>>ORLANDO GUDES: THE TAMPA CITY COUNCIL WILL NOW COME TO ORDER JUNE 24, 2021. ROLL CALL PLEASE. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE GUDES HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE ITEM 1-9. >> MR. MIRANDA HAS OPENE. SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO. WE ARE NOW OPEN. MR. SHELBY, DO YOU NEED TO DO YOUR SPIEL, SIR. >>MARTIN SHELBY: [INAUDIBLE] >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU HAVEN'T LEARNED IT BY HEART YET? AFTER A YEAR? >>MARTIN SHELBY: WELL, LET ME JUST SAY THIS. [ LAUGHTER ] TONIGHT'S EVENING MEETING OF THE TAMPA CITY COUNCIL IS BEING HELD DURING THE COVID-19 STATE OF EMERGENCY AND BEING CONDUCTED LIVE WITH AN IN-PERSON QUORUM IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. IN RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 RESTRICTIONS MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC IS ENCOURAGED TO PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY THROUGH VIDEO TELECONFERENCING REFERRED TO AS FLORIDA STATUTED A COMMUNICATION MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AS WE HAVE DISCUSSED TODAY CMT. THESE MEETINGS ARE BEING HELD IN ACCORDANCE OF EMERGENCY RULES AND PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY 2020-225 AND AMENDED RESOLUTION 2020-490 AND 2021-241. THE PUBLIC AND CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF TAMPA ARE ABLE TO WATCH, LISTEN AND VIEW THIS MEETING ON CABLE TV 640, FRONTIER 15, AND ON THE INTERNET AT TAMPA. TAMPA.GOV/LIVESTREAM. IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE THROUGH CMT, APPLICANTS AND THE PUBLIC ARE REQUIRED TO PREREGISTER BY GOING TO TAMPA -- EXCUSE ME, I KEEP CHANGING, TAMPA.GOV/QUASI. AND THOSE INSTRUCTIONARE AVAILABLE ALSO ON THE CITY'S WEB PAGE, THE CITY COUNCIL'S WEB PAGE AT TAMPA.GOV/CITY COUNCIL. NOW A CMT DEVICE THAT IS CAPABLE OF VIDEO IS ALSO REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY. THAT MEANS IT CAN NOT BE A PAY PHONE, A DESKTOP, LAPTOP OTHERWISE YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO PARTICIPATE. THE INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE. NOW ANY REGISTERED APPLICA WHO WISHES TO SHOW POWERPOINT PRESENTATION, RENDERINGS OR OTHER SUCH DOCUMENT MAY SHARE THEIR SCREEN DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT OR SUBMIT ALL SUCH EVIDENCE IN EVIDENCE. IF YOU DO SHARE YOUR SCREEN, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT OF ALL -- EXCUSE ME A ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL DOCUMENTS THAT WERE PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THAT GOES TO COUNCIL QUASI SUBMISSIONS AT TAMPA.GOV WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE CONCLUSION OF THE HRING IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A CMT DE DEVICE, COME TO CITY HALL AND PARTICIPATE 315 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD AND NOTE THAT THE USE OF MASKS AND SOCIAL DISTANCING INSIDES THE BUILDING ARE ENCOURAGE $. SEND COMMENTS IN ADVANCE VIA E-MAIL AND BE ADVISED THERE IS A DEADLINE TO SUBMIT THEM IN ADVANCE TO BE ABLE TO BE PART OF THE RECORD. NOW WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED BY E-MAIL OR MAIL ARE DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL AND WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE PERMANENT RECORD OF THE MEETING AS SOON AS -- ASSUMING THE DEADN. AND ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED TIMELY BY E-MAIL, M MAIL, OR VIA CMT WILL BE AFFORDED EQUAL CONSIDERATION AS IF THE PUBLIC COMMENT IS MADE IN PERSON. WITH REGARD TO THOSE PEOPLE PARTICIPATING REMOTELY ON THE GO TO MEETING PLATFORM, PLEASE BE ADVISED THERE IS A CHAT BOX, BUT THAT CHAT BOX IS NOT BE TO BE USED BY THE PUBLIC TO COMMUNICATE WITH CITY COUNCIL DURING THE MEETING. ONLY TO COMMUNICATE WITH STAFF FOR A TECHNICAL ISSUE. PLEASE DO NOT USE THE CHAT BOX TO COMMUNICATE ANY SUBSTANTIVE MATTERS DURING THE MEETING. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MR. SHELBY. FEW HOUSEKEEPING NOTES. MR. VIERA HAD AN EMERGENCY AND TOAD LEAVE. JUST NOTE THAT PLEASE. MR. SHELBY, WE HAVE TWO ITEMS THAT I WANT TO GO AHEAD NUMBER 14 TO LET THE CITY ATTORNEY LEAVE. ITEM NUMBER 14 MOVE TO NUMBER 1. ITEM NUMBER 14. >> SIMONE SINO ON BEHALF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT. GOOD EVENING CHAIR AND COUNCIL. WE ARE HERE TO REQUEST THAT ITEM 14 WOULD JUST BE MOVED TO NUMBER ONE AND ALSO THAT COUNCIL WOULD ADDRESS ITEM 14 AT THIS TIME IN WHICH WE WOULD REQUEST THAT YOU SCHEDULE A HEARING AFTER JULY 29 FOR A AB SUSPENSION FOR PROPERTY 3401 NORTH 15th STREET. AND YOUR -- THE HEARING CAN BE SET BY MOTION THIS EVENING. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION BY MR. MANISCALCO AND SECONDED. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN. >> THE REQUEST FOR THIS TIME AUGUST 26 AT 10:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: AUGUST 26? I THOUGHT IT WAS JULY 29. OH, AS -- >> THAT'S CORRECT. ANY DATE AFTER JULY 29 WAS AMENABLE. MOTION AND ON THE FLOOR BY MR. MANIALCO. SECONDED BY MR. MIRANDA. ANY DISCUSSION? ROLL CALL ON THAT, MR. SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, SIR. AND 10:30 A.M., IS THAT COR CORRECT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU. MR. SHELBY, CAN WE TALK OF THIS TRIM CALENDAR. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, MARTIN SH SHELBY, PER COUNCIL'S INSTRUCTION, I REFERRED TO THE CFO, MR. O'HARO AND PROVIDED A TRIM CALENDAR WITH MULTIPLE REVIEWS. THE ITEM NUMBER 4 WHICH IS COP IN FRONT OF YOU IS THE ONLY ONE I BELIEVE, THAT I RECALL, THAT DOES NOT HAVE THE FIRST OR SECOND READING ON A FRIDAY NIGHT OF THE BUDGET. SO IF YOU SEE IN FRONT OF YOU THE ONE THAT YOU DO HAVE THAT IS BEING PRESENTED BY THE ADMINISTRATION, IT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE CLERK'S OFFICE. AND IT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE CHIEF OF STAFF AN PRESENTED BY MR. ROGERO AS AN OPTION IS THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 13th OF SEPTEMBER AT 5:01 P.M. AND SECOND AT -- AT THE 28th OF SEPTEMBER, ALSO AT 5:01 P.M. THIS CALENDAR ALSO UPDATES THE FACT THAT COUNCIL CANCELLED THE 16th -- SEPTEMBER 16 MEETING BECAUSE OF YOM KIPPUR HOLD ON JUST A MINUTE, PLEASE -- MR. -- I AM TALKING TO THE CITY COUNCIL NOW AS WE SPEAK. I AM SORRY -- IS THERE SOMETHING I NEED TO COMMU COMMUNICATE. I AM SORRY TO INTERRUPT. SOMETHING I NEED XHOO COMMUNICATE. I WANT TO MAKE SURE IT IS NOT AN EMERGENCY. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU. MY APOLOGIES, BUT THAT WAS THE CFO AND I WANTED TO MAKE SURE NOTHING IMMEDIATELY PRESSING THAT WOULD AFFECT WHAT I AM ABOUT TO SAY. COUNCIL'S PLEASURE TO AGREE TO THIS THE CONSENSUS OF COUNCIL. YOU CAN DO IT BY MOTION AND VOTE AND THE ADMINISTRATION WILL HAVE CLEAR DIRECTION AND TAKE THAT FORWARD, THIS DOES ADDRESS COUNCIL'S CONCERNS THAT WERE EXPRESSED WITH THE ADMINISTRATION AND I BELIEVE IT ADDRESSES THOSE CONCERNS, HOPEFULLY TO YOUR SATISFACTION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, GENTLEMEN. WE HAVE -- MR. SHELBY HAS GIVEN US OPTIONS AND SAID FRIDAY WAS NOT AN OPTION FOR US AND GIVEN US AN OPTION FOR THE 13th FOR THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND THE 28th FOR THE SECOND OF SEPTEMBER. MOTION TO SET. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND SECOND BY COUNCILMAN -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: TO ACCEPT THIS OPTION AS ACCEPTED BY THE ADMINISTRATION. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: 13 AND 28. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MONDAY NIGHT AND THE SECOND IS ON A TUESDAY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: 6 P.M. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR. GENTLEMEN, IT HAS COME TO MY ATTENTION IN REFERENCE TO -- IS IT IS THE DEPUTY CLERK ONLINE? >>CLERK: NO, SHE'S NOT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SHE IS NOT ONLINE TONIGHT. >>CLERK: HER INTERNET IS DOWN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: H INTERNET IS DOWN -- AS YOU KNOW IT WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION THIS MORNING THAT THE MAYOR HAS SELECTED A FIRE CHIEF WHICH IS BARBARA TRIPP. AND APPARENTLY THE MEMORANDUM OR RELEASE WENT OUT A DAY AGO. I SAW IT LAST NIGHT. A LOT OF COUNCILMEMBERS HAD IT ON FACEBOOK AND I KNOW A LOT OF US ARE ELATED ABOUT THE MAYOR MAKING THAT SELECTION. DIDN'T COME TO THIS COUNCIL YET. AND APPARENTLY THERE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A SWEARING-IN ON FRIDAY WHICH I PLAN ON ATTENDING, BUT WE HAVE TO DO THINGS IN PROTOCOL WITH THE CHARTER, AND I WOULD HATE TO -- THE CHIEF TO GET SWORN IN ON FRIDAY AND COULDN'T BE THE CHIEF UNTIL JULY 15 UNTIL IN COUNCIL APPROVES A RESOLUTION. SO WE KIND OF PUT THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE. THINGS HAPPEN. I KNOW WE HEAR THIS TERM. THAT IS THE WAY WE ALWAYS HAVE DONE IT. AND I AM NOT BLAMING THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION FOR THAT BECAUSE A LOT OF THINGS AROUND HERE HOW WE ALWAYS DONE IT. AND CAN'T DO THOSE THINGS ANYMORE AND WE HAVE TO DO IT IN PROTOCOL, AND THIS COUNCIL MAKES THE FINAL APPOINTMENT OF ANY DEPARTMENT HEAD OR DIRECTOR AT AFTER THAT PERSON IS SELECTED BY THE MAYOR. SO I -- I TOLD MR. SHELBY IMMEDIATELY I WANTED HIM TO GET WITH LEGAL TO MAKE IT OFFICIAL FOR CHIEF TRIPP BECAUSE SHE HAS DONE A GREAT JOB AND EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE ABOVEBOARD ON FRIDAY SO IF THE MAYOR PLANS ON SWEARING IN, WE HAVE A RESOLUTION AND WE APPROVED HER APPOINTMENT AT THE COUNCIL'S PLEASURE AND AT FRIDAY AT 1:30. DO HAVE A RESOLUTION. >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ON THE TABLE FOR THE APPROVAL OF CHIEF BARBARA TRIPP. MR. MANISCALCO HAS MOVED IT. MR. CITRO HAS SECONDED IT. ANY DISCUSSION? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED SIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST FOR CLARIFICATION THE ADMINISTRATION IS ALSO ASKING FOR A ONE-YEAR RESIDENCY WAIVER BECAUSE THE CHARTER REQUIRES PEOPLE AT THAT LEVEL OF THE ADMINISTRATION TO LIVE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT'S CORRECT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WANT TO POINT THAT OUT. >>JOSEPH CITRO: IN THE CHARTER SAYS ONE-YEAR TIME FRAME TO MOVE TO THE CITY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT'S CORRECT. FOR ANY DIRECTOR OR ADMINISTRATOR. AND OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT SHOULD WATCH THAT AND PART OF THE CHARTER AND WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE CHARTER. JUST FOR FYI IN THE FUTURE, I WILL NOT ALLOW ANY DEPARTMENT HEADS OR APPOINTMENTS ON THE AGENDA UNLESS IT IS COME THROUGH COUNCIL PREVIOUSLY SO WE KNOW THE ASSIGNMENT THAT THE MAYOR IS LOOKING TO APPOINT. THAT WAY THIS COUNCIL CAN BE ABLE TO ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT APPOINTEE. THAT IS OUR RIGHT AS A COUNCIL SO WE KNOW ABOUT THAT APPOINTEE AND GIVE US AN OPPORTUNITY BEFORE WE BRING IT ON THE FLOOR FOR A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF AN APPOINTEE. >>HN DGFELR: THE GOOD NEWS, MR. CHAIR WITH CHIEF TRIPP, THAT NOT ONLY THE DEPARTMENT A LONG TIME SO EVERYBODY GOT A CHANCE TO KNOW HER IN THAT CAPACITY WHICH HAS BEEN ACTING CHIEF FOR ABOUT SIX MONTHS OR MORE. AND EVERYBODY SEEMS TO BE VERY HAPPY WITH THE JOB SHE IS DO DOING. SO WITH THAT, CONGRATULATIONS FROM ALL OF US. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY SHE WILL. >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, COUNCIL. TO CLARIFY, MAYBE SURE SOMEBODY MAY HAVE INADVERTENTLY SAYING POCE DARTMT, BUT THIS IS FOR FIRE RESCUE. AND ALSO WITH REGARD TO THE REST DEN SEE WAIVER. IT IS RE-- THE RESIDENCY WAIVER RENEWABLE FOR AN ADDITIONAL TWO TIMES TO DO THAT AND NOT JUST THE ONE YEAR THAT CAN COME BACK AND ASK FOR THAT. I BELIEVE -- IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE THAT WE NEED TO MENTION JUST SO WHEN -- BY THE WAY, FOR YOUR ENERGIES OR YOUR RECOLLECTION, WHEN CHIEF TRIPP WAS APPOINTED THE INTERIM, THERE WAS A RESIDENCY WAIVER FOR HER AS INTERIM AND THIS JUST CONFIRMS THAT NOW FOR NOW HER POSITION NOW AS THE FIRE CHIEF. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MADAM CLERK, WE HAVE DONE SO MUCH TALKING BUT MR. MANISCALCO MADE THE MOTION. >>CLERK: MANISCALCO MADE THE MOTION AND CITRO SECONDED IT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MADE THE MOTION AND CITRO SECONDED IT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES -- CITRO OR DINGFELDER. >>JOSEPH CITRO: WITH THE GREATEST PLEASURE YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I KNOW MR. VIERA WOULD LOVE TO BE HERE FOR THAT AND GIVE HIS BLESSING ON THAT. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DID IT RIGHT AND IF THE MAYOR IS MAKING THAT APPOINTMENT OF SWEARING IN, SHE WAS THE FIRE CHIEF AT THE END OF THE DAY AND NOT HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL JULY 15 BECAUSE SHE BOO NOT BE THE FIRE FIRE CHIEF BUT INTERIM FIRE CHIEF AND GET THAT DONE AND OUT OF THE WAY. THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN, TO HAVE MR. SHELBY IN THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO GET THIS RESOLUTION DONE FOR THE EVENING SESSION. THANK YOU AGAIN, CHIEF TRIPP, FOR THE JOB YOU HAVE DONE. WE HAVE GOT THOSE HOUSEKEEPING MATTERS OUT OF THE WAY, MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 1. PUBLIC HEARING FILE -- OH, THERE SHE IS. >> I APOLOGIZE, JENNIFER MALONE WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. IF I CAN HAVE PERMISSION TO SHARE MY SCREEN? OKAY. SO THIS IS TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 20-41. THIS WILL BE FAMILIAR WITH YOU, ROME AND SLIGH PARK. PUBLICLY INITIATED BY COUNCIL. SINCE IT WAS OVER TEN ACRES TRANSMITTED TO CEO WHICH CITY COUNCIL DID AND RECEIVED A NO COMMENT LETTER FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FROM RESIDENTIAL 20 AND RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE TO RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE AND WITH THAT, I WILL JUST STATE THAT IT IS ASKED FOR APPROVAL TONIGHT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. MR. MANISCALCO? WANT TO HEAR FROM STAFF, RIGHT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: ANYBODY -- >>ORLANDO GUDES: FROM STAFF. >>MARTIN SHELBY: ANYBODY WITH STAFF ON THIS? THERE IS SOMEBODY FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FRANK? >>ORLANDO GUDES: IS HE ON. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. HALL. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. FRANK HALL WITH THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THIS REQUEST IS ROUTED INTERNALLY FOR COMMENT BY CITY STAFF AND AT THIS POINT, THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>MARTIN SHELBY: ANYBODY GUS GUDES ANYBODY REGISTERED? >>CLERK: YES, WE DO. >>ORLANDO GUDES: RAISE YOUR HAND TO BE SWORN. WE CAN'T HEAR YOU. TURN YOUR MICROPHONE ON. >> I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS. HOW ARE YOU. I AM A PUBLIC POLICY ADMINISTRATION STUDENT AT ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE. I AM ORIGINALLY FROM PUERTO RICO AND HAVE LIVED IN FLORIDA FOR OVER A DECADE. CURRENTLY I RESIDE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA AND HAVE BEEN DOING SO FOR FOUR YEAR MINUTE WORK AT A LEGAL ASSISTANT FOR RIVAS LAW GROUP TO HELP THOSE WHO ARE INJURED WITH NEGLIGENCE. SINCE MOVING IN CITY OF TAMPA, I RECOGNIZED THE OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. I HAD THE PLEASURE OF SPEAKING WITH THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PLAN COORDINATOR AND PRINCIPAL PLANNER FOR COMPREHENSIVE POLICY AND REVIEW, MISS JENNIFER MALONE, ON THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 20-41. MISS MALONE PROVIDED ME WITH VALUABLE INSIGHTS ON THE BENEFITS THIS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT WILL BRING TO THE RESIDENTS OF NORTH ROME AVENUE. FOR INSTANCE, THIS ORDINANCE IS SET TO ALLOW RESIDENTS TO BENEFIT BY PROVIDING ADDITIONAL RECREATIONAL LAND USE THAT WOULD SERVE AS AN AMENITY TO THE COMMUNITY. ONE OF MY CONCERNS WAS THE POSSIBLE DISPLACEMENT OF RESIDENTS WHO RESIDE IN NORTH ROME AVENUE; HOWEVER, MISS MALONE ASSURED ME THIS ORDINANCE WOULD NOT REQUIRE RESIDENTS TO BE LOCATED. I WANT TO PERSONALLY THANK MISS MALONE TAKING THE TIME TO EXPRESS HER KNOWLEDGE TO ME AND A VALUABLE ASSET TO THE CITY OF TAMPA. LAND USE POLICY 4.2 UNDER THE HILLSBOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE CITY OF TAMPA STRIVES TO PROTECT OPEN SPACE FOR RECREATIONAL SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE. CONFERRING THE CHANGES TO LAND USE POSE NO RISK TO THE PUBLIC AND FOR MOST, THE PRESERVATION OF THE RECREATIONAL LAND AND OPEN SPACE, I AM IN FULL SUPPORT OF THIS ORDINANCE. COUNCILMEMBERS, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY AND FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK ON THIS ORDERS NANCE. HAVE A GREAT NIGHT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU. I CAN ELSE TO SPEAKN TH ITEM? >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION BY MR. MIRANDA. SECOND BY MR. SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I AM CONCERNED -- ANYBODY DOWNSTAIRS ON THE SECOND FLOOR? I DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS. I HAVEN'T CHECKED. AILEEN ROSARIO. >>AILEEN ROSARIO, PLANNING MANAGEMENT. NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO ONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR. ANYONE REGISTERED. MOVE TO CLOSE. MR. MANISCALCO SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. ANY OPPOSED. ALL RIGHT. MOTION CARRIES. MR. MANISCALCO, READ NUMBER ONE SIR PLEASE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH MR. CHAIRMAN. AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSID CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 IMAGINE 2040 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED 6800 NORTH ROME AVENUE, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS ROME AND SLIGH PARK FROM RESIDENTIAL 20 AND RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE TO RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE PROVIDING FOR REPEA OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING BY EFFECTIVE DATE. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION JULY 15 AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, ITEM NUMBER TWO.DIB >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN, I NOTICED THAT ITEM NUMBER 5 IS ONE OF THOSE PARK RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE IF YOU WANT TO GET RID OF IT QUICK. IT IS UP TO YOU. >>MARTIN SHELBY: ITEM NUMBER 9, ITEM NUMBER 8. >>ORLANDO GUDES: 8. NUMBER 9, YEP. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT IS UP TO YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: 9, 8, 5. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I THINK THAT IS IT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN THOSE WHO ARE GAUGING WHEN -- JUST TO DO IT IN ORDER RATHER THAN CHANGE THE AGENDA AT THIS POINT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: LET'S GO THROUGH THE AGENDA. NUMBER TWO. LET'S GO. >> GOOD AFTER, COUNCILMEMBERS, DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. IF I CAN SHARE MY SCREEN PL PLEASE. HOPEFULLY YOU ARE SEEING MY SCREEN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE ARE SEEING IT. >>DAVID HEY: THE NEXT AMENDMENT UP FOR YOUR REVIEW FILE NO. TA-CPA 21-02. IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT. IT'S MORE SPECIFICALLY IN THE NORTHEAST COMMUNITY LIVE OAK SQUARE NEIGHBORHOODS. AND EASTERN PORTION OF THE C CITY. WHERE THE STAR IS. HERE WE HAVE AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE. IT IS OUTLINED IN RED. HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW. HERE TO THE SOUTH IS EAST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. TO THE EAST IS NORTH 50th STREET. YOU COULD SEE THAT SHIPMENT COURT AND NORTH 48thTREE DEAD-ENDS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT SITE ON THE SOUTH SIDE FROM HILLSBOROUGH AND NORTH 47th STREET IS THE MAIN ACCESS POINT TO THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS DOTTED LINE IS THE CITY BOUNDARIES. SO EVERYTHING TO THE NORTH AND EAST OUT HERE IS INDIANA CORPORATEED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND NORTH 48th STREET GOES SOUTH -- DEAD-ENDS FROM THE SUBJECT SITE FROM UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. YOU CAN SEE THAT NORTH 50th STREET, THE EAST SIDE OF THE ROAD IS MOSTLY INDUSTRIAL IN CHARACTER. THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH 50th STREET WITHIN THE CITY IS HEAVY COMMERCIAL IN NATURE. THEN YOU HAVE GOT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED, PREDOMINANTLY TO THE NORTH. AND WEST. AND THERE ARE SOME SINGLE FAMILY USES TO THE SOUTH AS WELL BEFORE YOU GET TO THE COMMERCIAL USES LOCATED DOWN ON EAST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. A LITTLE BACKGROUND, THIS IS PUBLICLY INITIATED BY THE CITY OF TAMPA. IT IS A SMALL SCALE. IT IS APPROXIMATELY 7.24 ACRES IN SIZE. THE SUBJECT SITE HAS AN ADOPTED LAND USE CATEGORY OF RESIDENTIAL-10. REGARDING THE PROPOSED REQUEST, ORIGINALLY THE CITY ADMINISTRATION REQUESTED THE COMMERCIAL USE 5. AND DESPITE CONVERSATIONS WITH NEIGHBORHOOD STAKEHOLDERS AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, THE CITY OF TAMPA AMENDED THEIR ORIGINAL REQUEST DOWN TO THE RESIDENTIAL-35 FUTURLANDSE CATEGORY AND THAT IS THE CATEGORY THAT YOU SEE THIS EVENING. TAKE A QUICK TOUR AROUND THE SUBJECT SITE. HERE WE ARE LOOKING NORTH UP NORTH 48th STREET. SO EAST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE IS BEHIND YOU. WE ARE LOOKING TOWARD THE SUBJECT SITE, AND THAT IS THE SUBJECT SITE, THE WOODED AREA RIGHT AT THE END OF THE ROAD. THIS IS SOME SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL LOCATED TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, ALONG THAT NORTH 48th STREET CORRIDOR. THE SUBJECT SITE BEHIND THESE TREES TO THE RIGHT. NOW WE ARE LOOKING WHERE -- WE ARE KINDS OF MOVING WEST. LOOKING UP NORTH OF SHIPMENT COURT TOWARD THE SUBJECT SITE. EAST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE BEHIND YOU. SHIPMENT COURT DOES KINDS OF GO NORTH AND THEN ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY IMMEDIATELY TAKES A LEFT. SO THAT IS THAT JOG THAT YOU ARE SEEING. THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE ENDS OF THE ROAD. HERE WE ARE LOOKING EAST ALONG SHIPMENT COURT. SO WE ARE LOONG BK AT WHERE THAT CORNER WAS THERE. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED OVER HERE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PHOTO. BUT, AGAIN, WE ARE AT NORTH 47th STREET. TO THE EAST. NOW WE ARE LOOKING NORTH UP NORTH 47th STREET AND WE ARE STANDING RIGHT HAND THIS CAR IN THE LAST SHOT LOOKING DOWN SHIPMENT COURT. NOW WE ARE LOOKING NORTH OF NORTH 47th STREET. AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE FROM SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AND THAT IS THE SUBJECT SITE THAT IS VACANT. HERE WE HAVE GOT SOME SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS ALONG NORTH 47th ST STREET. HERE WE ARE LOOKING AT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG NORTHWEST 47th STREET. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED TO THE SOUTH. AND EAST OF THIS SITE. SO THE BACK YARD, ALL THIS GREEN HERE IN THE BACK IS THE SUBJECT SITE. NOW WE ARE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE -- OF THE SUBJECT SITE. LOKING SOUTH DOWN NORTH 48th STREET FROM UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. AND THEN THIS IS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG NORTH 48TH STREET. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE RIGHT HERE THAT DEAD-ENDS IN THE S SITE. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. YOU CAN SEE THE CURRENT DESIGNATION AND THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH, WEST AND SOUTH IN THAT TAN COLOR, ALL THE RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST, YOU -- IN THE RED, YOU HAVE THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35, SO THAT'S THE HEAVY COMMERCIAL TYPE USES THAT THE CATEGORY CAN ALSO BE FUNDS TO THE SOUTH ALONG EAST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. AND THIS DOTTED LINE ON THIS MAP REPRESENTS THE CITY BOUNDARY, SO UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY TO THE NORTH, WE HAVE RESIDENTIAL-6, WHICH IS- IS SIX DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND HARD TO SEE, BUT JUST TO THE EAST OF 50th STREET, YOU HAVE THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL REPRESENT THE BY THE GRAY. IF THIS AMENDMENT IS APPROVED, THIS SITE WOULD GO TO THE RESIDENTIAL-35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY RECOMMENDED BY THE BROWN COLOR. HERE WE HAVE THE MAXIMUM POTENTIAL AND INTENSITY AND DENSITY EXISTING UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10. THE SUBJECT SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR A MAXIMUM 72 DWELLING UNITS OR 110,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. MAXIMUM DENSITY UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35 IS 253. FOR THE RECORD, AN INCORRECT UNIT NUMBER WAS PROVIDED IN ONE PORTION OF THE STAFF REPORT. THE CORRECT MAXIMUM UNIT COUNT IS 253. THE BY RIGHT UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-35, THE SITE COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR 217 UNITS AND THAT IS 30 DWELLING UNITS AN ACRE. THAT IS THE BY RIGHT SENSE TEE. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL-35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED POLICY GUIDANCE WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND FOUR MAIN AREAS OF CONSISTENCY. SUBJECT SITE FALLING WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOGNIZES THE UNIVERSITY DISTRICT AS THE PRIMARY, RESEARCH, MEDICAL AND EMPLOYMENT CENTER FOR THE CITY OF TAMPA. ADDITIONAL HOUSING ESPECIALLY IN PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES FURTHER A NUMBER POLICIES SPECIFIC TO THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO PROMOTES COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT WITH EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS. THE RESIDENTIAL-35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY REMOVES ANY POTENTIAL FOR COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES THAT COULD BE INTRODUCED UNDER THE ORIGINAL COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FEATURE LAND USE CATEGORY. ALSO ANY NONRESIDENTIAL USES MUST MEET COMMERCIAL LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. PROPOSED R-35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY APPLIES FOR A TRANSITION OF DENSITY TO THAT COMMUNITY 35 LOCATED TO THE EAST AND THE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ALONG THIS SEGMENT OF NORTH 47th STREET. THIRD, THE CITY'S OVERALL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY IS TO PROMOTE RESIDENTIAL INFILL IN APPROPRIATE AREAS, ESPECIALLY AREAS THAT HAVE ACCESS TO TRANSIT AND EMPLOYMENT. THE PLAN ALSO SEEKS TO TARGET AREAS THAT ARE REAL SERVED BY INFRASTRUCTURE OR THAT HAVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ADDITIONAL EXPANSION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AT MINIMAL COST. DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE OVERALL LOCK PATTERN, ADDITIONAL INFILL MAY BE APPROPRIATE IN THIS GENERAL AREA. IF DEVELOPMENT CAN ALSO BE SENSITIVE TO EXISTING SI SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES. THE PLANNING COMMIION D FIND THE INTRODUCTION OF THE R-35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AT THIS LOCATION WOULD FURTHER A NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL INFILL POLICIES. FINALLY, THE CITY'S PLAN PROMOTES DENSITY INCREASES THAT ENCOURAGE THE USE OF TRANSIT. SEVERAL STUDIES INCLUDING A 2 2009 STUDY CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER OF TRANSIT ORIENTED FOUND THAT DOUBLING RESIDENTIAL DENSITY INCREASE TRANSIT BETWEEN 15 AND 59% DEPENDING ON PROXIMITY AND FREQUENCY OF THAT TRANSIT. EAST HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY IS SERVED BY HART'S ROUTE 34 WHICH CONNECTS THE SITE TO NET PARK IN THE NORTHWEST TRANSFER CENTER. ADDITIONAL DENSITY WITHIN00 FEET OF A TRANSIT STOP 308 SEE 9.8.4. SHOULD BE NOTED THAT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND THAT TAMPA CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE PLAN AMENDMENT, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, IN COOPERATION WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA AND PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS, SHOULD STUDY THE VIABILITY OF POTENTIALLY INCREASING DENSITY ESPECIALLY WITH THE R-10 AREAS BETWEEN THE SUBJECT SITE AND EAST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE. BASED ON THAT, YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE IMAGINE 2040 IMAGINE 2040. THAT INCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I BELIEVE THE CITY HAS A PRESENTATION AS WELL, BUT I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. HEY? POLICE FEELEY, YOU ARE UP. >>ABBYE FEELEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. ABBYE FEELEY, DIRECTOR OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT. I OVERSEE THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT. THE APPLICATION IS FROM HDC. THIS PROPERTY -- I DO HAVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION THAT I WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT TO YOU. I DID SUBMIT IN PRESENTATION TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE IF THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH ANY VISIBILITY, BUT SINCE I AM NOT AT HOME DRIVING THE SCREEN TONIGHT, I BROUGHT A GOOD OLD-FASHIONED PAPER COPY THAT I AM GOING TO SHARE WITH YOU. AS DAVID MENTIOND TO YOU, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON -- OH, MAY I HAVE THE ELMO PLEASE? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I THINK DAVID DID A GREAT JOB OF FAMILIARIZING YOU WHERE THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED. IT IS ON THE EAST SIDE O47th NORTH OF HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE, WEST OF 50th STREET. HE DID MENTION TO YOU THE CITY BOUNDARY IS AT 50th STREET. EVERYTHING EAST OF 50s IS ALL COUNTY, ALLIED LAND USE. THIS CONTAINS TWO PARCELS AND THEY DO TOTAL JUST OVER SEVEN ACRES. IT IS CURRENTLY RES-10. SO WE CAN ONLY REALLY DO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HERE. AND WHAT WE ARE PROPOSE SOMETHING A RESIDENTIAL-35. DAVID DID MENTION TO YOU WE DID TRY TO FOR A CMU-35 AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS NOT VERY RECEPTIVE TO THAT AND DID STEP IT DOWN AND I WILL GO FURTHER EXPLANATION BEYOND T THAT. THE CITY PURCHASE THIS PROPERTY WITH CDBG FUNDS BACK IN 20. SO WE ARE -- 2019. AND SO WE ARE LIMITED AND RESTRICTED HOW THIS PROPERTY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND HOUSING THAT RUNS CONSISTENT WITH THIS PROGRAM. OUR GOAL WITH THIS PLAN AMENDMENT IS TO MOVE FROM THAT SINGLE-FAMILY TO ALLOW FOR ALTERNATIVE TYPES OF HOUSING AND WE WILL BE PUTTING THIS PROPERTY OUT FOR AN RFP. SO BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS REAY TO TAKE US TO THAT -- THAT NEXT STEP OF DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPERTY IS SHOWN HERE TO YOU IN YELLOW. AND AS -- AS DAVID MENTIONED, YOU HAVE ALL THAT CC-35. EVERYTHING THAT RUNS ALONG 50th IS AUTO REPAIR WAREHOUSING. IT IS NOT VERY CONDUCIVE TO A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBOR. SO THIS WILL ACTUALLY ALLOW ONE OF THOSE TRANSITIONS THAT OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TALKS ABOUT WHERE YOU OFFER DIFFERENT HOUSING STOCK THAT KIND OF BUFFERS UP AINSTHAT. ALSO TO NOTE ON THE SEVEN ACRES, THERE ARE A LOT OF TREES, SO WE DO HAVE SOME NATURAL BUFFERS THAT ARE GOING TO ASSIST US IN DEVELOPING THIS IN A WAY THAT WILL PROVIDE SOME OF THOSE BUFFERS TO WHAT IS ON 50th. AND YOU HAVE HILLSBOROUGH TO THE SOUTH. I HAVE A FEW PHOTOS I WILL SHOW YOU OF THE COMMERCIAL THAT IS HERE. THERE IS A CHURCH. ALSO, AS YOU MOVE UP 47th TOWARD THE PROPERTY, AND THEN, AGAIN, I DO HAVE SOME TRANSIT TO SHARE WITH YOU AS WELL.. I DID GO OFF TO THE SITE AND TOOK A FEW PICTURES FOR YOU. AS I MENTIONED IT IS ALL EMPTY NOW. IT IS A LARGE PIECE. YOU CAN SEE IT FROM BOTH SIDES. SHIPMENT DOES WRAP AROUND ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, SO SHIPMENT COMES OFF OF HILLSBOROUGH AND DOES MAKE A LITTLE DOG LEG THERE THAT DOES COMPTON 47th. SOME PHOTOS. JUST TRAVELING FROM THAT WEST SIDE OF 47th. THERE IS A SHOPPING CENTER, A VACANT PARCEL. JUST NORTH OF THAT. THE PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY THAT I REFERRED TO AND SOME SINGLE FAMILY DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET. AS DAVID MENTIONED, WE ARE IN PROXIMITY TO A NUMBER OF TRANSIT ROUTES THAT SERVE THIS AREA. WITHIN00 FEET IS THE NEAREST ROUTE THAT IS ON HILLSBOROUGH, THE 34. WITHIN THREE QUARTERS OF A MILE AT 56th, THERE ARE FOUR ROUTES THAT SERVE THAT AREA AND WITHIN HALF A MILE ON 40th, THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL ONE ROOM. I PROVIDED YOU WITH SOME OF OUR LAND USE OBJECTIVES AS WELL IN RELATION TO ENSURING THAT THERE IS AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF LAND PLANNED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES TO ACCOMMODATE OUR PROJECTED POPULATION THAT WE PROTECT, PROMOTE AND MAINTAIN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS IN PRESERVE A ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL FOR FUTURE POPULATION GROWTH AND THE IMPACT OF REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ON THE FRAMEWORK AND CHARACTER OF EFFECTIVE AREA SHOULD BE RECOGNIZE $AND DISCUSSED THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS. WE HAVE LAND USE OBJECTIVE 9.6 OF INCREASING THE DIVERSITY AND IMPROVING THE SUSTAINABILITY OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND 9.6.4 SPEAKS OF BALANCING THE OBJECTING JECK IF I WAS TO INCREASE NEW DEVELOPMENT TO ENSURE ADEQUATE HSINGOR TAMPA RESIDENTS TO ENSURE THAT THE NEW DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBOR CHARACTER. IF I CAN JUST -- I WANT TO GO BACK JUST A SECOND TO THAT LAND USE MAP. BECAUSE SEE ACROSS FROM THE HILLSBOROUGH CORRIDOR A RES-35 APARTMENT COMPLEX SIMILAR TO A PATTERN THAT WILL BE CREATED BY THE APPROVAL OF THE PLAN AMOUNT BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING AND AN R-20. THE SAME PATTERN ON THE SOUTH SIDE AS YOU STEP BACK OFF OF THE CORRIDOR OF THE COMMERCIAL 35 TO THE RES-35 ON THE SOUTH SIDE AS WELL WHEN YOU GO OVER TO 40th STREET A CMU-35 CORRIDOR THAT RUNS ADJACENT TO THE R-10 THAT ALSO HAS DIFFERENT USES AND COMMERCIAL USES THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED THERE AND THAT IS WHATAVID MENTIONED EARLIER DID CONSIDER PUTTING THERE. THERE WERE SOME CONCERNS RELATED TO THAT AND STEPPED BACK THAT APPLICATION TO BE THES RE-35. -- THE RES-35. LASTLY WE HAVE POLICIES OF LOW AND MEDIUM-DENSITY AREAS AND PROVIDING FOR THESE TRANSITIONAL AREAS. 9.7.3 TALKS OF PROVIDING FOR DENSITY OF SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS AND MORE RESIDENTIAL INTENSIVE USES AND THAT IS WHAT I DISPLAYED TO YOU ON THE MAP WHEN I SHOWED THAT TRANSITION TO ALLOW FOR THIS USE FROM THE 50th STREET CORRIDOR. WITH THAT BEING SAID I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL THIS EVENING AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I WILL BE ANTICIPATE TO ANSWER THEM. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUES QUESTIONS? MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.DI >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MISS FEELEY. SEEMS LIKE A PRETTY EXCITING PROJECT POTENTIAL IN PARTNERSHIP WITH PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT TO TRY TO BUILD AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND THAT'S WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT. AS WE DISCUSSED EARLIER. DO -- IS ONE OF THOSE PHOTOGRAPHS ACTUALLY 47th OR 48th STREET? >>ABBYE FEELEY: NO 50th WOULD BE THE BACK SIDE WITH THE WAREHOUSING. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY. >>ABBYE FEELEY: 47. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WONDER IF YOU HAVE THE PHOTOGRAPH. >>ABBYE FEELEY: THE PHOTOS OF 47th. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NOT NECESSARILY ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY? >>ABBYE FEELEY: OH, I HAVE THOSE. THESE ARE THE SUBJECT ALONG THE TOP AND WHERE I SHOWED YOU SHIPMENT COURT COMES AROUND, THERE IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON THE SOUTH OF THAT. AND THEN THIS WAS ACROSS 47. THERE IS ANOTHER HOME. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE ONE YOUR FINGER IS ON RIGHT NOW I THINK MAKES POI. IT APPEARS TO ME LOOKING AT ALL THESE, THAT THERE IS A SEVERE SHORTAGE OF SIDEWALKS THROUGHOUT THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. AND IF -- IF WE ARE TALKING ABOUT, YOU KNOW, BUILDING THIS TYPE OF PROJECT WITHIN A FEW BLOCKS OF -- OF THE TRANSIT CORRIDOR WHICH IS ALL A GOOD THING, THEN I THINK IT IS INHERENT THAT WHEN WE DO THAT TO THE TUNE OF SEVERAL HUNDRED UNITS, THAT WE GIVE PEOPLE A SAFE WAY TO GET TO AND FROM. >> WE HAVE ALREADY SPOKEN TO MOBILITY ON THAT AND THEY ARE AWARE THAT THERE WILL BE SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS THERE. WE WILL BE PUTTING THEM ON OUR PROPERTY OR WHOMEVER ASSIGNED THE RFP WILL AND WILL BE MAKING THE OTHER CONNECTIONS AND THEY ARE AWARE OF THAT. KING >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I KNOW A LITTLE PREMATURE AND NOT HERE TO REVIEW REZONING OR CONTRACT WITH A PRIVATE DEVELOPER. BUT OBVIOUSLY YOU ALREADY THOUGHT OF IT BUT IN THE BACK OF YOUR MIND WHEN WE GO TO PUT OUT THE RFP. THE RFP SHOULD BE ABUNDANTLY CLEAR FUND THE SIDEWALKS INTERNAL AND ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND POSSIBLY SOME EXTERNAL SIDEWALKS AND PART OF THE RFP, PAY TO PLAY. I THINK PAY TO PLAY IN THIS CASE IS APPROPRIATE FOR SIDEWALKS. ANYWAY, OBVIOUSLY NOT TONIGHT, BUT I JUST WANTED TO MENTION IT SO WHEN IT COMES UP LATER WON'T BE SAWYER PRIZE TO EVERYBODY. THANK YOU. -- IT WON'T BE A SURPRISE TO EVERYBODY. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM VERY FAMILIAR WITH THAT. GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO THE CEMETERY. THE SIDE STREET BEHIND T MOTEL IS BACK THERE. I CAN'T THINK OF THAT STREET -- A SIDE STREET. MY QUESTION TONIGHT IS THAT -- BECAUSE THAT IS A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY AS WELL. IT MAY NOT LOOK LIKE THAT ON THE VIDEO, BUT IF YOU GO A LITTLE BIT TO THE WEST, IT IS COMMUNITY. SO HAVE WE TALKED TO THE RESIDENTS? YOU SAID ALTERNATIVE TYPE HOUSING. SO HAVE WE TALKED TO THE RESIDENTS OVER THERE ABOUT THIS PROJECT? AND WHAT MADE THAT ALTERNATIVE BE, BECAUSE PROJECTS. SOME COMMUNITIES DON'T REALLY CARE. SO I WANT TO KNOW HOW WE TALK TO THE COMMUNITY? >> WE DID HAVE A PUBLIC INFORMATION STATION. RONDO GOERS AND FRANK HALL CONDUCTED THAT. I WAS PARTY TO THAT AND WE DID RECEIVE FEEDBACK ON THAT. WHEN I SAY ALTERNATIVE, I MEAN WHEN WE PUT THE RFP OUT, IT MAY BE A COMBINATION OF MULTIFAMILY OR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED TOWN HOME STYLE. WHAT WE HAVE ON THE LAND IS ONLY GOOD FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOME AND LOOKING AT OUR NEED AND THE FUTURE POPULATION, WE ARE LOOKING TO PUT THIS INTO A CATEGORY WHERE YOU CAN START TO ENVISION AND PLAN FOR THAT. WE CAN'T DO THAT RIGHT NOW. THE ONLY THING WE CAN DO IS A SUBDIVISION ON THAT PROPERTY FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. SO THIS IS OUR FIRST STEP. WE WILL THEN HAVE TO GO TO THE NEXT PLANNING STEP, BUT WE DID HAVE THOSE INITIAL DISCUSSIONS AND DID RECEIVE FEEDBACK FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WHEN THOSE DISCUSSIONS WERE H HAD, THEY WERE ASKING WHAT THEY WANTED THERE AND WHAT CAME OUT WERE LIBRARIES, COMMUNITY CENTERS, OTHER THINGS. BASED ON HOW WE PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY WIT THOSE FEDERAL FUNDS, WE CAN NOT USE THIS FOR A LIBRARY. SO RANDY DID FOLLOW UP WITH THEM AND LET THEM KNOW BASED ON THAT INPUT AND BASED ON THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WE PROVIDED TO HIM, THAT WE ARE LOOKING -- I MEAN THE RFP COULD STILL INCORPORATE A COMMUNITY ROOM AND INCORPORATE OTHER THINGS AND WE WANT TO ASK SOMEBODY TO TAKE A LOOK AT THIS, THE DEVELOPER AND PUT IN -- PUT IN AN APPLICATION TO THE RFP IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO -- TO IMAGINE. BUT RIGHT NOW, IT CAN ONLY BE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES AND HOW IT ABUTS WHAT IS ALONG 50th AND WHAT OUR FUTURE NEEDS ARE IN THE PURCHASE OF THIS PROPERTY THAT WAS DONE UNDER THE PRIOR MANAGER. WE ARE TRYING TO GET THIS INTO A POSITION WHERE WE CAN MOVE IT FORWARD. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM GREAT GLAD YOU ARE TRANSPARENT AND TOLD ME ABOUT THAT BECAUSE I HEARD A RUMORS IN THAT COMMUNITY ABOUT WHAT WAS -- HOW IT WAS BROUGHT TO THEM. AND THEY DID NOT TAKE KINDLY WITH THE WAY IT WAS BROUGHT TO THEM. AND SOMETIMES THAT DOES HAPPEN AND WE DON'T REALLY COMMU COMMUNICATE. BUT I DID UNDERSTAND THAT STAFF DID BACK OUT THERE AND APOLOGIZE TO THE COMMUNITY FOR THE WAY IT WAS DELIVERED. I AM GLAD THAT DID HAPPEN. I GUESS OUR CONCERN -- WHEN YOU SAY "ALTERNATIVE,"FEARFUL OF THE TINY HOME CONCEPT. AND THEY ARE FEARFUL OF CONTAINERS. I DIDN'T HEAR YOU TALK ABOUT ANY OF THAT. >>ABBYE FEELEY: THIS IS NOT OUR INTENT FOR THIS PROPERTY. A GREAT PIECE OF PROPERTY, SEVEN ACRE. AS YOU MENTIONED COULD BE 217. I DON'T THINK IT WILL BE THERE. I THINK WE WOULD SHOOT FOR SOMEWHERE IN THE 150, 16 RANGE. I DON'T FORESEE US MAXING THIS OUT BASED ON THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE PROPERTY, THE TREES AND OTHER THINGS. I WANT US TO BE CONSIDERATE OF THAT AND BE CONSIDERATE OF THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA TO ENSURE THEIR WHAT WE ARE PUTTING IN THERE IS COMPATIBILITY AND DOES BENEFIT THAT COMMUNITY AND IS A POSITIVE INVESTMENT IN THAT COMMUNITY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ILLINOIS MORE YOU TO LOOK AT THAT PROPERTY AND THEY HAVE BEEN AN EYESORE -- NUISANCE LIKE THE MOTEL THERE. AND WHILE YOU ARE WORKING ON THAT. I THINK YOU SHOULD EXPLORE SOME OF THE OTHER OPTIONS THAT -- THAT -- THAT CAR LOT DEALERSHIP THAT IS ON THE CORNER RIGHT THERE. THE MOTEL NEXT TO IT AND THE OTHER OLD BUILDING RIGHT THERE. AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY USE. AND THE FAMILY DOLLAR. 5508. I KNOW THE AREA LIKE THE BACK OF MY HAND. WE GOT TO BE LOOKING AT THE BROADER PICTURE AND PUT THAT -- BECAUSE THAT IS BIGIECE OF PROPERTY. AS DINGFELDER SAID A LOT MORE TRAFFIC TO THAT AREA AND YOU FRY TO PUT THEM WITH THE SIZE OF THAT PROPERTY AND HE IS RIGHT. TO HAVE SIDEWALKS ON THAT STREET BECAUSE WITH THAT KIND OF TRAFFIC AND KIDS. THAT MEANS WALKING. AND PUT ALL THOSE THINGS IN PERSPECTIVE. >> YES, SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: IT IS A BEAUTIFUL PROPERTY. ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU, MISS FEELEY. HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC ON THE ITEM. >> NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS. >> ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR? >>ILEEROSAO, GROWTH MANAGEMENT. NO ONE HERE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION TO CLOSE. SECOND. MOTION CARRIES. MR. CARLSON, MINDS DOING THE HONORS FOR ITEM NUMBER 2. >>BILL CARLSON: YES, SIR, THANK YOU. I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE NUMBER TA/CPA 21-02, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040: TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED 5709 NORTH 47th STREET AND 4705 EAST HENRY AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL-10 R-10 TO RESIDENTIAL-35 R-35 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROVIDE EFFECTIVE DATE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. CARLSON KAVRLZ YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES WITH VIERA BEING SECOND. AND SECOND ON JULY 15 AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 3. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MISS FEELEY, MY AIDE WITH EARL NERF THE CONVERSATION. JENNIFER, YOU MAY CONTINUE. >>JENNIFER MALONE: THANK YOU. HOPEFULLY EVERYBODY CAN SEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. CPA 21-03. JENNIFER MALONE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN BLACK WITH A RED OVERLAY. A HALF-ACRE SITE ON WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE BETWEEN NORTH BOULEVARD. TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS THE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES. TO THE EAST IS A PACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY. TO THE SOUTH ARE MORE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOME. TO THE SOUTHWEST IS A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. FURTHER TO THE WEST IS ANOTHER PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY. TO THE NORTH IS THE DANNY DEL RIO POOL. WE HAVE FOREST HILLS ELEMENTARY AND ADAMS HILL SCHOOL IN THE NORTH AREA OF THE SITE. THIS IS A PRIVATELY INITIATED SMALL SCALE REQUEST AT ABOUT HALF ACHER FROM RESIDENTIAL-10 TO RESIDENTIAL 20. AND ALSO SITE PICTURES. FACING WEST ALONG WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE KIND OF LOOKING RIGHT INTO THE SITE. ON THIS NEXT ONE, THIS IS THE PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY NEXT TO THE SITE ALONG WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE. IN THIS PICTURE, THE SUBJECT SITE IS A HEAVILY WOODED SITE. A LITTLE DIFFICULT TO GET A PICTURE. BUT JUST LOOKING INTO THE SUBJECT SITE. THESE ARE THE MULTIFAMILIES TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE THAT I POINTED OUTERIER. -- EARLIER. THE FLORIDA GULF COAST ALONG LINEBAUGH. THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ALONG WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE. THIS IS WEST LIMBAUGH, AND THESE SINGLE-FAMILY HOPES WE LINEBAUGH AVENUE.LINE -- AND FACING EAST. THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG 101st AVENUE AND WE CAN SEE THE PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY NEAR THE SITE THROUGH THE SINGLE FAMILY. THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SITE IS RESIDENTIAL-10. A SMALL AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL 20 ON THE FAR WESTERN SIDE. THERE IS RESIDENTIAL 20 FURTHER WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND WE SEE THAT RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE TO THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AS WELL. AND WITH THIS CHANGE, THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE P OF THE ENTIRE SITE TO THE RESIDENTIAL 20 RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. THIS WOULD INCREASE THE IMPACTS FROM FIVE DWELLING UNITS TO 10. AND INCREASE THE NONRESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM 7949 SQUARE FEET TO 10,890. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA WILL BE APPLY WITHIN THE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND OFFERS A LEVEL OF PROTECTION IF THIS IS APPROVED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 20. SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND THIS CONSISTENTWITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUPPORTS THE PROMOTION OF INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND SITE IN PROXIMITY OF THE USF BUSINESS CENTER AND THE PLAN PROMOTES THE INFILL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THESE AREAS AND ALSO SUPPORTS SENSITIVE TRANSITION BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL USES TO PROVIDE THAT SENSITIVE TRANSITION FROM A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED TO THE NORTH TO BEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE. ALSO SEVERAL TRANSIT STOPS LOCATED ALONG WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE AS WELL AND DEFINITELY PROMOTES THAT AND ENCOURAGES HOUSING IN PROXIMITY TO TRA TRANSIT, EMPLOYMENT AND THE EMPLOYMENT WITH THE USF BUSINESS CENTER PIECE. IT ALSO PROMOTES SIGHTING THE LOCATION OF MULTIFAMILY AREAS AND AREAS THAT THEY ARE PRE PRESENT. AND THERE IS A MULTIFAMILY PRESENT TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. LASTLY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES THE PROMOTION OF NEW HOUSING ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND LOCATED ON A COLLECTOR WITH ACCESS TO TRANSITND EMPLOYMENT SO THE PLAN DOES SUPPORT THIS CHANGE. AND SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND IT CONSISTENT AND I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND FRANK HALL IS ON THE LINE RIGHT NOW WITH THE CITY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUES QUESTIONS, MISS MALONE? VICE-CHAIR IS RECOGNIZED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MISS MALONE, DID YOU PUT UP ONE OF THOSE AERIAL LOOKING MAPS. THAT ONE IS FINE SO LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, RIGHT NOW, YOU SAID THAT IT COULD ACCOMMODATE FIVE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES, CORRECT? >> THAT'S CORRECT. UNDER THE MAXIMUM POTENTIAL. THE POTENTIAL, YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IS THERE A SIDE STREET THERE RUNNING, WHAT NORTH-SOUTH? >>JENNIFER MALONE: THIS STREET HERE? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO, RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH. ALONG THE EDGE. >>JENNIFER MALONE: RIGHT HERE >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I DON'T KNOW, IF THAT I EAST-WEST OR NORTH-SOUTH. >>JENNIFER MALONE: SORRY, NORTH-SOUTH. WHICH SIDE STREET ARE YOU. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. >>JENNIFER MALONE: OVER HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE ONLY STREET TOUCHING THIS PROPERTY LINEBAUGH? >>JENNIFER MALONE: CORRECT, YES SIR. YES, THAT'S CORRECT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY. I MEAN, MY -- MY GUT FEELING SAYS WHY NOT LEAVE IT AS -- YOU KNOW, POTENTIALLY FOUR OR FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT IS BEHIND IT TO THE NORTH. BUT THEN NOW THEIR SAYING THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN GET IN AND OUT IS ON LINEBAUGH. SO THAT MIGHT LEAN TOWARD A LITTLE MORE DENSITY. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. >>JENNIFER MALONE: YOU ARE WELCOME. >>ORLANDO GUDES: CITY STAFF. FRANK? >> GOOD EVENING, AGAIN, FRANK HALL WITH THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. AGAIN, WE ROUTE THIS INTERNALLY AND THE CITY STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THIS EITHER. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. ANYONE ON SECOND FLOOR? ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THIS ITEM. >>AILEEN ROSARIO: AILEEN ROSARIO, DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT, NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR? >>AILEEN ROSARIO: YES, WE DO. >>CLERK: WE ACTUALLY HAVE THE APPLICANT ONLINE. THE APPLICANT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THE APICAN IS . SORRY ABOUT THAT. JUMPED TOO FAR. THE APPLICANT. >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL FOUR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU FOR HEARING US AND GETTING THIS IN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE GOT NO VIDEO. >> YES, SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: -- >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY, DO WE NEED VIDEO FOR QUASI -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU DON'T HAVE TO SPECIFICALLY. >> I AM SORRY, SIR. I CAN'T HEAR YOU. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS YOUR CAMERA ABLE TO TURN ON. >> I TURNED IT ON. SORRY ABOUT THE TECHNICAL ISSUES AND MADE -- CAN I MOVE ON WITHOUT IT, IS THAT OKAY, SIR GUDES IS THAT OKAY. YOU CAN CONTINUE. >> YES, SIR. SO THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME AGAIN. WE WOULD JUST ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT OF IT AND OUR ADJOINING NEIGHBOR TO THE WEST IS MULTIFAMILY PROPERTY AS WELL TO SOUTHWEST AND THE NORTH SIDE OF IT. AND O ONLY ACCESS, COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER, IS OFF OF LINEBAUGH AND WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: NOBODY FOR THIS ITEM ITEM 3 AND NOBODY REGISTERED. CLOSE. MOTION BY CITRO AND SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, MOTION CARRIED. MR. CITRO, ITEM 3. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH FILE NO. TA/CPA 21-03, MOVE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED 809 WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE, FROM RESIDENTIAL-10, R-10 AND RESIDENTIAL 20, R-20 TO RESIDENTIAL-20, R-20 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MR. CITRO. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES WITH COUNCILMAN VIERA BEING BE A SENT. SECOND READING JEWEL 15, 9:30 A.M. >>DANNY COLLINS: THIS IS DANNY COLLINS. CAN YOU SHARE MY SCREEN MRS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 4. DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 21-05. SUBJECT SITE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT WITHIN THE HISTORIC YBOR NEIGHBORHOOD AND ALSO WITHIN THE LOCAL HISTORIC YBOR DISTRICT AS WELL. THIS WENT TO THE BLC LAST ANTHEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO YOU. HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. THE REQUEST CONSISTS OF SIX FOLIO NUMBERS LOCATED NORTH AND NORTHEAST OF CHANNELSIDE. THIS IS THE SOUTHERN PARCEL. IT IS JUST ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH BALL STREET AND THE SELMON EXPRESSWAY. THE REMAINING FIVE PARCELS ARE NORTH OF ADAMO DRIVE AND NORTH 15th STREET AS YOU MOVE NORTH. HERE IS AN IMAGE LOOKING WEST ALONG EAST SECOND AVENUE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUT OF THE FRAME TO THE RIGHT. THIS IS STANDING AT THE SUBJECT SITE, AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST SECOND AVENUE AND NORTH 15th STREET LOOKING SOUTH. STANDING AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST SECOND AVENUE AND NORTH 15th STREET LOOKING EAST. BEHIND US. THIS IS LOOKING NORTH ALONG NORTH 15th STREET. THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON OUR LEFT. THIS IS LOOKING WEST AT ONE OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT SITES FROM NORTH 15th STREET AS WE MOVE FORWARD ON NORTH 15th STREET. AND THE NORTHERNMOST PARCEL LOOKING WEST FROM NORTH 15th STREET. A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE ON THE SUBJECT SITE. QUICK BACKGROUND OF THE REQ REQUEST. A PRIVATELY INITIATED AMEN AMENDMENT. SMALL SCALE IN SIZE. APPROXIMATELY 3.6 ACRES WITH 2.16 OF THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. AND REMAINING 1.44 ACRES OF HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. ON THE REQUEST IS A CHANGE, 3.50 ACRES TO REGIONAL MIXED USE-100 AND .55 ACRES TO CMU-35 DESIGNATION. HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. YOU WILL SEE THE SOUTHERNMOST PARCEL IS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED UNDER THE HEAVY INDUSTRAL. AND REMAINING FIVE PARCELS RECOGNIZED UNDER LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CATEGORIES. THE SURROUNDING AREA IS TRENDING TOWARD A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN NEAR SEVERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS FROM INDUSTRIAL CATEGORIES TO RM RMU-100 AND C-35HE PAST 25 YEAR. WITH THIS TO THE NORTH. CHANGE TO THE RMU-100 PREVIOUSLY. THERE IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE NORTHERNMOST PARCELS ARE BEING PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED TO THE CMU-35 DESIGNATION AND REMAINING FOUR PARCELS SOUTH OF EAST SECOND AVENUE ARE BEING REQUESTED FOR RMU-100 DESIGNATION. CURRENTLY, UNDER THE LIGHT INDUSTRY AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION, RESIDENTIAL USES CANNOT BE PERMITTED. BUT THE SITES CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR A TOTAL COMBINED 235,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. AS PROPOSED UNDER THE RMU-100 AND CMU-35 DESIGNATIONS. THE TOTAL REQUESTS CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR 324 DWELLING UNITS OR JUST OVER 500,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. SO THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR HIGHER RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND GREATER COMMERCIAL INTENSITY ON THE SUBJECT SITES AND ALSO REMOVE ANY INDUSTRIAL USES FROM THE SITES. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF SENT THIS OFF TO VARIOUS AGENCIES FOR REVIEW. WE DID GET SOME COMMENTS BACK FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD WHICH THEY IDENTIFIED LIKE HIGH SCHOOL AS A SCHOOL THAT DOESN'T NO HAVE A SCHOOL TO HAVEL DOES CAPACITY TO SUPPORT THE LAND USE CHANGE BASED ON ANALYSIS FOR FACILITIES NOT A DETERMINATION OF SCHOOL CONCURRENCY -- THE SCHOOL CONCURRENCY REVIEW WILL BE ISSUED PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. PRESIDENT PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S DESIGN AND CITY PLANNING STRATEGY. THE REQUEST WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE MIXED USE POLICIES BY A MIXTURE OF USES WITHIN PROXIMITY OF EACH OTHER. ALSO THE REQUEST WAS FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANNED HOUSING POLICIES BY ENSURING THERE WAS AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF LAND FOR TAMPA GROWING POPULATION. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL? MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: PUT UP E AERIAL. WHEN THE LIGHTNING HIT, IT KIND OF DETRACTED ME OF THE AERIAL AIR SHOT OF YOUR SURROUNDING PROPERTY. NOW THE ONE -- SORRY, THE ONE THAT SHOWED THE PLANNED DENSITIES ON THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. >> YOU MEAN THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: CORRECT. I KNOW WE HAD SOME RMU-100s IN THAT VICINITY. I WANT TO SEE WHERE THEY WERE. >> CURRENTLY SHOWING ON MY SCREEN A I DON'T KNOW IF I CAN SEE IT. THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE M MAP. THE PURPLE COVER REPRESENTS REGIONAL MIXED USE-100 CAT CATEGORY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE NEXT ONE OVER BETWEEN SECOND AVENUE AND ADA MO, THAT -- NO, STAY ON THE MAP THAT YOU WERE AT. BETWEEN 2nd AVENUE AND ADAMO. CAME IN MANY YEARS O TH KIMMONS -- THE KIMMONSPRO PROPERTY, IS THAT RIGHT? >> I DO NOT KNOW OFF HAND. >> I THINK THEY CAME IN LOOKING FOR THE RMU-100. AND NOW WE HAVE THESE FOLKS LOOKING FOR THE RMU-100. ARE THE TWO PROPERTIES FURTHER TO THE NORTH THAT GO UP TO THIRD AVENUE? IS THAT HE CMU-35? >> YES. SO THE PARCELS THAT ARE NORTH OF EAST 2nd AVENUE ARE GOING TO THE CMU-35. GOING TO RMU-100. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ONE AN ADAMO IS RMU-100. AROUND THE BEND, RMU-100 WERE POSED. >> CORRECT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE? FRANK WITH CITY STAFF. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: FRANK, YOU ARE UP. >> SORRY ABOUT THAT. MY MIC WASN'T WORKING. NONETHELESS, THE CITY HAS REVIEWED THE SUBMISSION. AND AT THIS TIME, IT WAS ROUTED THROUGH AND CITY HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THIS PROPOSAL AT THIS TIME. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR. >> GOOD MORNING, COMMISSIONERS, RON VILA WITH THE STAFF OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION. THIS REQUEST CAME FORWARD ON THE 22nd OF JUNE. IT WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD. ER IN INCORPORATING CMU-35 THAT IS CLOSER TO THE DISTRICT AS IT GOES CLOSER TO THE NORTH. ONE PROPERTY THAT IS IN THE DISTRICT THAT HAS TAKEN THE CMU-35 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION IF THIS MOVES FORWARD. THE RMU-100 WAS CLOSER TO ADAMO DRIVE AND FELT IT WAS ON THE SOUTHERN FRINGE AND FACED ADAMO DRIVE, THEN IT WAS A IT DID RECEIVE APPROVAL FOR A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUES QUESTIONS GENTLEMEN? ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. TYLER HUDSON, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. WITH ME VIRTUALLY IS GRAHAM TYREL, THE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT FOR DEVELOPMENT AT KETLER, GRAHAM IS ONE OF MANY NEW TAMPA RESIDENTS WE WELCOMED THE 12, 15 MONTHS. KETLEW DARYL SHAW WORKING FOR SOME TIME ON A MASTER PLAN FOR THIS PORTION OF YBOR CITY, A PORTION OF CHANNELSIDE AND PORTION OF DOWNTOWN THAT WE WILL TALK ABOUT HERE THIS EVENING. THIS PROJECT IS GOING TO BE ENTITLED. IT WILL BE DEVELOPED, CONSTRUCTED IN PHASES. WE ARE GOING TO BE BACK BEFORE YOU. MET SEVERAL TIMES. WE ARE GOING TO BE HERE LATER THIS YEAR FOR A PD REZONING. WE WILL SEE YOU AGAIN EARLY NEXT YEAR FOR A PD A REZONING. AND IN THOSE APPLICATIONS, WE ARE REALLY GOING TO FLUSH OUT MORE OF THE DETAILS OF THE PROGRAM, BUT BEFORE WE ARE ABLE TO ADVANCE WITH THOSE, WE DO NEED THESE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGES APPROVED, PARTICULARLY BECAUSE AS DANNY ALLUDED TO IN THE PARCELS, WE ARE GOING TO TALK OF RESIDENTIAL USE IS ENTIRELY PROHIBITED. AND THIS COUNCIL HAD TOUGH CONVERSATIONS, YOU HAD SOME TODAY ABOUT PORTIONS OF THE CITY WHERE WE WANT TO DIRECT GROWTH. THIS IS AN AREA WHERE WE BELIEVE GROWTH IS APPROPRIATE. PRESIDENT PLANNING COMMISSION BELIEVES THAT GROWTH IS APPROPRIATE AND, IF I MAY, I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE MYCREE AND GO THROUGH THE INDIVIDUAL PARCEL. CAN I SHARE MY SCREEN? THANKS. AT VIOUSOINT IN MY PRESENTATION OR IN GRAHAM'S PRESENTATION, WE MIGHT TALK ABOUT THE MASTER PLAN OR YBOR SOUTH OF THE PROJECT. THE AREA WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. THE AREAS IN BLUE ARE THE PARCELS WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON FOR SOME TIME FOR THIS MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT. WE ARE ONLY TALKING ABOUT A FEW PARCELS IN THIS BLUE AREA TODAY, BUT JUST SO EVERYONE HAS A FRAME OF REFERENCE IN THE AREA WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. AN AREA A BIT WEST AND EAST OF NUCCI O, NORTH OF ADAMO AND TH15th STREET ON THE EAST.G ON THE RED LINE ON SCREEN IS THE YBOR CITY DISTRICT BOUNDARY. PARCELS SOUTH OF THAT LINE ARE NOT IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT, BUT PARCELS THAT ARE NORTH AND TO THE EAST UP TO THE RIGHT, THOSE PARCELS, THAT IS THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. WE ARE TALKING SPECIFICALLY TODAY ABOUT THE FOUR PARCELS THAT ARE OUTLINED IN GREEN AS YOU WILL SEE THERE. I AM GOING TO GO THROUGH THESE INDIVIDUALLY SO IS THE COUNCIL HAS FULL APPRECIATION WHAT WE ARE ASKING FOR AND WHAT THE IMPACTS WILL BE FOR EACH PA PARC. THE FIRST PARCEL IS THE SMALLEST. 4400 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE FAMILY LOT A CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURE ON IT THAT WE HAVE COMMITTED TO LANDLE THROUGH THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS PROCESS. THE IMPACT -- YOU WILL SEE THIS IS A TREND. A GOOD PORTION OF THIS BLOCK IS ALREADY CMU-35. THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE OF THIS BLOCK IS A TECO SUBSTATION AND SEE THAT PINK AND RED COLOR CC-35. THERE IS PRECEDENT EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE ASKING FOR ON THIS BL BLOCK. THE IMPACIS THAT, FIRST OF ALL, RELATION USE WILL BE AL ALLOWED. AND SECONDLY, YOU WILL SEE THAT THERE IS GOING TO BE -- SORRY, I NEED TO CHANGE MY SCREEN. YOU WILL SEE THERE IS GOING TO BE AN APPRECIABLE INCREASE IN THE AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT ONE CAN DEVELOP. BEFORE I TALK ABOUT THE THREE BLOCKS -- THE THREE PARCELS OUTSIDE THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. I WANT TO TOUCH ON TWO THINGS THAT ARE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT BEAR ON YOUR CONSIDERATIONS THIS EVENING. THE FIRST IS THAT PAGE 81 OF THE COMPREHENVE PLAN REFERENCES A SOUTH YBOR CITY AREA. AND THE WORD GENERALLY THERE. THIS PROJECT IS GENERALLY IN THAT AREA. SOUTH OF THIRD AVENUE AND YOU WILL NOTE THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANTICIPATES THE INCREASE OF RELATION DEVELOPMENT. WHAT -- WHICH -- AND COUNCIL BELIEVES -- WE CERTAINLY BELIEVE IS APPROPRIATE FOR A PORTION OF THE CITY. THE INDUSTRY AND FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES THAT ARE IN PLACE TODAY PREVENT AND PROHIBIT ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE SECOND ITEM THAT I DRAW TO YOUR ATTENTION IS THAT ALL OF THE PARCELS THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THIS EVENING ARE IN THE B PERIPHERY, THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PERIPHERY WHICH ALLOWS FOR A DOUBLING OF ENTITLEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED USE PROJECTS IN AN AREA THAT IS AS IT SOUNDS ON THE PERIPHERY OF THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT DOWNTOWN WHERE DENSITY AND INTENSITY IS UNLIMITED. IT FAVORS OF APPROVING THE COMP PLAN THAT HAVE THE TYPE OF DENSITY APPROPRIATE FOR THE A AREA IN LIGHT OF THE PROXIMITY TO THE BUSINESS DISTRICT. NEXT PARCEL, LOOKINGT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECOND AVENUE AND 15th STREET. AGAIN THIS IS A DIVIDED BLOCK RIGHT NOW TO THE WEST YOU SEE ON THE LEFT PICTURE, CMU-35 ALREADY EXISTS TO THE WEST. WHAT WE WANT TO DO IS STRETCH THAT EASTWARD TO 15th STREET WHAT WE ARE DOING FOR ALL OF THE PARCELS. BRINGING WHAT ALREADY EXISTS TO THE WEST, EAST AND STOPPING ON 15th STREET WHERE THE HISTORIC DISTRICT STARTS. AGAIN, THE IMPACT WE ARE GOING FROM NO RESIDENTIAL ALLOWED TO POTENTIALLY 14 UNIT. AND A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE AS WELL. IF THIS PROJECT WILL BE DEVELOPED BASED ON FAR WHICH IT WILL BE BECAUSE IT WILL BE A MIXED USE PROJECT. AND NOT RUN AFOUL OF SOME OF THE ISSUES I KNOW COUNCIL OF SINGLE USE MULTIFAMILY PRO PROJECTS. NEXT ARE PARCEL CITY BLOCK. NORTHWEST CORNER OF ADAMO AND 15th STREET. THE RMU-100 TO THE WEST OF THE VACATED RIGHT-OF-WAY EASTWARD TO 15TH STREET. PRETTY SIGNIFICANT INCREASE OF ENTITLEMENT WITH RMU-100, IT WILL ALLOW FOR SIGNIFICANT RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AS WELL. ADAMO IS A MIXED USE CORRIDOR. ADAMO IS ALSO AN ARTERIAL ROAD. THE FURTHEST AWAY FROM THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. THIS IS A PARCEL THAT COUNCIL I BELIEVE WILL SEE IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE. THIS IS THE PROPOSED NEW GREEN FIELDS TUCKED BETWEEN TWO LANES OF THE EXPRESSWAY. THE PROPERTY OWNED BY THE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY ON THE END OF 12th STREET. AND ONE OF THE DOORSTEPS TTHE GASWORKS PARCEL THAT WE WILL TALK A LOT MORE ABOUT IN THE REZONINGS TO COME. AND AGAIN, THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF RMU-100 TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE EAST OF THE PARCEL. RMU-100 IS AN APPROPRIATE CHANGE AND THIS CURRENTLY UNLIKE THE OTHER PARCELS ARE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. NOT LIGHT STRILT. AGAIN, THE TALE OF THE TAPE, A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN THE DENSITY. DANNY ALLUDED TO, WE ARE HAVING A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION. AND FROM THE BARRIO LATINO COMMISSION WE HAD ON TUESDAY MORNING. AND WAY TO LOOK AT THIS IS MR. DINGFELDER CAUGHT ON THIS AS WELL. THE PICTURE TO THE LEFT. THE BEFORE PICTURE. THE OUTLINE PARCELS DON'T MATCH WITH WHAT IS SURROUNDING THEM. TAKES THESE PRIVATELY INITIATED MAP AMENDMENTS TO SOME TIME CATCH UP WITH WHERE AND GOING AND. AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. SO WITH THAT, I AM GOING TO HAND THINGS OVER TO GRAHAM AT HIS DIRECTION. GRAHAM IS GOING TO TALK A LITTLE BIT -- BIG PICTURE VIEW AND ASNG F THESE INDUSTRIAL PIECES AND ACCOMMODATING FOR RESIDENTIAL USE. SO WITH THAT, I WILL LET YOU TAKE FROM HERE. THIS EVENING. AND TODAY. A FORERUNNER TO MUCH - AND FOR -- AND TRYING TO TOGETHER AND PLAN AND THE GOALS ABOUT 35 TO 40 ACRES OF LAND. PUT THE PRESENTATION BACK UP. >> I THINK IT IS UP, GRAHAM. >> SO THE SLIDES THAT SHOW THE CONNECTING NEIGHBORHOODS. OKAY. OBVIOUSLY THIS AREA SITS BETWEEN CHANNEL DISTRICT AND YBOR CITY TO THE NORTH AND TO THE WEST OF US IS ENCORE. INCLUDES THE TAMPA PARK APARTMENTS THAT ARE NOW VACATED AND TRULY A SORT OF A INTERSTITCH WALL AREA BETWEEN THOSE NEIGHBRHOOD. VERY DYNAMIC NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE GROWING QUICKLY. SITTING NORTH OF THE UNION STATION AREA. AND WE SEE THIS AS A GREAT TO BRING SORT OF MUCH-NEEDEDT DENSITY MIXED USE AND REALLY CONNECT THE NEIGHBORHOODS THROUGH NOT ONLY BUILDING NEW BUILDINGS, BUT ALSO ULTIMATELY AS YOU ARE SEEING PRESENTATION OF THE MASTER PLAN FOR A SERIES OF OUR CONNECTIONS THROUGH ROADS, THROUGH TRAILS, THROUGH -- THROUGH GREEN SPACES. IF WE CAN GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. NEXT SLIDE IS -- IS REALLY CONCEPTUAL PRESENTATION OF THE MASSING. ONE OF THE THINGS WE ARE REALLY ACUTELY AWARE OF IS THE FACT THAT YBOR HISTORIC DISTRICTS SITS IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH AND INCORPORATES THE NOR NORTHERNMOST PROPERTIES AND LOOKING AT A PLAN THAT WILL REALLY ADDRESS THAT THROUGH THE MASSING OF SOME OF THESE PA PARCELS WILL HAVE DENSITY MUCH LARGER THAN WE NEED. THE OVERALL PLAN IS FOR HOLISTIC APPROACH WITH THE DEVELOPMENT LOOKING AT HOW WE CAN BLEND TO CREATE THIS AND THE TRANSITION FOR HISTORIC YBOR AND MUCH MORE DENSITY AS WE GET CLOSER TO THE CHANNEL DISTRICT. SO, AGAIN, WE WILL BE COMING BACK WITH A LOT MORE DETAIL ON THIS, BUT REALLY WANTED TO PROVIDE SOME CONTEXT THIS EVENING AS YOU ARE LOOKING AT THESE COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS. AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING A T THESE IN THE NEAR FUTURE. >> GREAT. THANKS GRAHAM. AND THANK YOU, COUNCIL, FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND WE ASK THAT YOU SUPPORT AND APPROVE THESE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS AS APPLIED FOR AND PRESENT THIS EVENING. AND WITH THAT, WE WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I HAVE A QUESTION. I RECALL A WHILE BACK WHEN THE ADJACENT PROPERTY CAME IN FOR THE RMU-100. YOUR PREDECESSOR EXPRESSED SOME CONCERN ON BEHALF OF YBOR CITY ABOUT THE POTENTIAL HEIGHT OF THE RMU-100. DID THAT COME UP WITH THE BLC DISCUSSION DELIBERATIONS AND MR. HUDSON, WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL HEIGHT FOR THE RMU-100. IS THERE A LIMITATION? >> SURE. SO LET'S UNPACK THAT IN ORDER. YES, THAT DID COME UP. THE QUESTIONS ABOUT HEIGHT. THE FIRST PARCEL IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT ZONING IS YC-6, WHICH HAD A 60-FT HEIGHT LIMITATION AND THIS IS A BIT OF A TRUST BUT VERIFY THING. THE REZONING WE ARE GOING TO BRING YOU WILL SHOW HEIGHT OF LESS THAN 60 FEET FOR THAT PARCEL, THAT IS IN YBOR CITY. RMU-100 DOESN'T HAVE A HEIGHT LIMIT. DOES TALK ABOUT EIGHT STORIES UP TO 24 STORIES AND THERE ARE PROVISIONS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CERTAINLY IN THE YBOR CITY DESIGN GUIDELINES OF MASSING AND SENSITIVITY TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT AND BUFF BUFFERING. I DON'T WANT TO PUT WORDS IN THE MOUTH OF THE BARRIO LATINO COMMISSION AND THE ARGUMENT. THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE YBOR CITY DESIGN GUIDELINES OF THE BARRIO LATINO COMMISSION AND THIS COUNCIL WHEN WE BAM BACK WITH REZONING FOR ADEQUATE POWER TO ENSURE THERE IS SENSITIVITY AND BUFFERING OF THAT DENSITY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. VILA. >> I WOULD LIKE TO PIGGY BACK ON THAT. AS TYLER INDICATED DISCUSSION AS THE REQUEST FROM THIRD AVENUE TO THE SOUTH. THERE IS THAT ONE TRUCK DHUR THAT IS CONTRIBUTING. THAT IS ONE -- STRUCTURE THAT IS CONTRIBUTING. ONE OF THE PARCELS THEY WANTED TO RECLASSIFY THE LAND USE TO CMU-35. THE BOARD FELT THAT DISCUSSION WAS ADEQUATE. GOING FROM THAT PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH CMU-35 AS WELL. THAT WAS COMPATIBLE WITH THE REST OF THAT BLOCK. AS YOU APPROACH THE ADAMO CORRIDOR, THERE WAS DISCUSSION ABOUT COMING IN WITH ANOTHER ZONING -- ANOTHER LAND USE CLASSIFICATION WHICH WAS THE UMU-60. THE BOARD FELT THROUGH DISCUSSION, AND THERE WAS A CONSIDERABLE DIALOGUE THAT THE ABUTTING PARCEL OR BLACK TO THE WEST HAD THE RMU-100 TAB ON IT AND SLIDE THAT OVER TO THE EASTERN PORTION AND THE ONE THAT ABUTS ADAMO DRIVE AND 15th STREET. THERE WAS DISCUSSION. AND THEN ULTIMATELY THE RECOMMENDATION CAME AS PRESENTED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AGAIN, THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MEMBER ELSE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM ON THE SECOND FLOOR? >>AILEEN ROSARIO: AILEEN ROSARIO, PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT. NOBODY HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY REGISTERED. >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPE SPEAKERS >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOTION. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. .>ORLAND >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, NUMBER 5. -- NUMBER 4, SORRY, NUMBER 4. THANK YOU, MR. MANISCALCO. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT, WILL CHAIRMAN. I WILL MOVE FILE NUMBER TA/CPA 21-05. THE FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING AND CONSIDERATION AMENDMENT AMENDING THE IMAGINE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED 1405, 1417 EAST 2nd AVENUE -- >>ORLANDO GUDES: SUBSTITUTE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: DOES A CLER HAVE A COPY OF THE SUBSTITUTE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: READING FOR CONSIDERATION THE IMAGINE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY 1405 AND 1417 EAST 2nd AVENUE, ALSO AT 1202 NORTH 15th STREET AND 802 NORTH 12th STREET FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LI TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL HI TO REGIONAL MIXED USE -- RMU-100. AND AT 1302 AND 1402 NORTH 15th STREET FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LI TO COMMUNITY MIXED USE CMU-35. PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCE IN CONFLICT PROVIDING SEVERABILITY. GUDES DINGFELDER READ THE MOTION AND MIRANDA SECONDED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES KHESHINGZ CLERK MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING JULY 15, 9:30 A.M. >> THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 5. >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COL COLLINS. CAN YOU SHARE MY SCREEN AGAIN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ONE SECOND, DANNY. MR. SHELBY, IF MR. -- CAN WE VOTE THEM SEPARATELY -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU MEAN TO DO ALL THE PARKS TOGETHER? >>ORLANDO GUDES: YEAH, IT IS GETTING LATE. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, SENIOR ASSISTANT ATTORNEY. THIS IS THE ONLY -- THE LAST AMENDMENT THAT IS BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING FOR ADOPTION. ALL THE REMAINING IS FOR TRANSMITTAL SO WE HAVE TO DO THIS ONE SEPARATELY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: OKAY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: GO AHEAD, MR. COLLINS. >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. OUR NEXT ITEM IS TA/CPA 21-09. DANNY DEL RIO POOL FROM THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT AND EAST FOREST HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD. QUICK BACKGROUND. PUBLICLY INITIATED BY TAMPA CITY COUNCIL TO RECOGNIZE THE EXISTING CITY OF TAMPA PARK. DANNY DEL RIO IS ON THE DEDICATED PARK LIST AND RECOGNIZE UNDER THE DESIGNATION. HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE, IT IS JUST NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION NORTH BOULEVARD AND WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE. A IMAGE LOOKING AT A ENTRANCE POOL. NORTH BOULEVARD. LOOKING A ADAMS MIDDLE SCHOOL WHICH IS DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. CURRENTLY THE SUBJECT SITE IS UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 FUTURE LAND USE. AND PREDOMINANTLY SURROUNDED BY THE R-10 TO THE NORTHEAST AND WEST TO THE SOUTH IS RESIDENTIAL 20. THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP ON THE SUBJECT SITE UNDER THE RECREATION/OPEN SPACE DESIGNATION. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICIES THAT RELATE TO THE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE OPPORTUNITIES THROHOUTHE CY. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUES QUESTIONS GENTLEMEN? CITY STAFF? FRANK? >> I THINK YOU ARE MUTED, SIR. >> GOOD EVENING. FOR THE RECORD, AGAIN, FRANK HALL WITH THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. IN REQUEST WAS ROUTED INTERNALLY FOR COMMENTS BY CITY STAFF AND THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTIONS AT THIS TIME. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU, SIR. >> YOU ARE WELCOME. >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO APPLICANT. SO ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR OR REGISTERED? >>CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPE SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>AILEEN ROSARIO: AILEEN ROSARIO, PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGE. NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK. GUDES GUDZ CITRO AMOVE AND. >>JOHN DINGFELDER. MOTION CARRIES. MR. MIRANDA, READ NUMBER 5. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: FILE NO. TA/CPA 21-09, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED 10105 NORTH BOULEVARD KNOWN AS DANNY DEL RIO POOL FROM RESIDENTIAL-10 TO R-10 AND RESIDENTIAL 20 TO ARE-20 TO RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE R/OS PROVIDING FOR REPEAL FOR AWED ORDINANCE, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. CARLSON CARLSON YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING JULY 15 AT 9:30 A.M. GUDES ITEM NUMBER 6. >>JENNIFER MALONE: GOOD AFTERNOON -- OR GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. ITEM NUMBER 6, JENNIFER MALONE WITH PLANNING COMMISSION. TA/CPA 21-01. PLEASE SHARE MY SCREEN. I AM JUST WAITING ON THAT. OKAY. HERE WE GO. THE TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALLOWING A FLOOR AREA RATIO IN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT. AGAIN JENNIFER MALONE WITH UR PLANNING COMMISSION. PRIVATELY INITIATED AND A PROPORTIONATE WEIGHT OF DENSITY AND INTENSITY IF THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN TWO LAND USE DESIGNATION. THIS IS ACHIEVED THROUGH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PD AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE PD-A ZONING. THIS IS CURRENTLY ALLOWED IN THE PLAN TODAY, BUT IT IS ONLY ALLOWED WITHIN YOU ARE BEGAN VILLAGES THROUGH THE APPROVAL OF THE PD. THE PROPOSED POLICY EXPAND THIS TO BE ALLOWABLE TO THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. SO THIS IS THE -- THIS IS THE CONSISTENCY REVIEW. YOU HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF RESEARCH. THE URBAN VILLAGES ESTABLISHED IN THE 1998 TAMPA COMPREHEND PLAN AND 2009 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THIS PROVISION WAS ESTABLISHED -- THE BLEND PROVISION WAS ESTABLISHED TO ALLOW FOR IT TO INTEGRATE A COMPLETE MIX OF USES AND THAT IS A QUOTE FROM THE PLAN. SO ALL NINE URBAN VILLAGES ARE LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT TODAY. THE MAP THAT IS ON THE SCREEN TODAY. THE NINE URBAN VILLAGES A THE GREEN BOUNDARY IS THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THAT LAND AREA COMPRISED OF APPROXIMATELY 53% OF THAT PLANNING DISTRICT. SO THIS REQUEST IS JUST EXPANDING SOMETHING THAT IS ALREADY ALLOWABLE WITHIN 53% OF THE DISTRICT TO BE ALLOWABLE WITHIN THE ENTIRE DISTRICT. SO IT WAS FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES STRATEGY TO PROVIDE GREATER INTENSITY AND DENSITY OF THE URBAN VILLAGES OF THE CENTRAL TAMPA DISTRICT IS AND ALLOW FOR E DEVELOPMENT PROCESS WHICH WILL STREAMLINE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY FORM ENCOURAGED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THIS CONSISTENT. I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUES QUESTIONS JAE? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. BUT WHO IS PROPOSING THIS? >>JENNIFER MALONE: TYLER HUDSON SUBMITTED THIS REQUEST AND HE IS ON YOUR SCREEN. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WILL HEAR FROM HIM FIRST. >>ORLANDO GUDES: CITY STAFF? >> GOOD EVENING, FOR THE RE RECORD, FRANK HALL, WITH YOUR PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE REQUEST WAS ROUTED INTERNALLY FOR COMMENT AND THE CITY STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION AT THIS TIME. >>ORLANDO GUDES: HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN. FOOD EVENING, AGAIN, COU COUNCILMEMBERS, TYLER HUDSON, 401 ASHLEY DRIVE. THE APPLICANT FOR THE AMEN AMENDMENT. THIS IS TRANSMITTAL HEARING. AS FAR AS PROCESS GOES, WHAT I AM ASKING FOR TODAY TO STEP OFF TO TALLAHASSEE TO SEE IF THE GOOD FOLKS FROM ANY COMMENTS AND BACK HERE FOR AN ADOPTION HEARING. I WANT COUNCIL TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS FULLY TRANSMITTING. AND INDULGE ME A BRIEF OVE OVERVIEW. YOU CAN S WHE WE ARE IN THE PROCESS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION WONDERFULLY ILLUSTRATED PLAN MANUEL. WE ARE AT THE GOVERNMENTAL HEARING STAGE AND AGAIN WILL COME BACK TO YOU FOR ACTUAL ADOPTION AND THE QUESTION TODAY IS WHETHER YOU WILL SEND IT OFF TO TALLAHASSEE. THIS COMP PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT IS MENTIONED VERY SPECIFICALLY -- TO SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS A VERY SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE SITUATION THAT LOOKS LIKE THIS. SOMETIMES IN -- IN CONNECTION WITH A REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, YOU D USE CATEGORIES THAT YOU WANT TO EN TITLE UNDER A CONSOLIDATED PD, WHICH, OF COURSE, LIKE WITH ANY PD, THIS COUNCIL HAS THE ABILITY TO APPROVE OR TO NOT APPROVE. AND THE URBAN VILLAGES, THERE IS A -- ESSENTIALLY A SPECIAL ENTITLEMENT WHAT WE REFER TO AS BLENDSING THAT -- I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE AVAILABLE THROUGHOUT THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICTS AS JENNIFER DESCRIBED. HERE ON SCREEN ARE SOME EXA EXAMPLES OF WHAT THIS LOOKED LIKE AND THE SITUATIONS WHERE YOU HAVE, RHAP, COMPATIBLE, EXTRAS INCOMPATIBLE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION WITH DIFFERENT DENSITIES. AND THE CHALLENGE OUTSIDE THE URBAN VILLAGES THAT YOU CAN SEE WITH THE TOP PICTURE. IF YOU HAVE A ONE PARCEL THAT HAS A 1.0 FAR ALLOWED. THE NEXT DOOR PARCEL HAS A .5 FAR ALLOWED. IF YOU ARE TRYING TO DEVELOP THAT TOGETHER AND YOU PD WHICH YOU HAVE DISCRETION TO APPROVE AND DENY. OUTSIDE THE URBAN VILLAGES, THE 1.0 F.A.R. CAN ONLY BE DEVELOPED ON PARCEL ONE. SIMILAR TO PARCEL TWO. CREATES AN UNEVENNESS. THE PARCEL TO THE WEST IS AS DENSE AS THE PARCEL TO THE EAST AND THE WAY TO FUNCTION THAT FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LANGUAGE THAT ALLOWS THAT BLENDING THAT YOU SEE BELOW. RIGHT NOW IN OTHER PARTS OF THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT TAT ARE OUTSIDE THE URBAN VILLAGES, YOU ARE UNABLE TO DO THIS. THIS FIRST DAME UP IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT THAT I WAS HERE FOR ON AGENDA ITEM 4. THERE ARE PORTIONS OF THAT PROJECT THAT ARE NOT WITHIN AN URBAN VILLAGE. SO OUR -- OUR FIRST INCLINATION IS TO CHANGE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE URBAN VILLAGE, BUT IT TURNS OUT THAT IS A LITTLE BIT MORE OF A CUMBERSOME PROCESS AND URBAN VILLAGES REMATE TO OTHER PLANNING PROCESS LIKE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND THINGS LIKE THAT. THAT IS WHY THIS TEXT AMENDMENT WAS FILED. IT DID NOT COME OUT OF THIN A AIR. IT CAME UP AS A SPECIFIC SITUATION. AND I BELIEVE AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND PLANNING MMISON BIEVES IT IS AN APPROPRIATE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IT IS LIMITED IN SCOPE INITIALLY TO THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. I THINK JENNIFER REALLY WENT THROUGH THIS ALREADY. I UNDER LINED THE PORTION. THIS IS THE ACTUAL AMENDMENT THAT LANGUAGE THAT IS ON SCREEN RIGHT NOW. IT WOULD BE A NEW LAND USE POLICY, BUT, AGAIN, ANY -- THE ABILITY TO USE THIS BLENDING RIGHT ASSUMES THAT, ONE, YOU GET A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE THROUGH COUNCIL AND NOT RELINQUISHING ANY OF THE LAND E AND ZONING CONTROL. TWO, YOU HAVE AT LEAST AN ACRE. THIS -- THIS SITUATION MIGHT NOT COME UP WITH A GREAT DEAL OF FREQUENCY, BUT IT IS CONSEQUENCES ARE PRETTY SEVERE WHEN YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO BLEND THE DIFFERENT LAND USE DENSITY AROUND A SITE, PARTICULARLY ONE OVER A ACRE AND ONE THAT COMPRISES SEVERAL ACRES. SO WITH THAT, I AM HAPPY -- SORRY, JENNIFER, SHE MENTIONED DOES HAVE THE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND IT DID RECEIVE A UNANIMOUS APPROVAL FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION BACK IN MAY. SO I KNOW YOU HAD A LONG DAY. WITH THAT, I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS? MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: TYLER, YOU GO BACK A FEW SLIDES TO THE EXAMPLE THAT YOU SHOWED OF PARCEL A, PARCEL B, AND THEN THE BLENDED. >> YEP. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE IS MY CONCERN. AND WE JUST SAW AN EMPLEF THIS IN THAT YBOR -- COMP PLAN AMENDMENT THAT YOU PUT FORTH. AND IF PARCEL -- IF PARCEL ONE HAS A 1.0 F.A.R., GREATER INTENSIVE AND PARCEL 2 HAVE 0.5 F.A.R. AND WHAT IF WE GO FORWARD TO THE RIGHT WHERE IT SAYS BUILDING ENVELOPE AND THE PARCEL OVER THERE HAS AN EVEN LOWER DENSITY OR SOMETHING THAT WE MIGHT WANT TO PROTECT, OKAY. THEN -- THEN MBE THAT WILL EXPLAIN WHY THE FAR IS DIFFERENT FROM PARCEL 1 TO PARCEL 2, IS TO PROTECT WHAT IS OVER TO THE RIGHT. BUT IF WE BLEND IT, WE LOSE 3 SOME OF THAT PROTECTION. BECAUSE NOW YOU GOT A GREATER MORE INTENSIVE PROJECT THAT COULD POTENTIALLY BE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE LITTLE LADY WHO IS LIVING THERE AND BUILDING ENVELOPE. THAT CONCERNS ME. THAT CONCERNS ME GREATLY. AND ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE ASKING US TO DO IT ON A BLANKET LEVEL ACROSSHE ENTIRE TAMPA CENTRAL PLANNING AREA, WHICH YOUR MAP BASICALLY SHOWS AS EVERYTHING ACCEPT FOR NEW TAMPA. >> SURE, IF I CAN RESPOND. YOUR CONCERNS ARE WELL-FOUNDED, BUT IT IS REALLY THAT TYPE OF PROTECTION THAT WE ARE TRYING TO GET, BECAUSE THIS -- IN A SITUATION LIKE YOU JUST DESCRIBED, I THINK IF A PD WAS BROUGHT TO YOU OR PD A BROUGHT TO THIS COUNCIL AND BELIEF THAT TOO MUCH IS PUT UP AGAINST AN EDGE WHERE IT COULDN'T BE, THIS W THE APPLICANT TO PUSH THE DENSITY FURTHER AWAY. I AM NOT SAYING THAT THIS UNSCRUPULOUS DEVELOPER OR PROPERTY OWNER COULDN'T TRY TO EXPLOIT THIS IN SOME WAY, BUT I THINK THERE ARE MORE FREQUENT CASES WHERE THIS AMENDMENT, IF ADOPTED, ALLOWS THOSE TRANSITIONS. BECAUSE RIGHT NOW, IN THIS ADMITTEDLY CRUDE AND SIMPLE EXAMPLE ON SCREEN, YOU HAVE THE 1.0 TO THE WEST AND .5209 RIGHT. IT COULD BE A SITUATION WHERE IT IS MORE APPROPRIATE TO HAVE A 1 .25 F.A.R. ON THE EAST ABOUT YOU WANT TO PROTECT AND .25 THAT IS NOT USED CAN BE ADDED TO THE WEST. THIS IS A PROVISION THAT ALLOWS FLEXIBILITY FOR DEVELOPERS AND -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: BUT AS YOU ADMITTED, THAT FLEXIBILITY CAN BE USED FOR GOOD OR EVIL. AND THAT -- THAT DOES CONCERN ME, BECAUSE WE POTENTIALLY OPEN THE DOOR FOR EVIL. AND EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY THAT WE COULD MAKE THAT DECISION AS THE REZONING PROCESS, WE HAVE BEEN PUT INANY, MANY SITUATIONS WHERE, YOU KNOW, ONCE THE -- ONCE THE PLAN AMENDMENT IS IN PLACE AND THE F.A.R.s ARE IN PLACE, WE GET TOLD THAT THERE IS A PRESUMPTION, YOU KNOW, THAT FAVOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND IN FAVOR OF THE DEVELOPER AND, YOU KNOW, THAT WE SHOULDN'T -- WE SHOULDN'T BE MESSING WITH THAT. AND WE GET. WE GET THAT SORT OF LEGAL ADVICE AND THEN WE GET SUED AND GET PUSHED IN A CORNER TO -- TO -- YOU KNOW, TO SETTLE BASED ON ALL THIS TYPE OF STUFF. SO I DON'T KNOW, I -- IT JUST SEEMS LIKE A BROAD STROKE WITH -- WITH POTENTIAL CONCERNS. IF ANYBODY WAS AS HONORABLE AS YOU ARE, TYLER, THEN I WOULDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM AND UNFORTUNATELY THEY ARE NOT. >> COUNCILMAN, IF I CAN JUST RESPOND BRIEFLY. WHAT THIS DOES IT CHANGE WHAT ARE GOING TO BE VERY, VERY LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES WHAT YOU CAN ASK FOR. AND WE DIDN'T PROPOSE THIS TO BE CITYWIDE. THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICTS AS JENNIFER THE S SHOWED 53% -- 53% OF CENTRAL TAMPA DISTRICTS ARE PROPOSED OF URBAN VILLAGES THAT DO NOT AFFECT SOUTH TAMPA. SOUTH TAMPA HAS ITS OWN PLANNING DISTRICTS. AND AGAIN I THINK -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: PUT UP THE MAP OF THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT TO REFRESH ALL OF OUR MEMORIES IF YOU WOULD. I THINK CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICTS INCLUDES A LOT OF STUFF. MAYBE EXPAND THAT OUT, YEAH. >> YEAH, SORRY. JUST THE AREA. EXPANSIVE AND DOES NOT GO INTO SOUTH. THE KIND OF TEAL, TOWER SEQUOIAS OUTLINE. >> IT INCLUDES DAVIS ISLAND AND INCLUDES ALL OF EAST TAMPA AND INCLUDES TO THE NORTH SEMINOLE HEIGHTS UP THE RIVER. A BIG CHUNK OF CHANG. AND SDOCHLTS LARGER THAN AN ACRE. GOING BE TOO SOMEWHAT LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCE BUT HAS A VERY NEGATIVE EFFECT WHEN IT COMES INTO PLAY AND I AM HAPPY TO MEET YOU OR ANY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES TO DISCUSS THIS FURTHER. I THINK COUNCIL STILL HAS SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF POWER TO CONSTRAIN HOW THIS IS USED. I DON'T THINK IT WILL BE USED VERY FREQUENTLY. IT IS ALREADY A RIGHT IS AFFOED PPERTIES IN THE URBAN VILLAGES AND THIS, I THINK, IS A MODEST EXPANSION OF THAT GIVEN THE ONE ACRE REQUIREMENT JUST NOT A LOT OF SMALL SCALE THAT ARE UNDER AN ACRE. THE TRANSMITTAL AND NOT FINAL ADOPTION AND TRANSMIT TO TALLAHASSEE TO CONTINUE THE PROCESS AND I BELIEVE THAT THIS COUNCIL HAS ADEQUATE LEGAL BASIS TO SCRUTINIZE PDs AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AT THAT I WAS USE IT. AND IT DOESN'T CREATE ANY PRESUMPTIONS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LAST THING, MR. CHAIRMAN. WITH ALL DUE RESPECT I DON'T THINK YOU WOKE UP ONE MORN AND SAID I THINK WE NEED TO DO T THIS. I THINK THE REALITY IS YOU HAVE A PARTICULAR PROJECT IN MIND AND IN A PARTICULAR LOCATION. SO WHY DON'T WE FOCUS IN ON THAT PROJECT AND LOCATION AND ADDRESS IT IN THAT WAY ON A. MOREED BASIS AS OPPOSED TO THE BROAD BRUSH THAT TWO YEARS OR FIVE YEARS THAT WE STAND HERE AND SCRATCH OUR HEAD AND SAY WHY DO WE DO THAT. >> COUNCILMAN, FOR THE RECORD I MENTIONED THAT FOR THE SAME PROJECT I WAS HERE FOR IN AGENDA ITEM 4. THERE ARE A FEW BLOCKS WITHIN OUR PROJECT BLUEPRINT THAT ARE NOT IN ANY URBAN VILLAGE THAT WILL BE REZONED IN THE SAME 28-ACRE PD A. SO THE DENSITY ON THOSE PAR PARCELS, SOME OF THEM THROUGH THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. WE CAN'T SHIFT AWAY FROM THE HISTORIC DISTRICT BECAUSE -- BECAUSE THIS PROVISION DOESN'T EXIST. I DID NOT WAKE UP WITH THIS IDEA. THIS IDEA CAME TO LIGHT AFTER LOOKING INTO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM THAT WE ARE TRYING TO CREATE FOR THIS AREA. SO, AGAIN, YOUR EXAMPLE OF HOW IT CAN BE USED POORLY. I CAN'T ARGUE AGAINST THAT. NO QUESTION, THAT IS A POSSIBILITY. BUT WHAT IS MORE LIKELY THE PD A WE WANT TO FILE IN TWO MONTHS LL UTILIZE IN -- TO TRANSITION DENSITY AWAY FROM HE AREA THAT WE KNOW THE BARRIO AND THE CITY COUNCIL. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MAYBE I CAN RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST -- I KNOW COUNCIL WILL KILL ME FOR TALKING ANYMORE BUT RESP RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST THAT YOU DEFER THIS A LITTLE BIT AND COME BACK WITH SOMETHING THAT IS A LOT TIGHTER, YOU KNOW, PUT ON YOUR THINKING CAP AND COME BACK WITH SOMETHING MUCH TIGHTER AS RELATED TO THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. AND, YOU KNOW, I THINK OVERALL FROM WHAT I CAN HEAR AND SEE, I THINK COUNCIL IS GENERALLY SUPPORTIVE OF THAT YBOR PROJECT. AND I DON'T SEE THE COMMUNITY OPPOSING IT. BUT I -- I ALWAYS HAVE -- WHAT DO THEY SAY ABOUT USING A HAMMER INSTEAD OF A FLY SWATTER OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT? I DON'T KNOW. SEEMS TO ME A BIG -- A BIG SWAT YOU ARE TAKING AT A SMALL ISS! ISSUE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU ARE RECOGNIZED SIR. >>BILL CARLSON: FROM A SCHEDULING PNT OF VIEW BECAUSE OUR SCHEDULE IS SO TIGHT. IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE THE CHANGE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING INSTEAD OF DELAYING IT AND STARTING OVER? >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, SENIOR ASSISTANT ATTORNEY. THIS IS A TRANSMITTAL HEARING AND ORDINANCE IN FRONT F YOU NOW. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RIGHT. ONCE IT IS TRANSMITTED, IT SEEMS TO GET A LIFE OF ITS OWN AND COMES BACK. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: I UNDERSTAND. IF YOU LIKE CHANGES TO THAT, YOUR DECISION TO TRANSMIT THE AMENDMENTS A IS ESEND THIS EVENING. >> IF I COULD SUGGEST ONE OPTION THAT WOULD SUFFICIENTLY TAYLOR THIS AND DON'T MEAN TO PUT JENNIFER OR DANNY OR DAVID ON THE SPOT BECAUSE WE HAVE GONE BACK AND FORTH ON THIS. IF A PARCEL THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN A QUARTER MILE OF AN URBAN VILLAGE WANTS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT BLENDING AND IT IS PUT INTO A PD THAT CONTAINS URBAN VILLAGE PARCELS, THAT WILL WORK AND I THINK THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TOO. YOU GUYS HAVE HAD A LONG DAY AND I DO NOT WANT TO TRY TO WRITE THAT ON THE SPOT WITH YOU ALL, BUT THAT WOULD ACHIEVE A GOOD POLICY OUTCOME AND HANDLE OUR CASE SPECIFICALLY. I DIDN'T WANT TO -- LEGISLATED BY PERCEPTION BUT MAY NARROWLY -- >>BILL CARLSON: CAN WE EDIT OR AMEND THE AMENDMENT. CAN WE AMEND IT NOW? >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: I AM NOT SURE IF MR. HUDSON -- SORRY, SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, SENIOR ASSISTANTENIOCITY ATTORNEY. I DON'T KNOW IF MR. HUDSON IS PREPARED TO WHITTLE DOWN THE AREA HE IS PROPOSING TO HAVE THIS TAKE EFFECT ON OR HOW WOULD YOU PROPOSE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WE HAVE A COUPLE MORE ITEM TO GO AND PUT ON YOUR THINKING CAP WITH ANY OF THE PLANNING STAFF THAT YOU CAN AND IF WE CAN DEFER IT TO ANOTHER HALF HOUR. >> SURE. YEAH, WE CAN DO THAT. JENNIFER, CAN YOU -- >>JENNIFER MALONE: YES. >> OKAY. >>JENNIFER MALONE: YOU HAVE MY NUMBER. >> OKAY. THANK YOU. CAN WE GUYS CONTINUE THIS ITEM UNTIL LATER THIS THIS MEETING? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THAT IS THE INTENT YES. >> OKAY. OKAY GREAT. WE WILL DO THAT, THANK YOU GUDES I HOPE WE CAN DO THAT BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO THROW SOME MOTH -- THROW SOMETHING OFF FOR 30 MINUTES AND GETS PAST THAT TIME BECAUSE I CAN TELL YOU WE HAVE A TIME LIMIT HERE. I WANT TO MIND SURE WE UNDERSTAND THAT. IF WE DON'T GET TO IT, IT IS GOING TO MOVE ON BECAUSE I AM NOT GOING TO GO PAST THE HOUR. >> I PROMISE, IT IS NOT IN MY INTEREST TO MAKE YOU ALL STAY LONGER THA YOU NEED TO. WE WILL BE VERY QUICK, I PROMISE. I APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER 7. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, DAVID HEY, MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN PLEASE? ALL RIGHT. HOPEFULLY YOU CAN SEE MY SCREEN NOW HOPEFULLY. CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN? >> YES, WE CAN HEY THANK YOU THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THE NEXT AMOUNT IS FILE NO. TA/CPA 21-04 WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE LAND USE CATEGORIES. A LITTLE BACKGROUND OF THE REQUEST. A CITY INITIATED TEXT AMENDMENT THAT IS USED TO SEEK CHANGES TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 16, THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 24, AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 3. THE AMENDMENT WOULD REMOVE REFERENCE TO VERTICAL MIXED USE ALLOWING ALL DEVELOPMENT TO UTILIZE THE MAXIMUM FAR OF 1.5. CURRENTLY MIXED USE CAN UTILIZE THE 1.5 F.A.R. NONRESIDENTIAL USES ARE CAST AT A 1 F.A.R. THE CITY IS ALSO PROPOSING CHANGES TO THE FUTURE LAND USE DESCRIPTIONS FOR THOSE THREE CATEGORIES. BY REMOVING REFERCES TO NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL USES THUS ALLOWING ADDITIONAL FLEXIBILITY REGARDING THE INCLUSION OF USES DEEMED COMMERCIAL GENERAL IN THE ZONING MATRIX. HERE WE HAVE -- HERE WE HAVE A MAP OF THE LAND USE CATEGORIES. THESE THREE CATEGORIES CAME OUT OF THE CENTRAL CITY PLAN AND MORE SPECIFICALLY THE WEST RIVERFRONT PLAN. THESE CATEGORIES WHICH ARE THE MMU-16 -- NMU-16 -- THE NMU CATEGORIES WERE DESIGNATED TO IMPLEMENT DIVISION OF THOSE PLANS. CURRENTLY ONLY THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY HAVE BEEN PLACED ON ACTUAL LAND. THE MAIN AREA AND HERE YOU CAN SEE ON THE MAP ON YOUR SCREEN. THE MAIN AREA IS FOUND ON THE FORMER SITE OF NORTH BOULEVARD HOMES. THE SALMON COLOR HERE. THAT IS NMU-35. AND SMALLER AREA DESIGNATED AS PART OF TA/CPA 16-03 B CAN BE FOUND ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST CYPRESS STREET ABOUT THREE BLOCKS WEST OF NORTH BOULEVARD IN THE WEST RIVERFRONT NEIGHBORHOOD DOWN THERE. AS USUAL, WE SEND THESE OUT TO REVIEWING AGENCIES AND NO CONCERNS RAISED BY THEM. PRESIDENT PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE TO AMEND THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE DISTRICT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED POLICY GUIDANCE WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. FINDS TWO MAIN ISSUES OF CONSISTENCY. POLICY DIRECTION OF THE USE IN THE CITY. THE CITY IS REMOVING REFERENCE TO VERTICAL MIXED USE. THE CATEGORIES CONTINUE AND PROMOTES A MIXTURE OF USES BOTH VERTICALLY AND HORIZONTALLY. THOUGH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF SHARES CONCERN OF THE LOSS OF THE INCENTIVE FOR VERTICAL MIXED USE, STAFF UNDERSTANDS THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNDERSTANDS THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE CATEGORIES WILL STILL PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL USES TO CO-EXIST IN PROXIMITY TO EACH OTHER. BOTH THE CITY OF TAMPA STAFF AND THE STAFF OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL CONTINUE TO LOOK AT WAYS TO FURTHER INCENTIVIZED MIXED USE ALONG THE TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDORS. OVERALL THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE CATEGORIES WILLURTHER THE ADOPTED OF MIXED USE DISTRICTS. ALSO, LAND USE POLICY 3.5 1, SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIES THIS AREA WEST OF THE HILLSBOROUGH RIVER AS AN AREA APPROPRIATE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL AND EDUCATIONAL USES. THESE ISSUES CAN LEVERAGE THEIR PROXIMITY TO THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA AND TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL AND THEIR NEW PROPOSED SATELLITE CAMPUS ON KENNEDY BOULEVARD BY ALLOWING NONRESIDENTIAL USES TO UTILIZE THE CATEGORIES MAXIMUM F.A.R. OF 1.5.. CITY IS PROMOTING ADDITIONAL OFFICE, EDUCATION AND AND COMMERCIAL USES TO DEVELOP IN THIS AREA. BASED ON THAT, YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION DOES RECOMMEND TO YOU THIS EVENING THE PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I SEE RANDY IS ON. AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AFTER. THANK YOU. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. HEY. ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. HEY? DAVID, I HAVE ON. IS THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE PART OF YOUR PRESENTATION, PART OF YOUR SLIDE PRESENTATION? I MEAN, I KNOW YOU SUMMARIZE -- I KNOW YOU SUMMARIZE THE LANGUAGE, BUT -- >> BUT THE LANGUAGE IS ACTUALLY IN THE -- IN THE STAFF REPORT. >> AND MY OTHER QUESTION -- AND RANDY YOU CAN ANSWER THIS WHILE FOEXAME CMU-35.. WHAT IS THE F.A.R.? >> FOR CMU-35? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YEAH. >> CMU-35 -- THERE ARE STAGES SO DEPENDS ON WHERE IT IS LOCATED. BASIC CMU-35 IS A 1.0 F.A.R. BY RIGHT. AND GOES UP TO A 2 F.A.R. WITH A BONUS. YOU ARE MEETING CERTAIN CRITERIA OF VERTICAL MIXED USE LOCATED ON ARTERIALS, YOU GET A 1.5 F.A.R. BY RIGHT AND THEN WITH THE OPTION TO BONUS UP TO A 2 F.A.R. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MY QUESTION TO ONE OF YOU OR TO RANDY WHY WOULD YOU TREAT THE NMU CATEGORIES. ESPECIALLY THE NMU 35 ANY DIFFERENTLY THAN WE DO THE CMU-35s. ESPECIALLY IF THOSE -- IF THE BONUS -- IF THE BONUSES ARE THERE FOR A REASON TO ENCOURAGE CERTAIN -- RTAIN THINGS THAT ARE PART OF THE BONUS SITU SITUATION. AND TO INCENTIVIZE THOSE BONUS -- ATTRIBUTES. AND WE INNOCENT RISE BY GIVING -- INCENTIVIZE BY ADDITIONAL F.A.R. IF WE GIVE THE 175 WITHOUT BONUS CRITERIA, WHAT IS THE INCENTIVES FOR DOING THOSE PARTLY FOGGY I HAVE IT THINGS. MR. GOERS. >> A GOOD QUESTION AND IF I COULD. A COUPLE OF SLIDES THAT EXPLAIN HOW WE GOT TO THIS POINT. SO IF -- COULD I SHARE MY SCREEN PLEASE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: EVERYBODYS THAT BEEN SWORN? WE ARE NOT QUASI? EXCUSE ME, NEVER MIND. >> OKAY, SO THIS PLAN AMENDMENT CAME OUT OF A REQUEST FROM THE RELATED COMPANY BASED ON SOME CHALLENGES THEY WERE HAVING AND GETTING APPROVAL FOR THE GROCERY STORE IN THE WEST RIVER AREA. AND HOW THAT EVOLVED REALLY -- WE GOT TO GO BACK TO 2016. AND 2015, WHEN THE CITY AND THE -- THE -- THE TAMPA HOUSING AUTHORITY AND THE COUNTY AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICT PARTNERED TO SUBMIT THE CHOICE NEIGHBORHOOD APPLICATION -- THAT WAS AN APPLICATION TO RECEIVE $35 MILLION FROM HD TO BEGIN THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE WEST RIVER AREA. AND THE IMAGE ON THE LEFT IS THE FIRST PLAN THAT WAS DEVELOPED FOR WEST RIVER. THE CONTINGENT FROM HUD IN THE GRANT THAT WE HAD TO SHOW THAT THERE WAS -- THAT THE PROPERTY WAS UNDER A JOINT OWNERSHIP OR OWNED BY SINGLE ENTITY, AND THAT THERE WAS -- IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATION. SO THE NMU-35 CATEGORY AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PLAN ON THE LEFT. AND WAS PUT IN PLACE. WE DID NOT RECEIVE THAT GRANT OPPORTUNITY IN 2015 WE APPLIED AGAIN IN 2016 WITH A DIFFERENT PARTNER IN TERM OF THE PLANNER. AND THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM. AND CAME BACK WITH SOMETHING CONSIDERABLY MORE MIXED USE, MORE DENSE THAN THE ORIGINAL PLAN. IT STILL WAS WITHIN THE NMU-35 LAND USE CATEGORY AND MET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS. WE DID NOT RECEIVE THE GRANT AWARD IN 2016, AND SO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY THEN PROCEEDED WITH PULLING TOGETHER THE RESOURCES TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN ON THEIR OWN. A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT WE DID NOT ENVISION WHEN THE WEST RIVER -- WHEN THE NMU-35 WAS PUT IN PLACE, AND THAT IS A COUPLE OF THINGS. THIS WAS REALLY ENVISIONED AS A -- AS A JOINT PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN ALL THE -- THE SCHOOL BOARD, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, THE CITY, AND -- AND THE CO COUNTY, AND EVENTUALLY WOULD HAVE TRANSLATED INTO A -- INTO A JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHRE ALL THE PARTNERS WOULD AGREE TO MOVE FORWARD. AND WE ENVISN THERE WOULD BE A JOINT SITE PLAN THAT ALL WOULD COME FORWARD ALL AT ONCE. ONCE THE NEIGHBORHOOD -- THE CHOICE NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT WAS NO LONGER ON THE TABLE AND THE HOUSING AUTHORITY BEGAN TAKING RESPONSIBILITY AND MOVING FORWARD, THEY ENDED UP DEVELOPING EACH BLOCK SEPARATELY. IN FACT, THEY HAD TWO -- THEY STARTED OFF WITH THE BANK OF AMERICA AS FOR DEVELOPMENT PARTNER AND RELATED CAME IN AFTER THAT. AND SO EACH ONE OF THESE BLOCKS WERE DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE NMU-35 PLAN CATEGORY. OF THE ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY DID EACH BLOCK WAS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS THAT THEY WERE DEVELOPING REQUIRE, YOU KNOW, FUNDING -- FUNDING PROGRAMS AT CERTAIN TIME LINES AND CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS. EACH ONE ALSO REQUIRED THAT WHATEVER YOU WERE SUBMITTING YOU HAD TO SHOW WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING AND THE SITE PLAN. SO EACH ONE OF THESE BLOCKS WERE DEVELOPED SEPARATE SITE PLANS. AND WERE REVIEWED SEPARATELY. HAG MECHANISMS FOR EACH OF THE PROJECTS. THIS ALL WORKED WELL ALL THE WAY THROUGH. YOU CAN SEE IF YOU GET TO THE BLOCK HERE WHICH IS NOW JUST A -- A GROCERY STORE. AND WITH THE SIZE OF THE GROCERY STORE WHICH WAS -- WHICH IS BEING PROPOSED, IT DID NOT -- THE PLANNING COMMISSION FELT -- THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FELT IT DIDN'T MEET THE DEFINITION OF WHAT A NEIGHBORHOOD SERVE -- SERVING USE WOULD BE. WE FELT THAT A GROCERY STORE WOULD SERVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE SIZE OF IT WAS A LITTLE BIT LARGER THAN WHAT WOULD BE APPROVED UNDER THE NMU-35 WITH THE DENSIT OR INTENSITY LIMIT. SINCE THEY ALREADY DEVELOPED ALL OF THIS NOT REALLY ANY LAND THAT THEY WOULD BRING FORWARD TO HELP THEM WITH THE CALCULATION. BUT WHEN YOU STAND BACK, IT IS STILL THE SAME DEVELOPMENT P PLAN, THE PLAN WE PUT FORWARD HAS EVOLVED AND A GROCERY STORE THAT ADDS TO THE WHOLE MIXED USE CHARACTER. THE OPTION WITH THE PLANNING CMMISSION AND WITH THE RELATED COMPANY, WE COULD HAVE BROUGHT IT IN AND DONE A PLAN AMENDMENT FOR CMU-35. WE DIDN'T WANT TO PUT A CMU-35 ON ONE SITE IN THE DISTRICT. WE THOUGHT OF AMENDING THE N MU REGULATIONS. REGULATIONS IS WHAT DETERMINED THE FORM OF THE A AREA. THAT WOULD HAVE TAKEN LONGER THAN WE -- THEN WE WOULD HAVE LIKED. THERE WAS ALSO DISCUSSION OF EXTENDING THE CDB PERIPHERY. WE THOUGHT THAT MIGHT, AGAIN, CREATE MORE TIME AND COMPLICATIONS. SO WE THOUGHT THIS WOULD BE THE MOST APPLICABLE SUTIO BECAUSE WE ALSO HAVE THE ROME YARD HERE AND WE FEEL THIS WILL END UP EVOLVING AND DEVELOPING IN THE SAME MANNER. WE DON'T THINK -- UNLESS THERE IS THE RELATED COMPANIES AGAIN COMES IN WITH THE ENTIRE PARCEL AND SITE PLAN, AND THEY HAVE THEIR ALL THEIR FUNDING REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTS, IT'S -- IT IS GOING TO END UP COMING IN BLACK BY BLOCK AND BEING SUBJECT TO THE SAME REVIEW. SO WE WERE ANTICIPATING THAT WE WOULD PROBABLY RUN INTO THE SAME SITUATION THERE WHEN IT GOT INTO THEIR -- THE BLOCKS WHERE THE TECHNOLOGY CENTER OR ONE OF THE OTHER MORE COMMERCIALLY ORIENTED BLOCKS. SO THIS WAS AN ATTEMPT TO RECOGNIZE THE MIXED USE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IT WAS A. SOMETHING THAT WE DIDN'T ANTICIPATE WHEN THE PLAN CATEGORY WAS DEVELOPED AND THE CODE WAS DEVELOPED AND BACK THEN FROM THEY HAD THE GROCERY STORE FIRST AND WAS ABLE TO BRING IT IN WITH SOME OF THE EARLIER BLOCKS, IT PROBABLY WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN AN ISSUE BUT AT THE SAME TIME, A WAY TO MAKE THE PROJECT MOVE FORWARD OTHERWISE WE HAVE TO LOOK AT CHANGING THE REGULATIONS WITH THE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR CHANGING THE SCALE OF THE -- OF THE GROCERY STORE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. CHAIRMAN. ONE LAST COMMENT. AGAIN, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO -- TO RANDY AND STAFF WHO HAS BEEN WORKING ON THIS, YOU KNOW, WE ARE CHANGING THE -- WE ARE CHANGING THIS ENTIRE CATEGORY TO ADDRESS THIS PARTICULAR NEIGHBORHOOD AND THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT. AND IT REALLY ISN'T A WHOLE LOT DIFFERENT FROM WHAT MR. HUDSON ASKED TO DO ON THINKS PROJECT A FEW MINUTES AGO. AS THE CITY, WE PROBABLY SHOULDN'T BE PLAYING FAVORITES. SO IT -- PHILOSOPHICALLY JUST BOTHERS ME AND ESPECIALLY BECAUSE, DAVID, NO LIMITATION THIS NMU WILL BE USED ELSEWHERE IN THE WHOLE CITY FOR SOME FURE -- SOME FUTURE DATE. SO SOMEBODY COMES IN WITH A PLAN AMENDMENT AND SAYS LIKE THAT NMU CATEGORY BETTER THAN THE CMU AND I DON'T HAVE TO DO BONUS DENSITY AND CHANGE THAT CMU TO THE NMU AND GIVE THE AUTOMATIC F.A.R. INCREASE AND I AM NOT SAYING THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE DOING HERE, RANDY, BUT BECAUSE YOU ARE CHANGING THE ENTIRE CATEGORY, IT LEAVES THAT POTENTIAL. >> COUNCILMAN, THIS IS DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION. IF I CANHARE MY SCREEN, I HAVE THE LANGUAGE UP FOR YOUR REFERENCE, BUT I ALSO WANT TO ADDRESS -- AND YOU WILL SEE IN THE LANGUAGE, THAT -- ONCE IT IS SHARED. NOW I LOST -- THERE WE GO. YOU WILL SEE THAT THE NMU IS PRETTY UNIQUE BECAUSE IT IS ONLY ALLOWED WITHIN THE GROWTH AREAS. HOPEFULLY YOU ARE SEEING MY SCREEN. AND MAYBE I CAN ZOOM IN TO MAKE IT A LITTLE BIGGER HERE. ALL RIGHT. SO IT IS PRETTY RESTRICTIVE ON WHERE IT COULD BE PLACED, BECAUSE RIGHT NOW, IT IS IN YOUR COMP PLAN. IT IS ONLY ALLOWED IN THE GROWTH AREAS, EMPLOYMENT CENTERS, RECOGNIZED URBAN VILLAGES, MIXED USE CORRIDORS AND CENTERS AND TRANSIT STATION AREAS. IN A NEIGHBORHOOD LIKE A RES-10 NEIGHBORHOOD, SOMEONE COULD NOT ASK FOR THAT CATEGORY. AND UNLESS -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: BUT THE URBAN VILLAGES TAKE UP HALF OF THE CITY. >>DAVID HEY: THEY TAKE UP 50% OF JUST CENTRAL TAMPA. REMEMBER NO URBAN VILLAGES OUTSIDE OF CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. SO -- AND ALSO I SHOULD NOTE, THERE ARE SPECIFIC ZONING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NMU. THEY CAN'T JUST ASK FOR, LIKE, A CI USE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. THEY HAVE TO USE EITHER A PD OR THE NMU ZONING DISTRICT. BUT HOPEFULLY YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE. THEY -- THE THINGS ADDED ARE IN RED. THE LANGUAGE IS STRICKEN THROUGH THAT IS BEING REMOVED. I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTIONS. IF NOT, LET ME KNOW. >> I COULD JUST CLARIFY THAT THE NMU CATEGORIES DO NOT ALLOW FOR A BONUS LIKE THE OTHER MIXED USE CATEGORIES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO. BUT IN REGARD TO THE 1.5 -- 1.5 FOR VERTICAL MIXED USE. EFFECTIVELY THAT IS SOMEWHAT OF A BONUS IN ITSELF OR WAS AND NOW YOU ARE ASKING TO STRIKE THAT AND ALLOW THE 1.5 AUTOMATIC. >>DAVID HEY: COUNCILMAN, THIS IS DAVID HEY AGAIN. OUR POINT OF VIEW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS NOT A BONUS. THAT IS WHAT THEY -- IT IS -- RANDY IS RIGHT. IT IS NOT LIKE THE CMU WHERE YOU CAN BUY UP TO ANOTHER -- YOU CAN COMBINE MORE FLOOR AREA RATIO AND THE ATTORNEYS DON'T SAY -- AND DO THE PROVISIONS AND TIE IT INTO A CIP PROJECT. BUT HERE -- THESE ARE THE MAXIMUMS. THERE IS NO BONUS MECHANISMS. THEY DON'T TALK TO LEGAL TO GET ADDITIONAL -- IT'S -- IT IS LIKE -- RIGHT NOW NONRESIDENTIAL USES ARE CAPPED AT 1. AND THAT IS WHAT IS THE ISSUE WITH THE SUPERMARKET WAS WE LOOK AT -- YOU KNOW, EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE COMING IN AS A WHOLE PD, WE LOOK AT BECAUSE THEY HAD -- THEY HAD PARCELS WITHIN THE -- WITHIN THE PD DEVELOPMENT PODS BASICALLY, AND WE WOULD TAKE AND LOOK AT EACH POD INDIVIDUALLY. IF ONE POD IS ONLY ASKING FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, THAT POD IS CAPPED AT A 1. 1 F.A.R. THERE WAS NO WAIT TO GET OUT OF THAT. AND THAT IS THERE WAS SOME ISSUE ONCE IT ACTUALLY -- ONCE IT WAS LOOKED AT THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. IT REALLDIDOT FUNCTION THE WAY IT WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED. THAT IS JUST MY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CARLSON, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >>BILL CARLSON: TWO QUICK QUESTIONS. NUMBER ONE, ISN'T IS USUAL THAT THE CITY IS MAKING AN APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPER. WHY ISN'T THE APPLICANT MAKING IT THEMSELVES. SECOND, WHY DIDN'T THEY INCLUDE THIS WHEN THEY RESPONDED TO THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR RFP? >> WE TOOK IT ON BECAUSE IT WAS TRYING TLOOK AT THE BEST WAY FORWARD FOR THE -- FOR THE COMMUNITY IN TERMS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT. PLUS, AGAIN, THE ROME AVENUE YARD IS SOMETHING THAT WE WERE LOOKING AT IN TERMS OF HOW IT WOULD FAIR UNDER THE SAME REGULATIONS. SO WE -- WE MOVED IT FORWARD AS OF -- AS A -- AS A MATTER OF TRYING TO ADDRESS THE EFFICIENCY AND THE -- AND THE OVERALL -- OVER ALL CONCEPT. IN TERMS OF NOT SURE -- YOUR SECOND QUESTION COUNCILMAN CARLSON, I AM NOT SURE WHAT YOU ARE -- >>BILL CARLSON: MY SECOND QUESTION AS I REMEMBER -- THEY HAD TO RESPOND TO AN RFP ON THAT DEAL AND WONDERING WHY IT WASN'T SORTED OUT THEN OR INCLUDED IN SOME OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE RFP. ARE YOU AWARE OF OTHER -- SORRY IF THIS ISN'T A FAIR QUESTION. ARE YOU A AWARE OF OTHER BIG DEVELOPMENTS WHERE THE CITY BORE THE APPLICATION, TIME AND MONEY TO APPLY FOR A DEVELOPER? >> I THINK WE ARE LOOKING AT IT IN TERMS OF THE CITY STAFF DOES TAKE ON TEXT AMENDMENTS IN RESPONSE ISSUES THAT ARE ARISING. WHETHER THE DEVELOPER THAT IS MOVING IT FORWARD AND WE REVIEW IT AND FIND IT WITH CONSISTENCY AND WE TAKE IT ON AND WHAT IS BEST FOR THE -- FOR THIS PART OF THE COMMUNITY. IN THIS CASE, WE WERE ALL PARTNERS IN THE IN THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE WEST RIVER AREA AND MAKES SENSE TO COME UP WITH A SOLUTION THAT WOULD BENEFIT THE ENTIRE COMMUNI. AND I WILL SAY THIS. THIS PLANNED CATEGORY AND ZONING CATEGORY WAS DEVELOPED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS AREA. SO WHEN WE DEVELOPED IT AS PART OF A FORM-BASED CODE, WE ALL KNEW THAT THERE MAY BE SOME -- MAY BE SOME NEED OR CHANGES IN THE FUTURE TO MODIFY IT. NOT SOMETHING THAT WE DIDN'T THINK WOULD NECESSARILY NOT HAPPEN. BUT AS DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS EVOLVED, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WERE FLEXIBLE TO SPONWITHHE BEST PROJECT FOR THE COMMUNITIES TRYING TO GET. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I GOT A LITTLE CONFUSED, RANDY. HOW DID THE ROME YARD PROJECT GET INTERTWINED WITH THIS PUBLIC STORE. >> THE ROME AVENUE IS UNDER THE SAME PLAN DESIGNATION IN ZO ZONING. SO SINCE IT IS GOING TO BE A PROJECT OF ABOUT ALMOST 1,000 RESIDENTIAL USES -- UNITS AND MIXED INCOME OR MIXED COMMERCIAL AND ALSO STAND-ALONE COMMERCIAL, WE FEEL THAT THERE MAY BE -- WE MAY RUN INTO THE SAME SITUATION THERE. WHERE PART OF IT IS DEVELOP AND MOVE FORWARD IN PHASES AND PART OF IT ALL OF A SUDDEN GETS CAUGHT IN THE -- IN THE INTERPRETATIONS OF THE CODE. WE ARE TRYING TO LOOK -- LOOK FORWARD TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS AREA DEVELOPS AS WELL AS IT C CAN. IS THE WAY WE ENVISION IT. THE PLAN WE SEE FORWARD WHICH IS DEVELOPED BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY AND RELATED GROUP IS AN EXAMPLE OF A -- OF A MIXED INCOME, MIXED USE COMMUNITY, PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED AND PROVIDES ALL THE THINGS THAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I WILL AGREE WITH THAT ON THAT POINT. I GOT CONFUSED WITH THE ROME PROJECT. THIS PROJECT ALREADY HAVE BEEN SATED AND WORKING ON. I GOT CONFUSED. >> ROME AVENUE ISN'T TECHNICALLY AFFECTED BY WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT. WE WERE JUST LOOKING AT BASED ON THE PROPOSALS THAT IT COULD BE. AND WE JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT IT ISN'T. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YEAH, RANDY, YOU HAD MENTIONED THAT ONE OF THE ALTERNATIVES YOU GUYS LOOKED AT BEFORE YOU CAME UP WITH THIS ONE WAS JUST TO FOCUS ON THE GROCERY STORE AND JUST DO A CMU-35. I THINK YOU SAID THAT. BUT DO A CMU-35 ON THE GROCERY STORE. TO ME, AGAIN, THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN A LOT MORE SURGICAL USING A SCALPEL INSTEAD OF A MACHETE. SO FROM A TIMING PERSPECTIVE, HAE STATION OR WHAT? DANNY ZAHRAN I BELIEVE . >> I BELIEVE THAT THE DEVE DEVELOPERS DO WANT TO MOVE FORWARD ON THE GROCERY STORE AS QUICK AS POSSIBLE AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT -- THAT WOULD HAVE ENABLED THAT. WE DIDN'T -- YOU KNOW, CMU-35, YES, WOULD TARGET TO THAT SPECIFIC SITE. WE JUST DIDN'T SEAT APPROPRIATENESS OF THE CMU-35. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IS THE DEVELOPER HERE WITH US TONIGHT? RANDY? >> I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ARE. >> HI, COUNCILMAN. NICOLE, I'M HERE TO SPEAK IN PUBLIC COMMENT BUT I CAN GO NOW IF YOU WOULD LIKE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ARE YOU REPRESENTING THE DEVELOPER? >> YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE HAVE HEARD FROM THE CITY. WE HEARD FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION. SO I GUESS WE WILL GO AND HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. ALL RIGHT, WELL, MR. DINGFELDER, DO YOU WANT TO HEAR FROM HER? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YEAH. I MEAN, THIS SEEMS TO BE CE CENTERED AROUND THE DEVELOPER, EVEN THOUGH THE CITY IS CARRYING THE WATE A LITTLE BIT. SO -- >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM CONFUSED OF THAT PORTION TOO. >> COUNCIL, IF IT WOULD HELP, WE ARE WILLING TO CONTINUE IT TO THE NEXT MEETING AND WORK OUT ANY OF THE AMBIGUITIES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, YOU WANT TO HEAR FROM HER AND RANDY TAKE IT BACK AND WE MOVE ON. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I AM FINE WITH A CONTINUANCE AND PERHAPS RANDY YOU AND NICOLE CAN COME MEET WITH US INDIVIDUALLY AND GIVE US A LITTLE MORE IN-DEPTH DETAILED DISCUSSION. >> IF POSSIBLE, I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TONIGHT. YOU KNOW, I AM HAPPY TO WORK WITH RANDY AND STAFF, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE SOME COMMENT TONIGHT, IF THAT IS POSSIBLE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, DO YOU WANT TO FROM HER? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: UP TO YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I THINK WE WILL BRING IT BACK. WE NEED TO MOVE ON. WHAT I AM HEARING FROM COUNCIL RIGHT NOW, THIS TRAIN IS NOT GOING TO MOVE TONIGHT. SO I PREFER WE JUST GO AND BRING IT BACK RANDY TO THE COUNCILMEMBERS INDIVIDUALLY TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE CITY IS INVOLVED AND BRING IT FORTH SO -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WHAT IS THE NEXT DATE THAT WE CAN CONTINUE IT TOO, MR. SHELBY? >>MARTIN SHELBY: A GOOD QUESTION. I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO T THAT. IF YOU -- IF YOU -- I -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A NIGHT MEETING. >> I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG THIS WILL TAKE. AND IF -- IF -- IT COULD TAKE THREE MINUTES, COUNCIL. MAY MAKE A DECISION IN TERMS OF HOW MUCH TIME THEY WILL NEED. AND I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU WISH TO PROCEED. BUT PICK A DATE. NOT COMING BACK UNTIL JULY. YOUR NEXT NIGHT MEETING IS THE 22nd. AND I DON'T KNOW HOW TO DOES WITH THE CYCLE OF TRANSMITTALS TO THE -- I DON'T KNOW, RANDY, HOW DOES THIS EFFECT -- OR DAVID, HOW DOES -- HOW DOES THIS EFFECT YOUR PROCESS FOR TRANSMITTAL. >> I WILL DEFER TO DAVID ON THE SCHEDULING PART OF IT. >> I CAN -- DAVID -- SORRY. >> JENNIFER, SORRY. >>JENNIFER MALONE: I CAN CHIME IN. WE WERE PLANNING ON TRANSMITTING THIS SO AFTER TODAY APPROVED FOR TRANSMITTAL, SENT TO CEO AND THE STATE FOR ADOPTION WAS THE EVENING OF SEPTEMBER 30. MY UNDERSTANDING THAT CITY COUNCIL HAS CREATED THAT NIGHT. WE HAVE A NUMBER OF PLAN AMENDMENTS THAT WE ARE COORDINATING ON RETURNING FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INCLUDING THE ONE THAT WAS BEFORE THIS ON THE AGENDA AND TWO MORE AFTER THIS. SO I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION. >> THE QUESTION IS WHAT IF IT IS CONTINUED AND FOR HOW LONG? WHAT EFFECT WILL THAT HAVE? >> IDEALLY IT COULD BE CONTINUED. I THINK THAT IT NEEDS TO BE AS LONG AS IT IS CONTINUED, IT NEEDS TO BE TRANSMITTED TO CEO WITHIN TEN WORKING DAYS OF THE DATE IT IS HEARD BY COUNCIL. IF IT IS CONTINUED FOR JUST A LITTLE BIT, THEN WE WOULD HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO STILL HIT THAT SEPTEMBER 30 ADOPTION HEARING DATE. SO I GUESS I WOULD JUST CAUTION THAT IT IS NOT CONTINUED FOR TOO LONG. UNLESS -- UNLESS SOMEONE NEEDS TO BE HEARD ON ANOTHER NIGHT WHICH IS SEPTEMBER 30 FOR PLAN AMENDMENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CARLSON, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >>BILL CARLSON: ONE QUESTION. IF WE CONTINUE THIS, ONE QUESTION I WOULD LIKE THE ANSWER BY THE TIME WE HEAR IT AGAIN AND HAVE THE ANSWER TONIGHT. ONE IS ALREADY ASKED IS WHY THE CITY IS PRESENTING IT INSTEAD OF THE DEVELOPER. BUT E SEND TNG IS, -- IS AS I REMEMBER, THESE PROPERTIES WERE DEVELOPED THROUGH RFPs. AND WAS A CONDITION OF THE RFP THAT THE DEVELOP HER TO PRESENT A PROPOSAL THAT OR WAS THERE FLEXIBILITY? JUST A QUESTION TO BE ANSWERED BY THE NEXT MEETING. THANK YOU. >> AND I WOULD ASK COUNCIL, PERHAPS, ALLOWING THE REPRESENTATIVE TO SPEAK IN CASE THERE WAS ANY TIMING QUESTIONS THAT THE CONTINUANCE MIGHT AFFECT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, I MIGHT POINT OUT THIS IS SET FOR PUBLIC HEARING. SHE WANTED TO SPEAK UNDER PUBLIC COMMENT. SO IF YOU WANT HER TO SPEAK BEFORE THAT, SHE HAS THAT RIGHT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THERE ARE A LOT OF QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED. AND THEN COME BACK WITH -- GROWTH MANAGEMENT, AND COME BACK WITH A DATE, AND DO THAT AND SEE WHAT'S GOING TO FIT IN THE TIME FRAME TO GET IT TRANSMITTED IF COUNCIL DECIDES TO DO IT AT THAT PARTICULAR TIME. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THE 22ND, THERE ARE A LOT OF THINGS GOING FORWARD BUT UNTIL THE END OF THE YEAR. SO THERE MAY BE THINGS THAT NEED TO BE WORKED OUT AND MAY NOT BE ABLE TO BE WORKED OUT TONIGHT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: DO YOU WANT A DAY MEETING? I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANY PROHIBITION AGAINST A DAY MEETING BUT THE NEXT NIGHT MEETING IS JULY 22ND AND THERE ARE 13 HEARINGS THAT NIGHT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MS. PEREZ IS HERE. AND WHATEVER THEY CAN COME UP WITH, THEY CAN DO IT AS A WALK-ON. I DON'T WANT TO BELABOR THE TIME. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHEN YOU SAY WALK ON, WHAT DO YOU MEAN? >>ORLANDO GUDES: THIS EVENING. THE THING IS WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO GET A TIME CERTAIN THIS EVENING BECAUSE THEY ARE MAKING THE SCHEDULE AS WE GO ALONG. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S WHAT THE DEAL WAS? >>MARTIN SHELBY: NO, SIR, I DON'T BELIEVE SO. MY UNDERSTANDING IS, THIS IS A MEETING THAT WAS NOTED FOR THIS EVENING, AND IT NEEDS TO BE CONTINUED TO A DATE A TIME CERTAIN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT RIGHT NOW, WE DON'T HAVE A DATE AND TIME BECAUSE OF THE CONTINUANCE SCHEDULE. AND FOR LEGAL TO SCHEDULE. IT WAS AN ADD-ON, X DATES ON THE CALENDAR, IS THAT CORRECT? >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF DURING YOUR HEARINGS A CONTINUANCE NEEDS TO BE GRANTED, IT HAS TO BE NOTICED TO A DATE AND TIME CERTAIN. IT HAS TO BE CONTINUED TO A DATE AND TIME CERTAIN. OTHERWISE IT HAS TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS AGAIN OF BEING NOTICEDROPEY. THEREFORE, WE TREAT THIS THE SAME WAY WE DO WHENEVER WE HAVE A HEARING. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHAT DATE DO WE HAVE? MICHELLE, WHAT DATE DO WE HAVE AVAILABLE? >>JENNIFER MALONE: THE NEXT AVAILABLE IS JULY 22ND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: >>MARTIN SHELBY: THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OR NIGHT MEETING? >> NIGHT MEETING. >>ORLANDO GUDES: >>MARTIN SHELBY: IT STARTS AT 6:00 AND YOU HAVE FIVE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, FIVE REZONINGS, DRI, AND CONTINUED PLAN AMENDMENT, CONTINUED REZING, TOTAL OF 13 ITEMS. IT'S YOUR CALL, COUNCIL. IT'S A TRANSMITTAL PUBLIC HEARING. IT SHOULDN'T TAKE LONG. WE DON'T KNOW, BUT WHAT'S HAPPENED TONIGHT. YOU ARE RIGHT. I STAND CORRECTED. >>ORLANDO GUDES: AGAINST MY BETTER ADJUSTMENT, I WILL GO WITH THE 29th YOU SAID? >>MARTIN SHELBY: 22ND OF JULY. DID I SAY THAT CORRECT? >> JULY 22ND. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I JUST HAVE A QUESTION PROCEDURALLY, AND COUNCIL, HELP ME OUT ON THIS. IS IT MS. NEWBAUER? SHE WAS GOING TO SPEAK DURING PUBLIC COMMENT. SHE NOTIFIED US THAT SHE REPRESENTS THE DEVELOPER. SHE HAS BEEN SITTING HERE WAITING PATIENTLY, WAITING TO SAY SOMETHING, AND WHEN SHE STARTED TO SAY SOMETHING, SHE WAS JUST CUT OFF. NOW, PROCEDURALLY, SHE HAS THE RIGHT TO SAY SOMETHING ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPER. AM I RIGHT OR WRONG? IF NOT, SHE HAS THE RIG TO SAY SOMETHING DURING PUBLIC COMMENT. IF WE ARE CONTINUING THIS CASE, SHE STILL HAS THE RIGHT TO SAY SOMETHING PERTAINING TO THE CONTINUANCE. IS THAT PROCEDURALLY CORRECT? >>MARTIN SHELBY: GENERALLY, YES SIR. >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. CHAIR, THIS NEWBAUER HAS BEEN HERE SITTING WAITING PATIENTLY. YES! >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: IF I MAY. SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY. THIS COMP PLAN AMENDMENT AFFECTS A NUMBER OF LAND USE CATORIE ANDC CATEGORIES. SO MS. NEWBURGER I THINK IS THE NAME? NEWBAUER SORRY. IS HERE, A DEVELOPER OF ONE PROJECT WHO MAY BE AFFECTED BY THIS CHANGE. SO -- >>JOSEPH CITRO: MAY BE AFFECTED BY IT. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: CORRECT. BUT THIS IS PUBLICLY BY THE CITY SO I DON'T WANT YOU TO GET MIXED UP WITH THE DEVELOPER. I DON'T WANTS ANYBODY TO -- I DON'T WANT ANY CFUSI. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I ASKED FOR A PROCEDURAL QUESTION. AGAIN, THIS WOMAN HAS BEEN SITTING HERE PATIENTLY. WHETHER TO SPEAK DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR NOT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU'RE WELCOME SIR. THANK YOU, MS. VELEZ. BUT MR. CITRO, EVEN THOUGH I KNEW THE ROLL-OUT WAS ON, I WOULD ALLOW IT BECAUSE SHE HAS SPENT SOME TIME HERE, EVEN THOUGH MS. VELEZ GAVE ME MY ANSWER, AND I APPRECIATE THAT. >>JOSEPH CITRO: AND MR. CHAIRMAN, IT'S YOUR SHOW. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MS. NEWBAUER? IS THAT CORRECT? >> YES, SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM GOING TO LET YOU SPEAK AND THEN WE ARE GOING TO BRING IT IN FOR A LANDING AND THEN WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ON EITHER WE GET AN ANSWER OR WE CONTINUES IT AND MOVE ON. ALL RIGHT? YOU MAY GO. >> GIVEN ALL THE DISCUSSION TONIGHT, I THINK THAT WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH A CONTINUANCE. I THANK YOU FOR HAVING SUCH A SERIOUS DISCUSSION AND I HAVE TAKEN DOWN YOUR COMMENTS AND YOUR CONCERNS AND HAPPY TO WORK WITH YOU OFFLINE TO WORK THIS OUT WITH EVERYONE, AND WE ARE OKAY WITH A CONTINUANCE AS LONG AS IT'S AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE. I DO WANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT I THINK -- THE CITY HAS INITIATED THE AMENDMENT. WE CAN WORK OUT OFFLINE THE REASON FOR THAT, >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MA'AM. MR. SHELBY, CONTINUANCE DATE, PLEASE SIR. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THE NEXT EVENING MEETING, MS. VELEZ YOU AGREE, IS THE EVENING OF THE 22ND TO ADD ON AN ADDITIONAL HEARING ON THE EVENING OF THE 22ND AT 6:00 P.M.? THIS WILL BE A CONTINUED TRANSMITTAL HEARING OF A PLAN AMENDMENT. OR A TEXT AMENDMENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION BY MR. MANISCALCO. SECOND BY MR. CARLSON. ROLL CALL, MR. SHELBY, OR NO? >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES, SIR, PLEASE. >>THE CLERK: THAT'S 5:01 P.M. OR 6:00 P.M.? >>MARTIN SHELBY YOU COULD PUT IT AT 5:01 BUT EVERYTHING RIGHT NOW IS PRESENTLY SET FOR 6:00. BUT YOU HAD DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY SETTING THINGS FOR 5:00. IT ONLY TAKES A FEW MINUTES. YOU MIGHT HAVE TO WAIT TILL 6:00 FOR OTHER ITEMS. SO IT'S YOUR CALL WHETHER YOU WANT IT 5 OR 6. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: 5:01. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THANK YOU. 5:00. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER 8. >>DANNY COLLINS: CAN YOU SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE? DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. OUR NEXT CASE IS 2007, TEMPLE CREST PARK, IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DTRIC AND IT'S IN THE TEMPLE CREST NEIGHBORHOOD. JUST A QUICK BACKGROUND. THIS IS PUBLICLY INITIATED BY TAMPA CITY COUNCIL, RECOGNIZE RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE CATEGORY. HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. IT IS GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF YU CHRON STREET AND NORTH 32ND STREET. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE FROM NORTH 37th STREET. AND LOOKING WEST ALONG RIVERVIEW DRIVE. HERE IS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE OPEN SPACE CATEGORY. NORTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE ARE WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL 10 AND ON THE SOUTHERN PORTIONS RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION. BRINGING THE ENTIRE SITE UNDER THAT RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE DESIGNATION. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH BE THE RECREATION OPEN SPACE POLICIES. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT TA CPA 21-07 BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN? ALL RIGHT. CITY STAFF. >> THIS IS FRANK HALL WITH THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. MY REQUEST WAS ROUTED INTERNALLY FOR COMMENT AND THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTIONS AT THIS TIME. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR. >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM. >>AILEEN ROSARIO: THERE IS NO ONE HEAR TO SPEAK. >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOVE THE TRANSMITTAL. MOVE TO CLOSE. SORRY. MOVE TO CLOSE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO SECONDED IT. ALL IN FAVOR? CARRIED. WE ARE BACK TO YOU, SIR. >> MOVE TO TRANSMIT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHEN IT GETS LATE LIKE THIS WE ALL GET CONFUSED. MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 9. >>DANNY COLLINS: CAN YOU SHARE MY SCREEN AGAIN? PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THIS IS WOODLAWN CEMETERY, CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE. THIS REQUEST RECOGNIZES WOODLAWN CEMETERY UNDER RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE DESIGNATION. HERE IS AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SURROUNDING SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, GENERALLY NORTH OF WEST 20th STREET, EAST OF NORTH BOULEVARD. HERE IS AN IMAGE LOOKING WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE [~DISTORTION~]% AVENUE. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. CURRENTLY THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC LAND USE DESIGNATION. THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP SHOWING THE SUBJECT SITE UNDER THE -- DESIGNATION. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST. THEY FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICIES IN THE PLAN TALK ABOUT RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE IN THE CITY. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS? MR. DINGFELDER. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: JUST A QUICK COMMENT. WE ALL RECEIVED AN E-MAIL FROM ONE OF OUR CONSTITUENTS, AND SHE SAID, HOW DARE YOU TURN THAT CEMETERY INTO A PARK. SHAME ON YOU. [ LAUGHTER ] AND THEN WE HAVE NO MORALS OR VALUES OR ANYTHING. BUT ANYWAY, I JUST WANTED TO A SURE HER AND ANYBODY ELSE WATCHING THAT THAT'S NOT THE CASE. THE CEMETERY IS SACRED GROUND. WE ALL KNOW IT'S SACRED GROUND. AND IT WILL ALWAYS REMAIN A CEMETERY. AS A MATTER OF FACT, THIS WILL PROTECT IT EVEN MORE SO AND NEVER ALLOW ANYTHING TO BE DEVELOPED ON THERE. JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT, >>LAND GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR. CITY STAFF. >> FRANK HALL WITH CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THIS REQUEST IS ROUTED INTERNALLY FOR COMMENT. IC STAFF. CITY HAS NO OBJECTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS? >> THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT. THERE IS NO ONE HEAR TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO CLOSE. MR. MANISCALCO MOVED IT. MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT. ALL IN FAVOR? ANYPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED. MR. CARLSON, TRANSMIT? JUST FOR THE RECORD REPEAT WHAT MR. DINGFELDER SAID, THIS IS TO PROTECT THE CEMETERY SO I MOVE TO TRANSMIT. >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO SECOND. ROLL CALL. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE GO BACK TO NUMBER 6. >>JENNIFER MALONE: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I WORKED WITH TYLER OFFLINE, OR MR. HUDSON, TO COME UP WITH SOME LANGUAGE TO PRESENT FOR YOU RIGHT NOW. >> TYLER HUDSON, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE. I AM GOING TO BE VERY QUICK IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN TO SHOW YOU THE TEXT ON SCREEN. WE HEARD COUNCIL LOUD AND CLEAR THAT YOU DO NOT WANT THE CLEAVER BUT INSTEAD A SCALPEL WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU HAVE COME UP WITH. WHAT YOU SEE ON SCREEN IS LAND USE OBJECTIVE 5.1 THAT ADDRESSES URBAN VILLAGES. THIS PORTION HERE LAND USE POLICY 5.16 IS WHERE THAT -- THAT'S CURRENTLY EXCLUSIVE TO URBAN VILLAGES. MY PROPOSED LANGUAGE THAT JENNIFER HAS REVIEWED IS IN BOLD UNDERLINE. IT'S IT STILL ONLY APPLIES TO THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT BUT WE HAVE FURTHER NARROWED THE SCOPE OF IT TO LAND WITHIN HALF A MILE OF AN URBAN VILLAGE BOUND RHYTHM IT STILL MUST GO THROUGH THE PD OR PDA APPROVAL PROCESS FOR PROJECTS THAT ARE AT LEAST ONE ACRE IN SIZE. I THINK THIS SUFFICIENTLY NARROWS DOWN THE SCOPE OF THIS TO THE RARE INSTANCES WHERE THIS IS GOING TO COME UP, BUT THOSE RARE INSTANCES, A VERY NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCE UNLESS THIS AMEND IS ADOPTED SO I ASK THAT YOU TRANSMIT THIS TO TALLAHASSEE THIS EVENING AND WE CAN HAVE A MORE COMPLETE DISCUSSION WHEN IT COMES BACK IN A FEW MONS. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT LOOKS LIKE AN IMPROVEMENT. THANK YOU, TAILOR AND JENNIFER. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME IN ALLOWING US TO MOVE THIS ON THE FLY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE HEARD IT. ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR, REGISTERED FOLKS FOR NUMBER 6? >>THE CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>AILEEN ROSARIO: THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK O TS ITEM. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVE TO CLOSE. MR. CITRO SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED. MR. CITRO, CAN YOU HANDLE NUMBER 6 PLEASE? >>JOSEPH CITRO: COMING BACK TO IT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NUMBER 6, I MOVE THE TRANSMITTAL. THANK YOU, AS AMENDED. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVED AND SECONDED WITH THE AMENDMENT. ROLL CALL. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES >>BILL CAR. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER 10. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOVE TO OPEN 10 THROUGH 13. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO HAS SECONDED IT. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? WE ARE OPEN. ITEM NUMBER 10. >>JAN MCLEAN: OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY BRINGING YOU TONIGHT IS THE SECOND AND FINAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR A PROPOSED BROWNFIELD AREA DESIGNATION, AN APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THIS BROWNFIELD REHABILITATION. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 376, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY GRAY STAR DEVELOPMENT EAST LLC AND PROPERTY OWNERS CANTERS, SPELLMAN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLLP, AND GLEN RICHARD AND TINA MARIE BECKER AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE GLEN AND TINA BECKER REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST FOR THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 7210 INTERBAY BOULEVARD CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 25.96 ACRES IN THE CITY OF TAMPA. THE DETAILS OF THE DESIGNATION HAVE BEEN OUTLINED IN A DOCUMENT THAT WAS PROVIDED TO YOU AND ENTITLED THE STAFF REPORT ON THE INTERBAY REDEVELOPMENT AREA PROPOSED BROWNFIELD AREA. CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS AND DETERMINED THAT ALL STATUTORY PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET, AND RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL APPROVE THIS DESIGNATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS SECOND PUBLIC HEARING, COUNCIL WOULD PLEASE, IF SO CONSIDERED, HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PASS THE RESOLUTION AS INCLUDED IN THE SIRE PACKET BY READING THE TITLE OF THE RESOLUTION AND DESIGNATING THE PROPERTY AT ISSUE HERE AS A BROWNFIELD AREA AS SPECIFIED IN CHAPTER 376 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES. AND I AM HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. WE ALSO HAVE, I BELIEVE ON VIRTUAL, IS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEVELOPER, IF YOU HE ANY QUESTIONS. ALSO DAN FAHEY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN. MS. MCLEAN, JUST TO BE SPECIFIC ON THIS FOR THE COMMUNITY -- THIS IS JUST TO DESIGNATE A BROWNFIELD AREA AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT TO BE DONE ON THIS PLAN. >>JAN MCLEAN: CORRECT. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE? ANY DISCUSSION? WHO IS THE APPLICANT? >>JAN MCLEAN: I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS OR NOT. >> CAN'T HEAR YOU. >> CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? I APOLOGIZE. YES. WE ARE NOT GOING TO MAKE ANY PRESENTATION AT THIS TIME. I AM JUST HERE IN THE EVENT COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: A QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC? >> THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT. THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >> MOVE TO CLOSE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MANISCALCO MOVES TO CLOSE, MR. MIRANDA SECONDS. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED. MR. DINGFELDER, WOULD YOU READ THE RESOLUTION, SIR? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SURE. IN REGARD TO BROWNFIELD 21-68148, WE JUST HAD THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I MOVE THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A BROWNFIELD AREA WITHIN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA UPON APPLICATION FROM SITE DEVELOPER GRAY STAR DEVELOPMENT EAST LLC AND PROPERTY OWNERS CANTOR SPELLMAN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLLP AND GLEN RICHARD AND TINA MARIE BECKER AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE GLEN AND TINA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 7210 INTERBAY BOULEVARD CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 25.96 ACRES FOR THE PURPOSE MUCH ENVIRONMENTAL REHABILITATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >> SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, MR. MIRANDA SECONDS IT. ROLL CALL. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: SI. YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: NUMBER 11. OUR CLERK NEEDS A BREAK FOR FIVE MINUTES. [ CITY COUNCIL RECESS ] PARAGRAPH >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE. >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM PRESENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, MA'AM. ITEM NUMBER 11. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. CAN I FLEECE BE SWORN IN WITH THE REST OF MY STAFF? (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK). >> YES. WONDERFUL. CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN? GREAT. ZAIN HUSAIN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION, CASE 82-21-12. THE APPLICANT IS LOCAL DIALECT LLC, JORDANA, 5023 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOL BEVERAGES FOR SMALL VENUE BEER AND WINE CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AND PACKAGE SALES OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION. THE PROPOSED USE IS A BREWERY WITH A TASTING ROOM. THE SALES AREA ON THE INTERIOR HERE IS 8,421 SQUARE FEET. 1,530 SQUARE FEET. FOR A TOTAL OF 9,951 SQUARE FEET. THE SITE SHOWS THREE DRIVEWAY ACCESS POINTS OFF EAST WILDER. THE ALLEY TO THE EAST, AND NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE. THE PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE SITE IS 28.6 PARKING SPACES, AND THE SITE PLAN HERE SHOWS THERE TO BE 29 PROVIDED. THE HOURS OF OPERATION INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN ARE FROM 12 P.M. TO 12 A.M. MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY. THE WAIVERS REQUESTED HERE ARE FROM SECTION 27-132, IT IS TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM DISTANCE TO OTHER ESTABLISHMENTS SELLING ALCOHOL FROM 250 FEET TO 11 FEET. THE DISTANCES SPECIFIED WITHIN THE URBAN VILLAGES ARE 250 FEET FROM OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS. 111 FEET AWAY IS THE INDEPENDENT BAR AND CAFE AT 5016 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE. LOOKING AT THE SITE OVERHEAD VIEW, YOU SEE THE EXTENT OF THE AB SALES AREA. AN OVERHEAD VIEW HEAR AERIAL MAP YOU WILL SEE THE AREA OUTLINED IN RED. TO THE WEST YOU HAVE NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE. TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE EAST WILDER AVENUE. TO THE EAST YOU HAVE EAST -- I'M SORRY, NORTH SUWANNEE AVENUE. TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE EAST FOWLER STREET ALL AROUND THE PROPERTY. I WENT OUT TO THE SITE AND TOOK PICTURES. AS YOU SEE THE SUBJECT SITE AS IT CURRENTLY IS. TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE YOU SEE NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE UP AND DOWN VERTICAL. TO THE WEST OF THE SITE YOU HAVE A DOLLAR TREE. ACROSS THE STREET. TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE YOU HAVE NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FIND IT INCONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES. MINOR CORRECTIONS TO THE PLAN ARE NEEDED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THANK YOU. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: FOR CLARIFICATION, THE PROPOSED AB SALES HOURS ON THE STAFF REPORT, I JUST WANT CONFIRMATION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: CITY STAFF? >>ZAIN HUSAIN: CORRECT. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 14 BUT ON THE SITE PLAN FROM 12 P.M. TILL 12 A.M. MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: 12 P.M. TO 12 A.M. AND THAT'S WHAT'S ON THE SITE PLAN? >>ZAIN HUSAIN: CORRECT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND CHAPTER 14 IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE 12 P.M. I WANTED CLARIFICATION. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: CORRECT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT REGISTERED? >> THEY HAVE TO TURN ON THEIR CAMERA AND UNMUTE THEMSELVES. >> HELLO. CAN YOU HEAR ME? >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE CAN HEAR YOU. >> MY NAME IS JORDAN A. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ONE SECOND. ONE SECOND. WE HAVE TO GET YOU SWORN IN, OKAY? >> PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK). >> YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WOULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME? >> MY NAME IS JORDANA -- >>ORLANDO GUDES: AND YOU ARE THE APPLICANT? >> I AM THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE APPLICANT. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING FURTHER TO ADD. I'M JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AS THEY COME UP. >>ORLANDO GUDES: OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? >> WE DID HAVE A REGISTERED SPEAKER JENNIFER KLUTH BUT SHE'S NOT LOGGED IN. >>AILEEN ROSARIO: I HAVE TWO PEOPLE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, AND THEY BOTH HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ONE SECOND. MR. CITRO, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR. >>JOSEPH CITRO: IS THE AGENT FOR THE APPLICANT STILL THERE, PLEASE? >> YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YOU ARE ASKING FOR AN OFF PREMISES PACKAGE SALE. IS THIS ESTABLISHMENT A MICROBREWERY? WILL YOU BE SELLING THE MICROBREWED BEER IN GROWLERS, OR IS THIS A FULL WINE AND BEER PACKAGE STORE OF PRODUCTS THAT YOU WILL NOT BE MAKING? >> I BELIEVE IT WILL BE ITEMS MADE FROM THE BREWERY THAT WILL BE SOLD ON PREMISES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU BELIEVE. DO YOU KNOW FOR SURE? >> I BELIEVE WE ALSO HAVE THE APPLICANT OR THE OWNERS HERE AND THEY CAN JOIN IN. THEY CAN CHIME IN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SWEAR THEM? >>THE CLERK: PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK) >> STATE YOUR NAME, PLEASE. >> MICHAEL CONBY. >> IS THIS A MICROBREWERY AND WILL YOU BE SELLING YOUR OWN BREW? >> YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU ALSO MAKE WINE TOO? >> I DO NOT MAKE WINE, NO. >>JOSEPH CITRO: BUT YOU WILL BE SELLING WINE IN YOUR PACKAGE STORE? >> NOT AS PACKAGE. IF PEOPLE WANT TO ORDER WINE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: SO IT'S JUST FOR THE SELL OF THE GROWLERS MORE OR LESS, CORRECT? THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY. COUNCILMAN CITRO, I KNOW YOU HAD THIS QUESTION BEFORE BUT YOU CANNOT CONTROL WHAT THEY SELL. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I DO HAVE A POINT TO THIS. AND I AM NOT TRYING TO CONTROL WHAT THEY ARE DOING. I AM JUST ASKING WHAT THEY WILL BE SELLING. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: I JUST WANTED TO -- >>JOSEPH CITRO: I ASKED, WAS THIS THEIR BREW OR -- DID THEY MAKE THEIR OWN WINE? THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>MARTIN SHELBY: JUST FOR PURPOSES OF THE RECORD. AS WE ALWAYS POINT OUT TO COUNCIL, THIS RUNS WITH THE LAND, AND IF IT'S A MICROBREWERY TODAY, IT MIGHT NOT BE A MICROBREWERY TOMORROW. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? GO BACK TO THE APPLICANT. I HAVE A QUESTION, PLEASE, SIR. I HAVE GOT TO LOOK AT HIM. TO THE APPLICANT. IS THERE ANY AMPLIFIED SOUND OUTSIDE? >> WE DON'T INTEND TO HAVE AMPLIFIED MUSIC OUTSIDE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, AGAIN I'M SORRY, BUT WITH REGARD TO THAT, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT'S WHAT THE REPRESENTATIONS THEY MAKE AT THE HEARING, SO IF IT'S NOT ON THE SITE PLAN IT'S NOT ENFORCEABLE. JUST A REMINDER. >>ORLANDO GUDES: CORRECT. CORRECT. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND HEAR FROM THE SECOND FLOOR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. BE SWORN IN. OKAY, SHE WAS SWORN. THAT'S RIGHT. >> MY NAME IS GENERAL I HAVE CREW, AND I I LIVE AT 6007 SOUTA 33614. LOCATED IN THE EGYPT LIKE LETO AREA AND I HAVE LIVED IN THIS AREA FOR OVER 15 YEARS. I AM CURRENTLY A STUDENT IN THE PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM AT ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE. I'M HERE TO SPEAK TO YOU ON FILE AB 2-21-12. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR A SPECIAL USE 2 PERMIT FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES AT 35023 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE AND SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE AND SEMINOLE HEIGHTS HISTORIC DISTRICT. APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT WILL ALLOW THE APPLICANT MR. aND MRS. CONTE TO SELL FOR CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AS WELL AS PACKAGE SALES FOR OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION. AFTER SPEAKING WITH URBAN PLANNER 1 IN THE GROWTH DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MR. BRETT BURKES, WHO HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE CITY FOR TWO YEARS NOW, IT SEEMS THAT THE APPLICANTS HAVE MET MAJORITY OF THE GUIDELINES NECESSARY, BUT THERE IS A WAIVER REQUEST. TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM DISTANCE FOR OTHER ESTABLISHMENTS SELLING ALCOHOL FROM 250 FEET TO 11 FEET. MR. BURKES STATED THAT COUNCIL WOULD NEED TO GRANT THAT WAIVER IN ORDER TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL 2 USE PERMIT. THE APPLICANTS MR. aND MRS. CONTE ARE WELL KNOWN IN THE COMMUNITY. I GOT THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH MS. KENDRA CONTE 1st 1:ONE OF THE OWNERS AND THE BUSINESS ALREADY LOCATED IN THIS AREA. THIS NEW LOCATION WILL ALLOW THEM TO OPERATE BOTH THE BROUGH BREWERY IN ONE LOCATION, AND BECOME OWNERS RATHER THAN RENTER. KENDRA AND HER HUSBAND HAVE BEEN DOING THINGS TO GIVE BACK TO THE COMMUNITY A WELL, PROVIDING A FOOD PANTRY DURING A PANDEMIC, KENDRA HAS BEEN PARTLY OF THE BUSINESS SKILL OF SEMINOLE HEIGHTS, SHE AND HER HUSBAND HAVE BEEN PARTS OF OTHER FOUNDATIONS GIVING BACK TO THE COMMUNITY AS WELL. MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY ALSO TOOK THE TIME TO SEND LETTERS IN SUPPORT OF THE BUSINESS OWNERS. THEY ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO THE NEW AND BIGGER LOCATION. FOR THIS REASON, I RECOMMEND THAT COUNCIL GRANT THE WAIVER THAT WILL ALLOW THEM TO ALSO APPROVE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT 2 SO THAT KENDRA AND HER HUSBAND CAN CONTINUE TO GIVE GREAT SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY. THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBERS, FOR YOUR NIGHT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHO IS YOUR PROFESSOR? >> PROFESSOR KEGG. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU. >> YOU'RE WELCOME. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY ELSE? >> ONE MORE PERSON. >>ORLANDO GUDES: STATE YOUR NAME. >> MY NAME IS DEAN TIDY, 5016 NORTH SUWANNEE AVENUE DIRECTLY BEHIND THE PROPOSED BUSINESS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. YOU WERE SWORN IN. GO AHEAD, SIR. >> SO I HAVE SOME CONCERNS ABOUT NOISE ONLY BECAUSE I LIVE DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE INDEPENDENT WHICH IS 11 FEET AWAY FROM THIS BUILDING. AND WE HAVE ALREADY HAD ISSUES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, A CONSTANT STRUGGLE WITH NOISE FROM INDEPENDENT BECAUSE THEY ARE ALSO ALIVE MUSIC VENUE, AND THEY HAVE MUSIC OUTSIDE. I LIVED AT THIS ADDRESS FOR 16 YEARS AND THE NOISE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD JUST KEEPS RAMPING UP OVER TIME SO THE MORE WE COMPLAIN ABOUT IT, THE LOUDER IT SEEMS TO GET. SO THIS IS RIGHT BEHIND MY HOUSE, AND MY NEIGHBORS, AND I DON'T BELIEVE HAVING ALIVE MUSIC VENUE IS NOT GOING TO CREATE ANY NOISE. I AM DELIGHTED THAT SOMETHING WOULD GO IN THAT PROPERTY, BUT I AM NOT SURE THAT SEMINOLE HEIGHTS IS STRUGGLING FOR BREWERIES. WE HAVE SO MANY BREWERIES ON FLORIDA AVENUE ALREADY. SO I WAS JUST VOICING SOME CONCERNS ABOUT THE NOISE. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY WITH THE AGENT THAT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING THERE WILL BE A CLARIFICATION ABOUT NO AMPLIFIED NOISE OUTDOORS, PLEASE. THAT'S NUMBER ONE. NUMBER TWO, A CORRECTION TO A PART OF THE SITE PLAN OR STAFF REPORT HERE, IT IS 111 FEET DISTANCE BETWEEN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND THE NEXT AB SALES 111. SO JORDANA, BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING, PLEASE. >> YES. WE WILL MAKE THOSE CORRECTIONS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I HAD TO STEP OUT FOR A SECOND. NOISE AND HOURS OF OPERATIONS. HAVE WE ADDRESSED ANY MODIFICATIONS? >>ORLANDO GUDES: I THINK SHE ADDRESSED IT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND THAT'S GOING TO BE A CONDITION ON THE SITE PLAN? >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND MR. CHAIRMAN, IF WE COULD ALSO -- >>JOSEPH CITRO: I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT SAID THERE WAS NO INTENT. DIDN'T GIVE A DEFINITE YES OR NO. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: LET'S HEAR A DEFINITE YES OR NO AND THEN IF THEY CAN AN OBJECTION THEN WE WOULD PUT IT ON THE SITE PLAN. >> WE WILL NOT HAVE ANY AMPLIFIED OUTDOOR MUSIC. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU HAVE NO OBJECTION IF WE INCLUDE IT ON THE SITE PLAN? >> NO OBJECTION. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THEN THE SECOND QUESTION. LET ME FINISH, NUMBER 2, MR. SHELBY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: NORMALLY, YOU PUT DOWN NO OUTDOOR AMPLE FOUND SOUND AS DEFINING MUSIC. EITHER WAY, SOUND. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU. THE SECOND QUESTION AS RELATES TO THE HOURS. ARE YOU REALLY GOING TO BE OPEN TILL MIDNIGHT SEVEN DAYS A WEEK? OR DO YOU PLAN ON 10:00 ON WEEKDAYS OR WHAT HAVE YOU? >> YEAH, WE DON'T INTEND ON OPEN TO MIDNIGHT EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK. I THINK IT WAS MIDNIGHT FRIDAY AND SATURDAY, AND BETWEEN 8 AND 10 CLOSING TUESDAY THROUGH THURSDAY. IT WILL PROBABLY CLOSE ON MONDAYS. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO FOR YOUR SITE PLAN, VERY OFTEN WE DO FRIDAYS AND SATURDAYS TILL MIDNIGHT, AND 10 P.M. THE REST OF THE WEEK. IS THAT OKAY WITH YOU? >> WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO MAKE IT TILL 11? WILL THAT BE ACCEPTABLE? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I DON'T KNOW WHO IS NEAR YOU. YOU ARE ON FLORIDA AVENUE SO CHANCES ARE THERE'S PROBABLY HOMES WITHIN SPITTING DISTANCE BEHIND YOU. SO I GUESS I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE -- I DON'T WANT TO CRAMP YOUR STYLE AND PEOPLE DO LIKE THESE ESTABLISHMENTS ON FLORIDA AVENUE. BUT IF IT'S SEVEN DAYS A WEEK TILL MIDNIGHT, THEN I THINK IT BECOMES BURDENSOME ON THE BACKS OF THE NEIGHBORS. TELL ME WHAT YOUR BUSINESS PLAN IS. >> BY 11. WE LIVE TWO BLOCKS FROM THE BUILDING ALSO. WE ARE WITHIN EARSHOT OF INDEPENDENT AND ALL THAT ANYWAY SO WE UNDERSTAND AND DEFINITELY SYMPATHIZE WITH THE SOUND ISSUE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IT'S A SOUND ISSUE AND A PARKING ISSUE, AS YOU KNOW. >> ABSOLUTELY. YES. ABSOLUTELY. SO, YEAH, WE ARE FINE TO MAKE THAT MORE AMENABLE FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD, FOR SURE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HOW ABOUT MIDNIGHT THURSDAY, FRIDAY AND SATURDAY, AND 10:00 THE REST OF THE WEEK? ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT? I DON'T WANT TO TWIST YOUR ARM. YOU HAVE TO AGREE OR DISAGREE. >> YEAH, IT'S HARD TO GO WITH RIGHT NOW BECAUSE IF WE WERE OPEN ALREADY, AND SEE WHAT THE TRAFFIC LOOKS LIKE AT THAT TIME. BUT WE WOULD PREFER TO HAVE LIKE A LITTLE WIGGLE ROOM IN THE SENSE THAT WE ARE GOING TO PUT IT ON THE SITE PLAN, 11 DURING THE WEEK, I THINK THAT WOULD BE A LITTLE MORE COMFORTABLE FOR US. BUT REALISTICALLY WE ARE PROBABLY OPEN TILL 10 TUESDAY THROUGH THURSDAY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: FOR THE SAKE OF THIS EVENING, HOW ABOUT 10:30 THE REST OF THE WEEK AND THURSDAY, FRIDAY AND SATURDAY MIDNIGHT? >> OKAY. I THINK THAT'S MORE THAN FAIR. THANK YOU. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION TO CLOSE BY. ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION CARRIED. MR. MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NUMBER 11, FILE AB 2-21-12. MOVE AN ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU-2 FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES, SMALL VENUE CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AND PACKAGE SALES OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION AND MAKING LAWFUL THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE AT OR FROM THAT CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT 5023 NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2 PROVIDING THAT ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT ARE REPEALED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND THE HOURS OF OPERATION THAT ARE NOTED WITH THE PETITIONER SAID. I FORGOT WHAT THEY WERE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: 10:30 P.M., AN FRIDAY THROUGH SUNDAY MIDNIGHT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IS THAT WHAT YOU SAID, SUNDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY, AND CLOSING AT 10:30. I DON'T KNOW. >> YES, I THINK THAT'S WHAT I SAID. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YOU HAVE GOT THURSDAY, FRIDAY AND SATURDAY AT WHAT TIME? THAT WAS MIDNIGHT? >> YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: AND THAT'S IT. WE PUT THAT IN YOUR SITE PLAN. OKAY? AND NO AMPLIFIED MUSIC OUTSIDE, RIGHT? >> YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THAT'S WHAT I HEARD. BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >> AS FAR AS THE AMPLIFIED MUSIC, IS THAT LIKE FROM ANYTIME TO ANYTIME OR IS THAT PAST A CERTAIN POINT? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO AMPLIFIED MUSIC OUTSIDE, PERIOD. ARE YOU HAVING SECOND. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ARE YOU HAVING SECOND THOUGHTS ABOUT THAT? >> CAN I TALK ABOUT THAT? [ LAUGHTER ] >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOVE TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. >> SECOND. (OATH ADMINISTERED BY CLERK). >> I DO. THE REASON WHY THE AMPLIFIED NOISE THING, I'M KIND OF TEETERING ON IT IS BECAUSE ORIGINALLY I THOUGHT IT WAS ONE OF THOSE THINGS LIKE NO AMPLIFIED NOISE AFTER LIKE 5 P.M., 6 P.M., WHATEVER. I HAD THIS IDEA BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS REALLY NICE LIKE A BLUEGRASS BRUNCH LIKE EVERY OTHER SUNDAY WE CAN HAVE A CUTE LITTLE TRIO COME OUT AND BARBECUE AND SOME BEER, AND SIGNED REALLY NICE. AND I DO THINK EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, IT'S NICE TO HAVE THAT OPTION SO IT WASN'T TAKE THAT AWAY, I THINK FOR FLEXIBILITY FOR OUR BUSINESS BALLOON. FOR ME THAT IS CONCERNING TO BE SAY THAT WE CAN NEVER LIKE HAVE ANYTHING FOR THE COMMUNITY TO ENJOY AS FAR AS LIKE ACTUAL LICENSES. ESPECIALLY WHEN RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET, THERE ARE SEVERAL PLACES ON FLORIDA AVENUE HAVE LIVE MUSIC AND THEY ARE ALSO OPEN MUCH LATER THAN WE ARE GOING TO BE. INDEPENDENT IS OPEN TILL 1:00 O'CLOCK. SO MUSIC LATER IN THE EVENING, I DON'T PLAN FOR THAT BUT I DO THINK LIKE THE COMMUNITY TO BE ABLE TO OFFER SOME OF THOSE THINGS AT LEAST IN THE DAYTIME. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WE APPRECIATE YOU SPEAKING UP, BECAUSE I THINK I CAN SPEAK FOR COUNCIL WE DO WANT TO WORK WITH YOU AND WE WANT TO BE SUCCESSFUL. BUT AT THE SAME TIME WE OBVIOUSLY WANT TO BE SENSITIVE TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD. AND YOU ARE PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. BUT ANYWAY, SO ABOUT. >> AMPLIFIED SOUND AFTER 10 P.M.? >> PERFECT. THANK YOU. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'M FINE WITH THAT IF EVERYBODY ELSE IS. >> KENDRA: THANK YOU. >> MOVE TO CLOSE. >> SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION CARRIED. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO I WILL CHANGE THE AMPLIFIED MUSIC TO NO LATER THAN 10:00. NO AMPLIFIED MUSIC AFTER 10 P.M. AM I CORRECT? >> SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVED BY MR. MIRANDA. ROLL CALL. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOSEH CITRO: NO. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT, CITRO VOTING, NO SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 15th AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER 12. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. CAN I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN? >>THE CLERK: YOU HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: CAN EVERYONE SEE MY SCREEN RIGHT NOW? HOW ABOUT NOW? >> YES. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: GREAT. CASE AB 2-21-09, THE APPLICANT IS MAISON DEW CIGAR LLC, REPRESENTATIVE NAME JOHN GRANDOFF, 3225 SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE, UNIT 103, AND 105. THE REQUEST IS FOR SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR SMALL VENUE BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AND PACKAGE SALES OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION. THE PROPOSED USE IS A BAR, LOUNGE AND RETAIL SALES. THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS AN APPROVED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES SPECIAL USE 2 FOR BAR LOUNGE, BEER AND WINE, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AND PACKAGE SALES OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION ONLY. WITH A TOTAL OF 2,369 SQUARE FEET INDOORS ONLY. THE PROPOSED APPLICATION REQUEST REQUESTS A TOTAL OF 2,369 SQUARE FEET ALSO INDOORS ONLY. ACCORDING TOTAL FLOOR PLAN, THERE IS A TOTAL OF 113 OCCUPANTS. THE SITE PLAN INDICATES ALSO THAT THE PROPOSED HOURS OF OPERATION WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 14, THE SITE PLAN SHOWS EXISTING DUAL ACCESS DRIVEWAYS OFF SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE AND TWO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS. THERE IS A CHANGE TO THE STAFF REPORT. THE REQUIRED PARKING ALL THE USES ON THE SITE, ON THE SITE ARE 230 PARKING SPACES, NOT 25 BUT 230 PARKING SPACES AND THE SITE PLAN SHOWING 157 PARKING SPACES. A WAIVER IS REQUESTED HERE FOR THE REDUCED PARKING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ALONG A MIXED USE CORRIDOR VILLAGE AND A DISTANCE SEPARATION AND REQUIREMENT OF 250 FEET FROM RESIDENTIAL USES AND 250 FEET FROM OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED TWO NEW WAIVERS HERE. PER SECTION 27-12332 TO REP DEUCE THE REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM 250 FEET TO 221 FEET FOR RESIDENTIAL USES AND ALSO ANOTHER CHANGE TO THE STAFF REPORT IN SECTION 27-283.7 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES FROM 230 TO 157. AND THIS IS A 32% REDUCTION HERE. YOU SEE MORE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT. OVERHEAD VIEW. I WENT ON-SITE AND TOOK SOME PICTURES OF THE SITE. HERE IS A VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE STRIP. THE SUBJECT PARKING LOT TO THE NORTH VIEW WITH ALL OF THE STORE SIGNS, PALMA CEIA VILLAGE. TO THE EAST YOU HAVE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL. AND TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE A SCHOOL WHERE THERE IS SOCCER FIELD BASKETBALL FOOTBALL AND OTHER SPORTS GO ON. WE HAVE AN OVERHEAD AERIAL VIEW HERE OF THE SITE OUTLINED IN RED. AND THE RECOMMENDATION. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FIND IT INCONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES. CORRECTIONS ARE NEEDED TO THE SITE PLAN AND BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THANK YOU. I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN? >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF I MAY. MAYBE I SHOULD BE ASKING PETITIONER THIS. IS THIS A NEW ESTABLISHMENT OR IS THIS ESTABLISHMENT THE SAME BAR? I'LL ASK PETITIONER. THANK YOU, CHAIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. APPLICANT. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT HERE? >> YES. HE'S ON THE SECOND FLOOR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. >> GOOD EVENING. JAMIE MAYOR, HILL, WARD, HENDERSON, SUITE 3700 FOR THE APPLICANT AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN. AND COUNCILMAN CITRO, I CAN DEFINITELY ANSWER THAT QUESTION. ACTUALLY I WILL JUST GO AHEAD AND ANSWER IT NOW WHILE IT'S FRESH IN MY MIND IF THAT'S OKAY. IT'S NOT A NEW ESTABLISHMENT. ACTUALLY, OUR CLIENT IS A TENANT SO HE DOESN'T OWN THE SPACES, BUT HE CURRENTLY OPERATES AS CHIEF LEASE CIGAR AS OUR BRAND SO IT'S NOT CHANGING THE USES OR EVEN THE BRAND. BUT HE'S A TENANT SO IT'S NOT A NEW OWNER. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I ASSUME IN A STRIP MALL THAT HE WOULD BE A TENANT. BUT THE BUSINESS ITSELF, HE ALREADY OWNS THE BUSINESS THAT IS IN THAT STRIP CENTER? >>JAIME MAIER: YES. THEY ARE BOTH HIS. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU. I WILL HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION LATER. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU MAY PROCEED. >>JAIME MAIER: OKAY. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I KNOW I CAN'T GIVE EVIDENCE. I WAS JUST QUESTIONING. >>JAIME MAIER: AS STAFF VERY ADEQUATELY PRESENTED, THESE ARE TWO ADJACENT UNITS, AND THIS PALMA CEIA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, THEY CURRENTLY SERVE BEER AND WINE, AND ALSO DELECTABLE CHEESES AND CIGARS, AND THE REQUEST HERE IS TO SERVE BEER, WINE AND NOW LIQUOR. THE SIZE IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE. THE REQUEST IS FOR CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES IN PACKAGE SALES THAT CURRENTLY CURSE. NO OUTDOOR SEATING PROPOSED. ALTHOUGH, YES, THE SITE PLAN STATES HOURS OF OPERATION WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 27, WE ARE MORE THAN WILLING TO LIMIT TO CLOSING AT MIDNIGHT ON THE WEEKENDS, AND DISCUSS CLOSING EARLIER DURING THE WEEK, THAT IS ALSO ACCEPTABLE. AND AGAIN NO OUTDOOR SEATING. NOTHING OUTDOORS. AS YOU CAN SEE THERE'S REALLY NOT A WHOLE LOT OF ROOM OUT THERE ANY WAY. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN. I JUST KIND OF WANTED TO BLOW UP THE IMAGE FOR YOU A LITTLE MORE TO SHOW YOU, THIS IS 2300 SQUARE FEET. THE TWO LITTLE STORES ARE NEXT TO EACH OTHER AND THE SUBJECT SITE DOWN THE MIDDLE SO IT'S ONE AB SITE PLAN SO THEY ARE CONNECTED. AND TWO STORES. AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE FLOOR PLAN SO IT'S A LITTLE MORE CLEAR. SO THE TOP IS CHIEF LEAVES ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH IS CIGAR. CHIEFS HAS ABOUT 30 FEET AND CIGAR ABOUT 23 FEET. AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S A LITTLE DOOR BETWEEN THE TWO TO PROVIDE KIND OF A CONNECTED EXPERIENCE FOR THEM. AS IS NOT UNCOMMON WITH THESE AB 2 APPLICATIONS WE ARE REQUESTING A DISTANCE WAIVER TO REDUCE THE SEPARATION FROM RESIDENTIAL USES FROM 250 TO 222 FEET. THAT'S TO THIS BUILDING HERE ACROSS THE STREET. AGAIN, AS I EXPLAINED, THE LOCATION OF THE USES ISN'T CHANGING. WE NEED THE WAIVER FOR THE AB 2 BECAUSE IT'S REQUIRED BY CODE. BUT THE USES DON'T CHANGE, NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE ABOUT THE SITE SO THE SURROUNDING AREA WILL NOT BE AFFECTED ANYTHING DIFFERENTLY THAT HASN'T BEEN AFFECTED NEGATIVELY NOW. AND WE ARE ALSO REQUESTING A PARKING WAIVER BECAUSE THE SHOPPING CENTER HAS 157 PARKING SPACES, JUST PER CODE A TOTAL OF 33 SPACES ALONE ARE REQUIRED FOR MAISON DU CIGAR AND CHEESE PLEASE AND ANY APPLICANT IN THE SHOPPING CENTER WHO WOULD BE SUBMITTING A PLANNING APPLICATION WOULD HAVE TO REQUEST A PARKING WAIVER SIMPLY BECAUSE THE MIX OF USES AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS CHART ONE REQUIRE UNDER THE CODE 230 SPACES. HOWEVER, IN PRACTICE, USING THE SAME PARKING LOT ADEQUATELY SERVES THE MIX OF TENANTS. THE USES IN THE SHOPPING CENTER HAVE ALTERNATING PEAK HOURS OF DEMAND, SO I KIND OF WENT THROUGH AND MADE THIS LITTLE CHART OF WHEN STORES OPEN AND WHEN THEY CLOSE, WHAT KIND OF STORES THEY ARE. THERE ARE ALSO DIFFERING LEVELS OF WHAT KIND OF CUSTOMER FLOW WILL BE PRODUCED. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE'S A HAIR SALON THAT'S BEEN APPOINTMENT ONLY SO IT'S GOING TO HAVE A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE AT ANY GIVEN TIME. THERE'S A NUMBER OF BOUTIQUE SPECIALTY STORES WHICH WOULD DRAW KIND OF A SMALLER CROWD. YOU ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE AS MUCH OF A FLOW OF CUSTOMERS AS YOU WOULD WITH SOME OF THE RESTAURANTS. THEN THERE'S A SELF-STORAGE UNIT THAT TAKES UP A LOT OF SPACE AS WELL IN THE SHOPPING CENTER IT HAS FOUR EMPLOYEES ON ITS LARGEST SHIFT AND THERE'S REALLY NO SET HOURS THAT WOULD BE AN INTENSE LEVEL OF DEMAND. OF THE 12 USES IN THE SHOPPING CENTER, EIGHT OF THEM CLOSE BY 8 P.M. MASON DU CIGAR AND CHEESE PLEASE DON'T OPEN TILL NOON. SO YOU HAVE THIS MIX OF USES THAT RESULT IN 150 SPACES BEING MORE THAN ENOUGH. AND I EVEN WENT THROUGH YELP BECAUSE IT'S SOMETHING THAT I PERSONALLY DO WHEN I AM GOING TO A NEW LOCATION, I GO TO YELP AND I SEARCH PARKING IN THE COMMENTS. I AM VERY ANXIOUS ABOUT BEING ABLE TO PARK. AND I DID THAT WITH THIS AND I FOUND SAYING PLENTY OF PARKING, PLENTY OF PARKING, AND I TOOK THESE PHOTOS DURING THE LUNCH HOUR. I APOLOGIZE IF THEY ARE A LITTLE HARD TO SEE, BUT WHAT YOU CAN SEE IS A LOT OF OPEN SPACE AND NOT A TON OF CARS. SO I THINK OUR PARKING WAIVER IS GOING TO BE REQUIRED BY ANYBODY IN THIS STRIP CENTER, AND I THINK IT'S PRETTY WELL JUSTIFIED. WE FIND THAT WE HAVE IDENTIFIED SPECIAL USE CRITERIA. OUR REQUEST FOR OUR WAIVERS SATISFIES THE SPECIAL USE CRITERIA. AS YOU SAW IN THE STAFF REPORT, THE TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT OF COURSE HAS NEVER RECEIVED ANY CALLS FOR THIS LOCATION, SO IT'S OBVIOUSLY HERETOFORE NOT CAUSED ANY APPROXIMATE SO IT'S IN LINE WITH HEALTH SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE. PARKING IS ADEQUATE. BESIDES THE TWO WAIVERS, WE WILL COMPLY WITH ALL CODE AND REGULATIONS. IT'S PROVEN COMPATIBLE WITH CONTIGUOUS AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY BECAUSE CHIEF CHEESE PLEASE HAS BEEN HERE FOR MANY YEARS AND CIGAR LAST YEAR, AND WE RECEIVED MANY LETTERS IN SUPPORT FROM NEIGHBORS WHO LIVE ACROSS THE STREET, OWN A CONDO ACROSS THE STREET AND THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TAMPA. FOR THE SAME REASONS THE USE IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. MIXED USE DISTRICT. AND THE SHOPPING CENTER HAS BEEN HERE FOR A LONG TIME. AND WILL NOT ESTABLISH ANY PRECEDENT BECAUSE IT'S AN EXISTING USE AND THIS IS WHATEK PEOPLE EXPECT OF THE AREA AND THEY HAVE A LONG HISTORY. SO WITH THAT, I DON'T EVEN KNOW -- THANK YOU. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? >>JOSEPH CITRO: IF I MAY, MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR. AS WE HAVE HEARD FROM SUSAN VALDEZ TELL ME REPEATEDLY I CANNOT DICTATE ON WHAT YOU CAN SELL AND WHAT YOU CANNOT SELL, SO I WILL JUST ASK YOU WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO SELL. YOU ARE GOING TO SELL FULL LIQUOR? >>JAIME MAIER: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: BEER AND WINE? >> YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THIS IS NOT A MICROBREWERY SO YOU WILL NOT BE SELLING BEER THAT YOU PRODUCE? >>JAIME MAIER: CORRECT. >>JOSEPH CITRO: WHAT'S THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE COMBINED SPACES? >> 2,369. OVER 2,000. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YOU HAVE PLUS OR MINUS 60 SEATING? >>JAIME MAIER: ABOUT 55. >>JOSEPH CITRO: WONDERFUL. YOU DO REALIZE THIS GOES WITH THE PROPERTY. SO IN CASE THE OWNER DECIDES TO SELL OUT, THIS WILL STAY WITH THE PROPERTY? >>JAIME MAIER: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: I SEE SOME OF THEM SHAKING THEIR HEAD UP AND DOWN. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? IS THERE ANYONE TO SPEAK ON THE SECOND FLOOR? >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT. THERE IS NO ONE UP HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. THANK YOU. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE STILL SMILING THIS TIME OF NIGHT. A BUNCH OF GRUMPY PEOPLE UP HERE, I'LL TELL YOU. >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >> MOVE TO CLOSE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION TO CLOSE AND SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? WE ARE BACK TO MR. CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: MOVE FILE NUMBER AB 2-21-09, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING, CAN AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT S-2 FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES BEVERAGE SALES, SMALL VENUE, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES AND PACKAGE SALES OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION AND MAKING LAWFUL THE SALE OF BEVERAGES REGARD LUGS OF ALCOHOLIC CONTENT, BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR, ON THAT CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT 3225 SOUTH MACDILL AVENUE, UNIT 103 AND 105, TAMPA, FLORIDA AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 3 PROVIDING THAT ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT ARE REPEALED, REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2013-100 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CARLSON MOVED IT. MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT. ROLL CALL. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: NO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT, CITRO VOTING NO. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 15th AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. NUMBER 13. GETTING CLOSE, GENTLEMEN. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. AGENDA DEM NUMBER 13, CASE FILE REZ 21-40, THIS IS FOR A REZONE FOR THE PROPERTY AT 7300 SOUTH SWOOPE STREET, PROPOSED REZONING FROM RS-50 TO IG. I WILL NOW PASS IT ALONG TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION, DAVID HEY. >>DAVID HEY: GOOD EVENING. DAVID HEY WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE. YOU ARE SEEING MY SCREEN. THIS NEXT REZONING 21-40 IS LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, MORE SPECIFICALLY THE PORT TAMPA CITY NEIGHBORHOOD. THE CLOSEST TRANSIT IS APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG WESTIN GRAHAM STREET, AND WESTIN GRAHAM STREET IS SERVED BY HART ROUTE 17 WHICH CONNECTS THE SITE UP TO BRITON PLAZA. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA AND THE SITE IS ALSO WITHIN A LEVEL A EVACUATION. THE SITE MAY LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU. IT DID COME TO YOU THROUGH A PLAN AMENDMENT AT TA/CPA 20-22. THIS IS AGAIN DOWN IN PORT TAMPA CITY. WE HAVE WESTIN GRAHAM STREET ON THE NORTH, SOUTH SHERILL STREET ON THE EAST, JUST TO THE EAST, SAINT MARK MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH. TO THE SOUTH, SWOOPE STREET IS A PRIVATE ROAD AND DEAD-ENDS INTO THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY OF THE SITE. IT'S ALL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO THE SOUTH. AND YOU CAN SEE TO THE WEST OF THE SITE, YOU HAVE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES PREDOMINANTLY OPEN STORAGE, AUTO REPAIR, THINGS LIKE THAT. ALSO, THERE'S INDUSTRIAL USES ALONG WESTIN GRAHAM STREET. HERE WE HAVE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. AGAIN, THIS SHOULD LOOK FAMILIAR. THE PLAN AMENDMENT BROUGHT IT FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THIS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THAT YOU SEE NOW. THE LIGHT GRAY IS THAT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, AND THEN TO THE SOUTH IS THE RESIDENTIAL 10. THE PARCEL IS LANDLOCKED BUT IT IS UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP WITH THIS PARCEL TO THE NORTH THROUGH THE INDUSTRIAL AREA. GIVEN THE PRESENCE OF PARCELS CURRENTLY ZONED FOR INDUSTRIAL GENERAL TO THE NORTH AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE COMMON OWNERSHIP PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT SUPPORTS POLICY DIRECTION BIEN CAN YOU REMEMBERING INDUSTRIAL NONRESIDENTIAL IN-FILL IN AN AREA LOCATED IN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA AND PLAN FOR INDUSTRIAL USES. IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL GENERAL ZONING WOULD PROVIDE FOR DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS THAT IS COME RABBLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ESPECIALLY TO THE NORTH AND WEST, AND IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THAT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. THE REQUESTS WILL CONTINUE TO RECOGNIZE INDUSTRIAL LANDS FOR THE SUPPORT, ITS KEY ECONOMIC ENGINES NOT ONLY WITHIN PORT TAMPA CITY BUT WITHIN THE ENTIRE CITY AS A HOTEL. YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DOES RECOMMEND THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU. YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MR. HEY, SO THE DARK BROWN IS WHAT? >>DAVID HEY: RESIDENTIAL 35. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: RESIDENTIAL 35. AND WHAT IS THE ACTUAL USE, SOME SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN THAT BROWN AREA? >>DAVID HEY: WELL, THIS IS THE -- LET'S GO BACK TO THE AERIAL. THIS IS CHURCH PROPERTY, I BELIEVE, THERE IS MAYBE A COUPLE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HERE. THERE'S ALSO ANOTHER CHURCH OVER IN THIS AREA AS WELL. AND THEN YOU DO GET -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I WAS TALKING ABOUT IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT ON THAT BLOCK. >>DAVID HEY: THIS IS A CHURCH. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THE WHOLE THING IS A CHURCH?% >>DAVID HEY: OWNED BY SAINT MARKS MISSIONARY BAPTIST. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO THERE'S NOT A SINGLE FAMILY ALONG THERE? >>DAVID HEY: NOT ON THIS -- SINGLE-FAMILY ONLY BEGINS TO THE SOUTH HERE. BUT RIGHT ABOUT RIGHT HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I REMEMBER THIS ONE BECAUSE THERE WAS A QUESTION OF ADEQUATE NOTICE AT THE END OF SWOOPE STREET LAST TIME. >>DAVID HEY: RIGHT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DID WE NOTICE IT FURTHER DOWN ON IDAHO THIS TIME? >>DAVID HEY: NOTICING IS HANDLED BY THE CITY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? CITY STAFF. >>ZAIN HUSAIN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. MAY I PLEASE HAVE CONTROL OF THE SCREEN AGAIN? THANK YOU. CASE REZ 21-40, THE APPLICANT HERE IS ROBERT VALDEZ, JR., REPRESENT R REPRESENTATIVE NAME IS JOHN GRANDOFF, PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 7300 SOUTH SWOOPE STREET. LOOKING AT THE OVERHEAD VIEW OF THE SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY, THE PROPOSED REZONE FROM RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO IG INDUSTRIAL GENERAL. THE OWNER DOES ALSO AS DAVID HEY SAID DOES ALSO OWN A PARCEL TO THE NORTH HERE. NOW, THIS IS A EUCLIDEAN REQUEST, SO NO WAIVES ARE PERMITTED HERE. THE SITE CONTAINS .98 ACRES AND IS CURRENTLY VACANT AT THIS TIME. THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY USES TO THE SOUTH, AS DAVID HEY SAID, A RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY TO THE WEST, AND INDUSTRIAL USES TO THE NORTH AND WEST. I'M SORRY, THE CHURCH IS TO THE EAST. OVERHEAD VIEW MAP HERE AS YOU SEE THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS OUTLINED HERE IN RED. THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AS I SAID ARE HERE TO THE SOUTH. THE CHURCH HERE IS ALONG HERE TO THE EAST. WE HAVE INDUSTRIAL, WHEN I WENT DOWN THERE PICTURES ALSO, THERE IS BOAT STORAGE, CAR STORAGE, AND SO ON INDUSTRIAL ALL ALONG THE NORTH AND THE WEST SIDE. COMING OUT, TOOK PICTURES OF TH. SOUTH SWOOP TO THE SOUTH AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOME. 732 SOUTH SWOOPE STREET, ALSO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOME. AND ALONG SOUTH SWOOPE STREET ALL THE WAY DOWN ARE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. THIS IS THE AREA WHERE THE INDUSTRIAL GENERAL PARCELS ARE LOCATED. AS YOU SEE, THE FORTH BOAT STORAGE, YOU HAVE INDUSTRIAL GENERAL BUILDING, WAREHOUSES, ET CETERA, ET CETERA. TO THE EAST OF THE SITE YOU HAVE A CHURCH ALL ALONG THE EAST. AND THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS APPLICATION AND FOUND OUR REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, SIR? ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT? >>JAIME MAIER: FOR THE APPLICANT, 101 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD SUITE 3100 AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: GIVE US THE SHORT VERSION. WE RESERVE FOR REBUTTAL. >>JAIME MAIER: I WAS JUST PULLING OUT ALL THE SLIDES AND I JUST WHITTLED IT DOWN TO TWO. SO I THINK I JUST WANT TO NOTE KIND OF THE LIST OF USES THAT PERMITTED IN THE IG ZONING DISTRICT. IT'S AN AREA OF THE WAREHOUSING TO PROVIDE FOR AREAS FOR INDUSTRY SERVED BY MAJOR TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES WHICH WE CERTAINLY ARE IN SUCH AN AREA. BUT IN AREAS THAT IT'S NOT DESIRABLE TO HAVE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE OF PROXIMITY TO RESIDENTIAL. SO WHERE WE ARE IS EXACTLY WHAT THIS DISTRICT IS INTENDED FOR, ESPECIALLY IN THIS PORT TAMPA AREA, IT MAKES SENSE TO USE THIS VACANT SPACE WHICH IS LANDLOCKED, OTHER THAN THE PIECE OF LAND THAT THE APPLICANT OWNS TO THE NORTH, FOR MORE INDUSTRIAL GENERAL USES. AND I JUST WANT TO NOTE THAT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS USES ARE NOT PERMITTED IN IG, ONLY PERMITTED IN INDUSTRIAL HEAVY. AS I MENTIONED AT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HEARING, THE APPLICANT'S INTENT, ALTHOUGH, IS EUCLIDEAN, THERE'S NO SITE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH IT BUT HE WANTS TO CREATE ACROSSMAN VILLAGE THAT WILL PROVIDE INDIVIDUAL SPACES FOR RENT BY SMALL AND SOLO INCUBATOR SET UP FOR THEM TO USE AS THEIR WORKSHOP. I THINK IT'S A VALUABLE IDEA AND IT'S A GREAT LOCATION FOR IT. AND AGAIN, JUST TO POINT OUT THE ACCESS OF THE RESIDENTIAL ALONG SWOOPE STREET WILL BE BUFFERING IS REQUIRED IN THE IG ZONING DISTRICT, AND SWOOPE STREET IS A PRIVATE ROAD. WE ARE NOT GOING TO BE USING THAT AT ALL. AND WE ARE GOING TO BE USE INGRAHAM WHERE THE REST OF THE PROPERTIES ALREADY HAVE THESE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES ALREADY HAVE THEIR ACCESS. SO WITH THAT, I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN? DO WE HAVE ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC? >> THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>AILEEN ROSARIO: DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT. THERE IS NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: GOOD NIGHT, MISS AILEEN. MR. CITRO MOVED TO CLOSE. SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED. MR. CITRO, COULD YOU CLOSE IT OUT SIR? >> FILE REZ 21-40, PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3700 SOUTH SWOOPE STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RS 50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO IG INDUSTRIAL GENERAL PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THAT THEY HAVE MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF, THE PETITIONER HAS, COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE GOALS, OBJECTIVES POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS NOTED IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, SUCH AS THE PROPOSED REZONING WOULD ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT IS COMPATIBLE TO THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING USES AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT CODE, THE PROPOSED ZONING CATEGORY IS CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO MOVED IT. SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON JULY 15th AT 9:30 A.M. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU. MR. MANISCALCO. NEW BUSINESS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO. >>BILL CARLSON: NO, SIR, THANK YOU. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES, I HAVE ABOUT 14 DIFFERENT THINGS. HOPE UP DON'T MIND TAKING MY TIME WITH THIS. [ LAUGHTER ] FIRST I WOULD LIKE TO THANK OUR FRIEND AND A PERSON WHO APPEARS BEFORE US, MR. JAKE CRAMER IS A NEW DADDY. CONGRATULATIONS JAKE. AGAIN, THANK YOUR WIFE FOR PUTTING IN ALL THE HARD WORK. YES, I MAKE A MOTION TO PRESENT A COMMENDATION TO THE BLACK BUSINESS BUS POOR AS THEY ARE CELEBRATING THEIR 15 YEARS OF INCREDIBLE PROMOTION TO SUPPORT THE BLACK-OWNED BUSINESS COMMUNITY. THE BLACK OWNED BUSINESS BOARD LED BY MISS CANDY LOWE HERSELF NOT ONLY PUT THE SPOTLIGHT ON BLACK OWNED BUSINESS THROUGH THE BUS POOR THAT HAS GROWN EVERY SINGLE TIME, THE BUS TOUR ALSO HAS CREATED AN ECOSYSTEM THAT SUPPORTS THE COMMUNITY AROUND THE BLACK BUSINESSES. THIS COMMENDATION WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE BLACK BUS TOUR OFF-SITE FOR THEIR 15-YEAR ANNIVERSARY THIS WEEKEND. THAT'S THE DAY I AM GOING TO HAND IT OVER TO CANDY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO MADE A MOTION, MR. MANISCALCO SECONDED. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED. MR. CITRO, GIVE CANDY LOWE MY LOVE. I HAVE A NATIONAL- I HAVE TO ATTEND AN EVENT FOR A WOMEN'S GROUP ON BAYSHORE AS WELL. SO TELL HER MY LOVE AND OF COURSE I SUPPORT THE TOUR. >>JOSEPH CITRO: SPEAK KNOWS YOU SUPPORT HER. COUNCIL COUNCIL AND CHAIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I HAVE GOT TWO ITEMS. ONE IS EASY. ON JULY 157th WE HAVE ON THE AGENDA A REPORT FROM MORAN HOMES IN REGARD TO THE MARGARET VIZZI NEIGHBORHOOD LEADER OF THE YEAR AWARD, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO PUT THAT OFF UNTIL AUGUST 26th FOR REASONS THAT YOU ALL DON'T CARE ABOUT TONIGHT. ANYWAY MOTION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO. MOTION CARRIED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND SO I HANDED YOU GUYS A DOCUMENT JUST NOW. I THINK EVERYONE HAS ONE. THE CLERK HAS A COPY MR. SHELBY HAS A COPY. I GAVE A COPY TO THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE EARLIER. THAT IS NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERS ASKED US LAST FALL TO EXPAND THE NOTICE AREA. YOU ALL REMEMBER THAT? >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND, ANYWAY, SO CARROLL ANN BENNETT WORKING WITH HER GROUP IN VIRGINIA PARK, SANDY SANCHEZ IN WEST TAMPA, DAVIS ISLAND, SOUTH OF GANDY FOLKS, AS WELL AS SOME OTHERS, HAVE PUT TOGETHER THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE RED LINES WOULD BE WHAT THEY WOULD BE RESPECTFULLY ADDING, OR REQUESTING THAT WE ADD TO THE CODE, AND WE DON'T NEED TO DEAL WITH IT TONIGHT BUT I WOULD LIKE TO JUST SET THIS ON OUR CALENDAR. APPARENTLY, COUNCIL TEXT AMENDMENT ARE DUE IN A LATER THAN JULY 15th. SO WHICH HAPPENS TO BE A COUNCIL DAY, I BELIEVE, MR. SHELBY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAT'S CORRECT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO I WOULD LIKE TO PUT IT UNDER STAFF REPORTS FOR A DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS NEIGHBORHOOD PROPOSED PROPOSAL, THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO DO IT AS A PRIVATELY INITIATED TEXT AMENDMENT. THEY ARE ASKING CITY COUNCIL TO DO IT AS A COUNCIL TEXT AMENDMENT. SO WITH THAT, I LEAVE THIS DOCUMENT WITH YOU TO MASSAGE. ONE OF THE THINGS I ALREADY DISAGREED WITH THEM ABOUT IS THEY SAID THEY WANT TO GIVE RENTERS NOTICE. I THINK THAT'S A WONDERFUL IDEA BUT IT'S LIKE COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE, BECAUSE THERE'S NO WAY TO KNOW WHO THE RENTERS ARE, BECAUSE IT'S NOT PART OF ANY PUBLIC RECORD. SO ANYWAY, AS YOU CAN SEE, I STRUCK OUT THAT RENTERS PROVISION, EVEN THOUGH IT'S WELL MEANING AND WELL INTENDED, IT'S JUST IMPRACTICAL. WITH THAT, I WOULD LIKE US TO COME BACK AS A POSSIBLE CITY COUNCIL TEXT AMENDMENT ON JULY 15th UNDER STAFF REPORTS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CARLSON SECOND IT. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AND HAVE A GOOD HOLIDAY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO, SIR, NONE, THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, I PASS THE GAVEL TO YOU SIR. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO GIVE THE FLORIDA CHAPTER OF THE BUFFALO MOTORCYCLE CLUB A COMMENDATION IN THE COMMUNITY BY SUPPORTING THOSE LESS FORTUNATE AND THE PRESENTATION ON JULY 29th. >> SECOND. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION? ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MADE A MOTION AND A SECOND. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I COULD HAVE SWORN MIRANDA MADE THE MOTION. OH, GUDES MADE THE MOTION. AND MIRANDA SECONDED IT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MY LAST ONE, I POSED A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS I COULD NOT ANSWER, AND HEARD SOME QUESTIONS THIS MORNING IN REFERENCE TO SOME OF THE ISSUES AS CODE ENFORCEMENT. I KNOW WE HAVE A NUISANCE ABATEMENT BOARD BUT WE ALSO HAVE A CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD. SOMEHOW THEY KIND OF INTERTWINED AND MINGLED SO I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO BRING BACK A PRESENTATION OF THE NUISANCE ABATEMENT BOARD AND CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD, AND I HAVE SOME OTHER WRITTEN ITEMS, AND I WILL GIVE THEM TO THE CLERK. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: AUGUST 26th. >>MARTIN SHELBY: UNDER STAFF REPORTS? >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, SIR. YOU HAVE THE GAVEL. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: ALL RIGHT. THERE'S A MOTION. [ LAUGHTER ] OKAY, THANK YOU, CHARLIE. THERE'S A MOTION AND BY COUNCILMAN CHAIRMAN GUDES. WHO SECONDED IT? MIRANDA SECONDED IT. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. >> MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA MOVES AND MR. MANISCALCO SECONDS IT. ALL IN FAVOR? WE ARE ADJOURNED.