I'll call the regular meeting to order. To make it easier for residents to voice their comments, there will be two public comment periods. There will be one at the beginning of the meeting designated for comments related to items on the agenda and one at the end of the meeting for general public comment. Public comment for designated public hearing items will be heard when the item is called. Speakers will be limited to three minutes to state their comments. This meeting is being video recorded and streamed live on the internet. Mr. Valdez, Please confirm posting and roll call. Mayor, this meeting has been posted in accordance with the Nevada Open Meeting Law. All members of the Council are present and you have a quorum. The record will reflect that Councilman Cox is attending via teleconference. Thank you. I would like to invite Donna Taft, care pastor of Sin City Church to the podium to give the invocation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by McDoniel and Dooley Elementary School National Honor Society students. Everlasting God, as we prepare for thanksgiving for our nation, we thank you for all the hard work our council members have given to the community. Lord, now we request that you continue to work in the hearts of all of our respected council members. Bestow on them the wisdom and the discernment they may need in making challenging decisions today. Bless them with your grace in his holy name, Amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Thanks, kids. Very good job. And so everybody can see you, can we have the Honor Society students stand up and be recognized, please? Thank you for being here today and for getting your tour of City Hall. Ms. Garcia-Vaas, are there any changes to the agenda? Yes, Mayor Romero, there are changes. The recommendation for item five should be to ratify Item 30 will be continued to the December 16, 2025 City Council regular meeting at the request of the applicant. Items 32 and 33 will be opened together but voted on separately. Thank you. May I have a motion to accept the agenda as amended? I move. Please vote. Councilwoman Cox, how do you vote? Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Seabach and it carries. Our first item today is a presentation of the Mayor's Honor Roll, which recognizes Henderson students, teachers, administrators, support professionals, and parents of students for special achievements, exemplary service, and outstanding contributions in education. This is our first awards presentation for the 2025-2026 school year. Our first honoree is Kayvel Basu, an eighth grade student at Bob Miller Middle School. As president of the robotics team and vice president of National Junior Honor Society, he mentors younger peers in robotics and innovative Lego building, inspiring their interest in STEM. Over the summer, he volunteered more than 120 hours with organizations such as Ronald McDonald House, Baby's Bounty, Helping Hands of Nevada, and Three Square. A three-year Nevada Science Olympiad medalist, Cavell leads by example through his charitable work, fundraising efforts, and thoughtful recognition of educators, including nominating his teacher for a national award that provided $5,000 for her classroom. His leadership, compassion, and commitment to giving back make him a true role model within his school and community. Our next recipient is Andrea Rose, a special education teacher at Liberty High School. Ms. Rose creates engaging hands-on learning experiences that foster independence and confidence in students with learning disabilities, while securing additional resources through grants and DonorsChoose to enhance instruction. Beyond the classroom, she serves as an advisor for Key Club, Hope Squad, and the Jewish Student Union, empowering students to become compassionate leaders and active community members. Through her collaboration with colleagues, families, and local partners, Ms. Rose cultivates a culture of inclusivity, respect, and service that positively impacts the entire school and sets her apart as a leader in education. Our last recipient today is Stacy Tiffany, an outstanding parent volunteer at Foothill High School who has greatly enriched the school community of not only Foothill High School, but also Smalley Elementary for more than a decade. As vice president of the PTO, she plays a vital role in organizing events, coordinating fundraisers, and managing volunteer signups. She consistently goes above and beyond and is known for her kindness, reliability, and tireless support. Congratulations to our Mayor's Honor Roll recipients. I'd like to invite Mayor and Council to the gallery and ask the honorees to come up to receive their awards. Stacy's principal is here. Come on up. Stacy is sick today and couldn't be here. So on her behalf, principal's going to accept the award. She's watching. Okay. Once again, I am... amazed by the work that you all do in our community to help our kids achieve their greatest possibility. And wow, what an example you are to all the other students at your school. Thank you for that. For all that you put into helping others is a testament to your parents and to those who have helped bring you up. Thank you for being such a phenomenal role model. Thank you for all the help that you've given to those who need it most in our schools. and efforts you've put in. It's a great example for all the other teachers. And please pass along our thanks to Stacy for all the work that she does on a volunteer basis to continue to improve education outcomes in our community for our kids. Congratulations to each one of you, and thank you. Now is the time for our first public comment. Before we start, our City Clerk will make a statement. All email, text and social media messages to the City Council and City staff is subject to the Nevada Public Records Act and the Nevada Open Meeting Law. Please do not sit, stand or block the aisles, walkways or doorways. And as a reminder, the vestibule at the back of the chambers is reserved for working City staff and public safety personnel only. During the meeting, there are three opportunities for public comment. The first public comment period at the beginning of the meeting is for items that are on the agenda but are not designated public hearing items. The second public comment period is designed for public hearing items. During this period, public comments are limited to designated public hearing items only. The third public comment period at the end of the meeting is for general public comment. During this period, comments may be offered on topics that are not on the agenda but comments should be limited to matters within the jurisdiction, authority, or control of the city. Please note that the City Council cannot take action or deliberate on matters that are not on the agenda. Therefore, issues raised during the final public comment period will be referred to the appropriate City Department for response to a contact Henderson case created by the City Clerk's Office at the direction of the City Manager. Persons who would like to speak during any of the three public comment periods should sign up with the deputy city clerk managing the public comment queue in the vestibule at the entrance of the chambers. When your name is called by the city clerk, please walk to the front of the podium, speak directly into the microphone, and state your first and last name for the record and your zip code. You will have three minutes to speak, and Mayor, there is no one in the first public comment queue. Thank you. I'll close public comment. Good evening, Mayor and Council. The community came together for our annual Veterans Day ceremony on November 8th at the Water Street Plaza Amphitheater, where we paid tribute to our local patriots and military heroes. This event included a presentation of 32 names added to the Henderson Veterans Memorial Wall, recognition of veterans organizations, presentation of colors, and special musical performances. We celebrated the grand opening of our go back. Thank you for the Veterans Day ceremony. Sorry. Now on to the next one. We celebrated the grand opening of our 75th park, Centiero Park on November 12th, 2025. Centiero is our seventh and final park in the Inspirata community. Opening new parks is an essential component of our healthy, livable, sustainable city strategic priority, and helps further our goal of a park within a 10-minute walk of every Henderson resident's home. Get your holiday shopping done early at Shop Small Business Saturday throughout the Water Street District on November 29th. Join over 100 local vendors offering unique gifts, handmade goods, art, and delicious food, along with live entertainment and festive fun. small businesses are the heart of our economic vitality strategic priority. Events like Shop Small Business Saturday show our support to this vital section of our local economy. Thank you, Mayor and Council. That concludes this evening's City Manager's Report. The next section of your agenda is the Consent Agenda, consisting of Items 3 through 29. As a reminder, Item 5, The recommendation is amended to ratify. Unless an item is pulled for discussion, Council will take action on all consent agenda items with one motion. Thank you. May I have a motion to accept the consent agenda as amended? I'll move. Please vote. So moved. Aye. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Sebach, and it carries. The next section of your agenda is public hearings. As a reminder, item 30 has been continued at the request of the applicant. Item 31 is a public hearing, appeal of decision AP-9-25 for variance VAA-2025-017447, Evelyn Pipitone, single residence, and the recommendation is to affirm Planning Commission's decision of approval. Mayor and members of Council, this is an appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the variance to reduce the interior site setbacks from 5 feet to 3 feet for a principal residence dwelling unit located approximately 100 feet southwest of the intersection of Evelyn Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. Staff in the Planning Commission recommended approval for the applicant, as they provided a compelling case that their request was a legal hardship based on the narrowness of the lot. Thank you. Is the applicant here? Or the appellant? Tiffany Stewart is the appellant. Come on down. Hi, I'm Tiffany Stewart. Say your zip code for the record. 89011. And my sister's going to represent me. Tessa Stewart, 89002. Good evening and thank you for hearing this appeal. This is a tight knit neighborhood and people here genuinely care about what happens on their street. In just two days, 42 neighbors signed an opposition of this variance. This is not normal turnout. That's a sign a community is deeply worried. To be clear, nobody is against building a home. What we object to is building a three story structure with reduced setbacks that would directly harm privacy, safety and livability. This proposed house is already unusually invasive for a neighborhood that is 95% single story. Actually, every house on Evelyn Street is a single story. A three-story structure will overlook every surrounding backyard, cast large shadows, and fundamentally change the character of this block. Shrinking the setbacks from five feet to three feet make the impact even worse. Being three feet off a property line is extremely close, especially for a house this tall. It also pushes the structure dangerously close to the existing utility pole and transformer. Nevada Energy's own clearance standards make it clear that reducing space around the pole compromises access and safety. I understand the lot is small, but the lot directly behind it is the same size and shape, and that home was built within code. Two stories, two bedrooms with a garage. Nothing about this parcel prevents the applicant from building a perfectly livable home. This isn't a housing crisis issue. This is wanting a bigger, grander house than the law can support issue. The applicant claims they need a variance to build what they want, but using a standard footprint, the house would only lose about 240 square feet, still leaving roughly 1800 square feet plus a 232 square foot garage. That's not a hardship, that's a preference. The city created these setback rules for a reason. Abending them for lots this small we remove the protections that keep this neighborhood safe consistent and livable We simply asked the city to apply the same rules to everyone a home can and will be built there Just not the one that damages the quality of life of the families who already live beside it for the reasons We respectfully ask you to not deny the variance. Thank you so much I Don't know we're trying to find that I have a question. Hold on, we're still trying to establish if the applicant is here. Does it? It doesn't appear so. Doesn't appear so. Do we have an exhibit that would show? Yes. Thank you. Yes. Want me to put it on the overhead? Before we start asking questions, this item is a public hearing, which I'll now open. Mayor Paterson- Can I say something? Born and raised in Henderson. I have no issue with anybody building anything on my street. I've watched many houses in 37 years be built on my street. I've never complained about any of them, but a big orange three-story house, which is as tall as the telephone poles in my neighborhood, everybody will see it. I'm the one that had all the petitions signed, all the signatures, and everybody I talked to had no problem with the house being built there until I showed them the picture of the house. You guys have a picture of the house? If you have a picture of the house, you'll see exactly what we're talking about. Somebody needs to show a picture of the house. This is the picture everybody needs to see. Excuse me one second. I'm going to try to hurry here. Come on. No, it's not going to work. Tiffany, can you pull that up? Picture of the house? My phone's not working for some reason in here. If you can see the picture, it is a big, giant, orange house squeezed in between two lobs. There's no way in this picture will come out with a fence line in between that house and that house. They will have no yard. That picture is deceiving. I want to say just if you guys allow this, every time I open my window, I'm going to see this big old orange house in my, I live across the street from it. And I just think you guys are not looking at the big picture. Nobody wants the house except for the guy that the city sold the property to, which was too small to build anything on. Now they want the revenue out of it. So they're going to let him build this house. So when I build my addition, 15 years ago, you guys wouldn't let me go 12 feet. I only had to go 11 feet because you wouldn't let me because of the variance. So I had to make my house 100 square feet smaller when I did my addition. And you guys only gave me one option, sell my house and move to another neighborhood or make my house bigger. So I tried to make my house bigger. You guys denied it. Not you guys, but the building commission denied it. So just like Tiffany, her and her father spent a year and a half building her house, her and her father. built her house right next to this house. She will have no privacy. Six houses up, I talked to the other neighbor, you know, she says she, you know, sometimes stays in the nude. She doesn't want the house there because she will have no privacy. So I rest my case. Thank you. Thank you, ma'am. Thank you, everybody. My phone. No one else in the queue, mayor. Thank you. Okay, I'll close the public hearing on this item. Council members, Councilman Cox, go ahead with your question. So can you please confirm this is a three story home that is scheduled to be built? Yes, that's what the applicant has proposed is a three story home under the 35 foot setback for the zoning in that district. And the houses to the left and the right are one story homes? I believe that's accurate, yes. Mayor and Council. Thank you. I don't know if you want to to continue this item, to allow the applicant the opportunity to come and attend to a future date. That is an option just to let you know. A question on that, Steph, may or may I? He was well informed, or the applicant was well informed of this item, this issue, correct? Presumably, I don't know that there was a confirmation. I don't know. I have not heard, so I would ask maybe the City Clerk's Office if there was a confirmation of that. Mayor and Council, I can confirm that we thoroughly reviewed the notices and sent those out in accordance with the statutory requirements. Thank you. I have no desire to postpone it. Neither do I. I agree. Did you have any more questions? No, thank you, Mayor. Any other questions? I actually have a question. what is the height that's allowed by Wright and what leeway? Let me back it up. If we deny the setback, that's the only variance that's being asked of this, what happens? Are they still meet height requirements, everything else, if they move forward with this, as long as they adjust the height Yes, Mayor. So the height in the district is 35 feet. They're under that. They're not requesting a variance for the height of the house. They're requesting the, basically it slims down at the front by the two feet on either side for the setbacks, and then it gets wider, and so that's what they're asking for the variance is for those extra two feet on each side, so four feet towards the rear of the property, which they've set it back from the single-story homes adjacent to it. So if you... overturn the Planning Commission's decision to approve the variance waiver, then basically they wouldn't be granted the setback, so they could then, they could come back again and ask for a waiver, or they could come back with a different variance, or they could just build the home at the same height without it being encroaching into the setback. Okay. Mayor, may I ask a question? This gentleman here said that he had a height limit, Has the code changed? Not a height limit. It's silent. Which they're asking for. Okay. But the height limit's been the height limit for a long time, correct? Yes, as far as I understand, yeah, the height limit's been the same for decades. Okay. Thank you. Okay. Any other questions? May I have a motion? And make your motion clear, because it... a motion to, what's recommended is a motion to affirm the Planning Commission's decision of approval. If we want something different, then we need to deny the... Mayor Redekopoulos- Then you want to overturn the Planning Commission approval, denying the variance. Mayor Redekopoulos- Okay. Do I have a motion? I'll make a motion. I would like to overturn the Planning Commission's decision of approval and recommend and deny the application. I have a question to that motion then. So a yay means that the Planning Commission will be overturned with a yay? Correct. Correct. Thank you. How would you like to vote, Councilwoman Cox? Yay. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Mayor Romero, and it carries. So to be clear to the neighbors, it's overturned. Thank you. You're welcome. As a reminder, items 32 and 33 will be opened together but voted on separately. Item 32 is a public hearing for CUP-2025017213, Green-Stephanie Plaza Dispensary, Recommendation is to approve with conditions. Item 33 is business license, retail marijuana store, green. Recommendation is to approve with conditions. Mayor, members of council, it's a conditional use permit for retail marijuana dispensary located at 47 South Stephanie Street, Suite 100. Staff recommends approval. Good evening, Mayor and Council. John Marchiano, 218 Lead Street. With me is Lindsey Clements, the Director of Operations for the dispensaries, and Mr. Foreman, who is the Director of Real Estate. We concur on both items with all the conditions and recommendations of staff. Just for the record, Mayor, Ms. Sosa and Mr. Beaton, my clients have a number of operations in a number of jurisdictions, and they said that both of your staff members are quite remarkable. So we just want the record to reflect that, please. Thank you. This item is a public hearing, which I'll now open. Mayor, there is no one in the public comment queue for item 32. Then I'll close the public hearing. Any questions or comments? Councilwoman Cox, any questions? No. Is that a yes or a no? Oh, no. I may have a motion. No, thank you. Please vote. Yay. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilwoman Larson, and it carries. Thank you. And may I have a motion for item 33 for the business license? Please vote. Councilwoman? Yay. Thank you. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Stewart, and it carries. Thank you. Item 34 is a continued public hearing. For A, CPA-2025-017496, Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Item B, ZCA-2025-017497, Zone Change. Item C, DEV-2025-017381, Development Agreement. Item D, DRA-2025-017497, 502 Design Review, Pueblo Pines Apartments, and the recommendation is to approve with conditions. Good evening. Oh, sorry. No, go ahead. Mayor and members of council, this is a four-part item for age-restricted affordable multifamily development on 7.5 acres on the northeast corner of Pueblo Boulevard and Boulder Highway. This includes a comprehensive plan and zone change amendment from commercial to mixed use on a 0.7 acre portion of the site. There's a negotiated development agreement for an age-restricted community, which requires biennial reviews to ensure compliance with the age-restricted obligations. And last is a design review for a 270-unit multifamily development. Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval. The applicant is here for a presentation. Good evening, Mayor and Council. My name is Bob Feibelman, and I'm with Nevada Hands, located at 9121 West Russell, Suite 219, Las Vegas. We're a nonprofit developer of affordable housing and have been serving the community for over 30 years. We're here tonight to present our plans for the proposed Pueblo Pines project. This project is located on 7.52 acres at the northwest corner of Pueblo Boulevard and Boulder Highway. We're very excited to be able to bring 270 units of high quality, affordable senior housing to the city of Henderson. This project consists of five four-story buildings, each with 54 apartments. It is also exciting to integrate this housing with the Reimagine Boulder Highway project, which provides efficient mass transit and beautification of the corridor. During our neighborhood meeting, we heard several concerns. Traffic on Pueblo. We know that senior housing has minimal impact on traffic compared to most other uses. At the Planning Commission meeting, there was discussion between the Planning Commissioners and the City's traffic engineer. They had reviewed and approved the project. There was also discussion about the project entrance location. The City determined the location of the entrance since no driveway can be built on Boulder Highway nor closer to the corner on Pueblo. The driveway location is where a utility easement exists, thus nothing can be built there. The neighbors did not like the buildings in the height of the buildings in that they lived in a one-story community and felt that our residents would look down into their backyards. We've taken several steps towards almost eliminating that concern. First, under the current zoning, we're allowed to build up to 90 feet in height, but we chose to stay under 60, actually closer to 50. That's almost half of what is allowable. The buildings do not have balconies for residents to view residents in their backyards. Third, our site is separated from the neighbors by a wide utility easement. 225 feet is the closest point from our closest building to a neighbor's backyard. The range from our buildings to the neighbors' backyards is 225 to 498 feet. We located the buildings to mostly avoid the north property line and designed the location of the closest building to be parallel to the perimeter wall, to not to be parallel to the perimeter wall in order to increase separation from the neighbors. We purposely worked to avoid building along the north property wall. For example, we located our dog park in the corner to further eliminate any visual impact from a structure. We prepared this line of sight exhibit to show the view from the neighboring backyards. Neighbors might see part of our third floor and most likely the fourth floor. Yet due to the significant distances, there should be very little visual impact to the neighbors. Fourth, the neighbors brought up the fear of the homeless. We believe developing this property should positively impact that. Finally, the neighbors spoke about past experiences with poorly maintained apartment complexes. We agree that property management is everything. Nevada HAND has been developing and managing our developments for over 30 years. We're very proud of our new construction. However, we are more proud of our older buildings because they are well maintained. We invite anyone to visit any of our 36 communities with over 5,400 apartments in Clark County to see how well maintained they are. I'd like to add that Nevada HAND provides additional services such as a transportation fleet to take our residents around the valley, full resident services department to help seniors with services that they are looking for. And we also have food pantries in many properties. Note that we have intentionally oriented the common area amenities to the center of the project. For amenities, we have large combination leasing, recreation, maintenance building with staff offices, large activity room, fitness area, and computer lab. Outdoors, we have covered areas, a swimming pool and spa, dog park, garden area, walking paths, and seating areas. We're here before you requesting approval to amend the comprehensive land use plan from commercial to transit-oriented development and rezoning from RS6 low-density residential to or mixed use for a small portion of the site, approval of the development agreement allowing for an age-restricted community, and design review for a 270-unit multifamily development. With that, we concur with staff recommendations, and I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Thank you. This item is a public hearing, which I'll now open. Mayor, there is no one in the public comment queue for item 34. I'll close the public hearing. I just have a couple quick questions. I believe I know the answers to these because I've toured some of your properties, but you, Nevada Hand, does not typically flip the properties. You continue to hold onto them and maintain ownership for the duration of the life of the project. Is that correct? Correct. Okay. And it's age-restricted forever. Is that correct? Well, this project... The development agreement will age restricted for 30 years, but essentially all of our senior projects that we've built forever have stayed age restricted. Okay, thank you. Any other questions or comments? I just have one more, a little more specific on that. So it's not just one floor is age restricted. The entire complex is age restricted, correct? Correct. Okay. Any questions, Councilwoman Cox? I just want to make a note that there is a large buffer between the project site and the neighborhood, correct? NEW SPEAKERS OF THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE CITY, THE C issue or the traffic flow by providing transportation. So thank you for being mindful and taking all the considerations of the community. Thank you. May I have a motion? I move. Please vote. Councilwoman Cox, how do you vote? Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Seabach and it carries. Item 35 is the accompanying resolution for Item 34, CPA-2025-017496, Pueblo Pines Apartments, and the recommendation is to adopt as Resolution 4655. We have a motion. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Stewart, and it carries. Item 36 is a continued public hearing for A, CPA-2025-017-252, comprehensive plan amendment. Item B, ZCA-2006660020-825, zone change amendment. Item C, CUP-2025-017-258, conditional use permit. Item D, WOS-2025-017-265, Waiver of Standards. Item E, TMA-2025-017-259, Tentative Map. Item F, DRA-2025-017-260, Design Review, The Falls, Lake Las Vegas, Lauren Williams, and Lake Mead, NWC. And the recommendation is to approve with conditions. Mayor and members of council, this is a six-part item on eight acres on the northwest corner of Lauren Williams Parkway and Lake Mead Parkway within the falls plan at Lake Las Vegas. This includes land use and zone change to amend the site from commercial to low-density residential. Third is a permit for a wastewater lift station. Fourth is a waiver of standards to increase the retaining wall height from six feet to nine feet. And tentative map and design review for a 31-lot single-family detached residential subdivision. Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval. Thank you. Mr. Amick? Thank you, Madam. Mr. Council, Tom Amick, 1980 Festival Plaza 89135. I'm here on behalf of Mr. Brynjolson tonight as the property owner. We appreciate the staff recommendation of approval as well as the Planning Commission for this 31 lots. Don't have anything further unless you have questions for me. Thank you. This item is a public hearing, which I'll now open. Mayor, there is no one in the public hearing queue for item number 36. I'll close the public hearing. Any questions or comments? May I have a motion? Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilwoman Larson, and it carries. Thank you. Item 37 is the accompanying resolution for item number 36, CPA-2025-017252-017252. the Falls at Lake Las Vegas, Lauren Williams in Lake Mead, NWC. The recommendation is to adopt as resolution number 4656. We have a motion to adopt. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Seabach and it carries. Thank you. Item 38 is the first of 16 items. I will open this item, and then there will be a brief presentation, and then we will open each one of them for votes. So item 38 is a continued public hearing for ACPA-2025-017463, Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Item B, ZCA-2025-017464, Zone Change, West Henderson, BLM Parcel 1, and the recommendation is to approve the conditions. So Mayor and members of Council, this time I'd like to invite Anthony Jukesup, one of our planners, to give you a brief presentation on all 16 items. Good evening, Mayor and Council. Anthony Jukes, senior planner with the City's Long Range Planning Division. In 2024, City Council approved the nominations of eight parcels in West Henderson for inclusion in the upcoming 2025 Bureau of Land Management Land Sale. The parcels are shown on that plan there. In preparation for the potential sale and future development for these nominated parcels, City staff conducted an evaluation of the current land use and zoning. The evaluation considered surrounding land uses and zoning, existing development patterns in the area, and the compatibility of future development with adjacent uses. Based on this review, staff are proposing amendments to the land use and zoning designations for these parcels. These proposed changes are in alignment with the city's long-term vision for the elderly growth and development as outlined in the Henderson-Strong Comprehensive Plan. No development plans are included with the following land use and zone change requests. And with that, I'd be happy to answer any questions. Thank you. So item 38 is a public hearing, which I'll now open. Mayor, there is no one in the public comment queue for item 38. I'll close the public hearing. Any questions or comments? May I have a motion? Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilwoman Larson, and it carries. Item 39 is the accompanying resolution for item number 38, CPA-2025-017463-1212. West Henderson BLM Parcel 1 and the recommendation is to adopt as resolution number 4657. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Stewart and it carries. Item 40 is a continued public hearing for ACPA-2025-017-480, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Item B, ZCA-2025-017-481, Zone Change, West Henderson BLM Parcel 2, and the recommendation is to approve with conditions. This item is a public hearing, which I'll now open. Mayor, there is no one in the public comment queue for Item 40. Close the public hearing. Questions or comments? A motion? I'll move. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilwoman Larson, and it carries. Item 41 is the accompanying resolution for item number 40, CPA-2025-017-480, West Henderson, BLM Parcel 2. The recommendation is to adopt as resolution number 4658. We have a motion to adopt. I'll move. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Seabock, and it carries. Item 42 is a continued public hearing for ACPA-2025-017484, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and Item B, ZCA-2025-017485, Zone Change, West Henderson, BLM Parcel 3. The recommendation is to approve with conditions. It's a public hearing, which I'll now open. Mayor, there is no one in the public comment queue for public hearing item 42. I'll close the public hearing. May I have a motion? Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Seabach, and it carries. Item 43 is the accompanying resolution for item number 42, CPA-2025-017-8. 484 West Henderson BLM Parcel 3. The recommendation is to adopt as resolution number 4659. Please vote. Yes. What happened? Why? It froze. It's not showing up on ours. It's frozen. May I have a voice vote? All in favor say aye. Aye. Who motioned? Who motioned for it? Dan Stewart. Dan Stewart. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Stewart and it carries. Item 44 is a continued public hearing for ACPA-2025-017472, comprehensive plan amendment. Item B, ZCA-2025-017473, zone change. West Henderson BLM Parcel 4 and the recommendation is to approve with conditions. This item is a public hearing which I'll now open. Mayor, there is no one in the public comment queue for this public hearing item. I'll close the public comment or public hearing. May I have a motion? So moved. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilwoman Larson and it carries. Item 45 is the accompanying resolution for item number 44, CPA-2025-017472, West Henderson, BLM Parcel 4. The recommendation is to adopt as resolution number 4660. We have a motion to adopt. Move. So moved. Please vote. Yes. Ms. Rosen? Okay, here we go. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekopoulos. Mayor Redekop 2025-017-460, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Item B, ZCA-2025-017461, Zone Change, West Henderson, BLM Parcel 5, and the recommendation is to approve with conditions. I'll open the public hearing. Mayor, there is no one in the public comment queue for public hearing item number 46. I'll close the public hearing. May I have a motion? So moved. Please vote. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Stubart, and it carries. Item 47 is the accompanying resolution for item number 46, CPA-2025-017460, West Henderson BLM Parcel 5. The recommendation is to adopt as resolution number 4661. We have a motion to adopt. So move. Please vote. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilwoman Cox and it carries. Item 48 is a continued public hearing for A, CPA-2025-017486, Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Item B, ZCA-2025-017487, Zone Change, West Henderson BLM Parcel 6. The recommendation is to approve with conditions. I'll open the public hearing. Mayor, there is no one in the public comment queue for public hearing item number 48. I'll close the public hearing. We have a motion. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilwoman Larson, and it carries. Item 49 is the accompanying resolution for item number 48, CPA-2025-017486, West Henderson, BLM Parcel 6. The recommendation is to adopt as resolution number 4662. May I have a motion? Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Stewart, and it carries. Item 50 is a continued public hearing. CPA-2025-017488. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Item B, ZCA-2025-017489. Zone changed. West Henderson BLM Parcel 7. The recommendation is to approve with conditions. I'll open the public hearing. Mayor, there is no one in the public comment queue for public hearing item number 50. Close the public hearing. We have a motion. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilwoman Larson and it carries. Item 51 is the accompanying resolution for item number 50, CPA-2025017488, West Henderson, BLM Parcel 7. The recommendation is to adopt as resolution number 4663. May I have a motion? I'll move. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilwoman Larson, and it carries. Item 52 is a continued public hearing for ACPA-2025017470, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Item B, ZCA-2025017471, Zone Change, West Henderson, BLM Parcel 8. The recommendation is to approve with conditions. I'll open the public hearing. Mayor, there is no one in the public comment queue for public hearing item number 52. Close the public hearing. May I have a motion? Move. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Seabach, and it carries. Item 53 is the accompanying resolution for item number 52, CPA-2025017470, West Henderson, BLM Parcel 8, The recommendation is to adopt as resolution number 4664. May I have a motion? I'll move. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Seabock, and it carries. The next section of your agenda is built. I'm sorry, could I interrupt just a sec, Mayor? I just want to commend staff and being proactive on this. Makes a lot of sense of... getting ahead of the game and letting developers know what the property can be used for. So thank you. Sorry for the interruption. No problem, Councilman. The next section of your agenda is bills referred for adoption as ordinance. Item 54 is bill number 3881, ZCA-202301-2292-A2, Mosaic WH, and the recommendation is to adopt as ordinance number 4119. I have a motion to adopt. I move. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Sebach and it carries. Item 55 is bill number 3882 DEV-2022009469-82, a major modification to Pinnacle Residences at McDonald Highlands, and the recommendation is to adopt as ordinance number 4120. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilman Stewart, and it carries. The next section of your agenda is new business. Item 56 is a resolution opioid settlement fund special revenue fund and the recommendation is to adopt as resolution number 4665. We have a motion. Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion made by Councilwoman Larson and it carries. The next section of your agenda is bills to be read in title unless an item is pulled for discussion. Council will take action on all bills to be read in title with one motion. Item 57 is the accompanying bill number 3883 for item 34, ZCA-2025-017497, Pueblo Pines Apartments. Item 58 is the accompanying bill, number 3884, for item number 34, DEV-2025017381, Pueblo Pines Senior Housing Development Agreement. Item 59 is the accompanying bill, number 3885, for item number 36, ZCA-20021. 666-0020-A25, The Falls at Lake Las Vegas, Lauren Williams, and Lake Mead, NWC. Item 60 is the accompanying bill number 3886 for item number 38, ZCA-2025-017464, West Henderson BLM Parcel 1. Item 61 is the accompanying bill number 3887 for item number 40, ZCA-2025-017481, West Henderson BLM Parcel 2. Item 62 is the accompanying bill number 3888. For item number 42, ZCA-2025-017485, West Henderson BLM Parcel 3. Item 63 is the accompanying bill number 3889. For item number 44, ZCA-2025-017473, West Henderson BLM Parcel 4. Item 64 is the accompanying bill number 3890 for item number 46, ZCA-2025-017461, West Henderson BLM Parcel 5. Item 65 is the accompanying bill number 3891 for item number 48, ZCA-2025-017487, West Henderson BLM Parcel 6, Item 66 is the accompanying bill number 3892. For item number 50, ZCA-2025-017489, West Henderson BLM Parcel 7. Item 67 is the accompanying bill number 3893. For item number 52, ZCA-2025-017489, 017471 West Henderson BLM Parcel 8. Item 68 is Bill number 3894, amending Henderson Municipal Code Section 14.08.050, Department Authorized Backflow Prevention Assembly Test Companies and Testers. Your recommendation is to refer Bill numbers 3883, 3884, 3885, 3886, 3887, 3888, 3889, 3890, 3891, 3892, 3893, and 3894 to the City Council regular meeting of December 2, 2025. Can you repeat that? Thank you. Thank you for that very long recommendation. May I have a motion to refer, please? Please vote. Yes. All members voted in favor of the motion moved by Councilman Stewart, and it carries. Now is the time for Mayor and Council comments. Are there any comments? Just a brief, do we still have one of the honor society students here? Stand up for me. Well done staying through this whole meeting. Nice job on that. Very good. Thank you for being here. I will set the next City Council regular meeting for December 2nd, 2025. And now is the time for our final public comment. If you wish to make a public comment, please come to the podium, speak directly into the mic, and you will have three minutes to speak. Mayor, there is no one in the second public comment queue. Thank you. I will close public comment and adjourn the meeting.