good good evening we're ready to begin this planning commission meeting is called to order this meeting is improperly noticed in post and compliance with the Open Meeting Law these proceedings are being video recorded as well as presented live on KC L V cable channel - please no customers at CenturyLink and Cox Communications can view this program in high definition on channel 1002 and in standard definition on channel 2 you can also watch this meeting live on Apple TV Roku in amazon firetv on the go vegas app the planning commission meeting as well as all the KC LV programming convened on the internet at WWE the proceedings will be rebroadcast on KC LV and the web the Saturday of the meeting at 10:00 a.m. Monday at midnight in the following Tuesday at 6:00 p.m. what everyone please stand for the pledge madam clerk Lee please call the roll chair cherry president vice chair de Salvio present commissioner schlattman present Commissioner Toussaint to present Commissioner Quinn excused commissioner flanges here Thank You chair thank you moving on to item number four all comments made under this item for specific action will be cross-reference to those items on the agenda are there any members of the public who wish to speak under this portion of the agenda also there are addenda is on each side of the podium if any would like to grab two to follow along moving on to item number five a motion for the minutes vice chair - Savio Thank You mr. chairman I'd like to make a motion to approve the minutes meeting minutes for April 23rd 2019 mr. chairman I'll be abstaining on this matter saying as though I wasn't at the meeting Thank You Commissioner phlanagus there's a motion on the floor please cast your votes please post and that motion carries moving on to our housekeeping items are there any items the Commissioner staff for applicants remember that the public would like to pull forward for action does anyone wish to speak on these items mr. chairman we have some housekeeping items please the applicant is requesting to obey items 25 through 26 to the July 23rd 2019 Planning Commission this is the second abeyance request for these items the applicant is requesting to obey items 37 through 40 to the June 25th 2019 Planning Commission this is the first abeyance request for these items thank you thank you again does anyone like to speak on these items seeing no one I will turn over to vice chair Savio Thank You mr. chairman I'd like to make a motion for to approve items number 25 and 26 bands to July 23 20 team's planning meeting and 37 through 40 request for abeyance to July excuse me jun 2015 18 thank you there's a motion on the floor please cast your votes please post and that motion carries moving on to the one motion one vote the following are items that may be considered in one motion one vote there consider routine on public and public hearing items all public hearings and non public hearings will be opened at one time any person representing an application or a member of the public or a member of the Planning Commission not agree with the conditions and all standard conditions for the application recommended by staff should request to have the item removed from this part of the agenda item number seven TMP 76248 applicant pinnacle home's owner Mexican golden oil exploration trust at all for possible action request for a tentative map for a 20 la single-family residential subdivision at the northwest corner of Hickam Avenue in Pioneer Way Ward 4 staff recommends approval item number 8 0n 76227 applicant advanced dental labs owner Wayne Murray for possible action request for rezoning from r4 to c1 at 321 South Maryland Parkway Ward 3 staff recommends approval related item SDR 7 6 2 2 8 for possible action request for site development plan review for proposed two-story 5732 square-foot dental laboratory with waivers to allow five parking spaces where 32 spaces are required lot width of 50 feet worth where a hundred feet is required lot coverage of 66% where 50% is allowed a 0 foot side yard setback on the north and 5 foot yard setback on the south where 10 feet is required a 5 foot wide landscape buffer along the West perimeter where 10 feet is required in a 0 foot wide landscape buffer along the South perimeter where 8 feet is required ward 3 staff recommends approval item number 10 var seven six two zero zero zero zero zero excuse me applicant owner school board of trustees for possible action request for a variance to allow deviations from title 19 100 - OH CV development standards at 1100 East st. Louis Avenue war three staff recommends approval related item number eleven STR seven six two zero one four possible action request for site development plan review for proposed ninety-eight thousand one hundred and seven square-foot public school primary ward three staff recommends approval item number twelve var seven six two six six applicant owner Edward Galan Stockton for possible action request for a variance to allow two accessory structures to be located in front of the primary residence where such is not allowed at 7151 Wittig Avenue Ward six staff recommends approval related item number 13 su P seven six two one seven four pause fashion request for a special use permit for proposed proposed accessory structure use Ward six staff recommends approval related item number 14 var seven six two two applicant owner our RA no excuse me this isn't related number fourteen var seven six two two two applicant owner our RA Holdings LLC for pas special request for variance to allow two proposed nine square foot wall signs were one two foot square 2 square foot wall sign is allowed at one thousand eight seventy six South Buffalo Drive Ward one staff recommends approval item number fifteen su p seven six two one nine applicant owner tup our two LLC for possible requests for especially use permit for proposed horse corral or stable use at two two two three one zero three two four and four three two South Main Street Ward five staff recommends approval related item number sixteen SDR seven six two two zero four possible request for a site development plan review for a proposed commercial recreation amusement with waivers of the interim downtown Las Vegas development standards ward five staff recommends approval item number 17 su P seven six one five two applicant owner Elkhorn Hualapai LLC for possible action request for a special use permit for proposed 2085 square-foot liquor sales use at 71 61 north Hualapai way award six staff recommends item number 18 su p76 two to three applicant SNS grooming envy LLC owner gi8 village square LLC for possible action request for a special use permit for proposed 2,750 square foot beer wine cooler on sale establishment use with a waiver to allow a zero foot distance separation from a church house of worship where 400 feet is required at 9340 west sahara ave suite 100 war two staff recommends approval item number 19 su p seven six two two four applicant taste of africa owner faec holdings marilla LLC for posture a request for specially used for a proposed twelve thousand seven hundred and forty-one square foot tavern limited establishment use with a 1245 square foot outdoor patio at 450 Fremont Street Suite 290 ward five staff recommends approval item number twenty su p seven six two three three applicant owner one Pulido for possible action or request for especially use permit for an existing accessory structure use at 8:04 lacey lane ward one staff recommends approval item number 21 SN c 76185 applicant owner Richmond American homes of Nevada Inc for possible and request for a street name change from Albatross links avenue to sky bluff court west of crotch ridge drive cross bridge drive south of Sun Creek Drive Ward to staff recommends approval item number 22 VA C seven six one four nine applicant owner and unite AMD United Holdings LLC for possible action request for a petition to vacate US government patent easements on the north side of Charleston Boulevard east of brush Street Ward 1 staff recommends approval and before I go to staff I will say I will be abstaining from items number 15 and 16 my company has a contractual relationship with the owner of the property mr. chairman staff would like to add the following conditions of approval to item number seven TMP 76248 as requested by the applicant first condition was all homes within the subdivision shall be limited to one story the second condition is the perimeter screen wall along the northern property line shall be seven foot four inches two additional courses in height thank you thank you is the applicant here for number seven if you could please come up I need your name and address for the record and if you agree to the additional conditions good evening Lord raya 5:20 South fourth Street and here with Frank whyatt of Pinnacle homes and he agrees to those conditions in fact he's the one that suggested them oh thanks Frank okay sure salvia yes mr. chairman before we vote I'll be abstaining on items number eight and nine as I have a contractual relationship with the applicant on this particular property thank you very much thanks for the disclosure Thank You mr. chairman I would entertain a motion to approve all motions one motion one vote items on today's agenda and adding both staffs mention conditions on item number seven thank you there's a motion on the floor please cast your votes please post a that motion carries mr. chairman item number seven is final action this evening less appealed to the City Clerk's office within seven days items 10 through 13 17 18 and 21 or final action this evening unless appealed to the City Clerk's office within 10 days and items 8 9 14 through 16 19 20 and 20 to move forward to City Council be heard as a part of their agenda on July 3rd 2019 thank you moving on to the public hearing items item number 23 aberrant abeyance GPA seven five nine thirty one applicant owner John J Sarah Petula trust for possible action request for general plan amendment from PCD to are on the west side of El Capitan Wade north of our hair O'Hare Road Ward six staff recommends denial related item 24 of a anzio and seven five nine three two you for possible action request for rezoning from you zone general plan excuse me - Rd Ward six staff recommends denial can we get the staff report please mr. chairman the subject parcel is surrounded by property that is zoned residential planned development three and Clark County residential agriculture residential planned development three zoning libous density - three units per acre while the proposed general plan amendment would allow five point four nine dwelling units per acre staff finds the proposed density would be incompatible with surrounding residential development and therefore recommends denial of both requests thank you thank you mr. chairman commissioners John vorn sand at savea's and Victor ORN sa ND 62 swan circle henderson representing the application this parcel if I could draw your attention to the overhead parcel is existed as a 1 and 1/4 acre lot since at least the early 1960s in 2002 the property was under the same original ownership for over 30 years when the adjacent property to the north west and south was rezone to and developed as an RPD 3 the property owner apparently at that time did not want to sell to those developers the and just maintained that lot as an acre and a quarter a lot the president owner and applicant purchased this property in 2007 about 12 years ago he's requesting Rd zoning for three Lots that would be at a density of there are fourteen thousand one hundred square foot lots of density a 2.4 dwelling units per acre the applicant did request the GP a general plan amendment to residential low however we would be willing to accept the reduction to either desert rural which allows a maximum density of 2.49 units per acre or rural density residential which would accommodate the three Lots the development of this parcel would actually be the last parcel remnant on the west side of El Capitan between log-cabin way and Horse Drive this would complete the development of the west side of El Capitan insofar as off-site improvements are concerned and be the last portion of the equestrian trail that runs from horse drive down to a log cabin way he that would be developed as a 30 foot easement across the front of the Lots the properties are also of sufficient width and depth to allow for a circular or hammerhead driveway to access El Capitan we did hold a neighborhood meeting one neighbor did come forward Dave Morgan who lives he owns his five acres directly across El Capitan he also indicated he represented his neighbors he said there was no objection from the neighborhood on the east side of El Capitan subject to single-story homes only the applicant is an agreement to single-story homes only this property is far too small at one or two quarter acres to be developed as any type of a planned community development or respectfully request your approval for the 3 Rd Lots Glide answer any questions you may have thank you this is notice as a public hearing the anyone from the public like to be heard in these items seeing no one I will close the public hearing turn it over to the Commission for discussion vice-chair salvia Thank You mr. chairman thanks John since we've met I've received some issues with the density and as you stated you you have no problem going into two Lots if it needed to be if we have to go for 2 lakhs we prefer the three what happens with two Lots I might point out the the actual envelope the building envelope this would be the layout for two lots and again we're at 2.4 units per acre with three Lots were actually two lesser density than the RPD 3 to our west north and south but this would be the layout for two Lots north probably ought to turn that in the proper direction the building envelope if we were to go with three Lots the actual building envelope would be at a depth 65 feet or a hut by 102 feet that's after the setbacks are taken into consideration that would allow a sixty six hundred and thirty square foot of buildable area going to two lots because of the setbacks as you can see you've got a 50-foot setback in the front 35 in the rear 10 on each side it leaves a building envelope of 40 feet deep by 148 feet wide and that would be a total of fifty nine hundred and twenty square feet we would certainly accept reduction to two Lots if need be to re but we feel that the three Lots at two point four units per acre would be also preferable thank you again based on you know the turnout from the community that I've talked with and and trying to keep it harmonious compatible like we discussed I think you know you can you can have that fight with the city when it goes before them for final but tonight I'm gonna have to ask you to go to if you are fine with two lots we will observe yeah all right so that if there's no other anybody wish to speak I'd like to make a motion to approve item 23 GPA 75 931 with the re mr. chairman through you mr. vice chair the change is going to be on the zoning request so that's where you're going to down zoning request alright fair enough okay so a motion to approve item 23 GPA 7 5 9 3 1 is written as a motion on the floor these cast your votes please post and I motion carries thank you and good evening I do have a copy of the flange I think okay mr. chairman I'd also like to make a motion to approve the item number 24 zero and seven five nine three two with the condition that this is to be re to Lots so again mr. chairman through you if I may just to clarify for the record that the the motion is to approve this at the re zoning district 2 Lots is all they can do but for the record is just to approve it for the re zoning district that's correct thank you so motion on the floor please cast your votes please post and that motion carries thank you Thank You mr. chairman those items will move forward to City Council and be heard as a part of their agenda on July 3rd 2019 thank you moving on to related items 27 through 36 I'm going to open them all up abeyance GPA 75 969 applicant DR horton owner Scott family trusts at all for posish and requests for a general plan amendment from R to L on the north side of Alexander Road West of Durango Drive Ward 4 staff recommends denial related item number 28 abeyance zo n seven five nine seven two four posish and request for rezoning from re to our one ward for staff recommends denial related item number 29 AB an abeyance VR seven five nine seven three four possibly and request for a variance to allow a 1.0 connectivity ratio were 1.3 is the minimum required private streets without a gate to not be constructed to public street standards and a non gated modified Street terminus where a cul-de-sac is required Ward 4 staff recommends denial related item number 30 abeyance V AC seven five nine seven four four plus fashion request for a petition to vacate US government bad knees mints and portions and on portions of a public sewer easement excuse me staff recommends approval related item number 31a bans TMP seven five nine seven five possible action request for a tentative map for proposed eight lot single-family residential subdivision ward for staff recommends denial item number thirty-two abeyance GPA seven five nine seven one applicant DR horton owner johnson trust for possible action request for a general plan amendment from our to hell on the north side of alexander road west of drangle ward for staff recommends denial related on the number 33 abeyance for possible action on the request for a rezoning from our ii to our one word for staff recommends denial related item number thirty-four abeyance for possible action request for variance to allow a 1.0 connectivity ratio or 1.30 is the minimum required private streets not constructed to public standards without an access gate where such as required and a modified street terminus where coldest a core hammer has required Ward for staff recommends denial related item 35 abejas V AC seven five nine seven eight four paws fire and request for partition to vacate US government patent easements award for staff recommends approval and related item number 36 abeyance TMP seven five nine seven nine four pause flash and request returned tentative map for a proposed eight law single-family residential subdivision Ward force staff recommends denial can we get the staff report please mr. chairman they proposed general plan amendments and rezoning would allow a density of five point four nine dwelling units per acre and a minimum buildable Lots size of 6500 square feet the subject parcels are within planning area B of the Northwest interlocal agreement which requires a minimum buildable Lots size of 10,000 square feet therefore staff does not support the general plan amendment and rezoning request staff does support the vacation request therefore staff recommends approval the vacation requests and denial of all other applications thank you thank you gonna get your name and address for the record please good evening mr. chairman planning commissioners my name is Tony Celeste address nineteen eighty Festival Plaza Drive here on behalf of the applicant DR horton which is the applicant for both parcels they're each about two little over two acres one located on the hard corner of Alexander and Giuliano and then the second one located just east of that with a parcel in between the two properties on the overhead you can see they are highlighted in when you're looking at the aerial highlighted in in yellow they're appreciate your your request and me allowing allowing me to do these both together since they are essentially very similar if not the same applications first we have the general plan amendment requests we're asking go to low-density I do understand that that allows over five units to the acre but when you look at the tentative map that we have associated with it it basically be capita around four units to the acre as much as we'd like to go to desert rural and have that capped at three and a half just cannot make that accommodation right now how exist the properties are located along Alexander Road there they are only two little over two acre parcels the build-out and infrastructure for those small portions attributed to those sites will be significant we have to build the full offsites curb gutter sidewalk right-of-way there and those costs are expensive so having adding additional lots to each one of those does does make a significant difference with respect to the developer so we are asking to go to the low-density to accommodate that when you look at the zoning r1 again these Lots are on the larger side of the r1 I'll show you the tentative map here in a second but the Lots range anywhere from about 7,000 square feet to over 12,000 square feet so exceed the r1 standards also if you can take a look at the bottom of the map there you look at Alexander Road especially on the south side of Alexander you can see a lot of those developments RPD five developments that have quite a bit larger density and then what we're posing so we do think that the the general plan and the zoning specifically when you take a look at a tentative map do comply and will help provided the much needed infrastructure in this area here's the site plan or the the site plan along with the essentially tentative map I think what's most important here what we're demonstrating is at least on the western to two plus acres that you can see the way we've designed this we only have two Lots on both sides the two Lots match up against the existing two Lots just to the north of us so we've kept that integrity with respect to the way the Lots look the layout of that so that I think is very important when future development comes in just to the north that would be the established pattern in a pattern you would expect to see with respect to the Lots being developed in here so we think at least with respect to the design we've designed it in a way to be compatible with what is existing out there a couple of other technical things we have with properties limit in size like this it's very difficult to meet the connectivity ratio especially the one on the the eastern portion that is essentially landlocked it only has one ability out that's Alexander so to meet that connectivity ratio on a very small parcel is very difficult and when you have something already developed to the north of you on the other parcel again it makes it makes it difficult to do that certainly if we were coming in with a ten acre 15 acre type development at that point I could definitely understand and seeing the need for to meet those connectivity ratios to help provide for for better flow but when you're talking about an 8 lakh coldest act that really only has the ability to get out to Alexander we do think the connectivity ratio that we're providing that the variance is appropriate we do have the typical patent easements associated with it and finally I know there was a some discussion or concern about the design of the cul-de-sac or to turn around did speak with our engineer we feel very calm that we will be that it does meet those turnarounds and we will continue to work with or that it's designed to the RTC standards and work with the fire department as we progress through we agree to all the if approved conditions I'm more happy to answer any questions you may have thank you very much this was notice as a public hearing anyone from the public like to be hurting these items please come forward come on up we have three microphones I'll need your name and address for the record if your four against and why my name is Eugene DeLeon oh did you spell your last name that's elli78 here this is my house okay and and all the other neighbors I got together with all the other neighbors and we we don't like this idea of eight houses in this small area if it's a rural area so there should be two houses per acre and I've talked to all the other neighbors and they they agree with me they don't like it okay thank you for anything else you want to add to it well it'll bring our property values down you know I bought the house and having these small houses there it'll bring the property value down and it's not good least for our other Ollis neighbors you know we bought it too because it was a rural area and all the houses would be you know big and if you notice they're building all the other houses and the other around the neighborhood big houses except he wants to build small houses here I think it's not fair lease to me anyway and to the other neighbors Thank You mr. Eliana thank you for your comments appreciate you coming out anyone else like to be heard in this item from the public seeing no one else I will okay I need you to speak into the microphone my name is Armin gruff I'm at 49th in North Giuliano this is just behind his houses and mr. Graf is it G how do you spell your last name GRA F thank you very much and I came from Europe I bought this property two years ago with the only reason that this is a rural area because we were stored two houses per acre everybody has a pool there there are big lots and that's the only reason we are there so this would destroy the neighborhood and everybody is against it so we please ask to keep the zoning as it is thank you mr. Graf thank you for coming out seeing no one else from the public I will close the public hearing turn it back over the applicant I'll give you a minute for rebuttal before it goes to the Commission neighbours comments again this is just a couple of things one I think this will provide a very nice transition along Alexander with respect to everything that's interior movie North these are by no means small Lots some of the Lots are 10 to 12,000 square feet ample size to do a lot of the many's in your backyard including pool this is a new build DR Horton home will be probably starting above 500,000 and then when you add your upgrades and various things like that you're you're talking about you know six to seven hundred thousand dollars easily so this is not something that will deteriorate the neighborhood in any in any mean and again this is going to be a mixture of single and storey house a one and two-story home so provide a nice a nice mix and compatibility with the area thank you very much I will turn it over to the Commission for discussion a Commission air Tucson yes thank you mr. Graf mr. Elio no for coming out I appreciate you being here I have family and friends that live on Alexander Durango and I'm on this corner all the time I I don't agree with you that's gonna bring your property values down in my opinion we'll bring your property values up these homes are going to go for almost seven hundred thousand dollars having in my opinion having this area developed will enhance your property rather than just having desert there and personally I think this is a beautiful project I know that DR Horton does a quality project and I want to thank mr. Celeste for coming here and explaining this to us personally I do not have a problem with it I think this is good for the area I would love to see this area be developed I think this is the perfect thing to be developed there so unless any of my other commissioners have anything to say I'm ready to make a motion to approve yes mr. chairman just three just want to say that mr. Celeste met with me and everything that he stated today represents what he stated to me in person so just wanted to put that on disclosure on the record and one of the things that we constantly look at is values of properties and stuff like that and that's something that we can't consider this board even though I don't I agree with you and I think this is gonna be a nice project I don't think it's gonna be detracting from any other persons property values Thank You Commissioner schlotz okay item number 27 GPA is seven five nine six nine I vote for approval so motion on floor please cast your votes please post that motion carries item 28 zo n 75 972 motion to approve some motion on floor please cast your votes please post that motion carries item 29 VAR 75 973 motion to approve there's a motion on the floor please cast your votes subject to conditions subject to conditions yes thank you please post that motion carries item number 30 BAC seven five nine seven four motion to approve subject to conditions subject to conditions thank you as a motion on floor please cast vote and that motion carries item number 31 TMP seven five nine seven five motion to approve its motion on the floor please cast your votes subject to conditions please post in that motion carries item number thirty-two GPA seven five nine seven one motion to approved there is a motion on the floor please cast your votes please post and that motion carries item number 33 zom seven five nine seven six motion to approve there's a motion on the floor please cast your votes please post that motion carries item number 34 var 75 977 motion to approve the motion on the floor please cast your votes subject to conditions please post that motion carries item number 35 da sees that seven five nine seven eight motion to approve with conditions subject to conditions as emotions on the floor please cast a vote please post that motion carries in item number thirty sixteen P seven five nine seven nine motion to approve subject to conditions the conditions there's motion on the floor please cast your vote please post and a motion carries mr. chairman those items 27 through 36 will be going on to City Council me heard as a part of their agenda on July 3rd 2019 thank you thank you moving on to item number 41 var 7-6 187 applicant owner Brock and Stephanie Goddard for possible action on a request for a variance to allow exist being 8 foot tall walls in the front yard where 5 feet is allowed and to allow a 40 foot front yard setback where 50 feet is required and a 6 foot side yard setback where 10 feet is required for 2 proposed patio cover additions to an existing single-family dwelling at 50/50 Elkhorn Road Ward 6 staff recommends denial we get the staff report please mr. chairman this application includes existing walls that do not meet title 19 height requirements and two proposed patio cover additions that do not meet title 19 setback requirements no evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented and staffed therefore recommends denial of the variance request thank you thank you is the applicant here tonight if I can get your name and address for the record please and if you could tell us about your application hi Stephanie Goddard 5050 Elkhorn Road Las Vegas about 8 and 1:31 thank you and I'm applicants father Brent Conrad 5336 Elkhorn Road Thank You mr. Conrad could you tell us about your application we're just looking to do well the wall was built before we purchased the home so I'm we didn't know that that was going to be an issue when we came into this but and then the front porch addition we were just looking to get some shade cover over the South son being in the windows okay all right I will open up the public hearing anyone from the public like to be heard in this I see no one I'll close the public here I have one person here Joseph domani on behalf of the Bella group family trusts 5040 92 properties that our neighbors to 5050 and we're in support of their motion to have their wall stay the same height alicorns an extremely busy street it's getting extremely busier based on the new developments in North Las Vegas foot traffic as well as the echo traffic and cars parking on the street has increased exponentially since that construction has started just east of Elkhorn Road the Goddard's also have horses that wall really protects their horses or anybody possibly doing any damage or teasing of the animals and so forth so we're in support of that and it causes no problems to the neighborhood whatsoever that's very nice of you to come out Thanks anyone else in the public like to be here I would like to point out that the setback of the wall and it looks just like the tracks around there because it allows for division to come off of the side street on Tom and if you on your overhead there's noticing the pictures you'll see that it it's not up against the proper line that this said way back in there and from Tom you have very good visual up the street up according to see around it and it looks just like the parameter of the housing tract just to the west so it I don't it really does conform even though it's out of us out of kotor so thank you okay i'm gonna i'm gonna the public hearing is closed i'm going to turn over to the commission for discussion vice chair - Savio Thank You mr. chairman thanks for coming out tonight I actually passed this property pretty much everyday myself I have no problem with it I really don't I think if it's clean it looks nice the only thing I would put on it as a condition which I'm actually having staff do it right now is is that you would get a permit for that wall so that way you don't go through any problems if you decide to do any more development in the future cuz I'm sure that's how you got whistle bit you submitted to have it done and then they came out and said what's this so let's get that cleared up are you good with trying to obtain permits within 30 days okay he'll draft proper language me layman's terms is have no problem I think it's harmonious compatible fits but I'm gonna put a condition on that agenda item that you obtain the proper permits for that wall within 30 days okay thank you so with that I'll make a motion to approve item 41 with staffs conditions mr. chairman if I may so mr. vice chair so they're being added your motion would be to add a condition that applicant are how we normally were this building permit application shall be submitted within 30 days final action with final inspection within 60 days of permit issuance to be extended by the building official at his discretion and you agree I need you to come up on the record just you just tell us you agree thank you agree yeah state your name Stephanie Goddard and you agree yes I agree you heard the motion there's a motion on floor please cast your votes please post and that motion carries mr. chairman that item is final actions evening unless appealed to the City Clerk's office within 10 days thank you very much moving on to item number 42 var 76198 applicant owner Stephanie paying for pasta watch and request for a variance to allow a 4-foot separation from the main building where six feet is required for an existing accessory structure at 21:09 Linda Vista Street award one staff recommends denial excuse me can we at the staff report please mr. chairman no evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance as this has been presented and staff concludes that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature staff therefore recommends denial the variance request please note that their additional there's additional letters of support since publication thank you thank you can I get your name and address for the record please I need your name and address for the record Stephanie pang 21:09 Linda Vista Street Las Vegas Nevada 891 No - thank you would you like to tell us about the application recently I live next door 21 own seven Linda Vista and recently my neighbors have been racing and they passed away and I purchased his house and it comes with the shed which is just the one I'm showing and he been sick for almost ten years and all or he'd been putting all the stuff there so I just purchased gazhams before I live next door and that I'm requesting a very very end four six four four six foot separation requirement for four foot separation requirement and they also still have that for and have a foreign half foot separation from from the next property okay thank you Stephanie paying I will open this up for a public hearing anyone from the public like to be heard in this item see no and I will close the public hearing and turn it over to the Commission for discussion I guess I'll start off commissioner Quinton is not with us today and as I always say she's a great steward the neighborhood and usually helps us through and meets with applicants to this area you know I'm looking at the photos of the building and it's pretty it looks pretty rundown I said the neighborhood have it for 19 years and he'd been sick almost are the last 10 years recently passed away purchasing our actually I've been fixing and cleaning up that because I lived I used to live next door so and I've been cleaning and cleaning it up so I think that's what I kind of wanted to hear is what the plan is I do see that there was a change in ownership in 2017 yes so your plan is just to keep cleaning it up and yes yeah because I used to live next door but he'd been it been sick almost like the last 15 years and he's just recently passed away and then he couldn't do anything we'll just keep powering up and I purchased been cleaning and and and there's still is there a code enforcement issue that that you're working on still with the property I'm sorry a code enforcement as you know in actually that the front yard used to be pile up and because he's six I'd guess they give him a special permit not to do anything usually you know he was the whole house was before were stuff and he has kind of sickness and and I the last 10 year did actually they gave him special for me not to do anything because he was really sick and he's passed away two years ago also okay I guess a question for staff if if this is approved I mean am I looking at the right so I saw I see the picture in her back up but I saw other pictures that showed the front yard well okay there we go it's on the overhead there yeah that's the stuff was all gone just only that recently that ring and that those are weak are all gone too so okay any other commissioners yes mr. chairman I just looking at the photo I mean the accessory structure looks just as tall or taller than the house it's it's unfortunate that that somebody built this and you're having to deal with it now but it it's not it's not visually pleasing I don't see anything about this it's a Danone valued to the neighborhood and I just don't think I could support this you know Commissioner Quinn was here or something maybe she would request a neighborhood meeting or something but as far as I go I mean at this point I couldn't couldn't support this okay placed yourself yet Thank You mr. chairman yeah I'm on the same lines as you commissioner looks old I don't even know if I put a condition of sure there's no building permits of nothing if there are it's something's up but I couldn't support it either I mean actually I think it's doing an injustice to the rest of the property that's sitting there to me it looks like an eyesore honestly I am improving it that's why it's a I didn't know you guys have a picture before I approach it oh you have any picture before I purchased that you could see the different so this is actually before that the Fania was actually they he have probably ties 10 different beat-up car doesn't run and he got holes in the ground as they've been unfortunately a patient's just for the for the shed there their accessory structure I know I've been inputting a lot so okay I mean we have to make a decision if it's harmonious and compatible and worth granting and I'll be honest with you I'm sitting with what I'm hearing with my other two commissioners anyone like to make a motion just like to be specific a bid I mean I I think the the property could be taken care of a lot better however that's not what I'm basing my motion on a motion specifically based on you know that that structure and you know I did there's not the required distance separation in between that building and it just it's kind of over beer and when you look at that compared to the house but I think he have a beautiful house I think he can cleaned up and make this a beautiful property but I just don't think the the storage shed fits in there very well for those reasons I would like to make a motion ok mr. chair through you on item 42 var 76198 I would move to follow staffs recommendation for denial thank you there's a motion on the floor please cast your votes yes voters for denial so what's the next step what do I do one second please post and that motion carries and mr. chairman then item will move forward to City Council and be heard as a part of their agenda on July 3rd 2019 so it's been recommended for denial by the Planning Commission this evening but City Council will weigh in and make a final decision that their meeting starting at 9:00 a.m. on July 3rd 2019 July 3rd where do I go you'll come right back to this room it'll be the City Council that will hear the item and make a determination I'm sorry the actual planning items won't be heard before 11:00 a.m. so if you're here by 11:00 a.m. on July 3rd your case will be heard on that agenda do I dirt July 3rd Wednesday morning July 3rd 11 a.m. and what do I have to do before then you'll come before the City Council and state your case of why you think it should be approved well we're recommending body to the City Council so you'll have to come back at that day for another hearing with City Council and if you do have additional questions staff can certainly help you out what would keep the meeting kind of moving along so I if you want to step to the side there we're gonna keep the meeting going and Eric can help you out there thank you very much moving on to item number 43 su p76 234 applicant owner lady Kyle LLC for posture and request for special use permit for proposed 6,000 square-foot liquor establishment tavern use on the east side of us o Blanco Road north of Kyle Canyon Ward Ward six staff recommends approval related item 44 STR 7-6 235 for possible action request for is site to bill and plan review for proposed commercial center consisting of 6,000 square foot tavern a 50 100 square foot retail building an 80-foot tall freestanding sign wireless communication facilities stealth design with waivers 12 5 foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to a portion of the South property line where 8 feet is required in a 10-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the east proper line where 15 feet is required Ward 6 staff recommends approval can we get the staff report please mr. chairman the applicant has proposed a tavern and retail building for an irregularly irregular shaped lot that meets the minimum requirements set forth by title 19 for a commercial development with the exception of the areas encumbered by the NV energy easement an alternative landscape plan how been agreed upon that will still provide trees and shrubs within the easement area while complying with envy Energy's requirements staff recommends approval of both the STR and su P with conditions staff does need to revise condition number three to read all development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan date stamped five 14 19 and building elevations date stamped 5 21 19 accept as amended by conditions here in and we also need to amend condition number 6 to read an exception from title 1908 is hereby approved to allow cassia tree within the landscape buffer adjacent to the east property line and within the envy energy easement please note that there are additional letters of support since publication thank you thank you very much ranking 1055 windy ranch road anderson nevada yes this is a development at the new Kyle Canyon interchange it's a 6,000 square foot tavern we have reduced the retail building to four thousand nine thousand nine hundred square feet in order to accommodate some additional trees along here that weren't part of our original plan so we were able to get the back of house pulled forward in order to get that landscape in we do have a small landscape waiver right here we're still providing the required number of trees but this allows us to utilize parking since this site is so tight we want to make sure we had adequate parking here so it's a very small buffer area here approximately 20 feet in length the Nevada energy easement runs along this section here where we're limited to what landscaping we can place in there and we've selected a tree that is very nice and flowers but it only gets to 12 feet in height which Nevada energy likes because they don't have to come and chop it down I think it's too big so it meets those requirements the sign itself signings along the u.s. 95 is allowed to be up to 80 feet tall this is proposed as an 80 foot sign as part of this the cell cellular antennas will be placed inside behind panels behind the sign so it's a fully stealth antenna you can't see it so it's a sign and an antenna both the elevations themselves are we worked very hard to try and match both sky canyon development standards and the Kyle Canyon interchange design and this is the design that architect came up with he wouldn't make sure I showed this he's very proud of this designing this is the tavern itself if there are any other questions I'm here to answer them we agree with all the staffs conditions and their recommendation for a thank you this is notice as a public hearing even from the public like to be heard on these applications seeing no one I'll turn it over to the Commission for discussion vice-chair to Silvia yes mr. chairman thank you very much yes this we do believe this is harmonious compatible for the use in which there's placing you know in this irregular size lot the only thing I would just want it for clarification is to make sure that that the sign wouldn't go up until there was a CFO on the on the buildings that is correct we would agree to that but that is you can't get a sign until you have a building okay I just I just wanted to make sure that that was but you do agree with all staff recommendations we do okay if I don't see any other with a comment I would entertain a motion for approval of item number 43 su p76 2 3 4 to solve you before we go did you hear that the public hearing portion was open this is Dan Reynolds he owns the tavern owner [Music] so with that I'll we make the motion for approval with all staff recommendations for su p76 2 3 4 there is a motion on the floor please cast your votes please post and that motion carries Thank You mr. chairman and make a motion for approval on item number 44 SDR 763 5 with all staff recommended please there's a motion on the floor please cast your vote please post that motion carries and mr. chairman those items will move forward to City Council we heard as a part of their agenda on July 3rd 2019 thank you for your time and consideration Thank You Jerry yes just to clarify for us on the first one there was no added or amended condition correct it was just subject to conditions thank you yeah thank you okay moving on to item number 45 I will be abstaining from 45 and 46 my family's in the cannabis industry and contracts with all these dispensaries so I will be abstaining vice-chair Thank You mr. chairman item number 45 SCP seven six one six three special use permit for canisters owner pine mountain holdings for a possible action on a request for a special use permit for proposed 5,000 square-foot marijuana dispensary use at 631 South Las Vegas Boulevard Ward 3 staff recommends approval NAB the staff report mr. chairman the proposed marijuana dispensary meets all title 19 special use permit requirements and staff finds that the proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses staff therefore recommends approval of the application please note that there are additional letters of support and protest since publication thank you go ahead mr. sloppy yes mr. vice chair through you just want to make a disclosure that I've worked on many of dispensaries production facilities and cultivation facilities throughout the past five years or so and however I've always put them all these with the exception of the ones that I was working on and it's not gonna affect me any greater or lesser than anybody else my independence adjustment won't be effective here so I'll be voting on this matter Thank You commissioner please state your name for the record good evening Lucy Stewart 1930 village center circle representing canisters and this is the location of a new dispensary that was approved back in December this is the site of the showgirls video which has been vacant for a little bit and they've purchased the site they're cleaning it up and we agree with all the staffs conditions and we respectfully request your approval okay this notice is notice as a public hearing anybody from the public we should be heard on this item seeing none I'll close the public comment open it up to commissioners Commissioner Stockman yes mr. vice chair through you written through the report and take a look at the location of this new establishment I think it's in an area that that where it will fit well within that neighborhood I don't have any objection staff doesn't have any objection so therefore I'm ready to make a motion please do mr. vice chair I'm Adam 45s ups seven seven six one six three I moved to approve subject to staffs conditions you've heard the motion please yes vote is for approval and that motion carries Thank You mr. vice chair that item is going on to City Council and will be heard a part of their agenda on July 3rd 2019 thank you very much next item number 46 su P 7 6 2 3 2 special use permit public hearing applicant owner Main Street Investments LLC for possible action on a request for a special use permit for a proposed 3720 square-foot marijuana dispensary used at 13 19 South Main Street Ward 3 staff recommends approval staff report please mr. chairman the proposed marijuana dispensary meets all title 19 special use permit requirements and staff finds that the proposed use is compatible surrounding uses staff therefore recommends approval of the application please note that there are additional letters of support since publication thank you please state your name for the record Paul Murad go ahead sir yes Paul Murad with the president Metroplex Realty we're the property manager of this property for the property ownership group also the leasing agent for this property and it's a property right on Main Street along the beautification of Main Street that have occurred and completed recently and the this property was used in the application for dispensary license in December it was one of the applications that did not get a dispensary license however with everything that's going on with that dispensary licensing round we believe that potentially there might be a second chance opportunity for that group in particular and then also a couple other groups that approached the property ownership since then so with that in mind that wanted to get this property already approved for dispensary use so that it's not putting the cart before the horse but putting the horse later the cart I suppose and getting that approved for dispensary use and ready for for that use this block in particular has been very depressed there's been no activity there until recently there was some rehabbed homes that were put in there but otherwise it had a lot of vandalism a lot of issues in in that particular block just from that area not having any businesses in vacant building so we believe that this use and this dispensary will actually improve the block with the added security both you know video cameras and actual physical security and also bring businesses bring people to the businesses there a near body so thank you very much for your support thank you this is notice as a public hearing anybody from the public wish to be heard on this item seeing none I'll close the public hearing and hand it over to commissioners yes said mr. vice chair through you a couple of disclosures first build just a roll dispensaries production facilities cultivation plants and however my independence and judgments not going to be affected on this one so I'll be voting on it and second I did some preliminary investigation on this building must have been two three years ago never when where's I was paid 100% for everything all the work that I've completed and I don't have any ongoing business relationship with mr. Moran so I'll be voting on this matter and third disclosure on this property I do own a bar urban lounge within the notification area however historically I would not vote on a matter if it was alcohol related however since it's not alcohol related I've historically voted on other items in the Arts District what after all this disclosure so just wrap up by saying I think I think that this location would work you know I it's not too far off from where a lot of the bars and everything else are opening on Main Street really happy with what the city is done with the streets and sidewalks and festoon lights and this is a exciting little area so good luck and ready to make a motion please do mr. vice chair on item 46 SGP 76230 I would move to approve subject to staffs conditions you've heard a motion please cast your vote and that motion passes Thank You mr. vice chair that item will move forward to City Council and be heard as a part of their agenda on July 3rd 2019 thank you moving on to citizens participation public comment during this portion the agenda must be limited to the matters within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission no subject may be acted upon by the Planning Commission unless that subject is on the agenda net infraction if you wish to be heard come to podium give your name for the record the amount of discussion on any single subject results the amount of time any single speakers allowed may be limited seeing no one I just want to quickly thank Commissioner flangers for joining us and sitting with us with us through the meetings it's always great to see you and happy you're here with us thank you I appreciate it thanks commissioner with that the meeting is adjourned