>>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WELCOME TO OUR CITY COUNCIL EVENING MEETING. IF WE COULD HAVE ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >> CARLSON? HURTAK? >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HERE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: PRESENT. >> VIERA? MIRANDA? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MEMO FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON'S OFFICE. HE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THIS EVENING'S MEETING. WANT TO PUT THAT IN THE RECORD. MS. DOCK, WE HAVE A VERY, VERY HEAVY AGENDA, IF YOU WANT TO KICK IT OFF. >>LaCHONE DOCK: GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL. YES, WE DO. I HAVE ONE ITEM TO CLEAR ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA. THAT IS ITEM NUMBER 5, IF THAT COULD BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA. THIS IS A MISNOTICE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE ITEM NUMBER 5 BY COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN AND A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AYE. OKAY. MAY I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA? >> SO MOVED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. IF I CAN GET A MOTION TO OPEN ALL THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, 1 THROUGH 4. MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. THESE ARE ALL QUASI-JUDICIAL. I SEE WE HAVE AT LEAST ONE PERSON REGISTERED ONLINE. BUT IF YOU ARE GOING TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THE ITEMS TONIGHT, 1, 2, 3, OR 4, PLEASE STAND, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN. IF YOU'RE GOING TO SPEAK ON ANYTHING. >> DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY THAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO GIVE IS THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? >> I DO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. LET'S START OFF WITH ITEM NUMBER 1. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU SO MUCH COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM NUMBER 1 IS SU2-23-09 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 16001 TAMPA PALMS BOULEVARD. THIS IS A SPECIAL USE REQUEST. THE REQUEST IS FOR A RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-IN WINDOW. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED CU, WHICH IS COMMUNITY UNIT. THIS IS A COUNTY DESIGNATION THAT IS A REMAINDER AFTER ANNEXATION. SOME OF THE PROPERTIES THAT HAD THIS DESIGNATION OF CU WERE NOT REZONED TO A CITY DESIGNATION. WHETHER IT'S A COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OR A PD SITE PLAN CONTROL DESIGNATION. SO THIS CU IS THE EQUIVALENT OF CG OR COMMERCIAL GENERAL USE. AND WHILE THE RESTAURANT USE IS AN ALLOWABLE USE, THE DRIVE-IN WINDOW IS THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE SPECIAL USE, AND THAT'S WHAT IS BEFORE YOU TODAY. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO GIVE THEIR REPORT AND I'LL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES SIR. >> GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL MEMBERS. DAVID HEY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. WE START IN THE NEW TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS FIRST CASE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS SITUATED WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING PLAZA. HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS BRUCE B. DOWNS. THEN YOU'VE GOT TAMPA PALMS BOULEVARD RUNNING ON THE WEST SIDE. AGAIN, IT'S AN EXISTING SHOPPING PLAZA. IT IS NOT WITHIN AN EVACUATION ZONE. HERE WE HAVE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE IS SUBURBAN MIX USE 6. THIS DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF A VARIETY OF USES, INCLUDING GENERAL COMMERCIAL. THE PORTION OF BRUCE B. DOWNS AND TAMPA BAY PALMS BOULEVARD ARE CHARACTERIZED BY A MIXTURE OF COMMERCIAL USES AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED NEIGHBORHOODS. THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH. THE DRIVE-THROUGH IS ORIENTED TOWARDS THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND THERE IS SOME BUFFERING AND SCREENING PRESENT ALONG BRUCE B. DOWNS THAT HELPS ENHANCE THE STREETSCAPE, WHICH IS HELPING IT MEET LAND USE POLICY 4.3.4. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED SPECIAL USE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS? NO. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU AGAIN, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. AND THIS PROPERTY REQUEST, AS MENTIONED EARLIER, IS FOR THE SPECIAL USE FOR THE DRIVE-IN WINDOW FOR THE RESTAURANT USE. SO THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD CONTAIN 664 SQUARE FEET. THIS IS A SCOOTER'S COFFEE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE SEEN ONE OF THOSE, BUT IT'S JUST THE STRUCTURE ITSELF. THE ONLY CUSTOMERS THAT ENTER -- THERE NO CUSTOMERS THAT ENTER THE INSIDE OF THE BUILDING. ONLY EMPLOYEES. THIS IS A DRIVE-THROUGH SERVICE ONLY THAT IS PROVIDED. SO ON THIS LOT, THIS IS AN OUTPARCEL OF THE OVERALL, AND I'LL JUST SHOW YOU THE AERIAL MAP, THE ZONING MAP. THIS WILL BE AN EASIER DESCRIPTION FOR YOU. EASIER TO SEE AND VISUAL. SO THIS IS THE SITE WHICH IS OUTLINED IN RED. THIS IS BRUCE B. DOWNS, AND THIS IS TAMPA PALMS. SO THIS IS THE PUBLIX SHOPPING CENTER, THE STRIP CENTER WITH THE COMMERCIAL USES LOCATED. THIS IS THE BANK ON THE CORNER. SO THIS, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS FOR THIS AREA LOCATED HERE APPROXIMATELY. THIS WOULD BE COMING OUT PARCEL -- THIS WOULD BECOME AN OUTPARCEL. THIS IS AN OUTPARCEL OF THE OVERALL PROPERTY. YOU CAN SEE THE USES, THE ZONINGS SURROUNDING PROPERTY. YOU HAVE THE CU DESIGNATION FURTHER WEST. YOU HAVE YOUR PD WITH YOUR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT'S TO THE NORTH AND NORTHEAST. RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT FURTHER NORTHEAST AND YOUR CU TO THE EAST ON THE EAST SIDE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BRUCE B. DOWNS. AND THEN YOU HAVE YOUR PD DEVELOPMENT TO THE WEST BECAUSE THIS IS THE LOCATION OF THE SITE. AND THAT ALLOWS FOR COMMERCIAL PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY USES ON THE SITE. VISUALLY, WHEN YOU'RE OUT ON SITE AND YOU LOOK ACROSS TAMPA PALMS, YOU SEE THE WATER FALL AND YOU'D HAVE TO REALLY COME ON AMBERLEY TO SEE THIS USE HERE. AMBERLY. AND THIS IS THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED. THIS IS THE SITE WITH THE GRAY OUTLINE. THIS IS BRUCE B. DOWNS, WHICH IS LOCATED HERE. SO VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE IS NOT FROM BRUCE B. DOWNS. YOU CANNOT ACCESS THIS PARCEL AT ALL FROM BRUCE B. DOWNS. THIS IS THE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. HERE IS THE BANK PARCEL THAT'S LOCATED HERE. HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT'S OUTLINED HERE. THIS IS THE BUILDING, AND THE TRAFFIC FLOW, THE TRAFFIC WOULD COME IN, ENTER THE SITE, CIRCLE THE DRIVE-THROUGH, AND THEN THEY CAN EXIT THE SITE. SO EXISTING RIGHT NOW ON SITE, I HAVE PHOTOS FOR YOU IS PARKING, SURFACE PARKING. SO THE SITE OVERALL IS OVER-PARKED. THIS USE, BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE INSIDE CUSTOMER SEATING REQUIRES TWO PARKING SPACES AND TWO PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED AND THE ADDITIONAL SPACES THERE ARE OVERAGE FOR THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. I HAVE THE ELEVATIONS OF THE SITE. SO THE TOP, THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION AND THIS IS THE WEST ELEVATION. AND THE TOP VIEW, THAT IS THE EAST ELEVATION, AND THEN THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION. AND THEN I HAVE A FEW PICTURES OF THE SITE THIS WOULD BE THE LOCATION, THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE OUTPARCEL. THIS IS BRUCE B. DOWNS. LET ME ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT. THIS IS ALSO A VIEW OF THE SITE. THIS IS IF -- THE VIEWPOINT OF WHERE THE SHOPPING CENTER IS LOCATE AND THE SITE WOULD BE SOMEWHERE ALONG IN THIS AREA. THIS IS A VIEW OF THE SHOPPING CENTER. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW. THIS IS NEAR THE ENTRY POINT WHERE VEHICLES WOULD ENTER. ANOTHER VIEW. THIS IS THE BANK, WHICH IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER. THIS IS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BRUCE B. DOWNS. AND THIS IS A VIEW, THE SITE IS OFF TO THE DISTANCE. THIS IS BRUCE B. DOWNS. THIS IS THAT PD WITH THE WATERFALL THAT'S LOCATED THERE, THE WEST OF THE SITE. AND THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE. THAT IS THE OTHER CORNER AT TAMPA PALMS. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FINDS THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. THERE ARE SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. WITH THAT, THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: I JUST HAD A QUESTION. I NOTICED HOW WOODED THE PARKING LOT IS, WHICH IS VERY NICE. WILL THE MAJORITY OF THOSE TREES IN THAT AREA BE STAYING OR WILL THEY HAVE TO TAKE DOWN TREES TO BUILD THE STRUCTURE? >>LaCHONE DOCK: THE MAJORITY OF THE TREES ARE STAYING. IT'S ENCOMPASSING A VERY SMALL AREA. I'M TRYING TO FIND A VIEW OF THE SITE GOING TO A VIEW THAT LOOKS DIRECTLY TO THE OUTPARCEL. DO YOU WANT TO TALK TO IT? >> ERIN MAEHR, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THEY ARE REMOVING FIVE OF THE OAKS I BELIEVE ON THE SITE. I EVEN ASKED THEM TO REMOVE A COUPLE OF ADDITIONAL SMALLER TREES THAT WERE NOT IN THE BEST CONDITION. THEY ARE GOING TO BE REPLACING THEM. THEY ARE ALSO REPLACING WITH I THINK IT'S 22 TREES. SO THEY ARE PUTTING A LOT OF TREES BACK, ADDITIONAL TREES. AND THEY ARE JUST REMOVING FIVE. THEY ARE GOING TO BE USING A LOT OF THE EXISTING ASPHALT. THEY ARE GOING TO REDO THE ASPHALT BUT A LOT OF THESE ARE IN ISLANDS AND THEY ARE GOING TO PROTECT THEM. >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT FOR ITEM NUMBER 1? IS THERE AN APPLICANT? YES, MA'AM, COME ON UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS BET WITH THOMAS ENGINEERING. THANK YOU ALL FOR HAVING US TODAY AND REVIEWING OUR PROPOSAL FOR THE DRIVE-THROUGH ONLY COFFEE SHOP. I'M HERE TO REPRESENT THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM AS WELL AS THE APPLICANT. AS STAFF PRESENTED TODAY, WE WILL BE PROPOSING A 664 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON A .55-ACRE LEASE AREA WITHIN A CITY PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER. IT'S LOCATED AT BRUCE B. DOWNS AND TAMPA PALMS BOULEVARD INTERSECTION. WE'RE HERE TO RESPECTFULLY REQUEST FOR APPROVAL AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 1? >> MOVE TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN WITH A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA, WOULD YOU MIND READING NUMBER ONE? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOT AT ALL, MR. CHAIRMAN. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER 1, FILE SU2-23-09, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU-2, APPROVING A RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-IN WINDOW IN A CU, COMMUNITY UNIT, ZONING DISTRICT IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 16001 TAMPA PALMS BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 HEREOF, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? WOULD YOU PREFER A ROLL CALL? NO. IT'S FIRST READING. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: LET ME JUST ADD THAT THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE PROPOSED REQUEST WITH THE EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER AND CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS, POLICY 1.2.3 AND 1.2.8 AND 15.2.1. ALSO THE USE OF THE LOCATION OF CU DISTRICT DOES NOT REQUEST ANY WAIVERS AND MEETS THE GENERAL STANDARDS OF SECTION 27-129, USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH MIXED NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL USES LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SITE AND WILL NOT ESTABLISH A PRECEDENT AND ENCOURAGE INCOMPATIBLE USES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. >>THE CLERK: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2024, AT 9:30 A.M. LOCATED AT OLD CITY HALL, 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ITEM NUMBER 2. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 2 IS REZ-23-84. THIS IS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5006 EAST 97th AVENUE. THIS ALSO CONTAINS FIVE ADDITIONAL FOLIOS, A TOTAL OF SIX PARCELS. IT'S JUST EASIER TO SHOW YOU ON THIS MAP THE LOCATION. THIS IS THE ADDRESS OF THE 5006 EAST 97th AVENUE. THIS IS 97th AVENUE AND THESE ARE THE ADDITIONAL FOLIOS WHICH ARE LISTED, WHICH ARE BEHIND THIS PARCEL. SO THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS 60, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, TO RM 24, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO GIVE THEIR REPORT AND I'LL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. >>DAVID HEY: DAVID HEY AGAIN WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING AREA, SPECIFICALLY IN THE TERRACE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITY IS ABOUT ONE-FOURTH OF A MILE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOP IS WITHIN A HALF MILE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE CORNER OF EAST BUSCH BOULEVARD AND NORTH 50th STREET. THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT WITHIN THE COASTAL PLANNING AREA OR AN EVACUATION ZONE. ON TO THE AERIAL, THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. YOU'VE GOT 97th STREET ON THE SOUTH SIDE. IT'S PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. AS YOU MOVE TO THE EAST, THOUGH, THERE ARE SOME TOWNHOMES AND MULTIFAMILY SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THIS AREA. THEN YOU ACTUALLY GO INTO TEMPLE TERRACE, I BELIEVE, OFF OF 52nd STREET. HERE WE HAVE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE IS HARD TO SEE. IT'S RESIDENTIAL 35. THE TAN COLOR AROUND IT IS ALL THE RESIDENTIAL 10. TO THE EAST AND NORTH AND FURTHER TO THE SOUTH IN THIS LIGHT BROWN COLOR, THAT IS THE RESIDENTIAL 20. YOU GET OTHER RESIDENTIAL 35 AREAS TO THE SOUTH AND FURTHER TO THE EAST. AND THEN THERE IS A REC OPEN SPACE. THAT IS THE PARK TO THE NORTH. AND THEN THIS IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 TO THE SOUTH. THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 35 DESIGNATION. THE DESIGNATION IS INTENDED FOR MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES, INCLUDING SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS, DUPLEXES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND TOWNHOMES AND MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS. THE PROPOSED RM 24 ZONING DISTRICT CAN BE CONSIDERED WITHIN THE R-35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, ACCORDING TO THE CONSISTENCY MATRIX PROVIDED IN SECTION 27-21 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. PART OF THE CITY'S PLANNING AND HOUSING STRATEGIES ARE TO COMMON AND CURRENT POPULATION DEMANDS BY USING LAND RESOURCES MORE EFFICIENTLY AND ENCOURAGING INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED SITES. THE REQUEST SUPPORS THESE STRATEGIES BECAUSE IT WILL ENCOURAGE HIGHER DENSITY ON A VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED SITE THAT IS PLANNED FOR UP TO 35 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. THE PROPOSED RM 24 ZONING DISTRICT WILL HELP PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING IN THE TERRACE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. IN SUMMARY, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 35 LAND USE DESIGNATION. AND THE REZONING REQUEST DOES SUPPORT THE OVERALL POLICY DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS? NO. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THIS REZONING REQUEST, AS MENTIONED EARLIER, IS THE REQUEST TO REZONE TO RM-24. I'D LIKE TO POINT OUT ON THE STAFF REPORT ON PAGE 2 OF THE REPORT, THE ACREAGE IS LISTED INCORRECTLY. I HAVE IT AT 1.45 BUT IT IS 1.1 ACRES. THAT IS THE TOTAL ACREAGE FOR THIS REQUEST. THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR FOR A MAXIMUM OF 33 UNITS ON-SITE. IN THE RM 24 ZONING CATEGORY, IN ADDITION TO THE LOT REQUIREMENT BEING A MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE WIDTH OF 50 FEET, A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET, IT ALSO ALLOWS FOR A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 60 FEET. NOW, THIS IS IN THE STAFF REPORT ON THE TOP OF PAGE 2, YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE IS AN ASTERISK THERE. FOR EACH FOOT ABOVE 35 FEET, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO STEP -- TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL FOOT TO YOUR SETBACK. SO I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU THE SITE HERE, THE SURVEY THAT WAS SUBMITTED. SO WHEN WE LOOK AT THE SITE, WHAT IT -- WOULD IT GET TO A HEIGHT OF 60 FEET GIVEN THAT YOU HAVE TO INCREASE YOUR SETBACK BY A FOOT, IT MAY NOT, BUT IT MAY REACH -- IT MAY BE ABLE TO BE DEVELOPED AND REACH A HEIGHT HIGHER THAN 35 FEET. THE ANALYSIS IS PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT, AND IT TALKS ABOUT THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, WHAT IS SURROUNDING THE SITE AND THE SCALE. I'LL GET TO THAT IN JUST A MOMENT. BUT THIS IS THE SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. THIS IS 97th AVENUE. THIS IS THE FRONTAGE OF THE PROPERTY, AND THEN HERE ARE THE LOTS, WHICH ARE CURRENTLY UNDER THIS REQUEST. SO WITHOUT THESE LOTS HERE THIS WOULD BECOME ONE ZONING LOT UPON APPROVAL TO BE DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. WITHOUT THIS ACCESS OR FRONTAGE, THESE LOTS WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BE DEVELOPED. THEY DON'T HAVE THE FRONTAGE. BUT I'LL SHOW YOU WHAT IS SURROUNDING THE SITE AND WHAT'S HERE TO THE EAST AND TO THE WEST OF THE SITE, THE SUBJECT SITE. AND REVIEW PART OF THE ANALYSIS PROVIDED. THIS IS THE ZONING MAP. THIS IS THE PARCEL WHICH IS IDENTIFIED AGAIN IN RED. I SHOWED THE MAP EARLIER. THIS IS 97th AVENUE. SO WHEN YOU'RE DRIVING ON THIS ROADWAY, THIS IS TEMPLE HEIGHTS ROAD. A VEHICLE CAN TRAVEL UP THE ROAD TO 97th. YOU MUST CURVE AROUND, AND THEN HEAD EAST. THE ROAD DOES NOT CONTINUE NORTH. THIS IS LIKE A DEAD END HERE. SO YOU HAVE YOUR USES HERE. YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS SITE IS SURROUNDED WITH RS 60 ZONING. YOU HAVE A POCKET OF RS 50 THAT'S LOCATED HERE. FURTHER NORTH, NORTH OF LINEBAUGH, YOU HAVE YOUR MULTIFAMILY ZONINGS AND USES. AND THEN FURTHER EAST ALONG MYRTLE, YOU HAVE YOUR RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY USES. RO. THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY IS HERE. BUT IT'S ALONG THE BOUNDARY ALONG THE EAST AND SOUTH AT TEMPLE HEIGHTS. AND THEN THIS IS 52nd STREET. THIS PD, WHICH IS SOUTH OF THE SITE, A BLOCK SOUTH, IS APPROVED FOR TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT. SO THIS IS SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES THAT ARE LOCATED HERE. BUT THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN HAS BEEN WITH THE MULTIFAMILY ALONG THE EAST AND THE SOUTH. THIS WOULD ALLOW THIS RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY IN THE CENTER OF THIS BLOCK. SO THE USE IS, I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU PHOTOS. VISUALLY -- IF YOU LOOK AT THIS PARCEL THIS APPEARS TO BE MULTIFAMILY. THESE ARE SEPARATE LOTS. SO THESE ARE TWO FAMILY HOMES. THIS IS WHAT WOULD BE THE DUPLEX USE. BUT IT IS IN OUR CODE A TWO-FAMILY. SINGLE-FAMILY. THIS IS SINGLE-FAMILY. THAT'S TO THE SOUTH. AND THEN TO THE NORTH IS THE SAME USE. SO I'LL SHOW YOU. WHAT MY REPORT TALKS ABOUT IS THAT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT EXISTS AND THE INTENSITY THAT'S ALLOWED WITH THIS RM 24. AND THAT IS THE REASON FOR THE FINDING OF INCONSISTENT ON THE SITE. THE OTHER THING IS JUST TO TALK ABOUT THE FUTURE LAND USE FOR A MOMENT. SO THE FUTURE LAND USE IS R 35 AND IT SUPPORTS THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY ZONE. SO ANY APPLICANT THAT COMES BEFORE COUNCIL FOR A FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT, IT IS WITH THE INTENT LATER TO COME BACK FOR ADDITIONAL ENTITLEMENTS, DO A REZONING WHERE THERE IS A PD OR EUCLIDEAN REZONING. THE QUESTION IS, IS THAT THE TIME FOR THAT REZONING? BECAUSE THAT FUTURE LAND USE IS ON THE PROPERTY, IS THAT THE TIME TO DEVELOP? I JUST ASK JUST CONSIDER, AND I'LL PRESENT TO YOU AND SHOW YOU THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT'S IN THIS AREA TO DETERMINE IF THAT IS THE RIGHT ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY. SO THE RM-24 IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE R 35. BUT ALSO WHAT IS ALLOWED IN MULTIFAMILY EUCLIDEAN IS RM 18. RM 18 ALLOWS FOR A 35-FOOT MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. AND THAT IS IN LINE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL THAT IS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT THAT IS THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED AT 35 FEET. SO HERE ARE PICTURES OF THE SITE. THIS IS ON 97th AVENUE. THIS IS A VIEW IF LOOKING EAST ON 97th. THIS IS THE SITE OFF TO THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT. THESE ARE SOME OF THE TWO UNITS THAT ARE THERE. THESE ARE ACTUALLY LAND LINES THAT ARE HERE BETWEEN THESE BUILDINGS, BUT THESE ARE YOUR DUPLEXES THAT EXIST THERE IMMEDIATELY EAST. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW. THIS IS FURTHER EAST, HEADING FURTHER EAST. THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING WEST ON 97th. SO THE SITE IS ACTUALLY OFF ON THE RIGHT ON THE PICTURE. SO THIS IS WHERE I SAID THAT ROAD KIND OF DEAD ENDS. IT HAS TO CURVE AROUND. THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE, SO THE SUBJECT SITE IS TO THE RIGHT IN THIS PICTURE TWO LOTS OVER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOVE IT UP. >>LaCHONE DOCK: I'M SORRY. YOU'RE MISSING HALF THE PHOTO. I DIDN'T ZOOM BACK OUT AGAIN. THANK YOU. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW ON THAT SIDE. THIS IS WEST OF THE SITE. THIS IS AT THE END OF THE BLOCK, SO THE SUBJECT SITE IS TWO PARCELS OVER. THIS IS THE HOUSE THAT'S AT THE END OF THE STREET AND THEN THESE ARE HOMES THAT ARE ON THE WEST AND THAT RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION THAT DEVELOPMENT THAT'S THERE ON THE WEST. THIS IS SOUTH OF THE SITE, SO THIS IS ACROSS THE STREET. THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. SO THERE ARE SOME PRETTY LARGE LOTS THAT EXIST OUT THERE TODAY. AND WITH THAT, THAT CONCLUDES THE PRESENTATION. STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT. AND I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>LaCHONE DOCK: OKAY. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> MR. CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL MEMBERS, TODD PRESSMAN, 200 2nd AVENUE SOUTH NUMBER 451 IN ST. PETERSBURG. IF WE COULD GO TO THE PowerPoint PLEASE. THIS IS REZ 23-84. SEEKING RS 60 TO RM 24. APPRECIATE MR. HEY'S REPORT, LaCHONE'S REPORT, TWO DIFFERENT OPINIONS. WE'RE HERE FOR ONE REASON AND ONE REASON ONLY, THAT LAST YEAR, THIS BODY VOTED TO APPROVE THE LAND USE AMENDMENT AND APPROVE THE DENSITY THAT'S BEFORE YOU TODAY. SO, OF COURSE, THE EDICT IS TO COME IN AND APPLY FOR COMPANION ZONING, WHICH IS WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY. WE'RE IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING AREA. WE'RE IN THE AREA BETWEEN BUSCH BOULEVARD AND NORTH 56th. THIS IS THE SITE WHICH IS AN ASSEMBLAGE AS I THINK THE STAFF MEMBERS HAVE MADE YOU WELL AWARE. AGAIN, THIS WAS -- SORRY, IT WAS APPROVED IN FEBRUARY OF '24. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT AS LaCHONE INDICATED, THAT ANY HEIGHT OVER 35 FEET WOULD HAVE TO BE BIRTHDAY CAKE IN TERMS OF LAYERED UP AND PUSHED BACK FOR THE SETBACK. PLANNING COMMISSION NOTES THE REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND SUPPORTS THE OVERALL POLICY AND DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. NOTES ACCOMMODATE CURRENT AND FUTURE POPULATION BY USING LAND RESOURCES MORE EFFICIENTLY, ENCOURAGING INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED SITES. THE PROPOSED 24 ZONING DISTRICT WHICH WILL HELP PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING IN THE TERRACE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. LaCHONE BROUGHT FORWARD A LOT OF POLICIES FOR YOU AND SO DID MR. HEY, BUT I THINK THERE ARE OTHER POLICIES LIKE THIS THAT DIRECT YOU FOR SPECIFICALLY WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING HERE, AND THESE ARE TWO OF THEM. WHEN YOU LOOK THROUGHOUT THE SITE, THERE IS SIGNIFICANT MULTIFAMILY ON THE BLOCK AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE BLOCK. LaCHONE SHOWED YOU SOME OF THOSE. THIS IS ONE HERE, AND YOU HAVE THESE, AND YOU HAVE THESE. AND THIS, WHICH IS ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE BLOCK TO THE NORTH. THIS IS A MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME OF $35,000. MIXED INCOME RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, THE EFFORT IS TO ATTRACT RESIDENTS TO LIVE IN TAMPA, MUST INCLUDE PROMOTION OF MIXED INCOME RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND THAT IS SPECIFIC TO PROMOTING MIXED INCOME RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT WHICH IS SPECIFICALLY AND EXACTLY WHERE WE ARE AT. THAT IS A VERY SPECIFIC POLICIES THAT IS DIRECTED. OBJECTIVE 9.6 IS INCREASE DIVERSITY AND IMPROVE THE SUSTAINABILITY OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS, WHICH THIS DOES. 9.6.1 IS ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT AND RETENTION OF THE DIVERSITY OF MULTIFAMILY HOMES TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS. AND OBJECTIVE 9.7, PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR INFILL IN AREAS ALREADY CHARACTERIZED BY LOW TO LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. WHICH I'VE SHOWN THAT YOU THIS AREA SPECIFICALLY IS. UNIVERSITY AREA COMMUNITY PLAN DOES HAVE A POINT ABOUT PROVIDING GREATER FLEXIBILITY IN LAND USE AND DENSITY FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WHILE ENSURING THAT NEIGHBORHOOD BUFFERS AND URBAN AMENITIES ARE ENHANCED. POLICY 9.8 SOMEWHAT ECHOS THAT, STANDARDS FOR MODERATE DENSITY FAMILY ZONE PROVIDE SCALE, DEVELOPMENT BUILDING TYPES THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE OF SINGLE-FAMILY AND LOW-DENSITY MULTIFAMILY AREAS. THERE'S PLENTY OF TRANSPORTATION ROUTES IN AND OUT OF THE SITE. YOU CAN GO NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, OR WEST. LaCHONE SHOWS YOU A COUPLE OF PICTURES HOW THE SITE SITS. IN SUMMARY, MR. CHAIRMAN, WE'RE HERE PRIMARILY AND SOLELY FOR ZONING CONSISTENCY AS REQUIRED FROM THE APPROVAL OF TAMPA CITY COUNCIL ON THE LAND USE AMENDMENT, SUPPORTED BY MANY, MANY COMPREHENSIVE POLICIES. THE NET INCREASE OF UNITS REALLY IS LOW. IT'S NOT A LARGE SITE. PROVIDES HOUSING OPTIONS AND TRANSPORTATION IS VERY SAFE. SO WITH THAT, HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN AND COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ONE, THE PICTURES YOU SHOWED WITHOUT CONTEXT OF WHERE THEY ARE GEOGRAPHICALLY REALLY IS NOT RELEVANT TO ME. THEY COULD BE ANYWHERE. I'M MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN PROXIMITY TO THE PARCEL THAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR REZONING. THE NEXT THING IS NONE OF THEM SHOWED 60-FOOT UNITS WHICH THE ZONING THAT YOU'VE ASKED FOR WOULD PERMIT BEING CONSTRUCTED WITH SETBACKS, OF COURSE, WHICH -- AT LEAST IN THE ONE PORTION, NOT REALLY USABLE. SO MY QUESTION WOULD BE, WHY YOU WOULDN'T COME, IF THE PLAN ISN'T TO BUILD TO 60, WHY WOULD YOU COME WITH A CLASSIFICATION THAT WAS MORE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS. >> WE DO FEEL THE CATEGORY CHOSEN IS COMPATIBLE BECAUSE IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE LAND USE CATEGORY. WE ALSO SENT OUT 60 NOTICES AND, OF COURSE, -- I DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK AGAINST IT, BUT WE SENT OUT QUITE A LARGE NUMBER OF NOTICES AND I WAS NOT MADE AWARE THERE WAS ANY IN OPPOSITION. THE PUSH OF ALL THE PLANNING POLICIES IS TO PROVIDE A MIX OF HOUSING AND TO PROVIDE MULTIFAMILY. THERE IS MULTIFAMILY ON THE BLOCK, AS I SHOWED THE ONE SLIDE. I CONCENTRATED ON THE BLOCK. NOT DIRECTLY NEXT DOOR BUT ON THE BLOCK IN THE GENERAL VICINITY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: AGAIN, IF YOU ARE NOT PLANNING TO BUILD TO 60, CLEARLY THERE IS EUCLIDEAN ZONING IN A LESSER CATEGORY THAT WOULD ALLOW YOU TO BUILD THE DENSITY WITHOUT THE HEIGHT, CORRECT? >> WELL, THE APPLICANT HAS NOT MOVED FORWARD FOR A SPECIFIC PLAN. THE INTEREST, OF COURSE, IS IN MAXIMIZING THE UNITS, AND THAT'S WHAT THIS CATEGORY DOES. AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION. THERE WERE A COUPLE OF PEOPLE AT THE LAND USE COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW, BUT WE'VE HAD NO PUSH-BACK ON IT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: AS I'M LOOKING AT THESE REQUESTS, I MEAN, EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT HERE, I FEEL LIKE IT IS MY JOB TO PROTECT THEM BECAUSE FOR PEOPLE THIS IS THEIR HOME. THIS IS THEIR SECURITY. AS WE APPROVE DEVELOPMENT CHANGES, I WANT TO MAKE SURE IT DOESN'T NEGATIVELY IMPACT THESE FOLKS EVEN IF THEY ARE UNWITTINGLY -- YOU KNOW, DON'T KNOW ABOUT IT. SEEMS LIKE THERE ARE A LOT OF SINGLE-FAMILY, SINGLE STORY, OR EVEN MAYBE A FEW TWO-STORY HOUSES BUT NOTHING BIGGER THAN THAT IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY. I'LL LET IT GO AT THAT. >> THE SITE CLEARLY IS NOT A HUGE SITE AND WOULD NOT LEND ITSELF TO A LOT OF HEIGHT. WHAT THE HEIGHT WOULD BE, I CAN'T ANSWER THAT AT THE MOMENT. >>LYNN HURTAK: MY QUESTION WAS GOING TO BE ABOUT PUBLIC OUTREACH. YOU SAID YOU WERE NOT -- YOU DIDN'T ACTUALLY SPEAK TO ANYONE. >> WE HAD A SERIES OF NOTICES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. AND WE HAD TWO NOTICES TO 60 RESIDENTS IN THE AREA PLUS, OF COURSE, SIGNS OUT THERE FOR I THINK ABOUT A MONTH, MONTH AND A HALF. THAT WAS THE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS MADE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE? IS THERE ANYBODY THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? PLEASE COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> HI. I'M DELGADO. I AM THE OWNER TO ONE OF THE ADJACENT LOTS. I'M THE ONE THAT YOU HAVE THE PICTURE, THE ONE THAT LOOKS LIKE THE L. MY QUESTION IS, HOW IS IT GOING TO AFFECT ME AND THE FOUR SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES THAT SIT, THREE TO MY LEFT, EAST, HALF-ACRE LOTS. MINE IS THREE-QUARTERS OF AN ACRE. THAT LOT IN QUESTION THAT'S EMPTY IS ABOUT AN ACRE. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO FIT 33 UNITS WHEN THE OTHER LOTS ONLY HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES? AND I HAVE THE BIGGEST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK, WHICH IS TWO STORY, STILL ONLY ONE FAMILY. HOW IS IT GOING TO AFFECT US AND THE NEIGHBORS ALONG LINEBAUGH AVENUE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE'LL HAVE THE APPLICANT RESPOND WITH THE ANSWER. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE HERE TO SPEAK? BRING IT ON UP, SIR. >> ARE YOU TALKING TO ME, SIR? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YEAH. >> I WAS ASKING THE YOUNG LADY WHERE SHE IS. SHE'S LOCATED RIGHT HERE. IS THAT CORRECT, MA'AM? >> YES. >> SHE'S ANSWERING YES. >> THE L-SHAPED LOT. >> WOULD YOU POINT? >> THIS ONE RIGHT HERE. THIS IS THE DRIVEWAY. THIS IS MY DRIVEWAY AND THIS IS MY HOME. >> OKAY. GOT IT. IN ANSWER, WHAT WAS PROPOSED WOULD BE A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. HEIGHT WOULD ONLY BE DETERMINED ONCE PENCIL IS PUT TO PAPER. BUT AGAIN, IT WILL BE LIKE A BIRTHDAY CAKE REQUIRING A BIGGER SETBACK FOR OVER 35 FEET. IT WOULD BE THE REAR OF HER LOT, WHICH YOU CAN SEE THERE'S SUBSTANTIAL BUFFERING AND SCREENING NATURALLY AT THE SITE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT FOR RM-24? RM-18 IS 35 FEET. MS. DOCK. >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED IN RM 24 IS 60 FEET. BUT AS YOUR HEIGHT INCREASES OVER 35 FEET, YOU MUST STEP BACK YOUR SETBACK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THIS BUILDING IS LIKE A LAYERED CAKE. ONCE YOU GO PAST THE THIRD FLOOR. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THE BUILDING ITSELF WOULD -- YES. THE SETBACK WOULD HAVE TO INCREASE, WHICH IS WHY GIVEN THIS LOT SIZE -- I CAN PUT UP THE SURVEY, WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO DEVELOP 60 FEET? I DON'T KNOW. AS YOU GO UP IN HEIGHT, THE SETBACK OF THAT BUILDING IS GOING TO STEP BACK ANOTHER FOOT, ANOTHER FOOT. YOU STILL HAVE TO PROVIDE PARKING PLUS THE OTHER CODE REQUIREMENTS. BUT THE CONCERN IS YOU CAN GET A STRUCTURE ON THIS SITE THAT IS OVER 35 FEET. IT MAY NOT BE 60, BUT IT COULD GO OVER 35 FEET. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AGAIN, JUST FOR THE RECORD, RM 18 IS 35 FEET CORRECT? >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: 60 FEET, IF THEY REACH AT 60-FOOT, AS YOU SAID, THE SETBACKS, HOW MANY STORIES DO YOU IFITY IN 60 FEET? IS IT FIVE, FOUR? >>LaCHONE DOCK: AT LEAST THE FIVE STORIES, BUT IT JUST DEPENDS ON THE DEVELOPMENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: BECAUSE OF THE SHAPE OF THE LOT, IT WOULD OBVIOUSLY BE, AS YOU SAID, IT WOULD BE SET BACK THE HIGHER THEY GO. >>LaCHONE DOCK: CORRECT. AND THIS WOULD JUST BE -- WHATEVER THE STRUCTURE IS AND THAT HEIGHT AND THE PLACEMENT, I'M ASSUMING STRUCTURES WOULD HAVE TO BE PLACED BACK HERE ON THIS LOT, ON THIS PROPERTY. SO THIS IS THE BACKYARD. THIS IS THE BACKYARDS OF THE HOMES TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AND THEN THIS IS HER YARD UP HERE, THE LADY THAT IS HERE NOW. SO THIS IS HER BACKYARD, THIS IS HER HEIGHT. THIS WOULD BE THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE REAR YARDS OF THESE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: AND IS THERE -- WHAT I SAW FROM THE OVERHEAD, IS THERE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER? ARE THERE EXISTING TREES THERE? >>LaCHONE DOCK: THERE ARE EXISTING TREES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO YOU HAVE AN IMAGE OF WHAT THOSE TREES% LOOK LIKE? IT'S NOT A COUPLE OF PALM TREES. IT'S TREE TREES. >>LaCHONE DOCK: I DON'T HAVE AN IMAGE OF THE TREES DIRECTLY ON-SITE BECAUSE WHEN I DROVE OUT ON-SITE, LIKE WHEN YOU'RE ON MISSION HILLS FO HER PROPERTY, IT'S HARD BECAUSE THIS HOME IS SET BACK SO FAR, IT'S HARD TO SEE. THESE ARE PRETTY DEEP LOTS. LIKE THIS LOT IS PRETTY LARGE. THESE ARE PRETTY LARGE PARCELS THAT ARE JUST KIND OF REMAINING, BUT THEY ARE THE SINGLE-FAMILY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN AND THEN HURTAK. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CAN YOU ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT? IS THERE ANYTHING IN PROXIMITY -- ANYTHING IN PROXIMITY TO THIS SITE THAT EXCEEDS ZONING THAT WOULD ALLOW ABOVE 35 FEET, ANYWHERE IN THIS AREA? >>LaCHONE DOCK: MAYBE ON -- EVEN LOOKING AT THE MULTIFAMILY THAT EXISTS ON THE EAST, WHEN YOU GET -- ONCE YOU APPROACH MYRTLE STREET. SO THESE, EVEN THESE ARE KIND OF WITHIN THAT HEIGHT. I DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING THAT WAS REALLY TALLER THAN THAT. IT'S POSSIBLE TOWARDS 52nd. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: I'M GOING TO ASK THE MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC IF YOU COULD COME UP. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> NOIANA DELGADO. >>LYNN HURTAK: DID YOU GET YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED? >> NO. I WANT TO KNOW HOW THESE 35 FAMILIES ARE GOING TO LIVE IN MY BACKYARD. THAT'S THE THING. TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAILS, THERE ARE ON LINEBAUGH AVENUE AND MISSION HILLS, TWO SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS. THOSE ARE MULTILEVEL, BUT THEY HAVE PLENTY OF SPACE. I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU'RE GOING TO GET 35 UNITS INTO A LANDLOCKED LOT. WHERE IS YOUR EASEMENT? WHERE IS THE TRAFFIC? HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET -- BECAUSE MY NEXT CONCERN IS, WHEN YOU APPROVE THIS, OH, CAN WE BORROW YOUR DRIVEWAY? I DO HAVE AN EASEMENT FOR THEM TO GET TO THEIR LANDLOCKED LOT FOR 35 FAMILIES. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WANT IT CLEAR IN MY MIND. THE LOT THAT YOU OWN WHERE YOU BUILT YOUR HOME, WAS THAT LAND LOCKED AT ONE TIME? >> NO. MINE SITS ON LINEBAUGH AVENUE. THE LOT THAT IS IN QUESTION IS LANDLOCKED BY MY LOT AND THE DUPLEX LOT ON 97th. IT SITS IN THE MIDDLE -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: L SHAPE THAT COMES BACK? >> NO, MINE IS L BUT THAT'S -- YEAH. THIS IS MINE. MINE WAS NEVER LANDLOCKED. THIS IS MINE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THAT'S YOURS, RIGHT? >> YEAH. AND THERE IS A HOUSE. RIGHT HERE, THIS IS A HOME AND THIS DRIVEWAY, THAT'S MY EASEMENT FROM THE STREET AND THIS IS MY HOME. AND THIS IS THE SITE THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING. THERE ARE PLENTY OF TREES THERE IN BETWEEN MY YARD AND THE PROPOSED SITE, BUT THEN THESE -- OVER HERE, THESE ARE ALREADY BUILT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IT LOOKS LIKE YOU HAVE ABOUT A 45-FOOT WIDE LOT AREA TO GET BACK INTO YOUR HOUSE OR 50-FOOT. I DON'T KNOW THE WIDTH OF IT COMING DOWN. >> I HAVE A DECENT SIZE YARD. BUT IT'S ONLY ONE FAMILY. IT'S ONLY FOUR PEOPLE LIVING THERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: CAN YOU PULL UP THE SCREEN A LITTLE BIT? I WANT TO SEE YOUR PARCEL IN QUESTION. THERE IS A ROAD THERE -- YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THIS SITE, CORRECT? >> I WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THE ONLY ACCESS TO THE SITE IS ON 97th, WHICH IS HERE. THE ACCESS TO THE SITE WOULD BE HERE. THERE'S NO ACCESS TO THE REAR. TO THE LADY'S PROPERTY. IT'S JUST ONLY TO 97th HERE. THE ASSEMBLAGE. THIS IS THE ASSEMBLAGE, AND THIS WOULD BE THE ACCESS POINT HERE. THE LADY IS HERE. THERE'S NO ACCESS TO THE REAR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD SIR? CLOSING COMMENTS? >> AGAIN THAT WE CONTACT THE 60 RESIDENTS IN THE AREA AND WE JUST HAD ONE, WITH GREAT RESPECT, WE HAVE ONE WOMAN HERE, THANK YOU, THAT APPEARS TO HAVE A WIDE BUFFER AND VERY INTENSIVE SCREENING. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ ITEM NUMBER 2. >>LUIS VIERA: SO I'M VERY CONFLICTED ON THIS ONE. WE OBVIOUSLY NEED HOUSING IN THE CITY OF TAMPA. WE IDENTIFY CERTAIN AREAS, REALLY ALL THE CITY OF TAMPA IS OBVIOUSLY RIPE FOR HOUSING. IT'S NOT RELEVANT TO THE YOU KNOW, I'M GOING BACK AND FORTH ON THIS ONE, TO BE HONEST. I AM. I THINK THAT WE CAN READ IT ON FIRST READING, PASS IT FORWARD, AND THEN MAYBE HAVE THE APPLICANT CONTINUE TO REACH OUT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THEN SEE WHERE IT GOES ON THE SECOND ROUND. TURNING AWAY A LEVEL OF HOUSING, IT'S A -- LET ME DO THIS. I'LL READ IT, SEE WHERE IT GOES. LET'S SEE WHERE IT GOES. READ AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 5006 EAST 97th% AVENUE AND FOLIO NUMBER 142834-0025 142830-5075 142830-5050, 142830-5025 AND 142830-5000, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, TO RM-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I FIND THAT THE APPLICANT HAS MET ITS BURDEN OF PROOF TO PROVIDE COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THE REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT AND I ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND REASONING OF THE SAID REPORT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'LL SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? >> NO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: FOR CLARIFICATION -- YEAH, LET'S DO A ROLL CALL. SOUNDED LIKE 3-3. GO AHEAD. >>THE CLERK: CARLSON? HURTAK? >>LYNN HURTAK: NO. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: NO. >>GWEN HENDERSON: NO. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: HURTAK, CLENDENIN, HENDERSON VOTING NO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IT'S A TIE VOTE. IT WILL COME BACK AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING WHEN WE HAVE A FULL COUNCIL, AND THEN WE WOULD TAKE IT UP THERE. >>LUIS VIERA: I HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. SHELBY. IT'S CLOSE, SO I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK TO THE APPLICANT, RIGHT? BUT DURING THIS TIME MR. PRESSMAN CAN MEET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND MAYBE LOOK AT POTENTIAL REFORMS IN HIS DISCRETION, IF HE WISHES IN THE PROJECT, AM I CORRECT? I'M GETTING A NO. STRIKE THE SECOND QUESTION. >>MARTIN SHELBY: WELL, THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION IS WHAT NORMALLY HAPPENS AT A SITUATION SUCH AS THIS IS THE HEARING IS AUTOMATICALLY REOPENED. SO LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT THE HEARING IS REOPENED, WHICH MEANS THAT THE MOTION HAS TO COME BACK. IT FAILS. SO A NEW MOTION HAS TO BE MADE. THE COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON WOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE REVIEWED THE RECORD AND BE PREPARED TO VOTE. CUSTOMARILY, IF HE HAS NO QUESTIONS AND IS PREPARED TO VOTE, THE HEARING WILL THEN BE CLOSED. A NEW MOTION IS MADE AND A VOTE IS THEN TAKEN ON THAT MOTION. >>LUIS VIERA: NO. MY POINT IS -- WELL, YOU KNOW WHAT, I THINK MY POINT -- I'M NOT GOING TO SAY ANYTHING. DISREGARD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU. NEXT REGULAR MEETING, WOULD THAT BE NEXT THURSDAY? >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE POSSIBLE BECAUSE I'M GOING TO BE OUT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HOW ABOUT JUNE 6? >> I'M OUT OF TOWN ON JUNE 6. >> CAN THE APPLICANT CHANGE HIS REQUEST BETWEEN THIS MEETING AND THE NEXT MEETING? I'M DOING IT VERY GENERALLY. I KNOW YOU WERE GOING TO GET INTO SPECIFICS. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I GUESS THAT IS A QUESTION -- >>LYNN HURTAK: IT WOULD BE THE 20th. >> CATE WELLS, LEGAL DEPARTMENT, WITH REGARD TO THAT QUESTION, THE APPLICANT CAN ALWAYS REQUEST A ZONING DISTRICT THAT IS LESS INTENSE. SO I THINK WHAT WAS DISCUSSED THIS EVENING, RM 18, THEY CAN -- THEY CAN'T GO HIGHER OR EXPAND THE SCOPE OF THE ZONING AREA. WITH REGARD TO THE ONE COMMENT ABOUT MEETING WITH THE PUBLIC AND MAYBE YOU CAN MAKE SOME REFORMS, THIS ISN'T SITE PLAN CONTROLLED. IT IS EUCLIDEAN. SO I THINK THE ONLY REFORM POTENTIALLY WOULD BE CONSIDERING A LESS DENSE ZONING DISTRICT THAT WOULD STILL ALLOW FOR THE MULTIFAMILY TYPE DEVELOPMENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. >>LYNN HURTAK: I'M ACTUALLY JUST GOING TO MAKE A PLEA. CAN WE DO ANOTHER VOTE OR ARE WE DONE? >>MARTIN SHELBY: LET ME TAKE A LOOK. >>LYNN HURTAK: CATE IS NODDING. SHE SAID YES. I WANT TO MAKE A BIT OF AN ARGUMENT THAT TECHNICALLY YOU CAN'T GO UP, BUT YOU'RE GONNA BE ABLE TO GO UP. IT'S GONNA BE MORE THAN THREE STORIES. AND I THINK THAT LOOKING AT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD NOW, THAT THAT'S NOT APPROPRIATE. IT DOESN'T MATTER. FOUR STORIES IS WAY TOO MUCH. THREE STORIES IS GOING TO BE HIGHER THAN ANYTHING ALREADY. I THINK THREE STORIES IS IT A MAX -- IS A MAX THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD CAN HANDLE WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT CONSISTENCY WITH WHAT'S SURROUNDING IT. SO I'M GOING TO ARGUE THAT WE SHOULD TRY FOR A DENIAL. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY WOULD BE WILLING FOR THAT. BUT STAIR STEPPING ISN'T GOING TO SAVE THE NEIGHBORS FROM A FOUR TO FIVE FOOT BUILDING -- I'M SORRY, FOUR TO FIVE STORY BUILDING. >>LUIS VIERA: FOR ME, I'M TRYING BALANCE A NUMBER OF THINGS, INCLUDING HOUSING IN THIS AREA, ET CETERA. YOUR SENTIMENTS I'M VERY, VERY SYMPATHETIC TO AND I'LL LEAVE IT AT THAT FOR THE RECORD. BUT, YEAH, I'LL -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: SORRY, I DON'T WANT TO INTERPRET. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I HAVE A QUESTION, AND MAYBE THIS IS BACK TO STAFF. MAYBE THE GOOD THING FOR THE APPLICANT OF US HANDLING THIS THE WAY WE DID THIS EVENING IS IT GIVES THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAYBE RETHINK AND MAYBE GO IN A DIRECTION THAT WAY. BUT IF WE DID IT THIS WAY, IT'S DONE RIGHT? >>MARTIN SHELBY: THERE IS ANOTHER OPTION. THERE IS A THIRD OPTION. AND THIS IS, AGAIN, SO THE COUNCIL IS CLEAR FOR THE RECORD AND SO IS THE APPLICANT, WE ARE REFERRING TO -- I WANT TO RECITE CHAPTER AND VERSE. RELYING ON RULE 6 UNDER QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING. RULE H, IF A MOTION IN A QUASI-JUDIIAL MATTER FAILS TO RECEIVE AT LEAST FOUR VOTES, THE MOTION FAILS. IF ANOTHER MOTION IN ORDER IS NOT MADE, THE PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE AUTOMATICALLY REOPENED AND CONTINUED TO A TIME CERTAIN AT THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING, AGAIN, SUBJECT TO YOUR SCHEDULE. SO THE OTHER THING IS THAT IF COUNCIL WISHES TO REOPEN THIS PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME, THEY CAN INQUIRE OF THE APPLICANT IF HE WISHES TO ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE OR TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THE REZONING. OTHERWISE IT WOULD MOVE FORWARD AS PLANNED TO AN AVAILABLE DATE, SUBJECT TO EVERYONE'S AVAILABILITY. >> YES, WE -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: REOPEN, PLEASE. >>LYNN HURTAK: I WOULD STILL LIKE THE CHANCE TO MAKE THE OTHER MOTION FIRST. I DON'T WANT TO HEAR FROM -- I WANT TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE MOTION TO DENY AND SEE WHERE IT GOES. THAT'S THE OPTION, CORRECT? >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU HAVE THAT RIGHT. IF THAT IS SECONDED, THAT'S ON THE FLOOR. >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY. I'LL GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION TO DENY REZ 23-84 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5006 EAST 97th AVENUE, FOLIO NUMBER 142,834.0025 142,830.5075 142,830.5050, 142,830.5025 AND 142,830.5000 FROM RS-60 TO RM-24. DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE APPLICANT TO MEET ITS BURDEN OF PROOF TO PROVIDE COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD THAT THE REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE CITY CODE. ALSO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND REASONINGS OF THE CITY STAFF. BUT MAINLY THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF COMPATIBILITY AS ADOPTED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ALTHOUGH THE REQUESTED ZONING DISTRICT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN THE RS 30 DESIGNATION, THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL IS OF A HEIGHT, SCALE, MASS, AND BULK THAT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES LOCATED NEAR OR ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY. AND ALTHOUGH COMPATIBILITY DOES NOT MEAN THE SAME AS, IT REQUIRES A SENSITIVITY OF DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE CHARACTER OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS. THE PROPOSED REZONING WHICH ALLOWS CONSIDERATION OF UP TO 34 DWELLING UNITS AT MAX I AM HEIGHT OF 60 FEET OR POSSIBLY SIX STORIES IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND ATTACHED USES. THIS ALLOWABLE HEIGHT IS OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE SURROUNDING BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND ALLOWS FOR A SCALE THAT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN NOR APPROPRIATE IN THE CENTER OF AN ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL SINGLE AND MULTIFAMILY BLOCK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, I'LL ASK FOR A ROLL CALL VOTE. >>THE CLERK: VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: NO. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO. >> CARLSON? HURTAK? >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO. >>MARTIN SHELBY: WHAT HAPPENS NOW IS THAT IF THERE IS A MOTION THAT IS MADE TO CONTINUE IT TO A DATE AND TIME CERTAIN, THE HEARING IS AUTOMATICALLY REOPENED. IF THERE IS A DESIRE OF CITY COUNCIL TO DISCUSS THIS FURTHER, THERE COULD BE A MOTION TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING NOW. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA, SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. ALL IN FAVOR? THE HEARING IS REOPENED. >>LUIS VIERA: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK'S MOTION, THERE IS SYMPATHY I HAVE WITH THAT, I DO. I BELIEVE IN TRYING TO KEEP THIS ALIVE TO GET THE GOOD OUT OF WHAT WE CAN FOR THE HOUSING. I THINK THAT'S VERY, VERY IMPORTANT HERE. BUT, AGAIN, I AM VERY SYMPATHETIC ON THE ISSUE OF SCALE AND MASSING, ET CETERA. SO THAT'S JUST -- YEAH, THAT'S IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HOW IS JUNE 20th? >> I THINK THAT WILL BE FINE. BEAR WITH ME ONE SECOND, PLEASE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CAN THE APPLICANT -- >> YEAH, JUNE 20 WORKS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CAN THE APPLICANT TODAY AT THIS HEARING AMEND HIS REQUEST FOR A LOWER EUCLIDEAN REZONING REQUEST? >> MAY I RESPOND TO THAT? I DO WANT TO CONSIDER IT BUT I DON'T KNOW ALL THE CHANGES. I DON'T WANT TO JUMP -- DEFINITELY WANT TO CONSIDER IT AND WE WILL CONSIDER IT. I NEED TO UNDERSTAND IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ALSO WHAT CAN HAPPEN IS AFTER THIS HEARING, IF THE APPLICANT DESIRES TO LOWER HIS REQUEST AND REQUEST TO AMEND IT FOR RM 18, HE CAN DO SO. WE CAN CERTAINLY GO BACK TO ANOTHER FIRST READING, IF HE DOES IT BETWEEN NOW AND THE NEXT READING, AND THEN YOU WOULD HEAR THE CASE AND THEN VOTE AGAIN. THAT HAPPENS SOMETIMES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND COUNCILMAN -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. IN FACT, WHAT I WAS HOPEFUL IS THAT THE APPLICANT AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR THE NEIGHBORS GET TOGETHER AND SEE WHAT CAN BE DONE. HOUSING IS NEEDED HERE SO BADLY. I'M NOT HERE TO PUSH ANYTHING ON ANYBODY. IT'S VERY DIFFICULT. I DON'T DISAGREE OR AGREE WITH ANYTHING THAT MY COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE SAID, BUT THERE IS A NEED AND THERE IS A COMPROMISE THAT COULD BE WORKED OUT. WHEN YOU LOOK AT FEET, FIVE FEET, FROM HOME TO FIRST IS 90 FEET, HOME TO SECOND 120 FEET, HOME TO PITCHER MOUND, 160 FEET. THAT GIVES YOU THE SCALE. MAYBE WITHIN THAT 60 FEET THERE COULD BE A CHANGE AND THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING. I CAN'T SPEAK FOR EITHER ONE FOR THE HOMEOWNER WHO I UNDERSTAND WHAT SHE'S SAYING AND FOR THE DEVELOPER, UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE SAYING. JUST THROWING THAT OUT TO SEE WHAT WOULD HAPPEN. THANK YOU. >>LYNN HURTAK: THE ONLY THING I WOULD RECOMMEND IS THAT YOU GET CONTACT INFO FOR THE NEIGHBORS SO THAT MAYBE THERE COULD BE MORE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN HER AND THEN MAYBE SOME OTHER NEIGHBORS AS WELL. YES, BUT I THINK A CHANGE OF ZONING TO SOMETHING A LITTLE LESS HIGH WOULD PROBABLY -- MIGHT GET A DIFFERENT VOTE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST A REMINDER COUNCIL. THIS IS SOMEWHAT DIFFERENT THAN YOUR USUAL 3-3 TIE. MY RECOMMENDATION NOW THAT THE HEARING IS OPEN, COULD BE A REQUEST FROM MR. PRESSMAN FOR A DATE -- A CONTINUANCE. OF COURSE, I WILL ASK COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON TO HAVE REVIEWED THE RECORD SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO GO THROUGH A WHOLE FULL HEARING BUT YOU COULD BEGIN BY HEARING FROM THE APPLICANT, NOT JUST CLOSING THE HEARING RIGHT OFF THE BAT AND BE ABLE TO HAVE TO VOTE. MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO SEE WHAT'S ACCEPTABLE TO THE CLERK AND TO COUNCIL AND CERTAINLY TO MR. PRESSMAN FOR A DATE FOR CONTINUANCE. >> JUNE 20 WOULD WORK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA, SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. JUNE 20, 2024, HERE, 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR. ALL IN FAVOR? >>MARTIN SHELBY: DID WE SAY A TIME? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: 1:00, 10:30? >>MARTIN SHELBY: 10:30 FOR A FIRST READING? IT WILL CHANGE BY THEN, PERHAPS. DON'T LEAVE UNTIL WE HAVE A DATE. WHERE IS THE PUBLIC? SHE IS OUT. COULD WE CALL THEM BACK, PLEASE? I WANT THEM TO HEAR THIS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A 1:30 REVIEW HEARINGS. 1 WILL BE 1:30 BY THEN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS 1:30 GOOD? >>MARTIN SHELBY: 1:30 IN THE AFTERNOON THAT DAY? >> OF THE 20th? >> FOR MYSELF, YES. >> YEAH, I'LL MAKE IT HAPPEN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. WE'LL SEE YOU THEN. >> THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ITEM NUMBER 3. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN AND COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 3 IS REZ 24-28 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 1102 WEST OHIO AVENUE. THIS REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS 60 TO RS 50. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO DAVID TO GIVE HIS REPORT AND I'LL COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS. DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. WE MOVE DOWN TO THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS NEXT CASE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD. PLYMOUTH PARK TO THE SOUTHEAST AND FREEDOM PARK TO THE NORTHEAST ARE THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITIES. THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE COASTAL PLANNING AREA AND MORE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED IN EVACUATION ZONE C. HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL. THE SUBJECT SITE IS RIGHT THERE IN THE CENTER. THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL THE TAN COLOR IS THAT RESIDENTIAL 10. YOU ONLY GET ADDITIONAL INTENSITY AND DENSITY UP ALONG DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD WITH THE PINK. THAT'S ALL THE COMMUNITY MIX%-@. AND THEN THESE ARE THE PARKS IN GREEN WITH THE REC OPEN SPACE CATEGORY. I SHOULD HAVE SHOWN THE AERIAL. BUT THE AERIAL YOU CAN SEE THAT IT'S MOSTLY ALL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. THE SUBJECT SITE AGAIN IS WITHIN THAT RESIDENTIAL 10. THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL IN CHARACTER. THIS PORTION OF WEST OHIO AVENUE BETWEEN NORTH RIDGE AVENUE AND NORTH OAKDALE AVENUE, EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE, HAS AN EXISTING DENSITY OF 5.56 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. THAT IS BASED ON TEN SAMPLE SITES WITHIN THAT BLOCK. THE EXISTING DENSITY ON THIS PORTION OF WEST OHIO AVENUE IS APPROXIMATELY 55% OF THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION. THE PROPOSED REZONING WILL ALLOW CONSIDERATION OF TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED ZONING LOTS AT A DENSITY OF 6.45 UNITS PER ACRE ON THE SUBJECT SITE IN AN AREA PLANNED FOR UP TO 10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF SINGLE-FAMILY USES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA AND THE PROPOSED DENSITY, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THAT THE REQUEST WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AND IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THIS PORTION OF WEST OHIO AVENUE. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOGNIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS SEEKING TO PROMOTE COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT OF NEIGHBORHOODS TO ENSURE ECONOMIC HEALTH AND THAT AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF LAND IS PLANNED FOR THE CITY'S GROWING POPULATION. BY APPROVAL OF THE REZONING, THE SUBJECT SITE HAS THE POTENTIAL TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFILL HOUSING ON AN UNDERUTILIZED PARCEL WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES FIND THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. >>LUIS VIERA: I DON'T HAVE A QUESTION. I'M JUST GOING TO SAY, DAVID, IT'S GOOD TO SEE YOU AT CITY COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I SECOND. >>LUIS VIERA: I MEAN THAT. >>DAVID HEY: THEY BRING ME OUT EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE. >>LUIS VIERA: YOU ARE A GENTLEMAN. >>DAVID HEY: THANKS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU AGAIN, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. SO THIS REQUEST FOR THE RS 50 ZONING IS FOR A PROPERTY WITH A LOT AREA OF 13,650 SQUARE FEET. THE LOT FRONTAGE IS 105 FEET AND THEN THE DEPTH IS 130 FEET. IN THIS ZONING DISTRICT, MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 35 FEET IS PERMITTED. THIS IS THE SURVEY SUBMITTED. THIS IS OHIO AVENUE. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE CORNER. IT IS A CORNER SITE. THIS IS KENYAN AVENUE THAT'S LOCATED HERE. THIS IS THE 105 FEET OF WIDTH AND THIS IS THE DEPTH OF THE LOT. IT HAS THE EXISTING ONE-STORY HOME ON THE SITE. THIS IS A PART OF NORTH RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION. BLOCK 23, LOT 1 IN THE EAST 45 FEET OF LOT 2. THE RS 50 ZONING DISTRICT REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET SO THIS WOULD MEET THE STANDARD. IF IT WERE DIVIDED IT WOULD MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RS 50. I WANT TO SHOW YOU THE ZONING MAP AND THEN I'LL SHOW THE CONFORMING MAP AND DISCUSS IT. SO THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT'S LOCATED HERE IN RED. THIS IS KENYAN AVENUE. THIS IS OHIO. THIS IS RIDGE AVENUE. THIS IS OAKDALE, JUST AS A POINT OF REFERENCE. BUT THIS SITE YOU CAN SEE HAS THE ZONING SURROUNDING IT OF RS 60. YOU DO HAVE A COUPLE OF PD REZONINGS THAT ARE NORTH OF THE SITE. SO THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. WITHIN ONE BLOCK IS THE PD. THIS WAS A PD THAT WAS APPROVED IN 06. THIS ALSO WAS A SPLIT THAT WAS APPROVED. THESE TWO PDs THAT ARE LOCATED HERE IS THE SAME. I'LL SHOW YOU ON THE CONFORMING MAP AND YOU CAN SEE THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVE AISLE FROM THE ROADWAY TO SEE THAT THESE WERE SPLIT. ALSO AND APPROVED. BUT THE REMAINDER OF THE ZONING IS THE RS 60. AS YOU CROSS THE RIVER, YOU HAVE THE RS 50 ZONING FURTHER NORTHWEST. SO THIS IS THE CONFORMING MAP. SO THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE THAT'S HATCHED HERE. THIS IS THE SUBJECT BLOCK, OF COURSE. SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS BLOCK IS UNIQUE. IT IS AT THE END OF THE ROAD. OHIO AND RIDGE AVENUE IS HERE. ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY ON THE WEST IS A VACANT LOT. SO THIS IS A BIT UNIQUE COMPARED TO THE BLOCK PATTERN OF THE REMAINDER OF THE ANALYSIS AREA. WHICH HAS COMPLETE BLOCKS ON IT. I'LL READ THE ANALYSIS THAT WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS BLOCK, THIS ONE AND THEN THIS BLOCK ALSO TO THE SOUTH. IN THE STAFF REPORT, STARTING ON PAGE 3 OF THE STAFF REPORT CONTAINS THE ANALYSIS. SO THE AREA OF ANALYSIS AND IF THAT MAP COULD REMAIN, PLEASE. THE AREA OF ANALYSIS INCLUDES 234 TOTAL ZONING LOTS. 233 LOTS ARE 95% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER AND 11 LOTS OR 5% HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS. THE SUBJECT BLOCK IS THE SMALLEST BLOCK IN THE STUDY AREA. PURSUANT TO A REVIEW OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, THE SUBJECT BLOCK ON WEST OHIO AVENUE, THIS IS FROM NORTH KINYON TO NORTH RIDGE AVENUE CONTAINS SEVEN TOTAL ZONING LOTS, INCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE WITH ONE OR 14 PERCENT OF THE LOTS DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH LESS THAN 59.99 FEET. AND SIX OR 86% OF THOSE LOTS BEING DEVELOPED WITH A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER. ONE BLOCK SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ON WEST WOODLAWN AVENUE, THIS IS BETWEEN NORTH KINYON AND NORTH RIDGE AVENUE, CONTAINS 8 TOTAL ZONING LOTS WITH ONE LOT BEING DEVELOPED AT 59.99 FEET OF WIDTH OR LESS. AND SEVEN LOTS DEVELOPED AT 60 FEET OR GREATER. ONE BLOCK EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WHICH IS LOCATED HERE, ON WEST OHIO AVENUE, THIS IS FROM NORTH KINYON AVENUE TO NORTH OAKDALE AVENUE, CONTAINS TEN TOTAL ZONING LOTS WITH 100% OF THE LOTS DEVELOPED AT A WIDTH OF 60 FEET OR GREATER. SO BASED ON THE ANALYSIS, STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT, BUT AS WE DESCRIBE, AS I DESCRIBED EARLIER, THE UNIQUENESS OF THIS BLOCK IS UNDER CONSIDERATION, AND THEN IT IS NOT LIKE THE REMAINDER OF THE BLOCK THAT'S WITHIN THE STUDY AREA. I HAVE PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING. THIS IS THE SITE. IT IS A PRETTY WIDE LOT CURRENTLY, SO I HAVE A COUPLE OF PICTURES. THIS IS THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE. THAT'S ANOTHER VIEW. YOU CAN SEE THE OTHER END OF THE SITE THAT'S LOCATED THERE. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE, SO THIS IS THE EAST SIDE OF THE SITE. THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE EAST. SO THIS IS EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, SO THIS IS ACROSS THE STREET. THIS IS AT THE CORNER AT KINYON. THIS IS THE VIEW, THE SUBJECT SITE IS OFF TO THE RIGHT IN THIS PICTURE. THIS IS IF YOU'RE LOOKING EAST ON OHIO. THIS IS THE NORTHEAST CORNER. THIS IS NORTHEAST OF THE SITE. IT'S NOT THE NORTHEAST CORNER. IT'S NORTHEAST OF THE SITE BUT IT'S ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE SITE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS BEHIND IN THIS PICTURE. THIS IS NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AND THIS IS FURTHER NORTH, WE'RE APPROACHING RIDGE. AND THEN THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW JUST SHOWING YOU AN ANGLE OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THAT IS THE VACANT AND NEXT TO IT IS THE VACANT PARCELS. AND THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT FOR ITEM NUMBER 3? >> GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL MEMBERS AND FRIENDS AND HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY TO YOU ALL AND ALL THE MOTHERS IN YOUR FAMILY, ESPECIALLY DIANA, MY WIFE THAT'S HERE WITH US. ANTHONY SCAGLIONE. THANK YOU FOR HEARING US TODAY FOR MY PROPERTY AT 1102 WEST OHIO AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA. I'M HERE WITH MY WIFE AND FOUR NEIGHBOR FRIENDS THAT HAVE COME TO SPEAK ON OUR BEHALF. KNOWING HOW VALUABLE YOUR TIME IS AND MY FELLOW CITIZENS HERE TONIGHT, I PREPARED COMMENTS WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO HOPEFULLY DEMONSTRATE THE MERIT OF OUR REQUEST AND YOUR APPROVAL. OUR APPLICATION NUMBER IS REZ 24-28, REQUESTING TO BE REZONED FROM RESIDENTIAL 60 SINGLE-FAMILY TO RESIDENTIAL 50 SINGLE-FAMILY. WE'RE REPRESENTING OURSELVES HAVING NO ATTORNEY OR CONSULTANT, AND THIS APPLICATION IS FOR OUR PERSONAL FAMILY USE. WE COME BEFORE YOU RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING YOUR CONSIDERATION FOR OUR REZONING REQUEST SO OUR FAMILY CAN HAVE EXPANDED HOUSING OPTIONS AT OUR PROPERTY, A TWO-BEDROOM, ONE BATH HOUSE ON DOUBLE SIZE CORNER LOT MEASURED 105 FEET IN THE FRONT, 130 FEET DEEP IN RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS. YOUR APPROVAL WOULD ALLOW ANOTHER DWELLING TO BE BUILT ON THE PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD GIVE OUR EXTENDED FAMILY BETTER HOUSNG OPTIONS, PARTICULARLY FOR DIANA'S MOTHER, MY MOTHER-IN-LAW, CARMEN, WHO IS WIDOWED, PHYSICALLY DISABLED AND THAT WE ARE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR. A LITTLE BACKGROUND. MY FAMILY, THE SCAGLIONES IMMIGRATED LIKE MANY TAMPA FAMILIES FROM SICILY TO WORK IN YBOR CITY AND START A NEW LIFE. FIRST SMALL HOME AND BUSINESS WAS IN YBOR CITY. IN THE 1950s, ONCE THEY SAVED ENOUGH MONEY, THEY BOUGHT PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF YBOR CITY IN A NEIGHBORHOOD THEN CALLED BUFFALO HEIGHTS, NOW RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS. THEY BROUGHT IN TRUCKLOADS OF FILL DIRT, LEVELED THE GROUND BY HAND. RECYCLED BRICKS FROM A DESTROYED BAKERY AND BUILT THEIR HOME AT 2902 NORTH PERRY BRICK BY BRICK. DRILLED AN ARTESIAN WELL IN THE BACKYARD FOR DRINKING WATER. OUR FAMILY HAS CONTRIBUTED, CARED FOR AND LOVED THE NEIGHBORHOOD ALONG WITH TAMPA FOR OVER 70 YEARS. FROM THIS UNIQUE BACKGROUND, I KNOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD VERY WELL AND CONTINUE TO LOVE IT TODAY. COMMUNITY OUTREACH. BEFORE WE STARTED THE APPLICATION PROCESS, WE SPOKE TO OUR IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORS AND EXTENDED NEIGHBORS ABOUT THE REZONE IDEA AND RECEIVED AN OUTPOURING OF SUPPORT. WE SUBMITTED BY E-MAIL TODAY TO THE QUASI-E-MAIL BOX OUR SUPPORT LETTER SIGNED BY 45 NEIGHBORS AND TAMPA RESIDENTS. WE ALSO HAVE FOUR NEIGHBORS HERE TONIGHT TO SPEAK ON OUR BEHALF. I'LL TRY TO USE THIS. THIS IS A COPY THAT WE SUBMITTED OF THE SIGNED LETTER THAT I CAN GIVE TO THE CITY TONIGHT. WE BEGAN OUR OUTREACH OVER A YEAR AGO IN MARCH OF 2023 BEFORE WE STARTED THE FORMAL PROCESS BY MAKING PHONE CALLS, HOUSE CALLS, KNOCKING ON DOORS AND VISITS AND THEN ULTIMATELY MAILING THE REQUIRED GOOD NEIGHBOR LETTER APRIL 3rd WITH MY PERSONAL CELL PHONE AND E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR DIRECT COMMUNICATION. I DID GET SOME CALLBACKS AND OUR NEIGHBOR, MR. GILLWRIGHT THEN MET WITH ME AND SIGNED OUR LETTER OF SUPPORT. WE RECEIVED NO CONCERNS OR OPPOSITION. ALL BEST EFFORTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO ENSURE OUR NEIGHBORS ARE SUPPORTIVE OF OUR REQUEST AND WE BELIEVE THROUGH THE PROCESS THEY ARE. WE'RE CONFIDENT THROUGH THE CONVERSATIONS WITH NEIGHBORS AND FOLLOWING SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AT OUR -- THAT OUR REQUEST, IF GRANTED WOULD BE POSITIVE FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND MAINTAIN OUR UNIQUE CHARACTER. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. LET THESE DOCUMENTS AND MAPS SHOW THAT WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ZONING A PARCEL DIFFERENT THAN MANY OF WHAT OUR NEIGHBORS HAVE. IN THE STAFF REPORT, WHICH SHOWS A LOT OF GOOD INFORMATION, THE STAFF REPORT IS OVERALL VERY FAVORABLE AND POSITIVE FOR OUR REQUEST. ON THE MAP THAT MS. DOCK REFERRED TO EARLIER, THERE ARE SOME ELEMENTS THAT ARE HELPFUL ON THIS MAP. I THINK WHAT IT SHOWS REALLY THAT WE'VE GOT A MELTING POT IN THE VICINITY OF OUR PROPERTY OF DIFFERENT PROPERTY SIZES AND TYPES AND USES. THIS MAP IS A THREE-BLOCK BUFFER OR A 1300 FEET. THERE ARE 11 PROPERTIES THAT ARE THE SIZE LOT THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR OR SMALLER. INCLUDING MR. GILL RAY'S PROPERTY DIRECTLY SOUTH ON WOODLAWN, WHICH IS A 50-FOOT LOT. THESE GREEN DOTS ARE -- THOSE ARE THE NINE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORS THAT WE WERE ABLE TO REACH DIRECTLY AND SIGN A LETTER OF SUPPORT. IN ADDITION TO MR. GILL RAY'S PROPERTY, THERE IS A SECOND PROPERTY ON RIDGE, AND THEN A THIRD PROPERTY ON PERRY THAT EACH HAVE A 55-FOOT LOT, WHICH IS THE SAME SIZE OR LESS THAN WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR. STARTING TWO BLOCKS AWAY, YOU GET INTO RS 50. SOME OF THIS HAS BEEN MENTIONED ALREADY. THERE ARE SOME CONDOS NORTH ON KENTUCKY. AND THE UNIQUENESS OF HOW SMALL MY BLOCK IS. WHILE ALL THIS INFORMATION WE BELIEVE IS HELPFUL AND SHOWS THAT WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, IN OUR CASE, THIS MAP IS NOT AN ACCURATE PORTRAYAL OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MAKEUP FOR A VERY IMPORTANT REASON. RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS IS A VERY BIG NEIGHBORHOOD. IT MEASURES ABOUT ONE MILE NORTH TO SOUTH FROM MLK DOWN TO COLUMBUS DRIVE AND ABOUT A MILE EAST TO WEST IN THE WIDEST PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO I WENT TO THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S CUSTOMER SERVICE, AND SUBMITTED TO THE RECORD FOLIO LIST OF 3,000-FOOT -- 3,000-FOOT BUFFER FROM OUR PROPERTY, AND USING A 3,000-FOOT BUFFER, THAT COVERS MOST OF RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS, NOT ALL, BUT MOST OF IT, AND YOU HAVE 420 HOMES WITH -- EXCUSE ME, PROPERTIES WITH PARCEL SIZES OF WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR THAT SIZE OR SMALLER. AND THEN IF YOU GO OUT A MILE, WHICH COMPLETELY COVERS RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS AND SOME OF THE OTHER AREAS, YOU GET OVER 2,300 HOMES WITH THE PARCEL SIZE THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR. WRAPPING UP HERE, SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS, SOME OF THIS HAS BEEN MENTIONED BY I BELIEVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ALREADY. THE ZONING THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS -- MEETS THE STANDARD OR THE MATRIX -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: TURN IT AROUND. >> SORRY. FIRST TIME USING THIS. MEETS THE STANDARD OF WHAT'S CALLED FOR IN THE CODE. AND THAT'S IT FOR SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. IN SUMMARY, COMBINING OUR BROAD COMMUNITY SUPPORT AND SUPPORTING TECHNICAL DATA, WE ASK THAT YOU PLEASE GRANT OUR REQUEST SO OUR FAMILY CAN HAVE BETTER AND EXPANDED HOUSING OPTIONS WHILE WE CONTRIBUTE TO OUR WONDERFUL NEIGHBORHOOD AND BELOVED HOME IN THE CITY OF TAMPA. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS? ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES T SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 3, PLEASE COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. GRAHAM. 908 WEST PLYMOUTH AVENUE, NEIGHBOR OF ANTHONY AND DIANA SCAGLIONE. SON IS WITH ME. HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THEIR PETITION TO BE ABLE TO BUILD ON THE LOT AND FOR THE REZONING FOR RS 50. DIANA AND ANTHONY HAVE SHARED THEIR REZONING IDEAS WITH US AND WE THINK IT'S BEEN -- NOT JUST FOR THEIR FAMILY AND THE LONG HERITAGE THEIR FAMILY HAS IN THE AREA AND CONTRIBUTE TO THE AREA BUT THE AREA IN GENERAL. THE CITY OF TAMPA AND MAYOR'S OFFICE HAS STATED SPECIFICALLY ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS ARE PART OF OUR FUTURE. IF WE DON'T TAKE REALLY GOOD EXAMPLES ON HOW TO DO THAT, YOU'RE GOING TO BE STUCK WITH A LOT OF BAD ONES. THIS IS A GOOD PLACE TO SHOW WHAT THAT POLICY WAS MADE FOR, I THINK. ANTHONY'S WORK GOES A LOT BEYOND WHAT HE'S SPOKEN ABOUT TODAY. HIS VOLUNTEER WORK WITH THE ROTARY CLUB, YBOR CITY, WHERE HE IS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE, REVITALIZING PARTS OF THE RIVER ALONG RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS SPEAKS TO HIS COMMITMENT TO THE AREA AS A LOCAL RESIDENT AND AS SOMEONE WHOSE FAMILY IS GOING TO USE THE PROPERTY THEMSELVES. I THINK THERE'S REALLY NO OTHER OPTION THAN FOR YOU ALL TO STRONGLY CONSIDER AND SUPPORT HIS REZONING FOR RS 50. I THINK IT'S BEYOND DOUBT THAT HE SHOWED THAT THERE ARE MULTIPLE OTHER PROPERTIES WITH SMALLER SIZES THAT ARE RS 50 IN THAT AREA. AND THIS IS NOT INCONSISTENT AT ALL WITH HOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD LOOKS. I THINK ANYTHING HE DOES THERE WILL SET THE SAME HIGH STANDARDS THAT HE'S HELD HIMSELF AND HIS FAMILY TO. I REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR STRONG CONSIDERATION AND SUPPORT FOR THE CHANGE OF ZONE. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS. MY NAME IS MATT BAILEY. I'M A NEIGHBOR AND FRIEND OF ANTHONY AND DIANA. I'M HERE TONIGHT TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THEIR REZONING OF THE PROPERTY AS WELL. FOR OVER A YEAR, ANTHONY HAS BEEN SPEAKING TO ME ABOUT THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY AND WORKING DILIGENT WITH THE APPLICATION PROCESS. I'VE SEEN HIM SPEAK TO ALL OF THE NEIGHBORS AND GO ABOVE AND BEYOND IN THE APPLICATION PROCESS, THE REQUIREMENTS, AND GETTING SUPPORT ALONG THE WAY. AS A REAL ESTATE BROKER, I'M FAMILIAR WITH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE MAKEUP OF THE PROPERTIES HERE. HIS DESIGN IDEAS MAINTAIN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD'S UNIQUENESS AND ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPERTIES IN THE AREA, BOTH BY SIZE AND DENSITY. ANTHONY AND DIANA ARE ACTIVE IN OUR COMMUNITY. OUR CHILDREN GO TO SCHOOL TOGETHER AT TRINITY. THEY GO ABOVE AND BEYOND TO VOLUNTEER THERE. THEY ALSO VOLUNTEER IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND HAVE HELPED GAIN SUPPORT AND SAFETY FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PARK. I BELIEVE THAT IF YOU GRANT THE RS 50 APPROVAL, THAT THEY WILL FURTHER IMPROVE THEIR PROPERTY ALONG WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I SUPPORT THEIR REQUEST AND ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL, PLEASE. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THAT IT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? YES, MA'AM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> ASHLEY TERRY. I AM A NEIGHBOR AND FRIEND ALSO. I LIVE AT 2906 NORTH PERRY AVENUE. MY HOME IS NEXT TO WHAT ANTHONY WAS SAYING IS HIS GREAT-GRANDPARENTS' ORIGINAL HOMESITE. I LIVE ON 52 WIDE LOT. IT'S VERY TYPICAL, LIKE HE MENTIONED, TO HAVE THE DIFFERENT SIZES GOING THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I DON'T THINK IT'S AGAINST ANYTHING. SO AS A NEIGHBOR AND LICENSED REAL ESTATE AGENT ALSO, I CAN TELL YOU THAT THE ONE NEXT TO ME, ACROSS THE STREET FROM ME, IN THE 50s TOO, NEXT TO SOMETHING BIGGER, TOTALLY MAKES SENSE. I ALSO HAVE RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER TOWNHOMES. SO IT FITS. THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS OVER A HUNDRED YEARS OLD. IT'S BEEN REZONED SO MANY TIMES. LIKE HE SAID, I THINK IT IS A MELTING POT AND IT'S ONLY GOING TO BENEFIT HIM AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO HAVE SOMETHING ELSE THERE AND TO HELP HIS FAMILY. IN SUPPORT OF THEM. I HOPE YOU FIND THAT AS WELL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SIR? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I JUST WANT TO SAY, THE PROFESSIONALISM THAT ANTHONY SHOWED, I DON'T KNOW IF HE IS AN ATTORNEY OR NOT AN ATTORNEY, BUT THE PROFESSIONALISM, YOU SOUND LIKE YOU ARE A CPA OR SOMETHING BECAUSE EVERYTHING WAS SO METHODICAL AND DONE IN PERFECT ORDER. I WANT TO CONGRATULATE THE NEIGHBORHOOD, ALL OF YOU FOR BEING WHO YOU ARE AND HOW YOU HANDLED YOURSELVES. VERY RARELY HAVE WE SEEN THIS KIND OF UNITY AND SOMETHING EVEN IF YOU HAD A DISAGREEMENT SOMEWHERE, IT WAS NEVER SHOWN HERE. I WANT TO THANK THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR BEING WHO YOU ARE AND WHERE YOU COME FROM, THE SCAGLIONE FAMILY, LIKE LOOKING AT THE JONESES AND SMITHS, THEY ARE EVERYWHERE. THERE ARE A LOT OF SCAGLIONES AND SOMETIMES THEY ARE RELATED AND MOST TIMES THEY ARE NOT. I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU TO THE WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR SHOWING UP. >>LUIS VIERA: I WAS JUST GOING TO AGREE. AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MY VOTE OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE. MR. SCAGLIONE HAS ALWAYS BEEN A VERY NICE GUY AND A GENTLEMAN. WE HAVEN'T TALKED A LOT IN A WHILE. IT'S BEEN A WHILE. BUT THIS PRESENTATION IS NOT INCONSISTENT WITH WHAT I'VE SEEN IN THE PAST. AND THE SUPPORT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S NICE TO SEE BECAUSE WE DON'T OFTEN SEE THAT. THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. MANISCALCO, WE'RE NOT RELATED. WE'RE NOT RELATED. >> I HAD THAT IN MY NOTES TO MENTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THERE'S NO CONFLICT. NOT RELATED. >> JORDAN MANISCALCO. NO RELATION TO COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. I'M A RESIDENT OF RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS AT 3211 NORTH PERRY. AND NEIGHBORHOOD FRIEND OF ANTHONY AND DIANA SCAGLIONE. I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THE REZONING APPLICATION FOR THEIR PROPERTY. ANTHONY AND DIANA ARE ACTIVE IN SUPPORTING AND VOLUNTEERING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. LAST OCTOBER, ANTHONY ORGANIZED A FLAG-RAISING CEREMONY HERE ABOVE THE OLD CITY HALL IN CELEBRATION OF ITALIAN AMERICAN HERITAGE. THE EVENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY COORDINATED WITH THE CITY AND WELL ATTENDED BY THE PUBLIC. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AT RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS IS MADE UP OF A THOUSAND HOMES AND MANY DIFFERENT PROPERTY SIZES. WE HAVE RESIDENTIAL, CONDOS, TOWNHOMES CHURCHES MULTIFAMILY. IT'S LIKE EVERYONE SAID, A VERY BIG MELTING POT. OVER HALF THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS PARCEL SIZES LESS THAN WHAT ANTHONY AND DIANA ARE ASKING FOR IN THIS APPLICATION. PERSONALLY I'M IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND I SEE MANY TYPES OF NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECTS AND DESIGNS IN MY WORK. IT IS MY PERSONAL OPINION THAT ANTHONY AND DIANA'S REZONING REQUEST IS CONSISTENT AND MAINTAINS THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE GRANT THEM APPROVAL FOR THEIR APPLICATION. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME THIS EVENING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE? IF NOT, NO QUESTIONS, ASK FOR A MOTION TO CLOSE. COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THIS IS AN INTERESTING ONE BECAUSE I'LL BE HONEST WITH YOU, I CAME INTO THIS FULLY EXPECTING TO VOTE AGAINST THIS. I MEAN 100%. I DO A LOT OF THE RESEARCH AND READING, LOOK AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I WILL TAKE ISSUE ON WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR REALLY ISN'T, BECAUSE I AGREE WITH STAFF. THIS IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. CLEARLY, MOST OF THE LOTS, IF NOT ALL BUT A FEW OUTLINED EXCEPTIONS, ONE ODD SHAPED LOT, RIVER LOT AND THE ONE DIRECTLY BEHIND YOUR PROPERTY ARE ALL SUBSTANTIALLY LARGER WIDTHS. THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY. BUT THAT BEING SAID, I DO APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT IT IS A VERY ECLECTIC NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S DEVELOPED IN A VERY ECLECTIC WAY WITH DIFFERENT STYLES OF HOUSING, DIFFERENT AGES OF HOUSING. RIVERFRONT PROPERTY, AGAIN, SWAYING THE TYPES -- THE WAY THE STREETS ARE LAID OUT IS SOMEWHAT DIFFERENT. I CONCUR WITH MY FELLOW COUNCILPERSONS. IT'S NICE TO SEE THE FOLKS THAT COME IN SUPPORTIVE OF THE ISSUE. OBVIOUSLY, I ALSO APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT YOU INCORPORATED YOUR NEIGHBORS INTO THE DISCUSSIONS AS YOU DEVELOPED THESE IDEAS. I THINK THAT WAS IMPORTANT. THE FACT THAT NOBODY, CLEARLY THIS WAS SIGNED PROPERLY AND PEOPLE DID NOT SHOW UP IN OPPOSITION I THINK IS A TESTAMENT TO YOUR OUTREACH AHEAD OF TIME AND BEING PROACTIVE. I THINK YOU SWAYED ME BECAUSE MINE WOULD HAVE BEEN A VOTE AGAINST. AGAIN, TAKING THIS IN A STERILE ENVIRONMENT, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A VOTE AGAINST. I WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED OUR CITY STAFF'S OBJECTIONS. BUT I THINK TAKING THAT AND WEIGHING THAT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE THAT WE'RE HEARING TONIGHT, I THINK YOU CHANGED MY MIND. THANK YOU. I MOVE TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. ALL IN FAVOR? COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. >>GWEN HENDERSON: I MOVE FILE REZ-24-28, AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 1102 WEST OHIO AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS-60 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY) TO RS-50 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE? ANY OPPOSED? >>GWEN HENDERSON: I DON'T NEED TO GIVE REASONS. >>GWEN HENDERSON: I FIND THE FINDINGS BASED ON COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FOUND IN THE REPORTS AND TESTIMONY ESTABLISHES THAT THE REZONING WILL ALLOW FOR ENHANCED UTILIZATION OF THE LAND CONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION AND WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFILL HOUSING ON AND UNDERUTILIZED PARCEL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAND USE POLICIES 2.112, HOUSING POLICY 1.3.4. AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. ALTHOUGH THE PROMINENT PATTERN OF THE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES LOT THAT ARE 60 FEET OR WIDER, THE OVERALL LOT AREA OF THE RESULTING LOTS IS APPROPRIATE -- APPROXIMATELY 6,825 WHICH IS GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM LOT AREA FOR THE RS 60 ZONING DISTRICT. AND WITHIN A TWO-BLOCK RANGE TO THE NORTH THERE ARE EXISTING PD ZONINGS, REZ 06-67 WHICH ALLOWED A LOT SPLIT WHICH CREATED A 37-FOOT WIDE LOT AND REZ 06-36 WHICH ALLOWED FOR TWO HOMES IN THE REAR OF AN EXISTING LOT. THANK YOU, CHAIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. ALL RIGHT. LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT. DID YOU DO A SECOND READING? >>THE CLERK: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2024, AT 9:30 A.M., LOCATED AT OLD CITY HALL, 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES MA'AM. LAST ITEM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THE LAST ITEM FOR THIS EVENING IS REZ 24-29. THIS IS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 1408 EAST 21st AVENUE. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RS 50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, TO RM 18, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO PLANNING COMMISSION AND COME BACK AND GIVE MY REPORT. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS. DAVID HEY AGAIN WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. WE END UP IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT FOR THIS LAST CASE, MORE SPECIFICALLY THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE. THERE IS THE CLOSEST TRANSIT STOPS ARE APPROXIMATELY .3 MILES FROM THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE NEAREST EAST 21st AVENUE INTERSECTION. CUSCADEN PARK IS THE CLOSEST PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITY. AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN A LEVEL E EVACUATION ZONE. HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL. THE SUBJECT SITE -- KIND OF HARD TO SEE HERE. THIS IS EAST 21st AVENUE. THIS IS THE PARK JUST TO THE SOUTH. YOU COULD SEE THE PREDOMINANT PATTERN IS MOSTLY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. THERE IS SOME MULTIFAMILY SCATTERED THROUGHOUT, ESPECIALLY TO THE WEST. AND THEN ALSO DOWN HERE IN THE SOUTH. HERE WE HAVE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THIS KIND OF SHOWS THE ECLECTIC FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS. THE SUBJECT SITE AND PARCELS SURROUNDING IT AND DOWN TO THE SOUTHWEST AND ALSO ALONG 15th AVENUE. THAT'S ALL THE RESIDENTIAL 20 IN THAT BROWN. IT GETS MORE DENSE AS YOU GO SOUTH OF THE PARK. AGAIN, RESIDENTIAL 20 AND THIS IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. FURTHER UP 15th, ON THAT RED, THAT IS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35. UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION, IT DOES HAVE AN EXISTING DENSITY -- WELL, WITHIN THAT BLOCK, BETWEEN NORTH AVENUE REPUBLIC DE CUBA AND NORTH 15th AVENUE, EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE, ANY VACANT AND COMMERCIAL PARCELS, THE DENSITY THERE IS 12.15 UNITS PER ACRE. THAT IS UNDER THAT RESIDENTIAL 20. THE EXISTING DENSITY OF THIS PORTION OF EAST 21st AVENUE IS APPROXIMATELY 60% OF THE DENSITY PLANNED FOR UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20. THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR TWO DWELLING UNITS BASED ON ITS SIZE. UNDER THAT REZ 20 DESIGNATION. PROPOSED ZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED IT WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OR DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE PORTION OF THE VM YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD. THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY DIRECTION DOES SEEK TO DIRECT THE GREATEST SHARE OF GROWTH TO THE URBAN CENTERS AND VILLAGES. IT IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT WHERE THE PLAN DOES IDENTIFY IT'S APPROPRIATE FOR INFILL DEVELOPMENT. IN CONCLUSION, THROUGH THE ASSESSMENT OF THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THE PROPOSES ZONING WILL ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT IS IN CHARACTER WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT LONG-RANGE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES RECOMMEND TO YOU THIS EVENING THAT THE ZONING REQUEST BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE REVISIONS OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I HAVE TO RECUSE MYSELF BECAUSE THIS IS WHERE I WAS RAISED. CUSCADEN PARK, THE PARK HE SAID, CUSCADEN PARK. TWO HALL OF FAMERS FROM THERE. AL LOPEZ AND TONY LaRUSSA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DAVIS ISLANDS AND THIS ONE. YES MA'AM. >>LaCHONE DOCK: LaCHONE DOCK, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. SO THE PARCEL THAT IS UNDER THIS REQUEST FOR THE REZONING IS 5,000 SQUARE FEET. 50 FEET OF FRONTAGE. JUST HAPPENS TO HAVE A HUNDRED FEET IN DEPTH. SO IT MEETS THAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT SIZE FOR THE LOT. IT IS CONTAINED ON EAST 21st AVENUE. LET ME SHOW THE ZONING MAP. SO THIS IS THE PROPERTY LOCATED HERE IN RED. THIS IS 21st AVENUE. IN EVALUATING THIS SITE, WE LOOKED AT THE USES THAT ARE ADJACENT TO THE SITE. THIS BLOCK ACTUALLY CONTAINS COMMERCIAL USE AT THE END, COMMERCIAL ZONING AND A VACANT COMMERCIAL USE. SO THIS IS CN, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. TO THE SOUTH IS THE PARK, TO THE SOUTHEAST IS A PD, WHICH IS AN OLDER PD. IT IS APPROVED FOR COMMERCIAL USES. AND TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE IS RO-1 ZONING, WHICH IS RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND IT DOES HAVE AN OFFICE USE HERE. SO THERE IS A MIXTURE OF USES WITHIN THIS BLOCK. SO THIS REQUESTED ZONING OF RM-18 WOULD ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS, WHICH WOULD HAVE MINIMAL IMPACTS CONSIDERING THE COMMERCIAL NATURE OF THE BLOCK. YOU CAN SEE THAT THE ZONING TO THE WEST, YOU HAVE THE YC 8 ZONING, WHICH IS THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING IN THE YBOR CITY DISTRICT. AND THEN NORTH OF 21st AVENUE, THE DISTRICTS CHANGE. THAT IS THE END OF THE YC DISTRICT AND YOU SEE YOUR PD DEVELOPMENT ALONG WITH YOUR RS 50 ZONING THAT'S FURTHER TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS A SURVEY OF THE SITE, WHICH SHOWS THE SITE ON 21st AVENUE. THIS IS THE FRONTAGE. IT IS CONTAINED WITHIN LOT 11, BLOCK 9, AND THIS IS THE PARCEL BOUNDARY. AND THEN I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SITE. SO THIS IS A VIEW OF THE SITE. THIS IS LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SITE. THIS IS EAST OF THE SITE. AND THIS IS THAT COMMERCIAL, THAT CN COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING, THE PROPERTY THAT'S ON THE CORNER. CUSCADEN PARK. LOCATED HERE. ANOTHER VIEW. SO THIS IS, OF COURSE, SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AND THEN THIS IS WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WHICH IS A VACANT LOT. BUT YOU CAN SEE THAT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. I HAVE ANOTHER VIEW OF IT. THROUGH THAT LOT. AND THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THIS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. SO THE SITE IN THIS PICTURE IS OVER IN THIS AREA. AND THEN THIS IS THE ALLEY AND THIS IS THE RESIDENTIAL, THAT RO-1 ZONING. IT'S NOT RESIDENTIAL USE. I'M SORRY. IT'S RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONE, BUT IT HAS AN OFFICE USE. AND THEN THIS IS WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. SO STAFF REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FINDS IT CONSISTENT. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPLICANT? YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> MICHAEL GIANESKIS. I AM THE OWNER OF THE LOT. I'M PRETTY EXCITED ABOUT THE POTENTIAL OF YOU GUYS PASSING THIS AND DOING A DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE. I PLAN ON LIVING THERE. I'VE SPOKEN TO THE OWNERS. THIS OWNER, I'VE SPOKEN TO THIS OWNER, THIS OWNER, THIS OWNER. THEY ARE ALL REALLY EXCITED ABOUT NEW DEVELOPMENT COMING IN. AND I'M REALLY EXCITED TOO BECAUSE YOU TALK ABOUT CUSCADEN PARK, I'LL BE ABLE TO WALK TO THE PICKLEBALL COURT, SO MY GAME WILL HOPEFULLY GET A LOT BETTER, TOO. I'M A REALLY BIG FAN OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND I KIND OF WANT TO DO MY PART TO HELP BUILD SOMETHING WITH A LOT OF CHARACTER. I APPRECIATE YOUR STRONG CONSIDERATION OF THIS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I'M NOT GOING TO HOLD THE PICKLEBALL AGAINST YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE'RE AN ANTI-PICKLEBALL COUNCIL. >> OH, SHOOT. >> MOTION TO DENY. [ LAUGHTER ] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE ONLY DO TENNIS AND PING-PONG. >> OKAY. [ LAUGHTER ] >>GWEN HENDERSON: I'M REALLY GLAD TO SEE SOME DEVELOPMENT IN THAT BLOCK IN PARTICULAR. I DRIVE BY THERE ALL THE TIME AND HOPEFULLY IT WILL INSPIRE SOME OTHER THINGS TO IMPROVE RIGHT IN THAT PARTICULAR SECTION. I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT YOU ARE ALSO GOING TO LIVE AT THE PROPERTY. SO REALLY GOOD. >> THE NEIGHBORS TO THE EAST OF ME, THEY ARE REALLY EXCITED BECAUSE I THINK IT'S LIKE A FAMILY LIKE FOUR OR FIVE. IN ALL TRANSPARENCY, THE CODE ENFORCEMENT HAS BEEN ON ME -- I'VE GOT TO GO BY THERE ONCE A WEEK BECAUSE THERE IS JUST A LOT OF LIKE HOMELESS PEOPLE THERE. I CLEANED UP -- I HAVE A PICTURE ON MY PHONE -- >>GWEN HENDERSON: SHOW IT TO US. >> YOU DO WANT TO SEE IT? >>GWEN HENDERSON: OF COURSE. THAT'S THE ONLY WAY WE KNOW. >> I HADN'T BEEN TO THE SITE IN A WHILE. SO THIS WAS -- I HAD TO GO TO THE DUMP, AND IT WAS LIKE OVER A THOUSAND POUNDS. WHAT'S WORSE, THERE'S LIKE OVER 150 NEEDLES. THE FAMILY TO THE EAST OF ME IS REALLY EXCITED THAT I'M GOING TO CLEAN UP THAT LOT AND THEY ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT ISSUE GOING FORWARD. >>GWEN HENDERSON: MOTION TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ASK IF THERE'S ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK. WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND TO CLOSE. ALL IN FAVOR. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. CLEAN DESPITE OR IN SPITE OF THE PICKLEBALL COMMENTS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 1408 EAST 21st AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION, RS 50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, TO RM 18 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I FIND THAT THE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS NOTED AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT THAT THE REZONING WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OR DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THIS PORTION OF VM YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD AND WILL ENCOURAGE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON UNDERUTILIZED LOT AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING CHOICES IN THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAND USE POLICIES 5.1.48, 1.52. 9.5 -- 5.11, 9.6.1. 9.62. 9.64. AND HOUSING POLICIES 1.34. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? >> THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: NOT DONE OFFICIALLY YET. >>THE CLERK: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2024, AT 9:30 A.M., LOCATED AT OLD CITY HALL, 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SEE YOU NEXT TIME. >> THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NEW BUSINESS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CHAIR PRO TEM RECOGNIZES CHAIRMAN MANISCALCO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. JUST A COUPLE OF QUICK THINGS. HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY TO ALL THE MOTHERS OUT THERE AND HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY. ALSO, MY FRIEND CHARLES, WHO I HAVE COFFEE WITH MANY MORNINGS IS GOING TO BE CELEBRATING A VERY SPECIAL BIRTHDAY THIS WEEKEND. HIS MOTHER IN SOUTH TAMPA ON MAY 12th WILL BE TURNING 108 YEARS OLD. AND SHE IS IN GREAT SHAPE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: REMEMBER WHEN SHE WAS BORN, CHARLIE? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WAS THERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WISH HER A VERY SPECIAL HAPPY BIRTHDAY. SHE MIGHT BE THE OLDEST LIVING TAMPA RESIDENT. I DON'T KNOW FOR SURE, BUT AT 108 YEARS OLD, IT'S EXCITING. COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, ANY NEW BUSINESS? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE PASS OF SCAGLIONE, 99 YEARS OLD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SIX MONTHS SHY OF A HUNDRED. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: VERY NICE GUY. THE WHOLE FAMILY VERY NICE. GOD BLESS THE WHOLE FAMILY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA. >>LUIS VIERA: A COUPLE OF QUICK ONES. JUDGE PERRY LITTLE IS GOING TO BE MARKING 55 YEARS AS BEING A MEMBER OF THE FLORIDA BAR. I WANTED TO GIVE HIM A COUNCIL COMMENDATION FOR THAT. IT WILL BE DONE OFF-SITE. I HAD TALKED TO HIM ACTUALLY ABOUT POTENTIAL BEING THE FACILITATOR FOR OUR COMMITTEE WHO WASN'T ABLE TO DO IT, BUT GOD BLESS HIM. GREAT GUY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA, SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? >>LUIS VIERA: I DID WANT TO REMIND COUNCIL MEMBERS THAT NEXT WEEK WE ARE GOING TO BE ADDRESSING THAT ISSUE. I HAVE SEEN SOME OF THE FOLKS BEING PUT ON, SO THAT'S GREAT. GOSH, I ONLY HAVE TWO. I MOTION FOR STAFF TO REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF CONDUCTING A GPR SCAN AND/OR CONSULTING WITH AN ARCHAEOLOGIST AND/OR DIVE TEAM TO CONDUCT A SEARCH FOR THE ERASED OR FOR THE COLLEGE HILL CEMETERY ON THE CITY-OWNED PROPERTY IN AND AROUND THE RETENTION POND LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF 25th AVENUE AND 26th STREET ADJACENT TO THE ITALIAN CLUB AT THE SEPTEMBER 19th MEETING. THERE WERE SOME NOTES HERE. I THOUGHT THERE WAS ANOTHER VERSION OF THIS MOTION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? WE DID VOTE ON THE COMMENDATION, CORRECT? >>GWEN HENDERSON: I MISSED IT. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING, CHAIRMAN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT BACK AT THIS MEETING, COUNCILMAN VIERA, ON THE SCANNING. I APPRECIATE HAVING THE TIME TO DO A LITTLE BIT OF RESEARCH JUST TO MAKE SURE ALL THE DUCKS ARE IN A ROW. I THINK IT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU. I'M GOING TO BE OUT NEXT WEEK. I KNOW YOU ALL ARE GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS SOME MORE. I ACTUALLY HAVE A MOTION ABOUT THAT. I MOVE THAT THE LEGAL STAFF PROVIDE AN IN-PERSON REPORT ON JUNE 6, 2024, REGARDING THE RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS IN CHARTER SECTION 6.01 SPECIFICALLY ANALYZING WHETHER AND HOW THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS TO WHOM THE REQUIREMENT APPLY CAN BE REDUCED. >> SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK WITH THE MOTION, SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? >>LYNN HURTAK: AND THEN WE ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE A SOLID WASTE RATE ADJUSTMENT STUDY OR DISCUSSION ON THURSDAY. AND SINCE I AM THE CHAIR OF THE PUBLIC WORKS, THEY HAVE ASKED TO MOVE THAT. THEY ALSO ASKED TO MAKE IT A TWO PART SINCE IT IS GOING TO BE TECHNICALLY MORE THAN $20 MILLION. ADMINISTRATION HAS ASKED THAT WE -- I CLEARED THIS WITH COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON WHO WILL NOT BE HERE FOR THE WORKSHOP SESSION, BUT I HAVE BEEN ASKED BY THE ADMINISTRATION TO MOVE THE SOLID WASTE RATE ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT FROM MAY 16th, 2024, TO THE MAY 23rd WORKSHOP, AND THEN THE RATE ADJUSTMENT VOTE WILL COME BACK TO COUNCIL ON JUNE 6, 2024. I'M MAKING TWO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE? >>LUIS VIERA: THERE WAS CONFUSION ON THIS OTHER MOTION. I THOUGHT I HAD ANOTHER VERSION OF IT. BUT WITH -- SORRY. WHERE DID IT GO? DARN IT. MOTION FOR TAMPA CITY COUNCIL LETTER IN SUPPORT OF INCLUSIVE COMMUNITY EFFORTS ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN TAMPA FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES. THEY ARE INQUIRING WITH THE COUNTY AND THEY WANTED TO HAVE SUPPORT FROM THE CITY. THEY HAVE PRESENTED HERE TODAY. REALLY GOOD FOLKS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HURTAK. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. WE HAVE A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. WE ARE ADJOURNED. [ SOUNDING GAVEL ]