>>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GOOD AFTERNOON, EVERYONE. I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THE TAMPA CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO ORDER. IF WE CAN HAVE ROLL CALL. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HERE. >>LUIS VIERA: HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUFOR. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS. I HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY BUT FIRST JENNIFER MALONE BEFORE WE CLOSE IT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: A MOTION TO OPEN THE HEARINGS FIRST. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO OPEN THE HEARING. MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER IF A LOAN, ITEM 2 IS A PLAN AMENDMENT, TA/CPA 24-02 AND REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM NUMBER TWO TO OCTOBER 12, 2024, 5:01 AT 315 E. KENNEDY, IT.FLORIDA, 33602. MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 3, FILE NUMBER REZ-23-99 TO THE OCTOBER PUBLIC HEARING. WAIVE THE 180-DAY RULE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PART OF THE MOTION TO WIFE THE 180 DAYS. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OH, 5:01 P.M., 30 1 E. KENNEDY, 33602. >>MARTIN SHELBY: REMINDER TO PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE YOU GET OF THAT DATE, OCTOBER 24, 2024 AT 5:01 P.M. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: TO THE MISNOTICES AND WITHDRAWALS. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: I DID HEAR MR. SHELBY SAY OCTOBER -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: OCTOBER 10, 2024. THANK YOU. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 8, THIS WAS A MISNOTICE AND CANNOT BE HEARD. PLEASE REMOVE IT FROM THE AGENDA. >> GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO REMOVE NUMBER 8. COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: AGENDA ITEM 9, THE APPLICANTS HAD ASKED THAT THIS APPLICATION BE WITHDRAWN. REMOVE IT FROM THE AGENDA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO WITH STRAW ITEM NUMBER 9 FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 10, ALSO A MISNOTICED CANNED NOT BE HEARD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: LASTLY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 11, REZ-24-56. A MISNOTICE AND CANNOT BE HEARD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO REMOVE ITEM NUMBER 9 FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSE? OKAY, WE HAVE OPENED ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DICK OFF WITH ITEM NUMBER 1. CAN I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED. >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSE? YES, MA'AM. >>ABBYE FEELEY: GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. ABBYE FEELEY, INTERIM ADMINISTRATOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OPPORTUNITY. TONIGHT I HAVE FIRST ON YOUR AGENDA ARE THE YBOR CITY PARKING STANDARDS. SECTION 27-178. LAST MONTH ON JULY 25, WE REQUESTED THAT A PORTION OF THE JULY, 2024 TEXT AMENDMENT CYCLE BE PULLED OUT. AND THAT WAS THE SECTION 27-178 AND CONTINUD UNTIL TONIGHT IN ORDER TO ALLOW STAFF TO MAKE MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO AREAS WITHIN THE LANGUAGE THAT WE FOUND NEEDED TO BE ADDRESSED, AS WELL AS TO RESPOND TO THE ADDITIONAL MOTION BY COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK RELATING TO THE LAND SCAPING ITEMS AND BUFFERING. WE HAVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION THAT WILL TAKE US THROUGH THOSE MODIFICATIONS AS WELL AS WE HAVE FOUR MINOR REVISIONS WE WOULD REQUEST COUNCIL TO MAKE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND I WILL GO THROUGH THOSE IF THAT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL. TONIGHT WITH ME, I JUST WANTED TO INTRODUCE -- I HAVE ERIC COTTON, OUR ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. DENNIS FERNANDEZ, HISTORIC PRESERVATION MANAGER, SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, AND DANA CROSBY COLLIER FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. AND THEN ALSO MAJOR ER ERIC DEFELISE WITH TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT, AS THIS HAS BEEN A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS TO GET TO THAT POINT TONIGHT. IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS ONCE WE GET THROUGH WITH THE PRESENTATION, I DO HAVE THOSE INDIVIDUALS AVAILABLE TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS FOR YOU. I WILL GO AHEAD THROUGH THE PRESENTATION REAL QUICK. SO THE MOTION. THE MOTION WAS ORIGINALLY MADE ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2022. SO WE HAVE BEEN WORKING HARD OVER THE PAST ALMOST TWO YEARS TO GET TO THIS.THAT WE ARE TONIGHT. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE CHANGES. ONE THING WE TALKED ABOUT ON JULY 25 WAS THE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE. SO THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE CORRECTED AND IS BEFORE YOU TONIGHT. AND THAT -- I WILL GO THROUGH EXACTLY WHAT THAT LANGUAGE IS. BUT THE -- THE ASSUMPTION IS IF YOU RECEIVED YOUR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FROM THE BLC AND THAT CEREBRAL PALSY ENTITLED THE PROPERTY TOO AND CONTINUED TO OPERATE UNDER THAT AND AS OF SEPTEMBER 5, 2024, YOU WILL BE CONSIDERED A PERFORMING LOT WITHIN THE DISTRICT. NEW LOTS THAT WILL REQUEST TO BE ESTABLISHED AFTER THAT WILL NOW GO THROUGH THE SPECIAL USE 2 PROCESS AND WILL BE HEARD IN A PUBLIC HEARING MUCH LIKE TONIGHT. IT WILL BE SITE PLAN CONTROLLED AND WILL STILL REQUIRE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FROM THE BLC. THE NEXT IS THE VEHICLE USE AREA BUFFER TO BE A FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA WITH FOUR-FOOT FENCE. I WILL GO TO THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE ON THAT IN JUST A MOMENT. INTERIOR LANDSCAPING TO BE REQUIRED FOR LOTS OVER 7500 SQUARE FEET. ON JULY 25, WE WENT OVER WITH YOU THAT THE CURRENT CODE HAS DIFFERENT STANDARDS FORE UNDER 7500 AND OVER 7500. AND WE DID NOW INCORPORATE THOSE INTERIOR LAND SCAPE ISLANDS FOR THE OVER 7500. PERMANENT IRRIGATION FOR NEW LOTS WILL NEED TO BE INSTALLED. A 15-FOOT BUFFER ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL USE WHICH IS IS STANDARD CODE FOR USE GROUP Cs NEXT TO GROUP As. THE REMOVAL OF THE REQUIREMENT TO SECURE THE LOTS. ONE THING WE DID FIND IS MOST OF THE LOTS -- THE MAJORITY OF THE LOTS IN THE DISTRICT ARE 24-7. SO REQUIRING THEM TO BE CLOSED WHEN THEY ARE NEVER CLOSED WAS DIFFICULT. WE ARE STILL COMMITTED TO LOOKING INTO THIS AS PART OF THE CODE UPDATE. SO IT IS JUST NOT IN THE LANGUAGE FOR YOU TONIGHT. BUT WE WILL BE LOOKING AT THAT AS WE UPDATE THE CODE WITH THE CONSULTANT IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS. AND THEN CHANGES TO THE SIGNS. AND THEN THE SECURITY REQUIR REQUIREMENTS. SO THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS THAT -- AND I JUST WENT OVER THIS BRIEFLY THAT ALL PRINCIPAL USE PARKING LOTS RECEIVED BLC APPROVAL SEPTEMBER 5, FOUR AND CONTINUE TO OPERATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUCH APPROVAL WILL BE CONSIDERED PERFORMING WITH THIS SUB EXCEPTION A. PRINCIPAL USE PARKING LOTS NOT APPROVED THAT BLC APPROVAL PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 5 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 27-177 IN THIS SUBSECTIONS A. ONE OF THE REVISIONS I WILL TALK TO YOU ABOUT IN JUST A MINUTE WILL BE SUBSECTIONS A AND B. WE LEFT THE B OFF AND ONE OF THE REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING THAT WILL NEED TO BE MADE AND I WILL GO THROUGH THAT VEHICLE USE LANDSCAPING AND USE-TO-USE BUFFERS AND SCREENING. I KNOW YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH THIS OF REZONING. WHAT IS REQUIRED WITH A USE KNOWS ANOTHER USE AND WHAT IS REQUIRED WITH PARKING AN AREA THAT IS ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. SO AS PART OF THE CHANGES THAT CAME THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN THE VUA WHICH IS THE PARK LOT AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH IS THE STREET WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE FIVE FOOT WITH A FOUR-FOOT TRANSPARENT FENCE. THE TYPICAL WROUGHT IRON TRANSPARENT THAT YOU CAN SEE THROUGH. AND A HEDGE. THE USE-TO-USE BUFFERS BETWEEN THE PARKING LOT AND RESIDENTIAL USE IS CONTAINED IN THE LANGUAGE THIS EVENING AS 15-FOOT WITH A SIX-FOOT SOLID FENCE. CLEARLY TO MEET PLC STANDARDS. AND THEN THAT IS ALSO PLANTED BUFFER. WHEN THE PARKING LOT IS NEXT TO A NONRESIDENTIAL USE, IT IS A FIVE-FOOT BUFFER AND THIS FIVE-FOOT CONSISTS OF TREES AND HED HEDGE. SCENES. WE HAVE DISCUSSED SIGNAGE FOR SEVERAL MONTHS NOW RELATED THAT THERE WAS A REQUIREMENT FOR A SIGN THAT SPOKE TO NO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY IN CHAPTER 14. WE HAVE NOW MOVED THAT REQUIREMENT FROM 14 INTO 27 SO IT IS NOW IN BOTH PLACES AND ALSO IT SHALL BE ONE SIGN FOR -- AT ENTRANCE FOR THE COST OF PARKING, HOURS OF OPERATION, THE PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF LOT AND THE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR THE OPERATOR. YOU WILL HEAR PROBABLY THIS EVENING IN PUBLIC COMMENT THAT THERE ARE A BUNCH OF OTHER SIGNS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY THE STATE WHEN YOU HAVE PRINCIPAL USE PARKING LOT RELATED TO LIABILITY, RELATED TO HOLD HARMLESS OTHER THINGS. LOCK YOUR VALUABLES. ETC. IF IT IS A STATE-REQUIRED SIGNS, YOU ARE ALLOWED TO PUT IT THERE. THIS IS FOR ONLY ADDITIONAL SIGNS THAT ARE CITY-REQUIRED SIGNS. AND THEN THE NEW ADDITION WITH AS TO HAVE AN ANNUAL OPERATIONS AND SECURITY PLAN. THIS IS TO HAVE A CLEARLY FOR LOTS THAT HAVE PAID PARKING THURSDAY, FRIDAY AND SATURDAY NIGHT FROM 10 P.M. TO 4 A.M. THEY ARE TO HAVE AN UNIFORM SECURITY GUARD AND THOSE LOTS WOULD SUBMIT AN ANNUAL OPERATIONS AND SECURITY PLAN THAT AN ACTUALLY CONFIRMS THE INTENT TO CONTINUE OPERATION OF THE LOT, THE ILLUSTRATION OF THE LOT, TO SHOW THAT IT REMAINS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THAT BLC PERMIT AS WAS PROVIDED OR APPROVED, THE COPY OF THE CONTRACT WITH THE SECURITY COMPANY. PHOTOS OF ALL THE SIGNS ON THE LOT AND AN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO OVERALL COMPLIANCE THOSE COUPLE OF REVISIONS. ONE THING WE HAVE HEARD IT THAT SOME OF THESE CHANGES NEED ADDITIONAL TIME COMPLY WITH. RIGHT NOW WE HAVE IT SET FOR SEPTEMBER 5 WHICH IS AFTER YOUR SECOND READING OF THIS ORDINANCE AND IF IT IS THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL, WE WILL REVISE THAT TO BE OCTOBER 1 WHICH IS ABOUT 60 DAYS, 45, 60 DAYS FROM TODAY AND THAT WAY I AM SHOWING YOU WHICH SECTIONS OF THE CODE WILL CHANGE TO BE OCTOBER 1. THAT WILL BE THE DATE OF COMPLIANCE AND WHEN THE SPECIAL USE WILL KICK IN, AS WELL AS WHEN THE LICENSE SECURITY GUARD WILL BE AND FINALLY WE WILL MAKE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO BE OCTOBER 1. THAT WAY WE ARE NOT SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENTING FROM AN ATTENDANT TO A SECURITY GUARD AND HAVE A VOID OF HAVING SOMEBODY AT THE L LOTS. SECONDLY IS THAT A AND A AND B THAT I TALKED ABOUT IN THE FIRST SECTION, THAT ALL LOTS, NEW LOTS WILL GO THROUGH THAT SPECIAL USE 2 PROCESS AND COMPLY WITH 27-177 IN SECTION A AND B. THEN THERE WAS ANOTHER STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE UNDER THE SURFACE PARKING LOT STANDARDS OF ALL APPLICATIONS OF SURFACE PARKING LOTS SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY CEREBR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS BY THE BARRIO LATINO COMMISSION. AND ALL NEW APPLICATION ALSO GO TO THE BLC. FULL BLC. NOT THE ADMINISTRATOR AND ANY SURFACE LOTS. I THINK SOME OF THE REQUEST HE IS THAT COME UP. ARE THESE STANDARDS FOR AN APARTMENT BUILDING THAT HAS A PARK LOT IF IT HAS SURFACE PARKING LOT? THE ANSWER IS, YES, THEY ARE. THIS IS NOT JUST IF YOU HAVE A PAID LOT. IF YOU WERE COMING IN WITH A NEW OFFICE BUILDING IN YBOR AND IT HAS A SURFACE PARKING LOT BEHIND IT, YOU ARE GOING TO MEET THE BUFFERING AND FENCING AND LANDSCAPING THAT A SINGLE LOT WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET. THESE NEW STANDARDS ARE FOR ALL LOTS. TYPICALLY THOSE LOTS COME IN TO THE BARRIO AS PART OF THE BUILDING. SO YOU WILL HAVE THE BANK AND THE LOT. IT IS ALL GOING TO THE BLC AS ONE PACKAGE. AND THAT IS WHEN THE STANDARDS WILL BE CHECKED. AND THEN LASTLY, THERE WERE TWO PEOPLE IN THE CODE THAT REFER TO THE TELEPHONE NUMBER OF A CONTACT PERSON OR THE SECURITY GUARD. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT WAS CHANGED TO SECURITY COMPANY BECAUSE YOU COULD HAVE DIFFERENT PEOPLE FOR DIFFERENT NIGHTS AND IS THAT INFORMATION FOR THE COMPANY WILL HAD BEEN PREFERRED AND OUR FOURTH REVISION WE WILL ASK TO BE MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING WITH THAT, I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: THANK YOU FOR ALL THE HARD WORK YOU PUT THROUGH THIS. I SPOKE TO MR. ACCARDI YESTERDAY. AND HE IS HERE TO SPEAK AT PUBLIC COMMENT. AND HE MAY HAVE A LOT OF CONCERNS, BUT THE TWO MAIN ONES THAT I HEARD FROM THIS. AND I SPENT MORE TIME WITH THE NEIGHBORS THAN I HAVE WITH HIM, BY THE WAY, BUT THAT IS THE TWO ISSUES HE IS MAINLY AGAINST IS ONE, THE SECURITY PLAN. JUST THE BURDEN OF CREATING A SECURITY PLAN. HOW DO YOU FIND THE EXPERTISE. HOW DO YOU PAY FOR IT? HOW DO YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE IN THE PARKING SFWHIS THE RELIABILITY AND COST OF HAVING INDIVIDUAL SECURITY AND THE QUESTION IS, WHY WOULDN'T THE CITY DO THIS. THIS MORNING WE HAD A CRA UPDATE AND THE CRA IS FIRUNDING SPECIF SECURITY AND A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT LIKE DOWNTOWN AND YBOR THAT MAY PAY A PART OF SECURITY. HE WILL SPEAK AND THEN YOU CAN DISCUSS IT. CAN YOU TELL US WHAT FROM YOUR RESEARCH THE SECURITY PLAN AND PARKING OWNERS PAYING FOR THEIR OWN SECURITY AND EACH ONE HAVING A DIFFERENT COMPANY, DIFFERENT POLICY. IS THAT A STANDARD THAT MOST CITIES VICE? WHAT IS BEST PRACTICES FROM YOUR RESEARCH? >>ABBYE FEELEY: AS YOU MIGHT RECALL, THIS IS -- THE CITY OF ORLANDO REQUIRES THIS ALSO. AND IF YOU WANT TO JUST CALL IT AN OPERATIONS PLAN, I MEAN, REALLY IT IS SHOWING US THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SECURITY REQUIREMENT AND YOU HAVE THAT ACTIVE CONTRACT WHICH MEANS YOU HAVE A LICENSED GUARD AT YOUR LOT THURSDAY, FRIDAY AND SATURDAY NIGHT FROM 10 P.M. UNTIL 4 A.M., SIMILAR TO THE ATTENDANT THAT IS CURRENTLY REARED, BUT IT IS GO-- REQUIRED BUT IT IS THROUGH A COMPLIANCE. >>BILL CARLSON: BETWEEN ORLANDO, OTHER SAYS THAT DO THAT AND OTHER FUNDING MECHANISMS LIKE USING CRA MONEY AND SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT AND PUTTING A SPECIAL FEE ON PARK SOMETHING IN IS THERE ANOTHER MODEL THAT WILL EXIST RATHER THAN INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER AS SOON AS. >>ABBYE FEELEY: I AM NOT AWARE OF THAT. >>BILL CARLSON: BESIDE ORLANDO, DO OTHER CITIES DO WHAT WE ARE SUGGESTING DOING? >>ABBYE FEELEY: SOME OTHER CITIES RIGHT NOW HAVE MORATORIUM ON NEW BUSINESSES AND NEW NIGHT CLUBS AS THEIR WAY OF APPROACHING SECURITY TO ENHANCE THE SECURITY SITUATION. THIS HAS BEEN SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT FOR A LONG TIME COUNCIL IS NOT IN SUPPORT OF HAVING THE OPERATIONS AND SECURITY PLAN. IT IS AT YOUR DISCRETION THAT THAT BE REMOVED. >>BILL CARLSON: I STWOONT ASK BECAUSE YOU SPENT A LOT OF TIME AND DONE A LOT OF RESEARCH. I WANT TO PUT WHATEVER RESEARCH YOU HAVE ON THE TABLE. LAST QUESTION. YOU TALKED A LOT OF APPLICATIONS GOING FORWARD. HAS LEGAL LOOKED AT IT AND PUT THIS REQUIREMENT IN FOR ANYBODY WHO HAS BEEN PERMITTED A LONG TIME AGO? >>ABBYE FEELEY: I WILL LET LEGAL SPEAK TO THAT, BUT ANYBODY WHO HAS BEEN PERMITTED AND HAS CONTINUED. THESE REGULATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE SECURITY GUARD IF THEY ARE PAID LOT ON THURSDAY NIGHT, THEY DO NOT MAINTAIN THEM. THEY HAVE A CURRENT PERMIT AND OPERATING UNDER THAT PERMIT AND VESTED FOR THAT PER PIT. THIS IS FOR NEW LOTS GOING FORWARD WHO DO NOT HAVE THAT. >>BILL CARLSON: THE ONES ALREADY PERMITTED DON'T HAVE TO HAVE THE SECURITY GUARD AND THE SECURITY PLAN? >>ABBYE FEELEY: THEY DO. THEY DO. >>BILL CARLSON: LEGAL HAS -- I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION. I'M JUST ASKING. >>ABBYE FEELEY: RIGHT NOW THE CODE REQUIRES AN ATTENDANT. IT DOESN'T SPECIFY WHAT HAD THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THAT ATTENDANT ARE. AND THE GOAL IS FROM AN ATTEND DONE AT A LICENSED SECURITY GUARD. >>BILL CARLSON: MY QUESTION IS IS IT OKAY TO PUT THIS REQUIREMENT ON PEOPLE WHO HAVE A WORKING PROPERTY FOR MANY YEARS? FOR THE LEGAL OPINION. I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER I AM JUST ASKING. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ, LEGAL DEPARTMENT. SOMETHING THAT COUNCIL IS CONSIDERING IN RESPONSE TO AN IDENTIFIED ISSUE IN -- IN THIS AREA. I THINK IT IS APPROPRIATE AND THESE ARE STANDARDS THAT AIR PLY TO ALL THE LOTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT WHETHER THEY ARE NEW OR ESTABLISHED. IT IS JUST A NEW REQUIREMENT TO ADDRESS A PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUE THAT COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THAT MISS FEELEY AND HER TEAM HAS DONE. ALL OF THEM HAVE SPENT A LOT OF TIME ON THIS. I AM VERY EXCITED. THERE COULD BE TWEAKS AFTER THIS IF WE NEED TO. BUT THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS IS SECURITY. AND I HAD THIS BECAUSE TPD OFFICERS WERE TELLING ME OF THE PROBLEMS THEY HAD IN THE DISTRICT. I WENT DOWN, CLOSED YBOR WITH THEM AND THAT IS THE PROBLEM. I HAVE OPINION WORKING FOR TWO YEARS TO TRY TO FIX THIS PROBLEM. THE PROBLEM IS SECURITY. THE PARKING LOTS, ADDITIONAL IS GREAT, BUT THE MAIN POINT IS THE SECURITY PLAN. ORLANDO HAD SUCCESS WITH THIS. MAYOR DEFELISE IS HERE TO SHOW US HOW IT HEMS. HE SHOWED US LAST TIME THAT HE CLEARLY SAID THEY DON'T HAVE THE CAPACITY NOR THE EXTRA OFFICER TO DO THIS. IT IS NOT TPD'S RESPONSIBILITY. SO I THINK THIS IS ABSOLUTELY WONDERFUL. AND I ABSOLUTELY PLAN TO SUPPORT IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: FIRST I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR. AND I KNOW A LOT OF WORK. YOU SPENT A LOT OF TIME ON IT AND I APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT YOU ARE TREATING THE PARKING LOTS EQUABLY. ONE OF THE CONCERNS I HEARD GOING INTO THIS -- WHY TREAT ONE PARKING LOT DIFFERENT THAN OTHERS AND I THINK THAT IS COMMENDABLE. I HAVE A QUESTION ON THE SIGN -- SIGN CLUTTER. YOU AND I HAVE TALKED ABOUT SIGN CLUTTER BEFORE. A CONTROL OF HOW MANY ENTRANCES. IF IT IS A FLAT PARKING LORE ARE THE HOW MANY ENTRANCE AS LOT CAN HAVE? HOW MANY BIG DESIGNATOR. ENTRANCE EVERY 15 FEET AND PUT SIGNS EVERY 15 FEET. >>ABBYE FEELEY: TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL STANDARDS OF HOW MANY AND THE DIFFERENCE OF THE ACCESS POINTS NEEDS TO BE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: FOR A PARKING LOT? VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE? COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: GLORIA MOREDA WAS HERE WHEN THEY STARTED 15, 17 YEARS. I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT THOSE FILES SAY. I REMEMBER A LONG CONVERSATION OF PARKING LOTS IN YBOR CITY. THERE IS ONLY ONE AREA -- AND SOME PEOPLE MAY BE SAYING, WHAT DID HE SAY? ONLY ONE I CAN'T THAT WE PAY OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR TRAFFIC AND THE CITIZENS PAY $ 50,000 A DAY CERTAINLY NOT IN YBOR CITY AND OPENING EYES TO SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING BECAUSE AT THAT TIME, YOUR LAND, YOUR POLICE OFFICERS, BUT THEY AIN'T PAIRING A DIME. AND IT IS ALL THEIRS. I AM NOT AN ANTI OR FOR ANYTHING. I AM FOR A GOOD SOLID CONTRACT FOR EVERYBODY. AND THAT DOESN'T COME UP FOR A VOTE UNTIL NOVEMBER. THESE ARE THINGS THAT I LOOK AT AND I SAY WHAT A DIFFERENCE. I AM NOT AGAINST THIS, BUT IF IT IS FAIR, IT WOULD BE EVERYWHERE. IF WE HAVE A SEPARATE CONTRACT, YOU CAN'T DO ANYTHING TO EVERY THERE. SO THESE ARE JUST AN EYE-OPENER OF WHAT WE HAVE DONE AND HOW WE CREATED IT AND HOW WE OWN A PARKING GARAGE AND SOLD IT FOR FACE VALUE. THAT WAS THE ONLY ONE MAKING MONEY. WE HAVE DONE IT ALL. NOT US BUT OTHERS HAVE. I WAS NOT HERE FOR THE LAST ONE. I WAS HERE FOR THE FIRST ONE. ONLY ONE. UNO. BECAUSE I KNEW WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN. OR I THOUGHT I DID. I AM NOT THAT SMART TO COME UP WITH THE FUTURE AND COME UP WITH SOMETHING. THESE ARE THE THINGS -- I AM NOT TROUBLED BY IN THIS. I AM NOT SURPRISE BY THIS. SOONER OR LATER WHEN YOU GIVE EVERYTHING AWAY, SOMEBODY MAY WANT THE SAME THING. THIS MAY BE DIRECT TO WHAT WE ARE DOING. SO WHICHEVER WAY I VOTE, I WANT THE OTHERS BIG PARKING GARAGE LIKE 10,000 CARS OR WHATEVER TO HAVE THE SAME THING THAT THIS ONE HAS. THAT IS ALL I AM GOING TO SAY, THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE? IF ANYTHING, THEN GO TO PUBLIC COMM COMMENT. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> JASON ACCARDI, THE PRESIDENT AND CEO OF 717 PARKING AND OWNER OF ACCARDI REAL ESTATE CODE. THANK YOU FOR THE TIME. COULD I ASK FOR A FEW EXTRA MINUTES TO TALK TONIGHT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY, DO WE ALLOW SPEAKER WAIVER FORMS IN THIS CASE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: DO YOU HAVE SPEAKER WAIVER FORMS OTHERWISE THREE MINUTES IF WAIVED BY COUNCIL. COUNCIL'S PLEASURE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY TO WAIVE THE TIME. >> MY SON AND MY DAUGHTER. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WILL BE ONE MINUTE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO MAKE IT FIVE MINUTES. >> THANK YOU. AS YOU ALL KNOW, I HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE. STEVE MICHELINI AND I HAVE COME IN FRONT OF THE COMMITTEE -- FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO THANK ABBY AND HER ENTIRE STAFF FOR BEING PATIENT WITH THE RESIDENTS OF YBOR AND THE COMMERCIAL BUSINESS OWNERS IN YBOR THROUGH THIS WHOLE PROCESS. I BOUGHT MY FIRST PARKING LO THE AND MANAGED MY FIRST PROPERTY IN YBOR CITY OVER 34 YEARS AGO. A LOCALLY OWNED BUSINESS, BEING IN FRONT OF YOU TALKING OF PARKING STANDARDS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO US. BEING PART OF THE COMMUNITY BEING A PART OF SAFETY AND SECURITY IN YBOR CITY, OWNING A BAR, OWNING A PARKING LOT, WHATEVER IT IS, IT IS ALL IMPORTANT TO US. SO I COMMEND THE CITY STAFF FOR THESE RECOMMENATIONS. I TOOK A LOOK AT AND MY STAFF TOOK A LOOK AT AND I SENT EVERYBODY AN E-MAIL OF SOME OF OUR SUGGESTED -- I DON'T WANT TO CALL THEM CONCERNS, BUT RECOMMENDATIONS, OBSERVATIONS OF THE CHANGES THAT CITY STAFF MADE. I AM GOING TO GO QUICKLY BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE FIVE MINUTES. TIMING, IF YOU PASS THIS. AT ANY POINT I WOULD APPRECIATE LOOKING A AT THIS TIME FRAME. THEY MOVED IT TO OCTOBER -- I DON'T KNOW WHEN -- SOME TIME IN OCTOBER BUT THE AFFECTED PARTIES WILL ASK FOR MORE TIME. MAYBE 90 DAYS. MAYBE A LITTLE MORE TIME. YOU ARE TALKING OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS LIABILITY BONDING. MY FIRST REQUEST FOR COUNCIL WHEN YOU LOOK AT MY PROPOSED MARK-UP I SUBMITTED YESTERDAY AFTERNOON IS TIMING. TIMING IS IMPORTANT TO THE OWNER-OPERATOR OF PARKING. SECONDLY, I HAVE 34 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE OWNING AND OPERATING PARKING LOTS AND GARAGES NATIONWIDE. I EMPLOY OVER 5,000 EMPLOYEES. WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF PURCHASING PARKING IN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE AS PART OF A DIVESTITURE WHERE WE ARE GOING TO OWN AND OPERATE A VERY LARGE MARKET IN THE AREA. I STUDIED IT LAST WEEK. I MET WITH A LIAISON FROM CITY STAFF AND WE TALKED OF SECURITY AND PARKING. NOTHING UNDER THEIR ORDINANCE. NUMBER ONE MARKET IN THE SOUTH, IN MY OPINION, WITH -- I COULDN'T BELIEVE HOW PACKED IT WAS. THEY DO A GOOD JOB WITH THEIR M.O.T. PLANS, MOBILITY PLANS AND WITH THEIR POLICE DEPARTMENT. WE TALK OF SECURITY. TODAY I AM TALKING ABOUT SECURITY. THAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING TO ME, MY COMPANY, AND MY STAFF. SECURITY AND LIABILITY IN OUR PARKING LOTS. I THINK THAT COUNCILMAN CARLSON BROUGHT IT UP EARLIER. WHAT IS MY CONCERN? ONE, A SECURITY REQUIREMENT ON PAID PARKING LOTS ONLY. I HAVE BEEN VERY, VERY VOCAL. I DON'T UNDERSTAND HAVING A PAVED OR UNPAVED PARKING LOT RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM EACH OTHER. CRIME DOESN'T DISCRIMINATE. UNFORTUNATELY THERE WAS A SHOOTING ON FOURTH AVENUE THIS LAST YEAR ON AN UNPAID PARKING LOT. AND SOMEBODY DIED. I DON'T WANT TO SAY WHOSE PROPERTY IT WAS. IT DOESN'T MATTER. IF WE ARE HEAR TO TALK OF SAFETY, WE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT IT AS A WHOLE ON PAID AND UNPAID PARKING LOT. A GARAGE OR PARKING LOT, CRIME CAN HAPPEN ANYWHERE. I WILL ASK YOU GUYS TO SPECIFICALLY REQUIRE US TO PUT A SECURITY PLAN TOGETHER. I HAVE ASKED -- AND I THINK MR. MICHELINI ASKED MULTIPLE TIMES FOR TPD TO COME UP AND PRESENT A SECURITY PLAN. I THINK THEY ARE THE ONE PROVIDING -- SINCE THEY ARE A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY A SECURITY PLAN. NOT A PRIVATE OWNER OPERATOR OF A PARKING LOT. WE DO RENT PARKING SPACES. WE DO REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT. BUT A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY TO TALK ABOUT A PLAN, NOT JUST FOR PARKING LOTS, BUT FOR THE ENTIRE DISTRICT. HOW ARE WE GOING TO HANDLE EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING. OFF STREET, ON STREET AND 7th AVENUE AND ETC. OTHER THING IS SIGNAGE AND LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. SIGNAGE TO ME IS VERY IMPORTANT. I TALKED TO MY TEAM ABOUT -- I HAVE THE WHOLE ENFORCEMENT AT CHET'S PARKING LOT. AND WHEN YOU PULL IN A PARKING LOT, YOU WANT TO KNOW HOW TO PAY, WHERE TO PAY. I KNOW AGAIN -- I JUST GOT THIS TONIGHT AND ON THE SCREEN THEY MADE ADDITIONAL CHANGES AND FOR US AS AN ORGANIZATION, MORE IS BETTER. BECAUSE WE HAVE PEOPLE CALLING EVERY DAY AND SAYING, OH, I DIDN'T SEE THE SIGN OR I DIDN'T KNOW HOW TO PAY. THE SIGNAGE IS IMPORTANT TO US. WE ARE GOING TO APPRECIATE SOME OF THE CHANGES THAT ABBY AND HER TEAM PUT TOGETHER ON THAT. FOR TIME BURNS TONIGHT, IF YOU CAN LOOK AT SOME OF THE SUGGESTED CHANGES OR STAFF TO LOOK AT THAT. I THINK THEY ARE REASONABLE. BECAUSE, AGAIN, WE ARE OWNER-OPERATORS. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. AS DENNIS KNOWS AND SEVERAL PEOPLE IN YBOR, THE PARKING LOTS IN YBOR ARE VERY SMALL. I KNOW THESE ARE FOR NEW PARKING LOTS. NOT OLD PARKING LOTS. OUR CONCERN IS A 15-FOOT SETBACK OFF OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AND SIX-FOOT WALL TAKES OFF A LOT OF REAL ESTATE IF YOU WANT TO MAKE IT A PARKING LOT. IF YOU CAN JUST KIND OF JUMP AHEAD AND IMAGINE IF I TOOK AWAY MY 15 OR 20 PARKING LOTS IN YBOR CITY. MADE THEM UNPAVED PARKING LOT. DIDN'T HAVE TO MEET YOUR REQUIREMENT AND HAD ALL THIS BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AND LOSE PARKING IN THE DISTRICT. AM I DONE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MR. ACCARDI -- I ALMOST CALLED YOU BY YOUR FIRST NAME. GOOD TO SEE YOU. I AM HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION TO CHANGE THE DATE TO NOVEMBER 1. A LITTLE BIT OF TIME. I UNDERSTAND THIS IS SIGNIFICANT -- >>LYNN HURTAK: WE HAVE TO WAIT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. I THINK WE NEED TO LISTEN TO PUBLIC COMMENT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT DOESN'T BOTHER ME AT ALL. JUST TO GET YOUR RESPONSE TO THAT. I MEAN WILL NOVEMBER 1 BE A REASONABLE TIME? >> YES, SIR. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THE OTHER THING IS, REFERENCE TO TAMPA PD. THAT IS -- BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU ASK FOR. WHEN YOU ASK A GOVERNMENT TEEING PROVIDE A PLAN, YOU MAY NOT LIKE THE PLAN THAT THEY PROVIDE. I THINK DIGITAL CONTROLS FOR YOU MAY BE A LITTLE BIT BETTER. THAT MAY BE A LITTLE BIT QUESTIONABLE. THE SIGN CLUTTER THING. I KNOW IT IS AN ISSUE AND SEEN IT -- A PROLIFERATION OF SIGNS. I GET WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, BUT EPECIALLY IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT, YOU KNOW HAVING SIGN CUT WILLER IS PROBLEMATIC AND BRINGING THAT IN AND MAKING IT MORE REASONABLE AND MORE AESTHETICALLY APPEALING. LACK OF BUFFER. IF YOU HAVE A HOUSE YOU WOULD WANT LESS THAN 15 FEET WITH A BARRIER WALL THERE. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: CAN I MOTION THAT WE LISTEN TO THE REST OF PUBLIC COMMENT BEFORE WE ALL COMMENT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SURE. >> THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE HERE TO SPEAK? >> STEVE MICHELINI. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I CAN'T HEAR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> STEVE MICHELINI. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF 717 PARKING. COUNCIL, YOU KNOW WE HAVE BEEN UP HERE SEVERAL TIMES ASKING FOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE. AND THE ISSUE REGARDING A SECURITY PLAN IS A REQUIREMENT THAT I DISCUSSED WITH MORRIS MASSEY WHO SAID TO ME THAT YOU HAVE TO HAVE A SECURITY PLAN ADOPTED BY THE CRA IN ORDER TO ENABLE FUNDING TO BE USED FOR CRA TO SUPPLEMENT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, NOT FOR PERSONNEL, BUT FOR OPERATIONAL EXPENSES. AND YOU KNOW, WE HAD A MEETING WITH TPD YESTERDAY. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THEY SAID WAS, IF YOU GIVE US MORE MONEY, WE ARE NOT GOING TO TURN IT DOWN. AND ALL OF THAT GOES HAND IN HAND WITH THE SECURITY OPERATIONS THAT YOU ARE ASKING FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS TO ENGAGE IN. AND THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN UNPAID VERSUS PAID LOTS. WE TALKED ABOUT THIS. IT DOESN'T STOP AT A PRIORITY LINE. WHATEVER CODE REQUIREMENT YOU ARE PLANNING TO ADOPT SHOULD BE UNIFORMLY REQUIRED ACROSS THE BOARD. AND YOU KNOW YOU ARE GOING TO GET EXCEPTIONS. YOU KNOW YOU ARE GOING TO GET EXCEPTIONS WHEN YOU SAY PAID VERSUS UNPAID LOTS. YOU HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE COMING IN SAYING DON'T DO THAT TO ME. WELL, YOU ARE DOING THAT TO THE OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS. IF THERE IS A SECURITY ISSUE, IT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED AS A COMMUNITY-WIDE ISSUE NOT SINGULARLY ON INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES. THE CHANGES IN THE CODE HAVE -- HAVE BEEN OCCURRING AS RECENTLY, AGAIN -- AS RECENTLY AS TONIGHT. YOU HAD SOME IN JULY. AND IT IS NOT FAIR TO HAVE US RESPOND TO THESE KIND OF CHANGES AND THEN SET A -- YOU KNOW, SET A DEADLINE THAT IS UNREASONABLE. AND YOU HEARD JASON SAY NOVEMBER 1 WOULD GIVE ENOUGH TIME. SO CERTAINLY WE WOULD APPRECIATE THAT CONSIDERATION GOING INTO NOVEMBER 1 OPPOSED TO SEPTEMBER -- OR OCTOBER 1 WITH WHAT THE STAFF HAS PROPOSED. THE ISSUES REGARDING IRRIGATION AND HEDGES AND THINGS LIKE THAT. IF YOU HAVE TO ADD A WATER METER, IT IS A VERY EXPENSIVE PROPOSITION. THIS IS NOT CHEAP. YOU PAY THE $50 FEE. YOU PAY FOR THE APPLICATION FOR A WATER CONNECTION. AND THEN YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR CONSTRUCTION FEES. AND THEN YOU ARE ALSO TALKING ABOUT -- RECENTLY YOU ADOPTED A PROVISION THAT WAS WATERING -- THE WATERING CODE -- THE RESTRICTION ON WATERING. AND REDUCING THAT TO SAVE WATER. SO IF YOU HAVE A LOT, YOU KNOW, AND YOU ARE PLANNING ZERO SCAPE OR PLANNING IRRIGATION TO UTILIZE THE NATURAL FLORA, YOU ARE GOING AGAINST THE OTHER CODES. I THINK YOU NEED MORE TIME ON THIS. YOU REALLY NEED MORE TIME. THE STAFF HAS BEEN GOOD WORKING WITH WITH US, AS WELL AS TPD, AND APPRECIATE EXTRA TIME TO GET THE DETAILS WORKED OUT. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE IN PUBLIC COMMENT? YES, SIR. PLEASE COME UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> DAVID BAILEY, LIVING HISTORIC YBOR. AND I WANTED TO SPEAK TO A COUPLE OF COMMENTS WE HEARD TONIGHT. WE HEARD THAT SECURITY IS THE COST OF DOING BUSINESS. IF THE CRA WILL CONSIDER SPENDING MONEY ON SECURITY, ARE THEY GOING TO START PAYING FOR THE LIGHTS AND THE PARKING STOPPERS. A SLIPPERY SLOPE. THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS NOT BEHIND THAT. AND IN TERMS OF MORE TIME. YOU HEARD HISTORIC YBOR COME TO YOU AND SAID WE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THIS FOR 20 YEARS. SO I DON'T THINK -- IF IT GOES TO NOVEMBER, SO BE IT. BUT IN TERMS OF ANY MORE TIME THAN THAT OR MORE SECURITY PLANS, WE HAVE BEEN THERE. DONE THAT. LAST HEARING, WE HEARD FROM MAYOR DEFELISE. PRETTY CLEAR WHAT THE PATH FORWARD IS GOING GOING TO BE. LANDSCAPE SOMETHING FINE WITH CITY LOTS. A MIRACLE OR SOMEBODY HAS THE RIGHT. FERTILIZER, PRIVATE LOTS. CITY LOTS. LANDSCAPE SOMETHING DOING JUST FINE. I DON'T WANT TO MUDDY THE WATERS BECAUSE I APPRECIATE STAFF'S PROGRESS THAT THEY MADE IN EVERYTHING THAT THEY PROPOSED. HISTORIC YBOR WANTS TO YOU MOVE FORWARD. BUT I DO WANT TO JUST SHOW YOU THE NUANCE OF LANGUAGE. SO -- I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE THIS. AND I DO HAVE COPIES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IF WE CAN ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT. >> SO THREE WORDS MAKE A DIFFERENCE. THIS IS THE LANGUAGE THAT WE RECEIVED LAST WEEK. AND THIS -- CAN YOU SEE THAT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: CAN YOU ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT? OKAY, THAT'S FINE. >> SO THE FRIENDLY AMENDMENT THAT WE ARE ASKING FOR AND WHETHER YOU SAY BY OR VIA. "PUBLIC HEARING" IS THE OPERATIVE TERM. NOT ALL BLC APPROVALS ARE THE SAME. WE HAVE THE BLC COMMISSION. FOLKS THAT STAY UP THERE. A PUBLIC HEARING. AND A LEGAL PROCESS. THEN YOU HAVE THE ADMINISTRATOR PROCESS FOR ENTIRE PARKING LOTS. AND THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED IN THE CODE. THERE ARE VARIANCES BEING GIVEN. THERE IS NO PUBLIC NOTICE. THERE IS NO PUBLIC HEARING. AND THERE IS NO COMMISSION DECISION. SO THE EASY SOLUTION IS THE FRIENDLY AMENDMENT OF JUST ADDING BY PUBLIC HEARING. AND I GET THERE ARE SEMANTICS HERE THAT SOUND CONFUSIG, BUT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A COMMISSION, A BOARD, PUBLIC NOTICE, AND A STAFF PERSON MAKING DECISIONS THAT THEY ARE NOT LEGALLY ABLE TO MAKE. FOR AN ENTIRE SITE. THEY CAN MAKE DECISIONS OF PIECES A SITE, BUT THEY CAN NOT MAKE THE DECISION FOR AN ENTIRE SITE, ESPECIALLY IN THE LANDMARK HISTORIC DISTRICT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. >> THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? YES, MA'AM. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. ALISON DUCETT. I JUST WANTED TO RAISE A FEW POINTS. OBVIOUSLY MY FIRM HAS SUBMITTED SEVERAL LETTERS. MR. ACCARDI PLACED THAT INTO THE RECORD AND A COUPLE OF POINTS YOU NEED TO CONSIDER AS YOU MOVE FORWARD IN THIS PROCESS. NUMBER ONE IS THE SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. THERE MAY HAVE BEEN CONFUSION EARLIER AND MAYBE I AM WRONG ABOUT THAT, BUT THE SECURITY REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO PRINCIPAL PAVED PARKING LOT AND DO NOT APPLY TO ANY OTHER PARKING LOT IN THE AREA AND THIS IS SIMPLY NOT FAIR TO PAVED PRINCIPAL PARKING LOT PROCEEDERS. THIS IS AN YBOR CITY WIDE ISSUE. SHOULD BE APPROPRIATELY APPLIED TO ALL PARKING LOTS IF YOU ARE GOING TO REQUIRE SECURITY GUARDS. ALL PARKING LOTS THAT ARE OPEN BETWEEN THE HOURS THAT YOU ARE REQUIRING SECURITY UNDER THIS OTHER ONE. NOTE THE DIFFERENCES. SECTION A OF THIS ORDINANCE, YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO APPLY TO ALL PUBLIC -- ALL SURFACE PARKING LOTS. WHY IS THE SECURITY ONLY APPLIED TO PAID PARKING LOT PROVIDERS. THEN ANOTHER ITEM THAT IS RELEVANT TO WHAT MR. BAILEY IS SPEAKING ABOUT, THE BLC APPROVAL. WE HAVE SEEN CLIENTS AND PARTICULARLY 717 PARKING. THEY HAVE BEEN IN THE COMMUNITY FOR PARKING LOT PROVIDERS FOR A 30 YEARS. GOING BACK 30 YEARS, IT HAS BEEN VERY DIFFICULT AND WE HAVE SEEN ISSUES COME BEFORE COUNCIL AS WELL TO MAKE SURE THEY HAVE ALL THE APPROVALS IN LINE. WE ARE STILL WORKING WITH THEM ON THAT A SEPARATE SET OF HEARINGS WHERE THE CLIENT HAVE ALL THE HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS AND FILED IT IN ALL ACELA BUT TAKES TIME. I APPRECIATE THE NOVEMBER POTENTIAL DATE AND I ALSO WANTED TO NOTE FOR THOSE SKEPTICAL ON THE NOVEMBER DATE AND ANY DATE IN THE FUTURE IS THAT IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THE TIMING ALONE IF YOU ARE GOING TO REQUIRE THAT THE LOTS RECEIVE BLC APPROVAL OR HAVE A VALID ONE BEFORE NOVEMBER. PLEASE UNDERSTAND -- BEFORE SEPTEMBER. PLEASE UNDERSTAND PART OF THE TIMING IS THAT THESE RECORDS -- WE NEED -- THE PARKING LOT OPERATORS NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE ON THE SAME PAGE WITH THE CITY AS TO WHAT IS APPROVED. WE SUGGESTED FEBRUARY 2024, BUT MR. ACCARDI SAID, IF IT IS NOVEMBER, THANK YOU FOR THAT. AGAIN, I THINK WE OBJECT AND I DON'T THINK THAT THE ADDITION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING IS APPROPRIATE IN THAT SENTENCE. IF HE IS SAYING IT IS ALREADY REQUIRED, IT IS SUPERFLUOUS. AND ADDS AN ADDITIONAL ELEMENT THAT IS NOT APPROPRIATE. I THINK THAT'S IT. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE? COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY. I APPRECIATE A LOT OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC AND HELPED TO CLARIFY THINGS FOR ME, BECAUSE PARKING LOTS ARE A B BUS BUSINESS. JUST LIKE ANY OTHER BUSINESS, YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW RULES. IF YOU OPEN A CLUB, YOU GOT TO THE HAVE SECURITY. WHAT WE ARE SAYING AS A CITY IS, IF YOU WANT TO HAVE A PAID PARKING LO THE IN YBOR, YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY FOR SECURITY. OOVPS I -- TPD HAS SECURITY PLAN. THEY CLEARLY SHARED IT LAST TIME. THEY DON'T WANT TO SHARE THE WHOLE PLAN IN PUBLIC BECAUSE SHARING A SECURITY PLAN IS NOT SAFE. IT IS NOT A GOOD IDEA. BUT YOU ALREADY HAVE A MEETING WITH THEM. SO IN THE CONVERSATION BETWEEN PAID AND UNPAID. UNPAID PARKING LOTS ARE GENERALLY ATTACHED TO BUSINESSES THAT HAVE PEOPLE ALREADY WORKING THERE. LESS CONCERNED OF UNPAID. IF YOU WANT TO LOOK AT UNPAID LATER, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT. BUT THIS A TWO-YEAR PROCESS. I DON'T THINK THAT NOVEMBER 1 st A GOOD IDEA BECAUSE THE LAST MAJOR ISSUE YBOR CITY WAS HALLOWEEN. IF WE WAIT UNTIL AFTER HALLOWEEN, WE ARE OPENING OURSELVES UP TO ANOTHER ISSUE. I CAN'T DO THAT IN GOOD CONSCIOUS. OCTOBER 1 IS A BETTER COMPROMISE. PARKING LOT OPERATORS KNEW THIS WAS COMING FOR YEARS. NOT A SURPRISE. THIS IS NOT NEW. NOT SCRAMBLING TO GET THIS DONE. IF YOU HAVEN'T BEEN PLANNING TO GET THIS DONE, I AM SORRY. BECAUSE YOU KNEW THIS WAS COMING. YOU GOT ADDITIONAL TIME BECAUSE WE DIDN'T APPROVE IT DURING THE ACTUAL CYCLE WHICH IS IN JULY. AND I DON'T AGREE WITH THAT AT ALL UP WANT TO APPROVE IT WITH THE CHANGES THAT MESS FEELEY MADE. AND I WILL READ THE ORDINANCE AND THEN WE CAN TALK ABOUT. ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. ORDINANCE OF CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA -- AND THEN YOU CAN HAVE A DISCUSSION AFTER SECOND -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: FIRST OF ALL, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS STILL OPEN. >> MOVE TO CLOSE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: MAYBE YOU CAN KEEP IT OPEN UNTIL YOU HAVE ALL YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: BECAUSE I HAVE QUESTIONS. MR. BAILEY, COULD YOU -- COULD I ASK YOU A QUESTION? I THINK -- I THINK IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY -- NOT TO PUT WORDS IN YOUR MOUTH -- BUT NEIGHBORS' NEIGHBORHOODS AROUND WOULD PREFER NOT TO HAVE ANY NEW -- TALKING ABOUT GOING FORWARD. NOT TO HAVE ANY NEW PARKING LOTS. BUT THE CITY -- KIND OF THE COMPROMISE TO PUT THE REQUIREMENTS IN. HAS YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION APPROVED THIS? OR ARE YOU OKAY WITH GOING FORWARD WITH THE RULES AND REQUIREMENTS? >> I CAN'T SPEAK FOR THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD. I AM A BOARD MEMBER ON THE ASSOCIATION. WE DISCUSSED THIS AT LENGTH. YOU HEARD FROM US MANY TIMES BEFORE. WE HAVE SEEN THIS LANGUAGE AND WORKED WITH STAFF THROUGH THE PROCESS. THE POINT THAT I MADE TONIGHT IS THE -- THE NUANCE -- THE THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS LOOKING FOR. BUT ALL IN ALL, THE NEIGHBORHOOD WANTS TO MOVE FORWARD. >>BILL CARLSON: WE ARE NOT -- MY QUESTION IS WE ARE NOT BANNING NEW -- SOME OF THESE RULES ARE APPLIED EXISTING. WE ARE NOT BANNING NEW PARKING LOTS. SOMEONE CAN BUILD A NEW PARK LOT UNDER THESE GUIDELINES. ARE YOU TO OKAY WITH THAT? >> THE BOARD UNDERSTANDS THERE IS A SPECIAL USE REQUIREMENT AND HAS TO GO IN FRONT OF A PUBLIC HEARING. THAT IS A PUBLIC PROCESS. FOR SOME REASON THE NEIGHBORHOOD WANTED TO GET BEHIND A NEW PARK LOG LOT FOR SOME REASON, WE COULD DO THAT. >>BILL CARLSON: OKAY. >> TAKES AWAY FROM OUR USE OF RIGHT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THIS IS FOR ABBYE FEELEY. MAYBE SUSAN, I AM NOT SURE WITH. THE NUANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING THAT MR. BAILEY DISCUSSED .WHAT IS THE CITY IMPLICATION OF CHANGING THAT LANGUAGE? >>ABBYE FEELEY: SO -- FEEL KEEP. RI -- INTO ABBYE FEELEY. RIGHT NOW THIS IS THE STATEMENT. WE HAVE BEEN CALLED AT THE RELATIONSHIP OF WHAT HAPPENED IN 2010. WHERE IS THE SIX MONTHS. THAT -- THAT STATEMENT THAT IS BEING PLACED IN THERE IS THE CONFORMING LOT STATEMENT FOR EVERYTHING THAT HAS RECEIVED A PERMIT UP UNTIL THE DATE OF THE IMPLICATION OF THE NEW CODE. SO THAT IS WHAT -- YOU CAN'T SAY "PUBLIC HEARING" BECAUSE IT IS NOT GOING TO BE A PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL AFTER YOU APPROVE THIS CODE. >>BILL CARLSON: AF >>ALAN CLENDENIN: AFTER WE APPROVE THIS CODE, IT WILL BE A PUBLIC HEARING. >>ABBYE FEELEY: EVERY NEW LOT. UNLESS YOU HAVE THE BLC PERMIT AND MAKE THE IMPROVEMENTS. SOME UNDER CODE ENFORCEMENT THROUGH THIS PROCESS THAT IF THEY DON'T -- THEY MAY HAVE NOW GOTTEN A C.A. THROUGH THE BLC, BUT UNTIL THEY GO AND INSTWHAUL IS IN THAT C.A. COME NOVEMBER 1 IF THAT IS THE DATE YOU SELECT, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO BE IN COMPLIANCE. C.A. DOES NOT MAKE NEW COMPLIANCE. YOU HAVE TO MAKE THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT YOU HAVE GOTTEN APPROVAL TO HAVE. THIS IS WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. YOU GOT YOUR BLC 'APPROVAL. YOU MADE THE IMPROVEMENTS AND NORTHBOUND OPERATION. AND AS OF -- IF YOU ARE GOING WHATEVER THE DATE IS, YOU ARE CONFORMING AND THAT DRAWS YOUR LINE TO SAY, ANYBODY HOLES COMES IN, YOU ARE COMING TO THIS COUNCIL. THERE IS NO OTHER ROUTE FOR YOU. YOU ARE NOW A SPECIAL USE AND COMING TO THIS COUNCIL. GO TO PUBLIC HEARING AND BLC FOR RECOMMENDATION LIKE YOU WOULD ON A REZONING OR ANOTHER SPECIAL USE. IT WILL COME TO YOU AND YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE THAT DECISION. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU. MR. BAILEY, DOES THAT ANSWER -- SATISFY YOU? SPRINKLE THE CLEAREST -- I UNDERSTAND WHAT MISS FEELEY IS SAYING. AND I BELIEVE HER WHEN SHE SAYS THAT, THE CLEAREST EXAMPLE WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG ARE THE BLUE RIBBON PARK LOG THE -- PARKING LOT. THAT IS THE PROCESS. THERE WAS AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL AT SOME TIME IN THE PAST NOT A PUBLIC HEARING I WAS AWARE OF. AND MR. MICHELINI MAY KNOW BETTER THAN I DO. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YOU TALK TO US. JASON, HOLD ON. >> HERE IS MY POINT. THE -- ANY SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS TO THAT LOT OVER TIME, SO WHETHER IT IS THE 2010 APPROVAL OR THE 2023 APPROVAL, THOSE ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS ARE CIRCUMVENTING THE PUBLIC PROCESS. WE DON'T GET TO PARTICIPATE PAUSE THEY ARE BEING APPROVED ADMINISTRATIVELY, THAT IS WHY WE ARE ASKING FOR THE BY PUBLIC HEARING CLENDENIN YOU THIS SAY APPLICABLE. IF WE PASS THIS TONIGHT, ALL NEW PARKING LOTS -- WHATEVER HAPPENED IN THE PAST WON'T MATTER. IF I AM HEARING MISS FEELEY CORRECT, ALL NEW PARKING LOTS WILL BE SUBJECT WITH PUBLIC HEARING. >> THE LANGUAGE WE ARE SUBMITTED, ALL PRINCIPAL PARKING LOTS THAT RECEIVED A BARRIO LATINO COMMISSION BLC APPROVAL AS OF SEPTEMBER 5, 2024, AND HAVE CONTINUED TO OPERATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BLC APPROVAL WILL BE CONSIDERED CONFORMING WITH THE SUBSECTION. THAT'S WHERE WE ARE TAKING OBJECTION. CLENDENIN OKAY, THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN VIERA. >>LUIS VIERA: I A-- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: LET ME -- COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK -- SOME OF THE STUFF I HEARD. IT IS THE COST OF DOING BUSINESS. SOME OF THIS IS -- SO I AM NOT -- I AM NOT TERRIBLY EMPATHETIC OF THE WATER METER THAT YOU REFERRED TO. YOU HEARD MY POINT ABOUON SIGN CLUTTER. I AM 100% EMPATHETIC OF TYPES OF PARKING LOTS. AND, YOU KNOW WHAT, I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT THINGS ARE INCREMENTAL. WE HAVE TO START SOMEWHERE. I GET THAT. AND I BELIEVE COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK SAID THE SAME THING. LET'S START SOME PLACE. WE CAN START HERE AND IF WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE OTHER PARKING LOTS, WE CAN DO THAT AS WELL. WE HAVE TO START SOMEWHERE. STAFF HAS PUT A LOT OF TIME IN THIS. VERY ACCOMMODATING. THIS HAS GOTTEN A LOT OF PUBLIC INPUT. THIS IS A BIG PUBLIC CONCERN. AND YBOR CITY IS A -- IT IS A HISTORIC DISTRICT. IT IS AN IMPORTANT ECONOMIC DRIVER FOR THE CITY OF TAMPA. IT IS ONE OF OUR CROWN JEWELS. ANYTHI ANYTHING WE CAN TO DO IMPROVE THAT AND THE SAFETY AND ENJOY KWMENT OF THE AREA, I AM ALL FOR IT. >> IF I COULD MAKE ONE COMMENT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: LET ME GO THROUGH THE DAIS. COUNCILMAN VIERA AND COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>LUIS VIERA: I WANTED TO SPEAK -- ONCE WE CLOSE GET MY THOUGHTS CONTINUE TO, ETC. ONE THING I WOULD SUGGEST AND COUNCILMAN HURTAK, YOUR POINT IS VERY WELL TAKEN ON HALLOWEEN. MAYBE SINCE THERE IS AN ASSERTED NEED FOR MORE TIME. MAYBE OCTOBER 25 WHICH IS THAT FRIDAY. SO, AGAIN, YOUR POINT OF HALLOWEEN IS VERY WELL TAKEN. MAYBE THE WEEK BEFORE. >>LYNN HURTAK: HOW ABOUT THE MIDDLE, BECAUSE THE -- THE PROBLEM IS IF YOU START IT -- THAT IS WHEN THEY WILL CELEBRATE. SO HOW ABOUT OCTOBER 15? >>LUIS VIERA: SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THAT IS WHAT I AM LOOKING AT. AGAIN, I WILL GIVE MY COMMENTS ONE WE CLOSE. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: I WILL MAKE MY COMMENTS BEFORE WE CLOSE, BUT I WOULD RATHER NOT VOTE ON A F FLAWED -- WHAT I THINK IS A FLAWED DOCUMENT. I THINK THERE ARE PROBLEMS WITH IT THAT ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BE WORKED OUT LATER. THE ISSUES IN YBOR THAT -- THE ISSUES IN YBOR ARE MUCH BIGGER THAN PARKING LOTS. AND WE KNOW WE HAVE A SHORTAGE OF POLICE. WE KNOW WE HAVE A FUNDING ISSUE. WE HAVE GOT TO CHANGE THE WAY THAT WE CONDUCT PUBLIC SAFETY IN YBOR. AND I KNOW THAT THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL ITERATIONS OF THAT, BUT THAT IS A BIGGER STRATEGY WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE PARKING LOT. I PERSONALLY HAVE SEEN A VIDEO ON SOMEONE'S PRIVATE LOT THAT IS NOT A PEACE LOT, WHERE THERE WAS A DRIVE-BY SHOOTING AND THIS ONE WAS NOT PUBLICIZED. TLR -- ONE OF THEM HAPPENED THE SAME NIGHT ON HALLOWEEN BUT NOT IN THE PAID LOTS. EVEN IF WE HAVE SHOOT IN THE PAID LOTS, THAT SHOOT ASKING HAPPEN AGAIN BECAUSE NOBODY IS GUARDING THE OTHER LOTS. WE NEED A SYSTEMIC WAY OF RESOLVING THIS. AND ALSO, IT DOESN'T DO GOOD TO PULL POLICE OFF HOWARD AVENUE AND PUT THEM IN YBOR OR PULL THEM OUT OF YBOR AND PUT THEM ON HOWARD AVENUE. WE NEED CONSISTENT POLICING THROUGHOUT. AND WE NEED TO OVERALL ADDRESS THE SHORTAGE ISSUE. I WISH WE COULD WORK CLOSER FOR UNDERLYING ISSUE. SHOULD I MAKE A MOTION TO ALLOW MICHELINI TO RESPOND OR -- I WILL MAKE MOTION TO HAVE HIM -- YOU GUYS CAN VOTE ON IT. I MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE HIM RESPOND FOR ONE MINUTE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COME UP FOR 60 SECONDS. >>LYNN HURTAK: NOBODY SECONDED IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. THIS ANY OPPOSED? >>LYNN HURTAK: NAY. >> MY ONLY POINT IS YOU -- STEVE MICHELINI. THEY JUST ASKED ME A QUESTION? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: LISTEN -- >> I AM NOT GOING TO GO TIT FOR TAT WITH YOU. YOU MADE SEVERAL REVISIONS FOR THIS CODE. WHY DON'T YOU CONSIDER PAID AND UNPAID LOTS AS PART OF THESE REVISIONS. YOU JUST HAD STAFF RECOMMEND FOUR ADDITIONAL CHANGES. IN JULY, YOU HAD OTHER CHANGES WHERE YOU INSERTED REQUIREMENTS FORKERGATION. WHAT IS THE ISSUE HERE? WE ARE JUST ASKING TO YOU MAKE ACROSS THE BOARD TO MAKE IT RESPONSIBLE AND FAIR. THE SECURITY ISSUE IS BROAD. AND IT IS AN AREA-WIDE ISSUE. NOT A SINGULAR ISSUE RELATING TO A PAID PARKING LOT. THANK YOU. >>LUIS VIERA: MOVE TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I HAVE TO CORRECT MYSELF ON WHAT I SAID EARLIER. AS I WAS THINKING BACK. I FORGOT A MISTAKE MADE WHEN THAT DEAL WAS CONSUMMATED SEPTEMBER 6, 1996. IN THE CITY THE DEED OF THE WHOLE PROPERTY TO HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY -- THE CITY CAN'T WAIVE AD VALOREM TAXES, BUT THE COUNTY CAN. I AM SORRY I MADE A MISTAKE. I HAD TO GO BACK AND REWIRE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOTION FORGIVE. >> SECOND. >> OPPOSED? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO CLOSE. MOTION TO CLOSE. HURTAK THAT'S WHY I WAS TRYING TO READ THE ORDINANCE AND I WAS INTERRUPTED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM, GO AHEAD. >>LYNN HURTAK: ORDER NACOGDOCHES THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, OF PUBLICLY AMENDMENTS MAKE REGULAR VISIONS TO THE CITY OF TAMPA CODE OF ORDINANCE ACE MENDING CHAPTER 27 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT. AMENDING 27-178, ALTERNATIVE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. REPEALING ALL ORDINANCE AND ALL ORDINANCES THEREWITH. PROVIDING SEVERABILITY. PROVIDING A EFFECTIVE DATE. INCLUDING THE FOUR REVISIONS AND CHANGING THE DATE FROM OCTOBER 1 TO OCTOBER 15. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A SECOND? >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. ANY DISCUSSION. >>LUIS VIERA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. I WANTED TO GIVE MY THOUGHTS. I SPOKE TO PEOPLE IN THIS ROOM AND THE KNOWS LIVE IN NEIGHBORHOODS, THE PROPERTY OWNERS, THEIR ADVOCATES, ETC. I WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS. I AM GLAD TO SEE THERE IS MORE TIME BEING GIVEN. IT IS REALLY WELL TAKEN WE HAVE MADE FOUR CHANGES TODAY AND YOU SAY, LISTEN, DISCUSS THIS FURTHER AND MAKE MORE REVISIONS BUT I DON'T WANT TO IRVEHICLEABLY KICK THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD. THIS REPRESENTS A REAL CHALLENGE, A CHALLENGE THAT EVERYBODY IN THIS ROOM ACKNOWLEDGES IS CRIME AND PUBLIC SAFETY IN YBOR CITY AND THE PROBLEM IS HOW ARE WE GOING TO ADDRESS IT? THE TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT WHO WILL DO THEIR CONTROL ADDRESS IT AND A ROLE TO PLAY FOR BUSINESSES. I SALUTE COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK FOR BRINGING THIS FORWARD. I KNOW ORDINANCE AND WORKING AND NOT EASY WHEN YOU HAVE COMPETING SIDES. AND YOU ARE TRYING TO GET AS MANY FOLKS ON BOARD. FOR ME, THE MAIN ISSUE IS PUBLIC SAFETY. I WANT TO MOVE THIS FORWARD FOR THAT ISSUE. A LOT OF CHALLENGES IN YBOR CITY. THIS IS TAYLORED FOR THOSE CHALLENGES. I HEAR OF FOLKS PAID VERSUS UNPAID. I AM NOT GOING TO REPEAT WHAT WAS SAID BEFORE BUT I GUESS I WILL. DEALING A PAVED PARKING LOT, THAT IS WHAT THE ABOUT IS IS. A UNPAID PARK LOG THE A BUSINESS AND MONETARY EFFORT THAT DRIVES BENEFIT WOULD YOU KNOW THINK FROM THAT UNPAID PARK LOG THE POTENTIALLY BUT NOT THE VERY UNIQUE NATURE OF YOUR BUSINESS. AND, THEREFORE, I THINK THERE IS MORE OF A RATIONAL BASIS FOR THAT DISTINCTION HERE. AGAIN, I HEAR THE CONCERN OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS 100%. AS WE WORK ON THIS. IF THERE ARE THINGS THAT CAN BE CHANGED. I REMEMBER WHEN WE DID THE APPRENTICESHIP ORDINANCE. I TOLD OUR CONTRACTOR FRIENDS, IF THERE ARE THINGS YOU THINK NEED TO BE CHANGED, LET'S TALK ABOUT THIS. WHEN YOU PASS THE ORDINANCE IT BECOMES THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, NOT THE SUGGESTIONS BUT WE CAN CHANGE THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, SO TO SPEAK IF THERE IS DEMOSTRATED CHANGE THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE. FOR ME IT IS PUBLIC SAFETY. AND I HEAR THE CONCERNS OF OUR FRIENDS IN BORCHELLER WHO LIVE OUT THERE WANTED TO MAKE BORCHELLER LIVABLE, WALKABLE, 100% QUALITY, IT INCLUDES THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY. EVERYBODY IN THE ROOM AGREES WITH THAT. A RESPECTFUL DISAGREEMENT OF HOW TO GET THERE. I WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS AND THAT'S IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THE QUOTE DO SOMETHING IMPERFECTLY THAN PERFECTLY. THAT IS SOMETHING WE DO ON COUNCIL. MAKING THE DECISIONS, IT IS NEVER BLACK AND WHITE. FINDING SOME PLACE IN THE GRAY AREA. LIKE YOU SAID, I AM EMPATHETIC WITH THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF PARKING LOT AND LOOK IN THE FUTURE OF TRYING TO RESOLVE THAT DIFFERENCE. YOU KNOW, I -- I STILL THINK THAT NOVEMBER IS NOVEMBER 1 -- I WANT TO BE AS ACCOMMODATING AS POSSIBLE AND RUNNING A BUSINESS AND A MILLION OTHER THINGS GOING ON AND DIFFICULT TO ACCOMPLISH ALL OF THOSE THINGS AND I UNDERSTAND THE POINT ABOUT THE -- ABOUT THE HOLIDAY, BUT, YOU ARE KNOW, THAT THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR YEARS. AND TWO WEEKS MAKES A DIFFERENCE IN A BUSINESS TO BE ABLE TO GET THE JOB DONE, I THINK IT IS A VERY REASONABLE REQUEST. I GUESS FOR LACK OF A BETTER WORD, I WILL MAKE THE MOTION TO CHANGE TO NOVEMBER 1 TO SEE WHERE IT GOES. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS APPETITE ON THAT OR NOT, BUT I THINK THAT NOVEMBER 1 IS A REASONABLE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN FOR NOVEMBER 1 INSTEAD OF OCTOBER 15. IS THERE A SECOND? A SECOND? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: JUST AS I SUSPECTED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT'S ALL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE? IF NOT, A MOTION AND A SECOND. YES, SIR. >>BILL CARLSON: AS I SAID, I DOESN'T TO VOTE ON AN IMPERFECT PLAN. IF THIS -- IT SOUNDS LIKE IS GOING TO PASS. AND IT REALLY NEEDS TO EVOLVE AND BE EDITED. I CAN'T VOTE AGAINST IF IT IS GOING TO BE APPROVED. I WOULD RATHER NOT VOTE ON A IMPERFECT PLAN BUT NEEDS TO EVOLVE. THERE IS A CRIME PROBLEM IN YBOR THAT WE NEED TO BE RESOLVED. I DON'T THINK IT IS FAIR FOR PEOPLE NOVEMBER 1. THEY GOT TO GO BEFORE THE BARRIO RIGHT? ANYWAY, I MEAN, IT SOUNDS LIKE WHAT WE NEED TO DO ON HALLOWEEN IS GET THE CRA TO PUT IN SOME EMERGENCY MONEY. I KNOW THE -- SOME OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN YBOR WERE TRYING GET THE LEGISLATURE TO FUND THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TO PUT PEOPLE THERE, BECAUSE THE CITY DOESN'T ENOUGH RESOURCES. WE HAVE GOT TO DO SOMETHING SYSTEMATICALLY, BECAUSE WE ACTUALLY HAD A SHOOTING IN AN UNPAID LOT LAST YEAR ON HALLOWEEN. WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT THAT? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I THINK WE SHOULD THAT DISCUSSION IN A WORKSHOP BETWEEN NOW AND HALLOWEEN ABOUT SPECIFICALLY THAT -- THAT CELEBRATION. >>BILL CARLSON: MY BOTTOM LINE IS I CAN'T VOTE AGAINST IT, BUT I DON'T LIKE THE DISPARITIES IN HERE AND I PUSH TO CHANGE THEM RIGHT AWAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? >>CLERK: MOTION CARED -- DID YOU SAY NO? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I SAID NO CLERK MOTION CARRIED REQUEST MANISCALCO VOTING NO. SEPTEMBER 5, 2024, 10:00 A.M., OF TAMPA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 315 KENNEDY BOULEVARD, 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ITEM NUMBER 4. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. REZONE 1314 TEMPLE STREET ARE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 16 TO -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: BEFORE YOU BEGIN, IF YOU WERE GOING TO SPEAK ON 4, 5, 6 OR 7 PLEASE STAND AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. [SWEARING IN] AND WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE REGISTER TODAY ARE ITEM NUMBER 7. WHEN WE GET TO IT, WE WILL SWEAR THEM IN. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 4, REZ-24-43. REZONE 3814 TEMPLE STREET F FROM RM-16 TO RM-18 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. TURN IT OVER TO JENNIFER WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. >>JENNIFER MALONE: WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT IN THE EAST URBAN VILLAGE. SOUTH -- SORRY, EAST OF NORTH 50th STREET OR NORTH OF EAST 28th AVENUE. THERE IS TYPICALLY -- THIS ALLOWS FOR COMMERCIAL USES, BUT IT HAS BEEN DEVELOPED WITH SOME VACANT LOTS, SOME RESIDENTIAL, AND A COMMERCIAL USE UP HERE ON THE CORNER. AND WE HAVE RESIDENTIAL EAST OF NORTH 50th. THE FUTURE LAND USE IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. THAT ALLOWS UP TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES. SO THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU OF RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 18 IS WELL WITHIN THAT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, WHAT IT HAS BEEN PLANNING FOR, AND WE HAVE THE RESIDENTIAL-20 AS -- WHICH IS TYPICALLY -- THIS IS THIS NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, EAST OF TEMPLE. AND THEN RESIDENTIAL-10 TO THE SOUTH. COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 AND MORE COMMUNITY USE 35. THIS IS GOING TO PROVIDE MORE HOUSING OPTIONS. THAT RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 18. IT GIVES A LITTLE BIT MORE DENSITY TO PLAY WITH, WELL WITHIN THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE DENSITY. AND SO WE FOUND THAT IT WAS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE TO SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND PROVIDE A NICE TRANSITION AND DENSITY AS ONE MOVES EAST OF THE SITE. SO THAT IS OUR FINDING. . THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, YES, SIR. T >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. AND START OFF WITH OUR AERIAL MAP. HERE IS THE SUBJECT SITE HERE OUTLINED IN RED OFF OF TEMPLE STREET. AND THEN YOU HAVE NORTH 50th STREET TO THE WEST. THERE IS A LOT ZONED CG TO THE SOUTH OF IT AND A FEW MORE CG LOTS SOUTH OF THAT. MOVE TO HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. CI USE ALONG HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. AND THAT WHOLE SECTION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD HERE IS RM-16. NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, WE HAVE SING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOUSES. SAME WITH OVER HERE. THIS IS ACTUALLY A COMMERCIAL USE. SEMI DETACHED AND ATTACHED USE ALONG THE SIDE HERE. AND TO THE WEST ON THE OTHER SIDE OF 50th STREET. THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT -- IT MAY BE FAMILIAR FOR YOU, REZONED NOT TOO LONG AGO FOR A FUNERAL HOME AND CEMETERY. SINCE THIS IS EUCLIDIAN, THERE ARE NO SITE PLANS OR ELEVATION SO AS WE WILL GO INTO THE PICTURES. IN IS LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SUBJECT SITE FROM TEMPLE STREET. THIS IS LOOKING WEST. LITTLE BETTER VIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS SOUTH ON TEMPLE STREET. THE SUBJECT SITE HERE. LOOKING NORTH. SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS LOOKING EAST ACROSS THE STREET. YOU CAN SEE THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES. THIS IS JUST NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS HERE. SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. THIS IS THE CG LOT JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE. THESE ARE SOME OF THE DETACHED AND SEMI DETACHED USES ON THE MAP ALL ON THE SAME BLOCK AS THE SUBJECT SITE. AT THE VERY END OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK, IT SHOW IT IS AS VACANT ON THE AERIAL MAP, BUT A NEW CONSTRUCTION OF SYMPHONY DETACHED USES. THIS IS ONCE WE ROUND THE CORNER ALONG 50th STREET. THE ENACT THE SUBJECT SITE IS RIGHT HERE LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE BACK OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND YOU CAN'T SEE IT THROUGH THE VEGETATION BUT WANT TO GIVE YOU A LOOK AT WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE ON TEMPLE AND 50th AND LOOKING ACROSS WEST ON 50th TOWARD THE SUBJECT SITE. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. FOUR DWELLING UNITS CAN BE CONSIDERED ON THE FLIGHT OF THE RESIDENTIAL 18 ZONING DISTRICT. REQUESTED DISTRICT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE SURROUND AREA AND APPROPRIATE IN LOCATION AND PROVIDE INFILL HOUSING. LASTLY THE SUBJECT SITE IF IS IN THE EAST TAMPA OVERLAY DEVELOPMENT AND MUST COMPLY WITH THE OVERLAY STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF MANISCALCO ANY QUESTIONS? ANYTHING ELSE, SIR? DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT? IS IT. COME ON UP. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. OF MANISCALCO HELLO. >> HI. MY NAME IS MARIA CUOLEY AND I AM ATE POINTED AGENT. AS WE STATED, WE WANTED TO DO REZONING OF THE PROPERTY FROM RM-16 TO RM-18. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE REQUESTING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYTHING ELSE? >> THAT'S IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISH SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 4. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: NOTION CLOSE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. OF. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. READ ITEM NUMBER 4 MIRANDA NOT AT ALL, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ITEM NUMBER 4, FILE NUMBER REZ-24-43. ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING RECONSIDERATION. GENERAL VICINITY OF 3614 TEMPLE STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION RM-16 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY TO RM-18 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE CLENDENIN SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: FAVOR. BE OPPOSED? >> MOTION CARRIED WITH HURTAK BEING ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 AT 10:00 A.M. IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY HALL, 315 E. KENNEDY THIRD FLOOR TAMPA FLORIDA, 33602. OF. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER 5. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 5, REZ-24-46, FROM 5825 SOUTH 5th STREET FROM RS-06. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. WE ARE IN SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT RIGHT NOW NORTH OF INTERBAY BETWEEN MacDILL AND SOUTH IS IT 6th AND ALL I LONG SOUTH 5th. INTERBAY HAS A VARIETY OF USES THAT ARE RESIDENTIAL. AND AT THE INTERSECTION OF MacDILL YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL IN THE SURROUNDING AREAS. AND LAND USE AS RESIDENTIAL-10. THE ORANGE COLOR. TO THE SOUTH IS RESIDENTIAL-20. I SAW SOME HOUSING ON THAT. AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 ALONG SOUTH MacDILL, WHICH ALLOWED FOR COMMERCIAL USES. WE REVIEWED THIS AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE RESIDENTIAL-10 LAND USE DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR A VARIETY OF LOT WIDTH AND LOT SIZES AND THIS STREET HAS DEVELOPED ABOUT HALF OF THEIR ALLOWABLE DENSITY UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE. AND AS ONE OF THE CITIES PLANS, GOALS, IS TO PROVIDE HOUSING OPTION FOR TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION AND UNDERUTILIZED SITES. WE FOUND THIS CONSISTENT WITH THOSE POLICIES AS WELL AS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN PER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. BE MANISCALCO THAN-- MANISCALCO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. WE WILL HAVE THE AERIAL MAP UP AND WE WILL GET STARTED. THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED ALONG SOUTH 5th STREET. YOU KIND OF HAVE A HODGEPODGE OF RS-50 AND RS-06 ZONING ON 5th STREET NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. SMALL RS- 06 AND TRANSITIONS TT TO RS-06 SOUTH. RS-50. AND ACROSS THE STREET IS RS-50 AND UTILIZED FOR MULTIFAMILY. AS YOU MENTIONED WE GO OVER T MacDILL AND INTERBAY, YOU HAVE CG USES. WE WILL GO THROUGH PICTURES OF SITE PLAN. IS IN LOOKING WEST DIRECTLY AT THE SUBJECT SITE. OF LOOKING NORTH ALONG NORTH 5th STREET OF THE SUBJECT SITE HERE THIS LOOKING EAST, THE MULTIFAMILY ACROSS THE STREET. NORTH ON FIFTH STREET. SOME OF THOSE RS-50 LOTS. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTHWEST. THE SUBJECT SITE HERE. IT AND HERE IS A BETTER VIEW OF THOSE RS-50 LOTS NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS LOOKING NORTHEAST. AND ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE STREET, THIS IS LOOKING NORTHWEST OF MORE RS-50 LOTS. SO NOW WE WILL MOVE CONTINUE TO OUR CONFORMING MAP. ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE HERE. IT IS RED. AND THE BLACK OUTLINE WITH THE HATCHING OVER IT. I JUST WANT TO WALK THROUGH WHERE THE CONFORMING ANALYSIS WAS BECAUSE VERY LITTLE OF THE ORIGINAL BLOCK EXISTS DUE TO REDEVELOPMENT OVER THE TIME. THE ANALYSIS FOR THE -- THE GRANULAR ANALYSIS ON SOUTH OF 5th STREET TO THE DEAD END AND A CAN FROM EWE LAR ANALYSIS ON 6th STREET TO LACY COURT. I WILL RUN THROUGH THAT AND A LITTLE LONG WENDED BUT I WANTS TO MAKE SURE IT IS AVAILABLE FOR YOU AND THE RECORD. OF LOT 24 AND LOT 25. THE SUBDIVISION WAS PLATTED IN OF 1911 AND PLOT FIVE IN 1914. THE SUBJECT BLOCK REPLATTED WITH 25 LOTS WITH FRONTAGE OF 28 FEET TO 59 FEET IN LENGTH. AREA OF ANALYSIS 461 PARCELS. 164 PARCELS WITH THE WIDTH OF TO 60 FEET FOR GREATER. AND A WIDTHS OF 59.99 FEET FOR LE LESS. THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH FIFTH STREET FROM INTERBAY TO THE DEAD END CONSISTS OF 11 PARCELS OF SUBJECT SITE 50 TO 49.99 FEET. OF THOSE PARCELS EIGHT OR 72% ARE 59.99 FEET OR LESS PER WIDTH AND THREE OF THE PARCELS ARE 27% AND 60 FEET AND GREATER IN WIDTH. THE EAST SIDE OF 5th STREET FROMMER. >> BAY TO THE DEAD END CONTAIN SIX PARCELS TO THE DEAD END LOT WITT OF 55 TO 49.99 FEET. OF THAT 100% OF THE PARCELS ARE LESS THAN 50 FEET IN WIDTH. ONE BLOCK TO THE SUBJECT SITE OF SOUTH 6th STREET, WE ARE LOOKING AT THE EAST SIDE FROM INTERBAY BOULEVARD TO LACY LEAF COURT. IT CONTAINS 14 PARCELS AND WIDTH FROM 50 TO 99 FEET. OF THOSE PARCELS TEN OR 71% ARE 59.99 FEET LESS IN WIDTH AND 29% ARE 60 FOOT FOR GREATER. STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED THAT 64% OF THE PARCELS WITH 59.99 FEET OR LESS. AND DUE TO THAT WITHIN THE STUDY AREA, STAFF FINDS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE AREA. I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. APPLICANT? >>. >> MR. SHELBY, I HAVE EIGHT COPIES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HELLO, SIR, PLEASE SKATE YOUR NAME. >> JOHN LUM,ER. >> BAY CIRCLE, TAMPA, FLORIDA. COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON, PLEASURE TO SEE YOU HERE TONIGHT. I WILL READ IT TO YOU. A LOT OF CONCERN THAT THE FOLKS IN THE INDUSTRY HAVE RIGHT NOW. AND I WANT TO TALK TO A COUPLE OF LAWYERS AND THEY ASKED ME -- THIS IS THE BEST WAY TO CLARIFY SOME OF THE AMBIGUITIES WITH THIS. MR. CHAIRMAN AS HOUSEKEEPING MATTER. WE ARE ALL AWARE OF THE SECTOR COURT DECISION BY JUDGE MOW THAT POTENTIALLY CALLS IN QUESTION THE JURISDICTION OF THIS BODY TO HEAR AND DECIDE QUASI JUDICIAL DECISIONS. I HAVE BEEN ADVISED BY SEVERAL ATTORNEYS KNOWLEDGEABLE THAT WE SHOULD REQUEST THIS AND PUT IT ON RECORD. MR. SHELBY CAN YOU CONFIRM THAT THIS BODY HAS THE POWER TO HOLD THIS HEARING AND MAKE DECISIONS ON THIS QUASI JUDICIAL HEARING TONIGHT? >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, MARTIN SHELBY, COUNCIL ATTORNEY. I WOULD LIKE TO DEFER TO DEPUTY CITY KOREAN CATE WELLS TO BE ABLE TO RESPOND ON THE CITY'S BEHALF. CATEGORY CATE CATE WELLS, DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY. I BELIEVE ANDREA ZELMAN, THE CITY ATTORNEY ADDRESSED CITY COUNCIL ON THIS VERY SPECIFIC ISSUE LAST THURSDAY AND RECOMMENDED THAT CITY COUNCIL CONTINUE HOLDING HEARINGS AS IT HAS BEEN. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> STEVE MICHELINI, REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER. THE STAFF HAS GONE THROUGH THE REVIEW AND WE FOUND IT TO BE CONSISTENT ON THE CITY STAFF AS WELL AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL-10 DESIGNATION LAND USE AREA. IT IS A MIX OF DIFFERENT USES AND DIFFERENT VARIETY OF SIZES OF PROPERTIES IN THE STAFF CORRECTLY POINTED OUT THAT WE HAVE MULTIFAMILY AS WELL AS SPOTS OF RS-60 IN THE AREA AND RS-50. SO IT GOES THROUGHOUT THE AREA. THE BLOCK FACE, AS THE STAFF POINTED OUT, THE DOMINANT PATTERN IS RS-50 AND THE REDEVELOPMENT NATIONAL ARE OCCURRING ARE BUILT ON 50-FOOT LOTS. THE AREA IS UNDERGOING A LOT OF CHANGES. BUT THEY WERE ORIGINALLY PLATTED AT 50 FEET. THE DEPTH OF THESE LOTS ARE FAIRLY DEEP. THEY ARE 150 FEET DEEP AND THE REQUIREMENT UNDER RS-50. THEY ARE ACTUALLY 7500-SQUARE-FOOT EACH. BOTH ARE IN TOTAL. THE INTERBAY THE SOUTH M[L]A[L]CDILL AREA IS AN ACTIVE AREA THAT WE ARE CONSISTENT WITH. WE DO NOT RECEIVE ANY CALLS OR ANYTHING REGARDING THIS PETITION. PROPOSED REZONING WILL ALLOW THE CONSIDERATION OF TWO SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES. AND THE LOTS ARE APPROXIMATELY 50 FEET MATCHING THE EXISTING LOT WHICHTHS THROUGHOUT THE AREA. WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR INTRODUCING A NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA. AND THE STAFF HAD POINTED THAT OUT. I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ALL THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS THAT THE STAFF CITED AS BEING APPROPIATE AND CONSISTENT AND RECEIVED AND FILED AND MADE PART OF THE RECORD. THERE ARE A LOT OF THEM AND IF YOU RECEIVE AND FILE THE REPORT, I WOULD APPRECIATE IT. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON ITE I SEE NO ONE MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN TO CLOSE AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MIRA MIRANDA. COUNCILMAN VIERA. >>LUIS VIERA: MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENT TODAY ARE FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. ORDINANCE IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 5825 SOUTH 5th STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION ONE FROM ZONING CLASSIFICATION RS-60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION SEPTEMBER 5, 2024, AT -- SORRY AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 3360. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM TOMAS, LAND. REZ-24-46 FROM RS-60 TO RR-50. TURN IT OVER TO JENNIFER. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THIS IS IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THIS IS REALLY ZOOMED IN, BUT WE ARE WEST OF N. BOULEVARD. RIGHT HERE. THIS IS WEST ROSS AVENUE. -- NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE RIGHT HERE. AND WE HAVE THE RIVER AND SOME VACANT LOTS AND THIS WONDERFUL BEAUTIFUL NEW ROUNDABOUT TO THE SOUTH. THE FUTURE LAND USE IS RESIDE RESIDENTIAL-10. THIS -- THESE TWO LOTS TO THE NORTH DARKER BROWN IS RESIDENTIAL-20. IF THAT LOOKS FAMILIAR TO YOU, IT IS BECAUSE IT WAS A PLAN AMENDMENT A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO. THIS IS RESIDENTIAL-35 EAST OF N. BOULEVARD WHICH IS ALSO AN URBAN VILLAGE, BUT THE SITE IS NOT WITHIN THE URBAN VILLAGE AND A LITTLE DENSER NORTH OF EAST BOULEVARD. SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND RELATIONAL MIX 100 TO THE SOUTH WHICH IS THE AMATEUR WORKS DEVELOPMENT. WE FOUND IN CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ENCOURAGE INFILL DEVELOPMENT IN AN AREA THAT IS UNDERUTILIZE. WE ARE LOOKING AT EXISTING DENSITY OF AND PLANNED FOR 10. TO ALLOWING THIS ZONING WILL ALLOW US TO UTILIZE THAT LAND MORE EFFECTIVELY AND PROVIDE MORE HOUSING FOR TAMPA GROWING POPULATION AND THE UNDERUTILIZATION OF THOSE SITES. I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? YES, SIR. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAMUEL THOMAS, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. THE AERIAL MAPS. YOU SEE THE SUBJECT SITE HERE IN RED. THE SURROUNDING AREA IS LARGELY RS-60. TO THE SOUTH IT SAYS RO-1. A MISTAKE ON OUR MAPS THAT HAVE BEEN CORRECT. PART OF THE PD-A. HEIGHTS BOULEVARD. OUR MAPS WERE NOT UPDATED BEFORE BUT THEY ARE UPDATED NOW. NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, A PD FOR TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES. AS JEN MENTIONED A COMP PLAN AMENDMENT NOT TOO LONG AGO AND A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR SEMI DETACHED USES AND THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS RS-60 ABOUT WITH A FEW POCKETS OF RS-5 OF N HAVE MULTIFAMILY USES. WE WILL GO INTO PICTURES OF THE SITE NOW. SO THIS IS LOOKING -- KINDS OF A PICTURES BECAUSE THE SITE IS RATHER LARGE. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ON GLENWOOD DRIVE. THIS IS ALL THE SUBJECT SITE RIGHT HERE. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ON GLENWOOD TOWARD ROSS. THIS IS MOVING FARTHER DOWN THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. MOVED A LITTLE FARTHER DOWN, AND NOW YOU CAN SEE THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME THAT IS CURRENTLY ON THE SUBJECT SITE. LOOKING FROM GLENWOOD STILL. AND THIS GIVES YOU THE FULL VIEW. ROSS IS OVER HERE AND GLENWOOD, THE SUBJECT SITE GOES FROM HERE ALL THE WAY TO WHERE THAT WHITE FENCE IS. THIS IS LOOKING NORTHEAST ON GLENWOOD. YOU CAN SEE SOME NEW DEVELOPMENT JUST NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS INTERIOR TO THE SUBJECT SITE LOOKING THAT THE HOUSE YOU JUST SAW ON THE FOREGROUND BEFORE. THIS IS LOOKING WEST ACROSS GLENWOOD. THIS IS THE PARK BUTTERFLY GARDEN AND NEW EXTENSION OF THE RIVERWALK AND ZOOMED IN PICTURE AND YOU CAN SEE THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ON THE SORE SIDE OF GLENWOOD. NEW CONSTRUCTION. GLENWOOD AND NEW CONSTRUCTION BEING BELT CURRENTLY THERE AND THIS IS LOOKING BACK TO E SUBJECT SITE NORTH OF GLENWOOD. WE MOVED OVER TO ROSS AVENUE NOW. THIS IS LOOKING EAST ON ROSS AVENUE TOWARD THE HEIGHTS REDEVELOPMENT. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. AND THEN SOME NEW CONSTRUCTION NEXT TO IT. THIS IS LOOKING NORTH TOWARD GLENWOOD DRIVE OVER HERE. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS ROSS AVENUE. AND NOW, WE ARE LOOKING WEST ON ROSS AVENUE WITH THE INTERSECTION OF GLENWOOD AND ROSS AND THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE. SO NOW WE WILL GO ON TO THE CONFORMING MAP. SO YOU HAVE THE SUBJECT SITE RIGHT HERE FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE GRANULAR ANALYSIS. WE LOOKED AT GLENWOOD DRIVE ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE BETWEEN PARK AND LOSS. AND THIS. AND TOWARD ROSS AVENUE AND THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT AND WE DID NOT INCLUDE THAT IN THE ANALYSIS AND ON THE ORIGINAL BLOCK, WE LOOKED BETWEEN GLENWOOD AND N. BOULEVARD IN THE TWO PARCELS THAT ARE ORIENTED TOWARD NORTH AVENUE. I WILL GO THROUGH THE ANALYSIS NOW. SO THE SUBJECT SITE IS PART OF THE RIDGEWOOD PARK SUBDIVISION, BLOCK D, LOTS 11 AND 12. THE SUBDIVISION IS PLAT WITH 13 BLOCKS. THE SUBJECT BLOCK THREE IS WILDFIRE FRONTAGES RANGES FROM 55 FEET TO 74 FEET. THE AREA ANALYSIS INCLUDED 180 PARCELS, 69 OF THOSE PARCEL TO ARE 39% ARE DEVELOPED WITH THE WIDTH OF 06 FOOT AND 111 PARCELS 61% WITHTH OF 59.99 OR LESS. BLOCKS EAST AND WEST OF NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE BETWEEN WEST PARK AVENUE ARE COMPRISED OF BLOCKS D ANDE. ON THE EAST SIDE OF GLENWOOD BLOCK D INCLUDE THREE PARCES EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE ALL FRONTING -- FOUR PARCELS, THREE OF THEM EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE FRONTING NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE. OF THESE THREE PARCELS 1,000% OF THE LOT WIDTH BETWEEN 55 AND 59.99 FEET. AND CONTAINS FIVE PARCELS AT NORTH GLENWOOD AND 100% OF THOSE LOT WIDTH ARE BETWEEN 55 AND 59.99 FEET OPINION NORTH GLENWOOD AND N. BOULEVARD, THERE ARE THREE PARCELS ORIENTED TOWARD WEST ROSS. THREE OR 100% OF THOSE PARCELS WITH LOT WIDTH LESS THAN 54.99. 52% HAVE LOT WIDTH BETWEEN 50 AND 54.99 AND BETWEEN 45 AND 49.99 FEET. MOVING TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SUBJECT BLOCK, ON NORTH GLENWOOD AND N. BOULEVARD, CONTAIN TWO PARCELS FRONTING WEST PARK AVENUE. OF TWO THOSE PARCELS OR 100% LOT WIDTH BETWEEN 70 AND 74. AND DEVELOPED WITH THE LOT WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS AND HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE OVERALL STUDY AREA. I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPLI APPLICANT. >> GOOD EVENING, SHANE O'NEIL. 804 WEST PARK AVENUE. I WILL MAKE MINE SHORT AND SWEET. SUBJECT LOTS WITH THE RED DOT HERE. WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED THIS EXACT SAME REZONING HERE IN THIS CORNER OF AMELIA AND GLENWOOD ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO. 2501, 2503 NORTH GLENWOOD, RS-50 AND RS-60. MY PERSONAL HOME AND A HOUSE NEXT DOOR. WE DID A PD. WITHIN THE ,D WE ASKED TO DO THE RS-60 TO RS-50. ALONG GLENWOOD, MOST HOMES EVEN THOUGH THE LOTS ARE RS-60, THEY ARE LESS THAN 60 FEET WIDE. FOR THAT REASON THIS IS RIGHT ON LINE WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE. MOBLEY HOMES IS IN THE PROCESS OF DOING THE SAME REZONING FROM RS-60 TO RS-50 ON THE DOUBLE LOT HERE ON THE CORNER. THAT IS MY PRESENTATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA? ANYBODY? ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 6. >>LUIS VIERA: MOVE TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO ITEM 7. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. A SECOND? SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSE? COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON, ITEM NUMBER 6. >>GWEN HENDERSON: FILE NUMBER REZ-24-48. ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 2201 NORTH GLENWOOD DRIVE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT RS-60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, TO RS-AUTO 50, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUS ME. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 AT 10:00 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL 15 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, HAS BEEN A WHILE SINCE THE LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT. REZ-24-51 TO REZONE 701, 705 AND 80 1 EAST WILMA STREET FROM RESIDENTIAL 6 0 TO RM-18 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE FROM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. WE ARE IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT. WEST OF NEBRASKA AVENUE. EAST OF NORTH BUSCH STREET. WE ARE KIND OF RIGHT AT THIS INTERCHANGE. THIS IS SHOWING VACANT ON MY AERIAL BUT IT HAS BEEN DEVELOPED. SAM WILL SHOW PICTURES I AM SURE NEXT. THE AERIAL IS A TOUCH OUTDATED. THIS IS MULTIFAMILY. WE, OF COURSE, HAVE COMMERCIAL USE NORTH OF NEBRASKA AND SOME RESIDENTIAL UNITS NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS LOOK LIKES A CAR LOT HERE AT THE CORNER. TWO FUTURE LAND USE DESI DESIGNATIONS. WE HAVE RESIDENTIAL-20, WHICH IS THE BROWN COLOR AND COMMUNTY COMMERCIAL 35 WHICH IS RED. PROBABLY WHY IT HAS TWO ZONING DISTRICTS RIGHT NOW. THE APPLICATION TO BRING IN ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND THE REQUEST OF THE ZONING DISTRICT CONSISTENT WITH BOTH THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS. COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 DOES ALLOW FOR PRETTY INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL USE BUS WE THINK OF PUTTING THE RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 18 HERE WOULD BE REALLY SENSITIVE AND COMPATIBLE FOR INTERSTATE 20 TO THE NORTH. THAT WILL PROVIDE THE NICE TRANSITION AS WELL AS TO THE MULTIFAMILY TO THE EAST. COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE PLAN DEFINITELY SUPPORT THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT HERE WE WILL STATE FOR THE RECORD THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION HAS ENHANCED ORIENTED DESIGN. SEEKS A CERTAIN DESIGN AND WE ASK THAT THE APPLICANT MEET WHAT WE UNDERSTAND IS EUCLIDIAN, BUT AT PERMITTING, JUST MEET WHAT THEY CAN. WITH THAT, IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU. MANISCALCO YES, SIR. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAMUEL THOMAS, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I WON'T SPEND TOO MUCH TIME ON THE AERIAL MAP BECAUSE JEN COVERED IS IT AS WELL. THE MAP IS A LITTLE OUTDATED. SO IS OURS. THERE WE GO. THE UPDATED AREA WHAT WHAT IS BEEN DEVELOPED RECENTLY AND THEN GO BACK TO THE ZONING MAP. >> YOU CAN SEE THESE TWO PARCELS ARE ZONED CN CURRENTLY AND A SMALL NONCONFORMING LOT RS-60. TO THE NORTH RS-60 AND A SMALL POCKET OF RS-50, THE CI AND CG IN THIS AIR DWLAEL HAVE THE MULTIFAMILY ON IT. AND YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL USE ALONG NEBRASKA THAT AS JEN SAID. ALONG BUSH, IG ZONING AND BACK UP TO 275. I WILL GO IN AND SHOW SOME PICTURES NOW. SO THIS IS LOOK CAN SOUTHEAST AT THE SUBJECT SITE FROM WILMA. THIS IS A VIEW OF THAT MULTIFAMILY THAT WAS DEVELOPED NEXT TO THE SUBJECT SITE LOOKING SOUTHWEST ON WILMA LOOKING TOWARD INTERSTATE 275 AND YOU CAN SEE HOW LONG THE SUBJECT SITE IS. I WILL ZOOM OUT SOME. THERE WE GO. SO THIS IS LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SUBJECT SITE. 275 IN THE FOREGROUND THERE. THIS IS LOOKING WEST TOWARD THE DEAD END OF WILMA. THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES ON THE OTHER SIDE. HERE IS A BETTER LOOK AT THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES. NOW WE ARE LOOKING BACK TOWARD NEBRASKA AVENUE AT THE SUBJECT SITE HERE. MOVED A LITTLE FARTHER EAST. YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE HERE. A LITTLE BETTER OF THE VIEW ON MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS LOOKING NORTH ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOME. GIVES YOU A VIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALMOST IN ITS ENTIRE LENGTH ON THE SITE OF WILMA AND PEEK OVER THE FENCE TO GIVE YOU A BETTER VIEW OF THE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT ABUTTING. ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS IN THE LAST PICTURE, THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH A MAXIMUM OF 14 DWELLING UNITS CONSIDERED ON THE SITE UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 18 ZONING DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE A TRANSITION FROM THE MULTIFAMILY USES OF THE EAST AND SOUTH TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED OPPORTUNITIES THE NORTH. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. P>>GUIDO MANISCALCO: VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS? NO? APPLI APPLICANT. >> GOOD EVENING. I AM JOHN LAROCCA, SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA, I AM THE AGENT FOR THE APPLICANT. OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT IS HERE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS POISED OF HIM. AS YOU KNOW A VERY DETAILED REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION DEPARTMENT WITH ALL THE DEPARTMENTS FINDING IT KENT. PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE APPLICATION CONSISTENT WITH -- CONSISTENT WITH ALL OF THE ADOPTED POLICIES, PLANT POLICIES. I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE FOR THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN INVOLVED AND BACK TO THE AERIAL. THIS PROPERTY IS DIRECTLY BEHIND WHAT SAN OLD RAMADA INN AT THE INTERSECTION OF I-275 AND BUSCH BEAUTIFUL OR THE EASTERN EDGE OF THE BLOCK IS NEBRASKA. ONE OF THE PRIMARY CORRIDORS WHERE YOU WILL SEE OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRANSIT EXPANSIONA AS TIME MOVES ON. AND TRANSIT CORRIDORS. AS A PLANNER AND LONG-TIME PRACTICING PLANNER OF I WILL INDICATE A CLASSIC PLAN THAT IS BEING SOUGHT HERE. YOU WILL SEE IN ONE OF THE PHOTOS THAT MR. THOMAS PRESENTED THAT THERE IS CELLULAR COMMUNICATION THAT IS SUBJECT OF THE REZONING. THAT TOWER IS ON A MONTH TO MONTH LEASE LAND BE REMOVED WHEN THIS PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED. THE APPLICANT AND I MET BEFORE WE MADE THE APPLICATION FOR THE REZONING. THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FOR THE AREA IS -- IS A BROAD CONNECTION OF RESIDENTIAL-20. FOR WILMA NORTH AROUND WEST OF NEBRASKA WITH COMMUNITY 35 LAND USE. AND THAT PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS VERY UNIQUE IN THAT IT IS THE ONLY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PARCEL AND RS-60 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILMA THAT BACKS UP TO THE INTERSTATE RAMP THAT BACKS UP TO THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. AGAIN, IT IS A CLASSIC TRANSITIONAL ZONE IN THE RESIDENTIAL-20 LAND USE DESIGNATION THAT IS COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH ALL THE POLICIES. I WANT TO QUALIFY ONE THING. THE PROPERTY IS THE WESTERN EDGE OF IT IS A SMALL TRII THINK AABLE. TO GET DEVELOPER LOTS THAT MEET THE RM-18 SHOULD THE SNOENG BE GRANTED. THE STANDARDS THAT ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKAGE IN THE REPORT FROM THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION DEPARTMENT. THE LAND USE PLAN WILL ALLOW CONSIDERATION OF UP TO 18 OR 20 UNITS TO THE ACRE WHICH WILL CONVERT BASED ON THE LAND AREA INVOLVED ABOUT THREE QUARTERS OF AN ACRE TO EITHER 14 OR 16 UNITS CONCERNING ON THE ZONES YOU ARE APPLYING FOR THE REALITY OF IT. AND WE CAN'T TALK OF DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS, BUT SIMPLY UTILIZING THE RM-18 STANDARD EUCLIDIAN GUIDELINES BASED ON THE CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND AND MEET THE CRITERIA OF THE PRIMARY USE ALLOWED WILL BE APPROXIMATELY EIGHT UNITS THAT WAS DISCUSSED BEFORE WE DID THE APPLICATION AND MAKING A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT IS NOT RECTANGULAR AND WITH A TOTAL FRONTAGE TO ACCOMMODATE MORE UNITS. I DO KNOW -- I KNOW THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE AND I WILL INTRODUCE MYSELF TO THEM DIRECT AND HONEST CONVERSATION OF INDIVIDUALS THAT TAUGHT VIRTUALLY AND PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY. THERE IS A LETTER THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED REGARDING SOME OBJECTIONS AND I BELIEVE -- I DON'T WANT TO INTERPRET THEIR WORDS BUT I THINK THE OPTIONS ARE DUE TO SOME OTHER PROBLEMS THAT ARE GOING ON IN TERMS OF CODE ENFORCEMENT AND ISSUES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD I CAN TELL YOU FROM THE APPLICANT PERSPECTIVE, IF THE PROPERTY IS ZONED RM-18. WILL COMPLY WITH ALL RM-18 GUIDELINES REGARDING PARKING, SETBACKS, DESIGN STANDARDS THAT ARE APPLICABLE TO THE CODE. IF ANYTHING IS PROPOSED ONCE THE APPLICANT GETS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS, IT SHOW IT IS INTO A WISH DONE OF THOSE CATEGORIES OF USE THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL USE AND APPROVAL TO COME BACK FOR THOSE KIND OF CONDITIONS. ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WAS RA RAISED AND DISCUSSED REQUEST WITH THE MULTIFAMILY AND THE EAST AND SOUTH WHERE THERE IS ACCESS TO THIS PROPERTY. THAT IS NOT ALLOWED IN THIS PAR APPLICANT HAS NO INTENTIONS OF DOING THAT. WITH THAT SAID, I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER I DIDN'T QUESTIONS AND I HAVE OTHER GRAPHICS IF WE NEED TO SHOW THEM TO SHOW EXACTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, MY EXPERIENCE AND AND WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION EXCEPTION OF ALL THE DEPARTMENTS. AND REVIEWING THE PROJECT. EVERYTHING IS CONSISTENT WITH THIS KIND OF ZONING. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO? ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? IF NOT, TWO REGISTERED SPEAKS ONLINE. I DON'T SEE ANYBODY IN THE PUB HERE TO SPEAK. JOEL SNOW AND JOAN CAUSEMAN. PLEASE TURN ON YOUR CAMERAS AND UNMUTE YOURSELVES. RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND SWEAR YOU IN. [SWEARING IN] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU ARE MUTED OR SOMEBODY IS MUTED. >> CAN YOU HEAR US? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH AND EVERYTHING ELSE SHE SAID. >> YES. >> YES. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. START WITH MR. JOEL SNOW AND JOAN CAUSEMAN. >> JOEL SNOW. MANISCALCO YES, SIR, GO AHEAD. >> THANK YOU FOR THE TIME. PLEASANT CONVERSATION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT -- THE OWNER AND DEVELOPER. MR. LA ROCCO AND I THINK THE CONCERNS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. PRIMARILY IN WHICH WE SUCCESSFULLY GOT FROM THE -- THAT FIVE-STORY LOW-INCOME HOUSING. NO ACCESS TO WILMA STREET. AS LONG AS -- THAT IS OUR NUMBER ONE THING. THAT IS ALL. AND -- GENERALLY SINCE THIS -- AND -- BY THE WAY, AND THE BUSINESSES ON THE EAST SIDE IS -- YOU KNOW, IT WAS FOUND TO BE A PROBLEM. AND BUSINESSES ARE GREAT AND -- WE ENGAGE IN THE MOBILITY DEPARTMENT AND WITH THE FOLKS AND THEY HAVE DONE AN AWESOME JOB. CITY HAS DONE AN AWESOME JOB. WE STILL HAVE C■HALLENGES. I KNOW THIS MAY NOT BE NECESSARILY RELATED TO THE ZONING BUT IT IS. BECAUSE IF WE ADD EVEN MORE PEOPLE DOWN THERE AND WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH STREET PARKING. IF PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY PARKING ON THE SIDEWALK. THOSE ARE THE THINGS. PARKING ON THE SIDEWALK AND BLOCKED ON A REGULAR BASE. SO WITH THAT, I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE REAL BOSS. >> OUR CONCERN IS JUST THE TRAFFIC FLOW BETWEEN WILMA AND TALIFETALIFERRO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: STATE YOUR NAME. >> JOAN CAUSEMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THAT IT? >> YES. >> I DON'T WANT TO TAKE TOO MUCH TIME. HELLO MR. SNOW AND MISS CAUSEMAN. WE TALKED A LOT ON THE PHONE. GOT TO KNOW EACH OTHER. WE HAVE NOT MET EACH OTHER FACE TO FACE. ALL I WANT TO SAY IN REBUTTAL AND NOT THE REBUTTAL THE CONCERNS THAT MR. SNOW AND MISS CAUSEMAN HAS RAISED IS HONESTLY CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUES IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. WHAT YOU IS IT NOT SEE IN THE PHOTOGRAPHY TONIGHT WAS THE COMMERCIAL AT THE END OF THE BLOCK WHERE IF THERE IS PARKING ALL OVER THE STREET AND ON THE SIDEWALK IN THE AREA. CONCERNED ABOUT THAT AND CUT-THRU TRAFFIC. CONCERNED ABOUT SPEEDING. ALL I CAN COMMIT TO IS THIS APPLICANT IS NOT INTENDING TO CONNECT TO ANYTHING TO THE SOUTH AND EAST TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL ACCESS. THESE WILL BE TRADITIONAL ATTACHED OR SEMI DETACHED UNITS THAT MEET THE RM-18 CODE AND THE APPLICANT DEVELOPER WILL COMPLY WITH THOSE STANDARDS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: ALL I WANT TO SAY THAT THE FOLKS WHO SPOKE VIRTUALLY ARE CONTINUING TO HAVE CODE ENFORCEMENT PROBLEMS -- OR PROBLEMS WITH PARKING THAT -- TO REACH OUT TO MY OFFICE AND I AM HAPPY TO HELP. MANISCALCO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. A MOTION TO CLOSE. MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN, READ ITEM NUMBER 7. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MAYBE COUNCILMAN VIERA. YES NEVER GET A EUCLIDIAN ZONING ASK. ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING, GENERAL VICINITY OF 701, 705, 801 EAST WILMA STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS RS-60, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, AND C, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO RM-18, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE MANISCALCO A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION SEPTEMBER 25, 2024, 10:00 A.M., CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 315 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR, 3602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. NEW BUSINESS? COUNCILMAN VIERA, NEW BUSINESS? >>LUIS VIERA: REAL QUICK IF I M MAY. >>LUIS VIERA: I HAD A COMMENDATION THAT WAS OFF PREMISE. I WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE IT FROM THE AGENDA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. >>LUIS VIERA: I HAD:ASKED BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR DEPUTY OF INVESTIGATIONS AND SUPPORT. MR. MICHAEL HUNTER ON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER 26 YEARS OF SERVICE ON THE AUGUST 22 REGULAR SESSION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSE? >>LUIS VIERA: ASKED BY FOLKS AT THE 13th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT TO GIVE A COMMENDATION NOVEMBER 21 WHERE WE APPEAR TO HAVE AN EMPTY CALENDAR FOR MR. DAVID ROLAND AS GENERAL COUNCIL TO OUR 13th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANYTHING GOING ON THE 13th JUDICIAL? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED? YES? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE KUDOS TO SENATOR MARK RUBIO AND SENATOR RICK SCOTT -- I AM JOKING. THAT IS SELF-DEPRECATING HUMOR. WITH A COUPLE OF PEOPLE. [LAUGHTER] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THAT IS IT SIR? >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: PUBLIC COMMENT. THIS MONTH IS NATIONAL BLACK BUSINESS MONTH. AND I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT AND SAY THAT TO OUR COMMUNITY THAT WE ARE -- WE ARE ACKNOWLEDGING THAT THIS MONTH. AND I JUST WANT TO PAY A SPECIAL TRIBUTE TO THOSE BLACK-OWNED BUSINESSES THAT DO BUSINESS WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA. WE WANT TO YOU KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOU. AND EVERY COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE REST OF THE MONTH, I WILL BE ACKNOWLEDGING BLACK BUSINESS MONTH. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU, CHAIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I WAS GOING TO RECOGNIZE -- MANY BUSINESSES BUT SPECIFICALLY THE CDC OF EAST TAMPA AND ALL THEY CONTRIBUTE. I AM PERSONAL FRIENDS WITH QUITE A FEW INDIVIDUALS THERE. I DON'T KNOW -- I AM NOT GOING TO MAKE A MOTION FOR A COMMENDATION OR IN THE FUTURE BUT YOU BROUGHT IT UP WITH THE MONTH OF AUGUST. I WANT TO GIVE THEM A SHOUT OUT. I WANT TO CONGRATULATE MY WIFE ON GETTING ALL As. SHE IS STUDIES FOR HER MASTERSER'S AT FLORIDA STATE. >>LYNN HURTAK: EXCELLENT EDUCATION SCHOOL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SHE WANTS TO BE A SCHOOL COUNSELOR. GIVE HER A SHOUT OUT. IN ALL -- OFFICIAL BUSINESS, I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO -- FOR THE SEPTEMBER 26 WORKSHOP AGENDA FOR THE CITY STAFF TO PRESENT THE CONCEPTUAL AMENDMENTS FOR THE JULY 2024 TEXT AMENDMENT CYCLE VIA TAMPA LDC AMENDMENTS. MANUFACTURE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO -- YOU DIDN'T TELL ME MICROPHONE. IS THAT YOUR JOB? MOTION FROM CHAIRMAN MANISCALCO. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED? EYES HAVE IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT'S IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YOU MAY HAVE THE GAVEL BACK. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, SIR. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SANITIZE IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY NEW BUSINESS? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THE DISCUSSION THAT COUNCILMAN CARLSON BROUGHT UP AND COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK ABOUT YBOR CITY AND HALLOWEEN. WE ARE IN BUDGET SEASON. AND SOME RESOURCES. WE REALLY NEED TO HAVE THIS DISCUSSION ABOUT PUTTING RESOURCES TO -- TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE A SAFE HALLOWEEN IN YBOR CITY. >>LYNN HURTAK: I MIGHT SUGGEST YOU TALK TO THE POLICE FIRST. LIKE JUSTOFF LINE. >>LYNN HURTAK: THAT'S WHAT I AM SAYING. TALK TO HIM OFF-LINE AND OF WHAT HE IS DOING. I DON'T WANT HIM TO COME HERE AND TELL US. IF THERE IS A NEED. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MAYBE WE SHOULD ALL TALK TO HIM. >>LYNN HURTAK: ABSOLUTELY. ALL REACH OUT, BUT I GET UNCOMFORTABLE TALKING OF SAFETY PLANS. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WE HAVE THEM. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I AM TALKING OF RESOURCES MAKING SURE THEY HAVE ENOUGH RESOURCES BECAUSE AFTER OCTOBER 1. THE NEW BUDGET -- WE ARE TALKING OF A BUDGET AND TALKING OF RESOURCES TO MAKE SURE THEY HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO POLICE THE MISSION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE SIR? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT'S ALL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. ┗>LYNN HURTAK: I HAVE A I WANT TO CHANGE THE MOTION I MADE ON AUGUST 1 REGARDING A WRITTEN STAFF REPORT ON SIDEWALKS BUILT IN WITH THE IN LIEU FEES. I TALKED TO THEM AGAIN AND THEY ASKED TO HAVE THE WRITTEN REPORT CONTINUED TO JANUARY 9 TO MATCH WITH THE IN LIEU 2025 AND THE SAME WITH THE SIDEWALK AND IN LIEU. >>MARTIN SHELBY: WHENS THAT WITH A MOTION SET FOR? >>LYNN HURTAK: IT WAS SET FOR AUGUST 22. >>MARTIN SHELBY: AUGUST 22. >>LYNN HURTAK: MOVING FROM AUGUST 22 TO -- TO JANUARY 9. I WILL PUT ON HERE WAS AUGUST 22. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. SECONDED FROM COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED? YES, MA'AM. >>LYNN HURTAK: A LITTLE BIT OF A LONG ONE. WE TALKED ABOUT -- WE TALKED ABOUT THIS WITH MR. ROGERO DURING THE BUDGET WORKSHOP. I MOVE TO HAVE STAFF PROVIDE AN IN-PERSON REPORT ON NOVEMBER 21, 2024 TO INCLUDE GENERAL FUND MAJOR REVENUE BY CATEGORY FOR THE FY-24 BUDGET, PRELIMINARY YEAR END AND THE VARIANCE OR CHANGE BETWEEN THE TWO. INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES OF REVENUE BASED ON PAGE 6 OF THE FY 25 BUDGET PRESENTATION TITLED GENERAL FUND BUDGET. PROPERTY TAXES, OTHER TAXES, CHARGES FOR SERVICES AND MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES. THE REASON I WANT THIS, I WANT TO SEE WHAT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT WE PREDICTED AND WHAT ENDED UP TO SEE WHAT THE VARIANCE IS. BUT ALSO, THE -- YES, THAT WAS THE REVENUE SIDE. NOW WE ARE DOING THE EXPENSES SIDE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: TWO SEPARATE MOTION AS SOON AS. >>LYNN HURTAK: THE SAME MOTION BECAUSE THEY GO TOGETHER AND TRAVEL TOGETHER. THE GENERAL FUND -- THINK OF WRITTEN DOWN TOO. GENERAL FUND, MAJOR EXPENDITURE BY CATEGORY FOR THE FY '24 ADOPTED BUDGET AND PRELIMINARY AND VARIANCE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES OF EXPENSE CHURS BASED ON PAGE 7 OF THE FY '25 TITLED GENERAL FUND BALANCE, SALARY AND BENEFITS, CRA CONTRIBUTIONS, PAY GO CAPITAL FUNDING, BUDGET INCREASES UNDER THAT WERE INCREASED COSTS, INCREASED LEVEL OF SERVICE AND NEW SERVICE. THAT IS THE MOTION. MANISCALCO A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CLENDENIN. FAVOR. ANY OPPOSED? YES, MA'AM. >>LYNN HURTAK: HARRY HEDGES RECENTLY RETIRED FROM THE AHAC BOARD AND ACKNOWLEDGE HIS PUBLIC SERVICE BY PROVIDING HIM WITH A COMMENDATIONP. NOVEMBER 22, 2024. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ABSOLUTELY. A MOTION AND A SECOND. YES, MA'AM. >>LYNN HURTAK: THE LAST THING I WANT TO TALK ABOUT -- SO WE HAVE THE CONVERSATION LAST -- LAST ON MONDAY ABOUT THE POLICE IMPOUND IF A STILT. WE HAVE DONE A LITTLE RESEARCH AND I WANT TO SHOW YOU THE -- HOW THIS -- HOW THIS HAS GONE FORWARD. AND WE CAN BE A PROBABLE VIED YOU WITH COPIES OF THIS. THIS STARTED IN 2022 AS A POLICE IMPOUND FACILITY AND THE PROJECT PROVIDES THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW BUILDING, ALL NECESSARY SITE IMPROVEMENTS FROM FOR THE IMPOUND LOT. A BUDGET OF $4 MILLION. NEXT YEAR, IT CHANGED. IT STILL IS CALLED THE IMPOUND FACILITY. AND THEY ADDED "AND OFFICES.." PROJECT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW BUILDING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS OF RELOCATING THE TPB INBOUND LOT AND EXISTING BUILDING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF RELOCATING VARIOUS TPD OFFICES AND THEN THE BUDGET INCREASES TO $8.1 MILLION. ISSUE HERE IS WHAT THEY ARE TELLING US IS THAT THIS IS WHEN THEY CHANGED AND DECIDED THAT. GOING TO PUT THE FORENSICS. BUT THEY DIDN'T TELL US. THE TITLE DIDN'T CHANGE. IT JUST CHANGED TO AND OFFICES. IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET, WHICH ACTUALLY HAS MY NOTES ON IT. WHAT EXACTLY WILL BE HOUSED HERE AND WHERE IS THE REMAINING $3 MILLION. SO RIGHT NOW, THEY -- THEY ALLOCATE AND USED ABOUT $557 MILLION. AND I UNDERLINED THE DEFINITION INCLUDES THAT VARIOUS TPD OFFICES, AGAIN. BUT THE PROJECT TITLE REMAINS RELOCATION OF TPD INBOUND FACILITY AND OFFICES. IT IS NOT AS CLEAR WHAT IT NEEDS TO BE. NEXT. IS THIS YEAR. THIS YEAR UNDER -- IS ALL UNDER THE SAME ACCOUNT NUMBER, 1002121. AGAIN, THIS IS THE EXACT SAME THING. AND IT CHANGED FROM OFFICES -- OFFICE NOTICE TITLE BUT NOW SEVERAL TPD UNITS. THE MONEY HAVEN'T CHANGED HERE. THEY STILL HAVEN'T USED THE 4 MILLION. BUT NEXT IS THE ADDITIONAL PROJECT. AND THAT WAS WHAT WAS ADDED. THIS IS THE 40 MILLION PROJECT. SO NOW WE HAVE $8.5 MILLION IN THE FIRST ONE. THIS PROJECT IS NOW -- IS NO, MA'AM 1002609. AND AGAIN, I AM HAPPY TO GIVE YOU ALL COPIES OF THIS. AND THIS SAYS -- THIS PROJECT PROVIDE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE RENOVATION OF THE EXISTING 38,000-SQUARE-FOOT WAREHOUSE WITH 7500-SQUARE-FOOT ADDITION TO ACCOMMODATE THE EVIDENCE CONTROL AND FORENSICS UNIT OF THE TPD WITH PARKING LOTS AND A RETENTION POND AND DOES NOT AT ALL TALK OF THE INBOUND LOT. SO I AM -- I AM VERY CONCERNED BECAUSE THIS IS HOW WE ENDED UP WITH SEVERAL OTHER BIG PROJECTS. WE STARTED WITH THESE LITTLE THINGS. IT WAS TITLED EN BOUND FACILITIES AND NEXT TO IT WAS INBOUND FACILITY AND OFFICES AND THAT WHAT HE IS IT STAYED. IT NEVER SAID WHAT THE OFFICES ARE. WE CAN NOT BE EXPECTED TO GO THROUGH 300 CIP PROJECTS TO SEE THE FINAL -- THE FINAL DOCUMENTS. IT IS THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AGREEMENT THAT WE FOUND DATED SEPTEMBER 2022 THAT CLEARLY SAYS "RELOCATION OF THE TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT INBOUND LOT EVIDENCE CONTROL SECTION AND FORENSIC UNITS TO THE EXISTING SITE AT THESE TWO ADDRESSES." SO THIS HAS BEEN PLANNED SINCE 2022. AND SIMPLY HAS NOT BEEN IN THE CIP AS -- AS -- IN THE DESCRIPTION. AND THIS IS MY CONCERN. SO MY MOTION IS TO HAVE AN IN-PERSON STAFF REPORT AT THE OPERATIONAL BUDGET WORKSHOP ON AUGUST 19 WITH A DETAILED TIMELINE FROM FY '21 TO PRESENT FOR THE TPD ANNEX SLASH IMPOUND PROJECT ITEMS 1002, 121. ASSOCIATED WITH ADDRESSES 505 NORTH HOWARD AVENUE AND 5112 NORTH ALBANY AVENUE WHICH SHOULD INCLUDE PURCHASE DOCUMENTS INCLUDING A SITE PLAN, ANY BUDGET AMOUNTS, ANY RAINFALLRFQs, SCOPES OF SERVICE AND FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IS THERE A SECOND? >>GWEN HENDERSON: THERE IS A SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND FROM MIRANDA. FAVOR. >>LYNN HURTAK: SO WHAT I WANT TO SAY, THIS DOESN'T REFLECT OUR TRUE FIVE-YEAR PLAN AND THIS IS WHAT I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO FIX. I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN HONEST CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS AND HOW WE GO FORWARD. BECAUSE WHAT THIS IS TELLING US AND WHAT THIS IS EVIDENCE OF, ANY SMALL PROJECT, ANY PROJECT, WITH GO FROM SMALL TO 40 MILLION WITHOUT OUR KNOWLEDGE. THIS IS WHAT THE PUBLIC IS SAYING THEY DON'T WANT. THESE ARE THE ISSUES THAT -- AND SO -- YEAH, I -- EXACTLY. IT HAPPENED WITH MAN IN AVENUE. AND WE -- WE HAVE ALL DESPERATELY -- AND THE RIVERWALK. SO WE HAVE ALL DESPERATELY ASKING FOR MORE TRANSPARENCY. BUT THIS IS NOT TRANSPARENT. THIS IS NOT A TRANSPARENT WAY OF GOING FORWARD. SO I WOULD REALLY LOVE TO HAVE A CONVERSATION THAT THE WORKSHOP OF HOW WE CAN DO THIS GOING FORWARD. >>BILL CARLSON: COULD YOU -- MR. CHAIR? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR. >>BILL CARLSON: COULD YOU MAKE A SEPARATE MOTION TO ADDRESS THE SYSTEMIC ISSUE. BECAUSE IT IS JUST A CASE STUDY. AS YOU SAID THERE ARE ALL THESE OTHER PROJECTS. AND WHAT THIS IS POINTING OUT IS THAT SOMEBODY MADE THE DECISION NOT TO BE TRANSPARENT WITH US OR THE PUBLIC. AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT ELSE IS OUT THERE. AND GOING BACKWARDS, YOU KNOW, LIKE IN MAN IN AVENUE -- I WON'T BRING ALL THAT UP AGAIN. THERE ARE SO MANY BAD THINGS THERE. >> THAT'S WHAT -- I WANT TO -- I WANT US TO HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT IT. AND I THINK SHOWING -- HAVING A TIMELINE FIRST. US HAVING A CONVERSATION AND MAKE MOTIONS. AND WHICH APPARENTLY WE CAN MAKE MOTIONS DURING WORKSHOPS. THAT WAS A MISTAKE ON OUR PART. CLENDENIN I WANT DO OVER. >>LYNN HURTAK: HURTAK I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT WE SHOULD HAVE THAT CONVERSATION AFTER WE HAVE THIS. I DON'T THINK ANYBODY WANTS TO STAY TONIGHT TO HAVE THIS CONVERSATION. >>BILL CARLSON: DO YOU WANT TO SET ANOTHER AGENDA ITEM AFTER THAT TO TALK OF THE SYSTEMIC ISSUE -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WAIT FOR THIS FIRST. >>LYNN HURTAK: VOTE FOR THIS FIRST. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I HAVE A QUESTION. ON THOSE DOCUMENTS THAT YOU DISCLOSED. EACH YEAR, WHAT WAS THE PRICE TAG? >>LYNN HURTAK: WE SHOW IT. KELL COMMITTEE SHOW IT AGAIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IT WAS DIFFICULT TO READ. >>LYNN HURTAK: WE WILL PROVIDE -- YES, SHE IS GOING TO MAKE THEM RIGHT IN THE MOMENT. BUT INITIALLY IT STARTED AT -- IT STARTED WITH FY '22 WHICH WAS $2.6 MILLION. THEN WENT TO THE NEXT YEAR IN FY '23 TO $5.2 MILLION FOR A TOTAL OF $8.1 MILLION. THEN WENT TO $8.248 IN FY '24. STAYED 8.5 IN 2025, AND ADDED 40 MILLION TO THE OTHER. WE ARE LOOKING AT $48.5 MILLION. I TALKED TO AT THE TEE CHIEF KATE, AND SHE SAID THEY INTEND TO KEEP KEANE IT AT $45 MILLION. I WANT THEM TO TELL US THAT. I DOESN'T TO SHARE THAT INFORMATION SECOND HAND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: FAVOR. ANYTHING ELSE? >>LYNN HURTAK: YES, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THAT. AND I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE BEST WAY TO ASK FOR THAT. SO I AM STILL WORK ON THIS MOTION. IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION, BUT -- BUT WE HAVE TO DISCUSS -- WE HAVE TO THINK FORWARD ABOUT HOW WE ARE GOING TO HOW WE ARE GOING TO COMBAT THIS. I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS REQUIRING PROJECT TITLES TO MATCH BY A CERTAIN DATE. I HAVE GOT THROUGH ALL SORTS OF THINGS BUT I THINK WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT IT AS A GROUP. AGAIN, I WANT TO GIVE YOU THE COPIES AND SOMETHING THAT I THINK WE CAN TALK ABOUT ON MONDAY. >> THIS IS FANTASTIC BACKGROUND. THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT. THE OTHER THING YOU DIDN'T DO IS SPECIFY WHO SHOULD COME SPEAK. I DON'T THINK IT SHOULD BE TPD SPEAKING ON THIS BUT FACILITIES AND CHIEF OF STAFF AND/OR CFO. IF IT IS TPD, DISCUSSION WHETHER THEY NEED IT OR NOT. THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE. THE ISSUE IS, WHY WASN'T IT DISCLOSED TO THE PUBLIC EARLIER AND HOW THE PRICE CASE SLATED JUST LIKE THESE OTHER PROJECTS. WILL. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS A BUDGET SPECIAL CALLED WORKSHOP. >> THIS IS WHY -- YOU ARE ADDING IT TO THE AGENDA AND GIVING ENOUGH NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC. THAT IS THE OPERATING BUDGET. THIS WILL BE SEPARATE BUT ON THE AGENDA BUDGET RELATED BECAUSE THIS IS BUDGET MOVING FORWARD. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. I THOUGHT ABOUT THAT AS WELL AND THE REASON I SAID "STAFF" BECAUSE I WANT IT TO BE THE STAFF THAT IS WORKING ON IT. BUT I WILL SPECIFY FACILITIES AND BUDGET STAFF. >>GWEN HENDERSON: THERE HAS BEEN A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP. >>LYNN HURTAK: YOU ARE RIGHT. FACILITIES AND BUDGET STATUTE REPORT. BECAUSE THIS IS NOT -- YOU ARE CORRECT. THIS IS A FACILITIES ISSUE. AND, BY THE WAY, THE POLICE IMPOUND FACILITY IS UNDER FACILITIES. THE NEW ONE IS.UNDER POLICE. SO THAT -- THERE ARE DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS TOO. SO ONE OF THE QUESTIONS I HAVE IS WHY IS IT TWO DIFFERENT PROJECTS AND WHY WE HAVEN'T COMBINED THEM TO ONE NUMBER. AND -- I WANT TO SPECIFICALLY THANK MISS SHARP AND MI MISS KAPESKI FOR HELPING ME WITH THIS. THEY DID A LOT OF WORK IN THIS AS WELL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING. HENDERSON NOTION RECEIVE AND FILE. SHELBY BIT OF HOUSEKEEPING WITH RESPONSE TO COUNCILMAN VIERA'S MOTION FOR THE CONDEMNATION ON AUGUST 22. YOUR NEW RULES STATE THAT A MAXIMUM OF ONE IN-PERSON COMMENDATION FOR OTHER THAN POLICE, FIRE AND ATU SET FOR EACH REGULAR MEETING. YOU PREVIOUSLY HAVE ONE COMMENDATION SET UP AND WILL REQUIRE A WAIVER OF YOUR RULES. >>LUIS VIERA: IS THAT -- I AM SORRY, DID WE --.SHELBY JUST REQUIRES A WAIVER OF THE RULES. >>LUIS VIERA: MAY I, MR. CHAIR? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SURE. >>LUIS VIERA: I TOOK THAT OFF. SHELBY THE PRESENTATION OF COMMENDATION? >>LUIS VIERA: YES, I ALREADY DID THAT SHELBY WHAT ABOUT THE RICHARD FORMICA? >>LUIS VIERA: OH, I DID NOT SEE THAT. OUR RULES IS WE CAN ONLY HAVE ONE IN-PERSON OF COMMENDATION. >>MARTIN SHELBY: PER MEETING IF IT IS NOT RELATED TO POLICE, FIRE AND ATU UNIONS. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THESE ARE THE NEW RULES. >>LUIS VIERA: WE WANT TO FOLLOW THE RULES. I WAS ASKED TO DO THIS COUNCIL APPARENTLY ON THIS DATE. IT IS HIS RETIREMENT CELEBRATION SO THEY WANT IT IN COUNCIL. SHOULDN'T TAKE MORE THAN FIVE MINUTES. I WILL MAKE THE MOTION OBVIOUSLY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOTION WAIVE THE RULES. >>BILL CARLSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION. ANY OPPOSED. >>GWEN HENDERSON: NAY. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH HURTAK AND HENDERSON VOTING NO. >>GWEN HENDERSON: WE JUST MADE THE RULES. >>LUIS VIERA: I WILL TELL HIM -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. >>GWEN HENDERSON: ONE MORE THING. SPECIAL PRIVILEGE. MY NIECE WALKED IN AND HER ALONG WITH ALL THE OTHER FRESHMAN GETTING READY TO GO OFF TO COLLEGE. LILLIAN, I WITH A TONIGHT SAY CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU HEADED TO ALBANY STATE UNIVERSITY IN ALBANY, GEORGIA. SO YOU WALKED IN HERE. I GUESS YOU -- YOU OBVIOUSLY WANTED ME TO DO THAT. GO TO THE POE PODIUM. TELL US WHERE YOU ARE GOING. WHAT YOU ARE MAJORING IN. >>LYNN HURTAK: YOUR NAME. >>GWEN HENDERSON: STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. >> MY NAME IS LILLIAN STREET. AND I AM GOING TO ALBANY STATE UNIVERSITY IN GEORGIA FOR NURSING. >>GWEN HENDERSON: FOR NURSING. >>GWEN HENDERSON: GOOD LUCK TO YOU. >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH. >>GWEN HENDERSON: KNOWS RECEIVE AND FILE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF PUBLIC SPEAKING. SO GET USED TO THIS. A LOT OF PUBLIC SPEAKING IN NURSING SCHOOL. HENDERSON A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: BEFORE DO YOU THAT. WHAT HAPPENED IS -- I APOLOGIES FOR COUNCIL NOT INFORMING YOU -- TO REMINDS YOU THAT WAIVER OF RULES REQUIRE A SUPERMAJORITY AND THE UNDERLYING MOTION THAT YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY IS STILL TH THERE. IN OTHER WORDS, TO ADD IT. >>LUIS VIERA: BY THE WAY -- THAT WAS A SEPARATE MOTION. BY THE WAY, I CAN PROBABLY DO IT AT HIS CEREMONY. THAT IS FINE. THEY JUST REQUESTED -- I AM TEXTING SOMEBODY RIGHT NOW ASKING IF I COULD MAKE AT HIS CEREMONY CLENDENIN MAKE THAT MOTION AND THEN AMEND IT IF YOU HAVE TO. MAKE THE MOTION FOR OFF-SITE. >>LUIS VIERA: LET ME RIGHT NOW -- I WILL JUST DO THE MOTION NEXT WEEK. LET ME SO I DON'T HAVE TO DO IT TWICE. I WILL SEE WHEN I AM GOING TO DO IT. I AM SURE IT IS NOT A BIG DEAL. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THE MOTION THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN MADE AND PASSED. IT IS ALREADY DONE. >>LUIS VIERA: THEN ACCORDING TO THAT THEN, I HENRY CIND MY MOTION FOR THE COMMENDATION ON AUGUST 22. SEE IF WE CAN KNIT OTHER STATE AND DO IT OFF-SITE. MANISCALCO A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN VIERA. SECONDED FROM COUNCILMAN. A MOTION AND SECOND. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON. WE ARE ADJOURNED.