CITY OF TAMPA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: CALL THIS TAMPA CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO ORDER. IF WE COULD HAVE ROLL CALL AT THIS TIME. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HERE. >> HENDERSON? VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: HERE, VIRTUALLY. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA IS ON. HE DID SEND A MEMO SAYING THAT HE INTENDS TO BE VIRTUAL, WHICH HE IS, FOR TONIGHT'S EVENING SESSION BECAUSE OF A COMMITMENT THAT HE MUST ATTEND TO IN PERSON. SO HE WOULD REQUEST THAT THE CITY CLERK SHARE THE MEETING LOG-IN CREDENTIALS. HE'S ALREADY ALL SET. >>LUIS VIERA: IF I MAY, MR. CHAIR, FOR MY TIME, IF I MAY, THANK YOU, SIR, I WILL HAVE TO LEAVE AT ABOUT 5:50 TO GET TO MY SON'S HIGH SCHOOL. AND THEN I ANTICIPATE BEING BACK ONLINE HOPEFULLY BY 8 I HOPE. JUST FOR THE PUBLIC. IT'S A THING WITH MY SON. GOOD THING. NOT A BAD THING, BUT STILL SOMETHING I HAVE TO DO. >>MARTIN SHELBY: CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY. IF WE COULD HAVE A MOTION TO PERMIT COUNCILMAN VIERA FROM PARTICIPATING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN AND A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA TO ALLOW COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA TO ATTEND VIRTUALLY THIS EVENING AND PARTICIPATE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A REMINDER, COUNCILMAN VIERA, DURING THE TIME THAT YOU ARE ON CAMERA, YOU ARE COUNTED AS BEING AT THE MEETING. DURING THE TIME THAT COUNCILMAN VIERA IS PARTICIPATING, IT WILL HAVE TO BE A ROLL CALL VOTE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO START THE MEETING. WE'LL GO THROUGH THE AGENDA WITH MS. DOCK. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. [MICROPHONE NOT ON] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE ITEM 10? MOTION FROM CLENDENIN, SECOND FROM MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? >>LaCHONE DOCK: THAT'S IT. WITH THAT, WE ARE READY TO START. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. I'LL SWEAR EVERYBODY IN FIRST AND THEN KICK IT OFF. IF YOU ARE GOING TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THE ITEMS, 1 THROUGH 9, PLEASE STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN. IF YOU ARE GOING TO SPEAK ON ANYTHING BETWEEN 1 THROUGH 9. [OATH ADMINISTERED] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MR. SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I COULD HAVE A QUICK MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ALL EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS THAT WERE IN WRITING THAT HAVE BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO FILE THOSE ITEMS FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU. IF THERE ARE ANY VERBAL EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL PLEASE BE REMINDED TO DISCLOSE THOSE PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY OF THE HEARINGS THAT MAY BE INVOLVED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I SEE NONE. YES MA'AM. GO AHEAD, ITEM NUMBER 1. >>LaCHONE DOCK: ITEM NUMBER 1 IS REZ 24-45 FOR THE PROPERTIES AT 3807 AND 3811 WEST SWANN AVENUE. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO GIVE THEIR REPORT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. LET THE RECORD REFLECT COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON IS HERE. YES MA'AM. GO AHEAD. >> JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THIS IS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THIS IS A TRADER JOE'S RIGHT HERE TO THE SOUTH, SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AND WEST SWANN AVENUE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN PURPLE. WE HAVE SOME DRIVE-THROUGH RESTAURANTS ON THE BLOCK AS WELL. SOME TOWNHOMES TO THE WEST OF THE SITE AND THEN TO THE NORTH. THE FUTURE LAND USE -- TWO FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES. SOME OF YOU MAY REMEMBER THAT ONE OF THESE PARCELS WAS THE SUBJECT OF A PLAN AMENDMENT A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO TO COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. THAT WAS PRE-COVID TIMES. PART OF THE SITE IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, WHICH IS THE PINK AND THEN SLIVER OF THE RESIDENTIAL 20 WHICH IS THE BROWN COLOR. COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 IS WHAT WE SEE ALONG OUR CORRIDORS. SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY IS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR. WE WANT TO PROMOTE DENSITIES TO UTILIZE ANY FUTURE TRANSIT SERVICE. RESIDENTIAL 20 ALLOWS FOR TOWNHOMES, MULTIFAMILY STYLE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL USES IN THE AREA AS WELL. SO THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED AND LaCHONE WILL POINT OUT, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS. WHEN THEY SUBMITTED THE SITE PLAN, WE DID ENSURE THAT THE DENSITY WAS LAID OUT CORRECTLY BECAUSE THERE IS A DIFFERENT DENSITY FOR THE RESIDENTIAL 20 IN THE CMU 35 PORTION. STAFF WORKED WITH THE APPLICANT ON THAT. WE FOUND THAT THIS WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. IT'S GOING TO PROVIDE INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON A SITE THAT IS PRESENTLY UNDERUTILIZED WHICH IS ENCOURAGED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT'S ALSO GOING TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION FROM THE COMMERCIAL USES TO THE EAST AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENCES OR ANY TOWNHOMES TO THE WEST. THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH LU POLICY 9.7.3 WHICH ENCOURAGES A TRANSITION IN DENSITY BETWEEN SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS AND THE MORE INTENSE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. WE ALSO FOUND THAT THE ORIENTATION OF THE UNITS PROVIDING THAT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE FRONT DOOR TO THE SIDEWALK ALONG SWANN WAS CONSISTENT WITH OUR POLICIES ABOUT THAT AS WELL. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THIS PD REQUEST, THIS REZONING REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF 12 UNITS ON-SITE. THAT IS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS. THEY ARE COMPRISED OF THREE BUILDINGS ON-SITE. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IS 38 FEET. THE PROPERTY ITSELF CONTAINS 26,515 SQUARE FEET. THE SETBACKS TORE THE NORTH, THREE FEET TO THE SOUTH, FIVE FEET TO THE WEST, THREE FEET IN THE EAST, SEVEN FEET. 27 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 28 PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED. SO ON THE SITE PLAN THAT'S SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT, THIS IS SWANN AVENUE. THIS IS THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY WHICH IS IDENTIFIED HERE IN THE DOTTED LINE. THIS DARK DOTTED LINE HERE DELINEATES THE FUTURE LAND USE. AS JENNIFER HAS MENTIONED, THERE ARE TWO FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ON THE PROPERTY. TO THE EAST OF THE LINE IS CMU 35. TO THE WEST OF THE LINE IS THE R-20 DESIGNATION. SO THIS IS THE BUILDING ONE, BUILDING TWO, AND BUILDING THREE. THE END UNITS OF EACH BUILDING YOU CAN SEE ARE ORIENTED TO SWANN AVENUE. THE INTERNAL UNITS ARE ORIENTED WITH THE FRONT DOOR TO THE INTERNAL SPACE BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS. THERE'S ALSO A WALKWAY WITH LEADS TO THE ADJOINING SIDEWALK ON-SITE. THESE BUILDINGS HAVE FRONT DOOR ORIENTATION TO THE SIDE YARD, SO THERE IS A WAIVER ON THE SITE PLAN FOR THAT. YOU CAN SEE SURFACE PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED HERE, THE VISITOR PARKING SPACES. THIS IS A SITE WHICH WAS REDESIGNED INITIALLY. THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED A REQUEST THAT HAD THE BUILDINGS FURTHER NORTH ON THE SITE. AND THEN NORTH OF THE SITE, WHICH I WILL SHOW YOU THE SURROUNDING PICTURES SHORTLY, THERE ARE TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE TO THE NORTH. BUT THE RESUBMITTAL WAS TO HAVE THE BUILDINGS PUSHED FURTHER SOUTH TOWARDS THE STREET TO ORIENT THE DOORS TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TO ALLOW THE PRESERVATION OF TREES THAT EXIST ALONG THE NORTH. ALONG WITH THE PLACEMENT OF THE SOLID WASTE. I JUST WANTED TO EXPLAIN THAT THE APPLICANT DID WORK WITH STAFF SOME ON THAT. THE ELEVATIONS, I'LL PROVIDE YOU THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE THREE UNIT BUILDING AND THEN THE FOUR UNIT BUILDING, THE FIVE UNIT BUILDING IS SIMILAR. SO THIS IS THE WEST ELEVATION. AND THEN THIS IS THE EAST ELEVATION. AGAIN, THIS IS THE THREE UNIT BUILDING AND THEN THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION AND THE SOUTH ELEVATION. AND THEN THE TOP PICTURES ARE THE WEST AND THE EAST ELEVATION AND THEN THIS IS THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH ELEVATION. THEN I HAVE THE ZONING ATLAS. THE ZONING MAP FOR THE PROPERTY. SO THIS IS THE PROPERTY WHICH IS OUTLINED HERE IN RED. THIS IS SWANN AVENUE. FOR ORIENTATION, THIS IS SOUTH DALE MABRY. THIS IS De LEON. THIS IS CHURCH AVENUE. AND THIS IS HENDERSON BOULEVARD. SO THE SUBJECT SITE YOU CAN SEE IS SURROUNDED WITH PROPERTIES THAT HAVE BEEN REZONED. YOU HAVE TO THE NORTH PD AND RO DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI DETACHED. TO THE WEST YOU HAVE THE RM 16 ZONING WITH THE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND SEMI DETACHED USES. FURTHER WEST OF THE SITE, WEST OF CHURCH AVENUE, YOU HAVE YOUR RS 60 ZONING AND THE DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING AS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. WHEN YOU MOVE FURTHER EAST, YOU HAVE SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY. THAT'S WHERE YOU HAVE, OF COURSE, YOUR MORE INTENSIVE USES, YOUR COMMERCIAL USES. THIS EAST OF THE PROPERTY IS THE PARKING ACCESS THAT GOES TO BURGER KING. THIS NORTH OF THE SITE, THIS IS THE CHICK-FIL-A SITE AND THIS IS THE TAHITIAN INN. TO THE SOUTH IS TRADER JOE'S AND YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL OFFICE WITH THE MULTIFAMILY -- THE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES. I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THIS IS THE SITE WHICH IS CURRENTLY VACANT. THIS IS ANOTHER IMAGE OF THE SITE, FURTHER IN THE SITE. THIS IS A VIEW IF YOU'RE LOOKING WEST ON SWANN. THE SITE IS HERE IN THE PICTURE. THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING EAST ON SWANN. THIS IS TO TURN THE OPPOSITE WAY LOOKING TOWARDS DALE MABRY. THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS EAST OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE PARKING ACCESS THAT'S LOCATED DIRECTLY. THE SITE IS HERE. THIS IS AT DALE MABRY EAST OF THE SITE. YOU CAN SEE THE COMMERCIAL USES IN THAT VIEW LOOKING EAST. THIS IS SOUTH. THIS IS THE TRADER JOE'S ENTRY. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW SOUTH. THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL THAT'S LOCATED SOUTH. YOU CAN SEE THE ATTACHED USES, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED. THIS IS A VIEW, TURN AROUND AND LOOK WEST ON SWANN. THE SITE IS HERE IN THE PICTURE OFF TO THE RIGHT. THIS IS DIRECTLY WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AND THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW IF YOU'RE LOOKING DOWN THE STREET, BUT YOU CAN SEE THE HOMES THAT ARE LOCATED WEST OF THE SITE. DRC STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. THERE ARE MOD CAKES TO BE MADE TO THE SITE PLAN BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I WOULD LIKE TO TURN IT OVER TO ERIN SO SHE CAN REVIEW NATURAL RESOURCES COMMENT AND FINDINGS. I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> ERIN MAEHR, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I'M JUST GOING TO SPEAK ON NATURAL RESOURCES FINDING OF CONSISTENCY FOR REZ 24-45. SO HERE ON THE OVERHEAD I'M GOING TO POINT OUT, THERE IS ONE NON-HAZARDOUS GRAND LIVE OAK ON THE SITE LOCATED ON THE EASTERN PARCEL. JUST TO CLARIFY, SO IN THE PREVIOUS REZONING, REZ 21-27, THE REZONING WAS FOR AN OFFICE USE. AND THEY REQUESTED THE WAIVER TO REMOVE THE GRAND TREE. IT WAS GRANTED. ALL THE TREES ON THE SITE WERE REQUESTED FOR REMOVAL AND THAT WAS APPROVED. BECAUSE THE USE HAS CHANGED, WE'RE REQUIRING THE WAIVER AGAIN FOR THEM TO REQUEST THAT AGAIN. BUT NATURAL RESOURCES DOES SUPPORT THE WAIVER AS THEY CAN PROVIDE SEVEN TYPE 1 TREES AND SEVEN TYPE 2 TREES ON THE SITE. AND THEY CAN MEET ALL THEIR TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS. SO THIS IS JUST THE GREENSPACE PLAN AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN BEING SHOWN. THE TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 TREES THAT THEY ARE PROVIDING, THEY ARE SIZING THEM UP TO FOUR INCH CALIPER, SO THESE HERE ALONG THE BACK ARE TYPE 2, LIKE YOUR CYPRESS TREES, PODOCARPUS. THE TYPE 1 TREES ARE HERE, LIKE YOUR LIVE OAKS ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND BACK HERE IN THE BUFFER. THE PROJECT ALSO EXCEEDS THE REQUIRED GREENSPACE. SO THE SITE REQUIRES 5900 SQUARE FEET AND THEY ARE PROVIDING 6489 SQUARE FEET. SO BASED ON WHAT THEY HAVE PROPOSED, NATURAL RESOURCES FOUND IT CONSISTENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS? NO. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DOES THAT COMPLETE THE PRESENTATION? ALL RIGHT. IF WE HAVE AN APPLICANT, MR. MECHANIK, PLEASE COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCIL MEMBERS, MY NAME IS DAVID MECHANIK. 305 SOUTH BOULEVARD, TAMPA, FLORIDA, HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. I HAVE WITH ME THIS EVENING STEVE SCHHALL WHO IS THE PROPERTY OWNER. I HAVE RICKY PETERIKA WHO IS THE ARBORIST ON THE PROJECT, AND I WILL ASK HIM TO SPEAK IN JUST A MOMENT. OUR CIVIL ENGINEER IS HERE, EL SHEIKH. FINALLY FOR ANY TRAFFIC QUESTIONS, AND I DON'T PLAN ON HAVING HIM DOING A PRESENTATION BUT I HAVE SOME INFORMATION REGARDING TRAFFIC THAT I WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT TO YOU LATER ON IN MY PRESENTATION. REGARDING THE PROJECT ITSELF, WE AGREE WITH ALL THE CHANGES THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED BY THE STAFF. WE WOULD MAKE THOSE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THE STAFF HAS FOUND THE PROJECT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND ALSO FOUND THAT IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREA. IN ADDITION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SPECIFICALLY REMARKED THAT IT FURTHERS THE GOAL OF PROVIDING HOUSING IN THIS AREA OF THE CITY. SO ALL OF OUR COMMENTS ARE FAVORABLE AND INDICATE A CONSISTENCY WITH THE REGULATIONS. AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT OUR TWO WAIVERS. THE FIRST I'LL ADDRESS AND THE SECOND ONE I'LL ASK RICKY TO SPEAK TO. WE ARE ASKING FOR A WAIVER TO ALLOW FOR ALL BUT THREE OF THE UNITS TO NOT FACE THE SWANN AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS IS A REGULATION IN THE CODE. YOU FREQUENTLY WAIVE THIS REQUIREMENT BECAUSE OF CONFIGURATIONS OF PROPERTY, IT'S NOT POSSIBLE FOR AN APPLICANT TO ALWAYS FACE THE TOWNHOMES DIRECTLY TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, THE PROPERTY IS QUITE DEEP. A TYPICAL TOWN HOUSE LOT IS ABOUT 75 FEET DEEP. SO IF YOU WERE TO ASK MY CLIENT TO PUT TOWNHOMES ALL IN A ROW FACING SWANN AVENUE, YOU'D HAVE A STRIP OF ABOUT 60 FEET OF LAND THAT HAD NO PARTICULAR USEFUL PURPOSE TO IT AND WE WOULD LOSE ABOUT THREE TOWNHOMES IN ORDER TO ADHERE TO THAT PARTICULAR REQUIREMENT. I WOULD ALSO JUST POINT OUT THAT IF YOU HAD GARAGES ALL BACKING UP TO SWANN AVENUE, ALL OF THOSE WOULD BECOME ACCESS POINTS ONTO SWANN AVENUE. AS YOU ALL KNOW, BEING ACROSS FROM TRADER JOE'S, THIS AREA IS A LITTLE BIT CHALLENGED AT CERTAIN TIMES OF DAY WHEN THERE'S TRUCK CONGESTION AND PEOPLE LOOKING FOR PARKING. WE DON'T WANT TO EXACERBATE THE PROBLEM BY HAVING TOWN HOUSE OWNERS BACKING INTO SWANN AVENUE IF WE CAN AVOID IT. SO WITH THAT, LET ME ASK RICKY PETERIKA TO JUST SPEAK BRIEFLY ABOUT THE WAIVER FOR THE GRAND TREE. AND I WOULD SAY, EMPHASIZE THAT ERIN DID INDICATE THAT WE WERE FULLY CONSISTENT WITH THE CODE, ALTHOUGH WE DO NEED THE WAIVER BUT WE EXCEEDED OTHER REQUIREMENTS, AND THAT WAS A FACTOR IN HER FINDING. >> THANK YOU, MR. MECHANIK. THANK YOU, COUNCIL. RICKY PETERIKA, 308 EAST 7TH AVENUE WITH DARK MOSS. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. INTRODUCE YOU TO THE TREE QUICKLY. 36-INCH GRAND LIVE OAK RATED C-5. SUBJECT TO 13 MITIGATION TREES. WE PREPARED TWO REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION OPTIONS. I'LL GO THROUGH THOSE NOW. THIS OPTION, THE TREE IN QUESTION IS HERE. IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF IMPACT IN THE TPZ, THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE, WE PROPOSE MOVING THIS UNIT TO THIS END OF THIS BUILDING. THIS PROVIDES MORE ROOTING VOLUME WITHIN THE TPZ, REQUIRES SOME SPECIAL DESIGN TECHNIQUES ON THE BUILDING, BUT THEN RESULTS IN 50% OF CANOPY LOSS OF THESE TWO ALMOST GRAND 30 AND 3. THAT ARE SHARED WITH THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE. SO WE FOUND THAT WAS -- AND IT ALSO IMPACTED THE ONLY SURFACE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ON THE SITE. THE SECOND OPTION, WHICH IS MORE INTERESTING ESOTERIC OPTION FROM WHAT WE'RE NORMALLY DOING, SIMILAR CONCEPT OF RELOCATING A UNIT TO ANOTHER BUILDING. SO HERE MOVED IT TO THIS UNIT, SHIFTED THE BUILDING OVER AS THE CRITERIA ALLOWS, ALSO TO THE SOUTH. HOWEVER, THIS ARRANGEMENT OF FOUR UNITS BEYOND THE COMP PLAN BOUNDARY WOULDN'T BE ALLOWED PER THE COMP PLAN. IT WOULD EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE DENSITY OF I THINK RES 20 ON THIS SIDE. WHILE IT SEEMED TO WORK ON FACE VALUE, IT DIDN'T WORK FROM A COMP PLAN PERSPECTIVE. THE TREE POSITION IS UNIQUE. IT ALREADY BEING APPROVED FOR REMOVAL IS UNIQUE, AND THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE SITE PLAN, LOSS OF POTENTIAL PARKING OR STORMWATER OR VIOLATION OF COMP PLAN AMENDMENT MAKE THIS, OUR REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CODE AND IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION AS WELL AS WITH THE COMP PLAN. I'LL TURN IT BACK OVER TO MR. MECHANIK. >> I'M JUST GOING TO HAND SOMETHING OUT TO COUNCIL AND THEN I'LL DESCRIBE IT VERY BRIEFLY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: I ACTUALLY HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. PETERIKA. WITH THOSE -- THE ALTERNATE DESIGNS YOU PUT UP, IS THERE A REASON -- IT SEEMS LIKE JUST REMOVING ONE OF THE TOWNHOMES WOULD HAVE SOLVED THE PROBLEM. >> THE REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION CRITERIA DOESN'T LIST REDUCING DENSITY OR INTENSITY AS ONE OF THE OPTIONS THAT -- AS THE CRITERIA. AS I UNDERSTAND IT, IT'S AN ADJUSTMENT OF -- IT'S A RECONFIGURATION OF WHAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WAS. >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY. IT JUST SEEMS AWFULLY ODD YOU WOULDN'T HAVE JUST REMOVED A TOWNHOME. >> YES, THANK YOU. THE CODE MAY NOT ASK US TO. >>GUIDO MA WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING TONIGHT. AS YOU COULD SEE, THE TRAFFIC FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT IS FAR LESS THAN ANY OF THE OTHER SCENARIOS THAT WERE AVAILABLE TO THIS PROPERTY. I ONLY MENTION TRAFFIC BECAUSE OF THE FACT WE KNOW THERE ARE SOME ISSUES WITH TRADER JOE'S, AND WE ARE NOT IN ANY WAY EXACERBATING THAT PROBLEM. I JUST WANTED COUNCIL TO KNOW THAT. WE'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. AND BE HERE TO REBUT ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SO, MR. MECHANIK, IS ANYBODY HERE FROM TRANSPORTATION, FROM STAFF? >>JONATHAN SCOTT: JONATHAN SCOTT MOBILITY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MY QUESTION IS, INTUITIVELY, HOW DID THIS PASS TRANSPORTATION? BECAUSE ANYBODY THAT LIVES HERE KNOWS THAT'S A NIGHTMARE. MR. MECHANIK INSINUATED THAT IN THE PRESENTATION. TRADER JOE'S IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT YOU HEAR ALL THE TIME, HOW DID THIS GET BUILT HERE? BECAUSE OF THE NIGHTMARE GOING IN AND OUT OF THAT. I CAN'T IMAGINE ADDING THE DENSITY ON THE PROPERTY RIGHT ACROSS THE WAY THAT ANYBODY WOULD LOOK AT THIS AND THINK, OH, THIS IS A GOOD IDEA. HOW IN THE WORLD DID THIS PASS TRANSPORTATION? >>JONATHAN SCOTT: JONATHAN SCOTT. THAT IS A CRAZY AREA. I KNOW THAT LOCATION VERY WELL. WE DID LOOK AT THE TRIPS ON THERE. I THINK THAT IT WAS MORE OF A DE MINIMIS USE AT THE TIME FOR THEIR USE. SO IT WASN'T AN IMPACT -- YOU DIDN'T HAVE A MEMO. >> WE DEMONSTRATED THAT -- >> YEAH, THEY HAD A DE MINIMIS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DO YOU HAVE THAT IN THE PRESENTATION? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COME ON UP TO THE MICROPHONE, SIR, SO WE CAN HEAR YOU. >> YOU COULD SEE THE NUMBER OF TRIPS, AND IT IS BELOW THE THRESHOLD OF THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE FOR REQUIRING A TRAFFIC STUDY. IT'S DE MINIMIS. A STUDY WAS NOT REQUIRED OF THIS CASE. AGAIN, THE PROBLEMS THAT YOU'RE SEEING ARE NOT CAUSED BY MY CLIENT'S PROPERTY. HIS PROPERTY IS VACANT. SO THERE'S NO -- WE'RE NOT CONTRIBUTING TO ANY PROBLEM OUT THERE TODAY AND 12 TOWNHOMES ARE CERTAINLY, WHILE I'M NOT GOING TO SAY THERE IS NO TRAFFIC, THIS IS ABOUT THE LEAST IMPACTFUL USE YOU COULD IMAGINE PUTTING ON THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY AND NOT CAUSING ANY FURTHER PROBLEMS IN THAT AREA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IF I COULD ASK FOR CLARITY. I'M NOT GOING BACK IN THE HISTORY BOOK. WHEN THAT PROPERTY CHANGED HANDS, TRADER JOE'S CAME IN, NO HEARING ON IT BECAUSE THAT LAND WAS ALREADY ZONED FOR WHAT THEY NEEDED. NO TRAFFIC STUDY WAS DONE, NOTHING WAS DONE. THEY CAME IN AND DID WHAT THEY HAD TO DO. HOWEVER, THIS IS ONE OF THE RARE CASES I'VE SEEN WHERE THE IDEA OF BEING SUCCESSFUL HAS CAUSED HEARTACHE TO A LOT OF PEOPLE. I CAN TELL YOU THAT I DRIVE THERE. I HAVE FAMILY IN THAT AREA, NOT NEAR THE ZONING OR ANYTHING ELSE, BUT WHEN I DRIVE THROUGH DALE MABRY HEADING SOUTH, AND I APPROACH SWANN AND I SEE THE CARS BACKED UP TO DALE MABRY AND COMING AT ME, WE GOT A PROBLEM. NOT ME. WE HAVE A PROBLEM. AND I APPLAUD THEM FOR DOING WHAT THEY HAVE DONE. THEY HAVE DONE A GREAT JOB WITH THE MARKETING. GREAT JOB WITH THEIR PRODUCT. I'VE BEEN THERE ONCE OR TWICE. I DON'T GO OFTEN BECAUSE I LIVE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF TOWN, BUT I CAN TELL YOU THAT IT'S THINGS LIKE THIS THAT MAKE ME BELIEVE SOMEWHERE ALONG THE LINE, I'M TALKING DIRECTLY TO OUR STAFF, SOMETHING HAS TO HAPPEN IN THE CITY OF TAMPA TO MAKE SOMEBODY RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE THINGS. SUCCESS -- BRINGS FAILURE TO SOMEBODY ELSE. THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE HERE TODAY. I'M NOT BLAMING TRADER JOE'S. THEIR BUSINESS, THE PEOPLE LOVE IT. IF NOT, THEY WOULDN'T GO THERE. THEY REALLY, REALLY ENJOY IT. NOT ONE COMPLAINT ON THEIR PRODUCT OR NOTHING. BUT I'VE HAD A LOT OF COMPLAINTS ON THE TRAFFIC SOMETIME BACK TO PRESENT TIME. IT'S NOT FROM MY FAMILY MEMBERS. THEY DON'T SPEAK TO ME ABOUT NONE OF THAT STUFF. I CAN TELL YOU WHAT I SEE AND THAT'S WITHOUT GLASSES. SUCCESS SOMETIMES BRINGS FAILURE OR LACK OF OPPORTUNITY TO SOMEONE ELSE. >> IF I COULD CLOSE OUR PRESENTATION BY SAYING WHILE TRADER JOE'S MAY, IN FACT, BE CAUSING A PROBLEM, MY CLIENT DIDN'T CAUSE THIS PROBLEM AND THE LEGAL ANSWER IS NOT TO SAY MR. SCHHALL, YOU CAN'T LIVE OR YOU CAN'T BUILD ANYTHING ON YOUR PROPERTY. WE HAVE THE LEAST IMPACTFUL USE YOU COULD POSSIBLY PUT ON THIS PROPERTY, AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST COUNCIL APPROVE OUR APPLICATION. AND WE WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. BEFORE I GO TO THE PUBLIC COMMENT IN THE ROOM, WE HAVE THREE REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS. ARE THEY ON? ROBERT, IF YOU ARE ON, PLEASE TURN YOUR CAMERA ON, UNMUTE YOURSELF, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN. ALSO, QUITE A FEW PEOPLE CAME INTO THE ROOM IN THE LAST FEW MINUTES. IF YOU WERE NOT SWORN IN AND RECENTLY CAME IN WITHIN THE LAST FEW MINUTES AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON ANY OF THE HEARINGS, PLEASE STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN. [OATH ADMINISTERED] ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD, ROBERT, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR HAVING ME. IS MY AUDIO OKAY? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, WE CAN HEAR YOU. GO AHEAD. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> PERFECT. ROBERT COMENSA. 3813 WEST SWANN UNIT 1 WHICH IS DIRECTLY FIRST UNIT TO THE LEFT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND MY BROTHER IS ACTUALLY UNIT 2, SO RIGHT ADJACENT TO THAT. I VOUCH FOR KIND OF THE CONGESTION ON WEST SWANN, ESPECIALLY DURING THE DAYTIME, ON THE WEEKENDS, IT'S PRETTY BACKED UP. CONSTRUCTION ITSELF, HOWEVER HOW LONG THAT TAKES WILL OBVIOUSLY BE A LITTLE MORE IMPACTFUL. MY MAIN CONCERN IS KIND OF THE DUMPSTER LOCATION, WHICH IS THE TOP LEFT CORNER OF THE DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS JUST A FOOT OR SO AWAY FROM THE FENCE LINE TO THE PROPERTY. AS YOU CAN IMAGINE, A LOT OF NOISE AND THAT SOMETIMES BRINGS IN RODENTS AND LIKE ANIMALS, WHICH WOULD BE IMPACTED TO THE UNIT BEHIND ME AS WELL. SO I THINK JUST TRAFFIC ISSUES AND KIND OF THE DUMPSTER LOCATION, I WAS WONDERING IF IT KIND OF MADE MORE SENSE TO KEEP IT AWAY FROM KIND OF THE EXISTING UNITS ON KIND OF WEST SWANN, IF THAT WOULD AT ALL BE POSSIBLE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE SIR? >> THAT WAS IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYBODY IN THIS ROOM THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 1? COME ON UP. YES SIR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL. KYLE ROSS. I'M ALSO A LOCAL HERE DIRECTLY IMPACTED BY THIS PROGRAM. MY HOME IS A STONE'S THROW AWAY FROM THIS PROJECT. I WANT TO START BY GETTING ORGANIZED HERE. I BROUGHT SOME DOCUMENTS I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH THE PANEL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SURE. DO YOU WANT TO HAND THEM TO US OR PUT THEM ON THE OVERHEAD? >> I WILL USE THE ELMO, IF THAT IS OKAY. I REVIEWED THE STAFF REPORT. I REVIEWED THE PROPOSALS. I'M GOING TO ASK THIS PANEL TO DO TWO THINGS TONIGHT. NUMBER ONE IS MANDATE THAT THAT DUMPSTER THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED IN THE NORTHWESTERN PORTION OF THIS PARCEL BE RELOCATED TO THE NORTHEASTERN PORTION OF THE PARCEL. AS ROBERT RECENTLY STATED, IT'S FEET AWAY FROM ABUTTING THREE DIFFERENT RESIDENTIAL HOUSES. IT'S LITERALLY FEET AWAY FROM WHERE CHILDREN ARE PLAYING. AND IT DOES NOT TAKE A CREATIVE MIND TO THINK HOW THIS COULD QUICKLY TURN INTO NOT ONLY A NUISANCE THROUGH NOISE AND SMELLS BUT ALSO A PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY CONCERN GIVEN THE KIND OF ANIMALS THAT WOULD BE ATTRACTED AND GRAVITATE TOWARDS A STRUCTURE LIKE THAT. NOW, I LOOK FOR GUIDANCE ON THIS ISSUE THROUGH TAMPA ORDINANCES. I COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING DIRECTLY ON POINT, SO I LOOKED AT OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED CITIES IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. I FOUND BROWARD COUNTY HAS A SIMILAR ORDINANCE. WISH TAMPA HAD THIS. I THINK THIS IS PRETTY ON POINT FOR WHAT WE'RE DEALING WITH. IT TALKS ABOUT THE PLACEMENT OF DUMPSTERS. WHEN ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY, ENCLOSURE SHALL BE PLACED AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM THE ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE. SO THE PANEL CAN GET A GOOD PICTURE OF WHERE THE DUMPSTER IS, THIS IS IT. THIS IS THE DUMPSTER. THAT IS A HOUSE. THAT IS A HOUSE. THAT IS A HOUSE. THOSE ARE ALL YARDS FEET AWAY. THERE IS AN EASY SOLUTION TO THIS. IT'S MOVE IT TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER. -- EXCUSE ME, NORTHEAST CORNER. THAT'S WHERE THIS DUMPSTER BELONGS. LAST EVENING, ABOUT 24 HOURS AGO, I WENT ON A WALK WITH MY WIFE AND SIX-MONTH-OLD. THERE'S CURRENTLY TRASH CANS SITTING THERE RIGHT NOW. THIS PICTURE WAS TAKEN ABOUT 24 HOURS AGO. YOU CAN SEE A TRASH CAN AND A BARN. IT'S BASICALLY SHARING A WALL WITH A COMMERCIAL DUMPSTER RIGHT NOW. SO IT MAKES ALL THE SENSE IN THE WORLD TO KEEP THE DUMPSTERS CLOSE TOGETHER. NOW, IF YOU LOOK AT THESE PLANS, THERE IS A PLOT, I BELIEVE OWNED BY THE SAME OWNER ZONED R 0-1. IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT, NOT A PART OF THE PLAN. I THINK IT PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN THIS DISCUSSION TODAY BECAUSE IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED AS RESIDENTIAL. I CERTAINLY WOULD HOPE THE COUNCIL WOULD NOT LET THESE BUILDERS PLACE THE PRIORITIES OF FUTURE POTENTIAL RESIDENTS OVER THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF CURRENT RESIDENTS. THAT'S NUMBER ONE. NUMBER TWO, I HAVE TO TOUCH ON THE TRAFFIC. THIS IS A BIG ONE. THE TRAFFIC HERE IS A DISASTER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. ANYBODY ELSE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 1? >> CAN I AT LEAST APPROACH WITH THE ARTICLES THAT TALK ABOUT THE TRAFFIC? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >> I ALSO HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF IMPACTS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, GIVE THEM WHATEVER YOU WANT TO GIVE THEM. >> THAT THREE MINUTES GOES QUICK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, COME ON UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> HELLO. RYAN CANELLIS. I LIVE IN ONE OF THE UNITS ALSO MAYBE TWO DOORS DOWN, THREE DOORS DOWN FROM WHERE THIS DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO BE BUILT. CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND THAT AT SOME POINT SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE ON THIS OPEN LOT. I DO APPRECIATE IT BEING A RESIDENTIAL UNIT VERSUS WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN ANYTHING WITH A COMMERCIAL UNIT. MY CONCERN IS IN LINE WITH KYLE WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE GARBAGE CANS. GOT A TWO-YEAR-OLD. GOT A FOUR-YEAR-OLD, THEY ARE RUNNING AROUND OUTSIDE ALL DAY. RATS, RODENTS, THE POSSIBILITY OF THAT IS NOT A GREAT THOUGHT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT RUNS OFF WITH RAINWATER AND WHATNOT INTO THE YARDS FROM A DUMPSTER. SMELL, NOISE WHEN THEY COME AT 5 IN THE MORNING TO PICK UP A COMMERCIAL DUMPSTER OR WHATEVER THAT WOULD BE CALLED, A PUBLIC DUMPSTER UNIT. SO I ECHO THAT. AND MY OTHER CONCERN, WE JOKE ALL THE TIME IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ABOUT HOW WHEN THE WATER BACKS UP ON SWANN, IT'S KIND OF LIKE SWANN RIVER WE CALL IT. WITH ALL THE FLOODING THAT'S TAKEN PLACE RECENTLY WITHIN A HALF A MILE OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, IT IS A CONCERN THAT SUCH A DENSE DEVELOPMENT COULD NOT ALLOW FOR ENOUGH RUNOFF. I DON'T KNOW WHAT KIND OF STUDIES ARE BEING DONE THERE, IS BUT I'D LIKE TO LEARN MORE ON THAT. AND, OF COURSE, TRAFFIC, EVERYONE KNOWS THE TRADER JOE'S TRAFFIC ISSUE. I DON'T REALLY HAVE A REQUEST, BUT I GUESS MY REQUEST WOULD BE OTHER THAN THE GARBAGE CAN, IT WOULD BE BASICALLY TO SEE IF WE COULD DO SOMETHING WITH THE PROPERTY THAT'S MAYBE NOT AS DENSE AS IS BEING PLANNED NOW. THAT'S REALLY ALL I HAVE TO SAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 1? ANYBODY ELSE, IF YOU'RE GOING TO SPEAK, JUST LINE UP AGAINST THE WALL SO WE KNOW. YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING. STEVEN ALT. 3815 WEST SWANN, RIGHT IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. I'M GOING TO ECHO THE LAST TWO SPEAKERS. BIGGEST CONCERN I HAVE IS THE PLACEMENT OF THE DUMPSTER. I REALLY WOULD IMPLORE THE BUILDER TO MOVE THAT TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AWAY FROM THE RESIDENCES THERE. I DON'T HAVE CHILDREN, AS YOU CAN -- I DO HAVE CHILDREN, GRANDCHILDREN I HAVE. MY DAUGHTERS DON'T REALLY PLAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD MUCH. THEY ARE IN THEIR 30s. BUT THE GRANDCHILDREN DO. MY KIDS CAN PLAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD IF THEY WANT, BUT WOULDN'T BECAUSE THEY ARE IN THE 30s. I WAS PLAYING WITH MY GRANDSON RIGHT BEFORE COMING HERE AND THERE IS CONCERN ABOUT THAT. I ALSO ECHO RYAN'S CONCERN ABOUT THE WATER IN THE STREET. JUST THE NORMAL SUMMER RAINFALL AND THAT TURNS INTO A RIVER. STUFF SPLASHING UP INTO OUR DRIVEWAYS. IT'S HORRIFIC. AND THAT PROPERTY NOW BEING VACANT IS SOAKING IN SOMETHING. IT IS A BIG VACANT PROPERTY UNCOVERED. IT'S SOAKING IN SOMETHING. THAT RUNOFF ISN'T CERTAINLY GOING TO BE HANDLED BY THE SMALL RETENTION POND DESIGNED IN THE CORNER OF THE PROPERTY NOW. EVERYBODY AGREES THE TRAFFIC THERE IS HORRIFIC. THE UNITS, LESS DENSE DEVELOPMENT I THINK WOULD BE BENEFICIAL. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. ANYBODY ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM 1? ANYBODY ELSE? YES SIR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> STEVE SCHHALL. I'M THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU WOULD BE PART OF THE PRESENTATION WITH MR. MECHANIK. SO ONCE WE ASK QUESTIONS, YOU'LL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK DURING REBUTTAL. IT WILL JUST BE A MOMENT. ALL RIGHT. IF THERE'S NOBODY ELSE TO SPEAK I'LL ASK, COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: STAFF, LaCHONE. DO YOU HAVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? >>LaCHONE DOCK: YES. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THIS IS THE SITE. ARE YOU LOOKING ADJACENT HERE OR THE RESIDENTIAL? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HOW THAT'S DEVELOPED THERE AND ON THE BACK SIDE, IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING ON THE BACK SIDE, TOO. I KNOW THE BURGER KING. THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL WHICH IS ACROSS THE STREET, FURTHER DOWN. THIS IS ON THE SITE HERE. THAT'S THIS RESIDENTIAL HERE. AND THEN I'LL SHOW YOU A PHOTO OF THIS. THIS IS ON THE OTHER SIDE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THEY ARE ALL TOWN HOUSES THAT FACE SWANN. >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS PICTURE IS THIS DIRECTLY WEST. AND IN THE FIRST PICTURE IS -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THOSE TOWN HOUSES ALL FACE SWANN AS WELL? >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ARE THERE ANY EXAMPLES THERE OF MULTIFAMILY THAT'S BUILT LIKE AN APARTMENT COMPLEX? >>LaCHONE DOCK: NOT THAT I HAVE PICTURES OF. THIS SHOWS THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY, BUT I DON'T HAVE IT OF THE FRONT VIEW OF THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE BLOCK. I'M SORRY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: GOTCHA. HOW WIDE AND DEEP IS THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL? >>LaCHONE DOCK: SO THIS PARCEL, I CAN PUT UP THE PLAN FOR YOU AND SHOW YOU. THERE IS 192 FEET OF FRONTAGE APPROXIMATELY, AND THEN THE DEPTH IS 137 -- LET ME LOOK. ABOUT 137 APPROXIMATELY IS THE DEPTH. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IT'S JUST SHY, IF IT WAS EUCLIDEAN ZONING WITH FRONT FACING DOORS, IT WOULD BE JUST SHY OF FOUR LOTS, 50-FOOT -- >>LaCHONE DOCK: UNDER EUCLIDEAN ZONING. KEEP IN MIND THIS IS CURRENTLY ZONED PD AND IT IS APPROVED FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. >>LYNN HURTAK: IT WASN'T ZONED PD. IT WAS ZONED PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IT WAS A PD FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, IS THAT WHAT THE ZONING WAS OR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE? >>LaCHONE DOCK: BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL -- YES, A PD. CORRECT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HOW LONG AGO WAS IT ZONED THAT WAY? >> [INAUDIBLE] >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THAT IS IN '21. RE ZERKZ 21-27. AND THAT APPROVED THE USE OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. SO THIS REQUEST WOULD BE FROM PD TO PD. EXCEPT GOING FROM THE OFFICE TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NO OTHER QUESTIONS, MR. MECHANIK, YOU HAVE REBUTTAL, WHICH IS FIVE MINUTES, AND THEN THE PROPERTY OWNER, IF HE WISHES TO BE PART OF YOUR FIVE MINUTES MAY COME UP AND SPEAK. YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AGAIN. >> I'M GOING TO ASK MR. SCHHALL TO SPEAK VERY BRIEFLY. BUT I DO WANT TO MAKE A FEW POINTS IN REBUTTAL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> STEVE SCHHALL. I'M THE OWNER. A COUPLE OF THINGS I HEARD A LOT ABOUT THE TRAFFIC AND TRADER JOE'S VERY EASY FOR THEM TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM. ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS PUT A GARAGE UP JUST LIKE BAY CARE DID ON THE OTHER SIDE. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THEY DID. THEY PUT A GARAGE UP AND THE WHOLE PROBLEM WAS SOLVED. SAME THING WITH CHICK-FIL-A ON De LEON. THEY BOUGHT ANOTHER LOT AND THEY KIND OF SOLVED THE PROBLEM. IT'S STILL THERE WITH CHICK-FIL-A. A LOT OF TIMES WHEN PEOPLE SEE TRAFFIC, IT'S NOT ALL TRADER JOE'S. IT'S ALSO CHICK-FIL-A'S TRAFFIC. AS FAR AS THE TRASH CAN, I'M MORE THAN HAPPY TO EITHER MOVE IT OR PUT A COMPACTOR IN THERE OR DO BOTH. I'M FINE WITH EITHER OPTION. IT'S UP TO YOU TO TELL ME WHETHER THIS IS ACCEPTABLE. THE THIRD THING I WANT TO SAY IS WE DO HAVE A PERMIT READY, PLANNED FOR 14,500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING IN THAT SPOT. IT'S READY. I CAN BREAK GROUND TOMORROW ON IT IF I WANT TO. BUT WE'RE CHOOSING THIS OPTION MAINLY BECAUSE TO MAKE A LITTLE BIT EASIER. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. AS MR. SCHHALL JUST SAID, HE WILL MOVE THE DUMPSTER ANYWHERE THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD LIKE. I WOULD ASK THAT WE NOT DELAY THIS HEARING TO DEBATE THE POINT. IF THERE'S SOME OTHER LOCATION THAT STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND, WE'LL LOCATE THE DUMPSTER THERE OR INSTALL A COMPACTOR IF THAT MAKES IT LESS INTRUSIVE. WE DON'T REALLY WANT TO HAVE TO CONTINUE A HEARING FOR SOMETHING AS -- I DON'T WANT TO SAY MINOR -- BUT SOMETHING AS SIMPLE AS LOCATING A DUMPSTER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHAT IS IN THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THAT PARCEL, THE EAST SIDE? >> THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHAT BUSINESS DOES IT TOUCH? CHICK-FIL-A? >> ON THE NEXT STREET OVER IS CHICK-FIL-A. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHAT IS IT BEHIND? THE BURGER KING? >> THERE IS A BURGER KING FACING DALE MABRY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OPPOSITE OF -- THE DUMPSTER IS OVER HERE IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT. IF YOU PUT IT IN THE NORTHEAST, THE DUMPSTER WOULD BE ON THE BACK -- IT WOULD HAVE A PARKING LOT ON THE OTHER SIDE, CORRECT? >> OUR ENGINEER MIGHT BE ABLE TO SPEAK TO THAT. I DON'T KNOW WHETHER THE CODE ALLOWS THAT. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THE DUMPSTER CAN BE PLACED ON THE NORTHEAST SECTION OF THE SITE, AND THAT CHANGE CAN BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. IF I CAN PUT THIS UP TO SHOW. THIS IS THE ENTRY TO THE BURGER KING PARKING LOT, AND THEN THIS IS THE BURGER KING THAT'S HERE. SO THIS IS THE COMMERCIAL USE. THERE'S NO RESIDENTIAL HERE ON THE NORTHEAST SECTION. THE RESIDENTIAL IS TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE. SO THAT CHANGE CAN BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. ASIDE -- WHICH THE ENGINEER CAN CONFIRM, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT RETENTION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT I THINK THERE IS PLENTY OF ROOM FOR IT TO EITHER BE LOCATED HERE OR EVEN HERE, ORIENTED THIS WAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHAT DOES THE ENGINEER SAY, SIR? >>LaCHONE DOCK: IF THEY CAN DO THAT, IF THEY ARE WILLING TO DO IT AND IF POSSIBLE, THEY CAN DO THAT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, SIR. >> AZAM ELSHEIKH WITH GLOBAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. WE CAN RELOCATE THE DUMPSTER, INSTEAD OF TO THE WEST PUT IT ON THE EAST OF THE PARKING SPACES. RETENTION IS GOING TO BE UNDERGROUND. IT WON'T BE IN THE CANOPY OF THAT TREE. WE WILL HAVE TO MEET THE DECK MANUAL. THE PERMITS ALREADY MEET THAT. THE PERMITS EXISTING TODAY FOR THE OFFICE BUILDING, AND WE'RE GOING TO COMPLY AND PUT ALL THE RETENTION UNDERGROUND IN THAT AREA TO MEET THE CODE. >> I'LL ASK RANDY COEN TO ADDRESS THE TRAFFIC COMMENTS VERY BRIEFLY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, SIR. >> RANDY COHEN, 4121 WEST CYPRESS, I HAVE BEEN SWORN. I WANT TO GO BACK TO THE CHART FOR JUST A MINUTE THAT'S ON THE ELMO. THE BLUE IS THE LAST USE ON THE PROPERTY, WHICH WAS THE DAY CARE. IT WAS THEN REZONED FOR THE OFFICE, WHICH IS THE CURRENT REZONING ON THE PROPERTY. AS YOU'VE HEARD FROM THE APPLICANT, COULD BE BUILT TODAY. THE RED IS DAILY TRAFFIC HERE, A.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC HERE, P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC THERE. THE TOWN HOUSE PROPOSAL, THAT IS THEIR DAILY TRAFFIC, FOUR TIMES LESS THAN WHAT IT WOULD BE FOR THE OFFICE. THIS IS THE MORNING TRAFFIC WHICH IS ABOUT FIVE TIMES LESS THAN IT WOULD BE WITH THE OFFICE, SAME IN THE AFTERNOON. SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BUILD THE OFFICE AND HAVE A LOT MORE TRAFFIC THERE OR BUILD THE TOWN HOUSES AND HAVE SUBSTANTIALLY LESS TRAFFIC THAN IS APPROVED FOR THE SITE TODAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE IN YOUR REBUTTAL, SIR? >> NO. I WOULD JUST CONCLUDE BY RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING YOUR APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. I WOULD RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST TO YOU THAT SAYING THAT MY CLIENT CAN'T BUILD ANYTHING ON THIS PROPERTY IS NOT A LEGAL ANSWER TO THE QUESTION. I THINK WE HAVE PROPOSED THE LEAST IMPACTFUL USE WE COULD POSSIBLY HAVE PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE? IF NOT, I'LL TAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE. WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA, WOULD YOU LIKE TO -- OH. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. NOW, COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ ITEM NUMBER 1. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: BOY, I'M SO LUCKY. I'LL TELL YOU WHAT, MR. CHAIRMAN -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I WOULD LIKE TO TALK ABOUT THIS, ACTUALLY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT'S WHY I'M TALKING SLOWLY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YOU KNOW I WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: GO ON. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THIS IS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF TOO MUCH ON TOO LITTLE. WE DO HAVE A POLICY IN THE CITY OF TAMPA ABOUT CONSTRUCTION AND DOORS FACING STREETS FOR A REASON BECAUSE WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE INTERACTIVE NEIGHBORHOODS AND CONSTRUCTION SO THAT WHEN WE BUILD THESE THINGS IN NEIGHBORHOODS, PEOPLE CAN, YOU KNOW, AGAIN INTEGRATE WITH THE STREET. INTEGRATE WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS. AND THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THAT POLICY THAT YOU'VE REQUESTED A WAIVER FOR. THIS IS OBVIOUSLY SUCH AN INTENSIVE PROJECT. GRANTED, IT ABUTS UP A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, WHICH LENDS ME KIND OF GIVE IT AT LEAST A CONSIDERATION. HOWEVER WITH ALL THE PROBLEMATICS, JUST BECAUSE OF SINS OF THE PAST DOESN'T MEAN WE COMPOUND THEM. MR. MECHANIK SAID YOU CAN'T BUILD SOMETHING HERE. YOU CAN BUILD LOTS OF THINGS ON HERE. YOU COULD BUILD TOWN HOUSES THAT FACE SWANN AND THEY COULD BE GENEROUS AND BEAUTIFUL AND PROBABLY DAMN EXPENSIVE TOWN HOUSES THAT FACE SWANN AS YOU SEE OTHER EXAMPLES IN THAT PARTICULAR NEIGHBORHOOD. THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD IS TOWN HOUSES THAT FACE THE STREET. AND THERE ARE SOME BEAUTIFUL TOWN HOUSES THAT FACE THAT STREET. I THINK THERE'S LOTS OF OPPORTUNITY HERE. THE FACT THAT SOME COUNCIL IN THE PAST PUT A PD ON HERE, ZONED IT FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING, IF IT WAS -- OBVIOUSLY, THE MARKET HAS CHANGED. OFFICE BUILDINGS AREN'T WHAT THEY WERE TEN YEARS AGO OR EVEN FIVE YEARS AGO AND I UNDERSTAND THAT AS WELL. THE CASH COW IS CRAMMING A WHOLE BUNCH OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSES ON A VERY SMALL PIECE OF PROPERTY AND THAT MAKES DEVELOPERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS A LOT OF MONEY, BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE HERE FOR. WE'RE HERE TO ENHANCE THE CITY OF TAMPA, ENHANCE THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THIS IS TOO MUCH ON TOO LITTLE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE? >>GWEN HENDERSON: MR. CLENDENIN, THAT IS SO INTERESTING BECAUSE I CAN NAME SO MANY PROPERTIES WHERE THE FRONT DOESN'T FACE THE STREET IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD WE'VE APPROVED. YEAH, THIS BOARD, BUT NEVERTHELESS. I THINK IT'S NOT A WHOLE LOT. ONLY THREE OF THEM DON'T FACE SWANN, AM I CORRECT -- THREE OF THEM DO FACE AND THE OTHERS DON'T. THAT'S WHAT I'M THINKING ABOUT. RIGHT NEXT TO MY BOOKSTORE, FIVE OF THEM THAT DON'T FACE -- WELL, THEY FACE THE STREET, YOU JUST CAN'T SEE THEM. I DON'T KNOW. IT'S KIND OF INTERESTING. IT IS WHAT I CONSIDER REASONABLE IF YOU MOVE THE DUMPSTER, SO I CAN SUPPORT IT AND I'LL JUST LEAVE IT AT THAT. I KNOW IT'S IN SOUTH TAMPA. >>BILL CARLSON: I WOULD JUST ASK IF COUNCILMAN MIRANDA MAKES A MOTION THAT HE ADD THAT CHANGE OF THE DUMPSTER BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: [INAUDIBLE] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE THE DUMPSTER -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I GOT THAT WRITTEN DOWN. MOVE THE DUMPSTER. WHAT WAS THE OTHER ONE? >>BILL CARLSON: MOVE THE DUMPSTER TO THE NORTHEAST. >>LUIS VIERA: MR. CHAIR, IF I MAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, YES, SIR. >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU. I INTEND TO SUPPORT THIS, BUT I HAVE MY REASONINGS I CAN TALK ABOUT WITH THE 12 RESIDENCES, I DON'T THINK IT'S TOO INTENSIVE FOR THE PARTICULAR AREA UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES. BUT THERE IS ONE THING I DO WANT TO SAY THIS. I HAVE TO LEAVE IN FIVE MINUTES. JUST FYI FOR COUNCIL. THAT'S ALL. >>BILL CARLSON: WE HAD A SESSION A FEW WEEKS AGO ABOUT CONSTRUCTION PLANNING, BUT WE ALREADY GET A LOT OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS INTERSECTION. IF THIS PASSES, I HOPE THE DEVELOPER WILL MANAGE THAT CAREFULLY SO THAT THE CONSTRUCTION AND THE CONSTRUCTION PARKING DOESN'T JAM UP THE ROADS AS WELL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: JUST REMEMBER, THIS IS AISLE-STYLE DEVELOPMENT. WE ALREADY HAD THAT CONVERSATION ABOUT AISLE-STYLE DEVELOPMENTS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: LET ME JUST SAY THIS AS WE ARE DEBATING AMONG OURSELVES. NO MATTER WHAT YOU PUT HERE, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ACCEPTABLE TO A LOT OF PEOPLE BECAUSE OF SOMETHING NO ONE DID. I DON'T KNOW THE DEVELOPER. I DON'T KNOW THE GUY WHO SOLD THE LOT OR BOUGHT THE LOT OR WHATEVER. IF I DID, IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE ANYWAY TO ME. LET ME SAY THIS, YOU CANNOT FROM WHAT I READ HERE, IN THE CITY AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION BOTH, AND I VOTED AGAINST SOME OF THESE IN THE PAST, YOU KNOW WHAT, I HAVEN'T WON YET. WHEN IT GOES TO MEDIATOR, MY TEETH ARE IN THE BACK OF MY NECK. THAT'S NOT TO SAY THAT THEY ARE RIGHT OR WRONG. THAT'S TO SAY THIS IS WHAT I HAVE TO WORK WITH IN FRONT OF US, ALL OF US TODAY. YES, I COULD SAY THIS DOESN'T FIT THAT AND I'M GOING TO MAKE THAT MOTION BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING FOR THAT DUMPSTER TO BE MOVED TO THE OPPOSITE SIDE, WHICH IS THE EAST SIDE, I BELIEVE. MR. CHAIRMAN, WITH THAT, I'LL READ, NUMBER ONE -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: I'M SORRY, BUT WHEN YOU SAID JUST BECAUSE STAFF APPROVES IT, IF THAT'S THE CASE, THOUGH -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THAT'S NOT HOW I VOTE ON THINGS. >>LYNN HURTAK: I KNOW. YOU SAID THAT STAFF, BOTH STAFFS THINK IT'S OKAY AND THAT WE SHOULD CONSIDER THAT. IF THAT'S THE CASE, THEN THEY DON'T NEED US. I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT. AND I WANTED TO SAY I'M NOT VOTING FOR THIS BECAUSE IT'S TOO MUCH IN TOO LITTLE SPACE. I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY WITH COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. I THINK THE TOWNHOMES THAT ARE NEXT DOOR ARE BEAUTIFUL, FACING THE STREET AND JUST ENGAGING THE COMMUNITY, AND THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT PUSHES THAT AWAY AND MAKES IT INSULAR AND NOT FOCUSING ON THE STREET, WHICH IS WHAT THE REST OF THE STREET DOES, SO IT IS NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH WHAT THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT IS OR THE PLAN FOR THE CITY. SO I WON'T VOTE FOR IT EITHER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. >>GWEN HENDERSON: MY THOUGHT ON THAT IS BECAUSE IT IS SWANN AVENUE, I CAN SEE WHY. I THINK IT'S MORE PROTECTIVE OF THE PEOPLE WHO DECIDE TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTIES THAT THEY ARE NOT NECESSARILY FACING SWANN, BECAUSE THAT IS A VERY INTENSE AREA, WHICH IS WHY I DON'T SHOP AT TRADER JOE'S. I CAN SEE THEM BEING ISOLATED IN A SENSE AND NOT FACING SWANN BECAUSE OF THAT REASON. I KNOW THAT'S ABNORMAL IN MANY REGARDS, BUT SWANN -- >>LYNN HURTAK: IF YOU HAVE DRIVEN DOWN THAT STREET, EVERY HOUSE FACES THE STREET. THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL BE SO DIFFERENT THAN EVERYTHING AROUND IT. >>GWEN HENDERSON: JUST LIKE THE PROPERTY YOU ALL VOTED ON A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO THAT IS THE ONLY DEVELOPMENT LIKE THAT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. EVERYTHING ELSE WAS SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. I UNDERSTAND BUT YOU ALL VOTED FOR THAT ONE TO BE BUILT AND IT WAS INCONSISTENT. I UNDERSTAND. THIS IS SOUTH TAMPA. I WOULDN'T WANT TO LIVE ON A CROWDED STREET LIKE THAT. THERE ARE PEOPLE DYING TO LIVE IN SOUTH TAMPA AND IT'S NOT UNREASONABLE. >>LYNN HURTAK: THERE'S ALSO NOT A REASON THAT YOU CAN'T BUILD SIX OR SEVEN BEAUTIFUL TOWNHOMES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: THAT'S TRUE, BUT ALL OF THEM ARE GREEDY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: EXCUSE ME, IF I CAN INTERRUPT FOR A MINUTE, MR. CHAIRMAN, OBVIOUSLY, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. JUST TO BE SURE WE DID THIS FOR THE RECORD, CAN WE HAVE THE MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. >>LUIS VIERA: MR. CHAIR, IF I MAY -- >>GWEN HENDERSON: THIS WAS COUNCIL DEBATE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: NOT THIS PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY. LET'S JUST CONTINUE BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO MESS UP THE RECORD. I WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW, COUNCIL MEMBERS, JUST, IF YOU HAVEN'T NOTICED, THERE IS A COURT REPORTER HERE WHO IS TAKING DOWN EVERY COMMENT THAT'S BEING SAID TONIGHT. THE REASON I'M SAYING THIS IS TO ENSURE THAT YOU MAKE WHATEVER DECISION YOU MAKE BASED ON COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD. THE LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY, IF IT'S NOT RELEVANT TO THE CRITERIA AND IT'S NOT PARTICULARLY RELEVANT TO THE CASE AND THE EVIDENCE THAT YOU HAVE TO RELY UPON, IT IS NOT RELEVANT TO YOUR DECISION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA HAS BEEN RECOGNIZED. >>LUIS VIERA: POINT OF ORDER, IF I MAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA. >>LUIS VIERA: GUYS, I HAVE TO LEAVE. I SAID THAT FIVE MINUTES AGO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HE'S READING IT RIGHT NOW. >>LUIS VIERA: OKAY. I DON'T MEAN TO RUSH PEOPLE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M GOING TO READ FILE REZ 24-45, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3807 AND 3811 WEST SWANN AVENUE IN THE CCITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MOE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PROMOTES THE EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE WITH CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACT TO OUTSIDE NATURAL ELEMENTS, SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS AND CULTURAL RESOURCES. TWO, INTEGRATE OF DIFFERENT LAND USES AND DENSITY IN ONE DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD NOT OTHERWISE BE PROVIDED FOR OR ALLOWED UNDER GENERAL ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHMENT IN THIS CHAPTER WHICH ENCOURAGES COMPATIBILITY AND SITE DESIGN AND SCALE, BOTH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL TO THE PROJECT SITE. THREE, PROVIDES PROCEDURE WHICH CAN RELATE THE TYPE, DESIGN AND LAYOUT OF RESIDENTIAL, NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE PARTICULAR SITE. FOUR, ACKNOWLEDGES CHANGING NEEDS, TECHNOLOGY, ECONOMIC AND CONSUMER PREFERENCE AND ALLOWS THE INGENUITY AND IMAGINATION IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF RELATIVE LARGE TRACT UNIFIED CONTROL AS WELL AS ALLOWING FLEXIBILITY IN THE REDEVELOPMENT OF OLDER AREAS IN THE CITY. SIX, PROMOTES AND ENCOURAGES DEVELOPMENT WHERE APPROPRIATE AND LOCATION, CHARACTER, COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING IMPACTED NEIGHBORHOODS BUILT ENVIRONMENTALLY EXISTING GEOGRAPHICALLY. SEVEN, PROMOTE MOST DESIRABLE LIVING AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT -- >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: PARDON ME? >>GWEN HENDERSON: I JUST SECONDED IT FOR YOU. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I THOUGHT SOMEBODY ELSE WANTED TO READ 7 AND 8. I WANTED TO DO THIS ON RECORD SINCE I'VE BEEN CHALLENGED. DESIRABLE LIVING AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT THAT WOULD BE POSSIBLE, STRICT APPLICATION AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF OTHER ZONING DISTRICTS. EIGHT PROMOTES ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AND ELEMENTS WHICH COMPLEMENTS THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY AND ENHANCE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. NINE, PROMOTES RETENTION OF REUSE OF EXISTING BUILDING STOCK. AS FAR AS I KNOW, THERE ARE NO WAIVERS. AM I CORRECT? >> THERE ARE TWO WAIVERS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU. >>LUIS VIERA: COUNCIL, I HAVE TO LEAVE IN 30 SECONDS. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I BELIEVE THAT IS SUFFICIENT FOR THE RECORD. MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE TO ADD IT IS CONSISTENT WITH STAFF REPORTS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: CHANGING OF THE DUMPSTER BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AS DISCUSSED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. >>MARTIN SHELBY: CAN YOU SAY IT GOES TO THE NORTHEAST SECTION. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NORTHEAST. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: I'M GOING TO VOTE NO BECAUSE SECTION 27-136, IT'S FUNNY THAT YOU READ ALL OF THEM, NUMBER 9, THEY ARE NOT REUSING ANY BUILDING STOCK, SO YOU JUST READ IT TO READ IT. NUMBER 6, PROMOTING AND ENCOURAGING DEVELOPMENT WHERE APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION, COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDED IMPACTED NEIGHBORHOOD, BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND EXISTING GEOGRAPHY IS CLEARLY NOT DOING THAT. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE SPEAKING ABOUT. NO. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I'LL HIT ON NUMBER 8 ABOUT PROMOTING THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AND ELEMENTS WHICH COMPLEMENT THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY AND ENHANCE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF DEVELOPMENT. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT MEETS THAT REQUIREMENT AS WELL. AND I ALSO AM OPPOSED TO WAIVING THE DOOR FOR THE POSITIONS THAT I STATED IN MY EARLIER DISCUSSION THAT IT DOES NOT PROMOTE THE SENSE OF NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH POLICIES OF THIS CITY COUNCIL OR THE CITY OF TAMPA. SO I VOTE NO. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: THE MOTION CARRIES WITH HURTAK AND CLENDENIN VOTING NO. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 27, 2025, AT 10 A.M., LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA FLORIDA 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>LUIS VIERA: I'LL BE BACK, COUNCIL. THANK YOU. I APOLOGIZE FOR RUSHING THAT. THANK YOU, COUNCIL. THANK YOU. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, COULD WE HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE REST OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO OPEN THE REST OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS? MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? IF WE COULD PLEASE ELIMINATE THE CONVERSATION IN THE ROOM. WE CAN'T HEAR. IT ECHOS THROUGH THE CHAMBER. [ SOUNDING GAVEL ] IF WE COULD PLEASE LIMIT -- I'M SORRY. PLEASE NOT HAVE CONVERSATIONS IN THE CHAMBER BECAUSE WE CAN'T HEAR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES MA'AM. ITEM NUMBER 2. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 2 IS REZ 24-70 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 3602 WEST AZEELE STREET. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO JENNIFER TO GIVE HER REPORT AND THEN COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. THANK YOU. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THIS IS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT ALONG WEST AZEELE STREET AT THE CORNER OF WEST AZEELE STREET AND SOUTH HIMES AVENUE. WE HAVE A VARIETY OF OFFICE USES ON THIS PORTION OF SOUTH AZEELE STREET ALREADY, BUT WE ALSO HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST AND THEN TO THE SOUTH. THE FUTURE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL 20. THAT IS THE BROWN COLOR. THAT'S PREDOMINANT ALONG WEST AZEELE STREET THIS WAY, RESIDENTIAL 35 IS DARKER BROWN, RESIDENTIAL 10 TO THE SOUTH IS YOUR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. THAT IS THE ORANGE COLOR. PINK IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 ALONG HENDERSON. THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BEFORE YOU AS LaCHONE OPENED IS FOR A BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WITH THE MEDICAL OFFICE USE. THIS WAS REZONED IN 2021 FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT. IT WAS APPROVED. THE PLAN LIMITS WHERE OFFICE USES SHOULD GO IF YOU ARE IN A RESIDENTIAL LAND USE CATEGORY. ONE OF THOSE CRITERIA, IF YOU ARE IN THE RESIDENTIAL 20 CATEGORY IS THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE FRONTAGE ALONG A COLLECTOR ROADWAY OR HIGHER. AZEELE IS AN ARTERIAL ROADWAY THAT IS A FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION HIGHER THAN A COLLECTOR. BUT THE PLAN ALSO SAYS THAT IF YOU HAVE ALREADY MET YOUR LOCATIONAL CRITERIA THE FIRST TIME YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE TO MEET IT AGAIN. SO THIS DOES MEET THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA, BUT I WANT TO STATE FOR THE RECORD THEY WERE NOT SUBJECT TO THAT A SECOND TIME. HAD THEY BEEN, IT WOULD HAVE MET IT SINCE AZEELE IS AN ARTERIAL AND ALREADY OFFICE USES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. WE FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. MALONE? NO. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THIS SITE IS CURRENTLY ZONED PD. IT DOES ALLOW FOR BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE. THIS REQUEST WOULD ALLOW THE ADDITION OF MEDICAL OFFICE. THE ADDITIONAL USE OF MEDICAL OFFICE ON-SITE. SO THE BUILDING THAT'S ON-SITE WILL REMAIN. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN WHICH IS SUBMITTED. THIS IS HIMES AVENUE. THIS IS AZEELE TO THE NORTH. SO THIS IS THE EXISTING BUILDING WHICH I'LL SHOW YOU PICTURES OF THAT WOULD REMAIN. THAT BUILDING CONTAINS 1,818 SQUARE FEET. THE SITE ITSELF CONTAINS 7,414 SQUARE FEET. THE SETBACKS ARE TO THE NORTH 20 FEET, TO THE SOUTH 68 FEET. TO THE EAST 10 FEET AND TO THE WEST 5 FEET. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 35 FEET. AND THE PARKING REQUIRED IS 11 SPACES, AND THEN 9 SPACES ARE PROVIDED. SO ON THE SITE ITSELF, THE EXISTING BUILDING AGAIN WILL REMAIN ON-SITE. SURFACE PARKING EXISTED IN THE REAR OF THE SITE, REAR OF THE BUILDING. THERE IS ONE POINT OF ACCESS TO THE SITE, AND THAT'S ON HIMES. THE ENTRY TO THE BUILDING IS HERE, AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE ARE WALKWAYS PROVIDED TO THE SURROUNDING SIDEWALK, THE SIDEWALKS THAT ARE SURROUNDING THE SITE. I HAVE THE ZONING MAP. SO THIS IS THE PARCEL THAT'S IDENTIFIED HERE IN RED ON THE CORNER OF AZEELE, THIS IS HIMES. THIS IS HENDERSON FOR ORIENTATION OF THE SITE, AND THEN THIS IS STERLING AVENUE. SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS SITE ALONG AZEELE YOU HAVE NUMEROUS REZONINGS THAT HAVE OCCURRED THROUGH THE YEARS. YOU HAVE PDs TO THE WEST AND FURTHER WEST YOU HAVE YOUR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. NORTH OF THE SITE YOU HAVE THE PD AND RO USES, WHICH ARE LIKE YOUR MEDICAL OFFICE OR THE BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES THAT RUN ALONG AZEELE. FURTHER NORTH OF THAT, YOU HAVE YOUR SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT. AND THEN FURTHER SOUTH, YOU HAVE THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND YOU HAVE A COUPLE OF RM ZONING DESIGNATIONS RO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND PD. THERE IS LIKE A MIXTURE OF USES WITHIN THE AREA. BUT MOSTLY THE BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE USES. SO THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS AT THE CORNER OF HIMES AND AZEELE. AND THIS WILL REMAIN. SO THIS IS THE ENTRY TO THE SITE. THIS IS SHOWING YOU THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. THIS IS IF YOU ARE ON-SITE LOOKING TOWARDS AZEELE TO THE NORTH, THE PARKING IS LOCATED HERE. THIS IS THE ACCESS TO THE SITE. THIS IS ON-SITE LOOKING TOWARDS HIMES. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH. THAT'S LOOKING NORTH ON HIMES. THAT IS ANOTHER VIEW OUTSIDE OF THE SITE LOOKING NORTH ON HIMES. THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS IF YOU ARE AT THE POINT OF THE SITE WHICH IS OFF TO THE RIGHT IN THIS PICTURE AND YOU'RE LOOKING EAST ON AZEELE. AND THAT'S EAST OF THE SITE. AND THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE. THIS IS IF YOU ARE LOOKING SOUTH ON HIMES. AND THAT'S ANOTHER VIEW ON HIMES LOOKING SOUTH. FURTHER SOUTH ON HIMES, AND THEN WE SWING BACK AROUND AND THIS IS LOOKING WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. SO WITH THAT, THE DRC STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST, FINDS THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT. IT IS DUE TO THE WAIVER REQUESTED. YOU CAN SEE THE FINDINGS FROM TRANSPORTATION. THE WAIVER IS TO REDUCE THE PARKING FROM 11 SPACES REQUIRED TO 9 SPACES. AND ALSO, THERE ARE SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. SO WITH THAT, THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THERE AN APPLICANT FOR THIS ITEM? COME ON UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> TOM SHIMLICK, ARCHITECT, 619 LUZON AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33606. I'VE BEEN SWORN IN. MR. CHAIRMAN, CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF TAMPA STAFF, GOOD EVENING, GOOD TO SEE EVERYONE. THIS IS A REZONING, A PD TO PD. WE'RE ASKING FOR THE ADDITIONAL USE FOR MEDICAL OFFICE. ON THE FACE OF IT, AS IT STANDS THE NINE SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND WE PROVIDED SIX. I'D LIKE TO DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY AND MY FOOTNOTE ON THE DOCUMENT I POINTED OUT THAT THE ADJACENT PROPERTY A SURGICAL CENTER AND PD REZONING REZ 22-53, THEY USED A METRIC OF 4.5 SPACES PER THOUSAND UNDER THE PD FOR THE REZONING -- FOR THE PARKING SPACES. IF WE APPLY THE SAME 4.5 TO 1800 SQUARE FEET, WHICH BY ANY STANDARD A SMALL BUILDING, THAT'S 8.18 SPACES. SO WE MEET THE STANDARD OF 9 SPACES USING THE SAME STANDARD APPLIED TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. SO I THINK ON THE FACE OF IT, IT'S A REASONABLE REQUEST JUST EVEN BY THE NINE SPACES BEING SHORT TWO. BUT I THINK GOING FURTHER WITH THE PRECEDENT OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, I THINK IT'S A REASONABLE REQUEST. AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR AFFIRMING VOTE OF YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN? I SEE NONE. IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 2? WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ ITEM NUMBER 2? >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES, CHAIR. I MOVE FILE NUMBER REZ-24-70, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3602 WEST AZEELE STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THERE A REVISION SHEET ON THIS MS. DOCK? >>GWEN HENDERSON: WITH THE REVISION SHEET. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION AND WE HAVE A SECOND. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >> VIERA? MANISCALCO? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 27, 2025, AT 10 A.M. LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA FLORIDA 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ITEM NUMBER 3. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 3 IS REZ 24-101 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8813 BROOKS STREET, 8901 NORTH 13th STREET AND 8814 NORTH 1th STREET. THIS REQUEST IS TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM IG INDUSTRIAL GENERAL AND RS 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO IG INDUSTRIAL GENERAL. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO JENNIFER TO GIVE HER REPORT. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THIS IS IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT. ANOTHER RECENT PLAN AMENDMENT BEFORE THIS COUNCIL, SO THE AREA MIGHT LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU, BUT IT IS THE PARCELS OUTLINED IN PURPLE. WE HAVE -- WE'RE JUST SOUTH OF EAST BUSCH BOULEVARD ALONG NORTH BROOKS STREET AND NORTH 14th STREET. I DO WANT TO POINT OUT THIS IS AN AREA WITH A VAST VARIETY OF USES OF INDUSTRIAL AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO ONE ANOTHER, WHICH IS REFLECTED ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. I'M SURE LaCHONE OR MS. DOCK WILL GO INTO THIS IN MORE DETAIL. WE DO HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ACROSS THE STREET, BUT WE ALSO HAVE THE INDUSTRIAL USES IN THE AREA AS WELL. SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE FUTURE LAND USE IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. WHERE SOME OF THOSE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ARE IS THE RESIDENTIAL 10, WHICH IS THE ORANGE COLOR. SO -- BUT THE AREA IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AS WE MOVE SOUTH OF EAST BUSCH BOULEVARD. THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU CHANGED THESE PARCELS TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THROUGH A PLAN AMENDMENT EARLIER, AND NOW THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING FOR THE IG ZONING DISTRICT. I DO WANT TO READ A PORTION OF THE REPORT JUST FOR THE RECORD. THE REPORT POINTS OUT THAT THE SURROUNDING AREA DOES CONTAIN A RANGE OF USES INCLUDING INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL AND SINGLE-FAMILY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES DO BORDER DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ZONED RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY 50 AND RECOGNIZED UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION. GIVEN THE WIDE RANGE OF USES IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED IG ZONING DISTRICT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, BUT I WANT TO NOTE LU POLICY 15.2.4 REQUIRES APPROPRIATE BUFFERING BETWEEN NONRESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING. THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET THOSE REQUIREMENTS DURING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THESE POLICIES. I JUST WANT TO STATE FOR THE RECORD THAT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE TOOK INTO CONSIDERATION IS THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO MEET THOSE DURING THAT REVIEW. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO ENCOURAGES INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AS A MEANS OF GENERATING EMPLOYMENT TO SUPPORT THE CITY'S GROWING POPULATION. SO THE PROPOSED REZONING TO IG WILL FACILITATE THE INDUSTRIAL USE OF THIS POLICY CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WHAT YOU JUST STATED, THAT'S NOTHING THAT REQUIRES COUNCIL'S READING INTO THE RECORD, IS IT? IS THAT SUFFICIENT? >>JENNIFER MALONE: I DON'T BELIEVE SO, NO. I'LL DEFINITELY REFER TO MS. DOCK. I WANT IT ON THE RECORD THAT WE DID LOOK AT THAT WHEN WE REVIEWED THE REQUEST ABOUT THE PROXIMITY TO SINGLE-FAMILY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THAT IS CORRECT, COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. IT WOULD BE ADDRESSED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING, THE BUFFERING THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PROPER BUFFERING ACCORDING TO CODE, YES. WITH THAT, THANK YOU, COUNCIL. THIS IS THE EASIEST WAY THAT I CAN SHOW YOU THESE PARCELS BEFORE I GET TO THE ZONING MAP. THERE ARE THREE PARCELS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS REQUEST. THIS WAS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT, BUT IT SHOWS CLEARLY THE PARCELS. THERE IS ONE PARCEL ON 13th STREET. THIS IS BUSCH BOULEVARD. THIS IS BROOKS STREET AND THIS IS 14th STREET. SO THE PARCELS THAT ARE OUTLINED IN RED ARE THE SUBJECT SITE AND THESE ARE THE PARCELS WHICH ARE REQUESTED TO REZONE TO IG, INDUSTRIAL GENERAL. JUST NOTE THAT BROOKS STREET GOES THROUGH TO BUSCH BOULEVARD, BUT 13th AND 14th, THOSE STREETS ACTUALLY DEAD END. BUT I'LL SHOW YOU PICTURES SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT SITE. EACH OF THE PARCELS, THE PARCEL THAT'S ON 13th STREET AND 14th STREET, BOTH OF THESE HAVE 50 FEET OF FRONTAGE. ON BROOKS STREET, THERE'S A HUNDRED FEET OF FRONTAGE. ALL THREE HAVE THE SAME DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY 104 FEET. 60 FEET WOULD BE THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT WITH THIS ZONING DESIGNATION. WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS ALSO PUT UP THE ZONING MAP. AGAIN, HERE ARE THE PARCELS THAT ARE IN RED IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE. THIS IS BUSCH BOULEVARD. NEBRASKA IS OFF TO THE WEST OFF OF THIS MAP. THIS SITE ON 13th STREET, BROOKS STREET, AND THEN 14th STREET. YOU CAN SEE ALONG BUSCH BOULEVARD, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BUSCH BOULEVARD ARE THE MORE INTENSE COMMERCIAL USES. ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BUSCH BOULEVARD, YOU GET INTO YOUR MORE INTENSIVE USES OF THE INDUSTRIAL GENERAL. SO THE ZONING IS REFLECTIVE OF THAT. YOU HAVE INDUSTRIAL GENERAL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BUSCH. NORTH SIDE OF BUSCH, YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE. FURTHER NORTH OF THIS SITE YOU GET INTO YOUR RESIDENTIAL ZONING AND USES. AND THE SAME GOES FOR THE SOUTH OF BUSCH BOULEVARD. WHEN YOU MOVE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, YOU MOVE INTO YOUR RESIDENTIAL, THE RS 50 ZONE AND THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES FURTHER SOUTH. AND THEN FOR THE PICTURES OF THE SITE, I'LL JUST SHOW YOU, NORMALLY IT IS THE SITE FIRST, THEN THE SURROUNDING USES BUT THREE PARCELS ON THREE DIFFERENT STREETS. I'LL SHOW YOU THIS SITE, SURROUNDING THE SITE AND THEN GO TO THIS SITE, SURROUNDING THE SITE AND THIS SITE SURROUNDING AND END THERE. THIS IS ON THE WEST SIDE. THIS IS THE SITE THAT'S ON 13th. THAT'S WEST OF THAT SITE, THE RESIDENTIAL. THIS IS ALSO WEST OF THAT, STILL ON 13th STREET. THIS IS MOVING TOWARDS BUSCH. THAT'S THE INDUSTRIAL. THAT'S TO THE WEST. THIS IS SHOWING YOU THE DEAD END, 13th DEAD ENDS. BUSCH BOULEVARD IS OFF IN THE PICTURE THERE. THE SITE IS OFF TO THE RIGHT. WE SWING AROUND, NORTH OF THE SITE ON 13th. HERE IS THE SITE ON 13th. THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE, THE RESIDENTIAL THAT EXISTS. AND THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE ON 13th. NOW THIS TAKES US TO THE PARCEL ON BROOKS. THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS ANOTHER PICTURE NORTH OF THE SITE. YOU CAN SEE THE OPEN STORAGE, THE INDUSTRIAL USE ON THE SITE. THIS IS THE SITE ON BROOKS STREET. AND THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING SOUTH ON BROOKS. THE SITE IS OFF TO THE LEFT. THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE. AND ANOTHER VIEW TO THE SOUTH. AND THEN THIS TAKES US AROUND TO THE SITE ON 14th. SO THAT'S THE SITE ON 14th. AND THEN THIS IS MAKING OUR WAY TOWARDS BUSCH, AS YOU HEAD NORTH. PHOTOS OF THE USES. THIS IS LOOKING NORTH TOWARD BUSCH. THEN WE SWING BACK AROUND. THAT'S ACROSS THE STREET EAST OF THE SITE. AND THEN THIS IS EAST. AS WE HEAD FURTHER SOUTH BACK ON THE BLOCK, THERE ARE OTHER PICTURES OF THE RESIDENTIAL THAT EXIST. EAST. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ON 14th. THAT'S SOUTH OF THE SITE ON 14th. AND THEN LASTLY, THIS IS IF YOU ARE AT HUMPHREY ON THE OTHER END OF THE BLOCK AND YOU'RE LOOKING DOWN TOWARDS THE SITE, TOWARDS BUSCH. AND WITH THAT, THE DRC STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST, SO THERE'S NO SITE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. ANY QUESTIONS? NO. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL. RYAN MANASSE WITH JOHNSON POPE, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE, SUITE 3100. IF CTTV CAN PULL UP MY PRESENTATION. IT'S IN EDIT MODE. YOU GUYS SEE THE FULL SCREEN? THERE WE GO. AGAIN, JUST TO REITERATE A COUPLE OF POINTS, WE'RE HERE REGARDING THE PARCEL LOCATED AT 8813 BROOKS STREET, 8901 NORTH 13th STREET AND 8814 NORTH 14th STREET. AS STAFF CONSISTS OF TAMPA SPRING COMPANY. IT'S JUST THESE SUBJECT SITES ARE THE REQUESTS BEFORE YOU BECAUSE THEIR LAND USE DIDN'T MATCH UP WITH THE ZONING, VICE VERSA. AGAIN, THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE. JUST A LITTLE HISTORY ON THAT, JENNIFER DIDN'T MENTION IT, BUT WE WERE BEFORE YOU BACK IN SEPTEMBER OF 2024 FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT. TA/CPA 2403. IT WAS TO RECOGNIZE AND ENCOURAGE THAT L.I. FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY FOR THE LOTS IN QUESTION. THE REZONING THAT'S HERE TONIGHT IS JUST THAT. WE'RE TRYING TO IMPLEMENT THE COMPATIBLE ZONING DISTRICT WITH THE NEWLY APPROVED L.I. CATEGORY. AS STAFF STATED, ANY DEVELOPMENT HAS TO MEET THE IG ZONING DISTRICT FOR BUFFERING, SCREENING, SETBACKS, ET CETERA, HEIGHT, USES AND THERE ARE NO WAIVERS BEING SOUGHT. NONE COULD BE ADDED TO THIS. NOW, OUR APPLICATION IS CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND STAFF -- PC STAFF HAS ANNOTATED THAT AS WELL. MOST OF THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PRIMARILY ADDRESS COMPATIBILITY AND PRESERVATION OF THE INDUSTRIAL LANDS, WHICH I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE IS NEEDED IN THE CITY OF TAMPA. THE REVIEW FINDINGS, ALL CITY AGENCIES AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND OUR REQUEST CONSISTENT AS OUTLINED IN YOUR CITY STAFF REPORT, USES ALLOWED IN IG ZONING DESIGNATION ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING USES IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PC STAFF REPORT STATED THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AND WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS ANTICIPATED UNDER THE L.I. DESIGNATION. SO WITH THAT, IN CONCLUSION, APPROVING THE REZONING WILL ALLOW FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CONSISTENT WITH L.I. CATEGORY. ALSO APPROVAL PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AS INDUSTRIAL IS A SCARCE COMMODITY IN THE CITY OF TAMPA. AGAIN, NO WAIVERS ARE BEING REQUESTED. THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN ZONING REQUEST. CITY AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. AND TO MY KNOWLEDGE, I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY OPPOSITION TO OUR REQUEST. WITH THAT, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY BUT WOULD REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 3? WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I MOVE FILE REZ 24-101, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 8813 BROOKS STREET, 8901 NORTH 13th STREET AND 8814 NORTH 14th STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS IG INDUSTRIAL GENERAL AND RS 50 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, TO IG, INDUSTRIAL GENERAL, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 27, 2025, AT 10 A.M. LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA FLORIDA 33602. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, CITY COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES SIR. ITEM NUMBER 4. >> CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 4 IS REZ 24-102, REQUEST TO REZONE 3604 TEMPLE STREET FROM RM 16 TO RM 18. I'LL TURN IT OVER NOW TO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. WE HAVE TRAVELED TO THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. WE'RE OFF OF NORTH 50th STREET AND TEMPLE STREET JUST NORTH OF EAST 28th. THE SURROUNDING AREA -- I MEAN, THIS BLOCK IS EITHER VACANT OR COMMERCIAL. THERE IS A COMMERCIAL USE AT THE CORNER HERE, BUT THERE'S RESIDENTIAL USES, ONE RIGHT HERE AND THEN ONE RIGHT HERE. TO THE SOUTH WE ALSO HAVE COMMERCIAL USES AND RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE EAST OF THE SITE. THE FUTURE LAND USE IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. THAT'S YOUR PINK COLOR, WHICH ALLOWS A BROAD VARIETY OF USES FROM RESIDENTIAL ALL THE WAY UP TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES. RESIDENTIAL 20 IS RIGHT BEHIND THE SITE TO THE EAST. THAT'S OUR SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED MULTIFAMILY CATEGORY. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THIS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THIS IS A REALLY UNDERUTILIZED AREA OF THE CITY. THERE ARE A LOT OF VACANT SITES AND THE DENSITY IS VERY LOW FOR WHAT WE WOULD EXPECT IN THIS FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. OUR PLAN HAS POLICIES ABOUT UTILIZING OUR VACANT LAND AND BRINGING OUR PARCELS UP TO DENSITY BECAUSE WE NEED TO PLAN FOR THAT GROWING POPULATION. SO THIS REQUEST FROM RM 16 TO RM 18 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN. IT ALSO IS CONSISTENT WITH OUR POLICIES, LIKE I SAID, ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND, AND IT WOULD NOT CAUSE ANY INCOMPATIBLE IMPACTS SINCE THE PARCELS TO THE SOUTH AND EAST OF THE SITE ARE ZONED RM 16 BUT THIS JUMP TO RM 18 WE FOUND WAS IN LINE WITH WHAT WE'RE PLANNING FOR IN THIS AREA OF THE CITY. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. MALONE? OKAY. SIR. >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: FOR THE RECORD, CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. WE'LL START WITH AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. SUBJECT PARCEL OUTLINED IN RED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TEMPLE STREET. SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED NORTH OF EAST 28th STREET, SOUTH OF 30th STREET AND EAST OF NORTH 50th STREET. THE SURROUNDING AREA DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS CHARACTERIZED BY MULTIFAMILY SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI DETACHED, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND COMMERCIAL USES, GIVEN THE SIZE OF THE PARCEL AT 5,350 SQUARE FEET, THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS ALLOWED BY RM 18 ZONING DISTRICT IS TWO DWELLING UNITS. THIS IS A SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN YELLOW. THE SUBJECT BLOCK BETWEEN EAST 28th AVENUE AND EAST 30th AVENUE IS COMPRISED OF VARIOUS USES, AS I'VE MENTIONED, RESIDENTIAL AS WELL AS COMMERCIAL. THERE HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE REZONINGS IN THE AREA, IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREA OF THE SUBJECT SITE OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS. DIRECTLY NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE SITE IS PROPERTY ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL GENERAL. THE REZONING DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE SITE WAS APPROVED IN 2018. DIRECTLY WEST OF THE SITE, ACROSS NORTH 50th STREET IS A PROPERTY THAT WAS REZONED TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR A FUNERAL PARLOR AND CEMETERY USES. OF COURSE, EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ACROSS TEMPLE WE HAVE MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS. GIVEN THE MIX OF THE USES IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT SUN REQUESTED BLOCK, CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. SUBJECT SITE IS IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY AND DEVELOPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SECTION 27-240, EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING. SINCE THIS IS EUCLIDEAN REZONING, THERE IS NO SITE PLAN OR ELEVATIONS TO BE SHOWN, BUT WE DO HAVE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WHICH I'LL SHARE. THIS IS A PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT SITE. WE HAVE TWO PHOTOS OF IT. THE SITE IS VACANT. NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. ONE ADDITIONAL, THE NORTH PARCEL. SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE A SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI DETACHED DWELLING. EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ACROSS 28th AVENUE. NEXT PHOTO WAS TAKEN ON NORTH 50th STREET AND LOOKING SOUTHEAST. YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PHOTO AND THE SEMI DETACHED DWELLING TO THE IMMEDIATE SOUTH IN THE PHOTO AS WELL. THIS IS LOOKING NORTH ON NORTH 50th STREET. THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE PHOTO. WE ALSO HAVE ONE MORE PHOTO FROM NORTH 50th STREET OF THE SUBJECT SITE. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION. WE FIND THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT FOR ITEM NUMBER 4? YES, SIR, COME ON UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL. I'M THE OWNER, ROBERT LAWRY THE II. REQUESTING REZONING FROM RM 16 TO RM 18. I REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 4. MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED. COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU. FILE REZ 24-102, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3604 TEMPLE STREET, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1, FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM 16, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, TO RM 18 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: THE MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 27, 2025, AT 10 A.M., LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA FLORIDA 33602. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE HAVE ARRIVED AT NUMBER 5. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 5 IS REZ 24-104 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 402 SOUTH OREGON AVENUE. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RM 12, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, TO PD, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO MS. MALONE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THIS IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. IT IS LOCATED ON SOUTH OREGON AVENUE. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN PURPLE AT THE CORNER OF SOUTH OREGON AVENUE AND WEST AZEELE STREET. IT IS WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY AS YOU CAN SEE, AS WELL AS WEST PLATT STREET. THE CHARACTER OF THE STREET IS -- THERE ARE THESE TOWNHOMES THAT INTERFACES RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET. SO THERE IS A VARIETY OF TOWNHOMES AND SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. AS WELL AS LIKE SOME MULTIFAMILY IN THE AREA AS WELL. I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO POINT OUT ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE FUTURE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL 20. THE SITE IS RIGHT INTERFACING COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 IN THE RED. THIS IS AN INTENSIVE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. THIS FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY IN THE RED ALLOWS CI USES WHICH COULD BE AUTO REPAIR. SO THAT'S THE CONTEXT ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP IS THAT IT IS A LITTLE BIT, WAS PLANNED FOR A LITTLE BIT MORE INTENSITY ACROSS THE STREET BUT THEY ARE DEVELOPED WITH TOWNHOMES. THAT IS THE EXISTING CHARACTER. RESIDENTIAL 20, THE FUTURE LAND USE OF THE SITE IS, ANTICIPATES SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED HOUSING, SUCH AS TOWNHOMES, DUPLEXES, SOME MULTIFAMILY. IT DOESN'T QUITE HAVE THE DENSITY FOR THAT ALWAYS. AND THEN SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED IF THAT'S APPROPRIATE. SO WE DID REVIEW THIS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT. WE LOOKED AT THE EXISTING DENSITY ALONG THE SEGMENT OF THE STREET, AND WE FOUND THAT IT WAS DEVELOPED THE RESIDENTIAL 20 PIECES OR AS A WHOLE, EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE APPROXIMATELY 49% OF THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THIS DESIGNATION. THIS REZONING WOULD ALLOW A DENSITY OF THE SITE OF 17.54 UNITS PER ACRE IN AN AREA PLANNED FOR 20 DWELLING UNITS AN ACRE. SO IT'S GETTING CLOSER TO THAT DENSITY THAT WE WOULD ANTICIPATE UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. AS I SAID, THIS IS THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, AND IT'S NOT FAR FROM THE CBD, FROM THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AS WELL. WE FOUND THAT IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICIES ABOUT PROVIDING ADDITIONAL INFILL HOUSING ON AN UNDERUTILIZED PARCEL WITHIN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT. WE'VE ALSO CITED IN OUR REPORT POLICIES RELATED TO THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND ITS HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE AND WE FOUND IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THOSE AS WELL. SO THOSE ARE IN THE REPORT FOR THE RECORD. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. MS. LaCHONE. >>LaCHONE DOCK: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I'LL PUT UP THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED. THE PD REQUEST BEFORE YOU WOULD ALLOW FOR TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES ON THE SITE. SO THE LOT ITSELF HAS A FRONTAGE OF 64 FEET AND THEN A DEPTH OF 77 FEET. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT THAT'S ALLOWED IS 35 FEET FOR THE TWO DWELLINGS ON-SITE. AND THEN FOUR PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE OVERALL USE AND FOUR SPACES ARE PROVIDED. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN. THIS IS THE SITE WHICH IS OUTLINED IN THE DOTTED LINE. THIS IS AZEELE STREET. THIS IS OREGON AVENUE. SO THIS OUTLINE IS THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ON-SITE, WHICH I'LL SHOW YOU MOMENTARILY PHOTOS OF. THE PROPOSAL IS TO ADD IN ADDITION TO THIS EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THEN THIS WOULD PROPOSE ACCESS TO THE SITE FROM AZEELE WITH THE SPACES HERE. THIS IS A CARPORT AND THEN THIS IS A SURFACE SPACE LOCATED HERE. THIS IS PROPOSED AS NEW DEVELOPMENT. SO THIS IS BUILDING TWO, WHICH IS THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN END OF THE SITE. THIS WOULD HAVE ACCESS ON OREGON AVENUE. SO ONE HAS VEHICULAR ACCESS ON AZEELE AND THE OTHER ON OREGON. THIS WOULD HAVE A CARPORT ALSO ON-SITE. YOU CAN SEE THE FRONT DOOR ORIENTATION HERE, AND THEN THIS HAS THE ACCESS HERE. YOU CAN ALSO SEE THE SIDEWALK SURROUNDS THE SITE ON BOTH THE NORTH AND THE WEST. ALSO, THIS LOT IS A PART OF DOBYVILLE. IT'S IN THE HYDE PARK LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. THE SUBJECT SITE IS A PART OF REVISED WATROUS SUBDIVISION. WEST 77 FEET OF LOT 12, BLOCK 2. IT WAS PLATTED IN 1915 WITH 12 LOTS, BUT IT HAS BEEN DEVELOPED TODAY. IT WAS PLATTED AT A LOT WIDTH AVERAGE OF 64 FEET OF FRONTAGE, 12 LOTS. TODAY, BLOCK 2 CONTAINS 27 LOTS. THOSE LOTS WE TOOK THE MEASUREMENTS AND ASSESSED THAT BLOCK FACE. THOSE LOTS ARE MEASURING IN WIDTH UP TO 54 FEET. SO WITHIN THE BLOCK FACE ITSELF, OVER 50% OF THE BLOCK FACE HAS LOTS THAT ARE BETWEEN ZERO TO 34 FEET IN WIDTH. 34 FEET IS THE WIDEST WIDTH ON THAT BLOCK FACE. I WANT TO SHOW YOU THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE SITE. SO THIS IS THE CURRENT STRUCTURE. THIS IS THE WEST ELEVATION. THIS SHOWS YOU THE NORTH ELEVATION. THIS IS THE EAST ELEVATION AT THE TOP AND THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION AT THE BOTTOM. AND THEN THIS ONE IS FOR THE STRUCTURE ON-SITE. THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION AND THEN THIS PHOTO IS THE WEST ELEVATION. THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION AND THEN THIS IS THE EAST ELEVATION. THEN I HAVE THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE SITE TO SHOW YOU. SO THIS IS THE ZONING. THIS IS THE PROPERTY WHICH IS OUTLINED HERE IN RED. THIS IS AZEELE STREET. THIS IS THIS IS OREGON. PLATT STREET IS TO THE NORTH. SURROUNDING THE SITE YOU HAVE THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY ZONES. SOME OF THE PD ZONINGS. THE USES ARE EITHER SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED OR MULTIFAMILY. TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS A PD. THIS WAS A PD APPROVED IN 04. THIS IS SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND MULTIFAMILY USES. AS YOU ARE, ALONG PLATT STREET, YOU HAVE YOUR COMMERCIAL USES WITH THE CG AND THE PD ZONING AND THOSE USES ALONG PLATT. BUT AS YOU MOVE SOUTH OF THE SITE AND SOUTH OF HORATIO, YOU HAVE YOUR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT. YOU STILL HAVE YOUR RM ZONINGS, THE RM 24s THAT ARE THROUGH HERE PLUS SOME PDs. AS YOU'RE ALONG SWANN, YOU'RE NOW AT THE POINT OF HYDE PARK VILLAGE. I HAVE PHOTOS OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. THAT IS THE HOME TO REMAIN. SO THE NEW HOME IS PROPOSED ON THE LOT NEXT TO THAT EXISTING STRUCTURE. SO THIS IS A VIEW OF THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE. THIS IS THAT ACCESS POINT THAT'S ON AZEELE. THIS IS LOOKING WEST ON AZEELE. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE LOOKING WEST ON AZEELE. THIS IS IF WE TURN AROUND THE SITE, AND THIS IS FROM OREGON LOOKING NORTH ON AZEELE. THIS IS THE NORTH END OF THE SITE, ANOTHER VIEW OF AZEELE. YOU'LL SEE THE DOBY HOUSE THAT'S FURTHER DOWN, BUT I HAVE A PICTURE OF THAT ALSO TO SHOW YOU IN THE SURROUNDING PHOTOS. THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE. YOU CAN SEE THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY IS ACROSS THE STREET. THIS IS THE DOBY HOUSE, WHICH IS LOCATED ON AZEELE. THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS ON AZEELE IF YOU'RE LOOKING EAST. THAT RESIDENCE IS OFF TO THE RIGHT IN THE PHOTO. THIS IS EAST OF THE SITE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS THERE. THIS IS EAST, THE OTHER SIDE >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND GO AHEAD. >> SURE. MY NAME IS ASSAD SHAKE. APPLICANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. >> STEVE MICHELINI. AGENT. >> I NEED HELP PLUGGING THIS IN. >>STEVE MICHELINI: CAN WE STOP THE CLOCK WHILE HE SETS UP? >> COUNCIL, WHENEVER THE CLOCK CAN START, I PREPARED THIS VIDEO FOR YOU GUYS KIND OF TO SHOW A MORE VISUAL VERSUS THE STILL RENDERINGS. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AFTER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS IT A GREEN SCREEN THAT YOU HAVE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: T AND I, CAN SOMEONE GIVE THEM A HANDSETTING THIS UP? PLUG IN A LAPTOP OR USB? >> I HAVE BOTH BUT RIGHT NOW WE'RE PLUGGED IN WITH A LAPTOP. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SOMEONE WILL COME OUT REAL QUICK. CTTV, ANYBODY IN THE BACK THAT CAN HELP PERHAPS? >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I'M GOING TO REMIND THE PUBLIC THE RULE REGARDING THE USE OF MEDIA. AND THAT WOULD BE RULE 5E. TO REFRESH THE PUBLIC'S RECOLLECTION, PERSONS REQUESTING TO USE ELECTRONIC MEDIA FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE CITY COUNCIL, ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE ELECTRONIC MEDIA TO THE CITY OF TAMPA DIGITAL MEDIA PRODUCTION CTTV AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BROADCAST. SUCH MATERIAL MUST COMPLY WITH THE ESTABLISHED TIME LIMITS AND COMPLY WITH THE RULES OF PROCEDURE AND SUBMISSIONS ARE NOT PERMITTED FOR USE UNDER GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT. BUT THIS IS PART OF -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A REMINDER, THAT THIS IS -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AS PETITIONER IS ALLOWED TO. >>MARTIN SHELBY: 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE. OBVIOUSLY, THE REASON I'M BRINGING THIS TO COUNCIL'S ATTENTION IS SO THAT THE PUBLIC IS AWARE THAT THE TIME THAT IS TAKEN CAN BE EXTENSIVE. I UNDERSTAND GIVING THE PETITIONER LATITUDE BUT JUST A REMINDER. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: [INAUDIBLE] -- THAT TELLS THEM WHAT THE RULES ARE? THAT IS THE ONLY TIME THEY ARE GOING TO KNOW. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I DON'T KNOW WHETHER IT IS ON THE DOCUMENTS THAT YOU GET ON THE RULES OF PROCEDURE WITH REGARD TO ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT. I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH WHAT LAND DEVELOPMENT HAS. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO WAIVE THE RULES FOR THIS APPLICANT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY, MR. SHELBY. BUT IN THE FUTURE, WE'LL KNOW. GO AHEAD, IF YOU WANT TO START THE VIDEO. MAKE SURE THE VOLUME IS UP. I DON'T KNOW IF CTTV NEEDS TO GET -- YEAH, GET THE -- THERE WE GO. THE VOLUME. IT SHOULD WORK. WE'LL TRY. IF NOT, WE'LL CHANGE THE OUTPUT DEVICE. CHECK THE OTHER SETTING THAT HAS THE OTHER OUTPUT. >> APOLOGIES, COUNCIL. WE PLAYED A VIDEO LAST TIME. >>STEVE MICHELINI: JUST SO YOU KNOW, THIS WAS REVIEWED PREVIOUSLY. BEFORE 48 HOURS. HE TOOK IT IN. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT TO MY ATTENTION. >> PLAY IT AND TALK OVER IT. >> ARE YOU ABLE TO SEE THE VIDEO AT LEAST? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE CAN SEE IT. >> HI. I'M ASSAD SHAKE. I'M THE OWNER OF 402 SOUTH OREGON AVENUE. THE PROJECT WE'RE PROPOSING HERE IS SIMPLE. WE'RE GOING TO PRESERVE THE EXISTING HISTORIC STRUCTURE ON THE SITE AND WE'RE GOING TO DO A SMALL ADDITION IN THE REAR THAT PROVIDES COVERED PARKING AND ALSO RESPECTS THE TWO OAK TREES THAT ARE IN THE BACK WHICH WE WILL BE KEEPING. IN ADDITION, ON THE VACANT PORTION OF THE LOT WE'RE GOING TO RESTORE THE HISTORIC FABRIC. THERE USED TO BE A HOME LOCATED HERE THAT WAS BUILT IN THE 1910s. SOMETIMES IN THE MID 1990s, THAT HOME WAS DEMOLISHED. WE ARE SEEKING TO BUILD A NEW CONSTRUCTION HOME WHERE THE OLD HOME USED TO SIT. NOW, OUR NEIGHBORS ON THIS SITE ARE THE TOWNHOMES ACROSS THE STREET, THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY, AND ALL THE GREENSPACE AND 406 SOUTH OREGON AVENUE. OUR NEIGHBORING HOUSE AT 406 SOUTH OREGON WAS BUILT IN 1925 AND SITS ON A 26-FOOT WIDE LOT. THE NEIGHBOR SUPPORTS OUR PROJECT, AND THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THEIR HOME, WHICH HAS A SMALL AT THE FRONT AND SECOND STORY RECESSED IN THE BACK WAS A GREAT INSPIRATION FOR OUR PLAN. OUR NEIGHBOR AT 408 SOUTH OREGON ALSO SUPPORTS OUR PROJECT. OUR NEIGHBORS AT 410, 412, AND -- >> 410 AND 414 SUPPORT US NOW AFTER THE DEAL. >> VIDEO: THEY ALL SIT ON AN APPROXIMATELY 30-FOOT WIDE LOT. -- ONLY OTHER CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC STRUCTURE THAT'S LEFT ON THE BLOCK. PAY ATTENTION TO THEIR METAL ROOF AND THE GABLE SHAPE OF THE ROOF. NEIGHBOR AT 420 SOUTH OREGON WAS BUILT IN 2008, AND IT KIND OF STANDS OUT FROM THE OTHER HOMES ON THE BLOCK BECAUSE OF YOU ARE YOU ARE TO OUR NEIGHBOR AT 422 SOUTH OREGON SITS AT A 32-FOOT-WIDE LOT AND METAL ROOF AND CHARACTERISTIC OF BLOCK. 426 SOUTH OREGON WHICH IS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHICH WAS PERMANENT BEFORE THE HISTORIC DISTRICT EXPANSION THAT SETS OUT ON THE BLOCK AND YOU CAN SEE OUR PROJECT IS MEANT TO BE A MUCH MORE SENSE TESTIFY INFILL NEW CONSTRUCTION. HERE WE ARE BACK AT FORESTRY SOUTH OREGON. LIKE I SAID WE ARE PRESERVING THESE OAK TREES. OUR NEIGHBORS HERE AT 1408 WEST 'ZEAL STREET ALSO SUPPORT OUR PROJECT AND HAVE WRITTEN A LETTER OF SUPPORT. 1406 WEST 'ZEAL AND 1404 WEST 'ZEAL. THESE ARE BOTH CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES ARE 1406 IS 29 FEET AND LOT IS 1800 SQUARE FEET. 1404 IS ONLY 32 FEET WIDE AND LOT IS 1600 SQUARE FEET TOTAL. NOW WE ARE AT 401 SOUTH ORLEANS. THE EARLY 1900 STRUCTURE ON THE LOT WAS TORN DOWN PRIOR TO THE EXPANSION OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. SOUTH OR LINE WHICH ARE BOTH CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES AN NARROW LOTS. 417 SOUTH ORLEANS BUILT IN 1919 AND LOOKS LIKE IT WAS HERE FOR OVER 100 YEARS. A 22-FOOT-WIDE LOT AND SENSITIVE INFILL CONSTRUCTION. HERE WE HAVE 421, 423 AND 425 SOUTH ORLEANS ALL CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES ALSO ON NARROW LOTS ALL BIMETAL ROOFS AND GABLE ROOFS AS WELL. HERE WE HAVE A SOUTH ORLEANS. A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE BUILT IN 1908. I MET THE OWNERS AND THEY SUPPORT OUR PROJECT. THIS WAS ONE OF OUR BIGGEST INSPIRATIONS FOR THE NEW HOME THAT WE ARE BUILDING. WE LOOKED AT THE GABLE ROOF STRUCTURE OF THIS HOME. WE LOOKED AT THE WAY THE FIRST FLOOR OF HOME. AND IT LOOKED DIMINUTIVE FROM THE STREET LEVEL AND SECOND STORY RISES IN THE BACK AND WE TOOK A LOT OF REFERENCING FROM THE HOME. WE HAVE 400 SOUTH ORLEANS ON A CORNER LOT, A MODERN HOME THAT WAS BUILT PRIOR TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT SO AS WE LOOK OVERHEAD, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF DOBYVILLE, BOTH HISTORICALLY AND MODERN TIMES IS CHARACTERIZED BY NARROW LOTS, REDUCED SIDE YARD SETBACKS AROUND THREE FEET, AND MANY ACCESSORY STRUCTURES BELT ALL THE WAY INTO THE REAR ALLEY. AND AS WE MOVE SOUTH OF SWANN AVENUE, IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF HYDE PARK IN THIS AREA DIFFERS SIGNIFICANTLY FROM DOBYVILLE. NEIGHBORHOOD HERE IS CHARACTERIZED BY LARGER LOTS, LOWER DENSITY AND LOWER FUTURE LAND USE. OUR REZONING AT 40 SOUTH OREGON HAS BEEN FOUND CONSISTENT BY CITY STAFF INCLUDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION, NATURAL RESOURCES TRANSPORTATION HISTORIC PRESERVATION, AND THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION WHO VOTED 4-1 TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF OUR PROJECT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE WITH THE VIDEO. HOPEFULLY OPENING THIS POWERPOINT WILL BE MUCH EASIER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LET ME SAY. WHAT A BEAUTIFUL NEIGHBORHOOD. SEEING IT LIKE THAT, ALL THE DIFFERENT COLORS AND ALL THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, IT IS REALLY A GEM. >> THANK YOU. OKAY. SO HOW WE HAVE THE PRESENTATION POR PORTION. AND WE HAVE SOME COPIES OF THIS. IF I CAN HAND THEM OUT TO COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE DON'T NEED THE SEVENTH ONE. >> OKAY. WE ALREADY WENT OVER THIS. WHAT I WANT TO FOCUS ON OUR PROPOSAL INSPIRED BY HISTORY. WHERE WE ARE SEEKING TO BUILD THE NEW CONSTRUCTION STRUCTURE, THERE USED TO BE A HOME BUILT IN 1913. SO WE BELIEVE WE ARE HONORING THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. REBUILDING THE HOME ON A FOOTPRINT WHERE THE HOME PREVIOUSLY EXISTED. BEFORE I BOUGHT THE HOUSE, THE PROPERTY WAS COMPLETELY UNMAINTAINED, OVERGROWN AND YOU CAN SEE IN THE PHOTOS THAT IS THE BEFORE AND THE AFTER AFTER WE CLEARED UP THE SITE. OUR SITE PLAN. STAFF ALREADY KIND OF WENT OVER THAT. AND I WILL SCROLL BY THAT. THE ELEVATIONS THAT STAFF ALREADY WENT OVER. THESE ARE SOME RENDERING OF THE PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE. THE PROPOSED ADDITION TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE AS WELL. THESE ARE RENDERINGS SHOWING THE TWO STRUCTURES SIDE BY SIDE. I THINK THAT THE VIDEO DID A LOT BETTER JOB THAN THESE STILL PHOTOS AND I WILL SCROLL PAST THESE. BUT I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT THAT -- THAT THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES ALL HAVE A CERTAIN ARCHITECTURAL VERNACULAR AND CHOSE TO FOLLOW THAT AND ARC RECOGNIZED THAT. MOST OF THESE HOMES HAVE VERY NARROW SIDE YARD SETBACKS. THAT KIND OF WAS DEMONSTRATED IN THE VIDEO AS WELL. AND THEN AS WE MENTIONED, IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT ALTHOUGH THIS WAS ADDED TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT, DOBYVILLE'S DEVELOPMENT PATTERN WAS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THAN THE REST OF HYDE PARK AND WE ARE TRYING TO RESPECT THAT. OUR FRONT YARD SETBACK IS BASED ON THE TWO CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE FRONT YARD QUARTERBACKS. TWO ARE 15 FOOT 5 INCHES AND 16 FOOT, 8 INCHES FOR FRONT YARD SETBACK. SO REPROPOSED A FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 15 FOOT, 6 INCHES FOR THE NEW CONSTRUCTION RESIDENCE. SO IT IS BASICALLY LINED UP WITH THE EXISTING HISTORIC HOME. TO KIND OF DOCUMENT THAT THERE WAS -- THIS IS THE VERY IMPORTANT PART OF -- OF OUR -- OUR REZONING. IF YOU LOOK AT THE SANBORN FIRE MAP, THE STRUCTURE THAT IS CURRENTLY THERE NOW IS ACTUALLY A NEWER STRUCTURE THAN THE STRUCTURE THAT WAS ORIGINALLY THERE AND THE SANBORN FIRE MAP IF YOU LOOK WHERE THE CURSOR WAS SHOWING, WHERE WE WERE PROPOSING TO BUILD A HOME, THERE USED TO BE A HOME. WENT TO THE LIBRARY AND PULLED OUT THE POLK DIRECTORY AND CONFIRMED 402 OR 404 OREGON WHERE IT WAS SEPARATELY ADDRESSED. AND I EVEN HAD PROPERTY APPRAISER CARDS THAT SHOWED THAT BOTH OF STRUCTURES HAVE EXISTED AT THE SAME TIME. AND THESE ARE ALL IN YUCK PACKETS. WE GOT -- I WENT TO FDOT.COM. THEY HAVE A REALLY NICE AERIAL DATABASE IS AND FOUND AN AERIAL, LITTLE BIT BLURRY, SHOWING TWO STRUCTURES SIDE BY SIDE IN 1909 AND DEMOLISHED SOME TIME AFTER 1909. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO LIVED ON 404 OREGON, THE VACANT POURING OF THE SITE. WE WENT INTO THE NEWSPAPER FOUND MR. JOHN JOLO IF,F WHO USED TO WORK FOR LIGHTHOUSE OF THE BLIND. SERGEANT JAMES COLEMAN CAME BACK FROM HIS NAVY SERVICE BACK IN 1952. AND THESE PEOPLE HAD MEMORIES IN THE HOUSE THAT WAS DEMOLISHED AND -- AND THAT WAS DEMOLISHED PRIOR TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT EXPANSION. THESE ARE THE DOBYVILLE MAPS. SHOWING THE DOBYVILLE BOUND BOUNDARIES. >> SHOW THEM THE LOCATION. >> YES, OUR PROPERTY IS RIGHT HERE AT THE CORNER OF OREGON AND AZEELE. RIGHT IN THE BOUNDARY. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. OUR PROPERTY IS AT THE TOP LEFT, AND WANTED TO SHOW PROPERTIES THAT HAD LESS OR SIMILAR WIDTH. AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS VERY UNIQUE AREA WHERE YOU HAVE LOTS -- LOTS AS NARROW AS 22 FEET AND 27, 2, ETC. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC STRUCTURES EVEN ARE ON LOTS AS NARROW AS 27, 29 AND 32 FEET. AS A MATTER OF FACT, NONCONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES THAT ARE ON NARROW LOTS WERE PROBABLY BELT -- WERE -- WERE HISTORIC HOMES WERE TORN DOWN. THESE ARE LOTS THAT HAVE LESS DEPTH. AGAIN WE ARE IN THE TOP LEFT CORNER. AND THE RED PIN SHOWS LOTS THAT HAVE LESS DEPTH. NOW THIS IS PRIOR -- PROBABLY MOST IMPORTANT PART, THE SUPPORT. WHERE THE RED PIN. OUR DIRECT NEIGHBORS SUPPORT US. THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO WILL BE MOST AFFECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION WE ARE DOING. AND WE HAVE THEIR SUPPORT. AS A MATTER OF FACT, 406 OREGON, 408, 410, 414 OREGON ALL SUPPORT OUR PROJECT. THE NEIGHBORS MOST AFFECTED BY OUR PROJECT SUPPORT OUR PROJECT. HAVE WRITTEN LETTERS OF SUPPORT. TWO OF THEM ARE EVEN HERE TODAY TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT. THIS IS AN OVERALL MAP SHOWING OUR SUPPORT IN ALL OF TAMPA WITH PI PINS AND THAT WILL WRAP UP MY PORTION. STEVE. >> WE HAVE BEEN FOUND CONSISTENT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY STAFF AND THE ARC. WE HAVE NO WAIVERS. WE ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH. AND WE -- WE DO PLAN TO SAVE AND RENOVATE THE EXISTING CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE. AND THEN ADD ANOTHER STRUCTURE THAT WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE ARC AND HAVE TO BE FOUND IN TERMS OF ITS DESIGN. IT WOULD HAVE TO BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH ALL OF THOSE GUIDELINES. WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME WORKING WITH STAFF TO DEVELOP A PLAN WHICH WE FEEL IS VERY SENSITIVE TO THE AREA AND HAVE TO KEEP IN MIND THAT DOBYVILLE WAS BUILT AND DESIGNED AND DEVELOPED UNDER VERY DIFFERENT GUIDELINES THAN THE OTHER HYDE PARK AREAS SOUTH OF SWANN. WE HAVE SHOWN YOU ON THE VIDEO AND ON THE SLIDES THAT -- THAT THE LOTS ARE IRREGULARLY SHAPED. AND YOU HAVE TO ALSO REMEMBER THAT THESE -- THESE AREAS WERE DESIGNED FOR -- FOR THE WORKERS THAT -- THAT ACTUALLY WERE SERVICING AND -- AND THE AREAS THAT WERE SOUTH OF -- OF SWANN. AND I UNDERSTAND -- I WAS TRYING TO PICK THAT -- PICK A CAREFUL -- >>GWEN HENDERSON: PICKING GOOD WORDS. >> CAREFUL EXPLANATION. BUT THESE -- >>GWEN HENDERSON: DON'T L LET ALAN HELP YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO HELPING. >> WORKER WHO DIDN'T RELY ON TRANSPORTATION TO GET TO THEIR JOBS SOUTH OF SWANN. DISTINCT AREA DEVELOPED IN A VERY DIFFERENT MANNER AND WE HAVE BEEN SENSITIVE TO THAT. WE HAVE SHOWN YOU THAT THERE WERE TWO STRUCTURES HERE BEFORE. AND THE CURRENT ROAD, WE ARE PROPOSING TO RENOVATE THE ONE VERY SENSITIVELY AND ADD ANOTHER STRUCTURE THAT IS ALSO SENSITIVE. WE -- WE HAVE BEEN FOUND TO IT BE CONSISTENT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THERE ARE PROBABLY 30 OR 40 DIFFERENT LAND USE CODES THAT WE ARE BEING FOUND CONSISTENT WITH. SAYS TO PROMOTE THE EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND, WE HAVE BEEN FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THAT. AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PRESERVE SHARED 30-FOOT LIVE OAK, 24-INCH LIVE OAK. ADVERSE IMPACTS ARE NOT ANTICIPATED FOR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD AND CULTURAL SOURCES OF DOBYVILLE BY PRESERVING THE EXISTING HOME AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOME. THAT IS -- ENCOURAGE FLEXIBLE LAND DEVELOPMENT WHICH REDUCES TRANSPORTATION NEEDS. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS PRESERVING TREES AND MEETING THE REQUIRED GREEN SPACE. WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR ANY GREEN SPACE WAIVERS. WE, BY CODE, MUST MEET ALL THE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS. THERE ARE NO WAIVERS THAT YOU CAN OBTAIN FOR THAT. PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT WHERE APPROPRIATE AN LOCATION AND CHARACTER. AND I AM READING FROM THE STAFF REPORT. THE AREA SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT AREA IS ZONED RM 12 AND PD AND DEVELOPED WITH A MIX OF SMALL LOTS AND SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY. THE DEVELOPMENT TO HAVE TWO STRUCTURES AND BUILDS A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOME WHICH IS BEING FOUND CONSISTENT. PROMOTE MORE DESIRABLE LIVING CONDITIONS, THE SMALLER HOMES ARE MORE AFFORDABLE AND WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING AS REQUESTED AND ONE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE CITY. PROMOTING ARCHITECTURE FEATURES AND STANDARDS. WE STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH ARC AND STILL HAVE TO MEET ALL OF THEIR GUIDELINES AND ALL OF THEIR REQUIREMENTS. THOSE ARE NOT WAIVABLE ISSUES. I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. AND AT THIS POINT, I WILL SURRENDER TO SPEAKERS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: I WANT TO ASK THE APPLICANT FOR QUESTION. FOR DISCLOSURE, I SPENT YEARS LIVING TWO BLOCKS AWAY AT EDGE OF HYDE PARK AND DOBYVILLE. MY KID GREW UP WALKING THROUGH THIS AREA EVERY DAY. SO I KNOW IT WELL. YOU OBVIOUSLY HAVE DONE A LOT OF RESEARCH ON THIS. AND I APPRECIATE THE SENSITIVITY TO ALL THAT. DID YOU -- HAVE YOU MET WITH THE NEIGHBOR ASSOCIATIONS? AND WHAT FEEDBACK DID YOU GET. IF THERE IS NEGATIVE FEEDBACK, YOU WILL HAVE A CHANCE FOR REBUTTAL LATER. BUT BEFORE ANYBODY ELSE SPEAKS, CAN YOU TELL US KIND OF WHAT YOUR -- WHAT YOUR RESPONSE IS? >> WE DID AND THEY SAID THEY DIDN'T LIKE PDs. BUT ASAD. >> NEIGHBORS ARE GREAT. I THOUGHT THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS REALLY RESPECT WHAT THEY DO. TOOK UP A CONFERENCE ROOM FOR TWO HOURS IN HYDE PARK AND MET WITH ALL THE MAJOR NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERS. PAT CIMIN OH, MY CAL, ETC. INITIALLY A LIST OF CONCERNS THEY SUBMITTED, YOU KNOW, GREEN SPACE. LITANY OF ITEMS. AND I CAN ACTUALLY BRING THOSE UP HERE. SO IN CONSISTENCY WITH CITY CODE WAS A CONCERN. WE WERE FOUND CONSISTENT BY STAFF. HISTORICAL GUIDELINES. CONSISTENT BY ARC. LACK OF GREEN PEACE. WE ARE PROVIDING MORE GREEN SPACE THAN WHAT WOULD BE REQUIRED. PARCEL HISTORY AND ZONING. THIS WAS VERY IMPORTANT. HE WAS ABLE TO SHOW THEM ALL THE DOCUMENTATION OF HOW THE ORIGINAL SITE CONFIGURATION WAS. IMPACT ON HISTORIC DES STR-- DISTRICT. AND STAFF FOUND AND ARC FOUND POSITIVE IMPACT AND FLOODING WE WILL ABIDE BY ALL CODES. THAT IS A BULLET POINT. I ASKED THE NEIGHBORHOOD, WHAT CAN WE CHANGE TO EARN YOUR SUPPORT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENCE. AND I RESPECT THIS POSITION, BUT FRANKLY THEY SAID NOTHING WE COULD CHANGE FOR THEM TO GIVE THEIR SUPPORT FOR US BUILDING A NEW RESIDENCE. THEY PREFERRED US TO ADD ON TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE AND JUST MAKE A LARGER -- ONE LARGER RESIDENCE, WHICH WE FEEL IS NOT IN CHARACTER WITH DOBYVILLE. THAT IS IN CHARACTER WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD SOUTH OF SWANN. AND WE ARE LITERALLY BUILDING A HOUSE WHETHER A HOME USED TO BE. I TRIED TO CONVEY THAT. A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION IN WHAT THE HISTORIC DISTRICT EXPANSION SEEKS TO ACCOMPLISH. I BELIEVE IT SEEKS TO ACCOMPLISH MAINTAINING THE HISTORIC FABRIC. I HOPE THAT HELPS AND IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> WE ALSO FOLLOWED THE ARC STAFF'S GUIDELINES IN THEIR DIRECTION WHAT WITH AS APPROPRIATE FOR THAT AREA. I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK FOR THEM DIRECTLY, BUT OUR IMPRESSION WAS THAT A LARGER. A VERY LARGE HOME ON THIS LOT WILL BE COMPLETELY INCONSISTENT WITH THE DOBYVILLE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND WHAT WAS PREVIOUSLY THERE. WE ARE TRYING TO BE RESPECTFUL OF WHAT WAS THERE. AND BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE NORMALLY WOULD BE APPROVED BY THE ARC. AND AS I SAID, WE STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. OKAY, WE WILL OPEN IT UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. IF YOU ARE HERE AND ARE GOING TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 5, PLEASE COME UP. AND IF WE COULD LINE UP AGAINST THE WALL SO WE CAN SEE -- HAS EVERYBODY BEEN SWORN IN THAT IS GOING TO BE SPEAKING TONIGHT? I SAW TWO MORE PEOPLE COME IN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: FIRST SPEAKER, COME ON UP. IF YOU HAVE A SPEAKER WAIVER FORM. BRING IT UP TO THE ATTORNEY AND HE WILL CALL THE NAMES OUT. AND IF YOU ARE HERE ONCE HE CALLS YOUR NAME, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. >>MARTIN SHELBY: PAT HENDERSON. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PAT HENDERSON. I SEE A HAND, YES. >>MARTIN SHELBY: SCOTT HENDERSON. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEY ARE HERE. THEY RAISED THEIR HANDS. >>MARTIN SHELBY: PATRICIA SUMMERVILLE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SHE, IS SHE STILL HERE? RIGHT THERE, YES. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU, THREE ADDITIONAL MEN FOR A TOTAL OF SIX, PLEASE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. BLESS YOU. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. MY NAME IS JANE GRAHAM, ATTORNEY AND FOUNDER OF SUNSHINE CITY LAW. I AM REPRESENTING HISTORIC HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION TONIGHT. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING THAT YOU VOTE TO DENY THIS ACTION FOR A PD. THERE IS A TIME AND PLACE FOR PDs, BUT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS AN INAPPROPRIATE TOOL IN THIS SPECIFIC CASE. THIS IS A BACK-DOOR WAY TO GET A LOT SPLIT THAT DOESN'T, DOESN'T MEET LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS. SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASES PERVIOUS SURFACE AND GREEN SPACE ON THE SITE FROM 86% TO 45%. AND A ROAD TO THE INTENT TO PROTECT THE HISTORIC INTEGRITY OF DOBYVILLE. A SQUARE PEG IN A ROUND HOLE. AND THEY HAVE RESORTED TO A PD BUT IT STILL DOESN'T FIT. MY CLIENT IS DEDICATED TO PROMOTING AND CULTIVATING HISTORIC AND COMMUNAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HYDE PARK AREA. WHY WOULD THEY GO TO THE TROUBLE TO HIRE A LAWYER TO SPEAK TO YOU TONIGHT OF A PARCEL OF LAND THAT IS JUST OVER 1/10 OF AN ACRE? THE REASON, BECAUSE IT IS IN DOBYVILLE. AND MY CLIENT HAS BEEN A HUGE ADVOCATE FOR EXPANSION OF THE DOBYVILLE DISTRICT AND FOR THE RECENT DESIGNATION OF THE DOBY HOUSE AS A LANDMARK. THIS PROPERTY IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER FROM IT, A PROPERTY DATING BACK TO THE 1950s AND RELEVANT AND IMPORTANT TO THE FUTURE OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. THIS IS WHERE THE DOBY HOUSE IT. AND THIS IS A THIS PROPERTY HERE. AS A QUASI JUDICIAL HEARING. APPLICANT HAS THE BURDEN TO SHOW THAT HE HAS MET ALL THE REQUIRED ZONING CRITERIA WITH COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. IN THIS CASE, HE CAN NOT. TONIGHT, YOU WILL HEAR TESTIMONY FROM EXPERTS IN ARCHITECTURE AND HISTORY, AS WELL AS LAYPERSON TESTIMONY AND FIRSTHAND ACCOUNTS OF CHARACTER OF A YEAR. THE EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT THIS ACTION FAILS TO MEET THE PURPOSE OF A PD, SPECIFICALLY IF DOES NOT PROMOTE THE SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND AND IMPACTS CULTURAL RESOURCES. DOES NOT MAXIMIZE PRESERVATION OF GREEN SPACE. NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE LOCATION AND DOES NOT COMPLIMENT THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY. NOT AN UNIQUE USE ON ANOTHER ZONING DISTRICT THAT CANNOT BE ACCOMM ACCOMMODATED. SIMPLE TERMS, TO JAM IN ANOTHER SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON A LOT THAT IS SMALLER THAN THE ZONING DISTRICT ALLOWS. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROHIBITS PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS FROM BEING USED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF WAIVING ESTABLISHED LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. HERE, THE PROPERTY IS ZONED RM-12, WHICH HAS MINIMUM LOT SIZES, SETBACK REQUIREMENT AND LOT SIZE WIDTHS. I THINK IT COMES DOWN TO REALLY LOOKING AT THE NUMBERS. BECAUSE IF YOU LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN, FIRST OF ALL, FOR LOT AREA, IN RM-12, THE LOT AREA NEED TO BE 5,000. NOW CURRENTLY THE TOTAL SITE IS 4967. IF YOU LOOK AT THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS, THERE ARE 56% OF IT AND 42% OF IT. IT IS REALLY SMALLER THAN WHAT IS REQUIRED. THIS IS A LOT SPLIT IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING THAT DOESN'T MEET CURRENT REQUIREMENTS. THE SETBACKS ARE ALSO FAR TOO SMALL AT THREE FEET. AND WHILE THERE IS -- LOOKING AT THE AREA. AND YOU WILL HEAR MORE FROM HISTORIC EXPERTS, THEY WILL LOOK AT WHAT IS ACTUALLY REQUIRED. SOME THE DWELLING UNIT SIZE IS ALSO SMALLER. AND REALLY INTERESTING ISSUE IS PERVIOUS AREA. WHICH I THINK IS THE MOST COMPELLING ISSUE HERE, WHERE THE PERVIOUS AREA IS A HUGE REDUCTION. CURRENTLY IT IS 84% OF THE EXISTING SITE VERSES 45% OF THE PROPOSED SITE. CLEARLY THIS IS A VERY SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION. AND THIS IS THE EXISTING FOOTPRINT, SIDE BY SIDE WHICH IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN VERSUS THE PROPOSED FOOTPRINT. SOMETHING YOU HAVEN'T BEEN PRESENTED SIDE BY SIDE TO SHOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OPEN PEACE AND WHAT IS THERE NOW VERSUS WHAT IS PROPOSED. THIS IS NOT WHAT PDs ARE FOR. THEY ARE MEANT TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE GREEN PEACE. THEY ARE NOT MEANT TO PAVE OVER EVERY INCH. YOU WILL HEAR COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FROM THE COMMUNITY OF THE DOBYVILLE EXPANSION AND PROTECTIONS TO PRESERVE IT. JUST BECAUSE PROPERTIES HAVE BEEN GRANTED THE OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP IN AREA IN A HAPHAZARD AND NONCONFORMING MATTER IN THE PAST, BEFORE THIS HAS BEEN HISTORICALLY DESIGNATED, THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT NOW THAT THE AREA IS PROTECTED, THAT YOU DON'T NEED TO TAKE A CLOSER LOOK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE PROTECTIONS FOR TODAY AND THE FUTURE. AND TO EDUCATE OUR COMMUNITY ABOUT THE PAST. ONE LAST THING I DO WANT TO HIGHLIGHT TO YOU IS THAT, AS YOU HAVE SEEN AND YOU WILL HEAR, THE ACTION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS AND IN U.S. BE DENIED ON THIS. TO EXTENT YOU HEAR CONCERNS ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND, YOU KNOW, OTHER OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING, THAT IS A LEGISLATIVE ISSUE THAT -- THAT NEEDS TO BE LOOKED AT AS FAR AS CHANGES TO LOT SPLITS OR ACCESSORY UNITS. AND SHOULD BE DEALT WITH LEGISLATIVELY AND HERE YOU ARE IN A QUASI-JUDICIAL GRAVITY AND SIMPLY DOES NOT MEET THE CODE. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST DENIAL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> I HAVE COPIES OF THE PRESENTATION AND ALSO THE HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE ATTORNEY WILL TAKE IT AND PUT IT INTO THE RECORD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> SHOULD I BEGIN? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: JUST A MOMENT. HE HAS TO READ THE NAMES. GO AHEAD FROM MR. SHELBY. >> MY NAME IS ROGER -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: RENEE MARY. O'BRIAN, THREE MINUTES. TOTAL OF SIX, PLEASE. >> MOI NAME IS ROGER GURNCA. NORTH ELHIS OR HER, TAMPA HEIGHTS, PRESERVATIONIST AND BUILDING CONTRACTOR. MY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS HAVE BEEN HONORED BY BOTH THE FLORIDA TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESENTATION AND THE TAMPA HILLSBOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION, SPECIFICALLY FOR EXCELLENCE IN NEW CONSTRUCTION WITHIN HISTORIC DISTRICTS. URBAN EN FILL. THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL DOES NOT COP FORM TO THE CITY OF TAMPA'S ORDINANCE 2002-230 THAT IS THE HYDE PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES. NOR DOES IS CONFORM TO THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR STANDARDS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION IN A HISTORIC DISTRICT. THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STATES THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO ADD NEW CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IF SITE CONDITIONS ALLOW AND IF, ONE, THE DESIGN, TWO, DENSITY, AND THREE, PLACEMENT OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION RESPECTS THE OVERALL CHARACTER OF THE SITE. THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR STANDARD NUMBER NINE ALSO GOES AND SAYS, NEW CONSTRUCTION NEED TO BE BUILT IN A MANNER THAT PROTECTS THE INTEGRITY OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND THE PROPERTY'S SETTINGS. EVALUATING THROUGH THE LENS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S PERIOD OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE, WHICH IS 1896-19 33. THIS PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE PRESERVATION STANDARDS. WHAT WAS BELT AFTER 1933 CANNOT BE CITED AS NEIGHBORHOOD'S HISTORIC CHARACTER. WE MUST GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING OF 19 -- OF THE 20th CENTURY AND STOP IN THE BEGINNING OF THE 1930s. THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S CHARACTER WAS THAT OF SMALL, NARROW AND USUALLY ONE-STORY BUILDINGS THAT WERE NOTABLY WITHOUT AUTOMOBILE INFRASTRUCTURE. THAT IS, NO DRIVEWAYS IN THE FRONT. NO PARKING IN THE FRONT. NO PAVED FRONT YARDS. NO GARAGE IN THE FRONT. DOBYVILLE WAS THE QUINTESSENTIAL WALK-TO-WORK NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS REQUIRED IT. DOBYVILLE WAS BELT BY WEALTHY WHITE HOMEOWNER WHO ELEVEN SOUTH OF SWANN AVENUE, AND TO ENABLE THEIR PARKING LOT. DOBYVILLE IS UNIQUE TO THE CITY AS A WHOLE. AND IN PARTICULAR, TO OUR SOCIAL HISTORY, AS IT PERSONIFIES THE CONDITIONS THAT PEOPLE OF COLOR ENDURED DURING THE JIM CROW ERA. HISTORIC PRESERVATION IS MORE THAN THE PRESERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL WORKMAN HIP. THE PRESERVATION OF THOSE BUILDINGS, STREETS AND OPEN SPACES THAT STAND AS REMINDERS TO OUR CULTURAL PAST. BOTH THE GOOD AND THE REGRETTABLE. WE HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION HERE TO PUT A STOP TO THE ERASING OF DOBYVILLE'S SIGNIFICANCE. GRANTING THE APPLICANT'S REZONING WOULD ONLY FURTHER DIMINISH OUR COLLECTIVE HISTORY. A YEAR AGO, COUNCIL VOTED IN FAVOR OF INCLUSION OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD INTO THE HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT. NOW WE LOOK TO YOU TO SUPPORT THE CONTENT AND THE MEANING BEHIND YOUR PAST VOTE. PLEASE DENY THIS ACTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, SIR. PATTERSON TRICK CIMINO. DO YOU HAVE A SPEAKER WAIVER FORM? >> NO. >> I AM USED TO TALKING FOR THREE MEN AND I TRY TO RESPECT YOU ALL FOR TIME. AND I TRY TO YOU ALL FOR TIME. AND I TRY TOU ALL FOR TIME. I AND I TRY TO RE YOU ALL N AND I TRY TO RESPECT YOU ALL FOR TIME. U AND I TRY T YOU ALL FOR TIME. TE AND I TRY RESPECT YOU ALL FOR TIME. S AND RESPECT YOU ALL FOR TIME. SORRY ABOUT THAT. WELL, I WILL GET YOU -- HERE IT IS. IT IS THE BOTTOM. I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS VISIBLE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IF YOU CAN ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT SO WE BELIEVE GET EVERYTHING IN THE FRA FRAME. >> ZOOM? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE WHEEL AT THE TOP. AT THE TOP. >> OKAY. THANK YOU. PERFECT. I THINK THAT GETS THIS SO I CAN SEE IT BETTER. WELL, I AM PAT CIMINO, CHAIR OF THE LAND USE COMMITTEE FOR HISTORIC HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. 064 SOUTH OREGON AVENUE. AND THIS TO TELL YOU OUR BOARD IS OPPOSED TO THIS ZONING. THIS IS REMNANT OF PAST RECONFIGURING AND THEY WANT TO PUT TWO INDEPENDENT UNIT ON IT. IT DOES NOT MEET ANY CURRENT LAND USE. THE RM-12 WON'T ALLOW FOR TWO UNITS. THE LOT SPLIT CODE WON'T ALLOW FOR IT. EVEN IT WOULDN'T QUALIFY. WE FEEL THIS IS RESORTING TO AN INAPPROPRIATE USE OF PD TO SQUEEZE IN ANOTHER UNIT AND EVADE THE -- THE CODES OF TODAY. SO -- SO FOUR OF YOU WERE HERE TWO YEARS AGO WHEN WE EXPANDED THE HOKE HISTORIC DISTRICT. THIS IS JUST A MAP. I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THAT. BECAUSE WE TOOK THAT VERY SERIOUSLY. IT TOOK US REALLY ALMOST TEN YEARS -- BILL STILL MAY HAVE BEEN LIVING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHEN THAT HAPPENED, I DON'T KNOW. BUT WE CLEARLY ARTICULATED OBJECTIVES FOR DOING THAT. ONE IS TO PROTECT THE REMAINING STRUCTURE. ONE TO ERADICATE THE LAND USE PRACTICES. AND UNFORTUNATELY THIS -- PARTICULARLY THE SECOND ONE, THIS PROPOSAL BETRAYS THAT. THAT WAS THE BIG INTENT OF OUR EXPANSION. THERE IS ALSO A DISCONNECT FROM THE ARC AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS JUST AS YOU ALL HAVE DEALT WITH SORT OF DIFFERENCES WITH THE STAFF OPINIONS AND THE GARDEN CLUB AND STORMWATER WORKSHOP, WE FEEL VERY DIFFERENT THAN THE ARC STAFF. WE INVESTED A LOT OF MONEY, ENERGY, TIME, ETC. IN THIS EXPANSION. SO WE TAKE IT VERY SERIOUSLY. AND WE DON'T FEEL LIKE OUR GOALS ARE BEING RESPECTED IN THIS. WE FEEL THERE IS A DISCONNECT FROM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. AND THAT IS NOT JUST US BUT OUR PEOPLE. WE NEED MORE DENSITY. TAMPA IS FIXATED ON THIS. AND THIS PROBABLY WOULD DECREASE THE ANNUAL HOUSING NEED BY ONE. 36,500 TO 36,499. AND HYDE PARK IS, AS MISS GRAHAM MENTIONED, REALLY THE ISSUE OF AFFORDABILITY IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS DISCUSSION. SO WE -- TO PRESERVE THE -- HAS FOUND THAT HISTORIC DISTRICTS ARE MORE DENSE AND ADVERSE IN ACTIVITIES ALREADY. WE DON'T NEED MORE OF THAT. FINALLY, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SHOULD FOCUS ON THINGS LIKE WHAT YOU ALL ARE DOING, THANK GOODNESS, STORMWATER MAINTENANCE. BECAUSE THAT IS MORE IMPORTANT. AND THEN WORK ON PRACTICAL SOLU SOLUTIONS. SO AT ANY RATE, WE FEEL THIS PROPOSAL IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS OF OUR HISTORIC EXPANSION THAT YOU VOTED FOR, FOUR OF YOU ANYWAY WHO ARE HERE OF WHICH I HOPE YOU WOULD OPPOSE THIS REZONING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, SIR. ALL RIGHT, NEXT SPEAKER. COME ON UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >>MARTIN SHELBY: TUCKER TURNER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE TO READ THE NAMES. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. TUCKER TURNER HERE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS TUCKER TURNER HERE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND IF THAT IS THE CASE. EXCUSE ME, SIR. CAN YOU TELL ME IF MR. TURNER IN THE ROOM? MR. TURNER PRESENT? >> I DON'T KNOW MR. TURNER. >>MARTIN SHELBY: HIS NAME IS ON THIS LIST. >>. HE STEPPED OUT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: HE STEPPED OUT, OKAY, THANK YOU. DEREK FRIGA. ARE YOU PRESENT? I DON'T SEE MR. FRIGA. DO YOU KNOW IF MR. FRIG APRESENCE IN THE ROOM. OKAY, THREE MINUTES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> BARRY NICOLA. I'M THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY ADJOINING THE PROPOSED REZONING. 1408 WEST AZEELE. THE APPLICANT HAS APPROACH ME MANY MONTHS AGO. AND ENGAGED IN A DISCUSSION EXPLAIN WHAT HIS PLANS WERE. HE HAS BEEN VERY GOOD ABOUT CONTINUING TO KEEP ME APPRISED OF WHAT IS GOING ON AND VERY RESPECTFUL, I BELIEVE. ESSENTIALLY THE CONTENTION POINT WHETHER THIS PROPERTY IS IN THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AS A NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENT WHO LIVED HERE TEN YEARS AND WALK IT REGULARLY, I DO FIND IT VERY CONSISTENT. I THINK HE HAS MADE A VERY GOOD CASE. HYDE PARK IS SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT THAN DOBIVILLE, EVEN JUST A FEW BLOCKS AWAY. AND I DO FIND THAT HIS PROPOSED RESIDENCE DOES SEEM TO BE IN KEEPING WITH THE STREET. I THINK WHEN IT IS COMPLETED -- IF IT IS COMPLETED, YOU WOULDN'T EVEN NOTICE IT AS ANY DIFFERENT THAN THE HOUSES ON THE STREET. SO I DO SUPPORT HIS -- HIS PROPOSAL. AND I DON'T SEE ANY ISSUES. AS FAR AS STORMWATER IS CONCERNED, WE ALSO CONSTRUCTED THE HOME NEXT DOOR. AND WE DID A VERY EXTENSIVE STUDY OF THE LOTS IN QUESTION. AND WE FOUND THAT WE ARE AT ONE OF THE HIGHEST POINTS IN HYDE PARK OR NORTH HYDE PARK. AND THE STORMWATER ESSENTIALLY DRAINS AWAY THESE PROPERTIES. AND WE HAVE NEVER HAD AN ISSUE, EVEN WITH THE RECENT TWO HURRICANES WE HAD. SO STORMWATER IS NOT A CONCERN TO ME AND WHERE THE DENSITY IS. AND THAT IS ESSENTIALLY ALL I HAVE TO SAY. HOPE DO YOU SUPPORT THIS REZONING. I FIND IT IN KEEPING WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. ALL RIGHT, NEXT SPEAKER. YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> MY NAME IS CHRIS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOUR LAST NAME. >> VALIENTE, WITH A V. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. >> I'M HERE TO SUPPORT THIS REZONING. I TRULY BELIEVE IT IS A GREAT FIT FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE PROJECT ISN'T JUST ABOUT NEW CONSTRUCTION, IT IS ABOUT PRESERVING AND ENHANCING THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA AS WE CAN ALL AGREE WITH EXISTING HOME AS WE SAW AND. AND GIVEN HIS BEAUTIFUL PRESENTATION WITH THE VIDEO, I THINK IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT HE IS CAREFULLY THOUGHTFUL. FROM WHAT WE SAW OF THE NEW HOME, BLEND RIGHT IN. KIND OF BRINGS BACK THE CHARM FROM THE 1910. I COULDN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE FROM THE HOMES THAT ARE ACTUALLY THERE AND WHAT HE PRESENTED. BLEND RIGHT IN. AS YOU KNOW, TAMPA IS GROWING AS WELL AS COSTS. THIS ALSO GIVES US OPPORTUNITY FOR MORE PEOPLE A CHANCE TO LIVE AND ENJOY THIS AMAZING PART OF TAMPA WITH ALL GREAT THINGS THAT HYDE PARK AND BAYSHORE HAVE TO OFFER, THE DEVELOPER HAS WORKED CLOSELY WITH THE CITY AS WE SAW. TO MAKE SURE EVERYTHING IS DONE RIGHT -- THE RIGHT WAY. AND I THINK THAT SPEAKS VOLUMES AGAIN HIS -- HIS PRESENTATION. SO I HOPE YOU WILL SUPPORT THIS REQUEST. IT IS A POSITIVE STEP TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, FOR TAMPA IT IS A GREAT WAY TO BRING THE PAST INTO THE FUTURE. BECAUSE I THINK -- YOU KNOW, THAT IS WHAT IT IS ABOUT. SO THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE. YES, MA'AM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. SHELBY ANDREA WATERS. ONE EXTRA MINUTE. >> ARISA CANELLA AND 502 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE. OTHER SPEAKERS TONIGHT HAVE ALREADY DISCUSSED OR WILL BE DISCUSSING PROBLEMS WITH FLOODING, DENSITY, ETC. I WON'T USE MY TIME. APPEARS MR. CHIC TREED TO GET SUPPORT BY POST ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND SENDING E-MAILS WITH A BLATANT DISREGARD IF THEY LIVE IN OR NEAR THE COMMUNITY DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROBABLY AT 402 SOUTH OREGON AVENUE. A PICTURE OF THE E-MAIL FOR REFERENCE. AS HIS E-MAIL CLEARLY STATES, QUOTE, PLEASE AVOID MENTIONING WHERE YOU LIVE IF IT IS NOT NEAR SOUTH TAMPA OR WITHIN A TEN-MINUTE DRIVE FROM DOWNTOWN TAMPA. IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE LARGE SOUTH TAMPA COMMUNITY APPROXIMATELY 35,000 PEOPLE AND EVEN THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO LIVE WITHIN TEN MINUTES OF DOWNTOWN WE INCLUDE PEOPLE LIVING MILES AWAY FROM THE PARCEL ARE NOT THE PEOPLE WHO WILL DIRECTLY IMPACTED BY THE REZONING, THE PEOPLE BEHIND USED TO AND OTHERS FROM THE HYDE PARK COMMUNITY, THE PEOPLE IN THIS COMMUNITY FORCING YOU TO VOTE IN SOME SIGNIFICANCES. IN THE INTEREST OF TIME, I AM GOING TO DISCUSS ONLY A FEW OF THE POINTS MENTIONED. HE STATED BY INTRODUCING DIVERSE HOUSING OPTIONS IN THIS BY A HAVE PEOPLE TO ENJOY ALL THAT TAMPA HAS TO OFFER, IT CANNILY THE AMENITIES OF HYDE PARK VILLAGE AND BAYSHORE BOULEVARD. THE MEMBERS SUPPORTED PROBABLY SAYING IT WOULD BRING MORE HOUSING TO THE AREA EVEN GOING AS FAR TO BRING AFFORD HOUSING, WILL SHEIHK THAT HE CARES OF OUR COMMUNITY BUT THAT IS NOT TRUE. A LOOK AT HIS WORK ON OTHER HOMES IN SOUTH OREGON. IN 2020, HIS FAMILY OR SOMEONE ASSOCIATED WITH HIM BOUGHT A SHOT-GUN HOME SIMILAR TO THE PARCEL THAT IS OF THIS HEARING. AND HE WAS THE APPLICANT IN THE HOME AND INVOLVED IN THAT REDEVELOPMENT. 426 SOUTH OREGON THE SAME STREET AS OUR PARCEL. A QUICK SEARCH SHOWS THE OPENER OF THE PARCEL. WHAT AND TO BE HIS GOAL FOR SHOTGUN TO SELL IT UPWARDS FOR $2 MILLION. SCREEN SHOT FROM THE LINKEDIN AND EXPECTED A VALUE ON COMPLETION $2 MILLION. REZONE 402 APPEARS TO BE NOTHING MORE AN ATTEMPT TO MAXIMIZE HIS PROFITS ON THAT PROPERTY PUT TWO HOMES ON ONE PIECE OF LINE IN VIOLATION OF THE GOALS OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND HISTORIC DESIGNATION OF THE STRUCTURE. HE ALSO STATED IN HIS E-MAIL, QUOTE, PROJECT NOT ONLY RESPECTS OR REVITALIZES OUR ARCHITECTURE BY EXPANDING THE EXISTING STRUCTURE TO MEET TODAY'S NEEDS. BEFORE AND AFTER PICTURES OF OTHER PROPERTY ON SOUTH OREGON. THERE WAS A SHOTGUN HOME, IT WAS TORN DOWN AND AN OVERSIZED MODERN HOME. MR. CHIC AND MR. MUKZ MAY COME UP DURING THE REBUTTAL AND WHAT HE HAD DONE ON OTHER WAS NOT SATURDAY. AN TO TAKE ACTIONS THAT ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND SUBJECT PARCEL OWED. INIS TO SQUEEZE ANOTHER STRUCTURE ON A SMALL HISTORICAL PIECE OF LAND IN OUR COMMUNITY TO MAXIMIZE PROFIT. HAVING ANOTHER STRUCTURE IS A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT AND SLIPPERY SLOPE TO HAVING OTHER DEVELOPERS COME IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THEIR ATTEMPT TO HELP OUR COMMUNITY. HE CAN EASILY DO SO IN A NONHISTORICAL AREA OF TOWN AND A LAND THAT DOES NOT HAVE A HOME. I AM NOT SPEAKING FOR MYSELF, WE, PEOPLE STANDING AND SITTING BEHIND ME WHO ELEVEN IN THE AREA THAT COME OUT TO VEHEMENTLY EXPRESS OPPOSITION AND COUNTLESS WHO COULDN'T BE HERE TONIGHT. WE IMPLORE YOU TO VOTE WITH THE LAW, THE FACTS AND CONSIDER THE NEGATIVE IMPACT THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ON OUR COMMUNITY. WE IMPLORE TO YOU VOTE TO OPPOSE THIS REZONING. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, MA'AM. NEXT SPEAKER. >> ARE YOU READY? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE SPEAKER WAIVER. >> I AM SORRY DID YOU SAY YOU WERE WAITING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HE NEEDS TO READ THE SPEAKER WAIVER FORM. >>MARTIN SHELBY: TWO ADDITIONAL MINUTES, PLEASE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> PAM CANELLA, 604 SOUTH ORLEANS. 402 SOUTH OREGON IS LOCATED IN DOBYVILLE IN OUR HISTORIC HYDE PARK DISTRICT. THIS APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO YOU BELIEVE THAT THIS ACTION TO REZONE TO PD TO ALLOW ANOTHER HOME ON THIS LOT IS JUSTIFIED. AND CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 27 -- SECTION 27-113-A 2J. BUT NOT CONSISTENT. HIS PROPOSAL HAS NO SIGNIFICANT HISTORICAL VALUE. IT IS THE EXISTING HOME -- THE EXISTING HOME ON 402 SOUTH OREGON THAT HAS CONTRIBUTING STATUS. AND PROTECTED UNDER THE NATIONAL AND LOCAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION REGISTER. THE HOME IS HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT. THE HOME CONTRIBUTES TO THE OVERALL CHARACTER OF THE HISTORIC HOMES IN DOBYVILLE. THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT PRESERVE THE HISTORICAL INTEGRITY OF NEIGHBORHOOD. BUT RESULTS IN A LOSS OF THE AREA'S UNIQUE, ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER. THAT IS TIED TO THE OLD EVERY HOME. IMPACTING THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S OVERALL APPEAL. THIS PROPOSAL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION, BUT ONLY HIS WANT TO MAXIMIZE HIS PROFITS. BUT HIS WANTS DO NOT JUSTIFY THIS REZONING TO PD. THIS APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DO EXACTLY WHAT ALL THE OTHER DEVELOPERS HAVE DONE BEFORE THE HISTORIC BOUNDARY EXPANSION AMENDMENT. FOR DECADES, DOBYVILLE WENT THROUGH ZONING CHANGES, SPLIT LOTS, VARIANCES, CREAMING HARDSHIP AND DEMOLISH OF OUR HISTORIC HOMES FROM NEGLECT. THE END RESULT IS A NEIGHBORHOOD OF MISMATCHED DWELLINGS, LOTS WITH THREE OR FOUR HOMES ON NONCONFORMING LOTS. BUT THEY DO NOT SET A PRECEDENCE. UNDER THE PRESENT HISTORIC PRESERVATION LAWS, THE GOALS ARE TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY AND CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. REHABILITATE AND PRESERVE THE REMAINING HISTORIC DOBYVILLE AND PROTECT THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE RESIDENTS. INTEGRITY. NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRITY. IT MEANS EVERYTHING THAT AFFECTS THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ITS RESIDENTS, NOT JUST THE OUTER CHARACTER OF THE DWELLING, BUT ALL THE ELEMENT THAT MAKE THE NEIGHBORHOOD WORK OR NOT. NEIGHBORHOODS ARE STRUGGLING FROM OVERDEVELOPMENT. THE RESIDENTS ARE IMPACTED DAILY. THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UNDER URBAN VILLAGES CLEARLY STATES HYDE PARK SHOULD ONLY HAVE MODEST DENSITY. AND THE PLAN DOESN'T CALL FORRA A LOT OF GROWTH AND CHANGE. HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT IS A HISTORIC RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. AND THE LAWS PROVIDE FOR PROTECTION OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. FLORIDA STATUTE OUGHT 163-77 AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOAL ONE STATES, PROVIDES ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT NEW GROWTH, BUT MAINTAIN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. BUT OUR INFRASTRUCTURE IS FAILING AND CANNOT SUPPORT EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS. WATER AND SEWER PEEPS ARE COLLAPSE BE. ROADS AND SIDEWALKS ARE CRUMBLING. POTHOLES AND CAVE INS. STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM HAS FAILED US. STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM 402 SOUTH OREGON AND SURROUNDING AREAS FLOW SOUTH TO DeLEON. THAT IS WHY IT DOESN'T FLOOD UP THERE. BECAUSE IT COMES TO US. AND FLOODS DELION A-- DeLEON AN THE HOME. ADDS MORE CONCRETE, LESS GREEN SPACE AND MORE FLOODING AND INCONSISTENT WITH POLICY 12.2 AND WE KNOW THAT HYDE PARK FLOODS. OUR AREA IS SO DENSE THAT EVACUATION WILL BE DEFENSE DEFENSE. NOT ENOUGH SHELTERS TO SUPPORT THEM ALL IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I HAPPEN TO KNOW THAT, BECAUSE I WENT TO ONE AND THEY TURNED ME AROUND. THERE IS NO STREET PARKING AVAILABLE ON SOUTH OREGON FOR RESIDENTS. FOUR PARKING SPACES ARE REARED ON THIS SMALL NONCONFORMING ILLEGAL LOT FOR TWO HOMES, WE ONLY ONE SUPPOSED TO BE HERE. APPLICANT HAS INTENDED TO SQUEEZE THEM IN ON-SITE PLAN, BUT NO PARKING FOR GUESTS. STAFF TOLD ME THAT PARKING ISSUES ARE A CODE ENFORCEMENT PROBLEM, NOT TRUE. THIS BECOMES A NEIGHBORHOOD PROBLEM. WHERE RESIDENT, VICTIMS. TRAFFIC IN SWANN. TRAFFIC IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD MAKE IT UNSAFE FOR EVERYONE. IT IS DIFFICULT TO LEAVE OR ENTER THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THESE IMPACTS AFFECT NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRITY. AND INCONSISTENT WITH -- WITH LAND USE POLICY 19.1 -- ANYWAY, YOU CAN LOOK THEM UP. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, MA'AM, THANK YOU. >> GOOD EVENING. THIS WILL BE BRIEF. HE NO SPEECH. BROOKE GAST. GRAY STREET. PROPERTY 1,000 WEST HORATIO. I'M HERE TO SUPPORT WHAT THE DEVELOPER IS DOING. WE ACTUALLY TRIED TO -- MY HUSBAND AND I TRIED TO PURCHASE 423 SOUTH ORLEANS A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO. IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS THE TINIEST HOUSE IN TAMPA IF YOU HAVEN'T BEEN IN DOBIVILLE, THAT AREA IS SO UNIQUE. HAS SO MUCH CHARM. I WISH THERE WAS A DEVELOPER COMING TO ARMORY GARDENS AND DOING WHAT THIS DEVELOPER IS DOING, BECAUSE EVERY TIME I TURN A CORNER A BEAUTIFUL MID CENTURY HOUSE BEING KNOCKED DOWN FOR A GIANT MONSTROSITY. I HAVE A LOT OF RESPECT FOR WHAT HE IS DOING. IT HE TAIL AND CHARACTER OF THE DESIGN FITS RIGHT INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. OF COURSE UNDERSTANDING NOT WANTING THAT DEVELOPMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND SOMETHING NEW COMING TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT PERSONALLY, I WISH THE SAME THING WAS HAPPENING NEAR ME. I JUST WANTED TO SHOW MY SUPPORT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT SPEAKER. HELLO, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> MIRIAM COLLINS. GOOD EVENING. I HAVE A SPEECH PREPARED, BUT HE WILL KEEP IT BRIEF. THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK TODAY. HE WANT TO ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AT 402 SOUTH OREGON. I DO BELIEVE DESPITE THE INITIAL RESERVATION IT IS HAS BEEN ME TECH US WILLY PLANNED TO HONOR OUR CITY'S HISTORY AND FOSTERING GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. CORNERSTONES OF THE PROJECT ARE KEEPING THE TWO MAJESTIC OAK TREES ON THE LOT. NOT ONLY THE THAT ARE ARE THE HOME THAT WAS THERE WAS PREVIOUS LEAVE BUILT IN 1913. AND THERE WAS A HOME ON THE PROPERTY PREVIOUSLY. THIS PROJECT IS ALSO BEEN ENDORSED BY THE MAJORITY OF THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNER WHO STAND TO BE THE MOST DIRECTLY AFFECTED. THEY HAVE RECOGNIZE THE THOUGHT AND THE CARE THAT HAS GONE INTO THE PLANNING OF THIS PROJECT AND THE POTENTIAL BENEFITS IT COULD BRING TO THE COMMUNITY. MOREVER, OUR CITY'S OWN STAFF, NATURAL RESOURCES, TRANSPORTATION AS MENTIONED BEFORE AND THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENTS FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE LONG-TERM VISION AND GOALS. THESE ARE PROFESSIONALS THAT HAVE DEDICATED THEIR CAREERS IN ENSURING THAT THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT IN LINE WITH SUSTAINABILITY, HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY. ARC COMMISSION, COMPRISED OF EXPERTS THIS FIELD VOTED 4-1 IN FAVOR OF THE 402 SOUTH OREGON. IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL LAND SCAPE AND ZONING REQUIREMENTS. IN ESSENCE, WE ARE NOT ASKING TO DEMOLISH OR CHANGE HISTORY AT ALL OR BUILDING UPON IT. WE ARE NOT AIL PROVING EVERYTHING AND AROUND THEM, A DEVELOPMENT OF OUR PROJECT IS A SYMBOL OF THE RESPECT TO THE PAST AND A COMMITMENT TO THE FUTURE. A PROBABLY THAT REPRESENTS HARMONY BETWEEN GROWTH AND RESERVATION. AND IN ORDER TO CONSIDER THE WIDESPREAD SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT IT HAS GARNERED CAREFUL PLANNING THAT HAS GONE INTO IT AND THE POTENTIAL ENHANCE OUR CITY AND PRESERVING THEIR RICH OF THE RE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NEXT SPEAKER. YES, MA'AM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, MARIA BANASI. HERE TODAY BECAUSE I AM A PROUD MEMBER OF THE SOUTH TAMPA COMMUNITY. HERE TODAY BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT THIS PROBABLY WILL REVITALIZE A HISTORIC PROPERTY WHILE PRESERVING THE CHARMING CHARACTER THAT MAKES HYDE PARK SO SPECIAL. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS NOT ABOUT REPLACING HISTORY, IT IS ABOUT RESTORING IT AND ENHANCING IT. THOUGHTFUL RENOVATION AND EXPANSION OF EXISTING HOME WILL MAINTAIN ITS HISTORIC INTEGRITY WHILE ADAPTING TO A MODERN LIVING STANDARD THAT A PROUD HOMEOWNER CAN ENJOY. FURTHERMORE, THE PLAN TO BUILD A NEW HOME ON THIS LOT IS A RESPECTFUL NOD TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S PAST. A HOME ONCE STOOD ON THIS VERY SPOT FOR OVER A CENTURY. THIS PROBABLY ENSURES THAT THE SPACE WILL ONCE AGAIN CORRECT TO THE FAB RUCK OF HYDE PARK, MIRRORING THE HISTORIC AESTHETIC THAT DEFINE THIS AREA. PROBLEMS LOOK THIS CREATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR MORE PEOPLE TO EXPERIENCE THE UNIQUE CHARACTER OF HYDE PARK AND ENJOY ITS INCREDIBLE AMENITIES FROM HYDE PARK I WILL HAVE LAMB TO BAYSHORE BOULEVARD. OFFERING I DID VERSE HOWLING OPTIONS THAT BLEND SEAMLESSLY INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE ENCOURAGE GROWTH THAT STRENGTHENS OUR COMMUNITY. IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT THIS PROBABLY HAS GONE THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE CHANNELS AND RECEIVED THE ELSE IN APPROVALS FROM THE CITY STAFF, AS WELL AS MANY OF THE NEIGHBORS. THIS REFLECTS FLORIDA SHEHK'S COMMITMENT TO FOLLOWING THE CITY'S PLANNING GUIDELINES AND WORKING COLLABORATIVELY WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE COMMUNITY AROUND HIM. I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROBABLY, AND I URGE YOU ALL TO CONSIDER THE POSITIVE IMPACT IT WILL HAVE ON BOTH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND GREATER TAMPA THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT SPEAKER. YES, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> HI. MY NAME IS ROSA TEWIL. I'M A REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY. I LIVE ON BARBIE. I PREVIOUSLY LIVED ON ROLAND NEAR DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AND KENNEDY. USED TO WORK AT 701 WAZEELE THA HAS BEEN IN SINCE THE EXPANSION. I WILL SAY ON THAT STREET ALL HISTORIC COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS THAT ONCE WERE HOMES. WILSON MIDDLE SCHOOL DOWN THE STREET. THOSE COULD HAVE ALL SERVED AS FAMILY HOMES HAD THEY BEEN UPDATED, REPAIRED PROPERLY AND CONSTRUCTION TO THIS THEY ALL HAVE BEEN DENIED AND TURNED INTO COMMERCIAL. A DISSERVICE TO THE SOUTH TAMPA COMMUNITY AND TO THE HOUSING NEED. THAT MIDDLE SCHOOL COULD BE SERVED BETTER BY HAVING FAMILIES THAT CAN WALK TO AND FROM THE SCHOOL. I THINK WHEN WE LOOK AT THE HISTORIC COMMUNITY AND WHAT THEY SEEK TO DO, I FEEL THERE ARE CHANNELS THAT THOSE NEED CAN BE MET SUCH AS WHAT THIS PROPOSAL HAS BROUGHT. I ALSO HEARD A FEW TALKING POINTS I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON. LIKE I SAID A REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY AND MY CURRENT OFFICE ON ARMENIA. I AM A SOUTH TAMPA PERSON. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT A LOT OF NEGATIVE IMPACTS THAT HAVE BEEN MENTIONED ARE IMPACTS SUCH AS PUTTING PAVEMENT, WHICH, AS WE KNOW, SOUTH TAMPA IS IN NEED OF MORE PARKING. THEY ALSO MENTIONED IN THE SAME, YOU KNOW, FOLD, THAT THERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT PARKING. THEY WANT TO MAINTAIN THE -- THE ONLY NEGATIVE IMPACT THAT HAS BEEN MENTIONED THAT HAVEN'T BEEN CONSTRUCTIVELY APPROACH BY MISS MALONE AND OTHER CITY STAFF IS THAT THEY WANT TO MAINTAIN THE JIM CROW ERA OF NOT HAVING PARKING LOTS. THEY ARE TALKING OF PROTECTING THE HISTORIC BUILDING AND PROPERTY SETTING FROM 1896 TO 1933. THERE WAS A HOME ON THAT LOT IN 1913. THEY ARE TALKING OF THE DESIGN, THE DENSITY AND THE OVERALL CHARACTER. MISS MALONE MENTIONED THAT THE AMPLE DENSITY IS 20. THIS IS ONLY 17.5. BENEATH WHAT THE DENSITY IS. AGAIN, I THINK THERE ARE A LOT OF NEGATIVE IMPACTS WE HAVE SEEN IN HISTORIC -- LIKE IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT OVERALL. BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT ALLOWING THOSE REPAIRS. SOMETHING THAT WORK WITH A LOT ON A BONO BASIS IN REAL ESTATE, REAL ESTATE, A LOT PEOPLE ARE HAVING LANDLORD-TENANT ISSUES. TENANTS NOT HAVE THE NECESSITY BECAUSE THE HOMES REAR A LOT OF REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AND NEW BUILDS SUPPORT THE NEEDS BETTER. YOU CAN'T HAVE THESE PLACES RENTED OUT BECAUSE PEOPLE EXPECT MEET THE LIVING STANDARDS SO THEY GET TURNED COMMERCIAL. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT MA'AM, STATE YOUR NAME. NEXT SPEAKER. >> MY NAME IS AMINA. FOR ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LAST NAME. >> AMINA SPAEACH. 20-PLUS-YEAR RESIDENT OF TAMPA AND THE AFOREMENTIONED REASONS, I'M HERE IN SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSAL TONIGHT. ONLY THING I THINK I CAN ADD IS THAT BEING A ADVOCATE IN THIS COMMUNITY, I CAN SAY WE NEED CONSCIOUS DEVELOPMENT. AND I DON'T THINK THAT SOMEONE WHO HAS GOTTEN COMMUNITY INPUT OBVIOUSLY AN EXCELLENT COMMUNITY ORGANIZER AND DONE THE WORK TO BE RESPECTFUL OF THE AESTHETICS AND THE HISTORY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD BE DENIED THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SOMETHING WITH THE LAND. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR, PLEASE COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> HELLO, SHEVIR HASHMI. AFTER ARE REVIEWING ALL THE INFORMATION THAT EVERYBODY HAS SHARED. I AM IN SUPPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT. IF IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE ARC AND DOES MEET FUTURE LAND USE AND -- AND IS ESTHETICALLY PLEASING. IT DOES APPEAL TO ALL THE CODES FOR THE AREA. IT DOES FIX THE NEED OF HOUSING AND DENSITY IS ONE WAY TO DO THAT. SO IT PRESERVES THE STRUCTURE FOR PRESERVATION. AND DOES PRESERVE THE ORIGINAL STRUCTURE AND ADDING BEAUTY TO IT TO SUPPORT THE LOOK THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHEEL ADDING A CREATIVE STRUCTURE SO -- THE -- IT IS MORE ENGAGING. AND -- AND THE SIDES AND THE BACK. I DO SUPPORT THIS DEVELOPMENT. AND I HOPE IT GETS APPROVED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR. NEXT SPEAKER. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> MY NAME IS SHANDON KIYA. I'M HERE IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROBABLY. I HAVE BEEN THIS REAL ESTATE -- I AM A REAL ESTATE AGENT AND HAS BEEN IN IT FOR FOUR AND A HALF YEARS. I HAVE STUDIED AND FOLLOWED THESE DEVELOPERS. AND TYPICALLY MORE TIMES THAN NOT, YOU WOULD SEE A PROPERTY LIKE THIS BE TORN DOWN. AND A LUXURY NEW CONSTRUCTION WHICH SEEMS TO BE THE MOTIF IN THE TAMPA BAY AREA, ESPECIALLY IN SOUTH TAMPA, WOULD BE WHAT IS CONSTRUCTED, BUT I FEEL THIS DEVELOPER HAS FOUND A CREATIVE WAY TO BOTH CONFORM TO THE NEIGHBORING HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND PROVIDE ATTAINABLE AND AFFORDABLE, IF YOU WOULD, HOUSING COMPARED TO THE MUCH LARGER PROPERTIES THAT WE ARE SEEING BEING DEVELOPED IN AREA. AS MENTIONED EARLIER, SMALLER PROPERTIES TEND TO BE MORE AFFORDABLE THAN LUXURY NEW CONSTRUCTION. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT SPEAKER. YES, SIR. >> MY NAME IS MESH BAUL. I AM IN SUPPORT OF THIS MOVEMENT. I GET STAGE FRIGHT, SORRY. BUT I BELIEVE -- I BELIEVE WITH EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN SAID EARLIER, IF HE -- IF HE PLAN ON STAYING CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING THAT IS PLANNED AND BUILDS IT -- BUILDS IT THE WAY HE SAYS HE IS GOING TO DO IT, I DON'T SEE A PROBLEM WITH ANYTHING GOING THROUGH WHICH IS WHY I AM IN SUPPORT. I DON'T KNOW -- I BELIEVE I HEARD THAT WHEN HE WENT TO GO SPEAK WITH THE ASSOCIATION, THEY SAID THAT THEY WANTED HIM TO BUILD ONE BIGGER UNIT, WHICH SEEMS PRETTY CONTRADICTING. BUT THAT IS ALL HE TO SAY. I'M IN SUPPORT. AND I HOPE YOU GUYS AGREE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT SPEAKER, COME ON UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> HELLO, GOOD EVENING. SHAHEAD KADER AND I WANT TO EXPRESS ME SUPPORT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. THIS PROJECT NOT ONLY REQUIREMENTS BUT REVITALIZES OUR HISTORICAL ARCHITECTURE. AND I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT. I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK TO THE DETAILS OF HOW IT DOES IT, BECAUSE MR. SHEIKH GAVE US A VERY COMPREHENSIVE PRESENTATION OF IT. SO I WANTED TO VOICE MY SUPPORT. IN ADDITION, I WOULD LIKE TO HEAL THE THE EXTENT TO WHICH HE IS EMPHASIZING TO MAINTAIN THE HISTORICAL ARCHITECTURE. I THINK THAT IS VERY IMPORTANT, ESPECIALLY IF YOU DRIVE AROUND THE LOCAL ROADS IN THE AREA. YOU WILL SEE SOMETIMES A HISTORICAL HOUSE. AND RECEIPT NEXT TO -- RIGHT NEXT TO IT A VERY MODERN SQUARE-LOOKING HOUSE AND THEY DON'T GO FORGET. IN THIS CASE WE ARE NOT DOING THAT AND I THINK IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT. THE THIRD THING, I DON'T THINK THERE SHOULD BE ANY OPPOSITION FOR MORE DIVERSE HOUSING IN THE AREA, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE ARE SEEING SUCH EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE THAT CARE HAS BEEN DONE IN MEETING THE NEIGHBORS, THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS, DISCUSSING WITH VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS. A LOT OF GROUNDWORK. A LOT OF DEDICATION HAS BEEN PUT INTO THIS. AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT YOU SHOULD RESPECT IN TERMS OF A DEVELOPER. BECAUSE I DON'T FEEL LIKE A LOT OF TIMES THAT IS DONE. SO I APPLAUD MR. SHEIK FOR DOING THAT. LASTLY, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE CITY COUNCIL TO PLEASE SUPPORT THIS MOVEMENT. I THINK IT IS -- IT IS SUBSTANTIALLY VERY GOOD ONE. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR, YES, SIR. NEXT SPEAKER. >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL. MY NAME IS DR. MICHAEL POBAT. AND I LIVE IN THE SPANISH TOWN CREEK AREA. AND I AM ALSO THE PRESIDENT OF THE HYDE PARK SPANISH TOWN CREEK CIVIC ASSOCIATION WITH A GROUP OF PASSIONATE RESIDENTS FOCUSED ON THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. HOME LOCATED 402 SOUTH OREGON AVENUE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE HYDE PARK SPANISH TOWN CREEK BOUNDARIES. THE HYDE PARK SPANISH TOWN CREEK BOARD OPPOSES THE REZONING ASK OF THE 402, 404 OREGON AVENUE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. INCONSISTENT WITH CITY CODE. PROPOSAL VIOLATES CITY CODE 27-11 BY ATTEMPT TO SPLIT THE PARCEL IN AN UNREASONABLE MANNER. HISTORIC GUIDELINES VIOLATIONS. PROPOSALS DES REGARDS LOCAL HISTORIC GUIDELINES BY ELIMINATING ALL SETBACKS EXCEPT THE FRONT WHICH IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH THE AREA'S CHARACTERLACK GREEN SPACE, THE PROJECT FAILS TO EN CORPS REAL GREEN SPACE BY THE NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT AND DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SETBACK OR GREEN SPACE PRESERVATION. PARCEL HISTORY AND ZONING. PARCEL 40 SOUTH OREGON A CONSOLIDATED LOT FROM 402 AND 404 SPLIT TO CREATE 1408 WEST AZEELE. IF THE ORIGINAL LOTS WERE INTACT ALLOW FOR TWO UNITS. CURRENT CONFIGURATION IS SMALL TO SUPPORT AN ADDITIONAL DWELLING. DOES NOT RESTORE THE HISTORICAL CONFIGURATION OF THESE LOTS. IMPACT ON HISTORIC DISTRICT. THE AREA, PART OF DOBYVILLE HISTORIC DISTRICT MUST COMPLY WITH MODERN CITY CODES AND DESIGN GUIDELINES WHICH THIS PROPOSAL FAILS TO DO. DEVELOPMENT OF DEVELOPMENT IS SEEN AS AN ATTEMPT TO BYPASS CURRENT STANDARDS AND THE INTEGRITY OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. FLOODING CONCERNS. THE PROPOSED CHANGES, PARTICULARLY SPLITTING THE PARCEL FURTHER WOULD CREATE THE SMALLEST LOT IN THE AREA, INCREASING VULNERABILITY OF FLOODING. THE HYDE PARK SPANISH TOWN CREEK BOARD REQUESTS THAT YOU DENY THE REZONING REQUEST AS IT UNDERMINES ESTABLISHED ZONING LAWS, HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND GUIDELINES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS. THANK YOU, COUNCIL, FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF YOUR TIME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. NEXT SPEAKER, COME ON UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIR, COUNCIL, JOSH BAUMGARTNER. 506 SOUTH OREGON. I COME IN SUPPORT OF APPLICANT AND THE PROBABLY, A PROJECT HE BELIEVE ENHANCES COMMUNITY, VITALIZES THAT SITE, WHILE ALSO ENHANCING THE SITE AS WELL. I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT HOUSING ON ALL FRONTS IS NEEDED NOW MORE THAN EVER. THIS PROBABLY DOES THAT, WHEEL STAYING CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTIAND SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND RESIDENCES ON OREGON. PER THE PLANS I HAVE SEEN TODAY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAFF, SEEMS CONSISTENT WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION ON PREVIOUS BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. NEIGHBOR DIRECTLY ADJACENT AND MOST IMPACTED. I FULLY SUPPORT THIS THIS. AND I HOPE YOU WILL SUPPORT AS WELL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU SO MUCH. YES, SIR, PLEASE COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS ADAM SHEIHK. I WANT TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS STRONG PROJECT. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK TODAY. I WILL STEP OUT TO THE SIDE -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE NEED YOU THERE BECAUSE OF THE MICROPHONE. >> I WILL LEAN SLIGHTLY TO THE SIDE AND LOOK AT THIS ENTIRE ROOM. NOW BY FAR, I'M YOUNGEST PERSON IN THIS ROOM. YOU REPRESENT A DIVERSE -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HE IS 21. >> ME TOO. ME TOO. >> WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY? >> I DO APOLOGIZE. I DO APOLOGIZE. I DO APOLOGIZE. I WOULD JUST BRIEFLY LIKE TO EXPLAIN WHY I SAID THAT. I OFFER A DIVERSE PERSPECTIVE. I OFFER A PERSPECTIVE THAT HAVEN'T BEEN BROUGHT HERE BEFORE THIS COUNCIL TODAY. I AM THE YOUTH ALONGSIDE YOURSELF AND YOURSELF. NOW -- I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT I AM IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT. AND I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND THIS COUNCIL OF THEIR VISION, WHICH I FOUND ON YOUR WEB SITE EARLIER THIS MORNING. THE CITY OF TAMPA'S VISION IS TO BE RECOGNIZED AS A DIVERSE CITY SELL RATED AS A PLACE TO LIVE, WORK, LEARN AND PLAY. NOW I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT THAT IN ORDER TO EMBODY THE PART OF THE VISION STATEMENT THAT MENTIONS BEING RECOGNIZED AS PROGRESSIVE, YOU HAVE TO LOOK PAST SOCIAL -- THIS DOES CONTRIBUTE TO ECONOMIC, BUT I AM TALKING OF REAL ESTATE. THIS IS A PROGRESS IN REAL ESTATE. AND WE NEED TO BE MINDFUL THAT FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS ARE ONLY GOING TO FURTHER TAMPA AND FURTHER TAMPA'S GROWTH. NOW ADDITIONALLY, I ALSO WANT TO SAY THAT CITY COUNCIL SERVES THE CITIZENS BY POLICIES THAT PROMOTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. THAT DOES JUST THAT. ALLOWING THESE NEW PROJECTS -- STRONG PROJECTS TO CONTINUE TO ELEVATE TAMPA AS A WHOLE FURTHERING OUR ECONOMIC FOAMS AS A CITY. WE NODE TO ALLOW THESE TO CONTINUE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR, PLEASE COME UP. STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, ALL ALREADY HASAN HALIBY. I WANT TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL. I WILL KEEP IT BRIEF. FIRST TIME IN THE ROOM WITHOUT A TIE. BUT AFTER 5 P.M., I WANT TO REMARK THAT I HAVE NO TIE TO ITEM 1. I ENJOY MISS HENDERSON. I WAS A LITTLE APPALLED BY WHAT THE OPPOSITION SAID. LOW STANDARDS AND INTEGRITY, INTEGRITY, INTEGRITY. I WILL STOP THE MORAL CODE AND WHY THE MAJORITY ATTACKING THE DEVELOPER NOT THE DEVELOPMENT ITSELF, BUT I SHARE A LOT OF SENTIMENTS AND FEARS WITH THE COUNCIL AND THE OPPOSITION BECAUSE I AM WARY OF AGGRESSIVE AND OUT-OF-STATE BUILDING GLASS AND STUCCO AND HAPHAZARDLY PLACING THEM. THIS IS NOT THAT. A TASTEFUL PROJECT AND CLEAR THAT THE DEVELOPER HAS DONE EVERYTHING, HIS DUE DILIGENCE, HOMEWORK AND ETC. STRONGLY ADVISE -- OR STRONGLY IMPLORE YOU TO SUPPORT THE MATTER. I THINK IT IS TASTEFUL. I THINK IT WILL BE A BENEFIT TO THE CITY OF TAMPA. THANK YOU SO MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, ARE YOU BACK WITH US? THERE HE IS. >>LUIS VIERA: YES, I AM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NEXT SPEAKER. PLEASE COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> DR.AL DAM ADAWAWI, WEST KATHLEEN AVENUE. BASICALLY, I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TODAY IN SUPPORT OF OUR PROJECT THAT REFLECTS THE CAREFUL BALANCE BETWEEN HONORING THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S PAST AND ENSURING ITS CONTINUED VITALITY FOR THE FUTURE. THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT DEVELOPMENT. IT IS ABOUT STEWARDSHIP. MAKE SHOOT YOU ARE THAT CHANGES IN OUR COMMUNITY ARE THOUGHTFUL, INTENTIONAL AND RESPECTFUL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER THAT IS CORRECT MAKES THIS AREA SO UNIQUE. PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF OUR HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD. PROBABLY EMBRACES THAT RESPONSIBILITY BE ENSURING THAT ANY UPDATES TO THE EXISTING HOME WITHIN THE COMMUNITY AND MAINTAINING ITS HISTORIC CHARM. AT THE SAME TIME, THE ADDITION OF THE NEW HOME IS DESIGNED TO FEEL LIKE A NATURAL EXTENSION. HISTORY AND PROGRESS DOESN'T HAVE TO BE AT TO ODDS. THIS PRODUCT DEMONSTRATES HOW THEY CAN WORK TOGETHER. BEYOND AESTHETICS, RESPONSIBLE GROWTH BENEFITS OUR COMMUNITY THAT BENEFIT CURREN AND FUTURE RESIDENTS .A BEAUTIFUL NEIGHBORHOOD AND A DESIRABLE CITY. PROJECTS LOOKING THIS MAKE SURE MORE PEOPLE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE PART OF IT. DEVELOPMENT IS DONE WITH CARE RESPECTING THE PHYSICAL LANDSCAPE AND HISTORY IT REPRESENTS, IT ONLY ADDS TO THE CHARACTER OF THE PLACE. I ENCOURAGE YOU TO YOU SUPPORT THIS PROJECT NOT JUST AS A PRACTICAL DECISION, BUT AS A COMMITMENT TO THOUGHTFUL, HISTORICALLY MINDFUL GROWTH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR, COME ON UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. SIR -- AT THE END OF LINE. WILL YOU BE LAST SPEAKER? ANYBODY ELSE THAT WILL BE GETTING UP TO SPEAK? >> SOMEBODY WENT TO THE REST ROOM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE WILL HOLD HER SPOT. THE GENTLEMAN IN THE BACK SHIRT THAT JUST GOT UP WILL BE THE LAST SPEAKER. >> JAMES LASCARA. LIVE NEARBY IN THE NORTH HYDE PARK AREA. I SUPPORT THE PROBABLY. WHAT A GREAT VIDEO. THANK YOU, MR. SHEIKH. HOW INFORM TESTIFY AND INCREDIBLE THE PREPARATION THAT PUT INTO IN. THE WORDS THAT CAME TO MIND WATCHING THIS VIDEO, SENSE TESTIFY, THOUGHTFUL AND CONSIDERATE. HE TOOK EN PUT FROM THE NEIGHBORS BEFORE COMING BEFORE COUNCIL. HE HEARD LACK OF GREEN SPACE AS A COMPLAINT. I HEARD ALSO THAT HE IS COMPLYING WITH MORE THAN THE REQUIRED GREEN SPACE WITH THIS PLAN. AND THEN SOMETHING I HEARD A LOT TONIGHT, WE NEED TO HEAR FROM THE EXPERTS. THE CITY STAFF DID WEIGH IN AND I HEARD THEIR TESTIMONY. THEY ARE THE EXPERTS AND FOUND THIS CONSISTENT ACROSS THE BOARD. I AM ALSO EXCITED TO HEAR THEY FOUND IT CONSISTENT AND I REALLY SUPPORT THE PROJECT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. YES, MA'AM, PLEASE COME ON UP. >> I AM TARA NEYLAND AT 1405 WEST AZEELE. I WAS AT THE MEETING IN DECEMBER THAT THE ARC REQUIRED THE APPLICANT TO HAVE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS. JUST AS I WAS THEN, I STAND BEFORE YOU TODAY OPPOSED TO REZONING OF 402 SOUTH OREGON FROM RM-12 TO PD AND CONTRASTRICTS THE PRINCIPLES OF OUR HIS I CAN NEIGHBORHOOD. I LIVE IN HYDE PARK SINCE JANUARY 2009 AND LIVE AND OWN A HOME IN SPANISH TOWN CREEK SINCE APRIL 020. I LOVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. I AM PROUD OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS AND ALL THOSE THAT AIDED IN EXPANSION OF THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT TO INCLUDE PARTS OF SPANISH TOWN CREEK AND PARTS OF DOBYVILLE. THIS IN THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT AND CAN EVOLVE UNDER RM OPINION 12. I LIVE 40 STEPS FROM 402 SOUTH OREGON AVENUE. 40 STEPS. AS YOU MAY RECALL IN A RECENT AGENDA ITEM BEFORE YOU AND IN THE NEWS EARLIER THIS WEEK, MY HOME 1405 AZEELE IS DESIGNATED A LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK AND ACROSS THE STREET. ACTION TO REZONE FROM RM-12 TO PD UNDERMINES THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT AND THE CODE ASSIGNED TO THE PROPERTY. ACTION TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO SKIRT RULES AND CODES AND PROMOTE ERRATIC LAND USE. STOPPING ERRATIC LAND USE OF THE INCLUSION OF MY NEIGHBORHOOD INTO THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. IN SUMMARY, FOUR KEY POINTS. ONE, ALLOWING THE PARCEL TO BE REZONED ALLOWSES THE USE OF UNCONTROLLED USE OF LAND. TWO, INCLUDED SEVERAL EXAMPLES TO BOLSTER THEIR CASE. HOPE THE COUNCIL RECOGNIZE AS THAT ECLECTIC CHARACTER AND SIMILAR DEVELOPMENTS LISTED WERE BUILT PRIOR TO THE AREA DESIGNATED IN THE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. APPLICANT CLAIMS THAT TWO HOMES FOR DOBYVILLE HISTORY. IT DOES NOT. PLANS TO RECONSTRUCT THE DOBIVILLE IS IMPRACTICAL GIVEN MODERN DEVELOPMENT. PRIORITIZES THE AUTHENTICITY OF HOMES THAT STILL EXIST. LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT HOPES TO HONOR THE STORIYS OF THOSE LIVE IT THERE AND HIGHLIGHTING THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF DOBYVILLE'S RUSS LOUIS. AND SITS 40 STEPS FROM WHAT IS NOW A LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK. I BEG YOU TO HELP US. IMPORTANT TO PROTECT THE SPACES AND PRESERVE THE INTEGRITY OF OUR HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD. I IMPLORE YOU TO DENY THE REZONING REQUEST. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT WEAKER. >> S. >> HAMERA IN A PSAL. I'M HERE IN FOR OF PROJECT AND FOR SOME OF THE REASONS THAT MANY HAVE SPOKEN ON. I RAISE SOME OF ISSUES RAZED IN OEMENTS IN THE E-MAILS AND COMMENTS. I CAME HERE SPENDING ME THREE HOURS OF MY EVENING BECAUSE I'M VERY FRUSTRATED TO SEE CONTINUOUS OPPOSITION TO AREAS WHERE A PERSON CAN EASILY GET BY WITH ONE OR NO CARS. LOTS OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT PARKING. TAKE THIS NUMBER. 813-274-8523. THAT IS THE PARKING DIVISION. CALL THEM IF THERE IS PARKING VIOLATIONS. THEY WILL COME OUT AND TAKE CARE OF IT. IN PARTICULAR, HYDE PARK GETS A LOT OF SPECIAL ATTENTION REGARDING PARKING. CALL PARKING DIVISION. IF IT IS ILLEGALLY PARK, THEY WILL COME AN TAKE CARE OF IT. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION. JUST ENCOURAGING PEOPLE THAT IF IF YOU DRIVE OR IF YOU PARK, YOU ARE PART OF THE PARKING TRAFFIC PROBLEM. THERE IS A BUS STOP A SHORT WALK AWAY AT PLATT AND DELAWARE. IT IS A 16-MEN BUS DRIVE FROM THAT LOCATION TO CITY COUNCIL. USE THE BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE ON NEARBY CLEVELAND. CITY DID A VERY NICE QUICK BUILD PROJECT. AREA IS ALSO CLOSE TO SOME VERY BIKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS. IT IS AN 11-MINUTE BIKE RIDE FROM THAT LOCATION TO HERE. THAT IS ONLY ONE MINUTE LONGER THAN IT TOOK ME TO BIKE HERE. WALKING. THAT LOCATION -- THAT -- THAT WOULD ADD DENSITY TO AN AREA THAT IS APPEALING, BECAUSE IT IS SO WALKABLE. IT IS LITERALLY A FIVE-MINUTE WALK TO HYDE PARK VILLAGE. THESE ARE THE KIND OF NEIGHBORHOODS WHERE WE NEED MORE DENSITY. SHORT-TERM RENTALS. A LOT OF COMPLAINTS OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS. AND E-MAILS. I UNDERSTAND. I HAVE A FULL-TIME AIR B&B ACROSS THE STREET FROM ME. I HAVE ONE NEXT DOOR TO ME. BUT I WOULD ENCOURAGE THE PEOPLE BOTHER BY THAT TO TAKE THEIR CONCERN UP WITH THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE. CITY CANNOT RESTRICT SHORT-TERM RENTALS BECAUSE OF A PREEMPTION PASS BY THE FLORIDA GOVERNMENT. SO IF PEOPLE ARE NOT HAPPY OF THE SHORT-TERM RENTALS IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD, I URGE THEM TO CONTACT THEIR REPRESENTATIVES. THAT AREA FOR THE FLORIDA HOUSE, KAREN GONZALEZ PETMAN. FLORIDA SENATE, JAY COLLINS 813-281-2538. THOSE CONCERNS NEED TO BE DIRECTED NOT AGAINST THIS DEVELOPMENT, THEY NEED TO BE DIRECTED TO PEOPLE WHO CAN ACTUALLY CHANGE THAT. I COMMEND MR. SHEIKH FOR THOUGHTFULLY DESIGNED INFILL PROJECT AND STRONGLY ENCOURAGE TO YOU APPROVE IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, MA'AM, COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> TATYANA MORALES, CHAPTER LEAGUE. LEVIS 111 SOUTH NEWPORT AND HE CAN SAY, YES, HE WANT THIS PROJECT IN MY BACK YARD. BUT THE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE WHEN WE LOOK AT INFILL DEVELOPMENT. LOOK AT LOTS THAT HAVE OLD LITTLE HOME THAT OWNER OF THE HOUSE SOLD BECAUSE THEY WANTED THIS TO BE THE FUTURE. I WENT YESTERDAY AND TODAY TO THAT LOT TO SEE HOW BAD IS PARKING BECAUSE I LIVE IN THAT AREA THINKING I BIKE ARMED HERE. I TOOK MY CAR AND DROVE THERE AND WATCHED AS MOST OF THE CARS IN THE TOWN HOMES PARK BEHIND IN THE PARKING LOT BEHIND THAT BUILDING. THE STREET WAS MOSTLY EMPTY BECAUSE ON THAT LITTLE CORNER, NOBODY GOES THERE BECAUSE THE EXPRESSWAY. SO PARKING ISN'T REALLY A PROBLEM IF PEOPLE WANT TO WALK MORE, CLEVELAND STREET ON THE SAME BIKEWAY, THEY ADDED A TON OF PARKING THAT IS ALWAYS AVAILABLE. NEWSCAST OF N.I.M.B.Y.ISM. NEIGHBORS COME OUT PROTECTING THEIR MULTIMILLION DOLLAR HOUSES AND DEFENDING NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE BLACK NEIGHBORHOODS WHEN NONE OF THEM HERE ARE BLACK. SOMETHING REALLY IRONIC ABOUT THAT. SOMETHING THAT REALLY GETS TO MY BONES ABOUT THAT. AND THE REASON THAT WHICH HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING IS SO CORRELATED WITH THE NOT DEVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS. I LIVE IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD -- IF YOU PRETEND THAT HYDE PARK IS I DIVERSE, THE ONLY DIVERSITY IN HYDE PARK ARE PEOPLE'S DOGS. I LIVE IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. I LOVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I WANT TO LIVE IT MORE, BUT NO ONE THAT LOOKS LIKE ME AND IT HAPPENS WHEN WE LET THESE HOUSES BE McMANSIONS AND $2 MILLION AND NEIGHBORS HERE, YOU KNOW, CAN REAP THE BENEFITS TO SELL OUT FOR $2 MILLION ONE DAY. PROBLEM IS WE HAVE A FUTURE AND TALK OF THE PEOPLE COMING IN AND LITTLE INFILL PROJECTS. ONE PROJECT. ONE HOME. BUT THAT HOME WILL HOME A FAMILY. MAYBE THE FAMILY THAT FESS OUT WHAT HAPPENS ON THAT GOODY GOODY CORNER AND ESTABLISH THEMSELVES IN THE FUTURE. WHAT HAPPENED WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR KIDS WHEN THEY ARE LOOKING FOR OPPORTUNITIES IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. WHEN WE TALK OF FLOODING, HE LIVE FURTHER DOWN THE STREET. FURTHER SOUTH PROBLEM. A LOT OF CONCERNS -- I GET IT. I LOVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I WANT IT TO BE BETTER. THIS IS A SMALL INFILL HOME. ADDITIONAL INFILL HOME MAKING SURE THIS IS A BEAUTIFUL THING. I WANT TO TALK OF SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING AND WHY SOMETIMES WE COME BACK TO IT, SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING HALLS EXPLICITLY RACIST ROOTS. OWN EQUITY AND DISCRIMINATION PLAN. COLOR OF LAW, THE BOOK THAT NEIGHBORHOODS ARE MEANT TO BE SEGREGATED AND KEPT WHITE. IT WAS INTENTIONAL. NEIGHBORS WITH LAWYERS SAYING -- OH, WHATEVER. UP WISH THE NEIGHBORS WOULD SPEND ALL THIS MONEY AND ENERGY THEY HAVE TO COME HERE TO SAY, HEY, WHAT IF I FOUND A LOT AND PEP IN FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THIS COMMUNITY. I FEEL LIKE THE NEIGHBORS ARE CONCERN OF CHIRPING AND FIGHTING WITH OTHER NEIGHBORS LOOKING FOR OTHER OPPORTUNITY. LAST THING I WANT TO SAY IS THAT I THINK ITS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT WHEN WE DECIDE WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH LAND USE. WE ARE TALKING OF THE FUTURE. RIGHT NOW THIS IS A CORNER OVERGROWN. DEVELOPER HAS DONE A GREAT JOB OF TAKING CARE OF IT. I THINK IT IS BETTER TO SUPPORT THIS AND IGNORE SOME NEIGHBORS THAT HAVE LEGAL IDEAS IN THEIR BACK YARD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR, STATE YOUR NAME. >> SHABAZ KHAN. I GO BY SHABBY, LIKE NOT TOO SHABBY. I WILL GO QUICK. A HARD ABILITY TO FOLLOW. I AM IN FAVOR OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. I THINK THE DEVELOPER DID A GOOD JOB RESEARCHING IT AND HISTORICAL ROUTES AND RESPECT IT AND RESPECT THE NEIGHBORHOOD. UP THINK IT WILL PROVIDE TREMENDOUS OPPORTUNITY FOR THEN WHO WANTS TO COME TO THIS GREAT CITY OF TAMPA AND HYDE PARK. A MOVIE OF "FIELD OF DREAMS" IF YOU BUILD IT, THEY WILL COME. I WANT GREAT INNOVATION, GREAT MIND AND FABULOUS HEARTS AND WHY NOT HERE IN THE GREAT CITY OF TAMPA. THAT IS ALL I HAVE TO SPAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOT TOO SHABBY. >> TOBIN GREEN. I LIVE AT 400 SOUTH ORLEANS, JUST ONE BLOCK TO THEPEACE OF THE -- OF THE PROJECT THAT THEY ARE TALKING IT SHALL THE PROPERTY WE ARE TALK BEING. I LIVE IN DOBYVILLE. MY WIFE AND I LIVED HERE ALMOST A DECADE. THIS IN DIGS TO BEING RESIDENTS ACTIVE COMMUNITY MEMBER WITH THE HYDE PARK TOWN CIVIC ASSOCIATION. MY WIFE AND I HAVE COME TO LOVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND TAKEN PERSONAL RISKS AND INVESTED. WE FINISHED A TWO-UNIT URBAN TOWN HOME AT THE END OF THE BLOCK AND END OF THE YEAR FOR ANOTHER SINGLE-FAMILY HOME PROJECT. WE ARE INVESTED IN OUR COMMUNITY, OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, AND OUR BLOCK. PHYSICALLY, FINANCIALLY AND EMOTI EMOTIONALLY. I BUILT HERE WITH MY BARE HAND AND BLEED FOR MY BLOCK. I AM NOT AGAINST NEW DEVELOPMENT. QUITE THE OPPOSITE, BUT THE DEVELOPMENT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HERE IS MISGUIDED AT BEST. I HAVE INDEED HEARD A LOT OF PERSPECTIVES TONIGHT. AND MOST OF WHICH I RESPECT. UNFORTUNATELY THE MOST HARD-FOUGHT AGREEMENT OF NEIGHBOR'S HISTORY. BEAUTIFUL THING OF HISTORY HOW IT TEACHES US AND HOW WE CAN LEARN FROM ITS PAST. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT ANY OF YOU GUYS OR ANYBODY ELSE IN THE ROOM, HAD THE INCREDIBLE OPPORTUNITY TO SIT WITH ONE OF -- IF NOT THE LAST MATRIARCH LIVING IN DOBYVILLE MISS ROSE SASS LEE BROWN. SHE WAS LIVING PART OF HISTORY. I WANTED TO LIVE IN HYDE PARK SINCE A KID. I HAVE A LOT TO SAY AND SKIP THIS SO I CAN GET IT ALL IN. I CAN TELL THAT YOU WHEN I DID GET THE OPPORTUNITY TO BUY HERE A DECADE AGO, I ADMITTEDLY KNEW NOTHING OF DOBYVILLE. KNEW NOTHING ABOUT IT WHATSOEVER. BUT IT WAS MY TIME WITH MISS ROSALIE BROWN HERSELF, WHICH I, AGAIN, HAD THE PLEASURE OF SETTING ON HER FRONT PORCH A HALF DOZEN TIMES. IT WAS HER THAT TAUGHT ME ABOUT THE HISTORY HERE. SHE THANKED -- THANKED US FOR BEING HERE AND WELCOMED US TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AFTER SEEING THE CITY TURN ITS BACK ON THAT PART OF THAT IBD FOR SO LONG, WE WERE WELCOMED HERE. AND IT REALLY MEANT THE WORLD TO ME. I HAD THE GREAT PLEASURE TO SPEAKING WITH MR. DOBY -- MR. DOBY'S GREAT, GREAT GRANDDAUGHTER. AND ONE OF THE MOST TELL THINGS I HEARD HER SAY WITH -- I THINK IT WAS MAYBE HER COUSIN THAT WAS WITH THEM, THE BEST THING WE COULD DO IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD TO HONOR RICHARD DOBY AND THE PEOPLE WHO LIVED BEFORE TO BUILD IT BACK BETTER THAN IT WAS IN THE PAST. I THINK ABOUT THAT. WE DON'T WANT TO BUILD FAUX VERSIONS OF WHAT USED TO BE HERE. DOBYVILLE WASN'T FILLED WITH MICRO HOMES BECAUSE IT WAS BECAUSE OF SYSTEMIC RACISM. HONOR THE HISTORY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND PEOPLE RESIDED HERE IN THE PAST, WE NEED TO TALK OF BUILDING IT BACK BETTER THAN IT EVER WAS BEFORE AND NOT MAKE THE SAME SOCIAL MISGUIDED MISTAKES THAT WERE MADE DECADES AGO. WITH THAT I RESPECTFULLY ASK YOU TO DENY THIS ASK. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THAT CONCLUDES PUBLIC COMMENT. REBUTTAL. MR. VILA, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU. SO WE VOTED -- WHEN WAS IT -- JUST OVER TWO YEARS AGO TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OR ESTABLISH THE BOUNDARIES OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. IT WAS SHOWN IN ONE OF THE PACKETS, ONE OF THE SPEAKERS THIS GENTLEMAN BUILT A HOUSE CIRCA 2020 AND VERY MODERN HOME. CAN A HOME LIKE THAT BE BUILT TODAY NOW THAT YOU HAVE THE HISTORIC GUIDELINES? >>. >> THE SHORT ANSWER IS NO. RON VILA WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION. SANBORN MAP FROM 1929. I WANT TO ILLUSTRATE HERE, THE HATCHED IN AREA IS THE EXPANSION IN 2023. ANYTHING AFTER 2023 WILL HAVE TO GO IN FRONT OF THE A IT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMISSION AND GET APPROVAL AND BE KENT WITH OUR CRITERIA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE ARC LOOKED AT EXISTING DESIGN AND THAT IS WHAT THE ARC APPROVED? >> AT THE TIME ARC LOOKED AT IT THE, THEIR CHARGE WAS CHAPTER 27, 113. THEIR DUTIES AND POWERS. THIS IS WHAT THEY TOOK INTO CONSIDERATION. THE ACTION FOR REZONINGS CHANGES TO LAND USE CLASSIFICATION, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS T IT AT THIS TIME. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: GO THROUGH IT AT THIS TIME. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SURE. ABSOLUTELY. >> RON VILA: THE SAME MATERIAL I SHOWED ARC THAT I WILL SHOW YOU THIS EVENING. THIS IS JUST THE GENERAL OVERHEAD OF SUBJECT SITE. YOU SEE THE PROXIMITY TO THE CROSSTOWN. AND YOU SEE SOME OF THE DENSITY ACROSS THE STREET AND THE FABRIC THAT IS LOW CH-- LOCATED WITHIN THAT BLOCK. % THIS IS THE HISTORIC DISTRICT OF HYDE PARK AS ILLUSTRATED IN THE RED TO SHOW IT IS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES. IT IS ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER NOW THIS IS -- THIS IS THE CORRECTING STRUCTURE THAT IS ON THE SITE NOW DATES BACK TO 1930 WITHIN THE PERIOD. SO THIS IS CONTRIBUTING AS I STATED. THIS IS THE SIDE SHOT AND THIS -- THIS SHOWS THE CURRENT STRUCTURE WITH WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE THE INFILL AT THIS PORTION HERE. AND I AM GOING TO SHOW OUT SANBORN MAP IN A MINUTE THAT SHOWED THERE WAS A HOUSE HERE IN THE EARLY 1900s. THIS WAS BUILT IN THE '20s AND KNOCKED DOWN IN THE '90s STYLES. THERE WERE TWO HOMES THAT EXISTED AT THIS PARTICULAR SITE. THIS IS CONTINUING DOWN THE BLOCK TO THE SOUTH. SOME OF THE INVENTORY OUT THERE. PERIOD HOMES ADDED ON TO. AND NEW CONSTRUCTION AS PART OF THE INFILL. THIS INFILL PRODUCTION WILL NOT BE CONSISTENT WITH OUR CRITERIA TODAY. PARKING IN THE FRONT THAT IS PROHIBITED BY OUR STANDARD. GOING BACK TO THE 1929 SANBORN MAP, I WANTED TO ZOOM IN HERE. THIS IS HYDE PARK. YOU SEE THE DENSITY HERE? HOW THE STRUCTURES ARE SPACED APART, AND THEN WHEN YOU LOOK AT DOBYVILLE, YOU LOOK AT THE CONCENTRATION, HOW THEY ARE TOGETHER. YOU ZOOM IN THAT AREA, I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT TO FOCUS ON THIS PARTICULAR BLOCK HERE. IF YOU LOOK AT THE CORNER PARCELS. OKAY, THEY ALL HAVE -- THEY ALL FACE -- THE ORIENTATION IS ONE WAY FOR THE HOUSES ON EACH BLOCK. AND THEN YOU SEE THE CORNER PARCELS THAT THEY ARE INTEGRATEDED WITH ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES. THESE ARE DWELLINGS. THE D IS DWELLING. SINGLE-FAMILY STRUCTURES THAT ARE UNDER DIFFERENT OR INSTALLATION. SO THESE CORNER PARCELS DO NOT HAVE ALLEY ACCESS AND THESE HAVE A SUBSTANDARD DEPTH. THIS IS IN 1929. ONCE AGAIN, IF YOU LOOK AT THE FRONT YARD, THEY ALL LINE UP PRETTY MUCH IN TANDEM. THIS IS THE DOCUMENTATION THAT WE USED TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO THE APPLICANTS AS THEY COME IN. LOOK AT THE SEPARATION FROM THE STRUCTURES TO EACH STRUCTURE AND LOOK OUTSIDE OF THE DISTRICT. MAYBE OVER HERE. YOU SEE HOW THEY ARE SPACED OUT MORE GENEROUSLY. HERE YOU SEE THE DENSIE DOBYVILLE. YOU SEE WITHIN EACH BLOCK BLOCK TWO, YOU HAVE THESE LOTS. TWO STRUCTURES ON ONE LOT. TWO STRUCTURES ON ONE LOT. THERE ARE TWO STRUCTURES ON ONE LOT. TWO STRUCTURE ON ONE LOT. TWO STRUCTURES ON ONE LOT. THIS IS THE PATTERN ESTABLISHED IN DOBIVILLE. HOUSE THAT REMOVED IN THE '90s. CURRENT HOUSE HERE NOW THAT WAS BUILT IN 1930. CONTINUING SHOWING ADDITIONAL ILLUSTRATIONS. PROPERTY IN QUESTION HAS THE RED DOT ON IT. SO MOVING FROM -- FROM 1929 TO CURRENTLY, YOU SEE THE ORIENTATION OF THIS HOUSE THAT FACES WEST. THERE IS THE HOUSE BEHIND IT THAT FACES NORTH. ONCE AGAIN ON THE CORNERS. A STRUCTURE THAT NAYSES WEST HERE. ONE THAT FACES SOUTH. A STRUCTURE THAT FACES EAST HERE. AND A STRUCTURE THAT FACES SOUTH HERE. MY POINT IS, THAT THESE CORNER PARCELS HAVE BEEN BIFURCATED .THEY DON'T HAVE THE ACCESS TO THE ALLEY, AND THEY DON'T HAVE THE DEPTH OF SOME OF THE OTHER LOTS. THIS IS THE NEW SITE PLAN THAT WAS PRESENTED. FOR TODAY TO MEET CURRENT CODE, EACH SINGLE-FAMILY STRUCTURES THAT TO HAVE TWO CARS ON-SITE. THIS REQUEST CAME FORWARD WITH NO VARIANCES. THIS IS THE 1930s STRUCTURE THAT HAS A LITTLE ADDITION. THAT SHOWS THE FOOTPRINT WITH TWO PARKING. THIS IS THE NEW LINEAR CONSTRUCTION THAT ALSO HAS TWO PARKING SPOTS OFF THE STREET. THAT IS TO MEET CITY OF TAMPA CODE. I'M GOING TO CLOSE WITH THIS HERE. THIS IS PART OF THE FILE. THIS IS FROM FDOT SHOWING IN 1990, THE SUBJECT SITE HAD THE TWO STRUCTURES ON THE SITE. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PORTION OF PRESENTATION. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SO HE FULLY UNDERSTAND AND YOU GUYS ARE THE SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS ON HISTORICAL PRESERVATION. YOU EVALUATE NOT JUST ON THE -- IF I UNDERSTAND YOU CORRECTLY, YOU EVALUATE THESE PROBLEMS NOT JUST ON ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTERS AND FEATURES BUT ALSO THE PATTERN AND THE SETBACKS AND THE -- SO YOU -- IS IT ALL ENCOMPASSING OVER -- LOOK AT EACH ONE OF THESE PROBLEMS OF HOW -- LIKE YOU JUST DESCRIBED, THESE CORNERS, HOW THEY WERE DEVELOPED. THAT PART OF YOUR REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF THIS YOU RECEIVE THE AR C ARE APPROVAL? >> FOR PD, YOU LOOK FOOTPRINT AND THE MASSING THROUGH THE HISTORIC FABRIC. SETBACK IS CONSISTENT WITH THE HISTORIC SETBACK WITHIN THAT BLOCK AND SETBACKS ARE CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE HISTORICALLY ALL THE HOUSES CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AS WELL. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: PART OF WHAT YOU ARE REQUIRED TO EVALUATE WHEN LOOKING AT THESE PROJECTS. >> RON VILA. PD HAS INTEGRITY. WE LOOK AT THE PATTERNS THAT WERE ESTABLISHED TO MOVE FORWARD AND WANT TO COPY THOSE PATTERNS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPRECIATE IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: YOU TALK OF THE PATTERNS, THE STUDY PERIOD WHERE IT WAS HISTORICALLY, NOT THE NONCONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES BUILT. >> RON VILA: ABSOLUTELY. WE GO BACK TO THE SANBORN MAPS AND HISTORIC REFERENCING THAT WE CAN. WE TRY TO ELIMINATE SOME OF THE NONCONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES BUILT IN THE '60s AND '70s. THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE CRITERIA THAT WE DO TODAY. >>BILL CARLSON: WHAT HAPPENS IF ONE OF THESE NONCONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES IN AN ADJACENT PROPERTY, IF THEY CAME BACK TO MAKE MAJOR CHANGES TO IT. WILL THEY BE FORCED TO REBUILD TO THIS NEW STANDARD OR. >> RON VILA: IF THERE IS A NONCONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE LOOK AT THE SCALE AND MASSING AND WREN IT WAS BUILT. WE DON'T MAKE THEM GO BACK TO 1920s. >>BILL CARLSON: IF A BUILDING GOT KNOCKED DOWN, WOULD THEY THEN HAVE TO FOLLOW THE NEW STANDARDS. >> RON VILA: YES, SIR, ABSOLUTELY. YES, SIR. >>BILL CARLSON: AND CONSIDERING THE RESEARCH YOU DID ON THIS ADDITIONAL HOUSE, FROM THE -- FROM THE SANBORN MAP, IT WAS IT A SEPARATE LOT? WAS IT SEPARATELY DESIGNATED AND TITLED? TWO DIFFERENT OWNERS? DO YOU KNOW? AND MY LAST QUESTION WHILE YOU ARE LOOKING THAT UP. YOU HEARD THAT PARKING IN THE BACK IS A REQUIREMENT. >> SAY THAT AGAIN? >>BILL CARLSON: PARKING IN THE BACK IS A REQUIREMENT. >> BEHIND THE FRONT YARD SETBACK. WHERE THE PORCH IS, TWO CARS. THE CARS SHOULD BE SUBORDINATE TO THE STRUCTURES AND CHALLENGING LOTS, HE DOES NOT HAVE ALLEY ACCESS. I TRIED TO SHOW IN THE DEMOCRAT ADMINISTRATION NO VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM THE REAR BUT FROM THE PRIMARY STREET. >>BILL CARLSON: THE CURRENT ACTUAL IT -- PARKING LOT IN FRONT. >> THAT WOULD NOT BE COMPATIBLE WITH OUR CRITERIA. >>BILL CARLSON: THE HOUSE THERE RIGHT NOW YOU SAID IS A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE. DOESN'T HAVE A THINKS TORIC DESIG DESIGNATION. >> CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. IT HAS PROTECTION. >>BILL CARLSON: CAN THEY MOVE IT? A LITTLE BIT WITHIN THE LOT? >> AND CAN MOVE IT SOMEWHERE HE WAS. WE LOOK AT REQUESTS THAT COME IN. DEMOLITION IS THE WORSE THING TO HAPPEN WITH THE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE. WE LOSE THAT FABRIC. VERY LOW CASE. IF THEY HAD VISIONS OF DOING SOMETHING MORE GRAND ON THAT SITE, WE WOULD TAKE INTO INTO CONSIDERATION. WE MOVED HOUSES IN YBOR CITY AND HYDE PARK AS WELL. >>BILL CARLSON: THE DESIGNATION PARTICULARLY FOR DOBYVILLE, ANY KEEP OF OVERRIDING STATEMENT OR MISSION STATEMENT. >> PART OF THEOVERALL HYDE PARK DISTRICT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YOU SAID SOMETHING MORE GRAND. WHAT I AM HEARING THAT DOBYVILLE WAS NOT A GRAND NEIGHBORHOOD. A MODEST NEIGHBORHOOD. WOULD THAT BE IN -- IF SOMEBODY CAME TO YOU AND WANTED TO BUILD A GRAND STATELY SOUTH OF SWANN TPD OF HOME, WOULD YOU FIND THAT APPROPRIATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE FABRIC ALONG THAT BLOCK. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT IS WHAT I WAS THINKING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, MR. VILA. OKAY, MR. MICHELINI, YOU AND YOUR CLIENT FOR REBUTTAL. YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES. >> QUITE HONESTLY -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AGAIN. >> I AM PERPLEXED THAT SOMEONE WILL COME UP AFTER THE ARC AND SAID THAT IS CONSISTENT. WE WENT THROUGH THE WHOLE EVALUATION. WE SPENT ALMOST A YEAR WORKING WITH THE -- WORKING WITH THE ARC STAFF TO COME UP WITH A PLAN THAT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THEIR GUIDELINES. WE WORKED WITH THE CITY STAFF AND ZONING. AND IMAPPALLED FOR THEM TO SAYS IT NOT CONSISTENT WITH ZONING OR VIOLATES ALL THESE OTHER CODES OR THAT IT VIOLATES THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S LAND USE DESIGNATION. YOU HAD JENNIFER COME UP AND TELL YOU IT IS CONSISTENT. LACHONE SAID IT WAS CONSISTENT AND RON VILA COME UP AND SAID IT WAS CONSISTENT. WE ARE ADJACENT ON THE VERY NORTH SIDE TO THE CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY. AND -- I WANT TO SHOW YOU A COUPLE OF PICTURES. THEY HAVE THROWN AROUND ISSUE OF GREEN SPACE. BOTH OF THESE LOTS EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS FOR GREEN SPACE. 710 WEAR FEET IS REQUIRED. AND WE ARE PROVIDING 1367 SQUARE FEET ON THE ONE DWELLING. AND 531 SQUARE IS REQUIRED AND PROVIDING 567 ON THE OTHER. LET ME JUST DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO A COUPLE OF THINGS. WE ARE MIMICKING THIS DESIGN ADJACENT TO IT. THIS WAS SO OVERGR GROWN YOU COULDN'T SEE THE HOUSE THIS THOSE INDIVIDUALS CAME FORWARD AND TOLD YOU THEY SUPPORTED THIS PROBABLY. DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET IS A TOWN HOUSE PROJECT. THIS IS THE -- THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. THERE IS THE TOWN HOUSES. THIS IS WHAT AZEELE LOOKS LIKE LOOKING EASTWARD. SUBJECT PROPERTIER WHO. CROSSTOWN EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY HERE. SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. DEAD-END INTO AZEELE AND THE CROSSTOWN. ANOTHER VIEW. SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. TOWN HOUSES OVER HERE. SUBJECT PROPERTY. HERE. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING YOU THE PROXIMITY OF TOWN HOUSES. THE SMALLER LOTS ALL AROUND THAT RON VILA POINTED OUT TO YOU. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS HERE. CROSSTOWN IS RIGHT HERE. THIS AREA IS NOT THIS. AND THE PEOPLE WHO CAME UP AND SPOKE TO YOU FROM SOUTH ORLEANS AND FROM OTHER AREAS IN HYDE PARK WANT DOBYVILLE -- WHICH WILL BE INCONSISTENT TO DEVELOP SOMETHING LIKE THIS -- SIMPLY DOESN'T WORK. WE HAVE GIVEN YOU THE BOU BOUNDARIES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE ZOOM OU OUT. >> THIS PROPERTY SR. LOCATED RI -- THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED JUST DOWN HERE. ANYWAY, WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE PROCESS. WE HAVE MET THE CRITERIA. THERE ARE NO WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED. WE HAVE BEEN FOUND CONSISTENT BY ALL OF THE REVIEWING AGENCIES. WE CANNOT WAIVE DRAINAGE. I KNOW THAT IS A BIG ISSUE THESE DAYS. YOU HAVE TO MEET DRAINAGE. NO WAIVERS ALLOWED FOR THAT. NO EXCEPTIONS. WITH RESPECT TO THE LOTS, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE DEMONSTRATED THAT THEY WERE THERE. THAT THE HOUSING WAS THERE. IT IS AN APPROPRIATE USE AT APPEAR APPROPRIATE LOCATION AND A SENSITIVE USE. WE STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE ARC FOR ALL THE DESIGN WORK. ONE OF THE SPEAKERS CAME UP AND TALKING TO BUT DESIGNS. THAT IS PREMATURE. WE HAVEN'T GOT TO THAT POINT. ZONING HAS TO BE APPROVED FIRST AND THEN WE CAN START APPLYING TO THE CRA FOR DESIGN CRITERIA MAKE SURE WE ARE COMPATIBLE. WE WILL SHOW YOU WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT LOOK LIKE. AND -- SO WE PLAN TO HAVE A VERY ATTRACTIVE INFILL PIECE THAT LOOKS LIKE THE OTHER HOUSES THAT WERE INFILL PIECES. AND WHEN RON VILA SHOWED YOU THERE WERE TWO HOUSE ON ALL THOSE CORNER LOTS. THIS IS THE SAME THING. WE ARE PROPOSING TWO HOUSES ON THE CORNER LOT, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF DOBYVILLE AND PROTECTS IT. IT DOESN'T DO ANYTHING TO HURT IT. YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING SOMETHING IN. >> NO, STEVE IS GREAT. THANK YOU, STEVE. >> WE APPRECIATE IT. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. AS I SAID, WE HAVE BEEN THROUGH THE DUE DILIGENCE AND SPENT A LOT OF TIME TO MAKE SURE WE DOTTED EVERY I AND CROSSED OVER T REGARDING REGULATIONS THAT GOVERN IT. DOBYVILLE IS NOT SOUTH OF SWANN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO CLOSE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THIS IS A REALLY INTERESTING CASE. AND I WILL BE HONEST YOU WITH, I -- YOU KNOW, I -- OBVIOUSLY I DO MY RESEARCH AND I LOOK AT ALL THESE DOCUMENTS AND EVERYTHING AHEAD OF TIME, BUT, OF COURSE, WE KEEP AN OPEN MIND AND WALK IN AND LISTEN TO THE TESTIMONY. BUT I HAD MY THOUGHTS. AND HE THOUGHT WHEN I FIRST LOOKED AT THIS CASE, OH, THESE PEOPLE ARE CRAZY COMING IN HERE ASKING FOR THIS REZONING FOR THIS PROPERTY ON A LOT THAT IS -- THAT THIS -- THIS SMALL. BUT THEN I -- I LISTENED TO THE PRESENTATIONS. I LISTEN TO THE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. QUITE HONESTLY -- I KNOW THIS IS GOING TO SURPRISE A LOT PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY KNOW MY POSITION ON A LOT THESE ISSUES ESPECIALLY WITH PDs AND I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF LOT SPLITS AND OVERDEVELOPMENT. AND THIS IS PROBABLY GOING TO SHOCK MR. MICHELINI AS MUCH AS ANYBODY ELSE, BUT I THINK THIS IS A REASONABLE REQUEST. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND WE SAW THE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FROM -- FROM -- RON REPRESENTS THE ARC WHO -- I TELL YOU THAT IS A TOUGH -- TOUGH STAFF AND TOUGH GOOD TO GET THROUGH WHEN THEY LOOK AT THE HIS FOR CAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND HOUSES THAT EXISTED THERE DURING THAT HISTORICAL TIME PERIOD 1896 TO 1933. BOTH OF THESE EXISTING CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES EXISTED AND THFLS A CONT-- THERE WAS A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE THAT WE LOST THAT WAS THERE DURING THAT PER OF TIME. MAKE SENSE AND CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE IT IS THEY ARE CONTRIBUTING OR NONCORRECTING ON THIS BLOCK ORR AJAY SHENT -- ADJACENT. IT IS AN ADD AREA. THEY ARE ACCOMMODATING OFF-STREET PARKING WHICH WOULD HAVE OPINION ONE OF MY BIGGEST OBJECTIONS. I'M FAMILIAR WITH AREA AND I KNOW THAT PARKING IS A PROBLEM. SO THE FACT THEY ARE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE PARKING ON-SITE WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT IS -- I THINK IT IS ADMIRABLE. I THINK THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO THROUGH THE ARC FOR THE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE HISTORICAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND I HAVE FULL FAITH AND CONFIDENCE THAT THE FOLKS THAT ARE CHARGED WITH THAT TASK WILL DO WHAT THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO DO. AND, AGAIN, THIS WAS A TOUGH ONE. I AM TELL YOU, I TOTALLY -- THIS IS WHY WE LISTEN TO THE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE WHEN WE WALK IN HERE. I LISTENED TO THE EVIDENCE. I LISTEN CAREFULLY AND FAMILIAR ENOUGH WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS THAT THERE IS REALLY ONLY ONE WAY TO GO AND THAT IS TO SUPPORT THE REQUEST. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT, THEN WHO WISHES TO READ THIS ITEM. COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON. YOU WERE UP. COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I MUST HAVE CHANGED MY MIND WITHOUT SAYING A WORD FIVE TIMES. I HEARD FROM ONE SIDE, IT WAS WONDERFUL. HEARD FROM OTHER. IT WAS WONDERFUL. I HEARD SPEECHES FROM BOTH SITED IT WAS WONDERFUL. PEOPLE NOT CRITICIZING EACH OTHER, THAT IS WONDERFUL. AND IT COMES TO -- THEN BE MR. VILA COMES UP. AND SAID SOMETHING I NEVER HEARD HIM SAY. IT WAS ACTUALLY FOR SOMETHING. EVERY TIME HE COMES HERE, HE IS AGAINST SOMETHING. I WILL BE HONEST YOU WITH. I KNOWN MR. VILA -- I AM NOT GOING TO SAY HOW OLD HE IS. BUT IT IS ALSO THAT YOU FEEL THAT BOTH SIDES ARE RIGHT, AND HOW CAN ANYBODY BE WRONG. BOTH SIDES WERE WRONG AND HOW CAN ANYBODY BE RIGHT. ONE OF THE TWO. BUT I KNOW THE STANDARD WE SET. WHEN YOU TALK OF THE CARS, IT IS PARKED FROM BASE OF THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE TO THE BACK. NOT IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE. SO IMPLORE THAN LIKELY GOING TO SUPPORT IF SOMEBODY MAKES A MOTION. NOT MY TURN TO SPEAK. MOTION TO GO TO -- REALLY WHEN THEY GO TO THE ARC, YOU REALLY GOT TO BE PREPARED. AND YOU GOT TO BE PREPARED BOTH SIDE WERE VERY WELL PREPARED FOR BOTH OF US. FOR ALL OF US. BUT THIS IS NOT EASY. NOT AT ALL. BUT I GUESS THAT IS WHY WE GOT ELECTED TO DO WHAT WE THINK IS RIGHT. NOT THAT I LIKE IT 200%. BUT I FEEL THEY HAVE DO WHAT THE LAW REQUIRES US TO DO. AND IT IS INCUMBENT TO SO HE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT THERE COULD BE -- AND ARC WILL DO THEIR JOB AND I AM SURE THEY WILL. I'M LOOKING TO SAY -- IT HAS BEEN VERY HARD TO MAKE A DECISION, BECAUSE IN THIS CASE, I HEARD TESTIMONY FROM BOTH SIDE THAT -- PEOPLE THAT I REALLY VALUE WHAT THEY SAY. AND TO MAKE A DECISION. SO I WILL BE MORE LIKELY SUPPORTING THIS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. >>GWEN HENDERSON: THANK YOU, CHAIR. MY MIND IS SAYING, GWEN DON'T SAY IT. BUT BUT, I DON'T KNOW, I WAS THINKING OF THE HISTORIC HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIAL DISTANCING WHEN THEY CREATED THEIR RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR HOUSING IN THE COMMUNITY. AND WHEN IT CAME TO DOBYVILLE. DID THEY FEET TO -- TO REALLY VALUE THE HISTORIC NATURE OF DOBYVILLE. IN THIS -- IN THIS FEET TO NOW OCCUPY THIS SPACE IN A WAY THAT THE -- THAT THE DEVELOPER SR. REQUESTING. I THINK WHEN I HEARD ONE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY WHO IS AGAINST THE PROBABLY SAY GHETTO AND SERVANTS, I HAD TO GET UP AND LEAVE AND GATHER MYSELF. BECAUSE THERE IS SOME TRUTH TO THAT. UNFORTUNATELY, THERE IS. MR. DOBY'S HOUSE, IN FACT, PROBABLY WAS CONSIDERED, YOU KNOW, THE MAN SON WHO OF THE PARTICULAR AREA AT THE TIME -- MANSION OF THE PARTICULAR AREA AT THE TIME. I BELIEVE I BELIEVE THAT THE PROJECT IS EXTREMELY THOUGHTFUL TO THE CHARACTER OF WHAT DOBYVILLE WAS. CRITERIA TODAY AND I WILL BE SUPPORTING IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO YOU WANT TO READ IT. >>GWEN HENDERSON: IT IS NOT MY TURN AND I DON'T WANT TO JUMP THE GUN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SURE. SO I AM GOING TO MOVE FILE NUMBER REZ 24 104, ORDER CONTINUES INTO FOR FIRST CONSIDERATION REZONING PROPERTY IN 402 SOUTH OREGON AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED EXCEPTION 1 RM-12 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO PD, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >> SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL VOTE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: NO. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH CARLSON VOTING NO. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 27, 2025 AT 10 A.M. LOCATED 315 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 36602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WOULD YOU ALL LIKE A FIVE-MINUTE RECESS. WE WILL BE IN RECESS FOR FIVE TO SEVEN MINUTES. . >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE TO WEIGHT FOR THE CLERK. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I WILL BE THE CLERK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE ARE WAITING FOR THE OTHER CLERK. TELL ME WHEN YOU ARE GOOD TO GO. ARE WE GOOD? ALL RIGHT. [GAVEL SOUNDING] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS TAMPA CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO ORDER. ROLL CALL PLEASE. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HERE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: PRESENT. >>LUIS VIERA: HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER 6. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 6 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2902 MELBOURNE BOULEVARD. REQUEST FROM RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY ANDCI TO CG, COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND TURN IT OVER TO MISS MALONE TO GIVE HER REPORT. >>JENNIFER MALONE: GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL. JENNIFER MALONE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THE AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE LOCATED AT THE INTERSTATE 4 AND NORTH 50th STREET INTERCHANGE. THERE IS SOME RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA, AS WELL AS SOME COMMERCIAL USES WHICH ARE REFLECTED WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE FUTURE LAND USE. IT IS ALSO IN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE. FUTURE LAND USE IS COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 THAT ALLOWS FOR RESIDENTIAL BUT ALSO SOME INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL USES. THIS APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR COMMERCIAL GENERAL WHICH IS NOT EVEN AS INTENSE AS THEY COULD GO. SO A NICE -- IT WILL FIT NICELY WITH THE INTENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. PATTERN OF THE SURROUNDING AREA ESPECIALLY SINCE GIVEN THE SURROUNDING ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND THE PROPOSED CG IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA AND ALLOW FOR INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT OF A MOSTLY VACANT SITE WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. YES, MA'AM. DOKZ DOBLGZ THANK YOU, LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. NO SITE PLAN. IT IS A EUCLIDIAN REQUEST. PROPERTY CONTAINS 46,173 SQUARE FEET APPROXIMATELY. THIS IS THE SURVEY SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT. THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN BLUE. THIS IS 49th STREET. THIS IS EAST 18th AVENUE. AND YOU CAN SEE THIS IS THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE. YOU CAN SEE 00 FEET OF DEP-- 20 FEET ON THE WEST. LARGE PARCEL WITH 330 ON THE EAST. SO THE SOUTH IS 280 FEET AND BOUNDARY TO THE NORTH HAVE 408 FEET. WITH THE REQUESTED ZONING, MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWABLE WOULD BE 45 FEET. AND THIS IS THE ZONING MAP OF THE PROPERTY. SO THIS IS THE PROPERTY WE IS OUTLINED IN RED. THESE ARE THE INDIVIDUAL PARCELS WITHIN THE OVERALL. BUT THE OUTSIDE BOUNDARY IS THAT PROPERTY PRE. SO YOU CAN SEE ALONG -- THIS IS MELBOURNE. THIS IS 50 HUMIDITIES STREET AND I-40 --I-40 TO THE SOUTH. NORTH OF OF THE SITE OF CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL. HOTEL USE. HE WILL SHOW YOU PICTURES. GAS STATION WITH THE COMMERCIAL USE ALONG THIS SEGMENT OF MELBOURNE. AS YOU MOVE FURTHER WEST AND NORTHWEST OF YOUR SITE, YOU GET INTO YOUR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. SOUTH OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE A COMMERCIAL USE, A HOTEL TO THE SOUTH. AND THEN YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY ZONING AND USES TO THE WEST. THEN I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SITE TO SHOW. OUT THE SITE VISUALLY, HARD TO TELL THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY BECAUSE NOT A COMPLETELY SEPARATE PARCEL. WHEN YOU ENTERED THE SITE, THIS PARKING AREA IS REALLY JUST SPLIT. THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL. SO WE WILL START AT THE NORTH END OF THE SITE, MAKE OUR WAY AROUND THE EAST .COM TO THE SOUTH. COME AROUND TO THE WEST AND THEN TO THE NORTH AND CIRCLE BACK TO THE SITE AGAIN. SO THIS IS THE SITE. THIS IS THE EAST END OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. THAT IS THE HOTEL THAT EXISTS THERE, THE ROADWAY INN. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW. THE CLOSE-UP OF ENTRY OF THE SITE SO THE SUBJECT SITE IS HERE ON THIS SITE. THIS IS THE VIEW INTERNAL TO THE SITE THAT IS JUST THE NORTH. NORTH OF THE SITE. SO THIS IS CIRCUMSTANCE LENGTH EAST OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE SOUTHEAST PORTION OF THE SITE. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH. THIS IS HEADED FURTHER SOUTH AND THIS IS TO THE SOUTH END. WE ARE ON 18th AVENUE HOOKING AT THE SITE. THIS IS SOUTH SUBJECT SITE AND THE HOTEL AND THE ENTRANCE TO THE HOTEL. THIS IS LOOK HAD WEST ON EAST 18th AVENUE. THIS IS ON EAST 18th AVENUE, SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE. ANOTHER VIEW. THIS IS THE WEST END OF THE SITE WHICH, OF COURSE, IS HEAVILY WOODED HERE. THIS WEST OF SITE. THE WE WERE PORTION OF IT. ANOTHER VIEW LEFT TO THE NORTH. ANOTHER VIEW OF, WEST END AND CIRCLING BACK TO THE SITE, THE HOTEL THERE. SUBJECT SITE. AND ANOTHER BOUNDARY OF THE SITE ITSELF THE ARC VERY SCREWED AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT. AND I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO. THANK YOU. APPLI APPLICANT. >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, COUNCILMEMBERS. I HAVE A QUICK POWERPOINT AND I WILL KEEP IT TO MINIMUM IF YOU PULL IT UP PLEASE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COMING OUT THE SCREEN. >> I THINK STAFF DID A GOOD JOB PRESENTING TO YOU RM-16 FROM CI TO CG. ALL CONSISTENT FINDING FROM PLANNING COMMISSION, ZONING AND ALL THE DEPARTMENTS. I AM NOT AWARE OF ANY ON CITIZENS ON THE RECORD. YOU SEE THE SITE IS LOCATED A VERY EN TEN SIEVE AREA NORTH 50th AND I-4 WHICH BRANCHES TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH RAMPS. CLOSER VIEW OF IT. VERY INTENSE. IT IS ABUTTING TO THE NORTH WE IS THE MOST INTENSIVE LAND USE SATURDAY IN THE CITY. ZONING CATEGORIES MUCH THAT AS A CI. AND CGs IN THE AREA. PLANNING COMMISSION INDICATED TO YOU THAT GIVEN THE SURROUNDING PATTERN, THEY FIND THE PROPOSED CG IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE. IN CONCLUSION WILL ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING USES AND CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE AREA. AND THESE ARE JUST A COUPLE OF PICTURES, AGAIN, THE SITE IS VERY INTENSIVE. WE ARE ALL FAMILIAR WITH 50th. A MULTILANE SEPARATED ROADWAY. I-4 IS RUNNING RIGHT ACROSS IN FRONT. 50th INTO MELBOURNE STREET AND I-4 WHICH IS IN ON FROM AS WELL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS. ANYONE IN PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO CLOSE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON, YOUR TURN. >>BILL CARLSON: MORE NUMBER 6, REZ 24-108. ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 2902 MEL BOURP BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE TECHNICALLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING CLASSIFICATION RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND CI, TO CG. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 27, 2025 AT 10 A.M. LOCATED 315 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, ITEM 67. >> GOOD EVENING AGAIN FOR THE RECORD, CHRISTOPHER DEMASH, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. REZ 24-110. REQUEST TO REZONE 622 AND 642 WEST DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AND 3912, 3915 AND 3917 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO CG AND RS-50. I WILL TURN IT OVER TO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. MANI . >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, MA'AM. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. AT THE CORNER OF N. BOULEVARD AND WEST MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULE BOULEVARD. BOTH OF THOSE ROADS ARE ARTERIAL ROADWAYS. SURROUNDING AREA IS EITHER RESIDENCES OR OFFICES AND MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. IS PRIMARILY COMMERCIAL. WE LOOK AT THE FUTURE LAND USE, IT HAS TWO FUTURE LAND USES ON THE SITE, COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 IS THE PINK. THAT IS WHAT WE SEE ALONG MOST OF OUR MAJOR CORRIDORS ALONG WEST DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD. RESIDENTIAL-10. THIS PORTION DOWN HERE IS TYPICALLY OUR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. AND THAT IS REALLY PREDOMINANTLY ON N. BOULEVARD. SO THAT APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED FOR COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING ON THE COMMUNITY MIXED 35 FLU AND THE SINGLE-FAMILY ON THE RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. THOSE ARE IN LINE. -- THE ZONING IS IN LINE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THOSE PARCELS. THIS IS KENT WITH OUR URBAN VILLAGE POLICIES WHICH SEEK TO DIRECT THE GROWTH TO URBAN VILLAGES THROUGH APPROVAL OF THIS REZONING. WE WOULD EXPECT THE -- THE GROWTH TO OCCUR AT THIS INTERSECTION. HE JUST ALSO WOULD LIKE TO SAYS IT COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SWOUPDING USES AND CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR. >> FOR RECORD RORD, CHRISSER IN DEMASH, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. START WITH AN AERIAL OF SUBJECT SITE. AND YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED. AND IT IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF N. BOULEVARD AND WEST DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD. SUBJECT SITE SUN DEVELOPED AND LOCATED IN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS OVERLAY DISTRICT. REQUESTED CG AND RS ZONING DISTRICTS ARE ALLOCATED AS FOLLOWS, LOTS 4-9 ARE PROPOSED FOR CG ZONING. AND LOT 10 ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE IS PROPOSED FOR RS-50 ZONING. SURROUND WILLING DEVELO-- SURRO DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS COMPRISE OF TO THE NORTH OF SUBJECT SITE. AN OFFICE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE A VACANT PARCEL. WE ALSO HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLS LOCATED ALONG NORTH CLEARFIELD AVENUE. WE HAVE A DENTAL OFFICE TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. WEST OF THE PROPERTY, WE HAVE OF A GAS STATION, A DRY-CLEANING BUSINESS, AND SOUTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLS. IT IS ALSO SHOULD BE NOTED THAT -- THAT FURTHER SOUTH ON SUBJECT PROPERTY ON NORTH 3W50UBOULEVAR WE HAVE THREE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITES. THESE PROPERTIES HAVE BEEN REZONED OVER THE PAST 0 YEARS. INCLUDE BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES. THOSE SEATS HAVE 'TAINED A RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER TO THEM. CURRENT PD FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OF SPELLINGS TEE RETAIL WITH RETAIL SALES AND DOES NOT ALLOW FOR ALL THE CG AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY USES WHICH IS -- WHICH IS THE PURPOSE FOR THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST IS TO ALLOW THOSE CG AND RS-50 US USES. THIS IS A SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT IS OUT LINED -- LET ME FIX THAT. SURVEY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY OUTLINED IN YELLOW. WE HAVE N. BOULEVARD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: BRING IT UP A LITTLE BIT. >> WHOOPS. THERE WE GO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. >> THE SURVEY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OUTLIVED IN YELLOW. WE HAVE N. BOULEVARD ALONG THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THERE IS APPROXIMATELY 295 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. WE ALSO HAVE WEST MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD. ON THE NORTHERN PORTION PRESIDENT OF PROPERTY AND APPROXIMATELY 121 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE ALONG THAT ROADWAY. GIVEN THE SURROUNDING USES, THE REQUESTED USE OF CG AND RS-50 ZONING IS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION AND PRO VOIDS AN OPPORTUNITY -- PROVIDES AN APPROPRIATE TRANSITION WITH THE SURROUNDING PARCELS. SINCE THIS IS AN EUCLIDIAN ZONING, NO SITE PLAN OR ELEVATIONS PROVIDED. WE DO HAVE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT PARCEL FROM THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD. THIS IS MORE OF A CLOSE-UP IF YOU ARE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THAT SAME ROADWAY. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER. THIS IS THE VIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IF YOU ARE ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH -- N. BOULEVARD. LOOKING NORTH, WE HAVE CVS PHARMACY. LOOKING NORTHWEST, WE HAVE AN OFFICE COMPLEX. SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL, WE HAVE AN EXISTING DENTAL OFFICE. EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE A VACANT PARCEL. AND THEN ADJACENT TO THE SITE ALONG NORTH CLEARFIELD AVENUE TO THE EAST, WE HAVE SEVERAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS. THESE ARE ALL ALONG NORTH CLEARFIELD AVENUE. LOOKING WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE A GAS STATION. AND TO THE SOUTH OF THE GAS STATION, WE HAVE A DRY-CLEANING BUSINESS. AND THEN LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLS. THESE ARE ALONG WEST ORIENT STREET. OF COURSE, THIS IS LOOKING DOWN WEST ORIENT STREET LOOKING WEST ACTUALLY. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND STAFF REVIEWED THE ACTION AND FIND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND WE ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. STEVE MICHELINI, REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER. THIS IS A DOWNZONING TAKING THE PD BACK TO THE ORIGINAL CG I WOULD REALLY BE HAPPY TO WALK TO SOMETHING I DON'T HAVE TO CROSS MLD TO VISIT. I WOULD LIKE TO MEET OTHER NEED OTHER THAN PHARMACEUTICAL ONES BY HAVING SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THAT PROPERTY. WITH THE ADDITION OF A -- OF A REAL COMMERCIAL PROBABLY THAT IS MORE INTENSE. BASED ON FACEBOOK POST THAT I UNFORTUNATELY CAN'T SHOW YOU BECAUSE OF A BUSTED PHONE, I LEARNED ABOUT THIS FROM A POST ON MY NEIGHBORHOOD PAGE WHERE A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE KIND OF BEMOANING THE FACT THERE IS LESS COMMERCIAL THAN WHAT WE REALLY ACTUALLY NEED AND WANT. OUR AREA IS A COMMERCIAL DEAD ZONE. AND THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL DESIGNATION ISN'T REALLY FOOLING ANYONE. AND REALLY ISN'T HELPING US THAT MUCH. A RESIDENTIALLY DENSE AREA LIKE OURS DOESN'T NEED MORE RESIDENCES, IT NEEDS MORE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. WE NEED TO LOOK TO THE FUTURE ON THIS AND PLAN FOR THE FUTURE. AND WE ARE UNDERGOING A REVITALIZATION WHERE A LOT MORE RESIDENTS ARE BEING PUT IN NEIGHBORHOOD. BUT COMMERCIAL ARTERIES REALLY SHOULD PREFER COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE TAMPA HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION OPPOSED THIS EARLIER INCARNATION BECAUSE IT WOULDN'T WORK. THIS PROBABLY IS REALLY JUST MORE OF THE SAME. THEY DIDN'T HOLD A GOOD NEIGHBOR MEETING WITH THE ASSOCIATION. I DO ATTEND MEETINGS REGULARLY, AND THEY DID NOT HOLD A GOOD NEIGHBOR MEETING WITH TAMPA HEIGHTS CIVIC ASSOCIATION. AND THEY ARE USING A VALUABLE COMMERCIAL LOCATION THAT WOULD BE WALKABLE FOR RESIDENTS BETWEEN COLUMBUS AND EVEN SEMINOLE HEIGHTS FOR SOMETHING PEOPLE PROBABLY WON'T WANT TO WALK TO. IF THE CITY IS BEING ASKED BY THE WAY TO VACATE THEIR ALLY TO DO THIS, I WOULD SUGGEST THAT YOU DISAPPROVE THIS REZONING. AND THAT YOU HAVE VIRTUALLY UNFETTERED DISCRETION OF THE ALLEY. I'M FAMILIAR WITH CASE THAT AROSE FROM THE PREVIOUS REZONING REQUEST. AND HE KNOW YOU CAN DO THAT. ALSO, WITH REGARD TO TOWN HOUSES AND BUSINESSES, I SEE WHAT IS GOING ON IN SEMINOLE HEIGHTS. AND IT IS NOT PRETTY. PLEASE DENIS THIS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE? YES, SIR. COME ON UP. YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> FIRST I HAVE TO ASK, IS THIS THE PROPERTY ON THE CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AND N. BOULEVARD. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. ANYBODY ELSE? IS THERE REBUTTAL? >> JUST AN EXPLANATION, COUNCIL. IT IS GOING TO CG ON THOSE AREAS THAT ARE AYE BUTTING THE COMMERCIAL, COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR AND RESIDENTIAL FURTHER DOWN ON N. BOULEVARD. I THINK THERE IS SOME CONFUSION WHAT IS BEING REQUESTED, BUT ANYWAY, I THINK I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CAN EITHER STAFF OR MR. MICHELINI EXPLAIN WHAT CG -- WHAT WILL BE DEVELOPED ON IN CG PROPERTY SO THE PERSON WHO EXPRESSED CONCERN. >> GENERAL COMMERCIAL, ALL TYPES OF RETAIL. I THINK -- YOU KNOW, OFFICE CAN GO IN THERE AS WELL. IT'S -- IT IS FAIRLY LOW INTENSIVE. CI IS MUCH MORE INTENSIVE. I HAVE A WHOLE LIST OF THE PROPOSED -- OF THE POSSIBLE USES, BUT -- YOU WANT TO EXPLAIN ANYOR I GOT IT C-- ANYMORE OR I IT COVERED. >> CHRIS DEMASH, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THERE IS A HOST OF USES THAT ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE CG ZONING. IF WE WANT TO GO THROUGH SOME OF THEM. >> THAT IS FINE. BOOK STORE, GAS STATION, ALL KINDS OF STUFF. BANK. IS THAT ENOUGH OR YOU WANT ME TO KEEP GOING. >> PERSONAL SERVICES, PHARMACY, MEDICAL OFFICE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I WILL SAVE YOU SOME TIME. IT WOULD NOT BE RESIDENTIAL SOME TYPE OF COMMERCIAL ACTION. >> IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DEVELOPED IN A COMMERCIAL WAY. >> THE REMAINING LOT TO THE BOTTOM -- TO THE FAR SOUTH HAS A RESIDENTIAL-10 LAND USE DESIGNATION SO CAN ONLY BE SINGLE-FAMILY. CLENDENIN CLENDENIN GOT IT, THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE. A MOTION TO CLOSE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO CLOSE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. READU HUTO'S. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ITEM NUMBER 7, FILE NUMBER REZ-24-110. ORDINANCE FOR IN FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, ORDINANCE REZONING FROM 622 AND 462 WEST MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD AND 3912, 3915, 3917 N. BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE TECHNICALLY DESCRIBED AS SECTION 1 ZONING DISTRICT PD TO CG AND RS-50 PROVIDE AN IF HE CAN TESTIFY DATE. SECOND BY CLENDENIN. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES CLEAN CLENDENIN YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY SEBLD READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 27, 2025 AT 10 A.M. LOCATED AT 315 E. KENNEDY THIRD FLORIDA. TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33612. >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER. YES, MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK. ITEM NUMBER 8 REZ 25-13. 48 4601 AND 4611 WEST NORTH AA STREET. REZONE FROM RO-1 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND PD TO PD, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED. I WILL TURN IT OVER TO MISS MALONE TO GIVE HER REPORT. >>JENNIFER MALONE: PLANNING COMMISSION, THIS IS JENNIFER MALONE. WE TRAVELED TO THE WEST SHORE PLANNING DISTRICT WITHIN THE WEST SHORE EMPLOYMENT AREA. THIS IS THE WEST SHORE MALL TO THE WEST OF THE SITE WE HAVE -- WHAT IS INTERESTING ABOUT THIS SITE IT IS ONE BLOCK NORTH OF WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD. AND I AM HOUR MISS DOCK WILL GO OVER THIS IN HER ANALYSIS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, BUT THE SITE ENDS UP INTERFACING THE COMMERCIAL USES THAT FRONT WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD. STREET ALONG WEST NORTH A STREET IS DEVELOPED WITH ALL OFFICES AND THERE IS NO -- I DIDN'T DO A RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION OF THE EXISTING DENSITY ON THE SITE, ON THE STREET, BECAUSE NO OTHER RESIDENTIAL. IT IS EITHER OFFICES OR THE BACK SIDE OF THE COMMERCIAL USES THAT ARE ALONG KENNEDY. THERE IS RESIDENTIAL ALONG -- AT THE CORNER OF TRASK. AND THEN NORTH OF THE SITE WHAT WILL BE AROUND THE SITE ALONG WEST NORTH B STREET. IF YOU LOOK IN THE FUTURE LAND USE, IT IS INTERFACING THE REGIONAL MIXED USE-100 FUTURE LAND USE WHICH IS -- THE SECOND HIGHEST FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY OF THE ENTIRE CITY. HIGHEST ONE IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WHICH IS DOWNTOWN. FUTURE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL-35 AND RESIDENTIAL-20 TO THE EAST. SO AS -- AS THE -- THE PATTERN CHANGES AS ONE MOVES NORTH. THE RESIDENTIAL-35 WAS PROVIDING THAT TRANSITION AS WE MOVED OFF OF A CORRIDOR FROM THOSE INTENSIVE USES. IT IS ALSO WITHIN PROXIMITY TO TWO TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDORS. RIGHT KIND OF OFF THE CORNER OF WEST KENNEDY AND NORTH WESTSHORE BOULEVARD. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUPPORTS PUTTING HOUSING IN THESE STRATEGIC LOCATION. ALSO A EMPLOYMENT CENTER. WE WANT OUR HOUSING IN PLACES THAT HAVE AMPLE ACCESS TO TRANSIT SERVICES AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES. ABOUT THE DESIGN, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES THESE USES TO BE DESIGNED FRONT DOORS ORIENTED TOWARD NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALKS AND STREETS. I AM SURE AS HIS DOCK WILL GO THROUGH HER PRESENTATION AS WELL. MOST UNITS HAVE THE ORIENTATION TOWARD THE STREETS EITHER TOWARD WEST NORTH A STREET AND NORTH TRASK STREET. ONE COUNTY BUILDINGS IS SET BACK. HOWEVER, WE FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THIS POLICY, BECAUSE THEY PROVIDED A CLEAR PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THOSE UNITS ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE. A WAY FOR PEDESTRIAN TO GET SAFELY FROM THOSE UNITS TO THE SIDEWALK ALL THE WAY DOWN TO WEST NORTH A STREET. SO WE ANALYZED THAT. WE DISCUSSED IT. AND WE FOUND IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THAT POLICY. SO I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS AS SOON AS THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, AGAIN. LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I WILL PUT UP THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTEDED WITH THIS REQUEST BY THE APPLICANT. LET ME ZOOM OUT JUST A LITTLE BIT. THIS REZONING. IN PD REZONING WILL ALLOW FOR A DEVELOPMENT OF 21 UNIT REASON RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN THREE BUILDINGS ON-SITE. THIS IS THE ON THE SITE, THIS IS TRASK STREET. LET ME ZOOM OUT A LITTLE MORE SO YOU CAN SEE THE STREET TO THE SOUTH WHICH IS NORTH A. THIS IS TRASK. THIS IS NORTH . YOU CAN SEE THE THREE BUILDINGS ON-SITE. THIS CONTAINS FIVE UNITS AND THESE TWO BUILDINGS CONTAIN EIGHT UNITS. THE BUILDING -- THIS IS BUILDING TWO. THIS IS BUILDING ONE. THIS IS BUILDING TWO. AND BUILDING THREE. BUILDING TWO AND BUILDING ONE HAS FRONT DOOR ORIENTATION TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. BUILDING ONE, THESE DOORS FRONT TRASK AND THE WALKWAY CONNECTION AND THE SAME WITH THE BUILDING, THE FRONT DOORS ORIENT TO THE RIGHT A WAY TO NORTH A STREET. FRONT DOORS ORIENT TO THE ETERNAL DRIVE AISLE. THERE IS ACCESS TWO POINTS OF VEHICULAR ACCESS AND BOTH ON NORTH ASHLGZ STREET. YOU CAN ENTER THE SITE AND CIRCLE THE SITE AND EXIT HERE. BOTH POINTS OF ENTRY -- BOTH POINTS OF ACCESS FROM TWO-WAY VEHICULAR TRAVEL. AN THEN THE SOLID WASTE IS LOCATED HERE ON-SITE. 21 PARKING SPACES AND 42 SPACES ARE PROVIDED. THE SITE MENTIONED IN THE WEST SHORE OVERLAY. R-35 LAND USE DESIGNATION. A MAXIMUM OF 23 DWELLING UNITS CAN BE DEVELOPED BY RIGHT ON THE SITE. AND THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 21 DWELLING UNITS ON-SITE. AND THIS DENSITY SAY LOWED WITHIN THE R-35 CATEGORY. AND THERE ARE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED. SOME I WILL SHOW YOU ONE SET OF ELEVATIONS. THEY ARE SIMILAR TO EACH BUILDING. SOME THIS IS THE -- THE REAR ELEVATION. THAT IS LOCATED THERE. THIS IS THE FRONT ELEVATION AND THIS IS THE SIDE. AND THEN THIS IS -- THIS IS THE OTHER SIDE ELEVATION THAT IS LOCATED THERE. THEN WE HAVE THE ZONING ATLAS THAT I WILL SHOW. THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT IS IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE IN RED. THIS IS NORTH A STREET. THIS IS WEST SHORE BOULEVARD. THIS IS KENNEDY BOULEVARD. SO THIS SITE AS MISS MALONE MENTIONED ON THE BLOCK FACE TO THE WEST, YOU HAVE YOUR OFFICE USES THAT EXIST. AND THESE ARE PRIOR PDs. SOUTH AND REALLY SOUTHWEST, THE SITE. YOU HAVE THE COMMERCIAL USES. AND THESE USES ALONG KENNEDY. THEY FRONT KENNEDY. AND THIS BLOCK DIRECTLY SOUTH, THIS IS THE PARKING FOR THE USES THAT FRONT. SOME THIS IS, LIKE, THE DRIVE THROUGH AND THE BANK PARKING FOR THE BANK THAT FRONTS KENNEDY. NORTH OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE SOME OF THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. BUT I WILL SHOW YOU PICTURES. YOU WILL YOU WILL HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED. RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND A BLOCK NORTH OF THE SITE AND THE ZONINGS WHERE THE PDs HAVE COME THROUGH. ALONG THE EAST, YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED. WEST OF THE SITE AS YOU APPROACH WESTSHORE BOULEVARD, YOU HAVE YOUR COMMERCIAL USES AND THIS IS THE MALL THAT WILL IS LOCATED H HERE. AND I HAVE A FEW PICTURES OF THE SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THIS IS THE SITE. THIS IS TRASK AT WEST NORTH A. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW. THIS IS SHOWING THE SIDE VIEW AND THIS IS HEADED TO THE WEST. AND THIS IS AS WE HEAD WEST DOWN THE BLOCK. THE STRUCTURE ON THE SITE AND THE OFFICE USES. AND THEN THIS -- THIS IS IF YOU TURN AROUND AND LOOK NORTH ON TRASK ON THE CORNER, THE SUBJECT SITE IS OFF TO THE -- TO THE WEST IN THIS PICTURE. THIS OF NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, SO THIS IS THE SIDE VIEW OF THE ACTUALLY THE SINGLE-FAMILY SEMI DETACHED USES THAT ARE LOCATED NORTH OF THE SITE AND A FRONT VIEW, THOSE. THIS IS THE BLOCK DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT NORTH OF THE SITE AND YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE MULTIFAMILY THIS THERE. A GREATER VIEW OF THAT MULTIFAMILY THAT IS ALONG THE NORTH. YOU COME BACK EAST OF THE SITE, THIS IS ONE THE PDs THAT ARE APPROVED WITH A SINGLE FAMILY SEMI DETACHED. THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE. THE BANK PARKING AND ANOTHER VIEW SOUTH OF THE SITE WITH REVIEW, THE DRC STAFF REVIEW THE REQUEST AND A FINDING OF INCONSISTENT WITH THE REQUEST. I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IRVIN GO OVER HER COMMENTS BUT FOUR WAIVERS THAT HIGHWAY REQUESTED. THREE OF THE WAIVERS REQUESTED ARE RELATED TO NATURAL RESOURCES AND ONE OF THE WAVERS ARE RELATED TO THE FRONT-DOOR ORIENTATION ON THE SITE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: BEFORE WE GET THERE, I HAVE A QUESTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GO AHEAD. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CONFUSED OF THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. 21 UNITS AND SAID ONLY REQUIRED TO HAVE 21 PARKING SPOTS AND REQUESTING A WAIVER IT SHALL WHAT IS HAPPENING? SO WHY -- IF THERE ARE 21 UNITS, WHY ONLY A REQUIREMENT FOR LESS THAN 42 SPOTS? >>LaCHONE DOCK: SO SHOULD BE BASED ON THE NUMBER OF BEDROOM UNITS THAT ARE PROVIDED. BECAUSE THEY ARE REQUESTING THE PAR PARKING. >>. >>JONATHAN SCOTT: JONATHAN SCOTT, MOBILITY. I GUESS THAT IS BECAUSE OF THE OVERLY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THEY ARE ONLY REQUIRED TO HAVE ONE PARKING SPOT PER UNIT. >>JONATHAN SCOTT: THAT'S CORRECT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: INTERESTING, THE FIRST TIME I HAVE SEEN THAT SINCE I WENT ON COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. ANYTHING ELSE? >>LaCHONE DOCK: NO. I DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE ARE OTHER QUESTIONS. SITE PLAN IN MODIFICATIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND TURN IT OVER TOER REN TO GO OVER HER COMMENTS. AND THEN I AM AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >> ERIN MAHER, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I WILL SPEAK TO NATURAL RESOURCES TYPING OF INCONSISTENCY. HERE ON THE OVERHEAD, YOU CAN SEE THE AERIAL OF THE SITE. DO WANT TO POINT OUT THESE TEARDROPS IN RED, THESE ARE THE TWO NONHAZARDOUS GRAND LIVE OAKS THEY ARE REQUESTING A WAIVER TO REMOVE. RIGHT NOW THE SITE PLAN ACTUALLY REQUESTS A WAIVER FOR THREE, BUT I JUST WANT TO FIX ON THE RECORD THEIR SHOULD BE TWO. THIS RED TRIANGLE HERE WAS NONHAZARDOUS LIVE OAK THAT UPROOTED DURING THE HURRICANE. THAT ONE IS NO LONGER THERE. THESE TWO TREE REQUIRE A 19 MITIGATION TREES. I AM JUST GOING TO SHOW YOU SOME PICTURES. THIS IS POST HURRICANE TOO, SO THERE HAVE BEEN SOME SIGNIFICANT DEFOLIATION AS THERE HAS BEEN WITH LOTS OF TREES THROUGHOUT THE CITY. THIS IS TREE 527. A GRAND LIVE OAK. 4 -INCH DIAMETER RATED B-7. I WANT TO POINT OUT THIS TREE HAD A FEW LIMB FAILURES IN THE UPPER CAM KNOW BEE AND THIS LARGE LIMB HERE. IT REQUIRES A WAIVER TO REF MOVE THE TREE, HOWEVER. AND THIS IS BEING REQUESTED. THIS IS THROW TESTIMONY FROM 548. ALONG THE ALLEY ALONG THE FENCE HERE. 36-INCH LIVE OAK RATED C-5. SETBACK THAT IS BEING REQUESTED HERE IS APPROXIMATELY 10 FEET. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION OF THE TREE'S CANOPY WOULD REQUIRE REMOVAL, HENCE THE REASON FOR THE WAIVER THAT IS BEING REQUESTED FOR THIS TREE. I AM GOING SHOW YOU SITE PLAN AND WHERE THE TWO GRAND TREES ARE ON THE SITE PLAN. BUILDING THREE IS THE FIRST I SHOWED YOU APPROXIMATELY 15 FEET JUST NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. AND HERE IS THE SECOND GRAND TREE. THIS TREE WOULD REQUIRE AT LEAST A 10-FOOT SETBACK IN ORDER FOR THE PRUNING TO NOT BE ADVERSE TO THE TREE'S CANOPY. AGAIN THIS IS AN UPROOTED GRAND TREE RIGHT HERE. THIS PROBABLY REQUIRES A WAIVER TO GREEN SPACE. THEY ARE REQUESTING A WAIVER FROM THE REQUIRED 350 SQUARE FEET OF GREEN SPACE PER UNIT TO 240 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT. TOTAL REQUIRED FOR THE SITE IS 8945 SQUARE FEET. AND THE APPLICANT IS PRO VEEZING 6646 SQUARE FEET WITH A TOTAL DEFICIT OF 2298. FURTHERMORE, THE SITE CANNOT 'COME DATE ANY TYPE TREES ON THE SITE. THE MAJORITY OF THE TREES THAT ARE BEING REMOVED ON THE SITE ARE TYPE ONE. GRANTED SOME OF THEM ARE IN DECLINING CONDITION, BUT, YOU KNOW, IT IS STILL REMOVING TYPE ONE TREE CANOPY. IT IS -- THERE ARE OVERHEAD WEIRS ON BOTH THE FRONTAGES TO THE EAST AND TO THE NORTH. SO THEY DO NEED TO PLANT TYPE THREE TREES IN THOSE LOCATIONS. THE ONLY LOCATIONS THAT CAN PROVIDE FOUR TYPE ONE TREES IS ALONG THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE STREET HERE. THIS SETBACK IS ONLY -- THE GREEN SPACE AREA IS ONLY FIVE FEET AND CAN'T ACCOMMODATE TYPE ONE TREES. SAME FOR THE WESTERN BORDER. SETBACK MAY BE SEVEN OR TV. BUT THE SOIL VOLUME IS SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN AND SUPPORT MATURE TREE CANOPY AND GROWTH. SO JUST FOR CONTEXT, TYPICALLY WHAT I -- WHAT WE REAR WHEN PEOPLE PLANT A TYPE 1 IS 20 X 20 WHICH IS 400 SQUARE FEET. A LOT TIME WE GO OFF THE CUBIC SOIL VOLUME WHICH IS 1200 CUBIC FEET. 1300 CUBIC FEET IS WHAT WE USUALLY WILL ASK FOR. BASED ON THE FACT NOT ANY TIME ONE TREES AND NOTING THE GREEN SPACE. WE FOUND THE PROBABLY EN CONS CONSISTENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU INVEST MUCH. DOES THAT CONCLUDE THE PRESENTATION BEFORE I GO TO THE APPLICANT? YES, COME ON UP. >> WHERE IS THE HDMI CONNECTION? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: JONATHAN SCOTT HAS BEEN OUR I.T. GUY. >> AM I RUNNING OFF OF HERE OR HERE? >> EITHER ONE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE. >> I AM ROB ROSNER WITH FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS. PROFESSIONAL PLANNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT REPRESENTING OUR CLIENT FOR THIS. RECENTLY THE AGENT OF RECORD WAS ALEX RIOS FROM RIOS ARCHITECTURE. WE RECENTLY PECKED THIS PROJECT UP. CONSULT CONSULTING ON IT PREVIOUSLY AND WE ARE HERE TO REPRESENT THE PROBABLY. THE ITEMS THAT WERE FOUND INCONSISTENT, WE ARE HAPPY TO SOLVE BETWEEN FIRST READING AND SECOND READING. IN PROJECT HAS BEEN GOING FOR ABOUT TWO YEARS. AND WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE HEARD BACK IN NOVEMBER WITH CHANGES AND THINGS THAT NEEDED TO HAPPEN. WITHER NOW BEING HEARD TODAY. SO WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH STAFF TO TRY TO RESOLVE SOME OF THE ISSUES IDENTIFIED AS EN CONSISTENT. PART OF MY PRESENTATION, I WILL SHARE THAT YOU WITH. CAN YOU SEE THIS ON YOUR SCREENS? OKAY, GREAT. SOME THIS IS -- THIS IS 4061 NORTH A STREET. 46 4611 IS HERE. WE WENT OUT AND TOOK PICTURES BACK IN SEPTEMBER BEFORE THE HURRICANE. AND THEN WE WENT OUT TWO DAYS AGO AND TOOK PICTURES AND DID A 360 CAMERA AND SHOWED WHAT THE CONDITIONS OF THE TREES WERE SO YOU CAN SEE THEM IN PERSON. BECAUSE WE DID A 360, SEE THE CANOPY SEE IT IN ALL DIRECTIONS. THE ONE WE TALK. WE HAVE SOME PHOTOS THAT THAT. SO THIS IS THOSE -- FROM LOOKING FROM INSIDE THE SITE, 545 IS UNDER THESE WORDS. BUT IT IS GAP. IT IS GAP IN THE FENCE WHERE THAT USED TO BE. 546 IS THE NEXT ONE. THAT ONE IS IN POOR CONDITION, BUT NOT A GRAND TREE. WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR THAT ONE. 548 IS HARD TO SEE IN THIS PARTICULAR PHOTO, BUT WE WILL GO BACK. AND THEN SO 548, WE DID A VIDEO OF THIS. SO WE TOOK THIS BACK IN SEPTEMBER. HAD A PRETTY GOOD-LOOKING HEAD. YOU CAN SEE THERE ARE WIRES THAT CROSS THROUGH THAT. WHEN LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN, ACCESS WIRES THAT ARE FEEDING THE BUILDING GO THROUGH THE CANOPY. WHEN TECO -- USUALLY BUTCHER THE TREES WHICH IS A SHAME AND WE TRY TO SAVE TREES WITH EN WE CAN. THIS TREE LOOKS GOOD TO THAT ANGLE. DOESN'T LOOK A WHOLE LOT WORSE AND WE DID SEE DAMAGE FROM THE HURRICANE THAT WAS DONE TWO DAYS AGO. AND THIS IS THIS ONE HERE. GO BACK TO THERE. DON'T I. TO SHOW WHAT YOU THAT LOOKS LIKE, CLICK ON THIS GUY. 10. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHAT A GREAT INTERACTIVE TOOL TO JUMP AROUND. >> THIS IS ME WALKING THE SITE SO WE CAN LOOK UP -- I AM SORRY. I SHOULD BE SLOWER AT THIS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: LIKE A VIDEO GAME. SO THIS IS THE TREE. THIS IS 548. YOU CAN SEE THAT TECO IS -- YOU KNOW, BUTCHERED THIS TREE ON ONE SIDE FOR MANY YEARS. THAT IS WHY THAT CANOPY HAPPENINGS OVER TO ONE SIDE BECAUSE IT IS TRYING TO SURVIVE BY LEANING OVER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU ARE DRAGGING -- >> THIS IS LIKE STREET VIEW. I WALKED AROUND WITH A 360 CAMERA ABOVE MY HEAD. IF YOU WANT TO SEE MY GOOFY HAT, I WILL SHOW IT TO YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY NEAT. >> WE DID THIS BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT TRYING TO FIGURE OUT STOP MOVING, PLEASE. WE WORKED WITH ERIN IN THE PAST. 20-FOOT. WE TOOK FROM THE AERIALS WHAT THE CANOPIES WERE. TYPICALLY A CIRCLE. BUT NO ONE HAS A PERFECTLY ROUND TREE EVER. AND ON OUR PLAN, WE ARE HAPPY TO TRY TO SHOW THAT, BUT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT, WE REALIZED THAT SOME OF THESE -- WE DID REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION PLANS WHICH GOING BACK TO THAT. SO THIS IS THE PLANS THAT WERE SUBMIT. SAME ISSUES THAT -- THAT SHE SHARED. SO ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH CLIENT ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO FIND PLACES TO PUT TYPE ONE TREES. AND WE HAVE LITTLE MORE OPPORTUNITY ALONG THIS END. AND WE ARE REMOVING A DRIVEWAY HERE. THE DRIVEWAY THAT IS BEING REMOVED HERE GIVES US AN OPPORTUNITY TO PUT A COUPLE OF TYPE 1 TREE HERE THAT WE WILL SHOW YOU IN JUST A MOMENT. WE PREPARED A COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER TO TALK ABOUT THE -- THE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION AND -- AGAIN, I'M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH EVERY COMMENT, BUT WE DID A CHART THAT TALKED ABOUT THE TWO OPTIONS AND BOTH OPTIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION OF UNITS IN ORDER TO HAVE THAT HAPPEN WHICH WE WILL SHOW NEW A MOMENT. FIRST RERECONFIGURATION PLAN. LOST UNITS AND TRIED TO SAVE THE TREES AND PUT IN A GREAT BEAM BEAM TO SPAN OVER THE THING. THIS IS SOMEWHAT DOABLE. THIS ONE USING UNITS AND RECONFIGURING. AND OUR SECOND PLAN WAS -- WE REARRANGED THE UNITS TO BE HORIZONTAL, EVEN THOUGH WE WOULD STILL BE TAKING OUT ONE. THEY GAVE US MORE ROOM TO HAVE -- TO SAVE THE TWO TREES TO THE NORTH. BUT STILL A REDUCTION IN UNITS. KNOW THAT IS NOT A REQUIREMENT, BUT WE FOUND THAT 21 UNITS ARE IS WHAT MAKES THIS PROBABLY FEASIBLE FOR OUR CLIENT. LOSING UNITS WAS NOT AN INTENTION, BUT IF WE WERE TRYING TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE THOSE, THAT IS WHAT IT WILL COST. SO WE ARE ASKING TO, YOU KNOW, SUBMIT FOR OUR ORIGINAL REQUEST FOR THE 21 UNITS. WE CAN WORK WITH STAFF BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING TO MAKE THIS CLOSER TO CONSISTENT, IF NOT COMPLETELY CONSISTENT. WE MAY HAVE A LITTLE TROUBLE GETTING TO THE FULL GREEN SPACE NUMBER BECAUSE A VOA NUMBER THAT ADDS TO THAT. BUT WE BELIEVE WE CAN HELP WITH THE TPD ONE TREES. AND THE CONDITIONS OF THESE TWO GRAND TREES. A LOT OF WORK TO SAVE A TREE AND IT NOT SURVIVE. AND THAT WOULD BE A SHAME. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. GO ON. I AM JUST -- I AM JUST A TAD CONCERNED. I NEVER SEEN A PROBABLY WITH JUST ONE CAR. MR. CLENDENIN BROUGHT THAT UP. AND I WAS AMAZED THAT YOU HAVE. >> EVERY GARAGE HAS TWO CARS. WE ARE PROVIDING MORE THAT REQUIRED, BUT THE WEST SHORE OVERLAY ONLY REQUIRES ONE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I UNDERSTOOD. >> 21 UNITS WITH TWO-CAR GARAGE. ONLY 21 IS BEING REQUIRED. >>LYNN HURTAK: YOU DON'T HAVE TWO-CAR GARAGE. BECAUSE WIDTH OF 17 OR 18 FEET WILL NOT FIT TWO CARS. WE JUST HAD A HUGE THING ABOUT THAT LAST WEEK OR TWO WEEKS AGO. THOSE THAT ARE FACING NORTH A, NO WAY YOU ARE FIT TWO CARS IN THOSE. SO KNOWING THAT IS AN OVERLAY ISSUE. BUT FOR ME, THE BIGGER ISSUE IS, YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE TREES. I MEAN, THE TREES ARE ONE THING, BUT 25% OF GREEN SPACE AND THE GARAGE THAT ARE TOO SMALL? IT JUST SEEMS LIKE YOU ARE PUTTING A LOT IN. WHY CAN'T YOU MEET THE GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IF I MAY ALSO -- >>LYNN HURTAK: OH, SORRY. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: 2900 IN REDUCTION. >>LYNN HURTAK: IT IS EXTREME. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THIS RIGHT HERE. 50 X 06 IS HALF THE LOT. THIS IS ABOUT IT, WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT THIS HALL OR WHATEVER YOU CALL. >> IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. I WANT -- I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE HER. ONE OF THINGS WE WERE OFFER FOR CONCESSION, UPROOTED TREE WILL DANIEL THE ALLEY AND WILL BE HAPPY TO HELP REPAIR THAT. TO GET MORE GREEN SPACE WHAT WE CAN TO DO SACRIFICE TO DO THAT. >>LYNN HURTAK: I AM ALSO CURIOUS. THERE IS ANOTHER PART TO MY QUESTION. YOU HAVE AN ALLEY. WHY IN THE WORLD WOULDN'T YOU HAVE GARAGES THAT FACE THE ALLEY? WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD YOU PUT MORE ASPHALT ON THIS PROBABLY. THIS SEEMS COMPLETELY BACKWARD. >> OKAY, COMING LATE AND COMING TO THIS PROJECT A LITTLE LATE, BUT IF STAFF MIGHT RECALL -- THEY ASKED US NOT TO USE THE ALLEY TO KEEP -- IF WE WERE TO DO THAT, WE WOULD HAVE TO TAKE ALL THE TREES OUT TO PUT ALL GARAGE -- IT WAS A TREE SAVING EFFORT IN THE FIRST ROUND. AND REALLY A SUBSTANDARD ALLEY -- YOU ASKED A QUESTION. I AM TRYING TO ANSWER. AND THAT FACING THOSE TO THE ALLEY WAS NOT WHAT STAFF WAS CYCLING FOR. THEY SAID CAN YOU DO INTERNAL CIRCULATION. FIRE CODE BIG DEAL THAT THE ALLEY WAS SUBSTANDARD. HAD THESE ISSUES. AND IF WE WERE TO DO THAT, THEN FIRE MARSHAL WAS SAYING THAT WOULD BE A PROBLEM FOR THEM. FOR US TO RECONFIGURE, THAT IS WHY WE HAVE THE U-SHAPED/ T CONFIGURATION. LIKE A BACKWARD H. TRYING TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR STAFF ASKING FOR THOSE OVER THE YEARS. AGAIN, I AM COMING LATE TO THE PROCESS. SO I WASN'T THERE FOR THE FIRST ROUND, BUT THAT IS MY RECOLLECTION OF WHAT THE EXPLANATION IS. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU FOR THE EXPLANATION, BUT TELL ME YOUR TAKING AWAY A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF GREEN SPACE, THAT WILL BE GREAT. >> YOU WANT ME TO OFFER MORE GREEN SPACE? >> I WOULD LOVE TO OFFER MORE GREEN SPACE -- THIS IS MY FIRST MEETING. I APOLOGIZE -- I WAS TOLD I NEED TO -- ROSALYN MG. 4830 WEST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, TAMPA, 33069. THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER COMPANY. AND I AM EXCITED ABOUT THE PROBABLY. I UNDERSTAND THERE IS SOME DEFICIENCY WITH GREEN SPACE, AND THAT IS SOMETHING WE ARE COMMITTED TO ADDRESSING IN ANY WAY THAT WE CAN. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE JUST RECENTLY TALKED ABOUT WAS WHAT IS ALLOWABLE FOR ADDING GREEN SPACE FOR ROOF TOP GARDENS AND VERTICALLY. CREATIVE WAYS TO ADD GREEN SPACE TO NIGHT THE NEED OF COMMUNITY WHILE ALSO PROVIDING THIS HOUSING THAT IS SO NECESSARY, THEN WE ARE INVESTED IN DOING THAT. THAT IS WHY WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE COMMUNITY AND WITH ROB HERE, WITH HIS EXPERTISE SEEING WHAT TREES WE CAN SAVE AND WHAT AREAS WE CAN ADD GREEN SPACE TOO. >>LYNN HURTAK: I DON'T THINK THE CITY OF TAMPA ALLOWS ROOFTOP SPACE TO BE CONSIDERED GREEN SPACE. GREEN SPACE IS FOR THE GROUND. YEAH. >> I APOLOGIZE, I DIDN'T KNOW. THANK YOU FOR TELL ME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN AND THEN BACK TO MIRANDA. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: LET'S RIGHT SET THIS. I KNOW -- OBVIOUSLY YOU GUYS HAVE COME LATE INTO THIS PROJECT, BUT -- YEAH, THIS IS -- THIS IS ALMOST LIKE A NONSTARTER. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS -- I MEAN, IT IS OBVIOUSLY IN AN AREA THAT WE WOULD BE -- WE WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE TO INCREASE CONSIDERING, YOU KNOW, DENSITY BECAUSE IT IS -- IT IS IN THAT -- THIS TYPE OF AN AREA. BUT IT HAS TO BE THE RIGHT TYPE OF PROJECT. AND WHAT -- AS COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK SAID, YOU REALLY -- THERE IS -- THERE IS JUST TOO MUCH ON TOO LITTLE WITHOUT ANY KIND OF CONCESSIONS. AND IT IS PUZZLING, AGAIN -- THIS IS ONE OF THE THINGS. YOU GOT TO GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD, BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN ALLEY SITTING THERE. AND YOUR NOT UTILIZING THAT ALLEY FOR GARAGE ACCESS IS BEYOND ME. I CAN'T IMAGINE ANYBODY IN THE CITY OF TAMPA T TELLING YOU NOT TO USE THE ALLEY FOR GARAGE ACCESS. STAFF, ANYBODY -- IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN SAID SOMETHING LONG WITH THAT ALLEY THAT PREVENTS IT FROM BEING UTILIZED. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I BELIEVE INITIALLY WHEN THIS WAS FIRST -- IF I CAN HAVE THE OVERHEAD, WHEN IT WAS FIRST SUBMITTED UNDER A DIFFERENT AGENT THAT WAS HANDLING THE CASE, THERE WERE -- THE TREES THAT WERE ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SITE, THERE WAS AN EFFORT TO TRY TO PRESERVE THOSE TREES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: NOT LONGER THE CASE. >>LaCHONE DOCK: ONE VERSION OF THE PLAN THAT ACCESSED THE ALLEY BUT I THINK IT WAS SOMETHING ABOUT A TURN AND THIS BUILDING DIDN'T HAVE AS MUCH OF A QUARTERBACK AS IT DOES HERE. SO THEN THE -- THEY RESUBMITTED A PLAN WHICH WOULD HAVE PRESERVED THESE TREES WHICH I THINK NOW AREN'T BEING PRESERVED, BUT THAT WAS THE INITIAL REASON FOR THE CHANGE TO PRESERVE THE TREES ALONG THE NORTH. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: OKAY. I MEAN -- YEAH, I AM SORRY THAT -- THIS IS AN INTERESTING SCENARIO THAT YOU ARE PUTTING AN AWFUL LOT AND IT IS SO LITTLE. WHEN LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THE GARAGE. I GET THE FACT -- A SURPRISE OF ALL OF US WITH THE OVERLAY DISTRICT AND THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. THE GREEN SPACE, THE DOOR ORIENTATION. JUST -- AND JUST -- IT IS NOT PROVIDING ANYTHING REALLY TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND ACCESS. THIS IS JUST A PROBLEMATIC PROPOSAL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WILL JUST -- CERTAINLY THE TREES HOLD WATER. THEY WILL BE GONE. YOU ARE CUTTING DOWN ON THE FLOOR SPACE WHERE WATER CAN DRAIN. THAT IS GOING TO BE GONE. I MEAN WHAT ARE WE GOING TO HAVE? I'M NOT TRYING TO BE IN ANY WAY ARGUMENTATIVE. IF THE GARAGE IS 18.7 INCHES, TWO CARS CAN'T FIT IN AND OPEN THE DOORS. THE CARS ARE NINE FOOT WIDE BY THE TIME YOU OPEN THE DOORS. YOU CAN'T GET IN OR OUT. THE WAY I -- IF I RECALL 20 FOOT, WHAT, SEVEN INCHES? >> SOME OF THEM 17. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WE ARE LOOKING 20 FOOT, 7 INCHES WITH TWO CARS. >> YOU ARE WILLING TO MAKE CHANGES -- IF YOU WANT TO MAKE CHANGES, WE CAN ASK TO MAKE CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THE CHANGES HAVE TO BE MADE. IF THESE ARE SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES, I BELIEVE YOU WOULD HAVE TO ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE AND COME BACK AND PERHAPS GO THROUGH DRC IF THAT IS THE PROCESS AND THEN MISS DOCK CAN INFORM COUNCIL AND THE APPLICANT. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. AT THIS POINT, THE OPTIONS ARE FOR THE APPLICANT TO ONLY MAKE THE CHANGES AS LISTED IN THE SITE PLAN MODIFICATION SHEET -- THE SITE PLAN REVISION SHEET. IF THEY WANT TO WORK TO TRY TO INCREASE THE GREEN SPACE, THEIR WOULD REQUIRE PROBABLY ELIMINATION OF A UNIT, REDUCTION OF A SETBACK ARE, WHICH COULD BE DONE, BUT WE WOULD STILL NEED SOME DIRECTION WHAT THE APPLICANT IS WORKING ON BETWEEN THESE HEARINGS. HE COULD -- CERTAIN CHANGES YOU CAN GO LESS NOT MORE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING OR IT CAN BE CONTINUED TO COME BACK FOR ANOTHER FIRST READING. >>LYNN HURTAK: I WOULD BE MORE COMFORTABLE WITH ANOTHER FIRST READING BECAUSE THING IS TOO SUBSTANTIAL OF A CHANGE TO COME -- AND NORMALLY WE DON'T DO THAT, BUT I WOULD ABSOLUTELY PREFER THAT -- I MEAN, THIS IS -- THIS IS DEVELOPMENT THAT IS NEEDED. IT IS JUST NOT FULLY BAKED. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IN THE RIGHT AREA. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT IS A WIN, BY THE WAY. >>LYNN HURTAK: IT REALLY IS. I WOULD COME BACK AGAIN. RECONSIDER THE ALLEY SINCE YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO SAVE THE TREES AND MORE GREEN SPACE. AND GARAGE -- EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO, WE ARE FIND A LOT OF COMPLAINTS OF PEOPLE WHO BUY A HOUSE OR A CONDO AND CANNOT -- AND BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO FIT TWO CARS AND CAN NOT. WE ARE HEARING IT FROM THE OTHER SIDE AS WELL. WE ARE COMMITTED TO MAKING SURE THAT GARAGE SIZES ARE CORRECT. WE HAD A BIG CONVERSATION ABOUT IT LAST WEEK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WISH THEM WELL. BECAUSE THE LOCATION IS FINE. EVERYTHING ELSE IS FINE. IT IS LIKE TOO MUCH FOR TOO LITTLE LAND. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I THINK WHAT WE WOULD BE LOOKING FOR FOR YOU ALL TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO IT. >> MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, I WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A CONTINUANCE ON THIS MATTER. >>LYNN HURTAK: WHAT DATE DO WE HAVE FOR THAT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: HOW MUCH TIME -- >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. FOR THE CHANGES WE DISCUSSED, THE ACCESS FROM THE ALLEY, THE REORIENTATION OF THE BUILDINGS ON-SITE, ANOTHER DRC WILL BE NEEDED. AND THEN WE WOULD COME BACK. SO NEED AT LEAST TWO-MONTH TIME FRAME. LOOKING FOR A CONTINUANCE -- WE ARE IN FEBRUARY. MAY 8 FOR -- JUNE 12 IS FULL. >>LYNN HURTAK: DOES MAY 8 WORK? >> IT DOES, RESPECTFULLY, I AM GOING TO ASK IF THERE IS ANY EARLIER DATE. ANYTHING THIS APRIL? >>LYNN HURTAK: BECAUSE OF WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH, MAY IS YOUR BEST BET. >> THANK YOU. DOCK DOKZ LOOKING AT SCHEDULING-WISE, DRC MAYBE IN MARCH AND THEN REVISE THE PLAN AND SUBMIT THEM. IT,RC STAFF WILL REVIEW THEM AGAIN. >>LYNN HURTAK: HAS TO HAVE 30 DAY' NOTICE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: CAN I SAY FOR YOUR CLIENTS. USUALLY NOW WE DON'T DO CONTINUANCES THIS LATE AFTER SOMETHING HAS BEEN HEARD, AND SO I THINK MY COLLEAGUES ARE SUGGESTING IT OUT OF -- OUT OF THE THOUGHT THAT THE PROJECT COULD COME BACK BETTER. AND LACHONE AND SOMEBODY -- IF WE TURN IT DOWN, HOW LONG WILL IT WOULD BE BEFORE THEY COULD COME BACK -- JUST SO THEIR -- >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. CORRECT, THEY WILL HAVE TO WAIT A YEAR TO COME BACK BEFORE COUNCIL WITH THE REQUEST ON THE PROPERTY . >>BILL CARLSON: IF WE WERE STRICTLY FOLLOWING THE RULES AND VOTE IT DOWN, IT WOULD BE A YEAR. SO BY -- BY ALLOWING A CONTINUANCE, IT IS SAVING A LOT TIME. >> WE APPRECIATE IT. >>LYNN HURTAK: I WILL MAKE A MO MOTION. >>MARTIN SHELBY: TO GRANT THE CONTINUANCE YOU NEED TO WAIVE YOUR RULES -- IF BUT MAKE -- IF COUNCIL -- CLEAN CLENDENIN MOTION TO WAIVE THE RULES. >>LYNN HURTAK: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE. >>LYNN HURTAK: I MOVE TO CONTINUE FILE NUMBER REZ 25-13 TO THE MAY 8 CITY COUNCIL EVENING SESSION AT 5:01 P.M. I SHOULD HAVE THIS MEMORIZE BY NOW, 315 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR AT 5:01. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SEE YOU BACK ON THE 8th >> LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT, 9. >>CHRISTOPHER DEMANCHE: AGENDA ITEM 9 IS REZ 25-19. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE 3502 NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE FROM RS 50 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. >> JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. WE ARE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THIS IS THE MacFARLANE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. I THINK THE IMAGE SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED ALL AROUND IT AT THE CORNER OF NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE AND WEST -- IT'S LATE. I'M GOING TO MESS IT UP. ADELA STREET. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT'S FINE. >> IT IS A FUTURE LAND USE OF RESIDENTIAL 10. IT IS THE ORANGE COLOR. IT IS THE PREDOMINANT FUTURE LAND USE IN THE SURROUNDING AREA, AND THAT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN BEING TYPICALLY VERY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. I WILL BE BRIEF, BUT I DO JUST WANT TO PUT ON THE RECORD THAT THE, IF YOU LOOK AT THE LOT SIZES OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, MS. DOCK WILL GO -- SORRY, MR. DEMANCHE WILL GO INTO MORE DETAIL HERE, BUT THIS IS DEVELOPED, THE STREET, AT 78% OF THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION. SO WE DO SEE THIS AREA OF THE CITY IS REACHING ITS DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL UNDER THIS DESIGNATION, PLANNED FOR TEN DWELLING UNITS AN ACRE. THE TWO DWELLING UNITS ON THE SUBJECT SITE WILL JUST FURTHER THAT. SUPPORTED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES TO PROVIDE MORE HOUSING FOR TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. >> WE'LL START WITH AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED. IT'S LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WEST OF BELLA STREET AND NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE. THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND EAST AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS COMPRISED OF SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS WITH RS 50 ZONING. SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING DEVELOPMENT CONTINUES WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, ALL THE WAY UP TO NORTH HIMES AVENUE, ALONG NORTH HIMES AVENUE, WE SEE A MIX OF NOT JUST THE RESIDENTIAL USES, BUT WE DO SEE SOME BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES SPRINKLED IN AND LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL USES. HERE WE HAVE THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT. THERE IS AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE. IT'S ONE STORY. IT'S A LITTLE OVER 1500 SQUARE FEET. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED STRUCTURE, TOTALING 1,806 SQUARE FEET TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE. THE EXISTING SITE OVERALL WITH FRONTAGE ALONG WEST OF BELLA STREET AND NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE WOULD BE SPLIT CREATING AN INDIVIDUAL LOT FOR EACH DWELLING. THE PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING WOULD HAVE FRONTAGE ALONG NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE WITH BOTH THE FRONT DOOR AND TWO CAR GARAGE FACING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE. HERE WE HAVE SOME ELEVATIONS. WE HAVE THE EAST ELEVATION SHOWING. THE FRONT ENTRYWAY, THE TWO-CAR GARAGE. THE OVERALL HEIGHT FOR THE PROPOSED DWELLING WOULD BE 24 FEET, 9 INCHES. SO WE HAVE THE EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS. THEN WE HAVE THE NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS. THERE ARE NO WAIVERS REQUESTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. I DO HAVE SOME PHOTOS SHOWING THE EXISTING SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA. WE'LL GET TO THOSE NOW. THIS IS THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING THAT WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE. THIS WAS TAKEN FROM WEST OF DELLA STREET. THE NEXT PHOTO SHOWS THE BACKYARD OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING. THIS IS THE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR THE PROPOSED DWELLING, WHICH WOULD BE ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE. JUST NORTH OF THE PROPOSED SITE WE HAVE ANOTHER DETACHED DWELLING. NEXT PHOTO SHOWS FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE LOOKING SOUTH ACROSS WEST OF DELLA STREET. THIS IS THE PARCEL ADJACENT ON THE WEST FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. THE NEXT PHOTO SHOWS LOOKING EAST ACROSS NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE. NEXT WE HAVE LOOKING DOWN, LOOKING EAST DOWN WEST ADELA STREET. LOOKING WEST DOWN WEST ADELA STREET. THE LAST PHOTO I HAVE HERE IS LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAVE REVIEWED THIS APPLICATION. WE FIND IT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION, MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED REVISION SHEET MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPLICANT. YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. MIKE NOLAN, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, AGENT FOR THE APPLICANT. OWNER'S INTENTION TO PUT AN ADDITIONAL ONE-STORY -- EXCUSE ME, ONE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE LOT. STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION HAVE FOUND IT CONSISTENT. I DON'T REALLY HAVE TOO MUCH TO ADD, BUT I WILL BE HERE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS YES MA'AM. >>LYNN HURTAK: I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS FOR YOU OR STAFF, BUT CAN YOU -- WHAT WILL THE SIZE OF THE LOTS BE? WILL THEY BE CONFORMING? >> SO THE EXISTING ZONING IS RS 50, WHICH THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH IS 50 FEET. SO THE NORTHERN LOT THAT WE'RE PROPOSING IS ONLY 45 FEET WIDE. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THAT AREA THERE, I'M NOT SURE IN THAT AREA, BUT RIGHT TO THE EAST OF YOU, THERE IS A LOT OF DITCHES. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE ARE DITCHES IN FRONT OF THESE HOUSES OR NOT. >> NO. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YOU ARE ON LINCOLN THEN, LINCOLN AND ADELA? >> NORTHWEST CORNER. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THOSE CORRESPONDENCE ARE USUALLY A -- THOSE CORNERS ARE A USUALLY A LITTLE LARGER. WHAT IS THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE LOT? >> TOTAL LOT CURRENTLY IS A LITTLE MORE THAN -- YEAH, SORRY. IT'S 10,700 SQUARE FEET. IT IS A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN A DOUBLE LOT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE OTHER RESIDENCE WILL STAY THE WAY IT IS. >> EXISTING RESIDENCE IS TO REMAIN. JUST WHERE THE LOCATION IS -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: -- HAD ABOUT THREE AIR-CONDITIONERS IN THE BACK. HOPE IT IS NOT A RENTAL PROPERTY OR A HOUSING UNIT IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT -- I SAW SOMETHING THAT HAD LIKE THREE -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YEAH, YOU SHOWED THE BACKYARD OF THE PROPERTY AND IT HAD THE EXTERIOR AC UNITS, THE INDIVIDUAL ONES BY EACH WINDOW. >> OH, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING RESIDENCE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SPLIT UNITS THEY CALL THEM, I THINK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THAT WHAT THE SPLIT UNIT IS? >> [INAUDIBLE] >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: AT THE OTHER HOUSE? >> THAT IS THE EXISTING HOUSE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE OR DOUBLE APARTMENT BUILDING? >> IT'S A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AS FAR AS I'M AWARE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THOSE ARE CALLED SPLITS. THEN YOU HAVE THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? I SEE NO ONE. MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. WHO WOULD LIKE TO READ THIS? GO AHEAD, SIR. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I MOVE FILE REZ 25-19, AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3502 NORTH LINCOLN AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS 50 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY, TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON. ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE? >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 27, 2025, AT 10 A.M. LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA FLORIDA 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. THAT CONCLUDES OUR AGENDA. NEW BUSINESS, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IF I MAY. THIS IS JUST A THOUGHT. THE MEETING WE HAD TODAY WAS GREAT REGARDING THE BUDGETS AND SO FORTH AND EVERYTHING. I WAS JUST THINKING IF WE COULD GET MS. HAGAR, THE BUDGET ANALYST FROM THE CITY, TO MEET DOWN STAIRS WITH THE BUDGET COMMITTEE WE FORMED AND WORK SO WELL, EXPLAIN, MAYBE GET FEEDBACK WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT TODAY, ESPECIALLY ON THE CIT TAX, BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW IF THAT CAN BE DONE. BUT IF WE CAN PAY THAT LITTLE BY LITTLE AS THE MONEY COMES IN, WE CAN SAVE A LOT OF MONEY, THE INTEREST THAT WILL BE ABSORBED TO US. >>LYNN HURTAK: MS. KOPESKY GOES TO EVERY ONE OF THE MEETINGS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MAKE A MOTION TO GET WITH THE CHAIRMAN OR YOURSELF OR SOMEBODY AND MEET -- MEET WITH THE COUNCIL INDIVIDUALLY TO GET IDEAS SO SHE CAN GO DOWN AND MEET AND PRESENT SOMETHING TO THEM SO THEY CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE DOING AND WORK OUT SOMETHING BETTER FOR THE CITIZENS. >>LYNN HURTAK: SHE COULD COME TO ALL OF US. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND. I DON'T KNOW THAT WE NEED. >>LYNN HURTAK: I DON'T KNOW THAT WE NEED A MOTION. I'LL SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND SECOND. ANY OPPOSED? COUNCILMAN -- >>BILL CARLSON: DID YOU MENTION A SPECIFIC IDEA YOU WANT THEM TO TALK ABOUT? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SPECIFIC IDEA WHEN I ASKED A QUESTION, DOES THAT MONEY PAY, NO, IT PAYS AS IT COMES IN. IF IT COMES IN, WHY DO WE HAVE TO PAY THE INTEREST? WHY BOND IT? >>BILL CARLSON: THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I BELIEVE AS WELL. I HOPE THEY'LL ASK, IF SHE'LL ASK THAT SPECIFIC QUESTION. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'LL MAKE SURE THEY DO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA, DO YOU HAVE ANY NEW BUSINESS? >>LUIS VIERA: NO, SIR. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHAT? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: FEBRUARY 27, 2025, 10:26 P.M., HISTORY WAS MADE. >>LUIS VIERA: LET'S WRITE THE POPE AND DECLARE A MIRACLE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I HAVE A COUPLE OF THINGS. ON FEBRUARY 16, 2025, I ACCEPTED THE RESIGNATION OF JONATHAN BRILL FROM THE CITY COUNCIL CITIZENS ADVISORY BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE. I WANTED TO THANK HIM FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE COMMITTEE. JONATHAN IS A GREAT GUY. PERSONAL COMMITMENTS THAT PRECLUDED HIM FROM BEING ABLE TO SERVE IN THAT CAPACITY. SO I WOULD LIKE TO MOTION TO APPOINT HOYT PAREN DAL TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR DISTRICT ONE FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY BUDGET CITY COUNCIL ADVISORY BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE TO SERVE THE REMAINDER OF THAT TERM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'VE GOT NO PROBLEM WITH THAT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ONE MORE THING, THIS AFTERNOON, I READ THAT MY PROPOSED RESOLUTION HONORING MUSLIM HERITAGE MONTH IN CONJUNCTION WITH RAMADAN 2025. I WON'T READ ALL THE ENTIRE WHEREASES BUT I WOULD LIKE TO READ THE THEREFORES BECAUSE WE HAVE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY HERE TO TALK ABOUT THIS. BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, TAMPA CITY COUNCIL HEREBY CELEBRATES THE PERIOD OF FEBRUARY 28, 2025, TO MARCH 29, 2025, AS MUSLIM HERITAGE MONTH IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OBSERVANCE OF RAMADAN. TAMPA CITY COUNCIL ENCOURAGES EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS, BUSINESSES AND RESIDENTS TO PARTICIPATE IN ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS THAT HONOR AND CELEBRATE THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY. TAMPA CITY COUNCIL SUPPORTS INITIATIVES THAT PROMOTE UNDERSTANDING, RESPECT AND COLLABORATION AMONG ALL CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS GROUPS WITHIN TAMPA. THIS RESOLUTION WILL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY UPON ITS ADOPTION. THAT IS THAT. AND WOULD YOU MIND -- I'M MOVING THE RESOLUTION, BUT WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO, BECAUSE WE HAVE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY THAT CAME TONIGHT, WOULD YOU MIND HAVING THEM COME UP AS A GROUP. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK, SAY ANYTHING? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WOULD SOMEBODY LIKE TO COME UP AND TALK VERY BRIEFLY BECAUSE IT IS SO LATE. I KNOW YOU GUYS SAT HERE ALL NIGHT LONG WAITING FOR THIS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> MY NAME IS GASSER. I PRESENT THE COMMUNITY OF THE MUSLIMS AND THE TAMPA BAY AREA. WE WOULD LIKE TO RECOGNIZE THE GREATNESS OF THE CITY OF TAMPA FOR RECOGNIZING OUR MUSLIM HERITAGE MONTH. WE REALLY APPRECIATE IT AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE? YES MA'AM. >> MY NAME IS TRANIA. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I KNOW IT'S LATE, BUT WE ARE ECSTATIC, EXCITED AND HAPPY TO CELEBRATE THIS. IN A COUPLE OF DAYS WE ARE STARTING THE MONTH OF RAMADAN WHICH WE WILL BE FASTING. I WANT TO THANK THE MEMBERS OF MY COMMUNITY FOR BRINGING THIS TO YOUR ATTENTION AND FOR YOU TO ACCEPT IT AND TO MAKE US FEEL AS MUSLIMS INCLUDED AND ACTIVE IN THIS COMMUNITY AND WE ARE HONORED TO BE YOUR NEIGHBORS AND YOUR DOCTORS AND MENTIONED THATS -- WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THE NEW TAMPA RECREATION CENTER A GET-TOGETHER. OBVIOUSLY, EVERYBODY FROM COUNCIL IS INVITED THERE IN PARTICULAR. IF COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN, IF YOU WANTED TO PRESENT THE RESOLUTION TO FOLKS THERE, IT'S GOING TO BE MONDAY AT 4:30. I KNOW WE'RE ALSO WORKING WITH THE MAYOR'S OFFICE TO HOPEFULLY GET A PROCLAMATION OUT OF THEM AS WELL, ONE FROM COUNCIL AND ONE FROM THE ADMINISTRATION, AND I SEE NO REASON AS TO WHY THAT WON'T HAPPEN. YEAH, JUST THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IF IT IS THIS MONDAY AT 4:30, I CAN'T. IF YOU'RE ABLE TO DO THAT ON OUR BEHALF, REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR, THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'VE SIGNED THE RESOLUTION. I'M GIVING IT BACK TO YOU. IT'S OFFICIAL THERE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYTHING ELSE, SIR? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I'M DONE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I DON'T HAVE A MOTION. I WANT TO OFFER MY CONDOLENCES TO THE FAMILY OF NORMA BEAN, WHICH MANY OF US KNOW. SHE PASSED AWAY YESTERDAY MORNING. SHE WAS MARRIED TO GEORGE BEAN, WHO WAS BASICALLY THE FATHER OF THE MODERN TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. AND SHE WAS ACTUALLY MARRIED TO COOKIE GARCIA, ANOTHER GENTLEMAN WHO WE ALL KNEW WHO PASSED AWAY. WONDERFUL PEOPLE. I WANT TO OFFER MY CONDOLENCES. SHE WAS VERY, VERY INVOLVED IN THE COMMUNITY AND, YOU KNOW, ALL THE GOOD ONES GO. YES MA'AM. >>LYNN HURTAK: I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING. >>BILL CARLSON: BEFORE SHE WENT INTO THE MEMORY CARE CENTER, WE ALL USED TO HANG OUT ALL THE TIME. SHE WAS SUCH A DELIGHTFUL, GREAT PERSON AND HAD ALL THE HISTORY OF GEORGE BEAN IN THE AIRPORT, WHICH IS REALLY FASCINATING. WHEN IS THE SERVICE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I DON'T KNOW YET. IT'S GOING TO BE AT THE FUNERAL HOME ON ARMENIA AND OSBORNE. THE DETAILS HAVEN'T BEEN POSTED YET. >>BILL CARLSON: PROBLEM WITH GETTING OLDER IS NOW ALL OF OUR FRIENDS ARE PASSING AWAY. A COUPLE OF THINGS, THANK YOU TO OUR FRIENDS FROM THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY FOR COMING HERE. WISH YOU A GREAT MUSLIM HERITAGE MONTH. ALSO, COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON GOT AN AWARD TONIGHT, ALTHOUGH SHE WAS HERE AND SKIPPED GETTING THE AWARD. CAN YOU TELL US WHAT THE AWARD WAS AGAIN, DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP? >>GWEN HENDERSON: DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP -- IT WAS FOR BLACK ENGLISH BOOKSTORE. IT WAS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES I GUESS IN THE DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP AREA. AND I WON. ARIEL WENT AND PICKED UP THE AWARD FOR ME. >>BILL CARLSON: IT IS A BIG DEAL TO WIN ONE OF THE AWARDS. >>GWEN HENDERSON: I COULDN'T BE THERE. WE'RE HERE. IT WAS SOUTH 2578. 2578 IT WAS SOUTH TAMPA. THANK YOU FOR SHARING THAT. >>BILL CARLSON: GOT A TROPHY. >>GWEN HENDERSON: LOOKS LIKE A RAILROAD TRACK OR SOMETHING. IT'S VERY NICE. GWEN MYERS HAS PASSED AWAY. CONDOLENCES TO HER -- GWEN MYERS HUSBAND HAS PASSED AWAY. CONDOLENCES TO HER. THE WAKE IS TOMORROW. I DID WRITE A LETTER ON BEHALF OF TAMPA CITY COUNCIL. >>BILL CARLSON: SHE SPOKE AT CAFE TAMPA. I'VE HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONS ABOUT KILEY GARDEN AND THE PARKING GARAGE UNDER IT. I DON'T REMEMBER THAT WE'VE HAD AN UPDATE ON THAT LATELY. UNLESS SOMEBODY REMEMBERS THAT WE HAVE. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ASK STAFF TO PRESENT A FIVE MINUTE UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF KILEY GARDEN AND THE PARKING GARAGE BENEATH IT ON JULY 31st TO INCLUDE PLANS AND TIMELINE TO REPAIR THE DAMAGE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION AND WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: TODAY IS JIM PORTER'S BIRTHDAY. HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MR. PORTER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, IT IS. HAPPY BIRTHDAY. MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE? MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. IWE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. WE ARE ADJOURNED. [ SOUNDING GAVEL ]