Good evening. I'm calling the Monday, December 8th, 2025 planning commission meeting to order. Will everyone please rise for the pledge of >> allegiance? I aliance to the flag of the United States of America to the republic for it stands one nation with all. >> Thank you everyone. All right. Uh, first item on the agenda is the approval of the agenda. Do I have any requests for changes to the agenda or do I have a motion to approve the agenda? >> I'll make a motion to approve the agenda. Do >> I have a second? >> Second. >> All those in favor approve the agenda say I. >> I opposed. >> All right. Agenda's set. All right. Looking at the minutes from our meeting on November 17th. Does anyone have any concerns about the minutes or edits or [snorts] not? Seeing any entertaining motion to approve the minutes. >> Move to approve the planning minutes. >> All right. Do I have a second? >> Second. All those in favor say I. >> I. >> Opposed. >> All right. The minutes from November 17th are approved. Moving on. This evening, we have one public hearing and that's Wings Financial Credit Union 2025-10. It's a site plan review on 9.08 acres. The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 3,271qt building in the northwest corner of the Cub Foods parking lot located on 8015 Den Road. The proposed site plan includes a drive-thru for an ATM machine and sufficient parking for both businesses. The site plan proposal meets all zoning requirements and performance standards. All right. Will the proponent of the project please come forward? Good evening. if you could state your name for the record, please, and tell us about your request. >> Yes, sir. My name is Han Schmidt. I'm an architect with Pope Design Group working with Wings. I believe there should be Oh, there we go. Excellent. Um, is everyone familiar with this? Have we read? Everyone's caught up. All right. Well, I'm going to give a quick refresher and I'm going to use my notes because that'll be clear and concise. Uh, we can go to the next slide. Oh, is that me? I thought I was in charge. All right. Okay. Um, so I want to point out a couple of things here. Uh, just an introduction to wings. Uh if everyone is familiar, uh Wings has a current membership of 383,423 members in Minnesota. Um they are the largest um credit union in Minnesota. And uh in Eden Prairie, there are 5,964 people who call um the Eden Prairie branch their home. Um 3,963 are residents. uh you can see a breakdown of kind of the age range of um people in Indian prairie who go to wings and um I'm going to read a little bit about uh what the proposal is and uh and then field any questions. So if you can go to the next slide, this will be uh you can see a site plan of the proposed um new branch uh as well as a brief description. And I'm going to read through this and then uh following this there are slides that are effectively uh five other four or five other um branches of the similar architecture, similar setting, which is kind of what I want to also point out um as being very successful in other communities in Minnesota. Um so if you look at the site uh right now um you can see that to the east uh southeast of this corner of the parking lot is Cub Foods. Uh primary access uh for the new building will utilize the existing access on the northwest area of the site via Den Road. Additional existing access on the southwest corner of the site via Den Road and the south side of the west of the site via West 78th Street will remain. So, we're not messing with existing access to this site overall. Um, we are uh maybe improving even um how people access this site. Wings credit union has entered into a land land lease agreement with Jerry's Foods uh which will be uh additionally governed by access agreement and CIC condo agreement. The existing parcel will not be subdivided. However, Jerry's Foods is pursuing a separate P for tax purposes. This project is privately funded. Pope Design Group is the architect of record working with Houston Engineering as a civil engineer and landscape architect to secure approvals for the site and building design. Wings Credit Union will be uh ready to begin construction upon approval and receipt of the building permits within expected occupancy date uh later this summer of 26. The existing property is zoned regional service commercial and the city guide frame land use plan designation of regional commercial. The property is not in a flood plane, wetland, air, port zone, environmentally sensitive area, or an area known to be uh culturally or archaeologically significant. Wings has developed branch architecture that is unique and easily identifiable while being attractive and tasteful. The design and square footage are crafted after the wings iconic branches in Lakeville, Maple Grove, Rochester, and Baxter with a footprint of just over just under 3500 square feet. The new Eden Prairie branch will be a state-of-the-art financial institution incorporating four-sided architecture. You can see this building from every side, so we can't have a back of house as it were. Um, we are using class one materials. Um, and we have an extended live teller drive up uh or a a drive up with extended live teller hours and a full service branch including wealth management and access to the best-in-class mortgage and consumer loan divisions. The building design has been adapted to complement the architecture and materials of the adjacent Cub Foods building um incorporating stone and the proposed building materials will meet city requirements outlined in the city zoning ordinance. Um, let's see here. I don't want to take up all of your evening, so I want to hit on a few important things about the site. Uh, this project will result in a reduction of impervious area on this site. Um, while still meeting city requirements for parking requirements for both businesses on the site, the credit union will utilize a single lane interactive teller machine. The drive-through lane accommodates up to three stacked vehicles, which exceeds an anticipated peak demand of two vehicles. Uh, the electronic teller functions as a traditional ATM, but also features video and audio capabilities, allowing drive-thru customers to conduct full service banking by speaking directly with a teller at the Wings location in Apple Valley. This system naturally distributes traffic more evenly than traditional drive-throughs. Remote teller services are available for 12 hours daily compared to eight hours in a normal personal banking situation and ATM functions uh operate 24/7. The extended availability uh spreads usage throughout the day and evening rather than concentrating traffic during peak banking hours as occurs with pneumatic tube systems requiring in-person tellers. you understand um like I had just mentioned that we are sharing parking with Jerry's Foods. Seven stalls will be immediately adjacent to the building including two accessible stalls. Uh we are including a bike rack as well as pedestrian access um improving pedestrian access to the site overall. And let's see here. We are removing six trees on the site uh in order to uh build the proposed facility and this is to not only accommodate the building but also to provide um sort of I would say renewed uh growth uh from a landscape landscaping perspective on the site. Uh because the building exceeds 20 feet in height, uh we are not only meeting the requirement of a one to one um tree removal and tree planting, but um providing more than what we're removing. Let's see here. I guess I'll just say in closing that the applicant's uh prototype branch architecture includes a pylon sign that is echoed in the building's fin element. You can see the blue fin. Uh we understand that there is not an allowance for um signage above the rooftop uh in Eden Prairie and so we have relocated the signage down to the side of the fin but the fin is very much um sort of a signature element of uh the architecture for Wings branches. Now if you want to go to the next slide I will just give you a quick peek at other existing uh locations in the Twin Cities and in Minnesota. Maple Grove, if you've been there, this building um you can see does sit kind of in shared parking with um uh with with surrounding buildings. And I want to point out that the the drive-thru in this instance uh is actually perpendicular to the flow of traffic. So there is no car stacking for this uh XTM drive-thru. There are two locations or two XTMs, but um there's no car stacking and there has not been a need to have car stacking added. You can go to the next image. The Lakeville location um is the only image that I have here that has an example of a drive-thru attached to the building. But again, you can see that um the architecture itself really does sort of stand out and beautify um the community that it's built in. You can go to the next down in Northfield. This is a smaller version of our branch. Um the drive-thru is uh adjacent to the building, but also still separate. Um, and this is another example of us tucking into an existing parking lot and utilizing that space to um provide more uh amenity and more services to people um shopping in the community. You can go to the next one. If you've been up in Baxter, um this building shines like a jewel as you're racing up to the cabin. And um again, it's it's really um an example of how we are utilizing kind of the fact that people are moving. They're on the move. Um the drive-thru is separate from the building and it's adjacent to retail. Um so it's very easy to access and utilize. And I think we might have is there one more? Here we go. Rochester. Um this is another example. I mean, they're starting to look the same, I suppose, but I just wanted to provide uh, you know, um, examples for you to see that we're doing this successfully in multiple communities in Minnesota. And, um, we want to do that here. >> There's one other thing I wanted to mention because I do know that there were some comments about stacking for the drive-thru. Um, there was a study done on um, current XDM usage. Uh and right now uh research has shown us that the average transaction time at the XTM drive-thru is 2 and a half to three minutes. Um average daily transactions are 61 and the average transactions per hour are two to five. So we do not personally have any concerns about car stacking um as it's been designed. >> All right. Uh, just to clarify, I think you said Jerry's Foods a couple times. You're talking about Cub Foods, right? >> Yeah, the owner is Jerry's Foods. Yeah, that's that's a company. [clears throat] >> Yes, [snorts] sir. >> All right. Any questions? >> I have a question, Chair. >> Commissioner Teller, >> um, were there any other locations you took in consideration versus the Cub where Cub is located for the uh, credit union for your bank? >> Uh, yes. side personally um looked at the parking lot. Well, the whole mall parking lot. We looked at multiple locations. We looked at Best Buy's parking lot, just Kitty Corner as well. >> Okay. >> Thank you, Commissioner Dun. >> Just a question regarding the XTM versus the ATM. What's the difference in time that people are spending in XTM versus ATM? I know you mentioned the time that are that is spent. What is the time spent typically on an ATM? Is that comparable? Typically less time. [clears throat] >> I have an associate who knows more than I do. >> Fabulous. >> Good evening. Uh I'm Tom Shanki. I'm with Wings Financial Credit Union. I'm vice president of real estate for Wings. Um ATMs versus XTMs. A lot faster at an ATM. People are coming in there to either get cash or deposit cash. Pretty much all they do. XTMs people can do a number of different transactions from seven to seven, but after those hours it's pretty much functions as an ATM. >> Very helpful. I'm just thinking about stack stacking and um how fast people are moving through an ATM versus an XTM. Very neat concept. >> It was interesting with um Maple Grove was our first one of these buildings that we built and as Hans mentioned, we had two XTMs in that. Actually, their predecessor was PTM. Same concept. We put two in there because no stacking. Since we built that building, we only go to one machine now. It's just drive up service is really on the downswing. I mean, I remember some of the banks when I was growing up, there would be like 10 lanes of drive up and you just don't see it that much anymore. >> Thank you. >> Any other questions, >> Mr. Chair Mr. >> Yeah, I was probably the one that stirred the pot about the queueing um for the ATM XTM and despite your research um I'm just trying to future proof it in case another in case you were to move out someone else was to occupy and just had an ATM there. um three stacks may not be enough, but it seems like with uh no downside, you could simply rotate that entire island 180 degrees so that instead of potentially stacking back into the main driveway of the Cub Foods, you could have all your customers enter the parking lot, make that turn uh in reverse order and drive through from west to east instead of east to west. And there doesn't seem to be a downside. Matter of fact, seems to be a lot of pluses to that. gets the remaining six stalls of yours closer to your front door. >> Uh get your customer looking at the XTM not in the sunlight because they're facing south here and get them facing north which would be better. >> I don't see point. Yeah. And if I can speak to that. Um so we ran a lot of different scenarios through this and I even recently reflipped it again to look at it and study it and try to understand, hey, would this be better? Um there are several different reasons that we we think that it should stay the way it is. Uh one is that uh when people are leaving an ATM and this isn't a good thing, but they're typically distracted. They're like putting their, you know, wallet away. They're shuffling their cash. They're figuring some things out. And if we have the exit for that at for that ATM XTM immediately into a primary artery of traffic on in that parking lot, that could be a potential hazard. Um, another is that uh yes, if we flip it, we add more parking spots for the Wings building, but we also then would significantly increase traffic through that parking lot. and um the average age of people coming in for personal banking. Um we want to keep that parking lot as safe as possible and minimize that through traffic. Um because when you flip it, the through traffic would have to come through uh the parking. Um but the way it is right now, you can come safely from the open um lot and stack right behind and not interfere with the immediate parking for the building. >> Right. I didn't understand that second point. you can uh get to it by going through the south loop on a clockwise direction just as easily. But I I understand your points. >> I would I would put more value on the um the not clogging up the intersection and having you address the safety concerns with a stop sign, something else on the way out. That's just my opinion, but um seems like a safer way to go and better for us all long term. >> So, >> understood. Uh, second question. Um, all of your images and all of your, uh, photographs of the buildings around town, nice design, by the way. I like it. They all have those nice horizontal sun shades up on a clear story clear. Uh, >> it was an award award-winning design. So, yes. >> Great. Congratulations. >> I don't see the sun shades here. >> Is there a reason? >> We took the louvers off uh, and actually just put to a film. The the louvers were an extra expense we thought would dissipate the sun. it didn't work. So, we went to a a film 3M night vision 15, I believe it is. >> And that actually helps a lot better and it's a lot less expensive. >> Okay. And that's on gray glass, it looks like, versus clear glass on the bottom. Did Did you really mean clear glass? >> Yeah, we tint the upper upper windows, but we don't on the lowers. >> Clear not tint at all. That gray tint is, like I said, it's a 3M night vision, so it basically gives it a little bit of a gray tone to it during the daylight, but >> doesn't block out. You can see through it fairly easily. >> Sure. Sure. Okay. So, is is the glass color of the outer light of glass is it blue? >> No, the blue is actually uh LED lighting inside the building. >> Oh, okay. Like when you see those night images, there's lighting on inside the building. >> Yep. >> So in this situation, the dark glazing would look darker or the top glazing would look darker. The bottom glazing is clear. >> Fine. >> Okay. Thanks for that explanation. Appreciate it. >> Yeah. And I guess since you have the site plan up right now, I would just comment that the the issue with coming in from the other side like we can't come through that parking and pull a U-turn into because you said you weren't quite clear on what I was trying to say about the flipping the it's not flipped here so I can't really illustrate it but >> but I'd be happy to correspond found offline. Um, yeah, it's hard to explain sometimes, but >> No, I I'll leave it up to staff to evaluate that. I just wanted to bring it up as a >> a potential betterment to the circulation and the long-term success of the site plan despite your optimism about the minimal number of stacks for your particular project. >> Understood. >> Thank you. >> Great. Thank you. >> I got one more question. >> Oh, yeah. Commissioner, >> as far as the XTMs, I know it's drive up, but would would your customer service would your policy allow someone to walk up and use the service as well, or do you have to be in a vehicle? >> We haven't we have not experienced walkups that I know I'm aware of. I'm sure it's probably happened and I'm sure they've probably let them transact. Okay, would be my guess. We do have walk up locations at, you know, certain locations as well. [snorts] First one comes to mind and we have a strip mall center in Blaine that and we had a center location here uh just on the south side of the Prairie Center which we just moved out of and that had a drive up on the side of the building. I'm guessing that somebody might have walked up to that one as well. >> Okay, thank you. >> Great. Thank you. Uh Jeremy will take us through the city report. You >> Thank you, chair, commissioners. Um the applicant hit most of the high points. I just want to kind of fill in fill in around the edges a bit. Um the project does meet all the um all the design requirements, setbacks, um things of that nature. There's no waivers or no variances requested with this one. The site did receive some waivers back when it was originally developed from a shoreland impervious coverage perspective. Um, and some other waiverss at the time. Um, so those still apply here. So no additional waiverss or variances are required. And as the applicant did mention, they're actually reducing the amount of impervious surface about 4,000 square feet. So that's a positive in terms of this development. Access to the site um will be as it is today. There's no new accesses off of Den Road or other adjacent streets. Um so they use the existing network um circulation network that serves Cub Foods. Um the parking um meets and actually exceeds the requirements on site. The parking will be shared. This is not a subdivision. So it's not necessarily a shared parking agreement that we normally would see in other kind of separate uses. Um but parking will be shared between the uses there. So they do uh exceed the parking requirements for the site. Um almost immediately almost immediately when this project went public in terms of public comment, we received some comments from some area residents um Eden Prairie residents. Um all of them commented on the loss of trees along Dent Road and and during this time as peak fall foliage time um really trees were at their splendor. Um many of those trees will be lost um due to the the construction of the building and the utilities. It's unavoidable. Um these trees were not installed at the time of the of the original development for specific screening purposes or as as now we require trees at the perimeter and um and not perimeter of sites to help kind of break up a sea of parking. the building will help that break up that that perception, but the the site will replace trees um both adjacent to the building and kind of throughout the parking lot. So, um while loss of trees is unavoidable in the situation, they are mitigating that loss as required by code. Other comments we received were concerns with the interior inter internal circulation within the parking lot. And the commenters based this on concerns that they experienced in the other Jerry Foods location or the Jerry Foods location on Hentown Road when the Chipotle and when the U Starbucks came in. They felt that that was confusing um and potentially dangerous. Um, reviewing this site plan, staff is confident that the uh the landscaped islands, the trees that will be be placed in those will help direct traffic and help guide users in that parking lot. Um, so that did not create a confusing situation. Um, obviously with a parking lot full of cars, there's always going to be a little bit of overload in terms of kind of visual where's my path, where pedestrians walking, that side of that sort of thing. Um but with the layout that we propose or is proposed and also um the pedestrian pathway that's shown on the plan that's shown on the screen earlier um that shows a connection between the sidewalk along Den Road and the Cub Foods um that helps provide a safe path or at least a knowledgeable path and this is similar to what we've done at the London Barley's project with the Culvers that was added and then also with the uh the Jerry food south of town when U Chipotle and Starbucks was added. So kind of that pattern has been established. Um there's some minor tweaks that we'd like to see in the plans before presented the city council outlined in the in the staff report. Really just changing of the plans, not anything new or any new criteria. Um, speaking of of Commissioner Far's comment about the the pathway of the access, if that's uh shared with the commission, that should be reflected as a part of your comments or part of your motion so that it can be addressed before it goes to council. Um, that would be the proper timing. So, if if the rest of the commissioners would like to see that changed, that now is the time to add that. Uh, staff is recommending approval as the plans are shown u subject to the conditions that are outlined in the memo. And I'd be happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Any questions for the city? >> Commissioner Tucker, >> just a couple. Um, so the sustainability requirements, building standards are not required. Can you just educate me on why that is? >> So the building sustainability building sustainability standards apply when uh a project is part of a PUB or a waiver and it's more than 10,000 square feet in terms of size. So not all buildings even if they part of a waiver are triggered or trigger the requirement. We always encourage um developers to add where appropriate um but it's not necessarily requirement. >> Okay. Thank you. And I think they've done a good job with some of the initiatives. Anyway, the other question I have is regarding the variance. Can you educate me on why the variance is allowed to stay with this site plan? >> Sure. A variance is applied to applies to a lot. doesn't apply to the applicant. So, regardless of who changes um or who owns the property, the variance still applies. In this situation, the variance is granted for the impervious surface coverage. They're actually decreasing the impervious surface. So, the variance wouldn't even apply if if that first statement didn't wasn't true. >> Okay. Thank you, >> Mr. Chair. Yeah, Commissioner. Um, I didn't see those six removed trees on the landscape plan as trees to be removed. Uh, but it's in their notes. What kind of trees are they? Do you know >> that are going to be removed? >> Yep. You said there's six trees being removed and the neighbors were concerned about. >> Um, I believe a couple of them were spruce uh trees. Maybe a couple of them were uh deciduous and autumn blaze or something like that. >> Maybe Matt knows >> a variety. >> Yeah, a couple of them were uh crab apples. Uh, I think one locust or maple and then the rest were pines. >> Okay. Are they planting something similar? >> Yeah, commissioner chair. Yeah, they'll be planting similar uh species. >> Great. Okay, thanks. And then, uh, regarding my idea to rotate everything 180 degrees to get the traffic flow from west to east. If we were to have that dialogue as a commission, is that something staff would support or have you evaluated it enough or I don't want to force the issue and make it a um a requirement of a recommendation if it's not a good idea if you guys have looked at it. >> Very I appreciate that comment. What I would recommend is if that's shared by the commission that maybe the motion would be that that um flipping of the pathway, whatever verb we want to use, um should be explored further before it goes to planning, before it goes to city council. That gives the applicant the ability to do some more research and then be able to explain to the council why that's not a feasible alternative. >> Good. Uh it so you you're sharing the goal of the commission but not necessarily locking it in step is we try to avoid redesigning a site at the day here. >> That's the guidance I was looking for. Thank you. >> Got a question for Commissioner Far. What what was the concern again with the XTM? I know it's it's facing >> What's that? >> It's facing west. You drive from east to west >> and if there were to be a backup of more than two cars waiting besides the customer at the XTM, it would block the Cub Foods north south back driveway and and also there's six stalls for the bank that are on the south side of that island and those people have to get out of their car and walk around the XTM lane to get into the front door of the bank. So, we could solve a few different problems at the same time by flipping everything 180 degrees. By everything, I mean the six stalls and the drive-thru lane going from east to west so that it goes from west to east and with with no other downside >> or or potentially move the XTM >> to the east. That's what it would be doing. The XTM would be moving to the east because the as as we rotate everything, it would end up on the east side of that lane. And so cars would be stacking. They would drive into the site um off of the north south Cub Foods aisle, we'll call it, >> they would drive past the front door, make a 180 degree turn, and start to queue for the the drive-through lane. And so instead of if you're looking at the site plan, instead of where you see the roof over the XTM device, >> Yeah. >> instead of it being on the left side of the drive line lane, it would be on the right side. >> That's correct. To the applicant's point, then once they're done with their transaction, they may look in the rearview mirror and see that there's someone behind them waiting. They'll put the car in drive and certainly there will be a stop sign in front of them, but they have to immediately turn out into a driveway and they suggested that might be a safety concern. >> Mr. Chair, what I might recommend is is the commission maybe agree on a concern rather than the solution. So if the concern is trying to add additional stacking on site, share that and then have the developer or applicant come up with a solution. Um kind of taking taking the solution off your table a little bit. Um but just sharing the main concerns because there's several ways to skin this tree and I think um we can come to a solution better and offline. Do others share that same concern? >> Absolutely. I think I don't think it's our job. I think it's great that we have the expertise on the commission to suggest ideas, but I think it's the applicant's responsibility to make any changes after hearing some of the ideas that we might have. I don't think it's our job to redesign anything. >> And do you share the same concern about the stacking? Are you concerned about the stacking? I'm I actually see both sides of it right now. I'm a little bit concerned about coming straight out of the XTM into a main traffic aisle and that could be a potential safety issue. >> Others thoughts about that? >> Can we ask the engineer? I'm curious what the city engineer thinks about it. >> Uh sure, chair and commissioners. Um we we had the exact same thought when we were looking at first this first draft. We lit I literally clipped out this and spun it 180 degrees and said what do you think of this idea? Um they came back with this the similar concerns. You know the first one being leaving the XTM immediately and now deciding okay I have to I have to enter traffic which is that that drive lane. Um the other one was the addition having all those parking spaces back to back in that area right in front of the bank. Um, and I I understand his point when he talks about if you're coming in from the we'll say plan south um that entrance um and you want to go into that XTM, there's a movement there that isn't just a 90 degree into a into a space. You would have to turn 180 degrees to get into that space. Um because if you're if you notice there's a there's a curb that separates the XTM lane from the other drive lane that's right there that Jeremy's pointing to. The driver if you're coming from the south, Jeremy, you can put your pointer to the south. That curb would be right in your way. So you would have to immediately almost take a 180 degrees to come around that. If you wanted to avoid that, you would have to go through the lane that's in the bank space, in the front door of the bank, >> which is I think his point about now there's more traffic in that space. You've got cars backing up into each other in that space. Um, so I think that the volume of cars in there, maybe it's not a lot, but now you've got cars backing up. I think they alluded to kind of their demographics of who's who's going to the bank, who's backing up in those spaces. Now they have to worry about a car coming through that that that area as well. So, those are some of the other points that they highlighted to us as we made the same comment about flipping that around. I'm not so concerned with the stacking. They've I think they've proven that with their their other stores um about not having that be an issue. Again, I I'd just point out too that this orientation of their parking and how where these people are driving, this is a parking lot. So, we're not talking about 30 mph speeds here. Hopefully, talking about a parking space where cars are driving around. Um they have to they have to negotiate a 90 degree turn at the end of this this what used to be the main through way in the back end of that parking lot. So hopefully speeds are a little slower there. Um so I just wanted to point out kind of those other two factors about the actual turning movement getting into there if it's flipped and if it is that's a problem to make that turning movement it does force more cars into that space between the uh in their front step. So that's how we saw it. So, if there was another car, where would it go as it's currently laid out? >> If there were four cars, uh, it would it would stack there. It would stand in that in that aisle. Uh, that's north south or it would park, you know, my is my assumption. >> Not in the drive lane. >> I mean, if north and south, >> it could. [laughter] I don't know that that would be detrimental to the two minutes uh that it would wait there for that that time frame, but um >> thank you thoughts about this real quickly. I'll go is uh this is a public hearing. If anyone would like to come forward and speak for against this project. I would like to come speak. All right. Seeing none, I entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Continue the discussion. >> I'll move to close the public hearing. >> All right. Do I have a second to close? >> Second. >> Second. All those in favor of closing public hearing say I. >> I. >> Opposed. Public hearing. [cough] [clears throat] >> All right. Uh, Commissioner Kirk, we'll discuss. >> No, I don't have a comment, right? Okay. Mr. Chair, >> yes. Um, with all this discussion already, I think it's going to be reflected in the minutes and so I don't think we necessarily need to force the issue anymore. Um, you know, staff has already looked at this. Um, I'm glad we had a discussion on it for those people who had an opinion about it and uh I'm I'm perfectly fine to let it ride. >> Sounds good. Any other comments about this? >> I I agree with Commissioner Far. I I think the discussion's important. I don't think it needs to go further than that in my opinion. Sounds good. Would anyone like to make a motion then? >> Mr. Chairman, move to recommend approval for the site plan review on 9.08 08 acres as recommended by staff represented in the December 8th, 2025 staff report. >> All right, a motion from Commissioner Kirk for approval. Do I have a second? >> Second. >> Second from Commissioner Sherwood. >> All those in favor say I. >> I. >> I. Opposed. Would anyone like to abstain? >> Okay, great. Thank you. Moving on. Thanks for your investment, Nean Prairie. Good luck. >> Uh Jeremy, any planners reports this evening? >> Not tonight. >> All right. Any members reports? All right. Entertain a motion to adjourn the meeting this evening. >> Motion to adjurnn. I >> have a second. >> Second. >> All those in favor of adjourning say I. >> I. >> We'rejourn. Thanks everyone. >> Hey there.