Tampa City Council PM - 02/13/25
No description available.
>>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS TAMPA CITY COUNCIL EVENING MEETING TO ORDER IF WE CAN HAVE ROLL CALL PLEASE. >>BILL CARLSON: HERE. >>LYNN HURTAK: HERE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: HERE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: PRESENT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HERE. >>CLERK: WE HAVE OF A PHYSICAL QUORUM. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, YOU ARE MUTED. DO WE NEED A MOTION TO ALLOW HIM TO BE VIRTUAL. >>LUIS VIERA: THERE WE GO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO ALLOW THEM TO BE VIRTUAL. MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. CATE WELLS IS ALSO VIRTUAL THIS EVENING. ALL RIGHT. ROLL CALL VOTES. OKAY. CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN ALL THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. YES, SIR, DO YOU WANT TO DO SOME HOUSEKEEPING. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOM MS., DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. A FEW HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS. FIRSTLY, THE APPLICANT FOR VAC 25-03, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2 AND REZ 2505, ANSWER ITEM NUMBER 8 HAVE REQUESTED THESE ITEMS TO BE HEARD TOGETHER AND VOTED ON SEPARATELY. WE WILL EITHER HAVE TO MOVE ITEM 2 ON THE ONLY OR BRING ITEM 8 UP ON THE AGENDA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SO 2 FOLLOWED BY 8 WITH SEPARATE VOTES. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: AND NEXT WE HAVE REZ 24-11. THAT IS ITEM NUMBER -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: 10. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: -- ITEM NUMBER 10 IS A MISNOTICE AND CANNOT BE HEARD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA TO REMOVE 10. SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED. ANYTHING ELSE? >>SAMUEL THOMAS: LASTLY, VAC 24-19, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 1 AND THEN AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6 WHICH IS REZ 2503. THE APPLICANT HAS CONTINUED A CONTINUANCE TO THE JUNE 12 PUBLIC HEARING DATE AND TO WAIVE THE 180-DAY REQUIREMENT FOR 25-03. ORIGINALLY REQUESTED MAY 8 BUT CONFIRMED THAT JUNE 12 WILL BE OKAY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MR. SHELBY, TAKE PUBLIC COMMENT? >>MARTIN SHELBY: TO SPEAK TO THE CONTINUANCE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM 1 AND 6 TO JUNE 12, YOU SAID? >>SAMUEL THOMAS: YES 5 W 01 P.M. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO TALK ON THE CONTINUANCE ONLY FOR ONE OR SIX. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SO MOVED, MR. CHAIRMAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT'S GOING TO BE 5:01 P.M., 315 E. KENNEDY, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33062 AND THIS ROOM. >>MARTIN SHELBY: A REMINDER NO OTHER PUBLIC NOTICE FOR THAT CONTINUANCE. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THAT, MAKE A NOTE OF THAT DATE AND TIME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: JUNE 12, 5:01 P.M. IN THIS ROOM. WE LISTED THE ADDRESS. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ROLL CALL VOTE FOR A CONTINUANCE FOR 1 AND 6. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: WAIVING THE 180-DAY RULE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A WAIVER OF THE 180 DAYS. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY. SINCE 2 GOING WITH 8 AND 8 IS ALREADY A QUASI JUDICIAL. IF YOU ARE GOING TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS TONIGHT, PLEASE STAND, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. [SWEARING IN] >> I DO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ITEM NUMBER 2. >> ASK THE CLERK TO SHARE THE ELMO SCREEN, PLEASE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: JUST PLACE YOUR ITEM THERE, AND WE WILL LOAD IT UP, THANKS. ALL RIGHT. IT IS UP ON THE BIG SCREEN. STATE YOUR NAME. >> ROSS SAMENS, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. TAMPA COMMONS LCC AND SHERWOOD PROPERTY LCC. APPLICANT TYLER HUDSON AND DALE MABRY HIGHWAY. PROPOSED VACATING REQUEST LOCATED NORTH OF KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF NORTH B STREET, EAST OF DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AND WEST OF STERLING AVENUE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: JUST AS SECOND, CAN -- CAN YOU PUT THE OVERHEAD PROJECTION IMAGE LARGER AND SHRINK COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA'S SCREEN SO WE CAN SEE IT BETTER ON OUR SCREEN. THERE WE GO. GO AHEAD, SIR. >>ROSS SAMONS: THIS APPLICANT WAS FILED FROM THE CITY OF TAMPA NOVEMBER 1, 2024. APPLICANT'S REASON FOR THE VACATING SOUTHERN PORTION OF MARIE AVENUE HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY VACATED. REMAINDER OF NORTH MARIE AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL BE PART OF A REDEVELOPMENT WITH FUTURE CROSS EASEMENTS. ALL PROPERTY OWNERS ARE APPLICANT ON THIS REQUEST. CREATED BY SUBDIVISION PLATT AND ACQUISITION. THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 13,3075 SQUARE FEET. THIS IS WITHIN THE WESTSHORE OVERLAY. HERE IS AN AIR YELL VIEW OF THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY IN RED. SECOND APPLICANT HERE. AND THE VACATING REQUEST IN YELLOW. OF NORTH MARIE AVENUE. THIS IS THE PLATT IN WHICH NORTH MARIE AVENUE WAS CREATED. PREVIOUSLY CALLED FAIRVIEW AVENUE. THIS IS THE IMAGE LOOKING NORTH ON MARIE AVENUE. THIS IS AN IMAGE LOOKING SOUTH ON MARIE AVENUE. STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THIS VACATING REQUEST. EASEMENT RESERVATION ARE REQUIRED BY TRANSPORTATION, WASTEWATER, WATER, FRONTIER AND SPECTRUM. SPECIAL CONDITIONS INCLUDE NATURAL RESOURCES MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 27 WITH TREE PRESERVATION AND SITE DESIGN FOR IMPROVEMENT PLACED ADJACENT TO TREES IN VACATED AREA. NO LATER THAN 12 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF THE ORDINANCE, OWNERS SHALL SUBMIT A RELEASE OF EASEMENT APPLICATIONS TO THE DIRECTOR OF CITY OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT REQUESTING THE RELEASE OF A TEMPORARY WATER EASEMENT RESERVED AND EXECUTE AND RECORD EASEMENT AGREEMENT WHICH SHALL INCLUDE A BILL OF SALE. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT, THANKS. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT FOR ITEM NUMBER 2? COME ON. YOU. >> TRUETT GRDNER, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE. CHAIRMAN, WE ARE HAPPY -- WHATEVER YOUR PLEASURE IS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE WE CAN -- SEPARATE? THAT'S FINE AS WELL. SO WE WILL HANDLE THE VACATING FIRST. AND THEN THE REZONING. THE TWO ARE TIED TOGETHER. WE WERE GOING TO PUT THEM ALL TOGETHER IN ONE 15-MINUTE PRESENTATION BUT THIS IS A ABSOLUTELY FINE. STAFF DID A GREAT JOB OF COVERING WHAT THIS IS -- AND MAYBE FOR THE SAKE OF TIME. I WILL GO AHEAD AND INTRODUCE THE ENTIRE TEAM. WITH ME TONIGHT THE LOCAL OWNERSHIP GROUP MITCHELL RICE, WHO IS APPEARING VIRTUALLY. AND SAM LINSKY AND THE DEVELOPER IS LESEE DEVELOPMENT WITH MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT WITH PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SOUTH EAST UNITED STATES. HERE IS JOHN FLYNN, MATT GORLAY AND JAMES McARTHUR. TODD PRESSMAN WILL BE PRESENTING AND SCOTT GILNEW KIMLEY-HORN. RICKY PETERIKA WITH DARK MOSS AND ERIC. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ON OUR SCREEN WE SEE THE CLOSED CAPTIONING. IS THERE ANY WAY TO SHRINK THE CLOSED CAPTIONING OR MOVE IT? BECAUSE IT BLOCKS SOME OF THE IMA IMAGES. >> CAN YOU SEE THAT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEY ARE REWORKING. THERE WE GO. THANKS. THEY ARE GOING TO BRING IT BACK UP. >> NO PROBLEM. OKAY. SO I SEE AN OVERVIEW HERE REGARDING THE VACATING. CAN YOU SEE IT? >> EVERYBODY HAS GOT IT? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE GOT IT. >> GOOD. ON THE LEFT WHICH I THINK IS ALSO YOUR LEFT IN BLUE IS AN OUTLINE OF THIS PROPERTY IN QUESTION. TAMPA COMMONS WAS ORIGINALLY GOING TO BE ONE DEVELOPMENT THAT SPANNED -- AGAIN, JUST TO ORIENT YOU, KENNEDY ON THE SOUTH. DALE MABRY ON THE WEST. THAT IS NORTH B ON THE NORTH. AND THEN NORTH STERLING ON THE EAST. AND SO TAMPA COMMONS WAS ORIGINALLY CONTEMPLATED TO BE THE FULL BLOCK FROM NORTH B ALL THE WAY SOUTH TO KENNEDY. THINGS HAPPENED IN THE ECONOMY. OBVIOUSLY THE 13-STORY BUILDING AND PARKING GARAGE GOT DEVELOPED ON THE SOUTH END AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE BARNES AND NOBLE AND OFFICE DEPOT CAME IN LATER. THIS REZONING WILL BE REALLY SUBJECT OF THE OR THE DEPOT SITE. BUT AS IT RELATES TO THE VACATING, EVERYTHING -- AND I WILL USE -- I GUESS I CAN'T USE MY POINTER. BUT EVERYTHING HAS BEEN VACATED ABSENT THE SMALL STUB THAT RUNS FROM NORTH B AND YOU CAN KIND OF FOLLOW THE ASPHALT DOWN TO WHERE IT DEAD-ENDS. AND SO WHAT WE ARE DOING IS JUST VACATING THAT PORTION WHICH YOU CAN MORE CLEARLY SEE ON -- ON THE RIGHT. AS ROSS MENTION, TRANSPORTATION EASEMENTS WILL BE GRANTED BACK. SIDEWALKS WILL BE PUT IN PLACE. AND BUILDINGS WILL BE ON THAT PORTION. WE ARE NOT UTILIZING ANY OF THE DENSITY GAINED FROM THAT. BASICALLY WE ARE JUST CLEARING A RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT HAPPENED -- I DON'T KNOW WHY WHEN THEY VACATE IT ORIGINALLY THEY DIDN'T VACATE THAT PORTION. THAT IS WHAT THAT IS. AND SECONDLY, A LITTLE BIT OF COMPLEXITY TO THIS WHICH I WILL GO AHEAD AND GET INTO NOW. WHICH IS ON THIS SLIDE, YOU CAN SEE THE SMALL GREEN TRIANGLE. THAT WAS ACTUALLY OWNED BY RMC AS THE CURRENT OWNER. THE PREDECESSOR AND TITLE, THEY DEEDED THAT PROPERTY TO THE CITY. I ASSUME FOR MANEUVERABILITY OF GETTING INTO THE OFFICE DEPOT. AT THE NEXT HEARING WE WOULD BE LUCKY ENOUGH TO PROCEED, THERE WILL BE A PURCHASE AGREEMENT WHERE RMC WILL BASICALLY BE BUYING BACK LAND THEY GAVE TO THE CITY. AND PRETTY UNIQUE WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO WITH THOSE FUNDS THAT I WILL GET INTO IN A SECOND. BUT I WANTED TO GIVE YOU A COMPLETE PICTURE OF THE VACATING WHICH IS THE PORTION HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW. AND ALSO THAT GREEN TRIANGLE NOT SUBJECT TO THE VACATING BUT SUBJECT TO THE SEPARATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ON THAT PORTION OF THE APPLICATION. AND SHOULD YOU NOT BE READY TO PROCEED WITH THE REZONING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: SO THAT SECTION IS NOW KNOWN AS NORTH MARIE AVENUE? >> CORRECT. >>LYNN HURTAK: AND SO EVEN WITH THE REZONING -- OR I AM SORRY, EVEN WITH THE VACATING, THAT WILL STILL ACT AS A DRIVEWAY. >> YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: BECAUSE THAT IS THE BACK WAY TO ALDI, JUST GOING TO THROW THAT OUT THERE. >> BACK WAY TO ALDI. EVEN MORE IMPORTANT, THE VILLAIN INN TOO. >>LYNN HURTAK: VERY IMPORTANT. WANTED TO THROW THAT OUT THERE. PEOPLE WILL STILL BE ABLE TO GET TO THEIR GROCERY STORE. >> 100% AND VILLAGE INN WILL GAIN OWNERSHIP OF THE WESTERN PORTION OF THAT, BUT, AGAIN, IT IS FUNCTION BETTER THAN IT DOES TODAY. SO YOU WILL HAVE BETTER ACCESS TO THE VILLAGE INN AND THE ALDI. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: FREE PIE WEDNESDAY WITH ANY PURCHASE. >> THERE YOU GO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING FURTHER TO YOUR PRESENTATION BEFORE I GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT? ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? THE ONLY PERSON I HAVE REGISTERED IS MITCHELL RICE, BUT HE IS PART OF YOUR APPLICATION. >> CORRECT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 2, JUST THE VACATING. A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECONDED FROM COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED? COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA, READ ITEM NUMBER 2. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I READ ITEM NUMBER 2. FILE NUMBER VAC 25-03. ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED -- FIRST READING -- PRESENTATION FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. ORDINANCE FROM THE CITY OF TAMPA FLORIDA VACATING CLOSING, DISCONTINUING OR ABANDONING MARRY STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH OF KENNEDY BOUL BOULEVARD. SOUTH OF NORTH B. EAST OF IF DALE MABRY WITHIN THE PLAT OF AMERA SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, HICK, FLORIDA, AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2 THEREOF SUBJECT TO CERTAIN COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS MORE PARTICULARLY SET FORTH PROVIDED FOR ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY, PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS AND REPEALING CONFLICTS. PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA. LET'S DO A ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD ON MARCH 6, 2025 AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 315 E. KENNEDY. THIRD FLORIDA, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ITEM NUMBER 8. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAMUEL THOMAS, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM NUMBER 8, REQUEST TO REZONE 01 NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR STOREFRONT, OFFICE, OFFICE BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL RETAIL SHOPPER GOODS, RESTAURANTS AND PERSONAL SERVICES. TURN IT OVER TO EMILY WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. >>EMILY PHELAN: CAN WE SWITCH THEM? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEY ARE GOING TO ACTIVATE THE OVERHEAD NOW. THERE YOU GO. >>EMILY PHELAN: EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE WEST SHORE PLANNING IT IS STRICT, WEST SHORE BUSINESS DISTRICT AND OAKWOOD PARK NEIGHBORHOOD AND LOCATED IN EVACUATION ZONE C. AS DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICATION. ? SITE IS HERE AS REFERENCED AND COMMERCIAL USE ALONG DALE MABRY MABRY AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED IS TO THE NORTH AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF SUBJECT SITE LOCATED HERE, REPRESENTED WITH THE REGIONAL MIXED USE-100 DESIGNATION WHICH DOES GO FURTHER NORTH ALONG DALE MABRY AND FURTHER SOUTH ALONG WEST KENNEDY. THE UMU 60 DESIGNATION AND R-10 IS TO THE NORTH AND EAST OF THE SUBJECT SITE WITH THAT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AS POINTED OUT EARLIER. THE REQUEST TO REZONE TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND RESTAURANT CAN BE CONSIDERED WITHIN THE RMU-100, A AND PROPOSING F.A.R. OF 1.237 WE IS 0% OF THE ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL. PER LAND USE POLICY 6.1.13. RMU-100 IS WITHIN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR AND ANY DEVELOPMENT SHOULD ADDRESS THE MIXED USE CORRIDORS AND POLICIES PROVIDED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPOSED PD IS FURTHERING MANY COMPREHENSIVE POLICIES FOR HOUSING OF TAMPA'S GROWING POPULATION ALONG MIXED USE CORRIDORS. PEDESTRIAN INTERCONNECTIVITY AND DENSITY TO SUPPORT TRANSIT SERVICE. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SPEAKS TO DESIGN AND SENSITIVE DEVELOPMENT TO HIGHER DENSITY AMONG CORRIDORS THAT ARE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL. THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A NOTE TO THE SITE DATA TABLE TO BE ADDED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING COMMITTING TO A STEP-DOWN APPROACH ON THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE STATE ADJACENT TO NORTH STERLING AVENUE. STEP-DOWN IN HEIGHT WHICH TRANSITIONS TO A 15-FOOT SETBACK FOR FLOORS FOUR AND ABOVE WILL PROVIDE SENSITIVE TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES. ADDITIONALLY THE PD FROM POSES WALK-UP UNITS WITH FRONT DOORS FACING THE SIDEWALKS ALONG THE EASTERN AND NORTHERN PERIMETER OF THIS SITE CONSISTENT WITH POLICY DIRECTION IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPOSED PD ALSO ADDS SIDEWALK TO SURROUND THE PERIMETER OF FRONT DOORS AND WALK-UP UNITS FOR RESIDENTS AND PEDESTRIANS. INTERNAL CONNECTIONS FROM C TO B AND BUILDING A TO B ARE MISSING. TO OBTAIN CONSISTENCY, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BETWEEN BUILDINGS A, B AND C ARE ADDED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. OVERALL, THE PROPOSED PD IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROVIDING HOUSING AND TRANSIT SERVICE WITH THE /* COMPACT SCALE AND MASSING THIS IS CONSISTENT TO THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I HAVE A REVISED REVISION SHEET BEFORE WE GET STARTED. THE APPLICANT HAS A COPY OF IT AS WELL. I WILL START WITH AN AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE. SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED ON NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY, NORTH B STREET, VACATED MARIE AVENUE AND NORTH STERLING AVENUE. AS EMILY MENTIONED, YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL USE ALONG DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AND KENNEDY BOULEVARD WITH A MIX OF PD ZONINGS. AS YOU MOVE OFF THESE COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS, TRANSITIONS PRETTY QUICKLY TO RS-50 ZONING FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES. SO WE WILL MOVE INTO THE SITE PLAN HERE. IT WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ONE NEW STRUCTURE THAT WILL BE BUILDING C, WHERE THE OFFICE DEPOT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED. THIS BUILDING WILL BE STOREFRONT RESIDENTIAL USES. AND THEN THE EXISTING STRUCTURES A, B AND D WILL BE RETAINED FOR RETAIL SHOPPERS GOODS, RESTAURANTS AND PERSONAL SERVICES. NEW PROPOSED BUILDING C WILL CONTAIN 335,705 SQUARE FEET WITH APPROXIMATELY 320 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 1200 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL OR OFFICE SPACE. THIS NUMBER IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT BY ABOUT 40,000 SQUARE FEET THAN WHAT IS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LISTED IN THE SITE DATA TABLE WHICH WAS 2940,000ISH SQUARE FEET. THE APPLICANT REACHED OUT AND INFORMED US A TYPO ON THEIR SITE PLAN AND SOMETHING THAT WILL BE CORRECTED DURING FIRST AND SECOND READING. PROPOSED OFFICE SPACE AND LEASING OFFICE IS LOCATED HERE. AND APPLICANT IS PROPOSING WALK-UP UNITS ALONG MARIE AVENUE, NORTH B STREET AND NORTH STERLING AVENUE. ACCESS TO THE PARKING GARAGE FOR THIS STRUCTURE IS LOCATED HERE FROM NORTH STERLING AVENUE, FROM THIS DRIVE AISLE. AND THEN FROM SOUTH OF THE VACATED MARIE AVENUE HERE AS WELL. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 100 FEET. THE ELEVATIONS DEPICT THE RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE COMMERCIAL PERSON OF THE STRUCTURE AS SEVEN STORIES. AND THEN THE PARKING GARAGE SOUTH OF THAT IS DEPICTED AS NINE STORIES WITH AN AMENITY LEVEL ON THE NINTH FLOOR OF THE PARKING GARAGE. BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AS EMILY MENTIONED PROPOSING A STEP BACK ON THE EASTERN SIDE ALONG NORTH STERLING AVENUE. THAT SETBACK CL PWILL APPLY TO THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE BUILDING. FROM FLOORS -- UP TO FLOOR THREE, THE SETBACK WILL BE TEN FEET. ONCE YOU GET ABOVE FLOOR THREE UP TO THE TOP FLOOR, THE SETBACK IS GOING TO GO TO A 15-FOOT SETBACK. LET'S SEE HERE. THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING C IS 324 PARKING SPACES AND 425 PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED. YOU ALSO HAVE BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED HERE, HERE, AND HERE. THERE IS A FIVE-FOOT -- FIVE TO SIX-FOOT SIDEWALK THAT RUNS ALONG NORTH B STREET, NORTH STERLING AVENUE, AND THE VACATED MARIE AVENUE. YOU CAN SEE THAT THE SIDEWALK KIND OF ENDS HERE AND ENDS HERE. APPLICANT AGREED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING TO MAKE THAT SIDEWALK CONNECTION GO ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING. YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT SITE OVERALL, VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY, VACATED MARRY AND NORTH B STREET AND STERLING AVENUE HERE AND STERLING AVENUE ALL THE WAY DOWN HERE TO THE SOUTH. THERE IS SURFACE PARKING THAT EXISTS FOR THE EXISTING STRUCTURES ON-SITE FOR A, B, AND THEN THERE IS -- THERE ARE TWO PARKING SPOTS FOR D. AND THEN ADDITIONAL SURFACE PARKING LOCATED TO THE SOUTH. THIS LITTLE JAUNT THAT GOES ALONG NORTH STERLING AVENUE. BUILDING HEIGHTS FOR THE BUILDINGS THAT WILL BE RETAINED RANGE FROM 22 TO 24.4 FEET IN HEIGHT. THERE IS AN EXISTING FIVE-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY. AS EMILY WAS MENTIONING, THE APPLICANT AGREED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS FROM BUILDING C TO BUILDING B. BUILDING B AND BUILDING A AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS TO THOSE BUILDINGS AND BETTER PEDESTRIAN MANEUVERABILITY AND CIRCULARABILITY. 367,609 SQUARE FEET OF RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL USES AT A 1.43 F.A.R. AS MENTIONED EARLIER A TYPO ON THE SITE PLAN AND THESE NUMBERS ARE DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IS ON THE SITE PLAN AND IN THE STAFF REPORT. DUE TO THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE DIFFERENT IN BUILDING C AND WILL BE CHANGED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I WILL RUN THROUGH SOME PICTURES NOW -- OR RUN THROUGH THE ELEVATIONS AND PICTURES. SO HERE ARE THE ELEVATION PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT. SO THIS IS THE EAST ELEVATION ALONG STERLING AVENUE. THIS IS WHERE YOU ARE GOING TO SEE DURING THE SECOND READING THIS IS APPROVED, WITH THEY WILL REVISE THESE ELEVATIONS FOR SETBACK IN HEIGHT ALONG STERLING AVENUE FROM THIS PORTION OF THE BUILDING. THIS IS GOING TO BE LOOKING -- LET'S SEE HERE WEST ALONG THE VACATED MARIE AVENUE. AND THEN YOU HAVE THE NORTH ELEVATION ALONG WEST NORTH B STREET. AND YOU HAVE THE SOUTH ELEVATION ALONG THAT INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE THAT IS SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. WE MOVE INTO SOME PICTURES NOW. THE SITE IS QUITE LARGE, SO KIND OF A LOT OF PICTURES TO GO THROUGH. SO BEAR WITH ME. IF YOU GET TIRED OF LOOKING AT THE PICTURES, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. THIS IS THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE SITE WHERE YOU HAVE THE PARKING THAT RUNS ALONG STERLING AVENUE. STERLING AVENUE WILL BE HERE. THIS IS THE PARKING GARAGE FOR THAT PD AND THE OFFICE BUILDING TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS LOOK CAN SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS THAT LAST ENTRANCE OFF STERLING AVENUE. AND THIS IS WHERE THE OTHER PD FOR THE PARKING GARAGE AND THE OFFICE BUILDING THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS. YOU HAVE KENNEDY BOULEVARD OFF IN THE DISTANCE. AND THEN A BETTER VIEW -- SUBJECT SITE STARTS HERE. THIS THAT EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING GARAGE. WE ARE NOW LOOKING EAST FROM THE SUBJECT SITE ACROSS NORTH STERLING AVENUE. KENNEDY BOULEVARD AND THE COMMERCIAL USES HERE. AND SOME VACANT RESIDENTIAL LAND. LOOKING NORTH ALONG STERLING AVENUE, YOU CAN SEE THAT PARKING AND THE MEDIAN AND THE MIDDLE OF STERLING AVENUE. AND THAT IS LOOKING BACK SOUTH AGAIN TOWARD KENNEDY BOULEVARD ALONG STERLING. MOVING FARTHER UP, SO THIS WILL BE ENTRANCE OFF STERLING AVENUE. THE OFFICE DEPOT WHERE THE PROPOSED BUILDING C WILL BE LOCATED AT. AND THIS IS LOOKING AT THAT DRIVE AISLE FROM STERLING AVENUE THAT GOES INTO THE SUBJECT SITE. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NEW BUILDING C AND WHERE THE PARKING GARAGE WILL BE FOR THAT STRUCTURE. THIS IS LOOKING ACROSS THE STREET AT THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF STERLING AVENUE. MOVING FARTHER NORTH ALONG THE SITE TOWARD NORTH B STREET. SUBJECT SITE IS RIGHT HERE. NOW LOOK CAN WEST FROM STERLING IN THE MEDIAN OF WHERE THAT NEW BUILDING C WILL BE LOCATED AT. GETTING CLOSER TO WEST NORTH B STREET NOW. LOOKING INTO THE SUBJECT SITE, WHERE THE EXISTING PARKING FOR THE OFFICE DEPOT IS. WHERE BUILDING C WILL BE LOCATED. LOOKING NORTHEAST AS THE INTERSECTION OF WEST NORTH B AND NORTH STERLING AVENUE. SOME OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. AND THIS IS LOOKING NORTH TO THE INTERSECTION. WE ARE NOW MOVING BACK TOWARD DALE MABRY HIGHWAY ON WEST STREET. THIS IS WHERE THE NEW SUBJECT SITE -- WHERE THE NEW BUILDING WILL BE LOCATED. LOOKING DOWN INTO THE SITE NOW MOVING CLOSER TO MARIE AVENUE. AND HERE IS THE INTERSECTION OF WEST NORTH B AND MARIE AVENUE ON THE NORTH SIDE. BACKS OUT HERE WHERE THE PORTION OF MARIE AVENUE WAS JUST VACATED. THERE IS THAT PORTION OF MARIE AVENUE THAT I WAS JUST TALKING ABOUT. THE NEW BUILDING WILL BE LOCATED HERE. BACK OF THIS HERE. AND THE VILLAGE INN PANCAKE HOUSE WILL BE RIGHT THERE. YOU CAN SEE THIS ACCESS BETTER ON THIS PICTURE. THIS IS LOOKING EAST BACK TOWARD STERLING WHERE THE OFFICE DEPOT WILL BE DEMOLISHED. AND FURTHER SOUTH TO THE SITE. THIS IS A LOOK WHERE THE NEW BUILDING WILL BE PROPOSED AT THE BACK OF ALDI. WE MOVED A LITTLE FARTHER, YOU CAN SEE THE SURFACE PARKING THAT WILL BE RETAINED. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH. THIS IS THE BUILDING D THAT WILL BE RETAINED. THAT WILL BE KIND OF ALMOST LIKE -- IF NOT UNDERNEATH THE PARKING GARAGE. THERE IS A BETTER VIEW OF THE BUILDING THAT WILL BE RETAINED. OFFICE DEPOT WILL BE DEMOLISHED AND WHERE BUILDING C WILL BE LOCATED. AS THE EXISTING RESTAURANTS ON-SITE THAT WILL BE RETAINED. WE ARE LOOKING SOUTH NOW. LOOKING BACK WEST FROM THE RESTAURANTS AT THE FRONT OF ALDI. NOW LOOKING IT EAST TOWARD THE FRONT OF ALDI TO DALE MABRY HIGHWAY. LOOKING SOUTH ALONG DALE MABRY HIGHWAY. LOOKING WEST FROM DALE MA I CANNERY TO THE SUBJECT SITE. LOOKING BACK NORTH TO THE EXISTING ACCESS TO THE SITE FROM NORTH DALE MABRY. THIS IS MOVING FARTHER SOUTH TOWARD KENNEDY BOULEVARD LOOKING WEST ACROSS NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY. WE MOVED BACK TO THE -- TO THE SOUTHERN SECTION OF THE SITE, LOOKING AT THE RESTAURANTS EXISTING. LOOKING SOUTH AGAIN. MOVING BACK BEHIND THAT EXISTING RESTAURANT IN THE SOUTHERN PERIMETER OF THE PD. LOOKING BACK TOWARD WHERE THE NEW CONSTRUCTION WILL BE. AND BUILDING D THAT WILL BE RETAINED. AND WE MADE A FULL CIRCLE BACK AROUND TO THE SITE TO THAT ACCESS THAT WILL BE PROVIDED FROM NORTH STERLING AVENUE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I THINK YOU BROKE THE RECORD FOR PICTURES. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: I WALKED THAT WHOLE SITE AND I WAS SWEATING BY THE TIME I WAS DONE. ALL RIGHTY. HERE IS THE SITE PLAN AGAIN. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF FOUND IT INCONSISTENT DUE TO THE FINDINGS FROM TRANSPORTATION RELATED TO ACCESS TO THE -- THE COMMERCIAL ACCESS TO LOCAL STREET. SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION AND WAIVE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE REVISION SHEET MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING AND THESE WILL NOT RESOLVES THE INCONSISTENT FINDING. I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? GREAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPL APPLICANT? >> GOOD EVENING, AGAIN, TRUETT GARDNER, 300 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE. PRIVILEGE TO BE IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT. A LONG TIME COMING. WE FILED IT IN 2023. WITHDRAW IT. FILED IT AGAIN. REALLY AN EFFORT OF COLLABORATION. AND I WANTED TO SPECIFICALLY THANK THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. MARCUS MODES IS HERE TO SPEAK TONIGHT. ALSO YOUR ZONING STAFF. WE WORE SAM OUT JUST WALKING AROUND TAKING PICTURES. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. AND THEN -- I GUESS IMPORTANTLY OUR CLIENT, TOO, FOR HAVING THE PATIENCE AND STICKING WITH US. AND STOKED PR-- TODD PRESSMAN WL COVER THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ZONING AND I THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO COVER TWO THINGS OUTSIDE THE PURVIEW OF THE ZONING THAT I DISCUSSEDED WITH YOUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT AND I JUST WANTED TO MENTION FOR THE RECORD. ONE, IF YOU RECALL DURING THE VACATING I TOUCHED ON THAT LITTLE GREEN TRIANGULAR PIECE. THAT WILL BE THE SUBJECT OF THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT. INTERESTING SITUATION WHERE THE LAND WAS GIVEN BY MY CLIENT. AND THEY ARE KIND OF IN THE SAME SITUATION TO BUY THE LAND THEY GAVE BACK FROM THE CITY. AND SO WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO WITH THAT PURCHASE PRICE IS THOSE FUNDS WILL BE DEVOTED TO THE CEHEVARIA PARK. AND THAT WILL BE PART OF THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT DEVELOPED BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AS WELL AS THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. WE THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO PUT ON THE RECORD. SECONDLY, OUTSIDE THE PURVIEW OF THE VERY ZONING, WE HAVE AGREED TO SOME OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH WE HANDLED THROUGH A LETTER AGREEMENT WITH THE O OVERHEAD PARK ASSOCIATION. RUN THROUGH THOSE. FOUR-WAY STOP ON NORTH B AND STERLING. CROSSWALKS ACROSS NORTH B AND ACROSS STERLING. AN INTERESTING MEDIAN IN THE MIDDLE THAT HAS A SIDEWALK THAT RUNS TO THE PARK. THOSE ARE THERE AND ALONG STERLING, SINCE WE ARE ACROSS FROM HOMES, WANTED TO DO THE BEST WE COULD TO MITIGATE ANY IMPACTS THERE. IMPROVEMENT ON THE MEDIAN THAT RUNS ALONG STERLING FROM KENNEDY TO NORTH B WITH ENHANCED LANDSCAPING, SAFER CHANNELIZATION INTO THE PROPERTY AND ONGOING MAINTENANCE AND IRRIGATION INSTALLED IN THAT. WE HAVE A LETTER 'AGREEMENT GONE THE ASSOCIATION, BUT I WANTED TO STATE THAT ON THE RECORD. AND WE HAVE THAT LETTER AGREEMENT, IF MARTY WILL TAKE IT, WE WILL SUBMIT TO THE RECORD TOO. LASTLY BEFORE I HAND THINGS OVER TO TODD, OUR CLIENTS WORKED HARD ON GETTING LETTERS OF SUPPORT AND PROVIDED THOSE THIS AFTERNOON. THESE ARE FROM OWNERS OF PROPERTY IN AND AROUND -- IN AND AROUND THE VICINITY, SO I WANT TO PUT THEM INTO THE RECORD. I WILL TURN THINGS OVER TO TODD. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS AND MR. CHAIRMAN, TODD PRESSMAN 200 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH, YOU NUMBER 451 IN ST. PETERSBURG. IS THE POWERPOINT UP? REZ 25-05. I WANT TO THANK THE STAFF FOR THEIR HARD WORK. AS TRUET, IT SAID, THIS HAS BEEN A LONG-TIME COMING BUT MARCHING ORDERS FROM DAY ONE HAVE BEEN FROM TRANSPARENCY, PRIMARY EMPHASIS TO SOLVE ISSUES AND CONCERNS THAT AROSE DURING THE FIRST RENDITION WHICH YOU DID NOT SEE. THAT HAS BEEN VERY SUCCESS SELF. JUST TO GIVE YOU AN OVERVIEW, IT HAS BEEN -- 36REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF FLOORS. 25% REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF UNITS. TREE RETENTION. GREEN SPACE. AND A POORLY WORN FLOOD ZONE X. LOOK CAN AT THE POWERPOINT, WE ARE LOOKING AT CENTRAL TAMPA AS SHOWN BY STAFF. 320 UNITS, SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE. SLIDES ARE NOT MOVING -- LOCATED AT DEAL MAYBELY AND KENNEDY. PROPERTY PRAISER HAS IT AS YOU'RE WARE. AND, AGAIN, WE ARE IN FLOOD ZONE X. THE LOCATION -- WE HAVE VILLAGE ENWHICH EVERYONE KNOWS, PARTICULARLY ALL THE POLITICAL FOLKS. USE RIGHT NEXT DOOR. UP FRONT IN THE SEVEN-FLOOR PARKING GARAGE AND ONE BUILDING THAT HAS 13 FLOORS BOTH OFF THE PROPERTY BUT VERY HIGH AND VERY INTENSIVE. AND THIS THE REAR OF THE SITE. COUNCILMEMBERS, CRITICALLY IMPORTANT IS THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES RMU-100, THE HIGHEST CATEGORY IN THE CITY AND THE COUNCIL HAS BEEN MOVING FORWARD TO ADD DENSITY AND HEIGHT ALONG THE KENNEDY CORRIDOR. WE FEEL THIS IS A SPOT THAT THIS PROJECT CERTAINLY BELONGS. THE ISSUE REALLY BEFORE YOU IS RESIDENTIAL UNITS NOTICE C IN THE REAR ON THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. AS YOU HEARD, IT INCLUDES WALK-UP UNITS, SIX-FOOT SIDEWALKS, STEP-DOWN BUILDING HEIGHT AND INTERNAL YARDS. WE HAVE SUPPORT FROM ALL THE DIFFERENT COUNTY DEPARTMENTS, PLANNING COMMISSION AND REVIEWING AGENCIES. AS TRUETT INDICATED HISTORY OF IT MAY OF '23 WHEN THE FIRST RENDITION CAME THROUGH. IT DID NOT MAKE IT TO COUNCIL BECAUSE ISSUES CAME UP. I GIVE CRED TOTE THE DEVELOPERS. THEY WENT THEY WENT BACK TO SQUARE ONE AND CHANGED THIS PROJECT PRETTY SUBSTANTIALLY.IT CAME BACK 11 FLOORS AND 400 UNITS. WHAT IS PROPOSED IS SEVEN FLOORS, 320 UNITS. WE SUPER EMSUPPOSED WHAT IS PROPOSED IN THE RED COMPARED TO THE OLD PLAN, A 30% REDUCTION OF FLOORS, 80 UNITS REDUCE. THIS IS A COMPARABLE TO IT THE ONE BUILDING I SHOWED YOU OUT FRONT AND THE EXISTING PARKING GARAGE OFF THE PROPERTY ON KENNEDY. THIS IS WHAT WE CONSIDER TO BE A BEAUTIFUL ELEVATION OF WHAT IS PROPOSED. AND, AGAIN, A COMPARABLE. THE OLD PLAN 11-STORY 400 UNITS NEW PLAN SEVEN FLOORS, 320 UNITS OVER A YEAR AND A HALF OF WORK THAT WE WERE ABLE TO COME TO REAL SUCCESS BEFORE YOU. THERE IS AN APPROVED STREETSCAPE I WANT TO SHOW YOU. THIS IS LOOKING AT STERLING DOWN TOWARD KENNEDY. TO FOCUS IN ON THIS AREA WHICH THE PLANNING COMMISSION VERY STRONGLY SUGGESTED AND DIRECTED TO WORK WITH, WHICH CAME OUT TO BE A GREAT ASSET TO THE PROJECT. AND THAT IS THE FIRST THREE FLOORS. FIRST THREE FLOORS AS INDICATED A BEAUTIFUL BUILDING ANDED A TOOT STREETSCAPE AND SETBACKS OF THE BUILDING AND YOU SEE IN THE NORTH STERLING IN THE RIGHT. THE WALK-UP UNITS TEN FOOT AND FIVE FOOT AFTER THE THIRD FLOOR. NOW REALLY IMPORTANT COMMISSIONERS -- OR COUNCILMEMBERS, SEVEN WAIVERS, BUT CRITICALLY, FIVE OF THEM ARE PASS-THROUGHS OR CARRY-OVERS FROM THE ORIGINALLY APPROVED ZONING. SO THERE IS TWO OTHERS. ONE IS REGARDING 50% TRANSPARENCY OF THE GROUND LEVEL WHICH IS TYPICALLY FOR RETAIL COMMERCIAL FOR DISPLAY WINDOWS BUT THESE WILL HAD BEEN INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND PRIVACY IS CALLED FOR AND WE ARE ASKING FOR A WAIVER TO THAT IN TERMS OF THE GROUND LEVEL OF BUILDING C FOR THE WALK-UP RESIDENTIAL UNITS. AND RICKY PETERIKA WILL SPEAK OF THE LAST ONE AND COME UP AFTER MYSELF TO TALK ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND GREEN SPACE. IF I MAY TURN IT OVER TO RICKY, MR. CHAIRMAN. >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL. RICKY PETERIKA WITH DARK MOSS. I HAVE BEEN SWORN. I WILL FIRST SPEAK TO THE GRAND TREE IN QUESTION WEST NORTH B, LIVE OAK REALED C-9 DUE TO HAZARD OF NORTH B. REVISE THAT RATING TO A C-6. HISTORICALLY GOOD HEALTH WITH FAIR STRUCTURE AND FAIR FORM. WE ARE REQUESTING REMOVAL, BECAUSE IF WE MAINTAIN THE 20 FEET WHERE THE BUILDING CURRENTLY SET, WE WOULD BE REMOVING TOO MUCH CANOPY BECAUSE IT TRENDS SOUTH. IN ORDER TO NOT REMOVE EXCESS CANOPY, THE REQUIRED SETBACK WILL BE 36 FEET FROM THE TREE. WE PREPARED TWO REASONABLE RECONFIGURATION OPTIONS. ONE ADDED A FLOOR TO THE -- TO THE SUBJECT SITE. AND ONE IMPACTED THE EXISTING BUILDING TO THE SOUTH BY SHIFTING SOUTH AND REDUCING PARKING BY 104 SPACES. GREEN SPACE IS SLIGHTLY MORE COMPLY DATED DUE TO THE MIXED USE OF THE SITE. THE MAIN TAKEAWAY THAT ALL GREEN SPACE HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND EVEN WITH ESTIMATION OF HARD SCAPE AREAS WITHIN THE COURTYARD GREEN SPACE TO SPARE IN THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO INCREASE SETBACKS FROM THE ORIGINAL DESIGN ON STERLING AND NORTH B AND ALL FACADES ACCOMMODATE TYPE I SHADE TREES WHICH ALIGN TO THE SHADE TREE DISCUSSION IN PRIOR CASES AND WITH THE WESTSHORE OVERLAY. THANK YOU. I WILL TURN IT BACK OVER. >> THAT IS ALL THAT WE HAVE, BUT WILL BE HAPPY TO STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. AND, AGAIN, WANTED TO THANK EVERYBODY FOR WORKING WITH US ON THIS PROJECT WILL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS? ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT PUSHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? YES? COME ON UP. ONE AT A TIME. I KNOW YOU WERE BOTH SWORN IN. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. YES, SIR. >> HELLO, MITCHELL STANCIL. I LIVE 216 NORTH CLEARVIEW AVENUE WHICH IS ONE BLOCK EAST OF STERLING. I AM NOT OPPOSED TO THE DEVELOPMENT, BUT I AM KIND OF OPPOSED TO THE ENCROACHMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. CURRENTLY, WHERE ALL STRUCTURES ARE, IT THERE HAS GOT TO BE A 50-FOOT SETBACK. BUT SAW ALL THE PHOTOS. THE PARKING GARAGE WHICH IS THE HIGHEST STRUCTURE CLOSEST TO MY NEIGHBORHOOD IS -- IS PUSHED FURTHER SOUTH. SO IT DOES ENCROACH IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FROM, LIKE, NORTH A BY MAYBE THREE LOTS. BUT WHERE THEY ARE GOING TO BE BUILDING NOW, LOOKING AT MY BACK YARD AND MY BACK WINDOW, I WILL BE SEEING A HIGH-RISE. BUT ALL THAT BE -- I DO WANT TO BRING UP A COUPLE OF THINGS. BESIDES THE SETBACK, OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS BASICALLY LANDLOCKED FROM ACCESS. THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN LEAVE ANYWHERE FROM HIMES, KENNEDY OR DALE MABRY IS BY TAKING A RIGHT-HAND TURN OR GOING TO GRAY STREET. IF YOU WERE PUTTING 320 APARTMENTS AND THOSE PEOPLE NEED TO GO TO HIMES, THEY ARE GOING TO GO NORTH B AND GO TO HIMES OR DOWN NORTH A WHICH IS ALREADY HAPPENING WITH THE OFFICE COMPLEX. AND WITH ALDI GOING IN THERE, IT IS ADDING MORE TRAFFIC. I WOULD HOPE THERE WOULD BE SOME CONSIDERATION WITH THAT. THEY ARE PROPOSING WALK-UP UNITS. I WALK MYSELF. I WALK OVER TO NORTH HYDE PARK WHERE THERE IS TONS OF APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT WHICH ARE BUILT BASICALLY, BASED OFF OF YOUR GUIDELINES, WITHIN TEN FEET OF THE SIDEWALK AND THERE IS PARKING. NO PARKING ON STERLING, BUT IF YOU HAVE AN APARTMENT YOU CAN WALK TO, APARTMENT ON STERLING. STERLING WIDER STREET, AND -- AND I WATCH PEOPLE GOING TO THAT OFFICE COMPLEX. THEY TURN OFF OF -- OFF OF DALE MABRY AND TAKE GRAY DOWN TO STERLING TO GET THERE. I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND THE TRAFFIC FLOW. SO -- CONSIDER THE FACT THAT ACCESS IS VERY LIMITED. THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS A HIGH VOLUME OF TRAFFIC. NOT RELATED TO IT, BUT THERE HAS BEEN MULTIPLE WATER MAIN BREAKS ON HIMES. WHEN THAT HAPPENS, TRAFFIC IS DIVERTED THROUGH MY NEIGHBORHOOD. THOSE ARE THE THINGS I WOULD LIKE TO CONSIDER. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. NEXT SPEAK REMEMBER, COME ON UP. ANYBODY ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? YES, SIR, COME AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> IS THE MICROPHONE -- YOU GUYS GOT ME? OKAY, PERFECT. MARCUS SMOOTS. CLEARVIEW AVENUE. I AM ON THE BOARD OF THE OAKBROOK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. I DID WANT TO STATE THAT THE DEVELOPER CERTAINLY WORKED WITH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE -- THE MAJORITY OF US DO FEEL WE HAVE BEEN HEARD. IF WE DIDN'T FEEL HEARD, THERE WOULD BE A LOT MORE HERE THAN THE TWO OF US, SO I CERTAINLY APPRECIATE THAT. AND THEN REVISIONS ARE MADE. NOTHING IS PERFECT BUT THIS EVOLVED IN WAY WE ARE APPRECIATIVE OF. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE KEY TO THIS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. TO. I WANTED TO RESTATE THAT AND APPRECIATE THE DEVELOPERS PUT THAT IN WRITING. TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS THAT MY FELLOW NEIGHBORHOOD MEMBER RAISED IS REAL AND SOME OF THAT WILL BE ADDRESSED IN THE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT THAT WERE MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY. WE ARE THANKFUL FOR THIS AND LOOKING FORWARD FOR WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE? >> MOTION TO CLOSE -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I HAVE A QUESTION IS TO FLORIDA GARDNER, THE GENTLEMAN MENTIONED THE WALK-UP UNITS ON STERLING AND NORTH HYDE HYDE PARK, ON ROME AVENUE, THERE IS WALK-UP UNITS, BUT ON ROME, AREA FOR THE RESIDENT TO PARK IN FRONT OF THE UNIT AND WALK UP. BEING THAT STERLING IS NOT THAT WIDE OF A ROAD, ANY PARKING OR JUST A WALK-UP UNIT AND THEY HAVE TO FIND THEIR OWN PARKING IN THE PARKING GARAGE. >> WE DO NOT HAVE ON-STREET AT ALL. THAT PARK ALSO BE SELF-CONTAINED IN THE GARAGE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. DO YOU NEED ANY REBUTTAL. >> I DON'T THINK SO. I WANT TO THANK MARCUS AND HIS GROUP FOR WORKING WITH US. A CONSTANT FLOW AND I THINK WE HAVE GOTTEN TO A GREAT PLACE AND I UNDERSTAND THE OTHER GENTLEMAN AND HIS CONCERN. I THINK THE FACT OF THIS IS THAT HE GOT RMU-100 OUTSIDE OF THE CDB IS THE MOST INTENSE, BUT I FEEL THAT RESIDENTIAL WILL BE A MUCH GETTER FIT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAN HIGH-IMPACT COMMERCIAL WHICH WOULD BE COMPLETELY SLATED FOR AND UNDERSTANDABLY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WHEN HIMES IS REDONE NORTH OF KENNEDY, YOU CAN ONLY TAKE A RIGHT-HAND TURN TO GO SOUTH ON HIMES COMING OUT OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. OVER THE YEARS, I HEARD COMPLAINTS, YOU CAN'T DRIVE ACROSS HIMES BECAUSE THE MEDIAN IS NOW BLOCKED. ACCESS POINTS ARE. PEOPLE TAKING GRAY STREET TO DALE MABRY AND NORTH A AND NORTH B. AGAIN WILL ONLY TAKE TO YOU HIMES TO TAKE A RIGHT, AND THEN HAVE KENNEDY TRAFFIC, WHICH IS VERY -- VERY, VERY BUSY. AND I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS WHEN YOU SAY LANDLOCKED BECAUSE OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS OVER THE YEARS HAVE CHANGED THE TRAFFIC FLOW FOR THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. WITH SO MANY UNITS, I KNOW IT IS A BIG CONCERN. SO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>LYNN HURTAK: I JUST COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. WHEN TALKING OF STERLING, AND YOU HAVE THE MEDIAN IN BETWEEN STERLING. ARE -- DO THOSE HAVE CURBS? >> THE MEDIANS? YES, THEY DO. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I MENTIONED -- I DON'T THINK WE HAVE A GREAT AERIAL, BUT TO HELP WITH THAT TRAFFIC, WE ARE GOING TO RESHAPE THOSE MEDIANS TO ALLOW FOR CHANNELIZATION AND SOME STACKING IN WHICH SHOULD HELP THAT NORTHBOUND FLOW ON STERLING CONTINUE AND NOT BE JAMMED UP BY PEOPLE TRYING TO TURN LEFT MIDBLOCK INTO THE SITE. >>LYNN HURTAK: MY INTEREST LIES MAINLY IN THE GENTLEMAN'S CONCERN OF ON-STREET PARKING WHICH I CAN ABSOLUTELY SEE HOW THIS CAN HAPPEN. SO IF THERE IS A CURB ON BOTH SIDES OF, SAY, THIS -- THIS IS THE SOUTHBOUND LANE THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. IS IT -- IT IS -- IS IT WIDE ENOUGH FOR SOMEONE TO PARK AND SOMEONE TO BE ABLE TO GO BY? >> IT IS NOT. THAT IS THE BEAUTY OF THE WIDE MEDIAN IS THAT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ISN'T ALL THAT EXPANSIVE. SO YOU HAVE THE MEDIANS THAT -- REALLY YOU ONLY HAVE TRAFFIC LANES NORTH AND SOUTH AND THE INABILITY TO ON STREET PARK I THINK IS YOUR QUESTION? >>LYNN HURTAK: YEAH, HOW WIDE IS THAT STREET THERE THOUGH? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ONE LANE SOUTH AND ONE LANE NORTH. >> ROSS HAD THAT PLAT. JONATHAN HAS GOT IT. >>. >> JONATHAN SCOTT: MOBILITY. I DON'T KNOW IF PEOPLE CAN PARK THERE -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU HAVE TO COME UP, SIR. >> I AM SORRY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. >> MITCHELL STANCILLELE, IT 06 NORTH CLEARVIEW. THERE ARE RESIDENTS ON THE EAST SIDE OF STERLING. THE MEDIAN SUPPORTS HIGH POWERED VOLTAGE POWER LINES. BUT THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PARKED THEIR CAR IN FRONT OF THEIR HOUSE, AND TRAFFIC STILL FLOWS DOWN. AND THE -- AND THE ROAD IS THE SAME WIDTH ON EITHER SIDE OF THAT MEDIAN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU, SIR. >>LYNN HURTAK: SO MY QUESTION WOULD BE, IF THERE IS ROOM, IS THERE A WAY THAT WE COULD BUILD IN PARKING, IF THERE IS ROOM FOR IT ALREADY IF -- IF WE COULD SIMPLY DESIGNATE THE PARKING INSTEAD OF JUST ALLOWING IT ON THE STREET. SO WHAT I AM SAYING IS -- I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING -- I CAN'T REALLY -- SO -- SO IF THE STREET IS WIDE ENOUGH, IF WE COULD SIMPLY PUT SOME LINES ON -- I MEAN IF RIGHT NOW YOU CAN JUST PARK THERE. IS THERE A WAY WE CAN ACTUALLY PHYSICALLY PUT DESIGNATED SPACES. SAY THAT YOU CAN CRAM TEN CARS IN THERE BUT REALLY COMFORTABLY AND SAFELY THERE SHOULD ONLY BE EIGHT CARS PARKED ON THAT STREET WITH BULB OUT AT KENNEDY AND NORTH A -- OR NORTH B, RATHER, SO PEOPLE CAN'T -- I GUESS IT WOULD BE NORTH A AND NORTH B. SO PEOPLE CAN'T PARK ALL THE WAY TO THE CORNER. AM I MAKING SENSE? >>CATE WELLS: IF I MAY RESPOND TO THAT QUESTION. CATE WELLS FROM THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT AND THANK YOU, AGAIN, FOR ALLOWING ME TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY. DISCUSSION OF THE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT AND PARKING ON THE STREET. THAT IS -- I WOULD SUGGEST TO COUNCIL THAT IS NOT RELATED TO THIS REZONING. ANY IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE DONE IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL BE DONE BY SEPARATE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT AND ANALYZED BY THAT STAFF. WHEN THE APPLICANT CAME TO US INITIALLY ABOUT WANTING TO ADD SOME CONDITIONS TO THE SITE PLAN OR DO A SEPARATE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO ADDRESS THESE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS. IT WAS DETERMINED BECAUSE THESE WERE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE DISCUSSED BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND NOT REQUESTED BY THE CITY, THAT THEY ARE BEST ADDRESSED SEPARATELY WHICH I BELIEVE TRUETT ADDRESSED AT THE BEGINNING OF HIS PRESENTATION AND THEY WILL THEN BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY THROUGH RIGHT-OF-WAY. SO THE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE -- THE DETAILED DISCUSSION THAT WE ARE NOW GETTING INTO CONCERNS ME A BIT, BECAUSE IT WOULD BE SEPARATE AND APART FROM THE REJOKE THAT IS BEFORE YOU. HURTAK HORIZON OKAY, THANK YOU. >> TO HELP AND I WILL STICK TO FACTS AND NOT GO OUTSIDE OF THE REZONING AS MISS WELLS MENTIONED. THERE ARE 580 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED. WE ARE PROVIDING 615. HOPEFULLY THAT WILL HELP IN NOT PUTTING PRESSURE ON THE STREETS. YOUR STAFF WAS GREAT HANDING ME INFORMATION. IT APPEARS THAT FROM THE EASTERN CURB OF THE PROPERTY LINE ON STERLING TO THAT CURB MEDIAN IS JUST OVER 16 FEET. SO IT IS ALREADY TIGHT. SO HARD FOR TWO CARS TO GET BY US. AND NOT ARGUING THAT SOMEBODY HAVEN'T DONE IT, BUT NOT SOMETHING THAT IS CONDUCIVE TO ON-STREET PARKING. >>LYNN HURTAK: OKAY. SINCE THERE IS NOTHING I CAN SAY ABOUT THAT, I WOULD -- I DON'T KNOW IF THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I THINK THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD NEED TO BRING UP BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. BUT I ALSO JUST WANTED TO SAY, I AM VERY APPRECIATIVE OF FOLKS LISTENING TO THE CONVERSATION ABOUT TYPE 1 SHADE TREES IN MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE SIDEWALKS. SO APPRECIATE THAT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE. FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED. COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, ARE YOU COMFORTABLE READING ITEM NUMBER 8 WITH THE REVISION SHEET? >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR. I HAVE IT HERE. I MOVE AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 201 NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PD STOREFRONT RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL OFFICE, OFFICE, PROFESSIONAL RETAIL SALES, SHOPPERS GOODS, RESTAURANTS AND PERSONAL SERVICES PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED REVISION SHEET. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND A SECOND. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I JUST WANT TO STATE SOMETHING FOR THE RECORD ON THIS. THIS IS -- THIS IS A GREAT PROJECT. THE ONLY DISAPPOINTMENT IT ISN'T MORE INTENSE. IF NOT HERE, THEN WHERE. THIS IS IN A TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR. WHERE WE SHOULD BE BUILDING INTENSITY AND DENSITY. AND THIS IS A CRITICAL PART AS WHEN WE DEVELOP THE CITY OF TAMPA. AND I KNOW THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT WERE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THESE LOCATIONS. THERE WILL BE IMPACT ON THESE NEIGHBORHOODS. IF YOU LIVE WITHIN A CITY BLOCK OF ONE OF THE MAJOR TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS IN THE FUTURE, YOUR NEIGHBORS ARE GOING TO BE IMPACTED BY THIS DENSITY SO I PROBABLY VOTE YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE MARCH 6, 2025 AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 315 E. KENNEDY THIRD FLORIDA TAMPA FLORIDA, 33602. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. THANK YOU, COUNCIL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HAVE A NICE EVENING. ITEM NUMBER 3. >> STEPHANIE POPE: STEPHANIE POPE, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. 23-47. GO TO REZONE 2010 EAST POWHATAN AVENUE FROM SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY. I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. >>EMILY PHELAN: EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. SUBJECT SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS URBAN VILLAGE AND OLD SEMINOLE HEIGHTS VILLAGE AND EVASION ZONE E. SURROUNDING A AREA IS PRIMARILY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. AS YOU GO FURTHER, THESE ARE TWO TECHNICAL SCHOOLS AND YOU HAVE PUBLIC-SEMI PUBLIC USES HERE. THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. AS YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE IS HERE REPRESENTED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL-10 DESIGNATION, WHICH DOES SURROUND THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE IMMEDIATE AREA. AND FURTHER TO IT THE WEST IS -- IS RESIDENTIAL-20, WHICH THERE ARE SEVERAL POCKETS OF IT. AND MOVING FURTHER SOUTH ALONG EAST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE IS WHERE THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 ZONING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION WHERE THE HEAVIER COMMERCIAL USES ARE. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING A AREA. THE EXISTING DENSITY OF THE PORTION OF EAST POWHATAN AVENUE BETWEEN NORTH 20th STREET AND NORTH 22nd STREET IS 3.55 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. BASED ON 17 SAMPLE SIZES EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE APPROXIMATELY 35% OF THE DENSITY ANTICIPATED UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 RESIGNATION. THIS REQUEST WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFILL WITH AN UNDERUTILIZED SITE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY USES TO BE DESIGNED WITH FRONT DOORS ORIENTED TOWARD NEIGHBORHOODS, SIDEWALKS AND STREETS. WHEN DESIGNING THE SITE, THE FRONT ENTRANCES TO THE PROPOSED UNITS ORIENTED TOWARD EAST POWHATAN AVENUE CONSISTENT WITH POLICY DIRECTION AND ANY APPLICABLE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS OVERLAY STANDARDS OF THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS VISION. SUPPORTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES OF HOUSING CITY'S POPULATION AS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED LAND TO ENSURE ANNED A SUPPLY OF HOUSING TO MEET THE NEED OF TAMPA'S PRESENT AND FUTURE POPULATIONS. WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING CHOICES IN WALKING DISTANCE OF TRANSIT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND ADDITIONAL HOUSING IN THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS VILLAGE CONSISTENT WITH THE RESIDENTIAL-10 LAND USE DESIGNATION. THAT COMPLETES MY PRESENTATION UNLESS YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO? ALL RIGHT, COME ON. YOU. >> STEPHANIE POPE, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. WE WILL START WITH AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING A AREA. YOU CAN SEE IS THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED HERE IN RED ON EAST POWHATAN. THE SITE IS LOCATED SOUTH OF EAST HENRY AVENUE, WEST OF NORTH 22nd STREET, EAST OF NORTH 20th STREET AND NORTH OF EAST HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE. THE SURROUNDING AREA'S DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS CHARACTERIZED BY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED SURROUNDING IS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. THIS ENTIRE AREA IS SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY. HERE IT CHANGES AFTER COMANCHE TO SEMINOLE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL INDIANA SIEVE. AND 22nd STREET RIGHT HERE IS WHERE THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS OVERLAY DISTRICT ENDS AND RESIDENTIAL -- SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-50 THERE. THIS IS A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. YOU CAN SEE THE OUTLINE OF THE PARCEL. THE SITE IS LOCATED ON EAST POWHATAN AVENUE. AND YOU CAN ALSO SEE THE EXISTING HOME RIGHT HERE. AND THIS IS THE OUTLINE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE -- OF THE PARCEL. THE SUBJECT SITE IS SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST. SUBJECT BLOCK SINGLE-FAMILY, DETACHED UNITS. SUBJECT SITE PART OF THE WINNI FRED PARK SUBDIVISION PLATTED IN 1946. APART FROM THE TWO PARCELS WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE DEVELOPED IN 2019 AND FIVE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED HOMES DEVELOPED IN 2023, ALL OF WHICH ARE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DETACHED UNITS, THE REMAINDER OF THE BLOCK FACE CONSIST OF HOMES BUILT MOSTLY IN THE 1950s. STAFF HAS PROVIDED AN ANALYSIS ON PAGE 2 OF THE STAFF REPORT. NO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY EXIST IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. GIVEN THE SITE IS IN THE SEMINOLE HEIGHTS SPECIAL DISTRICT, THE APPLICANT IS ALLOWED TO HAVE AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AS WELL. THIS WAS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION IN STAFF'S FINDING. SINCE THIS IS AN EUCLIDIAN REZONING, NO SITE PLAN OR ELEVATIONS. I WILL SHOW SOME PHOTOS OF THE SITE AND AREA -- SURROUNDING AREA. THIS IS A PHOTO OF THE SITE. THIS IS ANOTHER PHOTO OF THE SITE. THIS IS LOOKING EAST FROM THE SITE WHICH IS HERE DOWN POWH POWHATAN. THIS IS LOOKING AT THE ADJACENT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME TO THE EAST OF THIS SITE. THIS IS LOOKING FURTHER EAST DOWN POWHATAN. AND THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH OFF POWHATAN. AND THIS IS LOOKING WEST OF THE SITE AND THESE ARE SOME OF THE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED HOMES I SPOKE ABOUT EARLIER. AND THIS IS AT 20th AND POWHATAN THAT SHOW AS FEW OF THE NEWER CONSTRUCTED HOMES IN THAT AREA. STAFF REVIEWED AND FOUND IT INCONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND BUILD VIRILITY ENVIRONMENT. I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPLICANT. WE HAVE AN APPLICANT REGISTERED ONLINE. ARE THEY ONLINE? IF THEY ARE, MARTA VELASQUEZ, IF YOU CAN PLEASE TURN YOUR CAMERA ON, UNMUTE YOURSELF, AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. >>CLERK: MAKE SHE IS HAVING ISSUES? SHE LOGGED IN -- SHE IS TRYING TO WORK IT OUT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE WILL HOLD THIS ITEM SHE IS HAVING TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. WE WILL SKIP OVER TO ITEM NUMBER 4. >> STEPHANIE POPE: STEPHANIE POPE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. REZ 23-490 REQUEST TO REGROWN 4913 WEST ELVIS STREET FROM CD TO PD FOR VEHICLE SALES AND LEASING USE. THERE REZONING WAS SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 12, 2024 BUT WAS A MISNOTICE. I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. >>EMILY PHELAN: EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE WEST SHORE PLANNING DISTRICT, WEST SHORE BUSINESS DISTRICT AND DREW MARK NEIGHBORHOOD AND ALSO IN EVACUATION ZONE E. AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT SITE WHICH IS LOCATED HERE. THE SURROUNDING AREA IS A MIX OF USES BETWEEN LIGHT AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND SOME RESIDENTIAL USES. AND THERE IS MULTIFAMILY HERE AND SOME RESIDENTIAL LOCATED HERE. BUT IT IS MOSTLY COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL USES. THIS IS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE SUBJECT SITE. ALL OF THE RED IS COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35. AND FURTHER OFFICER TO THE EAST IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. LET'S SEE. THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED PD IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. THE SITE WITHIN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR AND ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE WILL ADDRESS THE APPLICABLE POLICIES. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND PROMOTES COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ENHANCES THE CITY'S CHARACTER AND AMBIENCE. THIS IN DOING SO, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO CONNECT BUILDING ENTRANCES TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND ENCOURAGES SIDEWALKS IN AREAS THAT ARE PRACTICAL AND FEASIBLE. ADDITIONALLY THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED A BICYCLE RACK FURTHER TERRING MOBILITY POLICIES WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED PD IS COMPARABLE TO THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND AS THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES 2704 SQUARE FEET AT A 0.28 F.A.R. WHICH IS CONSISTENT TO THE INTENSITY UNDER THE CC-35 DESIGNATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REQUESTS, IF APPROVED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS THE F.A.R. OF 0.28 BE ADDED TO THE SITE PLAN. FUTURE LAND USE OF CC-35 BE LISTED IN THE DATA TABLE AND THE FRONT ENTRANCES. ADDITIONALLY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROMOTES DEVELOPMENT THAT IS SENSITIVE TO THE SURROUND AREA. THE PD PROMOTES A TWO-FOOT BUFFER AND A SIX-FOOT FENCE TO THE EAST AND FOUR-AND-A-HALF-FOOT BUFFER AND SIX-FOOT FENCE TO THE WEST. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS COMPARABLE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING PATTERN AND CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT ANTICIPATED UNDER THE CC-35 DESIGNATION. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION UNLESS YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? YES? NEXT UP. >> STEPHANIE POPE: STEPHANIE POPE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. WE WILL START WITH AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE. YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED. THE SUBJECT SITE CURRENTLY CONTAINED ONE BUILDING, AND THE SITE IS LOCATED SOUTH OF WEST ALVA. WEST OF NORTH CHURCH AVENUE. AND NORTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY. WEST OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AND EAST OF NORTH LOIS AVENUE. BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH CORTEZ AND WEST ALVA STREET, THE ZONING ON THE EAST SIDE OF CORTEZ AVENUE IS COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE. YOU CAN SEE THAT HERE. THE COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE ZONING EXTENDS TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST. AND WEST OF NORTH CORE TIZ AVENUE, THE ZONING CHANGES TO INDUSTRIAL GENERAL WHICH IS OVER THIS WAY. CONSIDERING THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, THE REQUESTED USE OF VEHICLE SALES AND LEASING PROVIDES AN APPROPRIATE INFILL. HERE IS A VIEW OF SITE PLAN PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ONE NEW STRUCTURE AND EXISTING BUILDING WILL REMAIN. THE EXISTING BUILDING IS HERE AND THIS IS THE FOOTPRINT OF THE NEW STRUCTURE PROPOSED. EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL WITH SURFACE PARKING LOCATED TO NORTH OF EXISTING BUILDING. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CRON STRUCK A NEW BUILDING WEST OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. ACCESS TO THE SITE IS ON WEST ALVA, WHICH IS PROVIDED HERE. THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT ON THE PLAN. TWO PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. AND TWO -- TWO PARKING SPACES PLUS ONE A.D.A. SPACE HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND YOU CAN SEE THESE HERE. THE MAXIMUM PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT IS 18 FEET. THERE ARE TWO NEW NATURAL RESOURCE WAIVERS REQUESTED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION. HERE ARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT. THIS IS THE EXISTING BUILDING ON-SITE. AND THIS IS THE FRONT ELEVATION, THE REAR ELEVATION, AND THE TWO SIDE ELEVATIONS. I WILL GIVE SOME PICTURES OF THE SITE HERE. THIS A PICTURE OF THE SITE, AND YOU CAN SEE THE EXISTING BUILDING THERE. THIS IS A ANOTHER PHOTO OF THE SITE WHERE YOU CAN SEE THE EXISTING BUILDING. THIS IS LOOKING FROM THE SITE, LOOKING WEST TOWARD CORTEZ. AND YOU CAN SEE THE ADJACENT BUILDING THERE. THIS IS THE LOOKING WEST DOWN ALVA STREET TOWARD CORTEZ. THIS IS LOOKING DOWN ALVA TO CORTEZ, WHICH THAT IS THE INTERSECTION RIGHT HERE. THIS IS LOOKING NORTH ACROSS ALVA FROM THE SITE THIS IS A LOOKING EAST OF THE SITE OF THAT REDEBS. AND THIS IS LOOKING FURTHER DOWN ALVA. AND THAT IS WHERE YOU CAN START TO SEE THE COMMERCIAL DOWN THIS WAY. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE ACTION AND FOUND THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THERE ARE TWO WAIVERSES WITH THIS REQUEST. IS IT CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE APPLICATION, THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED REVISION SHEET MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? NO? IS THERE AN APPLICANT FOR ITEM NUMBER 4? COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> RAJIV JOHN NORTH ALVA STREET. I TRY TO DO THE REZONING AND ALL THE THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES CI AND WE WANT -- IT HAS BEEN SITTING THERE FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS AND WE DECIDED TO DO THE REZONING IN ORDER TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. AND WE ARE HAVING TO DO THE PERMITTING RIGHT NOW FOR BUILDING THE NEXT -- THE EXISTING BUILDING. BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG THAT WILL TAKE. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE DOING RIGHT NOW. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE? >> THAT'S ALL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL. ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 4? MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON, READ ITEM NUMBER 4. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES, SIR, CHAIR, THANK YOU. FILE NUMBER -- EXCUSE ME -- FILE NUMBER REZ 24-09, ORDINANCE BEING PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3916 WEST ALVA STREET IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING CLASSIFICATION CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, VEHICLE SALES AND LEASING PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. ROLL CALL VOTE -- SORRY, MIRANDA, MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WE LOOK ALIKE. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION MARCH 6, 2025, 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL 315 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GO BACK TO ITEM NUMBER. MARTA VELASQUEZ FROM SHE IS ON TURN OR YOUR CAMERA AND UNMUTE YOURSELF. WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. [SWEARING IN] >> YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEY ALREADY PRESENTED YOUR CASE. NOW IT IS YOUR TIME TO SPEAK. YOUR ITEM NUMBER 3. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND GO AHEAD. IT IS YOUR TIME TO PRESENT. >> MY NAME IS MARTA VELASQUEZ. I AM NOT SURE IF I AM STILL ALLOWED TO SPEAK AS WELL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I MEAN, GO AHEAD, YOU ARE PART OF THE PETITION. SO -- WHAT IS YOUR NAME, MA'AM? [ INAUDIBLE ] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY, GO AHEAD. I GUESS WE WANTED TO SHARE, LIKE, THE APPROACH TO WANTING TO CREATE A MULTIY FAMILY THAN TWO SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES THERE. WE WANT TO TAKE A CONSERVATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACH INSTEAD OF DEMOLISHING THE HOME AND BUILDING TWO SITES. THIS DESIGN PRESERVES THE HOUSES INFRASTRUCTURE AND BUILDING MATERIALS AND MOST OF THE REWORK IS WITHIN THE FRAME OF THE HOME AS IT EXISTS NOW. THE DESIGN ALSO AIMS TO AVOID AGREE REMOVAL BY PRIMARILY MODIFYING THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND ADDING VERY LITTLE TO THE BUILDING. ADDITIONALLY, RATHER THAN DEMOING AND CREATING TWO SEPARATE SMALLER UNITS, THIS WOULD KIND OF MAINTAIN THE APPEARANCE OF THE HOUSE AS IT IS TO CONTINUE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING HOMES. NOT TRYING TO MAKE ANY SORT OF CRAZY MEGA STRUCTURE. JUST TRYING TO DO SOMETHING PRACTICAL. >> AND DO SOMETHING FOR HER AND FOR ME. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: OKAY, YES, COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. >>LYNN HURTAK: WASN'T THIS AN EUCLIDIAN ZONING? WE DON'T HAVE A SITE PLAN FOR THIS. I AM NOT SURE WHY THE APPLICANT IS TALKING OF A SITE PLAN WHEN THAT IS NOT WHAT WE CAN DEBATE HERE. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I THINK THE APPLICANT IS TRYING TO SAY WHAT THEIR INTENT AND WHAT THEY PLAN TO DO. YOU CAN'T DECIDE BASED ON THAT, BUT THEY ARE ADDING CONTEXT TO THE REQUEST THAT IS BEFORE YOU TODAY. >>LYNN HURTAK: ALL RIGHT, OKAY, THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE TO SAY, NO? ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC WISHES TO SPEAK ON A ITEM. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: MOTION TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. SECONDED FROM COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED. COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I CAN'T READ IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK. COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON? >>BILL CARLSON: MOVE FILE NUMBER 3, FILE REZ-24-47 ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION, ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN 2010 EAST POWHATAN AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION SH-RS, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO SH-RM, SEMINOLE HEIGHTS FROM MULTIFAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ROLL CALL VOTE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: NO. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: NO. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIYS WITH HURTAK AND CLENDENIN VOTE NOTHING -- >>LUIS VIERA: YES, YES. >>CLERK: OKAY. MOTION CARRIES WITH HURTAK AND CLENDENIN VOTING NO. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE HELD MARCH 6, 2025 AT 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL LOCATED AT 15 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM NUMBER 5. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. REZ-25-03 TO REZONE 3212 WEST MARTIN AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL-06 TO RESIDENTIAL-50. >>EMILY PHELAN: EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THIS IS IN TAMPA DISTRICT IN THE INTERBAY GANDY NEIGHBORHOOD IN EVACUATION ZONE B. SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTS THAT SURROUND THE SUBJECT SITE. AS YOU MOVE NORTH OFF OF GANDY IS A LARGER MIX OF COMMERCIAL AND MULTIFAMILY USES AND AND GOY IS A TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDOR. THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. SUBJECT SITE IS DESIGNATED WITH RESIDENTIAL-10 THAT SURROUNDS THE SUBJECT SITE ON ALL SIDES. AGAIN AS YOU MOVE FORWARD TO GANDY WHERE THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE, COMMERCIAL MIXED USE 35 AND THIS IS CCCC-35. THE PORTION OF SOUTH MARLIN AND SOUTH SHERIDAN AND SOUTH 6th STREET DENSITY OF 5.89 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE BASE AND TEN SAMPLE SITES. LOT WIDTHS RANGE FROM 50 TO 76 FEET, AVERAGING 57.4 FEET. PROPOSED REZONING WILL ALLOW FOR CONSIDERATION OF ONE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED ZONING LOT WITH THE WIDTH OF APPROXIMATELY 50 FEET. MATCHING THE EXISTING LOT WIDTHS ON WEST MARLIN AVENUE. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST WILL PROVIDE FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL BE BUILT WITHIN THE EXISTING STREET, BLOCK AND LOT CONFIGURATION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FOUND NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THIS SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENCOURAGES INFILL DEVELOPMENT ON VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED SITES TO ACCOMMODATE CURREN AND FUTURE POPULATIONS. REQUEST PROMOTE HIGHER DENSITY TO THE SITE PLAN OF 10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. PROPOSED RS-50 ZONING DISTRICT ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL HOUSING IN THE SOUTH OF GANDY INTERBAY NEIGHBORHOOD. COMPATIBLE AND COMPARABLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL-10 LAND USE. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. START WITH OUR AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE. SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED ON WEST MARLIN AVENUE. SURROUNDING THE SITE IS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES. RS-60 AND QUITE A FEW RS-50 ZONING DISTRICTS THAT OCCURRED OVER THE YEARS THROUGH THE REZONING PROCESS. WHEN YOU MOVE NORTH, YOU HAVE GANDY BOULEVARD. RIGHT HERE COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES ALONG GANDY BOULEVARD AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED USES AND MULTIFAMILY ALONG SHERWOOD HERE AND SINGLE-FAMILY USE ALONG THE PERIPHERY OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. I WILL SHOW THE CONFORMING MAP NOW. THIS IS EUCLIDIAN. NO SITE PLAN, BUT STAFF DID AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE CONFORMING MAP. SUBJECT SITE IS 0.16 ACRES, 6750 SQUARE FEET. 50-FOOT FRONTAGE AND 135-FOOT DEPTH. RS-50 REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 56,000 SQUARE FEET AND 50B FOOT OF FRONTAGE. PART OF THE TROPICAL TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND WAS PLATTED AT 50 FEET. THE LOTS ON BLOCK 3 WERE ORIGINALLY PLATTED FROM 50 TO 60 FEET. NOW WE WILL GET INTO THE ANALYSIS PERFORMED BY STAFF AND THE CONFORMING MAP. SO WE WILL START OFF LOOKING AT THE ORIGINALLY PLATTED BLOCK WHICH IS FROM SHERIDAN, SOUTH SHERIDAN ROAD TO SOUTH 6th STREET, NORTH OF WEST PAUL AND SOUTH OF MARLIN. SO THIS HERE IS YOUR ORIGINAL PLAT -- PLATTED BLOCK. THAT IS WHAT THE FIRST PART OF THE ANALYSIS IS ABOUT ABOUT. THE SUBJECT BLOCK, BLOCK 3, THAT BASS JUST OUTLINED CONTAIN 23 PARCELS TODAY AND THE WIDTHS RANGE FROM 50 TO 79.99 FEET, EXCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE. FOUR PARCELS OF 18% OF THE SUBJECT SITE, RANGES 60 FEET OR GREATER. PARCELS ARE 28% OR 59.99 FEET OR LESS. THAT IS COVERING THE SUBJECT BLOCK HERE. WHEN WE ARE LOOKING AT THE STREET FACE THAT GOES ALONG MARLIN AVENUE FROM SOUTH SHERIDAN TO SOUTH SIXTH STREET. THAT WILL BE HERE AND HERE, THERE IS ANOTHER ANALYSIS THAT WE PROVIDED. SO WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING AT THAT STREET FACE ON THE SOUTH SIDE RIGHT HERE IT CONTAINS 11 PARCELS INCLUDING THE SUBJECT SITE WITH RANGING FROM 50 TO 79.99 FEET. 3 OR 27% OF THE PARCELS HAVE A WIDTH OF 60 FOOT OR GREATER AND EIGHT OR 73% OF THE PARCEL HAVE 59.99 OR LESS WIDTH. NOW WE WILL LOOK AT THE NORTH SIDE OF MARLIN AVENUE ON THIS STREET FACE. IT CONTAINS NINE PARCELS AND THE WIDTHS RANGE FROM -- THE WIDTHS RANGE FROM 50 TO 59.99 FIGHTS. SEVEN OR 78% HAVE A WHICHTH OF 506 FOOT FOR FREIGHTER AND 22% HAVE A WIDTH OF 59.99 FEET OR LESS. LASTLY WE WILL LOOK AT THE OVERALL ANALYSIS AREA FOR THIS. AND THEN BASED ON THAT OVERALL ANALYSIS AREA, 62% OF THE PARCELS HAVE A WIDTH OF 60 INTO THE OR GREATER AND 58% HAVE A WIDTH OF 59.99 SQUARE FEET OR LESS. I WILL SHOW YOU PICTURES OF THE AREA NOW. THIS IS LOOKING EAST FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. THIS IS LOOKING NORTH. THIS IS LOOKING WEST ON MARLIN AVENUE. LOOKING SOUTH. AND THAT IS LOOKING EAST ON MARLIN AVENUE. THIS IS LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SUBJECT SITE. AND THIS IS LOOKING WEST FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. I WILL PUT THE CONFORMING MAP BACK UP NOW. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE STAFF FOUND THE REQUEST INCONSISTENT. WHILE THERE ARE A VARIETY OF LOT SIZES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE, STAFF FIND THE PROPOSED REQUEST INCONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN BASED ON THAT OVERALL STUDY AREA. LOOKING AT THIS OVERALL AREA AND THAT ANALYSIS, 62% OF THE PARCELS HAVING A WIDTH OF 60 FOOT FOR GREATER. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I AM SURPRISED OF THE INCONSISTENCY ON THIS ONE. SUCH A DIVERSELY DEVELOPED AREA IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. I MEAN, YOU LOOK AT THIS MAP, THE ONLY THING CONSISTENT ABOUT THIS IS INCONSISTENCY. I MEAN -- YOU GOT A LOT OF RS-50 ON THAT BLOCK ABUTTING SOUTH OF IT. I MEAN, EVEN ONE ON THAT CORNER THAT HAS BEEN DEVELOPED. I MEAN, YOU GUYS OBVIOUSLY STRUGGLED WITH THIS ONE. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: YES, SIR. THAT IS KIND OF WHY WHEN WE LAID ON THE STAFF REPORT, WE WANTED TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THE ANALYSIS OF THE BLOCK THAT WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED AND THE STREET FACE AS WELL BEFORE WE PROVIDE THAT OVERALL ANALYSIS. EVEN THOUGH THE STREET FACE AND THE BLOCK -- YOU ARE LOOK AT THIS IMMEDIATE VERY CLOSE AREA, IT LOOKS LIKE IT WOULD MATCH WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. UNFORTUNATELY STAFF HAS TO MAKE THEIR DECISIONS BASED ON THIS OVERALL CONFORMING MAP AREA FOR THE ANALYSIS THAT SHOWS THAT 62% OF THE PARCEL ARE 06 FOOT OR GREATER. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: RS-50 WILL BE A CONFORMING LOT. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: THE LOT IS CURRENTLY 50 FOOT WIDE. AND A SLEW OF REZONINGS OVER THE YEAR WITHIN THE AREA THAT WENT TO RS-50. JUST STAFF DOES HAVE TO MAKE THEIR OVERALL DECISION ON CONSISTENT OR INCONSISTENT BASED ON THE OVERALL STUDY AREA AND NOT THE VICINITY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I UNDERSTAND. BET THEY ARE THAN THE PD. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT, APPLICANT FOR ITEM NUMBER VRB 23 23-16. YES, MA'AM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> AILEEN ROSARIO PERMITTING CONSULTING, 5827 EAST COLUMBUS DRIVE, TAMPA, FLORIDA. GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. MY CLIENT -- ALL HE WANTS TO DO IS TO MAKE SURE THAT WHEN HE GOES TO SELL THIS PROPERTY, IT IS LEGALLY 50 FEET WIDE. HE WANTS THE ZONING TO BE RS-50 SO THEY MATCH. HE WANTS TO JUST REBUILD A BRAND-NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOME. IS ALL HE WANTS. HE DOES NOT WANT TO ADD EXTRA RESIDENTIAL HOMES. JUST ONE SINGLE HOUSE, BUT HE WANTS THE ZONING TO BE WHAT IT SHOULD BE .IT WAS PLATTED AT 50 FEET. AND WE WANT TO SUPPORT THE ZONING TO BE RS-50. THAT'S ALL HE WANTS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANTANYONE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 5? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NOBODY REGISTERED. MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED? COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN, READ ITEM 5. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOVE FILE NUMBER 23-96, ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING CONSIDERATION. ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF 3212 WEST MARLIN AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 1 FROM ZONING CLASSIFICATION RS-60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO RS-50 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>LYNNHU . >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY SECOND READING MARCH 26, 2025 315 E. KENNEDY, THIRD, FLORIDA, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33602. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ITEM NUMBER 7. >> STEPHANIE POPE: GOOD EVENING, STEPHANIE POPE, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. ITEM 7 IS REZ-25-04. WHERE FROM 2711 NORTH MacDILL FROM CG TO PD FOR AIR-CONDITIONED STORAGE AND CLINIC. I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>EMILY PHELAN: EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. SUBJECT SITE LOCATED WITHIN CENTRAL TAMPA PLANNING DISTRICT. WEST TAMPA URBAN VILLAGE AND M[L]A[L]CFacFARLANE PARK AREA I EVACUATION ZONE E. SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED HERE AND TO THE NORTH AND WEST ARE COMMERCIAL USES. TO THE EAST IS AN INDUSTRIAL USE THAT IS OPERATING AS AN CRACKS STORAGE. TO THE SOUTH ARE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED. THIS IS THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE SUBJECT SITES HERE AND IT IS REPRESENTED WITH THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION TO THE NORTH, EAST AND WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND TO THE SOUTH WHERE THE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENCES ARE THE RESIDENTIAL-10. THE REQUEST FOR AC STORAGE AND CLINIC USES CAN BE CONSIDERED. AND IF IT IS APPROVED, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REQUESTS THAT CLIPPIC USES BE ADDED TO THE SITE DATA TABLE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS. LIKE I SAID, THEY CAN BE CONSIDERED UNDER THIS. THE CC-35 OF MEDIAN, INTENSITY AND VERTICAL AND INCLUDING INTENSIVE AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL, SERVICE, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL USES. UNDER THIS DESIGNATION, THE SITE COULD ALLOW FOR UP TO 35 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE O OR .20 F.A.R. SINCE THE SITE HAS ARTERIAL FRONTAGE, A LOT SIZE OVER .35 ACRES AND TWO USES FROM SEPARATE GENERAL CATEGORIES OUTLINED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, A BONUS AGREEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED. PROPOSED INTENSITY IS CONSISTENT WITHIN THE CC-35 DESIGNATION. SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR, URBAN VILLAGE AND ALONG THE TRANSIT CORRIDOR WHICH IS NORTH MacDILL AVENUE. COMPREHENSIVE PLANS EMPHASIZES MULTIMODAL SAFETY AND ENCOURAGES MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT THAT ENHANCES TAMPA'S AMBIENCE; HOWEVER, THE PROPOSED PD DO NOT ADEQUATELY ALIGN WITH THESE POLICIES. THE PLAN'S POLL RECEIVES PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED DESIGN WITH BUILDINGS CLOSER TO THE STREET WITH PRIMARY ENTRANCES ORIENTED TO THE PUBLIC REALM AND PARKING TO THE REAR WHERE FEASIBLE. CURRENT DESIGN WITH PARKING AND THE DUMPSTER ON THE FRONT OF THE SITE CONFLICTS WITH THESE POLICIES AN PRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT SAFETY CONCERN AS IT REQUIRES GARBAGE OVER THE ONLY PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. IN CONCLUSION WHILE THE PRO POSED USES CAN BE CONSIDERED, THE CURRENT SITE LAYOUT DOES NOT FULLY SUPPORT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY GUIDANCE FOR PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY, TRANSIT MIXED USE AND TRANSIT EMPHASIS CORRIDORS. PROPOSED DESIGN IS INCONSISTENT WITH POLICIES THAT PRIORITIZE AND ENHANCE STREETSCAPE AND WALKABILITY THAT IS ESSENTIAL FOR THE VISION OF THE MacFARLANE NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO YOU HAVE ANY YES, SIR? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> STEPHANIE POPE. STEPHANIE POPE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I HAVE A VERY VICED REVISION SHEET FOR YOU. IT IS FRONT AND BACK. WE WILL START WITH AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE OUTLINED IN RED. ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH MacDILL AVENUE, NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST ST. JOHN'S STREET AND NORTH MacDILL, WHICH IS RIGHT HERE. THE EXISTING USES SURROUNDING THE SITE ARE A MIXTURE OF COMMERCIAL GENERAL, COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE AND RESIDENTIAL. THERE ARE TWO PDs AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER ON WEST COLUMBUS DRIVE WHICH FILE NUMBER REZ 19-70 REZONED IN 2019 FOR COMMERCIAL USE AND BANK. FILE NUMBER REZ 12-02 REZONED IN 2012 FOR COMMERCIAL GENERAL WITH COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES, AND THOSE ARE LOCATED RIGHT HERE. THIS IS COLUMBUS. AND THIS IS NORTH MacDILL. COMMERCIAL GENERAL IS PROMINENT ALONG WEST COLUMBUS AND THIS PORTION OF NORTH MacDILL AVENUE. RESIDENTIAL USES ARE PROMINENT ONCE YOU MOVE SOUTH ON MacDILL AVENUE. CONSIDERING THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN REQUESTED USE OF COMMERCIAL GENERAL PROVIDES AN APPROPRIATE INFILL. SO THE -- YOU CAN SEE THE COMMERCIAL USE IS COMMON RIGHT HERE AT MacDILL. AND THIS AREA HERE IN COLUMBUS. AND THE RESIDENTIAL STARTS RIGHT HERE JUST SOUTH OF THE PARCEL. HERE IS A VIEW OF THE SITE PLAN. AND THIS IS JUST A ZOOMED-IN VIEW TO SEE IT A LITTLE BITTER. HE CAN PUT UP THE ENTIRE SITE PLAN, IF NEEDED. THIS IS A SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT ONE BUILDING ON-SITE. THIS IS THE -- THE GRAY -- DARK GRAY AREA HERE. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL CONTAIN A 96,579-SQUARE-FOOT AIR CONDITIONED STORAGE AND A CLINIC. PROPOSED BUILDING WILL HAVE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 49 FEET. ACCESS TO IS THIS SITE WILL BE FROM NORTH MacDILL AVENUE AND IS TWO-WAY. THE ACCESS IS HERE. THIS IS MacDILL, NORTH MacDILL HERE. THERE WILL BE SURFACE PARK ALONG THE WEST AND SOUTH PORTIONS OF THE SITE. WALKWAY CONNECT THE FRONT DOORS AN PARKING TO THE SIX-FOOT CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH MacDILL. THIS IS THAT PROPOSED CLINIC USE AND THE DOORS HERE. THERE IS AN OFFICE WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE AIR-CONDITIONED STORAGE. THEIR DOORS ARE HERE. AND THEN THIS IS THE CONNECTION ON THE FULL SITE PLAN I CAN SHOW YOU IF YOU WOULD LIKE. IT CONNECTS TO THE SIDEWALK, WHICH RUNS ALONG NORTH MacDILL. THIS IS THE ENTRANCE TO THE -- TO THE AIR-CONDITIONED STORAGE AREA. THE PROPOSED MEDICAL CLINIC IS SHOWN ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND PROPOSED OFFICE FOR THE STORAGE FACILITY ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE. THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL ENTRANCE TO THE STORAGE UNITS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. 49 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 11 SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED. THERE IS AS 71-FOOT BUFFER TO THE REAR HERE. YOU CAN SEE THAT. AND THAT IS ON THE EAST SIDE, AND EXISTING TREES ARING PRESERVED. THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS ALSO BEING PLACED TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE TO ALLOW FOR INCREASED BUFFER FOR THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. SO THE BUILDING IS PLACED HERE. AND THEN THOSE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ARE LOCATED H HERE. THERE ARE TWO NEW WAIVERS REQUESTED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING FROM 49 SPACES TO 11 SPACES AND REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF LOADING BERTH FROM FOUR TO TWO. AND I CAN SHOW YOU THE ENTIRE SITE PLAN HERE SO YOU CAN SEE THE SIDEWALK ON MacDILL. AND WHERE IT IS LOCATED. AND THEN THIS IS -- THIS IS THE BUFFER HERE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOU SAID THE LOADING BERTHS REDUCED FROM FOUR TO TWO. >>LYNN HURTAK: BUT THERE ARE FOUR THERE. >> STEPHANIE POPE: THERE ARE FOUR THERE. BUT THEY ARE REQUESTING AT THAT WAIVER. WHEN THE APPLICANT COMES UP, THEY HAVE SOME CHANGES THAT THEY ARE MAKING. SO THEY WILL SHOW WHAT THE CHANGES WILL BE. AND THEY WILL ALSO BE PROBABLY ADDITIONAL CHANGES TO THAT. HERE ARE THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT. THIS IS THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, WHICH FACES NORTH MacDILL. MERE YOU CAN SEE THE ENTRANCES. THIS IS GOING TO BE THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. AND THEN THIS IS THE ENTRANCE TO THE AIR-CONDITIONED STORAGE AREA. THIS IS THE EAST SIDE. AND THIS IS THE NORTH SIDE. AND YOU CAN SEE THIS AREA HERE THAT IS -- HIGH PRESSURE THAT IS ALONG NORTH MacDILL. I WILL SHOW YOU SOME PHOTOS OF THE SITE. OF THIS IS NORTH OF THE SITE. THIS IS FROM THE SITE LOOKING NORTH AT THE ADJACENT MEDICAL US USE. THIS IS LOOKING NORTH DOWN NORTH MacDILL AND YOU CAN SEE THE COMMERCIAL USES ALONG MacDILL IN THIS AREA. THIS IS LOOKING WEST ACROSS MacDILL. AND THEN THIS IS ALSO LOOKING ACROSS MacDILL. THE OTHER PHOTO OF THE -- OF THE CHURCH IS RIGHT HERE. AND THIS WAS LOOKING IN THE OPPOSITE WAY DOWN MacDILL. THIS IS THE SITE RIGHT HERE. THIS IS LOOK CAN AT THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES DOWN ST. JOHN. THIS IS A PHOTO OF THE SITE. THEN THE REAR HERE, YOU CAN SEE THE COMMERCIAL BEHIND THE SITE HERE AS WELL. ANOTHER PHOTO OF THE SITE. AND LASTLY ANOTHER PHOTO OF THE SITE. AND THESE ARE THE RESIDENTIAL ADJACENT HOMES THERE. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE STAFF REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND FIND THE REQUEST TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THERE ARE TWO WAIVERS AS PART OF THIS REQUEST. NOT WITHSTANDING, STAFF'S FINDING OF INCONSISTENCY, IF CITY COUNCIL APPROVES, THE MODIFICATIONS ON THE VERY VISION SHEET MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. THESE REVISION ALSO NOT RESOLVES THE ISSUE OF TRANSPORTATION'S INCONSISTENT FINDING. I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPLICANT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS BELLY BILLS. I AM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT. I HAVE OF A BRIEF POWERPOINT PRESENTATION. I MAY NEED A SECOND TO PULL IT UP. I APOLOGIZE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING OBJECT OUR SCREENS YET. IN THE MEAN TIME, I SEE A COUPLE OF NEW PEOPLE IN THE ROOM. IF YOU ARE GOING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM OR THE NEXT ITEM, PLEASE STAND AND WE WILL SWEAR YOU IN. [SWEARING IN] >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> I HAVE SOME PRINT OUTS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IF YOU HAVE A PAPER COPY. >> OKAY, EXCELLENT. I AM GOING TO FLIP THROUGH SOME THE SLIDES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN PRESENTED. WE KNOW THE LOCATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THEY ARE GOING TO ACTIVATE THE OVERSHE HAD A. IF YOU WANT TO BE BEGIN, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> WESLEY MILLS WITH MILL SHORE AND ASSOCIATES. THE ENGINEER ON RECORD FOR THE PROBABLY. I APPRECIATE BEING HERE TO PRESENT OUR PROJECT. I WANT TO THANK STEPHANIE AND HER TEAM. OUR FIRM WORKS THROUGHOUT THE STATE WITH NUMEROUS SMALL MUNICIPALITIES AND FOUND THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM AT THE CITY TO BE EXCELLENT TO WORK WITH AND VERY HELPFUL. SO REALLY ENJOYED WORKING WITH THEM TO THIS POINT. SO I HAVE A POWERPOINT OR A SLIDE HERE THAT SHOWS THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. THE AERIAL MAP THAT WE CHOSE IS SEVERAL YEARS OLD BUT SHOWS THE EXISTING BUILDING THAT WAS ON-SITE BEFORE RECENTLY BEING DEMOLISHED. AND I THINK THAT IS IMPORTANT FOR A COUPLE OF REASONS. ONE, TO JUST SEE THE SHAPE OF THE SITE AND SOME OF THE CHALLENGES THAT -- THAT RELATE TO DEVELOPING THE SITE. AND WE REALLY WORKED ON OUR SITE PLAN TO -- PRIORITY NUMBER ONE TO NOT IMPACT THE RESIDENTS TO THE SOUTH. AND AS WELL AS PRESERVING ALL THE EXISTING TREES AND VEGETATION ON THE SITE. OUR SITE PLAN MIMICS -- IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE EXISTING SITE PRIOR TO BEING DEMOLISHED. YOU SEE WITH THE EXISTING, TWO DRIVEWAY CUTS. OUR PROPOSED PROJECT WILL ELIMINATE THE WERE NO ONE AND MAINTAIN THE SOUTHERN ACCESS AS DDUAL ACCESS UAL ACCESS FOR OUR PROPOSED SITE PLAN THAT SHOWS THE EXISTING TREES WE PRESERVE. CITY'S REQUIREMENT IS 50%. WE MET AT 72% FOR THE SITE. ALSO IN STAFF'S REPORT, THEY ALSO INDICATE THAT THE MINIMUM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT, OUR PROJECT IS FIVE TIMES GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM THAT IS REQUIRED. WE REALLY TRY TO CONDENSE THE FOOTPRINT OF SITE, ONE TO STAY AWAY FROM THE RESIDENTS AND ALSO TO PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES AND STAY CLEAR OF ANY PROTECTION ZONES OF THE EXISTING TREES. WE HAVE THE ONE ENTRANCE. AND WE WORKED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMP PLAN AND THE GOALS OF THE CITY TO HAVE THE FRONT ENTRANCES ALONG MacDILL AND A PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG MacDILL. A COUPLE OF CLARIFICATIONS I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE WITH THE SITE PLAN IS THAT THERE WAS A MENTION OF ONE OF OUR WAIVERS FOR THE LOADING BERTHS ONLY BEING TWO. OUR PLAN HAS FOUR LOADING SPACES WHICH WILL BE COMPLIANT. SO WE WOULDN'T BE LOOKING FOR A WAIVER, BUT I BELIEVE THE MISUNDERSTANDING THERE IS THAT CITY STAFF WOULD LIKE TO SEE ONE OF THOSE LOADING SPACE THAT IS IN FRONT OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE STORAGE FACILITY RELOCATED AND ALSO ONE OF THE PARKING SPACES THAT IS ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER PAD TO ALSO BE RE RELO RELOCATED, AND WE ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THAT. OUR REVISED SITE PLAN WILL MOVE AROUND THE LOADING SPACES SLIGHTLY AND THEN THE PARKING. SO WE WOULD NOT BE SEEKING THAT WAIVER. THE OTHER THING I WANT TO NOTE WHEN WE TALK ABOUT A DUMPSTER PAD LOCATION AND BEING IN CONFLICT WITH CERTAIN FEATURESS THE SITE. WE WILL NOT HAVE AN EXTERIOR DUMPSTER WITH THIS PROJECT. WE'LL TRASH BIN LOCATED WITHIN THE FACILITY THAT WILL BE LOCKED SO ONLY CARDBOARD BOXES AND PAPER AND ITEMS LIKE THAT WILL BE THROWN AWAY. ONCE A WEEK, IT WILL BE WHEELED. SO DUMPSTER OR THE TRASH RESEPTEMBER TABLE CAL WILL BE STORED INSIDE THE BUILDING HERE AND BROUGHT OUT THE SIDE ENTRANCE. AND THEN PULLED OVER TO THE DUMPSTER PAD LOCATION. SO THIS WON'T BE A PHYSICAL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE LIKE YOU ARE USED TO SEEING WITH MORE HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL USES. ALSO, A COUPLE OF THINGS I WANT TO MAKE NOTE OF IS, WE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A ZERO LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SITE. AND ALSO ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE. WE HAVE A 750-FOOT BUFFER ON THE EAST SIDE AND 10-FOOT BUFFER ON THE NORTH SIDE. ON THE SOUTH SIDE, WE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A 15-FOOT BUFFER AND A 20-FOOT BUFFER WITH LANDSCAPING AND AN EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK WALL THAT SEPARATES OUR SITE FROM THE RESIDE RESIDENTIAL. THIS IS A COLORIZED VERSION OF OUR LANDSCAPE PLAN, JUST TO DELINEATE ALL OF THE OPEN SPACE WE HAVE WITH THE SITE IN GREEN. THE AREAS THAT ARE SHADED BLUE AND PURPLE ARE ALL THE EXISTING TREES THAT WE ARE MAINTAINING AND WE ARE ALSO MAINTAINING THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONES THAT ARE REQUESTED. AS WELL AS YOU WILL SEE SOME OF THE LANDSCAPING FEATURES ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY, WHICH WILL BE -- WHICH WILL BE AN ENHANCEMENT OF EXISTING SITE. IT WILL BE UNDERSTORY TREES, HEDGES, AND SOME BLOOMING-TYPE TREES, BUT NOT TALL CANOPY TREES BECAUSE WE ARE LOCATED AN EASEMENT A AND THE CITY WILL SEE ANY LARGELY ROOTED TREES. SO THE NEXT SLIDE JUST SUPERIMPOSES OUR SITE AND GIVES YOU A FEWER VIEW FROM THE SITE SHOWING OUT HOUR SITE PLAN WORKS WITHIN THE CORRIDOR OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS. AND -- AS YOU CAN SEE, WE TRIED TO PUSH THE BUILDING AS CLOSES TO NORTH MacDILL AS POSSIBLE. IT IS CLOSER TO MacDILL THAN ALL OF THE COMMERCIAL RESIDENTS AROUND IT. AND I THINK IT WAS REFERENCED THERE WAS A PD IN 2019 THAT IS AT THE CORNER OF COLUMBUS. AND THAT, ALSO -- THAT APPROVAL HAS PARKING IN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING. AND HAVING PARKING IN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, IF THE ENTRANCES ARE AT THE FRONT, AND WE HEARD THAT WAS A -- THAT WAS A SENSITIVE POINT TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY'S CAMP PLAN IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE BUILDING ENTRANCES WERE ALONG THE FRONT. WE HAVE A MEDICAL CLINIC AND THE MAIN OFFICE TO THE STORAGE FACILITY AT THE FRONT OF THE SITE. AND THERE ARE ADA AND FLORIDA BUILDING REQUIREMENTS, ESPECIALLY WITH A CLINIC THAT REQUIRES THE HANDICAPPED AND PARKING SPACES TO BE AT THE CLOSEST SPOT POSSIBLE TO THE FRONT DOORS. MOST OF OUR PARKING IS ALONG THE SIDE AND NOT AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING. WE DO HAVE PARKING SPACES IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING. AND WE REALLY FELT TO NOT BE -- TO -- TO NOT BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADA AND FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, THAT IT WAS CRITICAL TO HAVE THOSE PARKING SPACE THERE IS. SO WE TRIED TO PUSH THE BUILDING AS CLOSE TO NORTH MacDILL AS WE COULD. AND YOU WILL SEE SIMILAR DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOW A SIMILAR PATH. I WANTED TO PRO PROVIDE A BRIEF OUTLINE OF THE ENTITLEMENT SCHEDULE BECAUSE WE WORKED BACK AND FORTH WITH STAFF. THEY WERE VERY SUPPORTIVE. TWO PREAPPLICATION MEETINGS TO UNDERSTAND THE VISION OF THE SITE AND HOW THEY WILL BE COMPLIANT WITH THE COMP PLAN VISION FOR THE CITY. SO IN ADDITION TO THE TWO PREAPPLICATION MEETINGS, WE HAD OUR DRC REVIEW. WE ALSO HELD A NEIGHBORHOOD WORKSHOP PRIOR TO THIS MEETING. BECAUSE WE REALLY WANTED TO MEET WITH THE RESIDENTS, UNDERSTAND THEIR CONCERNS WITH OUR DEVELOPMENT, AND ALSO GIVE THEM SOME ADDITIONAL DETAIL WHAT WE PLAN TO DO WITH THE PROBABLY. MOST OF THE RESIDENTS WERE VERY SUPPORTIVE OF THE PROJECT. THIS FACILITY WILL BE APPROXIMATELY $15 MILLION. AND THEY FELT VERY -- VERY EXCITED FOR THE FACT THAT SOMEBODY WOULD COME INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND PUT THIS KIND OF INVESTMENT INTO THIS PROPERTY. AND THEY WERE PLEASED WITH HOW WE WOULD HAVE SITUATED THE BUILDING ON THE SITE AND BUFFERED AWAY FROM THE RESIDENCE AND GAVE THEM PRIVACY. THEY ALSO WERE HAPPY TO HEAR OF THE FACT IT IS KIND OF A RELATIVELY LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL USE INSTEAD OF SOMETHING MORE INTRUSIVE ON THE RESOLUI RESIDENTS. ONE, TWO, OR THREE NEIGHBORS THAT JUST DON'T WANT TO SEE ANYTHING HAPPEN THERE. SO I DON'T WANT TO PARENT THIS PRETTY PICTURE TO YOU GUYS THAT EVERYBODY WAS HAPPY. THERE WERE A FEW RESIDENTS THAT DON'T WANT TO SEE ANYTHING HAPPEN WITH THE SITE. SO THIS MATERIAL YOU HAVE IN YOUR STAFF'S REPORT, REALLY WHAT I AM OUTLINING IS ALL THE CONSISTENCIES THAT THIS PROJECT DOES HAVE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE TOWN'S -- OR THE CITY'S ORDINANCES. SOFT WE ARE OBVIOUSLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE. WE ARE COMBATABLE WITH FLOOR AREA RATIOS. PER COMPATIBLE WITH NATURAL RESOURCES THAT WE HAVE FIVE TIMES AS MUCH GREEN SPACE AREA THAN WHAT WAS REQUIRED. WE FAR EXCEED THE CITY'S TREE RETENTION REQUIREMENT. WE EXCEED THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. WE MEET SOLID WASTE REQUIREMENTS. STORMWATER, HISTORIC PRESERVATION, TAMPA FIRE RESCUE, WATER AND RIGHT-OF-WAY. PILL SKIP OVER MY NEXT SLIDE. IT IS JUST HIGHLIGHTING WHAT YOU ALREADY HAVE IN YOUR STAFF REPORT THAT SHOWS ALL THE AREAS OF THE COMP PLAN THAT WE ARE CONSISTENT WITH. NEXT, I WOULD LIKE TO TALK ABOUT THE PD WAIVERS. REALLY THE ONLY PD WAIVER THAT WE ARE SEEKING IS THE PARKING. AND THIS IS PRETTY COMMON FOR THESE TYPE OF FACILITIES. WHAT I DID WAS ALOOKED AT THE CITY'S PARKING REQUIREMENT AND COMPARED THAT TO THE INTERNATIONAL PARKING MANUAL, THE ITE, AS IT IS REFERENCEDED THAT GETS UPDATED ON A PRETTY REGULAR BASIS. IT IS A WIDELY ACCEPTED STANDARD FOR PARKING RATES. AND WHAT WE TEND TO FIND IS THAT -- AND NO KNOCK ON THE CITY. MOST MUNICIPALITIES, PARKING CODES JUST DON'T GET UPDATED AS REGULARLY AS THE ITE AND THEY ARE SOMEWHAT ANTIQUATED. SO, YES, PURPOSE TO LOOK AT THE CITY PARKING CODE, WE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE 38 SPACES FOR THE SELF-STORAGE FACILITY. BUT YOU LOOK AT THE ITE MANUAL, WE WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE 10. I ALSO LOOKED AT THE -- THE MEDICAL CLINIC. AND PER THE ITE, WILL REQUIRE HALF THE PARKING SPACES THAN WHAT THE CITY CODE PROVIDES. SOFT AS A COMPARATIVE, YES, THE CITY'S CODE TECHNICALLY REQUIRES 48 SPACES. OUR PROJECT HAS 16. BUT IF YOU LOOKING AT THE ITE REAL, IT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL PUBLICATION THAT IS WIDELY ACCEPTED. >> I AM GOING INTO THE HOP THREE MINUTES. I AM MARTY BLACK. CREDENTIALED CITY MANAGER AND AICP CITY PLANNER. I WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT A COUPLE OF ITEMS FOR YOU. IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, IT INDICATES THERE MAY BE INCONSISTENCY ISSUE BECAUSE OF THE PLACEMENT OF THE PARKING AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING. I WANT TO JUST EMPHASIZE THAT IF WE COULD PUT ALL THE PARKING IN THE BACK, WE WOULD HAVE TO TAKE DOWN ALL THE TREES REQUIRED TO PRESERVE UNDER THE CITY'S REGULATION. MOVING THE PARKING TO THE BACK OF THE BUILDING ACTS CONTRARY TO THAT AND WOULD CREATE AN INCONSISTENCY WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND TO HAVE TWO-W AND YOUR CODE DEFINES HOW WIDE TO GET TO THAT PARKING SPACES AND MET THE MINIMUM THERE. WE PROVIDED A NICE LANDSCAPE ACROSS THE STREET FRONTAGE WITH THE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS AND WHICH HAVE THE ENTRANCE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. TWO ENTRANCES. SO YOU GOT THE SPLIT THERE FROM THE -- FROM THE USE PERSPECTIVE FOR GENERAL CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. I WANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT THE PLAN IS ADVISORY AND NOT A STRICT MEASUREMENT. THE PROBLEM IF WE MOVE ALL OF THE PARKING INCLUDING THE HANDICAPPED TO THE BACK AND THE FRONT DOORS TO THE FRONT. WE WOULD BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE BUILDING CODES AND HAVE TO EFFECTIVELY -- WITH A MEDICAL CLINIC, SOMEBODY WITH A WALKER OR CANE OR EVEN A WHEELCHAIR AND TRY TO GET TO THE MEDICAL CLINIC COME ALL THE WAY AROUND THE PARKING AREA AND GET INTO THE FRONT, WE WILL CREATE MORE VEHICLE CONFLICTS. THE PRIMARY CONFLICT THAT IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF IS THE ONCE-A-WEEK TRASH PICKUP CROSSING DRIVEWAY INTO THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING. THAT IS -- IT IS NOT ANY DIFFERENT THAN THE DAILY CROSSING OF TRAFFIC ACROSS THE PUBLIC SIDEWALKS THAT COULD COME INTO EVERY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. WE TRY TO MINIMIZE THAT AND BRING THE BUILDING AS CLOSE TO THE FRONT. IDEALLY, WE WOULDN'T WANT TO HAVE THE BUILDING RIGHT UP ON THE STREET BECAUSE THAT ALSO CREATES, IF YOU WILL, A INCONSISTENCY WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER. TO THE SOUTH, HOMES ARE SET OFF OF MacDILL AND SET OFF THOSE YARDS AND MIR BROTHER THE LANDSCAPING AND SETBACK THAT FLOW BEFORE YOU GET INTO THE MORE INTENSIVE TO THE NORTH. I WILL CONCLUDE WITH 30 SECONDS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS? YES, MA'AM. >> STEPHANIE POPE: STEPHANIE POPE, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. I WOULD LIKE TO GO AHEAD -- WE WROTE OUT ANOTHER REVISED REVISION SHEET AND GO AHEAD AND STATE THESE FOR THE RECORD. FOR THE FIRST ONE, CROSS OUT WAIVERS AS LISTED ON PAGE ONE ON THE STAFF REPORT AND LIST THE WAIVERS AS WRITTEN IN THIS MOST RECENT REVISED REVISION SHEET. UNDER TRANSPORTATION, THE SECOND BULLET POINT, REVISE WAIVER NUMBER ONE TO SECTION 27-283-7 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING FROM 49 TO 12 WITH A 75% REDUCTION IS THE CHANGE. WE WILL STRIKEOUT THE WAIVER NUMBER TWO AS THAT IS NO LONGER NEEDED. THE TWO DOWN FROM THAT, SHOW THE LOADING PROVIDED TO IT BE FOUR SPACES. VERY LAST ONE UNDER TRANSPORTATION, STRIKE OUT THE HATCHED LOADING SPACE IN THE FRONT ENTRANCE. AND TO ADD TO SHIFT THE FURTHEST EAST LOADING BERTH FURTHER EAST PAST THE ENTRANCE. MOVE THE MOST NORTHERN PARKING SPOT TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. THAT IS THE ONE BY THE DUMPSTER. AND TO SHIFT THE REMAINING THREE LOADING BERTHS TO THE EAST TO ACCOMMODATE FOR THAT PARKING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: EXCUSE ME. THE MEDICAL OFFICE -- HAS A DOCTOR, I ASSUME. A DOCTOR'S OFFICE AND CLINIC, WHAT IS THE PARKING RATIO FOR A DOCTOR FOR FOR A VISIT EVERY 15 OR 20 MINUTES? >> JONATHAN, DO YOU HAVE THAT? >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IN OTHER WORDS, HOW MANY COME IN VOLUME-WISE. >> JONATHAN SCOTT: JONATHAN SCOTT, MOBILITY. I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER BUT WE HAVE SIX PER THOUSAND PARKING FOR MEDICAL, BUT WHAT YOU ARE ASKING. A GOOD QUESTION. KIND OF DEPENDS ON HOW MANY PATIENTS THEY BRING IN AND ALL THAT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THE REASON I AM ASKING. YEARS AGO -- I CAN'T TELL YOU HOW LONG IT HAS BEEN -- BUT WE CHANGED THAT BECAUSE THAT IS THE HIGHEST USE OF PEOPLE GOING IN IS TO A DOCTOR'S OFFICE. WE CHANGED THE -- THE AMOUNT OF NEEDED SPACES FOR THAT PROFESSION. BUT I AM NOT SURE. I DON'T KNOW IF IT HAS BEEN CHANGED. I HAD FOUR YEARS OF ABSENCE. >> JONATHAN SCOTT: I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY DATA FOR THAT BUT I GUESS HE WILL USE CLINIC WHICH IS A LITTLE BIT MORE. I REMEMBER THAT WAY BACK WHEN, YOU ALL HAD CHANGED THAT. I LOOKED INTO THAT KIND OF IN MORE DETAIL. THAT IS INTERESTING. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM NUMBER 7? ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC? COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. GO AHEAD. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: FOR OUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, THE APPLICANT IN HIS PRESENTATION MADE A STATEMENT THAT I DON'T BELIEVE WAS TRUE. HE SAID THIS WAS IN CONFORMITY WITH FUTURE LAND USE. YOU FOUND IT INCONSISTENT, CORRECT? >> CORRECT. WE DID NOT FIND IT INCONSISTENT BASED ON THE USES, BECAUSE THE USES CAN BE CONSIDERED WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. WE FOUND IT INCONSISTENT BASED OFF OF THE PARKING BEING LOCATED AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING. AND THERE ONLY BE WITH ONE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION THAT WAY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: OKAY, THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NO PUBLIC COMMENT? DO YOU NEED ANY REBUTTAL, GENTLEMEN? >> JUST AVAILABLE IF THERE ARE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE PETITIONER A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. WHEN YOU SAY "CLINIC"ISTIC BE ANY TYPE OF CLINIC. WHAT TYPE OF CLINIC. NOT A REHAB CLINIC, IS IT? NOT A MEDICAL CLINIC? I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS. >> IT IS PROPOSED TO BE A MEDICAL CLINIC, NOT A REHAB. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WHAT TYPE. >> WE TONIGHT HAVE A CLIENT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: IT CAN BE ANYTHING, A REHAB? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE COME ON UP. >> I WILL ASK THE OWNERS TO COME UP. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: STATE YOUR NAME. >> NIC JUDY. I REPRESENT THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM PROPOSED MEDICAL CLINIC, MORE OF A WALK-IN CLINIC. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: WALK-IN CLINIC FOR WHAT, FOR ILLNESS? >> CORRECT. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: BREAK MY FINGERNAIL AND GO IN. >> MORE OF AN URGENT CARE. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NOT A MEDICAL CLINIC FOR REHAB. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YOU SAY THAT, NOT ME. >> NOT FOR REHAB, THAT'S RIGHT. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOTION TO CLOSE FOR DISCUSSION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYTHING ELSE? COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. HEARING IS CLOSED. GO AHEAD, SIR. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I MEAN, LISTENING TO THE APPLICANT ON THIS, I WOULD THINK YOU ARE BUILDING SOMETHING THAT IS A REMARKABLE -- AND NOT WHAT I AM SEEING. YOU KNOW FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE AND FOR -- THE REASON WE HAVE THESE POLICIES IS REDEVELOP CITY OF TAMPA. WE ARE TRYING TO REDEVELOP IT IN A BETTER WAY THAN WHAT IS CURRENTLY EXISTING CONDITIONS. THAT IS WHY THAT POLICY ABOUT PARKING AND -- AND WHEN YOU -- I THINK IT WAS DISINGENUOUS TO SAY BEING NOT IN COMPLIANCE. THE REASON YOU ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE BECAUSE OF TYPE OF -- THE PROPERTY IS PERFECTLY DEVELOPER AND CAPABLE OF BEING DEVELOPED IN A DIFFERENT WAY AND A DIFFERENT PROJECT. YOU ARE TRYING TO PROPOSE SOMETHING ON THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT DOESN'T FIT AND IS NOT IN -- NOT IN HARMONY WITH THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD NOR TO THE FUTURE LAND USE, HENCE THE PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY. ALONG MacDILL AND COLUMBUS, TWO CRITICAL TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS. AND, YOU KNOW, I AM CLEARLY NOT IN SUPPORT OF THIS. IT IS NOT THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT -- NOT THE TYPE OF BUILDING OR SERVICE THAT SHOULD BE PUT IN THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION. SO I AM GOING TO VOTE IN OPPOSITION TO IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE? IF NOT, I WILL ASK COUNCILWOMAN HURTAK, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ THIS ITEM. >>LYNN HURTAK: NO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: NO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ THIS ITEM? >>LUIS VIERA: NO, SIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: NO, SIR. GO AHEAD, COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: OKAY. I WASN'T READY TO DO THAT, BUT I WILL. OKAY. I MOVE TO DENY FILE REZ 25-04 FOR REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 2711 NORTH MacDILL FROM CG TO PD, AIR-CONDITIONED STORAGE AND CLINIC. THE PD REQUEST DOES NOT APPLY A PROCEDURE THAT CAN RELATE TO THE TYPE, DESIGN, LAYOUT OF RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL OF THE PARTICULAR SITE. DOES NOT PROMOTE OR ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT WHERE THE APPROPRIATE LOCATION, CHARACTER AND COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS AND BUILT-IN ENVIRONMENT AND EXISTING GEOGRAPHY. DOES NOT PROMOTE LIVING AND WORKING ENVIRONMENTS THAT WILL BE POSSIBLE THROUGH STRICT OF APPLICATION OF OTHER ZONING DISTRICTS NOR DOES IT PROMOTE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AN MRMENTS THAT COMPLEMENT THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY AND ENHANCE THE OVERALL QUALITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. >>LYNN HURTAK: I WOULD RECOMMEND READING THE SECTION AND SUBSECTIONS -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: 27-136. THANK YOU. SUBSECTIONS, 3, 6, 7, 8. AND IN ADDITION TO THAT, I AGREE WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS ON INCONSISTENCY BASED ON FUTURE LAND USE AND THE LACK OF COMPLAINS WITH TRANSPORTATION AND -- AND PARKING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: WE HAVE A MOTION FOR DENIAL BY COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. RALE CAN CALL VOTE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>BILL CARLSON: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MOTION TO DENY CARRIED. WE GO TO THE LAST ITEM OF THE NIGHT, ITEM NUMBER 9. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, LAND DEVELOPMENT. REZONE 5200 SOUTH MANHATTAN AVENUE FROM CI TO PD, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED. EMILY PHELAN WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. >>EMILY PHELAN: EMILY PHELAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. IN THE SOUTH GANDY NEIGHBORHOOD. PORTIONS OF THE SITE ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA AND WITHIN EVACUATION ZONE A. SUBJECT SITE IS HERE. AND THE SURROUNDING AREA HAS A MIX OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES. YOU CAN SEE THE MULTIFAMILY HERE. AND SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HERE AND THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE LOCATED TO THE EAST. ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE OF THE SUBJECT SITE TO THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 35 -- FUTURE LAND USE DISTRICT WHICH THE SUBJECT SITE IS AS WELL. AND TO THE WEST IS RESIDENTIAL-10 AND FURTHER IS COMMUNITY MIXED USE 35. THE PROPOSED IT ANSWERS TOO HE IS 18.24 UNITS PER ACRE FOR 5 % OF THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED UNDER THE CC-35 DESIGNATION. GIVEN THE NONRESIDENTIAL NATURE OF WEST PEARL STREET AND THE EXISTING MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH, PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS THE REQUEST COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. PD PROVIDES A TRANSITION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY HE DID ATTACHED HOMES TO THE WEST TO THE MORE INTENSIVE NONRESIDENTIAL USES TO THE EAST WITH I IS CONSISTENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ADDITIONALLY NEIGHBORHOOD POLY1.1.2 EMPHASIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF PROTECTING AND ENHANCING SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS OF TRANSITIONS BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOODS AND ADJOINING AREAS. FURTHERMORE THE REQUEST WILL HAVE HOUSING AND TRANSIT AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES WITHOUT ADVERSELY AFFECTING THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE SITE IS WITHIN A MIXED USE CORRIDOR AND SHOULD ADDRESS MIXED USE CENTERS AND CORRIDOR POLICIES OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ADDITIONALLY LAND USE POLICY 9.276 ENCOURAGES SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DEVELOPMENTS TO ORIENT FRONT DOORS TO NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALKS AND STREETS. AND IN CASES WHEN INTERNAL UNITS CANNOT ORIENT TOWARD A NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK OR STREET, PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS FROM THE FRONT DOOR TO ADJACENT PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY ARE ENCOURAGED. TO CONNECT UNIT ENTRANCES TO ADJACENT PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS. BASED ON OUR REVIEW, THE CURRENT DESIGN DOES NOT FULLY ALIGN WITH THE POLICY GUIDANCE AS THE FRONT DOORS TO BUILDINGS 3, 4, 5, 8, 9 AND 10 ARE ORIENTED TOWARD AN INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE AND DO NOT CONNECT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK AND STREET. TOP ADDRESS THIS, THE APPLICANT AGREED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS. LABEL TO FRONT DOORS IN UNITS BUILDINGS 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, AND 10. AND RE-ORIENT THE UNIT FRONT ENTRANCES IN BUILDING 4, 5, 8 AND 9 TO FACE INTERNAL SIDEWALK AND COURTYARD. SHOW AND LABEL THE SECOND ENTRANCES IN BUILDINGS 3 AND 10 THAT FACE THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND ADD PEDESTRIAN COLLECTIONS FROM THE SECOND ENTRANCES OF BUILDING 3 AND 10 TO THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY. ADD A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE FRONT DOORS TO BUILDING 3 AND 10 TO THE SIDEWALK IN BETWEEN UNITS -- BUILDING 3 AND 10. FINALLY PROVIDE CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE INTERNAL SIDEWALKS TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALKS ALONG ADJACENT STREETS AND THE SIDEWALKS ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY BRYS. WITH THESE REVISION IT IS WILL ALOIN WITH THE PLAN'S EMPHASIS WITH PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY WHILE MINIMIZING CONFLICTS BETWEEN PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES. UNIT FRONT ENTRANCES FOR BUILDINGS 1, 2, 6 AND 7 ALREADY ALIGNED WITH THE POLICY DIRECTION AS THEY ARE ORIENTED TOWARD WEST PEARL AVENUE AND SOUTH MANHATTAN AVENUE. IF THE PROPOSED REVISION MADE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS, THE PD WILL ADEQUATELY ADDRESS LAND USE POLICY 9.2.6 AND RELATED DESIGN POLICIES FOR THE MIXED USE AND CENTERS. ADDITIONALLY THE PD IS IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY BY RETAINING AN EXISTING SIDEWALK ALONG WEST PEARL STREET AND PROPOSE A NEW SIDEWALK ALONG MANHATTAN AVENUE. SUPPORTS MANY POLICIES WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT RELATES TO HOUSING NEEDS OF TAMPA'S FUTURE AND PRESENT POPULATIONS AND PROVIDING DIVERSE MOUSING OPPORTUNITIES THAT ARE SERVED BY TRANSIT WHILE MAINTAINING THE CHARACTER OF ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. OVERALL, THE PROPOSE BIRTHDAY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ANTICIPATED UNDER THE CC-35 DESIGNATION AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUND AREA. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES, SIR. >>SAMUEL THOMAS: SAM THOMAS, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION. WE WILL START WITH OUR AERIAL MA MAP. YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT OUTLINED IN RED SOUTH MANHATTAN AND WEST PEARL AVENUE. NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, CI ZONING DEVELOPED WITH MULTIFAMILY USE. MORE CI ZONING TO THE EAST AND THE SOUTH. AS DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL USES. MOVE FURTHER SOUTH, YOU HAVE CG ZONING. TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE, A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT THAT IS DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND SEMI DETACHED USES. FURTHER SOUTHWEST, YOU CAN SEE SOME MORE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES THERE IS. DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE SUBJECT SITE HERE, YOU HAVE -- AND OVER HERE YOU HAVE RS-50 ZONING. THIS PARCEL IS DEVELOPED WITH THE PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY AND THE OTHER PARCEL C DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE SUBJECT SITE IS A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME THAT AS YOU MOVE FARTHER NORTH, GANDY BOULEVARD WITH ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL USES. I WILL MOVE TO THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT NOW. SO HERE IS THE SITE PLAN. AND I WILL EXPLAIN SOME MORE OF THE DETAILS OF THE CHANGES THAT EMILY SPOKE ABOUT EARLIER TO MAKE MORE SENSE OF THE SITE PLAN. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 54 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS WITH TEN BUILDINGS. BUILDINGS ONE AND TWO HERE ORIENTED TOWARD SOUTH MANHATTAN AVENUE WITH PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS TO THE SIDEWALK PROPOSED ON SOUTH MANHATTAN AVENUE. BUILDINGS 6 AND 7 ORIENTED STRAIGHTFORWARD QUEST PEARL AVENUE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS TO THE SIDEWALK THAT EXIST THERE IS ALREADY. BUILDINGS 4, 5, 8 AND 9 AS EMILY MENTIONED, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION STAFF AND APPLICANT WORKED TOGETHER TO RE-ORIENT SOME OF THESE FRONT DOORS AND ADD PEDESTRIAN CONSIDERATIONS. FRONT DOORS ORIENTED TOWARD THE COURTYARD WITH A SIDE WALK. THAT WILL BE DONE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. BUILDINGS 3 AND 10 HERE, THEIR FRONT DOOR ALSO BE ORIENTED TOWARD THIS PRIVATE ROADWAY AND WILL HAVE SECOND ENTRANCES -- SECOND ENTRANCES FACING THIS NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE WITH AN ADDITIONAL WALK OF THE VACATED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SOUTH MANHATTAN I HAVE A. ADDITIONALLY MORE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS WILL HAD BEEN ADDED. THEY WILL BE ADDING SOME PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ALONG THE FRONT DOORS HERE TO CONNECT TO THE SIDEWALK THERE. SAME HERE. CROSSWALKS WILL BE ADDED HERE. HERE AND ANOTHER CROSSWALK ADDED HERE DONE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. VEHICULAR ACCESS OF THE SITE FROM SOUTH MANHATTAN AVENUE AND WEST PEARL AVENUE AS WELL 135 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 181 PARK SPACES ARE PROVIDED. EACH UNIT WILL ARE A TWO-CAR GARAGE. GARAGES FOR THESE UNITS HERE, HERE AND THERE. AND ALONG THERE AS WELL. FOR BUILDINGS 3, 4, 5, 8, 9 AND 10, THERE ARE DRIVEWAYS PROVIDED WHILE THE UNITS THAT ARE FACING THE -- PUBLIC STREETS DO NOT HAVE DRIVEWAYS, JUST GARAGES. ADDITIONALLY ON-STREET PARKING OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT OUTSIDE OF THE ZONING BUT THE APPLICANT IS SHOWING THOSE ON THE SITE PLAN; HOWEVER, NOT COUNTED TOWARD THEIR OVERALL PARKING THAT IS PROVIDED. APPLICANT IS ADDITIONAL PRESERVING A 31-INCH GRAND OAK HERE AND 33-INCH GRAND LIVE OAK HERE. AND THEY ARE ALSO PRESERVING A CLUSTER OF LIVE OAKS ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE. I WILL SHOW YOU SOME PICTURES NOW. THE ELEVATIONS IN PICTURES. THESE ARE THE TYPICAL ELEVATIONS FOR BUILDINGS 1 AND 6. AND BUILDINGS TWO AND SEVEN ELEVATIONS FOR BUILDINGS FOUR, FIVE, EIGHT AND NINE. LASTLY, THE ELEVATIONS ARE FOR BUILDING AND 10. I WILL QUICKLY RUN THROUGH SOME PICTURES. ANOTHER QUITE LARGE SITE OVER TWO ACRES. A DECENT AMOUNT OF PICTURES TO WALK THROUGH THE ENTIRE SITE. ALONG WEST PEARL AVENUE. THIS IS LOOKING TOWARD SOUTH MANHATTAN AVENUE FROM HERE. THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE THERE. THIS IS LOOKING NORTH FROM WEST PEARL AVENUE. THIS IS THAT CLUSTER OF LIVE OAKS ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE THAT WILL BE PRESERVED. LOOKING EAST ON WEST PEARL ON THE COMMERCIAL USES WITH THE COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE ZONING DISTRICT. MOVING FURTHER WEST ALONG PEARL AVENUE. BACK SIDE OF IT. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTH ALONG PEARL AVENUE OF THE COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES THAT ARE JUST SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. CLOSE TO SOUTH MANHATTAN, EXPRESSISTING STRUCTURE ON SUBJ SITE. LOOKING AT THE BACK SIDE OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. AND NOW WE ARE GETTING CLOSER TO THE INTERSECTION OF WEST PEARL AND SOUTH MANHATTAN AVENUE AND NOT COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES AND SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS THAT I MENTIONED FURTHER T EARLIER ACROSS THE STREET. WE HAVE NOT GOT TO THE INTERSECTION. YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT SITE HERE, SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES AN PLACES OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY. LOOKING NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. SOUTH MANHATTAN HERE. NOW WE ARE LOOKING BACK EAST TOWARD THOSE COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE USES EAST OF THE SUBJECT SIGHT ON PEARL AVENUE. LOOKING SOUTH AT THE INTERSECTION OF PEARL AND SOUTH MANHATTAN, THE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES. A BETTER VIEW OF THOSE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED USES THAT ARE SOUTHWEST CADDY CORNER FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. LOOKING NORTH ON MANHATTAN AV AVENUE. THE SUBJECT SITE HERE. PLACE OF REF LEDGE JUSTICE ASSEMBLY IS HERE -- RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY IS HERE. ANOTHER PLACE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET. EAST OF MANHATTAN AVENUE OF THE SUBJECT SITE. MOVING FURTHER TER NORTH SR. ANOTHER VIEW LOOKING EAST AT THE SUBJECT SITE FROM SOUTH MANHATTAN AVENUE. LOOKING NORTH ON MANS HAT TAN LOOKING TOWARD GANDY BOULEVARD. THIS IS NOW THAT WE ARE GETTING TOWARD THE NORTHERN END OF THE SUBJECT SITE LOOKING EAST FROM MANISCALCO. LOOKING WEST ACROSS THE STREET ACROSS MANISCALCO AVENUE ACROSS FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME I SAID WAS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM IT. THE SINGLE-FAMILY FAMILY HOPES THAT ARE ACROSS THE STREET ARE ORIENTED NOT TOWARD MANHATTAN AVENUE BUT TOWARD THE SIDE STREETS THAT COME OFF OF MANHATTAN AVENUE. BETTER OF HOW THEY ARE ORIENTED OF THE SIDE STREET TOWARD MANHATTAN. LOOKING AT THE VACATED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT RUNS ALONG THE NORTHERN SECTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AND HERE IS THAT MULTIFAMILY THAT EXISTS DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AND THAT CI ZONING DISTRICT. YOU CAN KIND OF SEE GANDY BOULEVARD AND THE EXPRESSWAY CONNECTOR AND THE -- AND THERE IS A BETTER VIEW OF THAT MULTIFAMILY DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE. I WILL PUT THE PLAN BACK UP. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT. SHOULD IT BE THE PLEASURE OF THE COUNCIL TO APPROVE, THE MODIFICATION OF THE SITE PLAN ON THE REVISION SHEET MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING. I AM AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE NITROGEN QUESTIONS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPL APPLICANT? >> GOOD EVENING, KAMI CORBITT WITH THE LAW FIRM OF HILL, WARD AND HENDERSON. WITH THE INTEREST OF TIME, WE WILL GO AHEAD AND GIVE OUR PLANNING PRESENTATION FIRST. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: HELLO, SIR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> I WANTED TO ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT. MY NAME IS STEVE SPIZATO, I AM A CERTIFIED PLANNER WITH A CONSULTING FIRM. I HAVE BEEN PRACTICING IN FLORIDA -- PRACTICING PLANNER FOR OVER 30 YEARS. AND MOST OF THAT TIME IN FLORIDA. I HOPE NOT TO BE TOO REDUNDANT BASED ON THE DETAIL OF THE PRESENTATION -- THE PRESENTATION YOU ALREADY RECEIVED BUT THIS IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING SITE WITH A LONG-STANDING WAREHOUSE. IT CONSISTS OF A LARGE PARKING AREA. CAN YOU ALL SEE -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YEAH, IT IS GOOD. >> SO CONSISTENT WITH A LARGE PARKING AREA, CENTRAL BUILDING AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. THE COMP PLAN AND ZONING ARE ALREADY IN PLACE TO FACILITATE A RANGE OF DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS. IT IS A DYNAMIC PLACE. IT HAS VITALITY. AND REPRESENTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXERCISE QUALITY PLANS. THIS IS A PLACE WHERE PEOPLE WANT TO LIVE, WORK AND SHOP. AND IT IS FACILITATED THROUGH THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND SUPPORTED BY THE CAMP PLAN AND THE CURRENT, AGAIN, ZONING DESIGNATION. WORKING WITH THE APPLICANT, WE INTENTIONALLY CHOSE THE PD PROCESS TO ALLOW FOR TRANSPARENCY AND A COLLABORATIVE DESIGN PROCESS. WE DID HOLD A COMMUNITY MEETING. WE SENT OUT INVITATIONS TO APPROXIMATELY 500 UNIQUE ADDRESSES. OUR PRESENTATION WILL DEMONSTRATE THE REDEVELOPMENT WILL BENEFIT THE NEEDED AREA AND THE NEARBY AREA AND CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU ALREADY HAVE SEEN, BUT, I LIKE THIS VIEW, FROM A PLANNING PERSPECTIVE, YOU CAN SEE HOW THE LAND USE IS FORMED BY THE POLICY GUIDANCE AND YOU GO SEE THE BOUNDARY ALONG MANHATTAN TO THE WEST IS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. AND OUR SITE, RED, ALLOWS FOR A MIX OF USES INCLUDING SINGLE-USE RESIDENTIAL. I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT WE ARE SUBSTANTIALLY LESS DENSE THAN WHAT THE CC -- YEAH, THE CC-35 DESIGNATION ALLOWS. I THINK YOU HEARD QUITE A BIT ABOUT WHAT IS ADJACENT. WE JUST COLORED THE LAND USES TYPICALLY SERVICE YELLOW SHOWS THE CHURCH DIRECTLY ADJACENT. THE APARTMENTS TO THE SOUTH WHICH HAS THE SAME ZONING. BUT THEY ACHIEVED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT HERE BASED ON THE SPECIAL USE PROCESS. AND THEN TO THE -- TO THE EAST, THERE IS THE DOG BOARDING FACILITY. AND WE HAVE SMALL SCALE RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH. WHAT WE ARE DOING CURRENTLY IS NOT IN A VACUUM -- SORRY. THE CI DESIGNATION, COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE DESIGNATION ALLOWS MANY USES BY RIGHT, WHICH DOESN'T REQUIRE A PD OR A SPECIAL USE THAT IS MORE INTENSE THAN THE PROPOSED INTENSITY IS OFTEN MEASURED BY TRAFFIC, HOURS OF OPERATION, LIGHT, THOSE TYPES OF THINGS. THOSE ARE EXAMPLES, I APOLOGIZE. THESE ARE EXAMPLE WHAT WAS WILL BE ALLOWED BY RIGHT. NEXT SERIES OF SLIDE FOCUS ON THE DESIGN. AND THERE WILL BE SEVERAL -- SEVERAL DIFFERENT SLIDES. THIS ONE IS THE PD PLAN. WE HAVE ADDED SOME COLOR TO HAVE SHOW PARKING, BUT -- BUT QUICK ORIENTATION AND I KNOW THAT SAM WENT OVER IT, BUT YOU CAN SEE THAT WE HAVE UNITS ON SOUTH MANHATTAN. FRONT DOORS FACING SOUTH MANHATTAN AND FACING WEST PEARL. AND THE INTERIOR UNITS, WHICH ARE HERE AND HERE. AND, OF COURSE, WE HAVE ACCESS POINT HERE AND ACCESS POINT HERE AND CIRCULATION AROUND -- AROUND THIS SITE. WE HAVE SUBSTANTIALLY -- WE KNOW PARKING IS A SIGNIFICANT ISSUE. WE HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE PARKING THAN REQUIRED BY THE CODE, 3.35 UNITS -- SORRY, 3.35 SPACES PER UNIT AND 2.25 INCLUDING THE VISITOR PARKING AS REQUIRED. JUST TO KIND OF SHOW HOW WE ARE ACCOMMODATING PARKING. BROWN HERE ALONG THESE -- ON THE EDGE OF THESE BUILDINGS, THESE -- THESE -- INCLUDE TWO-CAR GARAGES AS WELL ALL OF THE INTERIOR UNITS. TAN COLORS HERE. TAN HERE. TAN HERE. ALSO HAVE TWO-CAR GARAGES. PURPLE -- WE ARE SHOWING THE PURPOSE{SUFFIX}LE RI-- PURPLE HE TWO SMALL PARKING SPACES IN FRONT OF THE GARAGES. ALSO NOTING -- YOU CAN SEE IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER A DUMPSTER. WE WILL NOT BE UTILIZING ROLL-OUT CONTAINERS. THERE WON'T BE ROLL OUT CONTAINERS IN THE GARAGES, AND WE WILL BE UTILIZING THE DUMPSTERS. I SEE THAT. THIS IS AN ILLUSTRATION OF OUR SITE PLAN. FOCUS OF OUR DESIGN IS, AGAIN, CIRCULATION AND KIND OF THE CONCEPT OF THE DRIVE AISLE AS IT RELATES TO TOWN HOUSES. AND SO WE -- WE DELINEATED THE MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDINGS WHERE THERE IS AN AISLE OR AN ACTWAY. SO YOU SEE 37.5, 2.5 AND 06 FEET. WE HAVE -- WE HAVE 24 -- THE DRIVE AISLES OR ACCESSWAYS THEMSELVES ARE 24 FEET. ALL OF THIS IS 24 FEET AND THE STANDARD WIDTH SIMILAR TO THE PAVEMENT ON MANHATTAN. SIMILAR TO THE PAVEMENT ON PEARL. WHAT WE ARE NOT DOING IS -- IS HERE. THAT IS -- THAT IS A GRAPHIC FROM A PRESENTATION GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL A WHILE BACK IN DECEMBER OF 2023. WE ARE ALSO JUST TO BE CLEAR, WE ARE NOT DOING ANY OF THIS. AGAIN, IT SHOWS UNITS BACK-TO-BACK ON AN ALLEY WITHOUT ANY LANDSCAPING COURTYARDS, THAT KIND OF THING. GREEN SPACE. TREE PRESERVATION. ALSO VERY IMPORTANT TO -- TO BE THE DESIGN OF THE SITE. WE REVISED OUR PLAN TO ACCOMMODATE AN ALMOST GRAND OAK HERE. YOU SEE THE SPACING. AND THE GRAND OAK HERE. KIND OF THE THEME IS THAT WE ARE PROVIDING MORE THAN REQUIRED. AND THAT IS SUSTAINED HERE. AND PROVIDING SUBSTANTIALLY MORE GREEN SPACE THAN REQUIRED. WE ARE ALSO -- KIND OF -- AS SAM INDICATED THIS PLAN ACTUALLY SHOW IT IS A LITTLE BIT BETTER. THE UNITS ALONG MANHATTAN AND PEARL FRONT DIRECTLY ON A REFURBISHED SIDEWALK THAT WILL BE DONE ALONG PEARL. AND THEN A BRAND-NEW SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTH MANISCALCO THA-- SO MANHATTAN, AND THE SIDEWALK, THAT WAS SHOWN BY THE PHOTOGRAPHS EARLIER. AND THEN -- AS THAT -- THIS IS A -- OKAY. STORM MANAGEMENT WAS A FACTOR. WHAT WE HEARD AT THE COMMUNITY MEETING HAD TO DO WITH STORMWATER. AS A RESIDENT OF TAMPA, I UNDERSTAND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS OVER WHAT OCCURRED THE LAST YEAR. WE DID MORE ENGINEERING THAN YOU TYPICALLY DO AS PART OF THE REZONE UNDER STAND THIS SITE AND THE QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS ISSUE. THE LEFT IS THE CURRENT SITE. EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. SHOWS THE IMPERVIOUS AND START OF THIS PINK COLOR. AND THEN THE PERVIOUS IS THE GREEN. AND THEN ON THE -- THIS SITE IS OUR SITE, SHOWING HOW THE -- HOW WE BREAK UP THE MASS OF PARKING AND ADD GREEN SPACES, YOU KNOW, AND -- AND WERE SIGNIFICANT -- WERE SIGNIFICANTLY -- WE HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE PERVIOUS AREA THAN WHAT IS CURRENTLY ON THE SITE. ALSO, CONSISTENT WITH THE STORMWATER ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS, WE ARE NOT UTILIZING ANY CREDITS FROM THE EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA. AND -- WE ARE ALSO MODERNIZING THE STORMWATER SYSTEM BASED ON CURRENT REQUIREMENTS. THIS IS JUST A -- A STREET SCRAPE RENDERING OF WHAT WEST PEARL WILL LOOK LIKE. IT ACTIVATES THE -- THE STREET AS A PUBLIC SPACE. IT HAS -- YOU CAN SEE THE ENHANCEMENTS THAT WERE PROVIDED INCLUDING PARKING, LANDSCAPING AND THEN THE FRONT DOORS, AS WELL AS THE ARCHITECTURE ALL LEND TO ACTIVATE THAT STREET FOR PUBLIC USE. THIS IS JUST AN OBLIQUE VIEW OF THE SITE. AGAIN, KIND OF SHOWING HOW IT FITS WITH THE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT NORTH AND TO THE EA EAST. I WILL JUST QUICKLY SUMMARIZE. WE ACHIEVED A HIGH LEVEL DESIGN -- SORRY -- WITHOUT THE NEED FOR WAIVERS. WE ARE NOT MAXIMIZING DENSITY. WE ARE NOT REDUCING IMPERVIOUS. WE ARE EXCEEDING PARKING, AND WE ARE PROTECTING EXISTING TREES. I HAVE ONE LAST SLIDE, I PROMISE. HERE WE GO. EIGHT REVIEW CRITERIA FOR THE DISTRICT. FIVE OF WHICH APPLY TO OUR PROJECT SITE. THEY ARE OUTLINED ON THIS SLIDE. WE HAVE POSITIVE FINDINGS FOR EACH. ALSO CONFIRMED BY STAFF. NOT GOING TO GO INTO EACH ONE OF THOSE, BUT IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION, WHICH IS ALSO, AGAIN, CONFIRMED BY YOUR STAFF REPORT, THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT AND IT FITS THE INTENT OF THE PD PROCESS. AND WITH THAT, IN MY VERY AWKWARD USE OF THE ELMO, I WILL TURN IT OVER TO MAC. >> THANK YOU, STEVEN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YOUR NAME. >> MAC McCRAW. RESIDENT OF TAMPA NICHOLAS STREET IN TAMPA. I AM THE APPLICANT FOR THE REZONING AND A REPRESENTATIVE FOR MATAMY HOMES. YOU GUYS DID A GREAT JOB. STEVEN, THANK YOU. I DON'T WANT TO GET TOO REDUNDANT TO TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT MATAMY. WE HAVE BEEN FOCUSED IN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA FOR TEN YEARS. I HAVE BEEN WITH THE TAMPA FOR TEN YEARS AND I AM EXCITED IN TAMPA. MY FIRST TIME IN FRONT OF YOU GUYS. AND I ENJOY THAT, BECAUSE I LIVE IN TAMPA. I LIVE IN PALMA CEIA PARK. MY WIFE AND I LIVED THERE 21 YEARS WITH OUR FAMILY. MATTAMY HOMES IS FOCUSED ON SUSTAINABILITY. I KNOW THAT IS IMPORTANT TO EVERYBODY, BUT I -- I WILL LEAVE HERE FOR THE RECORD OUR 62-PAGE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT WHICH IS PART OF OUR -- ON OUR EXTERNAL WEB SITE. WE SAY IT. WE MEAN IT. WE ARE FOCUSED ON IT. AND ALL OF OUR PROJECTS ARE TRYING TO INCORPORATE WAYS TO GET TO A CARBON NEUTRAL NET ZERO ENVIRONMENT. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE FOCUSED ON AND DOING IT IN ALL OF OUR COMMUNITIES. WE ARE LEADING THE WAY IN -- IN TAMPA WITH CARBON NEUTRAL AND CARBON CONCRETE AND OTHER BUILDERS ARE STARTING TO UTILIZE THAT AND WE ARE KIND OF THE LEADER IN THAT INDUSTRY AND FOCUS ON THE ENVIRONMENT. I LOVE TAMPA. LIKE I SAID, I GREW UP HERE. I KNOW THE GROWTH COMES WITH SOME GROWING PAINS. AND WE WILL LIKELY HEAR ABOUT SOME OF THOSE TONIGHT. I SEE THE BENEFITS. I LOVE THE REVITALIZED WALKABILITY. I LOVE THE DEDICATED BIKE PATHS. THE ENERGY. THE NEW RESTAURANTS. TAMPA IS SUCH A GREAT PLACE TO LIVE. YOU KNOW WHY WE WANT TO COME AND INVEST HERE AND BUILD HOMES, QUALITY HOMES. SOME GROWTH BRINGS MORE TAX REVENUE FROM NEW DEVELOPMENTS. THESE DOLLARS ARE HELPING TAMPA MODERNIZE AND REPLACE THE AGING INFRASTRUCTURE. WE CAN SEE THE RESULTS OF THESE EFFORTS ACROSS THE CITY AND WHILE CONSTRUCTION CAN BE DISRUPTED, THESE IMPROVEMENTS ARE MAKING TAMPA AN EVEN MORE ATTRACTIVE PLACE TO LIVE. MODERNIZING CREATES MORE VARIETY OF HOUSING. WE HEARD OF THAT OF THE PLANNERS. FINISHED FLOORS ABOVE THE ELEVATIONS. I WILL INCLUDE LETTERS OF SUPPORT IN THE RECORD -- AND YOU GOOD TO IS HAVE GOTTEN THEM AND THEY CAME IN LATED TO. WE HEARD FROM CITIZENS WHO WANT NEW HOUSING THAT IS ABOVE THE FLOOD PLAIN ESPECIALLY IN THE MID RANGE PRICING AND THAT'S WHAT WE ARE GOING TO OFFER. MISSING MIDDLE IS WHAT YOUR PLANNING REPORT REFERS TO IT AS. SO I DO THINK THAT VOTING NO ON A THOUGHTFULLY PLANNED PROJECT IS ONLY PUTTING MORE BURDEN ON OUR CONSTRAINED HOUSING SUPPLY AND MAKING TAMPA AN EVEN MORE UNAFFORDABLE PLACE TO LIVE SO MATTAMY'S PROJECTS IN THE HEART OF THE CITY WHERE DEMAND AND PEOPLE LIKE ME STAY AND LIVE. I PLAN TO LIVE HERE THE REST OF MY LIFE. HOUSING IS EXPENSIVE AND THIS WILL SOLVES SOME OF THE NEED. I LOVE THIS PROJECT IS FROM MY HOMETOWN. BEING FROM TAMPA, IT IS IMPORTANT FOR ME TO MEET WITH THE RESIDENTS. WE INTENTIONALLY DID THE PD TO MEET WITH THE STAKEHOLDERS. WE NOTIFIED OVER -- 500 LETTERS WERE SENT IN A HALF-MILE -- QUARTER-MILE RADIUS. WE ONLY HAD TO DO 300 FEET. QUARTER MILE, 500 LETTERS. WE TALKED TO MANY PEOPLE. SOME WERE IN SUPPORT. WE HAD A GREAT -- LET'S CALL IT LIVELY AND ROW MUST MEETING AT THE GANDY CIVIC ASSOCIATION. THANK YOU FOR MEETING US THERE AND HOSTING. AND I THINK WE HAVE ADDRESSED A LOT OF THEIR FEEDBACK. WE HAD A BETTER PLAN BECAUSE OF IT. IT IS A BETTER PLAN BECAUSE OF THE RESULTS OF THOSE MEETINGS. AND WITH THAT, I JUST WANT TO REITERATE, IT IS CONSISTENT. IT IS COMPATIBLE. THERE IS NO WAIVERS. IT IS AN ALLOWABLE USE IN THE CI LAND USE CATEGORY. WE RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL TONIGHT. I DO WANT TO ADD WE -- AFTER OUR MEETING WITH THEM, WE HAVE A -- BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READING -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY AS MUCH, SIR. YOU WILL HAVE TIME FOR REBUTTAL AFTER PUBLIC COMMENT. COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION. ON THE SITE PLAN, CAN YOU SHOW ME WHERE YOU ARE GOING TO ACCOMMODATE RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE? >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THE BOTTOM RIGHT HAND -- >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I WAS TRYING TO FIND IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: IT WAS RIGHT HERE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YEAH. HOW ABOUT JUST TRASH CANS FOR THE RESIDENTS? >> RIGHT HERE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THAT IS A DUMPSTER. HOW ABOUT RESIDENTIAL TRASH CANS. >> THERE WON'T BE. THEY WILL GO TO THE DUMPSTER. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: BRING IT RIGHT FROM THE HOUSE TO THE DUMPSTER. >> OUR HOA WILL HAVE A SERVICE TO PICK UP GARBAGE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: FEE SIMPLE FOR SALE UNITS? >> YES, SIR. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: BEAUTIFUL. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PUBLIC COMMENT. ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 9. COME ON UP. YOU DON'T HAVE TO RAISE YOUR HAND. YOU CAN JUST COME UP ONE BY ONE. GOOD EVENING. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL. MY NAME IS SANDY DE-DIEGO SANCHEZ AND HERE TO SPEAK FOR CARROLL ANN BENNETT WHO IS SICK AND DID NOT HAVE TIME TO ARRANGE FOR A CONFERENCE CALL AND I WOULD LIKE TO READ HER MESSAGE TO THE COUNCIL, IF I MAY. IT SAYS DEAR COUNCILMEMBERS, I AM RECOVERING FROM THE FLU AND I THOUGHT I WOULD BE ABLE TO ATTEND TONIGHT, BUT I OVERDID THINGS YESTERDAY AND I NEED TO REST AND PUT MY HEALTH FIRST. MARCH 7, 2024, YOU WERE TOLD BY STAFF THAT 18 X 18 GARAGES WERE NOT USABLE BY TWO CARS. YOU WERE TOLD POOH PEOPLE WOULD BE FORCE TO JUMP OUT THE WINDOWS. STAFF STATED AND I TALKED TO ARCHITECT WITH EXPERIENCES SAYING THAT TWO-CAR GARAGES SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 20 X 20. HE ASKED OF MAKING THE GARAGES SMALLER. THEY SAID IT IS NOT A GOOD IDEA TO EVEN CONSIDER IT. DRC COMMENT, THE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ASKED THEM TO MAKE THE GARAGES 20 X 20 FEET AND DEVELOPER ARE VERY FUSED TO <u>%</u>O THAT. THEREFORE IN THE REAL WORLD THESE ARE ONE HOME RUN CAR GARAGES. TWO-CAR GARAGES ONLY IN A MAKE-BELIEVE WORLD. THE QUESTION YOU COUNCILMEMBERS MUST ASK YOURSELF, DO TAMPA ACCIDENTS WANT TO APPROVE MAKE-BELIEVE GARAGES. WE ALL KNOW THE ANSWER IS NO. AT THAT MARCH MEETING, YOU COUNCILMEMBERS SAID YOU DO NOT WANT DEVELOPERS TO BUILD UNUSABLE GARAGES, THEREFORE, YOU MUST MAKE THE DEVELOPER INCREASE THE GARAGES TO 20 X 20 EVEN IF THEY MUST REDUCE THE NUMBER OF UNITS TO ACCOMPLISH THIS. THAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY AND HONEST THING TO DO. IF YOU DON'T, IT MEANS THAT IN THE REAL WORLD, THEY WILL BUILD 54 ONE-CAR GARAGES. IT MEANS IN THE REAL WORLD THEY DO NOT MEET THEIR PARKING REQUIREMENTS. IF YOU DON'T, IT MEANS IN THE REAL WORLD DAILY FRUSTRATION AND STRESS FOR THE NEW OWNERS. BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T KNOW A REAL ESTATE LISTING WITH TWO-CAR GARAGE IS ONLY MAKE BELIEVE. PLEASE REQUIRE THE HIGH-QUALITY REAL WORLD DEVELOPMENT THAT TAMPA DESERVES. SAY NO TO MEDIOCRITY AND SAY NO TO A MAKE-BELIEVE WORLD. THANK YOU, CARROLL ANN BENNETT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU INVEST MUCH. NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> GOOD EVENING, AILEEN MAYER. MAY I APPROACH AND GIVE YOU SOME HANDOUTS MANISCALCO SURE, PLEASE HAND THEM TO THE ATTORNEY -- >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: SURE. PLEASE HAND THEM TO THE ATTORNEY AND HE WILL PUT THEM INTO THE RECORD. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCILMEMBERS. MY NAME IS AILEEN MAYER AND I AM IN OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING PROPOSAL. THERE ARE MULTIPLE REASONS TO OPPOSE THIS PROPERTY BEING REZONED RESIDENTIAL, INCLUDING FLOODING STORMWATER DRAINAGE OVERPOPULATION, AND TRAFFIC. TONIGHT, I JUST WANT TO ADDRESS THE TRAFFIC ISSUE. IF YOU LOOK AT MY HANDOUT -- I AM SORRY, I DIDN'T HAVE THE PRESENTATION. I THINK WE ALL SEEN THIS. THIS IS THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION BUT RIGHT DIAGONAL ACROSS STREET IS ALREADY TOWN HOMES. BESIDES THAT -- NOT ON MY MAP, BUT RIGHT OVER HERE, OUR LEGACY TOWN HOMES. SOME WITHIN THIS PROPERTY RIGHT HERE IS AMSOUTH. AMSOUTH, WHICH I BELIEVE HAS 288 UNITS. S SO WITHIN FEET, WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE, THREE OTHER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. ALL THE ROAD SOUTH OF GANDY ARE SINGLE LANES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF DALE MABRY HIGHWAY. I THINK MOST OF US LIVE IN TAMPA, SO WE ALL KIND OF KNOW THAT. LET ME SWITCH THIS. IF YOU -- I HAVE LISTED ALL THE APARTMENTS, TOWN HOMES AND CONDOS. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE IS A PLETHORA OF THEM. THIS IS A PHOTO I TOOK ONLY LAST THURSDAY NIGHT. LAST THURSDAY NIGHT AS YOU CAN SEE THE TRAFFIC, THERE IS WALLACE CIRCLE. THIS IS TWO BLOCKS FROM THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION. SO AS YOU CAN SEE, THE TRAFFIC IS ALREADY BEYOND WALLACE CIRCLE AND ALL THE WAY DOWN OKLAHOMA. LAST THURSDAY WAS NOT A HOLIDAY. THIS WAS NO ACCIDENTS. I CAME FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF MANHATTAN. I CROSSED GANDY. THERE IS NO ACCIDENTS HOLDING UP. THIS IS JUST NORMAL, AVERAGE, RUSH-HOUR TRAFFIC. I LIVE ON WALLACE CIRCLE. THERE IS ONE WAY IN. AND ONE WAY OUT, WHICH IS MANHATTAN. SO I AM -- I AM SOMEBODY WHO TRAVELS MANHATTAN AVENUE EVERY SING IS DAY. I JUST -- SINGLE DAY. I JUST WANT TO GO TO THE LAST PAGE. IF YOU FLIP TO PAGE NUMBER 8. RIGHT HERE IS A STUDY. THE STUDY IS DONE BY THE CITY OF TAMPA. HERE IS YOUR SOURCE. HERE IS YOUR WEB SITE. THEY HAVE SERVICE LEVELS. THE LOWEST LEVEL S AN F. MANHATTAN IS ALREADY AN F. YOU CAN'T GO ANY LOWER THAN THAT. ALSO WEST SHORE IS IN THE SAME THING. ANYBODY THAT LIVES IN THE WEST SHORE AREA IS GOING TO CUT OVER TO MANHATTAN. AND MANHATTAN PEOPLE CUT OVER TO WEST SHORE AND VICE VERSA. TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF GROWTH AND I AM OPPOSED TO THE REZONING. AS I SAID, THE TRAFFIC IS ALREADY HORRIBLE. AND UNTIL YOU WIDEN THE ROADS ON WEST SHORE AND MANHATTAN, IT WON'T GET ANY BETTER. ADDING MORE RESIDENTIAL IS IRRESPONSIBLE IN MY OPINION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY WERE. >> THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: PLEASE COME UP. TOM SCHREIBER 810 SOUTH BARBIE DRIVE TAMPA MY PROPERTY -- THE PROPERTY -- THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MANHATTAN. MY PROPERTY IS ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MANHATTAN. ALSO, I HAVE A PROPERTY -- PROPERTY AT 5220 SOUTH MANHATTAN. I ALSO HAVE A PROPERTY AT 4314 PEARL AVENUE. THE REASON I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE PROPERTY, IT WAS AN OLD PLANT. I AM IN THE FOOD DISTRIBUTION BUSINESS. AND WHEN I SAW -- I HAD CALLED TEXAS TO SEE IF I COULD PERHAPS PURCHASE THE BUILDING. MY ZONING IS COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE. SO WE TALK ABOUT TRAFFIC. I CAN PUT A GAS STATION IN THERE AND NOT ASK FOR ANY PERMISSION AND HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE COMING AND GOING. ALSO, IF THEY -- IF THEY DID NOT BUY THAT PROPERTY, THEY COULD RUN 40 FOOT REEFERS IN THERE ALL DAY LONG AND DON'T NEED A VARIANCE. WHEN I TALKED TO MAC AND SAW WHAT WAS GOING ON. I SAID A BEAUTIFUL PIECE OF PROPERTY. PLENTY OF PARKING. PLENTY OF GREEN SPACE. RIGHT NOW IF YOU GO THERE, IT IS ALL CEMENT. DURING THE FLOOD -- WHICH MY HOUSE FLOODED, FIVE FEET OF WATER. MANHATTAN AND THE TWO BUILDINGS I HAVE ON MANHATTAN, WE DIDN'T GET AN OUNCE OF WATER IN THE BUILDINGS. SO FROM THE FLOOD STANDPOINT, IT IS NOT HAPPENING. I CAN THAT IS A BEAUTIFUL PROJECT. I THINK I AM ABOUT AS NERVOUS AS HE IS. BUT ALSO, IF THAT PROJECT PROCEEDS, THERE WILL BE SOME BEAUTIFUL THINGS DONE IN THAT AREA. BECAUSE IT IS A MISH-MASH ON THE EAST SIDE OF CI ZONING. SO IT DEPENDS ON WHAT -- I HOPE THIS IS APPROVED. BECAUSE IF NOT, YOU CAN OPEN UP FOR -- THEY CAN TURN IT BOOK IN A MANUFACTURING FACILITY. A COLD STORAGE FACILITY. I THINK IT IS A BEAUTIFUL PROJECT. AND I AM NOT SURE ABOUT THE TWO-CAR GARAGES, BUT I THINK THEY HAVE A LOT OF PARKING AND GREEN SPACE. I AM 150% IN FAVOR OF THIS PROJECT. AND I AM A LANDOWNER WITHIN -- RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET AND I BOUGHT. SO THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. YES, MA'AM, NIX SPEAKER. ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? IF SO, PLEASE LINE UP AGAINST THE WALL SO WE GET AN IDEA. >>MARTIN SHELBY: PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE YOU ARE HERE AND WAIVING YOUR THREE MINUTES TO GIVE THE SPEAKER AN EXTRA MINUTE. ANDY JOHNSON. THANK YOU. ASTRID FORTELLA. DEBRA STEELE. THANK YOU. CHRISTINA STAFFORD. THANK YOU. AND DENISE McCUE. ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR FIVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. >> STEPHANIE POYNOR. I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT VERY, VERY SPECIFICALLY WHAT THE GENTLEMAN TOLD IS YOU NOT WHAT IS ON BASE. NOT WHAT IS IN ACELA AND I AM GOING TO SHOW YOU DOCUMENTS IN ON BASE AND IN ACELA. THIS IS NOT THE PROJECT THEY PRESENTED TO THE NEIGHBORHOODS. AND THERE ARE MULTIPLE FOLKS IN THIS ROOM THAT WERE THERE THAT THEY DID NOT PRESENT THIS TO US. NUMBER ONE, I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT -- OH -- WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IF I TAKE THIS AND I POUR ALL OF THIS INTO THIS CLASS? IT IS GOING TO RUN OVER, RECEIPT. BECAUSE IT IS TOO MUCH. -- RIGHT. BECAUSE IT IS TOO MUCH. MORE THAN WE CAN HANDLE. WE ARE FULL. JUST LIKE THIS GLASS AND THE WATER RUNS EVERYWHERE. THAT IS WHAT S.O.G. IS. JUST KEEP THAT IN MIND. TOWN HOUSES ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE, THEY WERE BUILT BEFORE 2005 WHICH IS BEFORE THE CHAA. JUST SAYING. OKAY. SO WHILE I HAVE SEEN WORSE PROJECTS THIS WEEK, I HAVE GIVEN YOU A SPREADSHEET OF THE OTHER PROJECTS IN SOG, BY THE TIME WE ARE FINISHED 10,570 UNITS SINCE 2016 APPEAR AND THAT NICE LADY POINTED OUT AM SOUTH. AND I AM REMINDING YOU THOSE WERE APARTMENTS LONG BEFORE I STARTED ON THIS. HIGHLIGHTED IN 2024, LOOK AT ALL THESE APARTMENT COMPLEXES THAT THEY ARE TAKESES HAVE WENT DOWN IN THE 2024 -- TAXESES HAVE WENT DOWN IN THE 2024 COLUMN BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T FULL. THEY DOUBLED OUR TOWNHOUSES SOUTH OF GANDY SINCE 2016. THIS IS IN RESPONSE TO THE DRC. JONATHAN SCOTT ASKED -- RECOMMENDED THAT THE GARAGES BE 20 X 20 NOT ON THE SITE PLANS AS TURNED IN ON BASE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE IT AND YOU WILL HAVE TO ASK MR. THOMAS IF HE HAS AN UPDATED VERSION. I HAVEN'T SEEN IT. IT WASN'T THERE TODAY BECAUSE I PULLED THIS STUFF OFF TODAY. THIS SAYS GARAGES ARE 18 X 18. THIS GENTLEMAN SAID 20 FOOT, 7 INCHES. HERE IS THE PROBLEM -- YOU KNOW I LOVE MATH. I LOVE BASIC MATH. THIS PARTICULAR SET OF UNITS IS 144 FEET WIDE. DIVIDE THAT BY 6, THAT IS 24 INCHES. BUT WHAT THEY FAILED TO TALK ABOUT IS THAT THE FRONT DOORS ARE THERE. NOW EVERY FRONT DOOR I HAVE EVER SEEN HAS TO BE 36 INCHES WIDE BECAUSE YOU CAN'T GET YOUR REFRIGERATOR AND STOVE IN THERE. IT HAS TO BE 36 INCHES WIDE. SOME THAT BRINGS THEM DOWN TO 21 FEET. AND I AM NOT EVEN TALKING ABOUT THE DFRAME. YOU HAVE TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT CINDERBLOCKS ARE EIGHT INCHES WIDE. ONLY 21 INCHES WIDE AND YOU GOT TO THE PUT IN EIGHT INCH CINDERBLOCKS ON EACH SIDE, YOU LOSE EVEN MORE SPACE. WHERE THEY GOT THAT 20-FOOT-WIDE BY 20-FOOT-DEEP NUMBER, I DON'T KNOW. IT IS NOT WHAT WAS "ON BASE" TODAY. IF YOU PLAN IN FRONT OF CITY COUNCIL, WE SHOULD DO IT EVERY DAY. WE SHOULD DO IT EVERY DAY. THIS PLAN WAS INCOMPLETE. IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT IN HERE AND BEEN CHANGED IN FRONT OF YOUR FACES. OKAY. N NEXT, LET'S SEE. WAIVER. LIKE THIS. THIS IS IN YOUR PACKET. REMOVE THE WAIVER FROM THE SITE PLAN. WHAT CITY STAFF SAID TO DO. WAIVER THEY ARE REMOVING FROM THE SITE PLAN IS WHERE THE -- THEY DON'T FACE THE STREET. WHICH WE ALL KNOW THEY JUST SHOWED YOU THEY DON'T FACE THE STREET. AND HERE -- HERE IS THE PROBLEM BE WITH THAT. SAYS ENCLOSURE IN THE FRONT DOORS FOR BUILDINGS 3 AND 10 FACE A PRIVATE ROADWAY. THEY HAVE TO FACE THE PRIVATE ROADWAY, RIGHT. THIS IS YOUR DOOR FRONT WITH THE 18 X 18 GARAGE AND THEN SAYS 4, 5 AND 8 WHICH ARE THESE IN HERE, THEY HAVE TO OPEN THIS WAY. HERE IS THE THING, THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE SHOWING ON THAT SIDE. Y'ALL -- WHEN HAVE Y'ALL SEEN A FRONT SLIDING PATIO DOOR? YOU DON'T. 34, 76 WITH THE GLASS INSERTS. THEY ARE NOT EVEN 36 INCHES WIDE BECAUSE THEY DON'T OPEN ALL THE WAY. THEY HAVE TO ALWAYS OVERLAP. YOU CAN'T MAKE THE FRONT DOOR THE WAY IT IS. WHY DID THEY COME IN TONIGHT AND TELL YOU THEY WERE DOING SOMETHING DIFFERENT? I DON'T KNOW. BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT IS IN ON BASE TODAY. OKAY, NEXT. THESE ARE ALWAYS MY FAVORITE. IF WE DONE 18 X 18 GARAGES. YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS, ONE-CAR GARAGES. ALL THESE UNITS HERE DON'T HAVE A DRIVEWAY. THESE WE CAN LIVE WITH BECAUSE THEY HAVE DRIVEWAYS TO PUT THE CARS IN. IT IS WHAT IT IS. THESES ARE ONE-CAR GARAGES 18 X 18. YOU CAN NOT STRETCH 21 FEET. YOU CAN NOT MAKE A 20-FOOT GARAGE BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO TAKE THE 16 INCHES OFF FOR THE BLOCKS. THE OTHER THING THAT I NOTICED, WE ARE AT -- YOU KNOW, I KNOW THAT WE HAVE OF THIS GREEN SPACE THING. BUT WE ARE AT 24% PERMEABLE SURFACE. THAT IS NOT MUCH, ONE QUARTER. THEY SAY -- RIGHT NOW IT IS ALL IMPERMEABLE. WHAT ABOUT THIS THREE TO FOUR-FOOT DITCH, NICE DITCH THAT IS BUILT ALL THE WAY ON THE WEST SIDE, AND ALL THE WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE. WHERE IT KEPT ALL THAT WATER FROM RUNNING OFF INTO THE ROAD JUST TO THE NORTH OF THERE, SAYS JUNE OF 2024, FOLKS. NOT HURRICANE TIME. THIS HAPPENS EVERY TIME IT GETS A GOOD RAIN. FOUR HOURS AFTER IT RAINED AND WE HAD SO MUCH RAIN THERE, THAT THE POLICES HAD TO COME AND SIT ON EITHER SIDE OF IT. WHERE TO YOU THINK THAT RAIN WATER IS GOING TO GO THAT IS NOT GOING TO BE HELD IN THAT DITCH ANYMORE. I DON'T KNOW. Y'ALL FINISH IT OFF. Y'ALL ARE MUCH SMARTER THAN I AM. THIS IS PEARL AVENUE. THEY SHOWED YOU NICE DRY FIXTURES OF PEARL AVENUE. THIS IS THE STREET. THIS IS THE OTHER STREET. THESE ARE THE TWO CROSS STREETS WHERE WE WANT TO BUILD ALL THIS IMPERMEABLE SURFACE. LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING, THIS GENTLEMAN JUST CAME UP HERE AND SAID IT COULD BE A GAS STATION. IT CAN BE THIS AND THAT. GUESS WHAT, NOBODY EVACUATES FROM ANY OF THOSE. NO ONE EVACUATES FROM ANY OF THOSE. THEY ARE NOT FILLING UP OUR CUP ANYMORE. THEY ARE GIVING PEOPLE JOBS. EVERY BIT OF THESE 10,000 UNITS DAMN NEAR ALL OF THEM WERE BUILT ON COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY. WE HAVE LOST OVER 100 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF TAMPA IN THE LAST TEN YEARS. IN AND YET, HERE WE ARE AGAIN WITH PEOPLE WITH AN INCOMPLETE PLAN. ASK MR. THOMAS IF HE KNEW ABOUT THE 20 X 20 GARAGES. ASK HIM IF HE KNEW. OH, MY GOSH. I ALMOST FORGOT. HOLD ON. NOW WE ARE GOING TO MAKE OUR FRONT DOORS HERE. NOW IF YOU LOOK AT THIS, YOU ARE MAKING IT INTO A SIDE -- IT IS -- LOOK AT IT, A SIDEWALK, OKAY. BUT THEY GOT FENCES ALL AROUND IT. TOOK ME A WHEEL TO FIGURE OUT. IT SAYS -- STAFF SAYS THESE ARE THE FRONT DOORS. THAT IS WHAT STAFF SAYS IT HAS TO DO BUT HERE IS THE SITE PLAN. SAYS THAT THE FRONT DOORS ARE ON THE GARAGE SIDE OF THE HOUSE. NOW THEY CAN'T DO THIS AND THIS. SO -- THIS PROJECT IS NOT COMPLETE ACCORDING TO THE TWO DOCUMENTS HERE. THEY DON'T MAKE ANY SENSE PLEASE DON'T APPROVE THIS. IT IS RIDICULOUS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ANYBODY ELSE COMING UP TO SPEAK AND THE GENTLEMAN IN THE BLACK T-SHIRT GEMS THE WALL IS THE LAST PUBLIC COMMENT. COME ON UP AND PLEASE STATE YOUR N NAME. TOM KI REFRESHESSTAN NEAR PLANT HIGH SCHOOL. AUTO I HAVE TAN AFFILIATION OF THIS SITE THIS PROJECT IN THE WAY OF MY EMPLOYER WHO OFFERS TRANSACTIONAL AND BROKERAGE SURFACES ON BEHALF OF THE GROUP THAT PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY. I BELIEVE WE ARE ON A TRANSACTIONAL ROLE BETWEEN BUYER AND SELLER. LISTENING TONIGHT, THE PRIOR GENTLEMAN THAT CAME UP, HIS CONCERN. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: JUST A MOMENT, SIR, MR. SHELBY, WOULD HE BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE PETITION FOR WHAT HE JUST SAID? >>MARTIN SHELBY: HOW ARE YOU RELATED TO THE APPLICANT? >> MY PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT. >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOUR PLACE OF APPOINTMENT. >> FRANKLIN STREET BROKERED SERVICE THAT HAS THE LISTING ON BEHALF OF THE CURRENT OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. AND WE DELIVERED THIS SITE TO SEVERAL DEVELOPERS IN TOWN. SO WE ARE NOW IN A TRANSACTIONAL CAPACITY BECAUSE WE REPRESENT THE CURRENT OWNER AND BROUGHT IT TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPER. >>MARTIN SHELBY: YOU HAVE AN INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME OF THIS TRANSACTION, IS THAT CORRECT? >> MY COMPANY DOES. >>MARTIN SHELBY: MR. CHAIRMAN, MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE TO ALLOW THE COMMENTS, BUT ALTHOUGH TAKE INTO ACCOUNT KNOWING THAT THE RELATIONSHIP THAT THE -- THAT THE -- AND YOU CAN -- AND YOU CAN WEIGH THE TESTIMONY ACCORDINGLY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD. HE WILL THEN STAY WITHIN OUR THREE MINUTES THERE. KEEP GOING. >> SURE. SO CURRENT OWNER. JUST SUPPORTING -- I WASN'T INTENDING TO TALK BUT SUPPORTING THE GENTLEMAN'S COMMENTS THAT HAVE CONCERN WHAT COULD END UP HERE. WE HAVE AN OUT-OF-STATE OPPORTUNISTIC INVESTOR. THEY ARE AGNOSTIC WHAT GOES HERE. IT WILL LIKELY BE ANOTHER INDUSTRIAL USE. BEING A RESIDENT FOR 15 YEARS HERE AND DRIVEN UP AND DOWN THIS CORRIDOR COUNTLESS TIMES TO MONDAY MOW MIDDLE SCHOOL TO TAKE MY SONS TO SOCCER, I DON'T SEE THE ISSUE WITH THE TRAFFIC. I HAVE BEEN DOING IT FOREVER I ALSO AM A SMALL EXPECT OWNER AND EMPLOYER. WE OWN THE BUSINESS AT THE INTERSECTION OF EUCLID AND MANHATTAN. MY WIFE OFFERS DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES TO CHILDREN. WE OPERATE ON MANHATTAN ALL THE TIME. THE IMPROVEMENTS WE HAVE SEEN IN OUR CORRIDOR, WE HAVE WELCOMED. AND I THINK THIS TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT SOUTH OF GANDY WOULD BE THE SAME THING. IT IS GOING TO LIFT THE COMMUNITY. THE OTHER THING THAT I WOULD SAY, WE EMPLOY 14 LICENSED PROFESSIONALS AT OUR COMPANY THAT HAVE MASTERS AND DOCTOR RATS DEGREES AND CAN'T AFFORD TO LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE THEY WORK. ATTAINABLE HOUSE. SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE MAINTAIN OUR BROKERAGE 100 EMPLOYEES THAT WORK IN SOUTH TAMPA, ALL OF WHICH ARE LOOKING IN ST. PETE AND OTHER AREAS BECAUSE THEY CAN'T AFFORD TO LIVE WHERE THEY WORK. I THINK THIS PROJECT SUPPORTS A MUCH NEEDED ATTAINABLE HOUSING AND NEED FOR THE COMMUNITY. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. SIR, THE FINAL SPEAKER. COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> I AM AUGUSTIN CINTRON. I AM NOT RELATED TO THE APPLICANT AT ALL. MY FAMILY OWNS PROPERTY THE LAST 20 YEARS AT 5600 SOUTH MANHATTAN AVENUE. I AM FOR THE PROBABLY. I BELIEVE IT IS -- FROM WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS AT THE PROJECT NOW, A WAREHOUSE OR ABSENTEE OWNER WAREHOUSE. I THINK IT IS BEAUTIFUL FROM THE RENDERING I SAW. IT ADDS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND IT GIVES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR 54 FAMILIES TO LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH COULD NOT BE BEFORE. AND I SEE -- I DON'T SEE ANY NEGATIVES TO TAMPA BY ONLY SEE POSITIVES WHAT IS CURRENTLY PROPOSED OR WHAT CURRENTLY EXIST OR WHAT CAN BE BUILT THERE ACCORDING TO ZONING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. GO AHEAD, SIR. >> I AM FOR THE PROJECT. BASED ON WHY I AM, BECAUSE I HAVE SEEN -- I HAVE BEEN IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR 20 YEARS. AND I THINK A PROJECT LIKE THAT AND WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS THERE IS ONLY GOING TO ADD -- ADD TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN A POSITIVE WAY. GIVING 54 FAMILIES AN OPPORTUNITY TO OWN IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD WHICH COULDN'T POSSIBLY BEEN OWNED BEFORE BECAUSE PROBABLY NOT A -- BECAUSE A SHORTAGE OF HOUSING IS A POSITIVE AND I DON'T SEE MUCH OF A NEGATIVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. THAT WILL CONCLUDE PUBLIC COMMENT. I WOULD LIKE TO ANNOUNCE THAT COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON HAS GONE HOME SICK, SOUL HAVE SIX MEMBERS TONIGHT. COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA IS VIRTUAL. JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW. AT THIS TIME, WE WILL HAVE REBUTTAL IF THE APPLICANT HAS REBUTTAL, YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES. COME ON UP. KAMI CORBITT WITH THE LAW FIRM OF HILL, WARD AND HENDERSON. I WOULD LIKE STEVE HENRY TO COME UP AND ADDRESS THE TRAFFIC ISSUES RAISED. >> STEVE HENRY, LINKS AND ASSOCIATES. 5023 WEST LAUREL, 53607. I WANT TO ATTACK THE TRAFFIC ISSUE. A GRAPHIC OF THE COMPARISON OF WHAT IS PROPOSED SHOWN IN GREEN VE VE VERSES VERSUS THE EXISTING USES AND WHAT CAN BE BUILT WITH THE CI ZONING. THE PROPOSED AND EXISTING VIRTUALLY THE SAME. THIS IS DAILY TRAFFIC AND I WILL GIVE YOU THE A.M. AND P.M. ALSO. IF WE LOOK AT A RESTAURANT, GAS CONVENIENCE OR RETAIL, SIGNIFICANTLY MORE TRAFFIC. A.M. PEAK HOUR, AGAIN, THE -- THE GREEN IS THE -- IS THE PROPOSED, BLUE IS THE EXISTING, YELLOW ARE THE OTHER USES. ABOUT THE SAME FOR WHAT IS EXISTING THERE TODAY VERSES WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING SIGNIFICANT INCREASE OVER THE COMMERCIAL USES. P.M., PEAK HOUR, SAME THING. EXISTING AND PROPOSED ARE ABOUT THE SAME WITH THE COMMERCIAL WITH THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN TRAFFIC. THIS FROM THE TRAFFIC STANDPOINT, NOT AN INCREASE IN TRAFFIC ABOUT THE SAME WHAT IS OUT THERE TODAY. THANK YOU. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, MA'AM. >> CAM THROUGHY CORBITT. TO CLARIFY THE IMAGE OF THE GARAGES. YOU SHOW THESE TWO IMAGES, SOME ARE 18.97 X 20 AND SOME HAVE THE TWO-CAR DRIVEWAYS. THESE ALONG THE PERIMETER ARE THE 20 X 20. THE RECOMMENDATION IS WHEN THERE WERE TRASH CANS TO BE STORED UP SIDE OF THE GARAGE. WE ARE NOT DOING THAT HERE. JUST TO PUT A FINAL POINT ON -- WE TALKED OF WHAT THE EXISTING ZONING IS. MAKE IT CLEAR, IT IS ZONED CI THAT ALLOWS A PERSON TO ASK FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, TOWN HOME INDUSTRIAL RESTAURANT WHATEVER. THE TOWN HOMES COULD HAVE OPINION APPROVED THROUGH A S-1 PROCESS. AND WE REALLY THOUGHT -- AND TALKED ABOUT THAT AND WAS VERY THOUGHTFUL. WE WANT TO MEET WITH THE RESIDENT LEADERS FIRST BEEN WE FILE. THEY DID PRESS US ON PARKING. THEY DID PRESS US ON GARAGE SIZES. AND PRESSED US ON TREE PRESERVATION. AND VERY RARELY DO YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR A DEVELOPER TO COME IN AND VOLUNTARILY SAY WE ARE FOLLOWING BE 60% OF THE TOTAL ALLOWABLE DENSITY IN THIS AREA AND FOLLOWING DOUBLE THE PARKING AND WILLING TO DOUBLE THE OPEN SPACE. AND THERE ARE SPECIAL STORMWATER CRITERIA RULES THAT WERE ATTACHED TO THIS SITE AS WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER. AND WE ARE PERFECTLY FINE COMPLYING WITH THAT. AND THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT THAT IS FOUND CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE WITH YOUR EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND YOUR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND I DON'T REALLY SEE ANY BASIS FOR A DENIAL THIS EVENING. WE ARE HAPPY TO TALK OF SOME OF THE ISSUES SHOULD YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OF ANYTHING THAT IS PRESENTED, BUT WE HAVE PROPOSED A PLAN THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH YOUR CODE AND BELOW WHAT YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALLOWS. WITH THAT, I WILL CLOSE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO CLOSE AND SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. YEAH, BRING IT ON UP. >>GWEN HENDERSON: I WANT TO SEE THE GARAGE -- >> I CAN PUT IT UP. >>LYNN HURTAK: YOU WANT A MOTION TO REOPEN? >>GWEN HENDERSON: I JUST WANT TO LOOK AT IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL RIGHT. >>GWEN HENDERSON: THERE WAS A MOTION TO CLOSE AND I SECONDED IT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. THE HEARING IS CLOSED. KWEL WE WILL ASK THE QUESTION. COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN ASKED TO SPEAK FIRST. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: THIS MAY SURPRISE FOLKS AND. THIS IS ONE OF THOSE SITUATIONS WHERE YOU CAN'T SAY NO TO EVERYTHING. AND -- AND THIS IS -- THIS IS NOT ONE OF THOSE HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENTS THAT WE ARE SEEING, MULTISTORY APARTMENT COMPLEXES THAT ARE EXTRAORDINARY DENSE AND INTENSE. YOU KNOW, WHICH IS SIGNIFICANTLY OVERBUILT, SOME OF THESE AREAS. THESE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED I AM NOT FOND OF THE AESTHETICS OF THEM, BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT WE ARE HERE TO DISCUSS. THEY -- IT -- OBVIOUSLY THESE FOLKS HAVE LISTENED TO COUNCIL. BECAUSE THESE DRIVE AISLES AND PRIVATE STREETS ARE WIDER. THEY -- SO THEY CAN ACCOMMODATE THE VEHICLES AND BACKING UP. THE GARAGES THAT ARE -- THEY ARE ALMOST 19 WHICH IS -- IN MY EYE IS SUBSTANDARD, BUT THEY DID ACCOMMODATE WITH DRIVEWAY. THE PARK ALSO HAD BEEN SUFFICIENT BECAUSE EVEN IF IT IS A ONE-CAR GARAGE THEY CAN ACCOMMODATE ANOTHER CAR IN THE DRIVEWAY FOR THE SMALLER ONCE.THEY HAVE ROOM HERE. YOU WON'T END UP PUTTING PEOPLE -- MY CONCERN WITH THE GARAGE SIZES, WHEN WE APPROVE SOME OF THESE TANDEM GARAGES OR UNDERSIZED GARAGES THAT THE REALITY IS PEOPLE WILL BE PARKED ON STREETS AND ON CURBS AND SIDEWALKS AND BLOCKING BIKE LANES. THAT IS NOT WHAT WE ARE GOING TO SEE HERE. I LIKE THE FACT THAT THE -- THAT THE SIDEWALK INTEGRATION ON THE TWO ADJOINING STREETS, THAT WE HAVE THESE DOORS FACING THESE ADJOINING STREETS. AGAIN, IT IS KIND OF LIKE A MINI LITTLE DEVELOPMENT AND A FEE-SIMPLE TOWN HOUSE. SINGLE-FAMILY-OWNED HOUSES. IT IS KIND OF AN UNIQUE SITUATION. AGAIN, IT IS NOT -- I AM KIND OF SURPRISED BY THE AMOUNT -- THE FOLKS -- MY GOOD FRIEND IN OPPOSITION TO THIS, BECAUSE IT KIND -- IT SEEMS LIKE A SMART PROJECT CONSIDERING WHAT COULD BE DEVELOPED OWN THIS PROPERTY. I MEAN, I THINK THEY ARE UNDERDEVELOPING THIS PROPERTY. AND YOU LOOK AT THE -- YOU LOOK AT THE AMOUNT OF CONCRETE THAT THERE IS NOW WITH THAT BORDEN PROPERTY VERSES WHAT WILL COME, A LOT MORE GREEN SPACE. A LOT MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR GREEN SPACE. YEAH, I MEAN IT -- I JUST -- WE CAN'T BE IN A POSITION TO SAY NO TO EVERYTHING. THIS IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS I AM GOING TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF TAMPA. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE? COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN, WOULD YOU LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND -- YOU MADE THE LAST MOTION. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I WILL DO IT AGAIN IF YOU WANT ME TOO. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ITEM 9. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: MOVE 23-08 OR ORDINANCE REZONING 52000 SOUTH MANHATTAN AVENUE, THIS THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS ZONING CLASSIFICATION CI COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: DO WE HAVE A SECOND. >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, DID YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING? >>LUIS VIERA: NO, I WAS JUST GOING TO SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN AND A SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. ROLL CALL VOTE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: YES. >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES. >>LUIS VIERA: YES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: YES. >>LYNN HURTAK: YES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES. >>CLERK: MOTION CARRIES WITH CARLSON ABSENT AT VOTE. SECOND READING ADOPTION MARCH 6, 2025 10 A.M. AT OLD CITY HALL AT 315 E. KENNEDY, THIRD FLOOR, TAMPA, FLORIDA, 33062. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AT THIS TIME WE WILL GO TO NEW BUSINESS. GO AHEAD. PLEASE STAY QUIET WE ARE STILL IN THE MEETING. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO INVITE THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT MARCH 6, 2025 TO CELEBRATE PURCHASING MONTH AND HIGHLIGHT THE INCREDIBLE WORK THEY HAVE BEEN DOING. >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. SECONDED FROM COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: JV HOCKEY TEAM PLAYED AGAINST MANATEE ADMIRALS IN THE LANGUAGE HIGH SCHOOL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME. JESUIT BEAT THE ADMIRALS BY A SCORE OF 6-2 WITH A FINAL RECORD OF 20 WINS, NO LOSSES AND ONE TIE. I WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT THE TEAM AND THE COACHES WITH COMMENDATIONS OFF-SITE ON A DATE TO BE ANNOUNCED BY THE SCHOOL. IT WILL BE HELD IN THE COURTYARD BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS AND ALL COUNCILMEMBERS WILL BE INVITED. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU. >>GWEN HENDERSON: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA, ANY NEW BUSINESS SIR? >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR, REALLY QUICK, MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU. LONG STORY SHORT. I WENT NOW AND VISITED WITH SOME RESIDENTS IN NORTH TAMPA ROAR, AND THEY WANTED A REPORT -- I WILL MAKE IT A WRITTEN REPORT. BACKGROUND ON STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOREST HILLS AREA. SO I AM MAKING A MOTION FOR A WRITTEN REPORT ON THE STATUS OF STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS TO MAYBERRY AND ORANGE GROVE -- GROOVE, EX-CUSE ME IN THE NORTH TAMPA AREA WITH A WRITTEN REPORT. I WILL HAVE SOMETHING BACK. I APOLOGIZE, COUNCIL, I DON'T HAVE THE CALENDAR YEAR BUT LET'S DO MAY 1. IF THEY NEED MORE TIME, GLAD TO ACCOMMODATE JUST A WRITTEN REPORT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAY 1, WRITTEN REPORT. THAT IS FINE. A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA. A SECOND FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED. ANYTHING ELSE, SIR? >>LUIS VIERA: YES, SIR. YOU KNOW IT KIND OF SLIPPED PAST US. TO ME, PAUL GRUZO IS ONE OF THE MOST JUST LOCALLY IMPACTFUL HARD-HITTING JOURNALIST WHO HIS WORK WHETHER ON MOUNT ZION, ON CEMETERIES. HE HAS MOVED MOUNTAINS. SUCH A GREAT GUY. I WANTED TO PRESENT TO -- I WANTED TO GIVE HIM A COMMENDATION FOR A WHILE BUT I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS PROPER BECAUSE HE WAS AN ACTIVE JOURNALIST, BUT SINCE HE HAS LEFT, I WANT TO IF I CAN ON MAY 1 -- I DON'T BELIEVE THERE IS ANY CONFLICT THERE -- TO INVITE HIM TO CITY COUNCIL FOR A COMMENDATION. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MAY 1, WE HAVE POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER OF THE MONTH AND A PRESENTATION FROM FDOT SO I THINK YOU ARE FINE. MOTION TO PRESENT PAUL GUZA WITH A COMMENDATION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VIERA. SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. OPPOSED? ANYTHING ELSE, SIR. >>LUIS VIERA: THAT'S IT, THANK YOU, COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO BE VIRTUAL. MY SON IN TO GO TO WORK AND WE ONLY HAD ONE CAR HERE TONIGHT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THAT IS OKAY. >>LUIS VIERA: THE WAY IT IS. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON, YOU HAVE ANYTHING? >>GWEN HENDERSON: YES, JUST REALLY A COMMENT. I WANT TO MAKE IT OFFICIAL, BLAKE HIGH SCHOOL, HOWARD W. BLAKE HIGH SCHOOL IS WINNING THIS MONTH. ISAIAH RODGERS WON THE SUPER BOWL WITH THE PHILADELPHIA EAGLES IN AND DOLCHII WON THE GRAMMY AND GREAT CITIZENS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND TAMPA, FLORIDA, AND I WANT TO SAY CONGRATULATIONS. AT A LATER DATE, WE WILL TRY TO CELEBRATE DOELCHII IS IN THE WORKS WORKING TO CELEBRATE HER WITH A COMMENDATION ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF TAMPA. AND MR. McGREGOR IS WORK ON IT FOR ISAIAH RODGERS WELL AS WELL. I WANT TO CONGRATULATE THEM PUB LOWLY WHILE STILL HOT. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I WANT TO WISH OUR BELOVED MR. SHELBY AN EARLY HAPPY BIRTHDAY. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: CAN I WISH OUR NOT BELOVED ONE. >>GWEN HENDERSON: DON'T LAUGH AT HIS JOKES. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: YES, NO LAUGHING. COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: ONE, I HOPE IF SHE COMES, YOU ALL WILL INSIST THAT I DO A DUEF WITH HER. I WILL RAP WITH HER. >>GWEN HENDERSON: OFFSITE AT BLAKE. THEY MAY BOO YOU. IT MAY HURT YOUR FEELING. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I AM DOWN. I AM GOING TO START ON A SADDER NOTE. DURING THIS MEETING I WAS NOTIFIED THAT A GOOD FRIEND OF MINE AND A GOOD FRIEND OF PUBLIC EDUCATION IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE SENATOR GERALDINE THOMPSON PASSED AWAY. EVERYBODY KEEP HER FAMILIES IN THE THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS UNEXPECTEDLY DUE TO COMPLICATIONS FROM SURGERY. THAT WAS SAD. I HAVE TWO MOTIONS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MOTION NUMBER ONE, A REQUEST FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO SET A TRANSMITTAL PUBLIC HEARING TACPH 24-04 AND 05, AND 06 ON MAY 22, 2025 AT 5:01 P.M. AND DIRECT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY CLERK FOR A FORM OF NOTICE TO ADVERTISE THE PUBLIC HEARING. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN. SECONDED FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. GO AHEAD. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: REQUEST FOR THE MRSHG TO REMOVE 17 AND 18 FROM THE APRIL 24,2025 5:01 PUBLIC HEARINGS. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ANYTHING ELSE? >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I AM NOT READY TO MAKE THE MOTION. BUT REFERENCES TO THE GARAGE. WE HAVE TO CLOSE THIS GARAGE THING UP. SO WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO CREATE AN ORDINANCE -- >>LYNN HURTAK: IT IS A TECHNICAL STANDARD. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: SORRY, TECHNICAL STANDARD. AND MAYBE WE CAN WORK ON THAT. SOMEBODY PROD ME TO DO IT OR SOMEBODY ELSE WANTS TO TAKE CONTROL AND DO THAT. I THINK WE NEED TO CLOSE THIS UP, SO AT LEAST WE HAVE THE QUESTIONS ASKED AND ANSWERED. NO VAGUENESS IN OUR INTENT SO WE DON'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS EVERY MEETING IT SEEMS LIKE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: THANK YOU THANK YOU VERY MUCH, YES, MA'AM. >>LYNN HURTAK: I MADE THE FOLLOWING MOTION ON JANUARY 30, 2025 THAT THE MOBILITY DEPARTMENT BE REQUESTED TO PROVIDE A MONTHLY IN-PERSON REPORT ON DETAILING PERSONNEL THIRD-PARTY MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS AND EQUIPMENT PAID FOR BY THE STORMWATER ASSESSMENT. THAT SAID IN-PERSON REPORT ON MARCH 6. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH CARLSON AND CLENDENIN ABSENT. I INTO NEED TO CHANGE THE RECURRING MONTHLY REQUEST AND CHANGE THE PRESENTATION DATE TO MARCH 27, 2025. I MADE A BUNCH OF MOTIONS AT THE SAME TIME AND GOT CONFLATED. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: SECOND. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. >>LYNN HURTAK: I HAVE ONE MORE THING. I DON'T KNOW IF -- IF CCTV CAN SHOW, BUT THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS GOT A LOT BRIGHTER THIS WEEK. WE HAVE A BEAUTIFUL PIECE OF ART THAT WAS CREATED BY THE CHILDREN AT STEPPING-STONES IN SULPHUR SPRINGS. AND IT IS A GROUP THAT WE HAVE PROVIDED SOME SOCIAL ACTION AND ARTS FUNDING TO. AND IT IS JUST -- IT JUST MAKES ME SMILE EVERY TIME I LOOK AT IT. AND WE REALLY JUST NEEDED NICE COLOR. SO I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU TO SULPHUR SPRINGS AND THANK YOU TO THE CITY ART STAFF WHO WAS ABLE TO GET IT TOGETHER OR -- YOU KNOW, HELP PUT THIS ON A WALL THAT REALLY NEEDED SOME LOVE. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: I AGREE. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: WHAT YOU DIDN'T SEE, IT SAYS OUR HOME MATTERS AND ENVIRONMENTAL. >>GWEN HENDERSON: WE DIDN'T HAVE TO VOTE ON IS THAT? >>LYNN HURTAK: IT WAS A DONATION. >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: COUNCIL MEMBER CLENDENIN TO TALK OF HIS MOVIE ACTING CAREER HE HAS TAKEN OFF ON. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: TALK ABOUT IN FILM. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I AM NOT AT LIBERTY TO THE DISCUSS -- THIS ACTIVITY. >>GWEN HENDERSON: ARE YOU A S.A.G. ACTOR. >>LUIS VIERA: THAT IS AWESOME. >>ALAN CLENDENIN: I WILL BE IN A ROMANCE MOVIE. >>LUIS VIERA: SO COOL. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. >>GWEN HENDERSON: I APPRECIATE YOU CIRCLING BACK TO ME. I WANT TO PUBLICLY APOLOGIZE TO STAFF. WHEN I -- I DISCUSSED UNDER BUSINESS THIS MORNING, I ASKED ABOUT THE ARMY-NAVY STORE. AND THEY DID SEND US THE MEMO WHILE WE WERE ON VACATION ON JANUARY 2. SO I MISSED THAT ONE. AND I WANT TO THE APOLOGIZE PUBLICLY. I APPRECIATE YOU ALL FOLLOWING UP. MISS FEELEY FOR SENDING ME THAT CLARIFICATION THAT A JANUARY 2 -- THE DAY AFTER NEW YEAR'S MEMO WAS SENT. THANK YOU, CHAIR. >>GUIDO MANISCALCO: A MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER MIRANDA. SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN HENDERSON. THANK YOU. WE ARE ADJOURNED.