[GAVEL SOUNDING] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS TAMPA CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO ORDER. ROLL CALL PLEASE. >>CLERK: VIERA? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: HERE, I AM SO SORRY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>CLERK: DINGFELDER? DINGFELDER? >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SH SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL. WE ARE HERE AT OLD CITY HALL 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD FOR TONIGHT'S QUASI-JUDICIAL AND OTHER LAND USE RELATED MATTERS. THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL IS BEING HELD DURING THE COVID-19 EMERGENCY AND LIVE WITH AN IN-PERSON QUORUM PRESENT IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19 RESTRICTIONS MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE ENCOURAGED TO PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING OF COMMUNICATION MEDIA TECHNOLOGY OR CMT. THESE INGSINGS ARE HELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH EMERGENCY RULES AND PROCEDURES RESOLUTION NUMBER 2020-225 AND RESOLUTION 2020-49 0 AND 2021-241. THE PUBLIC AND THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF TAMPA ARE ABLE TO WATCH, LISTEN AND VIEW THIS MEETING ON SPECTRUM CHANNEL 6 640, FRONTIER CHANNEL 15 AND ON THE INTERNET STREAMING AT TA TAMPAGOV/LIVE STREAM. AND PREREGISTRATION FOR PAR PARTIES, APPLICANTS AND PUBLIC ARE NECESSARY TO REREGISTER IF YOU WANT TO APPEAR REMOTELY. THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL THAT ARE AVAILABLE ON TAMP TAMPA.GOV/QUASI, AND THE INSTRUCTIONS ARE ALSO LOCATED, I BELIEVE, WITHIN THE AGENDA AS WELL. THE CLERK DOES PROVIDE THAT. A CMT DEVICE IS REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE AND TO REMIND THE PUBLIC THAT IT MUST BE A DEVICE SUCH AS A TABLET OR COMPUTER, A LAPTOP OR DESKTOP EQUIPPED WITH A CAMERA AND MICROPHONE THAT ALLOW YOU TO BE SEENND HRD FOR THESE SPECIFIC TWO-WAY VIRTUAL MEETING FORMATS, QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS, SM SMARTPHONES AND CELL PHONES ARE NOT COMPATIBLE BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO SHARE YOUR CAMERA WHEN CON CONNECTED.AGAIN THE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE CITY'S WEB SITE. NOW JUST A REMINDER THAT APPLICANTS AND ALL OTHER PARTICIPANTS WHO ELECT TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE BY SHARING THEIR SCREEN AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETE ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL THE DOCUMENTS PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING TO COUNCIL QUASI SUBMISSIONS@TAMPA.GOV WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE CONCLUSION OF THE MEETING. AGAIN, THAT IS ALSO IN THE INSTRUCTIONS. COMMENTS HAVE BEEN DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL. AND THEY ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PERMANENT RECORD OF THE MEETING. ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS TIMELY RECEIVED BY MAIL, E-MAIL OR VIA CMT WILL BE AFFORDED EQUAL CONSIDERATION AS IF THE PUBLIC COMMENTS WERE MADE IN PERSON. W FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO PARTICIPATE AND DID NOT MAKE THE DEADLINE REMOTELY OR DON'T HAVE A CMT DEVICE, THEY ARE ABLE TO USE THE FACILITIES THAT ARE PROVIDED AND MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT HERE AT OLD CITY HALL, 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD ON THE SECOND FLOOR. PLEASE NOTE THAT USE OF MASKS AND SOCIAL DISTANCING INSIDE THE BUILDING ARE REQUIRED. AND ONE MORE REMINDER FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE USING THE GO TO MEETING MOM WILL, THE CHAT FUNCTION IS NOT TO BE USED BY THE PUBLIC TO COMMUNICATE TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, VERY MUCH. A MOTION TO ITEM 1-7. MOTION AND SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. MR. DINGFELDER? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST FOR THE RECORD, I HAVE ARRIVED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER IS IN THE HOUSE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: WE HAVEN'T TAKEN ROLL, HAVE WE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE. HE WAS HERE FOR THE RECORD. HE WAS OUT PARKING. >>JOSEPH CITRO: OKAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER 1S A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ITEM. WHOMEVER IS HERE TO SPEAK ON THAT. >>RYAN MANASSE: COUNCIL, RYAN MANASSE, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. FIRST A HOUSE KEEPING ITEMS. AB 2, THE APPLICANT BEING JOHN GRANDOFF QUESTIONED TO BE ON THE 6-24 PUBLIC HEARING, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE EVENING PUBLIC HEARING. AS YOU MAY REMEMBER APRIL 15 COUNCIL MOTIONED TO ALLOW FOR 11 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMOUNTS FOR THAT NIGHT AND YOU ARE OVER -- AMENDMENTS FOR THAT NIGHT AND YOU ARE OVER THE TEN AND FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE ALCOHOL TO BE ON THE NIGHT IS THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANY OBJECTION FROM COUNCILMEMBERS? ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? >>MARTIN SHELBY: COUNCIL, JUST A REMINDER, THIS -- THIS HAVEN'T BEEN INCORPORATED INTO YOUR RULES OF PROCEDURE BUT I SUSPECT IT WILL BE WHICH IS WHAT COUNCIL ADOPTED WITH REGARD TO T HAVING MEETINGS GO PAST -- EXCUSE ME HEARINGS PAST 11 P.M. UNLESS EACH INDIVIDUAL HEARING IS GIVEN A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE. THE COUNCIL'S INTENTION WAS TO NOT HAVE THE MEETINGS GO MUCH PAST 11:00. THAT WAS COMMUNICATED BY COUNCIL'S MOTION AND VOTE. THAT IS GOING TO BE COMING TO YOU SHORTLY TO BE INCORPORATED IN YOUR RULES AND PROCEDURES. THIS LOOKS LIKE -- THE REQUEST IS THE END OF JUNE. I CANNOT QUITE SAY WHAT EFFECT THIS WILL HAVE ON THE MEETING, THE TIME FRAME. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYTHING IS ASSOCIATED WITH IT. AND WHY THE ASK. MAYBE MR. MANASSE CAN IS MR. GRANDOFF HERE, WHY IT NEEDS TO BE THE 24th. >>RYAN MANASSE: I CAN BRIEFLY DESCRIBE IT. WOULDN'T SET THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL MAY 24. WHEN THE MOTION TO HAVE 11 CPAs ON AND WHEN -- [INTERFERENCE] >>RYAN MANASSE: SORRY, I AM HAVING FEEDBACK. THIS CASE WOULD HAVE BEEN SCHEDULED FOR THE 6/24, BUT STAFF IS TRYING TO WORK DILIGENTLY TO KEEP THE CASELOAD TO THE TEN THAT YOU REQUESTED, BUT AGAIN I AM PRESENTING THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU. I WILL SAY FOR THE RECORD THE 11 CPAs ARE SCHEDULED AT 5:01 AND SIX ARE SCHEDULED FOR PARKS IF THAT GIVES YOU ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU SAY SIX ARE FOR PARKS. IT SHOULD BE FINE. THE PARKS GO FAIRLY QUICKLY CONSIDERING THAT. AN ISSUE WITH IT CONSIDERINGVE WHAT -- MOST OF THOSE PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE. ANYBODY ELSE? ANY -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NEITHER I DO, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SORRY, SIR? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT EITHER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: CAN WE GET A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT ITEM FOR JUNE 24 AT OUR 6 P.M. MEETING? >>JOSEPH CITRO: SO MOVED. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUN COUNCILMAN? [INAUDIBLE] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. WHO MADE THE MOTION? >>JOSEPH CITRO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. I SECONDED IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. AND WE ARE ONLY DOING THIS BECAUSE OF THOSE PARK ITEMS FOR THOSE PLAN AMENDMENTS. WE GAVE IT SPECIAL CONSIDERATION. IN THE FUTURE IT MOST LIKELY IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. ALL RIGHT, ANYTHING ELSE, SIR? >>RYAN MANASSE: NO, CHAIR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RI RIGHTY. ITEM NUMBER ONE, SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. SAN HNSOVELEZ, SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY. BEFORE STAFF MAKES HIS OFFICIAL PRESENTATION I SEE MR. HAYES THERE. I WANT TO BECAUSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS A DIFFERENT TYPE OF PUBLIC HEARING THAN YOUR OTHER QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA. I DID WANT TO MAKE A COUPLE OF BRIEF REMARKS ON THIS PARTICULAR HEARING AND THE SUBJECT MATTER BEFORE YOU. SO THE -- THIS FIRST HEARING IS FOR CONSIDERATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMOUNT. AS YOU ALL KNOW, AN AMENDMENT TO ANY PORTION OR PART OF THE COMPHENSELAN IS A MAJOR POLICY DECISION BY CITY COU COUNCIL. THE POLICY DECISION ESSENTIALLY A DECLARATION THAT THE EXISTING LAND USE AND THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT IS EXISTING ON THESE PARCELS IS NO LONGER APPROPRIATE OR IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC. SO THIS IS A LEGISLATIVE THANKS YOU WILL BE TAKING ON THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT WHICH, AGAIN, IS DIFFERENT THAN A QUASI-JUDICIAL ACTION WHICH WOULD APPLY ANY POLICY DECISION THAT YOU MAKE FOR THESE PARCELS AT A LATER DATE. AND SO COUNCIL, IN CONSIDERING THIS REQUEST, MUST CONSIDER THE POLICY IMPLICATION, THE AMENDMENT ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP IN THE GENERAL AREA AND IN THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND POLICIES THAT ARE CURRENTLY BEING PURSUED THERE. STAFF HAS PREPARED A VERY DETAILED REPORT FOR YOU THAT DOES BEGIN PAGE 69, REVIEW CRITERIA FOR PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST AND ONE I WOULD JUST POINT OUT TO YOU -- ACTUALLY TWO. THE REQUESTED LAND USE CATEGORY -- THESE ARE YOUR CONSIDERATIONS ETHEIT MEETS THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL CHARACTER, DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY COMPONENT FOR WHICH IT IS BEING REQUESTED AND OTHERWISE CONSISTENT WITH THE REST OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THEN FOR ANY REQUEST FOR A LAND USE CATEGORY THAT PROVIDES FOR AN INCREASE IN DENSITY, INTENSITY OR FOR A BROADER RANGE OF USES THAN THE EXISTING LAND USE CATEGORY. THERE ARE THREE MATTERS THAT COUNCIL TAKES INTO CONSIDERATION AND YOU WOULD MAKE A DETERMINATION ON WHETHER THE LAND USE CATEGORY OF A SIMILAR DENSITY OR INTENSITY IS LOCATED ON AT LEAST ONE SIDE OF E SUECT SITE. WHETHER THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A QUARTER OF A MILE OF A DESIGNATED TRANSIT STOP OR DESIGNATED TRANSIT CORRIDOR OR IF THE SECOND PARCEL IS ADJACENT TO THE PARCEL HAS A CLASSIFICATION OF R-6 OR R-10 WHICH I BELIEVE THIS ONE DOES AND LOCATED WITHIN 8th OF A MILE OF A DESIGNATED TRANSIT STOP. I WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT THOSE MATTERS FOR COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC SO EVERYONE IS CLEAR THAT THE CRITERIA THAT YOU ARE EVALUATING THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IS DIFFERENT THAN THE CRITERIA ANY FUTURE REZONING APPLICATIONS THAT MIGHT BE APPLIED TO YOUR DECISION TONIGHT, YOUR POLICY DECISION TONIGHT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM OR I WILL TURN IT OVER TO MR. HEY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A TWO-PART ITEM. IF ITEM 1 DOES NOT PASS DOES THAT KILL ITEM 3 AND WE CAN NOT GO FORWARD WITH IT? >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: I BELIEVE ITEM 3 -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I SEE ONE OF THE SE ADESS AS THERE. >>CATE WELLS: MR. CHAIRMAN, CATE WELLS, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY. IF ITEM 1 IS NOT APPROVED, ITEM 3 WOULD HAVE TO BE CONTINUED OR WITHDRAWN AS THE REQUEST FOR REZONING ON ITEM 3 IS CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF CHANGE IN THE PLAN AMENDMENT CATEGORY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: CAN WE HEAR THEM BOTH TOGETHER ESSENTIALLY -- I MEAN EVERYTHING IS OPEN. SO PEOPLE IN THE PUBLIC DON'T HAVE TO SPEAK TWICE? BECAUSE WE HAVE AT LEAST 30 PUBLIC COMMENT IF NOT MORE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I C. MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY. PERHAPS THERE NEEDS TO BE A DISCUSSION OF THE CRITERIA AND THE BASIS OF YOUR DECISION. IT IS IN THE CITY COUNCIL'S BEST INTEREST TO INTEREST THEM HEARD SEPARATELY BECAUSE YOU APPLY DIFFERENT CRITERIA TO YOUR DECISION AS POLICE JOH JOHNSON-VELEZ STATED ONE IS A LEGISLATIVE MATTER THAT IS A FAIRLY DEBATABLE AND REZONING IS QUASI-JUDICIAL WHICH REQUIRES YOU TO FACE IT ON COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. FOR PURPOSE OF THE CLARITY OF THE RECORD AND CLARITY OF THE BASIS OF REVIEW IF THE DECISION NEEDS TO BE MADE OR LOOKED AT BY A CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO KEEP THE RECORD AS CLEAN AS POSSIBLE SO WHEN COUNCIL DOES DELIBERATE, IT IS APPLYING THE CORRECT CRITERIA FOR THE BASIS OF ITS DECISION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THEN WE WILL CONTINUE. THANK YOU. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCI COUNCILMEMBERS, DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. CAN I SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE. ALL RIGHT. HOPEFULLY -- ARE YOU SEEING THE SCREEN? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. GO AHEAD. >>DAVID HEY: ALL RIGHT. THIS ONE AMENDMENT FOR YOUR REVIEW THIS EVENING TA/CPA 20-34. IT INVOLVES THREE PARCELS 411 AND 413 SOUTH WILLOW AVENUE AND 502 SOUTH ORLEANS AVENUE. JUST THE GENERAL LOCATION. IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DIS DISTRICT. SINCE IT INVOES THREE SEPARATE PARCELS, IT ACTUALLY FALLS INTO TWO SEPARATE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE TWO NORTHERN ONES ON WILLOW OF TOWN CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD. WHILE THE SOUTHERN ONE ON ORLEANS FALLS WITHIN THE HISTORIC HYDE PARK NEIGH NEIGHBORHOOD. JUST TO LET YOU KNOW, THE SITES DO FALL IN THE NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. THEY DO NOT FALL IN THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: POINT OF ORDER. A QUESTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHEN I LOOKED AT THIS AND DROVE THROUGH THE PARCEL. I WAS CURIOUS WHY THIS WAS PROCESSED AS A SINGLE PLAN AMENDMENT WHEN THE PARCELS FROM WHAT I COULD SEE CONTIGUOUS. STREET AS WELL AS BEING. BY >> QUESTION LAND USE -- FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS DO NOT HAVE TO BE CONTIGUOUS TO EACH OTHER. IT IS ONE APPLICANT WHO HAS WORKED WITH THE THREE PROPERTY ONERS TO BRING THIS FORWARD. THERE HAS BEEN PLAN AMENDMENTS IN THE PAST THAT ARE NONCONTIGUOUS. EVEN THE CITY HAS BROUGHT AMENDMENTS IN THE PAST THAT ARE NONCONTIGUOUS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY. THAT IS FINE. I WAS MISTAKEN. I THOUGHT THEY HAD TO BE CONTIGUOUS. >>BILL CARLSON: SORRY TO INTERRUPT AND I DON'T USUALLY DO THAT. MR. HEY, YOU SAYS IT NOT IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. JUST NOT IN THE LOCAL. >>DAVID HEY: IT IS IN THE NATIONAL BUT NOT IN THE LOCAL. >>BILL CARLSON: ONLY A BLOCK AWAY FROM THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT CORRECT? >>DAVID HEY: I WILL SHOW YOU ON THE MAP, HERE -- HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL. HERE IS THE PROPERTIES ON WILLOW. AND HERE WE HAVE THE PROPERTY ON ORLEANS. THIS IS WILLOW AVENUE RUNNING UP TO WEST PLATT STREET. THE ON RAMP TO THE LEE ROY SELMON. WEST HORATIO RUNNING EAST-WEST. THIS RED LINE IS THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. SO DOWN HERE SOUTH OF THE RED LINE IS WITHIN THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. YOU CAN SEE FROM THE AERIAL THAT THE PATTERN ABOVE THIS NORTH -- THIS RED LINE DOES CHANGE. YOU CAN SEE TO THE SOUTH, IT IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. WHE YOU GO NORTH OF THE RED LINE, YOU CAN SEE A MIXTURE OF SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, AT ATTACHED AND EVEN MULTIFAMILY SCATTERED THROUGHOUT IN HERE. TO POINT THIS OUT ALSO, IF YOU GO ABOUT TWO BLOCKS TO THE WEST ON HORATIO. THE OLD GREG FACTORY. THAT HAS A INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL LAND USE LEFT OVER FROM WHEN THE BREAD FACTORY WAS THERE. SO HERE -- THIS IS -- THIS IS THE BASIC AERIAL IN THAT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WITHIN THE SURROUNDING AREA. AGAIN -- >>BILL CARLSON: MR. HEY, CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT THE DIFFERENCE IS BETWEEN THE NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT AND THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT? OR CAN SOMEBODY -- >>DAVID HEY: THAT MIGHT BE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR THE CITY TO ADDRESS. >>BILL CARLSON: SORRY ABOUT THAT. THANK YOU. >>DAVID HEY: AND THERE IS DENNIS. >> GOOD EVENING, WOULD YOU LIKE FOR ME TO ADDRESS THAT QUESTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SURE, GO AHEAD. >> THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT IN HYDE PARK IS CREATED BY A SEPARATE ORDINANCE THAT PLACE IT IS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FOR ANY CHANGES THAT OCCUR ON THE EXTERIOR STRUCTURES AND WITHIN THE DESIGNATED BOUNDARIES. THE NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT, THAT IS A DISTRICT THAT IS CREATED THROUGH THE STATE HISTORIC OFFICE IN COORDINATION WITH THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AD FORM OF DOCUMENT -- ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES THAT MEET CRITERIA FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER AND LITTLE IN THE FORM OF PROTECTION. >>BILL CARLSON: SINCE I HAVE MR. FERNANDEZ ON THE LINE COULD YOU JUST TELL US. IT WAS -- A NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD BE IN A NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT BECAUSE IT HAS CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES. WOULD THAT NOT BE TRUE? >> Dennis: THAT'S CORRECT. IT IS STRUCTURES WITHIN THE NATIONAL REGISTERED BOUNDARY THAT IS DESIGNATED AS CONTRIBUTING OR NOT CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES. AD ONE STRUCTURE WITHIN THE SUBJECT AREA THAT DOES HAVE THAT CONTRIBUTING DESIGNATION; HOWEVER, IT DOES NOT HAVE THE PROTECTIVE MEASURE OF LOCAL DESIGNATION. >>BILL CARLSON: BECAUSE IT IS NOT IN THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. >> THAT'S CORRECT. >>BILL CARLSON: YOU HAVE BEEN FOR A WHILE. WHY IT IS ON DELEON RATHER THAN HORATIO OR NORTH. >> I BELIEVE IT WAS FEASIBILITY OF GETTING THE AREA DESIGNATED. FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND IT HAPPENED SIGNIFICANTLY BEFORE I WAS WITH THE CITY. THERE WAS A PRETTY W WELL-ESTABLISHED DEGREE OF DEON.ITION IN THE AREA NORTH OF AND SO IT WAS ESSENTIALLY OMITTED. >>BILL CARLSON: ONE LAST QUESTION SINCE YOU ARE ON THE LINE, IF I COULD. COULD YOU TELL US WHAT THE HISTORIC NAME OF IT WAS AND WHO LIVED THERE? >> WELL, A POURING OF HYDE PARK THAT WAS SOMEWHAT TRANSITIONING INTO DOBYVILLE AND IT LIKE SOME OF THE OTHER STRUCTURES IN HYDE PARK, THE OLDER HOMES AND RESIDENTS WHO ESTABLISHED THAT PORTION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I DON'T KNOW OF ANY INDIVIDUALS IN PARTICULAR TO POINT OUT, BUT IT IS THE SAME LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AS WHAT THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. >>BILL CARLSON: CAN YOU TELL US QUICKLY WHAT DOBYVILLE WAS? >> WHAT DOBYVILLE WAS? IT WAS AN AREA THAT WAS SITUATED HERE, NORTH OF HERE WHICH WAS UNDER THE CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY THAT WAS THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD FOR A LOT OF THE INDIVIDUALS THAT SUPPORTED SOME OF WEALTHIER FAMILIES IN THE HYDE PARK AREA. MANY OF THEM WERE AFRICAN-AMERICAN AND THEY LIVED IN PROXIMITY TO WHERE THEY WORKED SO THEY COULD TRAVEL EASIER. >>BILL CARLSON: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. HEY, GO AHEAD. >>DAVID HEY: THANK YOU. HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL. BACK -- THIS IS PRIVATELY INITIATED. IT IS SMALL SCALE. THE THREE PARCELS TOT APPROXIMATELY .52 ACRES. IT -- CURRENTLY ALL THREE PARCELS DESIGNATES AS RESIDENTIAL-10 AND THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO GO TO THE RESIDENTIAL-35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. HERE ARE JUST SOME PHOTOS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. HERE WE ARE LOOKING NORTHEAST TOWARD 411. 411 WILLOW -- ACTUALLY 411 IS OVER HERE. THIS IS 413 IN YELLOW AND WE ARE LOOKING NORTH TOWARD THE LEE ROY SELMON. HERE WE ARE LOOKING EAST TOWARD 502 SOUTH ORLEANS AVENUE. THIS IS ORLEANS RIGHT IN THE FRONT. OUT OF FRAME ON THE LEFT WILL BE THE WILLOW PROPERTIES. HERE -- THESE ARE PROPERTIES LOCATED TO THE WEST OF 411 AND 413 SOUTH WILLOW AVENUE. SO THOSE PROPERTIES ARE OUT OF RANGE TO THE RIGHT. AND NORTH OF 502 SOUTH ORLEANS AVENUE WHICH IS PROXIMATELY WHERE THIS CAR IS OUT OF FRAME OVER THERE. WE ARE LOOKING -- YOU CAN SEE THE LEE ROY SELMON AT THE END OF THE STREET. HERE WE ARE LOOKING SOUTH DOWN SOUTH ORLEANS AVENUE. SO THE SOUTH. THE 502 SOUTH ORLEANS IS OUT OF FRAME TO THE LEFT. THESE ARE THE TOWN HOME THAT RUN ALL THE WAY DOWN TO DELEON. AND ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SREET, THESE ARE ALL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. HERE WE ARE LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD 1304 AND 1310 WEST HORATIO STREET. THESE ARE ALL TOWN HOMES. THIS IS THE BACK OF 502 SOUTH ORLEANS. AND THIS PORCH THAT WOULD JUST BE OUT OF FRAME IN THE FRONT YARD HERE, THIS IS 413 SOUTH WILLOW. NOW WE ARE STANDING BASICALLY ON THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF 411 SOUTH WILLOW, AND WE ARE LOOKING ACROSS THE STREET. AGAIN, MORE TOWN HOMES TO THE EAST. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. SO THE THREE PARCELS ARE THIS TAN COLOR. THAT REPRESENTS THE RESIDENTIAL-10. YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE ARE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND KIND OF TO THE SOUTHWEST. TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY ON SOUTH ORLEANS, THIS IS ALL RESIDENTIAL 20. SO -- AND EVEN THAT IS RESIDENTIAL 20. IT IS MOSTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, BUT IT IS ZONED -- THIS WHOLE AREA IS ZONED RM-12. THIS DARKER KIND OF BROWN COLOR THAT WE SEE. THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL-35. SO, FOR INSTANCE, THIS PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY TO THE -- LET'S SEE, WHERE ARE WE? THIS PROPERTY RIGHT HERE IS A PD. EVEN THOUGH THESE ARE R-10. THEY ARE ZONED AT RM-24. SO THAT PROPERTY OWNER COULD BUILD TO THE RM-24 STANDARDS. AND THEN YOU HAVE GOT -- YOU HAVE GOT RESIDENTIAL-35 THROUGHOUT. TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE EAST. WE ALSO HAVE IT TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY ON ORLEANS, THE R-35. THIS IS THE BOUNDARY OF THE NATIONAL, AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE IS -- THERE ARE STILL SOME RES-35 SOUTH OF DEE LEON BUT THERE IS MORE RESIDENTIAL-10. THEN, OF COURSE, WE HAVE GOT -- THIS IS THE BREAD FACTORY OR WHAT WAS THE BREAD FACTORY. IT IS NOW CONDOMINIUMS. ACTING AS A COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 LAND USE CATEGORY REPRESENTED BY THAT RED. THE ONLY WAY TO ACCESS THAT IS THROUGH LOCAL ROAD. TO THE NORTH ALONG PLATT, YOU HAVE THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE-35 FUTURE USE. AND THIS IS -- THE GRAY AREA HERE IS WHERE THE CROSSTOWN MAKES -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: COULD YOU TELL US THE MULTIFAMILY BUILDS THAT WERE THERE. DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW HOW LONG AGO THEY WERE BUILT? >>DAVID HEY: NOT ALL OF THEM. A LOT OF THEM -- WHEN WE WENT OUT INTO THE FIELD, A LOT OF THEM LOOKED LIKE '80s -- PROBABLY SOME '80s, EARLY '90s. THE ONES TO THE SOUTH OF ORLEANS ACTUALLY LOOKED NEWER. THOSE LOOKED, TO ME, MY -- THEY LOOKED EARLY 2000s. >>BILL CARLSON: DOES LOOK LIKE SINCE 2000s, IT HAS BEEN TURNING MORE MULTIFAMILY OR MORE RESTORING EXISTING HOMES OR BUILDING HOMES THAT LOOK LIKE HISTORIC HOMES? >>DAVID HEY:WELL, YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW IF I WOULD PHRASE THAT IN THAT WAY. BECAUSE I THINK THE PROPERTIES THAT HAVE THE RESIDENTIAL-35 HAVE DEVELOPED OUT WITH THEIR TOWN HOMES. THEY HAVE USED THEIR DENSITY THAT THEY HAVE AND THAT THEY DEVELOPED THAT WAY. WHILE I WAS OUT THERE, THERE ARE SOME HOUSES, SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED THAT LOOK REDONE. THERE ARE OTHERS THAT LOOK -- YOU KNOW, THAT THEY HAVE NOT BEEN REDONE. SOT IS A MIXTURE. WOULD -- IN OUR VIEW AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS A MIXED NEIGHBORHOOD WITH A VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES AND DENSITIES. >>BILL CARLSON: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. DINGFELDER DING GOOD EVENING, DAVID. I AM READING THE STAFF REPORT FROM YOUR OFFICE, PLANNING COMMISSION. AND ON PAGE TWO, IT COMPARES THE CURRENT LAND USE CATEGORY WHICH IS R-10 AND WOULD ALLOW FOR UP TO -- WELL, SAYS 10.55 UNIT PER ACRE FOR 13 DWELLING UNITS AS COMPARED TO THE R-35, WHICH IN THIS CASE, FOR WHATEVER REASON, WOULD ALLOW FOR 24.48 UNITS PER ACRE UP TO 21 UNITS. AM I READINGHAT RRECY, DAVID? >>DAVID HEY: NO, SORRY, THAT IS AN ANALYSIS -- THE PLANNING PLANNING COMMISSIONERS HAVE REQUESTED THAT ON ALL SITES, ON ALL PLAN AMENDMENTS. SO HOW WE ANALYZE IT IS WE LOOK AT, LIKE -- IN THIS INSTANCE, WE LOOKED AT 13 SITES THAT WERE DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL USES UNDER THAT R-10. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THOSE 13 SI SITES, THEY HAVE AN AVERAGE BUILT DENSITY OF 10.55 UNITS PER ACRE. SO THAT WOULD TELL US THAT SINCE IT IS OVER THE 10 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE, THAT THERE IS SOME NONCONFORMING USES WITHIN THAT AREA. THEN UNDER THE RES-35, WE FOUND 21 SITES THAT WERE DEVELOPED, YOU KNOW, WITH RESIDENTIAL U USES. AND THAT -- THEIR AVERAGE WAS BUILT OUT OF 24 -- ROUGHLY 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY, ALL RIGHT. CLIFICION.FOR THAT LET'S MOVE TO THE NEXT LINE. THE NEXT LINE SAYS MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL. SO CURRENTLY UNDER THE CURRENT EXISTING COMP PLAN CATEGORY R-10, THE MAXIMUM OF TEN DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE ALLOWING CONSIDERATION FOR TOTAL OF FIVE DWELLING UNITS. SO RIGHT NOW, AS FAR AS THE COMP PLAN IS CONCERNED, THEY COULD BUILD UP TO FIVE UNITS ON THESE THREE PARCELS. >>DAVID HEY: CORRECT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND THEN IF WE JUMP OVER TO THE R-35 THAT THEY ARE LOOKING FOR, IT SAYS UNDER THE R-35, 35 UNITS PER GROSS ACRE WILL LOT CONSIDERATION OF UP TO 18 DWELLING UNITS WHICH IS ABOUT A THREE THREE-AND-A-HALF-TIME JUMP. >>DAVID HEY: CORRECT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WANT TO JUMP DOWN TO THE HEIGHT. RANGE OF ALLOWABLE USES AND ON THE SAME PAGE. BUILDING HEIGHTS IN THE R-10 TYPICALLY RANGE UP TO THREE STORIES. OKAY. AND THEN AS FAR AS THE R-35, IT SAYS BUILDING HEIGHTS TYPICALLY RANGE UP TO EIGHT STORIES. >>DAVID HEY: LET ME GO BACK TO THE MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL AND THEN I WILL ADDRESS THE RANGE OF ALLOWABLE USES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LET ME READ ONE OTHER THING. AND THEN UNDER THE R-35, IT SAYS, LIMITED NEIGHBORHOOD CONSIDERED SUBJECT TO ALSO BE COMMERCIAL LOCATION CRITERIA WHICH I GUESS IS TRUE IN BOTH CATEGORIES. I GUESS I AM MAKING SURE I AM READING IT CORRECTLY. I WA READING THE FIRST LINE INCORRECTLY. SO THANK YOU FOR CORRECTING ME ON THAT. BUT I AM MAKING SURE I AM READING YOUR REPORT CORRECTLY AND SPECIFICALLY THE R-35 SAYS BUILDING HEIGHTS RANGE UP TO EIGHT STORIES. >>DAVID HEY: RIGHT. OKAY. UNDER THE MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL, YOU K KNOW, WE AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION LOOK AT THE TOTAL ACREAGE. SO WHEN WE CALCULATE OUT THE .52, THAT'S HOW WE GET TO THE 18. NOW YOU ARE WELL AWARE THAT THE ZONING THEN -- WHEN A ZONING COMES IN, IT IS LOOKED AT SPECIFICALLY, YOU KNOW, WHAT THE ACREAGE IS ON THAT PARCEL. SO IT WOULD ALMOST BE IMPOSSIBLE TO GET UP TO THE 18 DWELLING UNITS BECAUSE NOT ONLY WOULD THAT REQUIRE A BONUS, BUT THEY WILL HAVE TO SOMEHOW COMBINS AS ONE. SO THAT IS JUST ALWAYS TO GIVE YOU THE MAXIMUM POTENTIAL, BUT IN REALITY, NOWHERE NEAR THAT AMOUNT AFTER SITE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT IF -- ONE OF THE THINGS THAT CONCERNS ME GREATLY IS IN THE REPORT IT SAYS UP TO EIGHT STORIES IS THE TYPICAL RANGE FOR THESE TYPE OF PROJECTS. I MEAN, FOR ARGUMENT SAKES, WE CAN'T -- WE CAN'T EVALUATE THE ZONING -- THE ZONING, WHATHEY SAY OR WHAT THEY MIGHT DO. WE CAN ONLY EVALUATE AT THIS STAGE OF THE COMP PLAN STAGE WHAT THE POTENTIAL IS. AND MY CONCERN IS WHAT IF THEY DECIDED TO THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE ONE -- ON LARGER PARCEL, WHAT IF THEY DECIDED THEY WOULD HAVE ONE -- ONE FLOOR OF PARKING AND THEN THE NEXT FLOOR WILL BE AN APARTMENT AND THE NEXT FLOOR WILL BE AN APAR APARTMENT. THE NEXT FLOOR WILL BE AN APARTMENT. THE NEXT FLOOR WILL BE AN APARTMENT. YOU KNOW, UP TO FOUR OR FIVE OR SIX UNITS. UP TO FOUR OR FIVE STORIES T TALL. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT CAN KEEP THAT FROM HAPPENING FROM A COMP PLAN PERSPECTIVE? >>DAVID HEY: WELL, REMEMBER, THESE DESCRIPTIONS ARE FOR -- THEY ARE JUST DESCRIPTIONS. THEY ARE NOT -- THERE IS NO REGULATORY GUIDANCE BEHIND T THAT. THAT EIGHT STORIES COMES FROM WHEN OFF VERY LARGE RESIDENTIAL-35 MULTIFAMILY PROJECT. THAT COULD BE ON, LIKE, A FIVE ACRE OR TEN-AE PIECE. I CALLY IN THIS SCENARIO, SINCE IT IS SO PARCELIZED OUT, YOU WOULD NOT GET THE EIGHT STORIES JUST BECAUSE THE COMPATIBILITY -- WHEN WE LOOK AT THE -- AT THE NEXT STAGE AT THE ZONING LEVEL, IF SOMEONE CAME IN WITH THAT EIGHT-STORY PROJECT THAT YOU JUST DESCRIBED, WE WOULD IMMEDIATELY HAVE ISSUES WITH -- WELL, WOULD IT EVEN MEET EXISTING ZONING REQUIREMENTS. THAT IS THE FIRST QUESTION. AND IF THEY CAME THEN WITH THE PD, BECAUSE YOU ARE EUCLIDIANS WOULD NEVER ALLOW THAT TO OC OCCUR. I BELIEVE THAT IS 35 FEET MAXIMUM UNDER EUCLIDIANS. BUT IF THEY CAME IN UNDER A PD, THEY WOULD IMMEDIATELY RAISE ISSUES WITH COMPATIBILITY WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. NOTHING THAT IS EIGHT STORIES WITHIN THAT. SO AT THE ZONING STAGE IS WHEN THAT, I THINK, WOULD BE NOT EVEN PERMITTED. FOR CONSIDERATION. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST FOR ARGUMENT'S SAKE. BECAUSE ALL WE CAN DO IS LOOK AT IT FROM A COMP PLAN PERSPECTIVE. I AM NOT SAYING EIGHT STORIES IS REASONABLE, BUT MAYBE FIVE STORIES OR FOUR STORIES. WHAT IF SOME FUTURE COUNCIL SAID WE ARE OKAY WITH THAT PD BECAUSE IT MEETS THE COMP PLAN BECAUSE YOU -- BECAUSE SOME -- YOU KNOW LET'S SAY WE JUMP AHEAD 20 YEARS FROM NOW, OKAY. THE COMP PLAN CATEGORY IS R-35 AND SOME FUTURE COUNCIL 20 YEARS FROM NOW SAYS, YEAH, WE ARE OKAY WITH A FOUR OR F FIVE-STORY BUILDING WITH A PD. THAT COULD HAPPEN. ISN'T THAT ARGUABLY CORRECT? >>DAVID HEY: I DON'T BELIEVE SO BECAUSE I WOULD THINK THAT IN THAT THANK BETWEEN -- BETWEEN THAT TIME UNDER THAT SCENARIO, I WOULD THINK THAT MAJOR POLICY CHANGES BY THE CITY WOULD NEED TO BE UNDERTAKEN TO GET TO SCENARIO THAT YOU SAID. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I THINK -- I THINK -- I THINK A COUNCIL TODAY COULD ACTUALLY APPROVE A THREE OR FOUR OR FIVE-STORY CHGE THE R-35.AT PARCEL IF WE I DON'T THINK THERE IS ANY REGULATORY DESIGNATION TO KEEP THAT FROM HAPPENING. NOT IN A LOST LOCALLY HISTORIC DISTRICT. IF THE BUILDING CAN FIT ON T THAT, THAN ANYBODY COULD DO THAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, DAVID. >>DAVID HEY: REGARDING THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. BOTH THE R-10 AND R-35, ANY NONRESIDENTIAL USES WOULD NEED TO MEET COMMERCIAL LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. THE MAXIMUM ZONING DISTRICT FOR COMMERCIALHAT ALLOWED IN EITHER OF R-10 AND R-35 IS THE CN ZONING DISTRICT. OUR PRELIMINARY LOOK AT IT, JUST AT THIS EARLY STAGE, IS THAT THESE SITES WOULD NOT MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA UNDER THE R-10 AND R-35, BUT THAT FINAL JUDGMENT IS ALWAYS AT THE ZONING STAGE. NOW LET'S -- IF WE MOVE ON. THIS IS HOW THE MAP WOULD LOOK IF THIS PLAN AMENDMENT WAS ADOPTED. THE THREE PARCELS WOULD GTO THE R-35. THE SAME AS WHAT IS TO THE EAST AND SOUTH AND SIMILAR TO THE R-20 THAT IS FOUND IN ORLEANS. I KNOW WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THIS A LITTLE. THE MAXIMUM POTENTIAL IMPACTS. FIVE UNIT UNDER THE R-10 CURRENTLY WITH A MAXIMUM OF 8022 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES COULD BE CONSIDERED, BUT THE POTENTIAL AND YOU THE R-35, 18 UNITS. ZONINGS TYPICALLY -- THAT IS MUCH LESS. AND MAXIMUM CONSIDERATION OF UP TO 13,752 SQUARE FEET. THOSE WILL NEED TO MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. THE ZONING DISTRICTS THAT WOULD NOW BE ALLOWED TO BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE R-35 WILL BE THE RM-12, RM-16, RM-18 AND RM-24 ZONING DISTRICTS. THE RM-12 AND RM 24 DISTRICTS ARE PRESENT TO THE EAST, SOUTH AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THE -- AS USUAL, WE DO SEND THESE OUT TO ALL OUR REVIEWING AGENCIES. OUR PARTNER AGENCIES. AND WE VALUE THEIR INPUT. THE SCHOOL BOARD DID PROVIDE COMMENTS STATING THAT GORRIE ELEMENTARY, WILSON MIDDLE ARE ALL OVERCAPACITY AND THESE COMMENTS ARE ANNALYS OF ADEQUATE FACILITIES ONLY AND NOT A DETERMINATION OF SCHOOL CONCURRENCY. A SCHOOL CONCURRENCY REVIEW IS PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY PLAT OR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. ALL OTHER AGENCIES INCLUDING THE CITY OF TAMPA STAFF STATED THERE WERE NO CONCERNS OF THE PROPOSED REQUESTS. ALL THOSE COMMENTS ARE INCLUDED WITHIN YOUR PACKET. I SHOULD MENTION THAT WE RECEIVED A NUMBER OF CITIZEN COMMENTS AND THOSE ARE IN YOUR POCKET AS WELL FOR YOUR REVIEW. PLANNING COMMISSIONEVIEED THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR THE RESIDENTIAL-35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED POLICY GUIDANCE WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THREE MAIN AREAS OF CONSI CONSISTENCY: FIRST, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS SUPPORTIVE OF COMPATIBLE INFILL DEVELOPMENT, ESPECIALLY WITHIN CENTRAL TAMPA NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE CLOSE TO EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSIT OPPORTUNITY. IF YOU REMEMBER THE PICTURES, THE THE INFILL WILL BE SIMILAR TO WHAT IS EXISTING LIKE, FOR INSTANCE, THIS PICTURE HERE IS JUST SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS AN R-35 PIECE. SO THERE IS ALREADY SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE SURROUNDING AREA. THERE IS TRANSIT ON PLATT TO THE NORTH. THIS SITE IS ONE MILE FROM DOWNTOWN TAMPA, AND IT IS IN 1,000 FEET NORTH OF HYDE PARK VILLAGE WHICH PROVIDES COMMERCIAL RETAIL SERVICES. ALSO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SEEKS TO PROTECT OVERALL NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT AND CHARACTER BY ENSURING NEW DEVELOPMENT IS SIMILAR IN FORM AND SCALE TO EXISTING DEVELOPMENT FOUND WITHIN THE SURROUNDING AREA. RESIDENTIAL-35 AND RESIDENTIAL 20 PLAN PARCELS ARE LOCATED DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT SITE AND YOU SEE A NUMBER OF THOSE IN THE PHOTOS ALREADY. AGAIN, AND FINALLY, YOUR CMPREHENSIVE PLAN SEEKS TO PROMOTE A WIDE RANGE OF HOUNG TYPES WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA NEIGHBORHOODS AS TO PROVIDE HOUSING FOR A WIDE RANGE OF INCOME LEVELS AND FAMILY NEEDS. SO RESIDENTS CAN AGE IN PLACE. THEY MAY HAVE A SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE WHEN THEY ARE YOUNGER WITH FAMILY. AND AS THEY GET OPENEDER, THEY MAY WANT AN -- OLDER, THEY MAY WANT AN APARTMENT. HAVING A VARIETY OF HOUSING OMINGS IN ONE NEIGHBORHOOD ESPECIALLY ONE THAT ALREADY HAS THESE FACILITIES IS PROMOTED. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WILL ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL HOUSING UNITS A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT CLEARLY HAS A MIXTURE OF HOUSING TYPES. SO BASED ON THAT ALREADY YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE IMAGINE 2040 IMAGINE 2040. I AM AVAILABLE -- THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. I AM AVAILABLE AND THE CITY IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HEY OR FOR E CITY? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE CITY DOESN'T HAVE ANY REPORT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO, IT'S A PLAN AMENDMENT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I MEANT THE CITY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO REPORT FROM THE CITY. >> AT THIS POINT, THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. WE GO TO THE APPLICANT. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, STEVE MICHELINI REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT. AS THE STAFF HAS POINTED OUT, WE WENT THROUGH FAIRLY EXHAUSTIVE REVIEW REGARDING THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. AND EVEN WORKING WITH THE CITY, WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, IF YOU RECALL BASED ON THEERIAL THAT THEY SHOWED YOU AND THE LAND USE PLAN, THIS AREA SURROUNDED BY MULTIFAMILY, TOWN HOUSES ON -- ON ALL OF THE SIDES EXCEPT FOR ONE SIDE, WHICH IS TO THE -- TO THE WEST. AND ON THAT SIDE, IT IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND THE INDIVIDUAL WHO OWNS AND LIVES THERE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THIS CHANGE. I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW YOU FOR A SECOND -- AND I HAVE -- I HAVE SOME PICTURES TO GO ALONG WITH THIS AS WELL. THE SUBJECT SITE IS SHOWN HERE IN YELLOW. THERE IS AN EXISTING FOUR-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX THAT IS HERE. IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED RS-50. AND THE LAND USE IS R-10. OUR INTENTION WAS TO VEST THAT ONE AS PART O THE LAND USE TO MKE IT A CON -- HAVE A CONFORMING ST. LOUIS. AND ROSS THE STREET WE HAVE SIX TOWN HOUSES RES-35. I MEAN, THEY ARE ALL AROUND HERE. 35 HERE. WE HAVE HIGHER DENSITY BACK OVER HERE, WHICH IS THE OLD BREAD FACTORY. WE ARE ONE -- ONE AND A HALF BLOCKS OFF OF PLATT STREET WHICH IS A HIGHLY TRAVELED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH OFFICES ALL ALONG UP IN HERE. SOME TOWN HOUSES. AND THE RESIDENTIAL-35 WILL ENABLE US TO -- AND I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO THE WHOLE PRENTAON RARDING -- REGARDING THE REZONING, THAT IS A PORTION OF THIS -- OF THIS APPLICATION, BUT THE REZONING IS NEVER INTENDED TO BE -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I OBJECT -- MR. CHAIRMAN, STRANGE FOR ME TO OBJECT, BUT I THINK IT IS OUT OF ORDER FROM WHAT I HAVE BEEN TOLD OVER THE YEARS FOR ANY DISCUSSION OF THE REZONING THAT MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT COME DOWN THE ROAD. WE ARE IN THE COMP PLAN CATEGORY. MR. SHELBY OR MISS WELLS OR WHOEVER IS LISTENING. >> COUNCILMEN, I AM ONLY -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WANT AN OPINION FROM OUR ATTORNEYS BEFORE WE MOVE ON, STEVE. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: MR. DINGFELDER, THIS IS SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ. YES, THESE APPLICATIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED -- THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED INDEPENDENT OF ANY FUTURE REZONING ACTIONS THAT MAY COME BEFORE YOU AS A RESULT OF THIS AMENDMENT. >> IF I COULD, I WASN'T TRYING TO GET INTO THE REZONING PRESENTATION BUT RATHER ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF AN EIGHT-STORY BUILDING AND THE COMPATIBILITY OF THAT IN TERMS THEAND E. IF YOU LOOK AT THE -- AT THE STAFF REPORT, AGAIN, ON PAGE 2, IT INDICATES THAT YOU COULD HAVE UP TO EIGHT STORIES; HOWEVER, WITH THE SIZE OF THE -- OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS BEING CONSIDERED, WOULD YOU NEVER BE ABLE TO DO THAT. YOU ALSO WOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO ACHIEVE 18 DWELLING UNITS. SO ANYWAY, THAT IS THE ONLY REASON I WENT DOWN THAT ROAD BRIEFLY. THE -- WHEN WE WENT THROUGH THE LAND USE CRITERIA REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL, WE ALSO IDENTIFIED -- AND THE STAFF IDENTIFIED -- IF YOU LOOK ON PAGE 4 OF YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT, THAT THE APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND CRITERIA STARTING WITH LAND USE OBJECTIVE 1.1 RECOGNIZE AS THAT THE CITY IS COMPRISED OF UNIQUE DISTRICTS AND THIS IS THE CENTRAL TAMPA DISTRICT. IT RECOGNIZES THAT THIS IS A PRIMARY URBAN EMPLOYMENT, CIVIC AND CULTURAL CENTER, BUILDING ON THE HERITAGE OF ASSETS FOUND IN THE DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS WHILE FOSTERING A VIBRANT URBAN LIFESTYLE THROUGH URBAN, MIXED USE AND ENTERTAINMENT. THIS PARCEL AND THE ONES UNDER CONSIDERATION ARE SURROUNDED BY HIGHER DENSITY DEVELOPMENTS. AND THIS IS THE HOLE IN THE DOUGHNUT. THIS IS NOT TAKING A DOUGHNUT AND TRYING TO ACHIEVE SOMETHING ON THE OUTSIDE OF IT. AS I POINTED OUT, WE ARE ABSOLUTELY SURROUNDED BY OTHER DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE OF EQUAL AND HIGHER DENSITY -- SORRY, NOT HIGHER BUT THEY ARE ALL UAL IT. I HAVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS. I WOULD LIKE TO GO THROUGH THEM TO SHOW YOU WHAT WE HAVE ON THE -- ON THE PROPERTY ITSELF. AND DAVID HEY WAS SHOWING YOU THOSE AS WELL. THIS IS THE R-35 IMMEDIATELY IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH WHICH WAS THE -- THE TOWNHOUSE PROJECT THAT IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET AND YOU HAVE THE HIGHER DENSITIES AND MULTIFAMILY AND TOWN HOUSE DEVELOPMENTS UNTIL YOU GET TO DEE LEON. THIS IS DIAGONALLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE PICTURE I JUST SHOWED YOU WHICH ARE MORE TOWN HOUSES AND DIAGONALLY ACROSS FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND THIS PHOTOGRAPH IS DIRECTLY ACSS FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AGAIN MORE TOWN HOUSES. THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE APARTMENT BUILDING DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH. THIS IS R-10, AND THIS WILL BE VESTED UNDER THE DIRECT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION. THIS IS THE REAR OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BEING RUEST WITH THE APARTMENT BUILDING HERE AND THIS -- THIS PROPERTY WOULD BE WHERE THE PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT WOULD TAKE PLACE. AND WE ARE LOOKING DOWN THE STREET WHERE THERE ARE MORE TOWN HOUSES. BASICALLY OUR INTENT HERE IS TO -- IS TO CREATE AND IDENTIFY THE LAND USE AND MAKE IT COMPATIBLE WITH THE OER DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE IN THE AREA AS WELL AS TO VEST THE EXISTING BUILDING TO THE NORTH AND LET ME GO THROUGH THE VARIOUS CRITERIA THAT HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY THE -- LAND USE OBJECTIVE 1.2 TO CREATE AND INSPIRE URBAN DESIGN WHILE RESPECTING TAMPA'S URBAN SCALE, UNIQUE HISTORY AND AESTHETICS AND EVERYTHING BEING PROPOSED HERE WILL BE OF LIKE SIMILAR SCALE AND DESIGN, AS WELL AS INTENSITY. RELATES TO NEW BUILDINGS TO THE CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE COMMUNITY. IT WILL BE THE SAME AS THE OTHER EXISTING TOWN HOUSE DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE IN THE AREA. RELATE THE NEW BUILDINGS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTE A RANGE OF USES AND IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF EACH OTHER. THE STAFF HAS ALREADY POINTED OUT TO YOU A MIX OF USES HERE. AND UNTIL YOU GET FURTHER TO THE SOUTH WHERE YOU ARE AT DELEON, MOST OF THESE -- YOU HAVE MOSTLY, AT LEAST FROM MY WINDSHIELD SURVEY OF DRIVING AROUND THE NEIGHBORHOOD, TOWN HOUSES AND THEINTERSPERSED WITH ONE OR OCCASIONALLY TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES OR DUPLEXES OR APARTMENTS. AND IT IS TRULY A MIX. AND ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT ONE OF THE COUNCILMEMBERS ASKED WAS HOW DID THIS HAPPEN AND WELL IT AND WILL BECAUSE THE CITY COUNCIL DESIGNATED AS A HIGH GROWTH ACTIVITY AREA. AND YOU WANTED IT TO OCCUR WITH TRANSIT CORRIDORS, EMPLOYMENT CENTERS AND WHERE IT WAS NOT ON ANYTHING ELSE.IONAL BURDEN THIS IS NOT THE SAME AS OLD HYDE PARK VILLAGE OR HYDE PARK ITSELF. IT WAS ALWAYS A LITTLE HIGHER DENSITY DEVELOPMENT AREA. ONE OF THE OTHER QUESTIONS THAT WAS RAISED WAS THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE AND THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. WE HAD IT EVALUATED BY THE CITY OF TAMPA HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF AND WE HAVE A LETTER WHICH I BELIEVE IS ON FILE WITH YOU ALL THAT THEY HAVE NO OKAY TO THE REMOVAL OF THAT BUILDING. AND THIS THEY DID NOT FINE IT TO BE A CONTRIBUTING OR -- A BUILDING THAT SHOULD BE RE RETAINED. IT INDICATED IN A LETTER AND I WILL BE HAPPY TO PUT IT ON THE SCREEN IF YOU WOULD LIKE, TO THANK ONCE THE DEMOLITION PERMITS WERE APPLIED FOR THAT WOULD SIGN OFF ON THE DEMOLITION OF THE ONE STRU STRUCTURE. GOING ON FURTHER WITH THE STAFF ANALYSIS REGARDING LAND USE OBJECTIVES. THEIR JOB IS TO REGULATE THE INTENSITY AND LEVEL OF INTENSITY REGARDING THIS AREA. AND ANY PROPOSAL THAT WOULD COME FORWARD FOLLOWING AN APPROVAL OF A LAND USE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE TO BE IN CHARACTER WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IT WOULD HAVE TO BE IN CHARACTER WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. AND I HAVE ALREADY SHOWN YOU WHAT THE CHARACTER WAS. SO REGARDLESS OF -- OF, YOU KNOW, THE LAND USE DESIGNATION. IT COULD NOT BE OUT OF CHARACTER WHEN IT CAME TO YOU FOR A REZONING TO BE INCOMPATIBLE WITH ANYTHING THAT WAS BEING PROPOSED. LAND USE POLICY 3.4.1 ENCOURAGING MORE DIVERSE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY BY AMENDING CURRENT LAND USE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS IN A WAY TO PROMOTE RESIDENTIAL AND OR MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS. THIS IS CERTAINLY ONE OF THOSE. RECOGNIZE AND STRENGTHEN THE CENTER CITY NEIGHBORHOODS CREATING VIBRANT, DIVERSE, DISTINCTIVE AND INTERCONNECTED COMMUNITY. THIS IS SANDWICHED IN BETWEEN THE CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY ON THE NORTH. HYDE PARK VILLAGE ON THE SOUTH. AND THE SOHO DISTRICT ON THE WEST AND ALSO OTHER TOWN HOUSE POJECTS THAT ARE ALL AROUND THIS. AS I SAID, THIS -- THIS IS NOT AN EXCEPTION TO WHAT IS ALREADY DEVELOPED IN THE AREA. THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS ALREADY THERE. AND IT'S A REQUEST TO -- TO VEST AN EXISTING BUILDING, AS WELL AS TO ALLOW THE -- THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL PARCEL. THE IMPACT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL FRAME. WORK SHOULD BE RECOGNIZED AND SCUSD DURING THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS. THAT IS LAND USE POLICY 9.2.2. AND COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINED STABLE NEIGHBORHOODS TO ENSURE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC HEALTH. THIS WILL, IN FACT, INTRODUCE A REDEVELOPMENT I CAN'T THAT -- A REDEVELOPMENT -- AREA THAT -- A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT THAT WILL SUSTAIN THOSE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NEEDED. GENERALLY THE LOCATION OF SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED HOUSING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO THE PERIPHERY OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY DECHEDEIGHRHOODS;HOODS; HOW HOWEVER, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED HOUSING MAY BE CONSIDERED AS IT WAS DEMONSTRATED THAT IT WILL BE INTEGRATED WITH SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHD RESIDENTIAL USES BY MITIGATING THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF ANY. AND IN THIS CASE IT SITS SURROUNDED BY OTHER TOWN HOUSE AND MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS. SO IT IS NOT ON THE PERIPHERY. IT SITS -- AND IT IS NOT CREATING A NEW -- A NEW TREND OR ANYTHING ELSE. IT IS, IN FACT, RESPONDING TO THE DEVELOPMENT MEASURES THAT SURROUND IT. LAND USE POLICY 9.8.1, E MODERATE DENSITY MULTIFAMILY ZONE IN MULTIFAMILY AREAS TO PROMOTE ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES, ENCOURAGE INFILL PROJECTS AND CONVERSION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH MIXED USES HOUSES SMALL AND MODERATE SCALE OR PROVIDE NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND MODERATE DENSITY THAT CAN FILL IN VACANT OR UNDERDEVELOPED SITE. I WOULD CHARACTERIZE THIS AS A UNDERDEVELOPMENT SITE. IT IS A SINGLE FAMILY STRU STRUCTURE; HOWEVER, THAT PROPERTY IS CERTAINLY CONSIDING E FA THAT IT IS SURROUNDED BY MULTIFAMILY AND TOWN HOUSES, IT WILL BE COMPATIBLE AND LAND USE POLICY 9.8.1. WE AGREE WITH BOTH THE CITY STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF THAT THIS IS AT CORRECT USE FOR THIS LOCATION. AND WE GREATLY APPRECIATE YOUR FAVORABLE KRLING. THE OWNER -- DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK? THE OWNER IS HERE. MAYBE HE CAN TAKE A MINUTE TO SPEAK ON THIS PROJECT. >> HI, MY NAME IS BROOKS BIRD. I AM THE OWNER OF 413 SOUTH WILLOW. AND I APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION ON THIS PROJECT. WE DO FEEL THAT THIS PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. I HAVE BEEN A TAMPA RESIDENT NOW FOR 25 YEARS IN REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT FOR THAT AMOUNT OF TIME. AND WE TAKE PRIDE IN TRYING TOO DO WHAT IS RIGHT AND PROVIDE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENTS. AND WE DO BELIEVE THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN I LOOK AT THIS SITE AND WHAT IT IS SURROUNDED BY, THAT WE ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND KEEPING WITHIN THE SPANISH TOWN DISTRICT. WE APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> AGAIN, LET ME RUN THROUGH THESE PICTURES QUICKLY FOR YOU. THIS TOWN HOUSE PROJECT IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET TO THE SOU. IN IS THE APARTMENT BUILDING THAT IS DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: CAN YOU SEE THAT, MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. ARE YOU ABLE TO SEE THE PICTURE ON THE SCREEN? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO, -- PLEASE PUT THE OVERHEAD THAT THE GENTLEMAN IS SHOWING. THERE YOU GO. TRY IT AGAIN, SIR. >> THIS IS THE TOWN HOUSE PROJECT IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE STILL CAN'T. DO YOU HAVE PHOTOS -- THERE IT IS. GO AHEAD. I AM SORRY. >> THIS IS THE APARTMENT BUILDING THAT WOULD BE PART OF THE LAND USE DESIGNATION THAT WILL BE VESTED. A FOUR-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING THAT CURRENTLY HAS A RESIDENTIAL-10 CLASSIFICATION AND RES-50 ZONING, WHICH WE WOULD HAVE TO CORRECT. THIS IS -- THIS IS TO THE SOUTH AND SLIGHTLY TO THE EAST. THE TOWN HOUSE PROJECT IS DIAGONALLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED PROJECT. AND THIS IS -- LITTLE BIT FURTHER DOWN, ALSO A TOWNHOUSE PROJECT. THIS PHOTOGRAPH IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE SUBJECT THAT WE ARE REQUESTING. SO IN CONCLUSION, I WOULD SAY THAT SURELY THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DONE A DILIGENT EFFORT IN IDENTIFYING THESE AREAS. WE HAVE AS WELL. AND WE BELIEVE THAT IT IS COMPATIBLE. AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL AND WE WILL BE HAY TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CITRO. >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. MICHELINI? >> YES, SIR. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THAT FIRST AERIAL MAP THAT YOU HAVE, WILL YOU PUT THAT UP FOR ME PLEASE. >> THIS ONE OR -- >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO, NO, YOU GOT TO ZOOM OUT. THE ONE THAT HAD ALMOST THE COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOOD. YES SIR. I AM LOOKING AT THAT. AND SANS THE APARTMENTS THAT MAFACTING -- NO, ZOOM OUT. THERE YOU GO. ALL THE OTHERS, WHAT IS THE PERCENTAGE YOU WOULD SAY THOSE PLOTTED -- THOSE PLOTS WERE MULTIFAMILY AS OPPOSED TO THE PLOT FOR SINGLE-FAMILY IN THAT VIEW? >> I THINK THAT THE -- THE -- THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THAT -- I WILL HAVE TO REFER BACK TO THEIR REPORT. BUT I'M PRETTY SURE AND MAYBE DAVID HEY CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION -- >>JOSEPH CITRO: I AM NOT VERY GOOD AT MATH SO, PLEASE, I GOT 15%. >> THAT THESE ARE WERE 15%? THAT THE MULTIFAMILY WAS 15%? >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, SIR. THE OTHER -- THE OTHER MULTIFAMILIES THAT YOU ARE POINTING OUT. DO YOU KNOW WHEN THEY WERE BUILT? ROUGHLY? GIVE ME AN ESTIMATE. >> UM, MY -- >>JOSEPH CITRO: LET ME ASK THIS WAY, THE LATEST ONE THAT WAS BUILT, WHEN WAS IT? >> IN THE 2000S. >> THIS ONE WAS BUILT IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I AM GOING TO COUNCILMAN CARLSON'S STATEMENT. PLANNING COMMISSION GOES ESTIMATE FARTHER OUT. I AM TRYING TO FIGURE OUT SINCE THESE WERE FIRST STARTED, THESE MULTIFAMILIES. IT WAS IT IN '80. AND THE MULTIFAMILIES HAVE SLOWED DOWN SINCE THEN? I AM TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW HOW THE COMPATIBILITY IS GOING TO BE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU, MR. MICHELINI. >> I AM LOOKING FOR THE PERCENTAGE BUT I THINK IT IS MUCH HIGHER THAN THE 15%. IF YOU DRIVE AROUND THE AREA, YOU WILL SEE THAT IN THIS AREA THAT -- THAT IS NORTH OF HORATIO, THATING THERE A MIX OF A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT APARTMENT AND MULTIFAMILY AND TOWN HO HOUSES. IF YOU GO FURTHER SOUTH. IF YOU WERE GOING DOWN TO DELEON, IT CHANGES, BUT IN THIS AREA, THE NUMBER IS PRETTY H HIGH. >>JOSPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. MICHELINI. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. MICHELINI. ANDHEN I HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. HEY. STEPHEN, THE SITE -- THE MAP YOU HAVE IS POINTING TO ONE SITE BUT IN REALITY A SECOND SITE WHERE YOUR FINGER IS POINTING CORRECT. ON ORLEANS, THE CORNER OF ORLEANS. >> THIS IS AN UPDATED VIEW, BUT THIS IS THE OTHER CORNER HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST FOR THE SAKE OF TRANSPARENCY AND DISCLOSURE, DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE PARCEL ON ORLEAN -- NO, THE PARCEL ON ORLEANS, DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET ARE THREE SINGLE-FAMILY -- NO, ON ORLEANS, ARE THREE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES, ONE RIGHT WHERE YOUR FINGER IS, ONE, TWO, THREE. THREE LARGE HISTORIC -- WELL, THEY LOOK HISTORIC. THEY MAY BE NEWER. THEY MAY BE RENOVATIONS, I DON'T KNOW. BUT I DROVE IT THE OTHER DAY. THREE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES RIGHT THERE. SO I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE BECAUSE ANYBODY WHO IS LISTENING TO YOU AND MR. HEY WILL THINK IT IS ALL MULTIFAMILY AROUND THERE AND IN REALITY DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE ORLEANS PROPOSED PROPERTY IS -- ARE THREE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND IF I AM -- IF I AM MISTAKEN, PLEASE CORRECT ME. >> NO, SIR, WHAT I WAS REFERRING TO IS ON THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I KNOW. >> THESE ARE ALL SURROUNDED. IN ONE IS AN EXISTING DUPLEX. AND, AGAIN, THAT -- THE INTENT THERE BECAUSE IT IS NOT ALLOWED UNDER THE R-10 CLASSIFICATION AS IT IS T CURRENTLY EXISTS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WELL, YOU CAN VEST SOMETHING LESS THAN R-35. >> NO, SIR, I UNDERSTAND THAT. AND WE CERTAINLY WOULD LIKE TO DO SOMETHING THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE ARE NOT TRYING TO OVERBUILD THIS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MY OTHER QUESTION IS TO MR. HEY. DAVID, COULD YOU PUT UP THE MAP -- I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU PUT UP EARLIER. IS YOU CALL IT FIGURE 2 OR FIGURE 3, CITY OF TAMPA EXISTING LAND USE MAP. GOT A LOT OF YELLOW. >>DAVID HEY: YEAH, THAT MAP I DON'T HAVE IN THE POWERPOINT. THAT IS FROM THE PROPERTY APPRAISER AND LOOKS AT DUR CODES. HOW THEY CODE THE PARCEL. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IN THE STAFF REPORT THAT JENNIFER SENT OVER. >>DAVID HEY: JUST NOT IN THE POWERPOINT THAT WE HAVE. I KNOW OF THE MAP THAT YOUARE REFERENCING. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET IT FROM MY COMPUTER UP ON THE SCREEN, BUT ALL I WOULD SAY IN LOOKING AT THIS MAP OF EXISTING -- EXISTING USES, THESE TWO PA PARCELS ARE SURROUNDED WITH WHAT YOU GUYS DESCRIBE OR WHAT -- WHOEVER PUT THIS MAP TOGETHER DESCRIBES AS SINGLE FAMILY/MOBILE HOME. OBVIOUSLY NOT A WHOLE LOT OF MOBILE HOMES THERE. BUT SINGLE FAMILY USES, EXISTING USES. AND I SEE A HECK OF A LOT OF YELLOW -- DO COUNCILMEMBERS -- ANYBODY ELSE GOT THIS? >>DAVID HEY: BEAR WITH ME ONE SECOND. I AM PULLING UP THE MAP. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MAYBE PULL UP THE REPORT OR SOMETHING, I DON'T KNOW. >>DAVID HEY: THAT'S WHAT I AM -- BUT, YOU KNOW, WHILE WE ARE WAITING FOR THAT, I THINK I CAN ADDRESS YOUR CONCERN. THEY END UP CODING HOW THAT MAP DO IT TYPICALLY IS THEY CODE TOWN HOMES AS YELLOW. SO -- >>BILL CARLSON: CAN I JUST ADD TO THIS. I DON'T KNOW THE MAP THAT YOU ARE REFERENCING. MR. HEY, DO YOU HAVE A MAP -- THE MAP WE SAW JUST A FEW MINUTES AGO WAS A NARROW AREA FROM THE MULTIFAMILY ON WILLOW TO THE BREAD FACTORY CONDOS BUT DOESN'T SHOW THE LARGER HISTORIC DISTRICT AND OMITS THE AREA SOUTH OF DELEON. AND OMITS THE AREA EAST OF WILLOW. DO YOU HAPPEN TO HAVE A MAP THAT SHOWS THE MIXTURE OF HOMES THAT MAYBE GOES FROM THE BREAD FACTORY ALL THE WAY TO BOULEVARD OR TO -- TO AT LEAST PAST NEWPORT, SOME OF THE ROADS TO THE EAST. >>DAVID HEY: LET ME CHECK. WHILE I AM DOING THAT -- >>BILL CARLSON: MY SECOND QUESTION IS, WE SAW PICTURES OF A CORNER WITH SEVERAL 1980s AND 1990s CONDOS. WHAT WE DIDN'T SEE THE 1920 HISTORIC HOME AND THE HISTORIC HOMES OF DOBYVILLE, IS THAT CORRECT? DO YOU HAVE ANY PICTURES OF THE HISTORIC HOMES IN THAT AREA? >>DAVID HEY: LET ME LOOK. LET ME TRY TO ANSWER THESE IN -- >>BILL CARLSON: SORRY. >>DAVID HEY: IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE. THERE WE GO. OKAY. I THINK YOU SHOULD NOW BE SEEING THE MAP THAT I THINK COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER WAS REFERENCING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: Y, THE YELLOW. HEY THANK YOU IS AN EXISTING LAND USE MAP. WE USE IT AS PART OF OUR ANALYSIS. IT IS PART OF -- WHAT IT DOES IS IT PULLS THE DATA FROM THE PROPERTY APPRAISER AND HOW THEY CODE EACH DWELLING UNIT. SO LIKE, FOR INSTANCE, EAST -- TO THE SOUTH -- THESE ARE TOWN HOME, BUT IT IS THE WAY THAT THEY -- IT'S THE WAY THEY CODE THAT SOMETIMES THEY SHOW UP AS YELLOW. LIKE TSE TO THE SOUTH ARE TOWN HOME EVEN THOUGH THEY SHOW UP AS YELLOW. THSE ARE DOWN HOMES EVEN THOUGH THEY SHOW UP AS YELLOW. THAT IS THE WAY THE PROPERTY APPRAISER CODES THESE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I AGREE WITH YOU COMPLETELY BY THE SIZE OF THE PARCELS THOSE ARE TOWN HOMES; HOWEVER, IF WE GRANTED THIS R-35, IS THERE ANY GUARANTEE TODAY, AT THIS VERY SECOND, THAT THIS WOULD BE DEVELOPED OUT AS TOWN HOMES? COULDN'T IT BE DEVELOPED OUT AS LTIFAMILY APARTMENTS? >>DAVID HEY: I DON'T -- IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION, I DON'T SEE HOW THEY COULD FIT AN APARTMENT BUILDING THAT IS SIX OR EIGHT STORIES -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I DIDN'T SAY SIX OR EIGHT STORIES IN THIS LAST QUESTION. I JUST SAID COULDN'T IT BE DEVELOPED OUT AS A APARTMENT BUILDING, MAYBE THREE OR F FOUR-STORY APARTMENT BUILDING. >>DAVID HEY: REMEMBER, COUNCILMAN, WE DON'T LOOK INTO THEIR APARTMENTS AND CONDOS. WE LOOK WHETHER IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR MULTIFAMILY EDED.HE MULTIFAMILY IS APPROPRIATE IN THE R-35. IT CAN BE CONSIDERED, ZONING DISTRICTS FURTHER RESTRICTED SO, YOU KNOW, I -- I DON'T SEE -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT YOU ARE SAYING YOU DON'T LOOK AT THE WHAT IFs AS MUCH AS I MAY WANT TO LOOK AT THE WHAT IFs? >>DAVID HEY: YEAH, WE LOOK -- THEY CAN BE CONSIDERED, WHETHER THEY ARE PERMITTED UNDER A ZONING IS ANOTH MATR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY, THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>DAVID HEY: OKAY. NOW LET ME TRY TO -- LET'S -- LET'S GO TO COUNCILMAN CAR CARLSON'S QUESTION. I THINK HE WANTED A MAP THAT ZOOMED OUT. SO LET ME -- CORRECT, YOU WANTED A MAP, COUNCILMAN CARLSON? >>BILL CARLSON: IF YOU HAVE A MAP OVER TO SWANN OR BOULEVARD, AT LEAST. >>DAVID HEY: I AM GOING TO -- LET ME SHARE MY SCREEN AIN. BECAUSE REMEMBER WE LOOK AT -- EVEN THOUGH THERE IS THE BUILD ENVIRONMENT OUT THERE, WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE ZONING DISTRICTS THAT ARE PARTLY ON THE LAND. SO, LIKE -- AND ONCE I GET TO SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE, AGAIN, -- >>BILL CARLSON: IF A COMMUNITY HAPPENS TO HAVE HISTORIC HOMES, BUT AT SOME POINT PEOPLE RENOVATED THEM TO THE POINT THAT THEY DON'T MATCH THE CRITERIA OF CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES SO THEY ARE NOT EXACTLY PROTECTED, IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE -- IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT PROTECTS THOSE HOMES? OR ARE WE -- ARE WE TEARING THEM ALL DOWN. >> CAN YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION AGAIN? I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE -- >>BILL CARLSON: AND MAYBE THIS IS A QUESTION FOR MR. FERNANDEZ IF HE IS STILL AROUND, BUT THE -- IF A STUDY IS DONE AND A HOME OR BUILDING IS NOT CONSIDERED CONTRIBUTING BUT IT IS STILL HISTORIC HOME AND IT IS NOT CONTRIBUTING BECAUSE SOMEBODY ADDED ON TO IT OR RENOVATED ON TO IT AT THAT POINT. ARE WE OKAY -- IF THERE IS A NEIGHBORHOOD FULL OF THOSE HOMES. ARE WE OKAY TEARING THEM DOWN OR SOMETHING IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT CAN ADDRESS THEM. >>DAVID HEY: I CAN PROVIDE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PART AND DENNIS CAN PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON HIS END. AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES PROMOTE THE PROTECTION OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES ESPECIALLY DISTRICT.R DESIGNATED LOCAL >>BILL CARLSON: HOW ABOUT THE NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT? >>DAVID HEY: REALLY NO GUIDANCE ON THOSE AREAS. SO AN INDIVIDUAL STRUCTURE IN A NEIGHBORHOOD COULD BE DESIGNATED A HISTORIC STRUCTURE NOT PART OF A DISTRICT. THERE ARE POLICIES THAT ALSO PROMOTE THAT, BUT IT DOESN'T SPECIFICALLY CALL OUT, YOU K KNOW, SHALL PROTECT ANYTHING WITHIN A NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. IT FOCUSES ON CREATING THE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE CITY TO PROMOTE THE PROTECTION OF ITS DESIGNATED LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. IF DENNIS WANTS TO ADD ANY ANYTHING. >> DENNIS FERNANDEZ: YES, TO KIND OF ADD ON TO THAT THESE TYPE OF CHANGES WHEN THEY ARE WITHIN LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS LIKE A HYDE PARK OR YBOR CITY WOULD GO BEFORE THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONS FOR A RECOMMENDATION ON HOW THE LAND USE CHANGES MIGHT EFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT BECAUSE THIS IS SITUATED IN A NATIONAL DIST DISTRICT, THERE IS NOT THAT MECHANISM FOR THAT TYPE OF REVIEW OR RECOMMENDATION. WITHIN THESE AREAS, THE AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS, WHEN MY STAFF IS PRESENTED WITH A DEMOLITION APPLICATION LIKE THE ONE THAT RELATES TO 413 WILLOW, WE ARE IN A POSITION WHERE WE HAVE TO EVALUATE IT AGAINST SECTION OF THE CODE THAT IS ENTITLED EMERGENCY ACTIONS TO PROTECT HISTORIC BUILDING SITES, STRUCTURES OR OBJECTFOR POTENTIALLY THE CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION. THAT IS A VERY HIGH BAR TO MOVE A PROPERTY THAT LACKS THE CRITERIA TOWARD AN EMERGENCY DESIGNATION. THIS PARTICULAR STRUCTURE -- CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE WITH NO PARTICULAR RECOGNIZABLE DISTINGUISHMENTS TO RISE IT TO THE LEVEL -- >>BILL CARLSON: SORRY, MY QUESTION WAS THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE CONVERSION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IF SOME PRIOR CITY COUNCIL IN 1970s AND '0s WHEN THEY DIDN'T THINK HYDE PARK WAS AN IMPORTANT NEIGHBORHOOD APPROVED MLTIFAMILY, DOES THAT COMPEL US TO ALLOW A NEIGHBORHOOD FULL OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS TO BE TORCH DOWN AND CONVERTED TO CONDOS NOW? >> DENNIS FERNANDEZ: THE AREA -- I WILL HAVE TO LOOK IT THE AS NOT PROTECTED BY HISTORIC ORDINANCE. >>BILL CARLSON: ARE THERE HISTORIC BUILDINGS IN THERE BUILT IN E 19s OR NOT. >> DENNIS FERNANDEZ: THAT HAVE NOT BEEN LOCALLY DESIGNATED. >>BILL CARLSON: DO YOU KNOW IF THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS ASKED TO DESIGNATE THOSE HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR HAVE THEY TRIED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. >> DENNIS FERNANDEZ: WE HAVE HAD RECENT EFFORTS FROM THE SPANISH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING WITH IT AND PERHAPS ONE OR TWO OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS AND THEY BELIEVE THEY WILL PROBABLY SPEAK TO THAT THAT THEY DO DESIRE -- -- DESIRE, THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION DESIRES A LEVEL OF PROTECTION OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES WITHIN THE NATIONAL REGISTERED DISTRICT. >>BILL CARLSON: OKAY, THANK YOU. HEY AND COUNCILMAN CARLSON, HERE IS A FUTURE LAND USE MAP THAT IS ZOOMED OUT A LITTLE BIT MORE THE SUBJECT SITE IN THE MIDDLE. SOUTH OF SWANN GOES TO RES-10. THE HYDE PARK VILLAGE WHICH IS CMU-35. YOU CAN SEEORTHF SWANN, IT GOES TO R-50, R-35. THERE IS EVEN AN R-50 THREE BLOCKS TO THE EAST OF THIS SITE AND DOES TAPER DOWN AS YOU GO WEST TO THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY. I DO ALSO WANT TO ADDRESS BECAUSE I KNOW WE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THIS AREA. AND, YOU KNOW, I JUST WANTED TO BRING IT TO YOUR A. THIS IS THE PLAN THAT THE CITY ADOPTED IN 1975. SO THIS IS NOTHING NEW IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS AREA HERE -- THIS IS THE AREA THAT WE ARE IN. YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS IS MEDIUM INTENSITY. THEY HAVE DIFFERENT LAND USE CATEGORIES BACK THEN. MEDIUM INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL. BASICALLY EVERYTHING NORTH OF SWANN WAS MEDIUM TO HIGH AND SOUTH OF SWANN IN THE -- IS THE LOWER. THEY CALLED ITOWER AND THE SECTOR PLAN. LOW INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL IS THE YELLOW. THAT WAS TYPICALLY SI SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. SO, YOU KNOW, THE -- HOPEFULLY THAT GIVES SOME CONTEXT AND JUST LOST THE MAP, BUT -- OKAY, HERE WE GO. IT'S BEEN THE LONG-TERM TREND FOR THE CITY THAT HAS VIEWED THIS AREA THAT IT IS CLOSE TO THE -- TO THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY. IT IS CLOSE TO THAT KENNEDY CORRIDOR WHERE DENSITY HAS BEEN ENCOURAGED FOR DECADES NOW. SO HOPE THAT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION. IF WE NEED TO ZOOM OUT ON THE MAP AGAIN, I CAN DO THAT AS WELL. >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. CHAIR, IF I CAN ASK. DAVID, CAN I HAVE A COPY OF THAT. YOU SCROLLED OVER SOMETHING THAT SAID THE YEAR 2000. I WANTED TO SEE IF PROJECTIONS CAME TRUE OR NOT. MAYBE IF YOU JUST GIVE ME COPY OF THAT. >>DAVID HEY: I CAN SEND THAT TO YOU, YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE WE IF TO PUBLIC COMMENT. IF YOU WERE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 1 AND IN PERSON ON THE SECOND FLOOR. PLEASE COME TO THE LECTERN. AFTER EACH PERSON WE WILL SANITIZE THE LECTERN AND KEEP GOING FROM THERE. YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. AND JUST STATE YOUR NAME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA MA'AM, GO AHEAD. STATE YOUR NAME. >> THANK YOU, COUNCILMEN. MY NAME IS PAM CANELA. I LIVE AT 604 SOUTH ORLEANS AND THAT HOME HAS BEEN IN OUR FAMILY FOR 90 YEARS. I SENT YOU A 36-PAGE OBJECTION LETTER OUTLINING SOME OF THE PROBLEMS THAT WE ARE HAVING. IN IT, I INCLUDED PICTURES AND ALSO A PETITION FOR OBJECTION TO THE REZONING, WHICH, BY THE WAY, THE RESIDENT THAT MICHELINI WAS TALKING ABOUT THAT SAID SHE DIDN'T OBJECT. SHE DID. SHE IS ON THE PETITION. AND THIS IS THE REALITY OF THINGS. OUR INFRASTRUCTURE IS FRAGILE. IT IS OVERSTRESSED WITH OLD, BREAKING SEWER PIPES. WE HAD TO DEAL WITH ROAD C CAVE-INS AND DRAINAGE PROBLEMS RESULTING IN STREET FLOODING, ALLEY FLOODING, AND OUR RAS.YARDS FLOOD EVERY TIME IT ANY NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL BE TYING IN TO THESE EXISTING PROBLEMS. I WANT TO TALK ABOUT TRAFFIC DENSITY. WE DEAL DAILY WITH HEAVY TRAFFIC. DRIVING THE AREA REQUIRES IN AND OUT WEAVING TO AVOID CARS. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT STREET C CARS -- EXCUSE ME STREET PARKING CARS, ONCOMING CARS, CARS WHO ARE BEHIND US AND END UP IN FRONT OF US BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO WAIT IN LINE. AND THEN THERE ARE THE JOGGERS, THE WALKERS, DOGS WALKING THEIR OWNERS, BICYCLISTS, THE SCO SCOOTERS, GOLF CARTS, THE LANDSCAPERS, DELIVERY TRUCKS, THE POSTAL TRUCKS, AND OUR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. THESE ARE ALL IN OUR STREETS ALL THE TIME THAT WE HAVE TO WEAVE IN AND OUT TO ALLOW THE TRAFFIC TO FLOW. NOW LET'S DON'T FORGET THE SCHOOLS. THERE ARE CHILDREN WALKING TO AND FROM SCHOOLS. THERE ARE PARENTS IN CARS. THEY ARE KNOWN AS THE PICK-UP OR DROP-OFF LINES. SOMETIMES YOU FIND YOURSELF IN THAT LINE EVEN THOUGH YOU DON'T HAVE CHILDREN, BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO GET AROUND THEM. MY POINT IS, TRAFFIC DENSITY IS DANGEROUS. IT IS UNSAFE FOR EVERYONE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ANYONE THAT USES THOSE STREETS. AND IF YOU ALLOW THIS ZONING IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE AND SPOKE WITH THE RESIDENTS IN THOSE TOWN HOMES AND I WENT DOOR TO DOOR SPEAKING TO PEOPLE IN INFORMING THEM OF WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD AND THEY HAUL THE SAME COMPLAINT. THEY HAVE NO PARKING. AND THESE ARE THE CONDOS AND TOWN HOMES ALLOWED TO BE BUILT THERE. AND THAT'S ALL I GOT TO SAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE. YES SIR. GO AHEAD. >> GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS GEORGE COUCH. AND I LIVE AT 603 SOUTH ORLEANS AVENUE. PERCEPTION IS REALITY. AND THE REALITY THAT I SEE OF THIS IS DISTURBING. THE COUNCIL HAS BEEN SOMEWHAT GINGERLY TENACIOUS OF TRYING TO GET AN ASSURANCE IF IT WENT FROM R-10 TO R-35 THAT IT WON'T BE BUILT OUT TO A R-35 AND W HAVEN'T HAD ANY CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OR CONCLUSIVE ASSURANCES THAT WILL NOT HAPPEN. WHY NOT KEEP IT AT R-10. WHY GO TO THE R-35 IF IT IS NOT NECESSARY. AGAIN, NO ASSURANCES, HEMMING AND LAWING. YES, BUT THAT WILL NEVER HA HAPPEN, DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT. THAT IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH. WE LIVE IN THIS AREA AND ALSO PROPOSED THAT, YES, A LOT OF MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE. IT IS PACKED. AND THERE ARE GOING TO BE A LOT OF PRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE TRAFFIC NOT BEING THAT BAD. IF YOU LIVE THERE AND YOU ARE PART OF THAT EXPERIENCE ON A DAILY BASIS, IT'S BAD. ONE OF MY NEIGHBORS JUST SPOKE ABOUT THE JOGGERS AND THE RESIDENTS WHO USE THOSE STREETS ON A DAILY BASIS TO WALK AND EXERCISE AND ENJOY THE SENSE OF COMMUNITY THAT IT OFFERS. AND JAMMING THIS BUILDING SITES AND -- AND THE UNCERTAINTY OF GOING TO THE R-35 IS DETRIMENTAL. IT MAKESO SENSE. AGAIN, THE COUNCIL HAS BEEN GINGERLY TENACIOUS OF SAYING, LISTEN, IF WE WENT TO R-35 ON THIS. WILL YOU BUILD OUT TO R-35. AND THE POTENTIAL IS THERE AND WE HAVEN'T HEARD, NO, IT WON'T. SO THAT IS MY CONCERN. AND I AM GRAVELY CONCERNED ABOUT IT. THIS IS MY NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE I AM RAISING MY FAMILY. AND I HOPE THIS DOESN'T GO THROUGH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ATTENTION. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SIR? >> YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST FOR THE RECORD AS LOOK AT THE MAP IN FRONT OF US, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 502 SOUTH ORLEANS ON THE CORNER. I AM GOING TO PRESUME THAT YOU ARE DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET IN 503? >> NO, SIR, 603 SOUTH ORLEANS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I APOL APOLOGIZE. >> A BLOCK AWAY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OUR BLOCK UP. >> YES, SIR, THAT'S CORRECT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I -- I DON'T WANT TO TESTIFY BUT I NEED SOMEONE LOCAL TO TESTIFY, BUT I SAID THERE WERE THREE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSESIRECY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE 502. IS THAT CORRECT? >> THAT IS CORRECT STATEMENT, YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, MA'AM, GO AHEAD. >> YES, I AM A RESIDENT ON SOUTH ORLEANS TOO. I LIVED THERE SINCE 1985. BACK THEN WE HAD BURGLAR BARS ON ALL THE WINDOWS, BUT THE AREAS THAT COME UP QUITE A BIT. VERY AGAIN SIEVE HOME -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHAT WAS YOUR NAME, MAN. >> VIRGINIA PARK SMITH, 610 SOUTH ORLEANS. THE HOUSE NEXT DOOR TO ME SOLD FOR ONE MILLION 43 LAST YEAR. IT IS A VERY -- I WOULDN'T SAYS IT UP AND COMING, IT HAS ALREADY BECOME A GOOD AREA. NO UP AND COMING. IT'S THERE. MY ONLY CONCERN IS A LOT OF IT IS DENSITY. IT IS KIND OF LIKE FILLING YOUR MOUTH WITH A FIRE HOSE. AT WHAT POINT DOES IT OVERFLOW. OKAY, IT'S DENSE. OKAY, YOU CAN BUILD. WE HAVE A LOT OF, YOU KNOW, MULTIFAMILY UNITS, BUT HOW MUCH CAN WE TAKE? WILL WE FINALLY JUST OVERFLOW? MY QUESTION IS ALSO WATER. I MEAN, WE -- WE PUT UP WITH RAIN IN OUR BACKYARDS FROM ALL THE BUILDING WHERE PEOPLE ARE PIGGY BACKED HOUSES ON TOP OF BASIC BUNGALOWS WITH THE PIGGYEL-BAKRAOUI TEEN. ALL THAT WATER HAS TO GO SOMEWHERE. AND A LOT DOESN'T HAVE CISTERNS TO HOLD THE WATER ND ALL THIS WATER HAS TO GO SOMEWHERE. NOBODY MENTIONED WATER. ARE WE JUST TO OVERFLOW AND PLATT STREET AND SELMAN. WE COVER EVERYTHING WITH MULTIFAMILY HOUSES AN APARTMENTS AND PEOPLE DON'T HAVE LITTLE AREAS ON THE SIDES OF THEIR HOUSE TO ABSORB THE WATER AND TAKE DOWN THE TREES THAT ABSORB HE WATER. I DON'T KNOW WHERE IT IS GOING TO GO. THAT IS MY QUESTION. SO ANYWAY, THAT IS -- MOST OF MY THOUGHTS ARE ABOUT THE DENSITY AND WHERE THE WATER IS GOING TO GO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, NEXT SPEAKER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> PATRICK CIMIN O, 604 SOUTH OREGON AVENUE. I LIVED IN HYDE PARK 30 YEARS IN THREE DIFFERENCE HOUSE. I AM OPPOSED TO THIS INCREASED USE OF THE LAND THAT IS BEING QUESTIONED TONIGHT. I THINK THERE ARE THREE AREAS THAT I HAVE SIGNIFICANT CONCERN ABOUT. ONE IS THE CONCEPT THAT PEOPLE HAVE MENTIONED AND I THINK THE COUNCIL PEOPLE HE LAHED ON TO, MULTIUNIT APARTMENTS VERSUS SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. JENNY JUST MENTIONED ZERO LOT LINE DEVELOPMENT AND THE IMPACT THAT HAS ESPECIALLY IN A TIME OF CLIMATE CHANGE. AND FINALLY WHAT I WOULD LOOK AT A BIT OF A FALLING SEE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MENTIONS -- IT WAS IN THEIR REPORT AND I DIDN'T HEAR THEM TALK ABOUT IT TONIGHT OF PUSHING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN TAMPA TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO USE MASS TRAPPING. I NEVER HEARD THAT HYDE RK IS CHARMING BECAUSE OF MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS. IT IS BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC HOMES, TREE-LINED STREETS, SIDEWALKS, YARDS THAT IS WHAT RESIDENTS AND VISITORS CHERISH AND VALUE. THESE FEATURES DRAW VISITORS. THEY DRAW IT TO THE COMMERCIAL AREA. THAT IS THE NEIGHBOR -- THE APARTMENTS DO NOT OFFER US ANY COMMUNITY VALUE OR ENHANCEMENT. AS PEOPLE HAVE MENTIONED, IT CREATES MORE PROBLEMS FOR US. I WAS GOING TO TALK A LITTLE BIT HOW IT IS TO WALK IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD AND HAVTO DL WITH THE MULTIFAMILY VERSUS SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. SO ONE THING THAT MR. DINGFELDER POINTED OUT, MOST OF THE HOUSING WHEN YOU GO WEST IS STILL SINGLE-FAMILY. ON ORLEANS, THERE IS ACTUALLY FOUR HOUSES IN THE00 BLOCK OPPOSITE WHERE THAT DUPLEX IS. AND AS YOU GO INTO THE 600 BLOCK, IT IS ALMOST ALL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. THERE IS A DUPLEX. IT IS DESIGNED LIKE A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME. SO WE ARE TALKING ABOUT -- A SIGNIFICANT PORTION AND I THINK I TOTALLY AGREE THAT I THINK THE VIEW OF THE CAMERA FAILED TO SHOW THAT. I WILL REITERATE WHAT JENNY SAID. COVERING THESE LOTS IS WHAT GOT HOUSTON IN A LOT OF TROUBLE. HOUSTON SUFFERED FROM HARVEY IN PART, IT IS DOCUMENTED, IT'S HISTORY FROM PAVING OVER EVERYTHING. WHEN YOU PUT -- I KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT. I DON'T KNOW IF THEY WILL LIVE BY THEIR WORD, TALKING PUTTING FOUR UNITS PER LOT, THAT WILL CREATE THE TYPE OF ENVIRONMENT HOUSTON HAD, WHERE YOU HAVE VERY LITTLE LAND TO DRAIN. THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES, YEAH, THEY HAVE SMALL YARDS, BUT THEY GENERALLY HAVE A FAIR AMOUNT OF LAND WITH IT. AND FINALLY, DID WANT TO POINT OUT. I DON'T WANT TO HEAR ANY MORE OF TAMPA MASS TRANSPORTATION BECAUSE LESS TODAY -- IT IS MORE DIMINISHED TODAY. I KNOW IT, YOU ALL KNOW IT THAN IT WAS TEN YEARS AGO. TO GIVE A QUICK EXAMPLE A GUY ON ONE OF THE RESTAURANTS ON SWANN. HE WALKS BY MY HOUSE. HE WOULD TAKE A BUS FROM SWANN TO GO TO WORK. THE CLOSEST HE HAS NOW TO GO TO WORK IS WLOW AND KENNEDY. IT IS -- IT IS .6 MILES. AND HE HURT HIS KNEE AND HAD TO QUIT WORKING FOR A WHILE. SO I AM VERY OPPOSED TO THIS. IT IS NOT IN CHARACTER WITH THE HISTORIC DISTRICT AND NOT IN CHARACTER WITH THOSE OF HOUSE HAVE INVESTED DEARLY IN HOMES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT, NEXT SPEAKER >> HI, KELLY McMILLIAN -- KELLY McLITTLE RAN, 2110 WEST DECKLE AVENUE AND REPRESENTING THE HISTORIC HYDE PARK HYDE ORGANIZATION AND HUNDREDS OF MEMBERS. THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK. TO CULTIVATE, PRESERVE THE AESTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. CURRENT CLASSIFICATION, I JUST WANT TO SAY AGAIN OF R-10 AL ALLOWS FOR DWELLING UNITS AT A DENSITY OF FIVE, BUT IF APPROVED, DENSITY COULD INCREASE UP TO 18. IS W HAS BEEN WAGED IN THE PAST AND SHOULD BE REITERATED THAT THE EXISTING MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURES IN THIS AREA ARE ACTUALLY EARLY TO PRE1992, EARLY 1990. IF I CAN PARAPHRASE A STATEMENT MADE BY PLANNING COMMISSION DICK DURING RECENT PLANNING HEARING LAST WEEK AND HE SAID WE CAN HAVE RESPECT FOR DENSITY BUT THESE THREE PARCELS ARE SURROUNDED BY SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. HE THEN ASKED SOMEONE AT SOME POINT DECIDED THAT R-10 WAS THE APPROPRIATE CLASSIFICATION. AND WHY AND WHAT NEEDS ARE MET BY THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE. AND IT IS A IS IG CAN'T INCREASE. THE ANSWERS ARE MYSTERIOUS, CLOUDY AND UNKNOWN. THE APPLICANT CLAIMS THE PARCEL IS AT THE CENTER OF A W WELL-ESTABLISHED TOWN HOME AND MULTIFAMILY AREA. THIS IS REFUTABLE IF YOU CAN SEE A LARGER THAN THREE VISUAL BLOCK PICTURE. CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES IN THE VICINITY BUT MAYBE I AM NOT UNDERSTANDING THE USE OF THE TERM "SURROUNDED." THE APPLICANT CLAIMED THE RECENT TOWN HOME -- THE RECENT TOWN HOME IMPROVEMENTS FROM IMPROVED THE NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT THE TRUTH IS, IT IS THE OLDER SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES BROUGHT BACK TO LIFE BY DEDICATED HOMEOWNERS AND NEWLY CONSTRUCTED HOMES ARE DESIGNED WTH CARE AND RESPECT OF THE CHARACTER OF HYDE PARK. WE ALSO KNOW A FACT THAT THE LOCAL SCHOOLS ARE AT OR ABOVE STUDENT CAPACITY, THE INCREASED DENSITY DEFEATS THE SCHOOL CHOICE EFFORTS. PLANNING STANDARDS NEED TO BE APPLIED KEY ALLEY ACROSS TAMPA AND MUST KNOW THE UNIQUENESS OF INDIVIDUAL NEIGHBORHOODS. WILLOW SAFE A GATEWAY OF HIGHLY ADVERTISED POINT OF INTEREST IN THE CITY. THE AREA IS A JEWEL AND AN ONGOING STORY OF SUCCESSFUL RENAISSANCE AND REHABILITATION. ALSO NOTABLE IS THE HISTORIC MARKER ERECTEDED IN 2007 SHOWING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DOBYVILLE DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THESE PARCELS AND ADJACENT AND CONNECTED. WE KNOW APARTMENT COMPLEXES AND TYPICAL TOWN HOME STRUCTURES ARE NOT INTERESTING. PLOPPING DOWN A ANOTHER ARCHITECTURALLY INCOHERENT COMPOUND WON'T ENHANCE THIS HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD. WE ARE RESPECTFULLY ASKING THE PARCELS TO BE DEVELOPED RECORDING THE EXISTING REGULATIONS. THIS APPLICATION HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED A COMPELLING REASON TO INCREASE DENSITY. LASTLY WE FEEL LAND USE CHANGES SHOULD BE DONE INFREQUENTLY -- INFREQUENTLY AND WITH RESPECTFUL CONSIDERATION TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, ITS RESIDENTS AND BASED ON SUBSTANTIAL AND COMPETENT EVIDENCE. WE HOPE YOUILL CAREFULLY CONSIDER MAKING CHANGES THAT WILL INFLICT SIGNIFICANT ON HYDE PARK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. NEXT SPEAKER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> HANG ON A SECOND. I WILL JUST PUT IT DOWN HERE. LLO. GOOD EVENING. -- HELLO, GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS BAA ECSTACIES AT THAT MORDINI AND SOUTH ORLEANS AVENUE. I AM VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED TO T THIS. AND I WANT TO INTRODUCE MYSELF TO SAY I AM -- I HAVE AN UNDERGRADUATE AND MASTER FROM TULANE UNIVERSITY. I HAVE GRADUATED IN 1998. SO I HAVE BEEN IN THE INDUSTRY IN CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURE INDUSTRY FOR 23 YEARS AND 28 YEARS, INCLUDING SCHOOL WHICH HAD INTERNSHIPS AND WHATNOT. PART OF MY MASTER'S DEGREE IS IN HISTORIC PRESERVATION. ALL OF THESE THINGS PRESENT READY ABSOLUTELY MISLEADING. THE WAY THEY PRESENT THIS CASE IS ABSOLUTELY MISLEADING. THEY CAN'T TELL YOU THE BOUNDARIES OF DOBYVILLE AND HISTORY OF DOBYVILLE. HORATIO TO THE SOUTH, ROME TO THE LEFT AND WILLOW TO THE RIGHT. WILLOW WAS THE CUT OFF. BUILDING THESE MULTI FAMILY WHATNOT. LET'S GO TO THIS MAP -- WHICH IS THE EXISTING -- NOT FUTURE BUT EXISTING. LET ME GET THE RIGHT ORIENTATION HERE. SO TE KIND OF . IT LOOKS ALL YELLOW AND ORANGE IS TWO FAMILIES. SO ALL OF THIS IS SINGLE FA FAMILY. ALL OF IT. AND THE ONLY THING OVER HERE IS MULTIFAMILY. YES, THESE ARE CONDOS. NO HISTORIC -- I AM TALKING FAST BECAUSE I HAVE A LOT TO SAY. THIS HOUSE ON THE CORNER. THE HISTORIC HOUSE WAS TORN DOWN AND THEY BUILT THIS OBNOXIOUS MODERN THING THAT HAS NO CONTEXT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WHY? BECAUSE IT IS ON NATIONAL REGISTER. NOT THE LOCAL REGISTER. NORTH OFELEOWHICH IS THE NATIONAL REGISTER DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING. YOU CAN TEAR IT DOWN AND DO WHATEVER YOU WANT WITH IT. SO ON THIS CORNER HERE, THAT IS A HISTORIC HOUSE. A CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC STRUCTURE. THAT IF IT WAS IN THE LOCAL REGISTER, YOU WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO TOUCH IT. AND YOU WANT TO TALK OF MAXIMIZING THE POTENTIAL OF THIS LOT. THE MOST BEAUTIFUL LOT WITH HISTORIC HOME AND THE POTENTIAL FOR GIANT YARD. WANT TO SHOW YOU PICTURES REAL QUICK OF THE ACTUAL NEIGHBORHOOD. IF I CAN HERE. ALL RIGHT, SO -- THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY I AM TALKING ABOUT. CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE. THIS HOUSE BEHIND IT BUILT IN -- IT WAS BUILT IN 190. THESE ARE THE HOUSE NOTICE NEIGHBORHOOD. ORIGINAL HOUSES. THIS IS ONE OF THE SMALLEST HOUSES IN INCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. IT IS ONLY 465 SQUARE FEET. 100% ORIGINAL. ACROSS. DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM MY HOUSE IN 1908. EXACTLY THE SAME. HERE IS THE HOUSE I AM TALKING ABOUT. IN HOUSE IN 1908. EXACTLY THE SAME AS MY HOUSE. AND MY HOUSE IS THE BLUE ROOF. AND THIS ONE HERE IS BOTH EXACTLY THE SAME BUILT IN 1908. DOBYVILLE WAS HISTORICALLY OF O SEGREGATED FAMILIES, AFRICAN-AMERICAN FAMILIES TO BUILD THE TAMPA BAY HOTEL WHICH IS NOW THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA. AND YOU CAN SEE THE CHARACTER OF THE HOUSES THERE. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING -- NOTHING THAT PREVENTS THEM FROM BUILDING EIGHT STORIES. NOTHING. AS A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, ONCE YOU ONCE YOU GET TO -- I AM DONE WITH THE MAP HERE. SO ONCE YOU GET TO -- ONCE YOU START A PROJECT, THE FIRST THING YOU LOOK AT WHAT ARE THE ZONING PARAMETERS. WHAT ARE THE CODES. OH, I HAVE THIS SETBACK. AND THE FIRST THING I LOOK AT WHAT IS THE HEIGHT RESTRICTION. 35 FEET. NO. EIGHT STORIES. SO YOU CAN BUILD WHATEVER YOU WANT. IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT WE DECIDE. DOESN'T MATTER WHAT MR. MICHELINI MISLEADS TO YOU TH THINK. MR. IVY, NONWHAT YOUR PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATION YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY FALSE. YOU CAN'T ANSWER A YES ONO O ZONING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, SIR. >> 360% INCREASE. FIVE UNITS OVER THREE PROPERTIES. 18 UNITS OVER THREE PROPERTIES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> ABSOLUTELY AGAINST THIS AND OVERPACKS THE SCHOOLS AND EVERYTHING. RIDICULOUS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NEXT SPEAKER PLEASE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. I DIDN'T MEAN TO GET EXCITED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I BELIEVE THAT IS THE LAST IN-PERSON SPEAKER AND GO TO THE VIRTUAL REGISTERED SPEAKERS. WE HAVE QUITE A FEW. >>CLERK: MR. CHAIR WE HAVE FIVE SPEAKERS THAT HAVE BEEN ELEVATED AS A PANELIST, ANIKA, DAVID REGAL, DAVID LORIC AND ROBERT FELIA. IF YOU TURN ON YOUR VIDEO AND UNMUTE YOURSELVES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, MY FIRST SPEAKER IS ANIKA. >> YES, HI, ANIKA FAHAGEN. GOOD EVENING AND THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK. LIVE IN THE HOUSE 513 ORLEANS AVENUE WHICH IS ACROSS FROM 502 SOUTH ORLEANS HOSPITAL, ONE OF THE PROPOSED SITE, AND MY HUSBAND AND I HAVE LIVED IN HYDE PARK FOR 20 YEARS. WE ARE FROM RHODE ISLAND, SOUTH VERMONT AND FINALLY IN THIS WONDERFUL BEAUTIFUL SINGLE-FAMILY HOME. AND THERE ARE FOUR, LIKE PREVIOUSLY SAID. THEY ARE IN ALL THE CHARACTER OF HYDE PARK. AND ALSO ACROSS FROM MY STREET IS ANOTHER FAMILY HOME IS -- IT WAS OMITTED. THAT WASN'T SAID YET. AGAIN, FOUR BEAUTIFUL HOMES. AND WE ARE VERY, VERY CONCERNED AND OPPOSED WHAT IS HAPPENING AND WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED TO THE REZONING, BECAUSE WE POSSIBLY COULD GET A VERY UGLY, HUGE BUILDING ACROSS FROM US. WE ALSO WANT TO HIGHLIGHT THE SAFETY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IN TE ACROSS FROM THIS BUILDING SITE, MY NEIGHBOR HAS THREE LITTLE CHILDREN. I HAVE TWO LITTLE CHILDREN AND THEY LOVE PLAYING IN THE FRONT YARDS. IF THE DENSITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD INCREASES AND ALSO TRAFFIC, WE WON'T BE ABLE TO HAVE THEM OUT ON THE STREET ANYMORE. IT WILL BE UNSAFE. ALSO THESE CHILDREN WALK TO GORRIE. AND WHEN YOU -- RIGHT NOW ALREADY ACROSS THE STREET AT WILSON, THE CAR DRIVERS CAN SEE YOU -- CAN'T SEE YOU BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY PARKED CARS. THEY CAN'T SEE YOU WHEN YOU TRY TO CROSS THE STREET. YOU WANT TO CROSS THE STREET WITH MY CAR, IT IS HARD TO SEE IF ANY CARS ARE COMING. SUPER UNSAFE SITUATION. WE DON'T WANT TO HAVE HAPPEN WHAT HAPPENS ON BAYSHORE, RI RIGHT. THAT PEOPLE HAVE TO DIE BECAUSE OF UNSAFE SITUATION. TRAFFIC IS ALREADY BAD. TRAFFIC WILL ONLY GET WORSE. HOWARD IS CONGESTED. WEST SWANN IS CONGESTED. WILLOW IS CONGESTED AND WILL AFFECT THE ENTIRE NEIBORHD AS WELL AS DAVIS ISLAND. MY OTHER NEIGHBORS HAVE ALREADY ADDRESSED INFRASTRUCTURE. WE HAVE ALREADY HAVE FLOODING ISSUES. WE HAVE STORMWATER ISSUES. TRAFFIC CHALLENGES. WHEN I LEAVE MY HOME IN THE MORNING AND I GO ON DELEON, OFTEN I HAVE PARKED CARS ON TWO SIDES OF MY ALLEY AND I CAN BARELY GET OUT WITH MY CAR, RIGHT. SO SEVERAL ISSUES THAT WE ARE DEALING WITH. AND, AGAIN, I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE IF YOU COULD, YOU KNOW, CONSIDER OUR CONCERNS MY LIFETIME SAVINGS ARE IN THIS HOME. AND I WOULD HATE TO SEE IT DEPRECIATE WHEN WE ARE MOVED -- OR BEING FORCED TO MOVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. NEXT SPEAKER I HAVE IS DAVID RIGGLE. AND PLEASE UNMUTE YOURSELF, S SIR. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ARE MUTED. >> OKAY. CAN YOU HEAR ME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, GO AHEAD. >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU, CITY COUNCILED. MEMBERS FOR TAKING TIME ON THIS MATTER. MY NAME IS DAVID REESE RIGGLE AND RESIDENT OF THE A AREA AND PAST PRESIDENT OF HYDE PARK SPANISH TOWN CREEK. I BRING THAT UP BECAUSE A TRYING TIME FOR NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION A DURING THIS PAST YEAR BECAUSE OF COVID AS YOU MAY RECOGNIZE, DESPITE THAT, THERE HAVE BEEN A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF INTEREST INTO THIS ISSUE. ONE OF THE POINTS I WANT TO MAKE IS ALL THREE HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS ARE OPPOSED TO THIS REQUEST FOR AN INCREASE I DENSITY. SIGNIFICANT FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS. MOST NOTABLY THAT EVERYONE, INCLUDING MYSELF, ARE VOLU VOLUNTEERS IN THESE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS. WE ARE NOT PAID. THIS ISN'T OUR JOB. AND ALL OF US HAVE TAKEN A LOT OF TIME OUT OF OUR LIVES, INCLUDING TODAY, TO BRING OUR POINTS UP, AND I JUST HEARD FROM SO MANY PEOPLE THAT DON'T WANT TO SEE THIS HAPPEN. WHICH BRING ME TO MY NEXT POINT. WE ARE NOT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN DECLINE. TO THE CONTRARY OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS THRIVING. AS IT HAS BEEN NOTED BY A COUPLE OF OTHERS, THESE PROPERTIES AND THESE -- THIS AREA IS IN THE NATIONAL HISTORIC AREA. AND IT IS SURROUNDED BY TWO AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE. ONE BLOCK TO THE SOUTH IS THE LOCAL HISTORIC AREA. ONE BLOCK TO THE NORTH IS D DOBYVILLE. I WON'T SPEND A LOT OF TIME ON THOSE TWO POINTS WHICH I WAS PREPARED TO DO SO BUT IT HAS ALREADY BEEN NOTED. BUT THE -- I BELIEVE THAT THE REQUEST TO MAXIMIZE THE DENSITY IN THIS AREA WHICH IS IN THE NATIONAL HISTORIC AREA SEEMS OPPORTUNISTIC AND BENEFITS THE DEVELOPER THAN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT LARGE. THESE PROPERTIES ARE ALREADY ZONED FOR MULTIFAMILY SO WHAT THERE IS A NEED TO REZONE IT UP FOR LARGER DENSITY. WHILE THESE PROPERTIES ARE NOT IN THE LOCAL HISTORIC AREA, BEING IN THE NATIONAL HISTORIC AREA SHOULD NOT BE DISCOUNTED. SIGNIFICANT CRITERIA MUST BE MET TO BE IN THE NATIONAL HISTORIC AREA AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, THERE IS STRONG SUPPORT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE LOCAL HISTORIC AREA THAT WOULD COVER THESE PROPERTIES AND THE DEMOLITION OF A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE WOULD NOT FIT THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT IS DIRECTLY AGAINST THE WILL OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT LARGE FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE LOCAL HISTORIC AREA. THE FACT THAT THIS -- THIS PART OF THE IS IT SI EVEN ELIGIBLE TO BE EXPANDED INTO THE LOCAL HISTORIC AREA IS SIGNIFICANT. AND IT IS PROBABLY THE BIGGEST REASON WHY THIS IS NOT A NIMBY SITUATION, NOT IN MY BACK YARD. AREA OF HYDE PARK NOT IN LOCAL BUT COULD BE IS SIGNIFICANT. IT IS UNIQUE. WE ARE NOT OPPOSED TO DEVELOPMENT. EVERYONE I HAVE SPOKEN TO IS FINE FOR DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING MULTIFAMILY, JUST AT THE RIGHT DENSITY. AND THE DENSITY THAT IS BEING REQUESTED HERE DOES NOT SEEM TO FIT IN THE CHARACTERISTIC OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, NEXT IS UP ROBERT. >> HI. NICE TO ME YOU. MY NAME IS ROBT PALAYA. I LIVE AT 503 SOUTH WILLOW. AS A MATTER OF FACT, YOU SHOWED MY TOWN HOME IN AROUND 15 OF THE PICTURES THAT WAS SHOWN BY THE DEVELOPER AND THE OWNERS. IF I LOOK OVER MY RIGHT SHOULDER I CAN SEE THE HOUSE ON THE CORNER OF ORLEANS AND OVER MY OTHER SHOULDER THE YELLOW HOUSE ON THE CORNER AS IT HAS BEEN MANY YEARS SINCE WE HAVE LIVED HERE. TALK TO YOU ON BEHALF OF ALL OF THE TOWN HOMES ON THE WILLOWS OF HYDE PARK. AND I THINK ONE OF THE IMPORTANT THINGS THAT YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT, AS I WAS LISTENING TO THERESEATIO IN MY MIND MY WIFE AND I WERE SAYING THAT IS NOT TRUE. THAT IS NOT ACCURATE. THAT IS NOT TRUE. IT IS REMARKABLE HOW THINGS ARE BEING PRESENTED AS FACTUAL AND TRUTHFUL WHEN THEY ARE NOT. AND THE NUISANCE TO KEEP IN MIND WHEN TALK OF THE DENSITY O THE HOUSING FROM HORATIO GOING NORTH TO KENNEDY BEING SO DIFFERENT FROM ONE BLOCK OVER. AND -- AND -- AND IT IS JUST ONE BLOCK. I MEAN, THE DISTINCTION THAT THEY ARE DRAWING BETWEEN THESE TWO SECTIONS OF TOWN IS -- IS JUST ONE TINY LITTLE BLOCK. AND IOULD ENCOURAGE TO YOU THE EXTENT THAT YOU CAN, IF YOU WERE THINKING ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON HERE AND THE MISREPRESENTATIONS THAT ARE BEING MADE AND THE OPPORTUNISTIC NATURE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE. EVERYONE HAS PRETTY MUCH SAID THE SAME THING. IF THEY ARE GOING TO DO WHAT THEY SAID THEY ARE GOING TO DO, THEY CAN ALREADY DO THAT. THEY DON'T NEED THIS. SO WHY ARE THEY ASKING FOR IT? IF NOT TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT OPPORTUNITY AND TO BUILD THE STRUCTURE THAT JUST WON'T FIT INTO THIS HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD. SO I JUST ASK YOU TO THE EXTENT THAT YOU ARE LISTENING TO THIS TESTIMONY, AND YOU ARE HEARING PEOPLE WHO CAN'T EVEN TELL YOU THE YEARS THAT THINGS WERE BUILT. AND I CAN ASSURE YOU THOSE TOWN HOMES WEREN'T BUILT IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS, THEY SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THAT AND I ASK TO YOU PLEASE THINK ABOUT THIS BEFORE YOU APPROVE THIS. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NECK SPEAKER IS AARON. GO AHEAD, SIR. AARON, YOU ARE MUTED, SIR. IF YOU WOULD UNMUTE YOURSELF. STILL MUTED. I'M PRESIDENT OF HYDE PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION. APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE COMMENT. I'LL DO MY BEST TO BE BRIEF AND NOT REITERATE SEVERAL POINTS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN SPOKEN TO, BUT I DID WANT TO MENTION SHOWN UP TOYRONT DOOR ONRS HAVE- HORATIO, HAVE CALLED ME MULTIPLE TIMES, THAT HAD INTENDED ON SPEAKING, BUT I THINK THE PANDEMIC AND THE CONFUSION AROUND THAT, AND THE FRONTAGE ON THE PROPERTY. BUT TO DIVE INTO THE POINTS, I REITERATE THE IMPORTANCE OF THE GATEWAY THAT IS THE GATEWAY ROAD TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, CURRENTLY, AS A FEEDER STREET TO THE EXPRESSWAY AND THE OVERPASS. I BELIEVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION BELIEVES THAT THIS ZONE CHANGE IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ANY APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA. WE HAVE ALREADY BROAD NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT FOR OUR LOCAL HISTORIC AREA, AND HYDE PARK IS CURRENTLY UNDERWAY AFTER UNANIMOUS VOTE BY THE ASSOCIATION. IT WILL REQUIRE A NUMBER OF STRUCTURES IN ADDITION TO OUR LOCAL BOARD WHICH WE ALREADY HAVE IS INSTRUMENTAL TO THE ARC APPROVAL. LOSING CONTRIBUTG SUCTUS WILL IMPLEMENT OUR ABILITY TO SEE THIS PLAN CHANGE. ADDITIONALLY A ZONE CHANGE SEEKING HIGH DENSITIES WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN, MULTI-DEVELOPMENT AS MENTIONED BEFORE, THEY HAVEN'T BEEN BUILT AROUND SINCE THE 70s OR 80s, CURRENTLY NOT IN LINE WITH THE FABRIC OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AS IT STANDS TODAY. I DO AGREE WITH SEVERAL OTHER COMMENTERS THAT ZONE ZONE CHANGE TO ACT THE HIGHER DENSITY DEVELOPMENTS, AND ALREADY CURRENTLY THERE. THE NE CHANGE ALSO APPEARS TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH SURROUNDING USES. ON HORATIO, REGARDLESS OF THE BLOCK FROM A LOCAL HISTORIC AREA IN A NATURAL HISTORIC AREA, AND THE CURRENT DENSEDY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND NATIONALLY HISTORIC, THAT IS NOT -- THAT IS SIGNIFICANT DESIGNATION. ONE BLOCK IN A WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD, SIMILAR TO OUR SISTER NEIGHBORHOOD. REZONING NEIGHBORHOOD FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MUCH HIGHER DENSITY MULTIFAMILY WHEN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SURROUNDING IT IS OTHER SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES APPEARS TO BE INCONSISTENT, AND THE ZONE CHANGE LASTLY IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES. THERE IS A RECOGNIZED SAFETY CONCERN AROUND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC HERE TONIGHT, AND I ALSO BELIEVE HURRICANE AND DISASTER PE THE CITY IS CURRENTLY -- WITH STATE REGULATIONS REGARDING HURRICANE AND DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, LIKE A HIGHER DENSITY ZONE CHANGE WILL FURTHER EXACERBATE. I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE COMMENTS. THANK YOU. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I WAS GOING TO ASK IF HE WAS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE ASSOCIATION OR HIMSELF. >> I AM SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE ASSOCIATION. >>JOSEPH CITRO: ON BEHALF OF THE ASSOCIATION? >> THAT IS CORRECT. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE FOR VIRTUAL PUBLIC COMMENT? >> CHAIR, I DO HAVE DAVID LOWRICK ON THE LINE. HOWEVER HE DOES NOT HAVE VIDEO CAPABILITY. >> I AM UNMUTED. CAN YOU HEAR ME? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE NEED TO SEE YOUR FACE IF YOU ARE GOING TO BE SPEAKING. >> YES. LET ME SEE WHY THAT'S NOT ON. I'M SORRY FOR THE DELAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS YOU'RE CAMERA TURNED ON? >> I'M CHECKING IT NOW. >>THE CLERK: IF YOU ARE CALLING FROM A YELL PHONE, IT WILL NOT WORK. >> I AM USING A TABLET. >>THE CLERK: YOU ARE USING A TABLET? >> I AM USING A TABLET. AND I HAVE USED THIS FOR TELECONFERENCE BEFORE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY, ARE WE ABLE TO TAKE HIS PUBLIC COMMENT SINCE IT'S NOT A REZONING, JUST A SEPARATE ISSUE OR DO WE HAVE TO SEE THE GENTLEMAN ON CAMERA? >> I CAN RELATE WHAT I WOULD HAVE WRITTEN BUT I WANTED TO GIVE IN THE PERSON AND GIVE THE OTHER TESTIMONY. I WOULD APPRECIATE OFFERING SOME INPUT. I MUST SAY THAT ALL MY PREPARED COMMENTS, THEY WERE COVERED WELL BY COUNCIL MEMBERS THAT ASKED QUESTIONS OF THE PETITIOER. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: JUST A MOMENT. JUST A MOMENT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: ANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I DON'T KNOW WHY HE'S NOT ABLE TO DO IT. WE HAVE HAD ISSUES BEFORE. I GUESS IN ORDER TO BE CONSISTENT, WE HAVE NOT GENERALLY ALLOWED AUDIO FOR LEGISLATIVE MATTERS. FRANKLY, I BELIEVE FOR CONSISTENCY, BUT THE QUESTION IS, THE QUESTION IS WHETHER IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO DO SO NOW. DID YOU SAY, SIR, YOU ST SOMETHING IN WRITING? >> NO. I SAID -- I SAID RATHER THAN SEND SOMETHING IN WRITING, I WANTED TO HEAR THE OTHER TESTIMONY AND BE ABLE TO OFFER MY OWN. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MAY I ASK THE PETITIONER IF HE HAS ANY OBJECTION TO THIS? I'M SORRY, MR. MIRANDA WOULD LIKE TO BE RECOGNIZED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, IF YOU WOULD UNMUTE YOURSELF SIR. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE ONLY THING THAT I AM GOING TO SAY, THIS IS A NON-QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEEDING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT'S CORRECT SIR. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I DON'T KNOW IF IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE -- >>> DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO THIS, JUST LISTENING TO THE AUDIO? MR. MICHELINI? JUST ONE PERSON. >>STEVE MICHELINI: COUNCIL, AS A COURTESY, WE WILL NOT OBJECT TO HIM TESTIFYING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> MY NAME IS DAVID WARRICK, MY ADDRESS IS 601 SOU WILLOW AVENUE. THAT'S ONE BLOCK SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND I HAVE BEEN A RESIDENT HERE, A HOMEOWNER SINCE 1981. THERE'S A NUMBER OF COMMENTS I WAS GOING TO MAKE THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ADDRESSED BY QUESTIONS, BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND THEY HAVE ADDRESSED A LOT OF THE CONCERNS I HAD THE WAY THIS WAS PREPARED. FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS A FEW OF THE QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP REGARDING THE HISTORIC NATURE OF TRE IN THIS AREA. I REMEMBER WHEN HYDE PARK VILLAGE WAS BEING BUILT AND NEIGHBORS WERE ALLOWED TO GO IN TO SOME OF THE OLD HOMES IN THAT AREA AND REMOVE FIXTURES AND TRIM AND STORED IN GARAGES, SUPPORT RENOVATION IN THE AREA. I REMEMBER WHAT WAS HAPPENING BACK THEN AND HOW WE WERE ALL PUSHING FOR THE DESIGNATION OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT TO PROTECT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. IT WAS WELLAKEN THAT SOUTH OF SWANN WOULD BE PROTECTED, BUT IT WAS NOT GUARANTEED, WHETHER OR NOT NORTH OF SWANN WAS GOING TO BE TURNED INTO A CAR DEALERSHIP OR WHO KNOWS WHAT? AND AS IT WAS, THE ARGUMENT WAS, THERE'S A NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC STRUCTURES NORTH OF SWANN, AND THAT THERE SHOULD BE AN AREA DESIGNATING PART OF THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT TO PROTECT THE ENTIRE AREA. AND WHILE THIS WAS GOING ON, WE SAW EXAMPLESF TWO FINE OLD HOMES THAT WERE NOT IN NEED OF EXTENSIVE RENOVATION DEMOED, PUT UP, 15 OWNHOMES. AND THIS IS BACK IN THE 80s. AND IT WAS A TRAVESTY TO US THAT LIVED HERE THEN SEEING A LOSS OF THAT MUCH CHARACTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I THOUGHT THOSE DAYS WERE OVER. MY NEIGHBOR NEXT DOOR, THEIR HOME, I THINK, IS 1770 SQUARE FEET. THEY LISTED IT A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO AT 1 MILLION 50,000, AND THAT WEEKEND AT OPEN HOUSE THEY HAD TWO OFFERS AND ACCEPTED ONE. THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS TURNED AROUND. ACROSS FROM 502 SOUTH ORLEANS, THOSE HOMES WERE BUILT ABOUT 15 YEARS AGO, AND I REMEMBER SEEING ONE OF THEM LISTED FOR CLOSE TO 900,000 SEVERAL YEARS AGO. THE DIRECTION AND TREND IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WAS ESTABLISHED LONG AGO DURING THE EARLIER STF PRESENTATION, THEY MENTIONED THAT EVERYTHING NORTH OF HORATIO ON ORLEANS IS R-20. THAT MAY BE, BUT NEVERTHELESS, THEY ARE ALL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. A MILLION DOLLARS FOR 770 SQUARE FEET. >>JOSEPH CITRO: IT'S LIKE A CONDO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I THINK THAT CONCLUDES PUBLIC COMMENT. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS? IF NOT, WE GO TO MR. MICHELINI. FOR REBUTTAL. I HEAR AND SEE NONE. MR. MICHELINI, WOULD YOU LIKE TO REBUT SIR? >>STEVE MICHELINI: I HAVE GOT A COUPLE OF THINGS. FIRST I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS, THERE SEEMS TO BE SOMEBODY CONCERN ABOUT THE REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE AT 502 ORLEANS WHICH IS THIS PROPERTY IF YOU ARE ON THE SCREEN. CAN YOU SEE THAT? CAN YOU SEE THAT? IS THAT VISIBLE TO YOU? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>STEVE MICHELINI: OKAY. WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST TO REMOVE THAT FROM CONSIDERATION SO WE ARE NO LONGER ASKING FOR 502 ORLEANS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR ANY LAND USE CHANGE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SO YOU ARE ONLY ASKING FOR THE PROPERTY THERE IN YELLOW? >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR. AND WE ARE ALSO REQUESTING THAT THAT BE CHANGED TO REQUEST FOR RESIDENTIAL 20 AND NOT RESIDENTIAL 35. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COMMANDING DINGFELDER, ARE YOU GETTING THIS INFORMATION? >>MARTIN SHELBY: MAY I ASK THE STAFF, DOES THAT REQUIRE A CONTINUANCE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO YES, THEY HAVE TO RENOTICE. >>BILL CARLSON: AND THE PUBLIC HAS A CHANCE TO COMMENT ON THE NEW PROPOSAL. >>STEVE MICHELINI: WELL, IT'S A REDUCTION IN DENSITY. FOUNTAIN REQUIRES A CONTINUANCE, THAT'S FINE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: WHATEVER THE PROCESS IS, I WOULD LIKE STAFF TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS COUNCIL, PLEASE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DOES THIS NEED TO BE CONTINUED AND RENOTICED FOR THE CHANGE MADE BY THE APPLICANT? COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, I SEE YOUR HAND. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: GOEN I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY. I AM A STREET GUY. I DON'T THINK YOU CAN CHANGE THIS IN THE MIDDLE OF IT AND CONTINUE WITH THIS HEARING. THIS IS ADVERTISED AS WHAT IT IS TODAY. AND WHO KNOWS WHO IS GOING TO SHOW UP IF IT GOES THE OTHER WAY AROUND? MIGHT BE THE SAME. MIGHT BE MORE. MIGHT BE LESS. I HAVE TO SPEAK OUTLOUD HOW I FEEL. >> IN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A CONTINUANCE SO WE CAN AMEND THIS APPLICATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DOES THAT ALSO INCLUDE ITEM NUMBER 3? >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR. IT INCLUDES ITEM NUMBER 3. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: THIS IS THE ITEM ON NUMBER 1 SO JUST FOCUS ON ITEM NUMBER 1, PLEASE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OH, YES. THEY GO TOGETHER. >>MAIN SLBY: A MOTION ON THE FLOOR. YOU ARE OBJECTING? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: QUESTION ON THIS. AND I APOLOGIZE I.DID STEP OUT OF THE ROOM FOR A MINUTE. I THINK I HEARD FROM THE AUDIO SPEAKERS THAT ARE OUTSIDE. SO MR. MICHELINI, CAN YOU BE MORE SPECIFIC? OR RESTATE WHAT YOU SAID WHEN I WAS OUT OF THE ROOM? >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR. WE WOULD WITHDRAW THE REQUEST FOR LAND USE CHANGE ON 502 ORLEANS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: COMPLETELY? >>STEVE MICHELINI: COMPLETELY. WITHDRAW THAT REQUEST. AND ATTAR THE REQUEST FOR 411 AND 413 WILLOW WITH A REDUCTION GOING TO A REQUEST TO RESIDENTIAL 20. AND THEN RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A CONTINUANCE SO THAT WE CAN DO THE PROPER NOTICE IF THAT'S REQUIRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. AND WE DON'T WANT ANYBODY TO BE SURPRISED ABOUT WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO. A LOT OF THE COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE RELATED TO REZONING, BUT SOME RELATED TO DENSITY. WE CERTAINLY DON'T WANT TO OVERBUILD OR CREATE A CONDITION THAT PEOPLE WOULD BE UNCOMFORTABLE WITH. WE ARE TRYING TO BE COMPATIBLE, NOT INCOMPATIBLE. AND IF YOU REMEMBER, RESOLUTION 20 EXISTS IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST OF THESE PROPERTIES, AND RESIDENTIAL 35 IS IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I GUESS MY ONLY SUGGESTION, MR. CHAIR, PROCEDURALLY, IS PROBABLY TO BREAK THOSE INTO TWO PARTS. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: LEGAL DEPAMENT GIVEN THE EXTENT OF THET OF CHANGES, AND I AM NOT SURE WHAT IS INVOLVED, OR WHAT THE IMPLICATION HAS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S EVALUATION BOTH FOR STAFF AS WELL AS COMMISSION, I THINK THE APPROPRIATE REQUEST WOULD BE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPLICATION AND WORK WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO COME BACK WITH A MODIFIED APPLICATION. PERHAPS MR. HEY HAS SOME COMMENT ON WHAT WILL BE INVOLVED WITH WHAT MR. MICHELINI IS TRYING TO REQUEST. BUT I THINK TO MANIPULATE THIS APPLICATION AS IT SITS AND CONTINUE IT TO A DATE CERTAIN I THINK IS A LITTLE PROBLEMATIC. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. >>DAVID HEY: THIS IS DAVID HEY WITH PLANNING COMMISSION. JUST TO REFERENCE -- AND FOR SUSAN, BUT ON PAGE 69, WHICH IS THE PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST, THE THIRD BULLET DOES DISCUSS WHERE THE CITY, IF CITY COUNCIL MAKES THE DETERMINATION THAT THE EXISTING LAND USE CLASSIFICATION IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT, IT MAY APPROVE THE AMENDMENT, OR DIRECT THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY TO PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING LAND USE CLASSIFICATION. AND THEN THE FOURTH BULLET, THE LAND USE IS CHANGED BASED ON THIS CRITERIA, THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL -- SITE PLAN DISTRICT, AND IS PROVIDED FOR IN THE CITY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. I DON'T -- AND I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY, BUT I DON'T THINK IF THE APPCANT IS REQUESTING ANY CATEGORY THAT IS A REDUCTION IN DENSITY, AND REDUCING THE OVERALL ACREAGE, THAT IT NEEDS TO COME BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSON. IT CAN BE HANDLED AT THIS LEVEL, BECAUSE IF AN R-35 IS DEEMED APPROPRIATE ON A LARGER PARCEL BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND THEN AT CITY COUNCIL IT'S REDUCED IN ACREAGE, AND INTENSITY, I DON'T THINK IT REQUIRES ANOTHER REVIEW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: I AM GOING TO ASK YOU TO FOCUS ON THE FIRST PART OF THAT, IF CITY COUNCIL MAKES THE DETERMINATION THAT THE EXISTING LAND USE CLASSIFICATION IS NO LONGER IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC. SO IT'S ONLY AT THE POINT AFTER YOU MAYK MAKE THAT DETERMINATION THAT YOU MAY DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE. ANDO AT THIS POINT T MADE THAT DETERMINATION. YOU HAVEN'T MADE ANY DETERMINATION. SO I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD SATISFY WHAT YOU ARE SUGGESTING, DAVID. >>CATE WELLS: IF I MAY, SINCE THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A REDUCTION IN THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA TO BE INCLUDED IN THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT AS WELL AS A REDUCTION IN THE DENSITY, WE NOW HAVE AN ORINANCE FOR COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION FOR FIRST READING AND I WOULD RECOMMEND INSTEAD THAT THIS HEARING BE CONTINUED TO A DATE CERTAIN, AND I DEFER COUNCIL ON WHETHER YOU FEEL THAT REPOSTING AND RENOTICING IS APPROPRIATE. I DON'T THINK IT'S REQUIRED, BUT THAT WOULD BE COUNCIL'S DISCRETION. I JUST RECOMMEND THAT IT BE MOVED OUT IN ORDER TO ALLOW, IF COUNCIL IS SO INCLINED, TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY MR. MICHELINI, NOT TO APPROVE THE REDUCTION, BUT CONSIDERATION OF IT, I RECOMMEND THAT JUST BE MOVED OUT TO -- >>BILL CARLSON: YOU ARE SAYING BETWEEN NOW AND THE CONTINUANCE, IF HE COULD AMEND THE APPLICATION TO MAKE THE CHANGES HE REQUESTED, TO REDUCE THE DENSITY AND TAKE ONE OF THE PARCELS OUT, SO IT WOULDN'T HAVE TO BE A NEW APPLICATION BUT IT WOULD BE A REVISED APPLICATION WITH ALL THOSE CHANGES? >>CATE WELLS: I DON'T KNOW THAT THE APPLICATION ITSELF HAS TO BE REVISED. HE HAS STIPULATED ON THE RECORD THE PROPOSED REVISION. BUT AGAIN, WE DON'T HAVE AN ORDINANCE READY FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION ON FIRST READING THIS EVENING. AND IT'S JUST MY RECOMMENDATION GIVEN THE CHANGE IN DIRECTION REQUESTED BY APPLICANT THAT COUNCIL CONSIDER A CONTINUANCE, IF THE APPLICANT IS SO INCLINED, AND TO ALLOW IT TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THAT LOWER DENSITY AS WELL AS THE REDUCTION IN SIZE, AND I WOULD DEFER TO COUNCIL ON WHETHER THAT CONTINUED HEARING WOULD NEED TO BE RENOTICED, IT'S A DISCRETIONARY DECISION. >>BILL CARLSON: MS. JOHNSON-VELEZ SAID THAT ONE OPTION WOULD BE FOR THE APPLICANT TO WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION AND FILE A NEW APPLICATION. WHAT WOULD BE THE PROS AND CONS OF THAT FOR HIM? >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: I THINK IT WOULD BE BETTER OR BEST IF HE COULD WORK WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DETERMINE WHAT THE APPROPRIATE COURSE OF ACTION, IF THEY REQUIRE HIM TO REAPPLY OR MODIFY THIS IN THE TIME PERIOD BETWEEN NOW AND WHATEVER COUNCIL MAKES. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MAY I JUST INQUIRE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND CITY STAFF HOW MUCH TIME WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR A CONTINUANCE TO ALLOW ALL THESE ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED TO A DATE AND TIME CERTAIN? >>GUO MANISCALCO: HOW H TIME WOULD YOU SAY? WE HAVE SOME PRETTY FULL MEETINGS. YOU DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH TIME YOU NEED OVERALL. JULY 22ND AT 6 P.M. I KNOW IT'S FAR OUT, BUT IT LOOKS PRETTY OPEN. EVERYTHING ELSE IS QUITE A FEW ITEMS, AND I DON'T WANT TO OVERBURDEN -- YES, SIR, MR. HEY. >>DAVID HEY: JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, IT ALL DEPENDS ON REALLY WHAT YOUR PROCESS IS THAT YOU ARE GOING TO DECIDE ON. IF YOU ARE JUST CONTINUING THIS OUT TO ANOTHER CITY COUNCIL MEETING, AND NOT SENDING IT BACK FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR AN ENTIRE REVIEW, THE TIME WILL BE DIFFERENT DEPENDING ON WHAT YOU GUYS DECIDE, BECAUSE WE WOULD NEED TO -- IF YOU DECIDE THAT IT HAS TO GO BACK TO A PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING, WE HAVE TO TIP THAT INTO THE CYCLE, YOU KNOW, THE PLANNING COMMISSION CYCLE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HOW MUCH TIME WOULD YOU SAY, THREE DAYS OR FIVE MONTHS? >> IF I MAY. I UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE OF RETURNING THIS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION GIVING GIVEN THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IT CONSISTENT, BOTH THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND THE GREATER INTENSITY OR DENSITY. SO I DON'T BELIEVE THAT RETURNING IT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHERE THEY ARE REQUESTING A LOWER DENSITY AND REMOVING SOME OF THE PARCELS FROM CONSIDERATION WOULD CHANGE THE OUTCOME OF ITS RECOMMENDATION. SO WHAT I AM RECOMMENDING INSTEAD, GIVEN THAT THEY ARE REDUCING THE SCALE AND GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF THE AMENDMENT THAT IT BE CONTINUED, WHETHER IT'S 30 DAYS. IT DOESN'T NEED TO BE PUSHED THAT FURTHER OUT UNLESS YOU WANT THEM TO RENOTICE IT. IF YOU DON'T WANT THEM TO RENOTICE IT, IT'S DISCRETIONARY, AND THIS CAN JUST BE CONTINUED TO YOUR NEXT REGULAR MEETING WHERE YOU HAVE GOT ROOM. >>BILL CARLSON: LEGAL QUESTION. IF THE MOTION TO CONTINUE FAILS, CAN WE STILL VOTE IT DOWN TOGHT,R DO WE HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO CONTINUE IT? >>CATE WELLS: IF THE MOTION TO CONTINUE NOW, THEN YOU CAN VOTE IT UP OR DOWN TONIGHT. >>BILL CARLSON: THANK YOU. >>RYAN MANASSE: CHAIR, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. AND CATE, PLEASE JUMP IN IF YOU WANT TO CORRECT ME. I KNOW WE ARE NOT SPEAKING ABOUT REZONING BUT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TIMELINES. IF YOU WANT THEM TO RUN CONCURRENTLY THE ZONING MAY NEED ADDITIONAL TIMELINE TO CONFIGURE THE SITE PLAN. SO I WOULDN'T NECESSARILY GIVE THE STAFF ENOUGH TIME TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN. I'M SORRY, I AM SPEAKING ABOUT ITEM NUMBER 3, BUT I WANT TO MAKE CLEAR TO COUNCIL THAT YOU CONTINUE THIS, I DON'T THINK THE REZONING WOULD BE ABLE TO GO AT THE SAME TIME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SO WE SHOULD PUSH IT TO JULY 22ND. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, WHY DON'T WE HEAR FROM THE PETITIONER IF WE CAN PLEASE? >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR. I WAS GOING TO CONCUR WITH RYAN MANAS THAT THERE'S A COMPANION CEASE THAT NEEDS TO BE CONTINUED AND CERTAINLY JULY WOULD BE AN ACCEPTABLE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: JUNE 10thIGD EVERYTHING ELSE IS VERY FULL. >>STEVE MICHELINI: I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE TIME TO WORK OUT THE STRATEGIC ISSUES WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, ALTHOUGH NOT WITH THE STAFF ITSELF, NOT GOING BACK TO COMMISSIONERS, BUT ALSO GOING BACK AND REVISITING THE ISSUE WITH THEM, AS WELL AS CITY STAFF. I THINK JULY 22ND WOULD BE AN AGREEABLE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SO YOU WISH TO CONTINUE ITEM NUMBER 1 -- IT WILL TAKE TWO SEPARATE VOTES SINCE THEY ARE TWO SEPARATE ITEMS. SO THERE'S NO LEGAL CONFUSION. TO JULY 22ND AT 6:00 P.M. >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THERE A MOTION TO THAT EFFECT? >>JOSEPH CITRO: I WILL MAKE THE MOTION BUT ENSURING THAT THE PUBLIC IS RENOTICED ON THIS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MICHELINI, THE PUBLIC WILL BE RENOTICED ON THIS? >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR, WE AGREE TO RENOTICE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, THAT WAS GOING TO BE MY QUESTION. >> COUNCILMAN CITRO HAS MADE A MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM NUMBER 1 WITH RENOTICING THE NEIGHBORHOODS TO 6:00 P.M., JULY 22ND. YES SIR? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. MICHELINI, YOU HAVE BEEN IN THIS BUSINESS A LONG TIME. I CAN ONLYE THAT YOU WOULD MEET WITH ALL THREE OF THOSE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS AND MANY OF THE NEIGHBORS AROUND THERE TO SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS WHAT YOU PLAN TO ACCOMPLISH, NOT ONLY WITH THE PLAN AMENDMENT, BUT OF COURSE WITH ANY REZONING. >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR. AND THAT'S ANOTHER REASON WHY THE JULY DATE GIVES US SUFFICIENT TIME TO SIT DOWN AND EXPLAIN EXACTLY WHAT THE PROPOSAL IS. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMEMBER CITRO. DO WE HAVE A SECOND TO THE MOTION? SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER DINGFELDER, BECAUSE WE ARE VIRTUAL AND IN PERSON, LET'S TAKE A ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: NO. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON VOTING NO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NOW, MR. SHELBY, WOULD IT BE APPROPRIATE TO TAKE ITEM NUMBER 3, BECAUSE IT'S A COMPANION PIECE, AND WE ASSUME IT WOULD BE CONTINUED TO THE SAME DATE? >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, SIR. AND THE HEARINGS WERE ALL OPENED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MICHELINI, ITEM NUMBER 3 TO BE CONTINUED TO JULY 22ND AT 6:00 P.M. AS WELL? >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: INCLUDING RENOTICING AND EVERYTHING JUST LIKE NUMBER 1? >> >> YES, SIR. WE ARE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING NUMBER 3 WITH I IS A REZONING COMPANION PIECE BE CONTINUED TO JULY 22ND, 6 P.M. WITH THE OBLIGATION OF RENOTICING THE NEIGHBORS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMEMBER CITRO. >>JOSEPH CITRO: [OFF MICROPHONE] -- THE AUDIENCE ABOUT THE REQUEST? >>MARTIN SHELBY: NO, SIR. >>JOSEPH CITRO: OKAY, THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: TO CONTINUE ITEM NUMBER 3 TO JULY 22ND AT 6 P.M. MOTION FROM COUNCILMEMBER DINGFELDER. SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER CITRO. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: NO. >> YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. WITH CARLSON VOTING NO.RRIED >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: BEFORE WE GO TO ITEM NUMBER 2, WOULD YOU MIND IF WE TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE RECESS? ALL RIGHT. WE ARE IN RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. (CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN RECESS). (CITY COUNCIL RECESS). TAMPA CITY COUNCIL IN RECESS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL PLEASE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WONDERFUL. BEFORE WE GO TO ITEM NUMBER 2, WE NOW BEGIN THE QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEMS THROUGH 7. IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN SWORN IN, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK). >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD. LET'S BEGIN WITH ITEM NUMBER 2. >>RYAN MANASSE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. [OFF MICROPHONE] FILE REZ 21-18. PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, WE CAN SEE IT. GO AHEAD. >> THANK YOU. [OFF MICROPHONE] -- 45-FOOT SECTION OF BUILDING HATES FOR THE DALE MABRY PORTION OF THE SITE BY REORIENTATING THE BUILDING AND ADDING THE 8 FAT MASONRY WALL ALONG THE EAST AND INCORPORATE THE OTHER CHANGES AS REQUESTED IN THIS ORIGINAL PRESENTED STAFF REPORT. IT'S STAFF KNOWLEDGE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS WORKED WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS AND HAS SUBMITTED A SITE PLAN ELEVATION PACKAGE WITH THOSE CORRECTIONS SPECIFICALLY THAT WERE DIRECTED BY COUNCIL. WHAT I WILL DO HERE IS I WILL GO THROUGH A FEW OF THOSE CHANGES ON THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN, AND THEN I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE AGENT TO FURTHER DETAIL THOSE. SO IT LOOKS A LITTLE BEAR, BUT THIS IS THE SITE PLAN SHOWING THE 8-FOOT WALL WITH THE DIMENSION BUILDING, AND THEN THE SETBACKS THAT WERE REQUESTED. ALSO, THE REVISED ELEVATIONS. I'LL GET TO. THAT THOSE ARE THE SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS. THEY ARE REVISED, AND I PROVIDED THEM IN THIS PowerPoint PRESENTATION. AGENT HAS AGREED TO MAKE THOSE CORRECTIONS TO THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS OUTLINED IN THIS SCALED-DOWN VERSION SITE PLAN SHOULD THIS BE APPROVED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. WE STILL DO HAVE THE SAME CONSISTENT FINDING BY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, AND THE ELEVATIONS AS REVISED WILL SHOW THE HEIGHT I AM REFERENCING TO AT 35 FEET TO THE NORTH, THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND THE SOUTH ELEVATION, THE EAST ELEVATION, AND THE WEST ELEVATION. WITH THAT BEING SAID, I WILL TURF THE AGENT WOULD LIKE TO GO OVER THE MODIFICATION AGREED UPON FROM CITY COUNCIL IN THE FIRST READING, AND SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, I AM AVAILABLE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MARTIN SHELBY. QUESTION FOR STAFF. FOR PURPOSES OF REVIEW, WAS CITY COUNCIL PROVIDED WITH THESE REVISED STAFF REPORTS? EXCUSE ME, WITH THE REVISED SITE PLAN? >>RYAN MANASSE: SO, COUNCIL, ON APRIL 8th, CONTINUED TWO WEEKS, THAT'S TYPICALLY REALLY NOT ENOUGH TIME FOR A FULL SITE PLAN REVIEW REVISED STAFF REPORT. SO THESE MINOR MODIFICATIONS WERE CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS RECENTLY SUBMITTED BY STEVE MICHELINI TO ENSURE THAT STAFF WAS STILL ON THE SAME PAGE WITH THOSE ADDITIONS TO INCLUDE THE REVISIONS FROM THE ORIGINAL STAFF REPORT. SO AS I STATED, I STILL WANT COUNCIL TO KEEP IN MIND THAT ORIGINAL SITE PLAN THAT WAS PRESENTED AT THE APRIL 8th, WILL STILL BE SITE PLAN OF REVIEW, BUT THIS WAS JUST TO SHOW THAT THE APPLICANT WENT BACK TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WENT BACK TO THEIR DESIGN AND APL 1st.SOME OF THE ITEMS OF SHOULD THIS BE APPROVED TONIGHT THE MODIFICATION SHOWN ON APRIL 8th AS WELL AS THOSE COUNCIL DIRECTED ONES WOULD BE SHOWN ON THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND CERTIFIED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, MR. SHELBY? >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES. WOULD THAT REQUIRE A LONGER CONTINUANCE FOR THAT PURPOSE? >>RYAN MANASSE: NO, SIR. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SO I BELIEVE WE CAN GO RIGHT TO THE APPLICANT ON THIS. CORRECT? YES, SIR, MR. MICHELINI? >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR, I AM READY TO GO. WE HAVE WORKED WITH THE NEIGHBORS, AS WELL AS THE CITY STAFF, AND WE ARE PRESENTING THIS ELEVATION WHICH SEEMED TO BE THE BASIC ISSUE REGARDING THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING. IT'S NOW AT 35 FEET. AND THE PREVIOUS SITE PLAN DIDN'T DEPICT THE MASONRY WALL, SO WE WILL FINISH THIS UP AND PROVIDE THE -- CAN'T SEE IT THERE. WE GO. WE'LL FINISH THIS UP AND MAKE -- THE STAFF ALREADY HAS FINISHED COPIES OF THIS, BUT I HAVE WRITTEN IN THE DIMENSIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE IT. AND ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT WE DID BESIDES THE MASONRY WALL IS THAT ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING WE STAIR STEPPED IT BACK TO PROVIDE MORE OF A SET BACK AND MORE RELIEF FOR THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER TO THE EAST. SO YOU HAD A LONG NIGHT AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT ALREADY. THE NEIGHBORS ARE HERE AND ASKED THEM WERE THEY SATISFIED WITH THESE CHANGES? THEY MET WITH THE OWNER A COUPLE OF TIMES, AND WE HAVE GONE OVER THE SITE PLAN WITH THEM, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THEY HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. WITH THAT, I WILL LEAVE ANY TIME THAT I MAY NEED FOR SUMMARY AND REBUTTAL. BUT I THINK WE HAVE DONE EVERYTHING ASKED OF US AND WE ARE MAKING THE OTHER REVISIONS AS INDICAED ON THIS STAFF REPORT, AS WELL AS FINALIZING THE REVISIONS THAT YOU JUST SAW. THAT CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. MICHELINI, JUST FOR PURPOSES OF THE RECORD, YOU HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ON THE SECOND FLOOR -- AND I BELIEVE THERE WERE MEMBERS OF STAFF WHO ARE ONLINE AT THE TIME WERE ALSO SWORN IN. IF THAT'S NOT CORRECT, PLEASE ASK TO BE SWORN IN AND AGAIN IF THERE'S ANYBODY WHO IS PRESENT WHO WAS NOT SWORN PLEASE ASK TO DO SO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I SAW EVERYBODY ONLINE SWORN IN AND THEY TURNED THEIR CAMERAS ON, AND I BELIEVE EVERYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR WAS SWORN IN ALREADY. IS THAT CORRECT? >> YES. >>STEVE MICHELINI: YES, SIR. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUC ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE A? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK? I SEE TWO PEOPLE REGISTERED ONLINE, PHIL AND MARK, IF THAT IS CORRECT. >> WE DID RECEIVE TWO REGISTERED SPEAKERS BUT THEY ARE NOT LOGGED IN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC ON THE SECOND FLOOR? >>AILEEN ROSARIO: YES, WE DO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE ARE GOING TO SANITIZE THE LECTERN AND HAVE THAT PERSON SPEAK. TWO PEOPLE? VERY GOOD. >>AILEEN ROSARIO: THERE'S TWO PEOPLE. >>GUIDO MANISLCO: VERY GOOD. IF YOU ARE HEAR TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE COME UP. YES, SIR, GO AHEAD. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> MY NAME IS MARK ODOM. I LIVE DIRECTLY NEXT DOOR TO WHERE THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE. AND THE MAIN THING THAT WE DID MEET WITH THE OWNERS, AND HAD VERY, VERY GOOD CONVERSATIONS. THEY AGREED TO MAX IT OUT AT 35-FOOT, AND I KNOW FOR ONE I'M VERY HAPPY WITH THIS. AGAIN, LIKE I SAID, I WANTED THIS TO GO THROUGH. IT WAS JUST A FEW CONDITIONS THERE, BUT I THINK THAT THEY BENT OVER BACKWARDS AND THEY HAVE MET WITH US AND THEY HAVE BEEN VERY, VERY PROFESSIONAL. AND I'M HAPPY WITH THIS PLAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. NEXT SPEAKER? YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. GO AHEAD. >> PHILIP SCHLOSSNAGLE. ARE YOU ABLE TO SHARE MY SCREEN THERE? ARE YOU ABLE TO SEE MY SCREEN? CAN YOU GUYS SEE THE SCREEN THERE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOT YET. IF WE COULD SHARE THE GENTLEMAN'S SCREEN AT THE KIOSK. NO, NOT THE OVERHEAD. DO YOU HAVE A COMPUTER PLUGGED IN? >> I AM LOGGED ON, ON MINE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY. >> GO TO WEBINAR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. IF WE CAN GET THE GO-TO WEBINAR SET UP TO SHOW THE SCREEN SO WE CAN SHARE IT. I DON'T SEE ANYTHING YET, SIR. >> NO? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO. >> HMMM, OKAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE NEE THAT. DO IT LIKE THAT. THAT'S CLEAR. >> OKAY. SO JUST WANT TO START OUT BY SAYING THIS IS THE VIEW FROM MY FRONT DOOR HERE, DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET, THE YELLOW HOUSE, THAT'S MR. ODOM'S HOUSE. HE'S THE ONE WHO THAT JUST SPOKE. TWO WEEKS AGO MR. MICHELINI KIND OF SAID THAT I WOULDN'T BE AFFECTED BY THIS BUILDING, BUT OVER HERE, THIS IS WHAT I AM GOING TO SEE WHEN I WALK OUT MY FRONT DOOR, LOOK OUT MY FRONT WINDOWS. PERHAPS OTHER NEIGHBORS TO A IT. LESSER EXTENT. BUT THIS AT THE BOTTOM IS WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED, THE 45-FOOT HEIGHT THERE, WHICH THAT LEVEL WHAT IS CONTAINED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. IN TALKING TO MR. LANCI WAS INTENDED TO HAVE FOUR AIR CONDITIONING UNITS AND A GENERATOR UP THERE. WITH SOME SCREENING. BUT AFTER TALKING TO HIM ON FRIDAY, MR. ODOM AND I AND TWO OTHER NEIGHBORS MET WITH MR. LANCI ON FRIDAY AND HE AGREED TO MOVE THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DOWN TO E GUND LEVEL SO THAT THE BUILDING HEIGHTS COULD BE REDUCED, THAT 35 FEET. I THINK THAT WAS ALSO ACCOMPLISHED BY REDUCING, I THINK, THE CEILING HEIGHT OF THE FLOORS AS WELL. SO FROM 45 TO 35 FEET SO YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE CHANGE THERE. STILL A LITTLE TALLER THAN THE SURROUNDING BUILDING BUT A LOT MORE IN MIND WITH THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. SO I SAID WE KIND OF AGREED WITH MR. LANCI, THAT HIS PROPOSAL TO MOVE THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO THE GROUND LEVEL TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN, SO I THINK AT LEAST THE FEW OF US THAT MET WITH HIM ON FRIDAY ARE OKAY WITH THESE PROVISIONS. THAT'S ALL I HAVE GOT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. >> YEP. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. AND I BELIEVE THAT WAS THE LAST PERSON, IN-PERSON PUBLIC COMMENT? ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ANYTHING AT THIS TIME? MR. MICHELINI, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING BEFORE WE ASK FOR A MOTION TO CLOSE? >>STEVE MICHELINI: NO, SIR. I THINK WE HAVE DONE EVERYTHING THAT WE AGREED TOO AND THE NEIGHBORS ARE HAPPY, SO WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE? MOTION TO CLOSE BY CITRO. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 2, MR. DINGFELDER? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WE ARE AT 2 ALREADY? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. WE ARE MOVING QUICK TONIGHT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SURE. MR. MICHELINI, WE APPRECIATE YOU WORKING WITH THOSE NEIGHBORS. IN REGARD TO REZ 21-18, I'LL READ THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3724 WEST SAN PEDRO STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OFFICE BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL, TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE, BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER MIRANDA. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND MR. SHELBY IS REMINDING ME THAT WE'LL ADD A LITTLE BIT OF ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE. I BELIEVE THAT THE ALICANT HAS MET HIS BURDEN OF PROOF BY PROVIDING COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL ETCHED THAT THE DEVELOPMENT IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN AND CITY CODE AND FIND THAT THE WAIVERS DO NOT ADD VERSELY IMPACT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE, AND -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: WITH REGARD TO REVISIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: INCORPORATE ANY REVISIONS THAT MR. MANASSE HAS MADE REFERENCE TO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MANASSE, IS THAT ALL RIGHT? >>RYAN MANASSE: JUST ONE ADDITION BECAUSE MR. MICHELINI DID POINT OUT THE SCALED BACK ELEVATION WHICH I DID NOT RECEIVE SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT'S CLEAR FOR THE RECORD FOR SECOND READING SO WE CAN MAKE SURE OF THE RESUBMITTAL ON SECOND READING. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO MOVED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE MOTION. COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER WITH THE MOTION. SECOND FROM COUNCILMEMBER MIRANDA. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BEELD ON MAY 20th AT 6:00 P.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. >>THE CLERK: MAY 20th AT 9:30. >>STEVE MICHELNI: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NOW WE MOVE ONTO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE FOR THE NEXT AND LAST FOUR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. WE BEGIN WITH ITEM NUMBER 4. JUG AND BOTTLE. >>RYAN MANASSE: IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE. >>GUIDO MANISCCO: ES, R, WE SEE IT. GO AHEAD. >> ITEM NUMBER 4 IS FILE AB 2-21-04, JUG AND BOTTLE LLC, AND VERONICA DENKO, NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE. THIS SHIED SHOWS YOU SNIPPET FROM THE STAFF REPORT AND I WILL GO THROUGH MORE OF THIS TABLE IN MY PRESENTATION SUMMARY. THERE ARE TWO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED, THE REDUCTION REQUIRED FOR SEPARATION TO OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS FROM 250 FEET, 50 FEET, AND THEN ANOTHER ONE FROM SECTION 27-211.12 UNDER THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS CODE WHICH IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING FROM 9 TO 5 AND 44% REDUCTION. JUST MAKE NOTE THE ESTABLISHMENT IS 6120 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE, 2(APS) WHICH IS BEER AND WINE FOR PACKAGE SALES ONLY, SCHI, AND IT'S 50 FEET AWAY. THAT'S WHERE THAT 27132 WAIVER COMES FROM. THE APPLICATION BEFORE YOU IS REQUESTING A SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR A SMALL VENUE BEER AND WINE CONSUMPTION OFF PREMISES AND PACKAGE SALES FOR OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION. THE APPLICATIO IS CONSIDERED A CHANGE OF USE AND THE PROPOSED USE IS RESTAURANT AND RETAIL SALES. THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS APPROVED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES SPECIAL USE 1 FOR RETAIL SMALLS CONVENIENCE GOODS AND THAT'S WHAT THE BEER AND WINE PACKAGE SALES OFF CONSUMPTION ONLY A TOTAL OF 1,891 SQUARE FEET OF INDOOR OFFICE SPACE ONLY REQUESTS A TOTAL OF -- 1,018 SQUARE FEET INDOORS AND ACCORDING TO THE FLOOR PLAN SUBMITTED THERE WAS A TOTAL OF 51 APPLICANTS OCCUPANTS. THE HOURS OF OPERATION WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 14 AND ALSO IT SHOWS DUAL ACCESS ON DRIVEWAYS ON NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AS WELL AS WEST HANNA STREET. THE REVISED PARKING BEING NINE SPACES AND THE SITE IS SHOWING FIVE. THAT'S THE OTHER WAIVER THAT I STATED WAS FROM. AND THEN THE PROPERTY IS IN THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE AND THAT DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENT IS 250 FEET FROM OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS. THE SITE PLAN DOES STATE THE AREA SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PARKING LOADING OR SPACE AND L PEITS ISSUED AFTER APRIL 1st, 2011 SHALL BE KEPT ON-SITE WITH A COACH OF THE APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES. HERE IS A VICINITY MAP SHOWING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OUTLINED IN RED IN THE DASH. THE CLOSEST AB ESTABLISHMENT JUST FOR REFERENCE OVER THE AERIAL IS RIGHT HERE TO THE SOUTH. THAT'S IN LIKE A STRIP CENTER. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. APOVED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGEAN SPECIAL USE 1 FOR PACKAGE SALES BEER AND WINE SO AGAIN THEY ARE TRYING TO INCORPORATE THAT RETAIL SALES WHICH I WILL LET THE APPLICANT EXPLAIN FURTHER. AS YOU CAN SEE THE FOUR PARKING SPACES ARE IN THE REAR OF THE BUILDING, AND THEY HAVE DEMONSTRATED SOME MOTORCYCLE PARKING IN THE FRONT AS WELL AS SOME BICYCLE PARKING WHICH IN THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS DISTRIC THEY DO GET SOME CODE RELIEF FROM. HERE IS THE PLAN ESTIMATED BY THEIR ARCHITECTS SHOWING THE 51 OCCUPANTS AND HOW, AND THAT'S PARKING AND JONATHAN SCOTT REVIEW AS FAR AS THE WAIVER REQUIREMENTS. THE REVISIONS THAT ARE IN THE STAFF REPORT, I JUST THREW THEM ON THE SLIDE SO THAT THEY WOULD BE PRESENTED TO EVERYBODY, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION IS INCONSISTENT AND THAT'S DUE TO THE WAIVER, THE DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENT. URBAN DESIGN DID FIND THEM INCONSISTENT WITH SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS, SAYING THE PROJECT, THEY WANT THEM, THE OVERLAY BUILDING LANDSCAPE AND SIGN STANDARDS, AND THEN ALSO THEY FOUND IT INCONSISTENT BASED ON THE PARKING WAIVER. THESE ARE CONTINUED REVISIONS, AND THIS IS FROM TRANSPORTATION. THERE'S SOME MINOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS THAT WOULD BE NEEDED TO THE SITE DATA TABLE AS WELL AS THE FIVE SLOTS FOR THE BIKE RACK, AND JONATHAN COMMENTED ON THE MOTORCYCLE PARKING SHOWN IN THE FRONT. THOSE CHANGES WOULD BE ALLOWED BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND READING SHOULD YOU APPROVE THIS APPLICATION TONIGHT. AND THEN JUST GOING INTO THE PHOTOS, FROM LEFT TO RIGHT, THE VIEW NORTH, FLORIDA, VIEWING SOUTH, CLOSEST ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENT, AND THEN VIEWING EAST, THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. ON THE LEFT, VIEWING WEST, COMMERCIAL USES, AS WELL AS AN INTERSECTION KIND OF GOING SOUTH. AND SORRY, THIS PICTURE, NOT TOO MUCH IN THE FRONT BUT THE JUG AND BOTTLE ESTABLISHMENT, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ITSELF. WITH THAT BEING SAID THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND WE FIND IT INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES. AS I STATED THERE ARE MINOR REVISIONS NEEDED TO THE SITE PLAN SHOULD THIS BE APPROVED TONIGHT BETWEEN FIRST AND SOD SECOND READING OF THE ORDINANCE. STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THIS ALREADY HAD A WET ZONING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YEAH, ALREADY BEER AND WINE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RIGHT. RYAN? >>RYAN MANASSE: YES, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. IT'S UNDERSTOOD AB 1, SO THAT'S A SPECIAL USE 1 WHICH IS ADMINISTRATIVELY REVIEWED AND APPROVED, AND THAT'S FOR THE PACKAGE SALES FOR OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION ONLY SO THERE'S NO CONSUMPTION OFF PREMISES. THROUGH THIS PETITION THE APPLICANT IS TRYING TO GO UNDER THE SMALL VENUE WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR THAT ON PREMISES CONSUMPTION AS WELL AS MAINTAINING THAT OFF-PREMISES PACKAGE CONSUMPTION THAT THEY HAVE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE? >>ORLANDO GUDES: THE SAME QUESTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU JUST COULDN'T DRINK ON-SITE. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE THE APPLICANT ON THE VIDEO. CAN YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND SO WE CAN SWEAR YOU IN? I DON'T THINK WE SWORE YOU IN. >> GRAC YANG: I ACTUALLY HAVE BEEN SWORN BEFORE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. >>GRACE YANG: GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIR. MY NAME IS GRACE YANG, GRAY ROBINSON LAW FIRM, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET. HERE IN TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. WITH ME TONIGHT ARE THE APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVES FOR JUG AND BOTTLE, AND I WOULD LIKE THEM TO QUICKLY INTRODUCE THEMSELVES. >> VERONICA DENKA. AND RYAN DUSHAY. >> THANK YOU COUNCIL MEMBERS. JUG AND BOTTLE DEPARTMENT IS LOCATED AT 620 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND IT IS THE CURRENT SHOP IN SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE. JUG AND BOTTLE SPECIALIZES IN CARRYING CRAFT BARES, UNIQUE WINES AND SPECIAL -- IT HAS HAD A PACKAGE BEER AND WINE LICENSE FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA SINCE JUNE 5, 2016, AND AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED WAS INITIALLY APPROVED FOR A PACKAGE BEER AND WINE SALES FOR THE INSIDE SPACE. THE GOAL HAS BEEN AND CONTINUES TO BE A GOOD BUSINESS NEIGHBOR IN THE COMMUNITY. ALSO, PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS TO ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL TO ADD BEER AND WINE CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AND TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL OUTDOOR SPACE OF APPROXIMATELY 830 SQUARE FEET OR AN OUTSIDE SEATING AREA TO ACCOMMODATE TEN SEATS OUTSIDE SO THAT THE SHOPPERS AND CUSTOMERS MAY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SIT AND ENJOY SOME FRESH AIR AND HAVE A DRINK OUTSIDE. THE APPLICANT HAS REVIEWED THE STAFF REPORT AND AGREES TO THE AND SECOND READING.TWEEN FIRST- WE ARE REQUESTING THE TWO WAIVERS. FIRST A REDUCTION FROM THE OTHER ALCOHOL BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS, BEING A QUICK STOP, WHICH IS ABOUT 50 FEET AWAY, AND THAT SECOND REQUEST THAT WE ARE ASKING FOR COUNCIL TO A PHOTOGRAPH TONIGHT IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING TO THE FIVE PROVIDED SPACES. I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION SOME MITIGATION FACTORS IN THAT THE STORE GETS A GREAT DEAL OF WALK-UP AND BIKING NEIGHBORHOOD CUSTOMERS COMING IN TO SHOP, AND THAT FOR VEHICLES, IN ADDITION TO THE FIVE SPACES ON THE PROPERTY, THERE IS STREET PARKING ALONG HANNA STREET, A SHARED LOT WITH THE BARBERSHOP NEXT DOOR, WHICH IS THE CULTURE CONTROL BARBERSHOP, THAT PROVIDEN SPACES. AND THE SHOP OWNERS ALSO HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE QUICK STOP TO BE ABLE TO USE SOME OF QUICK STOP'S PARKING FOR THE JUG AND BOTTLE CUSTOMERS. WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND WISH YOUR APPROVAL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CHAIR? ISN'T THERE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DIRECTLY BEHIND THERE? THERE IS AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREA. THE NEAREST RESIDENTIAL IS ABOUT 56 FEET AWAY AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY THAT I SEE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: AND LOOKING AT OUTDOOR SEATING. ANY AMPLIFIED MUSIC? >>GRACE YANG: THERE ARE NO PLANS RIGHT NOW FOR ANY OUTDOOR AMPLIFIED MUSIC. THAT WOULD DISTURB THE NEIGHBORS IN THE AREA. AND AT MOST THEY MIGHT HAVE A SMALL SPEAKER SYSTEM JUST FOR A BIT OF AMBIENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: >>RYAN MANASSE: I WILL TRY TO GIVE YOU A QUICK IDEA. SO THE AERIAL -- TRY TO ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT. HERE IS MY CURSOR. YOU SEE THERE'S ONE, NOT OUTLINED AS WELL BECAUSE THIS IS NOT IDENTIFYING THE PROPERTY NES. YOU CAN SEE, COUNCILMAN GUDES, THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL BLOCK RIGHT HERE AS WELL AS TO THE SOUTH. PREDOMINANTLY IT RUNS ALONG FLORIDA AND THEN SH-RS WHICH IS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. JUST TO GIVE YOU A BRIEF NUMBER ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SEVEN EIGHT NINE TEN ELEVEN, TWELVE, 13, 14 HOUSES IN THIS VICINITY BLOCK THAT'S DIRECTLY TO THE EAST. BUT I JUST WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT TO COUNCIL THAT THE DISTANCE ESTABLISHMENTS.OR OTHER AB SALES DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, SIR? >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT ANSWERS MY QUESTION BUT WE HAD CONVERSATION ABOUT THAT THIS MORNING SO I WANTED TO LOOK AT THAT AERIAL. I KNOW THE AREA PRETTY WELL, HOW MANY HOUSES ARE BEHIND THERE THEY'RE. BUT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT MUSIC, AND IT'S GOING TO BE A BIG QUESTION, SAYING THERE'S GOING TO BE NO MUSIC AT ALL? >>GRACE YANG: THERE ARE NO PLANS TO HAVE ANY LOUD MUSIC CONCERTS OUT IN THE PROPOSED OUTDOOR SEATING AREA. I THINK THAT THE MOST THEY MIGHT HAVE AMALL SYSTEM JUST FOR LIGHT AMBIENT MUSIC. NO PLANS FOR BANDS OR LOUD AMPLIFIED MUSIC THAT WOULD DISTURB THE NEIGHBORHOOD. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I'M JUST CURIOUS. >>MARTIN SHELBY: CHAIRMAN, I'M SORRY, COUNCILMAN GUDES. IRRESPECTIVE OF WHAT YOU HEAR TESTIFIED TO, THERE IS NO MECHANISM FOR ENFORCEMENT UNLESS IT'S ON THE PLAN, NUMBER ONE. AND NUMBER TWO IS THAT PLEASE REMEMBER THIS SPECIAL USE WOULD RUN WITH THE LAND. THIS WOULD BE A SPECIAL USE TO CONTINUE. AND FUTURE OWNERS OF THAT PROPERTY -- AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE STATE OF THIS IS OR NOT, BUT JUST KNOW THAT IT WOULD NOT BE BOUND BY IT IF IT'S NOT ON THE SITE PLAN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT'S CORRECT. THANK YOU, MR. SHELBY. >>RYAN MANASSE: I JUST WANT TO ADD ON THAT JUST TO GET BACK INTO THE CONVERSATIONS WE HAVE SEEN IT IN THE PAST AND I THINK WHAT YOU MAY BE ALLUDING TO, I WOULD JUST BE MINDFUL, LIKE MARTIN SHELBY SAID, IF THE APPLICANT DID WANT TO AGREE TO SOME KIND OF STIPULATION OF THE SITE PLAN, LIKE NO AMPLIFIED SOUND FROM A TIME FRAME, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE SEEN IN THE PAST. BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT FOR THE RECORD. BUT WHATEVER WAY YOU GUYS WANT TO GONE, I'LL MAKE SURE TO MAKE AN ANNOTATION OF THAT. >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. CHAIR, IF I MAY. MR. MANASSE, DO YOU KNOW THE CAPACITY EXISTING IN THAT BUILDING? >>RYAN MANASSE: IT'S PROPOSED AT 51, SIR. >>JOSEPH CITRO: 51. AND HOW MANY PARKINGPACERE THEY ASKING FOR? >>RYAN MANASSE: THEY ARE HAVING A REDUCTION FROM THE REQUIRED PARKING OF 10 -- I'M SORRY, REQUIRED PARKING 9, AND THEY ARE GOING TO 5 SPACES BE PROVIDED. THAT'S ONE ADA THERE'S REGULAR AND ONE BIKE RACK FOR TRANSPORTATION'S REVIEW. IT'S A 44% REDUCTION. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. MANASSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE? COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MS. YANG, JUST AS A FOLLOW-UP, AND GOOD EVENING. >>GRACE YANG: GOOD EVENING. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ONE THING I WAED TO POINT OUT COUNCILMAN GUDES IS LOOKING AT THIS SITE PLAN, THE PROPOSED OUTDOOR SEATING AREA IS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING IN A LITTLE QUADRANT SORT OF ADJACENT, CLOSER TO FLORIDA, AND A LITTLE BIT REMOVED FROM THE RESIDENTIAL. SO THAT GIVES ME A LITTLE COMFORT. BUT A LITTLE MORE COMFORT, MS. YANG, WOULD BE YOUR STIPULATION THAT YOU WOULDN'T HAVE AMPLIFIED MUSIC ON THE SITE PLAN, JUST BECAUSE I THINK WE ARE JUST TRYING TO GENERALLY PROTECT GNASHES NEIGHBORHOODS ALL OVER THE CITY. I MEAN, THAT DOESN'T MEAN YOU CAN'T -- THAT DOESN'T MEAN YOU CAN'T HAVE ACOUSTIC. YOU HAVE ACOUSTIC GUITAR, I'LL COME STRUM THE GUITAR A LITTLE BIT EVEN THOUGH I DON'T PLAY. BUT ANYWAY THAT WOULD BE MY DRUTHER. IT'S UP TO YOU. >>GRACE YANG: THANK YOU, MR. DINGFELDER. THE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA, THAT OUTDOOR PATIO AREA IS THE BARBERSHOP, IN THAT COMMERCIAL ZONED AREA. I DISCUSSED WITH THE CLIENTS ABOUT THE OUTDOOR AREA AND THE CONCERNS ABOUT NOISE, AND WE WANTED TO PROPOSE, PUT ON THE SITE PLAN A CONDITION, BUT THERE WOULD BE NO OUTDOOR AMPLIFIED SOUND PAST 10 P.M. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: EEMS LIKE A REASONABLE COMPROMISE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC ON THE SECOND FLOOR THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 4? >>THE CLERK: NO, THERE'S NO ONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 4? >> WE DID HAVE FOUR SPEAKERS BUT THEY ARE NOT LOGGED ON. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE FROM COUNCIL? NOW WE WILL ASK FOR A MOTION TO CLOSE. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES. SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL I FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? VERY GOOD. COUNCILMAN CITRO, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 4? >>JOSEPH CITRO: FILE AB 2-21-04. I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU-2 FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES, SMALL VENUE COUPLES, ON PREMISES AND PACKAGE SALES OFF-PG LAWFUL THE SALE OF BEER AND WINALITY OR FROM A CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT 6203 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2, PROVIDING THAT ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT BE REPEALED, PROVIDING I FEEL THAT THIS PETITIONER HAS MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF. I AM ALSO GOING TO ASK FOR THE WAIVERS AND REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, THAT THE USE WILL NOT ESTABLISH A TENSE OR INCOMPATIBLE USES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >>MARTIN SHELBY: DOES THAT INCLUDE AS PART OF THE REVISIONS THE STIPULATION BY MS. YANG WITH REGARD TO NO AMPLIFIED SOUND? VERY MUCH.ITRO: YES, THANK YOU- AND THE PETITIONER ALSO GIVEN GIVING AUSTINULATION THAT THERE WILL BE NO AMPLIFIED MUSIC PAST 107 P.M. EVERY EVENING. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE THA% THE WORD WAS SOUND. >>JOSEPH CITRO: SOUND. AMPLIFIED SOUND. EXCUSE ME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROMOUNCMAN CITRO AND A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 20th AT 9:30 A.M. >>GRACE YANG: THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBERS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, GRACE. GOOD TO SEE YOU. >>GRACE YANG: THANK YOU. >> [OFF MICROPHONE] >>RYAN MANASSE: ARE YOU READY FOR ITEM NUMBER 5, CHAIR? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. ITEM NUMBER 5. >>RYAN MANASSE: ITEM NUMBER 5, IF I CAN SHARE MY SCREEN AS WELL. IF YOU WOULD LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU SEE THE PowerPoint. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. WE CAN SEE IT. >>RYAN MANASSE: FILE AB 2-21-07. THIS IS THE APPLICANT DEVIANT LIBATIONS, 3800 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE. I WILL GO BACK TO THIS SLIDE IN A SECOND. AGAIN, THIS IS OUTLINED IN YOUR STAFF REPORT. THIS IS A TABLE SHOWING THE ACTIVE ORDINANCE AND THE PROPOSED -- IT WILL BE MY SUMMARY AS WELL. THERE ARE SOME PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WAIVERS FROM AB 2-18-16 WHICH WAS A SPECIAL USE 2 THAT WAS APPROVED AGAIN IN 2018. THERE ARE TWO NEW WAIVERS BEING PRESENTED BEFORE YOU TONIGHT ON THIS PETITION. THEY COME FROM SECTION 27-283 .12 TO ALLOW COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC ACCESS TO LOCAL STREET, BOTH -- EAST STRATFORD AVENUE. THEN SECTION 27-284 TO REDUCE REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES FROM THE REQUIRED 69 TO 51 SPACES. [~DISTORTION~] THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO ALLOW SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, CONSUMPTION OFF PREMISES AND PACKAGE SALES FOR OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION. IT WAS REVIEWED BY DRC STAFF. SOE MICROBREWERY BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, DISTILLERY, RETAIL SALES. THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS AN ALCOHOL APPROVAL SPECIAL USE 2 FOR A SMALL VENUE BEER, WINE, LIQUOR CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AND PACKAGE SALES OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION FOR A TOTAL OF 15,133 SQUARE FEET BROKEN DOWN INDOOR, 7,628 SQUARE FEET AND OUTDOOR 7,505 SQUARE FEET. AGAIN THAT IS THE CURRENT APPROVAL. THE PROPOSED APPLICATION REQUESTS A TOTAL OF 8,760 SQUARE FEETOMPRING OF 6,279 SQUARE FEET INDOOR AND 2,481 SQUARE FEET OUTDOOR. SO ALL THOSE THOUGH THE PARKING REQUIREMENT WENT UP THE OVERALL AB SALES AREA WENT DOWN, AND THAT'S DUE TO THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF USES REQUIRING DIFFERENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND SUCH. THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THE PROPOSED HOURS OF OPERATION WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 14 AND IT SHOWS DUAL ACCESS ON EAST VIRGINIA AVENUE AS WELL AS EAST STRATFORD AVENUE WHICH REQUIRES THE OFF-STREET WAIVERS. THE SITE IS SHOWING 51 SPACES. THEY ARE ASKING FOR THA WAIVER. THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, THE DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENT% IS THAT 250 FEET FROM OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS. SITE PLAN STATES THE SALES AREA SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PARKING LOADING AREA OR SPACE AND AFTER APRIL 21st, 2011 SHALL BE KEPT ON-SITE WITH THE ASSOCIATED SITE PLAN. HERE IS A VICINITY MAP OF THE AREA. THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN RED. AND WHEN I GO TO THE SITE PLAN IT WILL BE A LITTLE MOWER CLEAR BUT ON THE SITE PLAN GOING TO SHOCK YOU WHERE THE FORMAL DECISION WAS ME ON THE PREVIOUS ALCOHOL PETITION, TO PUT THIS LOT, AND THE STRUCTURE AS BEING REMODELED TO THEIR CURRENT PROPOSED APPLICATION THAT YOU WILL SEE ON THE SITE PLAN. THE LOCAL ACCESS STREETS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH TO GET INTO THE SITE. ONE THING TO POINT OUT IT'S ZONED CG ALONG NEBRASKA, AND THEN TAPERS BACK INTO RS-50 ON BOTH SIDE OF NEBRASKA. HERE IS THE SITE PLAN AS PRESENTED. LET ME ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT. YOU CAN SEE THE INDOOR AREA RIGHT HERE, ONE O THE REQUESTS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING IS OUTLINED INDOOR AREA, AS THESE TWO OUTDOOR AREAS OUTLINED IN BLACK SO THESE TWO OUTDOOR AREAS ARE THE OUTDOOR AB SALES AREA AND THEN THE INDOOR OBVIOUSLY, AND AGAIN THE ACCESS ON BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE LOCAL STREET, PARKING TO THE REAR OFF OF NEBRASKA. THIS IS THE FLOOR PLAN. SO THERE IS A TWO-STORY FLOOR PLAN. THE FIRST FLOOR BEING MAINLY THE DISTILLERY, BREWERY, BAR AND LOUNGE, ART GALLERY. AND THEN THE TOP BEING THIS STOREFRONT RESIDENTI A WELL, WHICH IS A PERMITTED USE IN THE ZONING DISTRICT. AND I WILL LET THE APPLICANT EXPLAIN MORE OF THEIR USES AND THEIR IDEAS BEHIND THAT. THE NEXT SLIDE IS THE ELEVATION PROVIDED. AND THEN THE REVISION THAT'S OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT. I HAVEN'T HEARD BACK FROM THE AGENT HAVING ANY ISSUES WITH MAKING THESE REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. ONE OF THEM BEING SOLID WASTE, MOVING THE DUMPSTER AS IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE PAN TO A MORE NORTHERLY PART AND THAT WAS DUE TO THE TRUCK BEING ABLE TO MANEUVER IN AND OUT ACCORDING TO THEIR REQUIREMENTS. THERE ARE SOME PHOTOS STARTING FROM THE LEFT IS VIEWING NORTH. MIDDLE, TO THE SOUTH. ONTO THE RIGHT IS THE EAST, TO THE MOTEL ACROSS THE STREET. THIS IS THE VIEW WEST FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. SO THIS FENCE IS THE ACTUAL SITE, 3800 NEBRASKA AS WELL AS THIS RIGHT PICTURE. YOU CAN SEE THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST. ING WITH THAT BEING SAID THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FIND IT INCONSISTENT WITH OLYMPIC CITY OF TAMPA APPLICABLE ORDINANS. PLEASE REFER TO THE FINDING BY TRANSPORTATION AS RELATE TO THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED. SHOULD YOU APPROVE THIS APPLICATION TONIGHT, FINAL REVISIONS TO THE SITE PLAN WOULD BE REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING OF THE ORDINANCE. AND STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? COUNCILMAN GUDES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I RECEIVED A BUNCH OF CALLS THAT THOUGHT IT WAS A RESTAURANT. IS THIS CRAFT BREWERY HERE? I THOUGHT IT WAS A RESTAURANT. I GUESS I WOULD ASK PETITIONER ABOUT THAT. I'M I'M SORRY, COUNCILMAN GUDES, WERE THERE ANY COMMUNICATIONS WITH THIS OR ANY OTHER HEARING TONIGHT THAT PEOPLE NEED TO DISCLOSE BEFORE YOU VOTE TONIGHT? >>ORLANDO GUDES: [OFF MICROPHONE] >>MARTIN SHELBY: SO IT WAS WRITTEN COMMUNICATION THAT YOU ARE REFERRING TO THAT WAS PUT INTO THE RECORD? >>ORLANDO GUDES: RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT I HAVEOT. AND CALLED ME AND SAID IT WAS SUBMITTED INTO THE RECORD ABOUT A RESTAURANT. I WAS CONFUSED, THOUGHT WAS WAS A RESTAURANT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, MR. HUDSON, IF YOU WOULD RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK). >>THE CLERK: THE CLERK'S OFFICE DID RECEIVE WRITTEN COMMENTS FOR THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY GOOD. GO AHEAD, SIR. >> TYLER HUDSON, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE HERE ON BEHALF OF E APPLICANT. WITH ME HERE THIS EVENING IS TIM OGDEN AND DEVEN BRADY AND WITH ME IS JOSH FRANK THE ARCHITECT ON THIS PROJECT. I ASK TO SHARE MY SCREEN. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOT YET. OKAY, WE CAN SEE IT. GO AHEAD, SIR. >> TYLER HUDSON: OKAY, THANKS. SO THIS COMPRISES THREE DIFFERENT -- AROUND A PROJECT THAT COMBINES ARTS, MIXTURE OF USES AND WHERE YOU HAVE MORE INVESTMENTS. THE PROJECT, JOSH FRANK IS THE ARCHITECT BUT ALSO HAD INSIDE ASSISTANCE FROM ENGINEERING AND DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE. TO TALK ABOUT HOW WE GOT HERE. AS RYAN ALLUDED TO THERE IS AN AB 2 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR THIS SITE IN AUGUST 30 OF 2018, DUE TO THE COVID-19 EMERGENCY DECLARATION, THAT IS STILL ACTIVE TODAY, WHICH IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE, BUT IN SEPTEMBER OF 2020, THIS GROUP THAT'S HEAR WITH ME, MY CLIENTS, ACQUIRED THE PROPERTY AND THOUGHT THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL FOR MICROBREWERY WAS A GOOD START BUT THE PROJECT COULD DO MORE. THIS IS PROBABLY THE MOST MIXED USE PROJECT THAT I HAVE EVER HAD THE PLEASURE OF WORKING ON. MICROBREWERY IS A PART OF IT BUT RETAIL IS A PART OF IT SIS THE ART EXPERIENCE. SO IT'S NOT JUST ONE VERY SMALL RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THE LIQUOR COMPONENT SOMETIMES MIGHT GET SOME ATTENTION. BUT WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IS A 200 SQUARE FOOT VERY, VERY SMALL MICRODISTILLRY THAT IS ONLY GOING TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE SALE OF ITS OWN CREATIONS, FOR OFF-SITE CONSUMPTION. AND THE PROJECT TEAM IS GOING TO TALK ABOUT IN A SECOND. THEY WILL NOT EVEN HAVE A STATE LICENSE REQUIRED ON THE PREMISES. AS NOW ANY CHANGES TO THE FOOTPRINT OF AN AB 2 PLAN REQUIRES COMING BACK TO CITY UNCI AND SO WHILE THE BUILDING IS NOT CHANGING, THE BUILD HAS BEEN THEREBY WE THINK ABOUT 100 YEARS, WE ARE SHIFTING THE ALCOHOL SERVICE AREA FROM THE WEST, WHERE IT WAS CLOSER TO SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS, TO THE EAST. SO IT REALLY ACTIVATES NEBRASKA AVENUE AND INSTEAD A QUIETER PASSIVE USE AND PARKING ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. TO ORIENT YOURSELF, RYAN DID A GREAT JOB. THIS IS THE WINN-DIXIE TO IT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MLK AND NEBRASKA, BETWEEN NEBRASKA, KIND OF IN THE SHED-OF I-275. IT'S WORTH NOWING THAT THE ORIGINAL WET ZONINGS ARE ONLY FOR THE WESTERN AND SOUTHERN HALF OF THE SITE WHICH IS LESS HALF. BUT SINCE THEN IT'S BEEN COMBINED WITH THE NORTHERN LOT AS WELL. THIS BUILDING IS A FORMER CHURCH, AND NOW WE ARE LOOKING TO -- COUNCIL NOTES THERE'S A RANGE OF COMMERCIAL USES ALONG NEBRASKA AVENUE, FAIRLY SIGNIFICANT OF RESTAURANTS, AND MY CLIENT IS TRYING TO BRING SOME OF THAT BACK AND MLK. LET'S TALK ABOUT THE INCONSISTENCIES. THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, SOLID WIEST, FOUND THIS APPLICATION CONSISTENT, WITH MINOR CORRECTIONS, AND TO ADDRESS AS RYAN MENTIONED WE HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO ANY OF THOSE AND WILL BE MAKING THEM BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. IN ON WET ZONINGS, AND THEY HADH NO OBJECTION. AND ON TRANSPORTATION, COUNCIL WELL KNOWS, ONE PARKING SPACE REDUCTION MEANS INCONSISTENT FINDING, AND WE ARE SEEKING A WAIVER TO ESTABLISH 51 SPACES PROVIDED AS SUFFICIENT. CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN STILL? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE CAN SEE IT. >> ONE SECOND. I CAN'T. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ADDRESSING WAIVERS AND PARKING SLIDE. >> OKAY. I DID SEE MY SCREEN BUT SOMETHING THAT I CAN REMEMBER. WE ARE ASKING FOR TWO OF THE SAME WAIVERS IN DIFFERENT DEGREES, AND ONE IS PARKING. THE REQUIREMENT IS 69. WE ARE PROVIDING 51. BUT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO UNPACK THAT A LITTLE BIT. EIGHT OF THE SPACES THAT WERE REQUIRED ARE FOR THE RETAIL COMPONENT OF OUR SPACE BUT OUR BELIEF THAT FOLKS AREN'T GOING TO BE COME HERE JUST FOR THE RETAIL. THEY MATE UTILIZE THE RETAIL IN PART OF COME WITH THE MICROBREWERY TO HAVE A GLASS OF WINE OR BEER OUTSIDE. SOCIETY WE THINK FUNCTIONALLY, THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS PROBABLY ARE CLOSER TO 61. WE ARE PROVIDING AMPLE BIKE PARKING. YOU CAN SEE I BELIEVE ON SCREEN, THERE'S A VERY SIGNIFICANT HARTNETT WORK HERE, METRO LINE LINE RUNS THROUGH HERE, AND JOSH IN CONVERSATIONS WITH HART ABOUT POTENTIALLY LOCATING A STOP RIGHT HERE. THE SECOND TYPE OF WAIVER THAT WE ARE SEEKING JUST LIKE LAST TIME, BUT TO A DIFFERENT DEGREE, IS COMMERCIAL ACCESS ONTO THE LOCAL STREETS. TO VIRGINIA AVENUE TO THE STREET TO THE NORTH. WE REFER COMMERCIAL ACCESS TO STRATFORD AVENUE TO THE SOUTH. THE REASON WE NEED ACCESS ONTO VIRGINIA AVENUE IS THE CURRENT WET ZONING STILL INCLUDES A CURB CUT ON NEBRASKA AVENUE THAT CAN SEVERELY DISRUPT THE BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN FLOW SO WE ARE CLOSING THAT CURB CUT ON NEBRASKA AVENUE. THAT DOES ENTAIL -- JOSH WILL TALK ABOUT THIS IN A LITTLE BIT, TO MAKE NEBRASKA THE BEST AVENUE, CLOSING THAT CURB IS REALLY IMPORTANT. TALK ABOUT NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT. THIS TEAM THAT WILL TALK HAS WORKED THEIR TAILS OFF TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERY SINGLE NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS COMMUNITY GROUP IN THIS AREA IS AWARE OF THIS PROJECT, AND WANT THEM TO BUY INTO THEIR VISION, NOT JUST FOR THIS PROJECT, BUT WHAT IT CAN DO FOR YBOR HGHTS IN PARTICULAR, WHICH IS WHERE IT'S LOCATED. THE GREEN THUMBS UP, OUR SUPPORT IN THE PROJECT, SOME OF WHOM MIGHT BE SPEAKING TONIGHT, BUT SUPPORT OF SOME OF THE PROXIMATE NEIGHBORS THAT REALLY A A LOT OF SUPPORT FROM THE GROUPS THAT A LOT OF THESE COMMUNITY NEIGHBORS REPRESENT. YBOR HATES NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. THAT'S A NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT IT. THE SOUTHEAST SEMINOLE HEIGHTS ASSOCIATION AND ADJACENT ASSOCIATION TO THE NORTH, ALONG WITH THE HANSON TER -- HAMPTON TERRACE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION. A LARGE EMPLOYER AND FACILITY IS CATTY-CORNER ACROSS THE STREET ALSO SUPPORTS THIS PROJECT. SO I AM GOING TO TURN THINGS OVER TO JOSH FRANK, BECAUSE SOME OF THE ISSUES ABOUT THE REDESIGN. >> JOSH FRANK, 1003 EAST HAMILTON AVENUE. IT'S NICE TO SEE SO MANY OF YOU BE ON THE PROFESSIONAL SIDE OF WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT. I AM TALKING AS AN ADVOCATE. WHAT WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED WITH THE SITE, WOULD WHAT OUR CLIENT IS LOOKINGTO BUILD, I THINK, A LOT OF THE THINGS I TALK ABOUT TO YOU AND OUR CITIZENS HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR, FOR A LONG TIME, THE ENVIRONMENT. SO JUST TO HIGHLIGHT A HANDFUL OF REALLY FANTASTIC ATTRIBUTES THAT THIS SITE IS GOING TO BE CONTRIBUTING TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, INCLUDING AS TAILOR MENTIONED CLOSING TWO CURB CUTS ALONG NEBRASKA AVENUE, WHICH AS MANY OF YOU MAY KNOW, CLOSING THEM DOES TWO THINGS. ONE, IT HELPS PROMOTE THE CITY'S EFFORTS AN ALSO REDUCES CONFLICTS BETWEEN CYCLE LISTS AND PEDESTRIAN AS WELL AS MOTORISTS ALONG NEBRASKA AVENUE. THE SECOND PART OF THAT IS IN CONVERSATIONS WITH HART, WORKING TO POTENTIALLY RELOCATE A METRO RAPID STATION TO THIS PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD DO THINGS. ONE, IT WOULD PROVIDE TRANSIT ACCESS TO THE SITE BUT ALSO BETTER ACCESS TO THE WINN-DIXIE JUST NORTH OF THIS SITE SO FOLKS WOULD BE ABLE TO TAKE TRANSIT AND GET THEIR GROCERIES A LOT EASIER WITHOUT HAVING TO CROSS THE STREET AS THEY DO TODAY. THIRD, WE ARE REINTRODUCING WHAT IS SORT OF A TRADITIONAL BLOCK PATTERN IN THIS PROJECT BY RELOCATING THE PARKING TO THE BACK HALF OF THE PROPERTY. IT DOES A COUPLE THINGS. ONE IS IT FUNCTIONS IN A SIMILAR WAY TO HISTORICALLY WHICH KEEPS A LOT OF THE FRONTAGE ALONG NEBRASKA AVAILABLE FOR PEOPLE SPACE. IT MYSELF FOR A FANTASTIC TO WALK, YOU SEE IT AS YOU ARE WALKING, BIKING, RIDING A BUS, DRIVING BY. THAT'S WHAT WE TALK ABOUT ACTIVIST VATTING SPACES. THAT'S WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE. IN MOVING MOST OF THOSE ACTIVE SPACES TO THE FRO, THIS WILL ALSO SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE NOISE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS. SO I LISTENED THIS MORNING TO A LOT OF THE HEARINGS TALKING ABOUT NOISE LEVELS AND NOISE POLLUTION. THIS IS LITERALLY THE FURTHEST WE CAN POSSIBLY MOVE THE OUTDOOR ACTIVE SPACE AS WAY FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, WHICH GOES TO SOLVING A LOT OF THE ISSUES AT THIS POINT, NOT TO MENTION YOU HAVE GOT A BUILDING BETWEEN HERE AND RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. N ASKING FOR PARKING REDUCTION NOT ONLY ARE WE ENCOURAGING MORE WALKABILITY AND BIKABILITY AS WELL A TRANSIT USE BUT WE ARE ALSO DISINCENTIVIZING IMPAIRED DRIVING. WE HAVE SEEN A LOT RECENTLY IN THIS AREA FOR PEDESTRIANS BEING FATALLY HIT BY MOTORISTS. A LOT OF THAT COMES FROM IMPAIRED DRIVING. SO IF THIS IS GOING TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR THIS IS SOMETHING WE WANT TO INCENTIVIZE. IN PROVIDING BIKE SPACE, WE ARE RIGHT NOW SET FOR ABOUT 34 BIKES WHICH IS WELL ABOVE WHAT WE ARE REQUIRED TO DO, AND WELL ABOVE WHAT WE WOULD GIVE CREDIT FOR. BUT WE ALSO HAVE ROOM FOR MORE IN LATER PHASES. WE ARE PLANTING OVER 90 TREES ON-SITE INCLUDING 15 LIVE OAKS WHICH WILL CONTRIBUTE TO TAMPA'S WELL RENOWNED URBAN TREE CANNON I. WE ARE CHOOSING A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF PERMEABLE MATERIALS INCLUDING 100-FOOT LINEAR FEET OF BIOSWALE THAT WILL FILTER RAIN WATER BEFORE IT GETS TO OUR WATERWAYS. AND WE ARE ALSO PUTTING TWO SALVAGE 100-YEAR-OLD LAUREL OAK TREES THAT ARE BEING REINCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT THAT WILL SELL FROM AN ADJACENT SITE. SO WE ARE REINTROCINGLORI NATIVE ELEMENTS, MATERIALS, PLANTS, AND THEN LASTLY, THE PUBLIC REALM IS NOT ONLY 100% ADA COMPLIANT BUT WE ARE PURPOSEFULLY INCLUDING WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE FURNITURE IN THE BEER GARDEN FOR A GREATER AND LARGER MORE ROBUST AND DIVERSE PATRONAGE. SO WE FEEL THIS PROJECT IS A MASTER CONTRIBUTION NOT JUST TO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD BUT TO THE CITY OVERALL FOR THOSE REASONS. >> TYLER HUDSON. AND MORE ABOUT THE VISION. >> BRADY, 6247½ FLORIDA AVENUE. SO THIS IS A LARGE COMPLICATED PROJECT WITH A LOT OF MOVING PARTS TO IT. JUST TO BREAK IT DOWN QUICKLY, FOR YOU ALL, CRAP APPLE IS AN ARTS COLLECTION THAT ARTS COLLECTIVE BROUGHT TOGETHER OUT OF SEVERAL DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS. THEY PUT TOGETHER AN ATTRACTION HERE AT 3800 NORTH NEBRASKA. SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE VIEW AS NOT JUST A MICROBREWERY AND TASTING ROOM, BUT AS A CENTER OF ACTIVATION FOR ARTS AND CULTURE IN CENTRAL TAMPA. SO IT'S ONE SMALL PART THAT IS CRITICAL TO CUSTOMER RETENTION BUT IS NOT THE SOUL GOAL OF THE ENDEAVOR. THIS IS A LARGE SCALE PROJECT THAT HAS A LOT OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE INVOLVED. THE PROJECT IS AN ART GALLERY. TO BUY INTO T --RT SIDE OF THINGS AND YOU HEARD MENTION THE RESIDENTIAL SPACE UPSTAIRS. THAT SPACE IS SET ASIDE SO WE COULD USE THE ARTIST TO RESIDENTS PROGRAM. THEY HAVE BEEN RUNNING THE ART TOAST RESIDENT PROGRAM FOR THE LAST SEVEN YEARS OUT OF THEIR SPACE ON FLORIDA AVENUE, HAD A LOT OF SUCCESS BRINGING NATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL ARTISTS TO TAMPA FOR PROJECTS AND WITH OTHER ARTISANS IN TAMPA. SO WE ARE GOING TO ACTIVATE A SPACE TO PUT ALL OF THOSE ELEMENTS TOGETHER TO TRY TO PROVIDE JOBS AND RECREATION FOR THE PEOPLE. OUR COMMUNITY OUTREACH, KELLY CAN TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT IT. >> KELLY LEMIEU, EAST COMANCHE AVENUE. UP WITH THING WE REALLY WANT TO SHARE IS MAKING SURE THAT EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS A CORE BELIEF SYSTEM IN OUR ASSOCIATION IS THAT WE WANT TO BE GOOD STEWARD FOR OUR COMMUNITY, NOT JUST BRINGING SOMETHING COOL TO TAMPA, WHICH IS WHAT THIS WILL DO, BUT ALSO HELP ELEVATE THE NEIGHBORHOOD, HELP OUR NEIGHBORS, EMPLOY OUR NEIGHBORS, REACH OUR NEIGHBORS, AND IMPROVE THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE AS WELL AS RADICALLY INCLUSIVE FOR OUR COMMUNITY. >> WITH THAT, WE ARE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, AND WE'LL HANDLE THE REST OF THE REBUTTAL. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? COUNCILMAN CITRO. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. JOSH, THIS IS A NICE PLAN. HOW MUCH BARRIER BETWEEN THE PARKING AND THE PROPERTY NEXT TO THE WEST, OR THE PROPERTIES TO THE WEST? >> IF MEMORY SERVES, THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED TO BE 15 FEET, AND WE MEET THAT WITH SOME. SO NOT ONLY WILL IT BE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE BUFFER AS PART OF THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY, BUT IT WILL ALSO BE HEAVILY PLANTED. SO IT'S GOING TO SERVE MULTI-FUNCTIONS. >>JOSEPH CITRO: AND OF COURSE THAT BARRIER IS GOING TO BLOCK ANY TYPES OF LIGHTS FROM CARS GOING ACROSS TO THE NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY? >> CORRECT. AND WE ARE ALSO GOING TO BE EXTENDING AN EXISTING WHITE VINYL PVC FENCE THAT EXISTS. WE ARE GOING TO BE EXTENDING THAT ACROSS THE ENTIRE PROPERTY LINE. THAT WILL ALSO HELP, YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THE ONLY CONCERNS I AM HAVING, JOSH, IS THE PATRONS WILL BE ABLE TO COME OUT OF THIS PARNG LOT AND TURN WEST. IS THERE ANY PROPOSED SIGNAGE THAT SAYS YOU CAN ONLY MAKE, LET'S SAY, A RIGHT ON VIRGINIA OR A LEFT ON STRATFORD SO IT'S DIRECTING THEM BACK OUT TO NEBRASKA AVENUE? >> I THINK I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. AND I THINK THAT'S DEFINITELY POSSIBLE. WE HAVE TO CONFIRM THE SOLID WASTE MANEUVERABILITY WITH THAT, BUT I THINK THAT'S WITHIN THE REALM OF POSSIBILITY FOR SURE. >> FROM CERTAINLY WE ARE MORE THAN WILLING TO RESTRICT THAT, SO YOU CAN'T GO WEST DOWN VIRGINIA OR STRATFORD. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I BELIEVE MR. MANASSE WANTS TO SPEAK TO MY REQUEST. >>RYAN MANASSE: RYAN SORRY TO INTERRUPT. I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR BECAUSE I DO HAVE TRANSPORTATION ON THE LINE AND THEY CAN ANSWER THOSE KIND OF TECHNICAL QUESTIONS, AND I SUGGEST WE ASK THE STAFF MEMBER, IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THE SITE PLAN CAN ACTUALLY DO AND THEIR TECHNICAL MANUAL NEEDS. SO JOHN FISTADA. >> JONATHAN SCAT,RANSRTATION PLANNING. YES. WE ARE -RATE TURN ONLY OR LEFT TURN ONLY SIPE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: JONATHAN, CAN I ASK THAT AS A REQUEST ON THIS? >> THAT'S SOMETHING THAT -- I'LL LET THEEGAL.. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU ARE MUTED MA'AM. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: I APOLOGIZE. LEGAL DEPARTMENT. COUNCILMAN CITRO, THIS IS THE SUBJECT WAIVER REQUEST TO ACCESS THESE TWO LOCAL STREETS. SO UNDERSTOOD THE CODE, COUNCIL CAN GRANT WAIVERS IF YOU FEIGNED AN ACTIVE GRANT IN THE WAIVER THAT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL STANDARD, AND SO IF YOU ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE IMPACT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ADJACENT HERE, IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO IMPOSE SOME OF THOSE CONDITIONS AS A SULT OF GRANTING THE WAIVER, IF THAT IS THE WAY THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT THEY WILL MEAT THE GENERAL STANDARD. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MS. VELEZ. THANK YOU, JONATHAN. DO THE PETITIONERS, THE REPRESENTATIVE, HAVE ANY -- HAVE ANY PROBLEMS FOR ASKING FOR THAT CONDITION? >> NO, NOT AT ALL, COUNCIL. THAT'S A GREAT SUGGESTION. I THINK MAYBE WE NEED TO WORTH SMITH IT ON HERE, BUT I THINK WHAT WE WOULD SAY, CODIED PLAN CONDITION THAT THE DEVELOPER INSTALL SIGNAGE PROHIBITING VEHICULAR TURNS WESTBOUND ON STRATFORD AND VIRGINIA AVENUE, AND WE CAN WORK WITH JONATHAN AND RYAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. BUT I THINK I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE INTENT IS, AND ON BEHALF OF THE TEAM, THAT'S ACTUALLY OKAY FOR THAT CHANGE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THE INTENT IS TO HAVE THEM GO IN THE DIRECTION OF NEBRASKA AVENUE SO THEY ARE NOT TRAVELING THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. >> THAT'S RIGHT. I THINK FOR VIRGINIA AVENUE, LEFT ANDIGHT OUT, THEN THE OPPOSITE FOR THE STREET TO THE SOUTH. AND I MAY BE CONFUSED ON THE SLIDE THERE BUT I THINK WE ARE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >> I SUFFER FROM DICKS DYSLEXIA, TOO. THANK YOU. NOTHING MORE, MR. CHAIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR? >>ORLANDO GUDES: GOOD EVENING, SIR. >> TYLER HUDSON: GOOD EVENING. >>ORLANDO GUDES: AS RELATES TO AMPLIFIED SOUND OR MUSIC, THAT'S ON THE OUTSIDE, CORRECT? >> THERE WILL BE AN OUTDOOR AREA WHERE PEOPLE WILL BE, IN TERMS OF THE SOUND, I AM GOING TO DEFER TO THE FOLKS WHO ARE ACTUALLY DOING THIS PROJECT, DEVON. >> YEAH, THE INTENT FOR THE BEER GARDEN AREA IS AGAIN NOT TO HAVE OUTDOOR LIVE MUSIC AT THIS TIME. I THINK SIMILAR TO THE JUG AND BOTTLE APPLICATION, THE AMBIENT, I DON'T THINK ANYTHING, YOU KNOW, THE 10:00 LIMITATION I THINK WOULD BE FINE WITH US, IF THAT'S WHAT'S BEING ASKED FOR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT IS A RESIDENTIAL AREA BEHIND THERE. I HAVE SEEN PEOPLE LIVE BEHIND THAT AREA RIGHT THERE. ALSO, IF YOU AGREE WITH THAT ON THE SITE PLAN, IT WOULD BE GREAT. >> I WOULD BE AGREEABLE WITH THE SAME CONDITION THAT WAS JUST IMPOSED ON THE PRIOR APPLICATION, IF THAT WERE COUNCIL'S PLEASURE. WE ARE CERTAINLY OKAY WITH THAT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I WOULD APPRECIATE THAT. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW THA THAT SITE IS A LITTLE OF A HISTORICAL SITE. MR. MIRANDA MAY KNOW, MAYBE MR. DINGFELDER. THAT SITE USED TO BE THE OLD DUVAL FUNERAL HOME. MANY YEARS AGO. BEFORE IT WAS EVEN A CHURCH. SO IT HAS HISTORICAL VALUE. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? YES? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST FOR CLARITY, MR. HUDSON, YOU SAID -- WHAT DID YOU SAY, 10 P.M., SEVEN DAYS A WEEK AS FAR AS AMPLIFIED SOUND? >> YES. THAT WORKS FOR US, SIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HOW ABOUT YOUR GENERAL HOURS OF OPERATION? MR. MANASSE SAID 3 IN THE MORNING, BASICALLY, WAS THE STANDARD, THE DEFAULT POSITION. BUT I CAN'T IMAGINE YOU ARE LOOKING FOR 3 A.M., SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. >> THAT'S CORRECT. AND THESE DEFAULTS ARE CHAPTER 14 HOURS, AND DIDN'T WANT TO CHANGE THAT, OR DIDN'T ELECT TO CHANGE IT. BUT I SHOULDN'T ASSUME THAT WAS TO MAXIMIZE THE HOURS. I THINK HE'S STILL FIGURING OUT EXACTLY WHAT THE HOURS ARE GOING TO BE. AND I DON'T WANT TO PUT MY CLIENT -- >> SO THAT THE CRAP APPLE PORTION OF THINGS, DON'T SEE ANYTHING HAPPENING PAST MIDNIGHT. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO PLACE LIMITATIONS ON. HE'S STILL FIGURING OUT HRS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, TOO. >> YEAH, I MEAN, I HADN'T REALLY PLANNED -- I'M SORRY. STEVE OGDEN, 14727 NORWOOD EAKS DRIVE TAMPA FLORIDA. YEAH, SAYING OPENING AS 11 OR MIDNIGHT IN THE BEGINNING I.WEDNESDAY AND FRIDAY, FROM THE WEAK, PROBABLY MUCH SOONER THAN THAT, BUT I JUST DON'T SEE, YOU KNOW, IT'S A NEW BUSINESS STARTING UP. SO I AM NOT TRYING TO LIKE UPSET THE NEIGHBORS. WE REALLY WANT TO BE FRIENDLY TO EVERYBODY. IF WE CAN DO A LITTLE BIT MORE, A LITTLE LATER, OBVIOUSLY WHATEVER IS COMFORTABLE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I CAN'T REALLY TELL. DO YOU HAVE ANY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORS NEARBY OVER THERE ON TELE CO OR WHAT? >> THERE WAS RESIDENAL T THE WEST OF THE PARKING AREA SO ONE OF THE CHANGES WITH THIS SITE, WITH THE CURRENT WET ZONING FOR THIS PROPERTY, THE BUILDING IS WET ZONED. THAT'S NOT CHANGING NOW. IN THE CURRENT WET ZONING, THE OUTDOOR AREA IS ACTUALLY THE WEST, CLOSER TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND WHAT WE ARE DOING IS SHIFTING THAT EAST SO IT FRONTS NEBRASKA. AND IT CERTAINLY IS GOING TO BE A QUIETER SITUATION JUST BY VIRTUE OF THE FOOTPRINT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WOULD YOU BE COMFORTABLE WITH LIKE 11:00 ON SUNDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY, AND 1:00 IN THE MORNING THURSDAY, FRIDAY SATURDAY? >> THAT SOUND GOOD. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR FOR PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM NUMBER 5? WE HAVE SOMEONE. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, SIR. >> MY NAME IRICK WATTWOLF, 5121 SOUTH NICHOLS STREET. AND I AM HERE JUST TO BE CLEAR. I WANT FULL DISCLOSURE. I WAS HANDLING THE PROPERTY WHEN IT WAS ZONED FOR THIS SPECIAL USE 2 A YEAR AND A HALF OR TWO AGO. AND I WAS THE SELLER TO THE CURRENT OWNER. MY SOUL PURPOSE OF BEING HERE IS DURING THE COURSE OF MY OWNERSHIP, I ESTABLISHED A RELATIONSHIP WITH SEVERAL PEOPLE IN THE AREA, ONE OF WHOM ASKED ME TO SPEAK ON HER BEHALF. SO I WOULD LIKE TO READ THE AUTHORIZATION S YOU WILL KNOW THAT I AM TRYING TO KEEP MY SCOPE VERY LIMITED. DEAR COUNCILMAN GUDES, JUST HAPPENS TO BE HER COUNCILMAN, AS THE OWNER OF 707 EAST VIRGINIA AVENUE AND AS ONE OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS, I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU ALLOW RICK WOLF, THAT'S ME, TO SPEAK ON MY BEHALF AT THE UPCOME HEARING ON A MATTER DESCRIBED ABOVE. HE WILL LIMIT HIS INPUT TO READING THE LETTER I HAVE WRITTEN AND TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS TO THE BEST OF HIS ABILITY. NOW I WILL READ HER LETTER. DEAR COUNCILMAN GUDES, I AM WRITING TO EXPRESS MY OBJECTION TO THE PETITION REFERENCED ABOVE. AS A LIVE TIME RESIDENT OF THE AREA, IN FACT LIVING NEXT DOOR AND SHARING THE PROPERTY LINE IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST, I AM CONCERNED THAT THIS WILL HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ME, MY NEIGHBORS AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE OWNERS OF THE BUSINESS, CRAB DEVIL, HAVE MADE THEMSELVES AVAILABLE TO EXPLAIN THEIR PLAN. I HAVETTENDED ONE OF THEIR PRESENTATIONS. HOWEVER, THEY DID NOT MAKE IT CLEAR THAT ALCOHOL OTHER THAN BEER AND WINE WOULD BE PRODUCED OR SOLD, FOR BOTH CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AND OFF. IN ADDITION, IT HAS BEEN MY UNDERSTANDING THAT MULTIPLE SHIPPING CONTAINERS THAT HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO THE SITE OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS WILL BECOME PERMANENT INSTALLATIONS ON THIS SITE. MY MISTAKEN THOUGHT WAS THAT THEY WERE A TEMPORARY SOLUTION TO STORING CONSTRUCTION TERIALS AND TOOLS. THE OWNER DID NOT DISCLOSE THIS PORTION OF THEIR PLANS. I REMAIN CONFIDENT THAT INVESTMENTS IN THIS AREA COULD BE MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL. I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THERE SHOULD BE FULL AND CLEAR DISCLOSURE TO THE COUNCIL, AND TO THOSE OF US AFFECTED BY THE PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS MAGNITUDE AT THIS PROMINENT LOCATION BEFORE THE FIRST STEPS ARE TAKEN OR APPROVALS GRANTED. NOR REASON, I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU REJECT THIS PLAN AND ENCOURAGE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL WHOSE CONSTITUENTS ARE NOT DIRECTLY AFFECTED TO HONOR THE WISHES OF THOSE OF US WHO WILL BE MOST AFFECTED. AND I WELCOME THE PETITIONER CRAB DEVIL TO FULLY EXPLAIN THEIR PLANS WITH THE HOPE THAT WE CAN REACH A SOLUTION THAT WILL BENEFIT ALL OF US WHO HAVE SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENTS IN THIS AREA. THANK YOU FOR YOUR THOUGHTFUL REPRESENTATION AND SUPPORT OF MY REQUEST. SINCERELY, VICTORIA BERNARDO, 707 EAST VIRGINIA AVENUE. THANK YOU. AND I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN? NONE? WE GO TO THE NEXT PERSON. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ELSE ON THE SOAKED FLOOR HEAR TO SPEAK FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? >>AILEEN ROSARIO: NO, CHAIR, THERE'S NO ONE ELSE ON THE FLOOR TO SPEAK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED VIRTUALLY TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 5? WE DO? OKAY. >>THE CLERK: PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK). >> GO AHEAD, SIR. >> MY NAME IS SHAUN McGINN, EAST VIRGINIA AVENUE, CALLING TO SAY MY FAMILY AND I VERY STRONGLY SUPPORT THIS PROJECT. WE ARE NEW TO THE BAY AREA TWO MONTHS AGO AND ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE BOUGHT THE HOUSE THAT WE DID IS WHEN WE FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS PROJECT. SO WE ARE VERY EXCITED FOR IT. I KNOW SEVERAL OF MY NEIGHBORS ARE VERY EXCITED FOR IT. WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND THAT IS THE ONLY PERSON WE HAVE VIRTUALLY? >> WE DID HAVE FOUR OTHER REGISTERED SPEAKERS. BUT THEY ARE NOT LOGGED IN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY. ANYTHING FROM COUNCIL BEFORE WE GO TO REBUTTAL? ALL RIGHT. MR. DSON, GO AHEAD. OH, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, YES, SIR. PLEASE UNMUTE YOURSELF. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I JUST WANT CLARITY ON THE OUTDOOR MUSIC, THE TAMES. >>RYAN MANASSE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I WILL STATE IT AND IF IT'S INCORRECT, PLEASE LET ME KNOW, TYLER. I HEARD IN A OUTDOOR AMPLIFIED SOD AFTER 10 P.M. COUNCILMAN. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. HUDSON, I ALWAYS LIKE TO LISTEN TO MY CONSTITUENTS. AND I CAN TELL THIS IS PROBABLY SOMEONE ELDERLY I WHO COULDN'T GET HERE AT THE TIME TO HAVE SOMEONE TO WRITE A LETTER, HAVE IT NOTE RACED AND HAVE SOMEBODY COME IN AND READ IT. VERY PASSIONATE ABOUTEOPL IN MY DISTRICT ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY TAKE THE EXTRA STEPS TO WANT TO BE HEARD. I DON'T KNOW HOW THIS MAY GO, BUT IF IT RULES IN YOUR FAVOR OR NOT, I THINK WE OWE IT TO THE CONSTITUENTS, BECAUSE YOU ARE GOING TO BE THE NEW NINE IF THIS HAPPENS TO COME TO FRUITION. AND I WOULD HOPE THAT YOU WILL LISTEN TO THE ADDRESS OF THE NEIGHBOR WHO IS RIGHT BEHIND OR VERY CLOSE TO THIS BUSINESS AND TAKE THE TIME TO GO AND TALK TO THAT NEIGHBOR. THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO ME. IN CASEHE'S LISTENING, TO KNOW THAT IT IS IMPORTANT. SOMETIMES I DON'T LIKE PEOPLE, WHEN I SAY TRY TO PULL THE WOOL OVER MY EYES, I'M NOT SAYING THAT'S WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH YOUR GROUP, BUT I WILL MAKE AN APPEAL THAT YOU GO AND TALK TO THAT RESIDENT SO THEY CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT YOUR PLANS ARE, YOUR ART AND THINGS YOU ARE TRYING TO DO FOR THAT COMMUNITY, TO UPLIFT THAT COMMUNITY, BECAUSE THAT COMMUNITY RIGHT THERE DOES NEED SOME UPLIFTING. SO I WOULD ASK THAT YOU AND YOUR FOLKS DO THAT, NO MATTER HOW IT GOES THIS EVENING, SIR. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MR. HUDSON, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING BEFORE WE ASK FOR A MOTION TO CLOSE? YOU ARE MUTED. >> TYLER HUDSON: JUST VERY BRIEFLY, COUNCILMAN GUDES. WE ARE ABSOLUTELY GOING TO TALK TO THAT NEIGHBOR, I BELIEVE AS SOON AS TOMORROW MORNING, AND KELLY WILL SPEAK TO THAT IN A SECOND. JUST SO COUNCIL IS AWARE, I SPOKE TO MR. WOLF WHO READ THE LETTER AND WILL REPRESENT TO COUNCIL FROM WHAT WE UNDERSTAND THE BIGGEST CONCERN THAT THE NEIGHBOR HAS IS THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE A LIQUOR STORE, THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE BUSINESS. AND I AM SAYING AS SOMEONE WHO IS SWORN THAT THAT IS ABSOLUTELY NOT WHAT THIS BUSINESS IS GOING TO BE. THERE WILL BE SALES OF SPIRITS PRODUCED ON-SITE, BUT THIS WILL ABSOLUTELY NOT BE A LIQUOR STORE. MANY OF US ARE CONSTITUENTS, COUNCIL GUDES, ANDRE INVESTED IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT WE WILL BE IN CONTACT WITH HER. AND KELLY, I WOULD LIKE HER TO ADDRESS A LITTLE BIT THE COMMUNICATION THAT THEY HAVE ALREADY HAD TO DATE WITH HER, JUST SO COUNCIL HAS SOME ASSURANCE THAT WE ARE ABSOLUTELY LISTENING TO HER AND WILL BE DEDICATED TO HER SUPPORT. >> KELLY: THANK YOU. IN FACT I CAN ONLY ECHO WHAT TYLER SAID, AND AGREE WITH YOU 100%, COUNCILMAN GUDES, THAT YOU HAVE OUR COMMITMENT, AND OUR NEIGHBOR HAS THE COMMITMENT TO CONTINUING CONVERSATIONS, TO MAKE SURE THAT EXPECTATIONS ARE SET, AND THAT EXPECTATIONS ARE CLEAR ABOUT THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF OUR PROJECT, AND HOW MUCH WE WANT TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY, OUR IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORS, ESPECIALLY. SO WAVED COMMUNICATION WITH MANY OF THE NEIGHBORS ON VIRGINIA AND STRATFORD, REINALDO BEING ONE OF THEM. SO WE HAVE OPEN LANES OF COMMUNICATION AND WE WILL ABSOLUTELY CONTINUE TO MAKE SURE THAT AGAIN OUR VISION IS CLEAR TO ALL OF OUR NEIGHBORS IN OUR COMMUNITY. >> WITH THAT WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND REQUEST THAT YOU DO APPROVE THIS. >> MOTION TO CLOSE BY CITRO, SECOND BY GUDES. ALL IN FAVOR? COUNCILMEMBER GUDES WORKS YOU LIKE TO READ THIS ITEM? COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, ITEM NUMBER 5? >>BILL CARLSON: LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR FILE NUMBER AB 2-21-07, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU-2 FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES, LARGE VENUE CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES IN PACKAGE SALES OFF-PREMISES, CONSUMPTION AND MAKING LAWFUL THE SALE OF BEVERAGES REGARDLESS OF ALCOHOLIC CONTENT, BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR, AT OR FROM THAT CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT 3800 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 3 PROVIDING THAT ALL ORDINANCES OR PART OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT ARE REPEALED, REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2018-1 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >> SECOND. >>BILL CARLSON: AND THAT THE USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH CONTIGUOUS AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY, AND IT WILL NOT ESTABLISH A PRECEDENT OR ENCOURAGE MORE INTENSIVE OR COMPATIBLE USE OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'M SORRY, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>JOSEPH CITRO: AND DIRTING TRAFFIC TOWARDS NEBRASKA AVENUE, AND IN A AMPLIFIED OUTDOOR SOUND AFTER 10 P.M. >>BILL CARLSON: THANK YOU. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. HUDSON, ALSO THE HOURS OF OPERATION ON THE SITE PLAN? AND AGAIN, I BELIEVE YOU NEED TO HAVE THOSE NUMBERS, MR. MANASSE, OR DO YOU HAVE THOSE? >>RYAN MANASSE: I CAN STATE THEM. I HEARD IT WAS SUNDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY, 11 P.M. CLOSE, AND THEN THURSDAY, FRIDAY, SATURDAY, 1 A.M. DO WE HAVE AN OPENING TIME? DID YOU WANT TO PROVIDE THAT? >> WE ARE STILL FIGURING THINGS OUT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT DID YOU SAY? >> IF WE CAN JUST HAVE THE CLOSING TIME FOR NOW. WE ARE STILL TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE OPENING AND WHATNOT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT'S FINE WITH ME. >>MARTIN SHELBY: AGAIN ARE THERE ANY OTHER REVISIONS TO BE DONE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, MR. MANASSE? >> AS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT CAN BE STATED IN THE MOTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION MARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 20 AT 9:30 A.M. >> MAY I SAY SOMETHING, MR. CHAIR? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >> JUST BEFORE -- I KNOW THE HEARING IS DONE. WHEN IT COMES TO COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT, YOU ALWAYS TAKE PEOPLE AT THEIR KEYWORD. BUT THIS PARTICULAR APPLICANT, I HAVE JUST GIVEN THEIR VISION ON THE COMMUNITY AND THEIR INVOLVEMENT. I HAVE EVERY REASON TO BELIEVE -- OUR FRIEND COUNCILMAN GUDES, AND I KNOW BASED ON THEIR STELLAR REPUTATION AND EVERYTHING, I JUST WANTED TO MENTION THAT, SIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER 6. SANE SAWN DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. CAN WE HAVE ACCESS TO THE SCREEN? BLANN ( THANK YOU >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD, SIR. WE CAN SEE IT. ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. GOING OVER CASE AB 2-21-13. THE APPLICANT IS ODELMA MATOS, SEAN ROBINSON, PROPERTY ADDRESS FOR WAIVER REQUESTS WE HAVE SECTION NUMBER 27-132, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENT FROM OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS FROM. [~DISTORTION~] THE AB SALES, 1301 EAST 7TH AVENUE AND THEY ARE 23 FEET AWAY. [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] THE REQUEST HERE IS THE APPLICATION BEFORE YOU IS REQUESTING SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR A SMALL VENUE, BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES ONLY. THE PROPOSED USE IS ALLOWANCE LOUNGE, CIGAR BAR AND LOUNGE, RESTAURANT, AND RETAIL SALES. THE PROPOSED APPLICATION REQUEST A TOTAL OF 2,264 SQUARE FEET, COMPRISING OF 1,586 SQUARE FEET INDOOR, AND 6 SQUEEET OUTDOOR. THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THE PROPOSED HOURS OF OPERATION WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 14, OFF-STREET PARKING IS REQUIRED -- NOT REQUIRED IN YC 1. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE YBOR CITY URBAN VILLAGE AND THE DISTANCE SEPARATIONS REQUIREMENT IS 250 FEET FROM OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS. THE SITE PLAN STATES THAT THE SALES AREA SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN PARKING OR LOADING AREA OR SPACE AND ALL PERMITS ISSUED AFTER APRIL 1st, 2011 SHALL KEEP ON-SITE PROPERTY OF THE ADOPTED ORDINANCE AND ASSOCIATED SITE PLAN, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, SALES PERMIT. LOOKING OVER HERE, YOU WILL SEE THAT THE RED DOTTED AREA IS THE ESTABLISHMENT, TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE YC 3, TO THE WEST YOU HAVE YC 2 ZONING, TO THE YC 6 AND YC 9. LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN YOU WILLEE I THE RED YOU HAVE THE ESTABLISHMENT WITH THE PARKING RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO THE WEST. ACROSS THE STREET, YOU HAVE, ALSO YOU HAVE ESTABLISHMENTS LIKE OFFSIDS. HERE IS A VIEW, WHERE THE OFFICES ARE LOCATED. ALSO THERE'S VACANT OFFICES IN THE AREA. JUST SOUTH, YOU HAVE THE -- RIGHT BEHIND IT. [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] AND THE OFFICE IS ON THE RIGHT SIDE HEAR BEING THE CIGAR LOUNGE. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FIND IT INCONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA CODE ORDINANCES. I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO? ALL RIGHT. I SEE THE APPLICANT IS ON CAMERA. CAN YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND THE CLERK CAN SWEAR YOU IN? >>THE CLERK:WAYWAY. >> YES. >>GUIDO MANISCLCO: ALL RIGHT. GO AHE. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOU MAY PRESENT. (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK) MR. ROBINSON? >> YES, MR. SHARE. THIS IS SHAWN ROBINSON, 1315 EAST 7TH AVENUE, 33605. THE STAFF REPORT, AND [~DISTORTION~] CIGAR LOUNGE, BEER, WINE, LIQUOR TO ENHANCE, AND OFF TO THE DISTANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENT, [~AUDIO CUTS OUT ] TO 23 FEET. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS? NO? SIR, MA'AM, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT OF THE ANYTHING ELSE? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC? THERE'S NOBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR, BUT DWE HE ANYBODY VIRTUALLY? >> THERE ARE IN A REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IF THERE'S NOTHING FURTHER CAN WE GET A MOTION TO CLOSE? MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR? ALL RIGHT. COUNCILMAN GUDES WORKS YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 6? >>ORLANDO GUDES: AB 2-21-13, ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT S-2 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES SMALL VEIN VENUE CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES ONLY AND MAKING LEVEL BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR FOR LAND LOCATED AT 1315 EAST 7TH AVENUE TAMPA, FLORIDA DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2, ALL PORTIONS IN CONFLICT REPEALED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUDES. COUNCILMAN CITRO WITH THE SECOND. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOPH CITRO: YES.S. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES ON FIRST READING. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 20th AT 9:30 A.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ITEM NUMBER 7. >> ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATON. CAN I HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN AGAIN? THANK YOU. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: CAN YOU SEE THE SCREEN? WONDERFUL. ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, CASE AB 2-21-15. THE APPLICANT IS PSREG KNOW HOE SQUARE OWNER LLC, JOHN GRANDOFF, PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 1701 WEST GRAY STREET. THERE ARE NO WAIVERS FOR THIS PROPERTY, AND THERE ARE NO ESTABLISHMENTS WITH AB SALES WITHIN 250 FT OF THIS ESTABLISHMENT. THE APPLICATION BEFORE YOU IS REQUESTING A SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR A SMALL VENUE, BEER AND WINE, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AND PACKAGE SALES OFF-PREMISES ONLY. ALCOHOLIC SALE IS BEING APPLIED TO IS RETAIL SALES CONVENIENCE GOODS AND LIMITS THE USE TO 10 SEATS OR LESS. THE PROPOSED APPLICATION REQUESTS A TOTAL OF 1,457 SQUARE FEET COMPRISING 11,137 FEET INDOOR AND 320 SQUARE FEET OUTDOORS. THE PROPOSED HOURS OF OPERATION AND WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 14. THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE USES IS 348 PARKING SPACES FOR APPROVED PD REZ 21-01. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE AND THE DISTANCE SEPARATION'S REQUIREMENT IS 250 FEET FROM OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS. AND THERE ARE NO AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN THE 250 FEET. THE SITE PLAN STATES THAT THE SALES AREA SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A PARKING OR LOADING AREA OR SPACE AND ALL PERMITS ISSUED AFTER APRIL 1st, 2011 SHALL KEEP ON-SITE A COPY OF THE ORDINANCE AND ASSOCIATED SITE PLAN, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES SALES PERMITS. PERMITS. YOU SEE THE OVERHEAD VIEW OF THE MAP HERE. THE PD WITH A RED BOX AROUND IT. IF YOU LOOK AROUND THE AREA, TO THE WEST YOU HAVE RS-50 ZONING, NORTH AND WEST, CE ZONING, AND IG ZONING TO YOUR EAST YOU HAVE IG ZONING, AND PD ZONING, AND TO YOUR SOUTH YOU ALSO HAVE PD ZONING. LOOKING OVERHEAR AT THE SITE PLAN YOU SEE THE ESTABLISHMENT WHERE YOU CAN HAVE THE ALCOHOL BEVERAGE SALES. ALSO YOU HAVE THE ELEVATION, THE WEST, EAST, SOUTH, AND NORTH ELEVATIONS. LOOKING AT PICTURES OF THE SITE YOU WILL SEE TO THE NORTH, YOU HAVE MULTIFAMILY. TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE MORE MULTIFAMILY. AND TO THE EAST YOU ALSO HAVE MORE MULTIFAMILY. TO THE WEST YOU SEE YOU HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME AND ALSO THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON YOUR RIGHT SIDE LOOKING AT THE PROPERTY BEING ESTABLISHED. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FIND IT CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA CODE ORDINANCES. THANK YOU. AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? HEARG NOE APPLICANT ONLINE. IF YOU WERE NOT SWORN IN, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN. [OATH ADMINISTERED] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> MY NAME IS JAIME MAIER FOR THE APPLICANT, 101 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SUITE 3700 TAMPA. I AM GOING TO SHOW MY SCREEN AND A BRIEF PowerPoint. I WILL MAKE IT EXTRA BRIEF. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: EXCELLENT. GO AHEAD, MA'AM. WE CAN SEE IT. >> IS IT ON THE RIGHT SCREEN VERSION? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DUCKWEED URBAN GROCERIES. >> THIS IS THE DUCK WEED URBAN GROCERY. I AM SURE YOU ARE ALL FAMILIAR WITH THE OTHER DUCK WEED LOCATIONS IN THE CITY. THERE'S ONE IN CHANNELSIDE AND ONE DOWNTOWN. IN CHANNELSIDE THERE'S ALSO A LIQUOR STORE BUT WE ARE ONLY ASKING FOR BEER AND WINE THAT IT BE SOLD IN THE GROCERY STORE AND ALSO CAN BE CONSUDN PREMISES. AGAIN, YOU HAVE SEEN THIS ALREADY, BUT THIS IS CURRENTLY UNDERSTOOD CONSTRUCTION. IT'S NOT FULLY BUILT OUT BUT IT'S GOING TO BE MULTIFAMILY UNITS IN THAT AREA, WEST TAMPA, NORTH HYDE PARK AREA THAT IS BEING BUILT UP, KIND OF SIMILAR, I THINK, TO CHANNELSIDE WHERE THERE'S A LOT OF DENSITY AND THESE NEIGHBORHOOD TYPE USES AND I THINK DUCK WEED GROCERY STORE IS GOING TO COMPLEMENT THE AREA VERY WELL. HERE IS A CLOSE-UP OF THE SITE PLAN AND YOU CAN SEE THE CORNER WHERE THE DUCK WEED STORE IS GOING TO BE, AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROME AND GRAY. SO IT'S GOING TO BE COMPLETELY ENCLOSED BY FOUR DIFFERENT MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS IN THAT AREA. AND AGAIN, THE EAST BUILDING ELEVATION IS YOU ARE STANDING ON ROME, LOOKING TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT, THE DUCK WEED STORE WOULD BE OVER THERE WHERE WE HAVE CIRCLED IT. AGAIN WE ARE ASKING FOR A TOTAL OF ABOUT 1400 SQUARE FEET OF AB SEALS INDOOR, ABOUT 1100 THAT'S GOING TO BE SELLING BEER AND WINE THERE. MIGHBE A CAFE TABLE E FOR ON PREEMPTION CONSUMPTION. OUTDOORS, SMALL, 320 SQUARE FEET, AND IT WILL BE FENCED OFF AS REQUIRED, UNDERSTOOD 10 FEET. NO WAIVERS REQUESTED AS STAFF EXPLAINED. THERE'S SOME PICTURES. THIS IS THE DOWNTOWN STORE ON 10th STREET. YOU CAN SEE THEIR OUTDOOR SEATING EAR KIND OF THE SAME IDEA WHERE PEOPLE CAN SIT, RELAX. I THINK THEY SELL SMOOTHIES AS WELL AS ALCOHOL. AGAIN, STAFF FIND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. NO WAIVERS. ADEQUATE PARKING UNDERSTOOD THE PD PLAN. SO A LOT OF REG LEG WORK HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE. AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST COUNCIL'S APPROVAL AND I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: GOOD EVENING, MS. MAIER. I KNOW I SPEAK ON BEHALF OF ALL OF COUNCIL, WE APPRECIATE THE MIXED USE COMPONENT OF THIS APARTMENT BUILDING. SO THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM OR PERHAPS THE DUCK IN THE ROOM WOULD BE ABOUT THE HOURS OF OPERATION, AND POSSIBLE AMPLIFIED SOUND. ANY BUSINESS PLAN ON EITHER OF THOSE? >> AT THIS TIME, WE WERE GOING WITH WHAT'S PERMITTED IN CODE AS THE APPLICANT IS NOT HERE RIGHT NOW. I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF THEY ARE AWAKE RATE NOW. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEIR HOURS OF OPERATION ARE AT THE OTHER STORES? >> THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. I CAN ACTUALLY GOOGLEHATIGHT NOW, IF THAT IS OKAY. THE DUCK WEED. PROBABLY NOTHING. OH, IT CLOSES AT 11. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND WOULD YOU BE COMFORTABLE -- I WOULDN'T EVEN PUT YOU ON THE SPOT WITH 11. WOULD YOU BE COMFORTABLE WITH MIDNIGHT SEVEN DAYS A WEAK? >> I WOULD. THANK YOU. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HOW ABOUT AMPLIFIED MUSIC? WE HAVE RUN INTO THE SITUATION IN CHANNELSIDE AND BUILDING AT THE BOTTOM OF APARTMENTS WHERE THE MUSIC IS BOTHERING THE UPSTAIRS TENANTS. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE NIP THIS IN THE BUD. IN CASE THAT'S A POTENTIAL PROBLEM. I KNOW DUCK WEED IS NOT NECESSARILY KNOWN FOR RAUCOUS MUSIC OR ANYTHING, BUT THE ZONING GOES WITH THE LAND, SO WE HAVE TO BE EXTRA CAUTIOUS. >> SURE. I THINK YOURE QUITE RIGHT. THE DUCK WEED IS PROBABLY NOT THAT KIND OF LOCATION SO I'M SURE WE WOULD BE TOTALLY FINE WITH CUTTING OFF LOUD MUSIC. AGAIN OUTDOOR AREA IS 320 SQUARE FEET SO I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: TONIGHT WE SEEM TO BE IN THE MODE OF SAYING NO AMPLIFIED MUSIC OR NO AMPLIFIED ANYTHING AFTER 10 P.M., SEVEN DAYS A WEEK WOULD. THAT WORK? >> I BELIEVE SO. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY. YOU CAN ALWAYS TELL US AT SECOND READING IF IT DOESN'T WORK AND WE'LL DEAL WITH IT THEN. BUT YOU ARE OKAY WITH THAT TONIGHT? THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. COUNCILMAN GUDES. COUNCILMAN CITRO. >> I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I NOTICE KNOW IT'S A GROCERY STORE BUT WILL THERE BE ANY PREPARED FOOD AVAILABLE? >>JOH DINGFELDER: YOU ARE GETTING HUNGRY? >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO, I AM CONCERNED THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO TURN INTO A DRINKING ESTABLISHMENT UNDERSTOOD THE GUISE OF A GROCERY STORE. IS THERE GOING TO BE PREPARED FOOD? >> I HAVE BEEN IN DUCK WEED BEFORE AND THEY HAVE SMOOTHIES AND I THINK LITTLE SALADS. I'M NOT ENTIRELY SURE WHAT ALL THEY HAVE. BUT THEY ARE GROCERY STORES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU. I DON'T WANT TO SEE IT TURN INTO A DRINKING ESTABLISHMENT. >> SURE, YEAH. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I THINK MR. CITRO -- MOST OF THESE DON'T HAVE HOT FOOD. THEY HAVE SMALL THINGS LIKE 7-ELEVEN SO WE ARE JUST TRYING TO MAKE SURE T MIXED USES THAT WE DON'T HAVE ESTABLISHMENTS THAT WILL BE HAVING A LOT OF ISSUES WITH PARTIES AND THINGS OUTSIDE AND YOU HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE NEIGHBORS AND SO FORTH. SO I GUESS HE'S TRYING TO MAKE SURE -- >>JOSEPH CITRO: EXACTLY WHAT I STATED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MANASSE. >>RYAN MANASSE: AND JUST TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE CONCERN, AND MAYBE I WILL ELABORATE ON WHAT JAIME ALLUDED TO, I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT THE PRINCIPAL USE OF THIS PROPERTY, OR THIS SUBJECT AREA, IS CONVENIENCE GADS, RETAIL SALES, OKAY. R INRPRETION OF THE CODE FOR RETAIL SALES, BEING ABLE TO HAVE SOME OCCUPANCY, BUT LIMITING THAT THEY ARE STILL CONSIDERED RETAIL SALES. I WANT TO A SURE YOU THAT THE USE FOR THE APPROVEDLAND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT THAT WENT THROUGH IS FOR RETAIL SALES, CONVENIENCE GOOD. AND I DO UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERN BECAUSE THERE ARE A NUMBER ON THERE, BUT ANYWAY, I JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT FORD RECORD. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT. HOWEVER, THIS IS SERVING ALCOL FOR ON PREEMPTION CONSUMPTION AND OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION. SO AGAIN, I AM SURE THE DUCK WEED CAN CONTROL THEMSELVES AND NOT HAVE OUTSIDE AMPLIFIED MUSIC, NOT GOING TO HAVE PARTYING OUTSIDE, NOT GOING TO HAVE A BUNCH OF PEOPLE THERE. I JUST HAVE CONCERNS. I CAN UNDERSTAND IF THESE PEOPLE WERE SITTING THERE EATING A SANDWICH OR SOMETHING AT THESE TABLE TOPS THAT ARE OUTSIDE. BUT IF IT'S JUST GOING TO BE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL, THEREIN LIES A PROBLEM THAT I THINK MAY DEVELOP. THANK YOU, MR. MANASSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MS. VELEZ. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: LEGAL DEPARTMENT. I WANT TO CLARIFY. I HEARD A REFERENCE TO NO AMPLIFIED MUSIC. BUT YOU MEAN NO AMPLIFIED SOUND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE? ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY -- THERE'S NOBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY VIRTUAL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? YES, WE DO. MR. CA MIRRORES, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. [OATH ADMINISTERED] >> YES, I WILL. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER INDICATES THE TWO POINTS I WANTED. WE ARE VERY EXCITE BOARD OF DIRECTOR THIS COMING TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. I KNOW THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, WE ARE IN SUPPORT OF THIS PERMIT. HOWEVER, WE JUST HAVE THOSE TWO CONDITIONS, THERE'S NO AMPLIFIED SOUND AFTER TEN AND NO SERVING ALCOHOL AFTER MIDNIGHT. NOW, WHETHER THE HOURS GOEYON THAT, WE ARE OKAY WITH THAT. WE JUST DON'T WANT THE SERVING OF ALCOHOL TO BE PAST MIDNIGHT. THAT IS ALL. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND THAT'S THE ONLY PERSON WE HAD FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE CAN I GET A MOTION TO CLOSE? MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. COUNCILMAN, WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER 7? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. I PUT MY STUFF AWAY BUT I WILL FIND IT AGAIN. ITEM NUMBER 7, FILE NUMBER AB 2-21-15. MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERS, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT S-2 FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES, SMALL CONVENIENCE DRAW CONSUMPTION OFF PREMISES, PACKAGE SALES OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION MAKING THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE AT CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR BLOCK OF LAND AT 1701 WEST GRAY STREET, TAMPA, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2 PROVIDING THAT ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT ARE REPEALED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >> SECOND. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IF I MAY, I HAD PUT SOME OF MY WORK AWAY. I AM LOOKING FOR THE REVISION SHEET SO I CAN PUT IN EXACTLY WHAT I SAID IS FACTUAL. I NEED SOME HELP. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IT WAS HOURS UNTIL MIDNIGHT SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. AND NO AMPLIFIED SOUND. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IN A AMPLIFIED MUSIC AND THERE WAS ONE OTHER ITEM THAT I HAVE TO READ FOR THE RECORD, AND I LOST THAT SHEET. >> IN A AMPLIFIED SOUND AFTER 10 P.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IN A AMPLIFIED SOUND AFTER MIDNIGHT, CORRECT? >>MARTIN SHELBY: NO, THAT WAS SALE OF ALCOHOL. MR. MANASSE, CAN YOU STATE FOR THE RECORD AND MR. MIRDA CAN CORRECT. >>RYAN MANASSE: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. SO THE TWO STIPULATIONS THAT I HEARD FROM TONIGHT'S READING WAS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT TO INCLUDE THEIR OPERATION TO CLOSE AT 12 A.M. SEVEN DAYS A WEEK, AND THEN ALSO A SECOND NOTE TO BE ADDED WAS NO OUTDOOR AMPLIFIED SOUND AFTER 10 P.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: AND MR. MA REQUIREES RECEIVED THE SAME LETTER THAT I BELIEVE WE ALL RECEIVED THAT DID STATE THE 10 P.M. CLOSING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >> YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CITRO VOTING NO. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 20th AT 9:30 A.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. THAT CONCLUDES -- THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THAT CCLUD THE AGENDA. COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, DO YOU HAVE ANY NEW BUSINESS, SIR? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE ONLY NEW BUSINESS I HAVE IS TO RECEIVE AND FILE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. VERY GOOD. BUT NOT YET, NOT YET. COUNCILMAN VIERA, DO YOU HAVE ANY NEW BUSINESS? NO? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COUNCILMAN CARLSON, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING? >>BILL CARLSON: IF I COULD REAL FAST. WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE ECONOMY. I HAD SEVERAL RESTAURANT, HOTEL ESTABLISHMENT PEOPLE TELL ME IN THE LAST WEEK THAT THEY ARE HAVING A TERRIBLE TIME HIRING STAFF, AND IF IT'S APPROPRIATE, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT COUNCIL RECOMMEND TO STAFF THAT THEY LOOK INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF HOLDING A CAREER FAIR TO HELP THE HOSPITALITY BUSINESSES FIND MUCH NEEDED WORKERS TO FILL THE OPEN POSITIONS. >> [OFF MICROPHONE] >>BILL CARLSON: TURN YOUR MAKE ON. >>ORNDOUDES: FOR MY SISTERS WHO ARE RESTAURANT MANAGERS, DON'T WANT TO WORK -- >>BILL CARLSON: THIS IS WHAT -- THESE BUSINESSES WENT FROM LETTING PEOPLE GO AND PUT ON NEWER LOW TO NOW DESPERATELY TRYING TO HIRE THEM BACK. IT'S JUST AN IDEA OR RECOMMENDATION. IF YOU THINK IT'S A BAD IDEA -- MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CARLSON. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ALL RIGHT. >>BILL CARLSON: I WANT TO THANK YOU AGAIN FOR BEING CHAIR AND CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR FINAL -- >>> MY RETIREMENT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. COUNSEL MEMBER GUDES, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING, SIR? COUNCILMAN CITRO? >>JOSEPH CITRO: NOTHING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ON A SOMER NOTE JUST WANTED TO REMAINED EVERYBODY THAT NEXT TUESDAY EVENING OVER AT OXFORD EXCHANGE WILL BE MEMORIALIZING AND CELEBRATING OF THE LIFE OF JIM RAYS. SO FOR ANYBODY OUT THERE WHO KNEW COACH REECE, YOU ARE MORE THAN WELCOME TO JOIN US AT OXFORD CHANGE. DO YOU RECALL THE TIME, BILL? SEVEN? HOLD ON. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I HAVE IT RIGHT HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, JOE. >>BILL CARLSON: ELAINE SHIMBERG PASSED AWAY, AND THANK HER TO ALL THE GREAT THINGS SHE DID IN THE COMMUNITY ESPECIALLY FOR ARTS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES, MRS. SHIMBERG WAS AANAKESEING THE PERSON IN THIS COMMUNITY. JIM REESE' WAKE IS AT 6:30 AT OXFORD EXCHANGE NEXT TUESDAY EVENING. >> YOU SAID SEVEN LAST WEEK. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I STAND CORRECTED. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. CAN I GET A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE? MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN GUDES. SECOND BY COUNCILMAN CITRO. ALL IN FAVOR? YAY. WE ARE ADJOURNED.