All right, welcome everybody to the July 9th, 2025 city of Mesa Planning and Zoning Board public hearing. We'll begin today's meeting with a roll call. So, Chairs is present. Vice Chair Pritchard here. Board member Peterson here. Board member Blakeman here. Board member Carpenter here. Board member Farnsworth here. We'll excuse board member Montes. So, as part of the agenda today, we do have a consent agenda. We'll be reading this into the record and acted on in one motion. Uh board me, it's a very long agenda. That's why I'm laughing at myself a little bit. But uh we'll have board member Farnsworth read the consent agenda for today. All right. Items on the consent agenda are item 2A, approval of meeting minutes from uh the June 25th, 2025 planning and zoning board meeting. Motion to approve. All right. Thank you, Jason. Is it I'm looking for a motion to approve the consent agenda as read. Motion to approve. Is there a second? Second. All right. And we'll go ahead and vote. Board member Blakeman. Yes. Vice Chair Pitcher. Yes. All right. And the consent is approved. Thank you everybody. So with that we will move into the couple of items that we do have on the agenda and we will begin with I trying to find that item 3A. Well to a vote but Jamie just Yeah. So we Jamie I believe that you do have a statement to make. Is it Jamie? Yes. I'm going to be recusing myself from this this vote on 3A. Okay. Yeah. Then anything else we need to cover in that? Um chair. No. Um board member Blakeman already filled out the necessary conflict of interest form and sent it. So it's on file with the city. We don't need to read to make any motion or anything on that. Do we for her conflict uh for the item just to clarify what it is. Oh yes, you will need to make a a motion. Yes, I'll make a Oh, thank you. Go for it. Um motion to approve item 3A, discuss and make a recommendation to the city council on the following. Uh Z22 case 022-00890 Gateway Park 33.3 acres located at the northwest and southwest corners of East Ray Road and South House Road. Reszone 15.6 acres from Limited Commercial with a planned area development overlay to limited commercial. reszone 17.7 acres from LCPAD to light industrial with the planned area development overlay and site plan approval for development of an approximately 235,600 square foot industrial development and future commercial development and recommendation is to continue to the August 13th uh 2025 planning and zoning board meeting. Okay. So the motion is to just we're not approving this. We're just continuing. Correct. Correct. Sorry. Is there a second on that? Second. All right. All in favor? Board member Blakeman is not Never mind. Vice Chair Pitcher. Yes. All right. With all those present, that is good. All right. We've passed that agenda item. So, we'll move over to 3B. I do believe we do have a presentation to talk about a little bit more on this one. Thank you, chairs and members of the board. uh just for the sake of this presentation where you just wanted to talk about the specific item rather than the full presentation that works here. Great. Uh so we just wanted to clarify the specific deviation being requested in this uh for the garages. So the deviations included are supposed to be for the minimum garage size for all the units. Um there's while there is uh the depth is going to be an issue on all the lots or all the garages. um while the depth is met by certain units which is three and four but not one and two. So the option is we either uh have them all meet that minimum size as a condition or we have separate them out for the unit types. Um as part of that the width would be uh 19 foot by two or 192 in wide by 20 foot long for the minimum size which would be that units one and two or uh which would be one option of a condition or we and we separate the three and four out or we all just match it per the minimum garage size for that uh 192 by 20 uh depth. So, it's up to the board on how that that condition wants to be written, but we just want to declare that fire for that for you. Uh, chairs, maybe if I can elaborate on that just a little bit. Thanks, Josh. There are are three, excuse me, there are four floor plans associated with this. Plans one and two have a a width of 19t um 2 in and a depth of 20 ft. Right now, that condition of approval says 19' 11 in wide and 20 ft deep. So, at minimum, we would need to modify that for plans one and two. Plans three and four have a different garage dimension. It's 20 feet wide and 25 ft or excuse me, 20 ft deep, 25 ft wide. Um, which also does not meet the the minimum depth. It exceeds the area of a of a standard garage. So, we have two options as Josh alluded to. We could modify condition number three to have the minimum be 19 feet 2 in and 20 feet deep. We do um also uh we have compliance with the site plan, landscape plans and elevations submitted which will would cover us there. Or we can modify condition three to have that 19 ft 2 in by 20 ft for plans one and two and 20 ft deep and 25 ft wide for plans three and four. Y personal preference would that I agree as well. I think that we modify one and two for the minimum but we keep the three and four. That would be my preference just because the only reason I say that Evan is that we know the 11 plans on site would be impacted by the restriction going down which takes it down to a small enough garage in my opinion that you wouldn't be able to park two cars. the other you could still park two cars comfortably in the 25 foot width and I'd like to keep that there because that would be another 19 impacted parking spaces quote unquote that in my opinion I don't know what you guys think but the other ones are 20 yeah I'm more worried about the width but you guys chime in on that I would prefer that I feel the same I think it I'll say forces the hand like we were talking about downstairs to make sure that those that are renting or procuring by whatever means are very clearly aware Yeah, agree. Vice Chair Pitcher, board member Blakeman, anything for you guys on that? Nothing for me. Yeah, I I agree. So, go ahead. Would that be comfortable? 11. Ju just so I'm clear chairs the condition would be to modify condition of approval number three to require a minimum garage dimension for plans 1 and two of 19 ft 2 in wide and 20 ft long and a minimum dimension for plans three and four of 25 ft wide 20 ft deep. Yes, exactly perfect. Good over there on that. Okay, just making sure. Anything else that we need to review on that case? I believe that's it. Okay, that's condition number three. Condition number three, we would be updating that table. All right. Anything else that we need to on this one? I think we're good. Uh, sure. That'd be great. Thank you. Uh, make a motion to approve item 3B, case 025- Z00265, Sienna Ridge, P Amendment, 4 plus or minus acres located approximately, 1240 ft north of the northwest corner of East Broadway Road and South 90th Street. reszone to modify an existing PAD planned area development overlay for a 29 unit multiple residence development um with the modification to condition three as read and uh motion is approval with conditions. Is there a second on that motion? U chair board uh just for the record as part of the motion I suggest that you specify what the uh additional condition is the dimensions. Sure. So for condition three the the additional modification to the g condition would be for plans one and two minimum width of 19t 2 in minimum depth of 20 ft and for plans three and four minimum width of 25 ft minimum depth of 20 ft. Yes. All right. Is there a second on that motion? Second. All in favor? Board member Blakeman. Yes. Vice Chair Pitcher. Yes. All right. And I believe that will be unanimously. Okay. Item 3B is approved unanimously. Anything from staff that we need to finish up? Uh chair, there's no additional updates. All right. Then I will look for a motion to adjourn. So moved. Second. Second. Board member Blakeman. Yes. Vice Chair Pitcher. Yes. And with that, we are adjourned. Thank you everybody for being here. Thank you.