>>ALAN CLENDENIN: AN HOUR OR SO AGO, WE WERE SITTING HERE HAVING A DAY MEETING. I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE. >>NAYA YOUNG: HERE. >> VIERA? CARLSON? >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HERE. >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE A PHYSICAL QUORUM. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU. DO WE NEED AN AGENDA CLEANUP? ARE WE GOOD? I-- ARE WE GOD ASPUBLISHED? MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA -- A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO, SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. CAN I GET A MOTION TO OPEN THE 5:01 PUBLIC HEARINGS. MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. HERE WE GO. ITEM NUMBER 1. >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS WITH YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, PRESENTING ITEM ONE. TA/CPA 25-18. IT IS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3602 WEST EUCLID AVENUE. THIS IS A PRIVATELY INITIATED AMENDMENT. IT'S SMALL SCALE IN SIZE. IT'S APPROXIMATELY .229 ACRES. RESIDENTIAL 20 TO THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE SOUTH TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, SPECIFICALLY IN THE FAIR OAKS MANHATTAN NEIGHBORHOOD, AND IT IS SHOWN HERE ON OUR MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WEST EUCLID AVENUE AND SOUTH HIMES AVENUE. IT IS OUTLINED IN THIS YELLOW COLOR. THERE ARE A MIX OF HOUSES ALONG WEST EUCLID AVENUE, AS WELL AS SOME OFFICES ALONG THIS PORTION OF WEST EUCLID. TO THE NORTH, WE HAVE SOME SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. I DO WANT TO NOTE IT IS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO BRITTON PLAZA, WHICH HAS, AS YOU KNOW, COMMERCIAL USES CURRENTLY. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE TOWARDS BRITTON PLAZA. THIS IS LOOKING DIRECTLY WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG WEST EUCLID AVENUE. THIS IS LOOKING EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE INTERSECTION OF WEST EUCLID AVENUE AND SOUTH HIMES AVENUE. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG SOUTH HIMES AVENUE. HERE IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SUBJECT SITE IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION, WHICH ALLOWS LOW TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL UP TO 20 UNITS PER ACRE, ALLOWS ANYTHING FROM SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED TO SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS. THAT R-20 IS FOUND PREDOMINANTLY ALONG EUCLID AVENUE HERE. AGAIN, DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH AND SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE IS BRITTON PLAZA, WHICH IS RECOGNIZED UNDER THE CC-35 DESIGNATION. ALONG HIMES AVENUE, WE DO HAVE SOME CMU 35 LOCATED JUST TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THEN I DO WANT TO NOTE THAT THIS PARCEL HERE WAS REDESIGNATED FROM R-20 TO CMU 35 I BELIEVE IT WAS LAST YEAR. IT'S THE SAME EXACT REQUEST THAT IS BEFORE YOU TODAY. THEN WE DO HAVE THIS RESIDENTIAL 10 NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH. HERE IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP RECOGNIZING THE SITE UNDER THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION. SO THAT IS A MEDIUM DENSITY, INTENSITY MIXED USE CATEGORY. IT ALLOWS A RANGE OF USES FROM RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL TYPE USES. UNDER THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION, THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR FOUR DWELLING UNITS OR JUST OVER 6300 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. THOSE WOULD BE LIMITED TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TYPE USES AND THE SITE WOULD NEED TO MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. AS PROPOSED, THE REQUEST WOULD ALLOW UP TO EIGHT UNITS OR JUST OVER 25,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. THIS AMENDMENT WOULD INCREASE THE DENSITY AND INTENSITY ON THE SUBJECT SITE AND WOULD ALSO INTRODUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES ON THE SITE. THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH SEVERAL POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PARTICULARLY THOSE RELATED TO COMPATIBILITY SCALE AND MASSING. THIS WOULD ALLOW THE SAME F.A.R. AS BRITTON PLAZA TO THE SOUTH -- SOUTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AND IT WOULD ALSO -- IT WAS ALSO FOUND CONSISTENT WITH POLICIES THAT PROMOTE DENSITIES THAT SUPPORT TRANSIT AND A MIXTURE OF USES. AS YOU KNOW, THERE IS A TRANSIT STOP LOCATED AT BRITTON PLAZA. YEAH, THEY FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THOSE POLICIES. BASED ON THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE. YES MA'AM. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. ALEX SCHALER, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE. I HAVE A VERY BRIEF PRESENTATION. TO PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT MORE CONTEXT ON THE AMENDMENT THAT DANNY MENTIONED, WE REPRESENT THE OWNERS OF BRITTON PLAZA, BRICKS MORE PROPERTY GROUP. WEIRDLY THIS YELLOW STUBOUT AT THE TOP OF THEIR PROPERTY HAD A DESIGNATION OF RESIDENTIAL. WE CAME BEFORE YOU ALL, YOU PROBABLY REMEMBER THAT, SOME POINT LAST YEAR AS DANNY MENTIONED AND CHANGED THE SAME EXACT REQUEST FROM R-20 TO CMU 35. ABOUT TWO WEEKS BEFORE WE HAD THIS HEARING, I GOT A CALL FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN TEAL. HE SAID, HEY, I HEARD THE AMENDMENT IS GOING FORWARD. CAN I INCLUDE MY LAND? I SAID IT WAS A LITTLE TOO LATE BUT WE CAN FILE A NEW APPLICATION. THE ONE THAT BRICKS MORE FILED WAS WELL ACCEPTED, SO THAT'S WHAT WE DID. HE FILED THIS NOT SPECIFICALLY FOR CMU 35 BUT COMPANION REZONING TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL. THAT'S THE REAL REASON WE FILED THIS AMENDMENT. CURRENTLY THE SITE IS ZONED RESIDENTIAL OFFICE 1, RO-1. OFFICE USES ARE ALLOWED. SMALL COLLECTION OF COMMERCIAL USES. THE PROPERTY ATTORNEY IS AN ATTORNEY, HE OWNS THE LAW FIRM ON-SITE TODAY AND WANTED THE FLEXIBILITY IN THE FUTURE TO OPEN TO THE BROADER USES OF COMMERCIAL. AND HENCE THIS ACCOMPANYING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE FEEL THERE IS INHERENT JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS. THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES NORTH OF EUCLID, BUT SOUTH OF EUCLID IT'S TRENDING VERY COMMERCIAL. THIS IS AT THE INTERSECTION UP TO COLLECTOR ROADS AS WELL. STAFF FOUND THIS CONSISTENT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD ALSO FOUND THIS CONSISTENT. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. BUT I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? HEARING NONE, VERY GOOD. ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. COUNCILMAN CARLSON, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ THIS ONE? >>BILL CARLSON: MOVE ITEM 1, TA/CPA 25-18, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3602 WEST EUCLID AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL 20, R-20, TO COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35, CMU-35, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION FROM CARLSON, SECOND FROM MANISCALCO. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 21st, 2026, AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE ARE MOVING RIGHT ALONG. ITEM NUMBER 2. >> WE SHOULD HAVE A PRESENTATION SUBMITTED. IF NOT, I CAN PLUG MY LAPTOP IN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CTTV, DO WE HAVE SOMETHING ON ITEM NUMBER 2? IT'S COMING UP. START WITH YOUR NAME AND IT WILL COME UP THERE AS WELL. >> QUINN STEELE, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. TA/CPA 25-19, A MAP AMENDMENT FOR THE MOSI SITE LOCATED AT 4615 AND 4801 EAST FOWLER AVENUE. THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS PUBLICLY INITIATED IN SMALL SCALE, COVERING APPROXIMATELY 11.25 ACRES. THE REQUEST IS TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC TO UNIFIED PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC DESIGNATION. HERE IS THE GENERAL LOCATION MAP. SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT, TERRACE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD AND TAMPA GREEN CORRIDOR. THIS AERIAL SHOWS THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN BLUE WITH ADJACENT PUBLICLY INITIATED PLAN AMENDMENT, TA/CPA 25-20 OUTLINED IN PINK. SITE SITS SOUTH OF FOWLER AVENUE AND USF. IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST IS A DAY CARE CENTER WITH COMMERCIAL AND MULTIFAMILY USES LOCATED FURTHER EAST ACROSS NORTH 50th STREET. TO THE SOUTH AND WEST ARE INDUSTRIAL LANDS WITHIN THE TAMPA INDUSTRIAL PARK WHICH CONTINUES SOUTH TOWARD THE GRECO SOFTBALL COMPLEX AND NEARBY SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS. JUST BEYOND THE FRAME TO THE NORTHEAST ARE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND TEMPLE TERRACE JURISDICTION AND MORE ZOOMED OUT AERIAL IS SHOWN IN THE STAFF REPORT. THIS IS A PHOTO LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG EAST FOWLER AVENUE. LOOKING WEST ON EAST FOWLER AVENUE AND SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE LEFT. THE DAY CARE LOCATED DIRECTLY EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. LOOKING NORTHEAST AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST FOWLER AVENUE AND NORTH 50th STREET, AND LOOKING EAST ON NORTH 46th STREET TOWARD THE VACANT INDUSTRIAL LAND TO THE SOUTH. THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATES THE SITE AS PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC WHICH SUPPORTS PUBLIC SERVING ISSUES AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, ALLOWS USES LIKE LIGHT MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSING. SOUTH AND WEST PRIMARILY HEAVY AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WITHIN THE TAMPA INDUSTRIAL PARK. ALSO A FEW POCKETS OF CMU 35 IN THE AREA CREATED THROUGH INDIVIDUAL PLAN AMENDMENTS SPANNING FROM 2005 TO 2023. FURTHER SOUTH IS RECREATION OPEN SPACE, THE GRECO SOFTBALL SPACE WHICH TRANSITIONS TO RESIDENTIAL 10. NORTH AND EAST PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC USES INCLUDING USF AND DAY CARE. NORTHEAST OUTSIDE OF THE CITY IS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION AND THAT'S ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF USF IN THE BROWN. AND THEN FURTHER EAST IN TEMPLE TERRACE THE AREA IS RESIDENTIAL 9 AND COMMERCIAL USES ARE CLOSER TO EAST FOWLER AVENUE. AND THEN THIS MAP SHOWS A UNIFIED P/SP DESIGNATION FOR THE ENTIRE MOSI SITE. SITE IS CURRENTLY SPLIT BETWEEN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PORTION DOES NOT ALLOW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND COULD ACCOMMODATE JUST OVER 400,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC DOES NOT HAVE DEFINED MAXIMUMS FOR RESIDENTIAL OR NONRESIDENTIAL. UNDER THE AMENDMENT, UNIFIED P/SP DESIGNATION, NO LONGER DEFINED DENSITY AND INTENSITY MAXIMUMS AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE GUIDED BY THE TYPE OF PUBLIC OR PUBLIC SUPPORTING USE PROPOSED AND THE COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. WE SENT THIS OUT FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND DID NOT RECEIVE ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE REQUEST. THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE REQUEST ALIGNS WITH THE GREEN TECH CORRIDOR POLICIES AND THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT WHICH RECOGNIZES THIS AREA AS A MAJOR CENTER FOR EDUCATION, RESEARCH, AND EMPLOYMENT. THE LAND IS PUBLICLY OWNED AND THE PROPOSED DESIGNATION SUPPORTS THE CONTINUED USE AND REINVESTMENT IN THAT LONG-STANDING INSTITUTIONAL USE. IT IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH POLICIES THAT ENCOURAGE PUBLIC AMENITIES SINCE MOSI PROVIDES EDUCATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVING FACILITIES THAT BENEFIT THE BROADER AREA. WITH THAT, PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, APPLICANT. WELCOME BACK TO TAMPA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL. JULIA MANDELL WITH THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. I AM HERE IN MY CAPACITY AS A LAND USE LAWYER REPRESENTING HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ON THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. I ALSO HAVE WITH ME GREG, THE DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND JOHN MULLER, STANDING WITH, DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. THIS IS THE FIRST OF TWO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS THAT YOU HAVE THIS EVENING REGARDING THE ENTIRE MOSI PROPERTY.THE PREMISE BEHIND THIS PARTICULAR APPLICATION IS IF YOU WOULD NOTE FROM WHAT YOU SAW FROM THE STAFF REPORT, RIGHT NOW MOSI SITS WITH A SPLIT DESIGNATION. PART OF IT IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. PART IS PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC. THIS WOULD TRUE THAT UP AND ENSURE THAT THOSE PROPERTIES THAT ARE INTENDED TO REMAIN IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN SUCH AS MOSI AND THE FUTURE FIELD HOUSE PROJECT, SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE HEARD SOMETHING ABOUT, ARE REMAINING WITHIN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. BUT IT IS ALSO THE INTENT THAT THE OVERALL PROJECT, EVEN THOUGH YOU'LL HEAR ABOUT THAT IN THE NEXT APPLICATION, THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT AND THE PROPERTY IS INTENDED TO SERVE AS AN ANCHOR FOR THAT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. SO WE WOULD AGREE WITH STAFF'S PRESENTATION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID MAKE A DETERMINATION THAT THIS WAS APPROVABLE AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, AND WE WOULD JUST SIMPLY ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT IN THIS APPLICATION AND WOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, THANK YOU SO MUCH. DOES ANYBODYN THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? OKAY. COME ON UP. START WITH YOUR NAME ONCE YOU GET TO THE PODIUM AND YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES. >> CHARLES LOVE, TERRACE PARK. FIRST OF ALL, I'M NOT OPPOSED TO IT. I'M RATHER EXCITED ABOUT THE PROJECT COMING UP. BUT I DO HAVE A FEW CONCERNS. THE MAIN CONCERN THAT I WOULD HAPPEN TO HAVE IS THE FACT THAT, WELL, THE FACT TO DO WITH THE NEW FIRE RESCUE STATION THAT'S GOING TO BE NEARBY THERE, AND THAT TRAFFIC IS NOT TIED UP WITH EMERGENCY TRAFFIC TIED UP, TYING UP THE TRAFFIC, ESPECIALLY WHEN COMBINED WITH THE USF STADIUM. PART OF THE TERRACE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, FIRST OF ALL, WOULD LIKE YOU ALL TO COME AND TALK TO US. THE PLANNING PEOPLE COME AND TALK TO US, AND TO THE CITY OF TEMPLE TERRACE WILL AFFECT THEIR LIVES AS WELL, AS I MENTIONED, AS WELL AS OURS IN TERRACE PARK. ALSO, THAT EVERYBODY -- I ALSO KIND OF HOPING THAT WE AT THE TERRACE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION CAN FACILITATE, LET'S SAY, CREATING LIAISONS BETWEEN THE NEW FIRE RESCUE STATION THAT'S GOING TO BE NEAR THERE OVER NEAR GRECO PARK AND ALSO THE MOSI DEVELOPMENT, MAYBE IF WE'RE LUCKY OVER AT THE STADIUM TOO. IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO HAVE EVERYBODY ON THE SAME PAGE OF THE BOOK IN ORDER TO HAVE -- WELL, AS I PUT, TEMPLE TERRACE TWO NIGHTS AGO, TO MAXIMIZE POTENTIAL AND MINIMIZE PROBLEMS, WHICH I'M CROSSING MY FINGERS IN ABOUT, IN PARTICULAR WITH TRAFFIC PROBLEMS. I DON'T THINK IT WOULD BE THE ONLY PROBLEM WE WOULD HAVE. ONE OF THE THINGS WE TALKED ABOUT IS INVITING, WELL, COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK HAS BEEN TO OUR MEETINGS. AND WE WOULD LIKE, ESPECIALLY YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, TO COME TO OUR MEETINGS. OUR NEXT ONE IS GOING TO BE ON MAY 20 AT THE TEMPLE TERRACE LIBRARY AT 6:00 IN THE EVENING IF YOU CAN ARRANGE IT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, AS KIND OF THE CHAIRMAN, WITH LUIS NOT HERE TONIGHT, MOVING ON AND ALL THAT. SO WE CAN COME AND TALK AND YOU GET TO MEET US AND ALL THAT AND HEAR WHAT WE HAVE TO SAY. OF COURSE, WE'LL BE ALSO INTERESTED IN HEARING WHAT THE PROGRESS IS BY THAT TIME ABOUT THE RAYS STADIUM IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING AT THAT TIME AS WELL. DIVERT FROM THE SUBJECT. MAIN THING, WE WOULD LOVE TO HELP FACILITATE YOU ALL BETWEEN THE PEOPLE FROM MOSI AND THE PEOPLE FROM THE FIRE RESCUE PEOPLE, HELP CREATE LIAISONS THAT WILL MAKE THINGS SAFER AND BETTER FOR EVERYBODY THERE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'VE BEEN TO TWO OF YOUR MEETINGS. BUT I'M HAPPY TO COME BACK AGAIN. >>LYNN HURTAK: I THINK YOU MIGHT BE THINKING OF UNIVERSITY PARK. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: NO. I'VE BEEN THERE TWICE. APPLICANT HAVE ANY REBUTTAL ON THAT? >> THANK YOU. ONLY THING I DID WANT TO INDICATE IS MR. MULLER WITH THE COUNTY HAS SPOKEN WITH THE GENTLEMAN AND GOTTEN HIS CONTACT INFORMATION. IT'S CERTAINLY OUR INTENT TO FACILITATE ALL THE CONVERSATIONS WE NEED NOT JUST FOR OUR PARK OF THE PROJECT BUT FOR THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. >>LYNN HURTAK: THAT WAS GOING TO BE MY QUESTION BECAUSE TERRACE PARK ACTUALLY HAS JUST RECENTLY REESTABLISHED ITSELF, AND THAT'S -- YEAH, YOU WENT TO THE OLD TERRACE PARK. YES, YOU SHOULD GO VISIT THE NEW. BUT I THINK THAT MIGHT BE WHY BECAUSE THEY WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE REORGANIZING, BUT I'M GLAD YOU WERE ABLE TO CONNECT BECAUSE THAT WAS GOING TO BE MY QUESTION. >> ABSOLUTELY. WE WILL. WE INTEND TO DO SO. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANYBODY ELSE IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. >>NAYA YOUNG: FILE NUMBER TA/CPA 25-19, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4615 AND 4801 EAST FOWLER AVENUE FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC, P/SP TO PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC P/SP PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION FROM YOUNG AND SECOND FROM MANISCALCO. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER 3. 3. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 21st, 2026, AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SAM, COME TO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, PLEASE. GO AHEAD. FIND SAM FOR ME. ITEM NUMBER 3. >> EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. ITEM 3 IS TA/CPA 25-20 LOCATED AT 11315 NORTH 46th STREET AND ASSOCIATED PARCELS. THIS IS A TRANSMITTAL HEARING AS THIS IS A REGULAR AMENDMENT. THIS IS PUBLICLY INITIATED, REGULAR SCALE. APPROXIMATELY 62.8 ACRES. THE REQUEST IS TO GO FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC TO URBAN MIXED USE 60 AND COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT. THE TERRACE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD AND GREEN TECH CORRIDOR. OUTLINED IN PINK IS THE LARGER AREA YOU JUST HEARD THE MOSI SITE. THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA IS LOCATED DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH, TO THE EAST AS PART OF THE APPLICATION IN THIS CORNER IS THE DAY CARE. IT HAS MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES THAT ARE LOCATED FURTHER EAST ACROSS NORTH 50th STREET. TO THE SOUTH AND WEST ARE VACANT AND DEVELOPED LANDS WITHIN THE TAMPA INDUSTRIAL PARK, WHICH TRANSITIONS TO THE GRECO SOFTBALL COMPLEX, AND SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD. AND JUST BEYOND THE FRAME TO THE NORTHEAST ARE THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND TEMPLE TERRACE JURISDICTIONS. THIS IS LOOKING EAST ON NORTH 46th STREET TOWARDS THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS THE DAY CARE AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED ON THE SUBJECT SITE AT THE CORNER OF FOWLER AND 50th. THIS IS LOOKING WEST ON EAST FOWLER AVENUE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS ON THE LEFT. THIS IS LOOKING WEST ON NORTH 50th STREET AT THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES. THIS IS LOOKING NORTHEAST AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST FOWLER AVENUE AND NORTH 50th STREET. THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN BLACK. IT IS DESIGNATED WITH THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, AND THE PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC DESIGNATION. AGAIN, THIS IS THE SITE THAT YOU JUST HEARD TO GO COMPLETELY TO P/SP. THE P/SP DESIGNATION IS TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, IT DOES EXIST TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THE EXISTING CMU TO THE WEST LOCATED HERE WERE PREVIOUS PLAN AMENDMENTS. AND MOVING FURTHER EAST ALONG FOWLER AVENUE IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION, WHICH DOES TRANSITION GOING SOUTH TO THE LOWER DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES. THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. AGAIN, THE SITE IS OUTLINED IN BLACK. IT IS REPRESENTED WITH THE URBAN MIXED USE 60 WHICH IS THE DARKER PURPLE COLOR ALONG THIS PORTION OF THE SITE, AND THIS IS THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATION OF THE SITE. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAD IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL COMPATIBILITY CONCERNS IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER, AND STAFF WORKED WITH THE APPLICANT TO MITIGATE THOSE IMPACTS WHICH IS WHY THAT REQUEST WAS REDUCED TO THE CMU 35 IN THAT CORNER. THESE ARE THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF THE SUBJECT SITE. CURRENTLY UNDER THE LIGHT AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION, RESIDENTIAL USES ARE NOT ALLOWED. UNDER THE PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC DESIGNATION, THE MAXIMUM IS NOT DEFINED. HOWEVER, DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE SITE, UNDER THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, THEY CAN GET UP TO JUST OVER 3.6 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. UNDER THE PROPOSED UMU 60 AND THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35 DESIGNATIONS THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR JUST OVER 3,400 DWELLING UNITS OR JUST OVER 8.2 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF RESIDENTIAL OR NONRESIDENTIAL USES. THIS AMENDMENT WOULD INTRODUCE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND COMMERCIAL INTENSITY WHERE THEY ARE PREVIOUSLY NOT ALLOWED AND IT WOULD ALSO REMOVE THE INDUSTRIAL USES ON THE SITE COMPLETELY. THIS DID GO OUT FOR AGENCY REVIEW. WHILE THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS, THE EPC DID COMMENT THAT THE ADJACENT COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES MAY BE INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE PROPOSED FLU AMENDMENT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE SITE WAS COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH PROMOTING A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AS THE COMMERCIAL DOES EXIST ALONG FOWLER AVENUE. THEY ALSO FOUND IT CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPACT CITY FORM WITH THE DENSITY IN ALLOWING MORE RESIDENTIAL IN THE AREA. WITH THAT, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE. >> GOOD EVENING. MATT LEWIS WITH STANTEC ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE PROPRIETORSHIP BETWEEN AKP RENAISSANCE AND HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. THERE SHOULD BE A PRESENTATION IN THE QUEUE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YOU CAN START TALKING. >> WE'RE HERE TO TALK ABOUT THE FIRST STEP IN REALLY THE REIMAGINING OF THIS PARTICULAR DISTRICT IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF TAMPA. AS I MENTIONED, THIS IS A PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND AKP RENAISSANCE. WHAT THEY ARE LOOKING AT IS A TRANSFORMATIVE PROJECT, NOT SIMPLY TO BUILD A MIXED USE DISTRICT IN THE AREA BUT EVOLVE THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ROLE OF THE PROPERTY FROM INDUSTRIAL TO OFFICE AND TOURISM. WHAT WE'RE DOING IS TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE EXISTING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN THE REGION AND BEGINNING THE PROCESS OF REALLY A GENERATIONAL TRANSFORMATION OF THIS AREA FROM PLANNED TO BE HEAVY AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO SOMETHING THAT'S MORE TOURISM AND UNIVERSITY RELATED. SO THE REQUEST, AS MS. PHELAN WENT THROUGH IS TO CHANGE THE LAND USE FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC TO URBAN MIXED USE 60 AND CMU 35. WHAT THIS IS REALLY DOING IS REMOVING HEAVY INDUSTRIAL IMPACT TO THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE AREA AND REPLACING IT WITH AN ABILITY TO DO THOUGHTFUL MIXED USE PLANNING AND TRANSITION AWAY FROM THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND REALLY BUILD SOMETHING THAT YOU'LL SEE LATER IN THE PRESENTATION FILLS IN THE UNIVERSITY AREA. SO THIS HAS BEEN INDUSTRIAL IN YOUR PLANS SINCE IT'S BEEN IN YOUR PLANS. IN THE 1960s, THE AREA OF MOSI WAS ANNEXED INTO CITY OF TAMPA AS CITY PARK. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ANNEXED IN THE CITY OF TAMPA AS PARK BECAUSE IT WAS AN OLD ARMY AIR IT WOULD THAT TRANSITIONED TO AN AIR PARK. RAIL LINES RUNNING THROUGH IT. IT HAD EVERYTHING YOU WOULD NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STRONG INDUSTRIAL AREA. BUT TIME CHANGED. I WANT TO TALK ABOUT HOW WE GOT TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY, WHICH IS NOT NECESSARILY A HEALTHY INDUSTRIAL PARK ANYMORE. REALLY, THE INFLECTION POINT IS IN THE 1980s. WHAT HAPPENED IN THE 1980s IS THE YUENGLING CENTER OPENED AND MOSI MOVED TO THIS LOCATION ON FOWLER. YUENGLING CENTER OPENED WITH A SOLD OUT ALICE COOPER CONCERT AND USF BULLS BASKETBALL GAME ON THE SAME DAY. A RARE DOUBLEHEADER OPENING FOR THE STADIUM. NOW IT'S ONE OF THE BIGGEST EVENT VENUES ON THE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS IN THE COUNTRY. 300 EVENTS PER YEAR. BY THE 2000s, THIS AREA WAS PROJECTED TO BUILD OUT AS AN INDUSTRIAL PARK. THAT OBVIOUSLY DIDN'T HAPPEN. BUT THAT'S PROBABLY A GOOD THING BECAUSE THE AREA IS TRANSITIONING ALREADY, STARTING WITH THE INTRODUCTION OF THE YUENGLING BREWERY AND YUENGLING CENTER, BUSCH GARDENS, USF ITSELF. IT'S NO LONGER AN INDUSTRIAL PARK THAT WE'RE THINKING ABOUT, IT'S A REGIONAL DESTINATION WITH TOURISM ANCHORS, MOFFITT CANCER CENTER WHICH BRINGS PATIENTS FROM ALL OVER THE STATE, AS WELL AS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, UNIVERSITY AREA, WHICH IS ONE OF THE FACES OF TAMPA. WHEN PEOPLE THINK OF TAMPA, THEY THINK OF DOWNTOWN, WESTSHORE, AND THE UNIVERSITY. SO THIS IS, WHAT DOES YOUR FACE LOOK LIKE? AS TIME GOES ON, 2010s, STARTS TO REIMAGINE THE AREA AS A MIXED USE DISTRICT, TRANSIT SUPPORTED, AND THE PLANS ARE FOLLOWING SUIT. IMAGINE TAMPA IS ADOPTED IN 2016, INTRODUCING MORE TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE IDEAS. AND FINALLY, IT ALL COMES TO FRUITION IN FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR WHERE THE TRANSMITTAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TAMPA INCLUDED THE TRANSITION OF THIS PARTICULAR AREA INTO LAND USES THAT COMPLEMENT EXISTING ANCHOR INSTITUTIONS SUPPORT ENTREPRENEUR ENDEAVORS AND PROMOTE A MORE SUSTAINABLE, COMPACT AND WALKABLE ENVIRONMENT. THAT'S WHAT THE AMENDMENTS YOU SEE BEFORE YOU ARE GOING TO DO. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? THIS IS THE FOWLER AVENUE VISION. THE FOWLER AVENUE VISION IDENTIFIES THESE MIXED USE NODES ALONG IT. THE REALLY NEAT THING ABOUT THE MIXED USE NODES IS THEY ARE COINCIDENTALLY IDEAL SPACING FOR BRT OR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT. AND WHAT YOU'RE SEEING IS MOSI JUST BEING ONE STOP ALONG THE FUTURE FOWLER LINE, ALONG WITH THE RESEARCH PARK AND THE ALREADY APPROVED INNOVATION HUB. SO THE AREA IS STILL AN ECONOMIC ENGINE. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIC ENGINE. IT IS A DESTINATION CENTER. THE INTRODUCTION OF THE NEW COUNTY FIELD HOUSE AS WELL AS THE POSSIBILITY OF BUILDING AN ICE HOUSE IN THE AREA REALLY EXPANDS ECONOMIC POSSIBILITIES AS A TOURISM FACE FOR THE CITY OF TAMPA. WHAT DOES THIS DO FOR US IN THE LONG RUN IS IF YOU LOOK AT THE VARIOUS ANCHOR INSTITUTIONS IN THE AREA AND LOOK AT THIS SITE IN RELATION TO THEM, IT TURNS THIS PARTICULAR PORTION OF THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING AREA INTO A PARK DISTRICT. EACH OF THE PURPLE SQUARES IS WALKING DISTANCE TO A PARKING LOT OR TO A DESTINATION. AND WITHIN THE VERY CENTER OF IT IS THE SITE UNDER CONSIDERATION TODAY. SO IF YOU WERE TO GO TO ANY OF THESE LOCATIONS, GRECO PARK, THE YUENGLING CENTER, THE NEW STADIUM, YOU COULD PARK THERE AND WALK TO RESTAURANTS AND EVENTS AT THIS SITE AND GO TO THE MOSI MUSEUM. IF YOU WANTED TO, YOU COULD PARK HERE AND GO TO EVENTS AROUND IT. IT REALLY BRINGS THESE THINGS TOGETHER INTO ONE CENTRAL PLACE. I'M NOT GOING TO READ THIS TO YOU. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT WHY THIS IS EVOLVING AWAY FROM INDUSTRIAL, BUT WHAT SHOULD IT EVOLVE TO, THIS IS THE TEXT FROM THE PLAN, WHAT IT SAYS ABOUT THE UNIVERSITY PLANNING DISTRICT AND WHAT IT'S REALLY SAYING IS BUILD COMPLETE COMMUNITIES WITH OPPORTUNITIES FOR SHOPPING, LIVING, HOUSING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. THE OUTCOMES IS WE'RE LOOKING AT REALIZING A NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENGINE FOR THIS AREA. ONE WASN'T REALIZED. THIS ONE WE HOPE WILL BE THROUGH PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP. UMU 60 AND CMU AMENDMENT IMPLEMENT THAT OUTCOME. WE HOPE YOU'LL CONSIDER TRANSMITTAL OF THIS TO THE STATE FOR US. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. WHO TECHNICALLY OWNS THIS PROPERTY? >> CURRENT OWNER IS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. >>LYNN HURTAK: I LIKE THE WAY YOU SAID "CURRENT OWNER," BECAUSE AS THIS DEVELOPS INTO A MULTIUSE, ONE OF THE THINGS I HAVE TO SAY THAT I'M CURIOUS ABOUT IS THE TAXATION TO SUPPORT THIS. >> JULIA MANDELL, COUNTY ATTORNEY FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. CURRENTLY, THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY WITHIN THE OWNERSHIP OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, BOTH THE PREVIOUS AND THIS COMP PLAN AMENDMENT AS WE PROCEED FORWARD, WE ARE GOING TO BE LOOKING THROUGH AS A PARTNERSHIP HOW IT IS BEST TRANSFERRED TO ENSURE THERE'S TAXABILITY AVAILABLE. THAT'S PART OF THE PREMISE OF THIS ENTIRE EXERCISE. >>LYNN HURTAK: I JUST HAD TO ASK THE QUESTION. I THOUGHT SO, BUT YOU NEVER KNOW. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ASK AND ANSWERED. DOES THAT COMPLETE YOUR PRESENTATION? >> YES, THANK YOU. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: VERY GOOD. ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS TRANSMITTAL? MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, YOU ALL JUST NEED AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE ON THE TRANSMITTAL? >>LYNN HURTAK: MOVE TO TRANSMIT TA/CPA 25-20. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. A SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THWE'RE DONE ON THAT ONE. WE'LL LET EVERYBODY CALM DOWN FOR A MINUTE. YOU'RE WELCOME TO HANG OUT WITH US FOR THE REST OF THE NIGHT. JUST LET ME KNOW WHERE THE BAR IS AND THE OPEN TAB IS. HERE WE GO. ITEM NUMBER 4. >>EMILY PHELAN: ITEM 4 WAS A PREVIOUSLY CONTINUED ITEM AND THE PRESENTATION WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN. I CAN GO THROUGH A PRESENTATION AGAIN IF THAT IS COUNCIL'S PLEASURE, OR WE CAN CONTINUE. LIKE AN ABBREVIATED VERSION. >>LYNN HURTAK: SO I THINK IT MIGHT BE GOOD JUST TO QUICKLY SHOW BECAUSE I THINK THESE NEXT TWO ARE CONNECTED, BUT JUST TO REMIND US. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: GO AHEAD IN AN EXPEDITED FASHION, WHICH I KNOW YOU KNOW HOW TO DO. I'VE WATCHED IT. >>EMILY PHELAN: EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. TA/CPA 25-15. IT IS LOCATED AT 4304 NORTH 26th STREET, 4205 NORTH 25th STREET AND FOLIO NUMBER 156,781.0000. THIS IS PRIVATELY INITIATED. SMALL SCALE. APPROXIMATELY 1.36 ACRES. REQUEST IS TO GO FROM RESIDENTIAL 10 TO RESIDENTIAL 20. THIS IS THE GENERAL LOCATION MAP. IT'S LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, EAST TAMPA 1 NEIGHBORHOOD AND EAST TAMPA CRA. THIS IS THE GENERAL, LIKE AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE. SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN PINK. THE SITE OUTLINED IN BLUE IS TA/CPA 25-17, WHICH IS THE RELATED ITEM. THIS TO THE WEST IS THE GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY. THE PRIMARY SURROUNDING AREA IS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG NORTH 26th STREET. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE ALONG NORTH 25th STREET. THIS IS LOOKING WEST OF THE SITE ALONG NORTH 25th STREET LOOKING AT THE GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY. THIS IS LOOKING NORTHEAST ALONG NORTH 25th STREET, THE SUBJECT SITE IS TO THE RIGHT. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 26th STREET AND EAST 38th AVENUE AT THE SURROUNDING SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN BLACK IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION, WHICH IS TO THE NORTH, EAST, AND PART OF THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS DARK COLOR HERE IS THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION. AND TO THE WEST IS THE PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC DESIGNATION. THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED IN BLACK AND REPRESENTED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION. UNDER THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION, THE SUBJECT SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR 13 DWELLING UNITS OR JUST OVER 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES IF LOCATIONAL CRITERIA IS MET. UNDER THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION, THE SITE COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR 27 DWELLING UNITS OR JUST OVER 29,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES IF LOCATIONAL CRITERIA IS MET. THIS AMENDMENT WOULD RESULT IN AN INCREASE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND COMMERCIAL INTENSITY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ON THE SLIDE. COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. IT HAS A TRANSITION IN THE DENSITY AND IT ENSURES AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING. AND WITH THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, APPLICANT. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. STEVE MICHELINI. YOU MAY RECALL THAT AT OUR LAST MEETING, WE WERE ASKED TO CONDUCT A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, WHICH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND WE PARTICIPATED IN. AND IT WAS A FAIRLY EXTENSIVE. WE LISTENED INTENTLY WITH ALL OF THEIR QUESTIONS, AND ALTHOUGH IT'S NOT PART OF THIS PRESENTATION, BUT MANY OF THE QUESTIONS THAT CAME OUT OF THAT MEETING INVOLVED SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES AND NOT THE CHANGE FROM R-10 TO R-20. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND IT TO BE CONSISTENT. AS I SAID, WE HELD A JOINT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. CONSIDERATION, MEETS ALL OF THE CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION TO CHANGE FROM R-10 TO R-20. IT IS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE TO R-20. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WHEN IT COMES TO YOU AS A REZONING WILL ADDRESS A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT ISSUES. IT'S IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO A TRANSIT CORRIDOR, AND THE NEEDS AND ALL OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE FUTURE WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. IT WILL CLEAN UP A NUMBER OF DEFICIENCIES IN THE AREA. IT NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED -- IT WAS IDENTIFIED AND SUPPORTED IN THE LONG-TERM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE CITY OF TAMPA. THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CRA, ALL OF WHICH HAVE INDICATED IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THEIR OBJECTIVES. GOING FORWARD, IT WILL COME FORWARD TO YOU AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS THE ONLY WAY THAT WE CAN ADDRESS A NUMBER OF NEIGHBORHOOD ISSUES. THAT'S BOTH ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE. ULTIMATELY, THE GOAL IS TO DO NO HARM AND TO CREATE NO ADVERSE CONDITIONS. AND WE ARE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING YOUR APPROVAL TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE DENSITY. AND THIS IS NOT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, PER SE, BUT IT GIVES THE OPPORTUNITY FOR INCREASED DEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA, WHICH WOULD BE A TRANSITION BETWEEN THE ALLOWABLE R-20 ON THE SOUTH AND THE R-10 THAT GOES ON THE NORTH SIDE. IT IS DEFICIENT IN TRANSPORTATION, WHICH WILL BE ADDRESSED THROUGH THIS PROJECT, AND THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE ADDRESSED, AS I SAID, THROUGH A REZONING. IT WAS FOUND TO BE COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH ALL OF THE REVIEWING AGENCIES. I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? COME ON UP. START WITH YOUR NAME, PLEASE. >> HELLO. MY NAME IS DEVON ISET. IS THIS PROJECTOR WORKING? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES, PUT IT FACE UP, IT WILL COME ON AUTOMATICALLY. WE CAN SEE IT. >> I HAVE BROUGHT WITH ME A COPY OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH I BELIEVE THAT THIS DOES NOT AGREE WITH. SO IF YOU LOOK AT LAND USE POLICY 9.5.2, TO MAINTAIN THE CHARACTER OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA AND DISCOURAGE THE DEMOLITION OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES. AND 9.5.4 TO UTILIZE THE CATEGORIES TO MAINTAIN CURRENT DENSITY AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF SINGLE-FAMILY AREAS. NOW, I BOUGHT MY FIRST HOME IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE IT WAS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA. I LOVE TAMPA. I WANT TO START A FAMILY HERE. AND I'M IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY. AND THERE WAS A HOUSE ON THE PROPERTY -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ON THE TOP OF THE PROJECTOR, VERY TIPTOP, ON THE ARM UP THERE, VERY TOP, THERE IS A WHEEL. IT WILL SCROLL OUT SO YOU CAN GET THE WHOLE THING. >> THIS IS A PICTURE OF A HOUSE THAT WAS RIGHT NEXT TO ME. I WATCHED CONTRACTORS REFURBISH THIS HOUSE. IT IS ON THIS PROPERTY. THEY REFURBISHED THIS HOUSE AND THEN PUT IT UP FOR SALE. IT WAS BOUGHT UP AND IMMEDIATELY BULLDOZED FOR THIS DENSITY PROJECT. I THINK THAT THIS IS A BAD SPOT FOR DENSITY JUST BECAUSE ITS LOCATION NEAR LOMAX ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, FERRELL GIRL SCHOOL, MIDDLETON SCHOOL. THE INCREASED TRAFFIC IN THIS AREA IS GOING TO BE DANGEROUS FOR CHILDREN AND PEDESTRIANS. SO, YEAH, I DON'T THINK IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT ALL. DEVELOPERS COMING IN, BULLDOZING MY NEIGHBORS' HOUSES AND THEN PROPOSING A DENSITY PROJECT FOR RENTABLE UNITS. IT'S JUST NOT SOMETHING -- I WOULD HAVE NEVER BOUGHT THIS HOUSE IF I KNEW THIS WAS GOING IN RIGHT NEXT TO ME. I DON'T THINK IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO SHARE TONIGHT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU. APPLICANT? ANYBODY ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THE ITEM? >> I'M SORRY. I RUN UP THE STAIRS. LAST TIME WE SPOKE AT 9:00. MY NAME IS SACHIN. I AM A NEIGHBOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT. IN OUR FIRST MEETING, I WAS COMPLETELY AGAINST THE DEVELOPMENT. BECAUSE I DID NOT HAVE THE FACTS. THANK YOU, COUNCILWOMAN, THANKS TO YOU, AND THEN I ACTUALLY SENT THE E-MAIL MOBILIZING EVERYBODY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND EVERYTHING. I REMEMBER YOU. THE CITY PEOPLE WERE GREAT EXPLAINING EVERYTHING. SO I CHANGED MY MIND FROM MASSIVE NO TO A MASSIVE YES. BECAUSE THE WAY -- I ACTUALLY LOOKED. HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT THE PROJECT, AND THEY HAD TWO PONDS LOCATED IN IT. THESE PONDS ARE REALLY GOING TO WORK WITH ONE OF MY CONCERNS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: TAKE A DEEP BREATH. >> I RUN THE STAIRS LITERALLY. SO ONE OF THE CONCERNS IS FLOODING RIGHT? SO THESE PONDS WILL ACTUALLY COLLECT THE WATER COMING IN FROM THE RAIN, AND WILL STABILIZE OUR AREA. ALSO, I HAD THE IMPRESSION, FIRST INFORMATION THEY HAD, WHICH WAS WRONG, THAT THESE WOULD BE TINY LITTLE PLACES AND THAT IS NOT THE CASE. AS A MATTER OF FACT, I WOULD GLADLY GO BUY A UNIT IN THERE FOR MY SISTER. I'M ORIGINALLY FROM BRAZIL, TO LIVE THERE. YES, THERE WILL BE AN INCREASE IN POPULATION, BUT THAT IS A GOOD THING BECAUSE THEN YOU GUYS WILL HAVE TO LOCATE MORE MONEY FOR OUR SAFETY TO TAKE CARE OF OUR ROADS, TO INCREASE, YOU KNOW, THERE WILL BE PROBLEMS WITH TRAFFIC. NO, BECAUSE YOU GUYS WILL INSTALL LIGHTS. IT'S GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT SLOWER, HEY, I RUN THE STAIRS AND I'M 50 YEARS OLD. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT, AND I THINK IF I MAY SUGGEST HUMBLY, IN THE FUTURE, IF YOU ENGAGE THE COMMUNITY EARLIER AND YOU EXPLAIN THE FACTS, IF I HAD SEEN WHERE THE PONDS WERE LOCATED, HOW THE HOUSES, LIKE THE TOWN HOUSES WERE DESIGNED AND EVERYTHING, I WOULDN'T HAVE SAID NO. ALSO, I WAS HUMBLED BY A CAREGIVER BECAUSE I WAS KNOCKING ON DOORS. I WANTED EVERYBODY TO BE AT THE LIBRARY TO SEE THE CITY EMPLOYEES. AND THEN AN AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMAN WAS A CAREGIVER TO THE LADY WHO LIVES IN THE PINK HOUSE TOLD ME, HEY, YOU KNOW THAT PEOPLE CANNOT AFFORD EXPENSIVE HOUSES ANYMORE. AND THEN I WAS LIKE, HERE I AM, WHITE WOMAN, PREACHING TO THE WRONG PEOPLE. PLEASE APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT. IT IS A VERY GOOD THING YOU'RE DOING. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? COME ON UP. START WITH YOUR NAME. YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M VICTORIA. I LIVE NEXT DOOR TO WHERE THEY WANT TO BUILD. I WAS ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT THE TRAFFIC THAT'S GOING TO BE COMING THROUGH WHEN THOSE APARTMENTS OR UNITS ARE BUILT BECAUSE THE STREET RIGHT NOW IS VERY NARROW. I JUST WANT TO KNOW HOW THE TRAFFIC WILL GO, NORTH TO SOUTH, EAST TO WEST. THAT'S WHAT I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT. HOW THEY ARE GOING TO BUILD THIS UNIT RIGHT NEXT TO RESIDENTIAL AREA AND PUT THIS COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IN THE MIDDLE. THAT'S ONLY CONCERN I HAD WITH THE TRAFFIC GOING IN AND OUT OF THE COMPLEX. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE? IF THERE'S ANYBODY ELSE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM, YOU CAN STAND UP AGAINST THE WALL AND I'LL CALL YOU UP ONE AT A TIME. START WITH YOUR NAME, PLEASE. >> HI. MY NAME IS MARY GRACE. ACTUALLY I AM THE NEIGHBOR OF THE GENTLEMAN THAT JUST SPOKE. I HAVE THE SAME CONCERN AS FAR AS THE TRAFFIC THAT WOULD COME ABOUT AS FAR AS IN THAT AREA, THERE ARE GOING TO BE KIDS WALKING. RIGHT NOW, THE KIDS WALK TO AND FROM SCHOOL, FROM LOW MAX AS WELL AS MIDDLETON, AS FAR AS FERRELL. I KNOW THAT AS FAR AS THE KIDS WORKING FROM MIDDLETON, THEY ALSO HAVE TO HAVE THE POLICE COME OUT AND ESPECIALLY IF THEY START DIFFERENT FIGHTS OR WHATEVER, YOU HAVE THE KIDS THERE. NOW YOU ARE PUTTING IN A COMPLEX MORE OR LESS, 15 TO 27, IT'S GOING TO BE A LOT MORE ISSUES. AS FAR AS THE FLOODING, THE FLOODING COMES ABOUT DEVON'S HOUSE AS WELL AS MY HOME. THEN, TOO, WHEN YOU PUT IN ALL OF THESE COMPLEXES, MORE OR LESS, HOMES, THAT, OF COURSE, OUR TAXES ARE GOING TO GO UP. I HAVE BEEN LIVING IN THE AREA FOR ABOUT 40 YEARS. I WAS THERE WHEN THE HOME THAT WAS TORN DOWN AND THEY BOUGHT OUT THE PROPERTY. I WAS THERE. ALL THE TIME THAT I'VE LIVED THERE, IT'S BEEN A HOME, NOT MULTIPLE HOMES, 13 TO 27, I'M REALLY, REALLY CONCERNED. IT'S GOING TO BE TOO MUCH. TOO MUCH FOR THE AREA. THAT'S MY CONCERN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? APPLICANT? >>STEVE MICHELINI: COUNCIL, THAT'S WHY I WAS SAYING TO YOU EARLIER THAT THE ISSUES THAT CAME UP ARE REALLY DEVELOPMENT ISSUES AS OPPOSED TO WHETHER OR NOT THIS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR A LAND USE DESIGNATION, A CHANGE. AND THAT'S WHY WE SPENT AS MUCH TIME AS WE DID WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, AND ALSO WITH THE CITY STAFF AND WITH THE CRA TO MAKE SURE THAT IT WAS COMPATIBLE BECAUSE THE NEED FOR HOUSING IS CRITICAL. THIS IS NOT APARTMENTS, RENTAL KIND OF HIGH-RISE THINGS OR COMMERCIAL. IT NEVER WAS INTENDED THAT WAY. I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO THE SPECIFICS OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ITSELF, BUT COMING FORWARD, YOU WILL SEE THAT IT ACCOUNTS FOR THE BUFFERING. IT ACCOUNTS FOR THE TRAFFIC. IT ACCOUNTS FOR THE DRAINAGE. IT ACCOUNTS FOR ALL THOSE THINGS THAT ARE NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTIVE MEASURES. WHEN WE STARTED THIS PROJECT, WE DID START WITH SOME DISCUSSIONS WITH NEIGHBORS TO TRY TO SEE WHAT THEY THOUGHT WAS COMPATIBLE. WE KNOW ABOUT THE SCHOOL. THIS WILL ALSO ACCOMMODATE THE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC TO AND FROM THE SCHOOL. SO, AGAIN, THOSE ARE ISSUES THAT WE CAN DISCUSS AND SHOW YOU IN DETAIL SHOULD THIS BE APPROVED WHEN WE COME FORWARD WITH A REAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. I CAN SHOW IT TO YOU, BUT IT'S NOT PART OF THIS PRESENTATION. AGAIN, THE DISCUSSIONS AND THE COMMENTS THAT I'VE HEARD THIS EVENING ALL RELATE TO DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT AND NOT NECESSARILY TO WHETHER OR NOT AN R-20 DESIGNATION IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT R-20 DESIGNATION. DURING OUR DISCUSSION AND MEETINGS WITH THE NEIGHBORS, I THINK THEY DISCOVERED, AND I'LL SHOW YOU THAT MANY -- MANY OF THE HOUSES THAT THESE PEOPLE ARE TALKING ABOUT ALREADY HAVE THE R-20 DESIGNATION. AND THEY DIDN'T KNOW IT. I MEAN, WE POINTED IT OUT TO THEM. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF POINTED IT OUT TO THEM. WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS TO BE ABLE TO INCREASE THE R-20 DESIGNATION INTO THIS AREA HERE, AND THIS WAS THE SUBSEQUENT PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED REQUEST THAT'S COMING FORWARD. THE WOMAN THAT SPOKE TO YOU LIVES HERE. SO WE DO HAVE MIXED SUPPORT AMONG THE NEIGHBORS. WE ALSO HAVE CONCERNS, AND WE'LL BE ADDRESSING THOSE AS LONG AS COUNCIL GIVES US THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME FORWARD WITH A REAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, BUT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF PLANNING COMMISSION PRINCIPLES THAT ARE FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, OBJECTIVE LAND USE OBJECTIVE 2.1, 2.11, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2.6, 9.61, 9.62, AND IT GOES ON. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF PAGES THAT RELATE TO THAT LOW DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, MODERATE DENSITY, MULTIFAMILY. ADEQUATE SITES TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING FOUND CONSISTENT. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY PLANS, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. AGAIN, THE KEEPERS OF THE GATE HAVE SAID TO YOU THAT THEY SUPPORT THIS, AND THAT IT MEETS ALL THOSE CRITERIA. WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>LYNN HURTAK: ONE OF THE PUBLIC COMMENTERS MENTIONED COMMERCIAL BEING BUILT. >>STEVE MICHELINI: NO, MA'AM, NOT EVEN UNDER CONSIDERATION. YOU COULD HAVE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL IN AN R-20, BUT YOU COULDN'T HAVE CG OR SOMETHING -- NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE. THERE'S NO PLANS FOR THAT. >>EMILY PHELAN: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. WHILE THE COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT OF CN WOULD BE ALLOWED IN HERE, AT THE REZONING STAGE IT WOULD STILL HAVE TO MEET THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FOR THE SITE. >>LYNN HURTAK: BUT BECAUSE OF WHERE THIS SITE IS, IT WOULD NOT MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. >>STEVE MICHELINI: IT'S ON A RESIDENTIAL STREET. >>DANNY COLLINS: DANNY COLLINS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. JUST TO CLARIFY, COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD -- NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICES CAN BE CONSIDERED EXISTING RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION TODAY AS WELL AS THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION AS PROPOSED. BOTH WOULD HAVE TO MEET LOCATIONAL CRITERIA OF THE PLAN. >>LYNN HURTAK: BECAUSE OF THE RESIDENTIAL STREET. I WANTED TO ASK BECAUSE THAT'S HOW YOU GET ANSWERS. MY OTHER QUESTION IS, AND THIS CAN BE FOR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AS WELL. SOMEONE MENTIONED ANOTHER -- ANOTHER COMMENTER MENTIONED SINGLE-FAMILY. BUT ON THIS, WITH RESIDENTIAL 20, REALLY THE HIGHEST YOU COULD DO IS SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED, CORRECT? >>EMILY PHELAN: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, CORRECT. >>LYNN HURTAK: WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT APARTMENTS. THE MOST IT COULD BE IS SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED. >>EMILY PHELAN: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: THANK YOU. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, VERY GOOD. >>STEVE MICHELINI: CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. A SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4304 NORTH 26th STREET, 4205 NORTH 25th STREET AND FOLIO NUMBER 156781-0000 FROM RESIDENTIAL R-10 TO RESIDENTIAL R-20, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. A SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 21st, 2026 AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: I HAVE ONE REQUEST THAT THE PETITIONER MAKE SURE TO GO BACK TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO DISCUSS THESE PLANS BEFORE YOU BRING ANYTHING BACK BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE'LL EXPECT TO SEE. >>STEVE MICHELINI: WE'LL DO THAT. THANK YOU. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE'RE GOOD. ITEM NUMBER 5. >>EMILY PHELAN: EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. ITEM 5 IS TA/CPA 25-17. IT'S LOCATED AT 4216 NORTH 26th STREET. THIS ONE IS PUBLICLY INITIATED, SMALL SCALE. IT'S APPROXIMATELY 0.25 ACRES. THE REQUEST IS TO GO FROM RESIDENTIAL 10 TO RESIDENTIAL 20. IT'S LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. THE EAST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE, THE EAST TAMPA ONE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE EAST TAMPA CRA. AS THE LAST REQUEST IS OUTLINED IN BLUE, OUTLINE IN PINK IS THE CURRENT REQUEST. THIS REQUEST -- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DID INITIATE THIS REQUEST AS A RESULT OF THE PRIVATELY INITIATED AMENDMENT THAT YOU JUST HEARD. JUST TO GO OVER THE SURROUNDING AREA AGAIN, IT IS PRIMARILY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DETACHED. AND THE FERRELL GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY IS TO THE WEST. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS LOOKING NORTHEAST AT THE NORTH 26th STREET AND EAST GENESEE STREET. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH -- 26th STREET AND EAST 38th STREET AT THE SURROUNDING AREA. THIS IS LOOKING NORTHWEST ALONG NORTH 26th STREET AT TA/CPA 25-15 AND THE SUBJECT SITE IS TO THE LEFT. THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED HERE REPRESENTED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION, WHICH IS TO -- EXISTING TO THE NORTH AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. TO THE SOUTH IS THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION AND FURTHER TO THE WEST IS THE PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC DESIGNATION. THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITE IS OUTLINED HERE IN BLACK AND REPRESENTED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION. UNDER THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL 10 DESIGNATION, THE SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR TWO DWELLING UNITS OR JUST OVER 3,800 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES IF LOCATIONAL CRITERIA IS MET. UNDER THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION, THE SUBJECT SITE CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR FIVE DWELLING UNITS OR JUST OVER 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES IF LOCATIONAL CRITERIA IS MET. WHILE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA IS EXPANDED UPON IN THE RESIDENTIAL 20 DESIGNATION, THE SITE WOULD STILL HAVE TO MEET THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE SUBJECT SITE CONSISTENT WITH THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVES, POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. IT HAS A TRANSITION IN DENSITY, AND ENCOURAGE THE TRANSITION IN DENSITY AND IT ENSURES AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF HOUSING WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF TAMPA'S PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATION. WITH THAT, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT BE FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE. THANK YOU. THERE'S NO APPLICANT FOR THIS. I WAS SURPRISED HE WAS GETTING UP. COMING UP AS A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC. >> STEVE MICHELINI. AGAIN, WE WORKED WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. WE WEREN'T ABLE TO ASSEMBLE THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IN OUR ORIGINAL PETITION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF TOOK THAT ON AS AN INITIATION AS A PUBLICLY INITIATED COMPONENT. I'M HERE SUPPORTING THAT. IT MAKES GOOD SENSE. IT COMPLEMENTS THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT MAY BE COMING FORWARD TO YOU. ANYWAY, WE DO NOT HAVE A FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY. AND ANY -- IN ANY RESPECT. I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE USEFUL TO COME UP AND SUPPORT THEIR APPLICATION. THANK YOU. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE IN THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? COME ON UP. >> I AM IN FAVOR OF THIS ONE. SACHIN. I AM A NEIGHBOR OF THE PROPOSED. I CONCUR WITH IT, TOO. I THINK THE LOGISTICS WOULD BE SOLVED LATER ON. THAT LAND COULD BE USED FOR OTHER PEOPLE TO LIVE IN. I HAVE WAY TOO MUCH HOUSING FOR MYSELF. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COME ON UP. START WITH YOUR NAME, PLEASE. >> HELLO. DEVON ISET. I JUST WANT TO MAKE IT KNOWN THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THIS REZONING UNTIL I TOLD THEM ABOUT IT. I GUESS THEY DIDN'T GET THE LETTER IN THE MAIL. AND THEY COULDN'T BE HERE TO SPEAK ON IT TONIGHT BECAUSE OF THE MEDICAL EMERGENCY BUT THEY REALLY WANTED TO COME AND EXPRESS HOW IT WAS JUST KIND OF STRANGE THAT THE CITY DECIDED TO REZONE THEIR PROPERTY. THEY SAID THEY DIDN'T GET A LETTER OR ANYTHING. I TOLD THEM ABOUT IT. THEY WENT TO THE LIBRARY AND LEARNED ABOUT IT. THEY ARE JUST AGAINST GETTING THEIR PROPERTY REZONED FROM UNDERNEATH THEIR FEET. THEY FEEL A LITTLE STRANGE ABOUT THAT, THAT IT WAS JUST KIND OF A NEIGHBOR LETTING THEM KNOW. HEY, THEY ARE REZONING YOUR HOUSE. SO THAT'S ALL I WANTED TO SAY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HAVE YOU SPOKEN WITH STAFF AT ALL ABOUT WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE TODAY ON THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE? >> YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YOU TALKED TO STAFF. YOU UNDERSTAND FUTURE LAND USE. >> YEAH. I KNOW YOU'LL PROBABLY PASS IT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WHAT FUTURE LAND USE VERSUS ZONING, IF YOU HAVE GOTTEN A BRIEFING FROM STAFF. >> YES, I'M CLEAR. >> THEY DO A WONDERFUL JOB. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANYBODY ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ THIS, PLEASE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ITEM 5, FILE TA/CPA 25-17, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TAMPA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4216 NORTH 26th STREET, FROM RESIDENTIAL 10 R-10 TO RESIDENTIAL 20, R-20, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 21st, 2026, AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>STEVE MICHELINI: THANK YOU, COUNCIL. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HAVE A GOOD NIGHT. NEXT PUBLIC HEARINGS ARE QUASI-JUDICIAL. THEY REQUIRE YOU TO BE SWORN IN. IF YOU ARE HERE TO SPEAK TO EITHER ITEM 6 OR 7, PLEASE STAND, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND BE SWORN IN BY OUR CLERK. [OATH ADMINISTERED] >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ITEM NUMBER 6. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. LEO DEBARDELEBEN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM NUMBER 6 IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6 IS AB 2-25-14. THIS IS A SPECIAL USE 2 REQUEST FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1724 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE. THE REQUEST IS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES, SMALL VENUE CLASSIFICATION FOR BEER, WINE, LIQUOR, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES ONLY. THIS IS THE AERIAL MAP ON THE SCREEN. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, OUTLINED IN RED. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH NEBRASKA AND EAST 7TH AVENUE. THIS IS LOCATED WITHIN THE YBOR CITY HISTORIC DISTRICT. THIS IS IN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR, AND THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT IS OF MIXED USE AND COMMERCIAL. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANT. THIS IS EAST 7TH AVENUE AND NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE HERE. THIS IS AN EXISTING MULTI-TENANT MIXED USE BUILDING HERE. THIS IS THE PROPOSED ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LOCATION. IT IS HATCHED ON THE SITE PLAN. THIS IS THE ENTRANCE, THE MAIN ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING OFF OF EAST 7TH AVENUE AND VEHICLE ACCESS AND PARKING IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SITE OR SOUTH OF THE BUILDING HERE. THIS IS AN EXISTING RESTAURANT THAT OPERATES AS LASETIMA. CURRENTLY HAVE ALCOHOL BEVERAGE SALES APPROVAL FOR BEER AND WINE WITH A RESTAURANT CLASSIFICATION. THIS PROPOSAL WILL CHANGE THAT CLASSIFICATION TO A SMALL VENUE AND ALLOW FOR THE SALE OF LIQUOR. THERE IS A TOTAL BEVERAGE SALES AREA OF 1,536 SQUARE FEET. ALL OF WHICH IS INDOORS. THIS PROPOSAL IS NOT INCLUDING ANY OUTDOOR AREA. I HAVE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE NORTH ELEVATION OF THE SITE ALONG EAST 7TH AVENUE. THIS IS FACING WEST ON EAST 7TH. THE SITE IS GOING TO BE TO OUR LEFT. THIS IS FACING EAST. THE SITE IS ON OUR RIGHT. FACING NORTH ON NORTH NEBRASKA, THE SITE IS ON THE LEFT. FACING SOUTH ON NORTH NEBRASKA, THE SITE IS ON OUR RIGHT. THIS IS THE EAST ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING. THIS IS THE VEHICLE ACCESS AND PARKING AREA TO THE SOUTH OF THE BUILDING. AND THIS IS THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF DID REVIEW THE APPLICATION AND FOUND IT TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE TAMPA -- THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS DUE TO THE REQUESTED WAIVERS. MINOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? COUNCILMAN MIRANDA, DID YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO, I REMEMBER THAT BUILDING VERY WELL. BIG SIGN WHEN I WAS A TEENAGER WAY UP ON TOP. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT CONCLUDES. APPLICANT, COME ON UP. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. DEBARDELEBEN. GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. MY NAME IS MATTHEW BLIEDENBER. HERE WITH ME THIS EVENING IS COCOUNSEL BENJAMIN STRONZEL, WITH US ON BEHALF OF OUR CLIENT, LESETIMA CLUB, TWO OWNERS AND OPERATORS, RYAN AND KARL. AS YOU ALL KNOW, MR. DEBARDELEBEN JUST OUTLINED FOR EVERYBODY, LESETIMA IS HERE TONIGHT SEEKING UPGRADE OF CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION FOR THE SALE OF LIQUOR FOR, AGAIN, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES ONLY. THEY ARE CURRENTLY ZONED FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, BEER AND WINE, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES ONLY. LESETIMA IS LOCATED AT 1724 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE, NOT TOO FAR FROM HERE. I IMAGINE SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO VISIT THE BUILDING AT SOME POINT IN THE TIME IT HAS BEEN THERE. LESETIMA OPENED IN NOVEMBER OF 2022, BEGINNING AS A NATURAL WINE BAR. OVER TIME THEY BEGAN SERVING DIFFERENT ITEMS, INCLUDING CRAFT BEER AND FOOD AND NONALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AS WELL. TO DATE, LESETIMA HAS HAD NO VIOLATIONS WITH THE DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO OR OTHERWISE. THEY HAVE HAD NO CRIMINAL ACTIONS BROUGHT AGAINST THE BUSINESS. TO OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BASED ON OUR REVIEW OF THE RECORD THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIONS MADE TO THEIR APPLICATION THAT WE ARE HERE TODAY TO DISCUSS THIS EVENING FOR THEIR ZONING UPGRADE. THEY HAVE THE FULL SUPPORT OF THEIR COMMUNITY AND THEIR PATRONS WITH WHOM THEY MAINTAIN A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP. IN FACT, AS SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE SEEN, MULTIPLE COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND PATRONS WROTE THEIR SUPPORT IN PUBLIC COMMENT THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL. AS MR. DEBARDELEBEN DISCUSSED AND AS I'M SURE YOU'VE SEEN ON THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION, WE HAVE REQUESTED WAIVERS. THE FIRST TWO RELATE TO AN ISSUE WITH PARKING TO ALLOW AN INCREASE OF COMPACT PARKING FROM 65 PERCENT TO 92 PERCENT. AND ALSO TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING SPOTS FROM 18 TO 15. NOW, GIVEN THE LOCATION OF LESETIMA CLUB AND THE CLIENTELE THAT THEY BRING IN, THE VAST MAJORITY OF ITS PATRONS AND THE FOLKS THAT COME IN AND HAVE A DRINK AT LESETIMA CLUB ARE USUALLY ARRIVING THERE VIA THE YBOR CITY TROLLEY, VIA UBER, VIA LYFT, SCOOTER AND FOOT TRAFFIC. THE VAST MINORITY ARRIVE USING MOTOR VEHICLE, MID SIZE OR LARGE SIZE MOTOR VEHICLE THAT THEY PARK ON THE PREMISES. WITH THAT IN MIND, THOSE WAIVERS THAT WE REQUESTED REGARDING PARKING WOULD NOT PUT ANY SIGNIFICANT STRAIN ON THE FLOW AND FUNCTION OF THE BUSINESS FOR THOSE WHO DO CHOOSE TO DRIVE. YOU HAVE ALSO SEEN THAT WE ARE REQUESTING A WAIVER OF THE REQUIRED DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM 250 FEET TO 197 FEET FROM OTHER AB SALES ESTABLISHMENTS. AS WAS INCLUDED IN OUR RADIUS MAP, LESETIMA IS NOT A BUSINESS -- EXCUSE ME. AS WE SHOWED ON OUR RADIUS MAP, THE ONLY OTHER AB DESIGNATED FACILITY WITHIN 250 FEET IS THE COMMODORE. THAT IS A LIVE SKETCH AND IMPROV COMEDY STUDIO THAT OPERATES WITHIN THE SAME BUILDING THAT LESETIMA IS HOUSED IN. THEY ARE CURRENTLY AS WELL ONLY DESIGNATED FOR THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES. THEY ARE NOT DESIGNATED FOR THE SALE OF LIQUOR. AND ALSO NOTABLY, LESETIMA'S CLIENTELE IS NOT A ROWDY AND RAMBUNCTIOUS CROWD. THEY ARE TYPICALLY A LAID-BACK, QUIET GATHERING. LESETIMA LATEST HOURS ARE OPEN ONLY UNTIL 12 A.M. TWO NIGHTS OUT OF THE WEEK. APPROVING THIS APPLICATION WOULD HAVE NO NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE COMMUNITY AND WOULD ONLY FURTHER ENHANCE THE LOCAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. THEY HAVE THE FULL SUPPORT OF THEIR NEIGHBORS THAT ARE ALL HELD WITHIN THAT SAME BUILDING, INCLUDING THE COMMODORE THAT WE TALKED ABOUT. ON BEHALF OF LESETIMA, I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU TO THE COUNCIL FOR YOUR TIME, FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION THIS EVENING. I AM OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COUNCIL. THANK YOU. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: MY FIRST QUESTION IS, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO CHANGE THE SIGN, RIGHT? IT'S STILL GOING TO SAY BAR. BECAUSE THAT'S A GREAT LITTLE SCHTICK IN THE AREA. I LOVE IT. BUT I DID NOT RECEIVE ANY E-MAILS. I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY GOT INTO THE RECORD BECAUSE I DIDN'T SEE THEM. SO IF YOU HAVE A COPY OF THEM SO WE CAN ALL READ THEM AND THEN PUT THEM IN THE RECORD, THAT WOULD BE GREAT BECAUSE WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY. THAT WAS MY ONLY THING THAT I HEARD THAT I JUST -- I WAS LIKE, I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. OH, THAT'S EVEN BETTER. >> MY APOLOGIES. THAT IS ONE OF SEVERAL. WE HAVE QUITE A FEW. >>LYNN HURTAK: IF YOU WANT TO TAKE THE WHOLE BUNCH, GIVE THEM TO MR. SHELBY, WE'LL READ THEM ALL AND PASS THEM IN. APPRECIATE THAT. MY ONLY OTHER QUESTION HAS TO DO WITH THE SITE PLAN. THE SITE PLAN, DOES IT HAVE HOURS OF OPERATION ON THE SITE PLAN? >>LEO DEBARDELEBEN: DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION YES COUNCILWOMAN. THE HOURS OF OPERATION DUE TO IT BEING A COMMERCIAL MIXED USE CORRIDOR IS CHAPTER 14, WHICH IS WHAT THEY ARE CURRENTLY OPERATING UNDER. >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY. I THOUGHT I'D ASK. THANK YOU. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: I HAD THE SAME QUESTION ABOUT HOURS, THOUGH. YOU SAID THE BAR CLOSES AT 12. THE NEIGHBORS IN THE LARGER AREA WANT TO REDUCE THE IMPACT OF IT BEING AN ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT OR A BAR DISTRICT. IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE IT MIDNIGHT OR EARLIER ON WEEKDAYS? >> COUNCILMAN, ACTUALLY TO THAT EFFECT, I HAVE THE FULL HOURS THAT ARE AVAILABLE THROUGHOUT THE WEEK. THEY ARE CLOSED ON MONDAYS. TUESDAY THROUGH THURSDAY THEY CLOSE AT 10 P.M. THEY CLOSE AT MIDNIGHT ONLY ON FRIDAYS AND SATURDAYS. AND AGAIN CLOSE AT 10 P.M. ON SUNDAYS. >>BILL CARLSON: IS IT POSSIBLE INSTEAD OF CHAPTER 14 TO LIMIT IT TO 11 ON WEEKDAYS AND MIDNIGHT ON WEEKENDS. >> TALKING ABOUT FORMAL LIMITATION BECAUSE THEY ARE ALREADY WITHIN THOSE HOURS. >>BILL CARLSON: JUST FOR THE LIQUOR PART OF IT. >> THAT'S NOT A PROBLEM ON OUR PART. WE'RE FINE WITH IT. >>LYNN HURTAK: CAN I MAKE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT? TO JUST PUT MIDNIGHT SUNDAY THROUGH SATURDAY. SEVEN DAYS A WEEK JUST IN CASE THEY DECIDE TO OPEN ON A MONDAY. >>BILL CARLSON: WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME TALKING EARLIER ABOUT NOISE. >>LYNN HURTAK: THEY HAVE NO OUTDOOR SPACE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THIS IS MORE LIKE ENCORE. >>BILL CARLSON: WHAT HAPPENS AS YOU START MAKING EXCEPTIONS AND THEN YOU END UP WITH -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THERE'S LITERALLY NOTHING ELSE THERE. >>BILL CARLSON: NOT YET. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THIS WOULD BE IT. IT IS A RESTAURANT. THERE'S NOTHING ELSE THERE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GO THERE, COMEDY CLUB IS THERE. JUST ONE BUILDING. >>BILL CARLSON: IF YOU GUYS DON'T AGREE, THAT'S FINE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I WOULD GIVE THEM THE OPTION TO KEEP THE FLEXIBILITY FOR THEIR USE. >>BILL CARLSON: BECAUSE IF IT'S OPEN UNTIL THREE, THE PROBLEM IS IT CARRIES WITH THE SITE PLAN. SOMEBODY LESS BENEVOLENT TAKES IT OVER, PARTYING UNTIL 3:00 IN THE MORNING. >>MARTIN SHELBY: CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY, YOU MAY WANT TO ASK FOR A CLARIFICATION OF STAFF BASED ON THE PRESENTATION YOU HAD MENTIONED RESTAURANT. I DON'T BELIEVE IT WILL BE DESIGNATED AS A RESTAURANT. YOU SAID A SMALL VENUE. >>LEO DEBARDELEBEN: SMALL VENUE. THEY HAVE FOOD SERVICE, BUT SMALL VENUE. NOT RESTAURANT. >>BILL CARLSON: THEY SAID THEY WERE OKAY WITH IT. WHAT DO YOU GUYS WANT TO DO ON THAT? >>LYNN HURTAK: I THINK IT'S FINE TO DO MIDNIGHT. IF SOMETHING WANTS TO CHANGE, THEY CAN COME BACK AND ASK FOR HOURS. BUT IF THEY ARE FINE WITH IT. MY ONLY CONCERN IS I DON'T WANT TO LIMIT YOU. I DON'T WANT TO PUT YOU'RE NOT OPEN ON MONDAY. WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU WANT TO OPEN ON MONDAY? THAT'S WHY I THINK MIDNIGHT ACROSS THE BOARD IS FINE. THAT WAY IF YOU DECIDE TO STAY OPEN ON ANOTHER DAY. I DON'T WANT TO PIGEONHOLE THEM UNTIL 10. >> I UNDERSTAND COUNCILMAN CARLSON'S CONCERNS THAT IF IT DOES GET PASSED ALONG, IT PASSES WITH THE PROPERTY. WE'RE OKAY WITH MIDNIGHT DESIGNATION FOR SEVEN DAYS IF THAT'S OKAY WITH COUNCIL. >>BILL CARLSON: COULD I ASK ONE MORE INDULGENCE? CACAR -- CHARLIE, COULD YOU PRONOUNCE THE NAME OF THE RESTAURANT? >> LESETIMA [NOT SPEAKING ENGLISH] >> IT'S CALLED LESETIMA CLUB. >>LYNN HURTAK: WHAT IS THE NAME OUTSIDE OF YOUR OFFICE ON THE BIG SIGN? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MY OFFICE? LESETIMA. [NOT SPEAKING ENGLISH] >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I COMPLETELY LOST CONTROL OF THE DAIS. >>BILL CARLSON: WHEN I HEAR IT PRONOUNCED A DIFFERENT WAY -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THAT WAS IN SPAIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ISSUE? IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ISSUE? MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. A SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. COUNCILMAN CARLSON WITH YOUR AMENDMENT ON TIME FOR THE SITE PLAN, WOULD YOU PLEASE READ ITEM NUMBER 6. >>BILL CARLSON: I DON'T HAVE THE DOCUMENTS. >>LYNN HURTAK: WHO HAD THE LETTERS? >>MARTIN SHELBY: WHERE ARE THE LETTERS? THOSE LETTERS HAVE TO GO INTO THE RECORD. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILMAN CARLSON, WOULD YOU READ ITEM 6 WITH THE HOURS AMENDMENT FOR THE SITE PLAN. >>MARTIN SHELBY: AND ALSO THE OTHER CHANGES REQUESTED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >>BILL CARLSON: I'LL READ AND YOU ALL CAN ADD. MOVE NUMBER 6, FILE AB 2-25-14, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU-2 FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES, SMALL VENUE, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES ONLY, AND MAKING LAWFUL THE SALE OF BEVERAGES REGARDLESS OF ALCOHOLIC CONTENT, BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR, ON THAT CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT 1724 NORTH NEBRASKA AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 3, PROVIDING THAT ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT ARE REPEALED, REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-185, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, INCLUDING THE HOURS OF OPERATION TO GO TO MIDNIGHT SEVEN DAYS A WEEK AND CHANGES BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON. SECOND FROM ACTUALLY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 21st, 2026 AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YOU ALL WERE SO GIDDY DURING THAT ONE, I ASSUMED YOU WERE DRINKING DING THE BREAK. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COUNCIL MEMBERS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE'RE STILL MEETING. STILL HAVE ONE MORE ITEM. ITEM NUMBER 7. >>LEO DEBARDELEBEN: GOOD EVENING, AGAIN, COUNCIL AND CHAIRMAN. LEO DEBARDELEBEN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM NUMBER 7 IS AB 2-26-05. THIS IS A SPECIAL USE 2 REQUEST FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2507 SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE. THE REQUEST IS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES WITH RESTAURANT CLASSIFICATION FOR BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES ONLY. THE AERIAL MAP IS ON THE SCREEN. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE. IT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST -- SORRY, THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE AND WEST PALMIRA. THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND RM 16. IT'S LOCATED ALONG THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. IT'S SURROUNDED BY MIXED DEVELOPMENT OF USES AND COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT. THIS IS SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE HERE AND WEST PALMIRA AVENUE. VEHICLE ACCESS AND PARKING IS LOCATED OFF OF WEST PALMIRA. TO THE WEST OF THE BUILDING. THIS IS AN EXISTING MULTI-TENANT BUILDING, AND THIS ALCOHOL SALES REQUEST IS LIMITED TO THE FIRST FLOOR OF A TWO-STORY BUILDING. THE PROPOSED ALCOHOL BEVERAGE SALES AREA IS OUTLINED HERE IN GRAY. THE REQUESTED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES REQUEST HERE IS ALREADY WITHIN AN EXISTING LOCATION. THIS PROPERTY DOES HAVE AN EXISTING ALCOHOL BEVERAGE SALES PERMIT FOR BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES. THIS PROPOSAL IS NOT EXPANDING ON ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF REQUESTING A WAIVER TO PARKING, WHICH WASN'T INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL. ALTOGETHER, THERE'S 4,260 SQUARE FEET OF ALCOHOL BEVERAGE SALES AREA COMPRISED OF 2894 SQUARE FEET OF INDOOR AREA AND 1,366 SQUARE FEET OF OUTDOOR AREA. I HAVE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SITE. THIS IS THE EAST ELEVATION. THIS IS THE ENTRANCE TO THE BT RESTAURANT OFF OF SOUTH MacDILL. THIS IS FACING NORTH ON SOUTH MacDILL. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS GOING TO BE ON THE RIGHT HERE. THIS IS FACING SOUTH ON SOUTH MacDILL. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ON THE RIGHT BEHIND US HERE. THIS IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE CORNER OF SOUTH MacDILL AND WEST PALMIRA. THIS IS FACING NORTH OFF OF WEST PALMIRA INTO THE VEHICLE PARKING AND ACCESS AREA. THIS IS FACING WEST ON WEST PALMIRA. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ON OUR RIGHT. FACING EAST ON WEST PALMIRA, THE BUILDING IS ON OUR LEFT HERE. THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING. AND THIS IS THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING. THERE IS A SECOND ENTRANCE HERE, AND THE EXISTING PARKING, SURFACE PARKING LOT. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FIND THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF TAMPA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. BASED ON THE REQUESTED WAIVER. MINOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: EVERY SINGLE PERSON THAT GRADUATED FROM PLANT HIGH SCHOOL IS CRINGING WHEN YOU SAY -- HOW YOU PRONOUNCE PALMIRA. >>LYNN HURTAK: THAT'S WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY. I WAS GOING TO SAY COUNCILMAN MIRANDA NEEDS TO GO AND GIVE SOME STREET -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ANYBODY HAVE QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, APPLICANT. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR AND COUNCIL. JIM PORTER WITH AKERMAN, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET TAMPA, REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT. I WAS BEFORE YOU A FEW YEARS AGO ON THE EXACT SAME PROJECT, IF YOU RECALL. AS LEO SAID, NOTHING CHANGED WITH THE FOOTPRINT. WE HAD INTERNAL ISSUES WE NEEDED TO DEAL WITH THE STATE WITH THE OCCUPANCY. WE GOT THAT CLARIFIED SO WE'RE COMING BACK. WE DO HAVE PARKING ACROSS THE STREET. THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN USED BY BT WHO IS A WELL-KNOWN RESTAURANTEUR AT THIS SITE SINCE AT LEAST 2010. SHE'S BEEN IN THE AREA FOR EVEN LONGER THAN THAT. WE WORK WELL WITH OUR NEIGHBORS. WE DON'T HAVE ANY OPPOSITION TO THIS. THIS IS MORE OF A CLEANUP KIND OF REQUEST THAN ANYTHING ELSE. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OTHERWISE, RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCILMAN MIRANDA. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ ITEM 7? >>NAYA YOUNG: FILE NUMBER AB 2-26-04 -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: 05. >>NAYA YOUNG: SORRY. HOLD ON. FILE NUMBER AB 2-26-05, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU-2 FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES, RESTAURANT, CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES ONLY AND MAKING LAWFUL THE SALE OF BEVERAGES REGARDLESS OF ALCOHOLIC CONTENT, BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR, ON THAT CERTAIN LOT, PLOT OR TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT 2507 SOUTH MacDILL AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 3, PROVIDING THAT ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT ARE REPEALED, REPEALING ORDINANCE 2023-144, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG. SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN MANISCALCO. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. >>THE CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH VIERA BEING ABSENT. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 21st, 2026 AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU. THAT CONCLUDES OUR REGULAR SCHEDULED PROGRAM. NEW BUSINESS. COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: DEACONESS RUBY LEE JACKSON, WHO WAS 96 YEARS OLD FROM THE PORT TAMPA MOUNT ZION AME CHURCH PASSED AWAY. THE CHURCH WOULD LIKE US TO GIVE HER POSTHUMOUS COMMENDATION. MOTION TO GIVE AN OFF-SITE COMMENDATION. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION FROM COUNCILMAN CARLSON, SECOND FROM MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. >>BILL CARLSON: YOU SAW THE TRAFFIC IS HORRIBLE IN DOWNTOWN. AGAIN, WE'VE HAD STAFF BEFORE US FOUR, FIVE TIMES IN THE LAST FEW YEARS, ASKING THEM TO STOP INTERFERING WITH TRAFFIC. I DON'T KNOW WHAT LAW WE HAVE TO PASS OR SOMETHING, BUT THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT LISTENING. THE MAYOR IS PERSONALLY E-MAILING PEOPLE SAYING -- ON HARBOUR ISLAND SAYING IT'S YOUR FAULT -- IT'S HARBOUR ISLAND'S FAULT FOR BEING AGAINST MY RED LIGHTS WHICH WE KNEW WOULDN'T WORK IN THE FIRST PLACE. WE NEED TO COME UP WITH A SOLUTION. IF YOU ALL CAN SOMEHOW NEGOTIATE SOMETHING WITH ADMINISTRATION THAT WOULD BE GREAT. OTHERWISE, I THINK WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO PASS LAWS TO PROHIBIT THEM FROM SHUTTING DOWN ROADS. IT'S NOT JUST AFFECTING DOWNTOWN. DOWNTOWN IS BIG AND DEVELOPED NOW, AND IT'S CRUSHING DOWNTOWN AND HARBOUR ISLAND BUT ALSO AFFECTING ALL OF SOUTH TAMPA BECAUSE IT'S AFFECTING BAYSHORE AND PLATT STREET AND ALL AROUND YOUR HOUSE. WE'VE GOT TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM. I DON'T KNOW WHY THE ADMINISTRATION THROWS UP THEIR HANDS. WE KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM IS. THE PROBLEM IS THEY ARE SHUTTING DOWN THEIR ROAD FOR TOO LONG TO ALLOW PEDESTRIANS TO CROSS. EVEN VIK BHIDE SAID TO US ON THE RECORD YEARS AGO THAT IF THEY JUST LET THE LIGHTS GO AND WE NEED TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. IT IS UNACCEPTABLE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SECOND. IT IS THE PEDESTRIAN VEHICLE MANAGEMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF FRANKLIN AND -- >>LYNN HURTAK: EXCEPT WHAT WE ARE HEARING, THE PEDESTRIANS ARE MAKING -- DECIDING FOR THEM SELVES TO GO. THAT IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE NEED MORE PRESENCE DOWN THERE TO MANAGE THE PROCESS. >>BILL CARLSON: TAKE OUT -- I TOLD BRANDON EARLIER TODAY. I THINK HE IS ON VACATION BUT WE CAN TAKE OUT THAT CROSSWALK. >>LYNN HURTAK: THAT WON'T STOP PEOPLE. >>BILL CARLSON: YOU CAN PUT UP BIGGER WALLS LIKE THE REST OF IT, BUT IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO SHUT DOWN DOWNTOWN BECAUSE WE ARE JUST LETTING PEOPLE -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: DEFINITELY NEED SOMETHING THERE. PROBLEMATIC. I DON'T KNOW WITH THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT WITH THE PEDESTRIANS. BUT I WATCH ALL THE TIME. I RESET THE URGE TO JUMP OUT OF THE CAR AND THE PEOPLE MANAGING TRAFFIC TO SAY, YOU GUYS TWO THE TO DO BETTER. THEY CAN'T SEE IT. THE GUYS MANAGING THE TRAFFIC, THEY CAN'T SEE THROUGH THE CONVENTION CENTER AND HOW BACKED UP FOR MILES. THEY DON'T SEE THAT HAPPENS. COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG, ANY NEW BUSINESS? >>NAYA YOUNG: I ALREADY STATED EARLIER AND JUST FOR THE PUBLIC, I WILL MAKE THE MOTION ON MAY 7 FOR THE HONORARY NAMING FOR FRANK REDDICK. AND IT IS GOING TO BE LOCATED AT WILLIAMS PARK COMPLEX. SO JUST -- >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND -- >>NAYA YOUNG: I DIDN'T MAKE IT YET. I AM MAKING IT ON MAY 7. JUST AN ANNOUNCEMENT. OH, NO, I DIDN'T DO IT YET. I MADE AN ANNOUNCEMENT. I ALREADY SENT A MEMO. YOU KNOW I DO A WHOLE BUNCH OF STUFF. I DID ABOUT 15 THINGS SINCE OUR LAST COUNCIL MEETING AND I WANTED TO POINT OUT A FEW OF THEM. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE DONE THE TASTE OF WATER STREET. IT WAS ACTUALLY A LOT OF FUN. I MET A STUDENT WORKING THE EVENT FROM ARMWOOD OR PLANT HIGH SCHOOL, BUT THEY HAVE SOME PROGRAM SET UP WHERE THEY LET HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS COME AND WORK THE EVENT. WE DID THAT. SULPHUR SPRINGS MUSEUM CELEBRATED THEIR 20th ANNIVERSARY. ALSO I DID A TOUR OF LIVE OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH WAS AWESOME. AND THEN, OF COURSE, I HAD THE EAST TAMPA TOWN HALL WHICH WENT ABSOLUTELY AMAZING. WE HAD ABOUT 140 PEOPLE THERE. THE PANEL WAS GREAT. PEOPLE WERE ASKING WHEN I WAS GOING TO HAVE ANOTHER ONE. THAT WAS VERY EXCITING. I HAVE A BUNCH OF THINGS ON HERE, BUT I WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT A FEW OF THOSE THINGS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THANK YOU, I APPRECIATE THAT. COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. AS YOU MAY HAVE SEEN, THE NEWS THAT CAME OUT IN BOTH THE BUSINESS JOURNAL AND THE "TIMES" RECENTLY, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY DOES NOT SEEM LIKE THEY ARE GOING TO MAKE THEIR DEADLINE FOR THE RAYS. WE RECEIVED SOME CORRESPOND DENSE TODAY FROM OUR ATTORNEY. SO I MOVE -- SO I JUST DON'T KNOW THAT HOLDING SPECIAL-CALLED WORKSHOP ON MAY 5 IS PRUDENT AT THIS POINT. SO THIS IS THE LAST CHANCE WE HAVE TO DO IT. SO I MOVE TO CANCEL AND REMOVE THE MAY 5, 2026, RAYS SPECIALLY CALLED WORKSHOP FROM THE CALENDAR AND RESCHEDULE IT FOR A LATER DATE AS WE GET CLOSER TO A VOTE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT INFORMATION IN THE PAPER IS NOT CORRECT. THEY ARE ABOUT 36 HOURS OUT-OF-DATE FOR WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON. >>LYNN HURTAK: OUR OFFICE CALLED SCOTT STEADY BEFORE WE DID THIS AND HE RECOMMENDED THAT WE NOT CONTINUE WITH THIS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>BILL CARLSON: I DON'T KNOW IF I AM GOING TO VOTE FOR OR AGAINST IT. BUT I CALLED THE RAYS, AND THEY WANT THE INFORMATION TO GET OUT THERE AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE, AND I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE PUBLIC TO GIVE US FEEDBACK. I THINK IT IS A PERFECT OPPORTUNITY. THE CITY HAS BEEN VERY LITTLE INVOLVED IN THIS ANYWAY AND I ASKED THAT THE COUNTY SHOULD PRESENT INSTEAD OF THE CITY, BUT ANYWAY, THERE IS INFORMATION OUT THERE. LET'S HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC. WE CAN ALWAYS HAVE ANOTHER MEETING, BUT LET'S LET SOME STEAM BECAUSE THE PUBLIC FOR OR AGAINST IS REALLY EXCITED TO SAY SOMETHING. >>LYNN HURTAK: AGAIN THE REASON -- THIS IS LITERALLY OUR LAST CHANCE. IF WE DO IT, I AM WORRIED THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE ANY MORE INFORMATION AND THEN WE ARE SIMPLY GOING TO HAVE -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: IF NOTHING ELSE, AT LEAST THE RAYS PEOPLE CAN COME AND THE CITY PEOPLE CAN COME AND TELL EVERYBODY WHAT THEY ARE HEARING. COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG. >>NAYA YOUNG: I WAS JUST WONDERING IF YOU SAY THIS IS OUR LAST CHANCE, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT? >>LYNN HURTAK: BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE A MEETING NEXT WEEK. WE CAN'T CANCEL IT BECAUSE IT IS LITERALLY THE NEXT TIME WE WILL SEE EACH OTHER IS MAY 5 HERE. IF WE WANTED TO CANCEL IT, THIS WILL BE OUR ONLY OPPORTUNITY. AND SO, AGAIN, I JUST DON'T WANT US TO MEET AND NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY AND HAVE TO DO IT ALL OVER AGAIN BECAUSE THIS WILL BE A LONG MEETING. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YEAH, BUT I DON'T -- LET'S SAY HYPOTHETICALLY THAT IT IS GETTING DELAYED. IT SEEMS LIKE -- OBVIOUSLY I HAVE BEEN VERY INVOLVED, AND I PUSH MYSELF INTO THIS AND GOTTEN A LOT OF INFORMATION, MORE THAN MOST. >>LYNN HURTAK: I HAVE TOO. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SO WHY DON'T WE SHARE THAT WITH EVERYBODY ELSE. ALL THIS INFORMATION -- AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE EVERYBODY IN THE ROOM AT THE SAME TIME. WE HAVE THE RAYS PEOPLE HERE. THE CITY PEOPLE WILL BE HERE. EVERYBODY HERE SHARING IT WITH THE PUBLIC. THAT SEEMS LIKE A GOOD IDEA. >>LYNN HURTAK: BUT WE HAVE -- I HAVE WAY MORE QUESTIONS THAN I HAVE ANSWERS. AND I AM JUST AFRAID THAT THE PUBLIC IS GOING TO COME TO EXPECT ANSWERS AND NOT GET THEM. SO THAT IS KIND OF WHERE I HAVE BEEN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT WILL BE BAD ON THE ORGANIZATION IF THAT IS WHAT HAPPENS. >>MARTIN SHELBY: I HAVE A QUESTION IF I MAY, MARTIN SHELBY, CITY COUNCIL ATTORNEY. DO WE HAVE A COMMITMENT OF WHO IS COMING AND WHO IS NOT COMING. >>LYNN HURTAK: COUNTY IS NOT COMING. >>MARTIN SHELBY: HOW ABOUT THE CITY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THE CITY IS COMING. >>LYNN HURTAK: WE TALKED ABOUT THIS ALREADY. WE HAVE A FULL ... >>ALAN CLENDENIN: A WHOLE LIST AND EVERYBODY IS CONFIRMED. >>MARTIN SHELBY: HOW LONG IS THIS SCHEDULE SKED ULD TO LAST? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: TIME FRAMES ON EACH PRESENTATION. BUT WITHOUT PUBLIC COMMENT, WELL BE HOUR AND A HALF. WITH PUBLIC COMMENT. >>LYNN HURTAK: SIX TO SEVEN HOURS. >>NAYA YOUNG: WHY DON'T WE JUST SET A TIME. >>LYNN HURTAK: AGAIN, I AM WORRIED OF HAVING NOTHING TO -- I WATCH THE COUNTY PRESENTATION, AND IT DIDN'T GIVE ANY NEW INFORMATION. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MAY I -- FORGIVE ME FOR INTERJECTING BUT I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR FROM SCOTT STEADY ABOUT HIS POSITION YESTERDAY. AND THEY -- THEY, HE BELIEVE, ARE JUST FIRST BEGINNING THE PROCESS OF NEGOTIATIONS. AND CERTAINLY HE IS NOT HERE AND I CAN'T TAKE A POSITION FOR HIM, BUT FRANKLY, I DON'T KNOW FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE WHAT EFFECT HAVING THIS MEETING WOULD HAVE ON THE PROCESS OF NEXT. IT MAY HAVE AN AFFECT, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THE CITY IS WILLING TO BE HERE AND THE RAYS ARE WILLING TO BE HERE. >>LYNN HURTAK: I AM NOT GOING TO BE WILLING TO VOTE BY MAY 7. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE ARE NOT SCHEDULING A VOTE. THIS IS JUST WORKSHOP. THIS IS JUST HAVING A DISCUSSION. >>LYNN HURTAK: THE REASON WE SCHEDULED ON MAY 5 BECAUSE WE WERE GOING TO HAVE A VOTE ON MAY 7. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I DOUBT SERIOUSLY THAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN. >>LYNN HURTAK: IF Y'ALL STILL WANT TO DO IT, THAT IS FINE. I DIDN'T WANT TO DO IT IF THERE WASN'T. SO NEVER MIND. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I AM NOT OPPOSED TO WHAT YOU ARE SAYING -- SORRY, AM I SPEAKING OUT OF TURN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: GO AHEAD, COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE COUNTY HAS MORE FINANCIALLY AND WE SHOULD BE THE SECOND BIT OF THE APPLE, THE NOT THE FIRST. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. THE MOTION MAKER WILL PROFESSOR THAT. OKAY WITH THE SECONDER. COUNCIL MEMBER MANISCALCO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THERE IS NOT SUPPORT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE MOTION, SO I WILL HAVE TO AGREE TO PULL IT. >>LYNN HURTAK: I -- I WILL STILL REGISTER EVEN THOUGH I AM THE ONE THAT MADE THIS MOTION, I AM STILL GOING TO REGISTER THAT I AM CONCERNED WE ARE GOING TO ENDS THIS AND HAVE -- WE WILL BE BACK WHERE WE WERE. AND THAT'S THE WAY I STRONGLY FEEL, BECAUSE WE HAD MULTIPLE WEEKS OF ASKING FOR MORE INFORMATION AND NOT GETTING IT, BECAUSE THE RAYS HAVE BEEN VERY CONCRETE THAT THEY ARE NOT MOVING. SO ANYWAY, I HAVE A SECOND MOTION. I MOVE TO HOLD SPACE ON JUNE 25 DURING THAT WORKSHOP FOR THE SECOND ROUND OF THE CONVERSATION ON THE TREE TRUST FUND AND THE N-RACK. I WILL HAVE MORE SPECIFIC MOTIONS LATER AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE I HAVE THE SPACE THAT GOES ALONG WITH THE SOUND STUDY. I THINK BOTH OF THOSE GOING INTO THEIR SECOND PHASE WILL GO IN THAT SPACE. YES, THERE IS NOTHING THERE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SAY THAT IT WILL BE JUST THOSE ITEMS. >>LYNN HURTAK: I WILL MAKE THAT AS A SECONDARY MOTION. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED. >>CLERK: WHO SECONDED IT? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCILMAN CARLSON. >>LYNN HURTAK: I MOVE NOT TO TAKE ANY MORE ITEMS FOR THE JUNE WORKSHOP. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON. THE AYES HAVE IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I HAVE NOT NOTHING. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: COUNTY IS COORDINATING WITH THE CITY WITH COMMUNITY BLOCK GRANT DISASTER RECOVERY FUNDS AND THESE FUNDS ARE BEING MADE AVAILABLE FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN RESPONSE TO HURRICANE HELENE AND MILTON. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE THE COUNTY CDBG DIRECTOR PROGRAM MANAGER MR. ROBERT HENDERSON -- HENDRICKSON. HENDRICKSON, YES, SIR, TO PROVIDE A 15-MINUTE PRESENTATION OR PROGRAM ON MAY 28. I WOULD LIKE TO, IF POSSIBLE, MAKE A MOTION TO BE THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. A SECOND FROM. >>BILL CARLSON: SECOND. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON. >>LYNN HURTAK: THAT IS THE WORKSHOP. SHELBY THE MAY WORKSHOP. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WE CAN DO IT. ANYBODY HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO THAT? >>LYNN HURTAK: I HAVE A QUESTION, ARE THEY GOING TO TELL ME WHAT KIND OF MONEY WE ARE GETTING? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I DON'T REALLY KNOW. WHY IT IS COMING TO US. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION AND A SECOND. OPPOSED? THE AYES HAVE IT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COUNCILMAN HURTAK. SECOND ONE SEPTEMBER A BUDGET WORKSHOP ON THE SCHEDULE OF AUGUST 3, 10 AND 17. JUST DETERMINING IF WE WANT IT DAY OR NIGHT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ENTERPRISE ONE YOU SAID FOR DAY AND THE OTHER TWO AT NIGHT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SOMETHING LIKE THAT. >>LYNN HURTAK: ENTERPRISE ONE IS FINE DURING THE DAY AND KIND OF MORE WONKY AND HONEST. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: 9:00 ON THE 10th. IS THAT OKAY FOR MONDAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OTHER IS 5:01. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: 5:01 FOR AUGUST 3 AND 17. MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MANISCALCO. SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER -- >>LYNN HURTAK: DO WE HAVE TO DO IT ON MONDAY? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I THINK WE ALREADY SET THAT. WE DID THAT LIKE A MONTH AGO. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: ONE MORE JUST FOR ME SPEAKING FOR MY OWN. BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU ASK FOR. IF I WERE YOU GUYS, I WOULD LET THE PUBLIC DECIDE WHAT THEY WILL DO BETWEEN THE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE RAYS. THAT IS ALL. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. [LAUGHTER] OKAY. NOTHING ELSE? WE ARE GOOD? MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SO MOVED. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION AND RECEIVE AND FILE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MANISCALCO. SECONDED FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED. AYES HAVE IT. 6:42 AND WE ARE DONE.