. GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO THE APRIL 4TH, 2024 MEETING OF THE BLOOMINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS MADE UP OF SEVEN VOLUNTEER BLOOMINGTON RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT WE HAVE FIVE WHICH IS A QUORUM. THE COMMISSION ADVISES THE CITY COUNCIL ON DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS DEVELOPMENT, LONG RANGE PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION ISSUES. OUR WORK IS INFORMED BY THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VARIOUS DISTRICT PLANS AND THE CITY CODE FOR SOME ITEMS THE COMMISSION A RECOMMENDATION WITH THE CITY COUNCIL HAVING FINAL DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY. THERE ARE THREE OF THOSE ITEMS TONIGHT IN CASES THE PLANNING COMMISSION CAN APPROVE OR DENY AN APPLICATION SUBJECT APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF WHICH THERE IS ONE TONIGHT FOR EACH ACTION ITEM THERE WILL BE A STAFF REPORT AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE APPLICANT TO PRESENT AND THEN TIME FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC TO PROVIDE TESTIMONY. OUR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PLEASE STAND AS YOU ARE ABLE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. ALL RIGHT. TONIGHT THERE ARE SEVEN ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. THE FIRST ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT. IT WAS TO BE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR, THE PRELIMINARY FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS BUT THAT ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN SO WE WILL MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER TWO WHICH IS A PUBLIC HEARING, A FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS FOR RENOVATIONS AT BRYANT PARK AND PLANNER ASPECT HAS THE PRESENTATION. GOOD EVENING IT'S BEEN A WHILE I FEEL LIKE IT'S NOT SHARING ALL THE WAY ON THE SCREEN BUT NEVER AM SO YEAH TONIGHT ITEM TWO IS FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS FOR RENOVATIONS AT BRYANT PARK WHICH IS LOCATED AT 1001 WEST 85TH STREET. SO HERE IS AN OUTLINE OF THE PROPERTY E IT'S ZONED R ONE AND GUIDED AS PUBLIC ALL THE SURROUNDING ZONING IS ALSO R ONE SO THE PARK IMPROVEMENTS THERE ARE A VARIETY OF THEM BUT A QUICK SUMMARY IS A NEW PARK SHELTER AND ACCESSIBLE PLAYGROUND PARKING LOT SPORTS COURT ADDITIONS AND RELOCATION STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS AND NATURAL RESOURCE ENHANCEMENTS SO PLANNING COMMISSION HAS DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY ON THIS APPLICATION AND THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS TO REALLY LOOK AT THE BUILDING THE PARKING LOTS SIDEWALKS LIGHTING LANDSCAPING AND STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS AND SO WE NECESSARILY LOOKING AT EVERY SINGLE ADDITION THAT THEY'RE ADDING THIS A RENDERING THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR THE NEW PARK SHELTER BUILDING. IT IS PROPOSED TO BE A 2544 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITH SOLAR PANELS ON THE ROOFTOP. THE BUILDING ARE MOSTLY CODE COMPLIANT SUCH AS FIBER, SALMON AND VENEER BUT THERE WERE SOME AREAS ON THE PLANS WHICH SHOWED PAINT AND THAT IS PERMITTED. SO THERE'S A CONDITION THAT THAT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED PERMIT ISSUANCE AS FAR AS LANDSCAPE IN SCREENING AND LIGHTING GOES, THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PLAN SHOWS 187 TREES WHICH IS CODE COMPLIANT 89 SHRUBS AND 91 PERENNIALS. SO THE THING THERE THAT WE ARE UNSURE IF IT'S CODE COMPLYING ARE THE SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS . WE'RE STILL WORKING WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS TO DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED AREA AND BASED ON THAT WILL DETERMINE HOW MANY SHRUBS ARE NECESSARY THE REQUIREMENT IN THE CODE IS ONE SHRUB PER 1000 SQUARE FEET SO WE'RE WORKING ON THAT CALCULATION STILL THERE'S ALSO A CONDITION PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE LANDSCAPING MUST COMPLY WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS . SIMILARLY IF THE INITIAL SUBMITTED LIGHTING DID NOT COMPLY WITH CODE STANDARDS WE ARE LACKING KIND OF THE INITIAL AND MAINTAIN PLANS BUT WE RECENTLY RECEIVED UPDATED PLANS AND STAFF HASN'T REVIEWED THOSE YET BUT THERE IS A CONDITION THAT THAT LIGHTING PLANS MUST MEET CITY CODE PRIOR TO PERMIT AND THEN LASTLY FOR PARKING EVERYTHING HERE PRETTY MET CODE THE PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENT THE PARKING LOT SETBACK AND FOR PARK OR PUBLIC USES THERE'S NO SPECIFIC IN OUR CODE FOR LIKE A PARKING SPACE NUMBER SO THERE ARE 61 PROPOSED SPOTS WHICH STAFF COMFORTABLE WITH BASED ON A LACK OF COMPLAINTS OR IN THE PAST AND JUST ADDITIONALLY PARKING LOT ISLAND TREES AREN'T REQUIRED BECAUSE PARKING LOT IN BOTH PARKING LOTS HAVE FEWER THAN 50 STALLS BUT THERE A PLANNING BE PARKING LOT ISLAND TREES IN THE EAST PARKING LOT SO THAT'S A NICE ADDITION. SO WITH THAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF COMMISSIONER THANK YOU CHAIR PLAYER HAS BACK IN THE PLANS IS THERE ANY INDICATION THAT SOME OF THE MATURE TREES THAT EXIST TODAY WILL BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN? YEAH. CHAIRPERSON COMMISSIONER GOLTZMAN I BELIEVE SO. I SHOULD MENTION WE ALSO HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE AND PEOPLE FROM PUBLIC WORKS THAT CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AS WELL MORE THAN THAT. GREAT. THANK YOU. YEAH ANYONE WANTS TO TACKLE THAT OR IF IT'S NOT SURE YET THAT'S OKAY. COME ON ON UP THERE AT LEAST MATURE TREES THAT ARE NOT ASH . GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. WE HAVE MADE EFFORTS TO PRESERVE AS MANY OF THE EXISTING TREES AS WE CAN, ESPECIALLY IN THE SOUTH SOUTHWEST CORNER ALONG EMERSON AVENUE THERE ARE SEVERAL OLD LARGE CALIPER OR LARGE DIAMETER TRUNK TREES AND ALONG THE WHOLE SOUTHERN LINE OF THE PARK THERE ARE NUMEROUS LARGER TREES THAT WE'VE WORKED TO AVOID CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS TO . THERE ARE ALSO AT LEAST TWO IF NOT THREE ELM TREES STILL PRESENT IN THE PARK WHICH WE'RE WORKING TO HAVE SIDEWALKS GO AROUND AND PRESERVE THOSE IN PLACE AS BEST WE CAN. THERE ARE A HANDFUL OF TREES THAT WILL PROBABLY BE EITHER TRANSPLANTED OR MOVED OR REMOVED ENTIRELY. I THINK THERE'S ONE COTTONWOOD THAT MAY BE IN DECLINE THAT NEEDS TO BE TAKEN OUT BUT OTHERWISE WE HAVE MADE EFFORTS TO SAVE AS MANY TREES AS WE CAN WITH THE DESIGN OF THE PARK. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THIS ITEM IS A PUBLIC HEARING SO I OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IF THERE'S ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE TESTIMONY, DO OFFER 3 MINUTES FOR ANYONE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM IF YOU COULD GO AHEAD AND SIGN YOUR NAME ON THE LEDGER THERE AND INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND THEN YOU WILL HAVE 3 MINUTES. HELLO. MY NAME IS ROBERT COLEMAN. I'M A RESIDENT OF BLOOMINGTON AND I DO NOT HAVE A CAR. I GET AROUND EITHER BY WALKING OR TAKING THE BUS AND I. I THINK I SPOKE AT A CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF LIKE A MONTH OR TWO AGO ABOUT THAT REALLY AND I SPOKE IN FRONT OF RELATING TO A PRESSING IMPROVEMENT AT 86 AND EMERSON I DIDN'T SEE THAT IN THE PLAN IT'S POSSIBLE THAT I JUST DIDN'T SEE IT OR IT'S PART OF SOMETHING ELSE BUT I WANTED TO GIVE MY PERSPECTIVE ON THAT . I HAVE I'VE BEEN CAR FOR LIKE ALMOST TWO YEARS AT THIS POINT AND DURING THE LAST IN BLOOMINGTON I'VE NEARLY BEEN HIT BY A CAR TIMES AND I THINK THAT A LOT OF IT FEELS LIKE A LOT OF THE PROBLEMS AS A PEDESTRIAN CAN BE EASILY SOLVED. I'VE HAD A LOT OF TROUBLE SPECIFICALLY AT INTERSECTIONS WHERE IT IS ONE ONE DIRECTION HAS NO STOP SIGN AND THE OTHER DIRECTION HAS A STOP SIGN A TWO WAY STOP AND THAT IS THAT IS WHAT IS AT EMERSON AND 86 AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARK AND TWICE DURING MY LIKE DAILY WALK TO IT'S HAPPENED I'VE NEARLY BEEN HIT AT THE CORNER OF FRANCE AND 108 I'VE NEARLY BEEN HIT TWICE AT THE CORNER OF 106TH AND XERXES ONCE AT 108TH AND XERXES ONCE AT THE EXIT FRANCE AND THE THE PARKING LOT BY WILLIAM MCCOY'S AND THEN ONCE IN THE PARKING LOT OF MY WORK AND I'VE IT FEELS LIKE I'M IN THE AT FRANCE AND 108 THERE ARE BUMP OUTS IT WAS FOUR LANE ROAD AND IT'S CONVERTED TO A TWO IN THAT SPOT AND EVEN THEN LIKE THE BUMP OUTS I HAVE PICTURES WHERE IT GRASS WON'T GROW ON THE BUMP OUT BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE DRIVING OVER IT ALL THE TIME AND YOU CAN SEE THE TIRE MARKS EVEN LIKE THROUGHOUT THROUGHOUT THE YEAR YOU CAN SEE IT ON GOOGLE MAPS AND IT REALLY DOES NOT MAKE ME FEEL SAFE. ANOTHER THING IS THE LIGHTING ON MY ON MY WALK THERE'S LIKE THERE'S ONLY A STREET LAMP AT EACH INTERSECTION AND EVEN THEN THEY'RE NOT ALWAYS WORKING AND I THINK THAT LACK OF LIGHTING IS PARTICULARLY THE NUMBER ONE ISSUE IN THE TWICE I'VE ALMOST BEEN HIT AT 106 AND XERXES WHERE IN THE IT WAS IT HAPPENED THE EXACT SAME WAY BOTH A DRIVER GOING SOUTH ON XERXES TURNING LEFT AND NOT SEEING ME UNTIL THEY WERE A FOOT AND A HALF IN FRONT OF ME SCREECHING IT IT FEELS LIKE IT WHEN I LIKE I'VE SEEN A MAP OF THE SIDEWALKS IN BLOOMINGTON AND MANY DO NOT HAVE ANY. I'M FORTUNATE THAT MOST OF MY ROUTE DOES HAVE A SIDEWALK BUT IN SOME OF IT I'M STILL WALKING IN THE STREET WHEN THE STREET ISN'T PLOWED. IT'S REALLY HARD FOR ME WHEN THE SIDEWALKS ARE PLOWED AND IT FEELS WHEN YOU'RE WHEN BLOOMINGTON WAS DESIGNED YOU'RE CHOOSING WHERE YOU PUT YOUR MONEY AND LIKE IF YOU'RE CONSIDERING LIKE BAR OF WHERE YOU PLACE IT ON LIKE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLINESS AND CAR FRIENDLINESS IT'S LIKE IT'S ALL THE WAY AT THE END OF THE CAR FRIENDLINESS. I FEEL LIKE WE REALLY NEED TO DO SOMETHING TO MOVE THAT BAR AT LEAST A LITTLE BIT TOWARDS THE PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS. IT FEELS LIKE THE ACCOMMODATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE OF NOT REALLY BEEN ENOUGH AND IT JUST FEELS LIKE I NEED TO SAY SOMETHING BEFORE I GET KILLED BY A CAR AND ASK YOU TO WRAP UP YOUR COMMENTS IF YOU COULD. THANK YOU. THE CLOCK THE CLOCK IS NOT ON TONIGHT. I'M SORRY ABOUT THAT. SORRY. IT'S OKAY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TESTIMONY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE TESTIMONY ON THIS ITEM THAT I'M ALL RIGHT AND IT'S LIKE EVERYONE ON LINE IS SO THAT YEAH JEROME AND EVERYBODY ONLINE IS EITHER STAFF OR HERE FOR ANOTHER ITEM ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. SEEING NO OTHER COMMENTS I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING SO MOVED A SECOND MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I I OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES DISCUSSION. BEFORE WE START DISCUSSION I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE AN OPPORTUNITY TO AGAIN OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS ARE NOT Q&A BUT I THE COMMENTS ARE FOR THE FEEDBACK ON PEDESTRIAN IN THE CITY I KNOW THE SPECIFIC THING THAT AREA YOU STARTED TALKING ABOUT 86 AND EMERSON WE DID HEAR ABOUT THAT FROM STAFF AS PART OF THE PAYNT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM I BELIEVE A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO THAT IS HAPPENING WITH DIDN'T SHOW UP IN HERE BECAUSE THAT'S JUST A BLOCK PASS AND I WILL JUST SPEAK FOR MYSELF. YES, I'M NEARING THE END OF MY SIX YEARS IN THIS BODY. THE STAFF HAVE HEARD REPEATEDLY FROM ME ABOUT THE PRIORITY FOR SIDEWALKS AND WE ARE DOING SOME WORK ON OUR STREETS PLAN I DON'T UNTIL WE REALISTICALLY UNTIL WE OVERHAUL OUR STREETS THAT WOULD SAVE STREETS GET REBUILT THEY INCLUDE SIDEWALKS IT'S GOING TO BE A BLOCK BY BLOCK NEIGHBORHOOD BY NEIGHBORHOOD DECISION. I THINK THE COMMENTS THAT WE HEARD FROM THE MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WHO SHARED COMMENTS ARE I'M IN LINE WITH WHAT WE HEARD BECAUSE IT'S YEAH WE WERE BUILT AS A SUBURBS WERE BUILT TO BE THE ANTITHESIS OF THE CITY NO WALKING ALL DRIVING AND THE REALITY IS THAT'S CHANGING AND THE COST AND THE THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE LONGEVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MEANS THAT THAT STUFF TAKES A LONG TIME EVEN THINGS LIKE THE PARKS THAT WE'RE HERE TO TALK ABOUT TONIGHT THIS INFRASTRUCTURE THERE WAS LARGELY BUILT WHEN THE PARK WAS BUILT PROBABLY IN THE SIXTIES. SO THE ARC IS LONG AND SLOW BUT MANY OF US ARE HERE AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO BE THAT SQUEAKY WHEEL AS LONG AS WE ARE HERE. SO ON THE APPLICATION ITSELF I, I DON'T HAVE ANY CONCERNS ON THAT TO. ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO OFFER ANY COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION? MICHELLE GOLDSON THANK YOU CHAIR. I SAW YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT OBVIOUSLY PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AS WELL AS WHEN WE THINK ABOUT RESIDENTS THAT ARE WALKING TO AND FROM THE PARK FROM THEIR LOCAL NEIGHBORHOODS, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE FAMILIES AND THOSE RESIDENTS AND MAYBE EVEN NON RESIDENTS ARE PROVIDED SAFE VENUES TO GET THERE. SO I DO FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THE STAFF'S PLAN AND THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN TO PUT IN THE PROPER SAFETY SAFETY CROSSWALK SET THAT THEY PROPOSED TO US A MONTH SO AGO AS FAR AS THE PARKS PLAN I WAS ACTUALLY REALLY EXCITED TO SEE THIS PLAN MANY YEARS AGO WE DID HAVE THE PARKS MASTER PLAN PRESENTED TO US ABOUT HOW THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON IS REVITALIZING OUR AGED PARKS THAT ARE REALLY NOT KEEPING WITH WHAT RESIDENTS EXPECT OR WANT FROM OUR PARK. WE HAVE SOME GREAT PARKS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS BUT THEY DON'T THEY DON'T MEET THE AMENITIES THAT OUR AND OUR RESIDENTS WANT OR NEED. AND SO I SEE THIS BEING THE FIRST STEP FOR US TO REALLY INVEST IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS AND CREATE THIS COMMUNITY THAT WE CAN GATHER AND EXERCISE AND CONGREGATE AND AND JUST CELEBRATE THE COMMUNITY THAT WE LIVE IN AND ALL SEASON. SO I THINK THIS IS FANTASTIC. I'M REALLY ABOUT THE ADAPTIVE PLAYGROUND IN THE THE SPORT. COURTS ARE A GREAT ADDITION AND SO I THINK THIS IS GREAT AND I'LL BE IN FULL SUPPORT ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR A MOTION? MICHELLE ALTMAN IF I CAN I CAN MAKE A MOTION PLEASE DO IN CASE PEOPLE TOO SO YEAH JEROME AND JUST CONFERRING WITH KEVIN TASK HERE CITY ATTORNEY AND WE'RE NOT SURE THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN DEAR WE DID YOU DID WE DID OKAY THANK YOU WE HAD A MOTION AND A SECOND. EXCELLENT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IN CASE PEOPLE 202427 HAVING BEEN ABLE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED FINDINGS AND MOVE TO APPROVE FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS FOR BRYANT PARK RENOVATIONS AT 1001 WEST 85TH STREET SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND CODE REQUIREMENTS ATTACHED TO THE STAFF REPORT SECOND THANK YOU WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE SECOND TO URGE APPROVE FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OTHERS IN FAVOR SAY I I OPPOSED THE MOTION PASSES IS A FINAL DECISION BY THE COMMISSION UNLESS AN APPEAL IS RECEIVED BY 4:30 P.M. ON TUESDAY APRIL 9TH. THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR GOOD WORK ON THIS ITEM NUMBER THREE IS ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING. THIS IS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A SUNSHADE AND A DAYCARE AND PLANNER O'DEA THIS ONE THANK YOU CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS SO YEAH ITEM THREE FOR YOU THIS EVENING IS FOR A MAJOR REVISION TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A SUNSHADE AT EXISTING DAYCARE FACILITY THE ADDRESS IS 5600 AMERICAN BOULEVARD WEST JUST LOCATED WEST OF NORMAN DALE BOULEVARD AND AMERICAN BOULEVARD SURROUNDING AREA IS OFFICE TO THE NORTHWEST HOTEL TO THE SOUTHEAST AS WELL AS A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT BUILDING TO SOUTH. SO THIS THE SITE IS AN EXISTING STOREY OFFICE BUILDING AND LOCATED ON THE BOTTOM FLOOR IS PLATZ WHICH IS A DAYCARE AND THEN THEY HAVE AN OUTSIDE EXISTING OUTSIDE PLAY AREA JUST KIND OF TUCKED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE L-SHAPED BUILDING. SO THEY'RE PROPOSING A SUNSHADE ACCORDING TO OUR CODE WE DON'T HAVE A SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR SUNSHADE ITSELF SO WE KIND OF LUMPED THEM IN WITH OUR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE CODE AND SO THAT MUST MEET A 20 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND. SO WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING IS A DETACHED APPROXIMATELY 1700 SQUARE FOOT FABRIC SUNSHADE OVER THE EXISTING PLAY. THEY'RE RECOMMENDING 16 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE FROM THE SIDE THERE ARE THOSE SUNSHADE AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE SHADE BECAUSE IT'S UNUSABLE DURING HOT DAYS AND REFLECTION OF THE GLASS BUILDING. SO LIKE I SAID EARLIER THE APPLICANT IS DEMONSTRATING DIFFICULTY AND COMPLYING WITH THE 20 FOOT SETBACK DUE TO THE FOOTINGS OF THE SUNSHADE NEEDING TO BE OUTSIDE THE PLAY AREA AND THEN DUE TO THE ANGLE OF THE LOT LINE IT'S DIFFICULT TO MEET THAT 20 FOOT SETBACK. AND THEN JUST A NOTE INTERNAL SIDE IF THE SUNSHADE WERE TO BE ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING OUR FIRE PREVENTION DEPARTMENT MAY REQUIRE SPRINKLER OF SUNSHADE AND THEN JUST A NOTE THAT THE SUNSHADE IT IS CLOSEST TO ADJACENT HOTEL PARKING LOT WHICH I PROVIDED AN IMAGE ON THE RIGHT HAND OF THE SCREEN TAKEN FROM THE PARKING LOT OF THE HOTEL AND SO FLEXIBILITY MEASURES DON'T HAVE SPECIFIC FINDINGS SO WE USE THE PUBLIC BENEFIT TEST AND PLAYING OUTSIDE IS AN IMPORTANT ENRICHMENT ACTIVITY FOR CHILDREN AND. THEN THE SUNSHADE PROVIDES LIMITS SUN EXPOSURE TO CHILDREN WHICH PROMOTES HEALTH AND SAFETY AND THEN THERE IS LITTLE IMPACT ON THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES. SO WITH THAT WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. THIS DOES GO ON TO CITY COUNCIL AND THE APPLICANT FLAGSHIP RECREATION WHICH IS THE MANUFACTURER OF THE THE SUNSHADE IS AVAILABLE VIA WEBEX IF THERE ARE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS THANK YOU THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE AND IT MAY BE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT IS DO YOU KNOW IF THE APPLICANT HAS HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH THE HOTEL ABOUT THE NOT 20 FEET SET BACK CHAIR AM NOT AWARE OF ANY CONVERSATION THEY MIGHT KNOW OKAY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF BUT THE APPLICANT LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM ITEM CHAD I BELIEVE IT IS ONLINE THIS MUTED THOUGH I DIDN'T KNOW IF I COULD UNMUTE MYSELF THANK YOU. DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WANTED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM AT ALL? I THINK MR. DIAS HIT ALL THE CRITICAL POINTS I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF THERE ARE AND MY ONLY QUESTION IS DO YOU HAVE YOU THE DAYCARE HAD ANY CONVERSATIONS WITH THE ADJACENT THE HOTEL ABOUT ONE OF THE THINGS WE'RE ASKED TO CONSIDER IS THE LESS THAN 20 FOOT SETBACK HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONVERSATIONS WITH THE OTHER PROPERTY OWNER ON THIS? I AM ACTUALLY NOT CERTAIN IF THE HAS WE CAN DEFINITELY CHECK INTO THAT AND GET BACK TO THANK YOU COMMISSIONER ALBRECHT THANK YOU CHAIR MY QUESTION IS ABOUT THE ADDITIONAL USERS OF THE OFFICE PROPERTY. HAS THE OWNER BEEN IN CONTACT WITH THE VARIOUS LEASE HOLDERS THERE BESIDES THE KINDER PLATZ DAYCARE AND HAVE THEY BEEN IN CONVERSATIONS ABOUT THE SUNSHADE GOING IN AND ANY DISTURBANCE THAT THAT WOULD HAVE TO ANY OF THE WINDOW VIEWS ON THAT SIDE OF THE BUILDING? RIGHT QUESTION I CAN IN WITH THE OWNER I DID NOT INQUIRE ON THAT SPECIFIC QUESTION OTHER QUESTIONS THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS ITEM IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND SO I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK IF THERE'S ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM . SEEING THAT I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING SO MOVED A SECOND. THANK YOU EMOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I I OPPOSED PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED DISCUSSION COMMISSIONER GOLDSON I'LL GO FIRST. YOU KNOW I THINK WHEN WE LOOK AT IS WE LUMP A SUNSHADE INTO THE CODE OF ACCESSORY DWELLINGS I THINK THERE IS ACCESSORY DWELLING. IT WOULD BE LIKE A A SHED OR SOMETHING THAT IS NON AND I SEE THAT BEING A VERY DIFFERENT APPLICATION THAN A SUNSHADE I ALSO THINK WE LOOK AT THESE AS IF THIS BODY DOES NOT LIKE TO MAKE FOR THE CONCERN OF SETTING PRECEDENTS THAT THIS COULD OPEN UP A CAN OF WORMS FOR OTHER THINGS. I THINK THIS IS A UNIQUE ENOUGH ASK UNIQUE ENOUGH SITUATION THAT I'M COMFORTABLE MAKING THOSE EXCEPTIONS OR MAKING THE CONSIDERATION OF ALLOWING THAT FOUR FEET OF REDUCTION IN I THINK THE THE BENEFIT TO THAT DAYCARE AND EMPLOYEES AND CHILDREN AT THE DAYCARE OUTWEIGH THE FOUR FEET CONCERN OR THE FOUR FEET SETBACK CONCERNS THAT THE CITY HAS ESPECIALLY WHEN I LOOK WHAT DOES A SUNSHADE LOOK LIKE? IT'S TRANSPARENT MOSTLY FROM FRONT TO BACK AND IT'S ACCESSORY DWELLING WOULD NOT BE SO I WILL BE SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION AS IT SITS QUESTIONNAIRE I COOKED AND THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. YOU KNOW I'VE SAID MANY THAT THERE'S NO ONE ON GOVERNMENT THAT'S LOWER THAN WHERE THE CLOSEST FORM OF GOVERNMENT TO THE PEOPLE AND THE BENEFIT OF THAT IS THAT WE'RE ABLE TO TAKE A LENS OF PRACTICALITY TO APPLICATIONS AND RECOGNIZE WHEN VARIANCES ARE EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE IF YOU WILL, ARE ARE WORTHY. AND I DO FIND THAT IN THIS CASE IF YOU LOOK AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD I DON'T BELIEVE GOING TO BE DISTURBING ANYBODY WITH THIS CANOPY AND YOU LOOK AT THE PUBLIC BENEFIT, I CERTAINLY FIND A PUBLIC BENEFIT OF ALLOWING CHILDREN TO PLAY OUTSIDE MORE OFTEN. AND SO WITH THAT I AM IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION. YOU KNOW, I THINK I TOO AM I MY I WAS A LITTLE BIT DISAPPOINTED THAT NOBODY COULD SPEAK WHETHER OR NOT THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY HAD BEEN CONSULTED. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE FACT THAT THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY IS A PARKING LOT I WOULD HAVE GREAT RESERVATIONS OF THE NEIGHBORING WAS ANOTHER BUILD OR ANOTHER HOME OR A BUSINESS OR IT WAS BLOCKING THEM. BUT THE FACT THAT WE'RE ENCROACHING FOUR FEET CLOSER TO A PARKING LOT GIVES ME SOME COMFORT IN MAKING THIS KIND OF AN EXCEPTION AND AS FAR AS YOU KNOW, IMPACT ANYONE ON FLOORS ABOVE I THINK IT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I THINK ALL OF THESE ARE THE SAME OWNER AND SO WHILE THE TENANT MAY FIND THAT INCONVENIENT, IT'S THE OWNER WHO'S MAKING A DECISION ONE WAY OR ANOTHER ABOUT THEIR PROPERTY. SO I THINK IT'S AN EXCELLENT QUESTION. AND AGAIN GOING BACK TO THE IN THE ABSENCE OF HEARING FROM THEM IN THE ABSENCE OF HEARING FROM THE SO I THINK THE MY ADVICE TO ANY OF OUR APPLICANTS WHO COME FORWARD IS YOU KNOW, TALK TO YOUR NEIGHBORS, YOUR DUE DILIGENCE THEY'RE GOING TO BE YOUR MOST POWERFUL VOICE IN FRONT OF THIS GROUP. BUT GENERALLY I CAN SUPPORT THIS. COMMISSIONER ALBRECHT THANK YOU CHAIR. I AGREE YOUR STATEMENTS ABOUT YOU KNOW BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR I THINK WE HEAR THAT A LOT IN THIS BODY IS CONVERSATIONS GO A LONG AND HOPEFULLY THAT PROPERTY OWNER HAS HAD THOSE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE TENANTS IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE I KNOW THAT THE THE DAYCARE WANTS TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR TOO SO IT'S JUST GOOD FOR THEM TO HAVE COMMUNICATION ON THAT AS WELL AS SOMEONE WHO HAS AN 18 MONTH OLD WHO IS IN DAYCARE AND THEY LACK A SUNSHADE THIS WOULD BE VERY WELCOME ADDITION TO THE DAYCARE WE USE AND I KNOW HOW IMPORTANT IT IS FOR KIDS TO BE OUTSIDE AND GIVEN THE PUBLIC BENEFIT I THINK THAT THIS IS AN EASY YES FOR ME. ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION OR A MOTION COMMISSIONER COOKED IN MR. CHAIR IN CASE PEOPLE 2024-3 HAVING BEEN ABLE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED FINDINGS I MOVED RECOMMEND CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MAJOR REVISION TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS A SUNSHADE AT AN EXISTING DAYCARE FACILITY LOCATED AT 5600 AMERICAN BOULEVARD WEST SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS TWO REQUIREMENTS ATTACHED TO THE STAFF REPORT. SECOND THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION AT A SECOND TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF REVISION FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I I OPPOSED THE MOTION PASSES THIS ITEM WILL APPEAR ON THE APRIL 15TH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS A CONSENT ITEM. THE FOURTH ITEM IS A PRELIMINARY FINAL PLAT TO SUBDIVIDE ONE LOT INTO TWO AND PLANNER OH DAY IS WITH US AGAIN YES THANK YOU CHAIR MOVING ON TO ITEM FOUR AS YOU MENTIONED THIS A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT TO SUBDIVIDE ONE LOT INTO TWO LOTS AT 6701 WEST 78TH STREET THIS LOT LOOK MIGHT LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU ALL AS YOU APPROVED THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS JUST TWO MONTHS AGO FOR A FIVE STORY 208 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AND DETACHED THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT DAYCARE AS PART OF THIS PLAN BOTH THE ZONING AND THE GUIDANCE WOULD REMAIN. AND SO HERE IS AN IMAGE OF NINE MILE WEST FOURTH EDITION. THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT IS THE MORE DETAILED PLAT DOCUMENT AND. JUST A NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED PLAT MEETS THE MINIMUM SITE STANDARDS FOR C FOR ZONING DISTRICT AND THE DIVIDING LINE FOR THE TWO LOTS WOULD BE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE DAYCARE SO YOU HAVE THE DAYCARE LOT OUTLINED RED AND THE APARTMENT BUILDING LOT IN BLUE AND THEN HERE'S THE FINAL PLAT DOCUMENT SHOWS THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY AND SIDEWALK BIKEWAY EASEMENTS AND THEN JUST A NOTE THAT PARK DEDICATION IS IS REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF THE PLANNING. IT'S A PRETTY SIMPLE AND STRAIGHTFORWARD PRESENTATION FOR. YOU I HAVE THE APPLICANT ONLINE AND THIS IS A CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL THANK YOU. QUESTIONS FOR STAFF COMMISSIONER GOLTZMAN I GO FIRST AGAIN THE TEACHER AND QUESTION FOR YOU JUST FROM A PROCEDURAL QUESTION WHY WAS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THIS PROPERTY PRESENTED SEPARATELY FROM THE PLANNING OF THE PROPERTY? JUST WONDERING PROCEDURALLY WHY WHY THEY SEPARATE? CHAIR COMMISSIONER GOLTZMAN SO WAS KIND OF A MISCOMMUNICATION ON STAFF SIDE AND THEN AS WELL AS THERE WAS KIND OF AN INDICATION FROM THE APPLICANT SIDE THAT THEY WANTED TO WAIT UNTIL AFTER SO A LITTLE OF BOTH. YEAH. COULD YOU GO BACK TO THE AERIAL THE PREVIOUS ONE THERE THE NEXT ONE SORRY IT'S HARD TO TELL IN THIS IMAGE SO IF WE DO THIS DIVISION WHAT IS THE SETBACK ON DAYCARE AND HOW IS THAT IN COMPLIANCE THAT OR IS THAT NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR THIS AREA? CHAIR SO THAT SETBACKS WERE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND THOSE SETBACKS WERE WERE MET THE SETBACK THE SETBACK ON THE OH FROM NOT IF WE CREATE A NEW THAT YOU SEE ABOUT A BUILDING THAT POTENTIALLY APPEARS HERE MAY RUN RIGHT UP TO THE LOT LINE SO THAT'S WHERE IT GETS TRICKY IS WHERE YOU'RE LOOKING AT SITE STANDARDS WE'RE LOOKING AT THE PARCEL AS A WHOLE INSTEAD OF EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT IF THAT MAKES SENSE MAYBE ONE CAN EXPAND UPON THAT THERE'S A DIFFERENCE LOT AND SITE IN TERM ROOM AND COMMISSIONERS ONE IMPORTANT POINT TO TO BRING UP IS THAT THIS IS ONE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SO FUNCTIONS AS ONE LARGE SITE IN THOSE CASES THE INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES AND EFFECTIVELY ANY SETBACKS TO THOSE INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES FLEXIBLE ALREADY IS CONSIDERED AUTOMATICALLY GRANTED IN THE CASE WE HAVE MANY MANY PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY WHERE PROPERTY LINES ARE INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES SUBDIVIDE THE SITE AND OFTEN RIGHT ALONG BUILDING LINES VERY SIMILAR TO THIS OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF COMMISSIONER ALBRECHT THANK YOU CHAIR SO DAY WILL YOU REMIND US OF THE THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION THERE WAS A PROPOSED PARKING AGREEMENT SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES OF SHARED PARKING OR PROOF OF PARKING. I CAN'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHAT IT IS BUT IF YOU WOULD REMIND US OF THAT SHARED PARKING. MR.. ALBRECHT SHARED YEAH, THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER KIRKLAND. MR.. MR.. DAY WHEN WE SPLIT UP A LOT LIKE THIS, HOW IS IT I'M JUST ASKING OUT OF CURIOSITY HOW DOES IT DETERMINE LIKE WHICH PROPERTY STAYS 6701 AND WHAT IS THE OTHER PROPERTY NUMBERED AND WHAT IS THE PROCESS FOR NUMBERING A NEW PARCEL ARE CHAIR AND COMMISSIONER THAT'S ACTUALLY A FUNCTION OF OUR ENGINEERING DIVISION. THEY HANDLE KIND OF THE ADDRESSING OF OUR LOTS BLOOMINGTON SO I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH HOW THIS BE ADDRESSED. MAYBE JULIE LANG LOOKS SHE'S BEEN PROMOTED TO PANELIST CAN DESCRIBE AND I THINK IF YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS FOR US EITHER MAYBE JULIA BRIAN WHOEVER WANTS TO TAKE QUESTION UH COMMISSIONER ROHMAN PLANNING COMMISSION I'M BRUCE BUNKER HANDLES ALL OF OUR ADDRESSES AND WHAT WE DO IS WE LOOK AT WHAT ARE THE EXISTING ADDRESSES AND THEN WE TRY TO PROVIDE GAPS IF POSSIBLE SO THAT IF ANYTHING SHOULD GET SUBDIVIDED IN THE FUTURE THERE ARE STILL ADDRESSES TO BE USED IS THAT CLEAR? AND ALSO THERE'S A WHOLE SECTION IN THE CODE THAT TELLS YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD BE DOING. IT SOUNDS LIKE SOME GOOD WEEKEND READING MR. CHAIR. IT'S NOT AS EXCITING AS YOU THINK. YOU NEVER KNOW. THANK YOU FOR THAT. OTHER QUESTIONS FOR COMMISSIONER ALBRECHT. I'M ACTUALLY I'M GOING TO TAKE MY QUESTION BACK. OKAY. GOOD. THANK YOU. MR. GOLTZMAN ONE QUESTION I HAD IS WHEN WE REVIEWED FULL DEVELOPMENT PLAN I KNOW THAT THERE THERE'S A LOT OF DRAINAGE. THERE IS A WATER POND AND A LOT OF TIMES WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT FROM A DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE IS THE AMOUNT OF IMPERMEABLE SURFACE AREA, THE IMPACT TO THE WATERSHED. SO WHEN WE DIVIDE A LOT LIKE THIS, DOES THAT PERCENTAGE CHANGE THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PERCENTAGE BECAUSE IT'S NOW A SMALLER LOT OR DOES IT GO WITH THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT? COMMISSIONER CHAIR AND COMMISSIONER I DID CALCULATE THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SEPARATE LOTS SO LOT ONE WHICH IS THE DAY CARES PERCENT LOT TWO IS 50% AND MAXIMUM I BELIEVE IN C FOUR IS 90 OR 95% MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SO IT'S QUITE LARGE AND SHOWING CONSIDERABLY LESS THAN THAT. OKAY THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF RIGHT? WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO SPEAK IN THIS ITEM ? NO, I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD. WE DO HAVE OUR OUR CIVIL ENGINEER AT THE AT THE MEETING TONIGHT IF THEY HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS THAT GO ABOVE MY HEAD BUT OTHERWISE NO I THINK THEY DID A GREAT JOB OF GETTING EVERYTHING DETAILED AND. YES. THIS WAS NOT IDEAL TO DO THESE IN TWO DIFFERENT MEETINGS BUT IT JUST KIND OF ENDED UP WORKING OUT THIS WAY. OKAY. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANTED TO ADD RIGHT NOW QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT . OH, ALL RIGHT. THIS ITEM IS A PUBLIC HEARING SO WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK IF THERE'S ANYBODY IN THE CHAMBERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM SEEING NONE AND SEEING THAT NO ONE ONLINE IS A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING SO MOVED SECOND THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I I OPPOSED PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED DISCUSSION OR A MOTION CHRISTINA SHACKLETON THANKS MR. CHAIR YOU YOU KNOW WHEN WE SAW THIS THE FIRST TIME IT WASN'T MY FAVORITE PROPOSAL IN THE WORLD DUE TO ITS RELATIVELY LOW LACK OF DENSITY ON THE DAYCARE SITE BUT AT THAT TIME WE DISCUSSED IT WAS KIND OF WHAT IT WAS AND AND THE IDEA THAT WE'RE EVER GOING TO GET TO OFFICE TOWERS THERE IS PRETTY UNLIKELY GIVEN THE CURRENT CLIMATE OF THINGS. AND SO WITH HAVING ALL OF THOSE THINGS DONE WITH THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION, WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TONIGHT RELATIVELY NOT CONTROVERSIAL IN MY OPINION AND BE IN SUPPORT THE OTHER DISCUSSION OUR MOTION COMMISSIONER ALBRECHT HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION PLEASE IN CASE P.L. 2024-26 HAVING BEEN ABLE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED FINDINGS I MOVE TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY FINAL PLAT OF NINE MILE WEST FOURTH EDITION CREATING TWO LOTS FROM ONE EXISTING LOT LOCATED AT 6701 WEST 78TH STREET SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN CONTRACT ATTACHED TO THE STAFF REPORT. SECOND THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION THE SECOND TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT THIS DIVISION AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I I OPPOSED THE MOTION PASSES THIS ITEM WILL ALSO APPEAR ON THE APRIL 15TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING AS A CONSENT ITEM. THANK YOU. MOVING ALONG ITEM FIVE IS A TIFF REVIEW FOR A PROJECT AT LYNDALE AN AMERICAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ANALYST PALERMO HAS THE PRESENTATION. THANK YOU CHAIR COMMISSION I'M HERE TONIGHT TO TALK ABOUT 700 AMERICAN TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REVIEW SO TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE REMINDER OF THIS PROPERTY WHICH YOU SAW I IN NOVEMBER WENT TO COUNCIL IN DECEMBER LOCATED AT LYNDALE AT THE CORNER OF LYNDALE AND AMERICAN BOULEVARD OF REIT KIND OF IN THIS NORTHERN WESTERN CORNER THERE AND FOR 94 TO THE THE NORTH THERE CITY OWNS THE PROPERTY BUT WE'RE SELLING IT TO SCHAFER RICHARDSON TO DEVELOP 128 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING THIS WOULD BE A SENIOR LIVING FACILITY IT IS 100% AFFORDABLE EIGHT UNITS WILL BE AFFORDABLE TO THOSE MAKING 30% OF THE AREA MEDIAN INCOME 104 IT WOULD BE A 50% AREA MEDIAN INCOME AND 16 WOULD BE AT 60% AREA INCOME. YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A SMALL COMMERCIAL SPACE AT THE CORNER THERE AS WELL ABOUT 5000 SQUARE FEET. SO YOU'RE PROBABLY WONDERING WHY ARE WE HERE TODAY? YOU'VE ALREADY APPROVED THE PROJECT. IT'S GONE TO COUNCIL. WELL, WE'RE LOOKING AT THE FINANCIAL THAT WE WOULD BE WORKING WITH AND PART OF THEIR FUNDING SOURCES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING UNDER STATE STATUTE THERE ARE SOME FINDINGS THAT THE CITY NEEDS TO MAKE IN TO PROVIDE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING TO FILL A GAP IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL . SO TODAY THERE'S THINGS LIKE DOES IT QUALIFY AS A HOUSING TAXED AS A HOUSING DISTRICT WHICH HAS CERTAIN AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENTS WHICH IT MEET WHAT YOU MIGHT HAVE HEARD OF THAT BUT FOR TEST WITH THIS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT HAPPENED BUT FOR THIS FUNDING WAS THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE ON THIS PROPERTY AND THIS LAST ITEM IS WHERE THE PLANNING COMMISSION COMES IN UNDER STATE STATUTE YOU NEED TO REVIEW THIS AND MAKE SURE THAT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CITY AS A WHOLE. SO WE LOOK AT OUR 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THERE ARE SPECIFIC GOALS THAT RELATE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT GOAL NUMBER TWO IS TO PROVIDE IDENTIFY AND OPPORTUNITY FOR NEW HOUSING AND MIXED USE. SO THIS IS A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. IT'S HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT AND A PROMINENT CORNER AND ALSO MEETS OUR GOAL THREE OF PURSUING REDUCING HOUSING COSTS YOU KNOW HOUSING AND ALSO MEETING OUR GOALS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS PROVIDED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL. SO YOU CAN SEE HERE WE HAVE SPECIFIC ALLOCATION AND DIFFERENT OF THOSE INCOME THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT AND THEY'RE MEETING THAT TO HELPING US MEET OUR 30% GOAL WHICH IS YOU KNOW MUCH TICKET TO HIGHER SUBSIDY. SO AN OVERVIEW AGAIN YOU'RE LOOKING AT IS THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUT THIS WILL ALSO GO TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 15TH FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. THEY'LL KIND OF REVIEW THOSE OTHER ITEMS AND MAKE FINDINGS. IT ALSO GOES TO THE HRA BOARD WHICH WILL BE PROVIDING TEST AND THAT GOES ON APRIL 23RD. SO WITH THAT I'LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR HERE'S A MOTION FOR YOU. ALL RIGHT. AS WE'VE SEEN BEFORE AND AS ANALYSTS PLAY MORE OUTLINED, IT'S A FAIRLY NARROW FOCUS FOR THIS GROUP. SO QUESTIONS FOR STAFF SORRY. COMMISSIONER ESA SOON THEY'LL COME SOON. ANY QUESTIONS OR THEN I GUESS IT WILL BE ON YOU FOR THE MOTION. OH YES. SORRY DISCUSSION. YEAH. MR. CHAIR, I WAS GOING TO ASK IF THERE NEEDS TO BE A DISCUSSION PERIOD BEFORE IT'S A TECHNICALLY A STUDY ITEM. OKAY, SO IS THERE A DISCUSSION ? PLEASE PLEASE DO YOU KNOW OUR GOAL IS TO DETERMINE WHETHER THIS MEETS THE THIS PROJECT MEETS THE INTENT OF THE LONG TERM PLAN. THAT'S AN AWFULLY VAGUE STATEMENT IN MY AND I THINK I COULD FIND REASONS WHY THIS THIS PARTICULAR APPLICATION OR THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT MEET THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUT IT'S NOT WORTH THE FIGHT THIS THING IS WE'VE WE'VE ALREADY SEEN THE MEAT OF THIS PROJECT AND NOT GOING TO STOP IT HERE AND SO AS MANY REASONS AS THERE ARE NOT THAT IT DOESN'T MEET THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THERE'S JUST AS MANY THAT IT DOES AND AS YOU ASTUTELY NOTED WE HAVE A VERY NARROW ON THIS SO I THINK I'M GOING TO IT. WHERE IS THAT I DON'T DISAGREE WITH YOU THIS THE QUESTION ABOUT TIF ALWAYS FEELS TO ME LIKE WHEN WE USED TO CELL PHONE ANTENNAS AND HAD NO AUTHORITY TO DENY IT SO I'M NOT DISAGREEING WITH YOU ONE BIT. COMMISSIONER KIRKLAND ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTION ? YES, I WILL GO AHEAD AND FEEL FREE TO MAKE A MOTION. I MOVE TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT 700 AMERICAN BOULEVARD WEST REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TIFF OR TIFF PLAN ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE BLOOMINGTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SECOND, THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE TIFF PLAN AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION IN FAVOR SAY I OPPOSED THE MOTION PASSES AND THAT IS THE EXTENT OF THIS ITEM THIS AS NOTED THIS TOPIC WILL BE AT THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 15TH AND THE HRA ON THE 23RD. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER SIX IS TO CONSIDER THE MEETING SYNOPSIS FROM NOVEMBER 2ND. EVERYONE HERE WAS PRESENT AT THAT SO I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. YES. MR.. ALBRECHT OH YES. OH. SORRY. YES SURE. APOLOGIZE. I JUST HAD A QUESTION AROUND SO I TO TAKE A STEP BACK BECAUSE NOVEMBER 2ND WAS QUITE A LONG TIME AGO. SO CAN CAN WE TALK THROUGH WHY THERE HAS BEEN A DELAY IN THE THE THE REPORT? I'M SURE THAT THERE WAS DELAY UNTIL I SAW IT. YEAH. CHAIRWOMAN COMMISSIONER AND GOLTZMAN TWO ITEMS AT PLAY. ONE IS WE TEND TO PRIORITIZE IN ITS REVIEWS ITEMS THAT ARE GOING TO THE CITY COUNCIL SOON. SO PARTICULAR ONE THERE WERE I THINK ITEMS ON IT THAT WERE GOING TO CITY COUNCIL THAT WERE REVIEWED AND WERE ADVANCED AS ITEMS. BUT THERE ARE SOME VERY LARGE ITEMS HAVEN'T GONE TO CITY COUNCIL AND SO THAT'S ONE REASON FOR THE DELAY. THE OTHER REASON IS MORE INTERNAL REASON WE RECENTLY LOST SOME WORKFLOW SOFTWARE FUNCTION THAT USED TO HELP GUIDE THE MINUTES THROUGH THE VARIOUS REVIEWERS. SO IN THE ABSENCE OF THAT WE'RE KIND OF DOING EMAIL AND THEN IT TENDS TO GET STUCK IN YOU KNOW, A CERTAIN REVIEWER'S FOR A WHILE. SO THAT'S KIND OF WHY WE'RE A LITTLE BIT LATE ON THIS ONE. THANK YOU. HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION. PLEASE DO I MOVE TO APPROVE DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SYNOPSIS FROM NOVEMBER 2ND 2023 SECOND THANK YOU MOTION A SECOND TO APPROVE THE MEETING DISCUSSION IN FAVOR SAY I I PROPOSED. THOSE ARE APPROVED. ALL RIGHT, HOLD ONTO YOUR SEATS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ISSUE UPDATE BECAUSE IT'S A LONG ONE JEROME AND COMMISSIONERS THAT AS OFTEN OCCURS IT'S KIND OF A FEAST AND FAMINE SITUATION THE APRIL 25TH AGENDA WE ACTUALLY HAVE NO ITEMS SCHEDULED AND THEN WE'RE CONTINUING TONIGHT TO THAT AGENDA SO THAT MEETING WOULD BE CANCELED ON APRIL 25TH. HOWEVER, MAY 9TH IS A VERY, VERY FULL AGENDA RIGHT NOW WE HAVE TEN ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. HOWEVER, THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT OF THESE ITEMS ARE CITY INITIATED ITEMS SO I WILL BE EXPLORING WITH THE KIND OF PROJECT MANAGERS EACH OF THESE ITEMS WHICH ARE NOT TIME SENSITIVE AND CAN BE DEFERRED TO A FUTURE MEETING SECOND MEETING IN MAY. SO I SUSPECT THAT SEVERAL WILL DROP OFF THE AGENDA BUT AS OF TODAY WHAT'S TENTATIVELY TRACKING THAT AGAIN TEN ITEMS THE FIRST TO THE FINAL SAY IN THE BUILDING PLANS FOR STADIUM IMPROVEMENTS AT KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL AND THEN AT JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL AND THIRD WHEN I SAY NOT IN PLANS FOR PARKING LOT EXPANSION SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT'S AT 7900 CHICAGO AREA FOURTH ITEM IS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A HEALTH CLUB THAT'S AT THE EXPERT SERVICE 95 ON ONE LYNDALE FOR FIFTH ITEM WOULD BE A STUDY ITEM PARK AND FLY PRO FORMA ANALYSIS. THIS IS SOMETHING THE PLANNING COMMISSION BE REVIEWED ANNUALLY WHEN THAT INTERIM USE PERMIT BRINGS FORWARD PERFORMANCE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT IT'S A MILESTONE THOSE HAVE NOT BEEN MET. SIXTH DATE IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR CITY CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING SPEED LIMITS. SECOND ITEM IS A RELATED PUBLIC HEARING ON ADOPTION OF A SPEED LIMIT MAP. EIGHTH ITEM CITY CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS. I DON'T AS A STUDY ITEM REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE STREAMLINED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESSES. AND THEN THE 10TH ITEM ON THE STUDY ITEM SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY HOUSING STANDARDS. SO WE KNOW THAT THERE WILL BE A LOT OF PUBLIC INTEREST IN ITEMS ONE AND TWO AND FOUR THAT REASONABLY THINK WE'LL NEED TO SHIFT SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT WE CAN SHIFT EARNING YOUR ON MAY 9TH AREN'T WE OTHER ITEMS THAT ANYONE ON THE COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO BRING UP DURING THIS? YES, COMMISSIONER GOLTZMAN. AND ONE QUESTION I HAVE JUST FOR YOUR FELLOW COMMISSIONERS I KNOW THAT THE PLANNING NATIONAL PLANNING CONFERENCE IS NOT WEEKEND BUT NEXT. AND SO I JUST WANTED TO GET A POLL OF WHO WAS PLANNING ON ATTENDING SO THAT WE CAN COORDINATE ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER? ALL RIGHT. SEEING WE ARE ADJOURNED UNTIL MAY 9TH