INCLUDED 92 LOTS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EASTERN 49 FEET OF LOT 12 OF BLOCK 6. SO THE OVERALL AREA OF ANALYSIS INCLUDED 352 TOTAL ZONING LOTS, 332 OR 94% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 50 FEET OR GREATER. AND 20 OR 6% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 49.99 FEET OR LESS. IN A REVIEW OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, THE SUBJECT BLOCK CONTAINS 18 TOTAL ZONING LOTS, 17 OR 94% OF THE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 50 FEET OR GREATER. AND ONE OR 6% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 49.99 FEET OR LESS. THE 900 BLOCK, WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE 900 BLOCK OF EAST 25th AVENUE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET CONTAINS THE 17 ZONING LOTS, 16 OF THOSE LOTS OR 94% OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 50 FEET OR GREATER. AND ONE, OR 6%, HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 49.99 FEET OR LESS. A TOTAL OF 90% OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK FACE HAS BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH GREATER THAN 50 FEET. SO STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED THAT THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THAT STUDY AREA AND IN THE SUBJECT BLOCK AND BLOCK FACE ARE COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF LOTS GREATER THAN 50 FEET IN WIDTH. STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED 49-FOOT LOT WIDTH IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE STUDY AREA. THIS IS THE CONFORMING MAP. THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS IDENTIFIED HERE IN THE BLACK OUTLINE WITH THE STRIPE RUNNING THROUGH IT. THIS IS NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE TO THE WEST. THIS IS 26th AVENUE TO THE NORTH AND 25th AVENUE IS WHERE THE SITE IS LOCATED. AND THIS IS THE PATTERN, THE LOT WIDTHS THAT ARE TYPICAL ON THE BLOCK. THESE ARE THE LOTS THAT ARE REFERRED TO IN THE BLOCK FACE IN THE 900 BLOCK OF 25th AVENUE. THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS HERE IN RED ON THIS MAP AND TO ORIENT YOU ON THIS MAP, THIS IS NEBRASKA AVENUE TO THE WEST. 25th AVENUE, THE LOCATION OF THE SITE, AND THEN THIS IS 10th STREET, WHICH IS EAST OF THE SITE, AND 26th AVENUE IS NORTH OF THE SITE. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS SITE HAS THAT ZONING OF THE CG WITH A LITTLE SLIVER OF THAT RS 50, AND IT'S SURROUNDED TO THE EAST WITH RS 50 ZONING. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED. SO YOU CAN SEE IT IS PROPOSING THE STRUCTURE, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE WITH A DRIVEWAY AND A GARAGE PROPOSED. AND THEN THE ELEVATIONS ARE PROVIDED WITHIN THE -- ON THE PAGE WITH THE SITE PLAN IN THE UPPER RIGHT CORNER. AND THESE ARE PICTURES OF THE SITE. SO TO THE LEFT IS THE SITE. THIS IS THE SITE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY VACANT. THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS EAST OF THE SITE. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS WEST OF THE SITE. THIS IS AT THE CORNER ON NEBRASKA. THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS THE VIEW LOOKING EAST ON 25th AVENUE. AND YOU CAN SEE THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS THE -- ALONG THAT STREET. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS NORTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS ON 26th AVENUE. AND THIS IS ALSO ANOTHER PICTURE NORTH OF THE SITE ON 26th AVENUE. THERE ARE TWO VACANT LOTS. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. PLEASE REFER TO THE FINDINGS BY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION IN RELATION TO THE INCONSISTENCY WITH THE EXISTING HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THIS APPLICATION, THERE ARE MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? DO WE HAVE THE APPLICANT IN PERSON HERE ON THE SECOND FLOOR, ITEM 8? PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN, SIR. >> I'VE BEEN SWORN IN ALREADY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT'S RIGHT. YOU'RE IN PERSON. GO AHEAD, SIR. >> MY NAME IS BLAKE FRAZIER. I AM THE AGENT FOR THIS APPLICATION. I'D LIKE TO THANK CITY STAFF AND COUNTY COMMISSION FOR THEIR STUDY ON THIS PROPERTY. AS LaCHONE SAID, THE ONLY WAY TO DEVELOP THIS SITE IS THROUGH THE PD PROCESS. SO THIS PROPERTY BACK IN 2013 WAS BOUGHT THROUGH A BANK-OWNED SALE. AND AT THAT TIME, THE PROPERTY WAS TRANSFERRED EAST 49 FEET OF LOT 12, LOT 13, AND THE WEST 12 FEET OF LOT 14. THEN IN DECEMBER OF 2016, THE OWNER QUITCLAIMED THE EAST 49 FEET OF LOT 12 INTO AN LLC OWNERSHIP AND THE OWNER SOLD THE HOUSE WHICH SAT ON LOT 13 AND THE WEST 12 FEET OF LOT 14 TO THE FUTURE OWNER. THAT WAS IN A LEGAL LAW SPLIT. SINCE THAT SALE BACK IN DECEMBER 2016, BOTH THE VACANT LOT AND THE PROPERTY THAT USED TO BE ADJOINED WITH HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED IN OWNERSHIP MORE THAN ONCE. OUR APPLICATION SOLELY SEEKS TO ALLOW SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED CONSTRUCTION ON THE VACANT LOT. THAT PREVIOUSLY EXISTED AS PART OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PROPERTY. WHILE THIS LOT LACKS THE FRONT FOOTAGE AND OVERALL SIZE TYPICALLY FOUND ON THE STREETSCAPE OR THE OVERALL AREA STATED IN THE CITY STAFF STUDY, THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS STATED IN OUR APPLICATION DO. IF CITY COUNCIL FINDS THIS APPLICATION APPROVABLE, WE WILL HAPPILY MAKE THE ADJUSTMNTS THAT CITY STAFF RECOMMENDS BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND HEARING. AND WITH THAT, I WILL OPEN MYSELF UP FOR QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN? HEARING NONE, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT'S HERE TO SPEAK? I BELIEVE WE HAVE ONE REGISTERED PERSON TO SPEAK. ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC? >> AILEEN ROSARIO FROM DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT, THERE'S NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD. DO WE HAVE THE REGISTERED SPEAKER. I SEE AN IVAN RIVERA. MADAM CLERK? >> HE IS ON A DEVICE THAT WE CANNOT ELEVATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE CAN'T TAKE THE VIRTUAL SPEAKER BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO THE CAMERA AND WHATNOT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL. IF NOT, CAN WE GET A MOTION TO CLOSE? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR. AYE. COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 8? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOT AT ALL, MR. CHAIRMAN. ITEM NUMBER 8, FILE NUMBER REZ 21-17, MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION: AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 902 EAST 25th AVNUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-50 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY) AND CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. LET ME SAY THAT IN THIS CASE, WE FIND IT CONSISTENT. THE COMPLIANCE, APPLICABLE GOALS AND OBJECTIVE POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ARE CONSISTENT WITH LAND ZONING OBJECTIVE 9.2, WHICH IS INTENDED TO ENSURE THERE IS AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF LAND PLANNED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROJECTED POPULATION. THE DENSITY PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE DENSITY APPLICABLE UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE PURSUANT TO LAND USE POLICY 8.1.4-POINT ONE. THE APPLICANT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE POLICY 2.1.2 AND THE HOUSING POLICY 1.3.4 WHICH ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT UNUTILIZED LAND. CERTAINLY, THIS HAS BEEN UNUTILIZED FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 27-136 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS SHOWN THAT THE SITE PLAN PROMOTES AND ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION, CHARACTER COMPATIBILITY AND SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS. PROMOTES THE EFFECTIVE SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND INFRASTRUCTURE. LET ME SAY THIS, I KNOW THAT MAN PRETTY WELL. RAISED NOT TOO FAR FROM THERE, THAT TEXACO STATION. ACROSS THE STREET ONE THE VALDEZ SCHOOL, INDIVIDUAL WHO OWNED THAT BIG HOUSE, AND WHERE THIS GENTLEMAN IS TALKING AT, THIS AREA IS IN TRANSITION, AND IT NEEDS HELP. THIS AREA IS THE ONE THAT HAS HAD A LOT OF BAD PUBLICITY FROM INDIVIDUALS WHO UNFORTUNATELY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO TAKE CARE OF THEMSELVES PROPERLY. AND I THINK THIS WOULD HELP THE NEIGHBORHOOD RECOVER AND GET IT KICK STARTED IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. AND THE REVISION SHEET AS WELL. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MODIFICATION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I APPRECIATE YOUR HELP. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6 AT 9:30 A.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE RECESS. WE'LL BE BACK. [RECESS] >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A REMINDER, WE'RE STILL BROADCASTING FOR THOSE ON THE WEB. THANKS. [RECESS] [ SOUNDING GAVEL ] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS TAMPA CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO ORDER. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >> VIERA? GUDES? CARLSON? >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE. >> MIRANDA? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MIRANDA? >>THE CLERK: MIRANDA? AND MANISCALCO? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU SHOULD PROBABLY TELL PEOPLE YOUR GAVEL DISAPPEARED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO, THAT'S ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER 9. ITEM NUMBER 9. DO WE HAVE LaCHONE ON THE LINE? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SHE WENT HOME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE LaCHONE ON THE LINE SO WE CAN CONTINUE WITH ITEM NUMBER 9? THERE A TECHNICAL THING? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MAYBE JUST JUMP TO DAVID HEY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DAVID HEY, ARE YOU ON THE LINE? >> DID WE LOSE EVERYBODY? IT'S THE TWILIGHT ZONE. IT'S JUST US NOW. >> YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU TAKE BREAKS LATE AT NIGHT. FIVE MINUTES BECOMES 20. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE LaCHONE ON. GO AHEAD, LaCHONE, ITEM 9. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. ITEM 9 IS REZ 21-18. IT'S FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3724 WEST SAN PEDRO STREET. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PD BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO PD, BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO DAVID HEY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND IF YOU COULD RETURN BACK TO ME TO COMPLETE THE REPORT. THANK YOU. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS. DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO SEE MY SCREEN. WE'RE MOVING DOWN TO THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, MORE SPECIFICALLY THE PALMA CEIA NEIGHBORHOOD. THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE CORNER OF SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AND WEST SAN JUAN STREET. CLOSEST PUBLIC PARK IS PALMA CEIA PARK, APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE TO THE NORTHEAST. THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL C EVACUATION ZONE. HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE IN THE CENTER. THIS IS DALE MABRY HIGHWAY RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH. WE HAVE SAN PEDRO AND WEST OBISPO STREET TO THE SOUTH. THIS IS THE SEGMENT OF DALE MABRY THAT IS MOSTLY BUILT OUT WITH OFFICES. AND THEN OFF THE CORRIDOR, DIRECTLY OFF THE CORRIDOR, IT'S ALL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE PROPERTIES LINING THIS SECTION OF SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY ARE ALL THAT RESIDENTIAL 20. AND THEN ONE PARCEL IN, IT GOES DOWN TO THE RESIDENTIAL 10, WHICH IS THE TAN COLOR. THIS DOES HAVE DIFFERENT LOCATIONAL CRITERIA UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20 THAN THE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. THE SUBJECT SITE AS STATED IS IN THAT RESIDENTIAL 20. THIS DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF LOWER AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES SUCH AS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, ATTACHED, AND TOWNHOMES. A LIMITED NUMBER OF NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL USES AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICE USES CAN BE CONSIDERED IF THEY MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICE USES. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE COMMERCIAL LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AND FINDS THAT THE SUBJECT SITE MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION. THE SUBJECT SITE IS ADJACENT TO SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY WHICH IS CLASSIFIED AS AN ARTERIAL ROADWAY AND EXISTING NONRESIDENTIAL ZONING IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SITE ON THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST. WHILE THE SITE IS CONSISTENT WITH LOCATIONAL CRITERIA NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICE USES THAT WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT -- EXCUSE ME, THAT WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE ORIENTATION OF THE PROPOSED ROOFTOP PATIO, THE POTENTIAL FOR ACTIVITIES ON THE PATIO, AND THE PROXIMITY OF THE ADJACENT RESIDENTS TO THE EAST AND SOUTH. ADDITIONALLY, THE PD PROPOSES A FOUR-FOOT SETBACK TO THE EAST AND A FIVE-FOOT SETBACK TO THE SOUTH. THESE CONCERNS WERE PRESENTED TO THE APPLICANT, AND THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO ADDRESS THESE CONCERNS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO MOVE THE DECK TO ORIENT TOWARD DALE MABRY AND USE THE BUILDING AS SCREENING FROM THE ADJACENT RESIDENCES. THESE MODIFICATIONS WILL ADDRESS THE CONCERNS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. ADDITIONALLY, CITY STAFF HAS PROVIDED A NOTE IN THEIR REPORT RECOMMENDING THESE REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND CLOSELY COORDINATE WITH THE CITY STAFF. IN CONCLUSION, THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND THE OFFICE USES WITHIN THAT RESIDENTIAL 20. FURTHERMORE, THE PD FURTHERS THE INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. AND BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS AND THE REVISIONS ON THE REVISION SHEET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES FIND THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU, AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. LaCHONE. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. IN THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU, ALSO, CAN YOU SEE MY PowerPoint. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN SEE YOUR SCREEN. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE FROM PD TO PD. THE CURRENT PD IS APPROVED FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE, AND THEN THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS FOR THE SAME USE, BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. WITH THIS REQUEST, WHAT IS PROVIDED IS THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WAIVERS, AS ARE NORMALLY LISTED. THESE ARE WAIVERS APPROVED UNDER THE CURRENT APPROVAL, WHICH WAS APPROVED IN 2017. REZ 17-61. IF THERE WERE THREE WAIVERS GRANTED, ONE IS SPECIAL STREET SETBACK, THE OTHER IS TO REDUCE THE BACKUP DISTANCE. THE THIRD WAIVER WAS REGARDING THE USE TO USE BUFFER AND THAT WAS ON THE EAST AND THE SOUTH. SO THE NEW WAIVER IS A SLIGHT AMENDMENT OF THE USE-TO-USE BUFFER THAT WAS GRANTED FOR THE EAST AND THE SOUTH. ALONG THE EAST IT WOULD REDUCE TO FOUR FEET WITH SIX-FOOT FENCE AND THEN TO THREE FEET WITH A SIX-FOOT FENCE TO THE SOUTH. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP A 3,752 SQUARE FOOT STRUCTURE WITH THE USE OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. THE SITE CONTAINS A LOT AREA OF 7,500 SQUARE FEET. AS I MENTIONED, THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY APPROVED FOR A PD UNDER REZ 17-61. AND IT IS APPROVED FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. THAT WAS APPROVED WITH A TWO-STORY 3,333-SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING. THAT PD WAS NOT DEVELOPED. THE SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT, AS YOU'LL SEE IN SOME OF THE SITE PHOTOS THAT I'LL SHOW YOU MOMENTARILY. THE APPLICANT IS NOW PROPOSING A 3,752-SQUARE-FOOT BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING. IT WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE WITH GROUND FLOOR PARKING. THE PROPOSED USE REQUIRES 13 PARKING SPACES AND 13 SPACES ARE PROVIDED. THE PROPOSED SETBACKS ARE TO THE NORTH 10 FEET, THE WEST NINE FEET, THE SOUTH AND EAST FOUR FEET. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS PROPOSED AT 45 FEET, AND I'LL SHOW YOU AN AERIAL MAP WITH THE LOCATION OF THE SITE, AND AS DAVID HAS MENTIONED, THE SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH PROFESSIONA OFFICE USES. TO THE NORTH, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN THE RS 50 ZONING DISTRICT TO THE EAST AND THE SOUTH. AND THEN A VACANT LOT RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND THE ZONING, RO ZONING DISTRICT TO THE WEST. SO THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS OUTLINED IN RED, IN THE CENTER OF THE SCREEN. ON THIS MAP JUST TO ORIENT YOU, THIS IS DALE MABRY HIGHWAY TO THE WEST, AND THIS IS WEST SAN PEDRO STREET, WHICH IS WHERE THE SITE IS LOCATED. TO THE SOUTH IS OBISPO, AND THEN THIS IS THE PD. AS YOU CAN SEE NORTH OF IT IS THE PD FOR THE BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WITH MOSTLY COMMERCIAL RUNNING ALONG SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY IN THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE RS 50 LOCATED EAST OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THE REQUEST. SO THIS IS SAN PEDRO STREET. THIS IS DALE MABRY HIGHWAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE. AND YOU CAN SEE VEHICULAR ACCESS IS PROPOSED ON SAN PEDRO STREET AND THIS IS THE OUTLINE OF WHAT WOULD BE THE BUILDING PLACEMENT. THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED. THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION THAT IS ON THE LEFT, AND THIS IS THE WEST ELEVATION. THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION ON THE LEFT, AND THEN THIS IS THE EAST ELEVATION THAT IS ON THE RIGHT SIDE. SO HERE ARE PHOTOS OF THE SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS THE SITE. THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SITE. ON THE LEFT, THIS IS A PICTURE WEST OF THE SITE, AND THEN A PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS EAST OF THE SITE. AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS SOUTH OF THE SITE AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS WEST OF THE SITE. THAT IS ACROSS DALE MABRY. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. IN THE EVENT CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE APPLICATION, THE REPORT OUTLINES ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS WHICH ARE REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. AND I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. MR. MICHELINI. >>STEE MICHELINI: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. STEVE MICHELINI. I'M REPRESENTING MELANIA HOMES, AND THIS IS GOING TO BE THEIR NEW CORPORATE OFFICE. IT IS A SINGLE USER BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AS PROPOSED. AS NOTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF THEY FOUND IT TO BE CONSISTENT AND WE'RE ORIENTING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE BUILDING TOWARD DALE MABRY. THE PREVIOUS PD AS STAFF POINTED OUT 3,333 SQUARE FEET, AND THE PROPOSAL IS TO REPLACE THAT WITH -- REPLACE THAT PD WITH AN APPROVAL FOR 3,752 SQUARE FEET. THE PARKING HAS BEEN MET. THERE ARE NO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED. 13 ARE REQUIRED AND 13 ARE BEING PROVIDED. THERE IS A BUILDING REQUEST FOR IDENTIFICATION, LIKE A SMALL TOWER AT THE CORNER OF SAN PEDRO AND DALE MABRY. THAT'S NOT CLEARLY IDENTIFIED TO THE EXTENT TO WHERE THOSE -- WHERE THAT ELEMENT IS, SO WE NEED TO CORRECT THAT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. BUT IT IS ORIENTED AS AN IDENTIFICATION TOWER ALSO FOR MECHANICAL AND FOR THE ELEVATOR. THE SITE IS 7,500 SQUARE FEET, AND AS YOU PROBABLY WILL RECOGNIZE, THIS IS JUST SOUTH OF BAY TO BAY ON DALE MABRY. THESE ARE SMALLER LOTS THAT ARE IDEAL FOR INFILL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AS OPPOSED TO RETAIL. A RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT AT THIS CORNER WOULD INTRODUCE A LOT OF TRAFFIC INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. F.D.O.T. WOULD NOT ALLOW AN ACCESS ONTO DALE MABRY, AND THAT'S WHY OUR ACCESS POINT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS IS ON SAN PEDRO. ONE OF THE MODIFICATIONS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE PROPOSING THAT IS NOT ON THIS CURRENT SITE PLAN HAVING MET WITH ONE OF THE NEIGHBORS IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST IS AN EIGHT-FOOT MASONRY WALL ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. WE ALSO NEED TO REVISE SOME OF THE INFORMATION PER THE CITY STAFF THAT'S NOTED IN THEIR CONDITIONS REPORT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND WE'RE COMMITTING TO MAKING THOSE REVISIONS. THE CHALLENGE THAT WE RUN INTO IS HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES THAT FACE MAJOR HIGHWAYS LIKE DALE MABRY WHEN THEY ARE ADJACENT TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. SO WE'VE STRUGGLED WITH THAT A LITTLE BIT. WE'VE AGREED TO REORIENT THE ROOF DECK AREA, WHICH WILL REQUIRE REVISION AS WELL, AND WE'RE COMMITTING TO MAKING THAT CHANGE. THE SMALL PARCELS ON DALE MABRY ARE REALLY NOT WELL-SUITED FOR LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENTS, AND THIS ONE IS CONSISTENT AS THE STAFF HAS POINTED OUT FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL, AND I WILL POINT OUT TO YOU IN THE CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR US TO MEET THAT THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH END OF THE PROPERTY AND GROUND LEVEL OF THE BUILDING. SURFACE LEVEL PARKING IS BEING PROVIDED. AND THIS DESIGN ALLOWS FOR PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES LOCATED AROUND THE BOUNDARY AND ADJACENT TO THE SITE. AND THEN NUMBER 6 IS A SUBJECT SITE IS SURROUNDED BY COMMERCIAL USES ON THE NORTH, SOUTHWEST AND A SINGLE-FAMILY USES ARE ON THE EAST SIDE. AND AS I SAID, WE'RE SENSITIVE TO THAT ISSUE. I MET WITH THE OWNER, AND THE OWNER OF THIS PROPERTY THAT'S PLANNING TO GO IN THERE ALSO MET WITH HIM. SO WE'LL BE MAKING THOSE CHANGES IF COUNCIL PROVIDES US WITH AN APPROVAL BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THE VEHICULAR ACCESS, AS I MENTIONED, IS ON SAN PEDRO, AND THAT'S A DIRECT RESULT OF F.D.O.T. NOT ALLOWING US TO HAVE ACCESS ON DALE MABRY HIGHWAY. THE DESIGN WAS REVIEWED, AND IT WAS CONSIDERED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CRITERIA THAT'S ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY, INCLUDING THE WAIVERS AND NOT INJURED THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS OR THE PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED THAT WOULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. THE WAIVER IS IN HARMONY AND SERVES GENERAL INTENT AND PURPOSES OF THIS CHAPTER, AND ALLOWING THE WAIVER WOULD RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE BEING DONE. LET ME GO ON TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT WHERE THEY FOUND THAT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE PLAN AND THE POLICIES CONTAINED THEREIN. THERE ARE A NUMBER, FIRST OF ALL. LET ME STATE THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER EXAMPLES OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICES THAT ABUT RESIDENTIAL EITHER ON THE EAST OR WEST SIDES ALONG THIS ENTIRE STRETCH OF DALE MABRY. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND I'M GOING TO READ A COUPLE OF THE OBJECTIVES. THEY ARE IN YOUR REPORT, SO WE'D LIKE TO ASK THAT THEY BE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. YOU HAVE LAND USE OBJECTIVE 1.1 IS TO CREATE THE URBAN DESIGN WHICH RESPECTS THE TAMPA HUMAN SCALE AND UNIQUE HISTORIC AND AESTHETICS OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT. RELATE NEW BUILDINGS AND DEVELOPMENT TO THE CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE BELIEVE THAT WE'VE DONE THAT AND WE WILL IMPROVE THAT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING BY DEFINING THOSE AREAS THAT ARE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND PROMOTE THAT PRIVACY THAT WE'VE COMMITTED TO. PROMOTE A RANGE OF USES NEXT TO EACH OTHER WHICH ARE COMPATIBLE DIRECTLY ACROSS TO THE NORTH IS ANOTHER BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WHICH IS A CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE. THE SAME AS WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED HERE. THE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOODS ARE PLANNED FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USES IN A MANNER THAT ARE SENSITIVE AND COMPATIBLE. WE BELIEVE WE'RE TAKING MEASURES WHICH WILL MITIGATE ANY ADVERSE OR POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TO THE EAST. THESE ARE MORE OF THE POLICIES, 15.2.4 REQUIRE THE APPROPRIATE BUFFERING, AND WITH THE DISCUSSIONS TO THE PROPERTY OWNER ON THE EAST SIDE, WE OFFERED A 10-FOOT MASONRY WALL. HE WANTED AN EIGHT FOOT WALL, SO WE'RE COMMITTING TO THAT. ANYWAY, WE MET THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AS ESTABLISHED IN BOTH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE CITY OF TAMPA CODES AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS. WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WE'RE CREATING AN ADVERSE CONDITION BY PROPOSING A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AT THIS LOCATION. INDEED, WE HAVE A NUMBER OF EXAMPLES WHICH AS STAFF POINTED OUT TO YOU UP AND DOWN THIS PORTION OF DALE MABRY, AND WE BELIEVE THAT A BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IS A MUCH MORE COMPATIBLE AND APPROPRIATE USE AS OPPOSED TO A RETAIL USE WHICH YOU HAVE A LITTLE BIT FURTHER TO THE SOUTH OF THIS PROPERTY. SO, ANYWAY, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. AS I SAID, WE HAVE SOME REVISIONS TO MAKE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, INCLUDING THE ORIENTATION OF THE ROOF DECK, THE LOCATION AND THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE 45-FOOT PROVISION. THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING IS AT 35 PLUS, WHICH IS ABOUT 36 FEET, WHICH IS NORMALLY THE SAME HEIGHT AS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE. AND AS I SAID, WE'RE COMMITTING TO MAKING THE CHANGES AS REQUESTED BY STAFF. WE'VE ALSO COMMITTED TO MAKING SURE THAT THE NEIGHBORS WERE AWARE OF WHAT THOSE CHANGES WERE, AND BEFORE GOING TO SECOND READING, WE'LL BE PRESENTING THOSE CHANGES TO THEM FOR THEIR REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 9? ANYBODY IN PERSON? >> THIS IS AILEEN ROSARIO FROM REDEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT. THERE ARE TWO PEOPLE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD. COME ON UP IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 9. PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN. >> I'VE BEEN SWORN IN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. YOU'RE GOOD. >> MARK ODOM, I LIVE DIRECTLY EAST NEXT TO THE BUILDING. SO I'M VERY HAPPY THAT THIS PROPERTY IS GETTING BUILT HERE, BUT THE ONE THING THAT'S BOTHERING ME A LITTLE BIT IS I JUST HAD A POOL PUT IN. AND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OTHER BUILDINGS ACROSS THE STREET, YOU KNOW, WITH THE HEIGHT AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE, IT JUST CONCERNS ME A LITTLE BIT THAT THE SIDE WHERE MY POOL IS FACING IS 35-FOOT IN THE AIR, 36-FOOT IN THE AIR. THE FRONT, LIKE THEY SHOWED YOU IN THE PROPOSAL IS 45-FOOT IN THE FRONT BUT WHERE MY PROPERTY IS, IT'S 36-FOOT I BELIEVE IS WHAT HE SAID. THAT CONCERNS ME. WE DIDN'T PAY TO HAVE THE CAGE PUT OVER THE POOL FOR SHADE BECAUSE WE LIKE THE SUN. WE WANTED TO SUN. IN THIS CASE HERE, THIS IS GOING TO KNOCK MY SUNLIGHT OUT. AND THAT'S THE ONE THING THAT I HAVE CONCERNS. JUST THE LITTLE BIT OF CONSISTENCY HERE WITH EXACTLY WHAT IS ACROSS THE STREET AND WHAT HAS BEEN BUILT, THAT'S THE PROBLEM I HAVE. OTHER THAN THAT, I'M GOOD WITH THIS. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT SPEAKER. SANITIZE THAT LECTERN. GO AHEAD, SIR. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. PHIL SCHLOSSESNICKEL. I'VE GOT A PRESENTATION ON MY LAPTOP HERE, SO I WANT TO SHOW THAT TO YOU. CAN YOU GUYS SEE THAT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN. >> ALL RIGHT. AS WAS SHOWN PRIOR, THIS IS THE GENERAL VIEW OF THE INTERSECTION HERE, SAN PEDRO AND DALE MABRY, LOOKING NORTH ON DALE MABRY, YOU'VE GOT TERRA LAWN HOMES ON THE LEFT. THAT IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION. TB HOMES ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER, AND THIS IS MY HOUSE OVER HERE IN THE SHADOW OF THE TREE HERE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT IS RIGHT HERE ON THIS SOUTHEAST CORNER. AS YOU CAN SEE -- WELL, MY WIFE AND I HAVE LIVED HERE COMING UP ON 22 YEARS. WHEN WE FIRST MOVED HERE, THIS WAS A SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE. IT WAS ACTUALLY NEIL BARTLEY REALTY. THIS WAS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT EVENTUALLY BECAME A RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND THEN WAS TORN DOWN AND BECAME -- THESE ARE BOTH PDs, TWO-STORY OFFICES, PARKING ON THE GROUND FLOOR, OFFICE ON THE SECOND FLOOR. THIS IS WHAT'S PROPOSED. FULL THREE-STORY WITH A PARTIAL FOUR STORY -- THIS IS KIND OF GENERALEEEEL FOR WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT. AGAIN, I LIVE HERE. MARK, WHO JUST SPOKE, LIVES HERE. WE'VE GOT THE GREEN ARE OFFICES. ONE AND TWO STORY O OFFICES. THESE ARE TWO STORY OFFICES. EVERYTHING AROUND I THIS ONE STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDCECE, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE HERE. MARK'S HOUSE IS 18 FEET TO THE RIDGE H HIS ROOF. AGAIN, THIS IS PPOPOSED TO BE 36 TO 45 FEET TALL. STST FOR PERSPTITIVE PURPOSES. AGAIN, HERE'KIKIND OF A GENERAL YOYOUT OF THE FOUR PROPERTIES AT THE CORNER. THIS ONE IS STILL A RESIDENTI 130 FEET WIDE. THIS ONE IS TERRA LAWN H HOMES, 105 FTT HOM TB HOMES 80 FEET HE.E. SUBJECT PROPERTY ONLY 75 FEET WIDE. YOU NN SEE THE PROPODD FOOTPRINT, 4217 SQUARE FEET, ON A BIGGER LOT, ALMOST AS BIG AS THIS ONE. AND YOU CAN SEE THE SETBACKS AND HERE'S, ASR.R. MICHELINI ADDED, THIS WAS INITIALLY GOINGOO BE A FOUROOOOT BUFFER. I MET WHH OERER OF MILAA HOMES LAST NIGHT. SAID IWOWOULD B BE MOVED FRR FEET T TO THEORORTH, WHICH WOULD GI Y YOU A FIVE-FOOT SETBACK BEEEEEN THE DEE MABRY GHGHT-OF-WAY AND THE BUILDIN SO I'M CCECERNED ABOUT THE LINE OF SIG HE.E. ALREADY SNN OUR FAIR SHAREF'VE ACDEDENTS AT THI I INTERSECTION, ANIIHIHINK THAT WOUL BE DANGERSS THERE. STST FOR C COMPARISON PURSESES, IT'S SUPSESED TO BE 15-OTOT SETBAC FROM THE DALE MABRY RIGHT--W-WAY. -F-FOOT BUFFER O THEOUOUTH AND EAST SESES. THAT WLDLD BE - WITH NO W WAIRSS REIRIRED, THE GREENREREA T THER, WHAT'SEIEING PROPOSED ISS A LITTLE M MOR THAN ONANAND A HFF E WITHOU T THE WAIVERS. THS WHWHAT HAS B BEEN -- WHAT WAS PROVIDED TO ME A ACTUALLY LT R E OTHERDJACENENTFFFFICE BLDLDIN.. WHAT ISOSOST CRITICAL T THE MAMUMUMUIUILDING HEITT ALLLLOWE. 35 F FEE THEY WAN TO GO 45 F FEET, A NOT ONLY 4 FEET WI A A PCHCHED ROOF BU VERTIL.L. COMPARED T TO T OTHER P PROPERTS ON THE O OER CNENERS, YOU CAN SE. E PROPTYTYEXT T TO M ME, WHICH I BELIEV IS SUPPEDEDO BE IN THE BACKGROUND THERE, BUT THE I I NO BUILDINGHAHA BIGIG IN T T THISIS WOULD BE BY F,, BY FAR T TALLTT BUILDINININ T WHOLELE 'S N NOTONONSIENENT AT ALL W WH. THETHER BUILDLDINGS PROBOBABLY A ABO 2 25EEEET. OF THE R ROOF.T SEE THE PEA ALL YOUEEEE ISHE GUTTER LE,E, EE EDGDGE OFHEHEOOF. SO I IGINE STATANDINNN SAN DRDR HEREE ISHEHE ONE ON THEG . YOU U CANEEEEOW M MUCH HIGHER IT .. NOW, ON LELEABRYRY, THEY ARE PUININ IT F FE FEET OFF O OF T PO TA,, RELATATIVEL SPEININMEME LANCNCEY LAST N NIG AUTUTHEHEDON ALLL T TO QUALIFYORORLOT I IS TO NINI, AND D THE F F I IS TOO GRGREAT. SO I WOU J JUSTSK T TTSY COUNCILASAS D DONE IHEAST, MANINISCAL,,ND M MANDA, THIS WASA T YOU GSS M MAD T THE RIGHT DECIOO TH A P PITCH R ROO L LIKE ISISIG IT'S'SOT BTETER L LKING A AT ATAT THANNT WOULDE A A THRHREE STSTORY B BLDININ A AND INNR.DOS SE, FOURTORY, , SHEE WL L ETET TALL. I WLDLDSK THE C COUNC,, MODIDIFIEDHE P PPOSEDDUIUIINGGE SURROUNDING G PRERERES.HE >>GUO O NISCALCO: THANANK UU VEVERY MH.H. ANYBYY ELSE FOR P PLIC COCOMMEN DO WEE HEENYBODYDYEGEGTEREDO THE CLCLERK: WE DID, BUTUT THEY PEAREDEDN N RSON. GUIDO MANISCALAL: OKAY.Y. VERYOOOO COUNCIL MEMEMBER B BORE WE G TOO REBUTTALAL? >>ORNDNDGUDES: WE DONON H HE A PHOTOTO T GENTLEMEM JUST HAD? GUGUO MANISCALCO: : TH W W A >>JOHN D DINGFDEDE: COUNCILMAN GUDES, WERER YOU DONE? >>ORLALAO GUGUS: [INAUDIBLBLE] JOHNHNINGFELDER: ININ LOOKING AT IS, I REAEALIZE THAT THERER WAS . , C CARLY, A PD O OFFIC IS THE APPROPRIRIE USE FOR THIS LOCATION.. THERE'S NO DOUBT ABOUTHAHA STENEN BUTHEN I WASAS LOOKINGNG AT THE S SE P PLA IT DIDI JUMP OUOU ATTE AS 4545 F FT. AND D WE KNONO 35 F FT I TYPICACA F F ALL THEESIDENTIAL, SISILE-FAMILY RESESENTITI IN THE NEIGHBORHOHO, AND MOST,T LEAST AS FARARS T TESTIMONY W W J JT HEARD,D, U UP AND DOWN DADAABRY, EVEN W WN IT I IS OFFICE,E, IT'S STILL - -- IT STILL SEEMS TOOE LIMIMID TO 35 FEET. KNOW THAT YOUOU C CENT, A LOT OF G GD PEOPLE DON'T HAVE PROBOBM WITH T TT AT ALL BUT I DE NECESSITY IS S R THE 45 FEET. ARGUMENT FROROHE GENENEMANUASIVE CATTY-CORNERERCROSS THE STRTRT T. E OTHERERUESTION I HAD ISO ANSPORTATION.. I DON'T KNOW IFF ANYBODY IS STIL WITH US. IS MR. SCOTT IS IT ILLLL WITH U? >> YEAEA I'M STILL HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDEDE: I CAN'T SEE YOU, BUT I DON'T KNOW I IF THAT >> WE COULD CHANGE ITTROM T T BE ABLE T SEE HIM. T MEETING. ININHE CONTROLOOM, IF YOU CAN CH. >>GUIDO MANINIALCO: IF WE CAN SESETHE OTHER GENTLEMAN. >>JOHN DINGFGFDER: I KNOW MR. SHELBY LIKIK US TO SEE PEOPLE WHO ARE TESTIFYING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: Y Y'RE TALKING TO JONATHAN SCOTT. IF WE CAN PULL UP MR. SCOTT'S'S SCREEN. THTHE WE A A. THANK YOU. >> CAN YOU SEE MEOW? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: H H, JONATHAN. THE QUEUEION WAS RAISED BY THE NEIGHBOR ABOUT THE SITE LININ AD THEIR REQUEST T TO COME FIVE FET WITHTH THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE DALE MABRYRY SIDE. DOES THAT GIVE YOU ANY CONCERN IN TERMS OF VISIBILITY COMING OUT OF THAT SIDE STREET? >> THEY ARE FAR ENOUGH OVER. WE TYPICALLY LOOK AT THAT IN OUR REVIEW. 14 FEET BACK AS YOU TRAVEL THAT STOP SIGN AND THEY ARE WELL FARTHER -- CLOSER BY 20 FEET. NOT A SITE OBSTRUCTION -- NOT A SIGHT OBSTRUCTION FOR VEHICLES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU EVALUATED THE SIGHT TRIANGLE AND ALL THAT. >> OH, ABSOLUTELY. WE HAD THEM PUT A NOTE ON THE SITE PLAN TO NOT PUT ANY LANDSCAPING THERE, TOO, THAT MIGHT CAUSE SIGHT OBSTRUCTION. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, JONATHAN. THE HEIGHT QUESTION REALLY FALLS BACK TO YOU, MR. MICHELINI. WHAT IS THE NECESSITY TO ADD THAT ADDITIONAL TEN FEET THAT SEEMS TO BE A BIT OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE REST OF THE SURROUNDING. >>STEVE MICHELINI: MR. DINGFELDER, WHAT WE HAVE TO DO, AND THIS WAS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT THE NEIGHBORS RAISED. THIS EVENING.EY RAISED IT AGAIN- THE PLANNING COMMISSION ALSO RAISED THIS ISSUE AS WELL AS CITY STAFF. AND WHAT WE WERE PROPOSING TO DO AND WHAT WE'VE BEEN ASKED TO DO WAS TO LOCATE THAT 45 FEET STRUCTURE MORE CLEARLY ON THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THE CONCEPT WAS TO PUSH IT TOWARD DALE MABRY SO THAT IT WAS AN IDENTIFICATION, AN ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE, AND IT ALSO WAS DESIGNED TO HIDE THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND MOVING IT AWAY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE AND PUSHING IT OVER TOWARD DALE MABRY. SO THAT WAS THE CONCEPT. AND WHEN WE WENT THROUGH THE DESIGN PROCESS, WE REVISED THE SITE PLAN, BUT WE WERE INSIDE THE 14 DAYS. SO YOU'RE NOT ABLE TO SEE IT. AT LEAST NOT BEEN ABLE TO BE PRESENTED TO YOU AT THIS POINT. BUT WE WERE MAKING THOSE MODIFICATIONS, AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WERE MONITORING THE TESTIMONY WHEN YOU WERE IN THE OTHER ROOM, BUT THERE WERE OTHER THINGS THAT WE COMMITTED TO THAT ARE NOT ON THE SITE PLAN LIKE THE EIGHT FOOT MASONRY WALL, TRYING TO ORIENT THE BUILDING AND THE ROOFTOP SO THAT IT DID NOT DISTURB THE RESIDENCES ON THE EAST SIDE. THE LAST SPEAKER IS NOT THE ONE MOST DIRECTLY AFFECTED. IF YOU LOOK AT THE OVERHEAD, HIS PROPERTY IS OVER HERE. MR. ODOM IS HERE, AND MR. ODOM IS THE ONE WHO WE WERE WORKING WITH VERY CLOSELY. AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE AERIAL, THE OTHER CORNERS ALL HAVE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. I THINK THEY ARE A LITTLE BIT HIGHER THAN 35 FEET, BUT THEY ARE NOT 45. I UNDERSTAND THAT. SO WE CAN GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARDS, AND IF YOU'RE WILLING TO GIVE US THE OPPORTUNITY ON FIRST READING TO COME BACK WITH A REVISED PLAN THAT CLEARLY SHOWS WHERE THOSE DEFINED AREAS ARE FOR HEIGHT AND ALSO INCORPORATE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE WAIVERS AND THE REQUESTED CHANGES THAT THEY HAVE AND ALSO TO ADD THE OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT WE'VE MADE TO THE NEIGHBORS AS RECENTLY AS YESTERDAY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST ONE FOLLOW-UP QUESTION, MR. CHAIRMAN. MR. MICHELINI, DO YOU HAVE AN ESTIMATE ON HOW MANY SQUARE FEET OR EVEN LINEAR FEET COMING OFF OF DALE MABRY YOUR 40-FOOT APPENDAGE WOULD ULTIMATELY BE? ARE YOU FOLLOWING ME? ARE WE TALKING ABOUT JUST A LITTLE TEN-FOOT SECTION THAT'S GOING TO BE 45 FEET AND THEN THE REST OF THE WIDTH OF THE BUILDING WOULD BE 35 OR WHAT? HALF AND HALF? THE DRAWING I SEE RIGHT NOW LOOKS LIKE IT'S ABOUT HALF AND HALF. >>STEVE MICHELINI: YEAH, THE DRAWING NEEDS TO BE FIXED. WE WERE THINKING ABOUT 30 FEET ALONG SAN PEDRO, AND THEN THE FRONTAGE OF DALE MABRY. AND THAT WOULD BE ENOUGH TO INCORPORATE THE MECHANICAL, ALL OF THE STAIRWELL ACCESSES THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE. BUT AS I COMMITTED TO THE NEIGHBORS IN OUR DISCUSSIONS THIS EVENING, IT WASN'T INTENDED TO GO ALL THE WAY DOWN SAN PEDRO TO OBSTRUCT ANYTHING DOWN THERE. AND MR. ODOM WAS CONCERNED ABOUT BLOCKING THE SUNLIGHT ON THE BACK SIDE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MAYBE YOU'D LIKE A CONTINUANCE SO YOU CAN REFINE IT AND COME BACK FOR FIRST READING. I'M SURE MR. SHELBY IS GOING TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF HEARTBURN IF WE LEAVE IT SO VAGUE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. AS A MATTER OF FACT, HE'S NODDING IN FRONT OF ME. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IT'S A QUESTION FOR LaCHONE DOCK, I THINK IS APPROPRIATE. THAT WOULD BE MY ADVICE. I DO HAVE THAT CONCERN. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OTHERWISE, I'M OKAY WITH IT. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, LaCHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THE CHANGES WHICH ARE PROPOSED COULD REQUIRE HIM TO COME BACK FOR FIRST READING AGAIN. IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT AMENDING THE HEIGHT, YOU HAVE THE WALL PLACEMENT. THESE ARE CHANGES WHICH WOULD NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY THE REVIEWING STAFF, AND THEN BROUGHT BACK BEFORE COUNCIL FOR FIRST READING AGAIN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: JUST LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN AND VIEWING SOME OF THE VISUAL PHOTOS, WHAT I SEE, THIS IS WAY OUT OF THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO I'M HOPING THAT MR. MICHELINI WOULD BE INCLINED TO GET WITH HIS CLIENT AND COME BACK WITH A CONTINUANCE. AGAIN, THAT'S ON HIM. FROM WHAT I CAN SEE RIGHT NOW, IT DOESN'T LOOK THAT THIS PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO I WOULD ASK THAT MR. MICHELINI THINK ABOUT THAT CONTINUANCE. >>STEVE MICHELINI: THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD SAY, COUNCILMAN, IS THAT THE.NEIGHBORHOOD IS THE BUFFERING SITE AND THE MAIN CONCERN HERE IS THAT IT IS A DALE MABRY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. NOW, WE CAN WORK ON THE OTHER ISSUES. IF THE COUNCIL WISHES FOR US -- I MEAN, WE WOULD CONSIDER A CONTINUANCE TO WORK OUT THESE VARIOUS DESIGN ISSUES RELATED TO THE PROPERTY. BUT THE USE IS DEFINITELY COMPATIBLE. THE LOCATION AND HOW WE OPERATE IT IS ALSO COMPATIBLE WITH EVERYTHING UP AND DOWN DALE MABRY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IS 30 DAYS ENOUGH FOR YOU, MR. MICHELINI, AND FOR STAFF? >>STEVE MICHELINI: I'D LIKE TO GET BACK IN AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. I THINK THEY WOULD HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO WEEKS, SO 30 DAYS WOULD PROBABLY BE APPROPRIATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: APRIL 22nd. IT'S ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE, BUT IT'S A PRETTY LIGHT AGENDA. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO MOVED. >>LaCHONE DOCK: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, ON APRIL 22nd, THERE ARE SIX CASES TOTAL RIGHT NOW. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: FOUR AB SALES, ONE REZONING, AND ONE PLAN AMENDMENT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO MOVED. >>STEVE MICHELINI: IF I COULD REQUEST THAT WE GO EARLY IN THE SESSION, IF THAT'S POSSIBLE, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE HAVE NEIGHBORS THAT ARE INTERESTED IN OUR CHANGES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. WHAT WE'LL DO, WE HAVE THE PLAN AMENDMENT AT 5:01. AT 6 P.M., WE'LL PUT YOU FIRST ON THE AGENDA. >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. THAT'S APRIL 22. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT'S MY MOTION, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO APRIL 22nd AT 6 P.M. FIRST ON THE AGENDA WITH THE 6 P.M. HEARING. MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER GUDES. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? GREAT. >>STEVE MICHELINI: MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I COULD HAVE A POINT OF JUST A PRIVILEGE HERE TO GIVE A SHOUT-OUT TO LaCHONE DOCK. SHE IS LEAVING THE CITY. SHE WILL BE A GREAT LOSS. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO THANK HER FOR ALL OF HER DEDICATION AND HARD WORK IN HELPING MAKE THIS A BETTER PLACE TO LIVE, WORK, AND PLAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I'LL MAKE A MOTION AT THE END OF THE MEETING TO GIVE LaCHONE A COMMENDATION NEXT THURSDAY BECAUSE HER LAST DAY IS THE 16th. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE'RE ALL DISAPPOINTED. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU ALL. I APPRECIATE IT. >>STEVE MICHELINI: SHE WILL BE SORELY MISSED AND THANK HER FOR ALL HER HARD WORK. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: TWO MORE CASES. ITEM NUMBER 10. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM NUMBER 10 IS REZ 21-19. FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2717 WEST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. THE APPLICANT IS REPRESENTED BY TRUETT GARDNER. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM CG TO PD FOR RETAIL SALES CONVENIENCE GOODS AND GASOLINE. I'LL GO AHEAD AND TURN IT OVER TO DAVID HEY. ONCE HE'S FINISHED, IF I COULD HAVE IT BACK TO COMPLETE MY REPORT. THANK YOU. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS. DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. HOPEFULLY DO I NOT CUT OUT. MY COMPUTER IS STARTING TO ACT UP. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S GETTING TIRED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE'VE GOT YOU. GO AHEAD, SIR. >>DAVID HEY: IF I DISAPPEAR, THAT'S WHAT'S HAPPENED. THE NEXT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT AND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE -- IN THE PLAZA TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE SUBJECT SITE DUE TO THE LAND USE CATEGORY AND THE CORRIDOR THAT IS ALONG, IT'S WITHIN A MIXED USE AND TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR. THERE'S SPECIFIC POLICY DIRECTION FOR THOSE CORRIDORS IN THE COMP PLAN. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT. THERE IS TRANSIT AVAILABLE ON WEST HILLSBOROUGH. AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE. HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS WEST HILLSBOROUGH. WE HAVE NORTH HABANA AVENUE, MOHAWK IS TO THE NORTH BEHIND THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS THE HILLSBOROUGH PLAZA WITH THE PUBLIX IN IT AT THE CORNER OF HABANA AND HILLSBOROUGH. YOU COULD SEE THIS PORTION OF HILLSBOROUGH IS HEAVILY COMMERCIALIZED, ALSO OVER TO THE ARMENIA, THERE'S LOTS OF COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE USES ALONG THIS SEGMENT. ONCE YOU GET -- ONCE YOU GO NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, THERE IS SOME MULTIFAMILY, BUT THE PREDOMINANT PATTERN IS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO THE NORTH. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE AND PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST ARE ALL IN THAT PINK COLOR. THAT'S THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35, DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH IN THAT BROWN IS THE RESIDENTIAL 35. THAT'S WHERE THAT MULTIFAMILY THAT WE SAW IS, AND THEN THE TAN IS THAT RESIDENTIAL 10. OVER ON THE NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE CORRIDOR, THE BRIGHT RED REPRESENTS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35. AGAIN, PARCELS ARE UTILIZED FOR COMMERCIAL USES TO THE EAST, SOUTH, AND WEST. SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES FIND THE PROPOSED USE OF THE SITE CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. TYPICALLY WITHIN MIXED USE DISTRICTS CORRIDORS BUILDINGS SHALL BE PLACED CLOSE TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PARKING SHALL BE PLACED AT THE REAR OF THE DEVELOPMENT. DUE TO THE UNIQUE NATURE OF OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH GAS STATIONS, THERE ARE CHALLENGES WITH PLACING THE PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE CLOSE TO WEST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE AND PARKING AT THE REAR OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE APPLICANT HAS ADDRESSED THE MIXED USE CORRIDORS POLICIES TO THE BEST OF THEIR ABILITY. PROPOSED PD PROVIDES INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS WITHIN THE SITE TO ENSURE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND ACCESSIBILITY TO THE AMENITIES ON-SITE. PER LAND USE POLICY 15.2.7, IT DOES ENCOURAGE BUILDINGS TO BE CONNECTED TO SIDEWALK NETWORKS AND TO PROVIDE SHADE TREES ALONG PORTIONS OF WEST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF WOULD ENCOURAGE THE APPLICANT TO ADDRESS THIS POLICY DIRECTION BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READING. IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. I SHOULD NOTE THE PLAN THAT WE REVIEWED HAD VEHICULAR ACCESS ON MOHAWK DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE MULTIFAMILY, AND THAT'S THE ONE THAT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED. THERE ARE TWO SITE PLANS WITHIN YOUR PACKET THAT WE SAW. THE ONLY ONE THAT WE REVIEWED WAS THE ONE THAT HAD THE ACCESS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE MULTIFAMILY. THIS PROPOSED PD IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. LaCHONE. CHAIRMAN. IF I MAY SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST A POINT OF ORDER, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU. I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED, MR. HEY MADE REFERENCE TO TWO SITE PLANS. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE LOOKING AT THE RIGHT SITE PLAN. IF THERE ARE TWO OR HOW THEY DISTINGUISH ONE FROM THE OTHER? ARE THEY DATED DIFFERENT? THERE'S ONLY ONE MOVING -- IS ONLY ONE MOVING FORWARD OR TWO OF THEM MOVING FORWARD? >>LaCHONE DOCK: THIS IS LaCHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. LET ME TAKE A LOOK AT THE RECORD AND SEE IF MORE THAN ONE SITE PLAN WAS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. WE TYPICALLY GO WITH THE SITE PLAN THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND DISTRIBUTED FOR DRC REVIEW. IS THAT THE SITE PLAN, DAVID, THAT YOU USED, THE ONE DISCUSSED AT DRC? >>DAVID HEY: THERE ARE TWO WITHIN THE CITY'S PACKET. ONE -- I'M LOOKING AT ONE RIGHT NOW. IT HAS AN ACCESS POINT ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PARCEL ONTO MOHAWK DIRECTLY SOUTH OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. THEN THERE'S ANOTHER SITE PLAN, I THINK THESE MAY HAVE BEEN DONE WITH AUTO TURN WITH TRANSPORTATION. THIS ONE, IT HAS THE ACCESS FURTHER TO THE WEST ALONG MOHAWK DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE MULTIFAMILY, AND THAT'S THE ONE THAT WE HAVE REVIEWED IN THE FILE. >>LaCHONE DOCK: SO WHAT HAPPENED IS -- LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. APPLICANT HAD TO SUBMIT FOR REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION TO NATURAL RESOURCES. SO THAT'S WHY YOU SEE THE ADDITIONAL SITE PLANS. BUT THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN WOULD BE THE ONE SHOWING THE EXITS. BECAUSE ONE IS THE REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION AND THE APPLICANT CAN CERTAINLY CONFIRM THE ACCESS POINTS SHOULD BE TO THE NORTH, THE EAST AND SOUTH. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IF AND WHEN WE APPROVE THE PD SITE PLAN THAT WE KNOW WHICH ONE WE'RE APPROVING. >> MR. DINGFELDER, I CAN CLARIFY AND SA DAVID, I THINK THE ONE YOU'RE LOOKING AT IS THE ONE THAT HAD THE ACCESS POINT ON THE EAST SIDE OF MOHAWK ACROSS FROM SINGLE-FAMILY. >>DAVID HEY: CORRECT. >> TALKING TO RYAN THE OTHER DAY, I THINK HE LEFT THAT ONE IN JUST TO SHOW THE EVOLUTION OF THE SITE PLAN, AND THAT THE ACCESS POINT HAS BEEN MOVED WEST. AND TO YOUR POINT, ACROSS FROM THE MULTIFAMILY IN ORDER TO BE AS SENSITIVE AS POSSIBLE TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTS BEHIND. JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANKS FOR THE CLARIFICATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LaCHONE, GO AHEAD. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, THANK YOU. LaCHONE DOCK WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. SO WITH THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU, THIS PD REQUEST, THERE ARE A TOTAL OF FIVE WAIVERS REQUESTED. THREE OF THE WAIVERS ARE RELATED TO NATURAL RESOURCES, AND THEN THERE'S A WAIVER THAT IS REQUESTED REGARDING THE REDUCTION OF THE BUILDING SETBACK ON WEST MOHAWK, AND THEN THERE'S A WAIVER REQUESTED TO ALLOW COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC ACCESS TO THE LOCAL STREET, WHICH IS ON MOHAWK AND TAMPANIA. AND THE PETITIONER IS PROPOSING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT A 4,745 SQUARE FOOT STRUCTURE WITH THE PROPOSED USE OF RETAIL SALES FOR CONVENIENCE GOODS AND GASOLINE SALES. THE SUBJECT SITE CONTAINS 59,759 SQUARE FEET OR 1.37 ACRES. IT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE AND NORTH HABANA AVENUE. SO THE SITE ENCOMPASSES THAT ENTIRE BLOCK. IT'S BOUNDED BY TAMPANIA TO THE WEST, MOHAWK TO THE NORTH, AND AS DAVID HAS SHOWN YOU, THIS SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY USES, AND THEN ALONG THE MAIN COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR OF HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE, YOU HAVE YOUR COMMERCIAL USES. THE VEHICULAR ACCESS IS PROPOSED ON MOHAWK AVENUE, TAMPANIA, AND HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. THE CONVENIENCE STORE WILL BE LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE WITH ACCESSORY CAR WASH PROPOSED ON THE WEST, SURFACE PARKING SURROUNDING THE BUILDING. THE PROPOSED SETBACKS ARE TO THE SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST 10 FEET AND TO THE NORTH 8 FEET. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 23 FEET. THE PROPOSED USE REQUIRES 29 PARKING SPACES AND 40 SPACES ARE PROVIDED. AND THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE. AND THIS IS THE SITE THAT IS OUTLINED HERE IN RED. THIS IS HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. AND THEN THIS IS NORTH HABANA AVENUE, WHICH IS WEST ON THE SITE, AND THIS IS MOHAWK AVENUE. AND THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. AND I WANT TO JUST CONFIRM WITH THE APPLICANT, IS THIS YOUR FINAL SITE PLAN, TRUETT? >>TRUETT GARDNER: THAT IS CORRECT YES. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THIS IS THE SITE PLAN. HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. HABANA AVENUE ON THE WEST AND MOHAWK AVENUE ON THE NORTH AND TAMPANIA AVENUE IS ON THE EAST. SO YOU CAN SEE THE VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS THAT ARE LOCATED OFF OF MOHAWK. WITH THE ACCESS POINT ON HILLSBOROUGH BEING THE ENTRANCE ONLY, AND THEN ON THE EAST, THE TAMPANIA VEHICULAR ACCESS POINT IS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS. THE PROPOSED STORE WILL BE LOCATED AT THIS LOCATION ALMOST CENTER TO THE SITE WITH THE GASOLINE PUMPS LOCATED HERE ALONG WITH THE CANOPIES. AND THE PROPOSED CAR WASH WILL BE LOCATED TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE. THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS THAT ARE PROPOSED. THIS IS THE FRONT ELEVATION, AND THEN ON THE BOTTOM LEFT IS THE LEFT SIDE ELEVATION, AND THEN ON THE RIGHT SIDE IS THE FRONT AND THEN THE LEFT SIDE ELEVATION. AND THEN ALSO WHAT'S BEEN PROVIDED ARE ELEVATIONS FOR THE ACTUAL CANOPIES LOCATED ON-SITE, AND THEN THE CAR WASH, THE NORTH, EAST, SOUTH, AND WEST ELEVATIONS. HERE ARE PICTURES OF THE SITE. SO THIS IS THE EXISTING SITE. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS AT THE CORNER OF HABANA, AND THEN THIS IS FURTHER EAST ON THE SITE, THIS VIEW, AND THIS IS ON THE NORTH END OF THE SITE, THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT. THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE AND THEN ALSO THE WEST END OF THE SITE. THIS IS ON HABANA. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE WEST END OF THE SITE ON HABANA ON THE LEFT, AND THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT SHOWS THE USE WEST OF THE SITE, THE COMMERCIAL USE, WHICH IS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HABANA AND HILLSBOROUGH. AND THEN WE COME BACK AROUND NORTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY IN THE LEFT PICTURE, AND THEN THE PICTURES TO THE -- THE MIDDLE PICTURE AND THE RIGHT PICTURE ARE THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AS YOU'RE HEADING EAST. BUT THESE ARE ALL NORTH OF THE SITE. THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS NORTHEAST OF THE SITE, A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS EAST OF THE SITE. AND THEN THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE ACROSS WEST HILLSBOROUGH, YOUR COMMERCIAL USES THAT ARE LOCATED AND THE STRIP CENTER AND THEN ON THE OUTPARCELS. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FINDS IT INCONSISTENT WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. PLEASE REFER TO THE FINDINGS FROM TRANSPORTATION. IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL TO GRANT THE APPROVAL AND THE WAIVERS REQUESTED, THERE ARE SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MR. GARDNER, IF YOU CAN RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, WE DIDN'T SWEAR YOU IN. >>THE CLERK: DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. >>TRUETT GARDNER: I DO. >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR. >>TRUETT GARDNER: TRUETT GARDNER, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE. IF I COULD, I'VE GOT A BRIEF VISUAL PRESENTATION, SO I WANT TO SHARE MY SCREEN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR. >>TRUETT GARDNER: CAN YOU SEE THAT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. >>TRUETT GARDNER: TRUETT GARDNER, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE. I HAVE THE PLEASURE BEING HERE ON BEHALF OF RKM DEVELOPMENT. INTENDED USE AND REQUESTED DENSITY ARE ALREADY PERMITTED SO THE REZONING LARGELY ADDRESSES SITE CHALLENGES WITH THIS USE. I'LL BE BRIEF. WE'VE SUBMITTED SUPPORTING MEMOS IN ADVANCE OF THE HEARING. WE'RE NOT AWARE OF ANY OPPOSITION. LASTLY, WE HAVE NO OBJECTIONS FROM STAFF, EXCEPT FOR ONE TECHNICAL OBJECTION, WHICH I'LL ADDRESS. THIS SLIDE, DAVID AND LaCHONE DID A GREAT JOB OF GOING THROUGH JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME CONTEXT, THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND THEN THESE ARE THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF HABANA AND HILLSBOROUGH. AND THEN, UNFORTUNATELY, THE CHURCH THAT YOU SAW HAS BEEN ABANDONED AND HAS FALLEN INTO DISREPAIR. UNFORTUNATELY, NOW IT'S BEING USED REALLY AS A TRASH DUMP, AS WELL AS A HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT. SO JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU TRUE FLAVOR FOR WHAT THIS SITE CURRENTLY IS. OUR PROPOSAL, AND THIS IS OUR LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN IS TO REDEVELOP THE SITE WITH A NEW PROTOTYPE, 7-ELEVEN WITH CO-LOCATED RESTAURANT. WE WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH NATURAL RESOURCES ON THE LANDSCAPING TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S THOUGHTFUL AND LUSH AND ROBUST. SO THAT'S THE PLAN YOU SEE HERE. WE DO HAVE FIVE WAIVERS, AND THE ONE THAT I WANTED TO SPEND TIME WITH IS THE LAST ONE, WHICH IS THE ALLOWANCE OF COMMERCIAL ACCESS ON LOCAL STREETS. AND THE AERIAL IMAGE YOU'RE SEEING ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE OF THE SCREEN WITH THE YELLOW AREAS IS THE CURRENT CONFIGURATION. AS YOU'LL NOTE, THERE ARE CURRENTLY SIX ACCESS POINTS, TWO ON HILLSBOROUGH, ONE ON HABANA, TWO ON THE LOCAL STREET OF MOHAWK, AND THEN ONE ON TAMPANIA. WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING WAS LARGELY DICTATED BY F.D.O.T. AND JUST TO GO THROUGH, FIRST OF ALL, WHAT THEY DICTATED AND THEN, SECONDLY, WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING, BUT, IN GENERAL, IS TAKING THE SIX ACCESS POINTS AND REDUCING THEM TO THREE, ACTUALLY TWO AND A HALF, WHAT F.D.O.T. DICTATED TO US IS ABSOLUTELY NO ACCESS AT ALL ON HABANA, AND THEN AS IT RELATES TO HILLSBOROUGH, RIGHT-IN ONLY, BUT NO ABILITY TO EGRESS FROM THE SITE SO THAT LEFT US WITH NO ALTERNATIVE OTHER THAN TO HAVE ACCESS ON MOHAWK AND THEN TAMPANIA. AS YOU SAW FROM THE PICTURE FROM LaCHONE, THE ACCESS HERE ON TAMPANIA IS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM COMMERCIAL ACCESS. THIS IS A CRYSTAL FAST FOOD RESTAURANT. SO IT'S DIRECTLY ALIGNED WITH THAT, WHICH WE THOUGHT WAS SENSITIVE. AND THEN AS IT RELATES TO MOHAWK AND AS DAVID WAS MENTIONING BEFORE, THERE ARE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, ONE WAS HERE, THE OTHER ONE WAS HERE. SO WHAT WE TRIED TO DO IS MOVE THAT ACCESS POINT AS FAR WEST AS POSSIBLE TO BE IMMEDIATELY ACROSS FROM THIS MULTIFAMILY USE DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM US ON MOHAWK, WHICH IS DEEMED TO BE A COMMERCIAL USE. SO THAT'S THE ONE OBJECTION THAT WE HAD. WITH THAT, WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. BUT I JUST WANTED TO COVER THAT ONE LOOSE END. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, THERE'S NOBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR, BUT I WILL ASK, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT IN PERSON? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED FOR ITEM NUMBER 10. >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST A COMMENT BEFORE YOU CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. GARDNER, I JUST WANTED TO -- IT'S SAD TO SEE ANY CHURCH OR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION GETTING TORN DOWN, BUT I HAVE NOTICED THAT IT WAS ABANDONED IN RECENT TIMES. I WANTED TO COMMEND YOU AND YOUR TEAM ABOUT MOVING THAT ENTRANCE AND BEING MORE SENSITIVE TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME BEHIND IT. I THINK MOVING IT OVER TO THE WEST IS THE APPROPRIATE PLACE TO GO. SO THANK YOU. >>TRUETT GARDNER: APPRECIATE IT. IT WAS A TOUGH SITE TO CONFIGURE BUT THEY DID A GREAT JOB OF DOING IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAD A MOTION TO CLOSE AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. >>THE CLERK: WHO WAS THE SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: CARLSON. >>THE CLERK: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 10? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SURE. >> JOHN, CAN YOU HEAR ME? SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU RIGHT BEFORE A GOOD MOTION, BUT TWO THINGS I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN'T MENTION. IN THE STAFF REPORT, WHICH I DID CONFIRM -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE NEED A MOTION TO REOPEN THE HEARING. MOTION FOR CITRO TO REOPEN, SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE. GO AHEAD, SIR. >>TRUETT GARDNER: I JUST WANTED TO BE COMPLETELY CANDID AND MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE HERE. THE STAFF REPORT HAS THE NORTHERN SETBACK OF SIX FEET AND I KNOW LaCHONE IN HER PRESENTATION MENTIONED IT AS EIGHT. I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT IS SIX FEET. SO THE STAFF REPORT IS CORRECT THERE. CAN I UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM. I NOTICED IT TODAY. THE SITE PLAN AND THE DATA TABLE STATES 8 FEET BUT IT'S SHOWN ON THE DRAWING AS 6 FEET. I WANT TO CLARIFY THAT, AND THEN SECONDLY, WE HAVE WORKED WITH NATURAL RESOURCES CURRENTLY THE WAIVER IS TO REMOVE THREE GRAND OAKS, BUT THAT HAS NOW BEEN REDUCED TO TWO. JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THERE WERE NO SURPRISES WHEN WE REVISE THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I MAY, MR. CHAIRMAN, MARTIN SHELBY. DOES THAT HAVE TO BE NOTATED DURING THE MOTION, MS. DOCK? OR IS THAT ON THE -- I BELIEVE THAT'S AN ADDITION TO THE REVISION SHEET, THOSE CORRECTIONS, IS THAT CORRECT? >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THE CHANGES MENTIONED BY THE APPLICANT WOULD BE IN ADDITION TO THE CHANGES ALREADY REQUESTED TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF THAT COULD BE PART OF THE MOTION, PLEASE, MR. DINGFELDER. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, PLEASE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE. >> MOVE TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES. ALL IN FAVOR? COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MOVE THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO REZ 21-19, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 2717 WEST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION CG, COMMERCIAL GENERAL, TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RETAIL SALES, CONVENIENCE GOODS, AND GASOLINE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. AND SPECIFICALLY THAT THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF TO PROVIDE COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AS CONDITIONED AND SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE CITY CODE. FIND THAT THE REQUESTED WAIVERS DO NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE SPECIFICALLY I DO BELIEVE THEY COMPLY WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 27-136, AND THAT THE WAIVERS COMPLY WITH 27-139 PAREN 4. MY MOTION WOULD ALSO INCLUDE MAKING THE CHANGES THAT ARE ON THE STAFF LIST AS WELL AS THE ADDITIONAL CHANGES MENTIONED BY MR. GARDNER TONIGHT. SO MOVED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6th AT 9:30 A.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT. ITEM 11. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THE LAST ITEM FOR THE NIGHT IS REZ 21-20. THIS IS FOR THE PROJECT AREA WHICH IS BOUNDED BY SPRUCE TO THE NORTH, SPRUCE STREET, ROME AVENUE TO THE WEST, NORTH BOULEVARD THE BOUNDARY TO THE EAST AND THEN I-275 IS THE BOUNDARY TO THE SOUTH. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, POINT OF ORDER. JUST SO EVERYBODY CAN GUIDE THEMSELVES ACCORDINGLY, ARE THERE ANY SPEAKERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR, ON THE TELEPHONE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOBODY. JUST THE APPLICANT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WONDERFUL. JUST WANT EVERYBODY TO BE AWARE OF THAT. THANK YOU. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY. THE PROJECT AREA FROM NMU, NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE-35 TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. IT IS TO ALLOW ALL USES ALLOWED IN SECTION 212, TABLE 212.2 WHICH IS THE NMU DISTRICT RETAIL SALES, SHOPPER'S GOODS, DRIVE UP ATM, PRIVATE SCHOOLS, COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY, HOTEL WITH A MAXIMUM OF 200 ROOMS, BANK AND BANK WITH DRIVE-THROUGH ATM. WHAT I'LL DO NOW IS HAND IT OVER TO DAVID HEY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO GIVE HIS REPORT AND THEN IF YOU COULD RETURN TO ME AND I WILL COMPLETE MY REPORT. THANK YOU. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS. DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. WE END THE EVENING IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THIS IS THE WEST RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT AREA. THIS SITE IS SERVED BY HART'S ROUTE 7, WHICH RUNS ALONG WEST MAIN STREET. THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN TWO EVACUATION ZONES, B AND C, AND THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. RECREATION COMPLEX. THAT'S LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE WE HAVE THE JULIAN B. LANE PARK. HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL. WE SHOULD ALL BE FAMILIAR. THIS IS NORTH BOULEVARD, INTERSTATE 275. SOME REDEVELOPMENT IS ALREADY OCCURRING IN WHAT USED TO BE NORTH BOULEVARD HOMES. THIS IS THE HILLSBOROUGH RIVER. BLAKE HIGH SCHOOL IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THIS SALMON COLOR IS THAT NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE-35 CATEGORY. THIS IS THE ONLY LOCATION IN THE ENTIRE CITY THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE-35 CATEGORY IS FOUND. THE BLUE REPRESENTS PUBLIC. THERE'S TWO SCHOOLS LOCATED HERE IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTHWEST, WE HAVE THE RESIDENTIAL 50, AND THEN SOME RESIDENTIAL 20 IN THE LIGHT BROWN, AND THERE'S SOME REPRESENTED BY THE RED, THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WEST OF THE HILLSBOROUGH RIVER, WHICH HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS AN AREA APPROPRIATE FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO ENCOURAGES A MIX OF USES TO SUPPORT WALKING AND THE USE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO SEEKS TO PROVIDE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT NEAR EMPLOYMENT AND PUBLIC TRANSIT OPTIONS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY. THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN PROXIMITY TO THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WITH ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSIT AND WILL FURTHER THE RELATED POLICY DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WILL PROVIDE HOUSING AND RETAIL OPTIONS TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION. THE CITY OF TAMPA DEVELOPED THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES TO IMPLEMENT THE VISION OUTLINED IN THE WEST RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE CATEGORIES ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN NEIGHBORHOOD-SERVING USES. IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, QUOTE, NEIGHBORHOODS SERVING, UNQUOTE, HAS BEEN INTERPRETED AS ALLOWING A MAXIMUM OF COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD USES. THOUGH THE CITY INCLUDED THE TERM NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND USE CATEGORY WHILE CREATING THE NMU ZONING DISTRICTS, SEVERAL USES TYPICALLY DEEMED AS COMMERCIAL GENERAL WERE INCLUDED IN THE NMU TABLE OF USES, WHICH IS IN SECTION 27-212-4 IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN PROVIDES FOR SEVERAL USES THAT ARE NOT PERMITTED IN THE NMU ZONING DISTRICT, SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE RETAIL SALES SHOPPER'S GOODS AND PRIVATE SCHOOLS. THESE TYPICALLY COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE NMU FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES IF THE CITY DEEMS THEM APPROPRIATE UNDER SECTION 27-59 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CURRENTLY ONLY ALLOWS A MAXIMUM OF A 1.0 F.A.R. FOR SINGLE-USE STRUCTURES AND A 1.5 FLOOR AREA RATIO FOR VERTICAL MIXED USE STRUCTURES TO ALLOW GREATER FLEXIBILITY, THE CITY OF TAMPA HAS SUBMITTED A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IN THE FEBRUARY CYCLE PLAN AMENDMENTS TO CLARIFY MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO IN OVERALL PERMITTED USES. SINCE THIS REZONING IS GOING TO HEARING BEFORE THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT, WHICH IS TACPA 21-04, THE APPLICANT HAS INCLUDED LANGUAGE IN THE SITE PLAN, SEE NOTE 11, WHICH WILL ALLOW FLEXIBILITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE AS PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT WORKS THROUGH THE PROCESS. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE UNDER NOTE 11 AND FINDS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE NMU FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES. OVERALL, THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WILL IMPLEMENT THE OVERALL VISION OUTLINED IN THE WEST RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE REZONING WILL PROVIDE FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OVERALL THAT PROVIDES AN INTERCONNECTED GRID OF STREETS WHICH SUPPORTS WALKING AND TRANSIT USAGE. SO BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS AND THE NOTE PROVIDED UNDER NOTE 11, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. LaCHONE DOCK DOCK LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, IF I MAY SHARE MY SCREEN. THANK YOU. DO YOU SEE MY PowerPoint. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. GO AHEAD. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU. THIS REQUEST AGAIN IS TO REZONE FROM NMU 35 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. ON THE SITE PLAN, THERE ARE A TOTAL OF NINE WAIVERS REQUESTED. LET ME CHANGE MY VIEW. JUST A SECOND. SO THESE ARE THE WAIVERS WHICH ARE REQUESTED, WHICH ARE ON THE SITE PLAN, AND YOU'LL SEE SEVERAL OF THE WAIVERS ARE RELATED TO NATURAL RESOURCES WAIVERS, AND THEN THERE'S A WAIVER TO TRANSPORTATION FOR PARKING, LOADING SPACES, A REDUCTION IN LOADING SPACES, AND THE DIMENSIONS OF THE LOADING SPACES WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED. ALSO, THEY HAVE A WAIVER TO MANEUVER IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, FOR THE LOADING AND SOLID WASTE SERVICE, AND TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL PARKING LOTS TO A LOCAL STREET. SO THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO REZONE THE PROPERTY WHICH IS IN THE GENERAL VICINITY, WHICH DAVID HAS SHOWN YOU ON THE MAP IN WEST TAMPA, WHICH IS BOUNDED BY THE INTERSTATE TO THE SOUTH, ROME IS TO THE WEST, BOULEVARD IS TO THE EAST. AND THEY ARE REQUESTING TO DEVELOP THE SITE WITH A MIXTURE OF USES LISTED. THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR ALL USES ALLOWED IN THE NMU DISTRICT, RETAIL SALES, SHOPPER'S, DRIVE UP ATM, COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE SCHOOLS, HOTEL MAXIMUM 200 ROOMS, BANK WITH OR OUT WITH ATM. 5.9 ACRES. THAT IS ALL OF THE SITES THAT YOU SAW IDENTIFIED ON THE MAP PROVIDED BY DAVID, AND CAN I SHOW YOU ON THE AERIAL SHORTLY. ALL OF THESE ARE CONTAINED WITHIN THE WEST RIVER VISION PLAN AREA. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THE ABILITY TO DEVELOP THE USES PERMITTED AND LISTED IN THE USE TABLE WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARY. SO THE PROJECT BOUNDARY HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THE APPLICANT COMES IN FOR PERMITTING, PRIOR TO PERMITTING THEY MUST SUBMIT FOR INCREMENTAL SITE PLAN REVIEW. IT IS REVIEWED BY STAFF TO ENSURE IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED PD SHOULD THE PD PLAN BE APPROVED, AND THEN FROM THAT POINT, THEY WILL MOVE FORWARD TO PERMITTING. SO THIS IS THE PROCESS REQUESTED THROUGH THIS PD PROCESS. SO THEY HAVE PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN AN OVERALL BOUNDARY WITH THE PROJECT IN THE BLOCK AREAS IDENTIFIED, AND THEN THE USES WOULD BE PERMITTED ANYWHERE WITHIN THAT LOCATION. THE NMU ZONING DISTRICTS WERE CREATED THROUGH AN AREA-WIDE REZONING IN 2016. THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST REZONING BEFORE COUNCIL FROM THE NMU DISTRICT, SO JUST TO PROVIDE THE BRIEF BACKGROUND, THE TABLE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR YOU ALSO IN THE STAFF REPORT. BUT THE NMU ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS, THEY ARE A COMBINATION OF FORM BASED CODE REGULATIONS AND STANDARD CODE PROVISIONS. SO THE ZONING DISTRICTS WERE DEVELOPED TO IMPLEMENT THE WEST RIVER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE PROJECT DOES NOT ENCOMPASS THE ENTIRE WEST RIVER NMU DISTRICT BUT IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THAT BOUNDARY. AND THE GOAL OF THE WEST RIVER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS TO CREATE A MIXED INCOME, MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH INCORPORATES NEIGHBORHOOD-SERVING USES. SO THE MAJORITY OF THE PARCEL IS LOCATED WITHIN THIS OVERALL PROJECT AREA CURRENTLY VACANT. I CAN SHOW YOU PICTURES OF THE SITE AND WHAT'S SURROUNDING THE SITE. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 85 FEET FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURES AND 45 FEET FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. DEVELOPMENT ON THE BLOCKS WEST OF THE PROJECT HAVE EACH REQUIRED VARIANCES OR DESIGN EXCEPTIONS DUE TO THE TREES AND THE FORM-BASED CODE REQUIREMENTS. SO IF APPROVED, THIS PD WOULD ALLOW THE APPLICANT FLEXIBILITY TO DEVELOP THE REMAINING PARCELS WITHIN THIS PLANNING AREA WITH THE PERMITTED USES AS LISTED. THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE SITE IS NMU 35, WHICH DAVID HAS MENTIONED. IT DOES ALLOW FOR MAXIMUM OF 1.5 F.A.R. FOR VERTICAL MIXED USE PROJECTS OR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS AND A 1.0 F.A.R. FOR NONRESIDENTIAL OR 35 UNITS PER ACRE, THE DEVELOPER'S OPTION NMU. SO THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE. AND THE PARCELS ARE IDENTIFIED HERE IN RED, OUTLINED IN RED, AND TO ORIENT YOU ON THIS AERIAL, THIS IS I-275 ALONG THE SOUTH. THIS IS ROME AVENUE ON THE WEST, SPRUCE AVENUE IS THE NORTH BOUNDARY, AND THEN BOULEVARD IS ON THE EAST. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED. THERE WAS A SITE PLAN PACKET ACTUALLY SUBMITTED, BUT THIS IS THE SITE PLAN. TO ORIENT YOU ON THIS PLAN, THIS IS THE INTERSTATE WHICH WOULD BE LOCATED TO THE SOUTH, WHICH IS OFF THE PICTURE ON THE SITE PLAN. NORTH BOULEVARD IS HERE ON THE EAST. THIS IS SPRUCE STREET ON THE NORTH. THIS IS ROME AVENUE ON THE WEST. SO THE BLOCKS THAT ARE OUTLINED IN THIS BLUE LINE OR PURPLE LINE, THESE ARE THE BLOCKS UNDER THE REQUEST. THE AREAS THAT ARE GRAYED ARE NOT INCLUDED WITHIN THIS REQUEST. WHAT I'VE DONE IS I'VE TAKEN THE AERIAL AND ZOOMED IN ON THE AERIAL. THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE IS FENCED SO THERE IS NO INTERNAL ACCESS TO THE SITE, SO THE PHOTOS THAT I'LL SHOW YOU, I'LL JUST TAKE YOU ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF THE SITE. SO WE'LL START SOUTH END OF THE SITE HERE ALONG MAIN STREET AND THEN WORK OUR WAY TO THE WEST UP TO THE NORTHWEST PORTION. THEN RUN ALONG THE NORTH, COME BACK EAST AND BACK TO THE SOUTH. SO THIS IS THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE ON MAIN STREET. HERE ARE THE VIEWS OF THE SITE. THIS IS ONE AREA WHERE IT WAS -- YOU CAN SEE WHAT'S GOING ON SO THE MAJORITY YOU CAN SEE IN THE PICTURE TO THE RIGHT, THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE IS FENCED. THIS IS THE SITE. THIS IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MAIN AND OREGON. THIS IS THE VIEW ON THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT, IF YOU'RE LOOKING WEST ON MAIN. THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE. THIS IS ON ROME. SO STARTING FROM MAIN AND WORKING YOUR WAY NORTH ON ROME. THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE ALSO. THIS IS ON ROME AVENUE, AND THEN THIS IS AT THE CORNER, THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROME AND SPRUCE. ON THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT IS THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE WHICH IS ON SPRUCE STREET. THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ROME AND SPRUCE. AND THEN THESE ARE PICTURES NORTH OF THE SITE, WHICH ARE THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, THAT'S LOCATED TO THE NORTH. THIS IS THE NORTH END OF THE SITE THAT'S ON THE LEFT. THIS IS ON SPRUCE STREET THAT'S LOOKING SOUTH. THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS NORTH OF THE SITE. THAT'S THE VIEW ON SPRUCE STREET. AND THAT'S LOOKING EAST, AND YOU CAN SEE THE OVERPASS TO BOULEVARD THERE IN THE DISTANCE IN THE PICTURE. AND THIS IS A VIEW THAT BRINGS US AROUND TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE SITE. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ON BOULEVARD. THIS IS THE OVERPASS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PICTURE. BLAKE IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PICTURE. THIS IS THE EAST END OF THE SITE, THE PICTURE IN THE CENTER AND THEN THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT IS EAST OF THE SITE, AND THAT'S BLAKE. THIS IS THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SITE, SO IT BRINGS US BACK AROUND TO THE SOUTH, AND YOU CAN SEE THE INTERSTATE THERE IN THE BACKGROUND. SO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION. FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THIS IS IN REFERENCE TO THE FINDINGS FROM TRANSPORTATION. PLEASE REFERENCE THOSE WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT. SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE WAIVERS IN THE APPLICATION, THERE ARE SITE PLAN REVISIONS REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. SO THERE ARE SITE PLAN REVISIONS THAT ARE LISTED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT. THERE'S ALSO AN ADDITIONAL REVISION REQUIRED, AND THAT IS TO REMOVE A NOTE ON THE PLAN WHICH STATES THAT NO SINGLE TENANT SHALL EXCEED 35,000 SQUARE FEET. THESE CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO MAKE ALL CHANGES REQUESTED, AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >> MOVE TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WAIT. MR. CREMER, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. [OATH] >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHO MOVED TO CLOSE JAKE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO, COUNCILMAN VIERA. GO AHEAD, SIR. >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL. IN LIGHT OF THE LATE HOUR, I CAN TAKE A HINT WHEN I NEED TO. JAKE CREMER, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET. WE HAVE A PRESENTATION PREPARED. HAPPY TO PRESENT IF ANYONE HAS SPECIFIC QUESTIONS. I THINK STAFF HIT THE HIGH POINTS COUNCIL. THE MAIN IDEA HERE, THE ENTIRE PURPOSE IS ACTUALLY TO IMPLEMENT THAT WEST RIVER VISION PLAN THAT THE CITY WORKED ON SO HARD IN 2015. WE'VE LEARNED THROUGH EXPERIENC% WITH DEVELOPMENT THAT'S ACTUALLY GOING ON ON THE PROPERTY NOW THAT WE JUST NEED SOME UPDATES REALLY TO THE NMU CATEGORY, AND THAT'S ESSENTIALLY WHAT THIS PD IS DOING. WE WEREN'T ABLE TO INCLUDE ALL OF THE THA PROPERTY IN THIS BECAUSE UNDER ACTIVE DEVELOPMENT NOW. WE RECEIVED ONE CALL IN SUPPORT AND NOT AWARE OF ANY OTHER OPPOSITION TO THE PROJECT. WE'VE WORKED ON THE WAIVERS WITH STAFF AND BELIEVE THAT THOSE MEET THE CRITERIA IN THE CODE. SO WITH THAT, I'LL CLOSE AND OFFER OUR ENTIRE TEAM IS HERE IF YOU DO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? MR. SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A QUESTION FOR MS. DOCK, DID YOU SAY THERE WAS A REVISION SHEET ASSOCIATED WITH THIS IN THE STAFF REPORT? >>LaCHONE DOCK: THERE ARE SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND I BELIEVE THEY WERE IN THE REPORT. THEY ARE NOT INCLUDED? >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'M LOOKING FOR A REVISION SHEET. I DIDN'T HAPPEN TO SEE IT. I'M SORRY. >>LaCHONE DOCK: I APOLOGIZE. IT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN INCLUDED. THEY ARE JUST LISTED UNDER THE INDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENTAL -- I APOLOGIZE. IT'S NOT LISTED AS A SEPARATE SITE PLAN MODIFICATION STREET AS WE NORMALLY PUT IN THE STAFF REPORT. BUT THE MODIFICATIONS AS LISTED UNDER EACH DEPARTMENT, THOSE ARE THE ONES REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >>MARTIN SHELBY: GREAT. THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK? THERE'S NOBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED? >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, WOULD YOU MIND READING THIS LAST ITEM? >>LUIS VIERA: SURE. WE'RE ON ITEM 11. I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 1510, 1514, 1516, 1520 WEST SPRUCE STREET, 901 AND 1301 GREEN STREET, 1830 NORTH OREGON STREET AND FOLIO NUMBERS 179,822.0016, 179,822.0032 AND 179,822.0034, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION NMU-35 (NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ALL USES ALLOWED IN SECTION 212, TABLE 212.2 RETAIL SALES, SHOPPER'S GOODS, DRIVE UP ATM, PRIVATE SCHOOLS COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY HOTEL) MAXIMUM 200 ROOMS (BANK AND BANK WITH DRIVE THROUGH ATM, PROTECTED AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA WITH A SECOND FROM -- >>LUIS VIERA: GO AHEAD. I'M DUMBER THAN USUAL TONIGHT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: REVISION SHEET AS OUTLINED BY MS. DOCK AND AS AGREED TO BY THE APPLICANT. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. REVISION SHEET AS AGREED AND STIPULATED TO BY THE PARTIES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO. ROLL CALL? >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6th AT 9:30 A.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT'S IT. >> THANK YOU ALL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. COUNCILMAN CARLSON, DO YOU HAVE ANY NEW BUSINESS, SIR? >>BILL CARLSON: JUST QUICKLY BECAUSE I'M NOT ABLE TO TALK TO YOU ALL BECAUSE OF SUNSHINE. I WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW ON THE SO-CALLED TOILET TO TAP ISSUE, I TALKED TO THE CHIEF OF STAFF AND HE RECOMMENDED I MEET WITH CHUCK WEBER, WHO MR. -- CALLS KANSAS. I DID THAT ON MONDAY. I THINK WE HAD A GOOD MEETING. MY CONCERN WAS ABOUT THE ATTITUDE THE CITY OF TAMPA AND THE WATER DEPARTMENT TOOK IN THE PAST TOWARD REGIONAL COLLABORATION. AND IN THE LONG CONVERSATION WITH HIM, IT SEEMS LIKE THE ATTITUDE IS CHANGING OR HAS CHANGED, AND ONE RESULT OF THE CONVERSATION THAT WE HAD WAS THAT HE SENT OUT YOU THE DRAFT OF THE ALTERNATIVES WHICH I THINK ALL OF YOU GOT BY E-MAIL. THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS AND OTHERS WERE CONCERNED THAT THE CITY WAS NOT, IN THE PAST HAD NOT BEEN TRANSPARENT ABOUT THINGS LIKE THAT. SO HE'S COMMITTED TO A NEW LEVEL OF TRANSPARENCY TO SUBMIT INFORMATION CIRCULATE INFORMATION, AND SEVERAL OF THE KEY OPTIONS THAT INCLUDE THE REGION ARE INCLUDED IN THOSE ALTERNATIVES, AND WILL CONTINUE TO PUSH ON THOSE. I'LL MEET WITH THEM AND I KNOW YOU ALL WILL AS WELL, BUT I'M PUSHING FOR TRANSPARENCY TO MAKE SURE WE ARE FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE. ONE OF THE IDEAS I PUSHED WOULD SAVE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OVER DOING IT OURSELVES. AND I THINK WE MAY BE MAKING SOME HEADWAY. I WANT TO THANK MR. WEBER AND CHIEF BENNETT AND JEAN DUNCAN AND OTHERS FOR THEIR INTEREST AND ALSO THE MAYOR IN THEIR INTEREST IN TRYING TO BE COLLABORATIVE AND TRANSPARENT ON THESE ISSUES. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN GUDES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO, SIR. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. I WOULD LIKE TO -- TAMPA CITY COUNCIL TO GIVE A COMMENDATION TO THE 2021 AMERICAN ATHLETIC CONFERENCE CHAMPIONS, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA WOMEN'S BASKETBALL TEAM -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>JOSEPH CITRO: FOR WINNING THEIR FIRST-EVER ATHLETIC CONFERENCE TITLE AND GOING TO THE NCAA DIVISION ONE WOMEN'S BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS THIS OFF-SITE? >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IT HAPPENED TODAY. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, IT ALREADY HAPPENED. [ LAUGHTER ] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANYTHING ELSE, SIR? >>JOSEPH CITRO: NOTHING ELSE THIS EVENING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA. >>LUIS VIERA: I BELIEVE I ONLY HAVE ONE, MR. CHAIR. I MOTIONED LAST WEEK FOR THE ADMINISTRATION TO REPORT TO US NEXT WEEK ON THE PERSPECTIVE USE OF THE AMERICAN RELIEF ACT FUNDS, THAT IS THE FEDERAL STIMULUS ACT SIGNED INTO LAW BY PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN. IT APPEARS THAT WILL BE A LITTLE BIT TOO SOON. I WANT TO GO AHEAD AND WITHDRAW THAT, IF I MAY, AS FIRST MOTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA TO WITHDRAW. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE. >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU. THE NEXT MOTION I WOULD HAVE BECAUSE IT APPEARS BY THE TIME THE ADMINISTRATION GETS GUIDANCE ON HOW THESE FUNDS CAN BE USED, IT'S GOING TO BE CONFLICTING WITH BUDGET SEASON, SO TO SPEAK. I THINK IT WOULD JUST BE WORTHY FOR US TO PASS A SENSE OF COUNCIL THAT TO THE EXTENT THAT IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE, WHICH I THINK IT WILL BE, THAT AMERICAN RELIEF ACT FUNDS BE USED IN PART TO ADDRESS SOME OF OUR PUBLIC SAFETY DEFICITS THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT IN THE CITY OF TAMPA. I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT TAMPA FIRE RESCUE WITH REGARDS TO EAST TAMPA, HELPING WEST TAMPA, CHANNELSIDE, NEW TAMPA, STATION 13 AND NORTH TAMPA, ET CETERA. AND TO THE EXTENT THAT THOSE FUNDS CAN BE USED IN PART, BECAUSE I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT USES FOR THEM, TO HELP REMEDY THOSE DEFICITS, I'D LIKE TO HAVE A SENSE OF COUNCIL IN THAT REGARD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA, SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. ANYTHING ELSE? >>LUIS VIERA: NO, SIR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOTHING TONIGHT, THANK YOU. >>LUIS VIERA: IF I MAY, I APOLOGIZE. IF SOMEBODY HERE, I DON'T KNOW, COULD JUST COMMUNICATE THAT TO ADMINISTRATION VIA MAYBE -- I'LL JUST SEND THEM A TEXT OR WHATEVER. JUST TO LET THEM KNOW. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOTHING, SIR? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOTHING, MR. CHAIRMAN. THANK YOU. GOOD MEETING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES, SIR, I HAVE ONE WITH FOUR ITEMS UNDER IT. AS FINANCE CHAIR, I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT STAFF PROVIDE A REPORT FOR RECEIPT AND FILE IN REGARDS TO THE K-1, BUDGET AMENDMENT ANALYSIS REQUIRED TO GIVE MR. MARTIN SHELBY A RAISE TO THE 155,000. I SAID BEFORE I'M NOT OPPOSED. I GOT TO KNOW WHY AND HOW WE CAME TO THOSE ITEMS. ITEM 2, REVIEW WHERE THE RAISES FIT AND TO THE COMPARABLE STAFF OF THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE BASED ON 40 OR MORE HOUR WEEK. THREE, HOW THE PAY IS COMMENSURATE TO OTHER OUTSIDE COUNSEL PAY AND WORKLOAD. AND, FOUR, HOW THE INCREASES CORRESPOND TO THE CITY'S CHARTER AS IT RELATES TO THE INTERPRETATION FOR THE INCREASE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CITRO SECONDED IT? >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, I DID. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT'S THAT EXPRESSION ABOUT KICKING THE HORSE, DEAD HORSE OR SOMETHING OR ANOTHER. KICKING A DEAD DOG. I THINK WE'VE WRESTLED WITH THIS LONG ENOUGH. RECENTLY, I THINK -- I CAN'T SUPPORT THE MOTION. IF MR. MIRANDA WANTS TO GET THIS INFORMATION OFF LINE FROM STAFF, HE HAS THAT PREROGATIVE AND RIGHT TO DO THAT, BUT I CAN'T SUPPORT THE MOTION BECAUSE FRANKLY I THINK WE ALREADY SPENT TOO MUCH TIME ON THIS ALREADY. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THAT'S FINE WITH ME, MR. DINGFELDER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? COUNCILMAN CITRO WITH THE SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? VARY VIERA IF I MAY, JUST TO. >>LUIS VIERA: IF I MAY, JUST TO CLARIFY, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, IS GOING TO HAVE MORE INFORMATION ON HOW THE NUMBER WAS ARRIVED AT? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YOU NEED A BUDGET AMENDMENT. THE NUMBER WAS DERIVED, I DON'T KNOW HOW. WAS ANY ANALYSIS DONE OR JUST A NUMBER PICKED OUT OF THE SKY? I DON'T REALLY KNOW HOW. IT'S INCUMBENT ON ME AS FINANCE CHAIR TO FIND OUT WHERE THE NUMBER CAME FROM. I JUST DON'T KNOW. >>LUIS VIERA: I'LL SUPPORT IT AS A PROFESSIONAL COURTESY. I DO THINK WE VOTED ON THIS BUT IF A MEMBER OF THIS BODY WANTS THAT INFORMATION I CAN SUPPORT THAT AS A PROFESSIONAL COURTESY. YES SIR. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA IS ASKING THAT, ARE WE ASKING CAN THESE COMPARABLES BE DONE WITH ALL THE CITY ATTORNEYS? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M ASKING THAT A REVIEW WHERE THE RAISES FITS IN THE COMPARABLE STAFF -- IN OTHER WORDS, THERE MIGHT BE A TUMBLING EFFECT SOMEHOW, SOMEWHERE IN THE CITY'S OFFICE, ATTORNEYS' OFFICE THAT IS BASED ON 40 HOUR OR MORE WEEK. WE HAVEN'T COMPARED IT TO MUCH OF ANYTHING. WE CAME UP WITH A REVIEW. I DID THAT. I WANT TO COMPARE IT TO THE CITY STAFF OF CITY ATTORNEYS, WHAT -- I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY ATTORNEYS I WOULD IMAGINE IT'S MORE THAN 15, IN THAT REGARD. I WANT TO BASE ON A 40 HOUR A WEEK OR MORE AND THE PAY COMMENSURATE TO OUTSIDE COUNSEL PAY AND WORKLOAD, SO WE HAVE SOMETHING TO COMPARE WITH. IF WE GO OUT AND SOMEBODY ASKED US, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO TELL THEM? >>ORLANDO GUDES: I RESPECT YOU, SIR TREMENDOUSLY, BUT THAT'S KIND OF LIKE SAYING THE CLERK'S OFFICE. WHEN I LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, I DON'T THINK THEY ARE COMPARABLE TO SOME OF THE OTHER CITIES AS WELL TOO. IF THAT'S THE CASE, WE MAY DOWN THE ROAD BE LOOKING AT ALL DEPARTMENTS IN THE FUTURE. AS A COURTESY, MR. VIERA SAID, I'LL GO AHEAD AND SUPPORT IT, BUT, AGAIN, I JUST THINK THAT WE ARE KICKING A DEAD HORSE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M NOT ASKING TO KICK THE HORSE. I'M NOT ASKING TO CHANGE ANYONE'S MIND AT ALL. NOT AT ALL. I DON'T KICK A DEAD HORSE BECAUSE THE SON OR THE DAUGHTER OF THE DEAD HORSE MAY KICK ME. SO I KNOW WHAT -- I'VE KICKED MY HORSE BEFORE AND IT WAS 19 DAYS IN THE HOSPITAL. I CAN TELL YOU IT'S JUST SOMETHING I THINK IS NECESSARY FOR THE PUBLIC TO UNDERSTAND WHERE IT CAME FROM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON AND THEN DINGFELDER. >>BILL CARLSON: I JUST RESPECTFULLY VOTE AGAINST. I DID MY OWN ANALYSIS AND I AM IN FAVOR OF GETTING MORE INFORMATION, BUT WE GOT A BUNCH OF INFORMATION AT LAST TWO MEETINGS AGO. MORE THAN I THINK ANY OF US GOT ON THE SALARY REVIEW OF THE LEGISLATIVE AIDES. I THINK THAT THERE WAS SOME TOYING WITH THE CATEGORIES UNDER THE LAST CITY ATTORNEY, AND I HAVE A CONCERN ABOUT THIS POSITION BEING TREATED FAIRLY. AND SOME OF THE BACK CHANNEL QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS I'VE HEARD, I THINK ARE NOT FAIR. ANY IMPLICATION THAT OUR ATTORNEY IS NOT WORKING A 40 HOUR WEEK, I AGREE HE'S PROBABLY WORKING 80 HOURS A WEEK. I'LL RESPECTFULLY VOTE AGAINST THIS. I WOULD ASK IN MY OWN ANALYSIS I THINK HE SHOULD GET PAID MORE THAN WHAT WAS PROPOSED. IF A FAIR OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS IS DONE, I THINK WE SHOULD PROPOSE INCREASING IT. THANK YOU. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: QUESTION ON THE MOTION. >>LUIS VIERA: JOHN, YOU CAN GO FIRST. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: QUESTION ON THE MOTION, MR. MIRANDA, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU SPECIFIED WHO IS SUPPOSED TO BE DOING THIS ANALYSIS. I WOULD GUESS, I WOULD PRESUME THAT THAT SHOULD BE DONE BY HR AS AN OBJECTIVE BODY. I'M STILL NOT GOING TO SUPPORT IT, BUT I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT. ALSO, IN TERMS OF YOUR TIMING, I DO BELIEVE, WHAT WAS OUR TIMING, MR. CHAIRMAN, IN REGARD TO BRINGING BACK THE RESOLUTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: FOR MR. SHELBY, NEXT PAY PERIOD. 15 DAYS FROM NOW. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RIGHT. I DIDN'T KNOW IF YOU'RE TRYING TO JUMP THIS IN BEFORE WE PASS THE RESOLUTION OR YOU JUST WANT TO DO IT AFTER THE FACT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MR. CHAIRMAN AND MR. DINGFELDER, I THINK YOU KNOW ME BETTER THAN THAT. I'M NOT TRYING TO SUBVERT YOU OR ANYONE ELSE ON THIS COUNCIL. I JUST WANT THE INFORMATION. IF THIS COUNCIL TELLS ME I CAN'T GET IT, I UNDERSTAND THAT. WE GO FROM THERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHICH AGENCY, HR, ARE YOU COMFORTABLE WITH HR? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HR AGENCY, MORE LIKELY THE ONE THAT HANDLES ALL OF THE CITY'S THINGS WHEN IT COMES TO THIS EFFECT, I WOULD ASK THE ADMINISTRATION FOR THEM TO DO WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO TO GET THE INFORMATION FROM HR, WHOEVER. I DON'T KNOW WHO DOES THAT. YOU SAID HR, THEN I HAVE TO TAKE YOUR WORD IT'S HR. I USUALLY THINK THAT HR IS THE ONE THAT DOES ALL THE ANALYSIS. SOME STATISTICIAN HAS THE WORKLOAD IN COMPARISON TO THESE THINGS WHEN THEY HIRE PEOPLE, WHEN THEY DO THINGS. I WOULD IMAGINE IT IS HR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. MIRANDA. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: MY SECOND COMMENT, BASED ON THAT, IF HR IS GOING TO DO THE ANALYSIS AND I'VE SEEN THE STUDIES DONE BY HR IN THE PAST, THEY'VE BEEN OBJECTIVE, I REMEMBER EVEN THOUGH WE'RE ALL TIRED I REMEMBER MR. MIRANDA HAS SUPPORTED ME MANY TIMES WHEN I'VE ASKED FOR SIMILAR KINDS OF INFORMATION TO BE REQUESTED, AND EVEN THOUGH I FULLY SUPPORT OUR CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY AND WILL STAND BY OUR MOTION BEFORE AND OR INCREASING IT, I WILL CHANGE MY VOTE TO YES. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE? COUNCILMAN VIERA. >>LUIS VIERA: I WAS GOING TO ASK, AGAIN, I'M GOING TO STAND BY MY VOTE WITH REGARDS TO THE SALARY. I THINK I INDICATED THAT A COUNTY COURT JUDGE MAKES, I BELIEVE IT IS, SIMILAR NUMBER. I THINK THAT IS A REASONABLE NUMBER TO GO. I THINK GOING HIGHER THAN THAT, I THINK IS SOMETHING THAT IS NOT WARRANTED UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES. I KNOW THEM, BUT I'LL SUPPORT THIS. ONE QUESTION ON THE MOTION, SIR, AGAIN, I'M GLAD TO SUPPORT THIS AS A PROFESSIONAL COURTESY TO A FINE GENTLEMAN. BUT ARE YOU LOOKING FOR A REPORT OR A WRITTEN REPORT OR -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WOULD LIKE A WRITTEN REPORT SO THAT WE CAN ALL HAVE THE WRITTEN REPORT. I'M NOT ASKING FOR ANYTHING ELSE OTHER THAN THAT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: JUST FOR THE RECORD, AGAIN, I ALWAYS GIVE DEFERENCE, SUPPORT MR. MIRANDA, BUT NO MATTER HOW IT COMES BACK, THE CHARTER SAYS THIS BODY HAS THE RIGHT TO TO OPPOSE THE SALARY FOR OUR ATTORNEY. AGAIN, I THINK HE DESERVES A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN HE'S GETTING. WORKING FOR SEVEN PEOPLE. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT POSITION CLEAR, HOWEVER IT COMES BACK, I'M STILL GOING TO SUPPORT MR. SHELBY GETTING A DECENT SALARY FOR WHAT HE'S DONE FOR ALMOST 15 YEARS AND HAD NOT BEEN COMPENSATED PROPERLY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, IN LIGHT OF EVERYBODY ELSE, YOU KNOW, AND THEIR WISE COMMENTS AND MR. MIRANDA, I APPRECIATE ALL YOU DO AND ALL YOU'VE DONE FOR THE CITY, I'LL SUPPORT YOUR MOTION AS LONG AS THE RETURN DATE IS 30 DAYS FROM NOW, GIVE HR PLENTY OF TIME TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE. ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT, MR. MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I CAN'T TELL HR WHAT TO DO AND HOW TO DO IT OR WHEN TO DO IT. I'M ASKING FOR THIS AND IT GOES THROUGH THE SYSTEM IT MAY TAKE A WEEK, IT MAY TAKE TWO MONTHS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO DO. I REALLY DON'T. I HAVEN'T ASKED THEM. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I THINK WE LIKE TO PUT DATES ON THINGS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAY 6th WOULD BE 30 DAYS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IF YOU'RE OKAY WITH MAY 6th, I'LL SUPPORT YOUR MOTION. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M FINE WITH MAY 6th. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAY 6th UNDER STAFF REPORTS. >>LUIS VIERA: SHOULD WE WORKSHOP THIS? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CITRO, CORRECT? ALL RIGHT. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? AYE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: TH THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I'M SORRY. I DIDN'T HEAR THE CLERK DECLARE THE VOTE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO YOU HAVE THE VOTE? >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH MIRANDA AND CITRO BEING THE SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I DID NOT VOTE FOR IT. IT WAS NOT UNANIMOUS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: LET'S HAVE A ROLL CALL VOTE, IF I MAY, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH MANISCALCO VOTING NO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO, I'LL HAND YOU THE GAVEL. I HAVE TWO MOTIONS. FIRST IS I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO PRESENT A COMMENDATION TO TAMPA PRIDE FOR THEIR CONTINUED COMMITMENT TO DEMONSTRATE DIVERSITY AS A COMMUNITY. THIS COMMENDATION WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE DIVERSITY PARADE ON SATURDAY, MAY 22nd. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN VIERA. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THE LAST ONE IS I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO PRESENT A COMMENDATION TO LaCHONE DOCK WHO WILL BE RETIRING FROM THE CITY AFTER NEARLY 18 YEARS OF SERVING THE CITIZENS IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. I'D LIKE TO PRESENT THIS COMMENDATION TO LaCHONE NEXT THURSDAY APRIL 15 BECAUSE APRIL 16 WILL BE HER LAST DAY. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. CAN I GET A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE? MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES. SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE. WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU. [ADJOURNED]