[SOUNDING GAVEL] >>ORLANDO GUDES: GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. I CALL TAMPA CITY COUNCIL TO ORDER. [OFF MICROPHONE.] ROLL CALL. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: >>JOSEPH CITRO: HERE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: HERE. >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HERE -- >> OF THE TAMPA CITY COUNCIL IS BEING CONDUCTED WITH A LIVE IN-PERSON QUORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL PRESENT IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. HOWEVER, HEALTH STANDARDS OR GUIDANCE NOW IN EFFECT, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HAVE THE ABILITY TO APARTMENT BY VIDEO TELECONFERENCING MEDIA TECHNOLOGY. LIVESTREAM, WORD WORD. NOW, THERE HAS BEEN MULTIPLE WAYS THAT THE PUBLIC IS ABLE TO PARTICIPATE, AND THOSE ARE FOUND ON THE CITY WEB PAGE. IN ORDER TO PARTICIPANT REMOTELY THROUGH CMT, PREREGISTRATION WAS REQUIRED, AND THAT INFORMATION ON HOW TO DO THAT AND WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE IS AT TAMPA.GOV/QUASI- NOW, COUNCIL, THERE HAVE BEEN OPPORTUNITIES TO SEND IN COMMENTS IN ADVANCE VIA U.S. MAIL AND E-MAIL, AND WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED BY E-MAIL OR U.S. MAI HAVE BEEN DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL, AND WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE PERMANENT RECORD OF THE MEETING. ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED ARE BEING GIVEN EQUAL CONSIDERATION OR SHOULD BE AFFORDED EQUAL CONSIDERATION AS IF THE COMMENTS WERE MADE IN PERSON. I SHOULD POINT OUT THAT IF YOU ARE GOING TO BE PARTICIPATING ON THE GO TO MEETINGS PLATFORM, PLEASE DO NOT USE THE CHAT BOX TO COMMUNITY WITH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. THAT'S FOR TECHNICAL ISSUES ONLY. AGAIN DO NOT COMMUNICATE USING THE CHAT BOX. ALL OF THESE RULES THAT I HAVE TALKED ABOUT, CMT, HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE NOTICE THAT HAS BEEN POSTED AND ALSO WITHIN THE AGENDA, AND I WOULD ALSO CITY COUNCIL TO MAKE A MOTION TO ADOPT THOSE RULES, THE CMT ASSOCIATED RULES AS PART OF THE MEETING PLEASE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO MOVED. MR. CITRO SECONDS. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. >>MARTIN SHELBY: AFTER YOU OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, MR. CHAIRMAN, I BELIEVE JENNIFER MALONE WILL BE DISCUSSING SOME OF THE HOUSEKEEPING MATTERS ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA I. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. VIERA IS ONLINE NOW. AND MR. DINGFELDER WILL BE ABOUT 15 MINUTES LATE. OKAY. MOVED BY MR. DINGFELDER. SECOND BY MR. VIERA. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF WE CAN BEFORE MS. MALONE BEGINS, WITH ITEM NUMBER 1, IF YOU CAN ADDRESS SOME O THE CONTINUANCES, OR OTHER HOUSEKEEPING MATTERS, MOVING THINGS UP ON THE AGENDA MAY HAVE BEEN REQUESTED. MS. MALONE. >>JENNIFER MALONE: GOOD EVENING CHAIRMAN. ITEM NUMBER 7, TA/CPA 14, THE APPLICANTS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE, AS WELL AS ITEM NUMBER 12, 21-13, AND I BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE HERE TO REQUEST THOSE TO YOU TONIGHT. I WOULD ALSO ASK THAT -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: SORRY TO INTERRUPT. MAY WE TAKE THOSE ONE AT A TIME? UNLESS THEY ARE ACTUALLY RELATED IN SOME FORM OR FASHION. BECAUSE EACH ONE RUIRES A SEPARATE VOTE. >>JENNIFER MALONE: SHOULD WE SAVE THAT FOR THE RECORD THEN? >>MARTIN SHELBY: SURE, LET'S TAKE THEM SEPARATELY AND THEN MOVE TO THE NEXT ITEM. >>JENNIFER MALONE: ITEM NUMBER 7 IS -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I MOVE IT BE CONTINUED TO JANUARY -- 2020. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF WE COULD AND --TATE THE TIME, PLEASE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WOULD IMAGINE AT 6:00 IN THE EVENING. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA. >>MARTIN SHELBY: ITEM NUMBER 7 AT 6:00, BECAUSE COUNCIL HAS NOT MADE A DECISION AS TO WHAT TIME IT WANTS TO BEGIN AFTER THE FIRST OF THE NEW YEAR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO SECONDED IT. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED. >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT AGAIN IS JANUARY 20th. THANK YOU. >>JENNIFER MALONE: ITEM NUMBER 12, THE APPLICANT REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE BUT I DO NOT KNOW TO WHICH DATE THEY ARE GOING TO REQUEST SO I AM GOING TO HAND IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: DO WE HAVE THE APPLICANT ONLINE, ON THE SECOND FLOOR OR REGISTERED? >>THE CLERK: YES. SHE'S ONLINE, IF YOU COULD UNMUTE YOURSELF AND ALSO TURN ON THE VIDEO. >>ORLANDO GUDES: TURN THE VIDEO MA'AM. MADAM DEPUTY CLERK, DO WE HAVE HER? >> YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. >> CLICK ON THE MIKE ICON. >> I FIGURED IT OUT. MY NAME IS TERESA HADDOCK, CHAIRMAN OF SHOWMAN'S, INC., A NOT-FOR-PROFIT, AND A RESTING PLACE FOR THE MEMBERS OF THE ASSOCIATION. WE ARE HERE TONIGHT THIS EVENING TO RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A CONTINUANCE UNTIL FEBRUARY 22ND, 2022, TO ALLOW US MORE TIME TO MEET WITH THE NEIGHBORS AND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO SHARE OUR PLAN. THERE SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF MISCONCEPTIONS FLOWING AROUND AT THIS POINT, AND EXPECT THE PROPERTY IS PART OF WOODLAWN CEMETERY, WHICH IT'S NOT, AND REMAINS BURIED ON THE PROPERTY IN PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'M SORRY. M SORRY TO INTERRUPT. >>THE CLERK: >> THAT'S FINE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MY NAME IS MARTIN SHELBY. I'M THE CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY. RATHER THAN GET INTO THE FACTS TONIGHT -- >> OKAY. >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND DID YOU SAY FEBRUARY 22ND? >> THAT'S THE REQUEST, THEY SAID THAT WAS THE EARLIEST AVAILABLE. >>MARTIN SHELBY: WE HAVE FEBRUARY 24th WHICH IS A THURSDAY, ACCORDING TO THE CALENDAR. THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 24. UNCI DOE NOT MEET ON THE 22ND. >> WELL, I JUST GOT SOME BAD INFORMATION, AND I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A CONTINUANCE TO FEBRUARY 24th -- >>MARTIN SHELBY: NO, YOU CAN STATE WHAT THE BASIS WOULD BE WITHOUT GETTING INTO THE SPECIFIC FACTS OF THE MATTER BECAUSE WE ARE OUTSIDE BEING ABLE TO BRICK IT IN FOR A HEARING BECAUSE IF YOU WANT TO ADDRESS YOUR REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE. >> THANK YOU. >> SO YOU DO WANT ME TO SAY WHY I WANT A CONTINUANCE? >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES. >> WELL, I FEEL LIKE THERE'S A LOT OF MISCONCEPTIONS. I THINK THAT'S WRITE WAS HEADED. I FEEL LIKE AS THE APPLICANT WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE MORE TIME TO GET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PLAN AS THE FACTS AS WE KNOW THEM INSTEAD OF THE MISCONCEPTIONS THAT ARE GOING ON, AND WE FELT THATITH THE CONTINUANCE, WITH MORE TIME, WE COULD -- HAVE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHY AND WHAT WE WERE HOPING TO ACCOMPLISH. >>JOSEPH CITRO: MR. CHAIR, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK IN FILE TA/CPA 21-13 ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE UNTIL FEBRUARY 24, 2022 AT 6:00 P.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECONDED IT. A? ANY OPPOSED? >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF I CAN, MR. CHAIRMAN. AND CORRECT ME FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S PERSPECTIVE WITH REGARD TO NOTICE. IF THERE IS PUBLIC, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO ARE LISTENING, WHETHER DOWNSTAIRSORS MAYBE THOSE REGISTERED ONLINE, AND THE MATTER NOW IS DON'T CONTINUED, THE ONLY NOTICE THEY ARE RECEIVING WILL BE THE NOTICE THAT THEY ARE HERE TONIGHT. IS THAT CORRECT? >>JENNIFER MALONE: THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING YES. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF YOU DON'T MIND, THIS ITEM AIN, THIS ITEM NUMBER 12, WILL NOT BE HEARD TONIGHT, AND IT IS CONTINUED BY CITY COUNCIL TO THE 24th OF FEBRUARY. FEBRUARY 24th OF 2022 AT 6:00 P.M. THERE WILL BE NO OTHER NOTICE GIVEN, SO PLEASE DO MAKE A NOTE OF IT. AND PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOU ARE ONLINE, THE MATTER WILL NOT BE HEARD TONIGHT, BUT HAS BEEN CONTINUED BY MOTION OF CITY COUNCIL. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >> AND THANK YOU. I ARECIE YOUR TIME. >>JENNIFER MALONE: I HAVE TWO MORE HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS. FIRST WE ARE REQUESTING THAT ITEM NUMBER 15 -- >>ORLANDO GUDES: MS. MALONE, ONE SECOND. IN CASE WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE OR ANYBODY DOWNSTAIRS, THE PREVIOUS ITEM HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO THE FEBRUARY 24th, 2022. MS. MALONE, YOU MAY CONTINUE. >>JENNIFER MALONE: WE ARE REQUESTING THAT ITEM 15, TA/CPA 21-21 MOVED TO NUMBER ONE ON THE AGENDA. >>ORLANDO GUDES: 15, TO ITEM NUMBER 1. ALL RIGHT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: WAS THERE ANOTHER ONE THAT ALSO HAD TO BE MOVED UP? >>JENNIFER MALONE: WE ARE ALSO REQUESTING THAT ITEM NUMBER 13, CIP AND CIS FOR 2021 IS MOVED TO ITEM NUMBER 2. THAN YOU. >>MARTIN SHELBY: ANYTHING ELSE, MS. MALONE? >>JENNIFER MALONE: THAT WAS IT. AND THEN WHENEVER WE ARE READY TO TAKE ITEM NUMBER 1, 21-21, I WOULD LIKE PERMISSION TO SHARE MY SCREEN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT, MS. MALONE, ITEM NUMBER 13 -- 15, WHICH IS ITEM NUMBER 1. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE, PLANNING COMMISSION. I AM ACTUALLY GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO MARK HUDSON. >> MARK HUDSON, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. CAN YOU HEAR ME? >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, SIR, WE CAN HEAR YOU. >> GREAT. MARK HUDSON, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, HERE THIS EVENING TO PRESENT TO YOU A PROPERTY RIGHT NOW FOR INCLUSION IN YOUR IMAGINE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. JENNIFER, IF I COULD HAVE THE NEXT SLIDE. THE REASON THAT I AM HE THIS EVENING IS A NEW ELEMENT FOR YOUR PLAN, SURROUNDING THE ISSUE OF PROPERTY RIGHTS. THIS NEW ELEMENT IS REQUIRED BY SOME ACTION TAKEN DURING THE LAST LEGISLATIVE SESSION KNOWN AS HOUSE BILL 59. GOVERNOR DESANTIS SIGNED THIS ON JUNE 29th AND IT BECAME EFFECTIVE JULY 1st OF THIS YEAR. THE ELEMENT IS DESIGNED TO ENSURE THE PROPERTY RIGHTS ARE CONSIDERED, AND LOCAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IS IN TAMPA, AND IT IMPACTS EVERY SINGLE JURISDICTION IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. OUR STAFF AND YOUR STAFF HAS ANALYZED THIS AND WE TAKE THE IMPACT OF THE SETTLEMENT AS RATHER LIMITED. THE CITY IS MINDFUL TO PROTECT PROPERTY RIGHTS OF ITS CITIZENS. HOWEVER, THERE IS THIS INCLUDED IN YOUR LANGUAGE NOW. THERE IS A PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO DO SO, AND PRIMARILY WHAT IT DOES IS IT IMPOSES DELAYS IN THE PROCESSING OF OTHER PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLANNED AMENDMENTS THAT Y 1st OF THIS YEAR. IF I COULD HAVE THE NEXT SLIDE. THIS NEW ELEMENT IS RATHER SLIM. WE ARE REQUIRED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY TO BE VERY MINDFUL AND STICK TO THE INTENT OF THE LEGISLATION. THERE IS OPPORTUNITY AT A LATER DATE, ON A FUTURE BASIS, TO ADD ANYMORE DINGS AT THE DESIRE OF THE CITY, BUT CURRENTLY WE HAVE ONE GOAL, ONE OBJECTIVE AND ONE POLICY. THE POLICY READS: ACKNOWLEDGE PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS TO ENSURE THAT CONSIDERATION IN THE LOCAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, AND THE OBJECTIVE IS TO RESPECT PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE CITY OF TAMPA. IF I COULD HAVE THE NEXT SLIDE. AND I WON'T READ -- THIS IS A SINGLE POLICY BUT THIS LANGUAGE COMES VERBATIM OUT OF THE LEGISLATION. OUR STAFF AGAIN HAS ANALYZED THIS AND ALSO IN YOUR LEGAL AND PLANNING STAFF HAS TAKEN A LOOK AT THIS, AND WE DO NOT FEEL THAT IT HAS -- WE DON'T FEEL IT HAS MAJOR IMPACT TO THE OPERATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY. IF I COULD HAVE THE NEXT SLIDE. OUR STAFF DID REVIEW THIS TO ENSURE THAT IT WAS CONSISTENT IN THE PLAN, AND PARTICULARLY WE LOOKED AT THE GOALS, 20 OF THEM, THAT ARE IN YOUR FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT WHICH ARE BASICALLY DESIGNED TO IMPLEMENT THE OVERALL VISION OF THE COMMUNITY. THESE ARE GOALS RELATED TO LIVABLE CITIES, THE CENTRAL CITY, MIXED USE CORRIDORS AND THE LAKE, AND WE FEEL THAT THIS NEW ELEMENT WILL NOT IMPEDE YOUR ABILITY TO REACH THOSE GOALS. WE DO BELIEVE THAT THIS MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF 59 AND WE ASK FOR AN OFFICIAL REVIEW BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY, AND AN OFFICIAL REVIEW, BUT WE FEEL CONFIDENT THAT WE WILL MEAT THOSE REQUIREMENTS. AGAIN, WE DID APPLY THIS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND SIIFICCE.HING OF MAJOR NEXT SLIDE. THIS IS A TIMELINE THAT WE ARE OPERATING ON FOR THE CITY OF TAMPA. THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THIS OWN AUGUST 24th AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE ARE HERE TO HOLD A TRANSMITTAL HERE THIS EVENING PROJECTING AN ADOPTION DATE TO BRING THIS BACK TO YOU AT THE BEGINNING OF NEXT YEAR, JANUARY 27th. I WILL SAY WE ARE DOING THIS FOR ALL THE JURISDICTIONS IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. I AM THE 21st. TEMPLE TERRACE TNSMIED THERE'S, THE ONES THAT I JUST PRESENTED TO YOU. PLANT CITY ON THE 27th, THIS PAST MONDAY. AND WE EXPECT THE COUNTY TO DO LIKEWISE IN THE LATTER HALF OF OCTOBER. IF I CAN HAVE THE NEXT SLIDE. WITH THAT, PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND THIS IS A TRANSMITTAL HEARING, AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: FIRST OF ALL, I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE POLICIES ARE, AND SO FORTH, I BELIEVE I DO. BY ORDINANCE, NUMBER 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THIS IS BY POLICY. I HAVE A CONCERN THERE. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE -- I WAS READING THE WHOLE TEXT ON THIS NUMBER ONE ITEM. NUMBER 3, THIS PLAN SPECIFICALLY, 809 WEST LINEBAUGH HEAVE AVENUE. NUMBER 4, THE CATEGORY IN GENERAL FOR MIXED USE. NUMBER 5, HOWEVER, IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT. IT SPECIFICALLY SAYS NORTH OF ADAMO DRIVE AND EAST OF FOREST LAKE. IT DOESN'T SAY HOW FAR NORTH OR HOW FAR EAST. IT COULD GO ALL THE WAY TO ST. PETERSBURG, I GUESS. NUMBER 6. NUMBER 7, WE TALKED ABOUT TEMPLE CREST PARK. NUMBER 8, CEMETERY. NUMBER 9 ONLY SPEAKS DIRECTLY TO THE DEL RIO POOL WHICH I THINK IS CUSCADEN PARK, I'M NOT SURE. AND NUMBER 10. WHEN I LOOK AT THAT, I DON'T TRY TO HIDE THEM WITH HAIR, YOU HAVE HOW FAR NORTH AND HOW FAR EAST, AND CAN YOU ANSWER ME THAT QUESTION? >> I'M AFRAID AS RELATE TO THE ITEMS THAT I JUST PRESENTED. IS THAT ANOTHER AGENDA ITEM? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WELL, WHAT WE CAN DO AND NOT DO, LESS THAN ONE ACRE, MORE THAN ONE ACRE? THAT'S THE SAME THING WE ARE TALKING ABOUT? >> THAT'S MR. HEY OR MS. MALONE MIGHT BE ABLE TO RESPOND. >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THIS WAS ORIGINALLY ITEM 15. AND WE HAVE MOVED 15 UP TO NUMBER 1, WHICH IS TA/CPA 21-21. I THINK YOU ARE REFERENCING A DIFFERENT FILE NUMBER. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WELL, 15 AS I LOOK AT IT, A GENERIC ONE, WHAT YOU CAN DO AND YOU SHOULD DO BY LAW. AM I CORRECT? >>DAVID HEY: WELL, IT'S SPECIFICALLY IN REGARDS TO HOUSE BILL 59. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: RIGHT. >>DAVID HEY: AND HAS JURISDICTION TO IMPLEMENT WITHIN THEIR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: RIGHT. AND THEN I READ WAS NOT SPECIFIC TO THAT, BECAUSE THIS IS SPECIFIC. HOW IS NUMBER 1 ON THE AGENDA? AND THIS IS ITEM NUMBER 2 NOW, IS THAT IT? >>ORNDO GUDES: NO. THEY ASKED FOR ITEM NUMBER 15 TO BECOME NUMBER ONE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THEN THIS ONE IS NOT ONE. IT'S 1-A. IT DOESN'T HAVE A NUMBER 1. >>ORLANDO GUDES: NUMBER 15 IS NOW NUMBER 1, AND -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: OH, I SEE. I APOLOGIZE FOR WASTING YOUR TIME. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE ARE JUST TAKING 15 AND 13. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SO EVERYONE KNOWS WHERE YOU ARE GOING. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR ITEM NUMBER 15, MOVED TO NUMBER 1? >>THE CLERK: IN A REGISTERED SPEAKERS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: LL RIGHT. MR. MANISCALCO MOVED. CITRO SECONDED IT. ROLL CALL. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH DINGFELDER BEING ABSENT AT VOTE. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I LOOK FORWARD TO BEING BEFORE YOU BEGIN IN JANUARY 20232. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 13. MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN? >> WE CAN SEE IT. GO AHEAD. >> THANK YOU. [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] >>ORLANDO GUDES: ONE MINUTE. ONE MINUTE, SIR. DO YOU HAVE A LITTLE VOLUME SO WE CAN HEAR HIM? TRY IT AGAIN, SIR. >> DIEGO GUERRA, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THIS IS AN ANNUAL UPDATE REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTES. CHAPTER 150 REQUIRES THAT THE SCHEDULED PROJECT ADOPT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ON AN ANNUAL . IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -- [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] AND THESE ITEMS MAKE UP THE SCHEDULED PROJECT. IT IS PERMITTED BY THE CHAPTER WHICH IS NOT THE NORMAL PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS. ADDITIONALLY, THE PLANS ARE ADOPTED BY REFERENCE THROUGH THE POLICIES. TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER AND -- [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS A SCHEDULE WITH RESPECT TO THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE PLAN, 1.2.68. THE SCHEDULED FUNDING FOR PROJECTS THAT ARE -- [~DISTORTION~] AT A TIME PROPOSED AND 5.0 AND 5.6, POLICIES OF THE 2040 COMPHENSE PLAN, AND RECOMMEND THAT CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THIS IS THE PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS ON ITEM NUMBER 13? ANY QUESTIONS? ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC, ON THE SECOND FLOOR, OR REGISTERED? >> NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE. REGARDING PROJECTS TOTALING 1.78 MILLION, AM I CORRECT ON WHAT IT IS? >>ORLANDO GUDES: PLANNING COMMISSION? >> DIEGO: THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND THE CITY'S ANNUAL BUDGET. [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] -- THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THAT'S IT FOR ME. I'M FINE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: NOBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR AND NOBODY REGISTERED? >> THAT'S CORRECT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO MOVED TO CLO. AND SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I HAVE AN ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SECTION BY REPLACING THE CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SECTION SCHEDULE OF PROJECTS WITH THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULED OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2026 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES INONFLT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO SECOND. ROLL CALL. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH DINGFELDER BEING ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 21st AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. WE WILL GO TO ITEM NUMBER 1. MS. MALONE. >>JENNIFER MALONE: PLANNING COMMISSION. MAY I HAVE PERMISSION TO SHARE MY SCREEN? OKAY. THIS IS ITEM NUMBER 1. TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 21-01, AN ADOPTION HEARING IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. AS A REFRESHER, THIS WAS PRIVATELY INITIATED. IT WAS TRANSMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY BY THIS COUNCIL ON IT ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT. YOU MIGHT RECALL BACK IN JUNE THE LANGUAGE WAS APPENDED AT THE DIRECTION OF CITY COUNCIL, SO IT IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF GENERALLY ACHIEVES THE SAME PURPOSE WITH SOME MORE RESTRICTIONS SO THE PROPOSED POLICY WILL EXPAND ON THE WEIGHT AND OBJECTIVES, FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WHICH CAN BE ACHIEVED THROUGH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE ZONING, AND WITHIN A HALF MILE OF AN URBAN VILLAGE. ON THE NEXT SCREEN I WILL SHOW THE LANGUAGE THAT WAS TRANSMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. FOR THE LAND USE POLICY 5.1.6 ALREADY EXISTS IN THE PLAN AND THE PROPOSAL IS JUST TO EXPAND IT TO ALLOW THE PROVISION TO TAKE PLACE OUTSIDE OF THE PURCHASE BAN VILLAGE WITHIN A HALF MILE SO IT CANNOT -- IN TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF DID FIND THE LANGUAGE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES AND RECOMMENDING TO YOU TODAY FOR ADOPTION. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. AND THE APPLICANT IS ON THE LINE AS WELL. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS? MR. MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I HATE TO BE AN OLD HORSE LIKE MYSELF, BUT THIS IS THE SECOND NUMBER ONE THAT I WAS A LITTLE CONFUSED IN THE BEGINNING. BUT LET ME SAY THIS. THIS IS BY POLICY, AND THESE ARE SET BY ORDINANCE, I BELIEVE, BUT JUST READING THIS THING, AND IN THE WRONG AVENUE HERE, WHEN I WENT THROUGH THE LISTINGS THAT I SAW ON ANOTHER PAGE ONE AND FURTHER DOWN, IT WAS SPECIFICALLY ON THE LINE ITEMS, MOBILITY, STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT, BLAH-BLAH-BLAH, 809 WEST LINEBAUGH AVENUE. MOBILITY STAFF, CITY OF TAMPA, DOES NOT OBJECT TO WHAT, AMENDMENT IN COLLEGE PARK, TEMPLE CREST PARK, AMENDMENT OF WOODLAWN CEMETERY, DEL RIO POOL, CIRCLE PARK. HOWEVER, WHEN I COME TO WHAT I CALL -- IT TALKS ABOUT FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND IT SAYS IN BROAD FORM GENERALLY NORTH OF ADAMO DRIVE. WELL, ANYTHING NORTH OF ADAMO DRIVE CAN GO ALL THE WAY TO THE END OF DISTRICT 6 WHICH IS 109, IF I RECALL. OUT THERE THE NORTHERNMOST PART ON THE OTHER SIDE OF FOWLER AVENUE. THEN YOU GO EAST TO NUCCIO PARKWAY AND HERE IS WHERE IT BECOMES TRICKY BECAUSE EAST OF NORTH NUCCIO PARKWAY, 14th STREET, NUCCIO PARKWAY ALL THE WAY HEADING SOUTH, AND MEANDERING MANNER TO THE CASS AND NEBRASKA. SO MY QUESTION IS TO MYSELF, THAT'S WHY I BRING IT UP TO EVERYBODY ELSE SO MYSELF CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON, IT'S VERY SIMPLE. HOW FAR NORTH ARE WE GOING WITH THIS? AND HOW FAR EAST? BECAUSE IT CAN BE A SMALL PARCEL OF LAND OR A BIG ONE. IT'S GOT TO BE MORE THAN I BELIEVE ONE ACRE, AT LEAST ONE ACRE, BUT IT DOESN'T SAY HOW BIG. AND THIS IS REALLY -- >>JENNIFER MALONE: YES. I AM GOING TO SHARE MY SCREEN AGAIN SO I CAN EXPLAIN IT A LITTLE BETTER. THIS IS THE OUTLINE, BUT THIS IS THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. SO IT ENCOMPASSES A LOT OF THE CITY, AND THEN THE URBAN VILLAGES ARE WHAT'S IN THESE COLORS. SO RIGHT NOW, CAN ONLY UTILIZE WHAT'S IN THE URBAN VILLAGES, D B UTILIZED WITHIN A HALF MILE RADIUS OF THE URBAN VILLAGE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: DOES AT APOCALYPTIC TO ALL OF THE ONES THAT I MENTIONED? >>JENNIFER MALONE: THE ONCE YOU MENTIONED? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I MENTIONED MOBILITY, VERY SPECIFIC, CIRCLE PARK, VERY SPECIFIC, DEL RIO POOL, VERY SPECIFIC, TEMPLE CREST PARK, AND VERY SPECIFIC, 809 WEST LINEBAUGH. IT'S NOT VERY SPECIFIC, IN BROAD FORM. SO IF YOU LOOK AT YOUR MAP, IT SAYS NORTH OF ADAMO DRIVE. YOU CAN JUST ABOUT TELL WHERE IT'S AT. A AND THEN EAST OF NUCCIO PARKWAY. IT COULD GO ALL THE WAY -- >>JENNIFER MALONE: SORRY, DAVID. >>DAVID HEY: THIS IS DAVID HEY. I THINK ARE YOU REFERENCING THE CITY'S COMMENTS IN REGARDS TO THE OTHER AMENDMENTS? BECAUSE SOMETIMES THE CITY INCLUDES THEIR COMMENTS IN ONE MAIL OF ALL THE AMENDMENTS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: >>ORLANDO GUDES: WHERE ARE YOU TRYING TO GO WITH THIS? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I AM NOT TRYING TO GO ANYWHERE. I AM TRYING TO POINT OUT -- >>ORLANDO GUDES: I SEE WHERE YOU ARE GOING, AND I LOOK AT THE SPECIFIC AREAS THAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YOU MIGHT BE ON THE RIGHT TRACK, DICK TRACY. COLOMBO TAUGHT ME A LOT OF THINGS. AND THIS IS ONE OF THEM. IT'S HARD FOR ME, IF ANY OTHER% COUNCIL MEMBERS ASK A QUESTION, WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS ITEM? AND I SAY, I DON'T KNOW, IT'S JUST EAST OF NUCCIO PARKWAY AND TE ME WHERE.O DRIVE. I CAN'T TELL THEM WHERE. THAT'S ALL. >>JENNIFER MALONE: AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE CAN PROBABLY HELP ANSWER THE QUESTION HIS PRESENTATION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: GOOD. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF MS. MALONE BEFORE WE HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT? MR. HUDSON. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'M HERE A W DA ONLY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF MS. MALONE? LET'S HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. >>TYLER HUDSON: 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE. I'M THE APPLICANT FOR THIS TEXT AMENDMENT. IF I CAN SHARE MY SCREEN REAL QUICK. CAN YOU SEE MY SCREEN? >>ORLANDO GUDES: OH, THERE IT IS. >>TYLER HUDSON: SO A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND ON HOW WE GOT HERE, THIS APPLICATION WAS FILED BACK IN JANUARY OF THIS YEAR, IN APRIL, THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT, IN MAY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. WE WERE HERE IN LATE JUNE FOR THE TRANSMITTAL HEARINGS AND ACTUALLY HAD A PRETTY FULL CONVERSATION ABOUT WHAT THIS DOES, WHAT THIS TEXT AMENDMENT DOES, AND WHAT IT DOES VERY SPECIFICALLY. COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER AND OTHER MEMBERS OF COUNCIL HAD SOME CONCERNS, THE SPECIFIC GOAL WAS THAT WE WERE USING A HAMMER WHEN ALL WE NEEDED WAS A FLY SWATTER. SO AT THAT SAME HEARING, WAS KIND ENOUGH TO WORK ON A MORE NARROWLY TEXT AMENDMENT WHICH THIS COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE TRANSMITTAL UP TO TALLAHASSEE. AND SINCE JUNE, THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY HAD NO OBJECTIONS. SO PART OF THE PROBLEM THAT WE ARE TRYING TO FIX WITH THIS TEXT AMENDMENT -- OOPS, SORRY. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I SEE WHAT YOU HAVE HERE BUT I CAN'T DIE JUST IT, IT'S SO SMALL. AND WHAT YOU JUST SAID -- AND I BELIEVE WHAT YOU SAID IS CORRECT, MR. HUDSON. HOWEVER, WHAT HAPPENS IN POLITICS YOU VOTE ON SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING EXACTLY WHAT WE VOTED ON. THIS WOULD BE LAND EAST OF NUCCIO PARKWAY AND WEST -- NORTH, NO MORE NORTH, ALL THE WAY OUT? OR IT COULD BE ALL THE WAY OUT TO I THINK IT'S PRECINCT 109, UP THERE NEAR THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY AND THE COUNTY ON THAT SIDE OF DISTRICT 6, MR. MANISCALCO'S. AND ALL I AM ASKING FOR IS, WHERE IS THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY AT? YOU OUGHT TO KNOW. >>TYLER HUDSON: THIS IS A TEXT AMENDMENT, SO UNLIKE MOST OF THE OTHER MAP AMENDMENTS THAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU, AND YOU MENTIONED SOME CITIZENS AND CITY DICAD PARKS, THIS AMENDMENT BEFORE YOU IS JUST TO ADD A PARAGRAPH OF WORDS INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE STATUS OF ANY INDIVIDUAL PIECE OF LAND AT ALL. IT DOES NOT DO THAT. IT IS A TEXT AMENDMENT. WHAT I AM SHOWING YOU ON SCREEN OR WHAT GENERAL I HAVE SHOWED EARLIER IS THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. AND THE PARAGRAPH, THE WORDS THAT WE ARE ASKING YOU TO ADD TONIGHT INTO THE COMP PLAN, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THOSE WORDS COULD ONLY APPLY WITHIN THE OVERALL BOUNDARY YOU ARE SEEING. THAT'S THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, WHICH AS THIS COUNCIL I THINK HAS INDICATED AND MIGHT INDICATE ON A LATER ITEM TONIGHT, IS AN AREA OF THE CITY WHERE WE SEEM TO SEE MORE GROWTH BECAUSE IT DOESN'T ENCOMPASS WHAT WE THINK OF AS THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE CITY. NOW THESE CIRCLES AND SLATCHES, SO TO SPEAK, THAT ARE ON SCREEN, THOSE ARE URBAN VILLAGES. RIGHT NOW IF YOU ARE IN AN URBAN VILLAGE, AND YOU ARE A PROJECT THAT'S A PD REZONING, THAT COMES TO THIS GROUP FOR REZONING APPROVAL, AND LET'S SAY YOU HAVE TWO DIFFERENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES WITHIN YOUR DEVELOPMENT, YOU ARE ALLOWED TO ADD THEM UP AND BLEND THEM TOGETHER WITHIN YOUR SITE. IT PREVENTS THINGS FROM BEING LOPSIDED, FROM ONE HALF OF YOUR DEVELOPMENT BEING SIX STORIES TALL, THE OTHER BEING TWO STORIES TALL. YOU ARE ABLE TO BLEND THEM TOGETHER. WHAT WE ARE ASKING FOR TONIGHT, AND WHAT THIS PARAGRAPH OF TEXT THAT WE ARE REQUESTING GO INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES, IS IT ALLOWS YOU TO DO THAT SAME BLENDING, BUT INSTEAD OF JUST INSIDE OF THESE BOXES THAT ARE ON THE SCREEN, YOU ARE ABLE TO DO IT WITHIN A HALF MILE OF THE BOUNDARY OF THOSE BOXES IF YOUR PROJECT IS AT LEAST AN ACRE, AND YOU ARE GOING THROUGH A PD REZONING OR A PDA REZONING, SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO COME TO YOU, THIS COUNCIL. EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF LAND THAT THIS MAY AFFECT IN THE FUTURE, BUT GENERALLY IT IS THE AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN ONE HALF MILE OF THESE FOUR SHADES ON SCREEN. THOSE ARE THE URBAN VILLAGES. AND IF I COULD GET BACK TO THE BEGINNING OF MY PRESENTATION, JUST TO UNDERSCORE A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHY WE ARE REQUESTING THIS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE ALLUDING TO, SIR, AND I APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH. BUT THIS IS JUST NOT SPECIFIC ENOUGH FOR ME BECAUSE AT LEAST ONE ACRE, THAT'S FINE, ONE AND A HAF RADIUS OF THE URBAN VILLAGE BOUNDARY, I UNDERSTAND THAT. AND NOTHING SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY LAND OUTSIDE OF THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING. I UNDERSTAND THAT. HOWEVER, IT'S STILL A VERY LARGE PORTION OF LAND THAT IT ENCOMPASSES SO YOU MAY HAVE ONE HERE AND ONE HERE OR YOU MAY HAVE THEM TOGETHER MAKING SOMETHING THAT EQUALS 8 OR 10 ACRES. THAT'S ALL I AM SAYING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND I WILL NOT BE SUPPORTING THIS ONE. THANK YOU. >>TYLER HUDSON: IF I COULD BRIEFLY -- >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. HUDSON. YOU CAN CONTINUE, SIR. GO AHEAD. >>TYLER HUDSON: SO THE PROBLEM IS THAT YOU HAVE THESE DIFFERENT INTENSITIES, DIFFERENT DENSITIES WITHIN A PD, AND THE TEXT AMENDMENT, AND SOME OF COUNCILMAN DINGFELDER'S SUGGESTION, IS REALLY ABOUT AS NARROW AS IT CAN GET, AS COUNCILMAN MIRANDA ALLUDED TO. WE HAVE A LOT OF RESTRICTIONS IN PLACE. IF IT'S GOING TO GO TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OR PDA. SO THIS DELEGATION OF -- DOESN'T RELEASE OR DELEGATION OF COUNCIL'S AUTHORITY. ANYTIME ANY PIECE OF LAND, ANY DEVELOPER WANTS TO USE THIS, THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO COME TO CITY COUNCIL. AND IF THERE IS A REASON WHY THIS COUNCIL IS UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT THEY ARE PROPOSING, UTILIZING IT, THEN COUNCIL WILL HAVE THE DISCRETION TO DENY THAT. THE ORIGINAL SCONE OF THE APPLICATION WAS ANYWHERE IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRT. THAT HAS NOW BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED, SOLELY TO THE PARCELS THAT ARE WITHIN A HALF MILE OF THAT URBAN VILLAGE BOUNDARY, AN ANGER AT LEAST IN SIZE, AND WHICH IS GOING TO GO THROUGH A PD OR PDA REZONING. THIS PROJECT, YOU MENTIONED AT THE LAST HEARING, THIS ISSUE CAME UP IN CONNECTION WITH THE PLANNING FOR THE GAS WORX PROJECT. THERE ARE SEVERAL PARCELS THAT ARE NOT IN THE URBAN VILLAGE AT ALL. AND IN DISCUSSION ABOUT THE PLANNING COMMISSION, IT TURNS OUT THAT IT IS DIFFICULT TO CHANGE THE BOUNDARIES OFHOSE URBAN VILLAGES, BECAUSE THEY ARE OFTEN TIED TO ANOTHER PLANNING OR HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP. AND GIVEN THAT PROJECT, THE JCC, YBOR CITY HISTORIC DISTRICT, WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO USE THE DENSITY FOR OUR ENTIRE SITE IN A WAY THAT'S RESPECTFUL OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. RIGHT NOW, WE COULD BE FORCED TO HAVE SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF DENSITY RIGHT NEXT TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARY. THIS ALLOWS US TO AVOID THAT AND BE MORE FLEXIBLE. AND THAT'SHY W ARE ASKING FOR THIS, THIS EVENING. AND WITH THAT, I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS MIGHT HAVE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? MR. MANISCALCO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I KEEP THINKING ABOUT AL CAPONE'S CHARACTER IN THE UNTOUCHABLES. BASEBALL. THAT'S A WHOLE STORY. BASEBALL. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYTHING ELSE, SIR? ARE YOU FINISHED WITH YOUR PRESENTATION, SIR, MR. HUDSON? >>TYLER HUDSON: YES, SIR. I WOULD LIKE A LITTLE BIT ON REBUTTAL IF POSSIBLE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR? >> NO ONE IS REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, I DON'T KNOW IF HE WANT TO SAY ANYING BEFORE WE CLOSE ON THIS MATTER. GIVE HIM A FEW SECOND. S. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: PRIVATELY INITIATED PLAN AMENDMENT? >>ORLANDO GUDES: PRIVATELY INITIATED. MR. MIRANDA'S MAIN CONTENTION IS THE BOUNDARY LIMITS. >>DAVID HEY: COUNCIL MEMBERS, IF I MAY ADDRESS SOMETHING THAT WAS BROUGHT UP. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. HEY, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >>DAVID HEY: I BELIEVE COUNCILMAN MIRANDA BROUGHT UP PAGE 11 OF THE PACKET. PAGE 11 IS AN E-MAIL FROM FROM THE MOBILITY DEPARTMENT IN REGARD TO THE FEBRUARY CYCLE OF AMENDMENTS, WHICH THIS AMENDMENT IS ONE OF MANY AMENDMENTS, OF THE MOBILITY DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY RESPONDS TO OUR REQUEST FOR INFORMATION IS THEY PROVIDE ONE MAIL WH A WHOLE BUNCH OF DIFFERENT AMENDMENTS ON IT, AND EACH COMMENT IS OUTLINED. SO THE ONLY REASON WHY THIS E-MAIL IS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET IS IT REFERENCES AT THE TOP THIS ONE PARTICULAR AMENDMENT 21-01. ALL THE OTHER ONES THAT ARE REFERENCED ON PAGE 11 ARE OTHER AMENDMENTS. AND I BELIEVE 21-05 WAS BROUGHT UP. THAT WAS APPROVED BY COUNCIL IN JULY THAT AMENDMENT. SO I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT, THAT ALL THOSE COMMENTS ON THAT PAGE BELOW 21-01 DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS AMENDMENT. I HOPE THAT CLARIFIES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: GREAT WAY OF PRESENTING IT. EINSTEIN COULDN'T HAVE FIGURED IT OUT. >>DAVID HEY: THAT'S HOW WE GET THE E-MAIL. >> I AM NOT DISPUTING THAT, SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER IS LOOKING. I WILL GIVE HIM A FEWORE SECOND BEFORE WE MOVE ON THIS ITEM. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO WHO IS PROPOSING THIS? I APOLOGIZE FOR MY TARDINESS. >>TYLER HUDSON: I AM, COUNCILMAN. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU ARE? >> YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OWN WHOSE OF BEHALF -- >> THE GAS WORX, DARRYL SHAW. THAT'S WHAT THIS PROPOSAL IS AIMED AT. INSTEAD OF JUST APPLYING TO THE THAT PROJECT, WE ARE USING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO BLEND THE SCOPE BECAUSE WHISTLE THE GAS WORX PROJECT IS THE FIRST ONE THAT MAY HAVE -- REFIELD THIS SHORTCOMING IN THE COMP PLAN, THIS IS A GOOD IDEA, WE BELIEVE IT'S GOOD PLANNING AND IT'S GOING TO AFFECT OTHER PROJECTS IN THE FUTURE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DAVID AND COUNCIL, I APOLOGIZE. DAVID, CAN YOU EXPLAIN IN ONE MINUTE OR LESS THE PROS AND CONS OF THIS, AND HOW IT IMPACTS PROJECTS, AND HOW IT MIGHT IMPACT THE COMMUNITY? >>DAVID HEY: I THINK I AM GOING TO TURN THIS OVER TO GENERAL I HAVE BECAUSE GENERAL I HAVE WAS THE PLANNER REGARDING THIS, AND SHE COULD PROBABLY GIVE YOU A LITTLE MORE INFORMATION. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: GIVE ME THE CONCISE VERSION. >>JENNIFER MALONE: SURE. RIGHT NOW THERE'S A LANDSE LINE, A PARCEL SPLIT, WE ARE VERY SPECIFIC, AND IT'S NOT AN URBAN VILLAGE. MUST BE VERY SPECIFIC WITH THAT LINE. WITH THIS AMENDMENT, AND THIS IS ALREADY ALLOWED IN THE URBAN VILLAGES ONLY, AN APPLICANT CAN BLEND, SPREAD IT ACROSS THE SITE. IF THERE ARE TWO FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONSS. SO THIS THIS AMENDMENT, REQUESTING TO EXPAND IN A TO PERSONS OUTSIDE OF URBAN AN ONLY WITHIN THEF MILE RADIUS, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DISTRICT, AND ALL OF THE VILLAGES IN THE PLANNING DISTRICT ALREADY, BUT THE HALF MILE RADIUS JUST TO MAKE SURE, THAT THE RADIUS GOES OUT TO THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, THAT THEY CAN'T USE THE PROVISION OUTSIDE OF THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. IT'S ON THE SCREEN AGAIN IF YOU WOULD LIKE -- >>DAVID HEY: ONE FOLLOW-UP. THIS WAS PRESENTED PREVIOUSLY TO COUNCIL, AND I BELIEVE THIS IS NEGOTIATED LANGUAGE THAT OCCURRED TT EVENING, THAT THEN VOTED TO TRANSMIT UP, RIGHT? >>JENNIFER MALONE: ON JUNE 24th, SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT, AND COUNCIL FELT THAT IT WAS TOO BROAD, SO THE APPLICANT, STAFF, TOOK THE BREAK AND WENT OFF TO THE SIDE VIRTUALLY AND CAME UP WITH SOME LANGUAGE THAT COUNCIL FELT BETTER SUITED -- MORE COMFORTABLE WITH TRANSMITTING THE REVISED LANGUAGE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. IN JUNE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I KNEW IT LOOKED FAMILIAR. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. VIERA, I DID SEE YOUR HAND, SIR? >>LUIS VIERA: MR. VIERA? >>ORLANDO GUDES:DY SEE YOUR HAND SIR? MS. JOHNSON-VELEZ. >>LUIS VIERA: ACTUALLY, I WAS MUTING AND UNMUTING MYSELF ON THE COMPUTER BUT I WILL SAY SOMETHING. YOU KNOW WHAT, I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS AND THIS COULD BE POTENTIALLY EXPANSIVE BUT WE SENT IT BACK NARROWLY TAILORED A LITTLE BIT. THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN YOU VOTE FOR IT. BUT I THINK THAT TAKES CARE OF AT LEAST ON MY END SOME OF THOSE INITIAL CONCERNS, THAT -- I WILL CHIME IN LATER, BUT THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: COUNCILMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: LEGAL DEPARTMENT. I DID WANT TO FOLLOW UP ON MR. MIRANDA'S COMMENTS. THIS IS A TEXT AMENDMENT, AND -- AND SO IT DOES NOT APPLY AS PROPOSED TO A SPECIFIC PIECE OF PROPERTY, BUT ITOULD APPLY TO ALL PROPERTIES THAT FALL WITHIN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENDMENT. SO WITHIN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT AND WITHIN A MILE RADIUS OF THOSE URBAN VILLAGES, THE MAP THAT I BELIEVE IS PART OF MS. MALONE'S PRESENTATION, THE AREA IN WHICH THIS TEXT AMENDMENT COULD BE APPLIED TO SPECIFIC PIECE OF PROPERTY, IF THAT CLARIFIES. SO YOUR CONSIDERATION IS WHETHER AS A POLICY, YOU WOULD LIKE TO CHANGE THE CURRENT POLICY IN THE COMP PLAN TO ALLOW THE PROPOSAL THAT'S BEFORE YOU THIS EVENI, WHETHER YOU BELIEVE THAT THAT'S A GOOD POLICY. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MS. VELEZ, I AM NOT AGAINST ANYTHING OTHER THAN IT DOESN'T SPECIFICALLY SAT THEY SAID, REMEMBER IN JUNE YOU VOTED FOR IT. WHAT HAPPENS POLITICALLY IS WE DEAL WITH SO MANY THINGS THAT SO MANY TIMES AND SO QUICKLY THAT YOU BLAME -- NOT YOU, PLEASE DON'T TAP THAT PERSONAL ---THEN IT'S US THAT SAID, NO, WE VOTED FOR IT. YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THAT? WELL, YOU VOTED FOR IT. THEN THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS. WHEN YOU HAVE SOMETHING VAGUE, NORTH OF SOMETHING AND EAST OF SOMETHING ELSE, WELL, THAT COULD MEAN LAND O' LAKES, THAT COULD BE PLANT CITY, I MEAN ST. PETERSBURG. SO I JUST DON'T KNOW, IF YOU WANT TO DO THAT, I AM NOT AFRAID OF ANYONE TO DO IT, THIS AND THIS AND THIS, THE SPECIFIC AREA. I DON'T LIKE TO BE PLAY CARDS I T IN THE DECK. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE ON THIS ITEM? WE HAVE NOBODY TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. AND NOBODY DOWNSTAIRS. >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS. >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND I HAVE BEEN INFORMED THERE'S NOBODY DOWNSTAIRS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO CLOSE? MR. MANISCALCO. >> THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. I THINK THERE'S SOME CONFUSION ABOUT THIS. AND I WOULD LIKE TO ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE. THIS IS A GOOD IDEA. IT'S AN IDEA FOR A VERY IMPORTANT PROJECT IN TAMPA, THE GAS WORX PROJECT. WHICH ALL OF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH. SO AT THE RISK OF THIS GETTING DENIED TONIGHT, DUE TO SOME CONFUSION, THAT IS UNDERSTANDABLE, BUT I THINK DETRIMENTAL TO THE SUCCESS OF AN IMPORTANT PROJECT IN THE URBAN CORE OF THE CITY, I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE TO THE EAIESTOSSIBLE DATE SO THAT I CAN HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY, COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, TO SIT WITH YOU, AND TALK ABOUT THIS, AND ANYONE ELSE WHO HAS A LITTLE BIT OF SKEPTICISM ABOUT THAT. I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT THIS IS THE MOST SPECIFIC WAY TO DESCRIBE WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO WITHOUT HAVING IT APPLY TO A SINGLE PROJECT WHICH I DON'T THINK IS GOOD PLANNING OR FAIR. SO I WOULD ASK COUNCIL'S DISCRETION FOR A CONTINUANCE THIS EVENING. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. SHELBY? >>MARTIN SHELBY: IS THERE A SECOND TO THAT? >>ORLANDO GUDES: FOR THE CONTINUANCE? >> SECOND. >>MARTIN SHELBY: NOW WE NEED THE DATE. IS THERE A DATE THAT -- MS. MALONE, WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO ASSIST? >>JENNIFER MALONE: SURE. I AM NOT SURE -- I DON'T HAVE -- WELL, I DON'T HAVE THE CITY'S IN FRONT OF US BUT I KNOW WE HAVE PLAN AMENDMENTS GOING ON THE EVENING OF JANUARY 27th. I CAN'TPEAK TO NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER ASELOAD. BUT I KNOW WE HAVE SOME SPOTS. AND GOING ON FEBRUARY 24th AS WELL. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S ONLY ONE NIGHT MEETING IN NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER BECAUSE OF THE HOLIDAY. AND I DON'T KNOW WHETHER IF THOSE ARE FULL, AND I DON'T KNOW IF CITY STAFF KNOWS THE NUMBER OF CASES THAT HAVE BEEN SET FOR THAT NIGHT. IT DEPENDS HOW LONG THIS ITEM TAKES COUNCIL. >>ORLANDO GUDES: DOES JANUARY WORK? >> THIS WILL BE VERY QUICK, TO TALK TO EACH OF YOU ABOUT THIS, AND I DON'T WANT TO -- I THINK JANUARY WORKS FOR ME. >>MARTIN SHELBY: JANUARY 27th OF 2022 AT 6:00 P.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. MR. MANISCALCO MOVED. MR. CITRO SECONDED IT. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, JUST A REMINDER. MR. HSONID SUGGEST THAT HE WANTED TO TALK WITH EACH COUNCILMAN. JUST A REMINDER THAT THIS MATTER BECAUSE IT AFFECT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS BEEN DEEMED TO BE A LEGISLATIVE MATTER. THERE IS NO CONCERN ABOUT EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS THAT NEED TO BE DISCLOSED ON THIS. YOU CAN HEAR FROM ALL PARTIES RELATIVE TO LEGISLATIVE MATTERS, LEGISLATIVE COMP PLAN CHANGES. SO I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT WHAT NORMALLY APPLIES TO REZONING, IN THESE CASES TONIGHT, AS A MATTER OF FACT, NONE OF THEM ARE QUASI-JUDICIAL. THEY ARE ALL LEGISLATIVE. THANK YOU. ORLAO GES: THANK YOU, MR. SHELBY. ITEM NUMBER 2. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: AND I'M SORRY. I APOLOGIZE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO NEED TO APOLOGIZE. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS. >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE. THIS IS AN APTIO HEARING FOR TA/CPA 21-04. THIS IS IN REGARDS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. THIS IS PUBLICLY INITIATED BY THE CITY OF TAMPA. IT WAS TRANSMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY ON JULY 22ND OF 2021, AND EBO HAD NO COMMENT REGARDING THE REQUEST. A LITTLE BACKGROUND. THIS IS INITIATED BY THE CITY OF TAMPA. IT'S SEEKING TO AMEND THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 16, T NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 24, AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 35 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES. WE REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT THAT BUILDINGS MUST BE EITHER RESIDENTIAL OR VERTICALLY INTEGRATED MIXED USE, TO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE MAXIMUM F.A.R. TO ADD THE WORDS GENERAL IN THE DESCRIPTION, THAT ALLOW CONSIDERATION FOR ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL USES NOT CURRENTLY PERMITTED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USEONIN CODE. CURRENTLY, THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 35 IS THE ONLY NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE CATEGORY THAT HAS ACTUALLY BEEN PLACED ON LAND. HERE WE ARE, THIS LARGE CIRCLE, THIS IS THE WEST RIVERFRONT AREA. THIS IS THE RIVER HERE. THIS IS THE INTERSTATE 275 DOWN HERE. THIS IS THE LARGE AREA OF NMU 35. AND THEN THERE IS A SMALL POCKET OF JUST TO THE SOUTH, SOUTH OF THE CITY BUILDING ON NORTH BOULEVARD,CTUAY, WHICH IS RIGHT HERE. I BELIEVE THAT'S CYPRESS. YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND THIS CONSISTENT, WITH A NUMBER OF POLICIES REGARDING THE PROMOTION OF A MIXED USE COMMUNITIES. AGAIN, THIS WILL CONTINUE TO PROMOTE VERTICAL MIXED USE WITHIN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD THROUGH THE ZONING CODE. IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE PROMOTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE WEST RIVERFRONT AREA. AND BASED ON THAT, YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION DOES RECOMMEND THAT THE PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I BELIEVE RANDY GOERS FROM THE CITY IS ALSO ONLINE AND MAY HAVE A PRESENTATION AS WELL. OR IS AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. HEY AT THIS TIME? ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. HEY? ALL RIGHT, MR. GOERS, YOU ARE UP NEXT. >>RANDY GOERS: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. RANDY GOERS, CITY PNNIN DEPARTMENT. I WILL BE BRIEF. YOU REMEMBER THE TEXT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW THE NONRESIDENTIAL USES, THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED IN THE CATEGOY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SAME F.A.R. AS THE RESIDENTIAL OR MIXED USE PROJECT, SPECIFICALLY IN THE WEST RIVER AREA, THERE ARE A FEW NONRESIDENTIAL PROJECTS THAT WE EXPECT TO SEE, ONE OF THEM A GROCERY STORE, ANOTHER ONE IS THE CULTURAL ARTS, OR TECHNOLOGY CENTER, AND THEN THERE MAY BE AN AFRICAN MUSEUM IN THE ARE THIS ALLOWS THOSE PROJECTS TO MOVE FORWARD WITH SAME DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AS RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED USE PROJECTS. SO WE WOULD WELCOME YOUR SUPPORT OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS TO MR. GOERS? ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. ANYONE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ANYONE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ITEM NUMBER 2. ANYBODY REGISTERED, MADAM CLERK? >> YES, WE HAVE TWO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. >> GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS NICOLE, AND I AM AN ATTORNEY IN TAMPA. 401 EAST JACKSON STREET FOR THE RECORD. I AM HERE TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT IN SUPPORT OF TPCPA 21-04. I WAS ON THE TEAM THAT SERVED ON THE REDEVELOPMENT, AND DURING THE PROJECT THE NMU 35, ACCOMPLISHING THE GOAL AND THE INTENT OF THE PLAN. BOTH PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF HAD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT AFTER CAREFUL EXAMINATION OF THE HISTORY OF THIS AREA. WE REALLY APPRECIATE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY STAFF FOR RECOGNIZING THIS ISSUE AND WORKING WITH OUR TEAM TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT. THIS IS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITY AND THE RIVER COMMUNITY AND WE SAW THE GRAND OPENING OF . YOU BELIEVE THIS AMENDMENT WILL ALLOW TO CONTINUE THE RECORD OF SUCCESS. WITH THAT, I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? ANYBODY ELSE TO SPEAK? >> THE OTHER REGISTERED. SPEAKER, DAVID SMITH, HAS NOT LOGGED ON, SO THAT WOULD CONCLUDE THIS ITEM AS FAR AS SPEAKERS ARE CONCERNED. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. NOBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR, CORRECT? ALL RIG. MR. MANISCALCO TO CLOSE AND MR. CITRO SECONDED IT. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MR. VIERA, ITEM NUMBER 2. >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR, MR. CHAIR. I MOVE -- CAN YOU GUYS HEAR ME? >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, SIR. >>LUIS VIERA: SORRY. I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT T AMEND THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 16 NMU 16, NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 24, AND NMU 24, AND NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE 35, NMU 35, CATEGORIES TO REMOVE REFERENCE TO VERTICAL MIXED USE ALLOWING ALL DEVELOPMENT TO HAVE A MAXIMUM F.A.R. OF 1.5 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND BY MR. CITRO. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>JOSE CITRO: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH CARLSON BEING ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 21st AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I WAS BY THE WEST RIVER BOULEVARD APARTMENTS YESTERDAY. THEY LOOK -- YOU WON'T KNOW WHO IS LIVING IN THOSE APARTMENTS. IT'S LOW INCOME, MIXED INCOME, APARTMENTS ALL LOOK THE SAME. AND THEY ALL HAVE WASHERS, DRYERS, THEY ARE VERY NICE. SO I AM GLAD, TAMPA HOUSING AUTHORITY DID A GREAT JOB WITH THAT PROJECT. ITEM NUMBER 3. >>JENNIFER MALONE: NUMBER 3, I AM FILLING IN FOR DANNY COLLINS. THIS IS TA/CPA 21-06. WE ARE GOING TO GO OVER A COUPLE PARKS IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF MINUTES. 21-06 IS COLLINS PARK, 2107 IS -- PARK AND THIS IS PART OF THE ONGOING INITIATIVE TO RECOGNIZE THE TAMPA PARKS. THIS IS THE PLAN. SO 21-06 IS LOCATED IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. HISTORIC HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE HYDE PARK URBAN VILLAGE. HERE IT IS. AND BETWEEN WEST MATTHEW AVENUE AND WEST DEKLE AVENUE. I HAVE SOME SITE PICTURES. IT'S A VERY SMALL PARK. AND THE REQUEST IS TO GO FROM RESIDENTIAL 10 TO RECOLLECT NATIONAL -- RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE, TO REMOVE ANY POTENTIAL SQUIRE F.W. WOOLWORTHAGE. WITH THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN? >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES, SIR. >>MARTIN SHELBY: IF MS. MALONE IS WILLING TO HEAR -- TALKING ABOUT 3, 4 AND 5 AT THIS POINT, CAN YOU DO THAT? >>JENNIFER MALONE: I CAN DO THAT IF YOU LIKE. >>MARTIN SHELB BECSE YOU CAN CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARINGS -- ACTUALLY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, 3, 4 AND 5, TO THE PUBLIC, ANYBODY TO SPEAK TO% THOSE THREE ITEMS, AND WE HAVE DONE THAT BEFORE. YOU CAN READ THE ORDINANCE AND VOTE ON THEM SEPARATELY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. IS ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEMS 3, 4 AND 5? >>MARTIN SHELBY: WHY DON'T WE HEAR THE REPORTS ON 3, 4 AND 5 AND THEN WE CAN OPEN THE FLOOR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. MS. MALONE. >>JENNIFER MALONE: SO THE NEXT ONE IS 21-07, TEMPLE CREST PARK IN THE TEME CREST NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS ONE OVER THE THRESHOLD TRANSMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY IN JUNE AND THEY HAVE NO COMMENTS. A REAR FROMMER, HEAR IT IS. RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE, THE LITTLE PORTION DOWN ON THE SOUTH WHICH IS RESIDENTIAL 20 AND THEN ON THE NORTH RESIDENTIAL 10, AND THE PROPOSAL IS RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE. AND THE NEXT ONE IS THE WOODLAWN CEMETERY, TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD, URBAN VILLAGE. THIS IS TRANSMITTED IN JUNE. THIS IS THE PORTION THAT'S OWNED BY THE CITY OF TAMPA. IT'S UNDER THE PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC LAND USE NOW. AND THE WAY THAT THIS PROCESS HAS WORKED, WE ARE PROPOSING THE RECOLLECTION RAKAL OPEN SPACE FUTURE LAND USE FOR THEIR PARCEL THAT'S UNDER CITY OWNERSHIP. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE OLDEST FIRST. LET ME JUST SAY AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED, THIS IS NOT THE AMOUNT OF E-MAILS WE HAVE GOTTEN. THIS IS NOT RELATED TO THAT. AM I CORRECT? >>JENNIFER MALONE: THAT AMENDMENT -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: PRIVATE SALE GOING TO ANOTHER PRIVATE SALE, IF WHATEVER IT IS, I AM NOT GOING TO GET INVOLVED, BUT THIS IS SOMETHING TO MAKE IT WHAT IT IS FOREVER. >>JENNIFER MALONE: RIGHT. THE OUTLINED PARCEWNEDY THE CITY, THERE ARE SOME OTHER PARCELS LIKE THE ONES REMAINING IN BLUE ARE NOT UNDER OWNERSHIP -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MS. MALONE? >>JOHN DINGFELDR: I HAVE A QUESTION. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. JENNIFER, LOOKING AT THE MAP THAT'S IN IN FRONT OF US, THE UPPER LEFT CORNER IS THE SHOWMAN'S PROPERTY, TWO DIFFERENT PARCELS. THE LOWER LEFT CORNER IS THE OWD, PRIVATE NONPROFIT.RIVATELY IT'S WITHIN THE WOODLAWN BLOCK, BUT IT'S PRIVATELY OWNED, JUST LIKE SHOWMAN'S. BUT WHAT IS THAT SLIVER? WHAT'S THAT SLIVER COMING DOWN THE LAST LITTLE BLUE? >>JENNIFER MALONE: IT'S THE JEWISH CEMETERY. OH, I'M SORRY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I HAVE DRIVEN BY MANY TIMES. IT SAYS -- GEOGRAPHICALLY, YOU BEEEN NOW AND SECOND READING,HAT BECAUSE IT'S MY RECOLLECTION THAT IT ABUTS IMMEDIATELY UP TO SHOWMAN'S, UP THEREOF IN THAT CORNER, WHERE THE GREEN IS UP AT THE TOP. I DOESN'T WANT TO MAKE A BIG DEAL ABOUT IT TONIGHT. BUT -- >>JENNIFER MALONE: WE LOOKED AT THE PARCEL LEVEL AND WERE VERY CAREFUL, AND MAYBE DAVID WANTS TO CHIME IN, BUT THE WAY THE PARCEL OWNERSHIP IS ON THE PROPERTY, IT'S ONLY THE SMALL STRIP. I WILL ABSOLUTELY TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AND DEATH LET DAVID CHIME IN. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU MIGHT WANT TO DRIVE BY IT AND THEN TRY TO FIGURE IT OUT. BECAUSE I CUT THROUGH ON MY WAY HOME AND GO ALONG INDIANA THERE. SO I AM PRETTY FAMILIAR WITH IT ANYWAY, OKAY THAT WAS MY FIRST QUESTION. MY SECOND QUESTION IS, IN REGARD TO THE PROPOSED USES FOR THE RECREATION OPEN SPACE, AND IT'S SORT OF A STRANGE NAME FOR THE CITY CEMETERY, IS RECREATION, I CAN'T FIND IT NOW ON THE STAFF REPORT BUT I SAW IT EARLIER, AND I DON'T RECALL THAT IT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONS CEMETERY AS ONE OF THE USES AM I WRONG? >>JENNIFER MALONE: THAT IS MOST LIKELY -- I DON'T HAVE IN THE FRONT OF ME BUT THESE MOST LIKELY CORRECT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES, HERE IT IS. RANGE OF ALLOWABLE USES. PARKS, RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, GREENWAYS, NATURAL, MANAGED AND CULTIVATED OPEN SPA, GF COURSES AND COMMERCIAL RECREATION, OUTDOOR USE ARE ALSO ALLOWED. BUT IT WOULD KIND OF BE NICE ESPECIALLY FOR WOODLAWN IF WE HAD SPECIFICALLY A NAMED USE THERE FOR THE CEMETERY. >>JENNIFER MALONE: YES, WE CAN ALWAYS TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. I THINK IT WOULD PROBABLY FALL UNDER THE IMAGINED OPEN SPACES AND THEN THE FACT THAT ALSO ON THE PARK LIST, WOODLAWNS CEMETERY AND DOWNTOWN, COLOGNE CEMETERY UP ON COLUMBUS AS WELL, BUT IF THAT'S THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL, WE CAN TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO, I JUST NOTIFIED IT TODAY. YOU ALL TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND LET ME KNOW AT SECOND READING. >>JENNIFER MALONE: OKAY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>JENNIFER MALONE: THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MS. MALONE? >>JENNIFER MALONE: THAT WAS ACTUALLY MY PRESENTATION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MS. MALONE FOR 3, 4 OR 5? ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC? >>THE CLERK: THERE ARE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM. >>ORLANDO GUDES: 3, 4 OR 5. >>THE CLERK: NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS. >>MARTIN SHELBY: DOWNSTAIRS? >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR, MS. DEBBY? >> NOBODY DOWN HERE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU. MOVE TO CLOSE BY MR. MANISCALCO MOVED IT. MR. CITRO SECONDED IT. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED. WE WILL TAKE EACH ONE INDIVIDUALLY, MR. SHELBY? >>MARTIN SHELBY: THAT'S CORRECT. >>ORNDOUDES MR. CARLSON. THEN MR. CITRO. THEN MR. DINGFELDER. >>BILL CARLSON: I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE TA/CPA 21-06, ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2105 WEST DEKLE AVENUE OTHERWISE KNOWN AS COLLINS PARK FROM RESIDENTIAL 10 R-10 TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE R/OS PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >> SECOND. ORLAO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO SECONDED IT. ROLL CALL. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ONOCTOBER 21st AT 9:30 A.M. >> I HAD ONE PERSON TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 6. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE HAVEN'T GOT TONE ITEM NUMBER 6 YET. >>JOSEPH CITRO: FILE TA/CPA 21-07, AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT,% FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 8116 NORTH 37th STREET, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS TEMPLE CREST PARK, FROM RESIDENTIAL 10, R-10, REEATIONAL OPEN SPACE R/OS TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE RO-1 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SECOND. >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 21st AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, NUMBER 5. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: IN REGARDS TO FILE TA/CPA 21-08 I MOVE THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 3412 NORTH OLA AVENUE OTHERWISE KNOWN AS WOODLAWN CEMETERY FROM PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC PSP TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE R/OS PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >> SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO SECONDED IT. ROLL CALL. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT AT VOGUED VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 21st AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 6. >>JENNIFER MALONE: JENNIFER MALONE AGAIN. >> I WANTED CLARIFICATION ON ITEM NUMBER 3. >>THE CLERK: WE HAD A VOTE. THE MAKER WAS CARLSON. SECOND WAS MANISCALCO. SO IT PASSED WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 21 AT 9:30 A.M. >>DAVID HEY: THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 6. MS.ALON >>JENNIFER MALONE: THANO MUCH. THIS IS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 21-12, IT IS ROBLES PARK, THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE AND TAMPA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD. HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE, EAST OF MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD AND EAST OF NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE. THERE'S A VARIETY OF COMMERCIAL USES ALONG NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE. THERE'S A CHURCH TO THE SOUTH THE SOUTH AS WELL, AND THEN TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE IS ROBLES PARK COMMUNITY. THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS PRIVATELY INITIATED, UNDER THE NEW STATE ACREAGE CHANGE [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] 30.03 ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL 35 TO COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. I DO HAVE SOME PICTURES. THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG EAST LAKE AVENUE. I HAVE THE SUBJECT SITE INTERNALLY. THIS IS THE INTERSECTION OF EAST LAKE AVENUE, NORTH AVON STREET FACING NORTH. AND THIS IS THE INTERSECTION OF EAST LAKE AVENUE AND NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE. THE SUBJECT SITE WAS BEHIND ME WHEN I TOOK THIS PICTURE. AND THIS IS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED, ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE SUBJECT SITE ON NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. IT IS WITHIN THE PROXIMITY OF TH. THE ADOPTIVE FUTURE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL 35. TO THE NORTH IS RESIDENTIAL 20. THAT'S THAT LIGHTER BROWN COLOR. FURTHER NORTH IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. THAT'S THE PINK. AND THE RED IS COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 ON THE EAST ALONG NORTH FLORIDA AVENUE. THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 ALLOWS FOR COMMERCIAL USES, 35 IS MORE INTENSIVE. THE BLUE IS THE PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CHURCH PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC LAND USE DECEMBER IG THE GREEN TO THE SOUTH IS ROBLES PARK, THE CITY PARK. AND THEN THERE IS SOME RESIDENTIAL 10 IN THE AREA, AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. IN THE PROPOSAL, COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, WE ALREADY HAVE THAT COLOR TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THAT PINK IS ALREADY PRESENT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. IT'S GOING TO INCREASE THE POTENTIAL OF THE DWELLING UNITS, AND THAT WOULD BE FLOOR AREA RATIO OPTION IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. RESIDENTIAL 35 AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 ARE BOTH CALCULATED AT 35 PER ACRE OR THE FLOOR AREA RATIO TO ALLOW FOR THAT AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL USES. THAT WILL INCREASE ABOUT 78 THAT YOU TO 2.6 MILLION SQUARE FEET. THE PROPOSAL IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 CONSIDERATION BUT ALSO ALLOWS COMMERCIAL USES ON THE SUBJECT SITE. JUST A LITTLE HISTORY. I'M SURE EVERYONE IS FAMILIAR WITH IT. BUT SECTION 18, THERE IS SIGNIFICANT -- ZION CEMETERY WAS DISCOVERED WITH GROUND PENETRATING RADAR A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO. AND ANY PRESERVATION OF THE CEMETERY WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN THE REZONING PROCESS. I'M SURE THE APPLICANT WILL TALK ABOUT THAT IN THE PETITION AS WELL. IT ENCOURAGES MIXED USE IN-FILL WITH TRANSIT AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES AND DIRECT THE CITY TO ENSURE GROWTH TO URBAN VILLAGES. IT IS LOCATED IN THE TAMPA HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE. WE FOUND INCREASING THE DENSITY CONSISTENT WITH SELF OBJECTIVES POLICIES WITH, PROMOTES -- [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] WE WOULD ALSO NOTE THAT WHILE THE COUNIT MIXED USE 35 WOULD ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL USE ON-SITE, THERE ARE REQUIREMENTS IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, IF RESIDENTIAL IS ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL USES. SO WITH THAT, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID FIND THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. AND THE APPLICANT AS WELL. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED, SIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO YOU KNOW WHO LIVED HERE IN 62-63? MY MOTHER AND MY GRANDPARENTS, WHEN THEY CAME FROM CUBA. THEY LIVED HERE IN ROBLES PARK AND THEN THEY MOVED TO 48th STREET, HIGHLANDS PINES A COUPLE YEARS AGO. THE HOUSE IS STILL THERE. BUT I JUST WANT TO THROW THAT IN THERE. AND ALSO, ANOTHER ITEM HAS BEEN CONTINUED TONIGHT, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE THE CITY, OR THE COMMUNITY, ZION CEMETERY, SEEMS TO HAVE A LILITTLE BIT OF A REPUTATION OF PAVING OVER AREAS THAT THEY DIDN'T KNOW OR WHATEVER IT WAS, THAT THERE WAS A CEMETERY AT ONE POINT, AND HERE IS EXAMPLE OF THAT, AND THAT WAS BROUGHT UP, AND YOU SAW THAT IN THE NEWS. JUST WANTED TO THROW THAT OUT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE ELSE? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CURIOUS, AND I KNOW IT'S NOT 1,000 PERCENT, THAT OUR LAND USE DECISIONS ARE RIGHT, BUT SINCE GUIDO MENTIONED IT, I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CURIOUS EXACTLY WHERE THE ZION WAS DISCOVERED, MR. CHAIR. AND MAY THEY CAN HELP. RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: HE'S GOING TO PUT UP A MAP. IT'S SHOWING VIRGINIA AVENUE AVENUE AT THE TOP OF THIS PROJECT. AND THEY MENTIONED THE NORTHWEST CORNER. LOAN MY UNDERSTANDING IS IT WAS IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER. >> THERE'S FLORIDA. THERE'S VIRGINIA. SO THAT MIDDLE PORTION IN HERE. AND I THINK WE ARE -- I THINK THAT'S IT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO IN THAT REGARD, CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO A CMU-35, DO WE HAVE ANY HESITATIONS, WHY IS IT WE ARE NOTESERNG THAT UPPER NORTHWEST CORNER FOR THE RECREATION OPEN SPACE CEMETERY TYPE AREA? I'M CONFIDENT THAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITY IS NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING BAD, BUT JUST FROM A CONSISTENCY PERSPECTIVE, I AM JUST WONDERING WHY WE DON'T USE THAT R/OS DESIGNATION UP IN THAT TO CORNER WHERE WE KNOW THERE ARE GRAVES? AND THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY A QUESTION FOR YOU, JEN. IF YOU WANT TO DEFER THAT TO THE APPLICANT, I SEE THE ILLUSTRIOUS MR. SMITH THERE ON THE SCREEN. >>JENNIFER MALONE: I WILL DEFER THAT TO THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. WE WILL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT NOW. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MICROPHONE, DAVID. >> DAVID SMITH, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET 33601, SUITE 2100, WITH STEARNS WEAVER MILLER REPRESENTING APPLICANT. THERE'S REALLY A STAFF REPORT, AND I THINK I CAN GET TO THE POINT OF THE MATTER. THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR A COMP PLAN AMENDMENT, TO FACILITATE THE REDEVELOPMENT SIMILAR TO WHAT'S HAPPENING IN WEST RIVER, AND HAS ALREADY HAPPENED IN OTHER HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECTS, TO COME IN WITH A MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, THAT WILL PROVIDE MANY MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS. WE HAVE THE DENSITY ON THE PARTICULAR SITE, BUT DUE TO LOCATIONAL CRITERIA IT DID NOT FACILITATE A WELL PLANNED MIXED USE COMMUNITY, AND THAT IS THE BASIC REASON FOR THE CMU-35 ON THE PROPERTY. WE SEE THIS AS A SPRINGBOARD CAT A LISS TICK PROJECT FOR THE AREA. HOPEFULLY, AS THIS REDEVELOPS, WITH A LOT OF THOSE AUTOMOBILES, CI USES, START TO TRANSITION INTO MORE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING USES AS OPPOSED TO AUTOMOTIVE BASED USES. WITH RESPECT TO THE ZION CEMETERY, ZION SEAM TAKER ON THE TAMPA HOUSING PROPERTY BUT ALSO OFF-SITE, OUTSITE WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING FOR THE CMU-35, IS IN PRIVATE OWNERSHIP. SO AT THIS TIME, FOR OUR PROJECT, THE INCLUSION OF THE PROPERTY, FOR DENSITY PURPOSES, ALLOWS US TO UTILIZE THAT LAND TO MAXIMIZE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT, ALSO THE MIXED USE PROJECT, AND THEN ALSO FACILITATE BEING ABLE TO FUND PRESERVATION EFFORTS FOR ZION PA OF THE PROJECT INCLUDES A MUSEUM, A MEMORIAL FOR THE ZION, AND EXPANSION TO PROTECT THAT IN WORKING WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS WHOSE PROPERTY IS AFFECTED BY THE ZION DISCOVERY. SO I THINK LOOKING AT IT FROM A LAND USE PERSPECTIVE, I THINK MAYBE IT'S PREMATURE AT THIS TIME TO DESIGNATE IT AS SUCH FOR THE PURPOSE OF MOVING THE PROJECT FORWARD, BUT IT MAY BE SOMETHING ONCE ON A PRESERVATION EFFORTS IS UNDERWAY, BE ABLE TO GET THE MUSEUM IN PLACE, ACQUIRE SOME OF THAT PRIVATE LAND. THAT MAY BE THE APPROPRIATE LAND USE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S PRESERVED IN PERPETUITY. IT WILL ALSO BE PART OF A PROPERTY WE CONTROL, MOVING THE- FORWARD WITH A REDEVELOPMENT OF ROBLES PARK. THERE ARE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM THAT ARE ONLINE AND SIGNED UP FOR THE APPLICANT, THAT DEALT WITH THE MASTER PLAN AND MORE SPECIFIC THE GENERAL RESPONSE TO YOUR QUESTION, AND I HOPE THAT HELPS. IF NOT, THERE WILL BE OTHERS THAT CAN ANSWER MORE SPECICAL TH. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS, GENTLEMEN? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: SO, MR. SMITH, WE HAVE GOT APPROXIMATELY 30 ACRES TO THE UNDER THE HOUSING AUTHORITY CONTROL. WHAT PERCENTAGE OR HOW MANY ACRES OR LESS THAN AN ACRE OR WHATEVER ARE WE TALKING ABOUT FOR ZION THAT'S WITHIN THE HOUSING AUTHORITY PROPER? >>SUSAN KLAUSSMITH: I THINK AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN -- DAVID SMITH: IT'S ABOUT AN ACRE. IT'S WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY. AND THERE'S LIKELY MORE OF THE OUTSIDE ON OTHER PRIVATE PROPERTY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I AM NOT WORRIED ABOUT OUTSIDE TONIGHT. BECAUSE THAT'S NOT IN FRONT OF US. SO THAT MAKES A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF YOUR DENSITIES AND, I MEAN, CLEARLY WE ALL KNOW YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BE BUILDING ON TOP OF THAT, BUT YOU NEED THAT FOR YOUR DENSITY CALCULATIONS AND EVERYTHING TO DO WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO ELSEWHERE? >> DAVID SMITH: WELL, SINCE PART OF THE MASTER PLAN EFFORT IS TO PRESERVE ZION, THE DEVELOPMENT RISK TO THE PROPERTY, IN OUR MOVING FORWARD, ISN'T REALLY A REALITY. IT'S GOING TO BE PRESERVED. WE THINK THAT PUTTING RECREATION OPEN SPACE ON A PIECE OF THE PROPERTY NOW BEFORE WE GET TO THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND TRY TO INCORPORATE OUR MASTER PLAN THAT INCLUDES OTH PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO IT WOULD BE PREMATURE. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: PERHAPS I WOULD FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE IF I HAD YOUR AND YOUR CLIENT'S ASSURANCE THAT WHEN ALL IS SAID AND DONE THAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITY WILL CIRCLE BACK AND DO A COMP PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THAT SACRED AREA, AND OBVIOUSLY THAT MIGHT BE ANOTHER YEAR OR TWO, THREE DOWN THE ROAD, BUT JUST FOR CONSISTENCY SAKE, YOU KNOW, W JT WERE OVER AT WOODLAWN AND THAT'S THE REASON WE DID IT AT WOODLAWN, THAT'S THE REASON WE DID IT DOWNTOWN, ET CETERA, RECREATION OPEN SPACE. SO I'M OKAY WITH IT TONIGHT. I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU ARE COMING FROM TONIGHT. BUT PERHAPS BY SECOND READING YOU CAN GIVE US ASSURANCES AS TO HOW THE AUTHORITY WILL COME BACK AND DO A COMP PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THAT SMALL LITTLE ZION PARCEL. THERE'S MS. SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ RAISING HER HAND. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. MAY I BE RECOGNIZED? >>ORNDO GUDE RECOGNIZED. >>SUSAN JOHNSON-VELEZ: LEGAL DEPARTMENT. MR. DINGFELDER, I UNDERSTAND YOUR COMMENTS, BUT I WOULD BE AGAINST IMPOSING ANY TYPE OFL- CONDITIONS ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. IF YOU HAVE SOME CONCERNS, THEN PERHAPS THERE WOULD BE CONSIDERATION OF TAKING THAT LAND OUT, BUT IT WOULD BE PROBLEMATIC TO CONDITION YOUR DECISION BY THE APPLICANT. AGAIN, IT'S A POLICY DECISION WHETHER OR NOT THE REQUESTED LAND CATEGORY TO THE PARCEL THAT IS BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A CONDITION OR JUST A VERBAL ASSURANCE, SOME SORT OF MORAL ASSURANCE OR WHATEVER? >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER, HAVE YOU SEEN THE ROBLES PARK PLAN YET? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO, I HAVEN'T SEEN IT. AND I TRUST IT'S GOING TO BE DONE, I TRU IS ALL WONDERFUL. I'M JUST SAYING FROM A CONSISTENCY PERSPECTIVE, WE JUST SPENT A YEAR GOING THROUGH ALL OF OUR PARKS AND MAKING SURE THEY ARE IN RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE, WE HAVE GOT THREE CEMETERIES, MAKE SURE THEY ARE RECREATION OPEN SPACE, AND WE DO THAT FOR GOOD REASON, SO HERE IS ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY. I'M NOT TRYING TO HOLD THIS ONE UP TONIGHT. SUSAN, I AM NOT TRYING TO OWN, YOU KNOW, MAKE THEM CONDITIONED FOR APPROVAL. ALL I AM ASKING IS PERHAPS THEY CAN GIVE US SOME VERBAL ASSURANCE A COUPLE WEEKS FROM NOW TO SAY, BY THE WAY, WE HEAR YOU, AND W ARE GLAD TO DO THAT DOWN THE ROAD. >> IF I MIGHT, I THINK WE'LL SPEAK WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY. I THINK THE -- WHEN THE PD AMENDMENT COMES THROUGH, WITH THE PROPERTY, THAT IT WILL BE PRESERVED, AND AT THAT POINT IN TIME, WHEN WE ACTUALLY HAVE IT ON PAPER, EVERYBODY CAN SEE THE BOUNDARIES AND WHAT'S INVOLVED, THAT THAT MAY A GREAT TIME FOR US TO FORMALLY DEMONSTRATE THAT, YES, WE ARE GOING TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH AN AMENDMENT TO PUT THAT IN OPEN SPACE CATEGORY. BUT BETWEEN NOW AND SECOND READING, I WILL DISCUSS THAT WITH THE TAMPA HOUSING AUTHORITY,. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DEED RESTRICTION OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I DID SEE THE DRAWINGS WHERE THEY MAPPED OUT THE CEMETERY AREA IT'S REAL NICE HOW THEY ARE GOING TO MONUMENT IT OVER THERE. ANYONE ELSE FOR -- MS. MALONE, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >>JENNIFER MALONE: I JUST WANTED TO STATE FOR THE RECORD, TO CEMETERIES AROUND THE CITY -- [NO ENCODER] [NO ENCODER] >>ORLANDOUDES ANYONE HERE ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ITEM NUMBER 6. I SAW MISS DEBBY EARLIER. IS THAT ONE PERSON STILL THERE, MISS DEBBY? >>THE CLERK: YES. >> CAN YOU HEAR ME? >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >> WILLIAM SASHA. I'M FOR THE CHANGE IN THIS LOCATION. THERE'S MANY REASONS WHY, IT'S NG OVERDUE. I WAS ALSO RAISED IN ROBLES PARK, AS THE YOUNG MAN BACK IN THE 80s SO I AM BACK TO THE AREA BECAUSE I LIKE THE AREA, BOUGHT A HOUSE THERE SO VERY MUCH VERY MUCH AWARE OF THE AREA AND WHAT IT HAS, AND WHAT IT HAS GONE THROUGH. AND ALSO, TO BE REAL QUICK, IT'S JUST THAT THERE'S SO MUCH THAT'S GOING ON NOW THAT CONSISTS ALONG CENTRAL AVENUE, AND I THINK I HAVE SPOKEN TO MR. GUDES ABOUT THAT SITUATION. BUT THE PEOPLE STANDING OUT ALONG THE STREET, DOING THIS AND THAT, WE NEED TO HAVE A CHANGE, IT'S TIME FOR A CHANGE OVER THERE, BECAUSE THE CHANGES WERE ALL NEEDED. AND I THINK IT WILL BRING BACK THE COMMUNITY AND BRING BACK PEOPLE WHO WANT TO WORK IN THE COMMUNITY AND DO BETTER FOR THE COMMUNITY. THAT'S WHAT I WOULD SAY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR. I HAVE SEEN SOME OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY'S PLAN, AND HOW THEY ARE GOING TO LOOK AT CENTRAL AVENUE, AND TRYING TO ACQUIRE PROPERTIES TO DO JUST WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. TESTIMONY BE A GREAT CHANGE FOR THAT AREA. ANYONE ELSE ON THE SECOND FLOOR, MISS DEBBY? >> NO, SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANYONE REGISTERED FOR THISTEM? >> YES, WE HAVE ONE REGISTERED SPEAKER. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. >>THE CLERK: MR. MICHAEL GRANDOFF. THE ONLY THING HE DOES NOT HAVE THE VIDEO CAPABILITY. BUT AGAIN THIS IS A NONQUASI-ITEM, IS THAT CORRECT, MR. SHELBY? >>MARTIN SHELBY: I WOULD THINK SO YES. >>THE CLERK: MR. RANDOLPH, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I WOULD LIKE TO START OFF BY THANKING THE CITY PLANNING AND COUNTY PLANNING BECAUSE I HAVE -- ON THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL. IT'S RIGHT DOWN THE STREET FROM ME. THE CEMETERY IS PART OF THE ROBLES PARK MAP AMENDMENT, BUT THE MAP WAS PUT TOGETHER, AND PART OF THAT IS TO LOOK AT -- AND THERE WAS A LOT OF MEETING WA DECISION ON THAT. SO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY IS -- IN THE CONCLUSION OF WHAT HAPPENS AT THAT PARK. THEY HAVE MULTI-PROGRAMS WHICH IS GOOD. [~AUDIO DISTORTION~] IF YOU WANT PEOPLE TO CONNECT TO THE INTERNET, YOU CAN'T DO THAT. CRIME IS GOING TO BE REDUCED. THEY ARE GOING TO BE TECHNOLOGICALLY CONNECTED. IT'S GOING TO HAVE AN IMPACT IN TAMPA HEIGHTS. IT'S GOING TO INCREASE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. IT'S GOING TO INCREASE ECONOMIC -- IN THE COMMUNITY AND IT'S GOING TO INCREASE THE ECONOMIC VIBE IN THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE THEY CAN OWN THEIR OWN BUSINESS. SO AT THE END OF THE DAY I AM IN SUPPORT OF THIS PLAN. IF YOU LIVE IN ROBLES PARK YOU KNOW THE CONDITIONS. THEY ARE GOOD AT WHAT THEY DO. SO I DIDN'T MANY TO TAKE TOO MUCH TIME. I'M IN TOTAL AGREEMEN. I WISH IT WAS DONE. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU, SIR. ANYONE ELSE REGISTERED? >> THAT WAS THE ONLY REGISTERED SPEAKER FOR THIS ITEM. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOVE TO CLOSE. MR. MIRANDA SECONDED IT. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. MR. MIRANDA, NUMBER 6. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ITEM NUMR 6, TA/CPA 21-12. MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 3814 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL 35, R-35, TO MIXED USE, COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, CMU-35, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND BY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECONDYR. CITRO. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 21st AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 7 WAS TAKEN CARE OF EARLIER. ITEM NUMBER 8. >>MARTIN SHELBY: CITY CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY. THE NEXT FOUR ITEMS ALL TAKEN TOGEER A ALL -- YOU COULD DO WHAT WE DID THE LAST TIME AND DO THE FULL PRESENTATION. I UNDERSTAND, MRS. MERCER, THERE'S NOBODY LEFT ON TWO. IS THERE ANYBODY LEFT TONIGHT ON THESE PARKS? OR ANYBODY ELSE, FOR THAT MATTER? >> WE HAVE REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR ITEM NUMBER 14. >>MARTIN SHELBY: 14. SO IF YOU WISH TO TAKE THEM TOGETHER, THE PRESENTATION -- >>ORLANDO GUDES: ITEM NUMBER 8, 9 10 11? >>MARTIN SHELBY: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. TAKE THEM ALL TOGETHER. >>THE CLERK: EXCUSE ME, AND ALSO REGISTERED SPEAKER FOR ITEM NUMBER 10. >>MARTIN SHELBY: OKAY. >>JENNIFER MALONE: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. I WILL START WITH ITEM NUMBER 8, WHICH IS TA/CPA 21-15. THIS IS WHERE WE ARE GOING TODAY. I AM GOING TO SAY FRIENHIP PARK. MARCELLINO CHELO HUERTA. THEY ARE GOING CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN PROMOTING RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE OPPORTUNITY. WE HAVE THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT, DAVIS ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD AND DAVIS ISLAND VILLAGE. HERE IT IS ALONG DAVIS BOULEVARD. I HAVE SOME SUBJECT SITE PICTURES, PRETTY SMALL. AND ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL 35, AND RESIDENTIAL 10. AND THIS WOULD TAKE IN THAT RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE. AGAIN IT WOULD REMOVE ANY POTENTIAL, THE DWELLING UNITS, NONRESIDENTIAL SQUIRE FOOTAGE, AND THAT IS CONSISTENT. I AM GOING TO MOVE ONTO THE NEXT ONE. 21-16 IS THE KID MAY SEASON CENTER, DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD, RIGHT ACROSS FROM OAK LAWN CEMETERY ON NORTH JEFFERSON STREET AND RIGHTOWNTOWN. PICTURES OF THE SIGNS. THE FUTURE LAND USE IS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, AND THE REQUEST WOULD TAKE US TO THE RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE. OAK LAWN CEMETERY TO THE WEST FOR THE RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE. AGAIN THAT WOULD REMOVE ANY POTENTIAL FROM RESIDENTIAL ON THE SITE. THERE IS NO LIMIT -- AND IT IS COISTENT. THE NEXT ONE IS 21-17, THE FRIENDSHIP PARK, IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, IN THE VIRGINIA PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S AT SOUTH LOIS AVENUE AND WEST BAY TO BAY BOULEVARD. THEN I HAVE SUBJECT SITE PICTURES. THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE PARK ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF YOUR SCREEN. FUTURE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL 10. REQUEST TO GO TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE. AGAIN, POTENTIAL FOR NONRIDENAL O DWELLING UNITS ON THE SUBJECT SITE AND IT'S CONSISTENT. LAST BUT NOT LEAST, WE HAVE PORT TAMPA PARK IN THE CENTRAL PLANNING DISTRICT IN THE PORT TAMPA CITY NEIGHBORHOOD. HERE IT IS, WEST McCOY STREET. THIS IS WESTSHORE BOULEVARD. I HAVE SOME SUBJECT SITE PICTURES OF THE AMENITIES. AND MOST OF THIS IS ALREADY RECREATION A -- RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE, A VERY SMALL PORTION IS RESIDENTIAL 10. TH ENTIRE PARK IS RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE AND IS GOING TO REMOVE THAT ONE DWELLING UNIT, THAT RESIDENTIAL SQUIRE FOOTAGE. AND I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU SO MUCH, COUNCIL. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT.% >>JOHN DINGFELDER: [OFF MICROPHONE] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: GUESS WHAT ELSE IS IN THATARK? IT'S NO LONGER THERE. IT'S ONE OF THE LAST PARKS THAT HAS STAMPED ON THE SIDEWALK, NICK NUCCIO, COUNTY COMMISSIONER, AND HE WOULD STAMP BENCHES, AND ALL THAT STUFF. BUT THEY REDID THE PARK RECENTLY SO THEY TORE OUT THAT PARK. IT WAS A BASKETBALL COURT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WELL -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I AM GLAD TO SEE WHERE KID MASON IS. I HAD NO IDEA WHERE IT WAS. >>OR.>>ORLANDO GUDES: WELL, DOE HAVE ANYBODY TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THE ITEMS, 8 THROUGH 11? >>MARTIN SHELBY: NOBODY ON 2. THERE'S SOMEBODY ON NUMBER 10, I BELIEVE. >>THE CLERK: MICHAEL DUNKOFF. >> MIKA -- HE'S REGISTERED BUT IS NOT LOGGED ON AT THIS TIME. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. MOVE TO CLOSE. >>JOSEPH CITRO: SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND BY MR. CITRO. ALL IN FAV? OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED. MR. VIERA, YOU CAN HANDLE NUMBER 8 FOR US, SIR? >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR. I MOVE AN ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 106 EAST DAVIS BOULEVARD, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS DAVIS ISLANDS APX PARK, FROM RESIDENTIAL 35, R-35, AND RESIDENTIAL R-10 TO RECREATIONAL ON SPACE R/OS PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ROLL CALL. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 21st AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. MANISCALCO, TAKE NUMBER 9 FOR US. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I HAVE AN ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPAA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1101 NORTH JEFFERSON STREET OTHERWISE KNOWN AS KID MASON CENTER FROM CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT CDB TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE R/OS PROVIDING FOR AWL REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >> SECOND. >>LUIS VIERA: SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA. ROLL CALL. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>E CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 21st AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CARLSON, NUMBER 10, PLEASE. >>BILL CARLSON: I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE FILE NUMBER TA/CPA 21-17, FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4124 WEST BAY TO BAY BOULEVARD OTHERWISE KNOWN AS MARCELLINO CHE HUERTA JR. FRIENDSHIP PARK FROM RESIDENTIAL 10, R-10 TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE R/OS PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >> MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 21st AT 9:30 A.M. MIRANDA MANOR THAT'S RIGHT THERE E OF 24th, I BELIEVE WAS CALLED OWENS, AND A GREAT COACH, A GREAT GUY, AND TOOK TIME TO SPEAK TO ALL THE KIDS, AND HE REALLY HELPED A LOT OF PEOPLE, AND ONE OF THE LEADING COACHES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA. >>JOHN DINGFEDER: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: PLAYED BALL AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA. >> WERE YOU INVOLVED IN NAMING THAT? >> NO, WAYS IN LITTLE LEAGUE. [ LAUGHTER ] >>JOHN DINGFELDER: [OFF MICROPHONE] I THINK THERE'S SOME PERSONAL HARD FEELINGS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WAS GOOD FRIENDS WESTBOUND JOHN ALCOTT. HE WENT TO FLORIDA. AND I TOLD HIM THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN DO THAT, I HAVE TWO PEOPLE ON EACH SIDE, AND HE DID, HE WENT THROUGH THE WHOLE THING, HE GAVE UP -- CAN'T DO IT NOW. >>JOSEPH CITRO: MOVE AN ORDINANCE PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4702 WEST McCOY STREET OTHERWISE KNOWN AS PORT TAMPA PARK FROM RESIDENTIAL 10 R-10 TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE R/OS TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE R/OS, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA. ROLL CALL. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 21st AT 9:30 A.M. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THE LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT. NUMBER 14. >>DAVID HEY: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. IF I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN, PLEASE. YOUR LAST AMENDMENT SINGLE-FAMILY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT 21-11, IN REGARDS TO FLOOR AREA RATIO, THE UTILIZATION OF FLOOR AREA RATIO FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 AND URBAN MIXED USE 60 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. A LITTLE BACKGROUND ABOUT THE REQUEST. ON APRIL 1st OF THIS YEAR, TAMPA CITY COUNCIL DID DIRECT CITY STAFF TO REVIEW THE USE OF FLOOR AREA RATIO IN DETERMINING MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR SINGLE USE STRUCTURES. THIS ABILITY TO UTILIZE F.A.R. WAS IN THE MIXED USE CATEGORY, HAS BEEN AN OPTION WITHIN TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SINCE AT LEAST T 1998 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE PURPLE AS STATED IS N THAT 1998 PLAN WAS "THIS CONCEPT PERMITS RESIDENTIAL USES TO BE COMPETITIVE WITH COMMERCIAL AND/OR OFFICE USES." AFTER STAKEHOLDER MEETING WAS HELD ON MAY 25th, THE STAFF REVISED THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE, BASED ON THAT NOW AMENDED LANGUAGE. ANOTHER STAKEHOLDER MEETING WAS HOSTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HELD ON AUGUST 3rd. BUT NOW TO GO THROUGH THE PROPOSED CHANGES, FOR REFERENCE, THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE IS PROVIDED WITHIN YOUR PACKETS. THE MOST SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IS THE REMOVAL OF UTILIZING FLOOR AREA RATIO IN DETERMINING MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITY FOR SINGLE USE STRUCTURES IN THE SOUTH TAMPA AND NEW TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN, WE HAVE THE CITY'S VISION VISION MAP. I KNOW WE SEE THIS A LOT. WE SHOW IT A LOT DURING OUR ZONING HEARINGS. THIS IS THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. IT'S BASICALLY SOUTH OF KENNEDY, AND THEN KIND OF GETS DOWN, I BELIEVE THAT GOES SOUTH OF HYDE PARK. SO THIS IS ALL SOUTH TAMPA. AND THEN THE NEW TAMPA IS NORTH OF THE UNIVERSITY UP TO THE PASCO LINE, ALL THE PROPERTY WITHIN THAT BRIGHT PINK. BASED ON THE DISTRICT CHARACTERISTICS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS THESE TWO DISTRICTS PROVIDING "UNLIMITED GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES," ALSO CALLING THESE TWO AREAS "AREAS OF STABILITY." THE COMP PLAN REALLY ENVISIONS THE THREE CORE DISTRICTS, CENTRAL, WESTSHORE AND UNIVERSITY, AS HAVING THE MOST GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF TAMPA. OF THE CHANGES WITHIN THE LAND USE DESCRIPTIONS INCLUDE THE REMOVAL OF THE STATEMENT WHICH TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND THECL ADDITION OF "DETERMINATIVE SITE" TO CLARIFY AN EXISTING INCENTIVES." THEN FINALLY THE WORD CONSISTET IS REMOVED OUT OF THE LAND USE DESCRIPTION AND REPLACED WITH COMPATIBLE. THE WORD CONSISTENT IS NOT DEFINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE DEFINITION OF COMPATIBLE IS DEFINED, AND IS AS FOLLOWS: THE CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFERENT USES OR ACTIVITIES OR DESIGN WHICH ALLOW DENSITY LOCATED NEAR OR ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER, ELEMENTS AFFECTING COMPATIBILITY ARE THE FOLLOWING, PRICE HEIGHT, SCALE, MASS AND BULK OF STRUCTURE, PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION, ACCESS AND PARKING IMPACT, LANDSCAPING LIGHTING NOISE ODOR, AND ARCHITECTURE. COMPATIBILITY DOES NOT MEAN THE SAME AS, RATHER IT REFERS TO THE SENSITIVITY OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS IN MAINTAINING THE CHARACTER OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS. YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVT AND HAS IDENTIFIED SOME KEY ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE. THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE CONTINUES TO PROMOTE A MIXTURE OF USES WITHIN THE TWO PLANNING DISTRICTS. THE MAJORITY OF PROPERTIES DESIGNATED ONE OF THE THREE MIXED USE CATEGORIES ARE LOCATED ALONG OR WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO MAJOR CORRIDORS. VERTICAL MIXED USE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE TWO PLANNING DISTRICTS WILL CONTINUE TO BE ELIGIBLE TO USE F.A.R. FOR OVERALL RESIDENTIAL UNIT COUNT. SECOND, SINCE UNDER THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE, SINGLE USE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WOULD NO LONGER BE ABLE TO UTILIZE F.A.R. IN CALCULATING RESIDENTIAL DENSITY. IT IS -- THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S FINDINGS THAT THERE WILL BE AN OVERALL REDUCTION IN RESIDENTIAL UNITS OVER WHAT CAN CURRENTLY BE CONSIDERED. SO OVERALL, UNIT COUNT MAY BE REDUCED, THE SIZE AND COST OF EACH UNIT MAY INCREASE. AND THIRDLY, THE LANGUAGE ALSO CLARIFIES THAT DEVELOPMENTS MUST BE COMPATIBLE WHICH IS DEFINED AGAIN IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE IS FOUND TO PROVIDE GREATEST PROTECTION FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL BY POTENTIALLY REDUCING BUILDING, SCALE AND MASSING BASED ON THAT COMPATIBLF COMPATIBLE IN THE LAND USE CATEGORY. AS ALWAYS, WE SEND THIS OUT TO OUR PARTNER AGENCIES. THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS FROM ANY OF THE REVIEWING AGENCIES. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT A LARGE NUMBER OF CITIZEN COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGARDING THIS REQUEST AND CAN BE ACCESSED TO THE LINK THAT'S INCLUDED WITHIN YOUR PACKET. IT WAS, I THINK, OVER 100. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE TO AMEND THE URBAN MIXED USE 60, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 AND THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, TO REMOVE THE OPTION OR REFERRED TO AS THE F.A.R. OPTION FOR SINGLE USE RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS IN THE SOUTH AND NEW TAMPA PLANNING DIRICT CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED POLICY GUIDANCE WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THREE MAIN AREAS OF CONSISTENCY: ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY PROMOTES THE PRESERVATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER. POLICIES ALSO PROMOTE DESIGN SENSITIVITY. WHEN DEVELOPING ADJACENT TO ESTABLISHED SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. THE PROPOSAL CLARIFIES THE OVERALL INTENT OF THE DISTRICT BY PROVIDING THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT MUST BE COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. ALSO, OVERALL SCALE AND MASSING MAY BE RUCEDHICH IS ONE ASPECT OF MANY REGARDING OVERALL NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER. YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION ALSO FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S OVERALL GROWTH STRATEGY DESCRIBED AS THE COMPACT CITY FORM. THESE POLICIES ENCOURAGE THE CITY TO FOCUS HIGH DENSITY HOUSING IN AREAS WITH ACCESS TO TRANSIT AND EMPLOYMENT. THOUGH SOME TRANSIT IS PROVIDED IN AREAS OF SOUTH TAMPA, THERE IS NO LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICE CURRENTLY PROVIDED ALONG WESTSHORE BOULEVARD EXCEPT IN PORT TAMPA CITY, OR ALONG GANDY BOULEVARD. THESE TWO CORRIDORS PROVIDE FOR LARGE PERCENTAGE OF THE THREE LAND USE CATEGORIES FOUND WITHIN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THERE IS ALSO NO LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICE WITHIN THE WHOLE OF THE NEW TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THE MAJORITY OF TRANSIT AND EMPLOYMENT IN THE CITY OF TAMPA ARE FOUND WITHIN THE CENTRAL, WESTSHORE AND UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT. BOTH LAND USE POLICIES 9.4.1 AND 9.6.2 ENCOURAGE HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN AREAS WITH TRANSIT AND EMPLOYMENT AVAILABILITY. POLICIES ALSO ENCOURAGE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT AROUND RECOGNIZED URBAN VILLAGES OR BUSINESS CENTERS WHICH ARE ALL LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA WESTSHORE AND UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT. BASED ON THESE FACTS, PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THAT PROPOSED PROPOSED LANGUAGE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. SO BASED ON THAT, THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO YOU ALL THIS EVENING IS TO FIND THE PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT THE IMAGINE 2040 TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I BELIEVE STEVEN BESTON OF THE CITY OF TAMPA IS ALSO ONLINE AND WOULD LIKE TO GIVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION. BOTH OF US WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. HEY? >> THANK YOU, MAY I SHARE MY SCREEN PLEASE? STEPHEN BENSON WITH YOUR CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I DO HAVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION ON THIS ITEM. THIS AMENDMENT WAS INITIATED BY TAMPA CITY COUNCIL EARLIER THIS YEAR, RELATES TO A SPECIFIC PROVISION IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH WE REFER TO AS THE F.A.R. OPTION. COUNCIL REQUESTED STAFF TO REVIEW THE PROVISION FOR POTENTIAL MODIFICATION AND TO PROCESS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO ENSURE THAT FURTHER USE OF THIS OPTION IS IN LINE WITH ITS INTENT AS WELL AS THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES IN THE PLAN. FIRST I WANT TO SPEAK TO THE TIMELINE AND THE PROCESS FOR THIS AMENDMENT. THE SECOND, WE'LL LOOK AT THE FINAL PROPOSED AMENDMENT LANGUAGE AND THEN PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF THE POLICY IMPLICATIONS AND THEN THE NEXT STEPS. THIS AMENDMENT WAS INITIATED BY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 21-273 ON APRIL 1st. PLANNING COMMISSION HELD INFORMATIONAL MEETING ON MAY 25th FOR STAKEHOLDERS. DURING THE MONTH OF JULY, STAFF WORKED TOGETHER TO REVISE THE AMENDMENT LANGUAGE AND THEN HELD ANOTR IORMATIONAL MEETING OWN AUGUST 3rd. PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THIS AMENDMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN ON SEPTEMBER 14th. THE TWO MEETINGS WERE HELD AS I MENTIONED IN MAY AND AUGUST AND THOSE RECORDINGS ARE POSTED AND AVAILABLE AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WEBSITE, AND THE AMENDMENT WAS REFINED BASED UPON THE FEEDBACK RECEIVED AT THESE TWO SESSIONS. THE LANGUAGE PRESENTED ON YOUR SCREEN IS THE SECTION OF THE COMP PLAN THAT WE REFERRED TO AS THE F.A.R. OPTION, ON THE FAR LEFT, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AS YOU KNOW AECTS DENSITY, DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS REGULATED BY FLOOR AREA RATIO.@E REQUIRED TO MEET BOTH OF THESE THRESHOLD, BUT TO HELP DIRECT -- INTO THE MIXED USE CORRIDORS OF THE CITY. THIS OPTION ALLOWS THE MIXED USE AREAS, TO ONLY USE F.A.R. RATHER THAN THE HOOKS DENSITY TO DETERMINE HOW MANY MAY BE PROVIDED. THIS MEANS IT MAY PROVIDE MORE UNITS THAN NORMALLY CONSIDERED ALLOWABLE WITHOUT THIS PROVISION. THIS OPTION APPLIES TO THREE MIXED USE LAND USE CATEGORIES YOU SEE AT THE TOP OF THE SCREEN, MIXED USE 60, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35, AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. ALTHOUGH THE F.A.R. OPTION IS ONLY APPLICABLE TO MIXED USE PLAN CATEGORIES, SINGLE USE PROJECTS ARE CURRENTLY ALLOWED TO USE THE OPTION THE LANGUAGE PRESENTED ON APRIL 1st AND TRANSMITTED BY COUNCIL RECOGNIZES THE DISTINCTION AND THIS OPTION PROJECTS THAT WE N SINGLE USE, AND THE REVISED LANGUAGE BASED UPON THE STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS. STAFF COULD FURTHER LIMIT THIS TO THE NEW PLANNING DISTRICT AS WELL AS THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, AS WELL AS THE MODIFICATIONS THAT WERE PRESENTED BY MR. HEY PREVIOUSLY. THE MAP ON THE SCREEN SHOWS THE DISTRIBUTION OF PARCELS AFFECTED WITH ONE OF THE THREE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS THAT WE ARE DISCUSSING RIGHT NOW. THESE LANDS ARE ALLOWED TO USE THE F.A.R. OPTIONS TO DETERMINE THEIR DENSITY FOR POTENTIAL PROJECTS. YOU CAN SEE IN A LINEAR FASHION ALONG ADJACENT ARTERIAL COLLECTOR STREET SYSTEM. GENERALLY COMPRISING WHAT IS REFERRED TO IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COLLECTIVELY AS OUR MIXED USE CORRIDORS. AS MENTIONED, THE COMP PLAN DIVIDES THE CITY INTO FIVE PLANNING DISTRICT. THE PLAN INCLUDES LANGUAGE THAT DESCRIBES THE SPECIFIC -- EACH OF THESE DISTRICTS AND TO GROW AND CHANGE IN THE FUTURE. THE WESTSHORE DISTRICT IS SHOWN IN PURPLE. INCLUDES THE WESTSHORE BUSINESS DISTRICT, TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, TWO MAJOR SHOPPING MALLS, AND THE DREW PARK COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT IS ON THE MAP IN LIGHT BLUE. THE CENTRAL DISTRICT IS SHOWN IN GREEN, AND INCLUDES THE SEVEN CRAs AS WELL AS ALL OF THE URBAN VILLAGES, THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, AND PORT TAMPA BAY. AND THE UNIVERSITY DISTRICT WHICH IS THE THIRD DISTRICT, IS SHOWN IN ORANGE AND IT INCLUDES THE INNOVATION DISTRICT, USF TAMPA CAMPUS, AND CONSTITUTES THE THIRD MAJOR EMPLOYMENT CENTER IN THE CITY. THE NEW TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT IN SHOWNN THE COLOR AT THE TOP. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ESTABLISHES UNIQUE VISIONS FOR THE NEW TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THOSE EXCERPTS ARE SHOWN ON YOUR SCREEN.% AND BASED UPON LIMITED GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES IN THESE AREAS. THE VISIONS FOR THE SOUTH TAMPA AND NEW PLANNING -- TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT ARE CHARACTERIZEDGY MAINTAIN -- MAINTAINING OVER HEAD STABILITY AND THAN FILL AND IS HIEVING AND MORE SUSTAINABLE MIXED USE. IN THE RESEARCH THAT WE PERFORMED, YOU CAN SEE THE SLIDE DISPLAY IT IS RESIDENTIAL GROWTH THAT HAS OCCURRED IN THE CITY OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS. THE MOST RECENT TEN YEARS OF GROWTH IS BROKEN INTO FIVE-YEAR INCREMENTS. 2010 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE SHOWN IN GRAY. AND THE GROWTH THAT OCCURRED FROM 2010 TO 2015, THAT INCREASE IS SHOWN IN DARK BLUE. AND THE GROWTH THAT OCCURRED FROM 2015 TO 2020 IS SHOWN IN RED. THTWO DISTRICTS THAT HAVE SN THE HIGHEST RESIDENTIAL GROWTH IN THAT PERIOD ARE THE NEW TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT AND THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THIS CHANGE IS NOT IN LINE WITH TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENVISIONED FOR GROWTH WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO BE -- THESE TWO DISTRICTS. LOOKING IT APPEARS THAT THE GREAT OF RESIDENTIAL GROWTH IS DECREASING SINCE THE GROWTH FROM 2010 TO 2015 WERE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE THAN GROWTH FROM 2015 TO 2020, SO THE RED IS SMALLER THAN THE BLUE. YOU SEE THE GROWTH IS ACTUALLY DH TAMPA DISTRICT THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE. THE RED, THE GROWTH IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS, IS MORE THAN THE GROWTH IN FIVE YEARS PRIOR. SO AS SHOWN ON YOUR SCREEN IS THE AREA SOUTH OF KENNEDY, WEST OF PINES, SOUTH OF SWANN AVENUE AND WEST OF HOWARD AVENUE, COMPRISES THE INTERBAY PENINSULA. AND THE NEW TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT IS DESCRIBED GENERALLY AS AN AREA NORTH OF FLETCHER AND EAST MUCH 46th STREET. IT INCLUDES TAMPA PALMS AS WELL AS HIDDEN RIVER DEVELOPMENT. IT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PORTION ADJACENT UNDEVELOPED USF LANDS I WITH ARE PART OF THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT. AND JUST A FINAL SUMMARY OF WHAT THE ACTUAL AMENDMENT DOES, THE ABILITY TO USE F.A.R. OPTION TO DETERMINE DENSITY FOR SINGLE USE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS WOULD NO LONGER ASH LOUD IN BOTH OF THESE CRITERIA. THE FIRST IS CMU, CC AND UMU LAND USE CATEGORIES AND THEY MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLAN DISTRICT AND NEW TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. NO PARCELS WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, WESTSHORE PLANNING DISTRICT OR UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT WILL BE AFFECTED BY THIS AMENDMENT AND NO MIXED USE PROJECTS ANYWHERE IN THE CITY WILL BE AFFECTED BY THIS AMENDMENT. THIS MAP DISPLAYS THE PARCELS IN THE SOUTH TAMPA WILL BE. THEY ARE GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG PORTIONS OF DALE MABRY ALE MABRY HIGHWAY,ENDEON, WESTSHORE BOULEVARD, MANHATTAN AVENUE, MacDILL AVENUE, BAY TO BAY. IN THE NEW TAMPA DISTRICT, THE AREAS THAT ARE AFFECTED ARE SHOWN IN RED. THERE IS ONE IN THE APPLICABLE CATEGORIES IN THE NEW TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT GENERALLY AROUND I-75 AND BRUCE B. DOWNS INTERCHANGE. AS WAS MENTIONED, THERE ARE ALSO A COUPLE OF CHANGES THAT REMAIN PROPOSED, CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE THAT WAS USE DEFINED ALREADY IN THEOMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THE NEXT STEPS WOULD BE TO TRANSMIT THIS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOR REVIEW, AND THEN COME BACK TO YOU FOR A REVIEW AND ADOPTION. AND THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. AND I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ANY QUESTIONS? MR. DINGFELDER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I AM NOT SURE WHO TO DIRECT THIS TO. MAYBE YOU, STEPHEN. I HAVE HAD A BEEF FOR AT LEAST TWO-PLUS YEARS, AND DAVID IS WELL FAMILIAR WITH IT. THAT'S WHY I AM THROWING THIS AT YOU STEPHEN. ABOUT HOW WE DEFINE MIXED USE. AND WHAT OUR THRESHOLD IS FOR MIXED USE. I WAS HOPING THAT WHEN WE WENT THROUGH ALL OF THIS, YOU KNOW, SIX MONTH, EIGHT MONTH, TWELVE MONTH EXERCISE TO GET TO THIS POINT IN REGARD TO THIS PLAN AMENDMENT, WHICH IS A POSITIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, BUT IT STILL HAS A GAPING LOOPHOLE THAT IN MY OPINION -- AND I WILL ANSWER MY OWN QUESTION -- IN MY OPINION WE DON'T SEEM TO HAVE A DEFINITION OF WHAT IS MIXED USE. WE THINK DON'T HAVE A THRESHOLD. THE EXAMPLE, GENTLEMEN, AS YOU MAY REMEMBER, WHEN WE ALL FIRST STARTED THIS GO AROUND IN 2019, DOWN AT THE CORNER OF MacDILL AND GANDY, AND THEY HAD A PROJECT, AND THEY CALL IT MIXED USE, BUT IT HAD LIKE 1% OF THE WHOLE PROJECT WAS COMMERCIAL, AND THE OTHER 99% WAS RESIDENTIAL. AND, YET, THEY WERE ALLOWED TO CALL IT MIXED USE AND THEY WERE ALLOWED TO USE THE BONUS CRITERIA ASSOCIATED WITH MIXED USE. IS THAT GAPING HOLE STILL THERE? STEPHEN BENSON. DOING ABOUT IT?- >> I DO BELIEVE THAT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS BEEN WORKING ON SOME RESEARCH THAT WILL BE FORTHCOMING AS WE PRESENT IT TO YOU. MY UNDERSTANDING THUS FAR IS THAT WE HAVE YET TO DISCOVER A SIMPLE SOLUTION TO THAT ISSUE TO BE IDENTIFIED. WE DO ACKNOWLEDGE IT AND WE DO BELIEVE IT'S SOMETHING THAT CAN BE ADDRESSED AS WE LOOK TO UPDATE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION NEXT YEAR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: WELL, I THINK WE ARE JUST DRAGGING OUR FEET ON THIS. NOT NECESSARILY INTENTIONALLY. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THERE'S AN EVIL LURKING WITHIN THE CITY AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION. BUT I THINK WE ARE DRAGGING O OUR FEET ON IT. I THINK IT'S REALLY DANGEROUS TO AG O FEET ON IT BECAUSE WE GO TO ALL THE EFFORT OF DOING THIS AND SAYING, YOU KNOW, NO MORE IN THESE MIXED USE CATEGORIES, ET CETERA, ET CETERA, FROM MONOLITHIC SINGLE-USE M MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS AND ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS ADD 1% OR LESS, TEN SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL AND THEY CAN CALL IT MIXED USE, AND WE CAN'T STOP THEM. SO WHILE WE PERFECT THIS, DAVID HEY, I WILL THROW ITO YOU NOW, WHILE WE PERFECT, COME UP WITH THE PERFECT ANSWER, YOU CAN HAVE PROJECT AFTER PROJECT AFTER PROJECT SLIP THROUGH THE CRACKS. AM I CRAZY HEAR, OR JUST SLAP ME IF I AM. >> WE HEAR YOU ABOUT THE MIXED USE. WE ARE CONDUCTING RESEARCH. BEST PRACTICE, ON WT THE BEST WAY, HOW TO HANDLE THAT, WHETHER IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PUT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE MORE IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. I WILL ALSO REMAINED YOU, YES, THEY ARE ELIGIBLE TO APPLY, BUT REMEMBER, IF THEY HAVE TEN SQUARE FEET, IT IS WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF COUNCIL THAT THAT WILL BE A DECISION OF COUNCIL WHETHER THAT MIXED USE MEETS THE . I DON'T THINK WE HAD ANY THAT -- I WILL SAY THERE WERE SOME THAT HAD SOME SMALLER AREAS OF COMMERCIAL USES, AND -- >>JOHN DINGFELDER: AS I RECALL THAT ONE AT MacDILL AND GANDY WAS LIKE LESS THAN A THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. AND IT REALLY AMOUNTED TO LIKE 1% OF THE WHOLE PROJECT. IT WAS THE CLASSIC LOOPHOLE, CLASSIC WHERE THE DEVELOPER WAS TRYING TO CRAWL THROUGH THA LOOPHOLE. AND HERE IS THE PROBLEM WITH SAYING WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, DAVID. YOU ARE SAYING, COUNCIL CAN ALWAYS DENY IT, OKAY. BUT GUESS WHAT, LEGAL TURNS AROUND, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, MRS. JOHNSON-VELEZ WATCHING THIS, BUT LEGAL TURNS AROUND AND SAYS, WELL, THERE'S NOT REALLY LANGUAGE THERE THAT DEFINES WHAT MIXED USE IS, SO YOU BETTER FIND SOMETHING ELSE TO DENY IT ON. OKAY. BECAUSE IF WE ARE NOT DEFINING IT, THEN WHY SHOULDN'T THEY CALL THROUGH THAT LOOPHOLE? ANYWAY, I'M OFF MY SOAPBOX. I THINK WE NEED TO SPEED IT UP AND WE NEED TO CLOSE THAT LOOPHOLE. OTHERWISE, WHAT WE ARE DOING HERE TONIGHT IS A WONDERFUL EXERCISE, BUT IT'S MEANINGLESS FOR ANY HALF INTELLIGENT DEVELOPER OUT THERE, AND THERE ARE AT LEAST HALF INTELLIGENT. >> JUST A POINT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE, WE ARE CONTINUING TO DO AND SHOULD PRESENT TO CITY STAFF SHORTLY, YOU KNOW, WE REALLY NEED TO BE CAREFUL BECAUSE OUR MIXED USE -- THERE ARE MIXED USE DESIGNATIONS THAT ARE NOT ON MAIN ROADS. THERE IS MIXED USE ON DEAD-END ROADS. AND IS IT APPROPRIATE, AND WHAT IS THE BEST MECHANISM TO SEPARATE THOSE AREAS THAT MAY NOT BE CONDUCIVE FOR ACTUAL VERTICAL MIXED USE ON EACH SITE THAT LOOKS MORE AT WHAT IS THE MIXTURE OF MIXED USE THROUGHOUT A CORRIDOR, OR AN AREA? THAT'S WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO WRAP OUR HEADS AROUND. >> WELL, THAT WORRIES ME A LITTLE BIT, TOO, BECAUSE YOU ARE Y DOESN'T HAVE TO DO IT BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO RELY ON THE NEXT GUY TO DO IT DOWN THE STREET. >>DAVID HEY: WELL, IT IS A PLANNING MECHANISM, REALLY, THAL GET TO A POINT WHERE EVERY BUILDING PROPOSED IN A MIXED USE CATEGORY TO BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A MIXTURE OF USES. THE LAND USE CATEGORIES HAVE ALWAYS BEEN DESCRIBED AS WE LOOKED AT AN AREA OF US, THAT YOU CAN HAVE RESIDENTIAL NEXT TO COMMERCIAL, THAT IT WON'T JUST BE A SOLELY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, THAT YOU CAN HAVE OPTIONS. SOME OF THAT, PREVIOUS COUNCILS, PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS, WERE MORE MARKET DRIVEN, AND AS ALWAYS, IT'S ALWAYS GOOD TO GO BACK AND RELOOK AT THINGS, AND SEE WHAT TOOLS IN THE TOOL BOX HAVE WORKED PREVIOUSLY, ARE STILL WORKING, AND WE THINK WE'LL HAVE SOME RECOMMENDATIONS BACK TO YOU SHORTLY. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: OKAY. WELL, WE KNOW ONE DAY, AND YOU PROBABLY HAVE, TOO, SO I WON'T BELABOR IT BUT AT THE END OF THE NIGHT I AM GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO LIGHT A LITTLE FIRE UNDER EVERYBODY ON THIS ISSUE AND GET SOMETHING DONE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YOU KNOW, TIMES CHANGE AND THINGS ARE DIFFERENT. I REMEMBER NOT TOO MANY YEARS AGO THANKSGIVING, DECEMBER 26th, WAS THE CHRISTMAS SEASON, AND NOW, I SEE SOME ADS ON TV AND EVERYTHING ELSE, GO GET YOUR CHRISTMAS TOYS TODAY BECAUSE YOU WON'T HAVE ANY FOR CHRISTMAS, THE SHIPPING PROBLEM, THIS PROBLEM. LOOK AT THE CARS. YOU CAN'T FIND A CHIP THAT WHATS MADE IN AMERICA AND THAT'S WHY YOU CAN'T BUY CARS. AND LOOK AT PUBLIX, WINN-DIXIE, WALMART. YET ON THE OTHER SIDE, THE DOCTOR TELLS YOU GO WALK AT THE MALL AND THE MALL TELLS YOU -- THAT'S WHAT THEY WANT. YOU LOOK -- I DON'T KNOW HOW WE STAY ALIVE. AND THAT'S HOW IT IS. YOU GO TO A GAME AND THEY CHARGE ME $28 CONVENIENCE FEE. [ LAUGHTER ] AND I AM NOT DISAGREEING WITH YOU, BUT I HATE TO BE A NAYSAYER, THE LAST COUPLE OF SENTENCES YOU SAID THE INDUSTRY IS CHANGING. IT'S CHANGING BECAUSE WHAT WE GREW UP WITH, EVEN DOWNTOWN, WHEN YOU SAID -- I THOUGHT IT WAS FOR AN EXCURSION, WAY OUT THERE. GOING TO TAMPA THEATER. SO THESE ARE THE THINGS THAT HAVE CHANGED. AND THE WORLD IS CHANGING. AND WHETHER THEY HAVE MIXED USE OR NOT, YOU CAN PUT IT IN. IF IT DOESN'T WORK SIX MONTHS LATER THEY CHANGE IT TO WHATEVER THEY WANT. AND I AM NOT DISAGREEING WITH YOU SIR. I AM JUST SAYING THAT THE WORLD IS CHANGING SO QUICKLY. IF YOU HAVE A SICKNESS, YOU GO TO A DOCTOR. THAT'S HOW IT IS. AND IT'S GETTING WORSE. AND I SAID IT BEFORE. YBOR CITY DOWNTOWN WAS THE MAIN SHOPPING CENTER. ALL OF A SUDDEN NORTH GATE AND BRITTON PLAZA OPENED UP, DOWNWN A YBOR CITY, THEN THE MALLS CAME IN AND THEY CLOSED DOWN. NOW WE DON'T KNOW WHERE TO GO. THE MALLS ARE NO LONGER LIKE THEY USED TO BE. THEY HAVE VERY LITTLE AND THEY ARE ALL CHANGING TO LIKE MIDTOWN. YOU LIVE, YOU PLAY, EVERYTHING IN THAT AREA. SO I AM NOT DISAGREEING WITH YOU. BUT TIMES ARE CHANGING, AND IT'S A REALISTIC THING. THAT'S ALL. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. CITRO. >>JOSEPH CITRO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIR. I AM IN THE MIDDLE HERE AGREEING WITH COUNCILMAN MIRANDA AND THEN N DINGFELDER. I WAS JUST PERUSING THROUGH AN E-MAIL THAT WAS SENT TO THE CRA BOARD ABOUT A STUDY THAT WAS DONE IN YBOR CITY. AND ONE OF THE NUMBER ONE THINGS THEY WANTED WAS RETAIL. DAVID AND -- EXCUSE ME, MR. HEY AND MR. BENSON, THERE'S GOT TO BE A WAY THAT IT'S NOT THE BURDEN OF THE CITY TO PROVE THAT WE NEED THIS RETAIL SPACE OR THAT WE WANT THIS RETAIL SPACE. IN MY OPINION, THERE SHOULD BE A PERCENTAGE SET UP, AND THEN HAVE THE BURDEN PUT ON THE DEVELOPER OR THE PETITIONER TO SAY, OKAY, WE DON'T NEED THAT NOW, WE DON'T NEED THAT MUCH NOW. AND BECAUSE I THINK WE ARE ALL SEEING THE TRENDS THAT ARE HAPPENING NOW. PEOPLE WANT TO BE ABLE TO WALK OUTSIDE OF THEIR CONDOMINIUM OR THEIR HOME AND WALK FOUR OR FIVE BLOCKS AND GO TO A LITTLE RETAIL STORE. WHETHER IT BE HAIR SALON, SHOE STORE, LAUNDROMAT DOWNTOWN DOWN IN YBOR CITY, THEY WANT A LAUNDROMAT DOWN THE. SO I HEAR WHAT BOTH THESE COUNCILMEN ARE SAYING BUT AGAIN THERE SHOULD BE SOME SORT OF PERCENTAGE IN A MIXED USE THAT THE METER HAS TO PROVE. OKAY, WE DON'T NEED THAT HERE ON THIS DEAD-END ROAD. OR SAY YES. THAT'S MY POINT, COUNCILMAN. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I LOVE THIS DISCUSSION BECAUSE CHARLIE, YOU HAVE A GOOD POINT, TIMES ARE CHANGING AND THE MARKET CHANGES. I WAS AROUND WHEN -- I REMEMBER RIDING MY STINGRAY. POINT, TOO, AND MAYBE THAT IS- THE SOLUTION. MAYBE WE CREATE A STANDARD WHICH IS THE PRESUMPTION, IT'S THE PRESUMPTIVE STANDARD, BUT THEN THE DEVELOPER HAS THE ABILITY TO REBUT IT AND GET A WAIVER FROM THAT STANDARD, JUST LIKE WE DO WITH ALL OF OUR STANDARDS. AND I THINK YOU MIGHT HAVE HIT ON SOMETHING. BUT I THINK THE STANDARD LISTS IS RISKY. AND HERE IS WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT. I AM NOT SAYING -- WE LIVE IN A CAPITALIST SOCIETY. DEVELOPERS HAVE A RIGHT, YOU KNOW, TO BUILD -- IF THEY WANT TO BUILD RESIDENTIAL AND THEY HAVE THE RIGHT ZONING FOR IT, ET CETERA, THEY ARE GOING TO BUILD RESIDENTIAL. AND I AM NOT SAYING WE ARE MANDATING THAT MIXED USE, DAVID. BUT WHAT I AM SAYING IS THAT IN THIS CASE, WE ARE NOT MANDATING, WE ARE GIVING THEM THIS F.A.R. OPTION, WHICH IS A HUGE BONUS POTENTIAL OVER AND ABOVE WHAT THEY CAN FORM NORMALLY BUILD. THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT. IT'S REALLY A BIG BONUS OPPORTUNITY FOR MIXED USE. OKAY. AND THAT'S THE WAY IT WAS DESIGNED. I REMEMBER THE FIRST TIME THEY TOLD ME WHAT A MIXED USE PROJECT WAS ABOUT 30 YEARS AGO, AND IT WAS EXCITING. AND EVERYBODY WAS ALL ABOUT IT. BUT YOU SHOULD, TO ME, YOU SHOULD ONLY GET TO USE THAT BONUS INTENSITY, THAT BIG DENSITY IF YOU HAVE A MIXED USE AND IF YOU DON'T THEN IT FALLS BACK TO WHEREVER IT CAME FROM. AND, JOE, I REALLY, REALLY LIKE THAT IDEA, IS IF 20% IS THE THRESHOLD. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE ETCHED IN STONE BUT AT LEAST THAT'S A STARTING POINT, AND THE DEVELOPER CAN SAY, HEY, I AM DOWN THAT DEAD-END ROAD AND 20% DOESN'T WORK FOR ME BUT AT LEAST WE HAVE A NUMBER TO START IT. ALL RIGHT. THAT'S GREAT DISCUSSION FOR THK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YOU'RE WELCOME SIR. ALL RIGHT. >>LUIS VIERA: MR. CHAIR, THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE ALL THIS DISCUSSION. YOU KNOW, IT'S INTERESTING TO SEE NEW TAMPA. I KNOW IT WAS TALKED ABOUT SOME TIME AGO AS AN AREA WITH SUCH RAPID GROWTH. THAT'S WHAT THIS HAS. A LOT OF CORRELATION TO WHAT WE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT WITH REGARDS TO PUBLIC SAFETY, FIRE, IN TAMPA, AND THE WAY YOU SEE POPULATION IN NEW TAMPA, AND THAT'S PART OF WHAT WE ARING SEEING TONIGHT. I LIKE TO TELL THE STORY, I WAS IN THE 8th GRADE, AND IN 1990, I WAS GOING TO A FRIEND'S BIRTHDAY PARTY, A GUY I AM STILL FRIENDS WITH, AND ABOUT FIVE MINUTES WRITE LIVE, AND I REMEMBER GOING DOWN BRUCE B. DOWNS WITH MY MOM, THE BASEBALL PARK, IF I RECALL,ND THERE WAS NOTHING OUT THERE. AND THERE'S ABOUT 8 OR 9 THAT YOU ARE PEOPLE LIVING IN NEW TAMPA AT THE TIME, AND TODAY IT'S ABOUT 50, 60,000 PEOPLE LIVE OUT THERE. WE HAD A POPULATION GROWTH. SO NEW TAMPA, SOUTH TAMPA, THERE IS A POPULATION BOOM, AND A LOT OF ACTITION -- ACCOMMODATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THAT. I WANT TO POINT THAT OUT. THANK YOU, SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THAOU, SIR. ALL RIGHT. ANYBODY ELSE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ANYBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ALL RIGHT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: NOBODY ON THE SECOND FLOOR BUT I BELIEVE THERE ARE REGISTERED SPEAKERS. >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE THREE REGISTERED SPEAKERS. SARAH ANN BENNETT. STEPHANIE POYNOR. AND DAVID MECHANIK. THEY ARE ALL ONLINE. THEY NEED TO TURN OWN THEIR CAMERAS AND UNMUTE THEMSELVES. >> MY NAME IS CARROLL ANN BENNETT, A LIFE-LONG RESIDENT OF SOUTH TAMPA. THIS IS A VERY SMALL CHANGE THAT APPLIES ONLY TO SOUTH TAMPA AND NEW TAMPA. AS DAVID SAID, BECAUSE THE COMP PLAN STATES THESE DISTRICTS ARE UNSUITED TO URBANIZATION AND INCREASED DENSITY. THEY SHOULD BE STABLE AND HAVE THE LOWEST AMOUNT OF GROWTH IN THE CITY. SOME DEVELOPERS ARE GROSSLY EXAGGERATING THE EFFECTS OF THIS LITTLE CHANGE. DEVELOPERS CAN STILL BUILD BETWEEN 30 AND 50 UNITS PER ACRE IN SOUTH TAMPA. IT'S BEEN BILLED WITH THE ZONING. THEY CAN STILL USE F.A.R. IN SOUTH TAMPA IF THEY INCLUDE SOME MIXED USE. THEY CAN STILL GET INCREASED DENSITY IN SOUTH TAMPA IF THEY PAY FOR BONUS DENSITY. THEY CAN STILL USE F.A.R. TO ASSEMBLE USE IN THE THREE DISTRICTS WHERE IT MAKES SENSE. RANDY GOERS SAYS THERE IS PLENTY OF ROOM FOR SINGLE USE, AN F.A.R. AND THE OTHER THREE PLANNING DISTRICTS, AND THE CITY WOULD LOVE FOR THEM TO BUILD IT THERE. ONE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS SAID IT BEST. DEVELOPERS WANT TO BUILD IN SOUTH TAMPA BECAUSE THEY CAN CHARGE HIGHER RENT AND MAKE MORE MONEY THERE. SOME DEVELOPERS HAVE THE AUDACITY TO SAY WE ARE TRYING TO DIRECT GROWTH AWAY FROM SOG BECAUSE IT IS A RICH WHITE COMMUNITY AND THEY DON'T WANT PAR RENTERS IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT STATEMENT IS VERY IRONIC SINCE IT IS THEIR LUXURY HOUSING THAT WILL MAKE SOG RICHER AND WHITER THAN IT IS NOW. IN REALITY SOG IS ONE OF THE MOST DIVERSE AREAS IN TAMPA, MY ALMA MATER IS MONDAY ROPE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND ROBINSON HIGH SCHOOL WHERE NATURALLY INTEGRATED BEFORE FORCED BUSING BECAUSE PORT TAMPA HAD A SIGNIFICANT DIVERSE COMMUNITY MADE UP OF FAMILIES WHO OWNED THEIR OWN HOMES. CURRENTLY, SOG IS A VERY DIVERSE COMMUNITY AND THEY LIKE IT THAT WAY. THEY WANT IT TO STAY THAT WAY. IN 2019, 33616 WAS 54% WHITE, 20% LATINO AND 15% BLACK. FOR 70 YEARS SOG HAS BEEN A PLACE WHERE FAMILIES WITH VERY MODEST INCOME COS REALIZE THE DREAM OF HOME OWNERSHIP. I GREW UP IN HOUSES THAT AIRMEN COULD AFFORD, AND THEY WERE AFFORDABLE. THE REAL ATHLETE THREAT TO THE DIVERSITY OF THE COMMUNITY IS THE LUXURY HOUSING THAT HAS INVITED THOSE NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOODS AND PUT PROPERTIES OUT OF REACH FOR AVERAGE WORKING MEN AND WOMEN. WORKING PEOPLE WITH MODEST INCOMES CAN BUY A HOUSE AND RAISE A FAMILY IS THE GENTRY FIX THAT DEVELOPERS ARE FIGHTING FOR. THE CITY STAFF SOME WHO WOULD THE LANGUAGE THEY FELT WAS NEVER MEANT FOR RESIDENTIAL. IN REALITY THE -- [BELL SOUNDS] -- THE FIRST STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WHO DO WE HAVE NEXT? >> I BELIEVE SHE'S HAVING AN ISSUE WITH HER CAMERA. AGAIN, THIS IS A NONQUASI-ITEM. STEPHANIE, IF YOU WILL UNMUTE YOURSELF YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. >> CAN YOU HEAR ME? SORRY ABOUT THA WITH THE CAMERA. FLOOR AREA RATIO IS NOT BEEN USED IN ALL THE CASES THAT WE HAVE BEEN BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND SOG. THERE ARE MORE WORK AROUNDS THAN I CAN COUNT WITH THE REMOVAL OF THIS CITY CODE. DEVELOPERS CAN BUY BONUS DENSITY, DEVELOPERS CAN BUILD MIXED USE AND STILL USE THE F.A.R., DEVELOPERS CAN BUILD WHAT THEY ARE ZONED FOR. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT NEW TAMPA. THAT'S NOT MY AREA OF EXPERTISE. I HAVE FRIENDS FOR THA BUT AS YOU KNOW, ABOUT SOG, AND I KNOW THAT THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM ON THIS PENINSULA, AND THERE'S NOT ENOUGH ROOM MAINLY IN SOG. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT WHERE IS THERE ENOUGH ROOM TO PUT THIS KIND OF DENSITY, IT'S SOG. IT'S NOT NORTH OF GANDY. WE HAVE BEEN OVERWHELMED BY THE NUMBER OF MULTI-FAMILIES THAT RECEIVED A NUMBER OF SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN OUR AREA. I KW TT WE ARE -- TREE DESERT. I KNOW THAT NONE, NONE, NONE FOR A THIRD TIME, NOT EVEN ONE OF THE HOMES THAT HAVE BEEN ADDED TO OUR COMMUNITY IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAVE BEEN REMOTELY CLOSE TO AFFORDABLE. SO SCRATCH THAT DEVELOPER ARGUMENT. THEY ALSO NEED TO BUILD SOME 3-BEDROOM UNITS. WE ARE UP TO THE TOP WITH ONE NODY IS BUILDING ANYTHING FOR FAMILIES SO LET'S CALL IT WHAT IT IS. IT IS A BUNCH OF WHINEY PEOPLE WHO ARE USED TO GETTING WHAT THEY WANT BEING DENIED WHAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR. WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE ONE AND TWO-BEDROOM APARTMENTS. WE DON'T NEED ANYTHING ELSE DEEMED LUXURY. WE NEED FOLKS TO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE BEING PUSHED OUT OF THE COMMUNITIES THAT THEY HAVE GROWN UP SINCE CHILDHOOD. WE NEED A GROCERY STORE. WE NEED A G STATION. WE NEED JOBS. WE NEED COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL. THIS LAND USE CODE HAS BEEN IN PLACE SINCE 1978, 43 YEARS. I AGREE WITH COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. IT'S TIME FOR US TO GET OUT OF THE DARK AIRLINES AND MOVE FORWARD. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: STEPHANIE, LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION. >> YES, SIR. YES SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: WE HAD A CONVERSATION LAST WEEK. I STILL HAVEN'T RECEIVED THAT INFORMATION. I WAS LOOKING AT WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT. THEY HAVE THIS DEVELOPMENT AND THEY PUT A STOP TO IT WHERE IF YOU WANT TO BUILD, YOU HAVE TO BUILD -- >> OH. >>ORLANDO GUDES: IF YOU WANT TO BUILD APARTMENTS, YOU HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT APARTMENT HAS ENOUGH HOUSING FOR THAT COMMUNITY. >> THEY ARE DOING SOME SIGNIFICANT REZONING IN SOME OTHER CITIES ACROSS THE COUNTRY, YES SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I'M LOOKING AT THAT. >> IF YOU WANT ME TO ADDRESS THAT, I WILL BE HAPPY TO. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SEND ME WHAT YOU HAVE, AND AS MR. MIRANDA SAID, TIMES ARE CHANGING, AND WE HAVE TO LOOK AT SOMETHING THAT OTHER CITIES ARE DOING TO COME UP WITH THE TIMES. SO PLEASE SEND ME THAT INFORMATION AS SOON AS YOU CAN. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. >> THANK YOU. >>THE CLERK: THE LAST SPEAKER IS DAVID MECHANIK. HOWEVER, HE HAS NOT RESPONDED. I'M ASSUMING HE NO LONGER WANTS TO SPEAK, AND THAT ENDS THE PUBLIC PORTION. >>ORLANDO GUDES: OKAY, MOVE BY MR. CITRO, SECOND BY MR. MANISCALCO. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. MOVE TO TRANSMIT ITEM 14. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YOU'RE TORTURING ME. IN REGARDS TO THE FILE TA/CPA 21-11, TRANSMITTAL HEARING ON A PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT ESTABLISHING A GEOGRAPHIC AREA -- YOU CAN JUST MOVE TO TRANSMIT. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: MOVE TO TRANSMIT. >> SECOND. >>ORLANDO GUDES: SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA. >>JOSEPH CITRO: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>ORLANDO GUDES: YES. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. MR. SHELBY, ANYTHING, SIR? >>MARTIN SHELBY: NOTHING FROM ME, THANK YOU, SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. VIERA? >>LUIS VIERA: NOTHING. THANK YOU, SIR. IF I MAY SAY SO, GOOD MEETING. A LOT OF GOOD STUFF THERE. YOU RAN A GOOD MEETING. THANK YOU, SIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: THANK YOU. MR. MANISCALCO. MR. CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: NO, SIR. >>JOSEPH CITRO: NOT THIS EVENING. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MR. DINGFELDER? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: YES, SIR. DAVID HEY, DID YOU LEAVE ALREADY? OH, THERE YOU ARE. SO I WOULD LIKE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND CITY STAFF AND CITY LEGAL TO COME BACK TO US BY THE FIRST MEETING IN 4tCEMBER, MR. SHELBY, 2nd OR >>MARTIN SHELBY: SECOND, SIR. >>JOHN DINGFELDER: DURING STAFF REPORTS WITH AN UPDATE ON THIS ISSUE OF WHAT IF ANY THRESHOLD SHOULD BE USED FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION ON THE FLOOR. SECOND BY MR. CARLSON. ALL IN FAVOR? ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIED. ANYTHING ELSE, SIR? >>JOHN DINGFELDER: NO, SIR. THANK YOU. >>ORLANDO GUDES: ALL RIGHT. GENTLEMEN, AGAIN, LONG DAY. INSTRUCTING MR. SHELBY TO INTO OTHER OPTIONS FOR US FOR THESE LONG AGENDA ITEMS WE ARE FACING, AND ALSO WANT TO GIVE A SHOUTOUT TO THE TAMPA POLICE DEPARTMENT, THERE WERE FIVE INDICTMENTS. I SPOKE TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE, HE'S OUT OF TOWN ON A CONFERENCE BUT APPARENTLY THERE MAY BE SOME MORE INDICTMENTS COMING AS WELL. SO I AM HAPPY TO SEE THAT JUSTICE FOR THE LITTLE GIRL AT THIS POINT, GET SOME CONVICTIONS, BUT RIGHT NOW, THIS TAPE OF VIOLENCE WHERE SHE COULDN'T LIVE HER LIFE. BUT MR. MANISCALCO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. CHAIRMAN, DID YOU AND YOUR BROTHER HANDLE THE FUNERAL SERVICES? >>ORLANDO GUDES: NO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY. >>ORLANDO GUDES: I AM GRATEFUL THAT WE HAD -- MOVE TO RECEIVE AND FILE? >> SO MOVED. >>ORLANDO GUDES: MOTION BY CITRO, SECOND BY MR. MIRANDA. WE ARE ADJOURNED.