>>GUIDO MANISCALCO: CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. AT THIS TIME, IF I COULD HAVE ROLL CALL FOR THE MEMBERS PRESENT. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >> HURTAK? CLENDENIN? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HERE. >>LUIS VIERA: HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE CLERK THAT WE HAVE A EQUAL PHYSICAL QUORUM. >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM. >>MARTIN SHELBY: COUNCIL, I UNDERSTAND, WE'LL DO THIS FIRST, TO MAKE A FINDING THAT BOTH COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK AND COUNCILMAN VIERA CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY PURSUANT TO COUNCIL'S RULES, IF THAT COULD BE BY MOTION? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I MAKE A MOTION THAT COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK AND COUNCILMAN VIERA BE ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY FOR THIS MEETING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? >>MARTIN SHELBY: NOW IF YOU COULD TAKE VOICE VOTE FROM THEM AS WELL TO INCLUDE THEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK, YEAH? [INDISCERNIBLE] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: NAY -- JUST KIDDING. YEA. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, PER COUNCIL RULES, REMOTE PARTICIPATION BY A COUNCIL MEMBER USING CMT SHALL BE NOTED IN THE MINUTES. THE MEMBER ATTENDING OR MEMBERS ATTENDING VIRTUALLY MUST BOTH BE SEEN AND HEARD TO BE CONSIDERED PRESENT AND BE ABLE TO SEE AND HEAR THE OTHER MEETING ATTENDEES. IF A MEMBER IS ATTENDING VIRTUALLY, ALL MOTIONS SHALL BE MADE BY ROLL CALL VOTE. WE HAVE TWO MEMBERS PARTICIPATING VIRTUALLY TONIGHT. WE HAVE ONE MEMBER WHO IS ABSENT. WE HAVE THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE PERMITTED TO CREATE A QUORUM UNDER OUR CHARTER. PHYSICALLY PRESENT, WE HAVE FOUR MEMBERS. IF ANY ONE OF YOU SHOULD LEAVE THE DAIS, THE MEETING WILL HAVE TO STOP. I DON'T KNOW WHETHER YOU WANT TO ARRANGE, MR. CHAIR, IF THERE IS A NEED FOR BREAKS, OTHERWISE A PHYSICAL QUORUM HAS TO BE PRESENT IN ORDER FOR US TO BE ABLE TO CONDUCT OFFICIAL BUSINESS. THANK YOU, SIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. SO HAVING SAID THAT, YES, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: [INAUDIBLE] I WAS NOTIFIED AT THE HOUSE THAT THERE IS A HEARING HERE TONIGHT, I THINK NUMBER 6. BUT I'M NOT SURE WHAT IT WAS, NUMBER 5, NOTIFIED THAT THERE IS A PROPERTY THAT I MANAGE UNDER THE TRUST AND GOT NOTIFIED ABOUT THIS HEARING, SO I HAVE TO RECUSE MYSELF. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WOULD THAT TRIGGER AN AUTOMATIC CONTINUANCE BECAUSE WE WOULDN'T HAVE THE FOUR PHYSICAL PEOPLE UP HERE? >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES. THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE FOUR PEOPLE PHYSICALLY PRESENT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WOULDN'T HE BE PHYSICALLY PRESENT? JUST HAS TO RECUSE HIMSELF. >>MARTIN SHELBY: HE CANNOT VOTE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE STILL HAVE TWO PEOPLE VOTING VIRTUALLY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SIT QUIETLY AND NOT TAKE PART IN ANY DISCUSSION. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS THE PERSON WHO REPRESENTS NUMBER 5 HERE TONIGHT, THIS EVENING? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COME ON UP, SIR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> STEVE MICHELINI. I REPRESENT THE PETITIONER ON THAT PROJECT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: GOOD EVENING, MR. MICHELINI. MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY. I UNDERSTAND FROM WHAT I HEAR WE'RE ONLY GOING TO HAVE THREE MEMBERS PHYSICALLY ABLE TO VOTE AND WE HAVE TWO MEMBERS WHO ARE GOING TO BE PARTICIPATING VIRTUALLY. DO YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO -- >> HOLD ON ONE SECOND. THREE PRESENT, TWO VIRTUAL, ONE ABSTAINING. >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND ONE ABSENT. WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE THIS PERSON COME UP? JUST TO BE ABLE TO SPEAK ON THE RECORD. YOU'RE HAVING A SIDEBAR. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: JUST FOR MY OWN KNOWLEDGE, WHERE IS 2322 WEST GRACE? IS IT BETWEEN ARMENIA AND HOWARD? >>STEVE MICHELINI: THIS IS ON ARMENIA. THE CORNER OF ARMENIA AND HOWARD. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE PROPERTY I'M TALKING TO -- >>STEVE MICHELINI: ARMENIA AND GRAY. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: BEHIND THE LAW FIRM ON GRACE AND ARMENIA. >>STEVE MICHELINI: NO. THIS IS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE JCC. SOUTH OF THE JCC ON ARMENIA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I GOT NOTIFIED. THAT'S ALL I CAN TELL YOU. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF YOU RECEIVED THE NOTICE THAT'S LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SAY IT'S BEST THAT YOU ABSTAIN. LET US CONTINUE WITH THE CALENDAR, WITH THE DOCKET AND MAKE THE DECISION WHEN THE TIME COMES. ANOTHER REMINDER FOR THE COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO ARE ON VIRTUALLY, FOR THE PURPOSES OF A QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING, YOU HAVE TO BE ON CAMERA IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED PRESENT. JUST SO YOU KNOW THAT. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: FOR THE CLERK'S SAKE, I HAVE THE MEMOS HERE. PLEASE BE ADVISED I WILL NOT BE IN ATTENDANCE SEPTEMBER 12, 2024. THIS IS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. WE HAVE MEMBERS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK AND COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA THAT THEY WILL BE ATTENDING VIRTUALLY. WE ALSO SETTLED THAT. THIS IS ON THE RECORD. ALL RIGHT. LET'S G THROUGH THE AGENDA. >>LaCHONE DOCK: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL CHAIRMAN. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA, I WOULD LIKE TO CLEAR ITEM NUMBER 2. THERE IS A REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE TO OCTOBER 10, 2024. THIS IS VAC-24-09. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO CONTINUE VAC-24-09 TO OCTOBER 10 2024. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA TO CONTINUE ITEM NUMBER 2 TO OCTOBER 10, 2024, 5:01 P.M., 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, 33602. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? >>MARTIN SHELBY: ALL VOTES WITH MEMBERS PARTICIPATING VIRTUALLY NOW HAVE TO BE A ROLL CALL VOTE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LET'S DO A ROLL CALL VOTE ON THAT CONTINUANCE. [INDISCERNIBLE] >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION TO CONTINUE CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. THE CONTINUED DATE WILL BE OCTOBER 10, 2024. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER 10 IS NEXT. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THERE IS A REQUEST TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM. >>MARTIN SHELBY: REFRESH MY RECOLLECTION. FORGIVE ME. DID YOU ANNOUNCE THE DRESS? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. I DID IT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I WANT TO MAKE SURE ONE OF THEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I ANNOUNCED IT. YES MA'AM. ITEM NUMBER 10. >>LaCHONE DOCK: ITEM 10, THERE IS A REQUEST TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO OCTOBER 10, 2024. THIS IS FILE NUMBER REZ-24-52. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO CONTINUE FILE REZ-24-52 TO OCTOBER 10, 2024, AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, 5:01 P.M. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: THE MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. MOTION CARRIED TO OCTOBER 10, 2024 AT 10 A.M. NO NO. 5:01 P.M. CORRECTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HE READ THE ADDRESS. LAST IS ITEM NUMBER 11 TO REMOVE FROM THE AGENDA. >>LaCHONE DOCK: ITEM 11, REQUEST IS TO REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE AGENDA. IT IS A MISNOTICE. THIS IS REZ-24-26. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS ITEM. ITEM NUMBER 11, REZ-24-26 BY COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA, SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? MANISCALCO? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION TO REMOVE HAS BEEN APPROVED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: COUNCIL, IF I MAY TAKE A SECOND TO INTRODUCE OUR NEWEST TEAM MEMBER. I WANT TO INTRODUCE TO YOU, COUNCIL, STEPHANIE POPE. STEPHANIE POPE IS OUR NEW URBAN PLANNER TWO. SHE HAS EXPERIENCE IN THE FIELDS OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH. SHE HAS WORKED AT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND THE WATER DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. BUT SHE COMES TO US FROM A MOST RECENT POSITION AT THE CITY OF PLANT CITY WHERE HER JOB INCLUDED SITE PLAN REVIEW AND PROJECT COORDINATION FOR THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. SO I WANTED TO TAKE A SECOND AND JUST INTRODUCE YOU TO HER. YOU'LL SEE HER START PRESENTING CASES IN THE NEXT HEARING. WITH THAT, COUNCIL, THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WELCOME ABOARD. MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN ALL THE PUBLIC HEARINGS? WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. DO I NEED TO DO ROLL CALL VOTE FOR EVERYTHING? >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL VOTE. COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK, YES, MA'AM. >>LYNN HURTAK: DON'T WE NEED TO SOLVE NUMBER 5 FIRST? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE'RE GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS -- YEAH, I'LL REVISIT IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA AND CLENDENIN. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION TO OPEN CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, MR. SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF YOU COULD TAKE NUMBER ONE, THE NON-QUASI-JUDICIAL BEFORE I'M ABLE TO HANDLE NUMBER 5. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE'LL START WITH NUMBER 1 AND THEN FIGURE OUT NUMBER 5. ITEM NUMBER 1, YES, SIR. >> GOOD EVENING. DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. TODAY I'LL BE PRESENTING TA/CPA 24-02. IT'S A MAP AMENDMENT FOR PARCELS GENERALLY LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF THE BLOCK EAST OF NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE AND NORTH OF EAST AMELIA AVENUE. >>LYNN HURTAK: CAN WE SEE IT? CAN YOU PUT IT ON THE SCREEN SO WE CAN SEE IT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. HE HAS IT ON THE OVERHEAD. >>LYNN HURTAK: IT JUST WASN'T VISIBLE. THANK YOU. >>DANNY COLLINS: PRIVATELY INITIATED. SUBJECT SITE APPROXIMATELY 1.79 ACRES. THE REQUEST IS TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE OF THE SITE FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 AND RESIDENTIAL 35 TO URBAN MIXED USE 60 AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. IT'S WITHIN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE AND THE TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S ALSO WITHIN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS LOCAL AND NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS. BECAUSE IT'S WITHIN THE LOCAL DISTRICT, IT WENT TO THE ARC FOR REVIEW BACK IN JULY. HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE, NORTH MORGAN STREET IS JUST TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THEN AMELIA AVENUE IS JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THE SURROUNDING AREA PREDOMINANTLY ALONG FLORIDA AVENUE AND EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE IS PREDOMINANTLY NONRESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL IN NATURE. AS YOU GET OFF THE CORRIDORS, IT TRANSITIONS INTO RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. JUST FOR REFERENCE HERE, THIS IS LEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. >>LYNN HURTAK: TAMPA HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY. >>DANNY COLLINS: TAMPA HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE FACING NORTH. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE FACING NORTH. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE FACING EAST ALONG EAST AMELIA AVENUE. HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. FOR THE PARCELS LOCATED ALONG NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE, THE LAND USE IS COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35. FOR THE INTERIOR PARCELS THAT ARE LOCATED OFF THE CORRIDORS JUST NORTH OF AMELIA AVENUE, THE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL 35. THE CC-35 IS PREDOMINANTLY FOUND ALONG NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND JUST TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG COLUMBUS DRIVE. JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE WE HAVE RESIDENTIAL 35 WHICH IS A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE CATEGORY. HERE IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE PARCELS ALONG NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE TO THE URBAN MIXED USE 60 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS. THE PARCELS JUST NORTH OF AMELIA AVENUE INTERIOR WOULD BE CHANGED TO THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION. SO THIS WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE F.A.R. ON THE SUBJECT SITE. AS WELL AS THE DENSITY THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED ALONG COLUMBUS AND NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND WOULD ALSO ALLOW COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES ON THE PARCELS JUST NORTH OF AMELIA AVENUE. CURRENTLY UNDER THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, SUBJECT SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR 68 DWELLING UNITS OR JUST UNDER 132,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. AS PROPOSED, THE SUBJECT SITE WOULD BE CONSIDERED -- COULD BE CONSIDERED UP TO 101 DWELLING UNITS OR 243,500 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL OR RESIDENTIAL USES. OVERALL, THE REQUEST WILL RESULT IN A HIGHER RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND GREATER COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS WENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON MAY 13. THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SPECIFICALLY THEY FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH POLICIES THAT TALK ABOUT DEVELOPMENT OF MIXED USE AREAS AS WELL AS SOME OF THE HOUSING POLICIES. THIS WOULD INCREASE THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED ON THE SUBJECT SITE. IT WAS ALSO FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY AND PROMOTING DENSITIES IN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT. FINALLY, THEY FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH INFILL POLICIES 1.1.17 AND 1.1.18 WHICH DIRECTS THE GREATEST SHARE OF GROWTH TO THE CITY'S URBAN VILLAGES. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO. APPLICANT, COME ON UP AND PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> TYLER HUDSON. 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE. JOINED BY MY COLLEAGUE ALEX SCHALER ALONG WITH NICK HERRING AND HANNA ARE A BETWEENY FROM THE FRAMEWORK GROUP. ALEX WILL RUN THROUGH OUR PRESENTATION. THE ITEMS THAT YOU GRACIOUSLY CONTINUED EARLIER THIS EVENING ARE RELATED TO THIS PROJECT. THOSE ARE GOING TO OCTOBER. WE WERE GOING TO MOVE THIS TO OCTOBER TOO SO ALL THREE APPLICATIONS TRAVEL TOGETHER, BUT THERE'S ONLY TWO TICKETS FOR THE OCTOBER COUNCIL SHOW, SO WHAT WE DECIDED TO DO IS PRESENT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND SEEK YOUR VOTE ON THAT THIS SOMETIMES COUNCIL PREFERS THAT THE COMP PLAN BE SEPARATE FROM THE ZONING. I WANT TO MAKE THAT NOTE THAT THIS ISN'T SPECULATIVE DENSIFICATION. THERE IS A PENDING PD ZONING APPLICATION AND IT'S GOING TO GO IN OCTOBER INSTEAD. WE THINK THIS COMP PLAN AMENDMENT STANDS ON ITS OWN AND HAS A LOT OF SUPPORT BEHIND IT. WE'LL PRESENT THAT AND SEEK YOUR APPROVAL TONIGHT. WITH THAT, ALEX WILL RUN THROUGH THE PRESENTATION. NICK WILL SPEAK SHORTLY AND THEN WE'RE ALL AVAILABLE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. ALEX SCHALER, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE. DANNY DID A GREAT JOB SETTING UP WHERE THE PARCELS ARE LOCATED. I WOULD NOTE THAT BOTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND COLUMBUS DRIVE ARE ARTERIAL ROADWAYS, SO THIS IS SITUATED AT THE CORNER OF TWO ARTERIALS. THE REQUEST THAT WE HAVE BEFORE YOU, AS DANNY MENTIONED, I THINK YOU CAN SPLIT IT UP INTO TWO DIFFERENT CATEGORIES. THE LAND ALONG AMELIA AVENUE WHICH IS CURRENTLY R-35, THE LAND PROPOSED TO BE CMU 35, AND THEN AS WELL AS THE LAND LOCATED ALONG THE TWO ARTERIALS, KIND OF THAT L SHAPED CURRENTLY CC-35. WE'RE PROARPG THE NEXT RUNG UP TO UMU 60. THIS IS A COMPARISON FOR R 35 VERSUS CMU 35. AS YOU CAN SEE, DENSITY DOESN'T CHANGE BUT YOU DO GET THAT F.A.R. BUMP IN THE CMU 35 CATEGORY AS WELL AS THE ABILITY TO BONUS. CC-35 VERSUS UMU 60, INCREASE IN F.A.R. AND ALSO FROM A CHARACTERISTICS PERSPECTIVE, CC-35 IS MORE MEDIUM INTENSITY/DENSITY AS WE MOVE TO THAT UMU 60 CATEGORY, WE'RE LOOKING AT HIGHER INTENSITY. THE COMP PLAN DENOTES AREA WITHIN UMU 60 AS, QUOTE, COMMUNITY CENTERS OR ACTIVITY CENTERS. THIS IS INTERESTING BECAUSE THE TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD FELT THE SAME WAY JUST ABOUT 20 YEARS AGO. THEY ADOPTED BACK IN 2002.AN- OUR SUBJECT PROPERTY YOU CAN SEE WHERE THAT WHITE ARROW IS, IS WITHIN THIS RED BUBBLE DESIGNATED AS A TOWN CENTER OR AN ACTIVITY CENTER ACCORDING TO THEIR PLAN, WHICH WE THOUGHT WAS NOTEWORTHY BECAUSE THE NEIGHBORHOOD THEMSELVES FORECASTED THE DENSITY HERE LONG BEFORE WE DID. IN ADDITION TO BEING ARTERIAL ROADWAYS BOTH COLUMBUS AND FLORIDA ARE ALSO TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDORS. THE COMP PLAN HAS SIGNIFICANT LANGUAGE ABOUT THESE TYPES OF CORRIDORS, THAT THOSE ARE SUITABLE FOR BOTH REDEVELOPMENT AND INTENSIFICATION AS WELL. THIS IS WHOLLY LOCATED WITHIN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE. I THOUGHT THIS WAS A GOOD SLIDE AS WELL. SO THIS MIGHT LOOK A BIT FAMILIAR. WE BROUGHT A SIMILAR CASE BEFORE YOU BACK IN 2022. THIS IS THE GOLD RING SITE OVER HERE AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLUMBUS AND TAMPA. SAME EXACT REQUEST WE HAD THERE. THE LAND ALONG THE TWO ARTERIAL ROADWAYS. WE AMENDED FROM THAT CC-35 THE RED CATEGORY UP TO THE UMU 60. WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING AT THIS INTERSECTION, WHICH IS STILL WITHIN THAT BUBBLE OF WHAT WAS AN ACTIVITY CENTER, SAME EXACT REQUEST ON THIS SITE, UMU 60 ALONG THE ARTERIALS WITH THAT CMU 35 TUCKED MORE ON THE LOCAL STREETS. THESE ARE SOME HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE STAFF REPORT. AS DANNY MENTIONED, THE STAFF DID FIND THIS APPLICATION CONSISTENT. WE DID TAKE THIS TO THE ARC AS WELL. BACK IN JULY THEY UNANIMOUSLY VOTED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL ON THIS CASE TOO. AND THEN THE PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD ALSO UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED CONSISTENCY. I WILL FINISH SPEAKING WITH THAT AND BRING UP NICK HERRING FROM FRAMEWORK GROUP TO SAY A FEW WORDS ABOUT THE PROJECT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES SIR. COME ON UP AND PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. NICK HERRING, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT WITH THE FRAMEWORK GROUP. 1211 NORTH WESTSHORE BOULEVARD, TAMPA 33607. I'M JOINED TONIGHT BY HAD ANY ARDWINI OUR DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATE. WE ARE A TAMPA COMPANY. I PERSONALLY AM A TAMPA NATIVE AND THRILLED TO BE DEVELOPING IN OUR OWN BACKYARD IN THE EXCITING TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD. TONIGHT IS NOT THE NIGHT TO GET INTO SPECIFICS OF OUR PLAN WITH ONLY THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT BEING ON THE AGENDA. BUT IT'S A GOOD ONE. OUR PLAN IS A GOOD ONE. IT IS THE PRODUCT OF MANY CONSTRUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS WITH NEIGHBORHOOD ADVOCATES WHO LARGELY SUPPORT ADDITIONAL DENSITY ON THIS IMPORTANT CORNER, FLORIDA AND COLUMBUS. SO I'M HERE TONIGHT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. I LOOK FORWARD TO TALKING WITH YOU IN MORE DETAIL AT OUR OCTOBER HEARINGS. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES SIR. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M JUST LOOKING AROUND. THAT BUILDING HAS BEEN THERE ABOUT 90 YEARS ACROSS FROM THE BICYCLE SHOP, ACROSS THE STREET FROM A UNIQUE FURNITURE. BEHIND IT THERE IS AN AUTO REPAIR SHOP. THE REASON IS WE USED TO WALK ALL THE WAY, JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL AND THAT CORNER HAS ALWAYS BEEN SOME TYPE OF VINYL SHOP OR SELLING MATERIALS, STUFF OF THAT NATURE. THAT BUILDING HAS GOT TO BE ABOUT 90 YEARS OLD, I WOULD THINK, BUT I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WAS THE ORIGINAL ENTRANCE ON FLORIDA AVENUE? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I THINK IT WAS YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE? IF NOT, I'LL TAKE IT TO THE PUBLIC. >> THAT CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 1? WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE. THERE'S NOBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK. DO WE HAVE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS ONLINE AT ALL? MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. MAY I GET A ROLL CALL VOTE? >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >> HURTAK? >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I JUST WANT TO MAKE A COMMENT BEFORE I VOTE. THIS IS AN EXCITING AREA OF THE CITY OF TAMPA. I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO SEEING WHAT YOU HAVE PLANNED FOR THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL BECAUSE IT IS A CRITICAL AREA FOR OUR TRANSIT FUTURE. SO THANK YOU FOR COMING BEFORE COUNCIL TO INCREASE THE DENSITY IN THIS IMPORTANT AREA. YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 3rd -- >>LYNN HURTAK: THIS WAS THE VOTE TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I'M SORRY. THIS IS JUST A VOTE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA IS GOING TO READ THE ORDINANCE. IT'S OKAY. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. FILE NUMBER 1, TA/CPA 24-02, THIS ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2301, 2303, 2307 AND 2315 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE, 204 AND 206 EAST AMELIA AVENUE AND 205, 207 AND 209 EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35, CC-35 AND RESIDENTIAL 35 R 35 TO URBAN MIXED USE 60, UMU 60 AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >> HURTAK? >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 3rd, 2024, AT 10 A.M., LOCATED AT OLD CITY HALL AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. LET'S TALK ABOUT ITEM NUMBER 5. ARE WE GOING TO BE HEARING IT TONIGHT? >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. MICHELINI, CAN YOUR CLIENT ALSO COME UP? >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, CHAIRMAN. THE APPLICANT INDICATED THEY WISH TO MOVE FORWARD WITH ITEM NUMBER 5. I'LL LET HIM STATE IT ON THE RECORD. >>STEVE MICHELINI: STEVE MICHELINI REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER. THIS IS STEVEN GOULD -- I'M SORRY. OKAY. THESE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY, AND WE HAVE GREAT CONFIDENCE THAT AFTER FOLLOWING THE STAFF REPORT WHERE WE -- IT WAS FOUND CONSISTENT, THAT WE WILL GO FORWARD WITH THE HEARING WITH THE TWO VIRTUAL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PARTICIPATING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND ONE ABSTAINING. >>STEVE MICHELINI: AND ONE ABSTAINING. DO YOU WANT TO CONFIRM THAT? >>MARTIN SHELBY: LET ME JUST EXPLAIN. MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY. JUST TO EXPLAIN THAT YOU WILL ONLY HAVE THREE COUNCIL MEMBERS PHYSICALLY VOTING AND PARTICIPATING. YOU WILL HAVE FOUR MEMBERS PRESENT. COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA WILL NOT BE PARTICIPATING. HE CANNOT LEAVE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE LEGAL REQUIREMENT FOR A PHYSICAL QUORUM. WE HAVE TWO MEMBERS WHO ARE APPEARING VIRTUALLY AND ONE MEMBER WHO IS ABSENT. WITH THAT BEING SAID, WITH THREE MEMBERS PHYSICALLY PARTICIPATING AND ONE MEMBER REMAINING TO MAKE THE QUORUM, IS IT YOUR POSITION THAT YOU WOULD WAIVE ANY POTENTIAL DEFECT THERE MIGHT BE WITH REGARD TO A QUORUM NECESSARY IN ORDER TO GO FORWARD? IF YOU COULD STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ASK. >> STEVEN GOULD, PART OWNER. NO, I'M OKAY TO PROCEED. >> I'M ALSO OKAY WITH IT. MY NAME IS ANDREW RESTREPO. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU. THAT BEING SAID, NUMBER 5 WILL MOVE FORWARD WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT MR. MIRANDA HAS GRACIOUSLY AGREED WHEN THE TIME COMES FOR NUMBER 5, HE WILL ANNOUNCE THAT HE'S ABSTAINING AND THE REASON FOR HIS ABSTAINING AND THEN REMAINING PRESENT TO HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM WHILE THE HEARING IS HEARD THROUGH ITS ENTIRETY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE'LL GET TO NUMBER 5 WHEN WE GET TO NUMBER 5. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AT THIS TIME, WE ARE IN THE QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE AGENDA. IF YOU ARE HERE TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA, PLEASE STAND, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. IF ANYBODY PLANS TO SPEAK. [OATH ADMINISTERED BY THE CLERK] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. GO AHEAD. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 3 IS REZ-24-18. IT IS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2109 WEST SPRUCE STREET. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RM 18, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO DANNY TO GIVE HIS REPORT AND I'LL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. >>DANNY COLLINS: GOOD EVENING. DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I WAS SWORN IN. OUR FIRST CASE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT SPECIFICALLY WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE HERE. IT'S JUST TO THE WEST OF NORTH ALBANY AVENUE AND WEST SPRUCE STREET. THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER. THERE ARE SOME GROCERY STORES LOCATED ALONG THIS PORTION OF NORTH ALBANY AVENUE DIRECTLY -- JUST TO THE EAST OF THE INTERSECTION IS A PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY. HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SUBJECT SITE, IT IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. THAT IS MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY THAT ALLOWS DEVELOPMENT UP TO 35 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE PARCELS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20 THAT R 35 IS TO THE NORTH, EAST AND WEST AND ONE BLOCK TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE WE HAVE PARCELS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE CC-35 CATEGORY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL POLICY GUIDANCE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPOSED RM 18 ZONING DISTRICT CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE R 35 CATEGORY PER THE CONSISTENCY MATRIX PROVIDED IN THE LDC. STAFF FINDS THAT THE RM 18 ZONING DISTRICT WOULD PROVIDE FOR COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA, WHICH CONTAINS BOTH SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND TWO FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES. ADDITIONALLY, THE REQUEST SUPPORTS INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON CURRENTLY UNDERUTILIZED SITE WHICH IS ENCOURAGED BY THE PLAN. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY, ENCOURAGING INFILL DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSIT EMPLOYMENT SERVICES. SUBJECT SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET WEST OF NORTH HOWARD AVENUE, WHICH IS A DESIGNATED TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR. THE REQUEST SUPPORTS LU POLICY 9.6.2, WHICH PROMOTES INCREASING AVAILABILITY OF HOUSING AND DENSITIES THAT PROMOTE WALKING NEAR TRANSIT USE AND EMPLOYMENT AREAS. FINALLY, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DIRECTS THE GREATEST SHARE OF GROWTH TO THE URBAN VILLAGES. THIS REQUEST WOULD PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING IN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? I SEE NONE. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THIS REZONING REQUEST REZ-24-18, THE PROPERTY CONTAINS A TOTAL AREA OF 6,382 SQUARE FEET. THE LOT HAS A FRONTAGE OF 67 FEET AND DEPTH OF 94 FEET. A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED WITH THIS REQUEST IS 35 FEET. THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT SITE IS COMPRISED OF LOTS THAT ARE SMALLER LOTS THAN ALLOWED IN THE CURRENT RS 50 ZONING DISTRICT. I'LL SHOW YOU ON THE AERIAL MAP. IT CONTAINS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES, COMMERCIAL USES, WEST OF NORTH HOWARD. ALSO, THE PARCEL IS DIRECTLY EAST -- THE PARCEL THAT'S DIRECTLY EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, IT CONTAINS A WIDTH OF 28 FEET AND PARCEL DIRECTLY WEST HAS A WIDTH OF 33 FEET. SITE IN WEST TAMPA OVERLAY AND ALSO A PART OF THE BUSINESS CORE FOR THE BUSINESS CORE DISTRICT FOR WEST TAMPA. THE FUTURE LAND USE AS MENTIONED BY DANNY IS R 35. GIVEN THE SIZE OF THE SITE, A MAXIMUM OF TWO DWELLING UNITS ARE ALLOWED ON THE SITE. THIS SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH PARCELS THAT HAVE A PD ZONING, AND THESE PARCELS ARE A PART OF THE INTOWN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT APPROVED IN 2005 AND 2007 IN PHASES ONE AND TWO RESPECTIVELY. THOSE PROJECTS ALLOWED FOR DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL HOMES ON PARCELS THAT WERE SMALLER IN SIZE THAN THE STANDARD REQUIRED IN THAT ZONING DISTRICT. THIS IS A ZONING MAP OF THE SITE. YOU CAN SEE THE SITE HERE IN RED. THIS IS SPRUCE STREET, AND THEN THIS IS ALBANY AVENUE AND THIS IS HOWARD AVENUE. AND THIS IS MAIN STREET AND 275 TO THE SOUTH JUST TO ORIENT YOU. YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH THOSE PD PARCELS. STAFF REPORT LOCATED SURROUNDING THESE PDs ARE THE SAME 2007 APPROVAL FROM THAT INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. ALL OF THE PDs SURROUNDING THE SITE WITHIN THE TWO BLOCK RADIUS ARE A PART OF THAT. AS YOU HEAD WEST TO, MORE MIXED DEVELOPMENT OR HIGHER INTENSITY WITH COMMERCIAL USES. HAVE RS 50 ZONING, AND THEN AS YOU GET EAST OF FREMONT YOU HAVE A COUPLE OF PDs AND YOU DON'T GET YOUR MORE INTENSIVE ZONES UNTIL YOU GET FURTHER SOUTH TO MAIN STREET. THIS IS A SURVEY OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE PROPERTY. IT'S ON SPRUCE STREET. YOU CAN SEE THIS BLUE OUTLINE IS THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY. SO IT HAS THAT 67 FEET OF FRONTAGE WITH THAT 95 FEET OF DEPTH. AND THEN I HAVE PHOTOS OF THE SITE. THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING NORTH AT THE SITE. THIS IS ALSO THE SITE. SO THIS STRUCTURE IS ON ONE SIDE OF THE SITE AND THEN VACANT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SITE. THIS IS ACROSS THE STREET. SO THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE AND THAT IS THE VIEW. YOU CAN SEE THE HOMES LOCATED THERE. THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING WEST ON SPRUCE. AND THEN THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING EAST ON SPRUCE, YOU GO THE OTHER DIRECTION. THE PROPERTY IS TO THE LEFT OUTSIDE OF THIS PICTURE. AND THEN THIS IS AT THE SOUTH -- THIS IS SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE. THIS IS AT THE CORNER OF ALBANY AND SPRUCE. DRC STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. THIS IS EUCLIDEAN REQUEST SO THERE'S NO SITE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? ANYBODY ONLINE WITH QUESTIONS? COUNCILMAN VIERA OR HURTAK? NO. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COME ON UP, APPLICANT. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING. FRANCESCO, 14301 NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY. I'M GOING TO READ OVER THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PROPOSAL. WE'RE REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RS 50 TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, RM 18. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS ALSO FOUND THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE CODE. THE SITE IS A SHORT DISTANCE FROM COMMERCIAL USES LOCATED WEST OF THE SITE AND WITHIN THE BUSINESS CORE DISTRICT OF WEST TAMPA. THIS AREA ANTICIPATES AN INCREASE IN DENSITY OVER WHAT IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED BASED ON THE UNDERLYING R 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. IMPORTANT TO NOTE OF THIS PETITION, IF APPROVED, WE UNDERSTAND THE ZONING MUST ADHERE TO THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR MAXIMUM DENSITY, FLOOR AREA RATIO LIMITS AND PERMISSIBLE USES IN THE RM 18 ZONING DISTRICT. AND WE WILL COMPLY WITH THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY STANDARDS.% SPECIFICALLY THAT THE RM 18 ZONING DISTRICT ALLOWS FOR A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF ONE DWELLING UNIT PER 2400 SQUARE FEET. SO A MAXIMUM OF TWO DWELLING UNITS CAN BE CONSIDERED ON THE SUBJECT SITE WITH OTHER LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE MET. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AGAIN REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. THE REQUEST SUPPORTS INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND IS CURRENTLY UNDERUTILIZED SITE WHICH IS ENCOURAGED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE POLICIES 2.1.2 AND 9.2.1. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THAT THE RM 18 ZONING DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE FOR A COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. ANOTHER IMPORTANT NOTE SINCE WE ARE PROPOSING A EUCLIDEAN ZONING DISTRICT, WE SHALL ADDRESS LAND USE POLICY 9.2.6 AND ALL APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES AT TIME OF PERMITTING. LAND USE POLICY 9.2.6 ENCOURAGES SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS TO BE DESIGNATED TO INCLUDE THE ORIENTATION OF THE FRONT DOOR TO A NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWAL AND STREET WHICH WE WILL ADHERE TO THAT WHEN IT COMES TIME FOR PERMITTING. IN CONCLUSION, THE REZONING IS COMPATIBLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LONG-RANGE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND ENCOURAGED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL R 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN? ANYBODY -- COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA OR HURTAK, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? >>LYNN HURTAK: NO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 3? >> MOTION TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ROLL CALL VOTE. TO CLOSE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: THE MOTION TO CLOSE CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 3? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 2109 WEST SPRUCE STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS RS 50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I FIND THAT I CONCUR WITH THE STAFF ANALYSIS AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPACT CITY FORM OF STRATEGY AND ENCOURAGES INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND IS COMPATIBLE TO INCREASE DENSITY FOR A SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOOD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? MANISCALCO? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 3rd, 2024, AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I WANT TO SAY, I APPRECIATE THE EUCLIDEAN ZONING REQUEST AND WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT THE OVERLAY DISTRICT. THANK YOU FOR THAT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES MA'AM. MS. DOCK, NUMBER 4. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM NUMBER 4 IS REZ-24-20. IT IS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2511 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR ALL CN AND COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD USES. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO DANNY TO GIVE HIS REPORT AND I'LL COME BACK AND GIVE MINE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES SIR. >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I WAS SWORN IN. OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, SPECIFICALLY IN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE. SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN EVACUATION ZONE E. HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. JUST SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION NORTH HOWARD AVENUE AND WEST CONRAD STREET. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL. HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. THAT CATEGORY ENCOURAGES MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN UP TO 35 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE OR UP TO 2.0 F.A.R. TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE WE HAVE SOME PARCELS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE CC-35 ALONG NORTH HOWARD AVENUE AND COUPLE BLOCKS SOUTH, WE HAVE A PARCEL RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RECREATION OPEN SPACE CATEGORY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH OVERALL POLICY DIRECTION IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD USES SUCH AS PROPOSED THROUGH THIS REZONING CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE CMU 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION PER THE LDC, PD PROPOSES .26 F.A.R. WHICH IS WELL BELOW THE INTENSITY ANTICIPATED. THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED ON THIS SITE THROUGH THE CMU CATEGORY. WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH LU POLICY 8.15.1. STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES THE MIXED USE CENTER -- POLICY. BUILDING ORIENTED WITH MAIN ENTRANCE FACING SIX FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG HOWARD. DESIGN ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE BY PRIORITIZING SIDEWALK ACCESSIBILITY, MEETING BOTH THE MIXED USE CENTER AND CORRIDOR AND URBAN VILLAGE'S POLICIES. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. IN THIS REZONING REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR ALL CN USES ON-SITE. THERE'S ONE STRUCTURE WHICH EXISTS ON THE SITE. THE STRUCTURE CONTAINS 1800 SQUARE FEET. THE LOT ITSELF CONTAINS 6,760 SQUARE FEET WITH A LOT WIDTH AND FRONTAGE OF 65 FEET AND LOT DEPTH OF 104 FEET. THE SETBACKS ARE TO THE NORTH 35 FEET, SOUTH 1 FEET, EAST 32 FEET AND THE WEST 6 FEET. THE PROPERTY ITSELF THAT WE SHOW -- SO THE SITE HAS A CURRENT ZONING OF RO. I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION A CORRECTION ON THE STAFF REPORT. R.O., AS WE KNOW IT TODAY IN THE ZONING CODE IS A EUCLIDEAN ZONING DISTRICT. IF YOU APPLY TODAY FOR R.O. ZONING, YOU WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SITE PLAN. AT THIS TIME, OF ADOPTION IN 2012, THE R.O. WAS A SITE PLAN CONTROLLED DISTRICT. SO IT WAS CONTROLLED BY A SITE PLAN. SO WITHIN THE BODY OF THE STAFF REPORT, THERE ARE TWO REFERENCES TO PD. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN A SITE PLAN CONTROL BECAUSE IT IS SIMILAR TO THE PD, BUT IT IS IT'S OWN DESIGNATION OF THE R.O. SO THE SITE HAS THE R.O. ZONING THAT WAS APPROVED IN 2012. THAT APPROVAL WAS FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. WHAT IS BEFORE YOU TODAY IS A REQUEST TO ALLOW THIS PD WITH ALL CN USES ON-SITE. THIS SITE IS IN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY. IT IS ALSO A PART OF THE WEST TAMPA BUSINESS CORE. AND YOU WILL SEE WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT THERE ARE NO PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BECAUSE IT IS IN THAT BUSINESS CORE DISTRICT AND THERE ARE FOUR SPACES PROVIDED ON-SITE. SO THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT'S SUBMITTED. SO ON THE SITE PLAN, THIS IS HOWARD AVENUE. THIS IS CONRAD. I JUST DID A ZOOM-IN ON THE PLAN JUST FOR CLARITY. THIS IS THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY. SO VEHICLES WOULD ENTER THE SITE FROM THE WEST AND THEN THEY WOULD EXIT THE SITE ON THE ALLEY, WHICH IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SITE. SO THIS IS THE BUILDING ITSELF AND THEN BUILDING ENTRY IS LOCATED HERE. AND I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SITE. BUT FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW THE ZONING ATLAS JUST SO YOU CAN SEE THE AREA. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. IDENTIFIED HERE IN RED. THIS IS HOWARD AVENUE. THIS IS ALBANY AVENUE. THIS IS BEACH STREET AND THEN THIS IS WEST ST. CONRAD STREET. SO YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE HAS THIS R.O. ZONING BUT SURROUNDING THE SITE ON THE NORTH, THE NORTHWEST, AND NORTHEAST ARE RS 50 ZONING. THOSE USES CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING. ON HOWARD AVENUE, YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL USES HERE AND YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES. AS YOU HEAD FURTHER SOUTH. AND THEN ALSO THE SAME AS ON ALBANY. YOU HAVE MORE COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD USES THAT ARE LOCATED FOR THE WEST OF THE SITE. AND THEN FOR THE PICTURES, SO THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. THAT'S IF YOU ARE LOOKING STRAIGHT AHEAD AT THE SITE. THIS IS A VIEW OF THE SITE. THIS SHOWS WHERE THE PARKING WOULD BE LOCATED. THIS IS THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF THE SITE, SO THIS SHOWS YOU THE ACCESS FROM THE ALLEY. THIS IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SITE. CAR WASH. THIS IS SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE. THIS IS AT THE CORNER AT BEACH AND HOWARD. THIS IS LOCATED WEST OF THE SITE ACROSS THE STREET. AND THEN THIS IS LOCATED NORTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS AT ST. CONRAD AND HOWARD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. THERE IS ONE WAIVER REQUESTED FROM THE APPLICANT AND THAT'S LISTED ON PAGE 1 OF THE STAFF REPORT. THAT IS A USE-TO-USE BUFFER WAIVER. THERE IS A REQUEST TO REDUCE IT TO TWO FEET ON THE NORTH AND ONE FEET ON THE EAST AND TO PROVIDE A SIX FOOT PVC FENCE IN PLACE OF SIX FOOT MASONRY WALL. GIVEN THAT THE SITE EXISTS, STAFF SUPPORTED THE WAIVER REQUEST. THEY ARE UTILIZING THIS SITE AND THE EXISTING HOME WOULD NOT BE DEMOLISHED OR THE EXISTING BUILDING. WITH THAT, STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. THERE ARE CHANGES TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SO THE BUILDING EXISTS. THEY ARE NOT GOING TO CHANGE THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING. >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. THEY ARE NOT CHANGING THE FOOTPRINT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WHY ARE WE HERE? WHAT ARE THEY LOOKING FOR THAT ISN'T AN ALREADY EXISTING CONDITION? >>LaCHONE DOCK: THERE ARE USES ALLOWED IN THE CN THAT ARE NOT ALLOWED IN RO. THIS IS THE EXISTING SITE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IT'S JUST THE USAGE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING THAT'S UNDER DISCUSSION. >>LaCHONE DOCK: FOR THE USAGE. THE FOOTPRINT ITSELF WILL REMAIN. THERE ARE CERTAIN USES IN CN THAT ARE NOT ALLOWED IN RO, IN THE CURRENT RO. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YOU'RE WELCOME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE? APPLICANT PETITIONER STATE YOUR NAME. >> STEVE MICHELINI, HERE REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER. THIS IS AN EXISTING STRUCTURE, AS STAFF HAS POINTED OUT, AND WE ARE SAVING IT. IT IS A 1925 BUNGALOW THAT WAS CONVERTED TO A RESIDENTIAL OFFICE BACK IN 2008. AND THIS SIMPLY CHANGES THE ALLOWABLE USES. EVERYTHING ELSE REMAINS THE SAME. THERE WERE PREVIOUS WAIVERS THAT WERE GRANTED UNDER THE OTHER REZONINGS, BUT WE HAVE TO REINSTATE THEM AS WELL. WE WERE FOUND CONSISTENT BY THE CITY STAFF AS WELL AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION. WE RECEIVED NO CALLS OF OBJECTIONS OR CONCERNS. THIS IS A VERY PASSIVE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE CURRENTLY, AND WHEN THE OWNERS WENT TO TRY TO GET SOME PERMITS TO DO SOME RENOVATION, THEY DISCOVERED THAT THEY ESSENTIALLY WERE NOT ALLOWED UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION. WITH THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF 35 PER ACRE UNDER THE CMU, I% COULD BE A MUCH MORE INTENSIVE USE IF THEY TORE IT DOWN BUT THEY WANT TO PRESERVE IT. THE REQUEST FOR THE WAIVERS ON THE SETBACKS ARE FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS. SO THIS IS NOT AN EXPANSION OF THE USE OF THE BUILDING OR THE PARKING AREAS. IT SIMPLY VESTS THE ABILITY TO ENTER AND EXIT THE PROPERTY. IT DOES UTILIZE THE ALLEY FOR EXITING. WE WILL HAVE TO IMPROVE A PORTION OF THAT, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY CONDITIONS. IT'S BASICALLY, WE HAVE TO COMPLY -- THE BUILDING ALREADY COMPLIES WITH THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY. WE SIMPLY HAVE TO HAVE THE USES IN ORDER FOR THEM TO CONTINUE THEIR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. I WOULD LIKE TO STATE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS. THEY WERE ALL FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT. HAVE TO GO THROUGH THESE CRITERIA, SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE. DOING THAT BY MAINTAINING THE EXISTING BUILDING. ENCOURAGE FLEXIBLE LAND DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE NOT CHANGING THIS BUILDING EXCEPT FOR THE USES THAT WERE INVOLVED IN PROMOTE, ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT. PROMOTE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. WE'RE MAINTAINING THE EXISTING BUNGALOW INCLUDING ALL OF THE EXTERIOR FEATURES WHICH ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA. PROMOTE THE RETENTION AND REUSE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS. WE'RE DOING THAT. THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUILDING IS THE SAME AND IT IS CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THE DISTRICT. THE WAIVER IF ALLOWED WOULD NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE OR INJURE THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS. THEY EXIST ALREADY. WE'RE SIMPLY ASKING TO VEST THEM. WAIVER IS IN HARMONY AND SERVES THE GENERAL INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THIS CHAPTER. THE STAFF HAS FOUND THAT IT DOES AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS WELL. WAIVER WILL RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE BEING DONE. IT ALLOWS THE BUILDING TO REMAIN AND IT TO BE USED EFFICIENTLY AS IT'S LAID OUT. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: COULD YOU TELL US -- SORRY IF YOU MENTIONED THIS -- BUT COULD YOU TELL US WHAT CATEGORIES ARE INCLUDED IN THE NEW DESIGNATION VERSUS THE OLD ONE? >>STEVE MICHELINI: BASICALLY GONE FROM A RESIDENTIAL OFFICE THAT REQUIRED THE RESIDENTS TO BE ON THE PREMISES TO ALLOW IT TO ACT SOLELY AS A STAND-ALONE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. BEYOND THAT, CN USES ARE GENERALLY THINGS LIKE A NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING, SMALLER SCALE, LESS INTENSIVE USES. IT'S ON YOUR STAFF REPORT. I CAN GO THROUGH THAT LIST OR LaCHONE CAN PROBABLY, MIGHT BE BETTER TO SUMMARIZE THEM. THEY ARE VERY LOW INTENSIVE TYPES OF ACTIVITIES. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THERE ARE A FEW USES THAT ARE ALLOWED IN CN AND NOT IN RO. LIKE RETAIL SALES, FOR EXAMPLE, PERSONAL SERVICES, A RESTAURANT, THOSE USES ARE ALLOWED IN CN BUT THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED IN RO. RO IS PRIMARILY FOR A RESIDENTIAL OFFICE OR THAT TYPE OF USE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IT WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION THAT COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK IS HAVING CONNECTIVITY ISSUES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>STEVE MICHELINI: TO MY KNOWLEDGE, WE RECEIVED NO OBJECTIONS EITHER BY PHONE OR LETTER, AND WE DID HAVE A CONSISTENCY FINDING BY THE STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 4? WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ROLL CALL VOTE. THIS IS JUST TO CLOSE THE HEARING. CARLSON? >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >> HURTAK? CLENDENIN? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >> HURTAK? >>LYNN HURTAK: I'LL HAVE TO ABSTAIN FROM THIS BECAUSE MY POWER WENT OUT. I WILL REVIEW THE VIDEO FOR SECOND READING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY, IS THAT ALL RIGHT? >>MARTIN SHELBY: FRANKLY, COUNT HER AS ABSENT RATHER THAN ABSTAIN BECAUSE SHE WAS NOT PRESENT DURING THE HEARING AND THE FACT THAT THE MOTION TO CLOSE, SHE WAS COUNTED AS ABSENT, IS THAT CORRECT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. SHE WAS ABSENT AT MOTION TO CLOSE. IF YOU CAN, RATHER THAN ABSTAIN, YOU WERE ABSENT FROM THIS VOTE. >>LYNN HURTAK: THAT'S FINE. I WILL SIMPLY LOOK AT THE TAPE. I APOLOGIZE. IT'S THE INTERNET, WHAT CAN YOU DO? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SHE WILL BE MARKED AS ABSENT AND SO WILL HENDERSON, CLARITY FOR THE RECORD. >>THE CLERK: MOTION TO CLOSE CARRIED WITH HURTAK AND HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PERFECT. COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 4? >>BILL CARLSON: YES. I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE ITEM 4, FILE REZ-24-20, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 2511 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RO, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE OFFICE TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ALL COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD USES, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. TO REITERATE THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED THAT IT WAS FOUND CONSISTENT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE STAFF. PLANNING COMMISSION TALKED ABOUT IT BEING PEDESTRIAN CENTERED AND MEETING MANY OF THEIR CRITERIA, THAT IT'S LESS INTENSIVE THAN IT COULD HAVE BEEN OTHERWISE. ALSO WE'RE VESTING THE WAIVERS THAT WERE IN PLACE BEFORE. I THINK ONE NEW WAIVER. AND THEN I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR SAVING A 1925 BUNGALOW TOO. >> [INAUDIBLE] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: INCLUDE THE REVISION. >>BILL CARLSON: INCLUDE THE REVISION SHEET. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK, YOU HAD YOUR HAND UP OR ARE YOU GOOD? >>LYNN HURTAK: I WANTED TO MENTION THE WAIVERS. BUT YOU'RE ALREADY THERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU HAD A DELAY IN YOUR VOICE. WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON. THE SECOND WAS COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. A ROLL CALL VOTE. REMEMBER TO LIST HURTAK AND HENDERSON AS ABSENT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >> HURTAK? CLENDENIN? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HURTAK BEING ABSENT AT VOTE. HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 3rd, 2024, AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NOW FOR ITEM NUMBER 5, BECAUSE WE NEED TO HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM, COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA WILL BE IN THE ROOM. PLEASE DO NOT ENGAGE HIM. HE CANNOT PARTAKE IN ANYTHING. BUT HE IS ABSTAINING AND WILL FILE THE CORRECT PAPERWORK. >>MARTIN SHELBY: ANNOUNCE THE FACT THAT HE'S DOING THAT. HE STATED PREVIOUSLY WHY. IF YOU COULD VERY BRIEFLY STATING WHY YOU ARE ABSTAINING. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I SAID THAT EARLIER. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I KNOW THAT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU ARE WITHIN THE NOTICE AREA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I RECEIVED A NOTICE, TRUST I MANAGED AND RECEIVED A NOTICE THAT ZONING WITHIN 250 FEET OF THAT PROPERTY, THEREFORE I'M RECUSING MYSELF. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 5 IS REZ 24-58. PROPERTY AT 405 NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE AND 2322 WEST GRACE STREET. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RM 16 AND PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USE. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO DANNY TO COMPLETE HIS REPORT AND I'LL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES SIR. >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I WAS SWORN IN. OUR NEXT CASE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, SPECIFICALLY WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN EVACUATION ZONE E. THE SITE IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WEST GRACE STREET AND NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE. JCC IS JUST TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE. SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER. WEST HEINZ PARK APPROXIMATELY TWO BLOCKS NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION WHICH ALLOWS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UP TO 20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALONG HOWARD AVENUE, PARCEL RECOGNIZED UNDER CMU 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. R-20 IS TO THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST OF THE SITE AND R/OS IS ONE BLOCK TO THE NORTH ALONG ARMENIA AVENUE. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL POLICY DIRECTION. SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE R-20 CATEGORY PER THE LDC. REZONING WILL PROVIDE COMPATIBLE INFILL DEVELOPMENT IN AREA PLANNED FOR 20 UNITS PER ACRE. REQUEST WOULD ALSO PROVIDE FOR COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. ADDITIONALLY, REQUEST WILL PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING AT SLIGHTLY HIGHER DENSITIES THAN THE SURROUNDING AREA SUPPORTED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY USES TO BE DESIGNED WITH FRONT DOORS ORIENTED TOWARD THE NEIGHBORHOOD, SIDEWALK AND STREET. PRIMARY ENTRANCES TO THE PROPOSED UNITS ARE ORIENTED TOWARD WEST GRAY STREET, CONSISTENT WITH THIS POLICY DIRECTION. ADDITIONALLY, PD PROVIDES VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM ADJACENT ALLEY TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN. REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY OF THE POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT RELATES TO HOUSING THE CITY'S POPULATION. THE PLAN PROMOTES DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY WHICH ENCOURAGES INFILL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT, EMPLOYMENT SERVICES AND ON VACANT LAND. ADDITIONALLY, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DIRECTS THE GREATEST SHARE OF GROWTH TO THE URBAN VILLAGES. THE REQUEST WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING IN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE WHICH IS SUPPORTED -- WHICH SUPPORTS THIS POLICY DIRECTION. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN? I SEE NONE. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. IN THIS REZONING REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR FOUR RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON-SITE. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 35 FEET. SETBACKS ARE PROPOSED TO THE NORTH AT 16 FEET. TO THE SOUTH 27 FEET. TO THE EAST 13 FEET. AND TO THE WEST 5 FEET. THE PROPERTY ITSELF CONTAINS 10,082 SQUARE FEET. THE FRONTAGE IS 95 FEET AND THE DEPTH IS 106 FEET. ON THE SITE ITSELF, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT ONE STRUCTURE, AND THIS IS THE SITE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THE REQUEST. SO THIS IS THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY THAT'S LOCATED HERE. THIS IS THE SITE. THIS IS ARMENIA AVENUE, AND THEN THIS IS GRAY STREET. YOU CAN SEE FLOOR FOUR UNITS PROPOSED. THESE UNITS HAVE VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM THE ALLEY. EACH UNIT HAS A TWO CAR ENCLOSED GARAGE. THIS IS THE FRONT DOOR FOR EACH UNIT AND A WALKWAY IS PROVIDED TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY TO THE SIDEWALKS THAT SURROUND THE SITE. SO THIS SITE WAS ACTUALLY DESIGNED JUST SENSITIVE TO THE EXISTING GR GRAND TREE ON-SITE. THAT'S WHY THE SETBACK TO THE WEST IS AT 5 FEET. IT IS TO ALLOW THE PROTECTIVE RADIUS ON THIS PROPERTY. I'LL LET ERIN COME UP AFTERWARDS TO GIVE HER PRESENTATION ON THE NATURAL RESOURCES COMMENTS RELATING TO THIS REQUEST. THE SITE IS IN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY. TIME OF PERMITTING MUST COMPLY WITH WEST TAMPA OVERLAY STANDARDS. THE SITE HAS AN R-20 FUTURE LAND USE AS DANNY MENTIONED. GIVEN THE SIZE OF THE SUBJECT SITE, A MAXIMUM OF 4 UNITS ARE ALLOWED TO BE DEVELOPED ON THE SITE. THERE ARE ELEVATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED ALSO. THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION. THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION. AND THIS IS THE EAST, AND THEN THE WEST. THEN I HAVE THE ZONING MAP TO SHOW. THIS AREA HAS A MIXTURE OF ZONING DESIGNATIONS. THERE HAVE BEEN REZONINGS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED. YOU CAN SEE THE PD THROUGHOUT THE AREA WITHIN A TWO BLOCK RADIUS, BUT THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE THAT'S HERE IN RED. THIS IS ARMENIA AVENUE. THIS IS GRAY STREET. THIS IS JCC. THIS IS THIS PD WHICH WAS APPROVED AROUND 2016. SO HALF OF THIS SITE IS EXISTING PD AND THE OTHER HALF IS THE VACANT, WHICH IS THE RM 16 DESIGNATION. ALONG ARMENIA, YOU HAVE A COUPLE OF PDs. THIS IS A PD FROM '03. THIS IS AN OFFICE USE. YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES. I'LL SHOW YOU PICTURES OF THOSE ADJACENT USES. TO THE SOUTH, THIS IS AN OLDER PD WHICH WAS APPROVED FOR COMMERCIAL USE AND THEN THE SAME WITH THIS PD THAT'S LOCATED HERE SOUTH, A BLOCK SOUTH ON FIG STREET. AS YOU HEAD FURTHER EAST AND ALONG HOWARD AVENUE, YOU HAVE MORE OF YOUR COMMERCIAL ZONING AND COMMERCIAL USES CONSISTENT WITH THAT ZONING. AND THEN I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. SO THIS IS THE SITE. THIS IS ON ARMENIA. THIS IS ACTUALLY THE WEST END OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE NORTH END OF THE SITE. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE NORTH END OF THE SITE. THIS IS ON GRAY STREET IF YOU'RE LOOKING SOUTH. THIS IS THE NORTH END OF THE SITE, SO THIS IS THAT OTHER PIECE, THAT CURRENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE. THIS IS EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW EAST, HEADING FURTHER EAST. AND THIS IS, WE'LL SWING BACK AROUND AND GO SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS ACROSS THE STREET FROM THAT SITE. THIS IS SOUTH. THIS IS DIRECTLY WEST OF THE SITE AT THE CORNER OF GRAY AND ARMENIA. THIS IS NORTHWEST OF THE SITE, BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE. THIS IS A VIEW IF YOU'RE LOOKING NORTH ON ARMENIA, THE SITE IS BEHIND US IN THIS PICTURE, AND THIS IS A VIEW OF THE JCC. HAD TO GET A LANDSCAPE VIEW TO GET THE WHOLE BUILDING IN. WITH THAT, THERE IS ONE WAIVER REQUESTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. THERE IS A REQUEST TO REMOVE TWO NON-HAZARDOUS GRAND OAK TREES. THE WAIVER IS LISTED ON PAGE ONE OF THE STAFF REPORT. ERIN MAEHR IS HERE. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO HER TO GIVE HER REPORT ON NATURAL RESOURCES. STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT AND THERE ARE SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS ONCE ERIN HAS COMPLETED HER REPORT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> ERIN MAEHR, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I'M JUST GOING TO SPEAK TO THE NATURAL RESOURCES FINDINGS ON THIS APPLICATION. YOU CAN SEE HERE IN FRONT OF YOUD TREES THEY ARE REQUESTING WAIVERS FOR. THESE TREES ARE RATED NON-HAZARDOUS GRAND TREES. BOTH RATED C-8. YOU'VE SEEN THE SITE PLAN. I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT, SO THIS IS THE LOCATION FOR THE FIRST ONE RIGHT HERE IN UNIT 2 IN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THIS IS THE OTHER GRAND NON-HAZARDOUS TREE. THIS IS TREE NUMBER 5, THE 33-INCH, WORTH 11 MITIGATION TREES. TREE ONE, 36 INCHES DIAMETER, RATED CA AND WORTH 8 MITIGATION TREES. AND THEN DOWN HERE ALONG THE ALLEY AND THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER, THE APPLICANT IS PRESERVING THIS GRAND TREE. THEY HAVE SHIFTED THEIR BUILDING TOWARDS THE WEST TO PROVIDE MINIMAL, VERY MINIMAL PRUNING TO THE CANOPY OF THE TREE AND THEN THEY ARE GOING TO BE PUTTING THEIR DRIVEWAY AND THE ALLEY USING ON-GRADE MATERIALS. SO WITH THAT, I JUST WANT TO SPEAK TO A COUPLE OF THE OTHER THINGS THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO DO. THEY HAVE PROVIDED 800 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT OF GREENSPACE, WHICH THE CODE REQUIRES 350 SQUARE FEET. SO THEY ARE GIVING MORE THAN DOUBLE WHAT'S REQUIRED. SO WITH ALL THE SPACE THAT THEY HAVE PROVIDED IN GREENSPACE, THE SITE REQUIRES FOUR MITIGATION TYPE 1 TREES AND TWO PALMS. AND IT ALSO REQUIRES FOUR REQUIRED TREES FOR THE SITE. AND THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO UP-SIZE THE TREES TO 4-INCH CALIPER FROM THE REQUIRED 2.5 INCHES. SO THEY CAN PROVIDE ALL THE REQUIRED TREES AND THE MITIGATION TREES ON-SITE AND FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS. SO BASED ON THESE REASONS -- THEY ALSO SUBMITTED REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION AS WELL. BASED ON THE REASONS I JUST STATED, WE FOUND WE WERE CONSISTENT WITH CONDITIONS AND WE DID SUPPORT THE WAIVER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? YES MA'AM. ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD? >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, COUNCIL. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I JUST WANTED TO EXPLAIN WHAT WAS HANDED OUT WAS THE REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION. WE WOULD NORMALLY INCLUDE THAT WITH THE STAFF REPORT. I APOLOGIZE. THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED. SO WE HANDED THAT OUT TODAY, FOR THE RECORD. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPLICANT, MR. MICHELINI. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >>STEVE MICHELINI: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. STEVE MICHELINI, REPRESENTING THE PETITIONERS. YOU MAY RECALL THIS SITE WAS LOCATION OF I GUESS IT WAS A SEMI ANTIQUE KIND OF A JUNK STORE. THE DEBRIS AND TRASH WAS OVER 20 FEET HIGH WHEN THEY WENT IN TO BUY THIS PROPERTY AND TRY TO RESTORE IT. WE WERE WORKING WITH THE STAFF VERY CLOSELY REGARDING PLACEMENT OF THE UNITS, INCLUDING THE REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION TO TRY TO DO WHAT WE COULD TO SAVE THE TREES. WE DID -- WE ARE ENABLING TO SAVE ONE GRAND TREE ON THE SOUTH CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, AND TO USE THE GRAY BEAMS AS WELL AS THE PERVIOUS CONCRETE IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THOSE TREES OR THAT ONE TREE SURVIVES. AS ERIN POINTED OUT, WE ARE MORE THAN DOUBLING THE AMOUNT OF GREENSPACE, SO WE HAVE PLENTY OF ROOM, AND THE CONCEPT IS TO CREATE A VERY ATTRACTIVE LANDSCAPED CORRIDOR THAT WILL BE FACING ON THE NORTH SIDE, WHICH IS GRAY STREET, WHICH WILL INTERFACE WITH THE JCC. SO YOU HAVE A FENCE AND A WALL ON THE JCC SIDE, AND THEN YOU'LL HAVE A LINE OF TREES ON GRAY STREET. THE ALLEY ACCESS IS FOR THE CARS, SO YOU WON'T HAVE CARS PULLING IN FOR DRIVEWAYS ON THE FRONT. BOTH OF THOSE ISSUES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY. AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF POINTED OUT, THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION, AND IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH ALL OF THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT. YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT THINGS GOING ON. YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL. YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL. YOU HAVE MULTIFAMILY. AND YOU HAVE OFFICES. IN THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION, IT'S A GREAT TRANSITIONAL USE THAT GOES BETWEEN ARMENIA AND THE NORTH SIDE WHICH IS JCC. THIS IS IN A TRANSIT CORRIDOR, SO TAKING THAT TRAFFIC OFF OF GRAY STREET AND PUTTING IT ONTO THE ALLEY IS IDEAL AND EXACTLY WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE HAPPEN. IT IS CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY AND THE DESIGN GUIDELINES WILL HAVE TO BE MET THROUGH THIS REZONING. THE USE OF THE PROPERTY WITH RESPECT TO THE CONDITIONS FOR PD ZONING, WE REALLY HAD VERY FEW ALTERNATIVES TO CORRECT THE EXISTING PD AND THE RM 16 THAT WAS ALREADY THERE, EXCEPT TO GO BACK TO A PD. AND WE WERE ADJUSTING THE SITE SO THAT WE COULD SAVE THE GRAND TREE IN THE BACK AND SLIDE THE BUILDINGS TO THE WEST, WHICH ENABLES US TO SAVE THE TREE AND ALSO PROVIDE BETTER ACCESS. SO ANYWAY, TO PROMOTE THE EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE LAND USE AND INFRASTRUCTURE, WE'RE DOING THAT. WE'RE ENABLING US TO TAP INTO THE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE, AND WE'RE TAKING OUT THE EXISTING BUILDINGS THERE AND TRYING TO MAKE THEM MORE EFFICIENT AND PRODUCTIVE PART OF THIS COMMUNITY. IT DOES PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING AS IS REPORTED IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. IT DOES PROMOTE, ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT WHERE APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION CHARACTER AND CAPABILITIES SURROUNDING AN IMPACTED NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S ACROSS THE STREET FROM MULTIFAMILY. IT IS JUST NORTH OF OTHER OFFICE USES INSTEAD OF RESIDENTIAL USES. THIS IS A CORNER WHICH WILL BECOME A VERY ATTRACTIVE TREE-LINED STREET. PROMOTE THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AND ELEMENTS WE HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY, WHICH WILL MAKE IT AN ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT. PROMOTE THE RETENTION AND REUSE OF EXISTING HOUSING STOCK, EXISTING STOCK WILL BE DEMOLISHED HOWEVER IT WILL BE REPLACED WITH A MUCH MORE ATTRACTIVE REPLACEMENT COMPONENT. THE DESIGN IN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WEST TAMPA OVERLAY. THE WAIVERS GRANTED WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS. THE WAIVER IS IN HARMONY AND CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THIS CHAPTER AND ALLOWING THE WAIVER WILL RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE BEING DONE. WE TRIED TO SEE IF THERE WERE OTHER ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF COMPATIBLE, IN TERMS OF TRYING TO SAVE THE TREES. I HAVE TWO LETTERS OF SUPPORT. ONE OF THEM FROM WILLIAM KELLY WHO LIVES AT 2320 WEST GRAY STREET AND ONE FROM MAURICE LAUREN AGREE NORTHWARD AT 2411 CARMEN STREET. AND BASICALLY SAY THEY ARE EXPRESSING STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE REZONING PETITION SUBMITTED BY THEIR NEIGHBOR. THEY LIVE NEXT DOOR, AND I BELIEVE THE REZONING REQUEST WILL BE A POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT TO THE AREA, CONTRIBUTE TO THE OVERALL IMPROVEMENT OF OUR STREET AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALIGNS WITH OUR COMMUNITY DESIRES FOR FAMILY HOMES WHICH WILL ENHANCE THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT'S A GREAT TRANSITION BETWEEN THE JCC AND THE REST OF OUR COMMUNITY. FIRMLY BELIEVE IT IS ENCOURAGING HIGH-QUALITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, IMPROVE THE AESTHETICS AND APPEAL OF THE STREET AND ATTRACT MORE FAMILIES TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. YOU'RE INSERTING A NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL USES WHICH ARE FOUND TO BE COMPATIBLE WHICH THE NEIGHBORS. THAT'S THE FIRST-TIME HOMEOWNERS, MY WIFE AND I ARE POSITIVE ABOUT THE POTENTIAL IMPACT, MAINTAINING FAMILY FRIENDLY ATMOSPHERE. SUBMITTING A LETTER BECAUSE THEY ARE OUT OF TOWN OR OTHERWISE THEY WOULD BE AT THE HEARING. WANTED TO ENSURE MY SUPPORT OF THIS REZONING APPLICATION ON THE RECORD. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. I'LL SUBMIT THESE INTO THE RECORD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DOES THAT COMPLETE YOUR PRESENTATION? >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I APPRECIATE ALL THE INFORMATION THAT YOU'VE DONE. OBVIOUSLY, IT LOOKS LIKE A LOT OF WORK HAS BEEN PUT INTO THIS. I ALSO APPRECIATE THE GREENSPACE, THE ATTEMPT OF RECONFIGURATION TO SAVE THE TREES. I GET YOUR POINTS. THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE WHICH IS CONSIDERING THE MAGNITUDE OF THE RECONFIGURATION OF THIS IS WHERE ARE YOU GOING TO PUT THE GARBAGE? >>STEVE MICHELINI: THE GARBAGE PICKUP HAS TO OCCUR ALONG THE ALLEY. WE HAVE TO MAKE PROVISIONS FOR THAT. CAN'T GO IN THE FRONT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: OKAY. WHERE WOULD YOU PUT -- I GUESS IN THAT GREENSPACE YOU'VE GOT THERE? >>STEVE MICHELINI: HAS TO GO ADJACENT TO THE DRIVEWAY FOR THE ACCESS TO THE REAR GARAGES. AND IT HAS TO BE SCREENED. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YOU SAID FENCING. WHERE WERE YOU SAYING FENCING AT? >>STEVE MICHELINI: THAT'S ON THE EAST SIDE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THERE'S NOT ANY FENCING FACING JCC. >>STEVE MICHELINI: NO. THAT'S THE FACING OF THE HOUSE AND THE INTEGRATION OF ADDITIONAL ON-SITE MITIGATION TREES TO CREATE THAT TREE -- TO CREATE THE CANOPY, THAT MORE ATTRACTIVE CANOPY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT WAS MY ONLY QUESTION, WHERE THE TRASH. OTHER THAN THAT, SEEMS LIKE IT IS WELL PLANNED OUT AND I APPRECIATE -- >>STEVE MICHELINI: THIS IS A DIFFICULT SITE, AND WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW BEST TO ORIENT IT. I THINK WE CAME UP WITH A GOOD PLAN AND WORKING WITH STAFF AND WE REALLY APPRECIATE THE STAFF SPENDING THE TIME WORKING WITH US. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT -- COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU. DID YOU ALL KNOW THAT GRAY STREET IS A BICYCLE BOULEVARD? >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, THAT'S WHY WE'RE ORIENTING THE HOUSES THAT WAY AND ALSO PROVIDING THE TREES FOR SHADE AND LANDSCAPING. >>LYNN HURTAK: YEAH. YOU DIDN'T MENTION THE BICYCLE BOULEVARD BUT I WANTED TO COMMEND YOU FOR ADDING LARGE CALIPER TREES THERE, WHICH WILL PROVIDE SHADE FOR CYCLISTS AND I THINK THAT'S ABSOLUTELY WONDERFUL. IT'S DESPERATELY NEEDED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYTHING ELSE? ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 5? COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN WITH A MOTION TO CLOSE. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA. LET'S GET A ROLL CALL VOTE FOR THE MOTION TO CLOSE. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >> MIRANDA, ABSTAIN. CARLSON? >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION TO CLOSE CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. MIRANDA ABSTAIN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK, ARE YOU COMFORTABLE READING ITEM NUMBER 5? >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: I MOVE FILE REZ-24-58, AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 405 NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE AND 2322 WEST GRAY STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION, RM 16, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, AND PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, INCLUDING THE WAIVERS AND THE REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I FIND THAT THE APPLICANT HAS DONE THEIR DUE DILIGENCE TO PROVIDE OPTIONS FOR MOVING THE SITE TO KEEP THE TREES, BUT SINCE THEY COULDN'T KEEP THE TREES BY ANY OF THE MODIFICATIONS, INSTEAD OF THAT, THEY ARE ADDING LARGER CALIPER TREES THAT WILL -- AND ADDITIONAL GREENSPACE TO COMPENSATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. SECOND WAS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. ROLL CALL VOTE FOR THE MOTION, READING OF THE ORDINANCE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >> MIRANDA? CARLSON? >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. MIRANDA ABSTAINED. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 3rd, 2024, AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MR. SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK WOULD INCLUDE THE REVISION SHEET, IS THAT CORRECT? >>LYNN HURTAK: I SAID THE MODIFICATIONS, BUT I WILL AMEND THAT TO INCLUDE REVISION SHEET. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT. >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, SIR. YES MA'AM. ITEM 6. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 6 IS REZ 24-60. IT IS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2409 WEST FIG STREET. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RM 16, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, TO RM 18, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO DANNY TO GIVE HIS REPORT AND I'LL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. >>DANNY COLLINS: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I WAS SWORN IN. NEXT CASE IS JUST ACROSS NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE TO THE WEST IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. SPECIFICALLY WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE. SUBJECT SITE IS SITUATED HERE ABOUT MID BLOCK ALONG WEST FIG STREET BETWEEN NORTH TAMPANIA AVENUE AND NORTH ARMENIA AVENUE. AGAIN, THIS IS THE JCC. SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER. HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. SUBJECT SITE, INCLUDED THE PARCELS TO NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST, RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20 LAND USE SATURDAY. THAT CATEGORY ALLOWS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UP TO 20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. AGAIN WE HAVE PARCELS IN THE VICINITY RECOGNIZED UNDER CMU 35 DESIGNATION WELLS R/OS A COUPLE BLOCKS NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED APPLICATION AND FOUND CONSISTENT WITH OVERALL POLICY DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PROPOSED RM 18 DISTRICT CAN BE CONSIDERED IN R-20 DESIGNATION PER THE LDC. REZONING WILL PROVIDE COMPATIBLE INFILL DEVELOPMENT IN AREA PLANNED FOR 20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. STAFF FINDS THAT RM 18 ZONING DISTRICT WOULD PROVIDE FOR COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA WHICH CONTAINS A MIX OF HOUSING TYPES. ADDITIONALLY THE REQUEST SUPPORTS POLICIES THAT PROMOTE INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LANDS WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN. THE REQUEST SUPPORTS MANY OF THE HOUSING POLICIES IN THE PLAN. THE PLAN PROMOTES THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY WHICH ENCOURAGES INFILL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT EMPLOYMENT SERVICES. ADDITIONALLY, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DIRECTS THE GREATEST SHOW OF GROWTH TO THE CITY'S URBAN VILLAGES. AGAIN, THE SITE IS WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE AND IT WOULD PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING IN WEST TAMPA. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. COLLINS? NO. YES MA'AM. MS. DOCK. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, AGAIN COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THIS REZONING HAS A PARCEL WHICH CONTAINS A TOTAL LOT AREA OF 5,305 SQUARE FEET. I WOULD LIKE TO PUT UP THE SURVEY. THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN ZONING REQUEST, SO THERE IS NO SITE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST. THE LOT FRONTAGE IS 55 FEET AND THERE IS A DEPTH OF 96 FEET. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWALE BUILDING HEIGHT WITH THE REQUESTED ZONING DISTRICT IS 35 FEET. SO THE REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY USES ON-SITE. THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS COMPRISED OF MULTIFAMILY, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED. SEMI DETACHED AND DETACHED USES ALONG WITH COMMERCIAL USES IN THE AREA. DIRECTLY WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS A SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI DETACHED DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS APPROVED IN 2017. AND THAT WAS UNDER REZ 17-80 AND DIRECTLY NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST OF THE SITE IS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND ATTACHED USES. I'LL SHOW YOU THOSE SHORTLY ON THE AERIAL. THE SITE HAS AN R-20 FUTURE LAND USE AS DANNY HAS MENTIONED. GIVEN THE SIZE OF THIS LOT A MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS ALLOWED ON THIS LOT IS TWO UNITS. THE SITE IS IN THE WEST TAMPA OVERLAY AND MUST COMPLY WITH THE PERMITTING. SO THIS IS THE SURVEY OF THE SITE. THIS IS FIG STREET. AND YOU CAN SEE THIS IS THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY ON THE PROPERTY. YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS FRONTAGE IS AT 54 FEET, OR 54.9. THIS IS THE ZONING MAP OF THE PROPERTY. SO THIS LOOKS FAMILIAR. WE JUST HAD A REZONING HERE. SO THE ITEM BEFORE THIS. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE IN RED. THIS IS FIG STREET. THIS IS TAMPANIA. THIS IS ARMENIA. THIS IS HOWARD. SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THE SUBJECT SITE HAS SURROUNDING IT, YOU HAVE TO THE NORTH A REZONING. THIS IS TO THE WEST AND TO THE SOUTHWEST. THESE ARE ALL RM 18 REZONINGS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED RECENTLY WITHIN THIS AREA. FURTHER SOUTH IS AN RM 18 ZONING. AS YOU HEAD FURTHER WEST OF TAMPANIA, YOU HAVE MORE OF THE RM 16 ZONING. ON ARMENIA, YOU HAVE THE PD AND THE COMMERCIAL USES ALONG THERE, AND THEN AS YOU GET FURTHER EAST ALONG HOWARD YOU HAVE MORE OF YOUR COMMERCIAL USES IN THE AREA. I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SITE. SO THE SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT. THIS IS THE SITE ON FIG. AND THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING NORTH AT THE SITE. THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE. SO THIS IS ONE OF THOSE PD -- THE RM 18 REZONING, I'M SORRY. THAT'S TO THE WEST AND FURTHER WEST. THIS IS THE SAME. RM 18, SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI ATTACHED. THEN I WANTED TO SHOW JUST THE NORTH PORTION OF THE SITE BECAUSE THERE IS AN ALLEY THAT IS NORTH OF THE SITE. SO THE SUBJECT SITE IS HERE ADJACENT TO THESE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. THIS IS SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE. SO THIS IS ON FIG. AND THIS IS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FIG AND TAMPANIA. THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS IF YOU ARE ON FIG AND YOU'RE LOOKING SOUTH. AND THEN THIS IS EAST OF THE SITE. THE DRC STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? I SEE NONE. APPLICANT? >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >>STEVE MICHELINI: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. STEVE MICHELINI REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER. THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN ZONING. IT WAS FOUND CONSISTENT BY THE CITY AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION. IT IS SANDWICHED IN BETWEEN OTHER MULTIFAMILY RM 16 AND RM 18 PROPERTIES. LaCHONE SHOWED YOU THE PICTURES THAT THERE ARE DUPLEXES ALL THROUGHOUT THE AREA. OBVIOUSLY, WE HAVE TO MEET THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS FOR HEIGHT, SETBACKS, ET CETERA, AND THERE COULD ONLY BE TWO UNITS. SO IT IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT'S IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO IT, WHICH IS ON BOTH SIDES. IT'S FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD REQUEST. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. THAT'S OKAY. I CAN HANDLE IT. ANYWAY, 35 FEET IN HEIGHT. BASICALLY A 5,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING SURROUNDING IT AND IT WAS FOUND CONSISTENT BY BOTH STAFFS. SO WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 6? >> MOTION TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTIN TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. A ROLL CALL VOTE ON THE MOTION TO CLOSE, PLEASE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? MANISCALCO? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: THE MOTION TO CLOSE CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NOW MAY I HAVE COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, WOULD YOU BE COMFORTABLE READING ITEM NUMBER 6? >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR. IF YOU CAN HEAR ME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: I READ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 2409 WEST FIG STREET IN CITY OF TAMPA, MORE DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM 16, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, TO RM 18 RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. A ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >> HURTAK? >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: THE MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 3rd, 2024, AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER 7. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 7 IS REZ 24-64. IT IS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 709 WEST PARK AVENUE. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS 60, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, TO RS 50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO DANNY TO GIVE HIS REPORT AND I'LL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. THANK YOU. >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I WAS SWORN IN. OUR NEXT CASE IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. SPECIFICALLY IT IS IN THE RIDGEWOOD PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE HERE. IT'S ABOUT MID BLOCK OF WEST PARK AVENUE, JUST TO THE WEST OF NORTH BOULEVARD, WHICH IS HERE. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER. THERE ARE SOME NEW TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENTS ALONG NORTH BOULEVARD AVENUE. HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE, INCLUDING THE PARCEL TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. THAT CATEGORY ALLOWS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UP TO 10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. TWO BLOCKS TO THE EAST WE HAVE TWO PARCELS THAT ARE RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20. ON THE EAST SIDE OF BOULEVARD WE HAVE PARCELS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 35 CATEGORY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL POLICY DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPOSED RS 50 ZONING DISTRICT CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE R-10 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. THIS REZONING WILL PROVIDE COMPATIBLE INFILL DEVELOPMENT IN AN AREA PLANNED FOR TEN DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. AS SUCH, THE STAFF FINDS THAT@TD PROVIDE FOR COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE SURROUNDING AREA. GIVEN THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AND THE PROPOSED DENSITY THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED UNDER RS 50, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF CONCLUDES THAT THE REQUEST WILL MAINTAIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S CHARACTER AND ALIGN WELL WITH THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER ALONG NORTH PARK AVENUE. ADDITIONALLY, THE REQUEST SUPPORTS POLICIES THAT PROMOTE INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LANDS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN. THE REZONING WILL ALLOW FOR ENHANCED UTILIZATION OF THE LAND CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE R-10 DESIGNATION. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOGNIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS SEEKING TO PROMOTE COMPATIBLE REDEVELOPMENT OF NEIGHBORHOODS TO ENSURE ECONOMIC HEALTH AND ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF LAND IS PLANNED FOR THE CITY'S GROWING POPULATION. IF THE REZONING IS APPROVED, THE SUBJECT SITE HAS THE POTENTIAL TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING ON AN UNDERUTILIZED PARCEL WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE RIDGEWOOD PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN? I SEE NONE. YES, MA'AM, MS. DOCK. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU AGAIN, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THE AREA UNDER THE REQUEST CONTAINS 14,835 SQUARE FEET. THIS LOT HAS A FRONTAGE OF 117 FEET WITH A LOT DEPTH OF 130 FEET. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED WITHIN THIS REQUESTED ZONING DISTRICT IS 35 FEET. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED RS 60. GIVEN THE FRONTAGE, IT DOESN'T HAVE ENOUGH FRONTAGE TO MEET THE RS 60 STANDARDS. SO THE REQUEST IS BEFORE YOU FOR THE RS 50. ON PAGE 1 OF THE REPORT, I HAVE DETAILED THAT THE PRIOR APPLICATIONS ON THIS PROPERTY, THERE WAS A REQUEST FOR A FORMAL DECISION MADE. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED TO SPLIT THIS LOT INTO TWO LOTS, BUT THOSE LOTS WOULD BE FACING PARK AVENUE. SO JUST TO SHOW YOU ON THE ZONING MAP. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE, WHICH IS OUTLINED IN RED. THIS IS GLENWOOD DRIVE. THIS IS PARK AVENUE. AND THEN THIS IS NORTH BOULEVARD. SO THIS IS THE HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT THAT'S LOCATED HERE SOUTH OF ROSS. SO THE REQUEST WAS ORIGINALLY TO ORIENT THOSE LOTS AND SPLIT THEM WITH THE LOT LINE RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH. AND THEY WOULD -- THAT REQUEST WAS DENIED. SO THE APPLICANT IS BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING WITH THIS REQUEST TO REZONE TO THE RS 50 AND THE LOTS WOULD ORIENT TO THE WEST. AND GLENWOOD WOULD BE THE FRONTAGE ON THOSE LOTS. SO THE SUBJECT SITE IS A PART OF THE RIDGEWOOD PARK SUBDIVISION, A PART OF BLOCK C. LOTS 13 AND 14, THAT SUBDIVISION WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED IN 1932 WITH 13 BLOCKS. FRONTAGES RANGED ANYWHERE FROM 45 FEET TO 58 FEET. SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WEST PARK AVENUE AND NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE CONTAINS PARCELS WHICH ARE ZONED PD WHICH WAS APPROVED IN '21. THOSE PARCELS WERE APPROVED FOR TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS. ALSO, THERE HAVE BEEN RECENT REZONINGS WITHIN THE AREA APPROVED FOR SEMI DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES. ALSO, THERE IS A RECENT REZONING APPROVAL THAT WAS LOCATED EAST OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE PD THAT WAS APPROVED FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY USES. AND THEN YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE PD ZONINGS THAT ARE FURTHER UP NORTH BOULEVARD, AND THIS IS A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AND THEN THIS IS ONE THAT'S IN NOW FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ON THE CORNER. ASIDE FROM THAT SURROUNDING THE SITE, YOU SEE THAT EXISTING RS 60 ZONING AND THEN YOU HAVE THE POCKETS OF THE RS 50 THAT ARE THROUGHOUT THE AREA. THERE IS A CONFORMING MAP WITH AN ANALYSIS DONE OF THE AREA. THIS IS THAT MAP. ON THE MAP JUST TO ORIENT YOU, THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN BLACK IN THE HATCHED AREA. THIS IS GLENWOOD DRIVE. THIS IS PARK AVENUE. THIS IS ROSS AVENUE SOUTH AND THEN THIS IS NORTH BOULEVARD ON THE EAST. SO THE SUBJECT SITE WOULD HAVE THE TWO LOTS AND THEY WOULD ORIENT TO GLENWOOD DRIVE. I'M GOING TO READ THE CONFORMING ANALYSIS THAT IS PROVIDED ON PAGE 3 AND 4 OF THE STAFF REPORT. SO THE AREA OF ANALYSIS INCLUDED 161 PARCELS. 55 PARCELS, 34% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER AND 106 PARCELS OR 66% DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS. THE BLOCKS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE, BETWEEN WEST PARK AVENUE AND WEST FRANCES AVENUE IS COMPRISED OF BLOCKS C AND F. THE SUBJECT BLOCK ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE, BLOCK C CONTAINS THREE PARCELS. EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE, ALL FRONTING NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE WITH THREE OR HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE PARCELS HAVING LOT WIDTHS OF 55 FEET TO 59.99 FEET. BLOCK F ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE CONTAINS FIVE PARCELS THAT FRONT NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE WITH FIVE OR HUNDRED PERCENT OF THOSE LOT WIDTHS AT A RANGE OF 55 FEET TO 59.99 FEET. THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK BETWEEN NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE AND NORTH BOULEVARD CONTAINS THREE PARCELS, WHICH ARE ORIENTED TOWARDS PARK AVENUE. HUNDRED PERCENT OF THOSE LOTS ARE AT A WIDTH OF 54.99 FEET. TWO OR 67% WITH LOT WIDTHS AT 50 TO 54.99 FEET AND ONE OR 33% WITH A LOT WIDTH OF 45 TO 49.99 FEET. NORTH SIDE OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK BETWEEN NORTH GLENWOOD AND NORTH BOULEVARD CONTAINS FOUR PARCELS, FRONTING WEST FRANCES AVENUE WITH HUNDRED PERCENT OF THOSE LOTS AT A WIDTH OF 45 FEET TO 49.99 FEET. STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED THAT 66% OF THE PARCELS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS AND 34% OF THOSE PARCELS DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER IN THE STUDY AREA. STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE OVERALL STUDY AREA. I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE WEST END OF THE SITE. THIS IS ON GLENWOOD. THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING EAST. THIS IS THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE. VACANT, OF COURSE. AND THIS IS THE SITE. THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING EAST ON PARK AVENUE. AND THIS IS THE ALLEY LOCATED NORTH. PARK AVENUE AGAIN. THIS IS LOOKING EAST. SO THE SUBJECT SITE IS OFF TO THE LEFT ON THIS PICTURE. AND THIS IS IF YOU ARE AT THE SITE AND LOOKING SOUTH, SO YOU CAN SEE THE RESIDENTIAL THAT EXISTS OFF TO THE DISTANCE AND THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE THAT'S LOCATED. THIS IS ACROSS -- THIS IS CATTY-CORNER FROM THE SITE. THIS IS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GLENWOOD AND PARK. YOU CAN SEE THE RESIDENTIAL THAT EXISTS THERE. THIS IS WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. SO THE SITE IS BEHIND US IN THIS PICTURE. AND THEN THIS IS WEST. THIS IS THE VIEW LOOKING NORTH. THE SITE IS TO THE RIGHT IN THIS PICTURE. WITH THAT, STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT AND I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS? I SEE NONE. APPLICANT? >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MA'AM. >>STEVE MICHELINI: STEVE MICHELINI REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER. THE BASIC PRINCIPLE HERE IS TO BE ABLE TO REORIENT THE SITE SO THAT IT FACES GLENWOOD. I HAVE A COUPLE OF AERIALS I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW YOU. THE RIVERWALK BIKE PATH WILL RUN RIGHT IN FRONT OF IT. SO THE PETITIONER WANTS TO ORIENT THE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES TOWARD THAT ONE SECTION. THERE IS A BETTER VIEW OF THAT. NOT TO FACE THE HOUSES TOWARD PARK. ACTUALLY ORIENT THEM TOWARD THE PARK AND TO CREATE, AGAIN, THAT TREE CANOPY TO ENHANCE THE PARK AND TO MAKE IT MORE ATTRACTIVE. THE STAFF, BOTH PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF FOUND IT TO BE CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE. AS I SAID, WE'RE BASICALLY TRYING TO REORIENT THE PROJECT SO IT TAKES ADVANTAGE OF AND ENHANCES THAT BIKE PATH GOING THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. STAFF ALSO POINTED OUT THAT 66% OF THE HOUSES AND 100% OF THE HOMES FACE GLENWOOD. SO WE ARE CONSISTENT IN BOTH OF THOSE REGARDS. WE ARE TRYING TO MAKE GLENWOOD, THE ORIENTATION, THE REQUEST WILL ALLOW TWO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES AND IT WILL BE AN ENHANCEMENT OF THE PARK THAT IT FACES. WE APPRECIATE THE STAFF'S COMMENTS. AGAIN, IT DOESN'T MEET THE FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS UNDER RS 60, WHICH IS CREATING THE PROBLEM FOR US. THAT'S WHY WE'RE REQUESTING THEY GO TO RS 50. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THAT. IT DOES PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING. IT'S ON SMALLER LOTS, SO IT DOES PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ACCESS. IT'S NOT THE MULTIFAMILY, THE TOWN HOUSES THAT ARE ADJACENT AND TO THE SOUTH. IT IS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK OR VIERA, ANY QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY. ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 7? ITEM NUMBER 7? WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. ALL IN FAVOR? I'M SORRY. ROLL CALL VOTE TO CLOSE. I'M SORRY. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION TO CLOSE CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT -- I MEAN, MOTION TO CLOSE, YES, WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 7? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: FILE 7, REZ 24-64, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 709 WEST PARK AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS 60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS 50, RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ALONG WITH THE REVISION SHEET. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 3rd, 2024, AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DON'T GO TOO FAR BECAUSE YOU HAVE ONE MORE. ITEM NUMBER 8. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 8 IS REZ 24-65. IT IS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 206 CHIPPEWA AVENUE. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS 60, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, TO RS 50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO DANNY TO GIVE HIS REPORT AND I'LL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I WAS SWORN IN. OUR NEXT CASE IS ALSO IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, SPECIFICALLY IN THE DAVIS ISLANDS URBAN VILLAGE. THE SITE IS WITHIN EVACUATION ZONE A AND ALSO WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA. SUBJECT SITE IS JUST NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF CHIPPEWA AVENUE AND BISCAYNE BAY OR AVENUE. SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN THE PURPLE COLOR. IT IS SURROUNDED PREDOMINANTLY BY RESIDENTIAL USES. THIS IS A PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY HERE. AS YOU MOVE NORTHEAST, THERE ARE SOME NONRESIDENTIAL USES JUST OUT OF THE FRAME HERE. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL POLICY GUIDANCE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPOSED RS 50 ZONING DISTRICT CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE R-10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. PER THE LDC. THIS REZONING WILL PROVIDE COMPATIBLE INFILL DEVELOPMENT IN AN AREA PLANNED FOR TEN DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. STAFF FINDS THE RS 50 ZONING DISTRICT WOULD PROVIDE FOR COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE SURROUNDING AREA. GIVEN THE SURROUNDING USES, THIS PORTION OF CHIPPEWA AVENUE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND BISCAYNE AVENUE, SUBJECT SITE HAS EXISTING DENSITY OF 4.64 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. THE EXISTING DENSITY ALONG THE SEGMENT IS APPROXIMATELY 46% OF THE DENSITY THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE R-10 DESIGNATION. THE PROPOSED REZONING WILL ALLOW CONSIDERATION OF TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED ZONING LOTS, DENSITY AT 7.08 UNITS PER ACRE. CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE R-10 DESIGNATION. ADDITIONALLY, THE REQUEST SUPPORTS POLICIES THAT PROMOTE INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED PLANS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN. REZONING WILL ALLOW FOR ENHANCED UTILIZATION OF THE LAND, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOGNIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS SEEKING TO PROMOTE COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT OF NEIGHBORHOODS TO ENSURE ECONOMIC HEALTH AND ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF LAND IS PLANNED FOR THE CITY'S GROWING POPULATIONS. IF THE REZONING IS APPROVED SUBJECT SITE HAS POTENTIAL TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFILL HOUSING ON AN UNDERUTILIZED PARCEL WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE DAVIS ISLANDS URBAN VILLAGE. BASED ON THESE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO. MS. DOCK. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU AGAIN, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN ZONING REQUEST, SO THERE IS NO SITE PLAN, BUT A SURVEY WAS SUBMITTED. I'LL PUT THE SURVEY ON THE ELMO. SO THIS LOT CONTAINS 11,235 SQUARE FEET. IT HAS A FRONTAGE OF 105 FEET AND DEPTH OF 107 FEET. MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED IN THE ZONING DISTRICT REQUESTED IS 35 FEET. THE SUBJECT SITE IS A PART OF THE DAVIS ISLANDS SOUTH PARK SECTION, BLOCK 25, LOTS 9 AND 10. THIS WAS PLATTED IN 1925. THE SUBJECT BLOCK WAS PLATTED WITH 17 LOTS WITH LOT FRONTAGES RANGING IN WIDTH FROM 33 FEET TO 60 FEET. THE SURROUNDING USES WHICH I'LL SHOW ON THE ZONING AERIAL SHORTLY, APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE THERE IS AN EXISTING PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THAT HAS 20 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE PD, PARCELS WHICH ARE ZONED RS 50. ONE BLOCK EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, THERE ARE PARCELS THAT ARE ZONED RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. THERE IS A PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY AND SCHOOL USES ALSO WITHIN THAT PROXIMITY. THE SITE HAS A FUTURE LAND USE OF R-10, AND GIVEN THE SIZE OF THE SITE, A TOTAL OF TWO DWELLING UNITS CAN BE DEVELOPED. THIS HAS A CONFORMING MAP WITH IT, SO THIS IS THE CONFORMING MAP. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE, WHICH IS OUTLINED HERE IN BLACK AND IN THE HATCHED AREA. SO THIS IS BISCAYNE. THIS IS BARBADOS AVENUE. THIS IS DAVIS AVENUE, WHICH IS DAVIS BOULEVARD. WHICH IS HERE TO THE EAST. I WILL READ THE ANALYSIS INTO THE RECORD WHICH IS CONTAINED WITHIN PAGE 4 OF THE STAFF REPORT. SO THE AREA UNDER THE ANALYSIS INCLUDES 119 PARCELS, 74 OR 62% HAVE A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER AND 45 OR 38 PERCENT HAVE A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS. TODAY THE SUBJECT BLOCK CONTAINS 15 PARCELS, INCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE, WITH WIDTHS RANGING FROM 45 FEET TO 100 FEET. EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE, 7 OR 50% OF THE PARCELS ON THE SUBJECT BLOCK HAVE A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER. 7 OR 50% ARE 59.99 FEET OR LESS. THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK FACING BISCAYNE AVENUE CONTAINS 8 PARCELS WITH WIDTHS RANGING FROM 45 FEET TO 74.99 FEET. THREE OR 38% OF THE PARCELS HAVE A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER AND FIVE OR 62% HAVE A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS. THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK FACING BARBADOS AVENUE CONTAINS SIX PARCELS WITH WIDTHS RANGING FROM 50 TO 100 FEET. 4 OR 67% OF THE PARCELS HAVE A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER. AND 2 OR 33% HAVE A WIDTH OF 54.99 FEET OR LESS. THE SUBJECT SITE IS ONLY -- IS THE ONLY PARCEL WHICH IS ORIENTED TO CHIPPEWA AVENUE ON THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK. BLOCK 26 IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CHIPPEWA AVENUE ACROSS THE SUBJECT SITE. ACROSS FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. CONTAINS THREE PARCELS WHICH ARE ORIENTED TO -- TOWARDS CHIPPEWA WITH WIDTHS RANGING FROM 70 FEET TO 99.99 FEET. 100% OF THOSE PARCELS HAVE A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER. BLOCK 26, THE OVERALL, THAT BLOCK OVERALL CONTAINS 17 PARCELS WITH LOT WIDTHS RANGING FROM 45 FEET TO 99.99 FEET. 29% OF THOSE HAVE A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER AND 12 OR 71% HAVE A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS. STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED THAT 62 PERCENT OF THE PARCELS HAVE A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER. 38 PERCENT HAVE A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS IN THE STUDY AREA. WHILE THERE ARE A VARIETY OF LOT SIZES AND USES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE, STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE OVERALL STUDY AREA. WITH THAT, I'LL SHOW THE AERIAL, THE ZONING MAP AND THE AERIAL OF THE PROPERTY. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE WHICH IS IN RED. THIS IS BISCAYNE AVENUE. THIS IS DAVIS BOULEVARD. LOCATED HERE. YOU CAN SEE THE SURROUNDING USES SURROUNDING THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, WEST, AND EAST ARE THAT RS 60 ZONING. AS YOU MOVE FURTHER WEST, YOU GET INTO RS 75 ZONING DISTRICT AND FURTHER EAST AS YOU HEAD TOWARDS DAVIS BOULEVARD, DAVIS, OF COURSE, YOU HAVE YOUR COMMERCIAL USES. BUT YOU ACTUALLY REACH YOUR RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND THEN YOUR COMMERCIAL USES AS YOU GRADUALLY MOVE TOWARDS THE EAST. I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE IMMEDIATE AREA. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING WEST AT THE SITE. THIS IS THE SITE. THIS IS IF YOU ARE LOOKING, THIS IS THE SITE IN THE PICTURE AND THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ON CHIPPEWA. THAT'S ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE. THAT'S IF YOU'RE LOOKING NORTH, YOU DO IT THE OPPOSITE WAY. THIS IS ON CHIPPEWA LOOKING NORTH. SO THE SITE IN THIS PICTURE IS OFF TO THE LEFT. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE THAT'S LOCATED NORTHWEST ON BARBADOS. THIS IS ACROSS THE STREET. SO THIS IS EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. ANOTHER HOME EAST OF THE SITE. THIS IS AT BISCAYNE. THESE ARE THE TOWNHOMES, THE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED MENTIONED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT. THIS IS THE PD. AND THIS IS ACROSS FROM THE TOWNHOMES THAT ARE JUST SHOWED YOU. THIS IS LOOKING NORTHEAST ON BISCAYNE. AND THEN THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE SITE. THIS HOME FRONTS BISCAYNE AND IT IS AT THE CORNER. WITH THAT, STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT, I'M AVAILABLE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU. CAN YOU PLEASE PUT UP THE, OH, WHAT IS THIS CALLED, THE EXISTING LOT PATTERN FOR REZONING, THE COLORFUL MAP? >>LaCHONE DOCK: THE CONFORMING MAP? THIS MAP? >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY AND ASK THAT WHAT I HEARD, I HEARD. SO WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS THAT THE LOT IN QUESTION IS THE ONLY ONE ON ITS BLOCK THAT FACES CHIPPEWA. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES, MA'AM, THAT IS CORRECT. >>LYNN HURTAK: AND THERE ARE THREE HOUSES ACROSS THE STREET THAT FACE CHIPPEWA. >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. THIS BLOCK, THESE LOTS ALL FACE BARBADOS AND THEN THESE LOTS ON THE SOUTH END OF THE BLOCK FACE BISCAYNE. AND THEN ACROSS THE STREET, THESE ARE THE THREE LOTS THAT FRONT CHIPPEWA. THIS IS THE BLOCK FACE. LIKE FROM HERE TO HERE. >>LYNN HURTAK: FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, YOU SAID THAT THE THREE LOTS ACROSS THE STREET VARY IN WIDTH FROM 70 TO 99 FEET EACH? >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY. THANK YOU. >>LaCHONE DOCK: YOU'RE WELCOME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. PETITIONER, PLEASE COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. >>STEVE MICHELINI: I THINK EVERYONE HAS BEEN SWORN IN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANOTHER PERSON WALKED IN. JUST MAKING SURE. GO AHEAD. >>STEVE MICHELINI: STEVE MICHELINI REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. I THINK ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WE NEED TO DEAL WITH AND THEY'LL DEAL WITH THIS IN A PRESENTATION, IS THAT THEY HAVE ELIMINATED THE CONSIDERATION OF THE TOWN HOUSES AND THE MULTIFAMILY AS AFFECTING THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. THEY ARE USING SINGLE-FAMILY, BUT THAT'S BY POLICY. BUT WE'RE GOING TO POINT THAT OUT. AND THERE ARE A MIX OF SMALLER AND LARGER LOTS THROUGHOUT THIS AREA, INCLUDING APARTMENT BUILDING THAT IS CATTY-CORNER FROM THIS. AGAIN, THE LOT PATTERNS AND THE DESIGN OF THESE LOTS VARIES FROM ONE SIDE TO THE OTHER. SO THERE IS A WHOLE MIX. THEY ARE ALSO GOING TO PUT IN THE RECORD A LISTING OF ALL OF THE SMALLER LOTS THAT ARE WITHIN THE NOTICE AREA. SO I'LL TURN IT OVER TO THEM FOR THEIR PRESENTATION AND THEY HAVE A PowerPoint AS WELL. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. CHRIS MERCER, 599 RIVIERA DRIVE. I'M A LONGTIME DAVIS ISLAND RESIDENT, ABOUT 20 YEARS. LIVED ON LUZON TWICE AND RIVIERA. CURRENTLY OWN TWO HOUSES ON LUZON. ONE ON RIVIERA. I FULLY SUPPORT THE DIVERSE HOUSING STOCK ON DAVIS ISLAND FROM SMALL STUDIO APARTMENTS TO $40 MILLION HOUSES. PART OF OUR INTEREST IN THIS DIVISION IS TO TRY TO KEEP SOME NEW CONSTRUCTION UNDER $2 MILLION. IT'S NOT AFFORDABLE HOUSING, PER SE, BUT FOR DAVIS ISLAND AND CURRENT SITUATION, IT'S AS AFFORDABLE AS IT CAN GET. I SERVED ON THE DEKEA BOARD IN 2018, 2019, AND 2020. WE BUILT 17 HOUSES ON DAVIS ISLAND IN THE LAST NINE YEARS. I'VE ONLY COME BEFORE YOU TWICE ASKING FOR A REZONING. IN GENERAL, WE BUILD TO ENTITLEMENT. BOTH TIMES I ASK, CITY SUPPORTED ONE, CITY DID NOT SUPPORT THE OTHER. BOTH TIMES YOU GUYS APPROVED THEM. BUILT THE HOUSES AND FAMILIES LIVE. FULLY INVOLVED, VESTED AND IN LOVE WITH DAVIS ISLAND. WE TRY TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR. WE SUBMITTED THIS REZONING REQUEST. INITIALLY TWO OBJECTIONS FROM THE CONTIGUOUS NEIGHBORS. WE MET WITH THEM. WE LET THEM KNOW WE ALREADY HIRED A CIVIL ENGINEER TO DEAL WITH DRAINAGE, AND THEIR MAIN CONCERN WAS PRIVACY VIA LANDSCAPING. WE AGREED TO PROVIDE LANDSCAPING. SO BOTH OF THEM HAVE REMOVED THEIR OBJECTIONS AND SUPPORT OUR PROJECT. TO DATE I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY SUBSTANTIAL, COMPETENT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT DENYING THE REZONING IN ANY OBJECTION LETTER. MANY OF THE POINTS IN THE LETTERS ARE FACTUALLY WRONG AND A LITTLE LATER ON IN THE PRESENTATION WE'LL SHOW YOU WHY WE THINK THAT. I DISCUSSED THE PROJECT WITH MANY RESIDENTS OF DAVIS ISLAND. WE RECEIVED OVERWHELMING SUPPORT. MANY LETTERS OF SUPPORT WERE SUBMITTED TO DEKEA. UNFORTUNATELY, THAT WAS AFTER THEY HAD VOTED. I DIDN'T KNOW THAT THEY WERE GOING TO BE TALKING ON OUR PROJECT BECAUSE THE LAST TWO PROJECTS SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR SIZE AND CHANGE, THEY HAD NO OBJECTION TO. SO WE WERE CAUGHT A BIT OFF GUARD ON THAT. WE'LL NEVER MAKE EVERYBODY HAPPY. THIS IS A MINIMALLY INVASIVE REZONING REQUEST. FULLY SUPPORTED BY HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. SUPPORTED BY MOST OF THE CITY OF TAMPA DEPARTMENTS AS WELL AS MANY DAVIS ISLAND RESIDENTS. I BELIEVE WE HAVE TEN LETTERS OF SUPPORT. I BELIEVE THREE PEOPLE HERE SPEAKING ON OUR BEHALF TONIGHT. AGAIN, AS I SAID, I WASN'T AWARE THAT WE WERE GOING TO BE ON THE DAVIS ISLAND CIVIC ASSOCIATION RADAR. IN LIGHT OF WHAT THEY DID WITH CHANNEL DRIVE, SO I DIDN'T EXPECT OPPOSITION, SO I DIDN'T BOTHER THEM. ONCE I LEARNED OF THEIR OPPOSITION ONLY A FEW DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING I REACHED OUT TO DISCUSS WITH THEM OUR PLANS. THEY NOTED WITH THE SUPPORT LETTERS THAT THEY HAVE RECEIVED, OUR DRAINAGE THAT WE'LL DO AND OTHER ITEMS, THEY MIGHT BE LESS OPPOSED TO IT IF THEY HAD TIME TO HEAR US OUT, BUT THEY DIDN'T HAVE TIME TO VOTE TO SUPPORT OPPOSE OR ABSTAIN. IF APPROVED TODAY, I'LL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH DICA AND ANY RESIDENTS TO ADDRESS THEIR CONCERNS. ONLY RECEIVED OBJECTION LETTER TODAY AT 1:40 P.M. I WOULD NOTE WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE MAP AND YOU READ THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT AND CITY OF TAMPA ZONING MAP DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH A LOT OF THINGS THAT DICA'S OBJECTION LETTER SAYS. AGAIN, NEW HOMES ARE MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT. IF THE SPLIT IS APPROVED, EACH HOME WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED CARBON FOOTPRINT VERSUS ONE LARGE HOME. NEW HOMES WILL BE ABOVE THE FEMA FLOOD MAP AND THE FLOOD INSURANCE WILL BE ABOUT 80% LESS THAN WHAT AN ON-GRADE HOME WOULD COST. FINAL POINT AND THEN TURN IT OVER TO MY PARTNER, JONATHAN SANDS. PEOPLE WILL SAY THAT HAVING TWO HOMES IS GOING TO DRAMATICALLY CHANGE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ZONING DISAGREES. I OWN TWO HOUSES HERE AND AN APARTMENT COMPLEX SOMEWHERE RIGHT AROUND HERE. I WOULD BE ONE OF THE FIRST PEOPLE IF I THOUGHT THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD REDUCE VALUES, I WOULDN'T DO IT. IT WOULD HURT ME MORE THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON. WITH THAT, I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND TURN IT OVER TO MR. SANDS. >> JONATHAN SANDS. SAN RAFAEL. I JUST WANTED TO BRING YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS BOARD. DEALING WITH SAMUEL THOMAS. STAFF DID A GREAT JOB PREPARING THIS. WANT TO MAKE SURE WHAT SAMUEL THOMAS TOLD ME IS THAT IN THIS WHOLE AREA, THEY COULDN'T USE A LOT OF THE AREAS. COULDN'T USE THE PDs. COULDN'T USE THE RMs. THEY HAD TO GO TO A WIDE 1,000-FOOT BUFFER AREA AND HAD TO NOT USE A LOT OF THE THINGS. I WANT TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION, THIS IS A UNIQUE AREA THAT HAS MANY DIFFERENT ZONINGS OF MANY DIFFERENT SIZES. AS YOU SEE, THERE'S MULTIFAMILY RIGHT HERE. REZONES OVER HERE. SO THAT WASN'T REALLY INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL FINDINGS. SO AS YOU LOOK RIGHT HERE, YOU'LL SEE ON BLOCK 25, SEVERAL OF THESE ARE ACTUALLY BELOW THE ZONING STANDARDS. AND ON BLOCK 26, THE SAME EXACT THING HOLDS TRUE RIGHT THERE. IF I JUST GO TO THE NEXT PAGE I WANT TO GO TO, BASICALLY THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT, IF YOU DON'T MIND, I WOULD LIKE TO READ A COUPLE OF EXCERPTS OF THEIR FINDINGS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THAT THE REQUEST WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AND IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THIS PORTION OF NORTH DICA AVENUE. -- WITH NORTH CHIPPEWA AVENUE. FURTHERMORE, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED APPLICATION AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. REZONING WILL ALLOW FOR ENHANCED UTILIZATION OF THE LAND CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE R-10 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. SO THERE ARE A COUPLE OF HITS RIGHT HERE. THESE ARE PARTS OF THE REPORT AND JUST HITTING ON IT. BASICALLY BY APPROVAL OF THE REZONING, THE SUBJECT SITE HAS POTENTIAL FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONAL INFILL HOUSING ON UNDERUTILIZED LAND. NEXT I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE A WALK AROUND THE AREA SO WE CAN KIND OF TAKE A LOOK-SEE. FROM THE SUBJECT PARCEL, YOU CAN SEE ALREADY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING RIGHT THERE. THAT IS THE SAME PICTURE RIGHT HERE. BLOCK 25, WHICH IS THE BLOCK THAT WE'RE ON, YOU'LL NOTE ALL OF THESE HOUSES FIT RS 50. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO BUILD SOMETHING VERY SIMILAR. 3,000, 3500 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE. THIS IS WHAT THE AREA IS SHOWN TO BE CONSISTENT WHEN YOU DRIVE AROUND THE AREA. THEN I WANT TO GET INTO A LITTLE BIT CLOSER. THIS IS THE 300-FOOT BUFFER MAP. THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE TO SEND TO THE GOOD NEIGHBORS. GOT 8 MINUTES, COOL. SENT TO THE GOOD NEIGHBORS AND EVERYONE AROUND HERE. SEE ALL THE EXRKDZs, THESE ARE -- Xs, THESE ARE HOUSES THAT DO NOT MEET THE STANDARDS. OF NOTE ON 50 HOUSES IN THE 300-FOOT BUFFER ZONE, 27 OR 54 PERCENT OF THEM DO NOT MEET THE RS 60 STANDARDS. AND 12 OUT OF THE 27 DO NOT EVEN MEET THE RS 50 STANDARDS. NOW, I HIGHLIGHTED THESE TWO AREAS RIGHT HERE, THESE TWO CONTIGUOUS LOTS. THESE ARE THE NEIGHBORS THAT REACHED OUT TO US. THEY HAD SOME CONCERNS. THEIR CONCERNS WERE DRAINAGE. WHEN YOU'RE IN SOUTH TAMPA AND DAVIS ISLAND, DRAINAGE IS EVERYBODY'S CONCERN. WE LET THEM KNOW WE PROACTIVELY REACHED OUT AND HIRED A CIVIL ENGINEER TO CREATE A DRAINAGE PLAN THAT NOT ONLY EXCEEDS CODE REQUIREMENTS, BUT IT ACTUALLY RETAINS WATER ON-SITE. NOT ONLY DO WE HIRE A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, CIVIL ENGINEER, WE ALSO WORKED WITH CITY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AS WELL. SO IF I COULD TAKE A COUPLE OF SECONDS AND SHOW YOU, BY ENTITLEMENT, IF WE DID NOTHING AT ALL AND NEEDED ANYTHING, WE COULD BUILD THIS WHOLE ENTIRE HOUSE RIGHT HERE. THESE MEET THE SETBACKS. 20-FOOT REAR SETBACK, 25-FOOT SIDE SETBACK, 7-FOOT -- SORRY, 25-FOOT FRONT SETBACK, 7-FOOT SIDE AND 7-FOOT SIDE SETBACKS. SO THIS WOULD TAKE UP A LOT MORE AREA. WHEN YOU HAVE TWO HOUSES, YOU'RE GOING TO ACTUALLY HAVE A LOT MORE GREENSPACE BECAUSE THERE IS GOING TO BE TWO 7-FOOT SIDE SETBACKS RIGHT HERE. THAT ACTUALLY GIVES MORE GREENSPACE. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE MY MATH WAS ACCURATE, SO I CONTACTED CITY OF TAMPA STORMWATER. HE CONFIRMED TWO HOUSES BUILT TO MAXIMUM SETBACKS WILL TAKE UP LESS PERVIOUS AREA THAN ONE LARGE HOME BUILT TO MAXIMUM SETBACKS. ALSO CONFIRMED THAT WITH CIVIL ENGINEER, JUST TO DOUBLE CHECK TO MAKE SURE THE MATH IS RIGHT. AS YOU CAN SEE WITH MORE GREENSPACE THAT ALLOWS FOR MORE AREA FOR SWALES, DRAINAGE, ADS PIPE, MORE CONVEYANCE AND MORE WATER RETENTION. FOR THOSE THAT ARE CONCERNED ABOUT DRAIN SPACE AND FILLING UP TOO MUCH AREA, THIS ACTUALLY PROVIDES TWO HOUSES PROVIDE MORE GREENSPACE THAN ONE HOUSE DOES. HERE IS THE DRAINAGE PLAN THAT WE'RE PROPOSING. ALSO HAVE A FULL COPY. SENT TO ALL NEIGHBORS. DICA AS WELL FOR THEIR REVIEW. NOT ONLY DOING CODE MINIMUM OF ADS PIPE. WE'RE CREATING SWALES ON ALL SIDES. DRAINAGE PIPE WITH AN EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEM. JUST SO YOU KNOW, EXFILTRATION SYSTEM IS NOT REQUIRED ON RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. THAT'S TYPICALLY FOR COMMERCIAL AND MULTIFAMILY. I ALSO WANT TO LET YOU KNOW I CONTACTED CHARLIE RODRIGUEZ AT THE CITY STORMWATER, AND HE AGREED THAT THE PLANS ARE ABOVE AND BEYOND CODE REQUIREMENTS, ALTHOUGH HE SAID HE WAS NOT ATTENDING. IF ANYBODY REACHED OUT TO HIM, HE WOULD BE HAPPY TO SAY, YEAH, THEY ARE GOOD. THAT BEING SAID, IN SUMMARY, I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE ON THE SAME PAGE HERE, THAT THE AREA HAS SEVERAL RM, PD REZONES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY. WE HAVE YET TO SEE OBJECTION LETTERS OFFERING ANY SUBSTANTIAL COMPETENT EVIDENCE TO DENY THIS REQUEST. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IT CONSISTENT AND SUPPORTS THE REZONING NOTING IT WOULD NOT CREATE ADVERSE EFFECTS FOR SURROUNDING AREA AND GOOD USE OF UNDERUTILIZED SPACE TO HELP IN MEETING TAMPA'S LONG-TERM HOUSING PLAN. OF THE 50 HOUSES IN THE 300-FOOT BUFFER ZONE, THERE ARE 27 THAT DO NOT MEET THE RS 60 STANDARDS AND 12 OF THOSE 27 DO NOT MEET RS 50. OUR PROPOSED DESIGNS WILL MATCH THE SURROUNDING HOUSES IN THE AREA AND MORE OF A NATURAL FIT AND WILL NOT CREATE ADVERSE IMPACTS. IN ADDITION, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE PROPOSED DESIGN ALLOWS FOR A MUCH BETTER STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM THAT WILL ASSIST THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS AS WELL AS THE CITY STORMWATER SYSTEM. I CONFIRMED THIS WITH THE ENGINEER THAT NOT ONLY IS IT A BENEFIT TO THE NEIGHBORS BEHIND US THAT MAY BE IMPACTED OR CONCERNED ABOUT IT, BUT ALL OF CHIPPEWA BECAUSE WE'RE RETAINING MORE WATER THAN THE TYPICAL ONE HOUSE OR TWO HOUSE WOULD HAVE. WITH THAT, I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. THE DRAINAGE COMPONENT THAT WAS INTRODUCED BY THE APPLICANT, BECAUSE THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN ZONING, THERE'S NOTHING, THAT WON'T BE ATTACHED TO ANYTHING. NOT RELEVANT TO THIS CASE. >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST. SO THE APPLICANT IS WITH THE EUCLIDEAN REQUEST HAS TO MEET CODE AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING. ANYTHING THEY DO ABOVE AND BEYOND WE CANNOT COMMIT TO. WE CAN'T COMMIT TO ANYTHING ELSE ASIDE FROM THIS EUCLIDEAN REQUEST. SO ALTHOUGH THEY ARE STATING IT ON THE RECORD, WE HAVE NO WAY OF HOLDING THE APPLICANT TO THIS. JUST SO COUNCIL IS AWARE AND ON THE RECORD. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WITH THIS EUCLIDEAN ZONING REQUEST, ONE COMPELLING ARGUMENT FROM THE APPLICANT WAS THAT TWO HOUSES WITH THE INCREASED SIDE BY SIDE SETBACK, INCREASING GREENSPACE, THAT IS A FACT. IS THAT SOMETHING YOU WOULD CONCUR WITH? BUILT ONE HOUSE, THEY COULD BUILD BY RIGHT TO THE SETBACKS AND THIS WOULD ACTUALLY INCREASE GREENSPACE? >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. IF THEY BUILT ONE HOME ON THE PARCEL, AND IF THEY CHOSE TO BUILD TO THE SETBACKS, THEY COULD END UP WITH ONE LARGE HOME AND ONE LARGE FOOTPRINT. OR THEY COULD BUILD ONE HOME THAT DOESN'T MEET THE FOOTPRINT AND STILL MEET THE SAME LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IT SEEMS LIKE PRESENTED THIS. IT WAS A LONG TIME AGO. REFRESH MY MEMORY. STAFF'S OBJECTION WAS THE DENSITY IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE FRONTAGE ALONG CHIPPEWA BECAUSE THE HOUSES ACROSS THE WAY. >>LaCHONE DOCK: WELL, CORRECT. SO, WHEN WE LOOK AT THE CONFORMING MAP, WHAT WE DO IS LOOK AT THE FRONTAGES. SO WE LOOK AT ALL THE LOT WIDTHS WITHIN THE AREA. SO ALL THE LOTS HIGHLIGHTED WITH ANY COLOR HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS. AND THEN WE GIVE THE LOT WIDTH AT THE TOP BASED ON THE ANALYSIS. SO THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. WE LOOK AT THE BLOCK. WE LOOK AT THIS BLOCK FACE ACROSS THE STREET AND THAT IS A PART OF THE ANALYSIS. AND THEN WE GIVE YOU THE OVERALL ANALYSIS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IT LOOKS LIKE ALMOST A COIN FLIP BECAUSE IT IS PRETTY MIXED DENSITY. >>LaCHONE DOCK: OVERALL THE NUMBERS CAME OUT TO WHERE WE HAVE MORE OF THE LARGER LOTS. OVERALL WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS OVERALL AREA OF ANALYSIS. RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY WAS NOT INCLUDED, BUT KEEP IN MIND, THIS IS RS 75 ALSO. THIS WAS NOT INCLUDED. AND THESE TYPICALLY ARE GOING TO HAVE YOUR LARGER LOT SIZES BECAUSE IT HAS THE RS 75 ZONING. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DID YOU ALL CONSIDER THE PROXIMITY TO THE URBAN VILLAGE THERE? ANYTHING THAT YOU ALL CONSIDERED? >>LaCHONE DOCK: WELL, IN THE ANALYSIS WHENEVER THERE IS A REQUEST TO HAVE A ZONING WITH THE LOT WIDTH WHICH IS SMALLER THAN THE CURRENT ZONING, WE LOOK AT THE CONFORMING MAP AND THAT'S WHAT WE USED TO MAKE THE ANALYSIS ON. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, AS ALWAYS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DID COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK HAVE HER HAND UP? >>LYNN HURTAK: NO. BUT I WOULD -- YEAH, I'LL RESERVE MY QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FOR AFTER PUBLIC COMMENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, MR. MICHELINI. YOU STILL HAVE TIME. >>STEVE MICHELINI: ONE OF THE THINGS THEY POINTED OUT WAS THAT THE DRAINAGE PLAN AND I KNOW THAT WE CAN'T COMMIT TO THAT, BUT WE HAVE COMMITTED THAT TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. EXCEEDS THE CITY REQUIREMENTS, AND IT TAKES CARE OF OFF-SITE DRAINAGE, WHICH CURRENTLY IS NOT HAPPENING. I WANT TO PUT THIS UP HERE. THE TWO LOTS THAT ARE ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE, THESE ARE ANOMALIES. EVERY ONE OF THESE OTHER Xs ARE PROPERTIES THAT DO NOT -- ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE RS 60. AND WE HAVE A WHOLE LIST HERE% WITH THE ADDRESSES OF THE ONES THAT DON'T MEET RS 50 OR RS 60. AND I WOULD BE HAPPY TO PASS THAT AROUND. BT THESE ARE ALL WITHIN THAT NOTICE AREA. SO IT IS A MIXED BAG. AND THE STAFF CAN'T TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE APARTMENTS THAT ARE ACROSS THE STREET, THE TOWN HOUSES THAT ARE ACROSS THE STREET, AND THEY ARE LOOKING AT OTHER THINGS THAT WE THINK SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. THE ORIENTATION OF THESE HOMES WILL BE TOWARD CHIPPEWA. WE CANNOT ORIENT THEM TOWARD BARBADOS. WELL, YOU CAN SEE ON HERE. THEY HAVE TO BE ORIENTED THROUGH CHIPPEWA. THOSE LARGER LOTS ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH ANYTHING ELSE AROUND THERE. THOSE ARE OUTLIERS, ESSENTIALLY. AND THEN OVER HERE, YOU HAVE EVEN SMALLER LOTS. A WHOLE LINE OF THEM ON BISCAYNE. SO WITH THE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, THEY ARE CONSISTENT. SO WE HOPEFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU CONSIDER THAT AND BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR OPEN IT UP FOR GENERAL DISCUSSION. I UNDERSTAND SOME NEIGHBORS WHO HAD GENERAL CONCERNS EARLIER ON HAVE REVERSED THEIR CONCERNS, AND ARE NOW SUPPORTING THE PROJECT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AT THIS TIME, WE'LL OPEN IT UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. IF THERE'S ANYBODY THAT WISHES TO SPEAK, PLEASE COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. YES MA'AM. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> KRISTA CLEMENTS. I AM A PROPERTY OWNER AT 208 COMO STREET ON DAVIS ISLANDS. I RECEIVED A LETTER ABOUT THIS, AND I WAS NEVER NOTIFIED BY THE PETITIONER. SO WE'VE NOT HAD A CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS. HE STATED EARLIER THAT HE HAD TALKED TO ALL THE NEIGHBORS. I LIVE ONE BLOCK AWAY. I'M ALSO SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF MARK ZIEGLER AT 206 COMO STREET, JOE PA RADA 212 COMO STREET AND BILL BENSON AT 105 BISCAYNE AVENUE. WE ALL SUBMITTED LETTERS OF OPPOSITION TO SAMUEL THOMAS AT THE CITY OF TAMPA. WE'RE ALL LONG-TERM RESIDENTS IN THIS AREA. WE'VE OWNED OUR CURRENT HOMES FOR OVER 30 YEARS. WE OPPOSE THE LOT SPLIT APPLICATION AT 206 CHIPPEWA BECAUSE WE FEEL IT'S INCONSISTENT WITH THE ESTABLISHED CHARACTER OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTIES IN THIS AREA DO ADHERE TO RS 60. THE ZONING CRITERIA, AND WE WANT TO MAINTAIN A COHESIVE AND UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT. ALLOWING AN EXCEPTION FOR THIS LOT SPLIT WOULD UNDERMINE THE ZONING REGULATIONS IN PLACE TO PRESERVE THE CHARACTER AND THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND I URGE YOU TO CONSIDER THE IMPACT OF THIS PROPOSAL ON OUR COMMUNITY AND UPHOLD THE EXISTING ZONING STANDARDS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MA'AM. ALL RIGHT, SIR. COME ON UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING. WILLIAM, 573 LUZON AVENUE, DAVIS ISLANDS FLORIDA. I LIVED ON THE ISLAND FOR 12 YEARS NOW. I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF OVERDEVELOPMENT. THIS IS PROPER DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN WITH SOME OF THE OLDER HOMES ON DAVIS ISLANDS. WHAT YOU HAVE NOW IS AN EYESORE, AND IT'S IN A NEIGHBORHOOD. WE RECOGNIZE THAT, BUT IT'S ALSO RIGHT OFF EAST DAVIS BOULEVARD, WHICH IS AS COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE POINTED OUT, IT IS THE BUSINESS DISTRICT. THERE IS MULTIFAMILY HOUSING. THERE ARE TOWNHOMES RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER. I WOULD ASK THIS COUNCIL TO MAKE AN EXCEPTION TO THE RS 60. I BELIEVE THAT THE LAST RESIDENT WHO SPOKE ON COMO, THAT IS A 52-FOOT LOT IN AN RS 60 ZONE. SO IT'S NOT DRAMATICALLY MODIFYING THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS TAKING AWAY AN EYESORE, PUTTING IN, AGAIN, WE RECOGNIZE THAT $2 MILLION IS AN EXCEPTIONAL AMOUNT OF MONEY, BUT FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DAVIS ISLAND HOMES, THAT'S WHAT IT'S GOING FOR. SO THIS ACCOMPLISHES THAT GOAL AND MAKES IT REACHABLE FOR MORE YOUNGER FAMILIES IN THE AREA. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. PATRICK MURPHY HERE ON BEHALF OF THE DAVIS ISLAND CIVIC ASSOCIATION. AS INDICATED BY THE CITY STAFF REPORT, THIS IS INCONSISTENT WITH NEARBY DEVELOPMENT AND WE'RE ASKING THE CITY COUNCIL TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR REZONING. THE NEIGHBORS THAT HAVE REACHED OUT WITH CONCERNS TO DICA HAVE CONCERNS THAT THIS WILL INEVITABLY LEAD TO ADDITIONAL REZONING REQUESTS IN THE FUTURE BY CREATING MORE OF THESE NONCONFORMING LOTS, ESSENTIALLY TILTING THAT BALANCE TOWARDS MAKING THOSE MORE OF THE STANDARD THAN AN EXCEPTION. BASED ON THAT AND BASED ON THE CONCERNS OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT REACHED OUT TO US, WE SUBMITTED A LETTER OF OPPOSITION AND ASKING THE CITY COUNCIL TO DENY THE REQUEST. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> HELLO. RYAN McGINNIS. I'M A DAVIS ISLAND RESIDENT. I LIVE ACTUALLY NEXT DOOR TO 206 CHIPPEWA AVENUE. I'M HERE TO SHOW MY SUPPORT FOR THE REZONING REQUEST. I'M ALL TOO FAMILIAR WITH THE DRAINAGE ISSUES ON THAT PROPERTY, WHICH LEADS TO MOSQUITO INFESTATION. I REVIEWED THE DEVELOPER'S PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLANS THAT EXCEED CODE REQUIREMENTS. AND THIS WILL HELP RESOLVE THAT ISSUE. ADDITIONALLY, SPLITTING THE LOTS WILL LEAD TO TWO NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. THIS WILL IMPROVE THE SURROUNDING HOME VALUES AND INCREASE THE TAX ROLL FOR THE CITY WHILE KEEPING A SIMILAR SIZE AND LAYOUT OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. THE SPLIT WOULD NOT BE OUT OF THE ORDINARY AND, IN FACT, MY CURRENT LOT IS ACTUALLY SMALLER THAN THE TWO PROPOSED LOTS. THESE NEW HOMES WILL ALSO ALLOW MORE RESIDENTS TO MOVE TO DAVIS ISLAND, ALLEVIATING SOME OF THE EXTREME DEMAND. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME LISTENING TO ME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SIR, I SAW YOU WALK IN LATER IN THE MEETING. WERE YOU SWORN IN? >> NO, NOT SWORN IN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHEN YOU COME UP, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. WE SWEAR EVERYBODY AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING. [SWEARING IN] >> I DO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME ST STEVE GILLIS, 5 0 LADRONE. BUSINESS OWNER IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. I JUST WANT TO SHOW MY SUPPORT FOR THIS PROJECT. I BELIEVE THAT TWO WELL-FINISHED HOUSES ARE FIT BETTER IN THIS LOCATION THAN ONE BIG McMANSION. THAT'S IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? IF NOT, COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK WANTED TO SPEAK AFTER PUBLIC COMMENT. DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK NOW? >>LYNN HURTAK: NO, I AM SORRY. I AM GOOD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IF ANYTHING ELSE, THE APPLICANT TO REBUT. MR. SHELBY, YOUR MICROPHONE IS ON. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I NOTICED ON BASE THAT THERE ARE WRITTEN COMMENTS ENTERED INTO PRESIDENT RECORD. RECEIVE AND FILE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL VOTE TO RECEIVE AND FILE THOSE WRITTEN DOCUMENTS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION TO RECEIVE THOSE DOCUMENTS IS CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MR. MICHELINI, DO YOU HAVE REBUTTAL. IF SO. >> JONATHAN SANDS. EVER HAS A RIGHT TO HAVE THEIR OWN OPINION. I SAID WHEN WE MET WITH CLIENTS THAT HAD OBJECTIONS THIS THEY REACHED TO US. WE HAD TO SEND A MAILING. HAD TO SEND TWO MAILINGS. WHEN SHE SAID WE DIDN'T REACH OUT TO THEM, WE SENT A MAILING AND HAD THAT AND GOT THAT. SO I CAN LEAVE THAT TO STEVE. I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THE RECORD THAT I WASN'T SAYING ANYTHING THAT ISN'T TRUE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. MICHELINI, I WANT TO BE CLEAR FOR THE RECORD. YOU SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS TO CITY COUNCIL AS WELL AS AN ENGINEERING REPORT. >> THAT'S CORRECT. I DON'T HAVE THEM IN MY HANDS ANYMORE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> STEVE MICHELINI. IF YOU LOOK AT THE LIST OF NONCONFORMING LOTS. THEY FAR EXCEED WHAT THE CITY WAS ALLOWED TO PUT ON THE REPORT. PSO NOT A CLEAR PICTURE HAPPENING IN THAT AREA. THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SPOKEN, I MEAN, ACCORDING TO -- TO THE OWNERS, THEIR LOTS AREN'T CONFORMING ANYWAY. SO, I MEAN, WE HAVE A MIXED BAG HERE. AND LET ME SHOW YOU. THIS IS THE CITY'S EXHIBIT. ALL OF THE STUFF THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THEIR ANALYSIS. THAT IS BY THEIR POLICY, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT. JUST WASN'T INCLUDED. AND THAT INCLUDES APARTMENTS, TOWNHOUSES AND A VARIETY OF OTHER THINGS SO INDICATING THAT CHANGING FROM RS-60 TO RS-50 IS GOING TO SOMEHOW CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE AREA SIMPLY ISN'T ACCURATE. WE HAVE A MIX OF SMALLER -- SMALLER LOTS. AS I POINTED OUT, THE TWO ACROSS THE STREET ARE AN ANOMALY. THOSE ARE THE LARGEST LOTS IN THE WHOLE AREA. THOSE ARE NOT CONSISTENT. AND WOULDN'T BE CONSIDERED TO BE THE NORMAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE AREA. THEY ARE AN ANOMALY. THIS IS A REQUEST THAT WOULD ALLOW TWO SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. THEY HAVE ALREADY POINTED OUT TO YOU WITH THE ADDITIONAL SETBACKS BETWEEN THE HOMES, THEY WILL HAVE MORE GREEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE AREA THAN YOU WOULD WITH A SINGLE HOME. THE -- THE PLANNING COMMISSION, YOU KNOW, THROUGH THEIR ANALYSIS OF R-10 HAVE INDICATED THAT WOULD BE AN APPROPRIATE DESIGNATION AND AN APPROPRIATE USE GOING TO RS-50 IN THIS AREA. IF YOU -- IF YOU WANTED TO DO AN AREA-WIDE STUDY ARE, WOULD YOU HAVE TO INCLUDE MOST OF THOSE HOUSES THAT ARE TO THE EAST BECAUSE THEY AREN'T ALL NONCONFORMING. YOU HAVE TO INCLUDE EVERY ONE OF THEM AND SOME OF THEM ARE LESS THAN 50 FEET WIDE. SO I WOULD SAY THAT THAT SHOULD BE SOMETHING COUNCIL SHOULD CONSIDER. ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS -- AND I AGREE -- YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS AS A CONDITION OF THE REZONING. HOWEVER, THE COMMITMENT THAT HAS BEEN MADE TO NOT ONLY IMPROVE THE DRAINAGE FOR THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY BUT ALSO TO -- ALSO ASSIST IN ADDRESSING THE DRAINAGE ISSUE FOR THE OTHER AREA. OTHER. WISE, THOSE WOULDN'T HAVE COME UP AND SAY, HEY, LOOK, WE ARE IN FAVOR OF THIS BECAUSE WE HAD TO ADDRESS THEIR CONCERNS. AS YOU KNOW WE HAVE TO FILE TWO NOTICES. ONE IS A NOTICE OF FILING. THAT IS DESIGNED TO LET PEOPLE KNOW THAT THERE IS A PETITION PENDING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. AND IT IS CURRENTLY BEING REVIEWED BY CITY STAFF. THAT IS SUPPOSED TO GIVE PEOPLE ENOUGH NOTICE SO WHEN THEY COME IN AND TALK WITH THE PROPOSING APPLICANT TO ADDRESS ANY CONCERNS THAT THEY HAVE. THEY HELD A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. PEOPLE RESPONDED TO IT. AND -- AND AS A RESULT OF THAT WAS, THEY CHANGED THE DRAINAGE PLAN. AND THEN WHEN YOU SAID THAT ON SECOND NOTICE FOR THE HEARING, AND NO ONE COMES FORWARD UNTIL THE LAST NIGHT OR 24 HOURS BEFORE THE HEARING, HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO ADDRESS THAT? IT JUST MAKES IT VERY DIFFICULT. AND I THINK, YOU KNOW, HOLDING PEOPLE TO BEING HONEST OF THEIR CONCERNS. THEY HAVE AN OBLIGATION -- WHEN WE SEND THESE NOTICES OUT IF THEY HAVE A CONCERN TO COME AND ADDRESS IT WITH US SO WE CAN ADDRESS IT. THIS IS A REASONABLE REQUEST. CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE PLAN. YOU KNOW, WHEN LACHONE GOT UP AND SAID THEIR ANALYSIS SHOWED THAT THE PERCENTAGES OF DEVELOPMENT. THEY WERE HAMSTRUNG BY THEIR POLICY OF WHAT THEY CAN CONSIDER AND WHAT THEY CAN'T. THAT IS WHY I PROVIDED YOU WITH A DOCUMENT THAT SHOWED YOU HOW MANY WERE LESS THAN 50 FEET. HOW MANY WERE LESS THAN 60s FEET AND OFF THIS IN THE RECORD AND I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THAT RECEIVED AND FIELD. I THINK THAT WE HAVE DEMONSTRATED THAT WE HAVE GONE ABOVE AND BEYOND THE REQUIREMENTS. AND IT WE WOULD GREATLY APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION FOR A FAVORABLE VOTE ON THIS PETITION. I APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, YOU HAD YOUR MICROPHONE ON. DID YOU WANT TO SAY ANYTHING IS THAT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I AM LISTENING CAREFULLY AND MERIT ON BOTH SIDES. THE DRAINAGE THEY SAY THEY ARE GOING TO DO IF ANYTHING LEGALLY TO PUT ALL THESE THINGS AND NOT RECORDED ANYWHERE ELSE. WE ONLY HEAR THIS. THE PROBLEM IS AFTER BEING HERE A FEW YEARS, YOU SAY SOMETHING -- I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT THIS PETITION, BUT OTHER THINGS THAT HAPPENED. AND WHAT HAPPENS IS, YOU GET SOMETHING AND MR. MANISCALCO BOUGHT IT. AND HE LIVED THERE FOR TEN YEARS, HIM AND HIS WIFE. HE SELLS IT TO ME AND SAYS I DON'T LIKE IT. IT IS NEVER RECORDED. SO THERE IS A SYSTEM HERE THAT DOESN'T WORK. I AM TRYING TO CLEAR IT UP SOMEHOW BY MAKING THIS AS AN EXAMPLE. I AM NOT SAYING THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO IT, BUT HOW DO WE DO THOSE THINGS. >>CATE WELLS: CATE WELLS, LEGAL DEPARTMENT. THIS IS REQUEST FOR EUCLIDIAN AND NOT A SITE PLAN DISTRICT, THAT THAT IS NOT A CONDITION WE CAN ATTACH IF COUNCIL IS INCLINED TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MANY ARE NOT EUCLIDIAN AND THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED. >>CATE WELLS: A SITE PLAN REQUEST, YOU HAVE ABILITY TO HAVE CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO CHOSE AND A SECOND. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN TO CLOSED -- >> HE IS NOT FINISHED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HOW MUCH TIME IS LEFT IN THE REBUTTAL PERIOD? >> DON'T KNOW. >> I THINK IT WAS TWO MINUTES AND 30 SECONDS. >> I WILL NEED 30 SECONDS OR LESS. MAY I SPEAK BRIEFLY? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO GIVE TWO MINUTES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FOR TWO MINUTES IN REBUTTAL. SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER -- >>LYNN HURTAK: HE DOESN'T NEED IT. HE STILL HAS HIS TIME. RESCIND YOUR MOTION TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SET THE CLOCK FOR TWO MINUTES. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED TO SET THE CLOCK FOR TWO MEN WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> CHRIS MERCY. I JUST WANT TO SAY I PROMISED THE NEIGHBOR I WOULD DO IT. I PUT IT IN WRITING. PEOPLE HAVE LAWYERS. IF I DON'T HONOR WHAT I SAID I AM GOING TO DO, THEY CAN SUE ME. I AM GOING TO COME BEFORE YOU MANY TIMES OVER HIGH LIFETIME SO I AM NOT GOING TO DO IT OVER A ROUGHLY $10,000 OR $20,000 ON $4 MILLION WORTH OF DEVELOPMENT. I WAS HOPING TO SHOW JUST DEFINITIVELY. THIS IS THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S WEB SITE. THE WOMAN FROM 08 COMO WHO SPOKE ON HER BEHALF ON 105 BISCAYNE'S BEHALF. YOU CAN SEE ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER WEB SITE. NOT MY OPINION. IT SHOWS IT IS RS-60 ZONING, 50 FOOT FRONTAGE, 120 FOOT DEPTH FOR BATE OF THEM. KIND OF -- I STRUGGLE WITH IT. NOT GOOD FOR THE GOOD TOS IS GOOD FOR GANDER. WE ARE ASKING FOR WHAT EVERYBODY ELSE AROUND US HAVE AND ASKING FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THAT AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >>LYNN HURTAK: MOTION TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN AND SECONDED BY HURTAK. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION TO CLOSE CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN, YOU ARE UP TO READ IT BUT YOU WANTED TO SPEAK? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I DO WANT TO SPEAK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WELL, WE WILL HAVE COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN TO SPEAK. COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK TO SPEAK AND THEN CARLSON. GO AHEAD, SIR. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THIS IS AN INTERESTING ONE. ANYBODY WHO HAS LISTENED TO ME KNOW I AM NOT A BIG FAN OF LOT SPLITS, BUT GENERALLY BECAUSE WE HAVE A LOT OF DEVELOP THEIR COME TO SPLIT LOTS INTO NONCONFORMING LOTS. NOT CONFORMING WITH PDs. THIS IS A EUCLIDIAN ZONING WHICH I THINK IS A GOOD -- IS AED GOOD MOVE. IT IS ALSO, YOU KNOW -- OBVIOUSLY IT IS IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA. IT IS OLD HOUSING STOCK. AND IT IS IN AN URBAN VILLAGE. I THINK -- AND THE INTERESTING THING THAT WAS INTERJECTED INTO THE DISCUSSION IS BY RIGHT, THEY CAN DEVELOP ON THIS PIECE OF THE PROPERTY WITH SETBACKS AND LESS GREEN SPACE THAN TWO, BECAUSE YOU CAN INJECT THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS TO PROVIDE MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR DRAINAGE AND PERCOLATION. I SAY GENERALLY, I AM NOT -- FOR ALL OF YOU ALL LISTENING, I AM NOT GENERALLY IN FAVOR OF NONCONFORMING LOT SPLITS IN SOUTH TAMPA AS STEVE MICHELINI KNOWS, BUT THIS IS A CONFORMING LOT. THIS IS A CONFORMING LOT ONCE IT IS SPLIT. A VERY MIXED-USE AREA SPECIFICALLY IN THIS AREA LEADING UP TO THE YOU ARE BEEN A -- THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH A LOT OF APARTMENT BUILDINGS, TOWN HOUSES AS WE SAW, AND BECAUSE OF POLICY, I KNOW STAFF DIDN'T TAKE THOSE AREAS UNDER CONSIDERATION. JUST LIKE THEY DIDN'T TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION ON THE WEST SIDE OF -- YOU KNOW WITH MUCH LARGER LOTS, THE ESTATE-SIZED LOTS. THIS IS A VERY INTERESTING DIFFERENT AREA. BUT I DON'T SEE THE PROBLEM IN THIS ONE. I GET THAT THE NEIGHBORS ARE -- CHANGE IS SOMETIMES DIFFICULT AND I KNOW WE OVERDEVELOP SO MANY OF THOSE PLACES AND LOOK AT OUR ZONING MAPS AND SEE SO MANY PDs ALL OVER THE CITY OF TAMPA OF NONCONFORMING LOTS THAT CREATE PROBLEMS AND REALLY ADVERSELY IMPACT NEIGHBORHOODS, BUT THIS SEEMS TO BE IN LINE WITH DAVIS ISLAND. AND. HE SPECIFICALLY THIS AREA OF DAVIS ISLAND SO I AM VOTING IN SUP SUPPORT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK AND CARLSON. >>LYNN HURTAK: I WHOLEHEARTEDLY DISAGREE BECAUSE OF THE BLOCK AVERAGE. THAT IS GENERALLY WHAT I LIKE TO LOOK AT INITIALLY, BUT WHEN I SEE THAT THE ONLY HOUSES THAT FRONT THE STREET, THIS STREET, ARE ALL 70 FEET -- YEAH, 70 FEET WIDE OR WIDER, I JUST CAN'T SUPPORT THAT. IT DOESN'T WORK. WE CAN'T TALK ABOUT DRAINAGE. WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT. WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING DRAINAGE. WE ABSOLUTELY CAN'T CONSIDER SOMEONE'S PROMISE BECAUSE WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN TOMORROW. IF THIS LOT GETS SOLD -- IF THESE TWO LOTS GET SOLD BEFORE THEY ARE DEVELOPED. YOU CAN'T -- AS MISS WELLS SAID, WE ABSOLUTELY CAN'T PROMISE. WE CAN'T USE A PROMISE. SINCE 100% OF THE ACTUAL HOUSES ON THIS BLOCK ARE 70 FOOT WIDE OR WIDER, I'M NOT GOING TO SUPPORT THIS LOT SPLIT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: YEAH, SIMILAR TO COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN, I -- I KNOW THAT DAVIS ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD VERY WELL. I TALKED TO LEADERSHIP AND NEIGHBORS ALL THE TIME. I HAVE BEEN VERY DEFENSIVE OF -- NOT OVERDEVELOPING DAVIS ISLAND. MOST OF THE OPPOSITION TYPICALLY IS AROUND MULTIFAMILY OR BIG OVERSIZED PLACES. AND IN THIS CASE, THERE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES BEING PROPOSED. I ALSO TYPICALLY DON'T SUPPORT LOT SPLITS EITHER. THE BIG PROBLEM WITH THIS IS THAT I DIDN'T HEAR OR SEE ANY COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO TURN AGAINST IT. IN THE QUASI-JUDICIAL FORMAT, ONLY WHAT IS THE ROOM AND EVIDENCE BY THE APPLICANT AND TESTIMONY BUT NOT COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FROM THE OTHER SIDE. I READ THE LETTERS IN THE FILE AND LISTENED TO THE EVIDENCE TONIGHT. THIS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS TYPICALLY THE ONE THAT TRAIN OTHER NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS ON HOW TO GO AGAINST SOMETHING. THE FACT THAT SOME OF THE PEOPLE ARE NOT HERE TONIGHT, I REALIZE THAT THE ASSOCIATION VOTED AGAINST IT. THE FACT THAT SOME FOLKS THAT PROVIDE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ARE NOT HERE TONIGHT CONNECTS BACK TO THE COMMUNICATION AND WE ARE NOT ALOWERED TO TALK TO THESE PEOPLE WHILE THE APPLICATIONS ARE OUT. WHAT I WILL SAY BECAUSE WE DIDN'T SEE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AGAINST IT TONIGHT, I WILL VOTE FOR IT. BUT TO THE APPLICANT, THERE ARE TWO WEEKS TO MEET -- A HUGE COMMUNICATION PROBLEM THAT YOU ALL TALKED. IF I WERE YOU I WOULD TALK WITH THEM TO ALLAY PEOPLE'S FEARS A US THIS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION WILL SHOW UP WITH AN ARMY WITH COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IF THEY REALLY ARE AGAINST IT. YOU HAVE TWO WEEKS TO TRY TO CONVINCE THEM. IF THEY COME BACK WITH OVERWHELMING COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE WE MAY CHANGE OUR MINDS. IN THE ABSENCE OF THAT, I WILL VOTE YES AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS IN TWO WEEKS. ANYBODY ELSE, NO? COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN, READ ITEM NUMBER 7. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: LET'S SEE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OH, I AM SORRY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: EXCUSE ME, I AM HUNGRY. YES, I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, ORDINANCE IN THE GENERAL VICINITY 206 CHIPPEWA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, ZONING CLASSIFICATION RS-60 TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL MILY - SINGLE-FAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE TATE. I FIND THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS CONSISTENT WITH T THE COMPACT CITY FORM STRATEGY THAT CREATES TWO CONFORMING LOTS, IMPROVES TAMPA'S HOUSING STOCK, AND IT WORKS TO DEVELOP A DENSITY PATTERN FOR SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOOD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. GET A ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: NO. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: I AM FOLLOWING THE COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF CITY STAFF AND VOTING NO. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA, HURTAK VOTING NO AND HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 3, 2024 AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE NOW ARRIVED TO THE LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT WHICH IS ITEM NUMBER 9. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM NUMBER REZ 24-56 FOR THE PROMPT AT 4001 WEST CARMEN STREET. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS-50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USE AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO DANNY TO GIVE HIS REPORT AND I WILL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. THANK YOU. >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. BEFORE I GET STARTED, I FILED A NEW REVISED REPORT FOR THE RECORD. IT IS A VERY MINOR CORRECTION TO CONTEXT SECTION. IN OUR ORIGINAL REPORT, WE MADE A REFERENCE TO RS-60 AND CORRECTED THAT TO RS-50 IN THE CONTACT SECTION. OUR LAST CASE IS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING IT HE IS STRICT. THE SUBJECT SITE N EVACUATION ZONE C AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CARMEN STREET AND NORTH READY AVENUE. THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER. THE SUBJECT SITE INCLUDING PARCELS TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST RECOGNIZED UNDER THE R-10 ALLOWING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UP TO TEN DWELLING NITS PER ACRE. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE R-10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY FOR THE LDC. PROVIDE INFILL DEVELOPMENT FOR TEN UNITS PER ACRE. PROPOSED REZONING WILL ALLOW FOR A DENSITY OF 9.09 UNITS ER ACRE WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED IN THE R-10 CATEGORY. AGAIN THE PRESENCE OF SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA PRO PEZZED DENSITY AND AVERAGE LOT WHICHTHS, PLANNING COMMISSION CONCLUDE THAT THE REQUEST DOES NOT SIGNIFICANTLY ALTER THE CHARACTERS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. ALLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS OF WEST SHERMAN STREET SEEKING TO PROMOTE COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT TO ENSURE ECONOMIC HEALTH AND THAT AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF LAND IS CONSIDERED FOR THE CITY'S POPULATION. IF THE ZONING WITH APPROVED, THE SUBJECT SITE HAS THE POTENTIAL TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFILL HOUSING ON A UTILIZED PARCEL FOR THE WEST SHORE PLAN DISTRICT. BASED ON ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO? MA'AM, MISS DOCK. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU SO AS MUCH, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP THE SITE WITH TWO RESIDENTIAL UNITS. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 35 FEET IS PROPOSED .THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE REQUEST. THERE ARE TWO UNITS -- PROPOSED UNIT ONE WILL HAVE A SETBACK 20 FEET, SO THE SOUTH 20 FEET, TO THE WEST, SEVEN FEET AND TO THE EAST, SEVEN FEET. NORTH 20 FEET, SOUTH 20 FEET AND EAST AND WEST AT SEVEN FEET. 9570 SQUARE FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF 96 FEET AND A AT THETH OF 100 FEET. I HAVE A CLOSE-UP OF THE SITE PLAN. SO THIS IS THE SITE. THIS IS GRADY AVENUE. THIS IS CARMEN STREET. THIS IS THE PROPERTY LINE. THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY. THIS IS UNIT ONE AND TWO. AND YOU CAN SEE EACH UNIT HAS A TWO-CAR ENCLOSED GARAGE. WALKWAYS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. AND THEN THERE IS A SIDEWALK, WHICH IS -- WHICH WILL BE INSTALLED AND ON THE SITE ON THE SOUTH AND ON THE EAST. THERE ARE ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THIS REQUEST. SO THE ELEVATIONS ARE SIMILAR. THE ONES ON THE TOP ARE FOR THE UNIT ONE AND THE ELEVATIONS LOCATED ON THE BOTTOM FOR UNIT TWO. THESE ARE THE NORTH ELEVATIONS, WEST, EAST AND THE SOUTH ELEVATION SHOWING THE TWO-CAR GARAGE ENCLOSED. AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS A PART OF BROAD MOAR PARK REVISED SUB CITY VISION AND THE EAST BLOCK OF LOT 14. EACH HOT AS PROPOSED WILL ACTUALLY MEASURE 4 .8 FEET IN WIDTH. I WILL PUT THE SITE PLAN BACK SO YOU CAN SEE. SO THISTH FOR EACH WILL BE 48.2, FOR EACH OF THOSE. AND THE UNITS ARE GOING TO BE ORIENTED TOWARD CARMEN STREET. VEHICULAR ACCESS ON CARMEN STREET. AS DANNY MENTIONED R-10 LAND USE DESIGNATION AND CONSIDERED FOR TWO DWELLING UNITS. I HAVE THE ZONING AERIAL FOR THE SITE. SO THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE THAT IS LOCATED HERE IDENTIFIED IN RED. THIS IS GRADY AVENUE. THIS IS WEST CARMEN STREET. THIS IS CASS STREET. THIS IS CHURCH AVENUE. SO DALE MABRY IS OFF THE IMAGE TO THE EAST. AND CYPRESS IS LOCATED NORTH, BUT YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH THE RS-50 ZONING, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY AND MOST OF THIS HAS BEEN DEVELOPED WITH THAT USE CONSISTENT WITH THAT ZONING OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. EACH OF CHURCH STREET, YOU HAVE THAT MIXTURE WHERE YOU GET INTO YOUR COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, LOWER INTENSITY DISTRICTS. AS YOU MOVE FURTHER NORTH ALONG CYPRESS, YOU HAVE YOUR COMMERCIAL USES AND COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES ALONG CYPRESS. AND THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. SO THIS IS ON CARMEN IF YOU ARE LOOKING NORTH AT THE SITE. AND THIS IS PRETTY WIRED, SO THIS IS THE OTHER END OF THE SITE. THE EAST END OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE VIEW IF YOU ARE -- IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE SITE. THIS IS AT THE CORNER OF THE SITE OFFER GRADY LOOKING WEST. SO THIS IS AT CASS AND GRADY. THIS IS DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE SITE. WE WILL SWING AROUND. THIS IS EAST OF THE SITE. AND THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL SOUTH OF THE SITE. THEN I HAVE ANOTHER VIEW SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THE SITE ITSELF IS LOCATED IN THE PICTURE AND YOU CAN SEE THE RESIDENTIAL THAT IS THIS. THIS IS WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AND THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW FURTHER WEST OF SUBJECT SITE. THE DRC STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT AND THERE WERE NO WAIVERS ASSOCIATE TWD THIS REQUEST. THERE ARE MODIFICATIONS TO BE MADE TO THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPLICANT, PLEASE COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS JULIE. THE HOMEOWNER OF 4001 CARMEN STREET AND I AM REQUESTING YOUR APPROVAL FOR THE RS-50 TO PD TO ALLOW FOR TWO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES. I KINDLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ANYBODY HERE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? PLEASE COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. YES, SIR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> MY NAME IS RICHARD REVIS, 3907 ABOUT A BLOCK AWAY. AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PETITIONER'S REQUESTS, A LOT OF BACK AND FORTH ON NEXTDOOR.COM. A LOT OF OPPOSITION AND A LOT OF PEOPLE CONTACTED ME REGARDING THIS MATTER. A LOT OF QUESTIONS. A LOT OF MISINFORMATION. WITH MY KNOWLEDGE OF CITY WORKINGS AND MY PRIOR HISTORY PRESIDENT NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, I WAS ABLE TO ASSIST THEM IN WHAT WAS ACTUALLY GOING ON. IN NEIGHBORHOOD AS -- AS COUNCILMAN MIRANDA IS AWARE OF IS FAMOUS FOR ITS DETACHED HOMES. MISS JULIE IS WANTING TO KEEP THAT AS DETACHED. AND THAT IS WHAT I WAS ABLE TO PORTRAY TO EVERYBODY ELSE. ONE OF THE MANY OPPOSITIONS INFORMED ME AT 5:00 THIS EVENING SHE FINALLY UNDERSTOOD EXACTLY WHAT THE PETITION WAS FOR. SHE AGREED. AND SHE IS LIKE, OKAY, ALL GOOD. NO PROBLEMS. SO IS THE -- I SPOKE WITH SIX OF OUR SEVEN BOARD MEMBERS. AND WE ALL ARE IN AGREEMENT AND HAVE NO OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST. SO THE NEIGHBORHOOD BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL OF THIS PETITION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOVE TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE BEFORE WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE. A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. AND SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION TO CLOSE CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ THE ITEM. >>BILL CARLSON: REZ-24-66. 4001 WEST CARMEN STREET FROM RS-50 TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON AND A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU FOR SAVING THE ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFUL FREE THIS BACK. YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YEAH, FOR CONSISTENCY, YOU HEAR ME TALK ABOUT THESE LOT SPLITS. THIS ONE IS NEARLY CONFORMING. IT IS JUST A SMALL NONCONFORMING GOING TO PD SAVE THAT BEAUTIFUL TREE THAT COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK JUST DISCUSSED. A CORNER LOT AND STAY CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD SO YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 3, 2024 AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 315 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 3602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AT THIS TIME GO TO NEW BUSINESS. A QUICK SHOUT OUT TO FORMER MAYOR DICK GRECO WHO WILL BE TURNING 91 YEARS OLD THIS SATURDAY. HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO THE FORMER MAYOR. S THAT IT FOR ME. COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: TWO COMMENDATION -- ONE COMMENDATION -- MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE A COMMENDATION TO THE HISPANIC HERITAGE COMMITTEE AT THE HISTORIC TAMPA THEATRE. COMMENDATION WILL BE PRESENTED WITH ALL COUNCILMEMBERS AT THE EVENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND ONE, COMMENDATION TO KAY HUNTER RETIRING OCTOBER 11, 2024. I WILL BE PRESENTING THE COMMENT DAEGS AT HER RETIREMENT PARTY OFF PREMISE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, SIR, ANYTHING ELSE? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: JUST A FEW WEEKS FROM NOW. TELL ME WHAT A PUBLIC FACILITY IS. I DON'T NEED AN ANSWER TODAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN, ANY NEW BUSINESS? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES, I HAVE A LOT. AND IF COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK AND COUNCILMAN VIERA DIDN'T WANT TO BE HERE ANYMORE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I KNOW YOU ARE ONLY JOKING. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: EXACTLY. I ONLY HAVE FIVE. FIRST FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION, A REQUEST FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REMOVE 11 FROM THE 5:01 ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MR. SHELBY, THREE OTHERS CAN I READ THEM FOR ONE ROLL CALL VOTE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES. WITHOUT OBJECTION. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YEAH, EXACTLY. THREE MOTIONS FROM PLANNING COMMISSION. REQUEST FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION SETTING AN ADOPTION HEARING FOR TA-CPA 24-08 NOVEMBER 21, 2024, AT 5:01 AND DIRECT THE LEGAL DEPARTMEN FOR FORM OF NOTICE FOR THE ADVERTISING OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. NEXT MOTION, REQUEST FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION SETTING ADOPTION HEARING FOR THE CITY OF TAMPA FY '25-'29 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SECTION CIS SCHEDULE OF PROJECTS NOVEMBER 21, 2024 AT 5:01 AND DIRECT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO DIRECT A FORM TO THE CLERK FOR ADVERTISING PUBLIC HEARING. NEXT, REQUEST FROM THE WELCOME 24-11, 24-12 AND 24-13 ON JANUARY 30, 2024 AT 5:01 P.M. AND DIRECT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE CITY CLERK WITH A FORM OF NOTICE FOR ADVERTISING THE PUBLIC HEARING. >>LYNN HURTAK: YOU MEAN 2025? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SHOULD BE 2025 AND I WILL CHASTISE THE AUTHOR OF THIS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THESE GROUP -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: GOOD CATCH, MISS HURTAK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECONDED BY MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED FOR ALL THREE MOTIONS WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION FOR A FIVE-MINUTE PRESENTATION FROM THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION TO PRESENT TO COUNCIL DURING CEREMONIAL AND PRESENTATION OF -- REGARDING THE SBA DISASTER LOAN FOR THOSE IMPACT BY HURRICANE DEBBIE FOR OCTOBER 3. DEADLINE FOR PHYSICAL DAMAGE IS OCTOBER 29, 2024. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY, DOES THAT FIT WITHIN OUR AGENDA AND RULES? >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES. MANISCALCO COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN WITH THE MOTION AND COUNCILMAN MIRANDA WITH A SECOND. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT'S ALL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ARE YOU SURE? >>BILL CARLSON: THREE HOPEFULLY QUICK ONES. THE PUBLIC IN SOUTH TAMPA SOUTH OF GANDY HAS BEEN MADE AWARE THAT A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT THE CITY OWNS ON THE CORNER OF MARKAM AND PINEWOOD WILL BE CONVERTED TO A PARK. AND THE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED REALLY QUICKLY TO ASK US IF WE WILL CONSIDER NAMING IT AFTER LISA CHESER. WE GAVE HER A COMMENDATION JUST BEFORE SHE PASSED AWAY. BUT SHE WAS SOMEONE WHO FED HOMELESS PEOPLE, HELPED PEOPLE WHO HAD HOMES BUT DIDN'T HAVE FOOD -- TO GET FOOD AND SHE IS IT A LOT OF OTHER THINGS. UNIVERSALLY LOVED SOUTH OF GANDY. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ASK STAFF TO CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF NAMING THAT NEW PARK AFTER LISA CHESER AND REPORT BACK TO US ON NOVEMBER 7. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND A SECOND AND MR. SHELBY HAS THE MICROPHONE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THE PROCESS IS A MOTION FOR COUNCIL TO INITIATE THE PROCESS OF AN HONORARY NAMING OF A PROPERTY SHALL COMMENCE WITH AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO CITY CODE 2.829 ATTACHED TO A MEMORANDUM BY THE SPONSORING COUNCILMEMBER OF JUSTIFICATION WHY THE PARTICULAR CITY ASSET SHOULD BE NAMED AFTER THE PERSON CITED. LETTER OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND BUSINESS AND CIVIC ASSOCIATIONS AND CHARITABLE ORGANIZES SHOULD ACCOMPANY THE SUBMISSION. MEMORANDUM AND APPLICATION AND LETTER PACKET SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL NO LESS THAN TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO THE MOTION TO CONSIDER THE MATTER ON AN AGENDA AT A FUTURE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU WANT TO REVISIT THIS NEXT THURSDAY UNDER NEW BUSINESS FOR CLARIFICATION? >>BILL CARLSON: I HAVE GOT EVERYTHING EXCEPT AN APPLICATION. THE QUESTION -- I AM NOT ASKING ANYBODY TO VOTE ON IT. I AM ASKING TO PUT IT ON THE AGENDA TO DISCUSS IT. >>LYNN HURTAK: BUT WE CAN'T. WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND TO PUT IT ON THE AGENDA OF WHAT DATE WE HAVE GOT TO HAVE. WE CAN DO THAT NOW. >>LYNN HURTAK: BUT WE DIDN'T. WE HAVE TO HAVE THE APPLICATION FIRST. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: EVERYTHING HAS TO BE DONE -- SHALL -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN READ THE LAST SENTENCE. MEMORANDUM, APPLICATION AND LETTER PACKET SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO ANY MOTION TO CONSIDER THE MATTER ON AN AGENDA AT A FUTURE DATE. >>BILL CARLSON: I WILL COME BACK AT THAT TIME. I THINK THAT ADDITIONAL PART WITH AS DONE AT A MEETING I WASN'T AT. ANYWAY, IT WILL -- THE INFORMATION IS THERE AND IT WILL GO OUT. SECOND, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO GIVE AN OFF-SITE COMMENDATION TO CRAIG NEWMAN. HE HAS BEEN MY APPOINTEE TO THE BUDGET FINANCE COMMITTEE FOR SIX YEARS AND HE HAS BEEN THE CHAIR. HE IS NOT ONLY STEPPING DOWN AS CHAIR, AND TAKE VACATIONS AND NOT SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE ANYMORE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WILL REFUSE THAT -- IF YOU ARE LISTENING TO THIS, NO. WE -- WE DO NOT ACCEPT YOUR RESIGNATION. >>MARTIN SHELBY: TOY HAVE TO SHARE THAT HE WILL BE PRESENT HERE TOMORROW AT THE FINANCE BOARD MEETING AT 9:30 DOWNSTAIRS IN THE ROOM THAT I WILL LOOK FORWARD TO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND A SECOND FOR ONE OF THE BEST HUMAN BEINGS IN TAMPA HE IS. HE IS GREAT. I LOVE TALKING TO HIM. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WILL GO RIGHT TO CRAIG'S HEAD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LET IT GO. HE IS GREAT. ROLL CALL VOTE AFTER A MOTION AND A SECOND. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE LOVE YOU, CRAIG. YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. >>BILL CARLSON: I ASKED JAKE HOFFMAN TO TAKE HIS PLACE AND WILL GO GET ANY DOCUMENTATION THAT I NEED LATER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HE IS VERY SMART. VERY SMART. >>BILL CARLSON: ONE THING I WILL SAY ABOUT IT IS -- I ALWAYS SAY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS IS HOW YOU SPEND THE SAVINGS. BUT EVERYBODY WANTS TO SAVE MONEY. AND SO I AM HOPEFUL THAT HE WILL HELP US FIND WAYS TO SAVE MONEY. NOT THAT ANYBODY ELSE HAVEN'T, ABOUT YOU JUST ANOTHER SET OF EYES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU KNOW SOMEONE WHO TAUGHT ME SOMETHING SIMILAR, KATHY BARTALO. COUNCILMAN VIERA, NEW BUSINESS SIR? >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR. THANK YOU. TWO -- >>LYNN HURTAK: WE HAVE TO VOTE ON IT, RIGHT? >>BILL CARLSON: I HAVE TO -- I HAVE TO GET ALL THE DOCUMENTS AND COME BACK. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I HAVE BEEN TOLD THIS AFTERNOON, COUNCILMAN, THAT HE ACTUALLY HAS BEEN -- HE HAS FILED AN APPLICATION. >>BILL CARLSON: LET ME FINISH IT AND BRING IT BACK NEXT WEEK. I DIDN'T WANT TO BLINDSIDE YOU -- HE FILLED OUT AN APPLICATION BUT CRAIG HAD NOT ANNOUNCED PUBLICLY THAT HE WAS STEPPING DOWN. SO WE NEED TO CROSS THE Ts AND DOT THE Is. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA. >>LUIS VIERA: TWO VERY QUICK ONES IF I MAY. THIS ONE I WILL DO OFF-SITE BUT A LOT OF THING WITH THESE GUY. DECEMBER 19 IS OPEN. MANY OF YOU KNOW TAMPA POLICE OFFICER ROY PAZ. JUST THE NICEST GUY YOU WILL EVER FIND. HE IS RETIRING IN JANUARY. I WANT TO ON DECEMBER 19 OF THIS YEAR AT TAMPA CITY COUNCIL TO GIVE HIM A TAMPA CITY COUNCIL COMMENDATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION AND A SECOND. IF YOU DON'T KNOW ROY PAZ. I SAID CRAIG NEWMAN IS ONE OF THE -- ROY PAZ IS THE NICEST PERSON YOU WILL EVER MEET. POLICE OFFICER -- FIRST HE LOOKS LIKE AN ACTOR, YOU KNOW. SECOND, HIS PERSONALITY -- NO THIS GUY IS FANTASTIC. IF YOU HAVEN'T MET HIM, HE IS -- HE IS -- HE IS GREAT. SO -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE CAN ONLY HAVE ONE FAVORITE PERSON IN TAMPA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THIS GUY IS THE NICEST GUY NOT NAMED LUIS VIERA. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSONING ABSENT. GO AHEAD, SIR. >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR. OFF-SITE I WAS ASKED CARLOS CASTILLO WITH COCO. A LOCAL RESTAURANT HERE IN TAMPA. HE FUND RAISED $20,000 FOR THE FAMILY OF JESSIE MADSEN. AND I WAS GOING TO GET TOGETHER WITH THE PBA AND OTHER FOLKS FOR COUNCIL RECOMMEND COMMENDATION FOR HIS WORK IN THAT RECORD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>LUIS VIERA: UP -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. >>LUIS VIERA: NOT A MOTION BUT I WAS GOING TO SEND A MEMO OUT ON THIS. ON DECEMBER -- I AM SORRY, ON SEPTEMBER 18th, I BELIEVE IT IS, WE WERE GOING TO BE HAVING AN EVENT -- DECEMBER -- SORRY, SEPTEMBER -- I AM SLOWER THAN USUAL. SEPTEMBER 17, WE WERE GOING TO HAVE AN EVENT HAT MISSION BARBECUE OVER ON FLETCHER WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE 49th BIRTHDAY OF THE LATE JESSIE MADSEN. HIS FAMILY WAS GOING TO BE THERE. FYI FOR YOUR CALENDAR IT IS ANYBODY WANTS TO GO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: JUST A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION AND A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. BEST MOTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AMEN. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I WILL SUPPORT IT, YES. >>CLERK: MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE WITH HENDERSON BEING ABSENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE ARE ADJOURNED.