>> THANK YOU FOR JOINING US THIS EVENING. I'LL CALL THE MEETING TO OER. IT'S 7:00 P P.M. P.M. P.M. P.M.. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. [PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE) >> COMMENTS AND PUBLIC INTEREST. THIS ALLOWS UP TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER WITH 30 TOTAL MINUTES ON ITEMS OF INTEREST OR CONCERN AND NOT ON ITEMS THAT ARE ON THE CURRENT AGENDA. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY NOT DISCUSS THESE ITEMS BUT MAY RESPOND WITH FACTUAL OR POLICY INFORMATION. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY CHOOSE TO PLACE THE ITEM ON A FUTURE AGENDA. PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES IF DEEMED NECESSARY. >> ARE THERE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS? >> NO, THERE ARE NOT. >> PLEASE MOVE TO THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE ACTED UPON IN ONEOTION AND CONTAS ITEMS WHICH ARE ROUTINE AND TYPICAL NONCONTROVERSIAL. ITEMS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA OR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION BY COMMISSIONERS OR STAFF. >> WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO REMOVE ANY ITEMS FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? >> I MOVE WE ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PROPOSED. >> A MOVEMENT AND SECOND. PLEASE VOTE. THAT ITEM CARRIES BY A VOTE OF 7-0. PLEASE NOTE THAT VICE CHAIR HORN WAS UNABLE TO JOIN US THIS EVE EVENING. >> ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE BY THE CHAIR, SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THE ORDER REGISTRATIONS ARE RECEIVED. APPLICANTS ARE LIMITED TO 15 MINUTES OF PRESENTATION TIME WITH A FIVE-MINUTE REBUTTAL IF NEEDED. REMAINING SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO 30 TOTAL MINUTES OF TESTIMONY TIME WITH THREE MINUTES ASSIGNED PER SPEAKER. THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY. ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS MUST BE APPROVED IF THEY MEET CITY DEVOPMENT REGULATIONS, LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS ARE MORE DISCRETIONARY EXCEPT AS CONSTRAINED BY LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS. PUBLIC HEARING, REPLATE, AND REVISE THE SITE PLAN. MIDWAY PARKER SHOPPING CENTER EDITION. BLOCK A, LOT 3R. RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH ON ONE LOT ON 1.0 ACRE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MIDWAY ROAD, 266 FEET NORTH OF PARKER ROAD. ZONED RETAIL AND LOCATED WITHIN E PARKWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT. APPLICANT IS MUSTANG PARKER ROAD LIMITED, ADMINISTRATIVE CONSID CONSIDERATION. >> STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT AND THE REVISED SITE PLAN. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. >> ARE THERE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ITEM? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? >> NO, WE DO NOT. >> THANK YOU. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONFINE DISCUSSION TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF. >> I MOVE WE ACCEPT THIS AS SUBMITTED. >> SECOND. >> I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BRONSKI WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER STONE TO APPROVE ITEM 1 AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF. PLEASE VOTE. THAT ITEM CARRIES BY A VOTE OF 7-0. NEXT ITEM, PLEASE. AGDA ITEM NUMBER TWO, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT. 1897 TOWNHOMES EDITION BLOCKS A. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS ATTACHED UNITS AND ONE COMMON AREA LOT ON 1.1 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 15th STREET AND N AVENUE. ZONED PLAN DEVELOPMENT 133 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS/GOVERNMENT. APPLICANT IS IN TOWNHOMES LIMITED, ADMINISTRATIVE CONSERATION. >> GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. THIS REPLAT FOR 1897 TOWNHOMES IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED, AND I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ONE? ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS? SEEING NONE, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT OR ANYONE ELSE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? >> THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION. >> DOES COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY. THANK YOU. IILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONFINE DISCUSSION TO THE COMMISSION. >> MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. >> I WOULD LIKE TO SAY I'M EXCITED TO BE ADDING SOME MORE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, AND I'LL SECOND IT. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE ITEM 2 AS PRESENTED. PLEASE VOTE. THAT ITEM CARRIES 7-0. AGENDA ITEM 3. >> AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 3, PUBLIC HEARING, PRELIMINARY REPLAT. WEST PARK PRESTON ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT 3R, RETAIL STORE ON ONE LOT ON 2.2 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PRESTON ROAD AND PARK BOULEVARD. ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 68 RETAIL AND LOCATED WITHIN THE PRESTON ROAD OVERLAY DISTRICT. APPLICANT IS MC WEST PARK, LLC. ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION. >> THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND/OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. I WOULD BE PLEASED ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FROM STAFF ON ITEM 3? SEEING NONE, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT OR ANYONE ELSE WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? >> THE APPLICANT IS AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION. >> DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CONFINE DISCUSSION TO THE COMMISSION. >> I MOVE WE APPVE THIS SUBJEC ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. >> I SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BRONSKI WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TOM TO APPROVE ITEM 3 SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS OF THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. PLEASE VOTE. THAT ITEM PASSES BY A VOTE OF 7-0. THANK YOU. ITEM 4. >> NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL PUBL COMMENT F ITEMS ON THE AGENDA NOT POSTED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. PRESIDING OFFICER WILL ESTABLISH TIME LIMITS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKER REQUESTS, LENGTH OF THE AGENDA, AND TO INSURE MEETING EFFICIENCY AND MAY INCLUDE A TOTAL TIME LIMIT. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 4 IS DISCUSSION AND ACTION. CONSIDERATION OF PORTIONS OF THE COLLIN CREEK PATTERN BOOK/DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR URBAN MIXED USE 3. APPEAR CAN'T IS CENTURION AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP. >> THA YOU, MS. BRIDGES. URBAN MIXED USE 3 WAS INITIALLY APPROVED BY THE CITY IN 2018 AND WAS AMENDED IN 2020 AND 2021. AS PART OF THE ZONING REQUEST THE APPLICANT PROPOSED A VISION FOR THE SITE REDEVELOPMENT THAT INCLUDED PRELIMINARY DESIGN ELEMENTS FOR THE PROPERTY. HOWEVER, DUE TO SIZE AND PROPERTY, ADDITIONAL TIME AND STUDY WERE NEEDED TO DETERMINE THE PRECISE DESIGN STANDARDS. THEREFORE, THE CITY ADOPTED A REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO AROVE A PATTERN BOOK DETAILING THE DESIGN ELEMENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE PURPOSE OF THIS APPROVAL IS TO VERIFY THAT THE INITIAL VISION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT REMAINS INTACT AND IS BEING FULFILLED. ONCE THE BOOK IS APPROVED, GUIDES CONSISTENT STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. SINCE 2019 AND AFTER THE INITIAL APPROVAL TV UMU3 STAFF AND THE APPLICANT HAVE BEEN COLLABORATING ON THE PATTERN BOOK WITH THE SIGNIFICANT SIZE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY A PHASED APPROACH TO THE APPVAL IS RECOMMENDED. THIS IS THE FIRST PHASE OF THE PATTERN BOOK CONSISTENT WITH DEVELOPMENT PHASING. TONIGHT SECTIONS 1, 2, 3, AND 7 AS WELL AS A PORTION OF SECTION 6 ARE INCLUDED FOR CONSIDERATION. THIS INITIAL PHASE INCLUDES INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION, DETAILS ABOUT SINGLE FAMILY LAWS IN THE STREET SECTIONS, AND PROVIDES REFERENCE, INFORMATION IN THE APPENDIX, CONTAINING LANDSCAPE DETAILS, BUILDING MATERIAL PALATE, ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR ELEMENTS AND FINITIONS. APPROVAL OF THESE SECTIONS WOULD AUTHORIZE DEVELOPMENT IN THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA TO PROCEED. SIDE PLANS FOR BLOCKS OUTSIDE OF THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WILL NOT BE APPROVED UNTIL RELATED SECTION OF THE PATTERN BOOK ARE APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION AT A FUTURE DATE. THIS EXHIBIT DEMONSTRATES THE LAYOUT OF THE BLOCK PATTERNS AND PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL STYLES. BLOCK PATTERNS AND STREET DETAILS ARE INCLUDED TO SHOW HOW BLOCKS WILL BE DEVELOPED REGARDING STREET AND ALLEY CONNECTIONS LANDSCAPING MAILBOX LOCATIONS, AND OTHER DETAILS. AS IT IS SHOWN IN THIS SLIDE, A TOTAL OF FIVE INDIVIDUAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLES HAVE BEEN PROPOSED FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THE PATTERN BOOK IS PROPOSING BOTH REQUIRED AND OPTIONAL ELEMENTS FOR EACH STYLE, WHICH NEED TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. THE APPLICANT HAS ALSO PROVIDED A RENDERRING OF THE RESIDENTIAL AMENITY CENTER LOCATED IN BLOCK K, WHICH IS DESIGNED TO CREATE A UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL FOCAL POINT FOR THIS OPEN SPACE. AS THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRESSES, THERE WILL BE SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS TO ADD ADDITIONAL SECTIONS AND PROVIDE THE SPECIFICS ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. EACH TIME THE PATTERN BOOK IS AMENDED, STAFF WILL BRING FORWARD THE UPDATED PATTERN BOOK FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE COMMISSION. THIS EXHIBIT SHOWS THE BLOCK PATTERN CONTAINING THE FUTURE PATTERN BOOK ITEM. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PRESENTED SECTIONS OF THE COLLIN CREEK PATTERN BOOK. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. >> THANK YOU. WE'LL GET INTO QUESTIONS IN JUST A SEC HERE. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT JUST LIKE -- IT TOOK A LONG TIME FROM COLLIN EEK MALL TO GO FROM BEING CREATED, DREAMED UP, CREATED, BUILT, DECLINED, AND THEN IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR US TO FIND A DEVELOPER WHO COULD PULL TOGETHER ALL THE PIECES NECESSARY TO GET AN APPROVAL TO BUILD A PROJECT, BUT A PROJECT THIS SIZE IS NOT GOING TO HAVE EVERY DETAIL IN PLACE BEFORE YOU ARE ABLE TO COME TO COUNCIL OR YOUR FINANCES OR ANYONE ELSE. OUR JOB TONIGHT REALLY IS TO TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED AND ESSENTIALLY HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE TO THEIR ORIGINAL VISION AND PLAN UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE WILL BE SO CHANGES THAT HAVE TO TAKE PLACE. MOST OF YOU KNOW THAT THEY'VE BEEN BEFORE US MULTIPLE TIMES ASKING FOR CHANGES. I THINK IT'S EXCITING WE'RE NOW TO THE POINT OF FIGURING OUT WHAT THE DETAILS ARE FROM AN ARCHITECTURAL STANDPOINT. I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO GETTING THIS TO THEM SO THEY CAN START MAKING MORE PLANS. ALL RIGHT. THAT SAID, COMMISSIONER, YOU HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF? >> YES, WOULD YOU PLEASE VERIFY WHAT ARE WE APPROVING TONED? I KNOW YOU HAVE SOMETHING ON THE LIST OF -- OR NOT. JUST USING THAT SINGLE RESIDENTIAL STYLE, THAT'S NOT CLEAR TO ME IT'S A RESIDENTIAL STYLE OF BUILDING OR IS SINGLE RESIDENTIAL FAMILY BUILDING OR IS A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED BUILDING? THERE ARE DIFFERENT THINGS THAT COULD BE KIND OF ENCOMPASSED IN THAT WORD THERE. DO YOU HAVE DETAILS IN THAT? I WILL TRY TO ELAIN THAT AS MUCH AS I CAN. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS COMPRISED OF MULTIPLE BLOCKS. SOME OF THEM ARE URBAN CORE AND MIXED USE. THEY INCLUDE MULTI-FAMILY COMPONENTS. THEY HAVE RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL, OTHER MIXED USE COMPONENTS TO IT. THIS PATTERN BOOK, THIS PHASE OF PATTERN BOOK CURRENTY BEFORE YOU IS JUST PERTAINING THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THOSE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS INCLUDE BOTH DETACHED AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS. AS WE CAN SEE IN THE PROPOSED DESIGN, THE MODERN FARMHOUSE DESIGN, TEXAS CONTEMPORARY DESIGN, ARTS AND CRAFT, HILL COUNTRY, TEXAS TRANSITIONAL. THEY BOTH -- ALL OF THEM EACH HAVE CERTAIN DESIGNS OR EITHER SINGLE FAMILY OR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED. >> AND WE ARE APPROVING ALL OF THESE TONIGHT? >> CORRECT. ATTACH AND DETACHED PORTION OF THE ENTIRE COLLIN CREEK MALL. >> OKAY. THANK YOU. JUST TO BE CLEAR, THIS MAP SHOWS THE BLOCKS THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS, AND THESE ARE URBAN CORE, AND THOSE ARE NOT PART OF WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO APPROVE TONIGHT. ESSENTIALLY, THIS IS WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO APPROVE -- THIS PORTION OF THE COLLIN CREEK MALL IS WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO APPROVE IF YOU DECIDE TO APPROVE. >> GOT YOU. THANK YOU. >> SURE. COMMISSIONER RATLIFE. >> FIRST OF ALL, AN IMPRESSIVE PIECE OF WORK FOR THE STAFF. VERY THOROUGH AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND. LOTS OF PICTURES, WHICH I APPRECIATE. I NOTICED THAT THE LONG-TERM INTEREST IS THE OWNERS ASSOCIATION AND THE ARC ARE GOING TO BE DIVIDED INTO SINGLE FAMILY AND THE NON-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. IS THIS DOCUMENT BA EVERYTHING THAT THE SINGLE FAMILY ARCHITECTRAL VIEW COMMITTEE WOULD HAVE TO ENFORCE? IS THERE ANYTHING MISSING THAT THEY WOULD NEED? >> I BELIEVE THAT'S CORRECT. THOSE WILL BE REQUIREMENTS THAT THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION WILL BE ABLE TO ENFORCE. THERE'S GOING TO BE, OBVIOUSLY, COMMERCIAL SECTIONS OF THIS MULTI-FAMILY SECTION. AS THE DEVELOPMENT CONTINUES TO GROW, THEY'LL BE DIFFERENT PORTIONS ADDED TO THE PATTERN BOOK AS WELL AS TO THE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS. THE ENTIRE DISTRICT IS AN OVERALL GOVERNANCE DOCUMENT. IT SHARES IN THE MAINTENANCE AND THE ASSOCIATION OF THE ENTIRE DISTRICT. AS FAR AS ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS, EVERYTHING THAT APPLY TO THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PORTION. >> IT MAY BE A QUESTION TO ANSWER. STAFF IS IT HERE TO ADDRESS THAT. FROM THE CITY'S PERSPECTIVE, WE WILL NOT GET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE SINGLE FAMILY PRODUCTS FOR THE MULTI-FAMILY AND THE COMMERCIAL. WE WILL HAVE THE SITE PLANS THAT WE'LL REVIEW SO THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT WILL COME TO STAFF. >> THAT'S THE WAY I READ IT. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE WASN'T SOMETHING ELSE OUT THERE THAT WE WERE ANTICIPATING FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY PORTION. Z >> YOU ALL WILL NOT SEE ANYTHING ELSE ON THIS. >> MY OTHER COMMENT WAS RELATED TO LOT SIZE ON THE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHEDOT PATTERNS. 800 SQUARE FEET. 20 BY 35. I'M NOT SURE WHAT YOU CAN BUILD ON A 20 BY 35, 800 SQUARE FOOT LOT. IS THERE A SPECIFIC LOT OR TWO IN THIS DEVELOPMENT THAT ARE DRIVING THOSE REALLY TIGHT -- THE 20-FOOT WIDTH I GET. THE 35-FOOT DEPTH AND A REQUIREMENT FOR A TWO-CAR GARAGE SEEMS REALLY TIGHT TO ME, SO IS THERE ONE OR TWO THAT ARE DRIVING THAT, BECAUSE LOOKING AT THE PATTERNS MOST OF THEM ARE 50 TO 60 FEET DEEP, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE WERE SOME END LOTS OR SOMETHING THAT WAS GOVERNING THE NEED FOR A 35-FOOT DEEP LOT. >> MR. HILL CAN HELP ME IF I'M NOT EXPLAINING IT WELL, BUT BOTH LOT AREAS AND LOT DIMENSIONS WERE APPROVED AS PART OF THE ZONING REQUESTS BACK IN 2018 AND IT'S PART OF THE UMU3 DISCUSSION WHEN THE ZONING CASE WAS APPROVED. TONIGHT'S ITEM IS JUST PERTAINING TO THE PATTERN BOOK, AND I'M NOT SURE HOW WE CAN ADDRESS THE DIMENSIONS OF THE LOTS AT THIS POINT. >> MOST OF THE LOT DEPTHS ARE LONGER, BUT THEY DID WANT TO INCLUDE A REDUCED DEPTH JUST DUE TO THE DENTSTY THAT TLERP ASKING FOR AS PART OF THE PROJECT. YOU ALL HAVE SEEN PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS, AND WE'VE SEEN FINAL SITE PLANS ON THIS. WE DO HAVE THOSE DIMENSIONED REFINED. I DON'T THINK THERE'S THAT MANY THAT ARE THAT NARROW. THERE ARE SOME THAT COME CLOSE TO THAT. >> JUST TO BE CLEAR, THIS IS NOT NEW INFORMATION TONIGHT? I GUESS I -- >> NO. >> OKAY. THEN I'LL STAND DOWN. >> ALL OF THE LOT DIMENSIONS AND STUFF ARE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE ORIGINAL ZONING REQUEST THAT WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUN COUNCIL. >> WILL THIS PROHIBIT HOMEOWNERS FROM PUTTING SOLAR ON THEIR HOMES? >> I DON'T THINK THAT'S ADDRESSED, SO NO, I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD PROHIBIT AN OWNER. I THINK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION WOULD PROHIBIT IT, BUT THIS DOCUMENT WOULD NOT DO THAT. >> I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE SINCE IT WASN'T INCORPORATED SAYING THEY WERE PERMITTED TO DO IT THAT, IT WOULD BE THEN EXCLUDED FROM THE DESIGN ELEMENT. THEY WOULD NOT. >> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? GOOD QUESTIONS. ONE MORE. >> ONE MORE. REGARDING THE COLORS, I CAN TELL SOME LOOK LIKE WOOD. SOME LOOK LIKE MASONRY. NOT SURE, IS IT ALL INCLUDED IN EVERY PIECE THAT'S ALREADY DEPICTED NO MATTER WHAT KIND OF MATERIAL THAT THEY WILL USE FOR EVERY AREA OF THE EXTERIOR LOOK? >> I SEE SO. I'M N SURE IF THAT'S PART OF OUR EXAMINATION OR PART OF THE PROCESS TO GO THROUGH EVERY SINGLE PART OF THE BUILDING AND MAKE SURE THAT THE MATERIAL IS ALREADY DEFINED OR -- >> SO THE BUILDING MATERIALS WILL HAVE TO MEET THE CITY'S CODES AND BUILDING CODES. IT'S NOT REALLY -- WE'RE NOT BRINGING IT UP SO YOU COULD VET OR PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON EVERY SINGLE BUILDING MATERIAL, PAINT STYLE, THINGS LIKE THAT. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS, DEFITELY WE CAN DISCUSS THOSE, AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ADDRESS THOSE. IN GENERAL, WHAT THEY HAVE BEFORE YOU IS THEIR PROPOSED DESIGN. THEY'VE BEEN WORKING WITH SEVERAL BUILDERS. THEY'VE GOT SOME REFINED SPECIFICS BEFORE YOU, WE DO HAVE PAINT PALLETS AND STONES, THOSE SORTS OF MATERIALS AVAILABLE FOR YOU TO REVIEW. OUR EXPECTATION WAS NOT THAT YOU WOULD REVIEW EVERY SINGLE FAS ADD AND BE THAT PRECISE WITH YOUR COMMENTS. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, WE'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THOSE AND ABBY CAN ADDRESS THOSE AS WELL. >> THE PATTERN BOOK THAT WE HAVE TODAY IS JUST A COLLECTION OF THE POSSIBLE MATERIALS THAT WE USE. >> THESE ARE THE PROPOSED MATERIALS. WE WILL BRING THESE AND PRY THESE TO THE BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT WHEN THEY SUBMIT THEIR CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. THEY WILL TAKE THIS BOOK AND MATCH UP TO THE DESIGNS OF THE BUILDING AND HASHGS THAT THE -- ALL THE REQUIRED ELEMENTS ARE MET AND THE OPTIONAL DESIGN ELEMENTS ARE MET AS WELL AS THE COLOR PATTALS. THIS IS A SPECIFI AND REFINED DOCUMENT THAT WILL BE UTILIZED. THIS IS WHAT YOU SHOULD SEE WHEN IT'S FINISHED IN THE FIELD. >> WILL THAT COLOR PALATE ALSO BE ENFORCED BY THE OWNERS ASSOCIATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IF SOMEBODY COMES IN FIVE YEARS FROM NOW AND WANTS TO REPAINT THEIR HOUSE SOME COLOR THAT'S NOT IN THIS BOOK IS THAT GOVERNANCE DOCUMENT GOING TO REFER BACK TO THIS PATTE BOOK >> IT WILL. THERE'S INFORMATION IN THE PATTERN BOOK ABOUT THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. THEY WOULD HAVE TO ADJUST THE PATTERN BOOK? >> LAST BUT NOT LEAST, IT MAY BE IN HERE, DID NOT READ EVERY SINGLE LINE. THE WEATHER FORECAST. I PRESUME WE -- >> SAND. >> ZERO SCAPE WOULD BE GOOD. I PRESUME THESE ARE PRIMARILY NATIVE TEXAS PLANTING MATERIALS THAT WOULD BE 100 DEGREE 30-DAY DROUGHT-RESISTANT. THAT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED, AND, YES, THAT IS THE PURPOSE. >> THE NUMBER OF THOSE PLANTS ARE MINIMAL COMPARED TO THE REST OF THE -- >> DOES ANYONE HAVE A SPECIFIC QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT? IT IS. I WANTED TO OPEN IT UP BECAUSE THEY'RE HERE TO SPEAK, AND SHE'LL YELL AT ME IF I DON'T GIVE EVERYONE A CHANCE TO SPEAK. I DID. I DID. YOU'RE RIGHT. MICHAEL ZIZIK, 1800 VALLEY VIEW LANE, SUITE 400, THAT'S THE BUSH ARCHITECTS OFFICE LOCATION. WE'VE WORKED -- I THINK WE'RE UP TO TWO, TWO AND A HALF YEARS NOW ON THIS PORTION OF THE BOOK. THERE ARE COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE SECTIONS THAT WE'RE WORKING ON CURRENTLY TO PULL IT ALL TOGETHER. WE'VE WORKED WITH PLANNING AND THE LANDSCAPE TEAM. WE'VE GOT SOME CATCH-ALL NOTES IN THERE THAT IF AT A FUTURE DATE THERE'S A PROPOSED PLANTING THAT STILL FITS THE INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. NOT IN THERE YET, BUT IT CAN BE ADDED OR AMENDED WITHOUT MUCH TROUBLE. EVERYTHING SHOULD BE WELL-WATERED AND WELL TAKEN CARE OF. IT'S UNDER HOA CONTROL. THE INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT NOW STATES THAT WE'RE NOT RELYING ON THE HOMEOWNER TO TURN ON THEIR WATER TO KEEP EVERYTHING ALIVE. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR GO INTO ANY DETAIL. I HAD READ THIS 100 TIMES OVER. >> NO OTHER SPEAKERS? >> NO, WE DO NOT. I WILL NOT CLOSE THE NONEXISTENT PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY. DO WE NEED AN ACTION ON ITEM 4? WE NEED ACTION. WE NEED -- >> I'M EXCITED TO SAY JUST AS YOU MENTIONED, CHAIRMAN DOWNS, THAT GETTING THIS GOING. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THIS DOCUMENT AS SUBMITTED. >> WE HAVE COMMISSIONER AND SECONDO APPROVE ITEM 4. PATTERN BOOK IS SUBMITTED. PLEASE VOTE. EXCITED TO SAY 7-0. ALL RIGHT. GET HER DONE. >> 525 FEET SOUTH OF 15th STREET ZONED RETAIL WITH SPECIFIC USE PERMIT 333 FOR DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. APPLICANT IS GARTNER COIT LIMITED. >> THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COIT ROAD AND SOUTH OF 15th STREET. SHOWN ON THE SCREEN IS THE REVISED SITE PLAN FOR COIT PLAZA. IT IS A PROPOSED DRIVEHROUGH RESTAURANT, 1,200 SQUARE FEET WITH 12 PARKING SPACES, ONE MENU BOARD, AND ONE PICK-UP MENU. THE PURPOSE FOR CONSIDERATION FOR THE FINAL PLAT IS TO CONSIDER A VARIANCE THAT WILL ALLOW DEVELOPMENT TO PROCEED WITHOUT REPLATTING THE PROPERTY. THIS IS THE FINAL PLAT FOR COIT PLAZA BLOCK A LOTS ONE THROUGH FOUR ON THE SCREEN. IT WAS RECORDED IN 1994. A DIRECT ACCESS POINT IS REQUIRED PER SECTION 5.2 OF ARTICLE 5 IN TH SDIVISION ORDINANCE. IN THE STAFF REPORT FROM 1994 IT OR A VARIANCE REQUEST.EQUIREMEN- LOT 3 HAS BEEN DEVELOPED IN THE PAST AND WAS ACCESSED SOLELY FROM THE OFFSET DRIVEWAY OF THE TRANSIT CENTER TO THE SOUTH. STAFF DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT, AND THE OWNERS ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE NOW. THE AERIAL ON THE SCREEN SHOWS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ITS EXISTING DRIVEWAYS AND ACCESS IN ADDITION WITH THE TNSIT CENTER TO THE SOUTH. THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE VARIANCE STANDARDS ARE LISTED ON THE SCREEN. STAFF ANALYZED THE REQUEST TO GATHER WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. THEY CONCLUDED THAT ACCESS AND PROTECTION WAS SUFFICIENT. STAFF BELIEVES THERE ARE EXISTING CONDITIONS THAT ARE UNIQUE TO THIS PROPERTY THAT SUPPORT A VARIANCE BEING GRANTED. TO CONCLUDE, DUE TO THE PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE EXISTING ACCESS AND POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE OFF-SITE ACCESS AND BASED UPON THE CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REVISED SITE PLAN AND SUBMITTED AND THE VARIANCE REQUEST. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> THANK YOU. >> DO WE HAVE ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK ON THIS? >> THE APPLICANTS ARE HERE, AND THEY CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISON. >> DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ALL RIGHT. DISCUSSION? COMM COMMENTS? >> I THINK IT'S PRETTY CLEAR THIS IS SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN IN EXISTING USE OUT THERE. IT WORKED. THE ACCESS WAS FINE. YOU KNOW, IT SEEMS LIKE HAD THE BUSINESS STILL BEEN IN OPERATION, IT THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN GRANDFATHERED. IT SEEMS A ROUTINE MATTER IN MY MIND, AND I WOULDIKE TO MAKE A MOTIONOPPRO IT AS PRESENTED. >> SECOND. >> OKAY. SHOULD WE GET A LITTLE MORE SPECIFIC WITH OUR MOTIONS SINCE THERE ARE TWO ITEMS? THIS IS A VARIANCE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE HELPFUL IF THE IDEA IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN AND APPROVE THE VARIANCE TO THE FINAL PLAT AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. >> I WOULD --OULDAKE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE SITE PLAN AS PRESENTED AND THE VARIANCE AS NOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDED FOR APPR APPROVAL. >> SECOND THE MOTION. PLEASE VOTE. ITEM CARRIES 7-0. >> AGENDA ITE DISCUSSION AND ACTION. CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND VARIOUS ACTS AND ACCESS STATEMENTS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPLICANT IS CITY OF PLANO. >> MY NAME IS EVAN, AND I'M A PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THIS IT UM IS A REQUEST TO CALL A PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FOR ACTION THAT WERE OUTSIDE OF THE FOCUS OF THE 2020-2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. AS YOU MAY REMEMBER, THE 2020-2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS MADE RECOMMENDATIONS TO NUMEROUS ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN. FOR THOSE WHO ARE KEY TOPICS BEING LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION DENSITY, AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT. THE PLAN WAS ADOPTED NOVEMBER OF LAST YEAR AND SOME POLICIES AND ACTIONS OF THE PLAN HAVE NOT CHANGED SINCE 2014-2015. HERE ON THIS GRAPHIC YOU CAN SEE THAT THE POLICIES ON THE RIGHT, THE ACTION PERTAINING TO THOSE POLICIES WERE THE ONES STATIC SINCE 2014-2015, AND THOSE POLICIES ON THE LEFT,HE TIONS RELATING TO THOSE POLICIES THAT WERE ALTERED WITH THE PROCESS, THOSE ARE NOT GOING TO BE THE PROPOSED ACTION AMENDMENTS. THE PLAN IS INTENDED TO BE VIEWED ONLINE, WHICH IS THE BEST WAY TO STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ON THE WEBSITE YOU CAN TRACK THE IMPLEMENTATION STATUS OF EACH ACTION, WHETHER IT'S COMPLETE, IN PROGRESS, PENDING, OR RECURRING AND ON TRACK. THIS SPRING STAFF CLOSING BELLINGED WITH ALL DEPARTMENTS TO PROVIDE A STATUS UPDATE ON THOSE ACTIONS. WE RECEIVED FEEDBACK FROM THOSE DEPARTMENTS THAT THERE ARE SOME ACTIONS THAT ARE COMPLETE AND OTHERS THAT MAY NEED MORE DIRECTION. HERE YOU CAN SEE, FOR EXAMPLE, LIBRARIES, POLICY ACTION NUMBER 6, WHICH IS CREATE A MARKETING PROGRAM THAT PROMOTES THE LIBRARIES AS CIVIC FOCAL POINTS AND RESOURCE HUBS FOR PLANO'S COMMUNITY. THE DIRECTION THAT WE SEE FROM THE LIBRARIES WAS THAT THIS MARKETING PROGRAM WAS COMPLETED AND IS ANNUALLY EVALUATED BY THE PLAN YOER PUBLIC LIBRARY, AND SO SOME PROPOSED LANGUAGE THAT WE COULD USE IS THAT WE COULD CHANGE THAT ACTION UPDATE TO BE MAINTAINED AND ANNUALLY EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PLANO PUBLIC LIBRARY MARKETING PROGRAM AND PROMOTING CITY LIBRARIES AS CIVIC FOCAL POINTS AND RESOURCE HUBS FOR THE COMMUNITY. THIS WILL IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF THE ANNUAL STATUS REVIEW CYCLE. THESE AMENDMENT SAYS ASSIST STAFF BY UPDATING LANGUAGE TO BETTER REFLECT CURRENT CONDITIONS, AND THEY AVOID LEAD DEPARTMENTS FROM PROVIDING UPDATES ON ACTIONS THAT MAY BE OUTDATED OR OBSOLETE. MAP AMENDMENTS WILL PROVIDE UPDATES TO CHANGES TO THE PARK AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS AS WELL AS UPDATING FOR GREATER SPECIFICITY. THIS PAST SPRING GOING FORWARD WE WILL REVIEW WITH LEAD DEPARTMENTS EACH FALL TO BETTER CORRESPOND WITH THE FISCAL YEAR AND TO PREPAREOR T COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANNUAL REPORT. AS RECOMMENDED IN THE REDEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY ACTION 7-RGM-7, UPDATES RESULTING FROM THE REVIEWS WILL BE COLLECTED AND PRESENTED FOR A P & Z CONSIDERATION AS PART OF A PREPROGRAMMED TWO-YEAR REVIEW CYCLE BEGINNING NEXT YEAR, 2023. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE COMMISSION CALL A PUBLIC HEARING TO APPROVE THE PLAN. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> THERE'S ALWAYS A LOT OF WORK TO BE DONE. >> YES, SIR. >> ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ITEM? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ARE THERE ANY SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? >> NO, THERE ARE NOT. >> THANK YOU. OKAY. SOUNDS LIKE WE NEED TO CALL A PUBLIC HEARING. SOMEONE WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? GO FOR IT. >> I MOVE FOR CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND THE VARIOUS MAPS AND ACTION STATEMENTS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL. >> SEND. WE HAV A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TOM WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER OLLIE TO CALL A PUBLIC HEARING. PLEASE VOTE. THAT ITEM CARRIES 7-0. LAST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA ITEM 7 WITH THE ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT SOMEONE WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO A FUTURE AGENDA? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, WE ARE ADJOURNED. 7:37 P.M. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. (ADJOURNED)