GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO THIS APRIL 23RD MEETING OF THE BLOOMINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADVISES THE CITY COUNCIL ON DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LONG RANGE PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION ISSUES. SOME ITEMS BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OUR STUDY ITEMS WHERE WE WILL NOT TAKE FORMAL ACTION WHILE OTHER ITEMS BEFORE THIS COMMISSION ARE PUBLIC HEARINGS WERE WHERE WE ENCOURAGE PUBLIC TESTIMONY. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO TESTIFY ON AN ITEM YOU CAN DO SO HERE IN CHAMBERS OR ON LINE BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS ON YOUR SCREEN. WE HAVE TWO PUBLIC PUBLIC HEARINGS THIS EVENING. SOME ITEMS ARE FINAL DECISIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION SUBJECT TO APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHILE OTHER ITEMS HAVE PLANNING HAVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHERE THEY WILL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS MADE UP OF SEVEN VOLUNTEER RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON. EACH PLANNING COMMISSIONER HAS BEEN APPOINTED TO SERVE A THREE YEAR TERM WITH A TWO TERM LIMIT. WE HAVE SIX COMMISSIONERS IN CHAMBERS HERE TONIGHT AND ONE JOINING VIRTUALLY SO WE DO HAVE A QUORUM. OUR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS THIS EVENING IS THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PLEASE RISE IF YOU ARE ABLE TO CONSIDER ONE NATION AS FAR AS FROM EACH ITEM. NUMBER ONE THIS EVENING IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A REZONING AT 830 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH PLANNING MANAGER NICK JOHNSON IS HERE WITH THE STAFF REPORT. THANK YOU. ACTING CHAIR CUNNINGHAM. PINCH HITTING FOR LIZ O'DAY TONIGHT. SHE HAD A CONFLICT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN EASTERN BLOOMINGTON RIGHT ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 77. IT'S ACROSS THE HIGHWAY FROM MALL OF AMERICA SO LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF OLD CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH WHICH IS A COLLECTOR ROAD AND EAST 80TH STREET. SO IT IS A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING. IT HAS MANY DIFFERENT TENANTS, MOSTLY JUST OFFICE AND MEDICAL OFFICE TYPE USES. THE SITE IS ZONED F2 AND THAT IS WHAT BRINGS US HERE THIS EVENING. SO THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD LIKE TO ADD A SALON AND SPA TENANT TO THE BUILDING WITH ITS CURRENT F2 ZONING RETAIL IS NOT A PERMITTED USE AND THE FD2 ZONING DISTRICT SO AT FOLLOWING CONVERSATIONS WITH STAFF THE PROPERTY OWNER YOU KNOW WEIGHED VARIOUS PATHWAYS OR OPTIONS OF HOW TO PURSUE THIS RETAIL TENANT INCLUDING A PRIVATELY INITIATED CITY CODE AMENDMENT OR JUST REZONING THE PROPERTY. ULTIMATELY THEY DECIDED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH REZONING THE PROPERTY EITHER REQUESTING REZONING TO B ONE IN THE B ONE ZONING DISTRICT. RETAIL IS ALLOWED AS A LIMITED USE IN OUR CODE. A LIMITED USE IS SIMILAR TO AN ACCESSORY USE BUT IT ALLOWS FOR A LITTLE BIT MORE FLOOR AREA UP TO 25% OF A TOTAL BUILDING. SO SHOULD THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED THIS PARTICULAR TENANT WOULD TAKE UP 6% OF THE FLOOR OF THE BUILDING SO NO CONCERN THERE WITH RESPECT TO THE COMPLIANCE WITH THAT LIMITED USE DESIGNATION. SO AS NOTED BEFORE, THE EXISTING SITE IS EMPTY TOO. THEY WANT TO GO TO B ONE THE NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT. THE B ONE ZONING DISTRICT IS REALLY INTENDED AS A TRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT KIND OF LOWER INTENSITY TRANSITIONING BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL USES AND OTHER COMMERCIAL USES AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THE SITES TO THE SOUTH OF THIS PROPERTY ARE ALREADY ZONED B ONE DESIGNATION AND THERE'S SOME RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND WEST OF THIS PROPERTY GET INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THINKING ABOUT CONNECTION TO THE ZONING MAP SO THE COMP PLAN GUIDES THIS AREA IS OFFICE ALL VERY MUCH CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING BUILDING. THE CURRENT ZONING IS FD212 ASPECT OF THE STAFF'S ANALYSIS THAT INFORMS OUR RECOMMENDATION IS JUST THAT THE B ONE DISTRICT IS ACTUALLY IN GREATER CONFORMS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH THE OFFICE DESIGNATION SO SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT AND INFORMS THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IN THIS CASE. SO JUST TO SUMMARIZE THE OFFICE LAND USE CATEGORY IN THE PLAN IT'S INTENDED TO ALLOW PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS OFFICES AND THERE'S SOME ALLOWANCES FOR ACCESSORY RETAIL AND OTHER SIMILAR USES. THE PROPOSED B ONE ZONING DISTRICT IS MORE COMPATIBLE WITH THIS DESIGNATION THAN AFTER TWO AFTER TWO IS TECHNICALLY UNDER OUR INDUSTRIAL SUB LIST OF ZONING DISTRICTS THAT DOES ALLOW WAREHOUSING AND MANUFACTURING FOR EXAMPLE. SO STAFF DOES FEEL THAT B ONE IS MORE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN IN ADDITION TO THE SURROUNDING SITES AND LAND USES. SO FINALLY JUST TO PUT A BUTTON ON THE PROPOSED USE THAT'S NOT ANTICIPATED TO CREATE AN EXCESSIVE BURDEN AT THIS LOCATION IT SERVED BY A COLLECTOR ROAD. THERE'S ADEQUATE CAPACITY IN THE UTILITIES THAT SERVE THE SITE AND THERE IS A COMPLIANT AMOUNT OF OFF STREET PARKING TO ADDRESS THE RETAIL USE. SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS CHAIR CUNNINGHAM NOTED, MAKING A RECOMMENDATION IN THIS CASE TO THE CITY COUNCIL. SO HAVE A PROPOSED MOTION FOR YOU ON THE SLIDE AND HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS AND THE PROPERTY OWNER IS HERE AS WELL . SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM? THANK YOU MR. JOHNSON BEFORE WE GET TO THE APPLICANT, ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF SEEING NONE IF THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD PLEASE ENTER YOUR DETAILS ON THAT PAD THERE JUST SO WE HAVE IT FOR THE RECORD AND ANYTHING ELSE YOU'D LIKE US TO TELL ABOUT THE TELL US ABOUT THE APPLICATION WOULD BE APPRECIATED . I'M NOT WRITING AS FAST TONIGHT AS I SHOULD. SORRY. I PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE DONE THIS TO ADVANCE. I DON'T HAVE MUCH MORE MR. JOHNSON SUMMED IT UP REALLY WELL. THIS IS WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BRING IT'S REALLY HARD TO SAY ON TREND BUT TO HAVE SOME OF THESE BEAUTY SERVICES WE HAVE THEM IN OTHER OICES. THEY'RE REALLY GREAT TENANTS AND WE'D LIKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BRING THIS GREAT BUSINESS INTO A SPACE THAT'S RIGHT BY THE MALL. IT'S IT'S A WONDERFUL LOCATION FOR FOR WHAT WE'RE LOOKING TO DO. SO THAT IS THAT IS WHY WE'VE ASKED FOR THIS AND THEN GUIDED BY STAFF THANK YOU VERY MUCH ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. I WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO TESTIFY ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE. MS. BROWN, IS THERE ANYONE ONLINE? OH, PARTICIPANTS ONLINE OR STAFF. THANK YOU. I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AS I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. >> SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM ONE. MS. BROWN WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL CUNNINGHAM I E C WHITE I LONNIE I MONSTER I SUMMERS I GO I THAT MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO DISCUSSION COMMISSIONER WHITE MR. CHAIR THANK YOU. I JUST I THINK IT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE. IT SEEMS TO BRING THE ZONING IN LINE MORE WITH WHAT'S IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IT SEEMS LIKE A GREAT USE OF SPACE AND I DON'T HAVE ANY PARTICULAR CONCERNS ABOUT IT. >> THANK YOU COMMISSIONER LONNIE THANK YOU CHAIR OUR ACTING CHAIR I CONCUR. I THINK IT'S A EXCELLENT USE OF THE SPACE AND GREAT TO SEE ANOTHER BUSINESS COMING INTO THAT PART OF BLOOMINGTON. THANK YOU. I WOULD ECHO THAT SENTIMENT. I THINK THAT THIS IS A GOOD USE OF STAFF'S TIME AND APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK YOU GUYS PUT IN TO GUIDE THIS APPLICANT AND I'M IN SUPPORT OF THIS MOTION AS WELL. IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION COMMISSIONER NIGHT IN PLANNING CASE PL 2026-48I MOVED TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PROPERTY AT 8030 OLD CEDAR AVENUE FROM 42 FREEWAY DEVELOPMENT TO BE ONE NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE I SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND DO I NEED TO DO DISCUSSION ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION MS. BROWN PLEASE CALL THE ROLL CUNNINGHAM I YOU SAY HI WAIT I WANT A I MONSTER I SUMMERS I AND KICKED IN I THAT MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO THAT ACTION IS A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND WILL BE HEARD VIA A PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 18TH 2026 IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. MOVING ON TO ITEM TWO ITEM TWO IS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A HEAVY EQUIPMENT SALES BUSINESS AT 9545 PENN AVENUE SOUTH AND MR. KARIM CHARADE IS HERE WITH THE STAFF REPORT. IT'S YES. THANK YOU ACTING CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS HERE FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL FOR FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA LOCATED AT 2201 WEST 94TH STREET. SO JUST TO PROVIDE A BACKGROUND OF WHERE THE SITE IS LOCATED, IT'S LOCATED JUST NORTH SOUTH OF OAK SCOTIA. YEAH. THANK YOU. SO NOW EVERYBODY CAN SEE WHAT I'M SAYING. THE SITE IS LOCATED JUST SOUTH OF FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA SO THEY'RE LOOKING TO EXPAND TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXPANDING BUSINESS. SO JUST TO PROVIDE OUR FOCUS WE'LL FOCUS ON MINNESOTA IS LOOKING TO EXPAND ON TO THE FORMER HOAGLAND BUS SITE IS LOCATED NEXT TO PENN AVENUE AND CLOSED PROXIMITY TO WEST 94TH STREET . SO BASICALLY THE APPLICANT RECEIVED SO UPPER APPROVAL FOCUS ON MINNESOTA AT THE EXISTING FACILITY IN 2009 AND THEY INTEND TO EXPAND THEIR HEAVY EQUIPMENT, SALES AND SERVICE AT THE FORMER HOAGLAND BUS SITE WHICH IS IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE EXISTING FACILITY TO NOTE THAT THE CURRENT SITE IS IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SCREENING, LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS. SO I DON'T ANTICIPATE MUCH NEED FOR FORKLIFTS IN MINNESOTA TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE BECAUSE IT IS IN CURRENT CONFORMANCE TO OUR STANDARDS. IT'S A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD APPLICATION AND WE ARE IN FULL SUPPORT. I DO WANT TO NOTE THAT OUR FOCUS OVER MINNESOTA DOES ANTICIPATE TO HAVE A SHARED ACCESS CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO SITES IN THE FUTURE BUT THAT WILL ONLY REQUIRE A FRONT OF SITE AND BUILDING PLAN WITH APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING MANAGER. SO THIS IS A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD APPLICATION AND WE FIND OUT THIS IS ALL COMPATIBLE AND WE DEFINITELY RECOMMEND OUR RECOMMENDATION. SO THIS IS OUR RECOMMENDATION HERE. THANK YOU MR. SHERROD. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE. THANK YOU, MR. SHERROD. OH, EXCUSE ME. SO SORRY. COMMISSIONER COOKSON, PLEASE. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF SO I NOTICED ON THE APPLICATION THERE'S NO REPLY ADDING HAPPENING HERE THE PARCELS ARE BEING COMBINED. HOW DOES STAFF WORK WITH AN APPLICANT TO DETERMINE WHETHER THEY SHOULD COMBINE TWO PARCELS AND REPLANT THE SITE OR JUST KEEP THEM SEPARATE? THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. I WOULD REFER IT OVER TO PLANNING MANAGER JOHNSON. MR. JOHNSON YEAH. THANK YOU CHAIR CUNNINGHAM AND COMMISSIONER COOKED INSIDE OF ME TO SAY THAT IT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I THINK THERE'S PROS AND CONS BOTH WAYS. ULTIMATELY IT IS A PRIVATE DECISION SO FOR WHATEVER REASON SAY FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA WANTED TO SELL THIS PROPERTY AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE. KEEPING THEM SEPARATE MAKES MORE SENSE. THERE'S MORE RATIONAL THAT WAY. THERE'S REALLY AS LONG AS YOU HAVE A JOINT ACCESS AGREEMENT OR EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTIES THERE'S REALLY NOT A SIGNIFICANT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REASON TO COMBINE THE SITES. YOU CERTAINLY ARE COMBINING TAX RECORDS AND MAYBE MAKING YOUR ACCOUNTING AND RECORDKEEPING A LITTLE BIT EASIER. BUT NO, THERE'S THERE'S NOT A THERE'S NOT A SIGNIFICANT REASON FROM A PLANNING AND ZONING PERSPECTIVE TO RECOMMEND OR PUSH THE APPLICANT TO GO ONE DIRECTION OR THE OTHER IN THIS CASE. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER COOK'S IN ANY FOLLOW UP ON THAT? NO, THANK YOU MR.. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF CLARIFICATIONS? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU MR. SHERROD. YEP. IF THE APPLICANT IS OR APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT IS HERE TONIGHT AND YOU'D LIKE TO STEP FORWARD, PLEASE DO SO. HI. GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEGAN ROGERS WITH LARKIN HUFFMAN. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF SCHUBERT HOLDINGS WHICH IS THE ENTITY THAT OWNS THIS PROPERTY. I THINK CHAIR A CHAIR AWAY FROM US KICKED IN FOR THE QUESTION WITH REGARDS TO HOW THESE PROPERTIES FUNCTION TOGETHER POTENTIALLY AT SOME POINT IN TIME IN THE FUTURE THE FORKLIFTS PROPERTY IN THE SCHUBERT PROPERTY MAY HAVE AN ADJOINING DRIVE AISLE THAT WOULD BE SUBMITTED TO YOUR STAFF FOR REVIEW AS PART OF A FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLAN. THEY ARE A TWO DIFFERENT LINE OF BUSINESS LINES AND SO THAT'S THE REASON THAT WE ARE KEEPING THE PROPERTY AS SEPARATE AT THIS POINT IN TIME IN TERMS OF NOT HAVING OWNERSHIP UNDERNEATH ONE ENTITY BUT THEY VERY MUCH WILL WORK TOGETHER AND HAVE SIMILAR STAFFING NEEDS BETWEEN THEM. WE THINK STAFF FOR THEIR EXCELLENT SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION THAT WE PUT FORWARD HERE. PART OF THE REASON THAT WE SOUGHT A NEW COPY FOR THIS SITE IS THAT MUCH OF THE HOAGLAND SUE FOCUSED AROUND THE BUS STORAGE AND PARKING AND ENSURING THAT THERE IS COMPLIANCE WITH THE SCREENING CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF YOUR CODE IN THAT REGARD FOR FORKLIFTS AND FORKLIFTS SMALL FORKLIFTS OPERATION THAT'S WHAT SCHUBERT DOES SLIGHTLY SMALLER FORKLIFTS THAN FORKLIFTS ADJACENT AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE ABOUT THIS PROJECT OR OUR APPLICATION. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT ? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU SO MUCH. ALL RIGHT. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO TESTIFY ABOUT THIS ITEM, PLEASE COME ON DOWN AND SING. NO ONE COMING FORWARD. MS. BROWN, IS THERE ANYONE ONLINE ALL PARTICIPANTS ONLINE OR STAFF? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT COMMISSIONER WHITE I'M OF WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING I SENSE WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING MISS BROWN OR ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION MS. BROWN PLEASE CALL THE ROLL CUNNINGHAM I YSAYE I WAIT I LEONIE I MONSTER I SUMMERS I COOKED IN BY THAT MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED ON THIS ITEM ANY DISCUSSION I CAN LEAD US OFF I THINK THIS IS A RELATIVELY STRAIGHTFORWARD APPLICATION. IT SEEMS LIKE A BUSINESS IS EXPANDING AND GROWING IN BLOOMINGTON IS IS IS EXCELLENT TO SEE AND DOESN'T SEEM TO HAVE ANY ADVERSE LAND USE EFFECTS ON NEIGHBORS OR NEIGHBORING USES. SO I'M IN FAVOR OF THIS APPLICATION. >> COMMISSIONER LONEY I CONCUR AND I THINK IT SAYS A LOT THAT THE COMPANY WANTS TO CONTINUE TO STAY IN BLOOMINGTON AND THAT'S A POSITIVE SIGN FOR THE NEIGHBORING BUSINESSES AS WELL. SO I ALSO CONCUR I THINK SO AND IF THERE'S ANY OTHER DISCUSSION IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR COMMISSIONER WHITE IN CASE NUMBER PL 2026-43. HAVING BEEN ABLE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED FINDINGS I MOVED TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING A HEAVY EQUIPMENT SALES AND SERVICE FACILITY LOCATED AT 9545 PENN AVENUE SOUTH SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND CODE REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN THE RESOLUTION I SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE THIS RECOMMENDATION. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? MR. BROWN PLEASE CALL THE ROLL COMING HIM I YOU SAY I WAIT I LENNY I MONSTER I. SUMMERS I COOKED IN I THAT MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO THAT ITEM IS A FINAL DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS AN APPEAL IS RECEIVED AT CITY HALL BY 430 ON APRIL 28TH 2026. OUR FINAL ITEM OF THE EVENING IS OUR REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION POLICY ISSUES AND UPDATES. THANK YOU CHAIR CUNNINGHAM JUST PREVIEWING YOUR NEXT TWO MEETINGS ON MAY THE 7TH YOU HAVE THREE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR OUR NEXT MEETING . THE FIRST ITEM IS FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS AND A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR A 16 UNIT DETACHED TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT AT 1114011208 AND 11216 BLOOMINGTON FERRY ROAD IT'S AT THE SOUTH END OF BLOOMINGTON VERY. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING IS A REZONING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL VELOPMENT PLANS FOR GALLERY APARTMENTS AT 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH AND THE THIRD PUBLIC HEARING WOULD BE A VARIANCE TO OUR FREESTANDING SCIENCE STANDARDS FOR A FREESTANDING SIGN AT SOUTH TOWN SHOPPING CENTER AT 7803 PENN AVENUE. PREVIEWING THE MAY 21ST ITEM WE HAVE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ARE SCHEDULE B OF REZONING OF THE TELEGRAPH HILL OFFICE PARK GOING FROM R-1 PD TO B ONE PD AT 705 TELEGRAPH ROAD PUBLIC HEARING FOR REGARDING REZONING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING AIRPORT PARKING OPERATION AT 3737 50 AMERICAN BOULEVARD EAST THAT'S PARK AND FLY THE SAME APPLICATION TYPE FOR AN EXISTING AND OTHER EXISTING REMOTE AIRPORT PARKING FACILITY AT 79.1 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE THAT'S PARKING GO AND THEN FINALLY A PUBLIC HEARING AND A CITY INITIATED CITY CODE AMENDMENT F THE CORNER LOT STANDARDS SOMETHING YOU SAW ON STUDY SESSION NOT TOO LONG AGO. THE ONLY OTHER UPDATES I CAN OFFER IS AGAIN THE BLOOMINGTON HOME FAIR IS THE SATURDAY FROM 10 A.M. TO 3 P.M. SO IF YOU ARE A RESIDENT LOOKING FOR ADDITIONAL SUPPORT OR RESOURCES FROM STAFF ON PROJECTS YOUR HOME AND THERE'S A LOT OF OTHER ACTIVITIES FOOD TRUCKS, OTHER THINGS FOR KIDS I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE QUITE A FESTIVE ATMOSPHERE AND SOME TABLING FOR THE 2050 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THEN JUST A REMINDER THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION WINDOW IS STILL OPEN THROUGH MAY THE 6TH. SO ENCOURAGE THE PUBLIC TO APPLY TO SIT UP HERE ON THE DAIS. THAT'S ALL I GOT. THANK YOU. MR. JOHNSON ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR STAFF? COMMISSIONER COOKED IN. >> THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. A COUPLE OF THINGS. FIRST JUST WANT TO SAY THANK MRS. FOR STEPPING IN FOR ME THIS EVENING AND AT 720 OR 621 I DON'T THINK YOU ALL WILL EVER LET ME CHAIR AGAIN THE PRESENCE OF MR. JOHNSON. >> WHERE IS TELEGRAPH ROAD? YEAH. THANK YOU CHAIR CUNNINGHAM FORMER ABSENT CHAIR THEN TELEGRAPH ROAD IS IN THE VERY NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOOMINGTON ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 494. SO IT IS A VERY SMALL OFFICE COMPLEX THAT WAS DEVELOPED AS PART OF A RESIDENTIAL OR A FUTURE PHASE OF A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THERE IN NORTHWEST BLOOMINGTON. SO IT'S RIGHT ALONG FOR 94 CANNON NEAR FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THAT AREA. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ? ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT I WILL END THIS APRIL 23RD MEETING OF THE BLOOMINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION. GOOD NIGHT