good afternoon welcome to the june 8 2022 city of mesa planning and zoning board public hearing we're going to begin by taking a roll call of our board members chart chair sarkisian is absent vice chair vienna as present board member boyle is absent board member alan here board member crockett here board member airs here board member peterson here call this public hearing open as part of today's agenda we'll have a consent agenda we'll be right into the record enacted in one motion this will not be these items will not be individually discussed board member crockett is going to go ahead and read that for us so far we have two items being pulled off consent for uh discussion or comment from the public 3b and 4e if anybody else has a comment to provide we need your blue card asap if you could designate which item and whether you wish to speak or have your comment read into the record and 4e would mean 5a as well and 5a is a companion case that will also be pulled all right hearing none we'll go forward board member crockett thank you vice chair via nueva saucedo uh this is the consent agenda for wednesday june 8 2022. item 2a minutes from the may 25 2022 planning and zoning study session and regular meeting item 3a which is case zon22-000555 in district 1 within the 3 300 to 3 600 blocks of north val vista drive located south of thomas road on the east side of valvista drive this is a site plan review this request will allow for a multiple residence development the recommendation from staff is approval with conditions where item 3b is pulled off the agenda so we'll move ahead off the consent agenda rather agenda item 4a is case zon 21-00793 in district 4 within the 450 blocks of west holmes avenue located west of country club drive and north of the us-60 superstition freeway this is a re-zone from limited commercial to multiple residents for with a planned area development overlay and site plan review this request will allow for a multiple residence development the staff recommendation is approval with conditions item 4b is case 0n22-0023 in district 6 within the 10 100 to 10 600 blocks of east williams field road and within the 6100 to 6400 blocks of south to 222nd street located east of chrisman road south of williamsfield road and on the north side of the east 24 gateway freeway alignment this is a major modification to the avalon crossing plan community district community plan this will allow for a single for a single resident's development this item the staff recommendation on this item is to continue to the june 22nd 2022 planning and zoning board meeting item 4c is case zon 22-049 in district 6 within the 6800 to 7200 blocks of south chrisman road and within the 10 000 to 10 400 blocks of east pecos road located south of pecos road on the east side of chrisman road this is a site plan review and special use permit this request will allow for an industrial development the staff recommendation is approval with conditions item 4d is case zon 22-0-157 in district 5 within the 4 400 to 5200 blocks of east mccallups road within the 2000 to 2800 blocks of north greenfield road within the 4 400 to 5200 blocks of east mcdowell road and within the 2000 to 2800 blocks of north higley road located north of mcales road and east of greenfield road this is a an update to the falcon field design guidelines this request will modify the existing design guidelines to guide future development at falconfield airport the staff recommendation is approval with conditions item 4e is off of the consent agenda item 4f is case 0n22-00237 in district 1. within the 0 to 200 blocks of north vale vista drive located north of main street on the west side of vista drive this is a council use permit and site plan review this request will allow for the development of a mini storage facility with rv and boat storage the staff recommendation is approval with conditions item 4g is case zon22-00268 in district 6 within the 9200 to 9600 blocks of east pecos road and the 6400 to 6800 blocks of south ellsworth located north of pecos road and east of ellsworth road this is a rezone from agricultural to light industrial with a planned area development overlay and a site plan review this request will allow for an industrial development the staff recommendation is approval with conditions item 4h is case zon22-00293 in district 6. within the 10 100 to 10 600 blocks of east williamsfield road and within the 6100 to 6400 blocks of south 222nd street located east of crisman road south of williamsfield road and on the north side of the east 24 gateway freeway alignment this is a major modification to development unit plan 2 of avalon crossing planned community district this request will allow for a single residence development the staff recommendation on this item is continued to the june 22 2022 planning and zoning board meeting agenda item 5a is a preliminary plat that's the companion okay that's the companion case to 4e which i've already read and then agenda item 5b is the merit legacy business park that is a companion case to item 4g which i've read and on both of those items the staff recommendation is approval with conditions oh i still need to read this off consent okay so thank you this is a team effort up here so agenda item 5a is being taken off consent agenda and agenda item 5b is the merit legacy business park within the 9 200 to 9 600 blocks of east pecos road and the 6400 to 6800 blocks of south ellsworth road located north of pecos road and east of the ellsworth east of ellsworth road this is a preliminary plat this request will allow for an industrial development the staff recommendation here is approval with conditions and that is the consent agenda thank you board member crockett do i hear a motion i moved here to approve the consent agenda that's right second i would second that please vote board member alan yes board member heirs yes consent agenda is approved unanimously with chair sarkisian and board member boyle absent we'll move now to case three b z o n 22-0 zero two five seven district six within the 3 900 to 4 100 blocks of south signal butte road and within the 3 900 to 4 100 blocks of south binary alignment located south of elliott road on the west side of signal butte road site plan review staff recommendation is approval with conditions we do have one comment card someone who wished to speak is ray walter on the line we're going to hear a presentation on the case and then i'm going to turn to you you will have three minutes we'll just need to have your name and address for the record okay so stay tuned thank you you hear me okay okay uh this is kcon 22-00257 the request is for site plan review to allow a light industrial development within the eastmark community the location of the proposed project is south of elliott road on the west side of signal butte road on the immediate southwest corner of elliott and signal butte is the existing apple facility this building would be or these six buildings would be directly south of that facility it's also located with just south of the elliott road technology corridor and within the eastmark technology enterprise core as identified in their community plan this is a site photo looking at the property from signal butte looking west from signal butte road the general plan on the property is mixed used community the focus for that is to develop a mixture of uses to create complete and identifiable communities it includes the employment industrial office and open space recreational and residential uses are all allowed within that it's also within the gateway strategic development plan identified as mixed use community the zoning on the property is pc which is planned community it's also in the airport overflight area 3. it's also located within development unit 6 north of the eastmark community the land use group that the applicant has selected for this property which identifies uses for the property is lug c which stands is for regional center campus within that lug light industrial uses are allowed including light manufacturing warehouses and accessory office space which is what is identified for this project the eastmark framework just to give a general guideline of how it's set up for processing the community plan establishes the overall vision for the community and the plan establishes planning processes what the allowable land uses are the development units get to get established through that it includes infrastructure master plans and design guidelines as well as some development standards the development unit plan takes that a little bit further it talks more about the context and the conceptual land planning allocates land use budgets and the intensity for the uses identifies permitted land use groups that can go into that development unit design guidelines and compatibility is also discussed in that then it breaks down further to site plans and subdivision plots and it's identifying the land use group that they take from the what's allowed in there and establish what their actual land use group is going to be so their actual use of the property is established and that has to be identified on their site plan which it is as the luxie so the site plan that's proposed it's located on a parcel within a recorded subdivision plat that established this industrial lot it they're proposing six buildings which total over nine hundred thousand square feet of light industrial space um it has access from signal butte road to the east which is our primary access there is secondary access to binary which is a future straight to the west that will be required as part of this development or the development to the west which has recently been approved if they go first they would be the ones that get that straight installed so that this development would then have access to that as well they've provided some additional common open space for employees on the property throughout to enhance that experience for those these industrial projects can be intense and it's important to have a place to escape for a little bit during the day of respite so they've provided quite a number of those design review the building design has been approved by the design review committee for eastmark they don't go through the city of mesa process for that the community plan establishes that process as their own separate design review board committee or design review committee the citizen participation on this a letter was mailed to property owners within a thousand feet and hoas and registered neighborhoods within one mile um it was 458 neighbors that were notified they had a zoom meeting on may 3rd and there were 11 neighbors that were in attendance some of the [Music] concerns that were listed were property values uh duration of construction dust control traffic patterns ingress egress hours of operation and noise generation i was able to attend that meeting and listen to the conversation and the applicant was going to follow up with some of the residents that had some of those concerns on some of their questions they did answer a lot of questions in that meeting and then did some follow-up they did not provide any um they provided that they had not received anything after that i did not receive any calls or concerns or letters emails anything like that regarding this case so with that the proposed project complies with the 2040 mesa general plan with the smart community plan complies with development unit plan for du6 north it meets the review criteria for site plan review as outlined in the eastmark community plan and staff is recommending approval with conditions thank you leslie any questions from board is the applicant present did you wish to make any comments now or perhaps wait until after public comment excellent thank you so much ray are you still on the line ray can you hear us ray walter you there ray you could bear with us for a moment while we figure out hello i'm here do you hear me oh yes we can hear you now ray ray for the record if you could please if you could please state your name and your address and you will have three minutes to uh state your concerns go ahead and go okay my name is ray walter my address is 10927 east rembrandt avenue mesa arizona eight five two one two um i am a neighbor citizen residing 500 feet from the subject property and i did attend the zoom meeting and did make some concerns known although there wasn't follow-up that i'm aware of i understand the mix of residential and employment opportunities and the eastmark master plan and my concern is to preserve the residential aspects because we're right across the street so those include the noise traffic dust and dirt and of course the property values the planning division staff reports recommends approval with conditions and i would simply as my comment card suggest ask for these additional conditions and number one is to have the normal residential quiet times from 10 p.m until 7 00 am apply to this property and agree to for any businesses and occupants of the subject property under con from construction through full occupancy number two to ensure that per the mesa transportation review the roadways and driveways must align the center line to central line specifically at ruben avenue and the northernmost entrance to this property that's proposed and three to conduct a traffic study of the corner itself signal butte and east rubin because that's a very busy intersection it's going to get more busy with trucks and other vehicles in and out of the subject property to determine if any traffic control measures are needed as far as dust and dirt i think that the city does have requirements with respect to mitigating any of the deleterious effects of those what i would i would just ask that we continue and keep those in mind and the hours of operation have not been discussed at all but i would say that because of the residential neighborhood right across the street my hope is that there will not be traffic in and out in construction and work being done during normal quiet time so again my purpose is not to stop this property from moving forward it's simply to have us address those the noise especially the traffic and dust and dirt and whatever happens to property values no one knows no one can tell so again i don't empower the project but i would like the additional conditions to be noted um as discussed that's all thank you very much ray the applicant would like to come up and maybe address some of those concerns again primarily does stir traffic study hours of operation quiet time and if you state your name and address for the record so this doesn't drop later right there good afternoon madam chair members of the board my name is cassandra ayers i'm here from barrie riddell uh 6750 east camelback road on behalf of the applicant dolphin industrial give me just a second to start did i do that right great okay so this is i think this might be my first time appearing before you uh it's my last name as airs just clear up no relation to uh board member errors uh spelled differently just wanted to make sure that uh brought that up first um so i will i try not to reiterate everything that uh leslie outlined for you you folks but i'll go through this very quickly uh as she said we are um uh by the way forgot to mention our client representatives are here if there are any specific questions that that come up today and it's our pleasure to be here with you this afternoon to present the site plan for dalvin industrial uh so as leslie said we are in lux c of the regional center campus and she showed you where the site was there uh luxie regional center campus does allow for warehouse uses our request is for site plan review only and the site is already entitled for use this is not a rezoning case 63 acres six buildings with approximately 962 000 square feet of development uh here you can see the layout for the buildings there are six of them this buildings with lower height are oriented towards um signal b road and get progressively higher up to a maximum height of approximately 52 feet which allows for some architectural embellishments and screening as you get closer into the the property or farther into the property excuse me uh here's just a closer up version of that site plan so you can see how it aligns with uh the as we mentioned the recently approved industrial project on the other side as you can see we also have substantial setbacks here for this project we have approximately 100 feet of landscaping adjacent to signal butte we have 165 feet of landscaping adjacent to mesquite and as i hope you can see we also have some very generous separations between our project and the nearest residential neighbors over here in the um south west corner of the site we have the i think it's the disc golf that will be in there and that's approximately 350 feet away from the nearest residential neighbor and then we have as much as 1400 feet to the south for the next property let's just show you some of the elevations for the project you can see the various architectural embellishments and elements to break up some of that massing it's an example of what a corner would look like with the signage we did as leslie mentioned sent mailers to residents within 1 000 feet for both letters both the neighborhood meeting as well as the hearing notification the same list for both the neighborhood meeting was held virtually on may 3rd and 11 people attended we received and responded to several emails from neighborhood neighbors following that meeting and until this afternoon staff had not received any opposition so when we sent in this powerpoint staff had not received any opposition and i believe let me just make sure that i address the specific elements that mr banker raised i can address those right now with regard to the residential quiet times of course our clients will comply with whatever noise ordinance and hours of operation for construction are required not a problem the ensure that mesa per transportation review the roadways or driveways must align let me go back to the site plan you can see that our northern driveway does align with the road across the street to the east and then our driveway to the south also on signal butte there's no road with which to align but for that northern driveway we certainly do and then the last comment was conduct a traffic study at the corner of signal b road and ruben avenue to determine if traffic control measures are needed the eastmark transportation study was recently updated and we don't believe that any traffic mitigation measures were recommended for this particular intersection but these uses were taken into account when that traffic report that traffic study was updated so and i think you brought up a dust control as well of course we'll comply with maricopa county dust control measures during construction i i'll go to my thank you slide just to wrap it up if you have any questions great thank you for addressing each of those resident concerns i appreciate it any additional questions or comments from the board i do have a question for staff and leslie with regard to the noise issue is is the noise ordinance separate and apart from the zoning requirements and i mean do you typically include as a condition that the applicant comply with the applicable noise ordnance or is that simply part of the thing all of the things the applicant has to comply with that are applicable within the city of mesa madam chair board member crockett there is a stipulation that they comply with all development codes or all city codes and regulations which would include that it is not part of the zoning ordinance okay and if if you know do you know how the request from mr walter syncs up with the noise ordinance in terms of construction activities i think he was looking for quiet time from 10 p.m to 7 a.m do you know if that board member crockett i do not know the hours that are set for that um but we do hold all of our construction to that standard so there's a lot going on out in that area it's been okay thank you that's all the questions i had okay any other questions if if i could if i get add on to that i think that construction uh times the starting time is like five in the morning during the summer time and like six in the morning uh during the winter time if i remember correctly so that doesn't quite sync up with the seven in the morning until you know ten at night but it but it's an hour or two off depending on the summer or the winter thank you board member alan okay i'll entertain a motion if i could go ahead and jump on in then um i would make a recommendation that we approve z-o-n-22-00257 district six within the 3 900 to the 4100 block of south signal butte road within the 3 900 to the 4100 blocks of south binary alignment located south of elliott on the west side of signal butte road the site plan review along with a staff recommendation of approval with conditions and then there's the companion case that goes with it correct it by itself not with this one okay thank you for your motion board member alan do i have a second i will second the motion if you could please cast your vote board member alan yes board member airs yep uh case passes unanimously with board member sarkisian and boyle absent thank you very much folks we're going to move on to item 4e 4e0122-00162 district 5 within the 99 90 900 to 10 000 blocks of east brown road and within 1 000 to 1200 blocks of north brisbane road located south of brown road and on the west side of chrisman road rezoned from agricultural to single residents 15 with the planned area development overlay and site plan review the request will allow for a single residence development staff recommendation is approval with conditions including those discussed at today's study session there is a companion case 5a geneva vias within the 9 900 to 10 000 blocks of east brown road and within the 1 000 to 1200 blocks of north chrisman road located south of brown road on the west side of brisbane road preliminary flat the request will allow for single residents development staff recommendation is approval with conditions josh you are up after staff presentation will go to two comments uh online thank you thank you madam chair so yes this is for zeon 22.0012162 uh this is for geneva villas it is a site plan review as well as a associated annexation case and rezone is for the development of a single residence community the subject site is located west of crispin road on the south side of east brown as i previously said with the annexation this is currently under maricopa county jurisdiction uh here's the view of the site looking west from chrisman um as you can see on the west side of this photo is on the south side of the site you can see some major power lines uh which do encumber the site uh currently it is owned re43 as well as c3 within maricopa county uh with annexation case 22-0 161 the associated annexation case would get a comparable zoning to a g um and then from a g the proposed rezone is from aeg to rs 15 with a planned area development overlay uh per the general plan designation uh is a neighborhood designation which is to provide a safe place for people to live which includes a variety of housing that includes single residents uh per the site plan a total of 27 lots have been provided on this eight acre site and they have provided amenities that include a barbecue pavilion uh dog run as well an expanded uh natural open space uh desert that is meant to preserve the existing desert space out there um and that is about 47 of the site um so it is more and it's more uh per the p80 is more of the open space than is typically required for that area and for a project of this density per the pid request in order to meet those open space requirements they had to reduce the lot area as well as to address the srp easement within that they've reduced the lot area as well as the lot width and depth as well as associated setbacks in order to meet that the building envelope as required for the desert upland standards as well as because of the way that their uh product is designed uh they also asked for a deviation for the garage front distance from the primary building front just because of the way our code reads for how we measure the front setback they can only provide one foot rather than the required three uh here's the associated landscape plan as part of it they have tried to retain about 47 different plants on site and as part of that they've tried to incorporate the existing ocotillos as well as swarovs on-site in order to maintain that natural desert look they have been planted within that vegetable or vegetative area along the srp easement as well as within the open space throughout its fight uh overall this the uh participative participation letters were mailed out to property owners within a thousand feet and hoas and resident neighborhoods within a mile uh there's neighborhood meeting held on january fourth uh three households for a total of five persons attended uh they had general concerns about development um typically with these annexation cases there is an overall concern about uh neighboring properties being annexed as part of that as well i will say this only affects the subject property and will only annex that portion and you know further discussions for future annexations will have to come through at a later time as well since i made this powerpoint i've had about three phone calls from concerned citizens in the area one was the neighborhood on the southwest side of the site he had some concerns currently within the srp easement there's some illegal dumping taking place so they wanted some way to prevent that from occurring as work talk speaking with the applicant they're looking to boulders that meet the intent of that natural open space as well as making helping to prevent that from occurring going forward um as well as the neighbors directly to the south um they just had some general interest in future annexations and which i explained to them in the process but again that would be through a future case not through this case itself um as well as i had a phone call with david and arcelli laurenti about earlier today about some general concerns general comments about uh what is occurring on site things like density as well as lot sizing things of that nature so based off that staff finds that the overall project complies with the 2040 general plan uh criteria for chapter 69 for site plan review chapter 22 for planned area development overlay as well as criteria within chapter 6 section 5 of title 9 for desert uplands development stafford based off that staff is recommending approval conditions thank you any questions from board members okay is the applicant here would you like to make any comments or perhaps wait until after the citizens have commented thank you very much joel kaplan are you on the line joel can you hear us joel okay we'll go back to joel if he uh is not on the line we'll just read his name and address into the record david laurenti david are you on the line yes i am thank you david if you could state your name and address for the record and then you will have three minutes thank you this is david lauriante at 1218 north 101st place mesa arizona 85207 i'm within that thousand feet of the proposed plan building plan um thank you forgive me for my ignorance but we received one mailing on this and spoke with josh earlier today as he as he stated earlier question about the zoning and i saw the proposed planning i see that the lot size was around 6000 square feet but the zoning was for an rs15 so i don't understand that at all but that's neither the case my other concern was also about the uh the traffic and the road conditions that are there uh our lane is going to be going to be added uh single lane both ways surrounding that property both uh north south and east west on it and just the con just the congestion alone of such a use of land right there i understand development we were out here for many many years uh macy's going to grow understand that it seems like a lot to put into such a a small area i understand they're going to be developing or not developing the southern section due to the electrical and srp easements there but just wondering how this is all going to look and play out again i'm not opposed to a development in there i just uh it just seems a little bit awkward right now thank you david and yeah that's all i have thank you so much i appreciate it you bet thank you joel are you on the line yes ma'am great thank you joel if you could please state your name and address for the record and you will have three minutes thank you joel kaplan k-a-t-l-a-n i'm at 9-8-5-2 east elmwood street and i'll make this even shorter than three minutes i do have the same traffic concerns that the other gentleman had this neighborhood in this one square block from 96th street to chrisman and one long block south to elmwood to brown is all single family dwellings at least 1.5 acres and that development would probably not fit second of all the city has already tried an annexation one time with this whole group here and they would turn down so that's never going to happen third of all the annexat the the amount of revenue it's going to take from the city uh will never be recouped in 50 years from that one little development by itself and most of all interestingly enough i don't see that they've ever done an electromagnetic survey for the overhead power lines i am very familiar with that and i don't want to expand because i'll be on the phone for an hour but that is pretty important and if you don't do that you might have some electromagnetic problems normally what happens is you have to pay to have those lines buried under the ground instead of having them remain overhead so that should be a serious concern to anybody who decides to uh purchase a home there if this should be uh in included so the main thing really is that non-annexation is never going to happen and the city is going to lose money and the traffic is going to be ridiculous and it really ruins the integrity of this whole square block and with that i will thank you for listening to me thank you very much joel appreciate you chiming in today if the applicant would like to come up and maybe address some of the specific concerns regarding traffic zoning and if you are aware of any electromagnetic requirements uh before building here and we'll just preface it with saying that we i think all realize annexation is not within the purview of the sport all right thank you very much uh uh chairperson and board members uh appreciate it my name is sean lake 1744 south val vista here on behalf of brighton homes jaren sweeney who's here with me this evening he is a they are a local family home builder in the in the city of mesa and they've been here building homes in mesa for quite a few years and and we welcome them and are glad to keep them into the community they've done several projects here in mesa as well let me get jump straight to the points first off this rezoning as as josh had pointed out is to rezone from c3 county maricopa county c3 down zoning to a residential category and so as far as traffic goes for the development what is currently zoned here today versus what we're proposing would generate significantly less traffic than a c3 development would c3 would be things like a a fast food restaurant or auto sales or a storage facility or various different type of commercial operations but we don't think that's viable here at this location we think this is more of a residential area as the neighbors pointed out and so that's why we think the zoning is appropriate here we will be doing off-site improvements associated with this development to both brown and chrisman road and we'll be working with the city's traffic transportation department to make sure those roadway improvements are done this site has access to brown which is an arterial road in the city of mesa and also chrisman which is an arterial road in the city of mesa so from a traffic standpoint will not generate a substantial amount of traffic in comparison to the capacity of those both of those rto roadways and so we think we have excellent opportunity to disperse traffic into an arterial and that will then go into areas we've also had the plan circulated the transportation department at the city of mesa and they've determined there is not an issue with that let's see emc study we have not done an emc study we have not done one these are the large power lines that run across the city a lot of us have lived behind them in the past i have spoken with srp in the past about that issue i think there's we'll say there's different opinions on that and and i think i'll leave it at that as far as the emc study but you will notice as far as the zoning that almost 40 percent of this site is going to remain vacant on that south side and so we've consolidated the homes up to the north up along brown road and that's where the homes will be and then the south half of the site will remain natural desert and that's where josh brought up the rock idea because we did speak with some neighbors and work with the neighbors because there's a big dumping problem on this site we recognize that we don't want to have rhoa to have endless problems with dumping in that natural open space and so we're working to kind of try to close that off to address some of those neighbors concerns the idea that we're talking about is boulders it fits in but it also blocks cars and it's easier to work with srp to do that in their easement area because they're not the easiest jurisdiction to deal with so we're hoping to address everybody's comments we've tried to address as many as we could we think this is going to be an outstanding development we're glad to have a local home builder here doing these single family detached homes for sale for people that want to live in the city of mesa so we welcome that thank you i'll be happy to answer any questions thank you mr lake any questions for the applicant jeff thank you vice chair uh sean with regard to the dumping issue is that on land that's owned by your client or is that within the srp easement or both the it is on land that my client bright homes is purchasing from the existing property owner there is an srp easement and the vacant land that it's being dumped on quite frankly and with regard to the srp easement isn't is it srp responsible for keeping that clean or who's responsible for cleaning up the srp easement area property honor i i think largely if if it is to be it's up to me the property owner and that's kind of the i'm going to stick with that and and just last question with this new development do you expect that that would just naturally help the issue of dumping because now there's going to be homes right there and people watching and paying attention absolutely you will have a homeowners association that will be directly to the north that will have eyes on that area we will also have installed some type of barrier to stop that and so if per chance something happens because there's all kinds of creative people out there the hoa will have eyes on the street and then the hoa will have a responsibility to help again if it is to be it ups to me they'll clean it up okay thank you for that any other questions or comments for the applicant okay thank you very much appreciate it i'll entertain emotion or any other points of discussion comments board member alan i just know i'm gonna go ahead and make a motion if you're ready whoever makes that motion that there's both a revised site plan and a revised condition of approval did you catch the board i think you might need to remind me again but i think i got it okay thank you okay let's give this a shot let's i would recommend that we approve z-o-n 22-0-1-6-2 district 5 within the ninety nine hundred to thousand blocks of east brown road and within the one thousand to twelve hundred blocks of north chrisman road on the west side located south of brown road and on the west side of chrisman road rezoned from agricultural ag to single resident single residents 15 with the planned area development rs-15-pad and site plan review this request will allow for single residents development the staff recommendation is approval with conditions and i'll go ahead and make those corrections after i do the second one if that's okay if you could just go ahead go ahead go ahead board member allen okay uh i would also recommend that we approve geneva geneva villas within the 9900 to 10 000 blocks of east brown road south side and within the 1 000 to 1200 blocks of north chrisman road on the west side located south of brown road on the west side of chrisman road a preliminary plat this request allows for a single residence development and again staff recommendation is approval with conditions and one uh things that we talked about downstairs was this the corrected site plan and then also the amended conditions of approval thank you very much board member ellen is that sufficient so i just would make the motion to approve both of those cases with the amended conditions and the amended site plan if you could board member allen i would like to make a recommendation that we approve both of those previously read cases with the [Music] amended site plan submitted and also with the amended approval with of conditions thank you very much do i have a second second if you could please cast your vote board member alan yes board member errors yes both cases passed unanimously with board members sarkisian and boyle absent any other items from our planning staff today no other items here thank you very much i'll entertain a motion to adjourn a move to adjourn second second please cast your vote board member alan yes board member heirs yes great thank you everyone we will see you on june 22nd we won't see you not me