MAY 16, 2022 >> GOOD EVENING. WELCOME TO THE MAY 16, 2022 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. I WILL NOW CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER AT 7:00. WOULD YOU PLEASE RISE AND JOIN ME WITH THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE? [PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE] >> COMMENTS OF PUBLIC INTEREST THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING IS TO ALLOW UP TO THREE MINUTES PE SPEAKER WITH 30 TOTAL MINUTES ON ITEMS OF INTEREST OR CONCERN AND NOT ON ITEMS THAT ARE ON TH CURRENT AGENDA. THE PLANNING ANDT DISCUSS THESE ITEMS, BUT MAY RESPOND WITH FACTUAL OR POLICY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY CHOOSE TO PLACE THE ITEM ON A FUTURE AGENDA. THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIF THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY. >> ARE THERE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS AT THIS TIME? >> WE HAVE HAYDEN ALEXANDER. >> OKAY. THE CITY OF PLANO AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TAKES THE OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR FROM OUR CITIZENS VERY SERIOUSLY. WE ALWAYS WELCOME FEEDBACK ON HOW WE CAN MAKE OUR COMMUNITY BETTER. WE TAKE OUR ROLE IN THE CITY GOVERNMENT AND THE IMPORTANCE AND RESPECTING OUR CITIZENS' TIME AND RESOURCES THOUGHTFULLY. WE STRIVE TO CONDUCT OURSELVES WITH THE EXCELLENCE AND FOCUS ON OUR AGENDA ON CITY BUSINESS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THIS COMMISSION. IN RETURN, WE ASK THOSE WHO COME BEFORE US TO PROVIDE THAT SAME LEVEL OF RESPECT . WITH THAT BEING SAID, EACH SPEAKER WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO PRESENT THEIR COMMENTS. WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL THE SPEAKERS IN ORDER? >> MR. ALEXANDER. APPARENTLY, HE IS NOT HERE. >> WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE ACT UPON IN ONE MOTION AND CONTAINS ITEMS WHICH ARE ROUTINE AND TYPICALLY NONCONTROVERSIAL. ITEMS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THIS AGENDA FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION BY COMMISSIONERS OR STAFF. >> Horne: DOES ANYONE WISH TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? AS THE CHAIRMAN OF THIS MEETING, I WOULD LIKE TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THIS AGENDA. IS WILL B AGENDA ITEM NO. G, THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PROMONTORY ON PRESTON, BLOCK A, LOTS 1R AND 2R. APPLICANT IS PROMONTORY LIMITED. WE'LL PULL THAT FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. THAT BEING SAID, MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ITEM PULLED? >> CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS B, C, D, E, AND F AS PRESENTED. >> EXCUSE ME. WHAT ABOUT AGENDA ITEM A? A. I'M SOR. I SKIPPED OVER A. A AS WELL. >> A THROUGH F. >> Horne: OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION MADE BY BENNETT AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BRONSKY. ANY DISCUSSION? >> [OFF MIC] >> Horne: THE CONSENT AGENDA PASSES 6-0. WE'LL NOW MOVE FORWARD WITH THE DISCUSSION OF THE AGENDA ITEM -- I MEAN, THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THAT WAS PULLED. >> GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. I'M RAHA POULADI, LEAD PLANNER OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. >> Horne: THANK YOU. I ASKED THIR A SPECIFIC ELEMENT THAT WAS IN THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND I WAS HOPING TO GET SOME EXPLANATION FROM YOU AS TO THE PATH FORWARD. THIS IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC AND ALSO FOR OUR NEW COMMISSION MEMBERS. SO ON THIS PARTICULAR ELEMENT HERE, ON THIS PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, THERE IS A LINE ITEM, THE REMOVAL OF APPROXIMATELY 50% OF THE EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED WITH REDEVELOPMENT. I HAVE A LITTLE CONCERN WITH THAT IN THAT WHEN WE LOOK AT THE ZONING ORDINANCES, AND PARTICULARLY WHEN WE GO TO ARTICLE III AND WHEN IT ADDRESSES THE REVIEW OF THESE PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS, PART OF IT IS TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE CITY'S ENVIRONENT AND AESTHETIC QUALITIES. AND WE GO FURTHER THERE, USE OF LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING TO SHIELD LIGHT, NOISE, MOVEMENT, AND ACTIVITIES FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND TO COMPLEMENT THE DESIGN AND LOCATION OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING. SO CAN YOU HELP US HERE? WE KNOW STAFF HAS APPROVED THIS AND RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AND IT WENT THROUGH CONSENT. EXPLAIN TO THE COMMISSION, PLEASE, WHAT THE NEXT STEP IS AND -- WELL, BASICALLY HOW WE MAY MOVE FORWARD TO ADDRESS THE CONCERN OF REMOVAL OF THESE 50 TREES. >> SURE. THIS AGENDA ITEM, AS YOU MENTIONED, IT IS A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND THERE'S A GENERAL TREE SURVEY ASSOCIATED WITH THAT THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED BY STAFF AS IT MET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS. THE NEXT STEP WOULD BE A SITE PLAN, A LANDSCAPE PLAN, A TREE PRESERVATION PLAN, WHICH IS GOING TO BE REVIEWED IN DETAIL ADDRESSING ALL THE POTENTIAL MILIT MITIGATIONS AT THAT STAGE. CURRENTLY THIS IS JUST A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN. AND AS YOU MENTIONED IN OUR ORDINANCE, WE HAVE PROVISIONS REGARDING TREE MITIGATION AS WELL. THERE ARE CERTAIN AREAS THAT ON TREE MITIGATION WILL BE EXEMPT FROM TREE PRESERVATION AND ONE WOULD BE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, FIRE LANE, AND OTHER ASPECTS OF CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT. IF A TREE IS REMOVED AND IT'S NOT LOCATED IN THE CERTAIN AREAS THAT ARE CALLED OUT IN OUR ZONING ORDINANCE, THEN THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE TREE REPLACEMENT FOR EVERY SINGLE TREE THEY ARE úGOIN. IF THE TREE THAT THEY ARE REMOVING IS GREATER THAN 30 CALIPER INCHES, THEN THAT RATIWOR 1 INCH. SO IF THEY REMOVE 1 INCH OF THAT TREE, THEN THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE 1.5 INCHES OF TREES AND THE REPLACEMENT TREES SHOULD BE MORE THAN 4 INCHES. IN THAT REGARD, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. >> Horne: DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? >> Stone: YES, DO YOU HAVE THIS PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AVAILABLE TO PUT UP ON THE SCREEN FOR US? >> Y, S. I HAVE TO LOG IN MY COMPUTER. >> Stone: I UNDERSTAND. AND WHILE THAT'S GOING ON, THERE IS A RATHER INFLAMMATORY STATEMENT ON THE SITE PLAN OVER TO THE RIGHT O THE CHART. THERE'S A LINE THAT SAYS, I BELIEVE, IF MY MAGNIFYING GLASS IS CORRECT, 50% OF THE EXISTING TREES ON THIS SITE ARE GOING TO BE REMOVED. CAN YOU CONFIRM THAT THAT'S WHAT IT SAYS OR AM I MISREADING THAT? FIFTY% SOUNDS LIKE A PRETTY HEAVY AX . OVER TO THE RIGHT JUST ABOVE THE TITLE BLOCK S, RIGHT IN THERE. DOES THAT SAY 50% WILL BE REMOVED? >> YES, THAT'S A CORRECT STATEMENT BUT IT'S GOING TO BE REPLACED AND THE REPLACEMENT WILL BE SHOWN IN DETAIL AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. >> Stone: DO YOU HAVE A ROUGH EIMAT OF HOW MH OF THE 50% WILL BE REPLACED AT THIS POINT? >> I DON'T HAVE THE ROUGH ESTIMATION BUT I CAN SHOW IT TO YOU ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN. ESSENTIALLY THESE ONES THAT DON'T HAVE AN X ON IT, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO BE CHANGED. BUT THE ONES THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO BE MITIGATED. >> Stone: THEY ARE NOT GOING TO BE MITIGATED? >> NO, SIR. PER OUR ORDINANCE THEY ARE ALLOWED TO REMOVE THOSE TREES. >> Stone: OKAY. >> BUT THE ONES THAT THEY ARE LOCATED IN THE PARKING SPACE AND THEY ARE NOW LOCATED WITHIN THE FIRE LANE, THESE NEED TO BE MITIGATED. IF THEY ARE ABOVE 8 INCHES IN CALIPER. IF THEY ARE LESS THAN THAT THEY ARE NOT GOING TO BE MITIGATED. >> Stone: AND WE'LL SEE ALL OF THAT AT THE NEXT STAGE OF SUBMISSION? >> THEY ARE NOT GOING TO BE ON P&Z AGENDA BUT IF THE COMMISSION WISHES TO SEE THAT, WE CAN DEFINITELY MAKE THAT HAPPEN. IT IS A STAFF APPROVAL BUT IF YOU WISH TO SEE THAT, WE CAN BRING IT TO THE COMMISSION. >> Stone: I'LL LEAVE THAT TO CHAIR TO DETERMINE IF WE'D LIKE TO LOOK AT THAT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP TONIGHT. >> OF COURSE. >> Horne: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER TONG. >> Tong: JUST A QUESTION REGARDING THE REPLACEMENT. WHEN THEY REPLACE THE ONES, WHERE WOULD THEY GENERALLY PUT THE REPLACEMENTS? >> IF THEY HAVE ROOM ON THE SITE, THEY ARE GOING TO REPLACE IT WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE AREA THAT IS TO THE SOUTH. I HAVEN'T SEEN THEIR PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PN BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T SUBMITTED TO US. SO, TO BE FRANK, I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WILL BE THE PLACEMENT OF THE PROPOSED TREES. HOWEVER, THEY HAVE ROOM ON THE SOUTHERN OPEN SPACE AREA AND THEY CAN PROVIDE TREES ON THE PARKING TERMINAL AS WELL. IF THEY ARE OUT OF ROOM AND THEY CANNOT DO THAT , BY THE DISCRETION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, THEY CAN PROVIDE THE MITIGATIONREESN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY OR IN A PARKLAND. BUT THAT REQUIRES AN ALLOWANCE FROM THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING. >> Tong: THANK YOU. >> SURE. >> Horne: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION TO STAFF? I'LL SAY NONE. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN? >> THE APPLICANT IS AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY POTENTIAL QUESTIONS. >> Horne: IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WOULD YOU LIKE TO -- DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? NO? THAT'S GOOD. THANK YOU. OKAY. ANY OTHER REGISTERED SPEAKERS OR ATTENDEES ON THIS ITEM? >> NO, WE DO NOT. >> Horne: SEEING NONE, NOW WE'LL CONFINE THE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF. ANY COMMENTS? >> I RECOMMEND WE APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AS SUBMITTED BY THE PLANNING. >> SECOND. >> Horne: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER OLLEY -- EXCUSE ME. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER OLLEY WITH A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BRONSKY FOR APPROVAL. PLEASE VOTE. THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN IS APPROVED 6-0. MOVING ON TO THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM. REMAINING SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO 30 TOTAL MINUTES OF TESTIMON TIME, WITH THREE MINUTES ASSIGNED PER SPEAKER. THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS MUST BE APPROVED IF THEY MEET CITY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIO LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS ARE MORE DISCRETIONARY, EXCEPT AS CONSTRAINED BY LEGAL CONSIDE AGENDA ITEM NO. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONING CASE 2022-005 - REQUEST TO AMEND ARTICLE 4 (A AND RELATED SECTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE NOTICING REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-INITIATED ZONING CASES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. APPLICANT: CITY OF PLANO. THIS IS FOR LEGISLATION CONSIDERATION . >> GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. M CHRISTINA SEBASTIAN, LAND RECORDS WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. AT THE MARCH 1 AND 21 MEETINGS THE COMMISSION HELD DISCUSSIONS REGARDING THIS DRAFT AMENDMENT FOR THIS CASE . STAFF IS WORKING ON FINALIZING THE RECOMMENDATION FOR CONSIDERATION. REQUESTING TO TABLE THE ITEM UNTIL THE JUNE 6, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THEY TABLE IT TO THE JUNE 6 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. >> Horne: ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS OF STAFF? I WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? THE CITY OF PLANO. GUESS NOT. ARE THERE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS? >> NO, THERE ARE NOT. >> Horne: THAT SAID, I'LL CONFINE THE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. >> I MOVE THAT WE TABLE THIS ZONING CASE UNTIL OUR JUNE 6, 2022 MEETING. >> SECOND. >> Horne: I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BRONSKY AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TONG TO APPROVE THIS. PLEASE VOTE. TO TABLE IT. TO TABLE IT TO THE NEXT MEETING, TO THE NEXT JUNE 6 MEETING. PLEASE VOTE. AGENDA ITEM 1 IS APPROVED 6-0. MOVING ON TO AGENDA ITEM NO. 2. >> YOU JUST MEANT TABLED. >> AGENDA ITEM NO. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONING CASE 2022-006 - REQUEST TO AMEND ARTICLE 8 (D ARTICLE 14 (ALLOWED USES AND US CLASSIFICATIONS), ARTICLE 15 (USE-SPECIFIC REGULATIONS), AND RELATED SECTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO ARCADE REGULATIONS, AND TO RESCIND SPECIFIC USE PERMITS FO ARCADES THAT, BASED ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, ARE NO LONGER NEEDED TO PERMIT THAT LAND USE. APPLICANT: CITY OF PL. THIS IS FOR LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION. >> STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE COMMISSION ACCEPT STAFF'S REQUEST TO TABLE ZONING CASE 20:-006 TO THE JUNE 6 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. >> Horne: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SEEING NONE, ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? >> THERE ARE NO SPEAKERS REGISTERED. >> Horne: I WILL CONFINE THE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. >> I MOVE THAT WE TABLE THIS CASE TO OUR JUNE 6 MEETING, 2022. >> SECOND. >> Horne: I HAVE A MOTION TO TABLE THIS MEETING TO JUNE 6 BY COMMISSIONER BRONSKY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER RATLIFF. PLEASE VOTE. THE MOTION PASSES 6-0 TO TABLE TO THE JUNE 6 MEETING. NEXT ITEM, PLEASE. >> AGENDA ITEM NO. 3. PUBLIC HEARING - REPLAT: HUNTERS GLEN FIVE-A, BLOCK 7, LOTS 2R, 4, 5, AND 6. PARK/PLAYGROUND ON FOUR LOTS ON 70.8 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY MAUMELLE DRIVE. ZONED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE-9 WITH SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NO. 66 FOR GOVERNMENTAL SERVICE YARD. APPLICANT: CITY OF PLANO. ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION. >> GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. KOTCHE COPELAND, SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. STAFF DID SEND OUT NOTICES FOR THIS ITEM AND RECEIVED NONE IN VORR IN OPPOSITION. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED AND I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> Horne: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I HAVE ONE, PLEASE. WHY WOULD WE BE DIVIDING ONE LOT INTO FOUR? WHY WOULD THE CITY WANT TO DO THAT? WHAT IS THE ADVANTAGE OF THAT? >> THEY ARE PROPOSING WATER/SEWER LINES IN ADDITION TO A FIRE LANE. >> Horne: COULD THEY DO THAT WITH ONE LOT INSTEAD OF FOUR? >> I BELIEVE THEY COULD. HOWEVER, THIS PARK IS VERY LARGE, AS YOU CAN SEE. AND THE CITY WISHED TO SUBDIVIDE THIS INTO FOUR LOTS. THIS ISN'T THE FIRST TIME WE HAVE SEEN THIS AS THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THEY'VE DONE THIS. THE APPLICANT DID NOT FILE THIS WITH THE COUNTY WITHIN OUR SIX-MONTH TIME-FRAME AND SO WE ARE HEARING IT AGAIN TONIGHT. >> Horne: WOULD THIS BE FOR A BUDGETARY REASON THAT THEY WOULD HAVE THE FOUR LOTS SO IT WOULD BE EASIER TO PHASE FUNDING FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS? >> I WOULD NOT KNOW. >> Horne: OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU, MS. COPELAND. ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS? >> WE DO NOT. >> Horne: SEEING NONE, CONFINE THE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. >> I MOVE WE APPROVE THIS AS SUBMITTED. >> SECOND. >> Horne: I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BRONSKY AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER STONE TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 3. PLEASE VOTE. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 IS APPROVED 6-0. ON TO THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM. >> AGENDA ITEM NO. 4. PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY REPLAT AND REVISED SITE PLAN: LEGACY WEST ADDITION BLOCK E, LOTS 2R, 5R, AND 8R - PROFESSIONAL/G ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ON LOT 2R AND VACANT LAND ON LOTS 5R AND ■ 8R ON 95.6 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HEADQUARTERS DRIVE AND LEGACY D ZONED CENTRAL BUSINESS-1. APPLICANT -- I'M SORRY. I'M SORRY. APICAN CCI 6501 LEGACY OWNERS, LLC AND KINTESU ENTERPRISES COMPANY OF AMERICA. THIS IS AN ITEM FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION. >> GOOD EVENING. DONNA FALLETTA, SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE PRELIMINARY REPLAT IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND/OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. AND THE REVISED PLAN IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY UESTIONS. >> Horne: DO COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF REGDING THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE, I'LL KNOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? >> WE DO NOT HAVE ANY SPEAKERS REGISTERED. >> Horne: SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF. >> I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE ELIMINARYEPLAT SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND/OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND THE REVISED SITE PLAN I RECOMMEND AS WELL FOR APPROVAL. >> SECOND. >> Horne: I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSONER BRONSKY AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER OLLEY TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY REPLAT AND REVISED SITE PLAN FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 4. PLEASE VOTE. THAT ITEM IS APPROVED 6-0. I WILL HAVE TO BACK UP TO AGDA ITEM NO. 3 BECAUSE I FAILED TO OPEN UP THAT COMMENT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. SO WE'RE JUST GOING TO MOVE BACK JUST A LITTLE BIT. THIS IS REGARDING ITEM NO. 3, HUNTERS GLEN 5A, BLOCK 7, LOTS 2R, 4, 5, AND 6. WE'LL OPEN THE COMMENT TO THE PUBLIC. ARE THERE ANY SPEAKERS ON THIS? >> NO, THERE ARE NOT. >> Horne: SEEING NONE, I BELIEVE IT'S STILL APPROVED. OKAY. WE WILL NOT NEED TO VOTE ON IT BECAUSE THE AGENDA ITEM W APPROVED 6-0. WE WERE JUST COVERING. MOVING ON TO THE NEXT ITEM. >> AGENDA ITEM NO. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - REVISED PRELIMINARY REPLAT: LEGACY TOWN CENTER (NORTH), BLOCK C, LOTS 2R AND 6R - PROFESSIONAL/GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ON TWO LOTS ON 7.4 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BISHOP ROAD AND LEGACY CIRCLE. ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-65- CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT-1 AND LOCATED WITHIN THE DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT. APPLICANT: TR LEGACY TOWN CENTER LLC. THIS IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION. >> THANK YOU, MS. BRIDGES. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REVISED PRELIMINARY REPLAT SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND/OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. >> Horne: DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU. WE'LL NOW OPEN THIS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. ARE THERE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKER' OPINIONS ON THIS ITEM? >> APPLICANT SARAH SCOTT IS AVAILABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. >> Horne: ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. SCOTT? ANY OTHER COMMENTS? >> NO, THERE ARE NOT. >> Horne: SEEING NONE, WE WILL NOW CONFINE THE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. >> I MOVE WE APPROVE ITEM NO. 5 SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. >> SECOND. COMMISSIONER RATLIFF AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BRONSKY TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 5. PLEASE VOTE. AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 IS APPROVED 6-0. MOVING ON TO AGENDA ITEM NO. 6. >> NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: T PRESIDING OFFICER WILL PERMIT LIMITED PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM ON THE AGENDA NOT POSTED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL ESTABLISH TIME LIMITS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKER REQUESTS, LENGTH OF THE AGENDA, AND TO ENSURE MEETING EFFICIENCY, AND MAY INCLUDE A TOTAL TIME LIMIT. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION: REQUEST TO REPEAL OBSOLETE PLANNING POLICY DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING THE DOWNTOWN PLANO LIGHT RAIL STOP - DEVELOPMENT VISION AND OBJECTIVES (1998), THE DOWNTOWN PLANO LIGHT RAIL STOP - SITE COMPARISON STUDY (1998), FAR NORTH US 75 AMENITIES TASK FORCE PLANNING GUIDELINES REPORT (1989), DESIG GUIDELINES FOR PLANO'S HISTORIC AREAS (1993), INFILL HOUSING STUDY (1995), MULTIFAMILY TASK FORCE REPORT (1998) AND VARIOUS NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLANS (1999-2008). APPLICANT: CITY OF PLANO. >> GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. I'M DREW BRAWNER, LEAD PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF AN ITEM. THE REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE TO BE DONE OVER TIM AND TONIGHT'S ITEM IS THE CONSIDERATION OF GROUP 1 OF THESE DOCUMENTS. AS A RECAP, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEVELOPING PLANS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS TO GUIDE PHYSICAL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE VISION AND GOALS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. NUMEROUS DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED OVER THE YEARS, SOME DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN ADOPTED AS EARLY AS 1981. THESE DOCUMENTS MAY NO LONGER SUPPORT THE CITY'S CURRENT DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND SOMETIMES RESULTS IN CONFUSION OR UNCERTAINTY FOR STAFF WHEN PROVIDING GUIDANCE OR RECOMMENDATIONS. THE APRIL 18, 2022 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDED A PROCESS TO REVIEW THESE LONG-STANDING PLANNING POLICY DOCUMENTS IN GROUPS BASED ON PRIORITY, EASE OF REVIEW, AND POTENTIAL NEED FOR DOCUMENT UPDATES. THE TABLE HERE SUMMARIZES THIS REVIEW PROCESS. TONIGHT'S GROUP IS NUMBER ONE, WHICH ARE POLICY DOCUMENTS RECOMMENDED FOR RETIREMENT AND REPEAL. GROUP 2 ARE PRIORITY POLICY DOCUMENTS, WHICH WOULD BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF THOSE POLICY AND PLAN UPDATES. GROUP 3 ARE POLICY DOCUMENTS TO BE REVIEWED BY A COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE. THERE ARE 12 IN TOTAL AND WE RECOMMENDED FOUR PER MEETING WITH THE SUBCOMMITTEE. AND IN GROUP 4, INCLUDE OTHER POLICY REFERENCE DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NOT ADOPTED AND THEREFORE NO REVIEW IS NEEDED BUT THEY WOULD BE MAINTAINED AS REFERENCE DOCUMENTS. SO TONIGHT GROUP 1 INCLUDES THE POLICY DOCUMENTS RECOMMENDED FOR RETIREMENT AND REPEAL. THESE ARE DOCUMENTS THAT STAFF MOST EASILY RECOMMENDS FOR RETIREMENT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. THEY ARE OUTDATED AND NO LONGER USEFUL FOR STAFF. IN MANY CASES THEY ARE EXPECTED TO BE REFERENCED AS PART OF A FUTURE DOCUMENT AND GROUPS 2 AND 3 WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE COMMISSION AT A FUTURE MEETING. THE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE GROUP 1 DOCUMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION. NO. 1 IS THE DOWNTOWN PLANO LIGHT RAIL STOP DEVELOPMENT VISION AND OBJECTIVES FROM 1998. THIS STUDY LOOKED AT THE REDEVELOPMENT VISION FOR THE BLOCK ADJACENT TO THE DOWNTOWN PLANO TRANSIT STATION. THE AREA AROUND THE STATION HAS SINCE REDEVELOPED AND THE OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ARE NOW GENERALLY COMPLETE. DOCUMENT 2 IS A COMPANION ITEM TO NO. 1. IT'S THE DOWNTOWN PLANO LIGHT RAIL STOP COMPARISON STUDY. THIS WAS AN ANALYSIS OF THE PREFERRED LOCATION FOR THE DOWNTOWN PLANO TRANSIT STATION. THIS STUDY LOOKED AT TWO AREAS, NORTH AND SOUTH OF 15th STREET. ULTIMATELY SITE B WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE STUDY TO THE NORTH OF 15th STREET. THE TRANSIT STATION HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AT THIS LOCATION AND THE OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ARE NOW COMPLEE. DOCUMENT 3 IS THE FAR NORTH U.S. 75 AMENITIES TASK FORCE PLANNING GUIDELINES REPORT FROM 1989. THIS WAS A JOINT EFFORT BETWEEN THE CITIES ALONG THE U.S. 75 CORRIDOR BETWEEN DALLAS AND ALLEN AND INCLUDING COLLIN COUNTY TO LOOK AT DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE VISUAL IMPROVEMENT ALONG THE CORRIDOR. MANY OF THESE GUIDELINES HAVE SINCE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO LOCAL REGULATIONS AND OTHER STANDARDS ARE IRRELEVANT DUE TO IMPROVEMENTS TO U.S. 75. DOCUMENT 4 ARE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PLANO'S HISTORIC AREAS FOR 1993. THISOCUE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES NEAR DOWNTOWN PLANO. SINCE THIS TIME THE CITY HAS CREATED DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE HAGGARD PARK HERITAGE DISTRICT. THE HERITAGE RECOMMENDED TO REPEAL THIS DOCUMENT AT ITS APRIL 26, 2022 MEETING . DOCUMENT 5 IS THE INFILL HOUSING STUDY FROM 1995. THIS WAS A GUIDE FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION IN THE OLDER AREAS OF PLANO INCLUDING HAGGARD PARK, OLD TOWN, AND DOUAS NEIGHBORHOOD THE DOCUMENT INCLUDED DESIGN TEMPLATES THAT WOLD BE CONSISTENT WITH OLDER HISTORIC HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE INFORMATION WAS BASED ON ECONOMIC INDICATORS THAT ARE NOW OUTDATED AND THE FINDINGS ARE NO LONGER PERTINENT. THE HERITAGE COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER MAKING A RECOMMENDATION ON THE REPEAL OF THIS DOCUMENT AT ITS MAY 24, 2022 MEETING. DOCUMENT 6 IS THE MULTIFAMILY TASK FORCE REPORT FROM 1998. THIS REPORT EVALUATED THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT POLICIES REGARDING MULTIFAMILY HOUSING AT THE TIME. THE CITY P TOGETHER A MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS TASK FORCE WHICH RECOMMENDED POLICY CHANGES AND THESE CHANGES WERE INCORPORATED INTO UPDATES OF THE 1986 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE REPORT IS BASED ON POLICIES OF THE PREVIOUS 1986 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IS NOW CONSIDERED OUTDATED. UPDATED POLICIES REGARDING MULTIFAMILY HAVE ALSO BEEN RECENTLY ADOPTED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2021. AND THEN FINALLY NO. 7 IS A COLLECTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLANS. THESE PLANS WERE DEVELOPED BETWEEN 1999 AND 2008 BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING PROGRAM OF THE FORMER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. THESE PLANS IDENTIFY STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS TO ADDRESS NEIGHBORHOOD-LEVEL ISSUES. THE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONTINUES TO SUPPORT THESE NEIGHBORHOODS WITH OTHER INITIATIVES SUCH AS LOVE WHERE YOU LIVE AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGREES WITH THE RETIREMENT OF THESE PLANS SINCE THEY ARE NOW OUTDATED. THIS SLIDE LISTS THOSE 15 NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLANS RECOMMENDED FOR REPEAL BETWEEN 1999 AND 2008 STARTING WITH THE OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN IN '99 AND ENDING WITH THE STRATFORD ESTATES ACTION NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN IN 2008. IN SUMMARY, STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PLANNING POLICY DOCUMENTS OUTLINED IN THIS REPORT AND RECOMMENDS THEY BE RETIRED THROUGH APPEAL OF THE ASSOCIATED. IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR ITS CONSIDERATION AT THE JUNE 13, 2022 MEETING. IF REPEALED THE DOCUMENTS WILL BE RETAINED FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES IN DEPARTMENT RECORDS . STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. WE ALSO HAVE KEISHA HERE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DEPARTME. >> Horne: THANK YOU, MR. BRAWNER. THIS WAS A HERCULEAN JOB. I KNOW WE HAVE BEEN TACKLING THIS SINCE APRIL 2022, YOU AND THE STAFF, MR. BELL HAS BEEN PART OF IT, HAS DONE A GREAT JOB CULLING THIS AND WORKING WITH THE CHAIRMAN DOWNS AND MYSELF ON PUTTING THIS TOGETHER. AS WE DISCUSSED IN PREVIOUS MEETINGS, WE'RE GOING TO ALLOCATE, GET THE FIRST ONES, THE EASY ONES OFF THE TABLE FIRST SO WE CAN MOVE ON TO TAKE MORE SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION. BUT I WANT TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION AND TO THE COMMISSION'S ATTENTION THESE DOCUMENTS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TO RETIRE WERE DONE WITH PLANO.LP OF CITIZENS OF- SO WE HAVE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE GREAT WORK THAT THEY DID, STARTING BACK IN '88 ALL THE WAY THROUGH THESE NEIGHBORHOOD DOCUMENTS THAT YOU'RE SEEING IN 2008. WE APPLAUD THEM AND GREATLY APPRECIATE THEIR SUPPORT ON HELPING US GET TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PLUS WITH ALL THE OTHER PLANS THAT WE'VE INCORPORATED. THEIR WORK TO MAKE US THE CITY OF EXCELLENCE. SO, AGAIN, THANK YOU AND TO THE STAFF AND THE CITIZENS OF PLANO FOR DOING THAT. THAT BEING SAID, DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. BRAWNER? >> NO QUESTIONS. I JUST WANTED TO SECOND WHAT CHAIRMAN HORNE SAID. THE FACT THAT MOST OF THIS DOCUMENT SHOWS OBJECTIVES COMPLETED SHOWS A CONTINUITY WITHIN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND THE VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY THAT IS USUALLY NOT THE CASE IN MOST OTHER MUNICIPALITIES, SO KUDOS TO YOU ALL. >> Horne: OKAY. SO DO WE HAVE A CONSENSUS OF MOVING FORWARD WITH THE REPEAL OF THESE PLANS TO PUSH FORWARD WITH THE CORPUS CHRISTI WITH THE HELP OF THE HERITAGE COMMISSION? WITH THAT BEING SAID -- >> [OFF MIC] >> Horne: ARE THERE ANY SPEAKERS ON THIS? >> THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS. >> Horne: SEEING NONE, OKAY. SO -- >> MR. CHAIRMAN, YOU KNOW, I'M REALLY EXCITED TO SEE THAT AFTER TWO YEARS OF WORK BY THE CPRC AND A LOT OF THE CITIZENS AND STAFF AND PLANO THAT WE NOW HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT BRINGS US ALL BACK TOGETHER AND SOMETHING YOU SAID IS VERY IMPORTANT TO ME AND THAT WAS THAT WE'RE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE DEVELOPMENT THAT OUR COMMUNITY DESIRES AND SO I'M VERY PROUD OF THE EFFORT THAT WAS PUT FORWARD BY EVERYONE IN PLANO WHO SERVED ON ALL OF THIS AND IN RECOGNIZING ALL OF THAT WE ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT THE NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN 2021 IS ARRIVED IN A FULFILLMENT OF A LOT OF THIS AND SO I MOVE THAT WE REPEAL THESE 21 PLANNING POLICY DOCUMENTS. >> SECOND. >> Horne: THAT BEING SAID, DO WE JUST VOTE ON IT? >> WE'RE JUST LOOKING FOR CONSENSUS AT THIS POINT. RECOMMENDATIONS. >> Horne: ANYBODY WANT TO DEVIATE FROM THE RECOMMENDATION AS PRESENTED? NO? AHEAD AND RECOMMEND THE REPEAL OF THE 21 OBSOLETE PLANNING POLICY DOCUMENTS OUTLINED IN THIS NARRATIVE. THANK YOU. OKAY. NOW THE LAST ITEM, ARE THERE ANY ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDA? SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE MEETING AT 7:35. [MEETING ADJOURNED]