This transcript appears to be from a **White Bear Lake City Council** meeting. Based on the names mentioned and the procedural flow of the meeting, I have identified the speakers (Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Staff). [0:28] **(Silence/Ambient Noise)** [0:58] **(Silence/Ambient Noise)** [1:28] **(Silence/Ambient Noise)** [1:58] **(Silence/Ambient Noise)** [2:30] **Mayor:** All will be noted, thank you. Will you please rise and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance? [Pledge of Allegiance]. All right, jumping right into item 2A: minutes of the regular City Council meeting on July 23rd, 2024. I would entertain a motion to approve those minutes. Have a second? Motion and a second. All those in favor say "aye." Any opposed? Motion carries. I have two abstentions. All right, thank you; minutes are still approved. All right, thank you. 2B: minutes of the City Council work session on July 23rd, 2024. I would entertain a motion to approve those minutes. [3:16] **Mayor:** Approved. I have a motion and a second. All those in favor say "aye." Any opposed? One abstention. Very good, motion carries and minutes are approved. Adoption of the agenda: we have a couple amendments. I'll just note for item 4E, we have a replacement resolution that updates condition three; that was given to you at the dais here. And then we're going to pull item 4M (resolution adopting a fair housing policy), which will become new item 8B. Unless there are any other changes, I'd entertain a motion to adopt the agenda. I have a motion and a second. All those in favor say "aye." Any opposed? We have an agenda. Item four: consent agenda. I entertain a motion to approve the consent agenda as amended. [4:01] **Mayor:** Second. A motion and a second. All those in favor say "aye." Any opposed? Motion carries; consent agenda is approved. Item six A: vacation of sections of easement located at 12th Street and Bloom Avenue, White Bear Lake Schools additional preliminary and final plats. Mr. Lindall, whenever you're ready. **Jason Lindall (Community Development Director):** Thank you, Mayor, members of the Council. So again, the item that we're looking at tonight is the preliminary and final plat for the north campus site, along with vacations of sections of right-of-way that were found as cleanup items associated with that plat. The subject property, as I think everyone is probably aware, is located between Division and Bald Eagle, just south of... [4:47] **Jason Lindall:** ...the railroad tracks of the city's corporate limits and is currently zoned Public. The applicant is White Bear Public Schools. As we noted, this is a preliminary and final plat. It consolidates a number of properties that the school owned and then several that were acquired throughout the expansion process into one plat with two lots. So far, for community comment, we've had one call just asking about clarification to the procedures of what we were talking about and what was actually occurring. The Planning Commission held the public hearing for the preliminary and final plat sections of this item tonight with one... [5:33] **Jason Lindall:** ...question from the public about sidewalk maintenance related to the site. As I mentioned, as a related item tonight, now is the vacations of the portions of the 12th Street and Bloom Avenue right-of-way vacations or easement vacations. The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their last meeting and, along with staff, is recommending approval. So again, as just a couple of quick background items, as part of the 2019 referendum item, the school district has completed or is in the process of completing a number of expansions throughout their properties in White Bear Lake. The one tonight that we're focusing on is the north campus site. As part of the... [6:21] **Jason Lindall:** ...improvements to that site, the district acquired a number of properties and had several properties of their own, and so this consolidates all of those properties. In 2021, the school district was granted their original conditional use permit for the overall project, and one of the conditions of that original approval was that they complete this property consolidation process, and so they're completing that original process. You may also remember that a related item is that there was an amendment to that original 2021 approval in 2023 that was related to expansion of the stadium to accommodate... [7:09] **Jason Lindall:** ...football. The campus is, as I think again most people know, anticipated to open this year and include grades 9 through 12. So as I mentioned, the planning process consolidates all the properties acquired during the expansion process into two lots. Lot one, or the northern lot, contains predominantly the high school property itself. Lot two, the southern property, is Central Middle School and its surrounding properties. And again, we're looking at this as a housekeeping item, fulfilling one of the conditions of approval of their original conditional use permit in... [7:55] **Jason Lindall:** ...2021. So there are six general findings that we look at in reviewing a preliminary and final plat, and there's more detail in your staff report about these, but staff finds both a preliminary and final plat consistent with all of these findings. To look specifically at the vacation portion of what we're talking about tonight, again, during the platting preparation process, it was discovered a couple of these easements were no longer necessary. So the one for 12th Street actually runs through kind of the northern third or so, quarter of the property, and actually under the building and is no longer necessary, and so as a cleanup item, vacating this is... [8:42] **Jason Lindall:** ...appropriate. The second one is a portion of Bloom Avenue just north of 8th Street. With the school district acquiring properties on the neighboring block, this portion of Bloom will now function basically as their portion of their driveway—their private driveway. So again, it doesn't have a public purpose anymore and is appropriate to vacate it. So with that, also the city needs to find in this case that the easements no longer serve a public purpose and are no longer needed, and so vacation of these easements is in the public interest at this time. So with that, staff is recommending... [9:27] **Jason Lindall:** ...approval of the vacations of the public easements for the sections of 12th Street and Bloom Avenue that we just spoke about, and approval of the preliminary and final plats for the vacation portion of this item. The Council does need to hold a public hearing as part of that, and that's been noticed properly and set up for tonight, and I would just note that the vacation item requires a four-fifths vote for approval. And with that, I'd take questions. **Mayor:** Thank you, Mr. Lindall. Well, let's jump right into the public hearing for the vacation of sections of easements located at 12th Street and Bloom. I have nobody on my sign-up sheet, but if anybody would like to speak to that, I'm opening... [10:14] **Mayor:** ...up the public hearing now. Seeing none, we're going to close the public hearing and bring it back to the Council. Council, do we have questions for Mr. Lindall, or would someone like to move approval of one of two of the resolutions? No questions? It seems pretty straightforward. I don't think we need a street going through the school anymore. I'm pretty sure that school's going to last a long time and I can't imagine—although parking maybe—but no. So, sure, I'll move approval of the... we need the two resolutions. So I'd entertain a motion to approve the resolution granting preliminary and final plat approvals for White Bear Lake Area School additions. **Councilmember:** So moved. **Mayor:** Do I have a second? **Councilmember:** Second. **Mayor:** Any further discussion on that? All those in favor say "aye." Any opposed? That resolution passes. The second... [10:59] **Mayor:** ...resolution we have, which I would entertain a motion to approve, is the resolution vacating certain public easements within the City of White Bear Lake. **Councilmember:** So moved. **Mayor:** I have a motion and a second. Any further discussion on that? Seeing none, all those in favor say "aye." Any opposed? Motion carries, that resolution passes as well. All right, thank you. All right, item 6B: second reading of an ordinance amending the operation of cannabis business interim moratorium ordinance. Mr. Anderson, if you'd like to sure illuminate us on that, that'd be great. **Mr. Anderson (City Staff/Legal):** Thank you, Mayor and Council. So we're here tonight for a second reading for a relatively straightforward amendment to the cannabis moratorium that... [11:46] **Mr. Anderson:** ...was approved by Council last year. This was recommended mostly due to the fact that the legislature made some changes in this past session to the Cannabis Act, providing an opportunity for businesses to get license pre-approvals and potentially begin some cultivation activities early prior to licensure. They also modified the definition of the term "cannabis business," which again requires some clarification just so there's no confusion from business owners thinking that they may be able to operate in the city prior to the adoption of permanent zoning regulations. And so, again, just to make that clear—make that statement to those business owners that we do have... [12:32] **Mr. Anderson:** ...a moratorium and there's no ability for cannabis businesses to begin operating in White Bear until that all happens. We are recommending this really as "belt and suspenders." So again, typically we would have a public hearing at first reading; due to timing sequencing, tonight we teed that up for Council to happen at the second reading. So you do have to hold a public hearing. I'm happy to answer any questions after the public hearing. There is both an ordinance and a summary resolution that would allow staff to publish just a short summary of the ordinance that's a couple pages long. **Mayor:** Very good, thank you Mr. Anderson. At this time I will open up the public hearing for the second reading of an ordinance amending the operation of cannabis businesses interim... [13:18] **Mayor:** ...moratorium ordinance. I have nobody on my sign-up sheet, but if anybody would like to speak to this issue, they can do so now. Seeing none, I will close the public hearing and bring it back to the Council. This is just a straightforward housekeeping matter, so if people have questions, by all means ask. Otherwise, I'd entertain a motion to adopt the ordinance first. **Councilmember:** [Motion] **Mayor:** I have a second? **Councilmember:** Second. **Mayor:** Any further discussion on this? Seeing none, all those in favor say "aye." Any opposed? Motion carries; the ordinance is adopted. We have an accompanying resolution authorizing summary republication. I'd entertain a motion to approve that resolution. I have a motion and a second. Any further discussion on that resolution? Seeing none, all those in favor say "aye." [14:03] **Mayor:** Any opposed? Motion carries, the resolution is approved. **Councilmember Edberg:** Thank you, Mayor. So at some point—it doesn't have to be now—I'd be curious: are we prepared with our preparations for the work that happens after the state does its thing? And do we anticipate delays? Are we anticipating being in a position to allow businesses to operate legally under the new statute, etc.? If you have a response now, happy to hear it, but if not, I'm just kind of curious what happens in the next few months. [14:50] **Lindsey Crawford (City Manager):** Sure, Mayor, Councilmember Edberg. I will start, I may punt a little bit to Mr. Lindall, or we can follow up later as well. We do need to adopt a zoning ordinance regarding cannabis businesses, and so we have been waiting for guidance from the state on that. And we do, I think, have that—or mostly have that now—after a good clarification webinar last week from the new Office of Cannabis Management. So staff is prepared to be working on that and taking that to—Mr. Lindall, is that the September Planning Commission first? Yes, for initial discussion basically. And then that would require two readings... [15:35] **Lindsey Crawford:** ...prior to adoption by the City Council. Our moratorium will expire at the end of this year, as every other community's will. We will no longer have the authority to issue permits to the low-potency hemp product carriers, and we will not be licensing cannabis businesses—we are not allowed to do that. We strictly have a zoning oversight in the zoning side of it, and that's it. So we have been watching very closely and are prepared to bring that back this fall before January 1, 2025. Thank you. **Mayor:** Thank you. All right, item seven: unfinished business. We have nothing scheduled. Item... [16:20] **Mayor:** ...8A under new business: a first reading of an ordinance amending the zoning code as it relates to off-sale liquor. Mr. Lindall. **Jason Lindall:** Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. As you mentioned, this is the first reading of an ordinance amendment that would address off-sale liquor uses in the downtown Central Business District. The applicant in this case is in the audience in case the Council has questions, but Mr. Patel is the owner of the Casiraghi's Liquor Store at 2143 4th Street. And again, we're proposing an amendment to the B5 Central Business Districts to allow off-sale liquor in what we're going to be presenting to you is a couple of options... [17:09] **Jason Lindall:** ...different ways to do this, as either a permitted or conditional use, and we'll get into those in just a minute here. We did have, from a public comment perspective, two emails generally supporting the request that are included in your packet. And also, the Planning Commission heard a public hearing on this item with one speaker in support and one opposed to the request. As I mentioned, the Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing at their last meeting, and both Planning Commission and staff are recommending approval of one of the three particular options that we'll talk about here in a second. So the options that staff presented to the Planning... [17:54] **Jason Lindall:** ...Commission are these three options. Option one being a permitted use, which would treat off-sale liquor just like any other permitted use within the downtown zoning district, similar to retail or a restaurant kind of use. They would be allowed throughout the district and the approval process would be an administrative building permit, basically, for any improvements that you needed to make to a site to get then a certificate of occupancy for that particular property. The second option is a permitted use with some related conditions, specifically geographic ones that would limit the locations of where... [18:40] **Jason Lindall:** ...they could go within the downtown. That would also be an administrative process subject to approval by staff. The third option carries similar conditions to option two but would make it a conditional use permit that, instead of being an administrative process, would take it through the Planning Commission and City Council for approval. In this case, staff and the Planning Commission are recommending that these uses be allowed as a permitted use with some conditions. Those three conditions are that the property is located... that off-sale liquor would be located on properties... [19:27] **Jason Lindall:** ...located along Highway 61 and along 3rd and 4th streets, and parcels no larger than two-tenths of an acre. Under those criteria, that limits the site to—and I'm sorry, my square is off a little bit there—but limits it to the one site that the applicant is interested in, which is the former Frazier Auto site just across the street from his current location. This staff came up with this recommendation really to try and work with the applicant on their timeline because they are... [20:12] **Jason Lindall:** ...not able to renew their lease in their current location, so they're under a little bit of a timeline issue. And that it really preserves kind of the status quo in downtown related in this zoning district related to this use. And it also was suggested—we were suggesting this as a course of action because the zoning update process is currently ongoing. And so, in the context of the overall zoning update, we'll be looking at all sorts of uses in each different district and where the districts go, and so there would be a chance for a more detailed conversation about opening up kind of... [20:59] **Jason Lindall:** ...beyond what the current status quo is within the downtown district. So we think this recommendation accomplishes all three of those goals. So the staff report goes into detail about six criteria that are used to review both zoning text amendments and, in this case, a conditional use permit. The staff report reviews the application under both items because, in anticipation of the possibility that the City Council could select the conditional use permit item, the applicant applied for that and we've processed that concurrently. But staff's recommendation is again a permitted use with conditions. And so... [21:46] **Jason Lindall:** ...more detail about that in your staff report. Happy to answer questions if you have them, but at this case, basically what this comes down to is staff recommends conducting the first reading of the ordinance amendment to the zoning code to allow off-sale liquor as a permitted use in the downtown central business district with the conditions that I've mentioned, and that you direct staff to bring this item back on August 27th for a second reading and action. And with that, I'd take questions. **Mayor:** So just to clarify as a matter of process, you're looking for feedback tonight on which way the Council is kind of leaning with option one, two, or three? **Jason Lindall:** Correct. **Mayor:** Okay. All right, I'll just make my comments brief. [22:33] **Mayor:** I support staff's recommendation. Option two makes good sense to me for some of the reasons that you mentioned, and I don't really have a whole lot more to say on it. Council, do we have questions for Mr. Lindall? **Councilmember Edberg:** Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Mr. Lindall, my understanding of our current situation in the district under discussion is that we prohibit off-sale liquor sales right now, but we have "grandfathered in" as a pre-existing location the Casiraghi's liquor store. Am I correct in understanding that? **Jason Lindall:** Mr. Mayor, Councilmember Edberg, yes you are correct. **Councilmember Edberg:** And when I first began reading the... [23:19] **Councilmember Edberg:** ...packet and thinking of the options, essentially we have by law created a mini-monopoly and given a preferred advantage to the owner of a business by being the only permitted liquor store for off-sale sales in that area. Now, it's not a massive monopoly, if you will—it is in a narrow sense, but in a bigger sense it's not. You can go across 61, you can go a number of other places. But as a general rule, I'm not a big fan of monopoly; I think that's bad policy, especially when it's enforced by public law. And so I'm not all that inclined when I see the conditions that essentially limit it to one location... [24:06] **Councilmember Edberg:** ...in the absence of some other kind of massive buyout or some other major acquisition. It troubles me that we are limiting it to one entity again and using the force of law to perpetuate a business advantage, and that just strikes me as wrong. So that is an issue that I'm pondering. I will agree that it perpetuates the status quo, but I'm not a big fan of that status quo limitation as it is. So those would be my concerns that I'm going to voice now. I'll do more thinking and clearly we'll have some more conversation, but I am more inclined—if we are... [24:52] **Councilmember Edberg:** ...I'm not opposed to Casiraghi's moving across the street. I'm not opposed to supporting a local business trying to continue in business; they're losing their location, their current lease—let's do what we can to support them. But I'm not interested in doing it in a way that perpetuates monopoly. So those are my concerns. **Mayor:** Just a dovetail off of that, question for Mr. Lindall: is it true that when we do the kind of "full zoning revamp" that we can address some of Councilmember Edberg's concerns independent of whatever action we take? In other words, we can kind of alleviate some of those concerns in the broader zoning restructuring? Do I have that correct, or am I wrong? [25:39] **Jason Lindall:** Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, you're correct. Because I think those are good points. **Mayor:** I think in principle I agree with you. I guess I see this as a narrow situation that we can address those very valid concerns literally next month, or starting the process literally next month. Anyways, just wanted to share those comments. **Councilmember Walsh:** Just on that same issue, I... when I read the memo, I was surprised that we didn't allow—that it was a non-conforming use to sell off-sale liquor, and just hadn't thought about it. Well, there's only one and it's grandfathered in. Can you speak to the history of that? Do you think—I mean, is that just unique to White Bear Lake, or is it that downtowns don't normally do that? We have on-sale but not off-sale? Any idea on the history? [26:24] **Jason Lindall:** Mayor, members of the Council. So I can't give you specific history about the Casiraghi's site other than to say that before it was Casiraghi's, it was another liquor store. **Councilmember Walsh:** I mean the history of the ordinance or the history of the zoning decision... because they were grandfathered in; even Casiraghi's was grandfathered in at some point. I'm sorry to interrupt, but just the history generally of, you know, is there a reason—a public purpose—to not have off-sale in a downtown like ours? **Jason Lindall:** Members of the Council, so again, it would appear that without any specific history to look back on—when the last changes in the late '70s were made to the overall zoning update—there doesn't seem to be a specific reason listed as part... [27:12] **Jason Lindall:** ...of that process. You know, one way to look at it is if you were looking at downtown as more "destination-related" issues, and looking back at Minnesota's history about how we've kind of treated and regulated liquor over the time. You know, 30 to 40 years ago, the Council may have decided that they wanted to limit this particular use in downtown, but I don't have... I can't point to minutes that state that. I'm only giving you my kind of... what could have been the reason. If you look at liquor stores in general, they tend to be... [28:01] **Jason Lindall:** ...you know, more transient in the kind of user that they have. You tend to come there, make your purchase, and leave quickly. And if we were looking to promote more uses that promote more people coming downtown for longer periods of time, then it may be a use that you want to limit in some fashion. I think that staff really again tried to work within the status quo situation to try and work with the current business owner while also trying to honor the zoning update process that both Councilmember Walsh and Councilmember Edberg mentioned. [28:53] **Mayor:** Any other questions? Does anybody have—just so we can give staff some instruction with what to come back with—does anybody have strong opinions against what staff's recommendation is, assuming you're inclined to approve the permitted use? **Councilmember Edberg:** I'm just saying I'm not in favor of the recommendation. **Mayor:** Fair enough. Okay. All right, we've had our first reading, and I think you have what you need to bring back what we need for a second reading. Thank you very much. Item 8B: Fair Housing Policy. Mr. Lindall, you have that one as well? **Jason Lindall:** Thank you, members of the Council. I'm going to turn it over to Tracy for this. [29:39] **Tracy Shimik (Community Development):** Hello Mayor, members of Council. I'm here tonight to discuss the adoption of a Fair Housing Policy. To give a little bit of background—as you most likely recall—we've had a couple of work sessions to discuss this policy. We brought it forth at this time due to the fact that we've worked with Element Design Build to secure some funding to help clean up and redevelop the site at 2502 County Road E, commonly known as the Petra Wash site. As a requirement of one of the grants that they were awarded—the Metropolitan Council TBRA or Tax Base Revitalization Account Grant—we would be required to have a Fair Housing Policy adopted in order to accept any... [30:25] **Tracy Shimik:** ...funds from that grant award. Additionally, we had as a goal in our 2040 Comprehensive Plan in the housing chapter a goal of adopting a Fair Housing Policy by 2025. So this puts us a little bit ahead of the schedule, and it's just generally a good policy to have. It doesn't particularly change the workload of City staff; it's things that we commonly do anyway in the course of daily work, but it does provide clear advice or clear communication to our residents about how they may deal with fair housing issues. Next... [31:11] **Tracy Shimik:** ...slide. So at the first work session, we brought forth a draft policy. It was largely based on policies that have been adopted by other communities, which were based on a templated policy that was provided by the Metropolitan Council. After feedback from Council, there were some concerns about the language in the policy as well as the scope of work that would be laid out in that policy. So staff went back and, after receiving some counsel from our City Attorney as well as looking for other plans, redrafted the policy and brought that to the last work session where Council seemed generally supportive of what was brought forth. In the grant agreement with the... [31:58] **Tracy Shimik:** ...Metropolitan Council, they list out the minimum requirements for a Fair Housing Policy that meets the standards required to get the grant funding. We were required to have a purpose statement, procedures for complaint identification and referral, designate a Fair Housing Officer, and an outline of internal and external actions to advance fair housing. I'm going to walk you through those here as laid out in the policy that is in your packet. Our purpose statement affirms the city's commitment to fair housing as well as laying out the general content of the policy. Next one... [32:45] **Tracy Shimik:** ...we also lay out how we will accept complaints and how we will collect that information, as well as designating the Fair Housing Officer as the Community Development Director or his or her designee. The internal practices we've laid out and recommended in the policy are periodic housing analysis, periodic ordinance and policy review, planning and development analysis of housing developments, and affirmatively furthering fair housing, which is a requirement of other funding received through federal sources related to housing. These are all practices, as you can see, that we've traditionally engaged in as part of our various planning processes, so it's not outside the scope of what we would be doing anyway. And the external practices that we've outlined—again, the designation... [33:31] **Tracy Shimik:** ...of the Fair Housing Policy, how we will intake fair housing complaints, how we will communicate with the public fair housing information which we'll put on the city website, and we'll also have the fair housing information available in person at City Hall should someone choose to receive the information in that way. With that summary, staff would recommend that Council adopt the resolution in the packet adopting the Fair Housing Policy, and with that, I'll stand for any questions. **Mayor:** Thank you, Miss Shimik. Well, Councilmember West, I'll put you on the spot to start because you wanted to pull this. If you have some thoughts on this, please do share them. **Councilmember West:** I appreciate that, thank you Mayor. I really... [34:19] **Councilmember West:** ...just wanted to make sure that the community members who were interested in this were able to hear and clearly understand what the policy is that we're putting in place. And also just wanted to reiterate how important a Fair Housing Policy is for us and for our city. I think not only is it in our plan, but part of our plan is to be warm and welcoming, and that really goes a long way to being warm and welcoming—to be fair with housing policy. So, thank you. I support this. **Mayor:** Thank you. Just a couple of quick comments. First, I want to compliment staff because you rightfully so brought us a template... [35:07] **Mayor:** ...policy that every other city has adopted, and I was as vocal as anybody in my opposition to it going well beyond what I thought a Fair Housing Policy should be. And to your credit, you brought back, I think, a very simple, clean Fair Housing Policy that, quite frankly, says we're going to agree to abide by state and federal law—which we would do anyways, which we should do, which is good—and then adds a couple little internal practices and safeguards to help our residents that might be seeking this information. And that, I think, ultimately is a good thing. So again, thank you for listening to the policymakers and what our concerns were and bringing back a document that I think is great and I'll support tonight. Thank you. Any other thoughts or comments on this? All right, well, what do... [35:55] **Mayor:** ...we have? It's a resolution approving the Fair Housing Policy. So with that, I would entertain a motion to approve the resolution. **Councilmember:** So moved. **Mayor:** I have a motion. Do I have a second? **Councilmember:** Second. **Mayor:** Any further discussion on this? Seeing none, all those in favor say "aye." Any opposed? Motion carries; the Fair Housing Policy is adopted. Thank you again. Item nine: discussion, nothing scheduled. Item 10: Communications from the City Manager. Miss Crawford, whenever you're ready. **Lindsey Crawford (City Manager):** Thank you Mayor, members of the Council. We have a big event coming up next week. Next Thursday, August 22nd, is our Public Safety Open House... [36:42] **Lindsey Crawford:** ...ribbon cutting and open house. So from 5:00 to 7:00 PM next door at the newly renovated and expanded police and fire station. Inviting all of the public to come, as well as to check out this week's edition of the White Bear Press. They put together, in conjunction with staff, a nice pull-out section of the facility. So thank you to the Press for that. Everyone should go check that out and come to the event. So it's probably one of the only times maybe you'll get to see the inside of the police station for a good reason. So, please come. I think I have a couple more things. We have the very last Fridays with Firefighters... [37:27] **Lindsey Crawford:** ...this Friday, just of the summer. So this Friday from 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM at the South Fire Station. And the Historical Society has a program coming up on Monday, August 26th. It's related to the homes of the White Bear Lake Fire Department. I plan on attending; I think it sounds really interesting, I'll probably learn quite a bit. So from 6:00 to 7:00 PM at the library, Monday, August 26th. That's free to the public. And then lastly, our police squads have been rebranded. So the rebranding is done. I don't have a picture up here—I should have done that—but so you will see now... [38:13] **Lindsey Crawford:** ...new squads. Though, well, they're actually not—all of them aren't new; they look new, but they're just... they look a little different, a little updated. And staff made a fun video on social media kind of introducing that, but they are now all done and out on the street. So with that, that's what I have for tonight. **Mayor:** Thank you, Miss Crawford. Questions for our City Manager? Seeing none, I would entertain a motion to adjourn. **Councilmember:** So moved. **Mayor:** Motion and a second. All those in favor say "aye." We're adjourned. [38:56] **(End of Transcript)**